Tumgik
#hu jintao
cindydacatpink · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
B.R.I.C.S. but in 2003 (2000s)
I was inspired with @/viktor_regnsky Eggcountries an CountryHumans version.
That's why I draw them.
16 notes · View notes
xieyaohuan · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Interrupting my blorbo love posting to briefly talk about my most annoying obsession of all - PRC politics - and DAMN, Xi Jinping having his predecessor dragged out of the meeting WAS NOT ON MY PARTY CONGRESS BINGO CARD.
They did this in front of the international cameras. I want everybody who reads this to understand that this is BATSHIT FUCKING CRAZY. I never speculate about Chinese elite politics, but I might start anonymously speculating away on this hellsite because FUCK. (Also, we're all doomed, but we already were before so eh)
19 notes · View notes
toscanoirriverente · 2 years
Text
12 notes · View notes
meta-holott · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
2002 China, Hubei, Three gorges, Yangtze
10 notes · View notes
bighermie · 1 year
Link
3 notes · View notes
makapansgat · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Communist Pebbles
2 notes · View notes
psychreviews2 · 1 month
Text
Object Relations: Fear Of Success Pt. 7-3
Accusation In A Mirror
The most relevant example of projection in politics was covered in the paper Accusation in a Mirror, by Kenneth L. Marcus, and he explained the conscious awareness of these tactics, the strategies involved, and their aims. "Accusation In A Mirror (AiM) is a rhetorical practice in which one falsely accuses one’s enemies of conducting, plotting, or desiring to commit precisely the same transgressions that one plans to commit against them...AiM has historically been an almost invariable harbinger of genocide. [It] has been commonly used in atrocities committed by Nazis, Serbs, and Hutus, among others. This is a peculiar feature, not of genocide, but of AiM since non-genocidal forms of AiM have also been ubiquitous with respect to other forms of persecution."
For many people, they can see a projection of this enormity if they pay attention to politics and watch news stories unfold with continuity, but what about people who aren't political junkies and are busy with their lives? Marcus described this odd strategy and how it can work with people who are unconscious of the motives. They all steer a population into a fear state where the only response is to be pre-emptive, which is ultimately an incitement for one side and a chilling effect on the targets. The goals are "...to shock, to silence, to threaten, to insulate, and, finally, to motivate or incite...[and] do unto others as they would do unto you..."
Leon Mugesera sentenced to life for 'inciting' genocide in Rwanda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABrVyinrD8s
The stigma surrounding Christine Anderson - True North: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ETB-y_FKds
Hillary Clinton Says Trump Poses Danger to America's Democracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ-N0dHJAaE
Clinton calls for ‘deprogramming’ of MAGA ‘cult members’: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DH3SgIY7S5A
Tucker Carlson - "Always trust your gut." - https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1727090631850492257
Brace Yourself For What's Coming in 2024 - Victor Davis Hanson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V6jH-6F6K0&t=630s
When AiM is first used the first effect that is intended is to shock. "No one tells Holocaust survivors—or a nation of Holocaust survivors and their children—that they are Nazis without expecting to shock. The same can be said of the inversive accusations leveled at Bosnians, Tutsis, and Copts." As mentioned on prior episodes where Social Psychologist Susan Fiske was quoted, there's an inherent trust in accusations in that people believe that they must be true, otherwise why would they lie? The target then is afraid that there will be a confirmation of guilt if there's a strong response to the unjust accusation, meaning the strength of the response becomes a confirmation of the accusation. Silence follows because the targets are "...afraid of seeming too powerful." The freezing of any response to the outrage is also a threat of being disciplined. "...Ascription of guilt carries with it the threat of punishment." As the freezing continues, the outrage of the false accusation can insulate because it is treated as a legitimate accusation. Kenneth described how "holocaust inversion has been protected from normal anti-discrimination enforcement by its ability to replicate or mimic the tropes of a dissident political discourse." AiM at this point can swirl around without too much violence until the perpetrators are able to legitimize their arguments. The difficulty is to be able to manufacture a danger to the population that Aim needs for incitement. False flags need to operate where people who are on the side of AiM dress up as the targets and they say and approve those shocking comments to bring reality to the false pretenses. "With such a tactic, propagandists can persuade listeners and 'honest people' that they are being attacked and are justified in taking whatever measures are necessary 'for legitimate self-defense.'" Something that is not in the paper, but could be easily inferred is the use of mentally ill people who can be incited much easier. If they can say those shocking things with ease, and even more, if they commit an act of violence, it can catch a population unawares and goad them towards pre-emptive attacks that are worse. "AiM is motivating or inciting. That is to say, AiM not only provides a reason or justification for aggression, as other less effective forms of incitement also do; more insidiously, it also communicates to the listener that it is necessary to attack another group in order to avoid having the same fate visited upon one’s own community...Other rhetorical techniques such as demonization can make mass-murder seem acceptable, but AiM makes it appear necessary."
Biden delivers address outside Independence Hall on 'extremist threat to democracy': https://www.youtube.com/live/XC-k-lhml4o?si=a96yknsZ44SGxhZF
Naomi Wolf: Joe Biden Demonized Almost Half Of The American Nation With Speech Meant For Unity: https://rumble.com/v1iklcj-naomi-wolf-joe-biden-demonized-almost-half-of-the-american-nation-with-spee.html
Laura Loomer uncovers Massive Conspiracy: Nazi Terrorists being Protected by FBI & CIA - InfoWars: https://rumble.com/v3gp88q-laura-loomer-uncovers-massive-conspiracy-nazi-terrorists-being-protected-by.html
Joe Rogan's Opinion On Patriot Front: "You Ever Seen Anything That Looks More Like Feds?": https://rumble.com/v188ksx-joe-rogans-opinion-on-patriot-front-you-ever-seen-anything-that-looks-more-.html
A New Development in the Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Trial: https://rumble.com/v3hzmfa-a-new-development-in-the-gretchen-whitmer-kidnapping-trial.html
Why politicians, the military, governments, businesses, or even gangsters want to use any of these techniques is because they all want a monopoly of one kind or another, which is their idea of success. All the manipulation and bullying that one finds in school extends into the adult world. Corrupt people are always looking for an angle, and the unaware, the distracted, or the busy, don't know what's happening until their dreams start to shatter. Now that we have moved from the ancient past to recent history it's time to face modern politics of power and money to see how it can chase you down, even when you are living life inconspicuously.
Psycho-Political-Economics
"It's Friday and I'm mad as fuck...When was America ever great? Did you all forget that underneath my President Donald Trump we were the biggest producer of crude oil in the fucking world and now we ain't got no gas four months later are y'all serious?
Anybody else need their fucking Trump back? When was America ever great? We had gas. We had electricity. We had jobs. We had food. Now we sitting at home with no gas, some people no electricity, no jobs, waiting for a stimulus check, waiting on the goddamn extra food stamps. What's going on?
We wasn't going through this shit for the last four years. We were winning, winning, winning, winning and all ya'll sitting home being quiet and shit. Now somebody say something. Tell me why the fuck you support Joe Biden. Right now! Everybody want to get rid of fucking President Trump. What's up?
Look at this goofy ass shit. People ain't got shit to say no more, just sitting around like sheep, goofy ass sheep. All they can do is wait. All they can do is wait. All they can do is fucking wait. The Democrats tell us that they got a Green New Deal for 2030. You ain't got no fucking plans for everything to run off electricity in 10 years. You DO got a plan to fuck up everything within the next 10  years.
I want my goddamn Trump back...Everybody had a lot to say when Trump was in the White House. Ain't anybody got shit to say with this fucking old ass bum in there. Fucking about fucking country fucking up the economy. These motherfuckers projected that we gonna have a million new jobs, two hundred thousand new jobs, and where the fuck are they at? Probably two hundred thousand illegal immigrants that you motherfuckers proud about the border got new jobs, but we don't. We hurting in America!
Everybody quiet as shit! Where the fuck are the Joe Biden supporters? I can tell ya'll why I support Trump. Tell me why ya'll support this motherfucker? Ain't doing shit but fucking us up everyday, fucking us up...
When was America ever great? I guarantee you motherfuckers could wish you could go back to the day that Donald Trump won. That was a good fucking day. You might was mad in your fucking mind but I bet your ass was on the way to work. I bet you was on your fucking way to work. I bet you weren't standing at a fucking gas station looking for gas. I bet you wasn't waiting for a fucking stimulus check. I bet you weren't waiting for an extra $300 on your fucking food stamps. I bet you!
I'm pissed! The people walking around anybody saying shit. Everybody had a lot of fucking energy when Trump was the fucking president, a lot of fucking energy. It was never their plan for Trump to win. For four years they've been brainwashing ya'll to get rid of Trump so they could do what the fuck they want to do...
We right back to where we was four years ago! What part ya'll don't get? You made a mistake! You made a fucking mistake! 'Get rid of Trump,' stop Trump for what? We right back to where we was four years ago, drawing lines in the sand, people with motherfucking Russia, bombing the fucking Middle East. All types of kids coming across our fucking borders, all this shit to we're trying to stop.
Can't tell me shit better for you. You can't tell me nothing is better for you underneath your body. Not nothing is better for you. You sitting at home waiting for more fucking money on your food stamps. You had $300 worth of food stamps and now you got $800 worth of stamps that the Democrats want your ass depended upon them. I want to go the fuck to work, well I'm at work, but I want my motherfucking peoples to go to work! This is fucking stupid!"
SemoreViews "I Want My Trump Back!": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdqxwWXqRkA
In the modern world, as in the past, conflicts don't just appear out of nowhere. They come from people pursuing their self-interests and the interests of their family and friends. For example, in the micro you might witness nepotism and cronyism in your workplace. This can expand into alliances and cultures throughout governments and businesses and then spill over internationally. Summarizing from the René Girard chapter above, if you are in a weak position where you can't retaliate in anyway or fight back, you tend to be scapegoated and any aggression can vent itself on those individuals or groups through scapegoating. Boring contract disputes can suddenly be not so boring when the consequences are different groups turning to resentment when left behind. In economics, money is a form of power that allows one to access resources and relieve the tension of poverty for extended periods of time. If tensions cannot be released and if emotions can't be regulated, pathological behaviors ensue. Some people commit crimes, others turn to court systems, and if there are no laws that protect individuals, then gangsterism moves into the forefront, with politics being a legalized form of gangsterism. If all those avenues fail, especially if there is a violent incitement, war typically breaks out until a negotiation for peace can be arranged.
In the 21st century, economically there is still a 20th century hangover from the period after WWII, the rise of the United States, and then trade with Asia. Throughout this thread psychologically there is always one common denominator: People don't like being disrespected. The area that is not so common is for people to give respect to others at the same level they demand for themselves. This all relates to power and as the tables turn, the actor parts may change, but the complaints don't and are based on the same power differentials.
These cycles have been with us since the beginning of human awareness, as can be seen in the prior chapter on human ancestry. You can either produce what you need to consume, trade what you produced with others, or steal what you don't have through violent means. In the modern world, violence and theft has typically been denounced and trade has been considered the adult way of distributing resources. You can imagine the complexity of Freudian psychoanalysis and how everyone is trading with everyone else to satisfy libido, or cravings, which is essentially an energy exchange. Cravings always return but the ability to produce for oneself may not always be reliable, with the predictable mental health results.
As these cycles have returned again and again, along with war and strife, many theories arose on how to deal with conflicts. Almost all the theories involve some satiation that has to happen in the mind. When I'm hungry and I eat, I am satisfied for a few hours, until the hunger returns. If there's abundance there's a risk for addiction, and when there's poverty there can be a scarcity mindset and an escalating hostility. This is a tenuous balance where a people in an environment without social supports will want to save a lot of money, but then in order to earn a return they need to invest it in others, incurring a risk. As economies developed into the 20th century, tax and social support structures were developed from Marxist ideas as well as other older socialist ideas. Some countries went further with more centralized systems, but the fear of corruption has always hounded any centralized power scenario. The west settled for a solution where the government and the private sector negotiated repeatedly the different areas where it appeared that one side or another was best situated. Leaders in the private sector showed a distain for anything not related to the bottom line and they liked the simplicity of paying taxes so that others could deal with the homelessness, poverty, core social programs for education and healthcare, with cultural differences in each western country.
With the industrial revolution and the abundance that was offered for those who worked hard, some countries outperformed others. Some of this had to do with borders, domestic resources, and intellectual capital. Governments learned that if they didn't kill the goose that laid the golden egg they could get more tax revenue from less than 50% taxes rather than greater than or 100% government ownership. Humans are generally reward oriented and rationing systems tend to be jealous and miserly. In environments like the latter, motivation to work reduces, and since money is simply a medium of exchange, to decrease the limitations inherent in a barter system, less production = less wealth. This was a big problem for the Soviet Union, and as it collapsed, there were many triumphant theories on how the way of the West would influence the rest of the developing world.
The main Communist country that avoided that fate was China. Being very close to a similar fate as the Soviets, as seen after the Tiananmen Square riots, the U.S. went in the direction of working with the government, much to the chagrin of freedom protestors in China who complained about government corruption. The students protesting the government had sympathy from leaders like Zhao Ziyang who was the most supportive of liberal reforms and a successor to Hu Yaobang who was also in favor of market reforms. Unfortunately Deng Xiaoping and other party members felt threatened by the power shift. Deng determined that "'the entire imperialist Western world plans to make all socialist countries discard the socialist road and then bring them under the control of international monopoly capital and onto the capitalist road'; he stated further that if China did not up hold socialism then it would be turned into an appendage of the capitalist countries." The protest crackdown led to thousands of casualties, but the total number of dead has been an ongoing controversy. In A World Transformed, Deng was explicitly admitting the desire to punish when he told the U.S. that "China will persist in punishing those instigators of the rebellion and its behind-the-scenes boss in accordance with Chinese laws. China will by no means waver in its resolution of this kind. Otherwise how can the PRC continue to exist?" The protest never got the support it needed to overthrow the Communist regime, and the rest is history.
When Globalism was born - Jack Posobiec: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1608528342843592706
From George H.W. Bush, through Clinton and the younger Bush, China did liberalize the economy but not without protections for the political class. By the time China entered the World Trade Organization, they were given most-favored-nation status by the U.S. which allowed them to setup a mercantilist system where they were able to protect their markets while having access to western markets under a system of slave labor that tempted corporations and owners of capital to take advantage of the increased profits. The loss in jobs in the west was dubbed the China Trade Shock.
China Trade Shock: https://chinashock.info/
Since that time, many trade experts could not avoid noticing the changes, including former trade advisor to President Donald Trump, Robert Lighthizer. He grew up in an affluent manufacturing area in Ohio, but then saw the devastation since the North American Free Trade Agreement and China's WTO inclusion. "We had lost millions of jobs and thousands of factories while wages had stagnated." Despite the obvious destruction that was happening, there was not enough of a push to reverse what happened. "The political establishments of both the Republican and Democratic parties, under the influence of multinational corporations and importers, were unwilling or unable to recognize their mistakes. Instead, they remained convinced that rather than protect American workers and manufacturers, government policy had to put them at risk amid a quest to maximize corporate profits and economic efficiency while minimizing consumer prices."
The difficulty of course is that cheap prices only matter when you have a good paying job. If you are displaced and have to renegotiate wages to a lower level, the result is that nothing is cheap. "While corporate profits soared for a select group of importers and retailers, many of America’s manufacturing companies were hollowed out—forced either into bankruptcy or into moving their factories abroad. And what about ordinary Americans? Though prices for some products declined, wage growth in this country has utterly stagnated since the 1980s—driven in large part by the decline of manufacturing sector employment. As a result, increasingly, working-class families must rely on two full-time incomes in lower-end service sector jobs to maintain the same quality of life one manufacturing sector income once provided. It is no exaggeration to say that American leaders traded the health of the US industrial base and the good-paying manufacturing jobs it supported for current consumption and little more."
Lighthizer was a trade lawyer and he felt that a more nuanced view was required that looked at how skills are developed and the variety of jobs available. People have different personality types, different levels of skill and intelligence. The new model always relied on cheap products from Asia while workers without a super value-added education in the area of high tech could only try to get reeducated or work more hours in service jobs. The manufacturing gap was neglected and in many ways it still is. "When all citizens—including those without college degrees—have a chance to be productive, it’s good for the country...International trade, like all economic policy, is beneficial only if it contributes to the well-being of most of our citizens, if it makes families stronger, and if it makes our communities better...I feel strongly that the course we set for trade policy must rest on a more complete and nuanced understanding of the effects of international trade in the United States—and throughout the world—than can be captured by the question of how much we pay for televisions and toys."
For many Gen-Xers and later generations, they found that when they left school that finding a job that matched their education was exceedingly difficult compared to what baby boomers experienced. They found little sympathy from economists and politicians of any stripe. "Advocates for free trade seemed to accept the growing distress in so many manufacturing-centered communities with the easy assurance of those whose understanding of the calamity was wholly theoretical. It was also hard to dismiss the sense that the proponents of free trade whose voices were heard the most were not trying very hard to see the reality of those costs in the context of the people and families whose lives were affected. Impersonal, inexorable market forces provided an acceptable fig leaf for the turn to globalization that was always the preferred course regardless." Since increased profits from lower wages, and wages being the largest expense on an income statement for most companies, owners didn't have a vested interest in changing their good fortunes. Profits are either given to owners in dividends or reinvested. "New jobs would develop in new industries that would grow. Workers would move to new locations. Government job training would fix any remaining problems. Everything will work out, they said and continue to say. By the time that it became apparent that everything was not working out and that there were devastating costs to many communities, most people in DC didn’t worry very much, because it was all happening someplace far away to people they didn’t know. Nothing useful could be done to hold back the tides of inexorable market forces. This was all aided, of course, by the fact that many in the Washington business trade associations had become far more concerned with the interests of importers than those of US manufacturers. The lobbying money was on the side of free trade."
Even more, popular presidents like Ronald Reagan were quoted all the time and used as a baton to bash critics of free trade, but "President Reagan distinguished between free trade in theory and free trade in practice. He imposed quotas on imported steel, protected Harley-Davidson from Japanese competition, restrained imports of semiconductors and automobiles, took on the overvalued dollar, and pursued similar steps to keep American industry strong during the 1980s. Indeed, after he left office, one group of rabid libertarian free traders said that he was the most protectionist president since Herbert Hoover. I can’t hide the fact that I always took that as a compliment...The costs and benefits of trade liberalization were calibrated relative to national interests and changing political circumstances. No one would have argued for free trade and economic interdependence with the Soviet Union."
Donald Trump Teases a President Bid During a 1988 Oprah Show | The Oprah Winfrey Show | OWN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI
In glib news reports of Chinese trade practices, many in the world ignored what was going on and focused on cheaper prices. The access to world markets for China was much larger than what China allowed on their turf for the rest of the world. "The reality is that it is a mercantilist nation that wants to impose its system on the world. It is opposed to the liberal democratic order and wants to put an end to American hegemony...The post–World War II strategy of reducing barriers to imports in return for the hope of new exports seriously went off the rails in the 1990s. The United States placed an all-or-nothing bet on free trade in the form of three consecutive deals. Since that time, we have seen the loss of millions of jobs and exploding trade deficits. The United States needs to insist on fair trade in our market and reciprocal access in foreign markets. Decades of poor trade deals have produced neither. We need a policy that assures balanced trade. We cannot afford to continue to transfer our wealth to foreign countries in return for consumer products. These are the realities...Extensive state ownership, enormous state subsidies, a closed home market, currency manipulation, rampant government-sponsored theft of intellectual property, and every other mercantilist practice. Trade deficits skyrocketed to unprecedented levels. We were allowing China, a foreign adversary, to use all forms of state-sponsored, government-organized unfair trade to run up a more than $270 billion trade surplus with us and to take US jobs in the process...The 'China shock...was so severe that even the usual advocates for trade started to get a little nervous."
Conservative critic of modern schooling and abstract economic theories, Charlie Kirk, had to renounce his old opinions because reality couldn't be ignored. "If I had to indict philosophical libertarianism, of which I used to believe a lot of this stuff, because it's young. It's compelling. You read Ayn Rand. You read Hayek, and some of it's interesting, and some of it I still agree with, but a lot of it is nonsense because it's an indifference to the result." The results of course affect the psychology of the displaced, which moves out of scope for so many globalist economists. "Between 2000 and 2016, the United States lost nearly five million manufacturing jobs. Median household income stagnated. And in the places that prosperity left behind, the fabric of society frayed. Since the mid-1990s, the United States has faced an epidemic of what the economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton have termed 'deaths of despair.' They have found that among white middle-aged adults who lack a college education—a demographic that has borne much of the brunt of offshoring—deaths from cirrhosis of the liver increased by 50 percent between 1999 and 2013, suicides increased by 78 percent, and drug and alcohol overdoses increased by 323 percent. From 2014 to 2017, the increase in deaths of despair led to the first decrease in life expectancy in the United States over a three-year period since the 1918 flu pandemic." For those who ignored those results, often by blaming the people for being morally inferior, there were other arguments about the benefits of currying favor with enemies to change their tune, but like in situation with Deng Xiaoping, the trade negotiations changed the West much more. "One hears about the need for America to use its economic prowess to gain friends and to influence events. We need to trade more—read: import more—so that other countries will like us instead of, say, China. For others, trade is really about obtaining the cheapest products for our consumers. For these people, if the result is the loss of manufacturing and related jobs, that is a fair exchange. Cheap televisions trump American factories." There was also an argument based on fears related to trade protectionism before the U.S. entrance into WWII. "Anything other than full-throated support for free trade was regarded as a throwback to protectionism and isolationism, as well as an invitation to trade wars."
Charlie Kirk: The CATO Institute Deserves No Seat In The Conservative Movement: https://rumble.com/v1n00vo-charlie-kirk-the-cato-institute-deserves-no-seat-in-the-conservative-moveme.html
Adam Posen and displaced workers: https://humanevents.com/2022/10/09/posobiec-ultra-capitalist-adam-posen-admits-he-wants-your-family-to-suffer-so-elites-and-ccp-can-get-richer
Gen Z chicks are finding out that their college degrees are totally worthless - Benny Johnson: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vT6FMnIj3C4
0 notes
metal-cn · 9 months
Text
日本の、滋賀県子供aプール死亡溺れ死亡?泳げる人は何%だったのか?泳げて当然の、街やったか?五輪選手輩出含めて!
そして、プールの構造やろな。最大傾斜は?少なくとも10-15度は、あった可能性。プール自体、決して難易度、低くないやろな。子供には。そして子供aがまだ幼い。泳ぎが達者な、伝統ある街だったか?もちろん、泳法に関わらず、水面から出ている場合は、ある。そのときに、直射を浴びて体調はどうやったか。直射病有無やろな。ほかにも同時にプールにおり類似の、症例を示していた人、おるかやろな。もちろん、aはどれくらい、プールにおったか?浸かりすぎるなどして、低体温症的なことには、なっておらへん、かったやもね。こんなときほど、AI腕時計、例えば、柿ウォッチやったか?、脈拍分かるんやから、必要やろうな。あと、地理的に、周囲に、滝、底なしの。ある街なんか?どうかもね。子供の遊び場としてね。By reports, in a swimming pool, a small child was found to be dead in Shiga of JPN.Tragedy enough, he was already dead when other child found him, not a saver. This blog supports if a small child swims in, an IOT watch should be had on. It must be water resilient,also be supposed.
0 notes
ronnydeschepper · 11 months
Text
De peperbus van nonkel Miele (47): BRICS-landen kiezen eigen weg
Het wordt duidelijk dat het Westen niet meer in staat is de wereld alleen te regeren. Gewezen kolonies en slachtoffers van het imperialistisch optreden in het verleden, organiseren zich onder meer in BRICS om niet verder afhankelijk te zijn van het Westen. Vooral, ze zijn er ook economisch sterk genoeg voor geworden. Hun BBP, samen, is iets hoger dan dat van het Westen. Ze spreken namens 45% van…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
homocausticus · 1 year
Text
Jintao reaparece em público para acalmar o Ocidente
Jintao reaparece em público para acalmar o Ocidente
A ascensão de Xi Jimping no comando chinês trouxe dúvidas sobre seu antecessor Hu Jintao que foi retirado da cerimônia do Partido Comunista sob a alegação de saúde frágil. Pois bem, na cremação de Jiang Zemin. Ele apareceu ao lado de Xi para prestar a última homenagem a Zemin antes do corpo do ex-presidente ser cremado em um evento particular. Pelo jeito, o Ocidente não entende de política…
View On WordPress
0 notes
reportwire · 1 year
Text
Late Chinese leader Jiang hailed in memorial service
Late Chinese leader Jiang hailed in memorial service
BEIJING — China’s communist leaders eulogized the late leader Jiang Zemin on Tuesday as a loyal Marxist-Leninist who oversaw their country’s rapid economic rise while maintaining rigid party control over society. President and party leader Xi Jinping praised Jiang in an hour-long address at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People as senior officials and military brass stood at attention. Xi recalled…
View On WordPress
0 notes
kneedeepincynade · 1 year
Text
It's with great grief and sorrow that we at the shaoshan collective recive the news of Jiang Zemin death,a great inspiration for us all,we hope that he may find peace after all the troubles of life
This post is machine translated but the translation will be heavily controlled
The translation is at the bottom
The collective is on telegram
Collettivo Shaoshan - Notizie sulla Cina 🇨🇳:
⚠️ È MANCATO IL COMPAGNO JIAN ZEMIN⚠️
😔 Oggi, 30 novembre, è mancato - all'età di 96 anni - Jiang Zemin, che è stato Segretario Generale del Partito Comunista Cinese (1989 - 2002), Presidente della Repubblica Popolare Cinese (1993 - 2003) e Presidente della Commissione Militare Centrale (1989 - 2004).
🇨🇳 A nome del Comitato Permanente e del Comitato Centrale del CPC, dell'Assemblea Nazionale del Popolo, del Comitato Nazionale della Conferenza Consultiva Politica del Popolo Cinese, della Commissione Militare Centrale, è stata pubblicata una Lettera a tutto il Partito, all'Esercito e alla Nazione di ogni etnia del Paese ✉️
⭐️ "Il Compagno Jiang Zemin è riconosciuto dal nostro Partito, dal nostro Esercito e dal Popolo di tutte le etnie come un leader eccezionale di alto prestigio, un grande Marxista, un grande Rivoluzionario Proletario, statista, stratega militare, diplomatico e combattente comunista di lunga data" 🚩
⚙️ Come Ingegnere e Funzionario del Partito Comunista Cinese, ha dedicato la sua intera vita alla risoluzione dei problemi, e l'eredità teorica della Leadership della Terza Generazione di Comunisti Cinesi - con Jiang Zemin come Nucleo Centrale - risiede nella "Teoria delle Tre Rappresentanze"
📚 "Il Compagno Jiang Zemin ha studiato diligentemente fin da quando era un adolescente, ha perseguito la ricerca della verità ed è stato illuminato dal Pensiero del Patriottismo e della Rivoluzione Democratica, e - durante i suoi studi universitari - ha partecipato ad attività patriottiche anti-giapponesi, e ha formato una visione marxista del mondo" ⭐️
⚡️Dopo essersi laureato in Ingegneria Elettrica nel 1947, è andato a lavorare in fabbrica, dopo si è anche impegnato a portare avanti l'opera di propaganda rivoluzionaria tra le masse operaie 🚩
🛠 Nei primi giorni della Fondazione della Repubblica Popolare Cinese, il Compagno Jiang Zemin ha lavorato alla Shanghai Yimin Food Factory, alla Shanghai Soap Factory, ed è diventato Capo del Dipartimento Elettrico di Shanghai.
🚗 Nel 1954, durante l'Era di Mao Zedong, lo Stato costruì la prima fabbrica di automobili a Changchun, che richiedeva un gran numero di quadri tecnici, e Jiang Zemin fu trasferito lì, per poi recarsi - nel 1955 - in Unione Sovietica, dove lavorò e imparò tecniche ingegneristiche presso la Fabbrica di Automobili "Stalin" di Mosca.
⚡️Una volta tornato in Cina, ha lavorato come Vice-Direttore del Dipartimento Energetico della fabbrica di Changchun, per poi andare a lavorare presso una Centrale Elettrica.
🔬Nel 1962, il Compagno Jiang Zemin divenne Vice-Direttore dell'Istituto di Ricerca sugli Apparecchi Elettrici di Shanghai del Ministero dell'Industria, e fu responsabile per la direzione della Ricerca Scientifica.
🇨🇳|🇷🇴 Nel 1971, fu inviato - come Capo di un gruppo di esperti ingegneri - presso la Repubblica Socialista di Romania, dove lavorò fino al 1973.
📄 Tornato in Cina, iniziò ad avere anche ruoli politici, servendo come Direttore dell'Ufficio per gli Affari Esteri, e - nel 1982 - come Vice-Ministro dell'Industria Elettronica.
🚩Eletto membro del CC al 12° Congresso Nazionale del CPC, divenne Sindaco di Shanghai nel 1985, e iniziò il lavoro che portò alla trasformazione di Shanghai nella città tecnologicamente avanzata che è oggi.
⭐️ Nel 1987, fu eletto a membro dell'Ufficio Politico e - a cavallo tra la primavera e l'estate del 1989 - Jiang Zemin difese risolutamente il potere dello stato socialista, combattendo il tentativo di rivoluzione colorata, e attuando la corretta decisione del Comitato Centrale.
📉 Nel 1989, divenne Segretario Generale del CPC e Presidente della CMC, e dovette impegnarsi nel lavoro in Cina, in un contesto storico difficile per lo sviluppo del Socialismo, a causa della caduta dell'URSS e dei Paesi Socialisti in Europa dell'Est.
📖 Aderendo ai Quattro Principi Cardinali, Jiang Zemin ha guidato il CPC, l'EPL e il Popolo Cinese verso il processo di costruzione economica, la Riforma e Apertura e la Causa del Socialismo con Caratteristiche Cinesi.
🧾 Fonte
⭐️ "Il Compagno Jiang Zemin ha tenuto alta la Grande Bandiera del Marxismo-Leninismo, del Pensiero di Mao Zedong e della Teoria di Deng Xiaoping, e ha colto le opportunità, approfondendo la Riforma ed espandendo l'Apertura, per promuovere lo sviluppo economico, stabilendo un Sistema di Base con la Proprietà Pubblica come Pilastro e la coesistenza di vari metodi di distribuzione basati sul Lavoro" 🚩
🇨🇳 Aderendo ai Principi della Riunificazione Pacifica e "Un Paese, Due Sistemi", sotto il Compagno Jiang Zemin si realizzò il ritorno di Hong Kong e Macao alla Sovranità Cinese.
🪖 Durante il suo mandato come Presidente della CMC, Jiang Zemin ha lavorato duramente per guidare la Modernizzazione dell'Esercito Popolare di Liberazione, aderendo al Principio dello Sviluppo Coordinato della costruzione della Difesa Nazionale e dello sviluppo economico per rafforzare la Rivoluzione.
🌟 Aderendo alla linea ideologica del Marxismo, rispettando la Praxis e le Masse, Jiang Zemin ha colto le caratteristiche dei tempi, giudicando scientificamente la posizione storica del Partito Comunista Cinese, introducendo nuove idee, nuovi punti di vista e nuove conclusioni, portando alla creazione della "Teoria delle Tre Rappresentanze" 📕
📖 "La "Teoria delle Tre Rappresentanze" evidenzia che il nostro Partito rappresenta le esigenze di sviluppo delle Forze Produttive Avanzate, la direzione della Cultura Avanzata della Cina e gli interessi della stragrande maggioranza del Popolo Cinese"
🏢 Dimessosi dalla carica di Segretario Generale al 16° Congresso del CPC, il Compagno Hu Jintao divenne il suo successore e - nel 2004 - Jiang Zemin si dimise anche dalla carica di Presidente della CMC, che andò a Hu Jintao.
📚 Dopo essersi ritirato dalla posizione di comando, il Compagno Jiang Zemin ha fermamente sostenuto il lavoro del CC del CPC, aderendo ai Principi della Lotta Anti-Corruzione e le "Opere Scelte di Jiang Zemin" furono pubblicate, con scritti che partono dagli anni '80, fino al 21° Secolo.
⭐️ "La morte del Compagno Jiang Zemin è una perdita incommensurabile per il nostro Partito, il nostro Esercito e il nostro Popolo di tutti i gruppi etnici, e il CC invita il Partito, l'Esercito e il Popolo a trasformare il dolore in forza, aderendo alla Teoria di Base, alle "Due Sessioni", ai "Quattro Comprensivi", alle "Quattro Caratteristiche della Fiducia in Se Stessi", portando avanti la Missione Originaria" 🚩
🔖 "Dobbiamo lavorare duramente per studiare la "Teoria delle Tre Rappresentanze", imparare dallo Spirito e dallo Stile Rivoluzionario del Compagno Jiang Zemin, per studiare come risolvere nuovi problemi e favorire la costruzione di un Potere Socialista che sia Prospero, Forte, Democratico, Civile, Armonioso e Bello - Il Compagno Jiang Zemin è immortale!" 🌟
🧾 Fonte
🌸 Iscriviti 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
⚠️ COMRADE JIANG ZEMIN HAS DIED⚠️
😔 Today, November 30, Jiang Zemin passed away at the age of 96. He was General Secretary of the Communist Party of China (1989 - 2002), President of the People's Republic of China (1993 - 2003) and Chairman of the Central Military Commission (1989 - 2004).
🇨🇳 On behalf of the Standing Committee and the Central Committee of the CPC, the National People's Congress, the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, the Central Military Commission, a Letter was issued to the whole Party, the Army and to the nation of every ethnic group in the country ✉️
⭐️ "Comrade Jiang Zemin is recognized by our Party, Army and People of all ethnicities as an outstanding leader of high prestige, a great Marxist, a great Proletarian Revolutionary, statesman, military strategist, diplomat and long-time communist fighter date" 🚩
⚙️ As an engineer and an official of the Communist Party of China, he devoted his entire life to solving problems, and the theoretical legacy of the leadership of the third generation of Chinese Communists - with Jiang Zemin as the core - lies in the "Three Representation Theory"
📚 "Comrade Jiang Zemin has studied diligently since he was a teenager, pursued the pursuit of truth and was enlightened by the Thought of Patriotism and Democratic Revolution, and - during his university studies - participated in patriotic anti- Japanese, and formed a Marxist worldview" ⭐️
⚡️ After graduating from Electrical Engineering in 1947, he went to work in the factory, after which he also undertook to carry on the work of revolutionary propaganda among the working masses 🚩
🛠 In the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, Comrade Jiang Zemin worked at the Shanghai Yimin Food Factory, Shanghai Soap Factory, and became the Head of the Shanghai Electrical Department.
🚗 In 1954, during the Mao Zedong Era, the state built the first automobile factory in Changchun, which required a large number of technical cadres, and Jiang Zemin was transferred there, then went - in 1955 - to the Soviet Union, where he worked and learned engineering techniques at the "Stalin" Automobile Factory in Moscow.
⚡️ Once back in China, he worked as Deputy Director of the Energy Department of the Changchun factory, and then went to work at a power plant.
🔬In 1962, Comrade Jiang Zemin became Deputy Director of the Shanghai Electrical Appliance Research Institute of the Ministry of Industry, and was responsible for the direction of Scientific Research.
🇨🇳 | 🇷🇴 In 1971, he was sent - as Head of a group of expert engineers - to the Socialist Republic of Romania, where he worked until 1973.
📄 Back in China, he also began to have political roles, serving as Director of Foreign Affairs Bureau, and-in 1982-as Vice-Minister of Electronics Industry.
🚩 Elected a member of the CC at the 12th National Congress of the CPC, he became Mayor of Shanghai in 1985, and began the work that led to the transformation of Shanghai into the technologically advanced city it is today.
⭐️ In 1987, he was elected as a member of the Political Bureau and - at the turn of the spring and summer of 1989 - Jiang Zemin resolutely defended the power of the socialist state, fighting the attempted color revolution, and implementing the correct decision of the Central Committee.
📉 In 1989, he became General Secretary of the CPC and President of the CMC, and had to engage in work in China, in a difficult historical context for the development of Socialism, due to the fall of the USSR and the Socialist Countries in Eastern Europe.
📖 Adhering to the Four Cardinal Principles, Jiang Zemin led the CPC, PLA and Chinese people in the process of economic construction, Reform and Opening-up and the Cause of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.
🧾 Source
⭐️ "Comrade Jiang Zemin held up the Great Banner of Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought and Deng Xiaoping Theory, and seized the opportunities, deepening Reform and expanding Opening-up, to promote economic development, establishing a Basic System with Public Property as the Pillar and the coexistence of various Labor-based distribution methods" 🚩
🇨🇳 Adhering to the Principles of Peaceful Reunification and "One Country, Two Systems", the return of Hong Kong and Macao to Chinese Sovereignty was accomplished under Comrade Jiang Zemin.
🪖 During his tenure as Chairman of the CMC, Jiang Zemin worked hard to lead the Modernization of the People's Liberation Army, adhering to the Coordinated Development Principle of building National Defense and economic development to strengthen the Revolution.
🌟 Adhering to the ideological line of Marxism, respecting the Praxis and the Masses, Jiang Zemin grasped the characteristics of the times, scientifically judging the historical position of the Communist Party of China, introducing new ideas, new viewpoints and new conclusions, leading to the establishment of the "Theory of the Three Representations" 📕
📖 "The "Three Representative Theory" highlights that our Party represents the development needs of the Advanced Productive Forces, the direction of China's Advanced Culture, and the interests of the vast majority of the Chinese people"
🏢Comrade Hu Jintao stepped down as General Secretary at the 16th Congress of the CPC, and became his successor-in 2004-Jiang Zemin also stepped down as Chairman of the CMC, which went to Hu Jintao.
📚 After retiring from the leadership position, Comrade Jiang Zemin firmly supported the work of the CC of the CPC, adhering to the Principles of Fighting Anti-Corruption, and "Selected Works of Jiang Zemin" was published, with writings dating from the 1950s 80, up to the 21st Century.
⭐️ "Comrade Jiang Zemin's death is an immeasurable loss for our Party, Army and People of all ethnic groups, and the CC calls on the Party, Army and People to turn grief into strength, adhering to the Basic Theory, the "Two Sessions", the "Four Comprehensive", the "Four Characteristics of Self-Confidence", carrying out the Original Mission" 🚩
🔖 "We must work hard to study the "Three Representation Theory", learn from Comrade Jiang Zemin's Revolutionary Spirit and Style, to study how to solve new problems and help build a Prosperous, Strong, Democratic, Civilian Socialist Power , Harmonious and Beautiful - Comrade Jiang Zemin is immortal!" 🌟
🧾 Source
🌸 Subscribe 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
0 notes
sgreffenius · 1 year
Link
The best visual proof that Holman Jenkins is right about Xi Jinping: when Xi had his predecessor ushered out of the recent Chinese Communist Party Congress. What an ignominious thing to do! The best theory about why he would initiate such an outlandish act is also the simplest: Xi feared Hu Jintao might not bow to a third term for his successor. Two terms has been the limit since Mao died. Two terms was the limit that Xi Jinping and Hu Jintao operated under. Yet Xi wanted the Congress’s blessing on a third term. Would Hu Jintao signal his disapproval?
The only way to ensure Hu could not do so: escort him out of the room. Hu sat in the front row, right next to Xi, on his left. He appeared reluctant to leave when his escorts arrived to make him depart. As he walked out of the hall, every one of the delegates, row upon row, sat frozen. The choreography was perfect, if you wanted to extinguish your predecessor in public. The choreography was not in the least perfect, if your aim was to show continuity of leadership between Xi and Hu. In fact, China’s social media heavily censored Hu’s name after the episode. If no one can mention you on the internet, you do not exist.
Tumblr media
What will happen at the next Party Congress, in four years? Don’t look for Hu to make an appearance, if he is still alive. Do look for Xi to recommend a fourth term for himself. You might call him the Putin of Peking.
0 notes
Text
China ¿Qué te juegas?
China ¿Qué te juegas?
by j re crivello “En China, el color del cabello ha sido muestra del estatus social durante décadas. Cuanto más fuerte el negro del tinte, mayor expresión de juventud, vigencia y poder. Cuando más canoso el pelo, mayor expresión de la decadencia del cuerpo y del rango de la sociedad” (1) Hace unos días hemos presenciado la renovación delo poder de Xi Jinping en el XX Congreso del Partido…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
juuanre · 2 years
Text
China ¿Qué te juegas?
China ¿Qué te juegas?
by j re crivello “En China, el color del cabello ha sido muestra del estatus social durante décadas. Cuanto más fuerte el negro del tinte, mayor expresión de juventud, vigencia y poder. Cuando más canoso el pelo, mayor expresión de la decadencia del cuerpo y del rango de la sociedad” (1) Hace unos días hemos presenciado la renovación delo poder de Xi Jinping en el XX Congreso del Partido…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
psychreviews2 · 1 month
Text
Object Relations: Fear Of Success Pt. 7-2
Projection
Psychological projection is a very complex topic that is often badly explained because it's a catch-all term for many different phenomenon. If you are a successful person or are trying to rise in a social hierarchy, it's impossible to do that without experiencing the projections of others. A lot of the common projections you find in politics today involves a normalization of corruption and moral inventories. If enough people are so corrupt, it's easy to accuse others of what you're guilty of, because you may be right. Some of the projection is more unconscious and has been studied in dreams in Psychoanalysis and Analytical Psychology. Marie Von Franz saw more globally that "wherever known reality stops, where we touch the unknown, there we project an archetypal image." That image could be a good guy or bad guy. Typically, the bad guy is always the one who interferes with our goals, even if we are the criminal and the police are trying to stop us. The good guy is often an idol to be inspired by and given outsized expectations. Through moral inventories, our weaknesses, mistakes, and faults can be well known to us and become the material we use to accuse others, especially if we have a cynical worldview that assumes everyone is the same way. Carl Jung was also aware of how this could happen in therapy when the unknown for a patient has the blanks filled in by the therapist. When extended outside of therapy the example could be an "assumption that what the [onlooker] perceives or thinks is equally perceived or thought by the [recognized.]" Projection can also happen where there is a lack of understanding for real personal human struggles, through a lack of experience, and people mistakenly assume who they are judging are more unique that they actually are. The typical hypocrisy, as pointed in the Bible by Jesus, is when one is looking at a speck of dirt in another's eye while ignoring the plank of wood in their own. When one wants to do a moral inventory against someone else, most therapists agree that it's best to start with oneself before moving forward.
In the view of Jung's Shadow, which is the collection of all the weak parts of our personalities, that territory is often tender when there is a humiliating comparison with people who are better than us in these exact areas. There is a threat that they can be critical of us at any moment and we may lose our status and resources. They often appear like the bad guy, trigger defenses motivated to start moral inventories, and because the accused is more skilled or intelligent, and therefore hard to understand, we make assumptions based on what we know, which is all about us and our weaknesses. There's also a danger of annihilation because critical people who threaten resources, also threaten the well-being of the self. It's like a psychological murder attempt. You feel unconsciously like they are trying to kill you and you unconsciously harbor feelings for their demise. This means a reformer of a system will look extreme and scary, because one doesn't know where one will find another angle for survival. Like anyone looking for a new job, it's a stressful process.
Dreams also can provide symbols that can be interpreted outwardly towards predictions of the future, or they can be a displacement of internal struggles that are now symbolically appearing externally. The unconscious can be confusing in this way because thoughts in a meditation, or dreams in sleep, can just appear out of a nothing and they can already be fully formed projections and unrecognized as being so. For example, a person dying of a terminal disease starts to predict the end of the world, which is really a projection of the ending of their world. Jung felt that politics was an area where projection was common. "If people observe their own unconscious tendencies in other people, this is called a 'projection.'" Politics is full of individual ambitions tied to the ambitions of political groups and leaders. Threats of reform, revolution, and counter-revolution can easily spark a wave of projection.  The confusion happens when we don't ask the questions about our own dreams and symbols that appear in sleep or meditation. You can illuminate the situation by asking "are these symbols or ideas about the conflicts in my life? Would I feel better if others were proven guilty as I predicted? Does it feel better because those who I accuse are now seen as broken as I am?" When there is a lot of blame to go around, one way to escape the projections is to face all the problems of one's life truthfully and go through the process of self-correction. Once the self-correction is complete, is the blame for others still there? Is there more forgiveness? In some cases, the blame is justified because the evidence is glaring, but when the evidence is not there and there's no searching for evidence, it is likely a projection from a culture bound understanding of the world or a playing out of internal conflicts.
With projective identification, it goes even further where a person has an agenda with a narrative that will make themselves feel better and they have opportunities to brainwash a suggestible person who is open to introject, imitate, and identify with the new view. Connecting the psychology of victimhood and Girard's scapegoating, you can see examples in children or powerless people, who need resources from the powerful and they introject blame as a way to maintain survival along with other behaviors as found in Stockholm Syndrome, where there is real guilt taken on with the identification. You may stay alive longer in a kidnapping if you help the kidnapper for a period of time, but the cost of that is when you survive, you survive with guilt because you helped them. Other examples are when people adopt a worldview that others want them to have, to serve their agendas. This can be from a personal intimate point of view in a seduction, all the way up to religious or political agendas. Everyone on Earth more or less projects some of the time because it's tiring to do reality tests, or we are totally convinced of our point of view in one subject or another.
The need to blame to improve self-esteem is a clear demarcation between an honest prediction and an agenda. Blaming because there is an external reality and responsibility required, is less of a projection precisely because of the facts and reality involved. Also we sometimes criticize others because we are conscious of our mistakes and learned a lesson but can see that many other people are stuck where we were. Where it starts looking like an unconscious projection is when there's a holier-than-thou attitude to feel superior to elevate self-esteem. Why was there a low self-esteem in the first place that needed such a boost? A search for content in the mind that is creating feelings of low self-esteem can be a key to a projection that was unconscious. If there's wounding because others are superior in one arena of life or another, and if their downfall would make us feel better, it can numb the pain of having to face unpleasant facts about ourselves and the changes we need to make. Those projections also stay unconscious as long as the person avoids facing self-development. Projections can be recognized and forgotten because it's more comfortable to avoid change.
Milli Vanilli - Blame It On the Rain: https://youtu.be/BI5IA8assfk?si=DVkSZh8UeClQcQHT
How a Botched Bank Heist Created ‘Stockholm Syndrome’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYsGbvrmr68
From the point of view of Carl Jung and Analytical Psychology, projection is an unconscious process of "...projecting our own psychology into our fellow human beings. In this way everyone creates for himself a series of more or less imaginary relationships based essentially on projection...In these imaginary relationships the other person becomes an image or a carrier of symbols." Marie Louise Von Franz used an example of childhood play and how children playing with dolls are making associations that don't belong to the inanimate object. This primitive layer continues on into adulthood unconsciously, but for her it's only when projections have become problematic do we have something worth investigating. "The archaic identity of subject and object, which is the basis of the phenomenon of projection, persists subliminally, even in highly cultivated men and women. In the unconscious the inner world and the outer world are not differentiated. Only that which has become a content of consciousness is described as an inner or outer phenomenon, that is, either than an introspectively perceived condition, like a welling up of an emotion, or as an 'outer' event or object. Everything else, of which we are not conscious, remains, as before, an undifferentiated part of the occurrences of life." When there is finally an investigation this is "...only when we gain enough insight to see that they are imagos of peculiarities that are part of our own makeup; otherwise we are naïvely convinced that these peculiarities belong to the object." Because dreams and thoughts appear out of the unconscious fully formed, it's the lack of questioning that leads to the projection being undetected. When people are walking around with their worldview, the gaps in knowledge provide an opening for the "...archaic identity of subject and object...Whenever it prevails, the unconscious is merged with the outer world." Through awareness and meditation of mental content there can be a "...complete and final detachment...when the imago that mirrored itself in the object is restored, together with its meaning, to the subject. This restoration is achieved through conscious recognition of the projected content, that is, by acknowledging the 'symbolic value' of the object." The gap in knowledge is one way to catch a projection but also when there is a distorted label applied to the world. "Exaggeration indicates, in most cases, an interpretation on the subjective level."
Because projection is an "...involuntary process..." full of "...dreams, waking fantasies, and mythological traditions," energy is wasted on error and judgment. "An inner mental image, the object-imago, must be recognized as an inner factor; this is the only way in which the value or the energy invested in the image can flow back to the individual, who has need of [this energy] for his development...The presence or absence of an exaggeration, however, can often be determined only through a feeling evaluation, which in dream interpretation demands a high degree of sensitivity to nuance and atmosphere. It is, moreover, important to differentiate, as Jung emphasizes, between a quality or property that is really present in the object and the value or meaning this object possesses for the dreamer, that is, for the energy invested in the assessment." Energy of course is wasted when there is a negative criticism connected with the anger and stress. If one is interested in real success in the world, a projection-meditation can be a way to save energy for self-development. One can ask "Why was the judgment inaccurate? Does it have to do with my self-development? Are there any wishes embedded related to self-esteem and comparison? Is there an agenda I want to force on the object?" The energetic body language and countenance sets off a countertransference in the person being judged with a back and forth between two or more projecting people. This understanding can also help therapists who don't have the routine of questioning their symbols, or they don't have a regular therapist of their own.
Jung's method was always about self-development and he saw how both negative and positive projections could suppress areas of the personality in most need of development. "...Everyone tends to project their less-preferred functions onto others. Unconscious dislike of a [skill] often leads to conflict with those for whom the [skill] is prominent in the personality. Negative projections are a way of denying our own deficits, and thus they keep us blind to ourselves and others, but idealizing projections may be even worse, since they externalize positive attributes, deluding us into thinking we do not have the assets that others have...Our judgments against others’ personalities suppress parts of our own minds. These 'inner conflicts' always erupt in disturbances of our inner peace." Carol Shumate of Projection and Personality Development via the Eight-Function Model, concurs. "The goal of Jung’s system was to help individuals avoid becoming self-fulfilling prophecies based on their early preferences." Another question is to look at those we idolize and see if there are any inferior feelings when we look at their abilities. We should ask if it's really true that we can't develop skills in the same direction. Certainly the therapeutic effect would arise if weak skills were successfully developed. The concern would evaporate as people get used to operating at a higher level.
From the psychoanalytic point of view, there's also a question of weakened ego boundaries where children were not able to develop a sense of inside and outside, much like the above examples of conscious boundaries and unconscious boundarylessness. There's a "...tendency to search for an outside cause rather than an internal one..." There's a selective focus based on a worldview and then a desire for relief. Freud surmised that "whenever an internal change occurs, we can choose whether we shall attribute it to an internal or external cause. If something deters us from accepting an internal origin, we naturally seize upon an external one." There are several theories as to why, including a desire for purity in the ideal self. If we feel that any of our own behavior tarnishes the ideal self-image, or ego-ideal, that feeling can manifest as a form of self-hatred that looks for an influence to blame, to find relief from the tension. Again, this can be accurate if you were young and copied bad behaviors from parents or culture, and now as an adult you have rejected those influences, but there can be a hunting mentality to attack societal influences, and again there can be scapegoats if the perpetrator from long ago is inaccessible. If there's enough unconsciousness, what Freud called a pre-conscious, a person could also partially forget their past purity-tainting behavior but still make a mistake in their guess of another person, because the content was conscious enough to be a form of knowledge to draw upon, but not conscious enough to be a form of self-reflection.
It's common for people to find internal conflicts that they struggle with and assume others are in the same situation. Many examples include anything related to identity, like sexual orientation, political affiliations, ethnic values, and internal religious conflicts. For example, a bisexual could hate their homosexual self and start attacking others for being openly homosexual. You could then apply this to struggles over deep seeded values. Another example would be a person who is now unsure of what they believe, in terms of having adopted a toxic worldview in the past, and then they could look for social influences to blame. This gets more pernicious when you look at pleasure. Many points of view, identities, and values, all contain pleasure at different levels of intensity and they can violate boundaries of others with varying levels of damage. The anger at bad influences increases as people fail to accept the the dark side of their personality. Drawbacks to pleasures don't change the fact that one CAN get pleasure in many different ways that can hurt oneself or others. When someone realizes that their pleasure can be replaced by subjectively "better" pleasures, a therapeutic method can be to ACCEPT that one can have lower pleasures and one has simply developed into something more peaceful or longer-lasting. These identities relating to anything addictive can be a mire to be stuck in when there's an obsession over purity.
The problem is time and identity. If you were impure in the past that means you can't ever be pure no matter what you do. You can blame other people. You can attack yourself, but you're still a person with potentials for being impure. This projective exaggeration is called splitting in psychoanalysis and one can do that to oneself if one can only love oneself if one is pure. To accept impurity can be moral if people are also accepting of drawbacks to desires and are moving on to better pastures. It becomes pathological if people feel they can ONLY experience pleasure in certain situations. It takes a lot of mistakes, that many don't want to experience for practical reasons, to learn about the limits of one's pleasure template, and unfortunately many take their childhood history and solidify it into a self-belief that prevents new healthier experiences of pleasure. Carl Jung said this about about how to deal with counter-transference when patients are judged harshly by their professionals that "if the doctor wishes to help a human being, he must be able to accept him as he is, and he can do this in reality only when he has already seen and accepted himself as he is." The advantage of acknowledging your dark side is that what is conscious can be targeted for control. People who say they are pure may not actually know themselves that well and may act on the slightest temptation to the surprise of everyone around them including themselves. Learning for many people requires a lot of feeling and experience. Abstract knowledge may be accurate but it may also be sterile and not provide enough of a deterrence for bad behavior because of the possibility that one can get intense pleasure from something damaging. Any attempts to teach younger people may require more admission that something bad, like a drug habit, can include incredible pleasure along with the risks of wrong doses and adulterations. There needs to be an impure identity, which matches common humanity, so that exploring improved behaviors becomes possible. Rigid identities lead to hypocrisy and they can demotivate change as a way to defend the all-or-nothing identity.
Carl Jung - Ending Your Inner Civil War (read by Alan Watts): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15pjQRA80bs
90s Ravers Gurning On Ecstasy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfWBd9Eg3rI
Discotheque - U2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpvF7Qq9svk
It's been a perennial criticism of psychoanalysis in how it is hard to test for projection, but some tests have been done on how obsessive thinking can lead to projection. Deep wounds, shameful mistakes, and past addictions can be chewed on in the mind for long periods of time, swallowed with suppression, but then regurgitated when there are reminders in the environment. In A new look at defense projection, researchers found that "people dislike certain traits and are particularly loath to believe that they themselves have such traits. It is also clear that they seek to deny some of their faults and to suppress thoughts about evidence that paints them in certain dark colors...Cognitive suppression of unwanted self-knowledge may have an unintended side effect: It may lead thoughts about the problematic personality trait to rebound and become chronically accessible...The level of discrepancy between the undesired self and one's actual self-concept can be an important predictor of life satisfaction."
Almost all life choices involve some compromise and when weighing choices it's usually not so black and white. One of the modern illnesses is attributing too much to identity, but when one looks closely, identity is shifting all the time according to priority. If your priority is to send an e-mail, you're an e-mailer right now, but as soon as the priority changes on the list you're something else. In Identity and Identification, a case study illuminated the variety one finds and all the trial and error searches people engage in when they have to adapt to the economy and changes in the world. Identity is compartmentalized. Different lifestyles and ways of living, especially if you live in a multi-cultural society, can broaden horizons of what's possible and allow people to experiment and change lifestyles. To the question Who Are You?, Mark Walport responded: "It depends on the circumstances. That's what's very interesting about identity. So, talking to you now, I'm the Director of the Wellcome Trust, but at home I'm a husband and father. On Flickr, I'm someone else, and so on. In all sorts of different circumstances, we're slightly different people." Then when you add age and experience, complexity accrues in the character of the person. After a lot of trial and error, certain preferences become more solid and many others may have fallen away due to obsolescence, boredom, or an acute awareness of drawbacks. Keeping a flexible attitude of learning and development weakens rigid judgments about purity of character. The safety one finds in boundaries is enjoying a life where the enjoyments already include those healthy boundaries. The need for purity can rest.
Case Studies: The 'Wolfman' (3/3) - Freud and Beyond: https://rumble.com/v1gulsf-case-studies-the-wolfman-33-freud-and-beyond.html
Unfortunately, so many people will not read psychology with any real depth and they are going to be stuck with inflexible thoughts and they will project on the environment with an intense need to control. With projective identification people as well as the environment are manipulated to conform to the personal worldview that allows for relief. There's a "...manipulation of the external object in order to make it comply with what the subject is attempting to externalize." This makes the job of a therapist dealing with these ego disordered patients more difficult. Warren Brodey in, The Dynamics of Narcissism, described that selection process. "Projection is combined with the manipulation of reality selected for the purpose of verifying the projection. Reality that cannot be used to verify the projection is not perceived [because it's about the selection]. Information known by the externalizing person but beyond the perception of the others [in the family] is not transmitted to these others except as it is useful to train or manipulate them into validating what will then become the realization of the projection...The identity that the patient sees may be unknown to the therapist (although it holds a kernel of truth, which is usually disturbing to the therapist). The therapist's active denial of the patient's presumption may serve as confirmation of the as-if identity, particularly because the patient, constricted to his own externalized image, does not perceive the context of the other characteristics." Truth is used in projection, as Von Franz quoted Jung, who spoke of "a 'hook' in the object on which one hangs a projection as one hangs a coat on a coat hook." Therapists are treated like a coat hanger and all the realistic details about their life can be a form of brainwashing if not careful.
Brodey then expanded on the Narcissus parable and the lack of separation between the subject and the reflection in the water due to pathological parenting, with the distorted rewards and punishments, that didn't allow for boundaries between self and other for the child. A narcissist in therapy could easily take personal any perceived slights coming from the therapist as a form of self-injury while at the same time project one's content into the therapist. No boundaries. "Consider again Narcissus and his reflection: the not-self that is set at a distance for relationship exists only as a relocation of a part of 'I.' The reflected image of Narcissus has no separate existence. It is perceived outside of the self but is continuous with the self; it owes its existence to the primary self image rather than to the transfer of energy to the perception (or misperception) of an existent other. The existent child is not libidinized. He is responded to by his mother as an as-if child—that is, responded to only when he validates his mother’s projection." This tethering of the sense of self to authoritative people is a developmental trap that predicts a de-centering of the personality in the child preventing further independence. Brodey quoted Deutsch: "When a distanced self-reflection is [emotionally invested in] as an existent other, this is delusion." Like a puppet the child is stuck in a limited world partially separated from reality. "The image in the pool, having no separate existence, is wholly governed by expectation and can never be spontaneous. It can give nothing...This makes the work with ego-disordered children technically more difficult. The child patterned to the mother's expectations will not easily relate to a therapist who rejects these...The pseudo ego is that organization which validates the parental projection. It is [emotionally invested in] energy that aims to prevent abandonment and the threat of its own dissolution...The child's reality and his mode of organizing reality are altered. An identity grows that is unsupported from within."
As the child grows older and looks to find gratification in the adult world, the desperation to find objects to be pseudo-parents and objects to challenge for domination leads to bewildered victims. Anthony Hopkins in an interview described the feeling of talking with someone who could manipulate your attention span. "I met a madman who was on the loose in London, and that's pretty scary. I had coffee with him one day. I realized how nuts he was. He never blinked. He kept asking me questions and before you could answer he would ask me another one and another one. In the end it made you feel so that you were in a different reality."
Anthony Hopkins Reveals Why He Didn't Blink While Playing Hannibal | The Dick Cavett Show: https://youtu.be/rkh-bOujn40?si=D3KA9GF5fHPHVb2C
Going further than psychology patients, many psychoanalytic books talk about projection being common in the world of politics, but the reality is that so many people who use these tactics are not entirely unconscious of their effect. They find political rewards in the real world and those rewards guide them to be more strategic with their messaging. This is especially true for those who want to destabilize societies. They have a conscious agenda that is unpopular and it will only work if it is unconscious in their targets.
Patterson, N., Richter, D., Gnerre, S. et al. Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441, 1103–1108 (2006).
Moorjani P, Amorim CE, Arndt PF, Przeworski M. Variation in the molecular clock of primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):10607-12.
Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Baquedano, E., Organista, E. et al. Early Pleistocene faunivorous hominins were not kleptoparasitic, and this impacted the evolution of human anatomy and socio-ecology. Sci Rep 11, 16135 (2021).
Lahr, M. M., Rivera, F., Power, R. K., Mounier, A., Copsey, B., Crivellaro, F., … Foley, R. A. (2016). Inter-group violence among early Holocene hunter-gatherers of West Turkana, Kenya. Nature, 529(7586), 394–398.
Violence and the Sacred by René Girard: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780801822186/
Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable by Peter S. Ungar: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780195183474/
General History of Africa - Vol. 1 by Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Unesco Staff, Mokhtar: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780520039124/
Projection and Personality Development via the Eight-function Model by Carol Shumate: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780367341381/
Transference And Projection by Jan Grant, Jim Crawley: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780335203147/
Projection and re-collection in Jungian psychology by Marie Louise von Franz: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780875484174/
Newman, Leonard & Duff, Kimberly & Baumeister, Roy. (1997). A new look at defensive projection: Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased person perception. Journal of personality and social psychology. 72. 980-1001.
Identity and Identification by Ken Arnold, James Peto, Mick Gordon, Chris Wilkinson, Hugh Aldersey-Williams, The Wellcome Trust: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9781906155865/
Brodey WM. On the dynamics of narcissism. I. Externalization and early ego development. Psychoanal Study Child. 1965;20:165-93.
Marcus, Kenneth L., Accusation in a Mirror (2012). Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 357 - 393, 2012
Atrocity Speech Law by Gregory S. Gordon, Benjamin Ferencz: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780190612689/
A World Transformed by George Bush, Brent Scowcroft: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780679752592/
No Trade Is Free - Robert Lighthizer: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780063282131/
The People's Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited by Louisa Lim: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9780199347704/
Prisoner of the State - Zhao Ziyang: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9781439149393/
Dark Aeon : Transhumanism and the War Against Humanity by Joe Allen: https://www.isbns.net/isbn/9781648210105/
HOU Lulu, LIU Yungang, Life Circle Construction in China under the Idea of Collaborative Governance: A Comparative Study of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, Geographical review of Japan series B, 2017, Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 2-16
Psychology: http://psychreviews.org/category/psychology01/
Fear of Success Pt. 1: https://psychreviews.org/fear-of-success/
Fear of Success Pt. 2: https://psychreviews.org/object-relations-fear-of-success-pt-2/
Fear of Success Pt. 3: https://psychreviews.org/object-relations-fear-of-success-pt-3/
Fear of Success Pt. 4: https://psychreviews.org/object-relations-fear-of-success-pt-4/
Fear of Success Pt. 5: https://psychreviews.org/object-relations-fear-of-success-pt-5/
Fear of Success Pt. 6: https://psychreviews.org/object-relations-fear-of-success-pt-6/
0 notes