#data migration testing

[gqattech]

ETL and Data Testing Services: Why Data Quality Is the Backbone of Business Success | GQAT Tech

Data drives decision-making in the digital age. Businesses use data to build strategies, attain insights, and measure performance to plan for growth opportunities. However, data-driven decision-making only exists when the data is clean, complete, accurate, and trustworthy. This is where ETL and Data Testing Services are useful.

GQAT Tech provides ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) and Data Testing Services so your data pipelines can run smoothly. Whether you are migrating legacy data, developing on a data warehouse, or merging with other data, GQAT Tech services help ensure your data is an asset and not a liability.

What is ETL and Why Is It Important?

ETL (extract, transform, load) is a process for data warehousing and data integration, which consists of: 

Extracting data from different sources

Transforming the data to the right format or structure

Loading the transformed data into a central system, such as a data warehouse. 

Although ETL can simplify data processing, it can also create risks in that data can be lost, misformatted, corrupted, or misapplied transformation rules. This is why ETL testing is very important. 

The purpose of ETL testing is to ensure that the data is:

Correctly extracted from the source systems

Accurately transformed according to business logic

Correctly loaded into the destination systems.

Why Choose GQAT Tech for ETL and Data Testing?

At GQAT Tech combine our exceptional technical expertise and premier technology and custom-built frameworks to ensure your data is accurate and certified with correctness.

1.  End-to-End Data Validation

We will validate your data across the entire ETL process – extract, transform, and load- to confirm the source and target systems are 100% consistent.

2. Custom-Built Testing Frameworks

Every company has a custom data workflow.  We build testing frameworks fit for your proprietary data environments, business rules, and compliance requirements.

3. Automation + Accuracy

We automate to the highest extent using tools like QuerySurge, Talend, Informatica, SQL scripts, etc. This helps a) reduce the amount of testing effort, b) avoid human error.

4. Compliance Testing

Data Privacy and compliance are obligatory today.  We help you comply with regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, etc.

5. Industry Knowledge

GQAT has years of experience with clients in Finance, Healthcare, Telecom, eCommerce, and Retail, which we apply to every data testing assignment.

Types of ETL and Data Testing Services We Offer

Data Transformation Testing

We ensure your business rules are implemented accurately as part of the transformation process. Don't risk incorrect aggregations, mislabels, or logical errors in your final reports.

Data Migration Testing

We ensure that, regardless of moving to the cloud or the legacy to modern migration, all the data is transitioned completely, accurately, and securely.

BI Report Testing

We validate that both dashboards and business reports reflect the correct numbers by comparing visual data to actual backend data.

Metadata Testing

We validate schema, column names, formats, data types, and other metadata to ensure compatibility of source and target systems.

Key Benefits of GQAT Tech’s ETL Testing Services

1. Increase Data Security and Accuracy

We guarantee that valid and necessary data will only be transmitted to your system; we can reduce data leakage and security exposures.

2. Better Business Intelligence

Good data means quality outputs; dashboards and business intelligence you can trust, allowing you to make real-time choices with certainty.

3. Reduction of Time and Cost

We also lessen the impact of manual mistakes, compress timelines, and assist in lower rework costs by automating data testing.

4. Better Customer Satisfaction

Good data to make decisions off of leads to good customer experiences, better insights, and improved services.

5. Regulatory Compliance

By implementing structured testing, you can ensure compliance with data privacy laws and standards in order to avoid fines, penalties, and audits.

Why GQAT Tech?

With more than a decade of experience, we are passionate about delivering world-class ETL & Data Testing Services. Our purpose is to help you operate from clean, reliable data to exercise and action with confidence to allow you to scale, innovate, and compete more effectively.

Visit Us: https://gqattech.com Contact Us: info@gqattech.com

[icedq-toranainc]

What is iceDQ?

iceDQ is a purpose-built platform with integrated data testing, data monitoring and AI based data observability capabilities.

iceDQ is the only platform that works across the entire data development lifecycle – development, QA, and production – ensuring robust data processes and reliable data.

[database-integration]

Explore our in-depth guide on data migration testing strategies. Find out how to execute flawless migrations with proven techniques and insights.

For more information visit: https://www.augmentedtechlabs.com/blog/data-migration-testing-strategies-a-comprehensive-guide

[ourjobagency]

Salesforce data migration refers to the essential process of relocating data from Salesforce to a designated destination. which may include another Salesforce organization.

[serpentcsblog]

ERP Implementation Secrets: Avoid Costly Mistakes Now

Introduction

ERP implementation can be a make-or-break moment for your business. Get it right, and you’re streamlining operations like a pro. Get it wrong, and you’re stuck with a costly mess—think budget overruns, frustrated teams, and systems that don’t deliver. The secret? It’s all about dodging the pitfalls that trip up so many companies. In this guide, we’re spilling the ERP implementation secrets you need to avoid expensive mistakes and nail your rollout in 2025. Ready to save time, money, and headaches? Let’s uncover the tricks to a smooth ERP journey!

Secret #1: Don’t Skip the Planning Phase

Here’s a hard truth: rushing into ERP implementation without a plan is like building a house without a blueprint. It’ll collapse—fast. Too many businesses dive in headfirst, only to drown in delays and extra costs. The fix? Map out every step—set goals, define timelines, and allocate resources. For a Singapore SME, this might mean planning around GST compliance or peak sales seasons. A solid ERP implementation plan keeps you on track and cuts the risk of chaos down the line.

Secret #2: Pick the Right System for Your Needs

Choosing an ERP isn’t a one-size-fits-all deal. Grabbing the first shiny option—or the cheapest—can backfire big time. Imagine a retailer picking an ERP with weak inventory tools or a manufacturer missing production features. The secret here is research. Compare systems like Odoo, SAP, or NetSuite against your specific needs—scalability, industry fit, user-friendliness. A tailored ERP implementation saves you from costly retrofits later.

Secret #3: Clean Your Data Before You Move

Dirty data is an ERP implementation killer. Old records, duplicates, or messy formats turn your shiny new system into a glitchy nightmare. Before migration, scrub everything—think of it like spring cleaning for your business. A Singapore firm handling customer data can’t afford errors in a GST audit. Clean data ensures your ERP implementation starts strong, not stumbling over yesterday’s junk.

Secret #4: Train Your Team Like It’s Day One

An ERP is only as good as the people using it. Skimp on training, and you’re begging for resistance—or worse, mistakes that cost you. The secret? Invest in hands-on sessions tailored to roles—sales learns CRM, warehouse masters inventory. Start early, use real examples, and keep support flowing post-launch. A well-trained team turns your ERP implementation into a win, not a war.

Secret #5: Test Until You’re Sick of It

Launching an ERP without testing is like driving blindfolded—disaster’s waiting. Skipping this step risks bugs that halt operations. The secret to a flawless ERP implementation? Test everything—modules, workflows, user scenarios. A retailer might test POS sync; a service firm checks client tracking. Rigorous testing catches issues before they cost you time and money.

Secret #6: Budget for the Real World

Underestimating costs is a classic ERP implementation blunder. Licensing fees, customization, training—it adds up fast. The secret? Build a realistic budget that covers it all, not just the software sticker price. In Singapore, tap into grants like the EDG to offset up to 50% of costs. A smart budget keeps your ERP implementation from draining your bank account.

Secret #7: Get Everyone On Board

Silence kills ERP projects. If your team doesn’t know why the change is happening, they’ll fight it—or ignore it. The secret here is communication. Share the “why” and “how” early—think team meetings, emails, or quick chats. When everyone’s bought in, your ERP implementation rolls out smoother, with less pushback and more teamwork.

Secret #8: Partner with Pros Who Get It

Going it alone can sink your ERP implementation. A rookie mistake is picking a partner who doesn’t know your industry or system. The secret? Team up with experts—like Odoo’s Singapore partners—who’ve been there, done that. They’ll spot risks you won’t, saving you from costly detours. A pro partner is your shortcut to success.

Secret #9: Don’t Set It and Forget It

Think go-live is the end? Nope—it’s just the start. Ignoring post-launch tweaks can unravel your ERP implementation. The secret is monitoring—track KPIs like order speed or error rates, and listen to user gripes. Need a new report? Tweak it. A glitch? Fix it fast. Ongoing care keeps your system delivering, not decaying.

Secret #10: Learn from Others’ Fails

History’s littered with ERP flops—Nike lost $100M from a rushed rollout; Hershey’s botched Halloween orders. The secret? Study these disasters. Unrealistic timelines, poor testing, no training—they’re all avoidable. Use these lessons to bulletproof your ERP implementation and sidestep the million-dollar mistakes.

Conclusion

ERP implementation doesn’t have to be a gamble. With these secrets—planning smart, picking right, testing hard, and more—you can dodge the costly mistakes that sink others. Whether you’re a Singapore startup or a growing firm, a flawless ERP implementation is within reach in 2025. Ready to make it happen? Start today—your business can’t afford to wait!

[muskantam]

POS Implementation

POS Implementation: A Comprehensive Guide

In today’s fast-paced retail and service environments, implementing a Point of Sale (POS) system can significantly streamline operations, enhance customer experience, and improve overall efficiency. Whether you’re upgrading from a traditional cash register or installing your first POS system, proper implementation is crucial to maximizing its benefits. This guide will walk you through the essential steps of POS implementation.

Step 1: Identify Business Needs

Before selecting a POS system, assessing your business requirements is important. Consider the following:

The size and type of your business.

Specific features you need (e.g., inventory tracking, customer loyalty programs).

Budget constraints.

Integration requirements with existing software and hardware.

Step 2: Choose the Right POS System

Not all POS systems are created equal. Here’s how to select one that fits your needs:

Research and compare various providers.

Look for scalability to accommodate future growth.

Ensure it supports multiple payment methods.

Check reviews and testimonials from similar businesses.

Step 3: Hardware and Software Setup

A POS system consists of hardware (like barcode scanners, receipt printers, and card readers) and software. Ensure you:

Acquire hardware compatible with your chosen POS software.

Install and configure the software according to your operational needs.

Test all components to ensure they work seamlessly together.

Step 4: Data Migration

If you’re transitioning from an older system, data migration is a critical step:

Back up your existing data.

Transfer inventory, sales history, and customer information to the new system.

Verify the accuracy of migrated data.

Step 5: Employee Training

Proper training ensures your team can effectively use the POS system:

Organize hands-on training sessions.

Provide user manuals and support materials.

Address common troubleshooting scenarios.

Step 6: Pilot Testing

Before full-scale implementation, conduct a pilot test:

Use the system in a controlled environment.

Monitor for any issues or inefficiencies.

Gather feedback from staff and customers.

Step 7: Go Live

Once testing is complete, it’s time to roll out the system:

Schedule the launch during a low-traffic period to minimize disruptions.

Ensure on-site support is available for the initial days.

Communicate the change to your team and customers.

Step 8: Monitor and Optimize

Implementation doesn’t end with the launch. Regular monitoring is essential:

Analyze performance metrics (e.g., transaction times, error rates).

Update the system as needed to fix bugs and improve features.

Seek ongoing feedback from employees and customers.

Conclusion

Implementing a POS system is an investment in your business's future. With proper planning and execution, it can simplify daily operations, enhance customer satisfaction, and drive growth. By following the steps outlined above, you can ensure a smooth and successful implementation.

[odoodeveloper]

Odoo Migration Service | Odoo 17 ERP | MindRich Technologies

Celebrate Seamless Business Evolution with MindRich Technologies' Odoo Migration Services. Our seasoned experts specialize in effortless transitions, ensuring your data stays intact as you migrate to the latest Odoo version or seamlessly switch from other ERP software. Trust us to make your migration journey smooth and hassle-free, while preserving the heart of your business – your data. Explore the possibilities today!

[netzweltvt]

Magento 2 Upgrade Services | VTNetzwelt

Magento 2 upgrade services involve the process of migrating an eCommerce store from the Magento 1 platform to the more advanced Magento 2. This upgrade is essential for keeping your online store secure, performance-optimized, and equipped with the latest features. Magento 2 upgrade services encompass data migration, extension compatibility, and design transition, ensuring a smooth and efficient transition. By leveraging these services, businesses can enhance their eCommerce capabilities, improve user experiences, and stay competitive in the ever-evolving digital landscape.

[confession-of-the-heart]

So amid all of the pairing discourse being sent to this blog, one little thing stuck out to me. Someone commented claiming that AkuRoku is one of the most popular pairings on AO3 with some of the largest numbers of fics, but being the statistics nerd I am, and knowing the general trajectory of this fanbase, I decided to run some numbers and put that claim to the test.

(Actually, looking into that got me really curious about the general popularity over time of all the relatively notable pairings in KH, so I think I might eventually make a formal post compiling all my findings once I have a little more time. This is definitely informal, but it’s just an initial impression of my research thus far. Obviously, take this with a grain of salt: fanfic is only one piece of the general popularity puzzle, but it does seem to be generally understood as a decent benchmark for analysis of broader trends within fandoms.)

As a note, I measured fic numbers by date of update from April to April, year to year on AO3, so factors like game release date timing should be taken into account.

To absolutely no one’s surprise, SoRiku is the undisputed king of KH shipping. It’s been going incredibly strong since 02 but even then experienced a massive jump at KH3’s release, number of fics updated in the year multiplying nearly 6x in 2019 from where it had been in 2017. It’s slowly settled down since, but is still holding at well over 300 fics per year, even during this content drought. It’s vastly above everything else in popularity and always has been.

Most pairings have followed a similar pattern since KH3’s release: The entire fandom experienced a general jump in activity and most pairings got a boost from 2018-2020, although some more dramatically than others: Akusai fics (inclusive of fics tagged just leaisa, just akusai, or both, not counting the same fics twice) experienced a more dramatic leap than any other pairing in 2019, going from just 40 in 2017, to 183 the following year, to 350 in 2019–an 8x jump in interest. (Wow!)

Like Soriku, most other pairings have generally gone fallow since 2020, as that was the last time we all got any sort of content. (Missing Link when Nomura.)

As far as the stats for Akuroku go… Honestly a bit gobsmacked by the trends in the data. I decided to include both number of fics updated per year on both AO3 and fanfiction.net, as the fandom’s early 2000s heyday can’t really be accounted for on AO3. fanfiction.net’s numbers are a little inflated because I couldn’t honestly be bothered to separate out the infinitesimally small number of non-ship fics in the 2000s and early 2010s from the overwhelmingly large proportion of ship fics there, but if you compare how many fics that pairing used to get in its heyday from 2006-2011, it used to average out at roughly 1000 fics a year.

From 2012 on, the drop in popularity is precipitous—on both fanfiction.net and AO3. it had less than half the fics in 2012 on fanfiction.net than it did in 2010, and it’s continued to exponentially decline there since. For example, there were no AkuRoku ships updated on fanfiction.net last year, and there were only 2 updated the year before. (Noting that fandoms at large did begin to increasingly migrate away from fanfiction.net after 2012, which also explains similar but less extreme declines in otherwise healthy ships like SoRiku on that website).

It fares a little better on AO3, although it’s been eclipsed in popularity by ships that were once drastically less popular than it involving the same characters at several points—Leaisa/Akusai for example consistently had hundreds more fics than it from around 2018-2020, an impressive feat considering that ship basically didn’t exist prior to 2013~2014, although it’s gone quieter since.

AkuRoku has remained pretty much consistent at roughly 150~200 fics per year on AO3 since 2012 (a couple years have had roughly a 10~20 variance above or below that, no significant jumps either way, though it did roughly halve from a high year in 2020 to a low year in 2021) which leads me to believe that it’s… probably more off in its own world separate from what the rest of the fandom is doing than other ship communities? It doesn’t follow the same trends as ships that are more closely following the story developments in canon do.

It’s kind of surprising to see it be that much of a general drop, though. I knew it was less popular than it once was, but I didn’t realize just how much less popular it really is. 150~200 fics updated a year sounds like a lot, but if you compare it to how absurdly ubiquitous it used to be, it’s a shadow of its former self. Unless KH4 has a bunch of interactions with them and them alone, going by the trends and general attitude of the fandom, I think it’ll probably just continue to slowly lose momentum. It still has a lot of diehards, but it would appear that the majority compared to that of 15-20 years ago have jumped ship, so to speak. I have a feeling that if Roxas ever gains any significant peer relationships with different male characters in the future, it’ll likely be another nail in the coffin for it as enthusiasm for a gay Roxas ship bleeds elsewhere.

So, uh, basically… everyone who’s freaking out about it, chill? It’s probably just going to continue slowly petering out on its own eventually as the next games move away from the characterization that initially made it popular, whether anyone wants it to or not. That’s what fic trends would appear to indicate, at any rate.

Side note: out of all the pairings I’ve analyzed popularity over time for thus far, I’m surprisingly impressed by Naminé/Xion. I thought it was way more of a rarepair than it actually is. It’s not going anywhere crazy like Soriku, but it’s actually rather consistent with other moderately popular kid pairs like Roxas/Xion on AO3, and saw a jump in numbers above Roxas/Naminé of all things from 2019-2020, which I would never have anticipated. Let’s go lesbians! I guess KH3 really did change things up.

~~~

[icedq-toranainc]

Strengthen Your Data Quality Framework with iceDQ v2.0

Building a strong foundation for data quality is vital to making strategic decisions. With the iceDQ v2.0 User Training, you'll gain the technical knowledge and strategic mindset to design, monitor, and optimize a reliable data quality framework.

What You Will Gain:

7 progressive chapters guiding you from basics to advanced features.

Over 30 interactive videos to reinforce concepts visually.

Real-world business examples to bridge the theory-practice gap.

Final certification to demonstrate your expertise.

Practical tools and workflows you can deploy immediately.

This course empowers professionals to handle data complexities, whether in healthcare, finance, retail, or any other domain. You’ll learn to automate validations, set up monitoring dashboards, and ensure compliance with data standards.

Make your organization data-ready. Start the iceDQ v2.0 training now and establish a strong data quality culture.

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

The New Yorker :: @NewYorker [An advance look at Barry Blitt’s “Left to Their Own Devices,” the cover for next week’s issue.]

* * * *

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

March 28, 2025

Heather Cox Richardson

Mar 29, 2025

“Another wipeout walloped Wall Street Friday,” Stan Choe of the Associated Press wrote today. The S&P 500 had one of its worst days in two years, dropping 2%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 715 points, losing 1.7% of its value. The Nasdaq Composite fell 2.7%. On Tuesday, news dropped that the administration’s blanket firings and wildly shifting tariff policies have dropped consumer confidence to a low it has not hit since January 2021. Today’s stock market tumble started after the Commerce Department released data showing that consumer prices are rising faster than economists expected.

AIG chief international economist James Knightley said: “We are moving in the wrong direction and the concern is that tariffs threaten higher prices, which means the inflation prints are going to remain hot.” Business leaders like lower interest rates, which reduce borrowing costs and make it cheaper to finance business initiatives, but with rising inflation, the Federal Reserve will be less likely to cut interest rates.

Makena Kelly of Wired reported today that billionaire Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) is planning to move the computer system of the Social Security Administration (SSA) off the old programming language it uses, COBOL, to a new system. In 2017, the SSA estimated that such a migration would take about five years. DOGE is planning for the migration to take just a few months, using artificial intelligence to complete the change.

Experts have expressed concern. Dan Hon, who runs a technology strategy company that helps the government modernize its services, told Kelly: “If you weren’t worried about a whole bunch of people not getting benefits or getting the wrong benefits, or getting the wrong entitlements, or having to wait ages, then sure go ahead.” More than 65 million Americans currently receive Social Security benefits. Today Representative Don Beyer (D-VA) recorded himself calling the SSA and being told by a recording that the wait times were more than two hours and that he should call back. And then the system hung up on him.

Musk told the Fox News Channel today that he plans to step down from DOGE in May, apparently at the end of the 130-day cap for the “special government employee” designation that enables him to avoid financial disclosures. In February, White House staffers suggested Musk would stay despite the limit.

Today the State Department told Congress it is shutting down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) altogether by July 1. Whatever agency functions the administration approves will move into the State Department. Founded by President John F. Kennedy and enjoying bipartisan support, USAID administers programs for global health, disaster relief, long-term economic development, education, environmental protection, and democracy. It is widely perceived to be a key element of U.S. “soft power.”

USAID was created by Congress, and its funds are appropriated by Congress. Congress and the courts have established that the executive branch—the branch of government overseen by the president—cannot kill an agency Congress has created and cannot withhold appropriations Congress has made. The authors of Project 2025 want to challenge that principle and consolidate government power in the hands of the president. It appears they have chosen USAID as the test case.

As Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shatters science and health agencies, the nation’s top vaccine regulator, Dr. Peter Marks, submitted his resignation today after being given the choice to resign or be fired. Dan Diamond of the Washington Post noted that Marks has been at the Food and Drug Administration since 2012 and has been at the head of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research since 2016.

In his resignation letter, Diamond says, Marks expressed his deep concern over the ongoing measles outbreak in the Southwest—now more than 450 cases—and warned that the outbreak “reminds us of what happens when confidence in well-established science underlying public health and well-being is undermined.” Marks said that although he was willing to work with Kennedy on his plan to review vaccine safety, “it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the Secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.”

On Tuesday, news broke that Kennedy has tapped anti-vaccine activist David Geier to lead a study looking to link autism to vaccines, although that alleged link has been heavily studied and thoroughly debunked. Infectious disease journalist Helen Branswell notes that Geier does not have a medical degree and was disciplined in Maryland for practicing medicine without a license.

British investigative journalist Brian Deer, who has written about the hoax that vaccines cause autism, told Branswell: “If you want an independent source,… [you] wouldn’t go to somebody with no qualifications and a long track record of impropriety and incompetence.” But, he said, “[i]f you wanted to get in anybody off the street who would come up with the result that Kennedy would like to see, this would be your man.”

Tara Copp of the Associated Press reported today that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has done some targeted staffing, too. His younger brother Phil Hegseth is traveling to the Indo-Pacific with the secretary in his role at the Pentagon as a liaison and senior advisor to the Department of Homeland Security. Hegseth also employed his brother when he ran the nonprofit Concerned Veterans for America, where the younger Hegseth’s salary was $108,000 for his media work. Copp notes that a 1967 law “prohibits government officials from hiring, promoting or recommending relatives to any civilian position over which they exercise control.”

Hegseth and his colleagues are still in the hot seat for uploading the military’s attack plans against the Houthis in Yemen to Signal, an unsecure commercially available messaging app. Yesterday, Nancy A. Youssef, Alexander Ward, and Michael R. Gordon of the Wall Street Journal reported that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz identified a Houthi missile expert whose identity Israel had provided from a human source in Yemen, angering Israeli officials.

Americans, especially those with ties to the military, aren’t happy either. Military, the leading news website for service members, veterans, and their families, titled a story about the scandal “‘Different spanks for different ranks’: Hegseth’s Signal scandal would put regular troops in the brig.” Helene Cooper and Eric Schmitt of the New York Times reported that the story had “angered and bewildered” fighter pilots, who say “they can no longer be certain that the Pentagon is focused on their safety when they strap into cockpits.”

At a raucous town hall held today by Republican representative Victoria Spartz (R-IN), the crowd booed Spartz loudly when she said she would not call for the resignations of Waltz, Hegseth, and the rest of the people on the group chat.

All the mayhem created by the administration has created enough backlash that the White House appears concerned about upcoming special elections on April 1. One is for the seat in Florida’s District 6 that Waltz vacated when he became national security advisor. In 2024, Trump won that district by 30 points, and Republicans considered their candidate, state senator Randy Fine, whom Trump has strongly endorsed, to be such a shoo-in that he barely campaigned. His website features pictures of him with Trump but has only bullet points to explain his stand on issues.

Democrat Josh Weil, a middle-school math teacher who has outraised Fine by almost 10 to one, is polling within the margin of error for a victory in a contest where even a 10- to 15-point loss would show a dramatic collapse in Republican support. Weil has tied Fine to Musk’s unpopular DOGE and to the president, as well as to cuts to Social Security and Medicaid.

Trump is now personally campaigning for Fine and for the Republican candidate to fill the seat vacated by former representative Matt Gaetz in Florida District 1. There, Democratic candidate Gay Valimont is running against Republican Jimmy Patronis in a district that elected Trump with about 68% of the vote. Like Fine, Patronis is strongly backed by Trump and wants more cuts to the federal government; Gay is a former state leader for Moms Demand Action and focuses on healthcare and veterans’ services. She has criticized DOGE’s cuts to VA hospitals. Like Weil, she has significantly outraised her opponent.

Republicans are concerned enough about holding the seats that billionaire Elon Musk, who poured more than $291 million into the 2024 election to help Republicans, has begun to contribute to Republicans in Florida. On Tuesday he spent more than $10,000 apiece for texting services for the Florida candidates.

Musk has contributed far more than that—more than $20 million—to the April 1 election for a ten-year seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Trump loyalist Brad Schimel is running against circuit court judge Susan Crawford in a contest that has national significance. Wisconsin is evenly split between the parties, but when Republicans control the legislature and the supreme court, they suppress voting and heavily gerrymander the state in their favor. When liberals hold the majority on the court, they ease election rules and uphold fair maps. Currently, the state gerrymander gives Republicans 75% of the state’s seats in the U.S. House of Representatives although voting in 2024 was virtually dead even. The makeup of the court could well determine the congressional districts of Wisconsin through 2041, through the redistricting that will take place after the 2030 census.

Musk has told voters that if Crawford wins, “then the Democrats will attempt to redraw the districts and cause Wisconsin to lose two Republican seats.” Not only has Musk said he is going to Wisconsin to speak before the election, but also he is handing out checks to voters who sign a petition against “activist judges,” a suggestion that it would not be fair to unskew the Republican gerrymander. Last night, Musk advertised a contest that would award two voters a million dollars each, with the condition that the winners had to have already voted.

This morning, Wisconsin Democrats issued a press release noting that Musk had “committed a blatant felony,” directly violating the Wisconsin law that prohibits offering anyone anything worth more than $1 to get them to “vote or refrain from voting.” Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler said that if Schimel “does not immediately call on Musk to end this criminal activity, we can only assume he is complicit.”

Musk deleted the tweet and then, eliminating the language that said people had to have voted, posted that he would give the checks to spokespeople for his petition. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul sued to stop Musk “from any further promotion of the million-dollar gifts” and “from making any payments to Wisconsin electors to vote.” “The Wisconsin Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that elections in Wisconsin are safe, secure, free, and fair,” Kaul said in a statement. “We are aware of the offer recently posted by Elon Musk to award a million dollars to two people at an event in Wisconsin this weekend. Based on our understanding of applicable Wisconsin law, we intend to take legal action today to seek a court order to stop this from happening.”

MeidasTouch reposted Musk’s offer to “personally hand over two checks for a million dollars each in appreciation for you taking the time to vote” and noted: “No matter what side of the aisle you are on, you should be appalled that a billionaire thinks he has the right to buy elections like this.” Former chair of the Ohio Democratic Party David Pepper posted: “Have some pride, America. We are so much better than this guy thinks we are.”

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

[ourjobagency]

Salesforce data migration refers to the essential process of relocating data from Salesforce to a designated destination. which may include another Salesforce organization.

[destinationtoast]

*waves shyly* Hello!! First off, I absolutely adore all of your stats and get excited when you post new ones -- thank you so much for all that you do!

Secondly, a friend and I have been discussing fandom longevity lately, and I wondered if you have thoughts? Subjectively, it seems to us that new fandoms tend to have more quick bursts of fandom activity when a new season/movie/book/etc comes out that fades quickly with time, whereas older established fandoms have more staying power. I'm curious if you have any insight about whether this is objectively true in most cases or not, and as to whether or not the type of canon source material matters (eg show-based fandoms vs book-based fandoms). I hope you're having a great day <3

Hi there, and thanks! :D This is a great question, and one I have been having a bunch of conversations about lately.

I share this subjective experience -- it sure seems like the attention span of fans and lifespan of fandoms is shorter than it used to be, when I think of how quickly people stop talking about a bunch of newer movies and TV shows these days. And then I see some of the older fandoms like Harry Potter still producing a ton of new fanworks, and I think, "Wow, maybe new fandoms just don't have the staying power of older ones." At the same time, I also question how objectively true/simple that story is for a few reasons, including:

Memory bias: When we look back on the past, the fandoms we remember most are usually the ones that lasted a long time. So our estimates of past fandom longevity may be overly generous.

Changes to fandom size: Maybe any changes to fandom lifespan are mostly due to some other change, like fandom size... Attention is more splintered these days than it used to be across more streaming services/etc, and I think there are more, smaller fandoms than there used to be. Maybe if a fandom doesn't get really huge, it's just not likely to last that long.

For TV fandoms -- changes to canon release schedule: most TV shows used to have seasons that lasted most of the year, so they had a lot more reason to stay in the public mind longer. Now many seasons are shorter and sometimes drop all at once. Perhaps if we compared popular TV procedurals with 22 episodes/season from now vs. ~a decade ago, we'd see similar patterns of fandom activity?

I've been thinking about ways to try to gather quantitative data about the changes, and testing out a few methods. A few ideas I've had:

Look at the Tumblr official lists of top fandoms and see whether the top fandoms tend to leave the top 20 rankings faster now than they used to. (The Tumblr rankings go all the way back to 2013 on a yearly basis, at least -- I'm not sure how long they've been releasing the weekly lists; those may have started later.)

Look at AO3 fandom activity after new canon infusions - how quickly does activity drop off after a new movie/book/video game release, or after a TV season ends? How has the rate of activity dropoff changed over the years? (And how much of that seems to be explained by other factors, like fandom size?)

See how quickly AO3 authors/creators tend to migrate to new fandoms, and how that's changed over time - many authors tend to be active in multiple fandoms, so we'd have to define what it means to migrate to a new fandom, but I think we could do so in a way that would allow us to look for changes.

Look at Tumblr, Twitter/X, and/or Reddit activlty after new canon infusions - same as AO3, but on a platform where people are posting shorter content and there's more of a discussion. (This data would be harder to collect, though.)

I'd love to also hear other ideas. I think I'm going to need some volunteers to help gather data if I do any of the above, though... Readers, if you'd be interested in helping to gather data for an hour or more to help investigate this question, please reply/DM and let me know! And/or join the new fandom-data-projects community.

Also if any readers know of anyone else who has looked into this/similar questions, I'd love to hear about it!

[liadantaru]

MDZS Big Bang 2025 & Writing Changes

I have decided to join the MDZS Big Bang 2025 as a Writer.

This may slow down updates on Capital (A$$)ets to more 3-4 weeks, like with the last update, while I block out the story. I have the first check-in goal done, rough but enough for it, and have figured out my story mostly.

I will say my MDZS Big Bang fic is 100% Jiang Wanyin (Jiang Cheng) POV and started with this as the prompt:

I have also made the decision (after weeks of updates coming out on Saturdays anyway) to move While They Were Sleeping updates to officially be Saturdays since work is keeping me busy. We are in the middle of a second data migration even larger than the first and I'll be hella busy until the end of May over my head in testing. My insomnia has been kicked up from an 8 to a 20 in recent weeks, so I'm choosing quality over time and giving myself a better chance of editing well when it's not 1:30 am or 2:30 am and I'm posting the next chapter.

For those who don't know, I am a QA Specialist/QA Technician for a software company that is stock market adjacent. I've been with my company for 18 years and absolutely love what I do, both when I was a Technical Support Rep for our customers and in Quality Assurance now.

[plethomacademia]

I can't complain about my job too much because it's easy (for me) and it pays well, but days like this when I need some data to exist in a dev environment and get back the answer "well we don't do that" is why I commit so much time theft. Like I can't take y'all seriously if you don't take yourselves seriously.

Guess I'm testing a migration in prod, cool awesome

[darkmaga-returns]

The government, led by Labour’s Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, will release detailed crime data on foreign nationals (including deportees) by December 2025, reversing years of resistance to transparency to counter rising Reform Party support and address voter concerns over migration.

The policy stems from Reform UK’s surging 25% polling (vs Labour’s 23%), prompting Labour’s rightward shift toward law-and-order messaging, mirroring GOP tactics in the U.S. Domestic tensions include Reform’s internal strife around Nigel Farage and figures like Tommy Robinson.

Proponents, such as Reform’s Robert Jenrick, argue the data supports targeting criminals and improving deportations (e.g., 19,000 awaiting removal now face tagging/curfews). Critics, including migrant advocates, warn of inflaming anti-foreigner sentiment, citing Denmark’s model success vs. risks of social division akin to U.K. anti-asylum riots.

Critics argue tougher policies neglect systemic barriers like human rights appeals and unstable source countries delaying removals. Even within Labour, elites accuse Cooper of “pandering” to anti-migrant rhetoric to retain voters.

The policy tests whether transparency will rebuild trust or deepen divisions as immigration moves from a polarizing “edge” issue to the heart of national identity debates ahead of critical elections. Outcomes hinge on balancing security needs with societal cohesion.