shortnotsweet · 1 year ago
Text
Helaena The Dreamer: A Dissection of Symbolic Tragedy and Green Conservatism
Mythology in the Flesh: A Song of Tragedy
Defining tragic principles and their application to the narrative
Helaena’s ironic significance as a Dreamer
The role of the self-fulfilled or unfulfilled prophecy
Climate change deniers and why they’re fucking annoying but also everywhere
Helen of Troy and Her Sweet, Dead Boy
Significance of motherhood in four instances
Birth, Abortion, Abandonment, Contraceptives, and Miscarriage
Commentary on girlhood, womanhood, and self-extension
The Pious Nature of Being Evil. Like, Super Evil.
She Blinded Me with Political Silence
Conservatism and right-wing ideology within the Greens
The Faith as a mechanism of cultural deterioration (for Westeros and the Old Gods); the Political Machine
Impact in Westeros (theoretical and literal)
Sisyphus’s Hill: A De-Girlbossification of Alicent Hightower
Character Nuance + Vitality to the Plot
Deviance from the source material and why it was beneficial to the story, but had detrimental effects
Anti-feminist females and a never-ending boulder over a hill (ie. “Women for Trump”) ft. Olivia Cooke
The Inherent Eroticism of Catholicism
Sexual Repression vs. Lack Thereof (orientation and sexual expression)
The literary merits of Catholic/religious guilt
Alicent’s fate: guilt wins the day over greed, lust, love, and vengeance
Epic Slays and Their Legal Ramifications: Why Twink Death Leads to War
Faces that launch a thousand ships
Death of legitimacy => death of order => death of justice => tragedy => we’re back to climate change
The Self-Mastubatory Practice of Historical Revisionism
Fandom practices and response
In-text unreliability
Real-world significance and practices
18 notes · View notes
littlemisssquiggles · 5 years ago
Note
Some people are saying that Rosegarden feels forced, especially after the most recent interaction the two had. That RG had absolutely no build up in terms of shipping. What is your response to this?
Hello Draw. You see, one of the many perks of being both a Rosegardener and Rosegardening Pinehead is that my adoration for the budding bond between our pair of smaller, more honest souls has caused me to become more observant of their moments together; particularly over the course of the most recent three seasons. And it is because I pay so much attention to following these two and their interactions per episode that I can easily contest with full confidence that people’s point of the ship being “forced with no build up” is drivel because it’s not true.
Again, take this from someone who has been following the development of this bond since V5. While it’s not as in your face as the portrayal of certain other ships within the FNDM, I can’t deny the fact that he show has been slowly building up these two’s relationship from the moment they met.
Throughout the seasons, the PLOT continues to highlight Ruby and Oscar’s growing friendship in the form of their continued support of one another. In V5, we began off with Ruby being the sole member of RNJR to actively look out for Oscar during his stay with the group back in Mistral and this habit of our littlered rose being protective of our freckled farm boy turned little barn prince has remained consistent even till this season.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
And what’s interesting to note is that this protective and supportive nature wasn’t only established with Ruby. Oscar mirrors this behaviour as well with his own support of Ruby particularly in V6.
But don’t just take my word for it, here’s the photo proof because a picture says a thousand words:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
So no I don’t believe the relationship between the Rosebuds is forced at all. If anything, I think the CRWBY have done pretty decently on showcasing the development between these two kids. It’s slow but it’s definitely there and it’s certainly ain’t forced. ‘Forced’ would’ve been if we spent several seasons with the show never really acknowledging these two’s relationship at all, providing zero groundwork for the potential of a romance to spark between them only to suddenly slam them together for this season.
This has not been the case with them fortunately. The Rosegarden bond has been building up nicely with the show occasionally tossing in moments between V5-V7 that highlight just how much one values the other’s influence on them on the team.
My one gripe is that I wished the show had done just a bit more to push for their friendship for this season. What’s weird was that it honestly seemed like that was the direction they were going for at first looking back on CH2 and CH3 of this season.
But no, what that essentially boiled down to was more light exchange of comments between the two until the recent ninth episode. It’s not how I would’ve handled if I were a CRWBY writer but hey, it’s the PLOT and I’m not here to argue the PLOT of RWBY and how the show writes its characters.
Needless to say, the portrayal of Rosegarden and their budding bond has been handled well enough so far (certainly better than certain other ships).
The only thing I believe might be ‘forced’ here is the reaction or rather overreaction of certain members of the FNDM in regards to the recent development of Rosegarden. It honestly upsets me to no end the level of toxicity people can stoop to within this FNDM and just how far they will go to rain on another person’s parade when they weren’t even doing anything to bother them in the first place.
Do you have any idea how annoyed I was over the weekend hearing stories of people complaining about the Rosegarden moment in V7CH9? How angered I became when I saw retweets from fellow Rosegardeners with some of the comments people were making in regards to not just Rosegarden but also Oscar because of this episode. Heck I’m upset now that I can’t even answer this question since I am just so fed up with this part of FNDM and their nonsense.
And what’s silly to me the most about all of this is that these types of fans are losing their butts over a moment that confirmed nothing.
So Ruby and Oscar acted all awkward and adorable while talking to each other in a scene that focused on their interaction?
Tumblr media
So?
It’s no different than all the other times the show has had them act this way in a scene. And that’s just it! All they did was share another nice moment together that could easily be argued as not being all that romantically charged.
I’m a Rosegarden shipper and while I will say that that moment did toss a coin in the possibility of a future Rosegarden romance should the series really take them in that direction, it didn’t confirm this possibility for me either. It was just another cute moment between the two characters and the fact that folks are losing their knickers over something as minor as that is utterly ridiculous.
I even had a Whiterose shipper leave me comments on Twitter implying that their ship was now sunk thanks to that moment and they even congratulated me as a Rosegardener in this kind of way as if we were in some kind of beef regarding our ships. My reaction to that was “…Dude what?”
The last time I checked, I’m not fighting anyone on their ships. I am here because I love Rosegarden. They are my main RWBY OTP at the moment and like any fan, I’m more than delighted to see wherever the showrunners decide to take their bond—be it platonically or romantically. That being said, just because I ship RG, doesn’t mean I have any kind of beef or wish to be in any type of ridiculous shipping war with non-Rosegardeners.
To put it humbly, it doesn’t really matter to me what your shipping preferences are. Ship whoever you like so long as you remain respectable to other shippers. To put it bluntly, I don’t give a rat’s ass who or what you ship. Just don’t be a dickwad to anyone else regarding their own shipping choices. To each their own, in my books but respect is mandatory.
To the last episode in question, I’m going to be frank here. If Whiterose or Lancaster or any other non-RG ship had received any kind of moment in V7CH9 or in any episode before that, as a Rosegardener, I would be upset that my pairing didn’t get to have a moment too but I wouldn’t go out of my way to complain about the other ships or worse attack the shippers of said ship. That type of nonsense is unwarranted.
This is why this whole recent discourse surrounding a ship that I love has left me bothered. The things I have heard people say regarding the Rosegarden pair and even our shipping community is just deplorable.
I mean…it’s not entirely new what these people are saying.
It’s the same ole rubbish that’s been said to complain about the “problems” with RG for a while—the 2 year age gap. The Ozpin Dilemma. Yada-yada! Stuff that has already been debunked by the Rosegarden community, the CRWBY and the show itself. Yet…here we go again. The same recycled arguments going around and around, like a Beyblade.
I’ve even heard through the grapevine that certain-certain folks have reached as far as to refer to us Rosegardeners by a very ‘problematic’ term (i.e. paedophiles) just for liking Rosegarden. Like…wow! All of that just because RWBY gave our ship a little moment in the recent episode. Terrific.
But who is more problematic, though? The community of shippers who see this pairing of the two youngest huntsmen in our gaggle of heroes (who are not too far apart in age) as nothing more than an innocent bond that has the strong potential to blossom into an equally charming romance built on their mutual support of one another and their shared core values, as established within the canon.
Or…the group of people who are spreading hurtful backlash regarding said ship and its shippers that are not only NOT true but are just downright vulgar.
If I were to be completely honest with you, fam, my heart really isn’t in answering this question this time because there isn’t anything here I can really say to argue in favour of Rosegarden that either I or my fellow gardeners have not said multiple times before.
Seriously? How many times do we have to argue the hypocrisy of the nonsensical 2-year age gap “issue” that people still bring up to throw shade at Rosegarden while leaving ships like Whiterose, Lancaster and Nuts and Dolts who share the same age gap completely unscathed?
How many times do we have to repeat the same information provided by the show in which “The Lost Fable” episode (V6CH3) clearly said that Ozpin does not affect the Rosegarden relationship since in the past, Ozma had learnt to live in harmony with the men he was paired off with leading to one of them even getting married and having a family with Ozma being present but never interfering with Henkle’s (Dadpin) family affairs?
Seriously, how many times are people going to dig up both of these two poor, poor dead horses and continue to beat the ever living daylights out of em, huh?
It’s bad enough to ignore the rationales of the people who actually better understand the bond between the characters within the pairing since we pay closer attention to said relationship; however to ignore evidence provided by the series too as well as the word of the showrunners— that is a level of ignorance that has surpassed my patience to deal with this crap anymore.
Honestly, this squiggle meister has reached a point where I am fed up with the toxicity of some of the folks within this FNDM. The type of people, who to me, sound like nothing more than spoiled brats throwing hissy fits and tantrums just because the ‘CRWBY didn’t give them what they wanted in regards to their favourite SHIP so they have to ruin the experience for others who are just trying to have as much fun with it as they were’.
As if the CRWBY owe them anything. At the end of the day, the people running RWBY have all the say in the world. So if they decide they wish to give certain character relationships a bigger push than others then it’s their call.
And even if something becomes canon, that don’t necessarily mean it’s the end of a ship. Look how many other fandoms there are that dissolved into ridiculous shipping wars over whose ship was going to be canon and what happened? It didn’t matter in the end. Canon or not, people still continued to love and support the ship they liked even long after the series was over. Just look at Zutara from Avatar: The Last Airbender.
You think the Zutara-shippers gave two Flying Lemur shits about Kataang being endgame? No! Both ships still thrive pretty strongly even after all of these years as well as any other beloved ship from that show. So certain folks in the RWBY FNDM need to chill it with this kind of crap. It’s foolish!
And quite frankly, I have no more f***s left to give at this point to deal with it. Once upon a time, another fellow gardener approached me with this same kind of question and I’m going to repeat the same thing I told them in the end. There is a saying in my country that my mom used to say whenever conflict arose and people would just run their mouths for no reason. “Let the jackass bray!”
If folks within the FNDM wish to continue to run their mouths, making the same ole set of noise time and time again over small ting then it makes no sense trying to debate these kinds of people. This is why I feel more annoyed that I’m hearing about my fellow Rosegardeners still answering these people. STOP! Please STOP!
I myself have been caught up in it a little bit. Whether Rosegarden becomes canon or not, these types of people are always going to complain about it. We will never win with these people and y’know what? Whatever, because in all honesty, there is no fight or “shipping war” in the first place.
I refuse to argue with anyone over my preferred ship. Whether Rosegarden becomes canon or not, what matters to me is that I just want to kick back and enjoy the progression of our rosebuds who I adore so much. Ruby and Oscar are both my all-time favourite RWBY characters. Their individual stories mean a lot to me and their shared story together means a lot to me too.  I want to be able to express my admiration for the growing bond between these two buds and create content around them in peace; away from any kind of animosity.
Instead of wasting my time and energy on responding to the half-baked comments of people who clearly only care about my ship whenever they wish to stir up trouble, I will instead channel it into giving more support for the ship I adore. And I pray my fellow gardeners do the same.
I, for one, have been more inspired than I’ve ever been to create more RG content because if I have sit in my proverbial bubble and listen to constant chatter from folks like that then the least I can do is fill my bubble with the things I like. And I adore Rosegarden very much. I also adore our community. We’re a small bunch but we’re mostly all pretty cool, very nice, very talented and mostly courteous people. If certain-certain folks are saying things, let them run their mouths. Leave them alone with their noise.  
DON’T ANSWER THE TOXICITY! IGNORE IT! AND SHOULD IT DARE ATTACK YOU FOR NO REASON, DELETE AND BLOCK ARE YOUR WEAPONS. DON’T LET THE HATE RUIN YOUR FUN!
I understand how annoying it is to hear people talk smack about something you like while also being tempted to contest everything they say. But as I’ve mentioned before, I and many others have already debated these same old arguments before. They are not even worthy of being mentioned anymore since the CANON OF RWBY has deemed them invalid already.
While I appreciate you coming to me for my views, fam, truth is that I’ve already said my piece many, many, times before and I will always say the exact same thing:
I have been a Rosegardener (and by extension Rosegardening Pinehead) since RWBY V5 (2017). I have adored the pairing of Ruby and Oscar together since the series did a great job of hooking me in with how adorable these two’s first interactions were. Watching the way Ruby giggled and smiled at Oscar and seeing his ‘mini-stroke smile’ response to that was quite cute and such an expected reaction befitting of two adolescent kids meeting each other for the first time.
I have always viewed Rosegarden as the romantic pairing between Ruby Rose and Oscar Pine. I have NEVER once confused Rosegarden with Clockrose—the presumed RWBY pairing of Ruby Rose and Professor Ozpin. I wasn’t even aware of the existence of such a ship until V5.
But regardless, when I say I ship Ruby with Oscar, I mean exactly that, I ship Ruby with Oscar. To me, Oscar is NOT Ozpin. Nor will he ever be Ozpin or even another version of Ozpin.  
Do you wanna know why? Because by my understanding of the character of Oscar Pine, he is his own person separate from the character of Professor Ozpin.
As a matter of fact, when Ozpin previously had his old body, people saw him as himself. And when Oscar first appeared on the scene, the show introduced him to the audience as his own character. Even after Oz’s soul appeared, the show immediately highlighted that the two souls are different from the other in spite of sharing Oscar’s body.
It is for this reason why I don’t understand how people can keep insisting that Oscar and Oz are the same person.Especially when the show has gone out of its way to establish time and time again that these two souls, while like-minded, are NOT the same.
So when certain-certain folks attempt to imply that Rosegarden = Ruby and Ozpin because Oscar is Ozpin, not only do I find this remark to be gibberish but it’s also a complete misunderstanding of both the characters of Ozpin and Oscar.
Rosegarden does not involve Ozpin at all since it is a pairing between Ruby and Oscar and as I shall repeat with conviction, Oscar and Oz are not the same person. Two souls, people.
I also have no problem with shipping the Rosebuds despite their ginormous, galaxy-sized age difference of 2 years.
As confirmed by Miles Luna, the age gap between Ruby and Oscar is indeed 2 years. So even if Ruby is 17 years old as of present in the series, there is the likelihood that Oscar will be turning 15 soon. Possibly in V8.
As a matter of fact, 2 years is a common age gap used in RWBY. So common in fact that it’s the exact same age gap as non-RG ships like Whiterose, Lancaster, Nuts and Dolts and for all the ‘special folks’ in the FNDM who ship Enabler—the pairing of Ruby with her sister Yang.
Not trying to throw shade at Enabler, I just find it hilarious how incest is wincest within the FNDM yet my ship is the one getting heat all because they shared a cute moment where they finished each other’s sandwiches.
No declaration of love. No confirmation of a crush. No kiss. Not even a flushed cheek. Just two KIDS being absolute dorks with one another got certain-certain people all rattled up. Wow.  
Man I can’t wait to see how those same folks will react if Ruby and Oscar were to ever…dare I say it, hold hands and gaze into each other’s eyes.
RoosterTeeth may need to censor that kind of stuff because it’ll be too inappropriate for this type of uppity audience. The same audience who wouldn’t mind this type of thing or more if it were in favour of their favourite non-RG ship of the same age difference. Nope. Just the Garden is the problem. Sure….
Anyhow, while I understand that certain people may dislike Rosegarden for whatever reasons they got, what this squiggle meister firmly disapproves of is the outright disrespect of their fellow fans. I don’t understand the need for people to stir up trouble just because things within the show didn’t play out exactly how you wanted it. It’s just ridiculous and as I said, I’m done with it.
Just because certain-certain folks are talking, don’t mean I have to listen. Certainly not anymore now.
Anyways, that’s all I have to say on this topic. Not sure if I actually answered your question fam but that’s the best I got.
~LittleMissSquiggles (2020)
103 notes · View notes
sejinpk · 7 years ago
Text
So, this is a bit of a rant (among other things). Spoilers for Pokemon the Movie: I Choose You!
There’s a clip going around Twitter that a friend showed me, and that I’ve seen re-blogged by someone I follow on the website, of the moment near the end of the movie when Pikachu speaks. The near-unanimous reaction to it that I’ve seen is “WTF?!” and that it’s really weird and upsetting.
And like, I get that reaction. It was a little weird to me, too. I don’t think it’s a “wrong,” or misguided, or whatever, reaction to have. But it’s also frustrating to me that so much of the focus is on the fact that Pikachu speaks, not on what he says, what that means for the characters or the movie, or even that the overall context of the Pokemon anime franchise clearly points to what the scene did, and didn’t, intend to convey.
The theme of the movie is the importance of the bonds between us and the power they have and can give us. This moment plays directly into that theme. Pikachu isn’t literally speaking. The point of it is that it shows just how close Ash and Pikachu have become. I’ve also seen an interpretation that says Pikachu speaking is just in Ash’s head because he’s kind of out of it at the time, which I think works perfectly well as a diegetic explanation.
It seems to me like the reaction that so many people are having comes in part from what they’re used to and what they expect. Pikachu never speaks, so it feels “wrong” or “upsetting” or “off-putting” when he does, even if it’s just one line. I’ve also seen a few people wondering if it’s meant to be taken literally (which, uh, it’s definitely not, and I don’t see how people are even arriving at that interpretation; this is one that I just flat-out disagree with and don’t understand). However, that same history and context of the franchise that people are forming their expectations from also makes it clear that Pikachu speaking isn’t meant to be taken literally. Both within that larger context, and the smaller context of this individual movie, the overwhelming history of Pikachu not speaking is an indication that this is a one-off thing. And this movie’s theme, as well as the way the moment is contextualized by the surrounding scenes and the movie as a whole, give a clear indication as to why the creators decided to have Pikachu speak, which is to demonstrate that Ash and Pikachu have become so close by this point that, for all intents and purposes, Pikachu may as well be speaking a human language in terms of Ash’s ability to understand him. That’s the point.
The other explanation I’ve seen people give for why Pikachu speaking unnerves them is how the moment is framed, which I think is worth considering. They perceive it as being framed like a romantic confession, and say that the tone and pitch of Pikachu’s voice (which they described as a “lilting anime girl voice”) also contribute to that. I can see where they’re coming from, and I do agree that the framing is like what you’d be likely to see in a tender, quiet, romantic moment. However, in the overall context of the film, the moment doesn’t read that way to me.
Within the context of the film and its theme of the bonds between us that it heavily and repeatedly emphasizes, I think the framing is intended to speak to the level and depth of intimate connection between Ash and Pikachu, which by this point has come to include a more tender intimacy that we (stereo)typically associate with romance. The framing, due to what we typically associate with it, brings in that kind of intimacy, but the larger context modifies the moment’s meaning to not be romantic while enabling it to retain much of the kinds of intimacy that we tend to associate with romance. As for the way Pikachu’s voice sounds, I felt that the English VA and the dub director were simply going for something that sounded like what Pikachu would sound like speaking English in a tender, quiet, intimate moment. Again, that’s the important part--the context the moment gives to the performance, and the way the moment is, in turn, contextualized by the surrounding scenes and the movie as a whole. I definitely see how the moment can play as romantic when taken out of the context of the movie as a whole. But within that context, I disagree with that interpretation. And here’s the other thing to keep in mind: Ash and Pikachu’s relationship is supposed to be super-duper close, even more than what you’d probably think of for best friends. They’re more like soulmates than anything else. Actually, they are soulmates. With that in mind, I can definitely see that there would come to be kinds of intimacy and connection between them that we may not typically associate with even very close friendship.
To conclude, I guess what I’m frustrated by in all of this, even though I understand (the rationale behind) being weirded out by Pikachu speaking, is that the vast majority of what I’m seeing is simply that reaction, with relatively few people seeming to think about why they had the reaction they did, and even whether their reaction is supported by the film itself, let alone the larger franchise. And given that the film is made in large part for older fans who grew up with the franchise and thus have that larger context, the fact that many people only seem to be utilizing that context in one direction frustrates me.
The other thing that frustrates me is how much people seem to be viewing that clip out of the context of the movie (and thus doing things like taking its framing completely out of context). There’s no way for me to know how many of these people have or haven’t seen the movie, but especially for those who haven’t, it’s frustrating to me that they don’t seem to acknowledge not only that they’re taking the moment out of context, but that they don’t even have the full context of the movie to begin with.
And this is a movie we’re talking about, so I recognize and admit that my subjective frustrations are directed at other people’s subjective interpretations that I disagree with or find lacking, even if I understand the rationale behind them. But that doesn’t really make it any less frustrating.
In short: context. Context, context, context. Ugh.
11 notes · View notes
bharatiyamedia-blog · 5 years ago
Text
#WeStandWithTaylor: Celebs Again Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber Accused Of Dishonest, And MORE!
http://tinyurl.com/y4donvec The drama simply retains on comin’!!! Taylor Swift is burning all of it down hours after the open letter she published to Tumblr referred to as out supervisor Scooter Braun for purchasing up her music catalog — however she didn’t cease there, additionally calling out Scott Borchetta (the founding father of her unique document label, Huge Machine), Justin Bieber, Kim Kardashian West, Kanye West, and extra! And all afternoon, celebs, followers, fans, and interested observers have been reacting — with many tweeting on the #WeStandWithTaylor hashtag to indicate their help for the celebrity artist! Related: Justin Agrees To A Secret Fight With Tom Cruise?! Nicely, as afternoon turns to night on this Sunday, we’ve got even more updates for you here… for those who’re not already, get caught up on the latest Taylor-Justin-Scooter drama and then some, under!!! Extra Celebs Stand With Taylor! As you possibly can see (under), Cara Delevingne stands with Taylor: 📲 IG | @Caradelevingne feedback again on Justin Bieber’s Instagram put up in response to Hailey Bieber’s remark “Gentleman” “I want you spent much less time sticking up for males and extra time attempting to grasp girls and respecting their legitimate reactions.” #WeStandWithTaylor pic.twitter.com/SSTQ4W7zbO — Taylor Swift Information (@TSwiftNZ) June 30, 2019 Isn’t it great how she isn’t even a bit of bit afraid to name out��Hailey Bieber, both?! So right here for it!!! And he or she ain’t the one one!!! Selena Gomez‘s mother, Mandy Teefey, and the sisters of the band Haim are additionally enthusiastically pro-Taylor of their stances that artists ought to be able to own their own music (under): WE LOVE WOMEN SUPPORTING WOMAN #WeStandWithTaylor pic.twitter.com/ZQC5Xb9IAS — 𝑵𝒂𝒐 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 🍔 (@alltoobrien) June 30, 2019 Pretty!!! These artists and high-profile celebs be a part of earlier supporters like Halsey in throwing their weight behind Swift. That’s relieving to see contemplating it’s just about the one wise factor to argue that artists who write their very own music ought to be able to actually own it!!! Justin Cheated On Selena??? Umm, uh-oh, what’s THIS (under)?!?!?!?!?!?! Taylor Swift simply preferred a Tumblr put up confirming Justin cheated on Selena….HOLY SHIT #WeStandWithTaylor pic.twitter.com/aoRmKiQxBf — B (Fan Account) (@TS7Track3) June 30, 2019 Taylor simply casually confirmed Justin cheated on Selena Gomez #WeStandWithTaylor pic.twitter.com/GaFTdQpA1D — B (Fan Account) (@TS7Track3) June 30, 2019 Taylor is outwardly on Tumblr low-key confirming allegations that the Biebs might have cheated on Selena throughout their relationship! Oh?!?! Hold spillin’ that tea lady!!! We’re significantly right here for it… the extra particulars the higher! DRAG HIM!!! The place the F*CK are all the lads??? Different customers have posed an attention-grabbing query — the place the hell are all the lads, y’all?! Feminine artists aren’t having any bother standing up for Taylor this afternoon in the midst of the controversy, however what about Ed Sheeran, or Shawn Mendes, or Taylor’s most up-to-date collab associate, Brendon Urie?? Critically, this level is an effective one (under): the place the fuck is ed sheeran? the place the fuck is shawn mendes? the place the fuck is brendon urie? the place the fuck are the MEN? #WeStandWithTaylor — hannah helps taylor (@loveisasecrett) June 30, 2019 Rise up, fellas! Taylor isn’t having a “mood tantrum,” as Scooter’s irrelevant spouse tried to counsel (lady, go away), and each time a lady shares her emotions she’s not having a meltdown — so the place are all the lads who’re robust sufficient to face up for her?! Right here we go!!! Followers Hold Reacting Followers from all throughout the music spectrum maintain reacting (under): Taylor Swift is a multimillionaire. Clearly if she’d been given the chance to purchase her masters she would have. If this was about enterprise and cash Scott would have offered it to HER. As an alternative he offered it to a person who hates her. This was a sexist energy play. #WeStandWithTaylor — Madeline Rohn (@madelinarohn) June 30, 2019 a lady talking her thoughts shouldn’t be a mood tantrum #WeStandWithTaylor pic.twitter.com/vuDQVLQxBT — . (@lemmunade) June 30, 2019 Justin Bieber, his spouse and the individuals praising him for posting the worst apology #WeStandWithTaylorpic.twitter.com/vgrzr955py — 🏹 (@luckybIoom) June 30, 2019 Justin actually wrote the worst apology within the historical past of mankind and Hailey truly commented “Gentleman” beneath it. CLOWNS #westandwithtaylor pic.twitter.com/dL3CT1pvVM — . (@particularwhyy) June 30, 2019 The rationale why many artists aren’t sticking up for Taylor Swift is as a result of they will’t perceive her state of affairs since 90% of the artists within the trade don’t write their very own music in order that they don’t really feel entitled to it. Particularly, Justin Bieber. #WeStandWithTaylor pic.twitter.com/3sqnF9SnS0 — Ok 🌹 (@OnlyVocalists) June 30, 2019 In 2016: #/TaylorSwiftIsOverParty was trending Justin Bieber: “Taylor what’s good” In 2019: Taylor Swift: I’m unhappy. My artwork is owned by a person who has been attempting to tear me down. I’m nonetheless wanting ahead to the intense futureJustin Bieber: THAT’S BULLYING#WeStandWithTaylor — Leo 🏳️‍🌈 (@LeoTs13) June 30, 2019 Scooter’s spouse calling this a “mood tantrum,” makes me so mad. Think about each track you’ve ever written from the age of 13 being shifted in order that the person who laughed when individuals tried to finish your profession can revenue out of your life’s work? Make this make sense #WeStandWithTaylor — 4.26 Fan account since 2010 (@Swiftness13) June 30, 2019 And it doesn’t seem like it’s going to cease any time quickly!!! Reactions, Perezcious readers?? Hold sharing ALL your opinions with us within the feedback (under)!!! [Picture through iHeartRadio/Twitter] Source link
0 notes