Tumgik
#not to james b*nd post on main
Text
I thank you for your patience with my James B*nd posting. I promise I'm still gay.
10 notes · View notes
porcelainvino · 1 month
Text
[PART ONE] the room where it happens (b!g animatic): artist’s commentary
spoiler warning for eden, other than that, who wants to hear some lore?!?!
description/disclaimer:
better!glee is my (kind of) glee fanfiction in which my favs are essentially my ocs (i do not claim to own the characters). there’s a difference between the “glee club members” and the “better!glee characters” because some of the main characters in the better!glee story are just side characters i like in the real show who aren’t in the new directions (ex: kurt is in the NDs as well as a main character in b!g, rachel is in the NDs but is NOT a main character in b!g, maud is NOT in the NDs but is a main character in b!g; it’s confusing but i’ll try to elaborate as we go on).
each character has their own color, but it has no secret meaning, it’s just to separate them/tell them apart. i was planning, but it was honestly too much effort, to draw all of the new directions, so i only drew the ones who are main characters in better!glee.
the story takes place during the canonical 3rd season of glee, but it does not necessarily follow the canon plot of that season/the rest of the show. some of my b!g characters may act “out of character” compared to canon, but this isn’t necessarily meant to follow canon. in this animatic, there isn’t really a “good side” or “bad side”, both think their doing the right thing but also have their own flaws; this isn’t meant to villainize any character.
i do not necessarily plan to ever post the fanfiction publicly because it’s genuinely mediocre and frankly not even a glee fanfiction at this point. i don’t mean to gatekeep it or anything, this is genuinely just for my irl friends, not for anyone else. despite the name, better!glee is not meant to “fix” the show nor make it “better”, it’s just for silly funzies.
backstory, and basically the first minute of the animatic:
the last major plotline of better!glee mainly follows maud, the violin girl from s1, and her effort to join the glee club. she was unable to and discouraged to join for the past 2 years by her brother and her peers (there’s more to that but it’s too much to explain), but after becoming friends with some of the new directions members, she’s motivated to join and help them win nationals.
kurt encourages her to join. he didn’t get any letter from nyada yet, and he is determined to win nationals to add on to his transcript just in case. maud films her journey/the glee club’s plans for nationals for an av club project, and kurt encourages her to so he can maybe even use it to help him get into nyada.
kurt takes charge to help the glee club win nationals. however, kurt, the b!g characters, and the rest of the glee club have a bit of beef at the moment due to previous events (there’s more to that but it’s too much to explain), so tensions are high, and friendships are strained. his closest friends, mercedes and tina, try to negotiate with him, especially in such a busy time frame.
for context:
maud sings aaron burr’s part
kurt sings alexander hamilton’s part
tina sings thomas jefferson’s part
mercedes sings james madison’s part
rest of animatic, feel free to follow along :3:
• kurt has control of how nationals plays out, prioritizing winning. mercedes and tina hold a photo of the better!glee friend group, prioritizing their friends, at least in the beginning.
Tumblr media
• the trophies are colored in the character’s color, representing how each one of them helped win that competition, like tina got to have a solo at sectionals/got to chose the set list (there’s more to that but it’s too much to explain). nationals has not happened yet so there’s no trophy.
Tumblr media
• despite having beef with half of his friends (there’s more to that but it’s too much to explain), kurt begs mr. schue to help, at least temporarily, reunite the new directions for nationals.
Tumblr media
• “the pieces that are sacrificed in every game of chess” plays while they point to maud. this is showing how the b!g characters in the new directions are slowly but surely abandoning the non-glee club b!g friends in favor of nationals (i hope that made sense).
Tumblr media
• i genuinely don’t know how to properly explain this part because i’m not really sure how i want the plot to be (for context, i’ve only written 16 chapters but i plan for there to be over 80, with this animatic being one of the last plots), but i suppose this could be interpreted as either if mercedes and tina brought up the importance of friendship to kurt, they could all reconcile properly OR maybe mercedes and tina saying that their friend group will be fine if they temporarily work on nationals rather than focusing on fixing relationships? i’m not sure.
Tumblr media
• just maud wanting to be in “the room where it happens” aka the choir room.
Tumblr media
• there’s a message on the bulletin board saying that the glee club will continue to focus on nationals by themselves and do not require extra members. maud gets mad at kurt for getting her excited for nothing even though he had most of the control of how things would play out and had promised her he’d help her get in.
Tumblr media
• maud realizes that kurt was never going to let her join and only hyped her up so she could record the success of the new directions to further his chances of getting into nyada, using her for his own gain.
Tumblr media
• kurt saying that the better!glee friend group is insignificant compared to nationals, at least in his eyes. from his point of view, winning nationals is his chance to change the course of his future, and attempting to mend relationships is just an obstacle to that goal.
Tumblr media
• this is just my favorite frame lol
Tumblr media
[click here for part two]
5 notes · View notes
johnchiarello · 4 years
Text
Sunday sermon
Sunday Sermon
  [Post below]
Blog-  https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/
Site-  https://ccoutreach87.com/
Site-  https://johnchiarello.webs.com/
Site-  http://ccoutreach87.webstarts.com/__blog.html?r=20171009095200
Site-  https://corpusoutreach.weebly.com/
Site-  http://ccoutreach87.wixsite.com/mysite
 LINKS TO ALL MY SITES AT THE BOTTOM OF EACH POST
 The blog [Corpus Christi Outreach Ministries] is my main site- on some sites if you click the link it gives a ‘warning’- if that happens- simply type the address in or search on a search engine- the site is safe- the most up to date posts are on the Blog.
[Please Like, Share, Connect, Follow and Subscribe to the sites below- as well as all my sites linked at the bottom of each post-Thanks]
 Follow us on Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5?ref=bookmarks
Subscribe to our Youtube channel- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ4GsqTEVWRm0HxQTLsifvg?view_as=subscriber
Follow us on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/john.chiarello/channel/
Friend us on VK [Russia- Our largest group outside the U.S.] https://vk.com/id533663718  
Friend us on OK [Ukraine- Our 2nd largest in Europe] https://ok.ru/profile/589985645111
Follow us on Tumblr http://johnchiarello.tumblr.com/
Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/ccoutreach87
Connect on Linkedin [Our largest group] https://www.linkedin.com/home?trk=hb_logo
Follow us on Medium https://medium.com/@johnchiarello
Friend us on Plurk [Japan] https://www.plurk.com/ccoutreach87/public
Contact/Friend us on MeWe https://mewe.com/i/johnchiarello
Follow us on Pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/ccoutreach87/
Follow us on Reddit https://www.reddit.com/user/ccoutreach
Follow us on Mix https://mix.com/jchiarello
Follow us on Flipboard https://flipboard.com/@johnchiarel4hvs/ccoutreach87-q213nqldy
Follow us on Steemit https://steemit.com/@ccoutreach
Follow us on https://mastodon.social/@ccoutreach87
View on Trello https://trello.com/b/swhF9Vr8/ccoutreach87com
View on Voat https://voat.co/u/ccoutreach87/submissions
 Watch our videos here-
[Most viewed] https://www.flickr.com/photos/ccoutreach87/
[Most viewed] https://www.bitchute.com/channel/jsS961GkXUSn/
https://www.dailymotion.com/ccoutreach87/videos
https://vk.com/videos533663718 [Russia]
https://www.instagram.com/john.chiarello/channel/
[Most viewed- OK] https://ok.ru/video/c2081847?st.cmd=video&st.m=ALBUM&st.aid=c2081847&st.ft=album [Ukraine]
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ4GsqTEVWRm0HxQTLsifvg?view_as=subscriber
https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5/videos?lst=1779330793%3A1779330793%3A1546906912  [My Facebook videos]
 Other sites- https://ccoutreach87.com/links-to-my-sites-updated-10-2018/  
Cloud links- https://ccoutreach87.com/cloud-links-12-2018/
Archive- Text posts only- https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/archiv.html
 Some of my studies-
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/reformation_12.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/overview-ofphilosophy-thales-andthe-pre.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/romans-links-1-2019.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/colossians-links-2019.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/corinthians-links-4-2019.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/ephesians-links.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/acts-links.html
https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/galatians-links.html
  [Links to all my sites at the bottom of this post]
NOTE- Every so often some of my sites think I am Spam- or a Bot- I am not. My name is John Chiarello and I post original content [all videos and text are by me]. I do share my past posts from my other sites- but it is not spam- Thank you- John.
 [TODAY’S POST BEGINS HERE]
   Habakkuk 2:1 I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.
Habakkuk 2:2 And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.
Habakkuk 2:3 For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
  Sunday sermon videos-
 https://youtu.be/smTOw7EJSjY
https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5/videos/10205026402177950/ 
https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMhBp1wgu7lU34dS_Z
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0wagjiywi1hbl43/11-11-18%20Sunday%20sermon.mp4?dl=0
   NOTE-
Church Unlimited- Mass - https://youtu.be/DiRNv2hp3aU
https://ccoutreach87.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/5-28-17-c-u-mass.zip
https://ccoutreach87.com/5-28-17-c-u-mass/ 
 [I talked from the verses used in the Sunday Mass- and the verses from Church Unlimited]
  I added the above videos at the time I made this post. Overall I tried to challenge some of our mind sets about the ‘End Times’ and how 20th [and 21st] century Evangelicals look at these passages. The Mass readings for this date did cover some of the more popular passages about the End Times. Some [most?] might disagree with the perspective I tried to talk about- and that's ok. The main point I was trying to make was End Times teachings should be seen in the light of the overall redemptive purposes of God. Revelation [the book] is a beautiful picture of Christ and the Church. And yes- there are passages about ‘violence’ how the Word ‘slays’ people- but in a redemptive context- yes- the Word of God- and those who submit to the Lordship of Christ- are ‘put to death’- or ‘buried with him in death/baptism’ so these perspectives are what I tried to share on the video- For those who want to go deeper into the end times and different ways Christians have viewed these passages- just Google Preterism- partial Preterism- and you can see a different perspective rooted in scripture as well. I am not a ‘full Preterist’ meaning I do believe in the literal 2nd coming of Christ and the future resurrection to come- but some of their ideas are worth listening to-
John
 Here are a few links I just found- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preterism
https://www.ligonier.org/blog/preterist-approach-revelation-unfolding-biblical-eschatology/ 
 ON VIDEO- [Past posts below]
.Ascension Sunday
.Cathedral city
.We are the 2nd book- Bishop Mulvey
.Dead words versus life in the Spirit [manifested thru us- the Logos made flesh once again]
.Tertullian ‘Have we chased God into a book’?https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tertullian 
.Gnostic writing in the first few centuries
.Pseudepigraphy https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pseudepigraphy 
.Life in community
.Logos
.Watch Tower
.Theresa of Avila http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=208 
.Catholic Mystics
.Contemplative prayer
.Hebrews- James- context
.Paul and James
.Faith and works
Correction- On the video I mentioned a quote/book from Theresa of Avila- the book was called ‘The Interior Castle’ written in 1588 - the quote I used was ‘Cathedral of the mind’.
   PAST POSTS- [Past teaching I did that relates to today’s post- Verses below]
 https://ccoutreach87.com/galatians-links/
https://ccoutreach87.com/hebrews-updated-2015/https://ccoutreach87.com/hebrews-updated-2015/
https://ccoutreach87.com/romans-updated-2015/
https://ccoutreach87.com/james-2015/ 
https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/06/01/acts-13/ 
 CHAPTER 11: [see commentary on Acts 21]
END NOTES-
JUSTIFIED BY FAITH.
TORTURED- BY FAITH?
REJECTED MONEY- BY FAITH?
THEY ALL WAITED FOR THE CITY- THE CHURCH.
  ‘Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen, FOR BY IT THE ELDERS OBTAINED A GOOD REPORT [JUSTIFIED]’ This is the key verse to the chapter. Paul will go on to prove that all the Old Testament figures that ‘pleased God’ did it by faith, and not by works! ‘Through faith WE UNDERSTAND that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear’ Faith is not ‘blind’. It informs and gives understanding. This understanding is real! Let me show you what I mean. All of the universe and creation had a beginning point. Science did not always know or believe this. Today science teaches this. It is called ‘the point of singularity/density’. Science has traced back the origins of all things and has found scientific evidence to prove that all things had a ‘beginning point’. Now if you were to ask science ‘what did you have right before the beginning point’? They are stumped. Some of course believe in God and will boldly proclaim him at this point. To the others they can not answer this question. Why? Because they realize, thru science, that matter is not infinite.
 Some have theorized that either all things always existed [which science has now disproved] or that at one point nothing existed [which science also teaches that if this were true then you would have nothing today. You can not get something from nothing!] So all true science has gone back to this ‘point of singularity’ and can not see what is right before ‘the point’. The Christian ‘sees’ God at this point! He ‘understands’ that by necessity there has to have been something that existed before creation, science teaches this. This something can not have been created also, because then where did the ‘being’ who created ‘it’ come from? So science teaches us that whoever got the ball rolling [Saint Thomas Aquinas calls this the ‘prime mover’] had to have been preexistent/ self existent in order to have done it. And we know that creation couldn’t have done it by itself, so therefore all reasoning and understanding leave us at the philosophical point of ‘there had to have been something/someone who existed forever in order for anything to be today’. So now you see how ‘by faith we understand that all things that now exist were brought into existence by someone who we can not see’. FAITH UNDERSTANDS!
 As we go thru the rest of this chapter I want you to focus in on all the references of justification by faith. You will be surprised [I think?] on how many examples Paul gives to Israel from their own history [his too!] on God justifying people by faith. I will also try and show you [if I remember] how this chapter links the division between Paul’s epistles to the gentiles [Romans, Galatians] with James letter to the Jews. James was one of the lead Apostles at Jerusalem [Acts 15] and the Judaizers who were always accusing Paul of preaching grace in a way that justified sin, they came out of Jerusalem. James and Paul were rivals in a sense. James had the difficult job of overseeing the Church at Jerusalem, who had all the Pharisees who believed, while Paul was preaching this radical message of grace. This is why James’s letter [book of James] focused so much on faith and works. James was seeing the Genesis 22 account of Abraham’s justification when he offered Isaac on the altar. James will say ‘see how Abraham was justified by his works’. While in Paul’s letters he focuses on the Genesis 15 account of Abraham believing God and being made righteous. James was not contradicting Paul; he was showing the actual outcome of the life of a person who was previously justified by faith. James was saying ‘When God made Abraham righteous [Gen 15] he later actually became what God made him!’ [Gen. 22].
 Now when Abraham would later do righteous things, he only did them because he previously had faith in Gods promise. But the fact still remains that when Abraham did a righteous act, God still justified him [in a sense, God has the prerogative to say ‘good job son, I am pleased with you’ so this can be described as an act/function of justification]. Well, now that I already showed you all this, I guess I wont have to remember telling it to you later. The point is in this chapter Paul will go down and show all these examples of Jewish leaders acting by faith and doing righteous deeds. This sort of bridges the gap between the strong emphasis on faith in Paul’s letters, with the strong emphasis on works in James letter. Paul is telling Israel ‘yes, all the old saints did do good works that pleased God, but they did them by faith!’ ‘Faith without works is dead’ [James]. So in a sense this single chapter bridges one of the key divisions in the early church between Jerusalem and Antioch [Acts 13 and 15]. Note; I believe all the chapter references above are correct, I write all this from memory so you might want to go back and double check the references. I know all the stories are right.
 ‘By FAITH Able offered …by which he obtained witness that he was RIGHTEOUS…by FAITH Enoch was translated…he had this testimony that he PLEASED GOD…without FAITH it is impossible to PLEASE HIM [all these ‘please him’ references are like saying ‘being justified’ when a person is justified by God, God sees him as acceptable, pleasing. ‘Thou art my beloved son in whom I am well PLEASED’ God to Jesus!] By faith Noah… prepared an ark to the SAVING of his house…and became heir to the RIGHTEOUSNESS WHICH IS BY FAITH [wow, he makes this one real plain] By faith Abraham…went out into a strange land…and sojourned’ interesting, both the aspect of ‘going out to a new land’ and ‘staying in it when you get there’ are both functions of faith. Let me throw in some practical stuff here. Over the years of ‘doing ministry’ I have seen and been a partaker of both of these experiences. Sometimes it takes an act of faith to uproot us from familiar territory and move on to the next level. And do you know what can happen next? The enemy will try to intimidate you once you get in the land of promise, and tell you ‘you cant stay here, look at all the people who hate you. Look at all the mistakes you made’ and it often takes an act of faith to STAY IN THE LAND. Don’t leave the land of your destiny; all true leaders will go thru both of these dealings.
 ‘For he looked for a city which hath foundations [Jesus is the foundation of this city!] whose builder and maker is God’ All of these great heroes of the faith were looking forward towards a future promise of being in Gods true church, the ‘City of God’ the Bride, the Lambs wife. Paul shows Israel that this 1st century appearing of Messiah was for the purpose of Israel coming into the ‘new land’ the Body of Christ. It is important to see this. There are many preachers today who are treating natural Israel as in if everything is just fine. It isn’t! They need Christ as much as the Muslim does. God was telling Israel ‘come into this new city’ [New Jerusalem versus Old Jerusalem] he wasn’t appealing for them to stay in ‘old Jerusalem’ and be a ‘completed Jew’. [I know this sounds harsh, but I want to emphasize to all my evangelical friends that Jews need Jesus, they play a special role in Gods plan, but ultimately they need Christ!]
 ‘Through faith also Sara herself received strength to conceive seed’ it takes faith to produce spiritual offspring! It might look impossible, but with God all things are possible. ‘Therefore sprang there even of one, and him as good as dead, so many as the stars of the sky and the sand by the shore’ sometimes God will allow you to bring forth one ‘seed’ [person or act of ministry] and you will be surprised how much fruit can come forth from this singular effort. This is why it’s so important to simply hear and obey God. Often times in ministry we do tons of ‘leg work’ which is OK. But when God gives you an idea or mode of function that you weren’t even thinking of, go with it. These are usually the ‘little seeds’ that produce the great harvest! ‘THESE ALL DIED IN FAITH, NOT HAVING RECEIVED THE PROMISES’ I want to emphasize here that it is possible to live your whole life in faith without actually seeing the fulfillment of all that God has told you.
 Now faith does obtain promises [verse 33] but sometimes we also see things many years down the road and we must realize that the measurement of faith is not whether or not you are currently getting the actual promise. In the above [and below] verse’s we see Abraham and Sara being told that their offspring would number in the millions. They believed these promises, but it is obvious that they didn’t live to see it fulfilled, but they sure knew that after they were gone it would come to pass. So I want to exhort you to believe to see certain things fulfilled in your life time, but have some greater goals that you initiate while here on earth, knowing that after you depart they will be fulfilled. ‘And truly if they had been MINDFUL of the country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned’ what is Paul saying here? The greatest threat to the gospel taking root in the Hebrew community was the desire to go back to old law and culture. How many believers ‘revert’ back to an older form of church simply because they missed the old culture and ‘feelings’ that they had when they were younger? Many of the Jews would not go all the way with the gospel because they were ‘mindful’ of the good old days of law and sacrifice.
 I just watched a show the other day that told how even some gentile believers began celebrating certain feasts of Israel with their Jewish neighbors. While it is good to understand and see the significance of the feasts, yet we know Paul wrote the early believers and said ‘you observe days and times and feasts, and I am concerned about it’. So when we [or 1st century Israel] are ‘mindful’ of the ‘good old days’ then there is always a danger of going back! ‘By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac…of whom it was said in Isaac shall thy seed be called. Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure’ Abraham exhibited characteristics of the Father [God] as well as Isaac being a type of the Son [Jesus]. It’s interesting that these verses show that Abraham knew for a fact that God was going to give Isaac millions of children, Abraham also knew the voice of God so well that when he ‘thought’ he heard God say ‘offer up this boy’ that in the mind of Abraham, the only way these 2 things could be reconciled, is he came to the conclusion ‘I guess God will have to raise him up, being he has told me this boy will have millions of children, plus he is telling me to kill him’. Most of us would not have come to this conclusion! We would have doubted either the original promise, or said ‘surely this can’t be God telling me to offer Isaac’ [most likely we would have doubted the latter!].
 There is a real important reason for Abraham to have been a real man of faith. God wanted this ‘picture’ of the offering up of Isaac for a type of the Cross and Resurrection. The only way he could have shown this example was to have had someone so radically filled with faith, that he would have come to this conclusion of ‘well, I guess God will just raise him’. It was necessary for the figure to have been truly fulfilled. It took Abraham many years of hearing and believing God before he would get to this stage. The part of Abraham’s mind that said ‘God will just have to raise him up’ was important for the figure to truly work. God knew he could only bring someone to this conclusion by arranging the whole scenario around a person of faith. It truly took a real person of faith to have come to the conclusion of resurrection as being inevitable! [For Abraham to fulfill the type of God, he had to have been convinced beyond all doubt that after he offered up his son, that he would be raised again. This is exactly what the Father [God] believed and knew about his own Sons death. So not only did Isaac fulfill the type of Jesus in this story, but Abraham also fulfilled a type of God!] [NOTE; Today is September 22, 2007. Israel’s Day of Atonement. I just heard a brother preach on the feasts of the Lord [I have done this also] but he preached it in a way that said ‘because God said you were to observe these feasts perpetually, therefore all gentile believers need to start observing these days’ he added ‘I know Paul taught the law passed and all, but these feasts are supposed to be forever because God said so’.
 How are the feasts ‘perpetual’? Thru the fulfilling of them in Christ! Paul makes this plain all thru the New Testament [as well as this letter!] I was surprised to hear the brother preach that the first 2 feasts [out of the 3 main ones] were fulfilled and memorialized, but the 3rd one [Atonement/tabernacles] has yet to be fulfilled! What? Jesus fulfilled Passover and Pentecost for sure, and they are still being ‘fulfilled’ God is still bringing people in thru the blood of Christ and the Spirit is continually being poured out on people, and of course the ultimate reality of our atonement thru our high priest is a daily reality [he ever lives to make intercession] that is ‘fulfilled’ all the time[ I understand what the brother meant, that both Passover and Pentecost were fulfilled at the Cross and the day of Pentecost, and Tabernacles still has a future fulfillment. That Jesus will ‘ingather’ all peoples to himself at the end. The way he said it was in a way that he said Atonement, the beginning of Tabernacles/booths, still has to be fulfilled. It really came out badly!] I just thought it worth noting that today is natural Israel’s feast day, and we hold this feast in reality 24/7!]
 ‘By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of pharaohs daughter; choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, then to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season; esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt; for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward…by faith the harlot Rahab perished not…’ I want you to see that faith in Moses situation caused him to forsake great riches and leave a successful future. This is in keeping with all the times Jesus called people in the Gospels ‘forsake all and follow me’ mentality. We too often equate the ‘treasures of Egypt’ with following Jesus; the scripture puts a different spin on it! Also Rahab ‘perished not’ because she ‘believed’. Paul teaches in Corinthians that those who believe are ‘being saved’ and those who don’t believe are ‘perishing’. I want you to see that Paul is really making a theological argument for ‘being saved by faith’ in this chapter. Even a harlot can be saved! Wow. The law seemed to have no mercy on someone like that!
 ‘Who thru faith subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, stopped the mouths of lions…women received their dead raised to life…others were TORTURED not accepting deliverance…others had mocking and scourging and bonds and imprisonment, they were stoned, cut in half, were slain with the sword… being destitute, afflicted, tormented…they wandered in deserts and mountains and dens and caves of the earth, ALL THESE [both the ones who shut the mouths of lions as well as the one’s who were tortured without deliverance] OBTAINED A GOOD REPORT THRU FAITH, AND RECEIVED NOT THE PROMISE’ Faith does not always cause you to be better off in this life. I am very familiar with all the verses of God blessing us and providing for us ‘the blessing of the Lord it maketh rich, and he addeth no sorrow to it’. I believe and claim these verses just like the next guy. I also don’t want to tell people ‘give your life to Christ and all will go well’ did it go well for the ones who were tortured not getting delivered? Sure did. It went well the moment they saw the face of God. The same for those who were cut in half. It also went well for the women who received their dead raised to life. The point is ‘going well’ is not always defined by your outward circumstance.
 We must see the overall biblical worldview of all things here being temporary, while all true spiritual riches are eternal. Moses actually was ‘less rich’ by the choice to follow Christ. But he was ‘more rich’ in that he fulfilled Gods purpose. It is important to see that many of these great heroes of the faith died without fully seeing the promise in this life. Now the last verse does say ‘that they without us should not be made perfect’ and this does show that the promise is now fulfilled thru Christ. We have all become recipients of eternal salvation thru Christ. The Old Testament patriarchs have ‘found that city’ in that we are all now members of the great ‘City that comes down from God out of heaven’ we are all in Christ today, even our Old Testament brothers who had faith. The point is don’t always measure a persons faith by their outward wealth and condition. James rebuked this idea in his epistle, he taught us not to show partiality to people who were rich while despising the poor.
 When believers see faith only from the standpoint of outward things, they are missing the true riches. Jesus taught that all these outward things were not the true riches; I am surprised how many believers spend so much time hoarding and storing things that will all pass away some day. Let’s close this chapter on a good note. Paul has offered Israel all of their Old Testament heroes as an example of being justified by faith. He is saying ‘look, all the great fathers of the faith pleased God, just like you have said and taught for ages. I am declaring unto you they were all ‘justified/pleasing to God’ by faith, not law’. Therefore if you want to follow the example of Abraham and Moses and all the other wonderful fathers, then you too MUST BELIEVE!
END NOTES-
JUSTIFIED BY FAITH.
TORTURED- BY FAITH?
REJECTED MONEY- BY FAITH?
THEY ALL WAITED FOR THE CITY- THE CHURCH.
This chapter is loaded with the history of the Jewish people-
I could teach on each story- but that would be a bit much-
So I pasted the verses below to show that the writer is saying ‘see- all of our forefathers were justified- received a GOOD REPORT- by faith’.
Wait a minute- they DID THINGS- in these stories-
Isn’t that WORKS?
If you read the letter of James- and the letters of Paul- some scholars says there is a disagreement-
Paul says a man is justified by faith- and not by works.
James says ‘see how a man is justified by works- and not faith only’.
If this letter [Hebrews] was written by Paul- then it’s a true masterpiece- because he is combining the examples that James uses [Rahab- and Abrahams Genesis 22 experience- which James uses to say ‘see how works justifies’].
So- to me- Paul would be saying ‘no- I’m not contradicting James- we both believe/teach the same thing’.
If the letter was written by Barnabus- then it also is a masterpiece- because Barnabus might be trying to bridge the gap between Paul and James.
We read about this tension in Acts chapters 13 and 15.
This chapter is certainly not showing us how to obtain stuff [money- etc.] thru faith- because look at the examples- ‘Moses chose to suffer- and reject the wealth of Egypt- BY FAITH’-
‘SOME WERE TORTURED- SUFFERED- CUT IN HALF- by faith’- ‘CHOOSING TO not be delivered- because they had faith’.
We also see the heavenly city- as the goal of the patriarchs- they were all waiting for THE CHURCH- the city that the apostle John spoke about in the book of revelation.
The writer says ‘if they were mindful of the city they came out of [a reference to the law covenant- meaning if the Jews kept clinging to the law- the ‘city they came out from’- they will have a hard time moving on- into the New Covenant revelation of Messiah].
I didn’t quote verse 2- but we could teach modern physics from that one [the bible says all things were made from something invisible- modern physics has come to that reality in the 20th century- yet this verse was penned 2 millennia ago]!
By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.
So yeah- lots of good stuff in this chapter- but the main point is these ancients were justified by faith- the example of Noah and Abraham actually use that very language- salvation/righteousness [it’s a bit clearer in the King James Version- the above verses are from the NIV].
Yes- the writer is saying ‘everything is based on faith- and even our ancestors were justified by faith- they did all these things because they believed God- and God saw their faith- in action- and they too were made righteous- by faith’.
By faith Abel brought God a better offering than Cain did. By faith he was commended as righteous, when God spoke well of his offerings. And by faith Abel still speaks, even though he is dead.
By faith Noah, when warned about things not yet seen, in holy fear built an ark to save his family. By his faith he condemned the world and became heir of the righteousness that is in keeping with faith.
All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance, admitting that they were foreigners and strangers on earth. 14 People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. 15 If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. 16 Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them
By faith Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be known as the son of Pharaoh’s daughter. 25 He chose to be mistreated along with the people of God rather than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. 26 He regarded disgrace for the sake of Christ as of greater value than the treasures of Egypt, because he was looking ahead to his reward.
By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah, about David and Samuel and the prophets, 33 who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies.35 Women received back their dead, raised to life again. There were others who were tortured, refusing to be released so that they might gain an even better resurrection. 36 Some faced jeers and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. 37 They were put to death by stoning;[e] they were sawed in two; they were killed by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated— 38 the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, living in caves and in holes in the ground.
39 These were all commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised, 40 since God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.
  CHAPTER 12:
END NOTES-
A HEAVENLY CITY.
DON’T BE SAD, HE’S TREATING YOU LIKE A SON.
NO REPENTANCE- OUTSIDE OF CHRIST THAT IS.
CULTURE SHOCK IS HARD ON US ALL.
 ‘Wherefore seeing we are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses [all the heroes of the last chapter!] let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us’ a few practical things. Paul compares the journey to a marathon, not a sprint! The patient runner who paces himself will receive a reward. The sprinter will look good at the start, but you never see him again! I have been blessed by so many gifted people over the years. Some who were on radio, or were doing some type of ministry for the Lord. The gifts and callings were truly on these people. A few years would go by and they were no where to be found. Where did they go? Some of them jumped on the latest ‘Christian movement’ [I am not against movements from God, I just feel we get enamored by them and give up on the main thing the Lord has called us to] some walked away from the Lord.
 I have come to realize that God will put certain things in you from the early days, things that he predestined for you to fulfill before you were born. These are the things that you should be faithful to. Don’t abandon the original calling, it’s still there! You can spend your whole life leaving one ‘track’ and ‘sprinting’ in another. But God wants you to stay on the original course and run it with patience. It might not seem as glamorous or exciting as the newest race in town, but at the end you will receive a reward. ‘Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him ENDURED the cross, despising the shame and is set down on the right hand of the throne of God. For consider him that ENDURED such contradiction of sinners…and ye have forgotten the exhortation that speaketh to you as children [remember what we said about this type of privileged language in Hebrews? It is speaking to Israel] my son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art REBUKED of him: for whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If you endure chastening, God dealeth with you as sons’.
 Now, for many years I read this just like you. That God was telling Christians that he disciplines them. True enough. But in context what is Paul saying here? He spent 11 chapters ‘reproving’ Israel. He told them that all the sacrifices and wonderful holidays and family traditions are no more. That Messiah has fulfilled it and you can’t keep doing it. Now, how would you feel if some know it all preacher came along and totally dismantled your whole way of worship? And you knew in your heart he was right! You would take offence. You would feel like you just got ‘chastened’ up and down and all over. Your initial reaction would be ‘this is too much correction in one letter, I am tired of reading it!’ so Paul is telling Israel ‘Don’t take all this reproof the wrong way, Gods intent is to get you to move on with the program. He loves you guys; don’t forget that scripture [Old Testament] says ‘who God loves he chastens’ hey, God is just dealing with you as children who he loves’ get it? ‘We have had fathers of the flesh that corrected us…shall we not much rather be in subjection to the father of spirits and live?’ Paul is saying ‘you guys want to live [eternal life] then you need to submit to the correction the father is giving you’.
 ‘For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure, but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness’ Now, God does chasten believers for the purpose of holiness. Scripture says ‘those who have suffered in the flesh have ceased from sin, that they should no longer spend the rest of their days in the flesh pursuing the desires of the flesh, but the will of God’ ‘before I was afflicted I went astray, but after I kept thy word’ ‘thou in faithfulness hath afflicted me’ ‘though he were a son yet learned he obedience from the things he suffered’ ‘the captain of our salvation was made perfect thru suffering’ [the last 2 are in this letter, the others are some where in scripture, I just quoted them off the top of my head. As you can see I have some familiarity with this subject! Ouch] In context Paul is saying to Israel ‘you have tried to attain holiness thru legalistic means, by keeping the law [Romans 9-the last few verses] but until you submit to Gods chastening, and have faith in God, you will not truly have his ‘holiness’ [righteousness].
 So God is disciplining them thru this letter so they will ‘believe and become righteous’ as opposed to staying in the old system of law. ‘Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous [old brother Paul, he sure knew how to understate things!] nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of RIGHTEOUSNESS to them that are exercised [or exorcised! Just kidding, but it can feel like this at times] thereby. Wherefore lift up the hands which hang down…and make straight paths for your feet, lest that which is lame [broken] be turned out of the way, but let it rather be healed’ David said ‘restore to me the joy of your salvation that the bones which YOU HAVE BROKEN may rejoice’ The danger of chastening [both for Christians and Israel] is that we get so broken that we never fully recover. Paul is telling Israel ‘I know it’s been hard on you guys to hear so much rebuke. Don’t walk away totally discouraged. There is a danger that you might respond to Gods correction the wrong way. Lift up your hands, shake off the depression, and let yourselves be healed. God wants to restore you!’
 ‘Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. For you know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for HE FOUND NO PLACE OF REPENTANCE though he sought it carefully with tears’. This is another reason why reading Hebrews in context is important. One of the themes of this letter is ‘if you miss out on it now, you can’t repent later!’[Chapter 6]. We know that Pauls other letters to the churches leave open future repentance for those who have sinned. In Paul’s letters to the Corinthians we see this being done. But in Hebrews the idea is ‘if you pass on the Cross, you can not find repentance thru any other means. There is no other place for repentance’. So this is the reason why Hebrews has this theme of ‘no future repentance’ thru out the letter. Paul is certainly not telling Israel that if they decide to repent and accept Christ at a future date, they can’t! But he is saying ‘if you pass over this sacrifice of Christ, all the other ‘sacrifices’ and means of repentance that are contained in the law will have no future effect, remember Esau!’
 ‘For ye are not come unto the mount that might be touched…but ye are come to Mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem [the church]…and to the blood of sprinkling that speaketh better things than that of Able’ Here Paul comes back to a ‘scarlet thread’ that runs thru out this letter. He says ‘hey, you think the first covenant was a fearful thing, watch out! If you disregard this covenant [Jesus blood] then you have gone against something that is much greater than the law’. Also the ‘blood of Able’ cried out from the ground for vengeance, the blood of Jesus cries out from heaven for mercy and forgiveness! It ‘speaks’ better things than that of Able! ‘See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth [Moses and the law] much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him which speaketh from heaven’ again Paul repeats themes he hit on earlier in this letter. He says ‘Moses spoke Gods Word [law] to you from an earthly mountain and place, you are come to a heavenly mountain [Sion-spiritual Jerusalem] and Jesus is speaking to you from heaven. This is much more strict than he who spoke from earth’.
 ‘Wherefore we receiving a Kingdom that can not be moved, let us HAVE GRACE, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear: for our God is a consuming fire’ Though Paul doesn’t say it [I think he should have!] but this alludes to the ‘God’ of Moses day, who did not consume the burning bush, compared to the ‘God’ of today [new covenant] who will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire! This fits in with the theme of a harsher punishment for those who reject the covenant of grace as opposed to those who rejected the covenant of law. I know these themes are not popular, but this is clearly the way Paul is presenting them. I also am not saying the ‘God’ of the Old Testament is different from the ‘God’ of the new [this is the heresy of Marcion! I think that was his name. He was an early Christian heretic who comprised the first canon of scripture for a ‘new testament’ it included basically Paul’s letters, and he taught that The God of the new testament was different from the God in the old] but Paul is presenting the new covenant in a way that says ‘don’t neglect this new way of salvation, those who do will receive a harsher judgment than those who rejected the law’.
END NOTES-
A HEAVENLY CITY.
DON’T BE SAD, HE’S TREATING YOU LIKE A SON.
NO REPENTANCE- OUTSIDE OF CHRIST THAT IS.
CULTURE SHOCK IS HARD ON US ALL.
Once again we see the contrast between ‘he that spoke from earth’ [Moses- the law]- and he that ‘speaks from heaven’ [Jesus covenant is more strict- to those outside of it and reject it- because he has heavenly authority- Moses had earthly]. Hebrews 12:25 See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven:
 The writer says ‘don’t be sad- God disciplines every son who he receives’- though this certainly applies to Christians- Hebrews 12:5 And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him:
Hebrews 12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.
Hebrews 12:7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
Hebrews 12:8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
 Remember this- though the message of grace and Jesus as the Messiah is wonderful- especially to us Gentile believers-
Yet- it was indeed a cultural shock to the 1st century Jew-
Why?
Even though Jesus was the fulfillment of the prophets- yet in order for the Jewish person to accept this [Like the apostle Paul]
He had to accept a real cultural change in the religion he practiced from his youth-
He was being asked to stop the animal sacrifices- to ‘move on’ from the Law covenant- and to embrace Christ.
Now- in reality- it would be the fulfillment of all that was contained in the law- but it’s often hard for anyone to ‘move on’ from former religious practices that are embedded in his culture.
So- in context ‘Don’t be sad- God is disciplining you- showing you new stuff- and it’s tough for sure- but he does this with all the sons he receives’.
We also see the promise of the heavenly city- As opposed to the earthly one. Hebrews 12:22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
Hebrews 12:23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
 The writer is speaking about the church- and how both Jew and Gentile are part of this spiritual community coming down from God out of heaven.
And again we see the warning- of no repentance- for those who keep sinning.
I stress that this is never taught to the Gentile churches- as a matter of fact the Apostle Paul wrote the Corinthians- about a sinning brother- sleeping with his father’s wife [his step mom].
And In the 2nd letter- this brother repented- and Paul exhorted the church to receive him back into fellowship.
But to the 1st century Jew- still not fully in the covenant- he says ‘Hebrews 12:17 For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.
In keeping with the theme of the letter- Jesus is now the only acceptable means of repentance- and if you reject him as the Messiah- and continue in sin- then yes- there is no repentance.
[parts]
ACTS 1- Luke, the writer of this book, feels the need to document the ongoing work of Jesus and his revolution. He already wrote a gospel and believes this to be the beginning of the story. In essence, the reality of Jesus and his resurrection are just the start, we have much more to do and become on this journey. Most writers jump to chapter 2. We have churches and music groups called ‘Acts chapter 2’. Why does Luke seem to wait till chapter 2 before getting to ‘the good stuff’? Chapter one records the 40 days of Jesus showing himself alive after his death. Luke feels this singular truth to be important enough to simply stand alone [I do realize the early letters did not have chapter and verse divisions like today]. The real physical fact of Jesus bodily resurrection is without a doubt the foundational truth of the gospel. The outpouring of the Spirit and the whole future of the church depends on the reality of the resurrected Christ. Paul will write the Corinthians and tell them if the resurrection were not true then they are the most miserable of all people. Luke tells us Jesus gave instructions for the Apostles to wait at Jerusalem for the Spirit. They will be witnesses of him to all the surrounding nations after the Spirit empowers them. We also see Peter emerge as the key spokesman for the group. He quotes freely from the Psalms and reads their own history into the book. He sees the prophetic verse from David on ‘let another take his office’ as referring to Judas betrayal and death. They cast lots and choose Matthias as the one to replace Judas. Peter shows the importance of Judas replacement to come from one that was with them thru out the earthly time of Jesus. Someone who saw and witnessed Jesus after the resurrection. Scholars have confused this with the ‘ascension gift Apostles’. Some scholars have taken the truth of the early Apostles having the criteria of being actual witnesses of Jesus, and have said ‘therefore, you have no Apostles today’. Paul will teach in Ephesians that after Jesus ascension on high he gave gifts unto men ‘some Apostles, others Prophets, etc.’ The New Testament clearly speaks of Apostles as an ongoing gift in the church. Barnabas will later be called an Apostles [Acts 14:14] as well as many other references in the original Greek using the same Greek word for Apostle. But here we find Peter seeing the need to replace Judas. Other scholars think Peter might have jumped the gun. They see Paul’s apostleship as the possible person the Lord picked out as the replacement. You do find Paul referring time and again to his Apostolic authority as one ‘born out of due time’ who saw Jesus on the Damascus road. If Paul was simply an ascension gift Apostle, why would he refer time and again to his authority based on being a witness who also saw Jesus? It’s possible that Paul was in this group of ‘Apostles of the Lamb’ who had extra authority based upon their testimony of being eyewitnesses. So in chapter one we see that Jesus appeared for 40 days giving instructions to the early leadership and told them to wait at Jerusalem for the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. We see the incarnational purpose of God, Jesus was and continues to be the express image of God to man. He was not some ‘phantom’ like the Docetists will claim, but a very real physical resurrected Lord. Luke begins the early history of the church with this reality being important enough to stand on its own.
 ACTS 2- The Apostles are gathered together in the upper room. As they continue in unity and prayer the Spirit of God comes upon them like a rushing wind. There appear ‘cloven tongues’ like fire above each of them. Why this image? Why not ‘ears’ or some other sanctified body part? God is going to give supernatural power to the words that they will speak. In a few chapters we will read how an angel will supernaturally deliver Peter from prison and say ‘go, speak the words of this life’. These tongues are a precursor to the tremendous fire that will be loosed from their lips. James says the tongue is a little member but boasteth great things, it has the ability to start fires. Jesus said he came to earth to ‘start a fire’ and how he wished it were already burning. Here he gets his wish! Now the Apostles and early believers experience the gift of tongues. They begin speaking and prophesying in the unknown languages of all those who are gathered together to Jerusalem for the feast of Pentecost. God ordained this event to be strategically done at this time. All the surrounding regions heard the believers speak the ‘wondrous works of God’ in their native tongue. Peter stands up and delivers a scathing message! He basically tells Israel ‘this is that which the prophet Joel spoke about’ he goes on and says this outpouring is part of Gods predetermined plan to pour out his Spirit on all flesh in the last days. He speaks of divine manifestations [dreams, visions] and carries the prophecy right to the end of the age. He then speaks the gospel of Christ and tells Israel ‘this is the Jesus you killed’. Wow, these guys are bold. Peter leads them to faith in Christ, their public baptism is the immediate sign of their willingness to be identified with Jesus and 3 thousand Jews become believers this day. Now, what is the church? This corporate group of first time followers do 4 basic things. They ‘continue in the Apostles doctrine and breaking of bread and prayers and share their goods with all in need’[true fellowship]. This early community was a brotherhood who actually gave priority to the teachings of Jesus passed on to them from the Apostles. Don’t miss this! Many will develop all sorts of practices and beliefs that ‘make up church’. Some will justify extra biblical beliefs under the guise of ‘the Apostles doctrine’ as in if it were something totally contrary or not known thru the gospels or the writing of scripture. Paul will tell Timothy to stay true to the traditions he passed on to him. But I want to focus on the fact that the Apostles doctrine was not something different then the basic instructions Jesus left us in the gospels. Paul will add to this basic body of Christian doctrine thru his letters to the churches, as well as the whole New Testament. But we do not see a bunch of strange or unknown doctrines that come from this time period. The basics are mentioned above. I do want to stress the fact that this early expression of church life had no ‘Pastor’ in the sense of their gatherings being a time where a singular authority figure had oversight of the entire community. They had strong leaders to be sure, but would avoid the Protestant idea of Pastor. They had no church building or belief in a strong liturgy. The ‘breaking of bread’ was a common meal where they all shared together in a real life setting. And of course their giving was radical, it was not ‘a tithe’ and it was done to meet the real needs of the community around them. All these elements are basic to what the New Testament church is. A functioning society of people in whom Christ Spirit dwells and who see themselves as a real spiritual community of people. As we progress thru out the history of the church as seen in Acts we will never lose this basic mindset. It will be carried into the epistles of the New Testament and remain the best idea of ‘local church’ as found in the first century. There is a trend going on right now in Evangelicalism that says ‘lets return to the ancient practices of the church and see what we can find’. As an avid reader of church history I am not totally against this movement, but I do see a danger in thinking ‘the ancient practices’ are the 2nd or 3rd century development of liturgy and Eucharist and other early ideas, and by passing the ‘real ancient’ story in the book of Acts. To put it simply, some of the Protestant and Evangelical ‘practices and beliefs’ that have developed since the reformation are ‘ancient’. I believe we all have a long way to go, but the ‘low view’ of the Lords Table [low as opposed to ‘high church view’. Though I personally believe in the Lords table as a memorial, not as the actual Body and Blood of Jesus. Yet I personally don’t like referring to such an important practice as low!] seems to be the true ancient practice as seen in Acts. The absence of the Priest officiating over the altar is no where to be seen in the actual ‘church’ setting. This ancient church is really a simple brotherhood of believers having all things common and having the resurrection of the Son of God as the central organizing principle of their lives.
[parts]
The Donatists taught that the Sacraments were dependent upon the ‘holiness’ of the Priest who ministers them. That if you were in a Parish where the priests were bad- lived in sin- rejected a holy life- then if you were Baptized by these men- that the Baptism didn’t ‘stick’.
 The Donatists formed there own break away church in the 3rd century- and a few very influential men would join the group. A well respected early church father- Tertullian- eventually joined their ranks.
 Augustine argued against the Donatists teaching- and taught that Gods grace- and the grace given to believers thru the sacraments were not derived from the holiness of any priest or preacher- but if a believer in good conscience received the sacraments- that that’s what really counted.
 Saint Augustine is one of the titans of church history- he is loved by Protestants and Catholics alike. He is famous for his belief in the doctrine of Predestination [that those who are saved were chosen by God before they were born] and for this reason he is loved by the original protestant theologians [Luther, Calvin, etc.]
 He also taught a very ‘Catholic’ form of Ecclesiology [church govt.] and is well loved by many Catholics as well.
 The Catholic Church refers to him as the Doctor of Grace- later on in the 13th century we will meet Saint Thomas Aquinas- who the church refers to as the Angelic Doctor.
 Both of these men played a major role in the development of western thought and Augustine made an effort to distinguish true Christian thought from the philosophy of Neo Platonism which was very strong in his day.
 When reading Augustine [he wrote a lot] you need to be careful to distinguish some of his earlier writings from his later ones.
 Early on you still see forms of Platonic thought in Augustine- but as the years rolled by his thinking progressed more and more towards historic Christian thought.
 For those of you who are interested- the Confessions of Saint Augustine is considered one the classics of Christianity- you can pick up a short version at most good bookstores- it’s well worth the time to read.
www.corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com
 [parts]
The church has debated for centuries on whether or not Philosophy should be taught to Christians. One of the early church fathers- Tertullian- said no- his famous quote is ‘what does Jerusalem have to do with Athens’.
 Meaning what does Philosophy have in common with Christianity [Athens- Greece was the seat of philosophy in Jesus’ day].
 For the most part- the early church fathers would embrace the study of philosophy- and try to make arguments for the Christian faith by presenting Christianity as ‘thee’ philosophy that best answers the questions of man.
 These early Christian thinkers are called Apologists- men like Justin Martyr are in this class.
 Apologist is a word we use to describe those who defend the faith- it comes from the Apostle Peter’s letter in the N.T. where Peter says ‘give an answer to those who ask you about the faith’. In the Greek language- the original language the N.T. was written in- this phrase is talking about a defense- an ‘apology’ in the sense of ‘making the case’ not in the common sense of apologizing.
 In the book of Acts- chapter 17- we read the famous sermon of the apostle Paul- given at Mars Hill. He was in Athens at the time- and he was debating with all the philosophers of the day. He tells them ‘as I was looking around town- I saw that one of your altars is addressed to The Unknown God’.
 He would go on and declare unto them that this Jesus is the true God- the one raised from the dead.
 Paul also said ‘in Him we live and MOVE and have our being’. Kind of a popular verse quoted by preacher’s today- but we often overlook the significance of the MOVE part.
 I mean- why say we MOVE in him too? Paul was a smart guy- he knew these children of Socrates questioned where motion came from [Remember Thales?] So he was basically saying ‘I am declaring to you the one true reality- the true 5th Element- the missing God particle from your system’ and he went on and preached Christ- being raised from the dead.
 Paul knew that you can’t really do true philosophy- to grapple with the questions of life and being and ‘motion’ without realizing that God is indeed the ultimate answer to all things.
 Even Peter Singer- who claimed that you don’t need God or religion in order to do Ethics- even he unknowingly quoted Jesus in attempting to give a basis for his Philosophy- yes- he quoted a God- one unknown to him- just like the altar at Athens- but a God never the less.
 An inescapable 5th element- the missing part to the whole puzzle.
 www.corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com
 [parts]
Let’s do a little more on Eschatology [end times stuff] today. Over the last few weeks these things have been in the news because of the Harold Camping prediction and you have heard various news folk- as well as believers giving their slant to all the popular verses that deal with the subject.
 Some media people were quoting ‘no one knows when the last day will happen- not even the Son, only God’. Then you have had a few other popular verses seep into the flow. The main portions of the bible that deal with the end times are Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21. John’s gospel does not have an ‘end times’ discourse- possibly because he covers the subject in length in the book of Revelation.
 The main gospel on the subject is Matthew- Mark’s gospel seems to be a shorter compilation possibly taken from Matthew. By ‘taken’ I mean Mark was a scribe/recorder- he was the personality we see in the book of Acts- John Mark. If you remember- he had a falling out with the Apostle Paul and Mark ‘went home’ while Paul took Silas and they embarked on the great missionary journeys of the Apostle.
 You don’t hear that much about Mark after the ‘falling out’ but we know that Mark would later pen the 2nd gospel and he was also a recorder [secretary] for the Apostle Peter [might be important to remember this- if I get to it?]
 So anyway mark seems to have borrowed from Matthew [some scholars think the familiarity between the gospels should be attributed to another unknown common source- referred to as Q- I prefer to simply see it as the writers being familiar with what the other writers were writing- and in the 1st century you did not have Plagiarism as we do today- where it would be illegal to copy something verbatim from another writer- that’s why Mark- who also probably penned 2nd Peter- not as a Plagiarist who used Pseudepigraphy- writings by authors who pretended to be someone else- but as a scribe who was familiar with the other source documents of the time. 2nd Peter has come under scrutiny because chapter 2 seems to have borrowed heavily from the letter of Jude. At some spots it looks like a direct copy. But as Peter’s scribe- it would not have been out of the ordinary to have included- verbatim- a passage from Jude and to have attributed the entire letter to Peter. Or Peter might have simply been familiar with Jude's letter and it would not have been wrong according to 1st century writing standards to have done this. But skeptics in our day try to use this to say the bible is a forgery- so that’s why it’s important to be familiar with the debate and to have a good response.]
 Okay-lets at least try and start a little end times stuff. Matthews 24 begins with Jesus and the disciples walking away from the Temple and Jesus says ‘see all these buildings- truly I tell you that there will not be left one stone on top of another’.
 The disciples then ask Jesus ‘when will this happen- and what will be the sign of the end of the age/world, and the sign of your coming’. Now- this sets the stage for the entire scope of the answer. Jesus told them one thing ‘the temples coming down some day’ and they ask a few things.
 Some scholars believe that the entire answer Jesus gives- about the end of the world and the coming tribulation- some teach that all these things did happen by A.D. 70- that’s when the Roman general Titus [future emperor] attacked the city of Jerusalem and destroyed the temple. Jesus prediction about ‘one stone not being left on another’ was fulfilled to the tee because the temple stones were overlaid with Gold and the looters burned the stones to melt the gold and in the process they literally laid every stone out.
 In the Matthew discourse Jesus also warned the disciples that ‘when you see these things beginning to happen- let those in the city flee to the mountains’. As Titus made his way towards Jerusalem some early communities took his words literally and did use the mountains as a place for protection. The community at Qumran hid their writings in ‘the mountains’ that overlooked the Dead Sea- some 2 thousand years later these writings [scrolls] would be discovered- those are the Dead Sea Scrolls of today- one of the greatestarchaeological finds of history.
 And there were Jewish believers at Jerusalem who did indeed flee to the mountains and they escaped the slaughter. So there certainly were things that Jesus spoke about in his 'end times’ teaching that were fulfilled in the 1st century.
 But what about the other famous portions? As various media persons were quoting a few famous parts of this discourse [this is the 4th famous discourse known as the Olivet discourse in Matthew- 5 famous long sections of Jesus’ teaching] it would help us to know the entire context of the discourse [which includes chapter 25 by the way].
 One of the famous verses is ‘when you see the fig tree putting forth leaves- you know that summer is near- so when you see these signs you know the end is near’. In American evangelicalism this verse has been made popular by men like Hal Lindsay who teach that the fig tree is ALWAYS a symbol for the nation of Israel and therefore Jesus was saying that when Israel becomes a nation again [which happened in 1948] that within ‘a generation’ the end will happen.
 This view uses a few other verses to come to this conclusion. Jesus famous ‘this generation will not pass away until all these things happen’ and a few other scriptures. Simply reading the chapter in context does not seem to be saying this at all. The parallel passage in Luke says ‘and all the trees’. It seems like Jesus is simply saying ‘just like when you see a tree blossom- so when you see these signs know that the time is near’.
 There really is nothing in the actual text to indicate that this is speaking about 1948. But because of these verses having been used like this many preachers have tried to date the coming of Christ within ‘the generation’ from1948. Lindsey put out a book saying that 1988 was a ‘special time’ why 88? 1988 was 40 years [biblical generation] from 1948. Then some changed the biblical generation to 70 years- which makes this decade real important.
 The problem with all these dates is there based on a faulty premise- that Jesus was saying that within a generation of the ‘fig tree blooming’ the 2nd coming will take place- he never said that. As far as I can tell 1948 plays no significant role. Of course Israel becoming a nation again at that time was a great thing- but as a date to begin setting off some type of spiritual clock- that’s not in the bible.
 Okay- maybe I’ll do a few more of these over the next few days. Try and read these chapters the next few days and get a feel for the overall meaning [the context] when we become familiar with the overall meaning of the passage- it keeps us from getting lost in the Fig Tree ones.
 www.corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com 
THE RAPTURE?
 I spoke with a friend yesterday about the Harold Camping prediction that obviously failed. They know someone who is really into Camping and that person was being set up for the disappointment. On CNN they had a Baptist preacher who warned against this type of date setting- yet he spoke confidently about ‘the Rapture is the next event on Gods calendar- followed by the 7 years of great tribulation’.
 I’m sure this fine pastor felt like he was providing a balanced voice compared to Camping’s date setting- yet I felt his interpretation was almost as ‘bad’ as what Camping was doing. Why?
 My first introduction to ‘the Rapture’ came as a new believer who started attending a fine Baptist church- they were an ‘Independent, Fundamentalist, Pre-millennial’ Baptist church – and yes- they managed to fit all this on the sign!
 The standard teaching says that in the New Testament there are 2 separate events that make up the 2nd coming. The first event is called The Rapture- that Jesus secretly comes all the way back to the earth and stops short in the sky [his feet don’t touch the ground] he ‘catches away’ all true believers [normally the Catholics, Orthodox and other historic churches get ‘left behind’] and then begins a 7 year tribulation period.
 After the tribulation you have the other part of the 2nd coming- called the Revelation of Jesus- some Christians say this happens after 3.5 years of tribulation- others after the 7 year period.
 Some say Jesus comes back after a 1000 year literal reign on earth [post millennial] others say before [pre- millennial].
 And then you have various ways they interpret the end time judgment- some say you have what’s called ‘the Bema seat’ a separate judgment for believers- and then the ‘Great White Throne judgment’ the general judgment of the wicked.
 O.K. does the bible specifically teach that the Rapture event is a separate event from the 2nd coming? No- in my view the bible does not teach this. Now- I’m sure that most of my Protestant readers are surprised that I hold to this view, because in American Evangelicalism this view is almost like the Trinity- in some circles it divides the true believers from the heretics.
 Classic Christianity does not hold this view- this idea became popularized the 1800’s under a man by the name of John Nelson Darby and the idea spread to America in the 1900’s- primarily thru the revivalist strain of Christianity- and the ‘bible school/conference’ movement.
 The historic churches just stuck with the classic idea that there will be one second coming- and there will be a resurrection and final judgment. I pretty much fall into this category myself.
 You would be surprised how much thought has gone into this idea- I mean you have entire schools of thought- who call the other side heretics- just because they believe a 3.5 year tribulation as opposed to a 7 year one.
 The word rapture comes from the Greek phrase used in Paul’s 1st letter to the Thessalonians- chapter 4. That’s the rapture chapter. The apostle says that Jesus will return and catch up [catch away] the believers into the air- they will forever be with God. This event is biblical- I believe it will someday take place. I simply believe this event to be the 2nd coming- not another event that you would define as the rapture.
 I believe if you simply read the 2nd coming passages in the New Testament- that you would see this to be the most acceptable view. Jesus actually says ‘after these things [the great tribulation] then the sign of the coming of the Son of Man appears in heaven’ and he goes on to say ‘one will be taken- the other left’. It seems pretty clear to me that the event where ‘one is taken- another left’ takes place ‘after these things’ Jesus actually gives us the time table.
 To be fair- the other side has many-many ways to ‘get around’ these verses- I just feel that after all is said and done- that the best way to view The Rapture is to see this event as the actual 2nd coming.
 I have written a lot about this over the years [under the End Times section] and my purpose today is not to ‘prove’ whose view is right- I have found those tasks to be next to impossible. My point is if a believer [or group of them] chooses to break away from the historic church’s position on anything, then you need to think thru it very carefully. Most classic Christian churches have had very wise and knowledgeable men who thought long and hard before they articulated doctrine.
 This is not to say that the majority view is always right- but it’s simply a safe guide to stick with the majority Christian view most of the time. I’m very aware of the minority report when it comes to the Rapture doctrine- I just feel like the portions of scripture that are used to ‘prove’ the doctrine are not strong enough to overthrow the classic belief.
 The plain teaching of the New Testament is that there most definitely will be a Second Coming- and this event does not take place in 2 stages- the Rapture is the 2nd coming.
 www.corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com 
  VERSES- [These are the verses I quoted or taught from on the video for this post- Other videos below]
 Acts 1:1 The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach,
Acts 1:2 Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen:
Acts 1:3 To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God:
Acts 1:4 And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.
Acts 1:5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.
Acts 1:6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
Acts 1:7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
Acts 1:8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
Acts 1:9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.
Acts 1:10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;
Acts 1:11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.
Acts 1:12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey.
Acts 1:13 And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James.
Acts 1:14 These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.
Acts 1:15 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,)
Acts 1:16 Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.
Acts 1:17 For he was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry.
Acts 1:18 Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
Acts 1:19 And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.
Acts 1:20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: and his bishoprick let another take.
Acts 1:21 Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,
Acts 1:22 Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.
Acts 1:23 And they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias.
Acts 1:24 And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,
Acts 1:25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
Acts 1:26 And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.
Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Proverbs 29:18 Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he.
2 Corinthians 3:6
Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
John 16:7
Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
Psalm 85:8
I will hear what God the Lord will speak: for he will speak peace unto his people, and to his saints: but let them not turn again to folly.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
11 And he said, Go forth, and stand upon the mount before the Lord. And, behold, the Lord passed by, and a great and strong wind rent the mountains, and brake in pieces the rocks before the Lord; but the Lord was not in the wind: and after the wind an earthquake; but the Lord was not in the earthquake:
12 And after the earthquake a fire; but the Lord was not in the fire: and after the fire a still small voice.
13 And it was so, when Elijah heard it, that he wrapped his face in his mantle, and went out, and stood in the entering in of the cave. And, behold, there came a voice unto him, and said, What doest thou here, Elijah?
Kings 19
Proverbs 20:27
The spirit of man is the candle of the Lord, searching all the inward parts of the belly.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
Proverbs 4:26
Ponder the path of thy feet, and let all thy ways be established.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
Proverbs 30:5
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations
[these are the verses for the video made 11-11-18]
November 18, 2018
 « November 17 | November 19 »
Thirty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time Lectionary: 158 Reading 1DN 12:1-3
In those days, I Daniel, heard this word of the Lord: "At that time there shall arise Michael, the great prince, guardian of your people; it shall be a time unsurpassed in distress since nations began until that time. At that time your people shall escape, everyone who is found written in the book. "Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake; some shall live forever, others shall be an everlasting horror and disgrace. "But the wise shall shine brightly like the splendor of the firmament, and those who lead the many to justice shall be like the stars forever."
Responsorial PsalmPS 16:5, 8, 9-10, 11
R. (1) You are my inheritance, O Lord! O LORD, my allotted portion and my cup, you it is who hold fast my lot. I set the LORD ever before me; with him at my right hand I shall not be disturbed. R. You are my inheritance, O Lord! Therefore my heart is glad and my soul rejoices, my body, too, abides in confidence; because you will not abandon my soul to the netherworld, nor will you suffer your faithful one to undergo corruption. R. You are my inheritance, O Lord! You will show me the path to life, fullness of joys in your presence, the delights at your right hand forever. R. You are my inheritance, O Lord!
Reading 2HEB 10:11-14, 18
Brothers and sisters: Every priest stands daily at his ministry, offering frequently those same sacrifices that can never take away sins. But this one offered one sacrifice for sins, and took his seat forever at the right hand of God; now he waits until his enemies are made his footstool. For by one offering he has made perfect forever those who are being consecrated. Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer offering for sin.
AlleluiaLK 21:36
R. Alleluia, alleluia. Be vigilant at all times and pray that you have the strength to stand before the Son of Man. R. Alleluia, alleluia.
GospelMK 13:24-32
Jesus said to his disciples: "In those days after that tribulation the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will be falling from the sky, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. "And then they will see 'the Son of Man coming in the clouds' with great power and glory, and then he will send out the angels and gather his elect from the four winds, from the end of the earth to the end of the sky. "Learn a lesson from the fig tree. When its branch becomes tender and sprouts leaves, you know that summer is near. In the same way, when you see these things happening, know that he is near, at the gates. Amen, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. "But of that day or hour, no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."
 Other videos- [These are the videos I post every night- Links to all my sites below]
 Kings 4  https://youtu.be/OLW-5PVlzV8
John 19  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg3M4Hh28mYlGWq8a
Friends  https://youtu.be/cZLwTwxkESc
Its all a gift  https://flic.kr/p/2iD9qA3
11-3-19 Sunday sermon  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMjE2X0-DUqPwM4brX
8-27-17 Sunday sermon  https://www.dropbox.com/s/bh48my17zjp506z/8-27-17%20Sunday%20Mass.mp4?dl=0
2nd Samuel 22 [NYC]  https://www.dropbox.com/s/wlwkjbm5nozgcdn/2-22-17%20Day%20Kennedy%20died%20%5B2nd%20Sam.%2022%5D.mp4?dl=0
Isaiah 53  https://dai.ly/x7m5j3q
4-10-20 Good Friday  https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5/videos/10207012789156383/
https://youtu.be/m6YP7RNWYUk
The good Sabbath  https://youtu.be/YFhTQFRQurI
https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5/videos/10207016524209757/
I have come to start a fire  https://youtu.be/pyu0kSBYBO8
Acts 3  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg3FpIZPaevEu4-sx
Homeless friend  https://youtu.be/C25zsHNg1J8
Acts 4  https://www.dropbox.com/s/mbpzi567ay7iebq/2-2-17%20Acts%204.mp4?dl=0
4-16-17 Sunday sermon  https://www.dropbox.com/s/synraurg0yshfr2/4-16-17%20Easter.mp4?dl=0
Teaching  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMilxNimhHJ5e9WBqc
10-11-15 Sunday sermon  https://ok.ru/video/1589887109687
6-10-18 Sunday sermon  https://www.bitchute.com/video/Vn8oXrAMhd1G/
Zech. 2  https://youtu.be/RXCFjghyBHY
Homeless friend  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg2-i-JrQQgw8G34T
City of refuge  https://youtu.be/BicEi6AvmFE
Waters cover the sea  https://flic.kr/p/2iCpydt
6-19-16 Sunday sermon  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMhjgVDOmEQJQeDwpr
11-13-16Sunday sermon  https://www.dropbox.com/s/tra4vdf2ut8tmsc/11-13-16%20Christ%20Church%20%5BC.U.-%20Mass%5D.mp4?dl=0
Samuel 17  https://dai.ly/x7m5j3r
2nd Samuel 21 [NYC view]  https://www.dropbox.com/s/jt2dvbku9roav3e/2-20-17%202nd%20Sam.%2021%20%5BNYC%20view%5D.mp4?dl=0
This generation  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg2uGrLczW3CETdD2
Homeless friends  https://youtu.be/iWQnkKPnIpo
Spiritual Rock  https://flic.kr/p/2iBjXwB
12-30-18 Sunday sermon [Part 2]  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMil1muwvXJPNC3BNn
Colossians 4  https://www.dropbox.com/s/u3urlhqn0uohehn/4-26-18%20Colossians%204.mp4?dl=0
Fatima- 2nd Mile [N.J.]   https://www.dropbox.com/s/3b8obhv6chhub8h/2-19-17%20Fatima%20%5B2nd%20mile%5D.mp4?dl=0
Revelation 6  https://dai.ly/x7m20nh
 Acts 9  https://youtu.be/VBw6tOxifc4
10-11-15 Sunday sermon  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg3CWH34dXfqKGZEA
Not a performance  https://youtu.be/hipVuk4m6JY
Colossians 3  https://www.dropbox.com/s/l5uniom6iw4j1tm/4-12-18%20Colossians%203.mp4?dl=0
10-5-19 Sunday sermon  https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMjElNfB6A3ly1GW_g
Acts 25  https://ok.ru/video/1588890503735
Teaching in NYC  https://www.dropbox.com/s/31al0l8zx4e0m0r/2-18-17%20Teaching%20in%20NYC%20%5B2nd%20Sam.%2020%5D.mp4?dl=0
5-6-18 Sunday sermon  https://www.bitchute.com/video/LhHGVKYdg6we/ 2-26-18 One https://youtu.be/a0dxi27SeD8 2-25-18 Update https://youtu.be/8VhbTy6MgT8 Galatians 5 https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMejbeju1g4BLexRc Fatima [North Bergen] 2nd mile https://youtu.be/YcfnxpqOOo4 Acts 2 https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMe74Uzp8M7zlLwek 2nd Samuel 21 [NYC view] https://youtu.be/ahBwNwiQ1s0 Acts 2 https://1drv.ms/v/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMe74Uzp8M7zlLwek  
 Twilight of the Idols https://youtu.be/OUQg7muqpzU
 The carnival https://youtu.be/71ACh0RVuZo
The hornets nest https://trello.com/c/zRamqon8/275-4-9-16-the-hornets-nestmp4
Neil- and Rick Hart- who died about a month ago- https://dai.ly/x6xcitv 
Talking church https://www.bitchute.com/video/bbqifwCZs72d/ 
https://trello.com/c/iffb3zTX/276-talking-church 
Acts 12 https://youtu.be/SRmccCVfFTQ 
11-20-18 News update-
https://youtu.be/iZj8l-K_jEU
 11-19-18 Bank robbery https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5/videos/10205029651339177/
https://youtu.be/KkL1ZUIoiqs 
Bethlehem christians https://youtu.be/3QiH9JSXn90
Ride thru Lincoln tunnel https://bit.tube/play?hash=Qmc5Di9G5JQ2F9PDScSnU4WNvBpiiR5WDLCuTuWeG6mpyy&channel=160276 
  8-26-18 Sunday sermon https://dai.ly/x6xafhp
Homeless friends- Bill Hagan https://flic.kr/p/JSJQEH 
Acts 3 https://youtu.be/Zdx2ZP4VqOo 
Hebrews 12 https://www.bitchute.com/video/QqXiog6LDAwW/
Holy Savior https://d.tube/v/ccoutreach/b4uq9ws4
North Bergen- Fatima- 2nd mile https://bit.tube/play?hash=QmQHdUN2Ao9UrzZpuJ8Z4v2L1i6kVVfrUZUdQat4hkBgok&channel=160276 
Friends https://youtu.be/XXl-Rw0xByk 
 2nd Samuel 1 https://ccoutreach87.com/2018/11/20/2nd-samuel-1/
Corpus Christi https://ccoutreach87.com/2018/11/21/corpus-christi-4/ 
2nd Samuel 2-3 https://ccoutreach87.com/2018/11/23/2nd-samuel-2-3/ 
  MY SITES [Please Like, Share, Connect, Follow and Subscribe to the sites below- Thanks]
Web sites-
www.corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com  [Main site]
https://ccoutreach87.com/
https://medium.com/@johnchiarello
https://johnchiarello.webs.com/  
http://ccoutreach.over-blog.com/ [France]
https://ccoutreach87.jimdo.com/
http://ccoutreach87.webstarts.com/__blog.html?r=20171009095200
http://ccoutreach87-1.mozello.com/
https://ccoutreach87.site123.me/
http://ccoutreach87.wixsite.com/mysite
https://corpusoutreach.weebly.com/
http://ccoutreach87.strikingly.com/
https://ccoutreach87.webs.com/
 Social Media sites-
https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5?ref=bookmarks  
https://vk.com/id533663718  [Russia- Our largest group outside the U.S.]
https://www.linkedin.com/home?trk=hb_logo [Our largest group]
https://twitter.com/ccoutreach87
https://www.plurk.com/ccoutreach87/public [Japan]
https://www.instagram.com/john.chiarello/channel/
https://ok.ru/profile/589985645111 [Ukraine- Our 2nd largest in Europe]
http://johnchiarello.tumblr.com/
https://mewe.com/i/johnchiarello
https://steemit.com/@ccoutreach
https://mastodon.social/@ccoutreach87
 Link sharing sites-
https://www.pinterest.com/ccoutreach87/
https://mix.com/jchiarello
https://trello.com/b/swhF9Vr8/ccoutreach87com
https://www.reddit.com/user/ccoutreach
https://buffer.com/app/profile/5b1be0280852690407c54007/analytics/posts
https://flipboard.com/@johnchiarel4hvs/ccoutreach87-q213nqldy
https://voat.co/u/ccoutreach87/submissions
 http://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/one-link_18.html [Link to past teaching]
 Video sites- [Can view and download my videos free of charge]
Streaming sites-
Youtube  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ4GsqTEVWRm0HxQTLsifvg?view_as=subscriber
Youtube Playlist- https://ccoutreach87.com/youtube-playlist/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ccoutreach87/ [Most viewed]
https://www.dailymotion.com/ccoutreach87/videos [India]
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/jsS961GkXUSn/ [Most viewed]
https://vk.com/videos533663718 [Russia]
https://www.facebook.com/john.chiarello.5/videos?lst=1779330793%3A1779330793%3A1546906912  [My Facebook videos]
https://www.instagram.com/john.chiarello/channel/ [IGTV]
[Ukraine-Most viewed]
https://ok.ru/video/c2081847?st.cmd=video&st.m=ALBUM&st.aid=c2081847&st.ft=album
https://www.brighteon.com/channel/ccoutreach87
https://vimeo.com/user85764413
https://ccoutreach87.com/youtube-catalog-2020/ [Youtube catalog- 2020]
Cloud sites-
https://1drv.ms/f/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg0G_aInmCi8XUC-C
https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=kZ1sXP7ZardKGRUxFByiFYi667jeup7MD1Sy
https://mega.nz/#F!7WQCSIJR!-4v9-zUQRq4MIQbBfI2n4A  
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/d43nhtrgysqg493/AAAlCszxZXJoRtk8UudtuR9ma?dl=0
https://ln.sync.com/dl/3e1f4c5e0/tcnm9p32-xiwe4nbu-zjbkitqj-4fvemf6m
https://1drv.ms/f/s!Aocp2PkNEAGMg0MwmUCJ1XM3q9ui  
https://icedrive.net/dashboard/#/cloud
Cloud sites- https://ccoutreach87.com/cloud-links-12-2018/
 Inactive- work in progress-
https://sites.google.com/yahoo.com/ccoutreach87/home
http://johnchiarello.doodlekit.com/
http://corpus-christijohnchiarello.simplesite.com/
https://spark.adobe.com/page/6INKwX1tFT7WA/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxWXKfaFDZrfNUzloSqg8Kg?view_as=subscriber 
Beta
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYlLmUkKiB6VoWE9CB1UQew?view_as=subscriber ccoutreach87
https://www.facebook.com/ccoutreach1/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel&eid=ARCo7sBBI_1fHMUwrHJbFUGf73C6FmpZxtgTcWET2gVwpdHCKmXSGxs6wyeA-qGCnbsr2ILaXqpd4ACt  [my page]
 These are some of the first posts ever made, I hope to share some of them over time in between my regular studies. Of course they are ‘dated’- and it would be too difficult to edit each post. Some have old news comments in them, but if I also taught on the posts, I’ll post them ‘as is’. Hopefully they will be a benefit in some way- John.
All past posts can be found here- https://corpuschristioutreachministries.blogspot.com/p/links-to-past-posts-up-to-12-2017.html
 Note- Please do me a favor, those who read/like the posts- re-post them on other sites as well as the site you read them on-  Copy text- download video links- make complete copies of my books/studies and posts- everything is copyrighted by me- I give permission for all to copy and share as much as you like- I just ask that nothing be sold. We live in an online world- yet- there is only one internet- meaning if it ever goes down- the only access to the teachings are what others have copied or downloaded- so feel free to copy and download as much as you want- it’s all free-
 Note- I have many web sites- at times some question whether I’m a ‘bot’ because I do post a lot.
I am not a ‘bot’- I’m John- so please- if you are on the verge of deleting something- my contact email is [email protected] - contact me first- thank you- John
1 note · View note
legobatjoker · 3 years
Note
ik the tiktok thing is j the lil clips from the songs but i have been listening 2 thee rosemary song a lot after u send me the ask abtits a rly good song i think... also i keep getting it stuck in my head nd i keep singing it 2 myself but i keep singing strawberry instead of rosemary which ig does make sense bc u said i wld b rosemary :] !!!
also i did look at the it girls trend on tiktok a bit nd i found a dif version of it (tho it was less assigning ur friends it nd more dressing as the diff girls) w it girls from tswift songs which were (at least w the audio i found) rebekah from the last great american dynasty, dorothea from dorothea, este from no body no crime, august/augustine from august, betty from betty (and cardigan), inez from betty, and sometimes also james from betty, james was included in the og audio at least but sometimes ppl exculde her in some of the ones ive seen w the audio bc shes at the very end FDHJGHRDGH but ya am also a v big fan of the tswift it girls...
WAIT ALSO ALSO bc the august from august/ the last ask in general might not make sense if u dont know this (but also idk if this is like obvious or not bc it might b but i didnt fully get it when i first listened 2 the album but also maybe im dumb so if u knew this already then sorry DSGSDFDG) but like ok so folklore has like this story within it refered to a the teenaged love triangle (at least thts what taylor called it) w the characters of betty, james and august/augustine (she didnt get an offical name in any of the songs but her pov song is august so ppl j called her august nd then taylor called her augustine in a post for the anniversry for folklore, im j gonna call her august from now on) (theres also inez who isnt included in actual love tirange but is still a part of the story as the one who told betty that james chated with august) the whole story is basically told in the song betty, but cardigan is from betty prespective and august is from augusts, and betty(the song) has refences to both songs in it to tie it all together (for cardigan, the lyric "standing in your cardigan / kissing in my car again" obvs mention of a cardigan and reference to the "to kiss in cars" line and for august the "she said "james get in lets drive"" line referncing the "remeber when i pulled up and said "get in the car"?" line in august) cardigan and august are kinda more general than betty which tells the specific story more (tho tht hasnt stopped us misinterpreting it 4 carulia <3) ) nd like obvs (like i j said DFSG) thts not my main thoughts hearing the songs (main thoughts w cardigan nd betty r tht i am gonna make this soo carulia in my silly little brain <3 main thoughts w august is woww tht ""crush"" i had summer break of 2020 when i was still verry much thinking i was alloro was wild huh FGHDG) but i still think its a neat little story tht the songs tell :] evermore has a similar thing w dorothea and tis the damm season, basically tht tis the damm season is from dorotheas perspective and tht dorothea is from the perspective of the ex thats she visiting for the holidays yk (theres are lotss of lyrical paralles between the two songs nd taylor confimed it) and taylor also says that she thinks dorothea and her ex went to the same highschool as james betty and august, i think bc of tht some ppl like 2 say tht they think tht dorotheas ex is inez but either way dorothea nd her ex r part of the universe of the betty/james/august story. thats it i think yah sorry if this makes no sense or if im j explaining the obvious but either way ty 4 indulging me <3 STGFDHFGSDG
ALSO SORRY not done w the wholee tanget i had abt the it girls im sorry but i like ik betty idnt in the audio 4 it but i think she shld b she deserve 2 b one both bc i like betty its a good song nd also bc like heather has her sweater nd betty has her cardigan they wld b matching besties....
DO NOT B SORRY i literally love to hear u tell me these things they r of great interest to me and i love to hear u enthusiastic ab stuff so yuh:!!! :33 anyway omg i need to find that other version of it now and also YEAH tbh i was surprised betty wasnt she deserves itttt…..
1 note · View note
maxwellyjordan · 5 years
Text
Friday round-up
In an op-ed at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), John Bursch pushes back against “one of the advocates’ main arguments” in a trio of cases the court heard this week about whether federal law protects employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, “that Title VII bans discrimination based on interracial relationships, so it must ban discrimination based on same-sex relationships too,” arguing that “race and sex are not interchangeable.” At Balkinization, Andy Koppelman explains why a hypothetical question asked by Justice Samuel Alito in Tuesday’s argument was “a desperation move, looking for some way to avoid the obvious implications of the statute’s plain text.” At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen tries to “narrow down the prospects” for the cases, and Ernie Haffner suggests at his eponymous blog that the court could adopt “a middle ground position.”  Commentary on one of the cases, Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. EEOC , which involves discrimination against transgender people, comes from Walt Heyer in an op-ed for The Washington Times and James Gottry at Townhall. [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris.]
Briefly:
At Bloomberg Law, Ellen Gilmer reports that “[a] top lawmaker in Maui County is calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to scrap a significant Clean Water Act case less than a month before the justices are set to hear oral arguments.”
Kevin Daley reports at the Daily Caller that a “coalition of brandname Fortune 500 companies, trade associations, and tech giants have intervened in a pair of marquee Supreme Court cases, urging the justices to rule for liberal social positions.”
At Fix the Court, Dylan Hosmer-Quint chronicles his experience attending Monday morning’s oral arguments; he arrived at 4:15 a.m. and was “no. 65 in line, just close enough to make it in the building.”
At Slate (via How Appealing), Adriel I. Cepeta Derieux writes that “[o]n the surface,” Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC “concerns a constitutional challenge to the board overseeing Puerto Rico’s debt restructuring[, b]ut deep questions going to the heart of the long relationship between the United States and Puerto Rico lurk just beneath[, a]nd the Supreme Court’s past reliance on offensive racial assumptions to answer those questions will again be on display.”
In an op-ed at Bloomberg Law, John Ellem weighs in on Mathena v. Malvo, in which convicted Washington, D.C.-area sniper Lee Boyd Malvo is asking the justices to overturn his sentence of life without parole, arguing that although “Malvo committed serious crimes when he was 17 years old and must be held accountable, … he also must be afforded constitutional protections, like all other child offenders.”
At National Review, Charles Cooke talks to Justice Neil Gorsuch about Gorsuch’s new book, “A Republic, If You Can Keep It.”
In the latest episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, “Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates discuss the Supreme Court’s new 2 minute rule and recap the week’s oral arguments.”
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!
The post Friday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
from Law https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/10/friday-round-up-491/ via http://www.rssmix.com/
0 notes
coachjeffsworkouts · 6 years
Text
2019 Sectionals.... what an incredible meet
Now that was a fun weekend of coaching. I shared with the swimmers at points that this was rapidly becoming one of my favorite meets. Every coach will have highlights along the way, memories that are etched in our minds. This is going to be one of those meets for me, but not because of individual or even TEAM highlights in results as much as it being the epitome of TEAM and process, working together.
So this is obviously going to be part meet recap and part blog, as these are lessons I just don’t want us to lose. It wasn’t one of those meets that we needed to handle anything huge. A little bit of rain, wind, and cold weather, but that wasn’t really even a thought of an issue from what I could tell. This meet really became about each swimmer battling their own hurdles along the way. It was one of those meets where it wasn’t going to come easy, but the results were there if you really wanted them. That “just short on rest” time where you are absolutely stronger, but man does it hurt to get up to those speeds and try to hold them.  “Easy speed” didn’t seem to make the bus for this trip and was left back at Rose Bowl. (Just another example of how I take being on time seriously, especially on trips. 😉
What this did though was challenge your personal weaknesses. Whether it be the process, the willingness to attack races, your ability to forget about how you feel and let yourself work, eliminating the fear of “dying” and starting to understand you have the control over that, and so many more. So we’re going to go over some of those here, and then I’ll hit the results.
“Tapering” to become stronger, not fragile. We don’t taper so that you have this perfect amount of speed for one swim at a time. That you are too fragile to handle the work. We taper from our intensity of training in order to allow your body to adapt and be STRONGER. When we taper you are ready for more, not less. Yes, resting is part of it, so we don’t want you out doing physical things during that time so that we can do our absolute best to get you the rest you need to be the strongest possible at the meet.  But as we learned this weekend, if we are working the legs in warm up all year long to get them fired up and ready to work, then we better be doing some of that to get ready to race. We’ll handle the design of the meet wuts, but I hope you understand the need to get your muscles “working” before we ask them to perform at your highest possible levels. Get them to that point before we start the race, so that we can utilize them at optimal levels the entire race, and not hope they get warmed up enough to help at the end.  
Being aggressive in your races. This weekend was going to challenge those of you afraid to attack races. If you are afraid of “dying” in races when you feel good, then your chances of attacking and believing you could hold on when you didn’t feel great went down to somewhere around 0%. Every time we “Sent It” and then fought, we went best times. Every time we pushed for the speeds needed going out and were willing to then hit the pace we needed to at the beginning (say the first 2 50’s of a 200, not just the first one), we were able to hit best times. Now the best times are great, but it’s only the tip of the iceberg compared to the lesson I hope you learned about you, your racing, your ability to be fast no matter how you feel, etc.
The last few for now is to remember to control the controllable’s, make sure your actions match your words/goals, and remember to just keep “pounding that rock” with everything you have, the time will come.
As we all know, it wasn’t the “perfect” meet by any means, but wow what an incredible meet. I am still on a bit of a high from it actually but it’s an odd one to share. Yes, we had great performances in the water, a ton of best times, cuts, wins, coaches recognizing your performances, and more. The thing is that I’ll need to go through my little red book soon here to remember what those were. I am way more focused on the processes that were worked through this weekend. The fact that when you were challenged, you didn’t back down. You understood it to be part of the process and responded incredibly. If you slipped in any way, you didn’t stay down. You got up, adjusted, and attacked the next one.
I find myself extremely proud of this entire TEAM and the way they responded to things this weekend. Then to see others that have come so far in their process that they just handled their business from race to race.  Ownership taken, adjustments made, longer term vision, emotions in check, and so many pieces that hit me so much deeper than any time ever will.
Then I also find myself more hopeful than ever that the lessons taught this weekend were actually learned. That may sound weird to say, but one of the coach’s main jobs is repetition and variable approaches, as lessons are actually rarely learned the first time. (Oh, but when coachable swimmers do, what fun that is. :) But this weekend felt like to me it was the incredible balance of success, learning lessons from obstacles, never giving up, enjoying the process, having FUN (pretty sure you had at least half of the swimmers in the meet singing along with you at some point), and being a TEAM. And maybe it’s just the excitement from such a great “coaching meet”, but I just have a feeling that more swimmers than ever had something click. Learned something more about the process and themselves, and that makes me very happy and very hopeful.
Swimmers, please remember to learn the lessons from this meet.  Learn the efforts you can give in races going out and how tough you really are, and when that race comes that it all connects….. look out. Congrats to you all! As we said the last night, you should all be proud of yourselves from this meet. Zero best times or all best times, you all did an incredible job and your coaches are very proud of you.
Okay, not sure where to start here, so I’ll just bullet point some highlights of the meet. Please know I can’t hit them all here, so I apologize if I miss them, but again, I hope this is more about process than results:
·         Rose Bowl Relays: Once again coming up big for the TEAM. Whether it was the Women’s 400 Medley of Kailee Ruiz, Amanda Petersen, Alex Syrkin, Maya Wilson that smashed the 15-16 TEAM record by 11 seconds, or the Men’s Medley TEAM of Mark McCrary, James Lee, Danny Syrkin, Will Blake winning it in convincing fashion against some of the top competition in the country, we seemed to step up on every single relay throughout the weekend. My favorite isn’t the wins though, it was our 2nd place finish in the 800 Free Relay. Unfortunately, Will Blake, who had just posted a big swim of 1:38.8 in the individual, hurt his shoulder on the finish of the 50, so he was out of the relay.  Time to pull someone up from the B and off the sideline for the B, and they stood up huge. Our A relay battled the entire race. Danny Syrkin led it off with a big swim, getting under 1:40 for the first time, followed by Ronald Dalmacio posting right on his best time from the day, third came Chris O’Grady (he’s getting used to pressure on relays by now I would imagine) and with the field on his heels posted a best split of over 2 seconds, and our anchor leg of Mark McCrary battled hard to hold on to 2nd and posted his lifetime best by over a second and a half as well. Such an exciting race. Then the B relay came back and I think averaged a 2 ½ second drop on splits, with James Lee coming off the sidelines 30 minutes before and still posting a 5 second drop off his best. Talk about being about the TEAM. We’re all lucky to have him going into the Navy.
·         Danny Syrkin had a huge meet, but again out of water more impressive than in the water. Yes, he won the 200 Fly and broke the Open TEAM record in the process (hearing a congrats from his predecessor when it happened).  Dropping bests in all freestyle events in the process as well. But the most outstanding part of it all was to see his new approach to swimming. He’s listened to guidance on some nuances of the sport and taken them to heart. His reaction to things now are processed based, ready for the next one, and always looking to improve over just the result. He’s a picture of what I see as possible for so many swimmers from this past meet. And as much as he had a solid meet here, with this type of approach, look out in the future.
·         Mark McCrary also had a huge meet, but again my happiness has more to do with the maturity and process approach he has learned over the years as well. He showed it a ton at Jrs and only continued it here. I can’t wait to see what he accomplishes the rest of his time here and his career in college as he takes in a great process. It’s not all the highlights, but congrats to Mark on the new Open/17-18 TEAM record in the 200 Back, as well as the new 17-18 TEAM record in the 100 Back.
·         Hojung Yoon had a huge meet. The 13 year old came in without fear and ready to race every time she touched the water. Coachable athletes like Hojung are a lot of fun to coach, and I really enjoyed working with her this weekend. When you can tell an athlete something for a race, her answer is “Yes”, and then she goes and does exactly that…… now that’s a lot of fun to watch. I’m going to highlight the impressive 400 IM, with a 9 second drop on the day total, she obviously wasn’t satisfied with the 4 second drop in the morning and came into finals ready to attack it even more and dropped an impressive 4:24.8 as a 13 year old, leaving her 6th in the country now.
·         James Lee was listed above but needs to be recognized here for sure. Mr. Consistency to me, he again came to play. Congrats to him on breaking the Open/17-18 TEAM record once again in the 200 Breast, coming off his huge race at Juniors to break it the first time. But the real James is shown by the readiness to jump up, change, and race an 800 Free Relay with 30 minutes notice all with a smile on his face. And then to split his leg 5 seconds faster than his best time ever, incredible TEAM effort.
·         Isaac Hwang took a huge step in his swimming. He had a number of best times along the way, but the best part once again was the change in mindset. He was willing to attack races and work for them like he does in practice. It’s a bigger breakthrough than the times will show, as long as he remembers this lessons and builds from here!
·         Devyn Walklett came to swim, and it didn’t matter where it needed to be done. In her 2 individual events she dropped over 2 seconds in the 200 IM and nearly 4 in the 200 Breast, only to utilize time trials to post even more best times. Showing how it is just another meet to stand up and race your race. Don’t get lost in the swimmers around you, just take care of business in your lane, and that is exactly what Devyn did this weekend.
·         New Winter Juniors qualifiers coming in Alex Syrkin (100 Fly) and Winston Chen (100 and 200 Back). Congrats to you both.
·         Ronald Dalmacio continued to work his process and learn lessons through the weekend, bouncing back from races he was disappointed with and managing to break his own 13-14 TEAM record in the 200 Back on the last night of competition and stepping up to help the TEAM on every race.
·         Two swimmers that are consistently willing attack their races and saw some great swims in the process are Amanda Petersen (who just missed Win Jr cuts in both 100 and 200 Breast, but will be way past that by December) and Eddie Cosic. Keep up that attack and keep training to bring it home. When we get those two together it’s going to be a lot of fun.
Okay, while that’s not everyone, and I wish I could take the time to write about all, since there’s a story in each one for sure, it’s time to wrap this up. I can’t say this enough swimmers, please look to take away the lessons over anything else. Remember how much fun you had at the meet, all while working your process, being held accountable for your actions but given the opportunity to be better, learning lessons instead of reacting emotionally to results, and so much more. When things don’t come easy and you need to fight and work for it, is exactly when you can learn the most about your process. If you set things up based on those “easy” times, you will struggle when adversity comes. If you set your process based on times you need to fight for what you want, then you set a process that will allow you to reach your absolute potential when it matters most, no matter the circumstance.
Congrats again to all, from your very proud coach.
#Worktheprocess
Go Rose Bowl!
0 notes
gwanth1002 · 7 years
Text
Anthropology 1002 Syllabus
Anth 1002.11 Introduction to Sociocultural Anthropology
Spring 2017: Hybrid Version
Professor Barbara Miller, [email protected]
Office hours: Friday 11:30am-1pm (please email in advance to confirm)
Email and phone availability (cell 202-420-1002, for emergency)
 Hybrid course mission:
A so-called hybrid course involves less time in a traditional classroom setting and requires more independent, self-monitored work by the student outside of class. In this case, class time will not be devoted to lectures or watching full-length documentary films. Instead, class time will be used for structured discussion of readings, film viewings, and independent research projects. Given the altered course delivery, evaluations of student achievement will not be based on the traditional testing model. In all, the class will consider students to constitute a community of scholars, working toward the common goal of learning a lot about sociocultural anthropology and how it connects to our everyday lives through reading, viewing, sharing, and independent observational research and analysis.
Given GW guidelines about expected class time per week:
► Students will spend 90 minutes a week in class (attendance is required; please see below for details).
► Students are expected to devote at least six hours a week, on average, outside of class to this course.
 Expectations – students will:
Do the assigned reading, watch the assigned films, and be prepared to discuss them in class and participate in Blackboard discussions about them
Conduct and present 6 of the “Anthropology in Everyday Life” Research Exercises; review classmates’ presentations on Tumblr, and be prepared to comment on them in class.
Take a turn being a class note-taker for one-half of a class session (45 minutes); thus each student will have an opportunity. There will be a list/sign-up sheet; if something goes wrong and you cannot take notes at your assigned time, it is your responsibility to swap a time with another student (social capital at work). Class notes will be posted on a thread on Discussion Board on a weekly basis so that we build an archive.
Participate in class discussion in person and on Discussion Board (ONE thoughtful post each week, either a novel post or a post in response to another student’s post; posts should be about 100 words on average, thoughtful, well-crafted, and perhaps drawing on other class readings/learning); individual introductions at the beginning of class do not count).
  Learning objectives:
► Awareness of concepts and theories in sociocultural anthropology and awareness of world ethnographic variation
► Understanding of ethical responsibilities and challenges in fieldwork; learn of the value and limitation of purely optical research
► Facility with critical thinking in assessing anthropology’s approaches and findings
► Practicing close observation, note-taking, and reflexivity
► Writing short reports and visual presentation on Tumblr
► Preparing and presenting short oral reports on research (6 in all) including required overview during the last class
► Appreciation of value of peer learning through “Community of Scholars” approach
 Grading:
As of the first class, everyone starts with an “A” grade. I will be your coach, guiding you to achieving learning objectives. There are no exams.
Draft rubric:
 Task
 Midpoint
 End of Course
 Misc.
 % of Grade
Attendance
      20
Discussion Board
      30
Tumblr
      50
                                        TOTAL
      100 percent
 Required Books (on sale in the GW bookstore; 2-hour reserve in Gelman Library):
Barbara D. Miller, Cultural Anthropology (2017, 8th edition). ISBN 978-0-13-44190-7 [My Anthro Lab not required].
James Spradley and David W. McCurdy, eds., Conformity and Conflict (2016, 15th edition); referred to below as C&C.  ISBN 13-978-0-205-98079-5 [selected chapters].
Elizabeth Thomas, The Old Way: A Story of the First People (2006, any edition].
Seth Holmes, Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies: Migrant Farmworkers in the United States (2013).
Jon D. Holtzman, Nuer Journeys, Nuer Lives: Sudanese Refugees in Minnesota (2000, any edition).
 GW support for students:
► Instructional Technology Help Desk open every day 24 hours:  Tel. 202-994-4948; [email protected]
►Disability Support Services (DSS): Marvin Center 242, telephone 994-8250; http://gwired.gwu.edu/dss
►Mental Health Services, counsellors available all day, every day at 202-994-5300; https://counselingcenter.gwu.edu/
 In case of an emergency:
Our class meets in the seminar room, 2nd floor, of 2110 G Street, the main anthropology department building. It is a historic row house and has no elevator. In case of an emergency, we will follow general GW instructions about evacuating the building, as needed, or “sheltering in place.”
 Week- by-Week
Week 1. January 27.  Introductions and orientation
Introductions around the room (also posted on Blackboard in more detail)
Discussion of creating a Tumblr site for the class research presentations: need to decide on its name and draft a mini-description [Nicole volunteered to set it up]
 Week 2. February 3. What are goals and scope of anthropology and how to the four fields contribute to a broad and deep view of humanity?  
Class discussion: Review of student comments to topics on Discussion Board Week 2
Readings for Week 2 discussion:
Miller Chapters 1 & 2
C&C Chapter 31 "Body Ritual among the Nacirema”
Start reading Thomas
Viewing for Week 2: two films: Nanook of the North (YouTube) and The Fast Runner    
Discussion Board
Exercise 1 due by midnight Sunday, Feb 5 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts (listed at the end of the chapter) from Chapters 1-2; take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post the text and photos on Tumblr as part of your growing research archive.
 Week 3. February 10.  Research methods: truth, objectivity, intersubjectivity; and Economic systems: working, eating, sharing, exclusion
Class presentation by each student about their posts for Exercise 1 and comments on classmates’ post.
Readings for Week 3 discussion:
Miller Chapter 3, 4 & 5
C&C Chapter 3 "Fieldwork on Prostitution in the Era of AIDS"
C&C Chapter 4 "Nice Girls Don't Talk to Rastas"
C&C Chapter 13 "Poverty at Work: Office Employment and the Crack Alternative"
C&C Chapter 14 "Women in the Mine"
C&C Chapter 2 "Eating Christmas in the Kalahari"
Continue reading Thomas
Discussion Board
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
Exercise 2 due by midnight Sunday February 12 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapters 3-5 including a related photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept, and post on Tumblr
 Week 4. February 17: Reproduction, the life cycle, and well-being
Class discussion of one’s own posts for Exercise 2 and comments on classmates’ posts
Readings for Week 4 discussion: Miller Chapter 6 & 7
C&C Chapter 16 “Mother’s Love: Death without Weeping”
C&C Chapter 37 "Medical Anthropology: Improving Nutrition in Malawi"
C&C Chapter 38 "Public Interest Ethnography: Women's Prisons and Health Care in California"
Finish reading Thomas
Viewing: Maasai Women (e-reserves streaming video)
Discussion Board: Questions will focus on The Old Way
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
Exercise 3 due by midnight Sunday February 19 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 6 or Chapter 7 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to each of them, write 100-150 words about each concept, and post on Tumblr
 Week 5. February 24: People related  
Presentation and class discussion of posts for Exercise 3
Readings for Week 5 discussion: Miller Chapter 8
C&C Chapter 18 "Polyandry: When Brothers Take a Wife,"
C&C Chapter 19, “Marriage and Adulthood in West Africa”
Start reading Holmes
Viewing: Dadi’s Family (e-reserves streaming video)
Discussion Board: Questions will cover Weeks 4 and 5 textbook topics and C&C readings
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
Exercise 4 due by midnight Sunday February 26 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 8 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concept, write 100-150 words about each concept, and post on Tumblr
 Week 6. March 3 Groups
Presentation and class discussion of Exercise 4
Readings for Week 6 discussion: Miller Chapter 9
C&C Chapter 22 "Mixed Blood"
Finish reading Holmes
No viewing
Discussion Board
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
Exercise 5 due by midnight Sunday March 5 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 9 and take a photo for each from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
 Week 7. March 10 Power and politics
Presentation and class discussion of Exercise 5
Readings for Week 7 discussion: Miller Chapter 10
C&C Chapter 24 "Cross-Cultural Law: The Case of the Gypsy Offender"
C&C Chapter 6 “Manipulating Meaning: The Military Name Game”
Viewing: Kawelka—Ongka’s Big Moka (e-reserves streaming video)
Exercise 6 due by midnight Sunday March 12 on Tumblr: choose a Key Concept from Chapter 10 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concept, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
Discussion Board: Questions will focus on Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
Mid-point assessment: The professor will review and comment on the students’ two files (Discussion Board posts and Tumblr photos/posts, provided on Blackboard/Assignment no later than midnight March 10; post as much as you have done by the deadline).
 Week 8 SPRING BREAK
 Week 9.  March 24 Communication
Class discussion of one’s own post for Exercise 6 and comments on classmates’ post
Readings for week 9 discussion: Miller Chapter 11
C&C Chapter 7 "Conversation Style: Talking on the Job"
Start reading Holtzman
Exercise 7 due by midnight Sunday March 19 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 11 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
Discussion Board: Questions will cover week & and week 9
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
 Week 10 March 31 Religion and beliefs
Class discussion of one’s own post for Exercise 7 and comments on classmates’ post
Readings for week 10 discussion: Miller Chapter 12
C&C Chapter 29 "Baseball Magic"
C&C Chapter 30 "Run for the Wall: An American Pilgrimage"
Continue reading Holtzman
Exercise 8 due by midnight Sunday March 26 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 12 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
 Week 11. April 7 Expressive culture
Class discussion of one’s own post for Exercise 8 and comments on classmates’ post
Readings for week 11 discussion: Miller Chapter 13
C&C Chapter 32 "How Sushi Went Global
C&C Chapter 33 "Village Walks: Tourism and Globalization among the Tharu of Nepal"
Finish reading Holtzman
No viewing
Exercise 9 due by midnight Sunday April 2 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 13 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
Discussion Board
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
 Week 12. April 14 People on the move
Class discussion of one’s own post for Exercise 9 and comments on classmates’ post
Readings for week 12 discussion:  Miller Chapter 14
Viewing “First Contact” (e-reserves on Blackboard)
Exercise 10 due by midnight Sunday April 9 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 14 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
Discussion Board
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
 Week 13 April 21 People (re)defining development
Class discussion of one’s own post for Exercise 10 and comments on classmates’ post
Readings for week 13 discussion: Miller Chapter 15
C&C Chapter 11 "Forest Development the Indian Way"
C&C Chapter 36 "Advice for Developers: Peace Corps Problems in Botswana"
C&C Chapter 39 "Using Anthropology"
Viewing: Kayapo: Out of the Rainforest (e-reserves on Blackboard)
Discussion Board: final posts due by  
Read Tumblr posts and be prepared to comment in class next week
Exercise 11 due by midnight Sunday April 23 on Tumblr: choose two Key Concepts from Chapter 15 and take a photo from your daily experiences connecting to your chosen concepts, write 100-150 words about each concept and post on Tumblr
 Week 14 TUESDAY May 2 Class round-up
Following the guiding principle of this class as being formed by a “community of scholars,” we will devote this final class meeting to discussing the format of the class in terms of its learning objectives. We will consider expectations, work load, research assignment details, and student accountability in terms of Discussion Board, Tumblr, and class participation.
 Second-half assessment: The professor will review and comment on the students’ two files (Discussion Board posts and Tumblr photos/posts, provided on Blackboard/Assignment no later than April 30; post your work since the mid-point assessment, March 10, following instructions on Blackboard).
0 notes
miketellszagz-blog · 7 years
Text
Who-Should-Win-All-the-Various-NBA-Awards-&-How-You-Should-Feel-About-It-Column
The 2017 NBA season is almost over, which is sad. But, the 2017 NBA playoffs are almost here, which is good. Here is your 3rd Annual (slightly belated) Who-Should-Win-All-the-Various-NBA-Awards-&-How-You-Should-Feel-About-It-Column.
 1.       Russy Westbrook should win the 2017 NBA Most Valuable Player
FEELS: Collecting forty-two triple doubles &  averaging a triple-double while dragging the Oklahoma City “Steven Adams + Some Misfits” to the 5 seed is the most impressive individual season since….last year, when Steph made ten thousand three pointers, I guess. For perspective: when Lebron James won all but one MVP vote (some dumbass voted for Carmelo) in 2013, he was putting up 26p/8r/7a, while playing with 3 other All-Stars & the best supporting cast outside of San Antonio. This year, Russy is putting up 31/10/10 with the best supporting cast in all of Oklahoma.
The main argument you will hear saying Russy shouldn’t win is people saying triple doubles are overrated & arbitrary, and that we as fans & humans should not care about arbitrary statistical cutoffs. I don’t agree with it. It’s dumb. Just because a triple-double is arbitrary doesn’t mean it isn’t incredible. Also, deciding to not care about triple-doubles by calling them “arbitrary” is essentially an attempt to discredit the decimal system, which is bad, because the decimal system is important for counting things and doing math, both of which are linchpins of civilization & what separate us from the animals.
Also you may hear someone argue that some other player is more “valuable” to their team that Russy is to the Thunder. This is wrong because (a) it’s the stupidest, pendanticest, “kid-who-pushes-his-glasses-up-with-his-forefinger-before-talking”-est way to pick a league MVP & (b) nobody is more valuable to their team than Russy is to the Thunder. Russy for MVP.
 2.       Giannis Antetokounmpo should be your 2017 NBA Most Improved Player
He is much better this year than he was last year. He went from being “kid in Milwaukee who’s pretty fun to watch” to “first-team all-nba” pretty quick. Also, I spend a whole paragraph teaching you how to pronounce his name correctly & that needs to have some sort of payoff, I think.
 3.       Mike Dan Tony should be your 2017 NBA Coach of the Year
Mike D’Antoni never gets no respect, in my book. He invented the NBA as we know it today by turning a young Canadian man into two-time MVP Steve Nash, then went on to totally fuck up the Kobe-Dwight-Nash Lakers, both of which should be enough to put him in the Hall of Fame. This year he turned the Rockets into the 3rd best team in the league by excising Dwight from them & telling James Harden he’s only allowed to shoot threes.
 4.       Zach Randolph should be your 6th Man of the Year
FEELS: This award will probably go to Eric Gordon of the Rockets because this award has become “guy that doesn’t start the game but can still go off for 25 points anyway” award, which is understandable, but still. Zach Randolph doesn’t start for the Grizz anymore (this is because you need at least 4 people on the court who can jump, and neither Marc Gasol nor Zach Randolph are able to jump anymore) and he is better than Eric Gordon. 
 5.       Defensive Player of the Year: Rudy Gobert
FEELS: A lot of people want either Dray or Kawhi to win this award. Dray, because the Warriors are the best defensive team in the league when he plays, and they aren’t when he doesn’t. That’s a nuanced argument! The people who want Kawhi noticed that he’s the best at sticking to an opposing guard like a glove & making sure they don’t shoot well. That’s a simple but good argument! They’re both wrong tho. Rudy “the French Rejection” “Stifle Tower” “the Gobert Report” Gobert is better then both of those dudes (but with big dudes instead of guards). When Rudy is on the court for the Jazz, every other Jazz player just hangs out on the perimeter and prevents three point shots. They are all super comfortable letting their man drives, because if he drives, he has to run into Rudy, who will send him to the Shadow Realm. He also does a brutal job blocking the hell out of big dudes who try to post up on him. That is the point of the DPOY. So give him the DPOY. 
 6.       Rookie of the Year: Malcom Brogden
FEELS: Nobody really deserves this award. Joel Embiid only player like 30 minutes all season, Dario Saric is mediocre at best, Brogdon can’t shoot the ball, Brandon Ingram got bodied by the Buck’s shooing coach in a fight, Kris Dunn is somehow a worse shooter than Ricky Rubio, Yogi Ferrell wasn’t even on an NBA team until February, Buddy Heild plays for the Kings, DeAndre Bembry is only allowed to take 2 shots per game, Malachai Richardson is only allowed two shots per game & he plays for the Kings. But, of all the players who don’t super deserve it, Brogden doesn’t deserve it the least.
 7.       All -NBA First team: Russy Westbrook, James Harden, Lebron James, Kawhi Leonard, Marc Gasol
FEELS: As expected. The best players in the league + one center who’s just there because the rules say you need a center.  
 8.       All-NBA Second Team: Steph Curry, Kyle Lowry, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Kevin Durant, Boogie Cousins
FEELS: Boogie gets it bc you gotta have one of the spots be a center. Giannis is now eligible to get a billion goddamn dollars from the Bucks. Kevin might have made the first team if he didn’t miss a month of the season.
 9.       All-NBA Third Team: Mike Conley, Kyrie Irving, Blake Griffin, Paul Millsap, Anthony Davis
FEELS: I’m not super sure if Tony Davis counts as a center but I think he should & that’s what matters most. Also, Gordon Hayward, DeMar DeRozen, Hassan Whiteside & Paul George NOT making an all-nba team means that they will probably leave in free agency because they aren’t eligible for the super secret derrick rose max salaries anymore.
 10.   All-MTZ 1st Team: Russy Westbrook, Russy Westbrook, Russy Westbrook, Russy Westbrook, Russy Westbrook
 11.   All-MTZ 2nd Team: Richard Jefferson, Dion Waiters, Yogi Ferrell, Boogie Cousins, Jusef Nurkic
 FEELS: Richard Jefferson has no business being good. He’s old has hell, he’s balder than anyone else I’ve ever seen, his best season was 15 years ago when he played next to Jason Kidd on the Nets. But it’s 2017 and it feels like he’s the third-best player on the reigning world champion cavs some nights. Dion Waiters stared making all the dumb-as-hell threes he’s been taking his entire life & now somebody’s gonna offer him 15 million dollars a year to keep chucking next season. Yogi would be rookie of the year if the Mavs had signed him before March. Boogie leads the league in technical fouls. Jusef Nurkic was a bench player for the Nuggets, was terrible his entire time with them, and got traded for the Nuggets for Miles Plumlee, who is terrible. The Nuggets and Blazers played each other a week after the trade. Miles played terribly, because he is terrible. Jusef, who had never scored more than 12 points in a game before this, put up 33 points & 15 rebounds & trash talked his way through the post-game interview, which is super petty and super great.
12.   MTZ Hall of Fame entrants: I’m disqualifying these guys from MTZ mid- and end-year awards so I don’t end up only writing bout them for the rest of time: Vince Carter, Demarre Carroll, Zbo. FEELS: Vince Carter
I will hopefully write you a playoff preview soon.
0 notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
This iguana has a charge account.
9 notes · View notes
Text
Love Ken Adam’s use of medium brown here. There’s not so much style mixing, it’s more flatout modern, but I’m very into this set and the furniture.
Tumblr media
8 notes · View notes
Text
Okay I lied I think THIS is my favorite Ken Adam checkerboard motif.
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
Text
Also, Ken Adam’s hotel room set in Thunderball (1965) is so my taste. The light wood floor, baseboard, arches, paneling, and slatted doors give the room a warm and natural feel. The tan textured (fabric?) wall contributes to this as well.
Tumblr media
I’m not really into the style of artwork above the bed, but it works in context. Also I dig the red lamps..
Tumblr media
Though mid-century modernism has gotten more popular in the last decade, for whatever reason tall lampshades are an aspect of the style that’s been left behind and I think that’s a shame.
Tumblr media
Through the connecting door is the next suite. The large checkerboard motif is one Ken Adam used many times, and this is my favorite instance of it. The black and stainless steel ceiling tiles are eye-catching, modern, and a less overt alternative to the ol’ mirror-over-the-bed.
Tumblr media
Something that parodies of Adam’s Bond sets often ignore is the way he (and anyone else dressing the set) harmoniously mixes styles. A sleek modernist credenza coexists with elaborately carved lyre-back chairs and the fairly unobtrusive sofa, armchair, and coffee table. It helps these sets feel lived in and not catalogue-decorated or overly cold and modern.
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
Text
These Swiss locations are gorgeous
5 notes · View notes
Text
Gaymes Bond agent 0069: licence to SLAY
2 notes · View notes
Text
This film's main "Bond girl" is not a good actor.
2 notes · View notes
Text
1989: the phrase "jerk off" is used in a James Bond movie
2 notes · View notes