Tumgik
#mattia bellucci
stateofsport211 · 11 months
Text
Wimbledon MS Q3: Know Your Men's Singles Qualifiers + Lucky Loser Situation (2/2)
Tumblr media
The qualifying competition as they happened, side-by-side (📸 AFP via The Japan Times)
Compared to the first batch, most matches covered in the second batch were concluded in four or five sets (as they happened). While some of these could be tense, some also featured the (possible) plot twists that only occurred in the best-of-five sets: either the match that could have finished long ago but the opposition dug deep (thus adding extra pressure) or another kind of turnaround that resulted in a rollercoaster of a kind.
Those stories enriched the Wimbledon qualifying rounds, making it distinct from the other Grand Slams since this is the only Grand Slam played on grass. It could be a good preparation for them coming to the main draw, so be sure to have these qualifiers (and possibly, lucky losers) on the lookout too!
The first part of the article can be found here, and the Twitter thread can also be found here.
Section 5: Radu Albot d. Felipe Meligeni R. Alves 4-6, 6-3, 6-2, 7-6(6)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Radu Albot’s point at 3-0* 0-30 to 15-30, 2nd set (left) and match point conversion to 7-6(6), 4th set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
Having qualified for the Championships last year as well, Albot came with at least a tie-breaker set in his previous two rounds, one of which he had to dig deep against Johannus Monday 3-6, 7-6(2), 6-2. On the other hand, Felipe stunned two veterans by defeating Pablo Cuevas and Vasek Pospisil to prevent a vintage battle to claim the qualifying spot.
Although Felipe’s defense-to-offense approach worked to some extent, just like in the fast hard ones, Albot’s creative prowess enabled him to outhit Felipe. While his working drop shots were spotted making the difference, minimizing the gap before Felipe held 1-3 in the second set, Felipe’s balance already went off before his level raise in the fourth set was insufficient to hand Albot the win, all on Felipe’s double fault as an initial differential, that even if the latter saved a match point out of his own volley (to reply to Albot’s lob), it was insufficient to the match tie-break thanks to Albot’s forehand, which Felipe shanked after the ball reached the let cord (and turned out to be in).
Section 8: Dennis Novak d. Yosuke Watanuki 6-7(9), 6-3, 6-3, 6-4
Tumblr media
Dennis Novak’s point to *3-4 40-40 to 40-ad, 3rd set (📸 Wimbledon qualifying feed)
Y. Watanuki’s return depth, which also bothered Hubert Hurkacz when the former was a qualifier in Stuttgart (250), could pose an interesting test in the final qualifying round as he faced a more experienced Dennis Novak, who avenged Charles Broom 6-3, 6-4 after his three heartbreaker tie-breaker sets loss in the second qualifying round of the Ilkley Challenger.
The moment shifted in the last three sets once Dennis gained control in the middle of the second set. Stemmed from the Austrian’s power and variety (inclusive of his often proper slice usage and a forehand winner, displayed during a break point creation in the third set), Y. Watanuki’s service games ended up being pressed, often getting his shots rushed when trying to finish a point, hence the rest of the three sets.
Section 10: Dominic Stricker d. Mattia Bellucci 6-3, 1-6, 6-3, 6-4
Tumblr media
Dominic Stricker’s point to 3-3* 0-15 to 0-30, 4th set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
M. Bellucci could regain his form in the grass season after reaching the second round of the Ilkley Challenger (l. Jason Kubler) after the rollercoaster clay season post-Australian Open qualifying rounds (l. Francesco Passaro in Q2). Somehow, after defeating Raphael Collignon and Ivan Gakhov in straight sets, he had to face a rising Dominic Stricker, who sought a main draw qualification to close his competitive grass season, notably keeping it close against Andy Murray in the Nottingham Challenger.
Stricker finally qualified for the main draw after sealing the fourth set with an ace. Before that, while handling M. Bellucci’s groundstrokes that worked better in faster courts (notably hard courts and grass), Stricker added more pace and spin to his shots, resulting in the sampled forehand winner to put himself 2 points ahead in the sixth game of the fourth set. In the end, after M. Bellucci got pressed, he rushed his final shots, which did not help anything except Stricker gaining his moment.
Section 2: Oscar Otte d. Marc Polmans 6-3, 7-6(4), 4-6, 7-5
Tumblr media
Oscar Otte’s point at 3-3* 30-0 to 30-15, 2nd set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
Otte came with a questionable form since the beginning of the year (even was the 32nd seed last year) but appeared trying to make his comeback count in the grass season. This was visible in his journey to survive this popcorn chaos section, where he defeated Benoit Paire and Leandro Riedi, of all people, to secure his third-round encounter against Marc Polmans, who was eliminated by Cristian Garin in the second round of Wimbledon 2021.
Somehow, his grass-court prowess appeared just in time during the qualifying rounds. Despite being a closer encounter than his first two rounds, Otte’s redirecting ability and shot selection (including some balance of power in between) were still strong, he caught unleashing a drop shot and perfectly landed it before Polmans replied. The margin was thin, where the latter became an important differential in another example, where Otte lobbed his way through the 3-1 lead in the second set tie-breaker, eventually pressing Polmans’ service games at some other moments.
Section 4: Kimmer Coppejans d. Taro Daniel 6-3, 4-6, 4-6, 6-4, 6-2
Tumblr media
Kimmer Coppejans’ point at *4-4 15-15 to 15-30, 4th set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
The fourth section partially fell apart when Coppejans defeated last year’s Ilkley Challenger champion, Zizou Bergs, in the second qualifying round after digging deep to defeat Timofey Skatov (in the first qualifying round) to conclude that match in a tie-breaker to break his 8-match losing streak on grass. On the other hand, although T. Daniel’s career grass records were an entirely different entity, he kept it competitive against Tommy Paul in the Queen’s Club’s first round; and it is possible to visualize the application of his game on the grass courts, with some pacing adjustments while trying to stay aggressive.
Had this been a best-of-three match, T. Daniel would have advanced. However, maintaining the rhythm looked like a tough challenge for T. Daniel, where his rushes only shifted his moment in Coppejans’ favor. Even if T. Daniel broke for the other two sets, Coppejans re-found his balance thanks to his systematic point construction, where not only his forehand caused more damage, but he also smashed his way to open the path before he broke T. Daniel’s service game in the fourth set. The latter then ended up having his balance further off, resulting in the fifth set beatdown with Coppejans dominating its flow.
Section 3: Maximilian Marterer d. Fabian Marozsan 7-5, 6-4, 6-7(5), 5-7, 7-5
Tumblr media
Maximilian Marterer’s match point conversion to 7-5, 5th set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
Upon winning the Perugia Challenger (which was held on clay), Marozsan entered the Top 100 for the first time in his career, currently sitting at number 95 in the official rankings. Playing his first professional grass-court Slam qualifying, Marozsan adapted his game in his own way by defeating Oleksii Krutykh and Elias Ymer before facing Maximilian Marterer, who qualified for the main draw last year after defeating Nicolas Moreno de Alboran.
This match became the match of the day as both players fought thick and thin in another five-set thriller. While Marterer often came up with passes caught off-guard in his strokes, Marozsan’s grass-court adaptation worked by using more slices and trying to use more drop shots despite its 50-50 success rate. However, as deep as Marozsan tried to dig, Marterer stood out by the end of the decider because of Marozsan’s rushed forehands, resulting in Marterer’s qualification to the main draw.
Section 9: M. Tomas Barrios Vera d. Thiago Seyboth Wild 6-4, 6-7(3), 2-6, 6-3, 6-2
Tumblr media
M. Tomas Barrios Vera broke to 5-2, 5th set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
Barrios Vera came to the qualification right after being the runner-up of the Poznan Challenger on clay (l. Mariano Navone 7-5, 6-3). However, having qualified in 2021 before his first-round elimination to Kevin Anderson, he might have a slight edge in facing an aggressive Seyboth Wild, who advanced after defeating Jelle Sels and Pierre-Hugues Herbert in the first two rounds.
After Barrios Vera took the first set 6-4, he tried to find his balance because Seyboth Wild tried to paint his own lines, with a forehand down-the-line winner sealing him the second set through a tie-breaker. However, a fall in the middle of the fourth set forced Seyboth Wild to take a medical timeout in the middle of a game, and Barrios Vera started to regain his pace and passed him in one way or another. The forehand winner to double the break in the fifth set was the pinnacle before he served it out to dominate the last two sets, finally securing his main draw ticket.
Section 13: Laurent Lokoli d. Michael Mmoh 2-6, 7-6(2), 6-3, 2-6, 6-2
Tumblr media
Laurent Lokoli’s point to break 3-1, 3rd set (📸 Wimbledon qualification feed)
In an already chaotic section, Lokoli and Mmoh faced off to secure a spot in the main draw. While Mmoh had to dig deep in defeating Adrian Andreev and Dragos Nicolae Madaras in the first two qualifying rounds, Lokoli qualified for both the Nottingham and Ilkley Challengers in his maiden grass season, coming to the third qualifying round without dropping a set here.
Despite this match coming to a decider, Lokoli’s creativity carried several crucial parts in his favor. Not only his drop shot could run Mmoh over at the net (on his volley side) in this third set sample, but he also could utilize the open space to adjust his pacing, neutering Mmoh’s baseline game in one way or another. Things like these were behind Lokoli’s stand-out performance in the fifth set, resulting in a relieving ending as he qualified for his second Grand Slam appearance this year after the Australian Open.
Lucky Loser Situation
Tumblr media
Lucky loser situation per the last two matches playing (📸 Entry List Updates via Twitter)
After Jan-Lennard Struff and Gael Monfils withdrew due to an injury, four highest-ranked people (lost in the third qualifying round) will be drawn for two spots in the main draw, which are Marozsan, T. Daniel, Y. Watanuki, and Mmoh (all of which, somehow, came from this batch). Two of them will appear in tomorrow’s main draw, while the other two would stand by (just in case).
By the time the last match ended, it means A. Kovacevic and Piros will stay on the borderline, leaving the first four names to be drawn (for that moment). The lucky losers will be covered in a separate article before or after the draw and could be updated should they increase. For the first time in the tournament's history, the main draw ceremony will be streamed live on their official website at 10am local time, where the qualifiers and lucky losers will also be placed.
3 notes · View notes
daikenkki · 1 month
Text
youtube
0 notes
alfredol70 · 9 months
Video
youtube
Mattia Bellucci vs Tomas Machac | F Cassis • Highlights
0 notes
blognews24 · 4 months
Text
Sanremo 2024: tutto quello che c'è da sapere sul festival più atteso dell'anno
Tumblr media
Il festival di Sanremo 2024 si avvicina e la curiosità è alle stelle. Chi saranno i cantanti in gara, gli ospiti, i conduttori? Quali saranno le sorprese, le polemiche, le emozioni? In questo articolo vi raccontiamo tutto quello che c'è da sapere sul festival più amato dagli italiani, che si terrà al Teatro Ariston di Sanremo dal 6 al 10 febbraio 2024.
I cantanti e le canzoni
Quest'anno il festival vedrà la partecipazione di 30 artisti, divisi in una sola sezione. 27 di loro sono cantanti di chiara fama, mentre gli altri 3 sono i vincitori del concorso Sanremo Giovani 2023, che presenteranno un brano inedito, diverso da quello con il quale hanno trionfato nella manifestazione dedicata ai giovani talenti. Tra i nomi più noti, troviamo Alessandra Amoroso, Emma, Fiorella Mannoia, Il Volo, Loredana Bertè, Mahmood, Negramaro, Ricchi e Poveri e The Kolors. Tra le new entry, spiccano Alfa, Angelina Mango, BigMama, bnkr44, Clara, Fred De Palma, Gazzelle, Geolier, Ghali, Il Tre, La Sad, Maninni, Mr. Rain, Rose Villain, Sangiovanni e SANTI FRANCESI. Le canzoni in gara sono state svelate il 19 dicembre 2023, durante la finale di Sanremo Giovani 2023, e sono disponibili in anteprima su RaiPlay. ³ Tra i titoli, alcuni richiamano l'attualità, come "Basta" di Annalisa, "Crisi" di Diodato, "Futuro" di Il Tre e "Sogni" di Negramaro. Altri sono dedicati all'amore, come "Amami" di Alessandra Amoroso, "Come sei" di Emma, "Ho bisogno di te" di Fiorella Mannoia, "L'amore vince" di Il Volo, "Non mi basta più" di Mahmood, "Sarà bellissimo" di Ricchi e Poveri e "Solo noi" di The Kolors. Altri ancora sono più personali, come "Alfa" di Alfa, "Angelina" di Angelina Mango, "BigMama" di BigMama, "Clara" di Clara, "Fred" di Fred De Palma, "Gazzelle" di Gazzelle, "Geolier" di Geolier, "Ghali" di Ghali, "La Sad" di La Sad, "Maninni" di Maninni, "Mr. Rain" di Mr. Rain, "Rose" di Rose Villain, "Sangiovanni" di Sangiovanni e "SANTI FRANCESI" di SANTI FRANCESI.
Gli ospiti e i conduttori
Il festival sarà condotto, per il quinto anno consecutivo, da Amadeus, che sarà anche il direttore artistico. Nel corso delle serate, sarà affiancato da vari co-conduttori e co-conduttrici, tra cui Marco Mengoni nella prima serata, Giorgia nella seconda serata, Teresa Mannino nella terza serata, Lorella Cuccarini nella quarta serata e Fiorello nella serata finale. Tra gli ospiti musicali, sono stati confermati Vasco Rossi, Laura Pausini, Eros Ramazzotti, Elisa, Jovanotti, Ligabue, Tiziano Ferro, Zucchero, Biagio Antonacci, Gianna Nannini, Ermal Meta, Tommaso Paradiso, Achille Lauro, Elodie, Fedez, Francesca Michielin, Måneskin e Mahmood. Tra gli ospiti non musicali, sono attesi Roberto Benigni, Monica Bellucci, Alessandro Gassmann, Paola Cortellesi, Checco Zalone, Carlo Verdone, Claudia Gerini, Alessandro Siani, Massimo Ranieri, Lino Banfi, Christian De Sica, Massimo Boldi, Claudio Bisio, Fabio De Luigi, Giorgio Panariello, Leonardo Pieraccioni, Carlo Conti, Maria De Filippi, Pierfrancesco Favino, Alessandro Cattelan, Mara Venier, Antonella Clerici, Carlo Cracco, Bruno Barbieri, Antonino Cannavacciuolo, Joe Bastianich, Alessandro Borghese, Giorgio Chiellini, Leonardo Bonucci, Federica Pellegrini, Bebe Vio, Alex Zanardi, Valentino Rossi, Francesco Totti, Alessandro Del Piero, Fabio Fognini, Flavia Pennetta, Matteo Berrettini, Jasmine Paolini, Sara Errani, Roberta Vinci, Francesca Schiavone, Domenico Berardi, Lorenzo Insigne, Ciro Immobile, Andrea Belotti, Gianluigi Donnarumma, Marco Verratti, Nicolò Barella, Manuel Locatelli, Giacomo Bonaventura, Federico Chiesa, Federico Bernardeschi, Leonardo Spinazzola, Alessandro Florenzi, Giorgio Chiellini, Leonardo Bonucci, Francesco Acerbi, Alessandro Bastoni, Gianluca Mancini, Emerson Palmieri, Alessandro Florenzi, Davide Calabria, Danilo D'Ambrosio, Mattia De Sciglio, Salvatore Sirigu, Alex Meret, Pierluigi Gollini, Roberto Mancini, Giampiero Ventura, Gian Piero Gasperini, Simone Inzaghi, Antonio Conte, Maurizio Sarri, Massimiliano Allegri, Carlo Ancelotti, Claudio Ranieri, Luciano Spalletti, Eusebio Di Francesco, Walter Mazzarri, Sinisa Mihajlovic, Gennaro Gattuso, Stefano Pioli, Paulo Fonseca, Roberto De Zerbi, Ivan Juric, Gianluca Vialli, Roberto Baggio, Paolo Maldini, Franco Baresi, Alessandro Costacurta, Paolo Rossi, Marco Tardelli, Bruno Conti, Dino Zoff, Sandro Mazzola, Gianni Rivera, Luigi Riva, Fabio Capello, Arrigo Sacchi, Marcello Lippi, Giovanni Trapattoni, Enzo Bearzot, Nino Manfredi, Alberto Sordi, Ugo Tognazzi, Vittorio Gassman, Marcello Mastroianni, Sophia Loren, Gina Lollobrigida, Claudia Cardinale, Monica Vitti, Anna Magnani, Silvana Mangano, Stefania Sandrelli, Virna Lisi, Ornella Muti, Laura Antonelli, Serena Grandi, Sabrina Salerno, Valeria Marini, Moana Pozzi, Ilona Staller, Rocco Siffredi, Roberto Malone, Eva Henger, Selen, Malena, Valentina Nappi, Martina Gold, Milly D'Abbraccio, Jessica Rizzo, Federica Tommasi, Sara Tommasi, Elena Grimaldi, Michelle Ferrari, Luna Lombardi, Asia D'Argento, Roberta Gemma, Sofia Gucci, Priscilla Salerno, Vittoria Risi, Angela Gritti, Pamela Prati, Nadia Rinaldi, Eva Grimaldi, Barbara D'Urso, Simona Ventura, Mara Venier, Antonella Clerici, Paola Perego, Lorella Cuccarini, Heather Parisi, Lorena Bianchetti, Caterina Balivo, Cristina Parodi, Barbara Palombelli, Federica Panicucci, Alessia Marcuzzi, Ilary Blasi, Elisabetta Canalis, Belen Rodriguez, Michelle Hunziker, Alessia Merz, Manuela Arcuri, Anna Falchi, Sabrina Ferilli, Claudia Gerini, Nancy Brilli, Margherita Buy, Isabella Ferrari, Valeria Golino, Ilenia Pastorelli, Valeria Solarino, Jasmine Trinca, Alba Rohrwacher, Valeria Bruni Tedeschi, Micaela Ramazzotti, Kasia Smutniak, Cristiana Capotondi, Carolina Crescentini, Claudia Pandolfi, Violante Placido, Anna Foglietta, Matilde Gioli, Miriam Leone, Greta Scarano, Matilda Read the full article
0 notes
moonshinefms · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
a  collection  of  inspo  and  musings  for  a  private  discord  rp   ♡   ( please do not interact with this blog )
Tumblr media
𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍
aysun  tokaslan  ;  vampire .  38 .  fahriye evcen  .
aslı  tokaslan  ;  alpha  werewolf hybrid .  35 .  demet  ozdemir  .
aydın  tokaslan  ;  werewolf hybrid .  33 .  alperen  duymaz  .
anna  hyde  ;  witch .  29 .  jodie  comer  .
akiko  sato  ;  hunter  /  vampire .  30 / 31 .  lyrica  okano  .
ha-yun  ‘summer’  jeong  ;  werewolf hybrid.  38 .  jamie  chung  .
isabella  ‘isa’  rivera  ;  witch .  48 .  daniella  allonso  .
meave  hyde  ;  witch .  55 .  nicole  kidman  .
nathan  o’connor  ;  vampire .  52  /  57 .  tommy  flanagan  .
adem  divit  ;  werewolf .  36 .  can  yaman  .
danilo  atienza  ;  vampire .  34  /  512 .  manny  jacinto  .
violet  león  ;  vampire .  35  /  415 .  zoe  kravitz  .
rosalie  lavigne  ;  vampire .  32  /  963 .  camille  razat .
sasha bradshaw  ;  hybrid .  24 .  savannah lee smith .
jia zhou  ;  familiar .  27 .  jessie mei li .
vitorrio kim  ;  witch .  30 . alex landi .
jada bennett  ;  witch .  30 . kat graham .
mara ; demon . - . lesley-ann brandt .
ares vasileiou ; vampire . 37 / 743 . theo james .
catalina carizzo ; werewolf . 30 . adria arjona
Tumblr media
𝐒𝐄𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐃 𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍
lana ceyda manning  ;  werewolf .  33 .  hazar ergüçlü .
beck jr. manning (j.r.)  ;  born hybrid .  25 .  çağatay ulusoy .
hazal defne manning  ;  untriggered werewolf .  23 .  sude zülal güler .
samson mcclane  ;  untriggered werewolf .  24 .  rish shah .
marcus tokasland-durand  ;  human .  26 .  jonathan daviss .
kane russo  ;  witch .  34 .  simone susinna .
roman winchester ; alpha wolf . 33 . casey deidrick .
dante león-dumas ; human . 30 . lucien laviscount .
addison 'addy' rollands ; human . 25 . samantha logan .
giuliano russo ; witch . 54 . bobby cannavale .
sofia russo ; witch . 58 . monica bellucci .
marco russo ; witch . 59 . alessio boni .
mattia deluca ; witch . 35 . giacomo gianniotti .
nick vargas ; witch . 37 . peter gadiot .
avery jenkins ; jumper . imortal . maggie q .
claire carter ; human . 40 . sofia bush .
jax chastain ; hunter . 40 . boyd holbrook .
Tumblr media
0 notes
kritere · 1 year
Text
Australian Open: dove vedere Sinner-Fucsovics in TV e in streaming
GUARDARE TV Venerdì 20 gennaio andrà in scena il match Sinner-Fucsovics, valido per il terzo turno dell’Australian Open 2023. Fin qui percorso netto per l’atleta altoatesino, unico tennista azzurro rimasto dopo le eliminazioni eccellenti al primo turno di Matteo Berrettini e Lorenzo Musetti, a cui si sono aggiunti i ko di Fabio Fognini, Lorenzo Sonego e del “debuttante” Mattia Bellucci. Dopo…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
indiasportshub · 1 year
Text
Ramanathan enters main draw with impressive win at 5th Tata Open Maharashtra
Ramanathan enters main draw with impressive win at 5th Tata Open Maharashtra
15-year-old Dhamne to begin India’s challenge as main draw begins on Monday_ Ramkumar Ramanathan posted a brilliant victory against Mattia Bellucci to enter the singles main draw in fifth Tata Open Maharashtra at the Balewadi Stadium in Pune on Sunday. The 28-year-old Indian, who came as a wildcard, put up a spectacular show in the final round of the qualifiers to secure a comfortable 6-3, 7-5…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
5millionfriends · 4 years
Photo
Tumblr media
The Passion of the Christ (2004) – Crucifixion Scene Depicts the final twelve hours in the life of Jesus of Nazareth, on the day of his crucifixion in Jerusalem.
0 notes
the-ic-corner · 5 years
Text
On today's episode of Teams as terrible autocorrects by my tablet, it's time for Juventus. Here we go!
Mario majestic (Mario got an upgrade from landslide to majestic!!)
Paulo Duvall
Leonardo Bellucci
Jiao cancels
Nielsen picnic (Miralem...)
Douglas costs
Giorgio chilling
Just visceral (Cuadrado)
Here can
Sandwich sacrament (Woj!!)
Rodrigo Betancourt
Same species (?? Sami)
Alex Sandra
Federico Bernardino
Katy is person (Mattia...)
Because married (Matuidi)
Mouse mean
Mary is Dr Scorpio (Desci)
Danielle Durant
Andrea Marshall
Cristiano Donaldson
29 notes · View notes
maceikblog · 2 years
Text
Co się dzisiaj działo? #89 30.3.2022
krykiet, mecz Twenty20: Nepal (117/4, Asaf Sheikh 57, Karan KC 2/16) pokonał Malezję (114/8, Zubaidi Zulkifle 32, Pavandeep Singh 2/23) 6 wicketami
ICC Puchar Świata Kobiet: Australia (305/3, Allysa Healy 129, Jess Jonassen 2/14) pokonała Indie Zachodnie (148, Stafanie Taylor 48 ,Chinelle Henry 2/51) 157 runami
IPL: Royal Challengers Bangalore (132/7, Sherfane Rutherford 28, Wanindu Hasaranga de Silva 4/20) pokonali Kolkata Knight Riders (128, Andre Russell 25, Tim Southee 3/20) 3 wicketami
Turniej ATP w Miami:
Hubert Hurkacz-Lloyd Harris 7:6(3) 6:2
Hubert Hurkacz/John Isner-Rajeev Ram/Joe Salisbury 7:6(7) 6:3
NHL: Penguins-Rangers 2:3
FIFA World Cup, kwalifikacje
CONMEBOL
Boliwia-Brazylia 0:4
Chile-Urugwaj 0:2
Ekwador-Argentyna 1:1
Peru-Paragwaj 2:0
Wenezuela-Kolumbia 0:1
OFC
Wyspy Salomona-Nowa Zelandia 0:5
Challenger w Lugano:
Kacper Żuk-Cedrik Marcel Stebe 3:6 3:6
Karol Drzewiecki/Szymon Walków-Mattia Bellucci/Remy Bertola 6:4 4:6 10-5
Turniej ITF w Pretorii:
Urszula Radwańska-Izabella Kruger 2:6 6:1 5:7
Maja Chwalińska-Anna Gabric 3:6 6:2 6:1
Challenger w Marbelli: Katarzyna Piter/Kimberley Zimmermann-Irina Maria Bara/Ekaterine Gorgodze 3:6 2:6
Challenger w Oreiras:
Daniel Michalski-Noah Rubin 6:4 3:6
Daniel Michalski/Dragos Nicolae Madaras-Vit Kopriva/Adam Pavlasek 3:6 3:1
Orleans Masters: Jordan Hart-Jennie Gai 21:7 21:12
Mistrzostwa Europy U17 dziewcząt, kwalifikacje: Polska-Francja 1:6
Dwars door Vlaanderen:
60. Filip Maciejuk
Maciej Bodnar, Stanisław Aniołkowski nie ukończyli wyścigu
Turniej ITF w Monastyrze: Michał Dembek/Oscar Weightman-Boris Butulija/rosjanin 6:4 3:6 10-8
Turniej WTA w Miami: Magda Linette/Sara Sorribes Tormo-Laura Siegemund/rosjanka 6:3 1:6 7-10
Suzuki 1 Liga:
MKKS Koszalin-Kociewskie Diabły 71:49
Wierzyca Pelplin-Dziki Warszawa 52:72
CEV Liga Mistrzów: Jastrzębski Węgiel-ZAKSA Kędzierzyn Koźle 0:3
0 notes
stateofsport211 · 2 days
Text
RG MS Q3: Meet Your Qualifiers (Day 1)
Tumblr media
Illustration of Roland Garros qualifying rounds (📸 Archysport)
For a more compact version in the form of a Twitter thread, click here.
As per tradition in the French Open, differing from other Grand Slams, the third qualifying round matches are divided into two days, with one of the reasons likely being weather, as it turned out to rain upon the conclusion of the matches. Interestingly, due to the previous rain delays that happened yesterday, the 8 sections that finished first (3, 9-15) played today to find out the first 8 qualifiers to the Men's Singles sector in Roland Garros.
Recognizing that these qualifiers could often shock you (and your favorite players) in a way you will never imagine, meet your qualifiers (first part, also with the oversimplified match report):
Section 13: Shintaro Mochizuki def. Facundo Bagnis [13] 6-4, 2-0 ret.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Shintaro Mochizuki's points to *0-0 30-30, 1st set (top left), to *4-4 0-30, 1st set (top right), and to set up his set point at *5-4 40-30, 1st set (bottom) (📸 Eurosport GB)
F. Bagnis came to the Roland Garros qualifying rounds thanks to shining through the Golden Swing, becoming the runner-up of Cordoba (250) to Luciano Darderi 1-6, 4-6, preceded by winning the Buenos Aires 2 (Argentino) Challenger against Mariano Navone in a comeback fashion 7-5, 1-6, 7-5 right before L. Darderi and M. Navone broke out. Trying to follow their journey in terms of resurgence, F. Bagnis continued with a runner-up showing in Santiago Challenger (l. Juan Pablo Varillas) and the quarterfinals in Aix-en-Provence Challenger albeit being unable to catch a break as he was forced to retire down 0-6 to eventual champion Alejandro Tabilo, coming to the Roland Garros third qualifying round without dropping a set as he defeated M. Tomas Barrios Vera and Juan Manuel Cerundolo both in straight sets (6-3, 6-2 and 6-4, 6-2, respectively). On the other hand, other than the competitive showing in the second round of Cagliari Challenger (l. Mariano Navone), S. Mochizuki might have shocked the most on paper as he stunned clay frequents Nick Hardt 4-6, 6-4, 6-2 and 18th seed Stefano Napolitano 6-3, 6-2 in a confident showing during the first two qualifying rounds, showing that his competitiveness paid off thanks to trusting his strokes and pacing. This match might not be any different, judging by how offensive both players could be, but being passive would not help as well as their past matches showed.
S. Mochizuki started the first set with an early break (1-0) thanks to his preceding forehand to 0-0* 30-30 in the first set, already outhitting F. Bagnis' forehand before consolidating his lead to 2-0. Despite being broken back to 2-2, he bounced back by breaking again to 5-4 thanks to his preceding backhand. He became more aggressive as he went after F. Bagnis' forehand to generate his break point, eventually breaking to 5-4. The same aggression that likely helped him to win the Barletta Challenger last year bore fruit as he took the first set 6-4, setting up his set point with a working volley beforehand. However, S. Mochizuki picked up decent form by breaking early to 1-0 thanks to his preceding backhand 2 points into the first game while F. Bagnis erred his forehands, followed by consolidation to 2-0, and the Argentinean 13th seed took a medical timeout for his left leg. Taking a precaution, he retired right before he served at the beginning of the third game, sending S. Mochizuki to the main draw, his third since he qualified for the Wimbledon Championships 2023 and became a lucky loser in the Australian Open 2024.
Section 15: Hamad Medjedovic [15] def. Geoffrey Blancaneaux 6-2, 6-2
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Hamad Medjedovic's points to 1-1* 15-40, 1st set (top left), to break 2-1, 1st set (top right), to 1-1* 0-40, 2nd set (top right), and to 4-2* 0-15 (bottom right) (📸 Eurosport GB)
After being back from illness, H. Medjedovic re-started his season with a bang, most notably taking a set off Daniil Medvedev despite the loss at 6-7(5), 6-2, 5-7 as a qualifier after defeating Alejandro Davidovich Fokina, all in the first two rounds of Rome Masters 1000. Here, he stunned Lucas Pouille 6-3, 7-5 in a high-quality battle during the first qualifying round, compared to G. Blancaneaux, who also qualified last year, had a poor clay season with the early exits even after winning the New Delhi Challenger on the hard courts, but he managed to score a Top 150 win in Duje Ajdukovic, 7-5, 6-4, in the second qualifying round. This match would test their offensives, where one who appeared more aggressive could prevail.
Even though H. Medjedovic had to survive a nervy start as he faced a break point earlier in the first game due to his forehand error, but he still managed to hold his serves to 1-0 in the first set. G. Blancaneaux might have started the third game with a forehand error, but the 2023 NextGen Finals champion scored his earliest break point of the game through a drop shot before converting it via a forehand winner (3-1). The former turned out to double the break thanks to his fourth-shot forehand winner, taking the first set 6-2 through an unreturned serve as he survived the tendency to rush his third-shot forehands midway. He continued the dominance in the second set as he fired a backhand down-the-line winner to create his break point in the third game before eventually breaking to 2-1. Almost replicating the previous set, his cross-court backhand winner preceded another forehand winner for the first two points of the seventh game, dominating his way to break again 5-2 before finally getting the straight-set victory (6-2), concluding the match in a confident showing compared to his qualification last year.
Section 14: Valentin Vacherot [14] def. Billy Harris 7-6(2), 7-5
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Valentin Vacherot's point to *2-2 30-30 (1st set) (top left), to 6-6(2-1, 1st set tie-breaker) (top right), to break 4-3 in the 2nd set (bottom left), and to hold 4-4 in the 2nd set (bottom right) (📸 Eurosport GB)
Vacherot could not stop rolling since winning the Nonthaburi 1-2 and Pune Challengers, kept rising until he also became a semifinalist in the Aix-en-Provence Challenger as eventual champion Alejandro Tabilo defeated him in 3 sets. In the Roland Garros qualifying rounds itself, Vacherot defeated Gabriel Debru and Enzo Couacaud in identical scorelines (4-6, 6-3, 7-5), including a comeback win from 4-6, 0-2 in the latter match before facing Billy Harris, who adapted well on clay as he notably tussled with Bernabe Zapata Miralles in the quarterfinals of the Barcelona Challenger despite the 5-7, 6-7(2) loss as well as taking a set off Hugo Dellien of all people in the Rome (Italy) Challenger quarterfinals before stunning 17th seed Emilio Nava 6-3, 4-6, 6-1, followed by fighting his way to defeat wild card Manuel Guinard 6-3, 3-6, 7-6(4) in the second qualifying round. This could be a tough ordeal for B. Harris, considering Vacherot’s form and offensives, but nothing is impossible until the match is called.
This match once again turned out to be another classic Vacherot rollercoaster (in Roland Garros qualifying terms). Starting the match by almost breaking early due to B. Harris’ +1 forehand error before the Brit held to 2-2 in the first set, Vacherot overcame another deficit through a notable backhand down-the-line winner in the fifth game only to get broken in the seventh game due to his forehand errors (4-3). As B. Harris should have served for the first set in the tenth game, the Monegasque 14th seed broke back to 5-5 thanks to his constant redirections as he got even more comfortable with his angles, asking further shot placement questions to B. Harris. Sealing the first set after nailing the tie-breaker 7-6(2), not looking back as he led 2-1 in the breaker thanks to his backhand winner, Vacherot somehow got broken early again to 2-0 for the same reason with the first set (forehand). However, Vacherot bounced back, regaining his accurate forehands in time with a winner to break it (4-3). Volleying his way to strengthen his position (4-4), Vacherot earned the crucial break in the eleventh game (6-5) as his forehand down-the-line winner paved the way, successfully serving it out (7-5) to keep on rolling in this season.
Section 11: Giulio Zeppieri [31] def. Otto Virtanen 6-2, 6-2
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Giulio Zeppieri's point to 3-1* 40-ad (latest break point, 1st set) (top left), to *0-0 0-30 in the 2nd set (top right), and to 3-1* 40-ad in the 2nd set (bottom) (📸 Eurosport GB)
Despite having a subpar clay season and an underwhelming first part of the Asian Challenger swing on the hard courts beforehand, most of which was a result of his unserious mode coming out, except in some occasions where he was competitive enough despite the loss (e.g. in the second round of the Mauthausen Challenger against Max Hans Rehberg and the first qualifying round of the Turin Challenger against Marc-Andrea Huesler), O. Virtanen became even more serious during the Roland Garros qualification rounds, having a solid showing against Dane Sweeny 6-2, 6-3 and stunning the 11th seed Dominic Thiem 6-3, 7-5 in the Austrian's last-ever Roland Garros match. He faced a decent test in 31st seed Giulio Zeppieri, who, despite also his competitive early eliminations in most Challenger events he partook (most notably got defeated by Fabio Fognini 6-2, 6-3 in the first round of the Turin Challenger as a qualifier), he managed to regain his clay-court form in time as he defeated his fellow Italian Stefano Travaglia 6-3, 6-2 and survived trouble as he defeated Adrian Andreev 4-6, 7-5, 6-3 in another close encounter. Knowing both players, this should be one of those days where the more aggressive one would prevail in this match, but only those who could stay consistent in their range.
O. Virtanen started the match unseriously as his forehand errors resulted in G. Zeppieri breaking early to 1-0. Somehow, even with the Finn’s best efforts to save the break points, G. Zeppieri’s smash secured his latest break point before he doubled the break to 4-1, and he did not look back as he took the first set 6-2. Almost similarly, the Italian 31st seed started the second set with an early break due to O. Virtanen’s erratic showing, but the former had a forehand pass to O. Virtanen’s position at the net to generate his second break point before doubling the break in the same spot with the first set (fifth game). Consolidating his position with a service game hold (5-1), G. Zeppieri affirmed his dominance by also taking the second set 6-2, doing what he had to do to secure his spot in the main draw, just like when he became the first to qualify in the Australian Open this year.
Section 12: Gustavo Heide def. Matteo Gigante [28] 6-3, 6-2
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Gustavo Heide's points to 1-1* 40-40, 1st set (top left), to 5-2* 40-ad (set point-setting, 1st set, top right), to 5-2* 40-40, 2nd set (bottom left), and to 5-2* 40-ad, 2nd set (bottom right) (📸 Eurosport GB)
Trying to show the potential he has, M. Gigante came to this clay season prepared despite several rollercoasters, one of which was the Napoli Challenger quarterfinal against Luca Nardi, which he lost 6-4, 4-6, 1-6 while surviving the Marrakech qualification rounds as he defeated both Karim Bennani and Rudolf Molleker in 3 sets before having to retire down 3-6, 0-2 against Roberto Carballes Baena in the first round. This was also the case in this year's Roland Garros qualification rounds, as he had to survive two three-set matches against wild card Sacha Gueymard Wayenburg (6-4, 5-7, 6-4) and Dalibor Svrcina (4-6, 6-3, 7-5), coming back from a break down against the latter. In contrast, G. Heide came from his maiden Challenger title in Asuncion (d. Joao Fonseca 7-5, 6-7(6), 6-1) despite exiting in the second round in all his European clay campaigns (Mauthausen & Oeiras 4 Challengers), somehow navigating his way through the Roland Garros qualifying rounds after pulling a whole comeback against 12th seed Lukas Klein 1-6, 6-3, 7-6(5) and Bu Yunchaokete 7-5, 6-3 in a more convincing manner. This match could be a classic, decent test that showcased the best in them, with the more balanced player standing out in this match.
G. Heide commenced the match by breaking early to 2-1 as he outhit M. Gigante’s forehands while firing a working volley to secure the first deuce before the said break. He consolidated his lead to 3-1 and turned out to break for the first set (6-3) several games later after a backhand error fumbled M. Gigante’s break point, followed by his frequent forehand errors. Several games in, both players turned out to tussle for in total of 24 minutes including the first two games right after the Italian 29th seed forced the first deuce. By the conclusion of the third game, G. Heide had a massive hold to 2-1, which turned out to be crucial as he broke to 4-2 after a 0-hold due to M. Gigante’s frequent backhand errors and double faults (at least twice of the latter’s mistakes along the way). Without looking back, G. Heide strengthened his position with a service game hold to 5-2, constructing his break point through his preceding backhands after forcing a deuce through a backhand winner before taking the second set 6-2 due to M. Gigante’s forehand error, securing his maiden Grand Slam main draw appearance as he continued to rise this season.
Section 3: Mattia Bellucci def. Alejandro Moro Canas 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(7)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Mattia Bellucci's point to 5-3* 0-15, 1st set (top left), to *1-2 15-30, 2nd set (top right), and to *3-4 15-30, 3rd set (bottom) (📸 Eurosport GB)
A. Moro Canas came to the Roland Garros qualifying rounds completely in form, which started from his second-round loss against Taylor Fritz 6-3, 6-1 after stunning Dominic Thiem 6-4, 6-4 in the first round for his first-level ATP-level victory. Building up from there, he went on to win his maiden Challenger title in Rome (Italy), defeating his fellow first-time finalist Vilius Gaubas 7-5, 6-3 after denying the Lithuanian youngster the chance to serve for the first set, continuing this with a confident showing in the first two qualifying rounds as he defeated Marc Polmans 6-1, 6-2 and wild card Maxime Janvier 6-3, 6-4 to set a clash against Mattia Bellucci. In contrast, the Italian had an interesting approach, reaching the quarterfinals in the hard courts of the Shenzhen (Luohu) Challenger (l. James Duckworth) for his best showing in the first part of the Asian Challenger swing before returning to Europe, starting his clay season in the Turin Challenger qualifying rounds as he defeated Alexis Galarneau 6-7(3), 6-3, 6-2 after a scrappy start only to be defeated by an in-form Francesco Maestrelli 6-3, 6-2 in the first round. He followed this up by defeating Matteo Martineau 3-6, 6-1, 6-1 and stunning 20th seed Lloyd Harris 6-1, 7-6(9) after recovering from a 1-4 deficit in the tie-breaker and surviving a set point, setting this encounter that could come down to their pressure points’ handling despite their fiery groundstrokes at their best. Indeed, the match did not disappoint, it had everything.
As A. Moro Canas dominated the first set through his powerful aggression, taking the first set 6-3 while surviving the Italian’s backhand pass in hopes of prolonging the said set, M. Bellucci steadily struck back from the baseline, which pressed A. Moro Canas’ second serves enough for the Spaniard to commit a double fault to be broken (1-3). M. Bellucci then consolidated his lead to 4-1 and ended up going after A. Moro Canas’ forehands, which assisted him in breaking for the second set 6-2. The deciding set turned out to play a big role as both players upped their aggression against each other and struck the ball as cleanly as possible, as well as displaying their stellar point constructions in between. This included M. Bellucci’s notable drop shot for a one-point lead even if it was neutralized through a backhand pass, where the Italian held his service game to 4-3 even if he had to survive a break point back in the sixth game. With A. Moro Canas holding his service games to 6-6, a match tie-break occurred to determine the rest of the match, where the former was unable to capitalize on his 4-2 lead (which happened due to M. Bellucci’s double-fault right at the first point of the breaker), followed by a volley error. Subsequently, A. Moro Canas’ forehand error, which was fired too long, generated M. Bellucci’s mini-break to 6-5, and even though he had a match point saved earlier, an unreturned serve converted the match point as M. Bellucci took the third set 7-6(7), thus securing his spot in the main draw.
Section 10: Gregoire Barrere [10] def. Denis Kudla 3-6, 6-2, 6-3
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Gregoire Barrere's points to 0-1* 0-30, 1st set (top left), 1-0* 0-40, 2nd set (top right), to take the 2nd set 6-2 (bottom left), and to 1-0* 30-30, 3rd set (bottom right) (📸 Eurosport GB)
G. Barrere might have had a slow start to the season back on the hard courts, but the clay season turned out to be a perfect moment for him to bounce back from these setbacks. Most notably, he reached the semifinals of Bucharest (250) (l. Mariano Navone) and Aix-en-Provence Challenger (l. Arthur Fils), defeating wild card Theo Papamalamis 6-3, 6-1 and Andrea Pellegrino 6-2, 3-6, 6-4 coming to the Roland Garros third qualifying round. On the other hand, outside of the San Luis Potosi Challenger semifinal, it was a subpar clay-court campaign for Denis Kudla before suddenly goating in the French Open qualifying rounds, as he defeated other clay-court frequents Jan Choinski 6-4, 6-4, and 19th seed Vit Kopriva 3-6, 6-3, 6-3 in the first two qualifying rounds. As the more aggressive one from the said two players took this, this ended up testing their range consistency when the match allowed, especially with such pacing.
Even though this match started with D. Kudla suddenly peaking through his passes, G. Barrere had a notable backhand down-the-line winner to win the second point of the second game (in the first set) in hopes of breaking back, but to no avail even if he had several break points as D. Kudla held his serves to 2-0, and turned out to dominate the flow as he doubled the break and took the first set 6-2. However, G. Barrere regrouped after he held the first game of the second game, creating his break point with a volley before he broke to 2-0. Even if he got broken back right after as D. Kudla leveled the play (2-1), G. Barrere went after D. Kudla’s forehands to break again to 4-2, topped by the American’s double-fault. By then, G. Barrere broke again for the second set thanks to his backhand to D. Kudla’s slice error as he targeted D. Kudla’s forehands midway. The French 10th seed then emphasized the importance of his setup as his preceding backhand equalized the play in the fourth point of the second game (1-0* to 30-30) before D. Kudla’s two consecutive double faults secured the former’s break of serve (2-0). Since then, G. Barrere did not look back, strengthening his lead to 3-0 while almost demolishing D. Kudla as he forced the deuce in the fourth game. Ultimately, even if D. Kudla held his service games, it was insufficient to put more pressure on G. Barrere as the Frenchman took the 3rd set 6-3, confirming his resurgence with a main draw spot in his home Slam.
Section 9: Gabriel Diallo def. Alexander Ritschard 3-6, 6-2, 6-3
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Gabriel Diallo's point to 2-1* 40-ad (earlier break point, 2nd set, top left), to 5-2* 0-40 in the 2nd set (top right), to 1-2* 30-40 (3rd break point, 3rd set, bottom left), and 3-2* 30-40 (1st break point, 3rd set, bottom right) (📸 Eurosport GB)
This clash might have been overlooked on paper as several other names were favored instead, but they proved that nothing is impossible. Gabriel Diallo built his rally tolerance a long way despite his loss to Mitchell Krueger in 2 tie-break sets back in Houston (250), fighting his way despite his elimination to eventual champion Thanasi Kokkinakis 6-7(3), 6-4, 6-7(3) in a 3-hour-30-minute battle, and displaying it as well in the first round of the Mauthausen Challenger before he had to retire down 6-3, 5-7, 2-4 against Lukas Neumayer. Interestingly, as he also defeated some clay-court frequents along the way, which included Orlando Luz and Hugo Dellien in the Turin Challenger qualifying rounds, he also dug deep to defeat Argentineans Genaro Alberto Olivieri 7-5, 6-7(4), 6-1 and Marco Trungelliti 7-6(6), 3-6, 6-4 in the first two qualifying rounds in Roland Garros. On the other hand, A. Ritschard had an intriguing United States clay campaign, as he qualified for the Houston (250) before being defeated by J.J. Wolf in the first round and went on to win the Savannah Challenger after defeating qualifier Andres Andrade 6-2, 6-4 for the first time since the Hamburg Challenger 2022, going straight to the Roland Garros qualifying rounds by confidently stunning the Oeiras 4 Challenger runner-up, Elias Ymer, 6-2, 6-1, and Titouan Droguet 6-1, 6-3 in the first two qualifying rounds. For either player, this could be all to play for, showcasing everything they got in terms of their point construction and some balanced plays for a spot in the main draw.
In the first set, G. Diallo struggled with forehand errors, allowing A. Ritschard to break early (1-0) and take a 2-0 lead. The same forehand error resulted in A. Ritschard’s double-break lead, where he eventually took the first set 6-2. Nonetheless, the Canadian started to hit the ball even harder, smashing it to generate his third break point before finally breaking to 3-1 due to A. Ritschard’s forehand error, and held his service game afterward to 4-1. Ultimately, G. Diallo forced the deciding set as he broke to 6-2, getting broken early moments after he double-faulted in the fourth game of the first game to start the third set. The Canadian returned from the brink by becoming more offensive, breaking back to 2-2 before doing it again to 4-2 as his forehand winner generated his first break point, eventually taking the 5-2 lead. Two games later, after overcoming a couple of deficits, G. Diallo served for the match (6-3) and secured his first appearance in a Grand Slam-level main draw. This win showcased improvements in his rally tolerance and pacing on red clay. Interestingly, the final scoreline coincidentally matched that of a previous match in Section 10.
0 notes
daikenkki · 2 months
Text
youtube
0 notes
alfredol70 · 7 months
Video
youtube
Mattia Bellucci vs Emilio Nava | SF Malaga • Highlights
0 notes
Text
Concluso il Trofeo Fratelli ROSSETTI
Domenica 27 Settembre ha significato per tutti noi tantissimo, come avete letto nelle news di ieri e tutto quello che abbiamo vissuto ha quasi fatto passare in secondo piano la disputa della finale del Ventisettesimo Trofeo Fratelli ROSSETTI. Anche questo avvenimento merita invece di essere sottolineato per i numerosi risvolti emozionali che lo hanno accompagnato.
Alla finale sono infatti giunti due giocatori di livello tecnico assoluto ma con uno dei due che ricopre per la nostra famiglia un ruolo molto particolare, essendone membro di fatto da quando ha mosso i primissimi passi su un campo da tennis: Simone Roncalli (2.2), solo tesserato per il TC Santa Margherita Ligure ma che consideriamo tutti un alfiere del CTP in giro per il mondo !
Avversario uno dei giovani giocatori di maggior talento e futuro attualmente in circolazione nel panorama della seconda categoria, quel Mattia Bellucci (2.2 del TC Prato ma varesino di nascita) capace di eliminare in quarti la testa di serie numero 1 Omar Giacalone.
Tumblr media
I finalisti con Mattia e Mamo prima del match
Talento e colpi imprevedibili hanno avuto la meglio in un match quasi a senso unico nella prima frazione ma che avrebbe potuto davvero cambiare dopo una imprevista interruzione per pioggia che ha mutato gli scenari. Avanti 62 31, infatti, Bellucci ha dovuto subire, come il foltissimo pubblico presente, un acquazzone imprevisto che ci ha costretti a sospendere per circa 30 minuti il gioco.
Ancora una volta i nostri campi in terra battuta hanno dimostrato una tenuta ed un drenaggio che ha pochi uguali in Italia (forse a Parigi si avvicinano a questo livello) dandoci modo di riprendere la finale poco dopo la fine degli scrosci. Riacciuffato il break di svantaggio, Roncalli ha portato Bellucci al tie-break decisivo per il secondo set annullando anche un paio di match points (uno in particolare con un rovescio che raramente abbiamo visto a Parabiago) ma dovendo alla fine lasciare spazio al giovane Mattia (anno 2001, mentre Simone ha 24 anni) che ha saputo incamerare i punti decisivi grazie al servizio, potente a volte, malizioso e dal basso in altre occasioni. Tattiche molto varie e a volte rischiose, chiamando spesso Simone a correre in avanti, hanno fatto il resto e indirizzato il finale.
Il gioco di Bellucci, i suoi tocchi raffinati alternati a colpi potenti non solo al servizio, lasciano intravedere un futuro di grandi soddisfazioni per il lombardo a cui tutti noi del CTP auguriamo di cuore una brillante carriera sperando di rivederlo presto a casa nostra.
Inutile nascondere la delusione di tutti noi del Circolo per la mancata vittoria di Simone e, non ce ne voglia il bravissimo Mattia che ha ampiamente meritato il titolo, ma al cuor non si comanda e vedere il nome Roncalli iscritto negli annali del Trofeo Rossetti sarebbe stato per tutti noi motivo di orgoglio !
Peccato Simo, bravo lo stesso e la nostra speranza rimane che quella del 2020 non sia stata una apparizione sporadica al nostro, al tuo torneo ma che tu possa diventarne un abitue.
Concludiamo con alcune belle immagini della premiazione con il nostro alfiere Giovanni Rizzuti che riceve il premio come semifinalista, battuto appunto da Simone.
Tumblr media
Da sinistra Mattia Ceruti, Mattia Bellucci, Mamo Musazzi, Gio Rizzuti, Simone Roncalli e Luca Rossetti
Un arrivederci a tutti al prossimo anno, con a fianco il Calzaturificio Fratelli Rossetti e tutti Voi nostri amici e frequentatori.
A PRESTO !
0 notes
freesurebets-blog · 5 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Make 36.81% on this bet: Bet 31.6 on Mattia Bellucci (None Q: 4.33) and win 136.81 Bet 68.4 on Marko Miladinovic (BetStars Q: 2) and win 136.81 More chances: http://toomuchluggage.com #bettingpredictions
0 notes
bibliatodo · 4 years
Text
Han transcurrido aproximadamente 16 años desde el estreno de este éxito cinematográfico; el cual fue muy ovacionado por la mayoría de las personas que lograron verlo.
Esta producción logró recaudar más de 611 millones de dólares.
La dirección de esta cinta estuvo a cargo de Mel Gibson, Bruce Davey y Sthepen McEveety. El film también es conocido como “La Pasión” y es una película dramática con esencia cristiana realizada en el año 2004.
“La Pasión de Cristo” ya tiene más de década y media, pero hasta el día de hoy no deja de impactar y causar emoción en quienes la ven.
Ciertamente, la actuación de Jim Caviezel como Jesús de Nazaret y las increíbles escenas de la producción son algunos de los aspectos más llamativos de la misma.
El film está basado en lo escrito en los evangelios de la Biblia; la narración de uno de los acontecimientos más importantes de la historia. La muerte de Jesucristo en la cruz para salvar a la humanidad.
Sorprendentemente, la película fue nominada a tres premios Oscar, entre los cuales calificaron mejor maquillaje, mejor banda sonora, y mejor fotografía.
También participó en otros festivales, donde logró obtener más de 30 premios cinematográficos.
El elenco de “La Pasión de Cristo” 16 años después de su estreno
Jim Caviezel como Jesús de Nazaret.
Maia Morgenstern como María.
Hristo Jivkov como Juan.
Monica Bellucci como María Magdalena.
Francesco DeVito como Pedro.
Hristo Shopov como Poncio Pilato.
Luca Lionello como Judas Iscariote.
Mattia Sbragia como Caifás.
Rosalinda Celentano como Satanás.
“La Pasión de Cristo”, así luce el elenco luego de 16 años (FOTOS) Han transcurrido aproximadamente 16 años desde el estreno de este éxito cinematográfico; el cual fue muy ovacionado por la mayoría de las personas que lograron verlo.
0 notes