#footpod

[hdsports]

Wattmessung für Läufer: Der Stryd Footpod liefert revolutionäre Daten und hebt dein Training auf ein neues Level. Alles, was du wissen musst, findest du hier: 👉 https://www.hdsports.at/ausruestung/stryd-footpod-laufen

#Laufen #Trainingshilfe #HDsports

[jlunnposh]

Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: ALTRA Women's Provision 4 Athletic Running Shoes Sneakers Size 7.5 Black Peach.

[whatdoesthathavetodowiththis]

Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: Altra Women's Rivera Running/Hiking/Outdoor Shoes Light Blue Aqua Sz 7.

[runcoachmike]

Rainy 10-miler! Waited pretty much all day for a break on the rain, but there wasn't much of a window. Pushed out finally in a cold drizzle since I knew I'd barely get the distance in before dark and supposed to rain all day tomorrow as well. Not a bad run and had enough in the tank to pick it up. I think my footpod measured the distance short on a known route, so might have a calibration run in my future.

[ldonnay]

Right gear Right speed #beatyesterday @garmin #fenix5xplustitanium #tempe #footpod #swimrun @mizunoeurope #waveparadox #running #sportislife @jabra #elitesport (à Bonn, Germany) https://www.instagram.com/p/BxK89CrH1Lz/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1nmvwoakk3c03

[kcowgill]

Ambitious?

Apparently at some point yesterday I was deciding what I'd do for my next workout (today) - and instead of another day of taking it easy (by keeping the same weight but only doing one set) I decided to back off the weight a bit and do 2-3 sets (depending on the exercise).

I guess I'll find out in a day or two if this was a good idea.

I'll do a mile on the treadmill afterwards, come heck or high water. WITH my footpod so I don't have to do more than I expect.

[worldsokayestrunner1]

Today was suppose to be a “no work day,” but when duty calls, you go. After working all day I finally had a chance to hit the indoor track. Unfortunately I left my @garmin footpod. So my pace wasn’t easy to track like normal. Still, I wasn’t going to make any excuses about not running. Great way to start the week https://www.instagram.com/p/B7lGOxAHzIN/?igshid=yr02gymx3qhh

[dante2568]

New post alert! The @garminfitness #runningdynamicspod review has finally crept out of the gate last night and onto #titaniumgeek Let’s be honest, you can’t really have a #running #powermeter without talking about @Stryd running so this post also stands as a bit of a comparison between the two. As the field is so immature it’s difficult from the data to determine the winner, but much easier from an implementation side of things!! Link in the bio 👆 • • • #stryd #garmin #power #runner #jog #fitness #training #runwithpower #runningwithpower #pm #footpod #cadence #run #rundynamics #garminfitness (at Nuneaton, Warwickshire)

[londonmarathoninvirgin]

Who Will Host London Marathon 2020

The 2020 Virgin Cash London Long distance race will occur on Sunday 26 April 2020. Guinness World Records is joining forces with the Virgin Cash London Long distance race for the thirteenth progressive year, giving members on The London Marathon 2020 Live Stream planet's most noteworthy long distance race the opportunity to become official record title holders.

An adjudicator will be toward the end goal to reveal to you whether you have effectively accomplished the record you are endeavoring - something which is generally a paid-for administration yet, during the current day just, the confirmation is accomplished for nothing. You can help profit London Long distance race the best yet by endeavoring to break a world record on the day. If you don't mind note that so as to apply for a record, you more likely than not verified a spot in the 2020 Virgin Cash London Long distance race on Sunday 26 April. Spots are not accessible through Guinness World Records.

To ensure our records are reasonable and exceptional, a few changes have been made to our long distance race record classifications following an exhaustive year-long audit. The focal point of the audit was to guarantee we're not incidentally victimizing any gatherings, propagating any generalizations, or bringing any callings into unsavoriness. Or on the other hand put essentially, guaranteeing that our records mirror the world we live in today. We've likewise streamlined our record classifications, which has included combining comparable record classifications and ceasing some record titles.

Be that as it may, the audit has likewise brought about some energizing new classes being made and leaves several long distance race titles to browse. Endeavoring a Guinness World Records title won't just improve your own London Long distance race 2020 experience, however can likewise help bring issues to light and cash for your picked philanthropy. Who knows, you may leave a mark on the world! Find out about a year ago's record breakers to get motivated.

The Virgin Cash London Long distance race is the most well known long distance race on the planet with more than 450,000 individuals applying through the voting form this year. With a relatively hardly any 40,000 places available for anyone, this makes passage into the long distance race one of the most elite mass-investment games on the planet. For the individuals who passed up a great opportunity this year, Zwift has joined forces with New Parity to exhibit an extremely uncommon chance to verify a spot at the 2020 occasion occurring on April 26th. The challenge, which is available to anybody, likewise incorporates a movement recompense of $1,500 to spend on the excursion.

So what do you have to do? To be in with an opportunity, participants must join to the New Equalization Long distance race Strategic Zwift and run a sum of 26.2 miles during the period of December. Finishing the test will open the New Parity Run Club unit and all finishers will be participated in into a drawing for the stupendous prize of a chin-wiper to the 2020 Virgin Cash London Long distance race. The Virgin Cash London Long distance race is a standout amongst other realized occasions in sport. Says Eric Min, Zwift Chief and Prime supporter. Every year rivalry to attract a spot the race gets increasingly hard. This is the reason we are so eager to have the option to join forces with New Equalization and offer up an uncommon chance. For the victor, it truly will be a unique occasion. I wish everybody entering the absolute best of karma.

Zwift Run is an allowed to utilize application accessible on the iOS Application Store and Google Play. To control your symbol in game, Zwifters will require either a bluetooth empowered footpod, for example, the Zwift RunPod, or a Bluetooth empowered treadmill. In the case of hoping to finish your first long distance race or pursuing another PB, join the in-game New Parity Run Club local gathering runs and plan for the Virgin Cash London Long distance race.

LONDON - World Competitor of the Year Eliud Kipchoge of Kenyan will shield his title at the 2020 London Long distance race, a World Sports Platinum occasion, set to happen in the English capital on April 26.

Kipchoge, who not long ago turned into the principal individual to cover 42.195km inside two hours, has his sights set on proceeding with his mind blowing dash of record-breaking exhibitions at what will be the 40th version of the London Long distance race. In September a year ago he set an official world record of 2:01:39 in Berlin, at that point in April not long ago he crushed his own course record to win in London in 2:02:37. The Olympic victor from Kenya will expect to turn into the primary individual to win five London Long distance race titles.

Kipchoge is as of now tied with Ingrid Kristiansen in the London Long distance race history books for the most successes by a healthy competitor. The Norwegian incredible won four London Long distance race titles somewhere in the range of 1984 and 1988. On the off chance that Kipchoge proceeds with his unbeaten run at the London Long distance race next April – where he won in 2015, 2016, 2018 and 2019 – he will outperform Kristiansen's count. I am charmed to be coming back to the Virgin Cash London Long distance race in 2020, said Kipchoge.

I love running in London where the group support is constantly brilliant. Breaking the two-hour obstruction in Vienna was a fantastic minute. It demonstrated that no human is constrained and that is a conviction that keeps on driving me on to set new targets. Impacting the world forever in London is my next objective. I am pleased that I am at present the main male physically fit competitor to have won this incredible race multiple times and that nobody, male or female, has won it more than that.

Kipchoge was given the most noteworthy respect of Kenya following his exhibition in Vienna, the Senior of the Request for the Brilliant Heart of Kenya (EGH). Just as his four London Long distance race titles and the Olympic gold award he won in Rio in 2016, Kipchoge has additionally won the Berlin Long distance race on three events and the Chicago Long distance race once. What's more, he has won the general Abbott World Significant Long distance race arrangement titles multiple times. He is the first of the tip top sprinters to be declared for the 2020 race. For More Details About London Marathon Go To This Site.

[superrunningwatchfog-blog]

Most accurate running watch - What to Look For in a Running Watch

So you have to purchase a most accurate running watch? What kind of highlights do you need? What amount would you like to spend? To what extent will it last you? Will having one improve your running time?

These are a portion of the inquiries that plague sprinters in any event more than once in their running life particularly these days where produces are discharging new works for running watches like clockwork.

Very much read on as this article will clear a portion of the inquiries you may have about running watches and ideally get you the one you merit! (also, thump those additional minutes of your own best too).

What sort of Running Watch do you need?

Maybe you never keep running with a watch yet have as of late paid attention to running more and need to improve your occasions. Or on the other hand perhaps you as of now have a fundamental running watch yet need to move up to something better as your present running watch doesn't exactly take care of business.

Regardless of whether you're an easygoing sprinter (1 to 2 strolls/runs for every week), you should even now consider and consider getting a decent running watch. It will be perhaps the best speculation you will make as a sprinter. A decent running watch will last you for a considerable length of time and you will have those additional capacities to play with as you become better at running.

Essential Functions to Look Out For

As a sprinter, the most significant necessity is to follow the hour of your runs. Practically all running watches highlight an essential chronograph stopwatch. In the event that a running watch doesn't have a chronograph - it fundamentally wasn't intended to be kept running in. Another significant thing to recall when purchasing a running watch is in the event that you are happy with wearing it. There is no point wearing something that is a super PC yet makes you feel awkward. You ought to consistently be searching for a running watch which has the accompanying basic highlights:

1. A huge clear show that is anything but difficult to take a gander at while running.

2. A stopwatch chronograph with the capacity to record split occasions.

3. The capacity to store laps in its memory.

4. Has an interim clock mode and commencement clock.

5. A pulse screen (discretionary).

You ought to likewise consider picking a running watch with the capacity to record lap parts during your running sessions. This can be helpful for estimating individual lap times around a running track or part of a long run.

In the event that you are running a great deal, at that point a watch with the capacity to record a past filled with keeps running for download to PC or Mac is likewise a gift as it will remove the diligent work from hand recording the majority of your running information into a diary.

In the event that you are progressively genuine competitor, at that point you might be acquainted with the utilization of a pulse screen also which will monitor your heart thumps to tell how hard you are propelling yourself. Many running watches nowadays even have worked in GPS watches or footpods to follow how far you running! No more need to do any mystery.

At last, I generally prescribe that you ought to consistently take a gander at the highlights of a watch you are peering toward off to guarantee it is a decent counterpart for your needs. There are even observes extraordinarily made for ladies! Give a ton of them a shot and ensure it fits you well - there is nothing more awful than a poor fitting running watch.

Alex Lam is an ardent sprinter, long distance runner and running columnist. A portion of his interests including helping individuals, the outside, wellness and obviously running watches.

Visit here for get familiar with best running watches runners world.

[juliebrost]

Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: Altra Running Shoes Womens 7 Used ALW1937K220 Torin Plush 4.

[ultra-kel]

NEW MODEL DROP The Rivera 3 Here are the stats: DESCRIPTION: From your first stride to your first finish line and every exciting moment in between, the Rivera 3 is soon to be your favorite neutral road running shoe. With our Slim FootShape™ Fit and molded heel collar, experience a secure feel that emphasizes performance. A slightly higher stack height of 28mm is constructed with Altra EGO™ midsole foam for a soft yet responsive ride. Help keep your feet cool and happy with a breathable tongue and layered mesh, no matter the race-day forecast. Whether you’re jogging your morning miles, competing in your first 5K, or walking a few blocks to yoga class, the Rivera 3 is the shoe you’ll reach for every time. DETAILS: Womens: Weight: 8.2 oz / 232 g Midsole: Altra EGO™ Outsole: FootPod™ Cushion: Moderate Stack Height: 28 mm Drop: 0 mm Upper: Layered Mesh Mens: Weight: 9.8 oz / 278 g Midsole: Altra EGO™ Outsole: FootPod™ Cushion: Moderate Stack Height: 28 mm Drop: 0 mm Upper: Layered Mesh Let me know what you think about the Rivera 3 in the comments. #Rivera3 #Altra #Altrarunning #altrarunningfans #NewModel #run #RunRoad https://www.instagram.com/p/CoH9RX-LCCh/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[libramonthlyhoroscope1]

Power meter for running

Let’s assume, for the moment, that you want a device that measures your running power. Yes, there are reasonable questions and spirited debates that verge on the philosophical about what running power really means, and whether it offers anything that you couldn’t get from a GPS watch or a heart-rate monitor. But as I discussed in the March issue of Outside, lots of runners are leaving those questions behind and wondering instead about more practical issues—like which running power device they should spring for.

Power meter for running

That’s what a research team at the University of Murcia in Spain, led by Jesús Pallarés, decided to explore in a new study published in the European Journal of Sport Science. They report no outside sponsorship and no conflicts of interest. (Neither do I.) They recruited 12 trained runners, strapped on equipment from the four main players in the running power market, and put them through a series of tests to assess how the various power meters performed.

The power meters they used were: a Stryd footpod linked to either a phone or a Garmin watch; a pair of RunScribe footpods linked to a Garmin watch; the Garmin Running Power app using a Forerunner 935 and a chest-mounted heart rate monitor equipped with accelerometers; and Polar’s watch-only estimate of running power. Bear in mind that because of the lag between experiment and publication, these likely aren’t the current versions of any of these devices.

The runners did four days of testing: two identical days on an indoor treadmill, and two identical days on an outdoor track. (The Polar device was only used outdoors, since it makes its estimates based on GPS data.) By comparing the data from nominally identical sessions, the researchers were able to calculate various measures of repeatability: if you measure the same thing twice, how close do you come to getting the same answer? This is obviously a pretty important characteristic if you want to base any training or racing decisions on your power data.

There are various ways to measure repeatability, and the Stryd device came out on top in all of them. For example, the coefficient of variation should generally be less than 5 percent to get meaningful data from exercise tests. In the outdoor tests, Stryd came in at 4.3 percent, compared to 7.7 percent for Garmin, 14.5 percent for Polar, and 14.8 percent for RunScribe. Even for Stryd, that variation was the equivalent of 12.5 watts, suggesting that you shouldn’t get too stressed if your power output fluctuates by a few watts from one day to the next.

The other set of tests involved comparing running power to oxygen consumption, or VO2, which is a proxy measure for how much energy you’re burning (at least during relatively easy running). Here, much as I’d love to avoid it, it’s worth dipping back into those arguments about the meaning of running power.

As I wrote in 2018, the concept of power has no useful intrinsic definition in running, since each stride consists of a mishmash of positive, negative, internal, and external power as your legs and arms swing backwards and forwards, your tendons stretch and recoil, and so on. Instead, what people think of as running power is basically an analogy to cycling power, where the power applied to the pedals has a consistent relationship to how much energy you’re burning and thus how sustainable your effort is. As a result, my conclusion in 2018 was that a running power meter is useful only insofar as it successfully tracks VO2—which, as it happens, was precisely what Stryd was trying to rig its algorithm to do.

Not everyone agrees with that definition. While reporting my recent magazine piece on running power, I went back and forth with an engineer at Garmin about the goal of its running power app. Their algorithm, they insisted, is not designed to track VO2. Instead, it’s designed to estimate the power applied by your foot to the road. I still can’t quite figure out why you’d care about that number in isolation, if it doesn’t also tell you something about how much energy you’re burning, like it does in cycling. Be that as it may, it’s worth noting that the VO2 tests below are only relevant if you think (as I do) that VO2 matters.

They did three sets of VO2 tests, each of which involved three-minute bouts of running separated by four-minute bouts of rest. The first test started at just under 11-minute mile pace and got progressively faster with each stage until the runners were no longer running aerobically (meaning that VO2 would no longer provide a useful estimate of energy consumption). The second test stayed at about 9:30 mile pace, but subsequent stages added vests weighing 2.5 then 5 kilograms. The third test, which was only performed indoors, varied the slope between -6 percent and +6 percent in five stages.

Here’s a set of graphs showing the relationship between running power (on the horizontal axis) and oxygen consumption (on the vertical axis) for each of the devices for the running speed test. If running power is indeed a good proxy for energy consumption at various speeds, you’d expect all the dots to fall along a nice straight line.(Courtesy European Journal of Sport Science)

Once again, you can see that the Stryd data is pretty tightly clustered around the straight line. Their calculated standard error is 6.5 percent when connected to the phone app and 7.3 percent when connected to the Garmin watch. (For what it’s worth, I see no reason that the Stryd device should give different data based on what it’s connected to, so I assume those results are equivalent.) The picture gets a little uglier for the other devices: 9.7 percent for Polar, 12.9 percent for Garmin, and 14.5 percent for RunScribe.

When you vary the weight or the slope, the Stryd remains just as accurate, with standard errors of 6.3 and 6.9 percent respectively. But the other ones don’t handle it as well, particularly when slope is varied: Garmin’s standard error balloons to 19.0 percent and RunScribe’s to 18.5 percent. Polar doesn’t even get a score for slope, because it doesn’t work on the treadmill.

A side note: Polar does reasonably well in the VO2 test, and it’s worth pausing to understand why. The other three devices are all using accelerometers to estimate the accelerations and forces of your feet smacking into the ground, and feeding that data into an algorithm that essentially estimates VO2. Polar is completely skipping the middleman, because it doesn’t even bother trying to estimate the forces and accelerations. It just uses the speed measured by your GPS and the slope measured by a barometer, along with other personal data you’ve inputted. In a sense, it’s taking my claim that running power is only useful as a VO2 estimator to its logical conclusion—though calling its calculation a “power” seems a little cheeky.

A couple of other caveats to consider. One is that they forced everyone to maintain the same cadence (based on their individual cadences during an initial familiarization run) throughout all the test sessions to “improve the quality of the repeatability.” This strikes me as bizarre: one of the main points of the study was to find out how repeatable the measurements were, so eliminating one of the potential sources of variation sort of defeats the purpose. Maybe one of the devices gives terrible data when you change your cadence due to natural variations in pace or slope, while the others handle it fine. If so, that would be worth knowing.

The other caveat, as I mentioned above, is that all of these devices and algorithms continue to evolve. My article in the print magazine focused on how the latest Stryd devices can now measure and account for wind conditions, which is a pretty cool new feature that doesn’t make it into this study. The other devices and algorithms continue to evolve too, so this isn’t the final word on the topic. But for now, if you’re in the market for a running power device—and if what you really mean by that is a consistently repeatable estimate of oxygen consumption—this data suggests that Stryd is your best bet.

[ajinkya100k]

ALTRA Men's AL0A4VQT Torin 4.5 Plush Road Running Shoe

ALTRA Men’s AL0A4VQT Torin 4.5 Plush Road Running Shoe

Price: (as of – Details) Package Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 11.97 x 8.5 x 4.8 inches; 1.65 Pounds Item model number ‏ : ‎ AL0A4VQT Department ‏ : ‎ Mens Date First Available ‏ : ‎ November 25, 2020 Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ Altra Footwear ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08P4Q7PG8 Rubber soleWeight: 9.1 oz / 258 gInsole: 5mm Premium PU Sculpted FootbedMidsole: QuanticOutsole: FootPod TechnologyCushion: High

[glenevans]

Many people select activity trackers based on brand loyalty or celebrity endorsements. While you'll still benefit from the functionality these devices bring to your daily life, you can search smarter. Finding the best fitness tracker means meeting your individual goals.

Before clicking "add to cart," ensure that you've tried the activity tracker in the physical store of the vendor. You can find fitness wearables for wrists that are small or hypoallergenic straps. You can also find the straps you cannot remove and attach to the body. You can also take advantage of clip-on trackers, footpods that are hybrid smartwatches, smart rings.

Make sure your tracker has a built-in heart rate monitor. Heart rate sensors let the device assess your calorie burned during your workout, which is crucial when trying to lose weight. You can plan your workouts more effectively with this feature rather than relying on step counts and fitness app indicator.   https://www.hometownstation.com/news-articles/kinetic-pro-watch-reviews-multi-feature-smartwatch-for-your-needs-408277

[kcowgill]

"Running". I didn't feel like changing clothes, putting on shoes, etc just to track a treadmill walk. Briskish walk at what the treadmill reports as being 3mph*, which means a mile should take 20 minutes. Notice all the dropouts? That's my watch failing to accurately capture my footfalls. The treadmill said 1.25 miles* by the time I was done, but my watch said only .96. I'd had enough of waiting for the thing to continue tracking so abruptly stopped short and trying to calculate in my brain how much mileage I thought I could "legally" claim by editing it afterwards. I settled on a mile. Mostly because I didn't want to do math.

Mildly sore from lifting yesterday. Good.

---

* Very early on when I bought the treadmill, I was convinced it wasn't accurate. It never agreed with my Garmin (when paired with a footpod) - and I had spent some considerable effort calibrating that footpod against the treadmills at the office gym, so I felt the FOOTPOD was accurate, and thus the treadmill was off by about 10%.

During the #90to22 at the end of the year, I noticed the my Garmin was often pretty close to what the treadmill reported. Keep in mind I tightened the internal drive belt last .. summer? So maybe that helped the accuracy, too.