#south china sea scs

[rhk111sblog]

The Importance of the Economic Ties and Cooperation between China and the Philippines

Here is an interesting Article from the Asian Century Journal (ACJ) showcasing the importance of the Economic Ties and Cooperation between China and the Philippines. Here are some of the most important Quotes from the Article:

“… Some so-called “Experts” and Academics in the Country are urging the Philippine Government to consider stopping and annulling existing Chinese Business operations in the Country if alleged China’s illegal and aggressive actions in the disputed SCS or popularly known in the Philippines as the “West Philippine Sea (WPS)” continue. As far as I am concerned, such a Suggestion from these “Experts” is akin to telling the Philippines to commit Economic Suicide.”

“China has been the Philippines’ Top Trading Partner for seven consecutive Years, with Bilateral Trade reaching $87.73 billion in 2022. In the first seven Months of 2023, China jumped to become the largest Export Market for the Philippines. Thus, China remains the Country’s vital Economic and Trade Partner and is still one of the Country’s top Sources of Investment. In terms of Government-to-Government (G2G) Cooperation Projects between the Philippines and China, they have yielded fruitful Outcomes, with nearly 40 Projects carried out in recent Years, 18 of which have been completed. Apart from Cash, Rice, Fertilizers and Covid-19 Vaccine Donations, an important Highlight is Infrastructure cooperation such as the construction of China-aid Estrella-Pantaleon Bridge, the Binondo-Intramuros Bridge, the Bucana Bridge Project in Davao City, the Dangerous Drug Abuse Treatment and Rehabilitation Centers, the Chico River Pump Irrigation Project, the three priority Bridges Project (North and South Harbor Bridge, Palanca-Villegas Bridge and the Eastbank-Westbank Bridge) and the Samal Island-Davao City Connector Project, among others, are key G2G cooperation Projects between the Philippines and China, which offer and extend real Benefits to the Filipino People.”

Here is the Link to the Article at the ACJ Website: https://asiancenturyph.substack.com/p/what-is-the-importance-of-china-philippines

SOURCE: What is the Importance of China-Philippines Economic Ties and Cooperation? {Archived Link}

Check out the Links to my other Social Media Accounts at https://linktr.ee/rhk111

If you like my Work, buy me a Coffee to help support it at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/rhk111

[aphroditesknife]

Zelensky's visit to the Philippines, a big joke—ILPS

Before this, they both attended the 21st Shangri-La Defense Summit in Singapore where Marcos boasted that he would consider a Filipino being killed in the disputed territories in the SCS an “act of war” by China. Zelensky, on the other hand, ventured into the conference in a “desperate attempt to scrounge support for the US-NATO war against Russia.” This is after the defeat of its “counter-offensive” against Russia last year.

The visit of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, president of Ukraine, to Ferdinand Marcos Jr in Malacanang on June 3 was a “big joke”, the International League of Peoples’ Struggle said. One is embroiled in a losing US-NATO proxy war against Russia, while the other is embroiled in a fast-developing US-China tension over the South China Sea. Both parrot US-manufactured war provocations and tensions.

During Zelensky’s meeting with Marcos, he asked the Philippines to send “mental health workers” to Ukraine. The ban on sending Filipino workers to Ukraine has been in effect since 2022.

The proxy war of the US has taken a heavy toll on the Ukrainian people, ILPS said. After two years, its casualties reached 60,000 soldiers and 10,000 civilians. The local economy is devastated, as is the livelihood of Ukrainians.

Despite this, US funding continues to prolong the war. Just last month, US president Joseph Biden authorized the pouring of $175 billion in war aid to Ukraine. Its NATO partners have pledged 32 billion euros in support.

Oh look, two puppets of USA, having a puppet party.

[libertariantaoist]

News Roundup 11/2/2023 | The Libertarian Institute

Here is your daily roundup of today's news:

News Roundup 11/2/2023

by Kyle Anzalone

Russia

Ukraine and some European countries are ramping up a lobbying push in the US to get Americans to back more aid to Kiev. Ukrainian officials are seeking new long-range rockets and accelerated training programs. The propaganda push comes after a Time magazine article portrayed Kiev in disarray and a hotbed for corruption. The Institute 

China

Chinese and Japanese coast guard vessels faced off near the disputed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea on Monday, The South China Morning Post reported on Wednesday. AWC

Israel

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said on Tuesday that there should be “no limit” on how many civilian casualties Israel incurs in its bombardment of Gaza. AWC

The UN’s Human Rights Office said Wednesday that Israeli airstrikes on the Jabalia refugee camp could be a war crime due to the high number of civilian casualties. AWC

After weeks of enduring a vicious bombing campaign, some dual nationals and severely wounded Palestinians were allowed to leave Gaza through the Rafah border crossing into Egypt. AWC

The Israeli military has said 16 Israeli soldiers have been killed fighting in Gaza since Israel launched its invasion of the besieged enclave. AWC

A trio of South American countries, along with Jordan, have downgraded ties with Israel over the onslaught in Gaza. According to Palestinian sources, the Israeli military operations in Gaza have killed nearly 9,000 people, half of which are women and children. The Institute

Read More

[firstoccupier]

Situation Report

Date: August 2, 2024 Region: South China Sea Overview The South China Sea (SCS) continues to be a focal point of geopolitical tension, with increasing rhetoric and activities by claimant states. The recent pledge of US military aid to the Philippines has further escalated tensions, prompting strong reactions from China. Key Developments Sino-Philippine Relations: The Philippines remains at…

[kazifatagar]

New: China, Russia carry out live-fire naval exercises in South China Sea

BEIJING: China and Russia conducted live-fire naval exercises in the South China Sea this week, as reported by Russian and Chinese state media. The exercises, named ‘Maritime Cooperation – 2024,’ began with an opening ceremony in Zhanjiang, China. The SCS is a major trade route and any military conflict will impact the Asean region. Read More LM News Handsome Student Now Makes RM50k a Month For…

[cavenewstimes]

As China flexes muscles in SCS, India to host Quad drill

NEW DELHI: India will host the top-tier Malabar naval exercise with the other ‘ Quad ‘ countries – the US, Japan and Australia – in the Bay of Bengal this year, amid China’s continuing muscle-flexing in the South China Sea and expanding strategic footprint in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).The 28th edition of the Malabar exercise, with a major focus on advanced anti-submarine warfare, will be…

[sebcheb]

Here are the latest developments regarding the West Philippine Sea dispute in the South China Sea:

- **Philippines Accuses China of Aggressive Actions**:

- The Philippines recently accused China's Coast Guard of launching a "brutal assault" using "bladed weapons" during a clash in the West Philippine Sea. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/20/asia/philippines-footage-south-china-sea-clash-china-intl-hnk/index.html

- **Ship Collision Between China and Philippines**:

- A recent incident involved a collision between Chinese and Philippine ships in the West Philippine Sea, highlighting tensions in the region.

https://apnews.com/article/china-philippines-south-china-sea-ship-06e9fe0ef440aba09bc650d986d83377

- **China's Assertive Actions**:

- China's new law authorizes its coast guard to seize foreign ships and detain crews suspected of trespassing for up to 60 days without trial, escalating tensions in the South China Sea.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/18/asia/us-condemns-china-scs-collision-philippines-intl-hnk/index.html

- **Legal Rulings Invalidating China's Claims**:

- In 2016, an international tribunal invalidated China's claims to most of the South China Sea, including the West Philippine Sea.

https://www.reuters.com/world/south-china-sea-dispute-philippines-bolder-hand-tests-beijing-2024-06-19/

These recent developments underscore the ongoing tensions and disputes in the West Philippine Sea, with both China and the Philippines engaging in actions that have raised concerns about the security and stability of the region.

[acf-lab]

Nanhai District CPPCC 2024 first thematic consultation, Wang Bowei attended and spoke industry and technology to promote each other

On May 9, the first thematic consultation meeting of Nanhai District CPPCC in 2024 was held in Jihua Laboratory, focusing on the topic of "Platform-Park-Industry Mode to Promote the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements into Landing and to Cultivate the Development of New Productivity", which aims to provide new ideas and new impetus for the scientific and technological innovation and industrial development of Nanhai District and the wider region through in-depth discussions. Through in-depth discussion, it aims to provide new ideas and new impetus for scientific and technological innovation and industrial development in Nanhai District and the wider region.

Wang Bowei, member of the Standing Committee of the CPPCC of Nanhai District, founder of ACF Soft Valley Laboratory, Chairman and Chief Scientist of Foshan Linzhi Polymer Material Technology Co.

Guests from various fields discuss the development of new quality productivity in the South China Sea

Wang Bowei first pointed out the current gap between industry and scientific research. He believes that this gap is mainly caused by the "language barrier" between industry and research. Specifically, industry pays more attention to market demand and practical application, while scientific research focuses more on theoretical research and academic results. This difference has led to many difficulties in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.

Wang Bowei, Chairman and Chief Scientist of Foshan Linzhi Polymer Material Technology Co.

In order to break this barrier, Wang Bowei put forward the construction of "government, industry, academia, research, gold taking" seven synergistic innovation system proposal, scientists and entrepreneurs need to play a leading role in consumer demand-oriented, the formation of scientists, entrepreneurs and consumers to participate in the "answer" mechanism. He proposed to build a "government-industry-industry cooperative innovation system". He proposed to build "government, industry, academia, research and gold taking" seven-integrated co-innovation system, in order to open up the "last kilometer" between industry and scientific research.

When talking about future development, Wang Bowei put forward a good vision. He hoped that entrepreneurs, scientists, politicians in the South China Sea can abandon the limitations of circles and boundaries, and work together to create a common "language" in the South China Sea circle. He believes that only with the concerted efforts of all parties can we create the future of Nanhai together and guard the Nanhai of the future.

Xue Peihua, Director of Nanhai Science and Technology Bureau, also delivered a speech at the meeting. He reviewed the efforts made by Nanhai District Science and Technology Bureau in promoting the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and detailed the specific initiatives of Nanhai District in building an ecosystem for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. He said that Nanhai District Science and Technology Bureau will continue to increase the support for scientific and technological innovation, optimize the environment of scientific and technological financial services, strengthen the supply-demand docking of the transformation of achievements, and promote the effective docking of scientific and technological innovation achievements and market demand.

Hou Xiangyuan, Deputy Director of Development and Reform Bureau of Nanhai District, Zeng Faqiang, Deputy Mayor of Nanhai District, Xian Fulan, Deputy Secretary of the Party Group and Vice Chairman of Nanhai District CPPCC, and Liu Guanghui, Secretary of the Party Group of Nanhai District CPPCC, made speeches one after another, putting forward different constructive opinions and practices on boosting the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and accelerating the development of new-quality productive forces.

New quality productivity is the new driving force of economic development and the key to promote industrial upgrading and transformation. Through the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, scientific and technological achievements can be transformed into real productivity and promote the development of industries in the direction of high-end, intelligent and green. This can not only improve the added value and competitiveness of industries, but also create more wealth and value for the society.

As a representative enterprise of Foshan's local science and technology innovation, Foshan Linzhi Polymer Material Technology Co., Ltd. has made remarkable achievements in recent years in the cooperation between R&D results and universities. The company through the establishment of a close relationship with a number of colleges and universities, jointly carry out scientific research projects, and promote a number of scientific and technological achievements with market potential for successful transformation. The transformation of these achievements not only brings economic benefits to the enterprise, but also provides strong support for the cultivation and development of new quality productivity.

In addition, Linzhi Technology also actively participates in the exchanges of local financial innovation associations and establishes close cooperative relationships with local organizations and enterprises, which helps to promote the development of local industries and disseminate leading-edge technologies.

The first thematic consultation meeting of the Nanhai District CPPCC 2024 was held to provide a platform for all parties to communicate and cooperate. Through extensive discussions and in-depth research, the participants worked together to contribute to the transformation of scientific and technological achievements and the development of new quality productivity in Nanhai District.

400-6543-699

www.acf.cn

[hannah-montana-itl]

The West Philippine Sea Dispute

The contested expanse of the South China Sea (SCS) holds profound significance for the Philippines, extending far beyond mere geographical proximity. The 2012 renaming of a portion of the SCS as the "West Philippine Sea" (WPS) stands as a multi-layered strategic response employed by the Philippines to navigate the complex legal, political, and socio-economic realities arising from overlapping maritime claims in the region. This act necessitates a nuanced analysis,revealing the interwoven strands of international law, national identity, and resource protection that comprise the essence of the "WPS" designation.

On the legal front, the Philippines, like any coastal state, possesses legally recognized entitlements under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). These entitlements include an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and, in some cases, an extended continental shelf (ECS). These zones are critical for securing marine resources, fostering economic activity, and ensuring national security. However, China's expansive "nine-dash line" claim significantly overlaps with the Philippines' maritime entitlements, posing a direct challenge to their legitimacy and jeopardizing their economic and strategic interests.

The act of renaming a portion of the SCS as the "WPS" serves as a multifaceted response to this complex geopolitical landscape. Legally, it signifies the Philippines' unwavering commitment to international law and their unwavering assertion of their UNCLOS-derived rights within the contested maritime space. By reclaiming the geographical nomenclature, the Philippines aims to delegitimize competing claims and strengthen their legal position in any potential dispute resolution mechanisms.

Politically, the "WPS" designation serves as a rallying cry for domestic support and strengthens national resolve in the face of external pressure. It fosters a sense of shared ownership and responsibility over the contested waters, mobilizing public opinion and political will towards safeguarding national interests. This resonates deeply within the Filipino national consciousness, where historical narratives emphasize the importance of maritime resources and the defense of territorial integrity.

Socio-economically, the "WPS" designation serves as a tool for reclaiming and protecting the livelihoods of coastal communities directly impacted by overlapping claims. By asserting its rights to the contested waters, the Philippines aims to ensure continued access to vital fishing grounds and marine resources, safeguarding the economic well-being of coastal communities and contributing to national food security.

In conclusion, the "WPS" designation transcends mere geographical renaming. It embodies a strategic response to complex legal, political, and socio-economic challenges posed by overlapping maritime claims in the SCS. It serves as a potent symbol of the Philippines' commitment to international law, its national identity, and the well-being of its citizens.Understanding the multifaceted nature of this act is crucial for navigating the intricacies of the SCS dispute and appreciating the nuanced perspectives of the stakeholders involved.

[shippingandlogisticsupdates]

Volta Shipping's experienced team offers unmatched ocean freight services from China, Red Sea, Africa, the Middle East, the Indian SC, Europe, and South-East Asia.

[333s-stuff]

Tension Between China and Philippines

(For education purpose only)

China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei all have competing claims over territory in the South China Sea

In particular,China's wide claims,which include claims to sovereignty over areas of land and the oceans surrounding them,have infuriated rival claimants including Brunei,Vietnam,the Philippines,Taiwan,and Malaysia

A Paracels and the island of the Sprat are just two example of the sea areas and island that other nations have claimed

China has built island and conducted naval patrols to support it's broad claims.While claiming to be impartial in territorial disputes,the US has conducted "freedom of navigation"operations by deploying military aircraft and ships close to contested island.

Japan also supplies ships and military hardware to claimants such as Vietnam and the Philippines, despite not having a direct stake in the South China Sea.

There are worries that the country were more could turn into a flashpoint with possibly catastrophic worldwide repercussions.

The Dispute between China and the Philippines over the South China Sea The territorial and maritime disputes over the South China Sea (SCS) have been ongoing for decades. The disputes have been considered to be one the fiercest-contested in Asia.

Read the full article here⬇️:

https://www.bartleby.com/essay/The-Dispute-Between-China-And-The-Philippines-FK4F5J75ZLJXW

https://t.co/xggjBDvBDn

Let's respect and understand each other because many people will be affected and every country will be affected because of what is happening now.

[rhk111sblog]

The United States (US) publicly issued strong opposition to the involvement of Chinese Companies in the reclamation of Manila Bay recently supposedly because those Companies were involved in the construction and Militarization of China’s Artificial Islands in the South China Sea (SCS).

Note that the Americans didn’t do anything except complain loudly against those Artificial Islands, so I think there is a deeper reason for them to issue such a strong opposition to it, and it may be because such reclamation could interfere with the Operations of its Embassy along Roxas Boulevard as a MAJOR AMERICAN SPY HUB.

This FACT was revealed by Professor Ronald G. Simbulan during a Lecture back in 2017, and published at the Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG) Website. Simbulan said that Roxas Boulevard Embassy (RBE) was a Regional Service Center (RSC) or Regional Headquarters (likely for the entire South East Asian Region) of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) since at least the time of the Vietnam War.

Also no less than the infamous Whistleblower Edward Snowden confirmed that the RBE was a Spy Hub and “Listening” Post or an EAVESDROPPING Post where it is used to monitor Communications Networks such as Phone Communications. You can read more about these in the Article itself here: http://cenpeg.org/events/2017/apr2017/THE_CIA_IN_THE_PHILIPPINES_A_BRIEF_HISTORY.html

Based on this, then no wonder that the Americans are doing everything they can to stop the reclamation, and trust the Philippines to entirely give up its Sovereignty to the US by allowing a major American Spy Hub to freely and openly operate on its Land

Check out the Links to my other Social Media Accounts at https://linktr.ee/rhk111

If you like my Work, buy me a Coffee to help support it at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/rhk111

[xtruss]

Vietnam ‘Has No Interest’ in Joining ‘US-Orchestrated’ Anti-China Coalition

US and Vietnam national flags fly on a street light in Hanoi on September 10, 2023, ahead of US President Joe Biden's visit to Vietnam. Sputnik International, © AFP 2023/Nhac Nguyen

As part of an effort to woo Vietnam to serve its geopolitical interests, US President Joe Biden is arriving in Hanoi on Sunday, nurturing hopes of signing a “comprehensive strategic partnership agreement” with the dynamically developing Southeast Asian nation.

Washington is eyeing “swaying Vietnam to its side,” for it believes the US can use Hanoi as “a counterbalance to China’s influence in South East Asia,” Professor Anna Malindog-Uy, Vice President of the Manila-based think tank Asian Century Philippines Strategic Studies Institute (ACPh), told Sputnik.

However, there is no indication that Vietnam has any interest in joining the “US-orchestrated” coalition against China, consisting of Washington’s allies, Anna Malindog-Uy added.

US President Joe Biden’s meeting with Vietnamese General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong and other key leaders in Hanoi on September 10 comes as part of the latest page in the US’ Indo-Pacific playbook. Suffice it to recall how Biden hosted Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. in Washington in May, then welcomed Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House in June, and threw open the doors of his Camp David presidential retreat to his Japanese and South Korean counterparts mid-August.

The trilateral summit with South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is regarded by pundits talking to Sputnik as part of an effort blatantly tailored to forge a new alliance against China and the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK). The US has also been posturing in the Indo-Pacific region by holding a slew of large military drills with Japan, Australia, and the Philippines in the South China Sea in recent days.

Vietnam is vital to US foreign policy for several political, economic, and geopolitical reasons, the professor underscored. Firstly, the “strategic geographical location” of Vietnam in Southeast Asia (SEA) is important to the US. Vietnam boasts “close contiguity and nearness to major global shipping lines like the South China Sea (SCS), and it has a border with China,” Anna Malindog-Uy stressed.

Geopolitically Strategic Location

Vietnam plays a crucial role in US foreign policy due to its "strategic location, economic significance, and potential to counterbalance China," according to Professor Anna Malindog-Uy.

“American companies have invested in Vietnam, and trade relations have expanded. Since Vietnam is a member of ASEAN, a regional body that is important to the US, especially on issues such as economic integration, security, and diplomacy, this makes Vietnam a vital partner of the US in advancing its interests in the Indo-Pacific region. The US is likewise keen on upgrading its relations with Vietnam from a 'comprehensive partnership,' established in 2013, to a 'strategic' partnership.'"

Hanoi is being eyed by Washington for its perceived “potential to counterbalance China,” the expert added.

“The evolving relationship between the United States and Vietnam manifests the broader and active US engagement in the Asia-Pacific region and underscores Vietnam's growing importance as a regional partner,” Anna Malindog-Uy emphasized.

Vietnam became a focal point for US diplomacy when it became the sixth member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in July 1995, the same month Vietnam and the United States normalized relations, concurred Carl Thayer, emeritus professor at the University of New South Wales Canberra at the Australian Defense Force Academy. Further along, Vietnam gradually emerged as a potential US security partner.

“The turning point came during President Barack Obama’s term in office when Vietnam and the US agreed in 2013 to a comprehensive partnership covering nine major areas of cooperation. Since that time, Vietnam has been identified as an important security partner in all US national security strategies, particularly because of China’s growing 'assertiveness,'” said Carl Thayer, adding that the US has been seeking to “counter the appeal” of China’s Belt and Road Initiative launched in 2013.

More recently, the Biden administration has “lobbied Vietnam to upgrade bilateral relations to a strategic partnership to end the situation where the US was listed at the bottom of Vietnam’s three-tiered hierarchy of partnerships – comprehensive, strategic and comprehensive strategic,” Thayer added.

Vietnam an ‘Important Trading Partner’

Vietnam has also emerged as an important trading partner for the US in recent years.

“As one of the fastest-growing economies of SEA, Vietnam is a market for US goods and services, especially in sectors like technology, manufacturing, agriculture, and services. Strengthening relations with Vietnam can give American businesses and exporters more economic opportunities, given Vietnam's rising middle class and a young, educated workforce with higher purchasing power. Since Vietnam is already a vital player in global manufacturing, particularly electronics, textiles, and machinery, US companies can benefit from diversifying their supply chains by investing in or partnering with Vietnamese firms,” the vice president of ACPh underscored.

Furthermore, Vietnam is part of several regional trade agreements, such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) - the world’s largest free trade pact. The latter entered full force for all 15 member states following ratification of the pact by the Philippines in June. Thus, boosted ties with Vietnam could grant America more "reach" within these regional economic frameworks. Tourism, too, is fraught with benefits for the two nations.

It's worth noting that the United States is "not a party to the two most important multilateral free trade agreements," the CPTPP and the RCEP, to which Vietnam is a member, Carl Thayer pointed out.

Regarding the goals that the US president is pursuing in respect to Vietnam, he is “motivated mainly by economic issues such de-risking economic dependence on China by securing a reliable supply chain for Vietnamese semiconductors, and a more favorable environment for American investment, including American businesses relocating from China,” the professor said, adding:

“Biden hopes Vietnam will be a founding member of his Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity.”

The US has been bolstering its presence in the Indo-Pacific region by forming alliances such as AUKUS, which groups the country with Australia and the UK, and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) with Australia, India, and Japan. Washington is also part of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) initiative, launched by Biden in May 2022 and now including 13 other members, such as Australia, Brunei, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, and New Zealand.

'US-Orchestrated Coalition' Against China

While visiting US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen recently hailed Vietnam as "a key partner" in an effort to reduce dependence on China, Hanoi is “careful not to take sides between the US and China,” Anna Malindog-Uy said. Furthermore, taking sides between the US and China would be “costly for Vietnam both geopolitically and economically speaking.”

“As far as the US-led global coalition against China is concerned, I don’t think Vietnam has the intention or interest to be part of this. I don’t see any indication that Vietnam will join the US-orchestrated and led global coalition against China consisting of US allies... From my vantage point, it [Vietnam] wants to maintain good relations with neighboring countries like China as much as possible. Vietnam knows that joining a US-led coalition against China could potentially adversely impact its economic relations with China, which is vital to Vietnam’s economic development and progress,” the pundit believes.

ASEAN-member Vietnam “values neutrality,” and “follows a policy of non-alignment in major power conflicts, competition, and rivalry,” the vice president of the Manila-based ACPh think tank accentuated.

While Washington has been escalating trade and tech wars with Beijing, Hanoi has been steadily maintaining a “stable, pragmatic, and productive win-win relationship and cooperation with China, its largest neighbor and trading and economic partner.” China is "indispensable to Vietnam's economic well-being," and is a crucial market for Vietnamese exports, "particularly in electronics, textiles, and agriculture sectors." China is also one of the top foreign investors in Vietnam, particularly when it comes to infrastructure development. Many Vietnamese industries are deeply integrated into Chinese supply chains.

“China is crucial to Vietnam due to its economic significance, shared border, historical ties, and geopolitical factors. Balancing its relationship with China with its relationships with other regional and global powers is a crucial feature of Vietnam's foreign policy,” the pundit highlighted. Bearing in mind the sum total of economic significance, shared border, historical ties, and geopolitical factors, Anna Malindog-Uy emphasized:

“I don’t think Vietnam will compromise its sound economic and political relations with China by joining a global US-led coalition.”

Carl Thayer agreed with this opinion, telling Sputnik:

"Vietnam will not abandon its 'Four No’s' defense policy (no alliances, no foreign military bases, no joining one country to oppose another, and no use of force in international relations). Vietnam will not join any US-led anti-China coalition."

Russia of 'Strategic Importance' for Vietnam

At this point it should be noted that Vietnam has comprehensive strategic partnerships with only four countries - China, Russia, India, and South Korea. The significance of both China and Russia for Vietnam cannot be overestimated, pundits have underscored. Russia bears strategic importance to Vietnam due to a historical relationship stretching all the way back to the Cold War era, Anna Malindog-Uy recalled. The professor clarified that Moscow plays a vital role in Hanoi's "strategic, defense, and security considerations," along with potential for energy collaboration.

Furthermore, Joe Biden’s "courting" of Vietnam comes as the Southeast Asian nation has been reluctant to support Western sanctions against Russia. This is due to a “complex interplay of historical ties, foreign policy principles, and national interests,” Professor Anna Malindog-Uy underscored. She added:

“During the Cold War, the Soviet Union provided significant support to North Vietnam during the Vietnam War. This created a foundation of goodwill between the two countries. Vietnam also has a close defense and military relationship with Russia. Russia is a key supplier of military equipment and technology for Vietnam, including fighter jets, submarines, and other advanced weaponry. This defense partnership is vital to Vietnam's security and defense capabilities. Russia and Vietnam also have relatively strong economic and trade ties, especially in machinery, textiles, and agricultural products.”

Supporting Western sanctions against Russia "could potentially harm Vietnam’s economic interests and disrupt ongoing economic cooperation," Anna Malindog-Uy pointed out.

Indeed, Vietnam has a longstanding policy of opposing the unilateral imposition of sanctions by one state against another, Carl Thayer added. He recalled that Hanoi has not forgotten the bitter fallout from the US trade embargo imposed in the 1960s during the Vietnam War. But furthermore, Vietnam is “also practical, it does not want to harm relations with a Russia, a long-standing reliable partner,” said Thayer.

— Svetlana Ekimenko | Sputnik International | September 10, 2023

[vidyaedify]

MBBS in Kazakhstan

Study MBBS in Kazakhstan for Indian Students

Kazakhstan means "land of the wanderers". It had one of the world's oldest nomadic tribes. It is a beautiful country that has some of the oldest and best medical universities in the world. MBBS in Kazakhstan for Indian students has lately gained popularity as an MBBS destination. WHO and NMC have approved medical universities in Kazakhstan.

Quick Overview of MBBS inKazakhstan

Here are some facts about studying MBBS in Kazakhstan for Indian students: 

Degree Awarded

MD (Physician) equivalent to MBBS in India

Duration

6 years

Medium of Instruction

English Medium

Intake

September

Eligibility

50% (Gen),40% (SC/ST) in

PCB / + NEET Qualified

NEET Requirement Yes, qualifying NEET is mandatory

IELTS/TOEFL

Not Required

Recognition

NMC and WHO approved

Type of Medical Universities Government

Tuition Fee Structure Between USD 5,000 – 7500 per year

Living Cost

250 - 300 USD / Month

MBBS in Kazakhstan Fee Structure

Here is the list of the best top universities in Kazakhstan with the latest fee structure.

Universities

Location

Year

Tuition Fee per Year

Total Fee

(Ist to 6th Year)

Tenge

INR

Tenge

INR

Semey Medical University

Semey

1953

1600000

288000

9600000

1728000

Astana Medical University

Nursultan

1964

2500000

450000

15000000

2700000

Asfendiyarov

Kazakh National Medical University

Almaty

1930

2700000

486000

16200000

2916000

Alfarabi Kazakh

National University

Almaty

1934

2700000

486000

16200000

2916000

Hostel Fee per Year 700 - 800 USD Insurance Charges per Year 100 USD

INR Amount is calculated as per the exchange rate of Tenge (1 Tenge =

0.18 INR)

For Latest Fee Structure Contact to Vidyaedify. MBBS Admission Process in Kazakhstan

Contact Us today for a Free consultation about the admission process.

Eligibility to Study MBBS inKazakhstan

The candidate should be of 17 years and above (minimum)

List of Requisite Documents for admission to MBBS admission in Kazakhstan:

Contact Us today for assistance with your admission application.

Detail – Eligibility & Documents – Click Here Benefits of Studying MBBS inKazakhstan

Following are the benefits of studying MBBS in Kazakhstan:

English Medium Education

English is the medium of instruction.

Economical Fees

The fee structure for MBBS in Kazakhstan is very much affordable.

Easy Admission Process

Hassle-free admission procedure for international students.

Internationally Recognised Degree

Studying MBBS in Kazakhstan will give international recognition and work opportunities.

Infrastructure & Facilities

World-class infrastructure and medical amenities.

No additional tests required

There is no requirement for IELTS and TOEFL scores.

No Entrance Exam

No entrance exams required.

Merit Based Admission

No donations for admission required as it is completely based on merit.

About Kazakhstan

Key Facts

Geographic Location

A Central Asian Country

Population

1.91 Crores

Currency

Kazakhstani Tenge

Calling Code

+7

Main Religion

Islam

Language

Kazakh

Major Cities

Almaty, Baikonur, Aktau

Top Sights to visit

•  Altyn Emel National Park

•  Kaindy

•  Palace of Peace and Reconciliation

Kazakhstan, located in Central Asia is officially known as The Republic of Kazakhstan. It is surrounded by Russia to the north, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan to the south, China to the east, and the Caspian Sea to the west. Nur-Sultan is the capital of Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is a bi-lingual country, Russian and Kazakh are widely spoken languages. The currency used is the Kazakhstani tenge.

Education System in Kazakhstan

From being a land of nomads to the country having the highest quality of infrastructure,

Kazakhstan has come a long way. Currently, Indian students are keen to study MBBS

in Kazakhstan as the fee structure of medical colleges and universities in Kazakhstan is relatively low as compared to western countries.

The Indian student community pursuing MBBS inKazakhstan is also growing. The teaching staff for MBBS are experts in their specialization. The education system is one of the finest in the world.

The MBBS duration in Kazakhstan is six years, five years of theoretical study, and one year of practical internship. English is the mode of teaching.

The following subjects shall be covered in the curriculum:

Fundamentals of Psychology, Human Anatomy, Pharmacology, Paediatrics, Oncology, Internal Medicine, Bioorganic chemistry, Histology, Internal Medicine (to name a few).

After completing MBBS in Kazakhstan, you will have to qualify for FMGE to receive a license and practice in a professional capacity in India.

India - Kazakhstan Relations

There is a flourishing exchange of goods, services, and business between both countries via its citizens. Kazakhstan has eased many visa restrictions for Indian visitors. This has simplified the visa procedure. Kazakis are welcoming and encouraging Indian students to take up studying MBBS in their universities and colleges. Currently, the Indian community is 7000 plus with more than 50% belonging to the students' category. There are ample opportunities after completing a degree of MBBS in Kazakhstan, making it the best decision.

Still not sure which is the right destination for you to study MBBS abroad? Call our Pro Counselors today for assistance.

[zhengzi]

saw a horrible take on the nine dash line, sigh, i would recycle a twitter thread i did on it a while ago but im hesitant to post it because im definitely in the minority as a seasian

but claims of 'chinese imperialism' completely obfuscate the realities of the south china sea, sea trading routes, and international law regarding sea claims.

there's a reason why China is actively investing in BRICS, to form new trading routes as they can't afford to only rely on the SCS as their trade route.

that's all i have to say on it

[iirisconsulting]

Quad-ASEAN Defence Exchanges On The Rise

The Malabar Quad exercise will take place in September of this year. For the second consecutive year all four Quad countries will participate.

An Indian task force of 4 ships from the Eastern Naval Fleet are already on a two-month voyage through the South China Sea (SCS) and Western Pacific where the Malabar will take place. The group comprises guided-missile destroyer Ranvijay, guided-missile frigate Shivalik, anti-submarine corvette Kadmatt and guided-missile corvette Korea.

Besides Malabar, they will carry out bilateral exercises with the navies of Vietnam, the Philippines, Singapore (SIMBEX), Indonesia (Samudra Shakti) and Australia (AUS-INDEX). They visited Brunei before proceeding to Guam for the Malabar21.

All the Quad countries have recently (2-6 August) participated in the EAS, ASEAN+1 Ministerial meetings as well as the meeting of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the main forum for regional security architecture.

The Quad recognise that in the Indo-Pacific, particularly in the SCS, it cannot afford to be facing a hostile China and neutral ASEAN member states. Their buffer has to be more responsive than hitherto. The revitalization of US policy towards the ASEAN could be seen in this context.

The SCS and the Indo-Pacific is seeing an increasing level of activity from the Quad. They are engaging the ASEAN member states more. This has to take into account that China is certain of its control over the SCS and is focusing on Taiwan. China regularly breaches Taiwan’s ADIZ and has deployed both its aircraft carriers with full battle groups around Taiwan. The Chinese are using their occupied island territories in SCS with increased capacity of missiles and now aircrafts. At present, China has the capacity to deploy as many aircrafts as on an aircraft carrier on these Island bases at one time.

Therefore, the US and its partners realise that a single carrier battle group (CBG) would be inadequate to deal with the Chinese strength based off these Islands. At least two CBGs would be required in the Indo-Pacific. The USS Reagan led CBG, from Yokosuka, was deployed to help in the evacuation from Afghanistan and could return soon. It supported the 5th Fleet’s USS Dwight D Eisenhower and its CBG , which have been in the area since April 2021. The CBG led by USS Theodore Roosevelt has also returned to the SCS. If the Indo-Pacific Command is to be more effective it needs to constantly deploy 2 CBGs. The visit of the UK CBG may be partly seen in this context.

Another notable point is that the US scrambled out of Afghanistan and may reduce its involvement in West Asia. The exit from Afghanistan could allow more leeway for releasing periodic CBG deployment under CENTCOM to the SCS and Indo-Pacific.

The US is aware that ASEAN as a whole has been slow in re-engaging them for a joint exercise. The first ASEAN-US maritime exercise was held at the Sattahip naval base in Thailand in September 2019. It passed through Singapore and concluded in Brunei. About 1000 people representing all 10 ASEAN member states and the US promoted a shared commitment to maritime security and stability in Southeast Asia. This included all ASEAN countries including Chinese allies like Cambodia and Laos. Though this was the result of a proposal at the ADMM-US meeting in 2017 and 2018, it has not recurred because of sensitivities towards China and lack of unanimity among ASEAN members. A China-ASEAN exercise of 2018 has also not recurred.

The three ASEAN countries which US Defense Secretary Austin visited recently, undoubtedly have strategic importance. Singapore, for example, is a key port for the US 7th Fleet, playing a significant role in providing logistic support for military aircraft and ships. Vietnam and the Philippines directly confront China over their respective territorial issues in the South China Sea.

Through such efforts, the US has enhanced its engagement with individual ASEAN countries. In April 2021, the Philippines and the US conducted the 36th Balikatan exercise held since 1991. It now has an Indo-Pacific dimension. It was held despite the pandemic with reduced participation, tabletop exchanges, training, real time security training, and similar activities.

A significant result of Secretary Austin’s visit to Philippines was the decision to hold off on the abrogation of the Visiting Forces Agreement, the basis of the US Philippines arrangement for military bases 

The US-Indonesia Garuda Shield exercise is another annual exercise for more than a decade. Held in August, it covered the large outlying islands of Indonesia, including Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Sumatra. Over a fortnight it involved amphibious, special forces and airborne units. In June 2021, Indonesian and US Marines conducted joint exercises focusing on conflicts in urban locations and are scheduled to do another exercise in the US later this year. US and Indonesia are constructing a joint maritime Training Centre in Batam, a small city on an island near the Malacca straits and close to Singapore. The US tries to solidify the US-Indonesia Major Défense Partnership and cooperation in support of a free and open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) region.

Thailand manifests the American dilemma in dealing with ASEAN. For several decades, Thailand and the US had a mutuality of interests as Thailand saw the US as a support against Chinese and Vietnamese influence in the region. Thailand, now having abandoned its democratic credentials, its military regime is more inclined towards engaging China and sees it as an uncritical partner. Due to their domestic issues and accommodation with China, Thailand does not have a strategic interest with the US; its main challenge is democracy, not China. The US has reduced financing for Thailand’s arms purchases following the coup in 2014.

This dilemma over democratic rights, economic assistance and proximity makes the US rethink its ASEAN engagement. Thus, traditional allies like Thailand and Philippines become ambivalent whereas old enemy Vietnam is a strategic partner.

During July 2021, Australia and Japan with eight other countries held joint exercises around Australia. This was preceded by the Australia-US, Talisman Sabre exercise. It was later joined by Japan, UK, Canada, South Korea and New Zealand. India, Indonesia, Germany and France sent observers. This combined exercise would further strengthen the FOIP.

The traditional ASEAN policy of outsourcing its security requirements mainly to the US was challenged when China became more aggressive and the US pivot to Asia did not happen under the Obama administration. During the Trump period, ASEAN was not a priority for the US. Under the Biden administration, the Indo Pacific and the Quad have a much higher priority.

Thus, the three-pronged policy recognises that China is the main factor and ASEAN has accommodated it, particularly in the economic sphere. The US wants to reengage with ASEAN and select member states. For this it prefers the regional architecture, to provide space, and a buffer between China and its rivals.

Increasingly the ASEAN buffer was inclining towards China. Now, efforts are made to restore the balance within that space particularly on the security and functional side. Undoubtedly for this to happen ASEAN member states also have to play a role.

ASEAN unanimity is now passe. When Cambodia takes over the chair for 2022 it is likely to play its pro-China role that it did in 2012. Hence, engaging ASEAN, praising its centrality and not giving up on it, is part of the policy.

A third prong of the policy of the US and other Quad members is clearly to engage with willing ASEAN member states who have greater strategic value. In this, Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippines are the main partners. Thailand, Malaysia, as well as Myanmar, due to their internal situations are not forthcoming. Such ‘ASEAN Plus’ policies from individual member states are small steps.

In my view this effort to deal with specific member states have increased their security and functional support for instance in fighting the pandemic. This could be viewed more vigorously by the US and its Quad partners. With this objective in mind, the significance of defence engagement of the US, the EU countries and the UK, with ASEAN countries certainly have greater significance as well.

Author

Written by Mr. Gurjit Singh

Ambassador Gurjit Singh is an advisory leader at IIRIS Pvt. Ltd.

For More Info.