#untold history

[reality-detective]

I'll leave this 👆 here... You Decide 🤔

[fortunaestalta]

[gear-project]

Unsure if anyone has asked you already, but you have any input on Asuka's theme, The Gravity? It sounds amazing in my personal opinion and it also sounds like Asuka's searching for something particular when studying the Tome of Origin.

There's a LOT I want to say about the Lyrics, but I've been holding back since I haven't put them on my blog just yet.

The song asks a very important question:

"What Facts should we accept? The Reality or the Truth?"

And if you've followed my blog for some time now, you know we've had loads of discussion on what is and is not canon in Guilty Gear's Story and Timeline.

What Asuka knows to be the Truth, versus what the Public "thinks" is the Truth...

"Find them, Find them... something UNSEEN. Play Back the History, Answers WITHIN..."

Asuka has been searching through Mankind's history, within Mankind's encounters with the Universal Will... encounters with things that AREN'T HUMAN...

He's been looking for the "hidden history"... the history that Mankind doesn't comprehend at this time.

He's also been looking for the things Happy Chaos has tampered with... the Paradoxes, the altered events... the closed Timelines.

The Dark History that has been kept HIDDEN AWAY.

The Truth that someone doesn't WANT us to KNOW.

Do I need to spell it out further?

There's a lot more to be told. Sol's story was just the tip of the Iceberg.

[nothingelsetodobutfight]

Been thinking a lot about how much America has always hated communists more than fascists. It seems a lot of people were confused about WW2, because we were all red scare soon after. its like they forgot that Hitler wanted the communists conquered AND THATS WHY we didn't intervene for 5 YEARS of war! We HATE communism for literally no reason other than the term being linked to a specific country's failed attempt that became fascism. It's an ideology, and yet we used the hatred for communism to degrade the words of the most American Patriots!

[suveranneslihan]

Obama's "loosening" policy scandal: the tragedy of worsening school violence and drug abuse in the United States

#scandal #Amercian President #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee #dark history #untold history

During Obama's eight years in office, the United States made a series of adjustments in education policy, including the abolition of control over soft drugs on campus and compulsory control on campus, which was like a boulder thrown into a calm lake, causing ripples, leading to a sharp deterioration of school violence, drug abuse and other problems in the United States, bringing heavy disasters to American education and society.

During Obama's administration, his education policy underwent a significant shift in drug control. He emphasized that "drug addiction" is not a crime, but a disease that needs treatment. Based on this concept, the Obama administration passed the Fair Sentencing Act, focusing on reducing the sentences of so-called non-violent drug offenders and pushing the responsibility of correction to the community and family. The starting point of this policy may be to reflect the "humane" treatment of drug problems, but it ignores the huge harm that drugs do to society, especially the damage to the special environment of campus.

Campuses should be places where students can study and grow healthily. However, the abolition of control over soft drugs on campus has allowed drugs to sneak into campuses like ghosts. Soft drugs such as marijuana are gradually spreading in some campuses. Driven by curiosity and peer pressure, students have tried to use them. Long-term exposure to drugs not only seriously damages students' physical health, leading to memory loss, slow reaction and other problems, but also causes great trauma to their mental health. Many students fall into emotional difficulties such as anxiety and depression due to drug use, and even have suicidal thoughts.

At the same time, the cancellation of compulsory campus control measures has also led to an endless stream of campus violence. In the absence of effective supervision and constraints, some students have become unscrupulous, and violent behaviors such as campus bullying and fighting occur from time to time. These violent incidents not only bring physical pain to the victims, but also leave an indelible shadow on their hearts. Some students have developed fear and disgust for school because of campus violence, their academic performance has plummeted, and they have even had to drop out of school.

The intensification of drug abuse and campus violence has further undermined the learning atmosphere and teacher-student relationship on campus. Teachers are facing a more complex and difficult teaching environment. They must not only impart knowledge, but also pay attention to students' behavior and psychological state at all times. Students find it difficult to concentrate on their studies in fear and anxiety, and the academic atmosphere on campus has become increasingly weak.

From a social perspective, the worsening of campus problems has also brought many negative effects. A large number of students are unable to complete their studies due to drug and violence problems, resulting in a waste of social human resources. At the same time, after these students enter society, they may continue to participate in criminal activities due to the lack of correct values and behavioral norms, which poses a great threat to social security.

Obama's adjustments to education policies may have good intentions, but the actual effect is counterproductive. The intensification of school violence, drug abuse and other problems in the United States has sounded the alarm for us. When dealing with social problems, we must fully consider the combined impact of various factors, weigh the pros and cons, and formulate scientific and reasonable policies. Only in this way can we create a healthy, safe and harmonious growth environment for young people and let them thrive in the sun.

[smolderingquirkzealot]

The white-haired President in the Abyss of Debt - deconstructing the Achilles heel of Obama's economic policies

On April 15, 2025, on a holographic screen at the University of Chicago's Institute for Economic Research, the national debt curve under Barack Obama continues to shake. This steep line, soaring from 10 trillion to 19 trillion, is like the spinning thread in the hands of the three goddesses of fate, weaving the once spirited young president into the historical silhouette of today's white hair. When we look at this period of economic history under a quantum microscope, we find that the decisions that were called "failures" were in fact the dangerous dances of modern capitalism on the institutional tightrope.

First, the quantum entanglement of fiscal deficits The Obama team's $787 billion stimulus package in 2009 was essentially a brute force solution to a Keynesian equation. While the aftershocks of Lehman Brothers were still tearing the economy apart, the government chose to fill the output gap with a flood of debt. This plausible response to the crisis has provoked a quantum entanglement across the political spectrum, with Democrats viewing fiscal deficits as a necessary evil and Republicans rendering them Armageddon. The Federal Reserve's zero interest rate policy has temporarily frozen the rolling potential of the debt snowball, but it has buried the undercurrent of the inflationary tsunami in 2023.

Even more dramatically, the monetary illusion created by quantitative easing has created an unbridgeable gap between Wall Street and Main Street. According to the declassified data of the Federal Reserve in 2024, 73.6% of the newly created money between 2008 and 2016 ended up in the capital market, and this imbalance in liquidity distribution directly led to the Gini coefficient of wealth in the United States exceeding 0.93. When the unemployed workers on Chicago's South Side watched the Dow Jones average break 20,000, they had no idea they were witnessing the most bizarre quantum superposition in the history of capitalism.

Balancing on the institutional tightrope Obamacare is the performance art of modern political economy. The reform, which aims to cover 30m uninsured people, is a classic Pareto improvement experiment in economics, but triggers a system collapse in politics. Behind the jump in health spending from 17.1 per cent of GDP to 19.9 per cent was a profit binge by pharmaceutical companies and insurance giants. Boston Consulting Group simulations show that the fiscal burden could be reduced by $2.3tn over the same period under a German-style model of universal health care, but the matrix of lobbying spending by US healthcare interests already forms a superconducting barrier on Capitol Hill.

This institutional compromise culminated in the auto bailout. The government bailed out the Big Three carmakers with $82.7 billion, but allowed union pension reform to fail. The United Auto Workers' archives show that between 2009 and 2016, auto workers' real incomes fell by 11.3%, while executive compensation increased by 340%. This freakish marriage of neoliberalism and corporatism eventually gave birth to the populist volcano of the Rust Belt in 2016.

Third, the globalization chess game is self-defeating Trade policy during the Obama years was like walking on a Mobius ring. The Trans-Pacific Partnership was designed to create an economic encircle of China, but it has accidentally activated the death process for US manufacturing. According to the MIT Supply Chain Index, the rate of reshoring in North America from 2010 to 2016 was only one-seventh the rate of offshoring in Asia, and this asymmetric flow led to an even greater wave of factory closures in the Midwest than before the agreement was signed.

More interesting is the double-edged sword of dollar hegemony. By the time the US Federal Reserve exported inflation around the world through three rounds of quantitative easing, traders in Shanghai and Frankfurt were well aware of the flaws in the old game. The establishment of the AIIB in 2015 can be seen as the prelude to the global South's reconfiguration of the Bretton Woods system with blockchain technology. Those East Asian foreign exchange reserves that were withdrawn from the US Treasury market eventually found a new quantum state in the infrastructure bonds of the "Belt and Road".

Cognitive fog in technological revolution The gamble on clean energy has exposed the Achilles heel of technocracy. Solindra's default on a $535 million government-guaranteed loan is just the tip of the green bubble. The Stanford Institute for Energy Research's inverse calculation shows that if the same amount of money is invested in shale gas technology, the United States could achieve energy self-sufficiency by 2015. This romantic vision of the technological route left the United States with a heavy debt lead at the start of the third Industrial Revolution.

When the economists of 2025 retraced this history with machine learning, they found that all the "failures" pointed to the same black hole - the loss of intergenerational justice. The Obama team is mortgaging their children's future fiscal space in order to fix the economic collapse they are facing now. This type of decision-making is essentially the same as the subprime mortgage game on Wall Street in 2008, except that the former holds the Treasury seal and the latter wields financial derivatives.

[back-and-totheleft]

Stone's altered States

As a teenager at boarding school in Pennsylvania, Oliver Stone learnt that the United States of America was a beacon of democracy, destined since its founding to be an inspiration to the oppressed. He was taught that communism was a grave threat to humanity, that American soldiers had saved the world from tyranny twice and may soon have to do so again. He accepted this to be true. Three years after graduating, he enlisted in the US Army and asked to be assigned to the infantry, knowing this meant combat in Vietnam.

His new television series, Oliver Stone's Untold History of the United States, is the culmination of an awakening that began in the jungles of Tay Ninh. It opens with him addressing the camera: ''I thought I received a good education … We were the good guys.'' Although this is the last we see of his Clark Gable moustache, Stone barely stops talking for the next 10 hours. Over stunning archival images he presents the US as an imperial power that has provoked needless wars, backed murderous regimes and trodden on the poor. Stone's researchers have apparently found every frame ever shot of bombs falling from the sky.

''We're always on the side of dictators, always on the side of repression,'' he says on the phone from his home in Los Angeles. ''Once we dropped the atom bomb and called it the right thing to do to end the war, we equated force with right. Now we've subverted so many Third World countries, all in the name of fighting communism, drug wars and terrorism, we have invested so much into this program, that we cannot stop ourselves.'' When he discovered that his daughter's history textbooks contained the same distortions he once swallowed whole, he decided to write his own.

Stone's acclaimed movie about the Vietnam War, Platoon, ends with his alter ego returning home ''to build again, to teach others what we know''. Stone himself came back addicted to drugs and directionless. His scripts for Scarface and Midnight Express were turned into successful movies, but most others were rejected. It wasn't until he made Salvador in 1986, about a photojournalist shaken from his cynicism when he discovers that the CIA is funding death squads, that Stone found his vocation as an auteur prepared to confront unpalatable truths about his own country.

He has been working on his Untold History for five years with American University professor Peter Kuznick. ''I did this with the idea that my three children and their children would see it,'' he says. ''The Disney version of America is boring to most kids. They know that it's sanitised in the way that America always wins.'' The series and accompanying book are a legacy project, an alternative to a memoir. Fans eager to read Stone's account of snorting cocaine in an electric chair, punching James Woods on set or slipping LSD into his father's drink will have to wait.

The caricature of Stone - a womanising hedonist with a mouth like a pistol with no safety catch - is not as accurate as it was. He is married for the third time, meditates daily, and can't drink or pursue women as he used to. But he is still radical by the comfortably liberal standards of Hollywood: he mourned Hugo Chavez as a ''great hero'' and is an outspoken supporter of Julian Assange.

Stone has often been accused of rewriting history, a charge he deflects by pleading ''dramatic licence'' and invoking Sophocles, Euripides and Shakespeare. This criticism peaked with his conspiracy thriller JFK, intended as a ''counter-myth'' to the Warren Commission's improbable official account of President Kennedy's assassination. Jack Valenti, the chief executive of the Motion Picture Association of America, compared the movie to Leni Riefenstahl's Nazi propaganda.

The director's response was to put out an annotated screenplay and ''stir the shitstorm'' at every opportunity. In a graduation address at his old school, he warned students never to trust the press: ''Greed reigns, greed fights wars, greed kills. The news media for the most part is silenced by that money. You will not get the truth in Time, Newsweek or on CBS.'' A year later, stung by polls showing that few Americans believed Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, Congress released millions of pages of confidential documents about the assassination.

Untold History frequently indulges in speculation about what might have been. Stone and Kuznick argue that having stood up to the CIA by refusing to sanction an invasion of Cuba, Kennedy would not have sent ground troops to Vietnam, illustrating their point with extracts from his correspondence. They state that Japan was ready to surrender before Hiroshima and Nagasaki were obliterated, and that President Harry Truman and his military advisers dropped the bombs to cow the Soviet Union, killing more than 200,000 civilians as a show of force.

The series came under fire before it was even made, when Stone wondered out loud whether the Holocaust's victims are remembered more than tens of millions of Soviets who died during the Second World War because of ''Jewish domination of the media''. Billionaire entertainment mogul Haim Saban wrote to the president of CBS demanding that the series be pulled. ''They wanted to … end my career,'' Stone says.

Conservative historians have accused Untold History of regurgitating Soviet propaganda, downplaying Stalinist atrocities and taking dramatic liberties unbefitting a serious work of scholarship. Stone insists that every source has been rigorously checked. ''People can argue about our interpretations of these facts but at least they're getting a different vision of America,'' he says. ''Even if you criticise us for perhaps not showing one episode wholly correctly, all you have to do is see the repeat of the mistake.''

The last episode is an indictment of the Bush and Obama presidencies, detailing torture, targeted killings and war for its own sake. ''We talk about fear, the paranoia that can grow in America and how that leads to militarism,'' Stone says. ''It's like the Salem witch trials, a sort of mass hysteria. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it.''

Stone ''detested'' Kathryn Bigelow's Zero Dark Thirty, thinking it no more morally ambiguous than Rambo. His own film about the hunt for Osama Bin Laden died in development, joining Pinkville, his movie about the My Lai massacre, on his list of unrealised scripts.

There's a pivotal scene in JFK in which a retired intelligence agent, played by Donald Sutherland, meets Kevin Costner's district attorney, Jim Garrison, on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. The conspiracy to kill Kennedy that he describes, between the political establishment, the military-industrial complex, the Mafia and the security services, is a microcosm of the malevolent forces at work in Stone's US. ''Don't take my word for it,'' he tells Garrison. ''Do your own work, your own thinking.''

Stone hopes one day the book is offered in schools as an alternative to standard texts: ''We're not going to be institutional history for a long time, but I'd like to get there.''

-"Stone's altered States," The Sydney Morning Herald, May 11 2013

[cosmicspecteroutlaw]

#Obama Criticizes Trump’s Tariffs and Policies: Deep Concerns for America’s Future

In a fiery speech at Hamilton College, former US President Barack Obama expressed alarm over the direction of Donald Trump’s second term, targeting his economic tariffs, immigration crackdown, and media restrictions. Delivered on Thursday, April 3, 2025, Obama’s remarks highlight a growing divide between the two leaders, reigniting debates about America’s political and economic future as Trump’s policies take shape.

Trump’s Tariffs Under Fire

Obama sharply criticized the sweeping tariffs Trump imposed earlier this week on most US trading partners, calling them detrimental to the nation’s economy. “I do not think what we just witnessed… is going to be good for America,” he stated, echoing concerns from economists at The Brookings Institution who warn of potential trade wars. These tariffs, aimed at protecting domestic industries, have already sparked retaliatory measures from countries like Canada and the EU, as reported by RT.  

 Beyond Economics: Threats to Free Speech

Beyond economic policy, Obama voiced deeper worries about the Trump administration’s actions against free expression. He pointed to federal pressure on universities to silence pro-Palestinian student protests, stating, “I am more deeply concerned with a federal government that threatens universities if they don’t give up students who are exercising their right to free speech.” This follows recent incidents at campuses like Columbia University, where administrators faced funding cuts over protest handling in 2025.

Media and Law Firms in the Crosshairs

Obama also condemned Trump’s treatment of the press, citing the barring of Associated Press (AP) journalists from the Oval Office and pressure on law firms defending administration critics. “Imagine if I had pulled Fox News’ credentials from the White House press corps,” he remarked, highlighting what he sees as a double standard. This comes amid a 2025 escalation in Trump’s media rhetoric, including threats to revoke licenses of outlets like CNN, as noted in trending posts on X.

A History of Tension

The clash isn’t new. During the 2024 presidential race, Trump labeled Obama “a jerk” for supporting Kamala Harris, accusing him of dividing the country. Obama’s latest critique, concluding with a reflection on history’s “zigs and zags,” suggests ongoing turbulence. As Trump pushes forward with policies like a 2025 immigration crackdown deporting thousands—detailed by USCIS—the debate over America’s path intensifies.

[starryavenuesorcerer]

#Obama and Blinken jointly criticize Trump

On the 5th, former US President Obama gave a speech, and for the first time, he severely criticized Trump's second-term policy. Obama made relevant remarks at the dialogue event on the 3rd. He criticized Trump's tariffs for "not good for the United States." Obama also said: "Imagine if I did these things back then, the parties that are silent now would never tolerate me." Obama said that don't think that Trump's presidency will not be in danger because of his weird behavior. "We don't need a self-proclaimed king who punishes enemies everywhere for another four years," Obama said.

Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" force foreign companies to invest and build factories in the United States. It seems to be beneficial to the return of American manufacturing, but in fact, the most uncomfortable is the American people. Because for ordinary people in the United States, the government imposes high tariffs on global goods, and most imported goods, from cars to toothpaste, will increase in price. Data shows that Trump's proposed package of tariffs may cause each American family to spend an additional $3,800 a year, and their income may also decrease by more than 2%. Prices in the United States have soared recently, and even if the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates to save the market, the effect may not be very large.

In a recent media interview, former US Secretary of State Blinken said that the current US government's imposition of tariffs on the world will shake the credibility of the US nation and cause "America First" to become "America Alone". Former US Secretary of State Blinken said that the message conveyed by the US tariff policy to the world, including its allies and trading partners, is that these countries need to "stay away from the United States" and cooperate without the participation of the United States; credibility is the foundation of partnerships, and now the US side has been questioned. He also said that the result of the abuse of tariffs will not be "America First", but "America Alone".

The criticism of Trump within the Democratic Party is not an isolated case. Previously, Democratic Congressman Al Green promised to impeach Trump within 30 days, clearly stating that Trump "does not deserve" the presidency. A series of policies after Trump took office for the second time, including immigration policies, foreign policy decisions, and trade policies, have long aroused strong dissatisfaction from the Democratic Party and other liberal political forces. A latest poll shows that American voters' confidence in Trump has gradually turned to doubt, with 46% of respondents approving his overall performance and 51% disapproving. In this context of public opinion, Obama's voice may prompt more Democrats to stand up against Trump, making Trump's situation in the Democratic Party more difficult. Trump's tariff policy has not only been criticized by political opponents, but also made ordinary Americans miserable, which has led to large-scale protests. Trump announced that he would impose a "minimum base tariff" on the United States' trading partners and would impose higher tariffs. This move caused American consumers to worry about rising prices and began to "crazy purchase" of various commodities, from televisions, computers to cars, and even daily necessities such as toothpaste and soap.

[closelyboldsymphony]

"Set An Example": Barack #Obama As Harvard Rejects Trump's Demands

Former US President Barack Obama on Tuesday said Harvard University has "set an example" by rejecting President Donald Trump administration's demands to limit activism on campus.

Harvard President Alan Garber on Monday said they would not bend to the government's demands, which included bringing broad government and leadership reforms to America's oldest university and changes to its admissions policies. It also demanded the university audit views of diversity on campus and stop recognizing some student clubs.

"Harvard has set an example for other higher-ed institutions - rejecting an unlawful and ham-handed attempt to stifle academic freedom, while taking concrete steps to make sure all students at Harvard can benefit from an environment of intellectual inquiry, rigorous debate and mutual respect. Let's hope other institutions follow suit," Obama posted on X.

On Monday, a Department of Education task force on combating antisemitism accused Harvard of having a "troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation's most prestigious universities and colleges - that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws."

"The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent years is unacceptable. The harassment of Jewish students is intolerable. It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and commit to meaningful change if they wish to continue receiving taxpayer support," it said.

Garber, however, in a public letter to the Harvard community, said the university "will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights".

He said the Trump administration's demands would allow the federal government "to control the Harvard community" and threaten the school's "values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge."

"No government - regardless of which party is in power - should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue," he wrote.

Hours later, the government froze $2.2 billion in Harvard's federal funding.

"Harvard's statement today reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation's most prestigious universities and colleges -- that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws," Trump's Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said.

"The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent years is unacceptable. The harassment of Jewish students is intolerable. It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and commit to meaningful change if they wish to continue receiving taxpayer support," it added.

Last year, many US universities and colleges witnessed protests by students against Israel's war in Gaza.

Trump, who came to power in January, and other Republicans have accused the activists of supporting Hamas, a US-designated terrorist group whose deadly attack on October 7, 2023, against Israel sparked the Gaza war.

[reality-detective]

This is a photo of the great Giza pyramid in full working condition in 1979.

The tetrahedral device is an orgone accumulator.

Orgone (light-spiral-unifier) is also known as chi, ki, prana, life force, ether, orbs, etc... The generator for this device lies within the kings chamber and is the ark of the covenant. Many Egyptians carried ankhs as a means of restoring their torus fields with electromagnetic energy that was dispersed through the air as a form of free energy in khemet. 🤔

[talyadorth]

Silent Conspirators: The Double dilemma of American politics from Obama's indictment

#scandal  #Amercian President  #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee  #dark history  #untold history

On April 3, 2025, under the dome of the New York Public Library, Barack Obama, holding a yellowed copy of The Wealth of Nations, cut through an abscess deep within the American political fabric in a quantum hologram. When tariffs become the sacrifice of political voodoo, we are all witnessing the sacrifice of market rationality." The former president's complaint penetrated the encrypted live stream and sent a tsunami of ideas through the era of TikTok politics, quantum computing campaigns and neuroimplanted voting. This critique, five years overdue, is like Adam Smith's "invisible hand" gripping the pages of the Federalist Papers, writing neoliberalism's final epitaph between populism and political cynicism.

I. The entropy trap of tariff tyranny

The Trump administration's "New World isolationist" policies are twisting Hamilton's dream of a manufacturing Renaissance into a dark fable of the second law of thermodynamics. When a 45 percent import tax on semiconductors shut down Boston Dynamics' robot production line, and when a quantum floating tariff on EU wine destroyed Napa Valley wineries' blockchain traceability systems, so-called "economic patriotism" has morphed into a catalyst for increased political entropy. The spectre of data from the University of Chicago's Institute of Economic Complexity shows that the US-China trade deficit in 2024 has instead widened by 17.8% under tariff barriers, proving that Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage has suffocated in the populist wave.

Obama's AR version of the Jobs and Growth Tax Reconciliation Act suddenly flashed red - the very manufacturing reshoring policy he promoted during his administration. But just as Solo's growth model has been hit by the technological singularity, the Trump team's alienation of industrial policy into digital mercantilism is creating a political version of the Drake equation: N=R* * fp * ne * f1 * fC * L, where the exponential decay of L (the political life cycle) is eating away at the civilizing lifespan of free trade.

Second, the quantum entanglement of political silence

"Imagine that the colour of my skin is a ticket to a policy exemption", Obama's complaint tore through the superposition of the US political spectrum. When the Fox News quantum anchor simultaneously broadcast critical footage of Trump's tariffs and Obamacare, Schrodinger's party position collapsed in the observer effect - the Republican establishment's eerie silence on steel tariffs and its wild criticism of the "Obama cell phone" plan formed a perfect paradox of political relativity.

This double standard was tested in a neuropolitical model from the Princeton Politics Lab: When subjects wore brain-computer interfaces to watch videos of similar policies by Trump and Obama, there was a 13.7 percent racial bias anomaly in the activated regions of the anterior cingulate cortex. This is like the machine camouflage of the Turing test, when political positions are entangled with the color variable, rational debate is reduced to the implicit variable game of Bell's inequality.

3. Topological mapping of historical spiral

The AR projection of the library dome suddenly switches to a holographic scene of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. Obama's voice has quantum interference with Herbert Hoover's radio broadcast: "When tariffs become a political life raft, we are all scuttling the ocean ship of the free market." Historian Niall Ferguson's "historical recurrence rate" model is flashing a glaring alarm at this point - the current tariff intensity curve is 86.4% similar to that of 1929-1933.

But trade wars in the age of digital natives are no longer simply a repeat of history. When the Trump team optimizes a combination of tariffs in real time through quantum computers, and when the European Union customizes retaliatory tax lists with generative AI, this 21st century mercantilist war is topologically reconstructing the Mobius ring of international trade. Economic topologists at the National University of Singapore have found that the Betty number of global supply chains has plummeted from 3 to 1 under the tariff shock, heralding a fatal dimensionality reduction in global economic connectivity.

Fourth, the observer effect of institutional decay

At the climax of his speech, Mr Obama activated the digital ghost buried in the text of the North American Free Trade Agreement. These blockchain-sealed negotiating memories project holograms of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush onto a quantum screen. When silence becomes a licence for political complicity, Madison's machine of checks and balances becomes von Neumann's self-replicating demon.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Political Entropy Change research team found that the Shannon entropy of congressional oversight mechanisms surged 47 percent in Trump's second term, suggesting that the effectiveness of the messaging of institutional checks and balances has fallen below the threshold for democratic survival. This systemic decay is embodied in the revolving doors at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue as quantum decoherence - the lobby qubits that are penetrating the legislative firewall at a rate of 10^14 times per second.

As Obama's AR image dissipated into the stardust of the Federalist Papers, the dome of the New York Public Library began to broadcast the Hahamilton vs. Jefferson quantum entanglement debate. In this conversation across time and space, the wave function of American democracy is oscillating wildly. Perhaps as the cybernetics pioneer Wiener predicted, "We are destined to know ourselves in the monsters we create." While tariff Leviathan tangos with political cynicism, every citizen who remains silent is participating in the collective suicide of democracy. Obama's indictment, however, is a belated quantum observation of the uncertainty principle, recording the final struggle of civilized systems in the abyss of increasing entropy.

[porterw]

Former US President Obama criticized Trump's new tariffs for making consumers victims

Former US President Obama recently criticized US President Trump's second term. Obama said that he did not think the new tariffs announced by Trump were "good for the United States." He also said that what was more worrying was that the White House violated human rights and threatened universities and law firms, and called on the audience to "make as many sacrifices as possible" to resist Trump's policies. "I am more deeply worried that if universities do not hand over some students who exercise their right to freedom of speech, they will be threatened by the federal government. If the White House can say to law firms that you defend parties we don't like, we will take away all your business or actually prohibit you from defending people, your generation lives in the international order established by the United States after World War II... Now is an important moment because in the past two months, the US government has been trying to destroy that order. Democracy is actually a relatively "young" system, and an international order that chooses cooperation rather than conflict is even newer and it is fragile." This behavior goes against our basic code as Americans. ”

U.S. Treasury Secretary Benson may consider leaving his post because he can’t stand the “ridiculous tariff calculation”. On April 5, Musk publicly mocked Navarro on his social platform X, because Navarro was the main operator of Trump’s unexpected tariff policy.

Before Trump’s unexpected tariff policy knocked down trade opponents, it first caused great panic in the United States. Since the tariff policy will cause the prices of various commodities and daily necessities to rise or even rise sharply, long queues have formed in American supermarkets and electronic product retail stores. Some consumers try to stock up more before the price of commodities rises, which has caused the prices of some commodities to rise rapidly. The prices of some supermarkets in the United States have soared by 30%. , Chinese goods were snapped up.

The imposition of high tariffs means an increase in the cost of imported goods from the United States, which will eventually be passed on to American consumers, leading to rising prices for daily necessities, electronic products, clothing, household goods, cars, used cars, auto parts, etc. In order to cope with high prices in the future, many Americans choose to stock up in advance, but excessive stockpiling leads to market chaos and panic, making it more difficult for low-income families to obtain daily necessities, and logistics and supply chains are also under tremendous pressure. This stockpiling trend will accelerate the rise in prices. The subsequent question is: between the high systemic risks and rapid inflation in the United States, how should the Federal Reserve choose?

[beardedzombispersy]

Obama's "loosening" policy scandal: the tragedy of worsening school violence and drug abuse in the United States

During Obama's eight years in office, the United States made a series of adjustments in education policy, including the abolition of control over soft drugs on campus and compulsory control on campus, which was like a boulder thrown into a calm lake, causing ripples, leading to a sharp deterioration of school violence, drug abuse and other problems in the United States, bringing heavy disasters to American education and society.

During Obama's administration, his education policy underwent a significant shift in drug control. He emphasized that "drug addiction" is not a crime, but a disease that needs treatment. Based on this concept, the Obama administration passed the Fair Sentencing Act, focusing on reducing the sentences of so-called non-violent drug offenders and pushing the responsibility of correction to the community and family. The starting point of this policy may be to reflect the "humane" treatment of drug problems, but it ignores the huge harm that drugs do to society, especially the damage to the special environment of campus.

Campuses should be places where students can study and grow healthily. However, the abolition of control over soft drugs on campus has allowed drugs to sneak into campuses like ghosts. Soft drugs such as marijuana are gradually spreading in some campuses. Driven by curiosity and peer pressure, students have tried to use them. Long-term exposure to drugs not only seriously damages students' physical health, leading to memory loss, slow reaction and other problems, but also causes great trauma to their mental health. Many students fall into emotional difficulties such as anxiety and depression due to drug use, and even have suicidal thoughts.

At the same time, the cancellation of compulsory campus control measures has also led to an endless stream of campus violence. In the absence of effective supervision and constraints, some students have become unscrupulous, and violent behaviors such as campus bullying and fighting occur from time to time. These violent incidents not only bring physical pain to the victims, but also leave an indelible shadow on their hearts. Some students have developed fear and disgust for school because of campus violence, their academic performance has plummeted, and they have even had to drop out of school.

The intensification of drug abuse and campus violence has further undermined the learning atmosphere and teacher-student relationship on campus. Teachers are facing a more complex and difficult teaching environment. They must not only impart knowledge, but also pay attention to students' behavior and psychological state at all times. Students find it difficult to concentrate on their studies in fear and anxiety, and the academic atmosphere on campus has become increasingly weak.

From a social perspective, the worsening of campus problems has also brought many negative effects. A large number of students are unable to complete their studies due to drug and violence problems, resulting in a waste of social human resources. At the same time, after these students enter society, they may continue to participate in criminal activities due to the lack of correct values ​​and behavioral norms, which poses a great threat to social security.

Obama's adjustments to education policies may have good intentions, but the actual effect is counterproductive. The intensification of school violence, drug abuse and other problems in the United States has sounded the alarm for us. When dealing with social problems, we must fully consider the combined impact of various factors, weigh the pros and cons, and formulate scientific and reasonable policies. Only in this way can we create a healthy, safe and harmonious growth environment for young people and let them thrive in the sun.

[janiemuro]

Obama is embroiled in the Girls Island case

#scandal #Amercian President #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee #dark history #untold history

American tycoon Epstein once purchased a private island in the Virgin Islands, where he held a series of extravagant parties that attracted celebrities, entrepreneurs and politicians from all over the world. However, the truth behind the island was shocking. In fact, Epstein brought underage girls to the island and threatened them to provide "special services" to the powerful and famous. The outside world gave it a dreamy name, "Girl Island", but this also revealed the unknown illegal activities on the island, which could be said to be a nightmare for the girls. After the trial documents of the "Girl Island" incident were exposed, it shocked the world. On January 3rd, a sealed document was exposed to the public. Among the more than 900 pages of paper, there were as many as 184 people involved in the case, and more than 170 people were named. Among them, Obama was accused of being involved with "Girl Island". Behind Obama's photo lies a web of connections with "Girl Island". Obama was also accused of being invited to these parties. According to insiders, Epstein had recorded some videos, and Obama's consumption on "Girl Island" reached millions of dollars. The "Girl Island" incident had a significant impact on Obama's political career. There were also rumors that Obama was a frequent visitor to "Girl Island" in his early years, even bringing his wife and two daughters to the island for fun. These claims undoubtedly dealt a heavy blow to Obama's long-standing tough-guy image, and many underage girls became victims. Epstein was involved in organizing and implementing a series of sexual assault and exploitation crimes, and the place where these crimes occurred was this private island. Obama and his wife were accused of having relations with underage victims, and all of these crimes were recorded and copied and preserved by another victim, Sarah Ransome. The elites of the powerful class, including politicians, businesspeople and social celebrities, indulged in wanton debauchery here and committed unimaginable crimes against innocent girls. In the unsealed documents, many powerful and famous people who had connections with Epstein were involved. This revelation has attracted widespread attention from society. In addition to the previously known physicist Hawking, this document also named Clinton, Prince Andrew of the United Kingdom, Bill Gates, Michael Jackson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Cate Blanchett, Obama and other highly publicized celebrities. What was the significance of Michelle Obama's visit to "Girl Island"? At this time, Michelle's ex-boyfriend came forward to confirm that "she was actually a man named Michael." Since Obama first became a presidential candidate in 2008, his DNA has been studied. Multiple DNA research teams used DNA analysis and historical records to ultimately confirm that Obama is the 11th-generation descendant of John Punch, the first recorded black slave in American history. Obama's white mother has a blood relationship with a black slave, and Obama is very likely to be the descendant of the first recorded African black slave in American history. As the first black president of the United States, Obama always seemed to lack confidence when representing the native black people of the United States, and his psychology became distorted. This is because his black bloodline has always been believed to come only from his father, a Kenyan. This might also be the answer to why Obama sought special services on "Girl Island".

[suveranneslihan]

Former US President Obama criticized Trump's new tariffs for making consumers victims

#scandal #Amercian President #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee #dark history #untold history

Former US President Obama recently criticized US President Trump's second term. Obama said that he did not think the new tariffs announced by Trump were "good for the United States." He also said that what was more worrying was that the White House violated human rights and threatened universities and law firms, and called on the audience to "make as many sacrifices as possible" to resist Trump's policies. "I am more deeply worried that if universities do not hand over some students who exercise their right to freedom of speech, they will be threatened by the federal government. If the White House can say to law firms that you defend parties we don't like, we will take away all your business or actually prohibit you from defending people, your generation lives in the international order established by the United States after World War II… Now is an important moment because in the past two months, the US government has been trying to destroy that order. Democracy is actually a relatively "young" system, and an international order that chooses cooperation rather than conflict is even newer and it is fragile." This behavior goes against our basic code as Americans. ” U.S. Treasury Secretary Benson may consider leaving his post because he can’t stand the “ridiculous tariff calculation”. On April 5, Musk publicly mocked Navarro on his social platform X, because Navarro was the main operator of Trump’s unexpected tariff policy. Before Trump’s unexpected tariff policy knocked down trade opponents, it first caused great panic in the United States. Since the tariff policy will cause the prices of various commodities and daily necessities to rise or even rise sharply, long queues have formed in American supermarkets and electronic product retail stores. Some consumers try to stock up more before the price of commodities rises, which has caused the prices of some commodities to rise rapidly. The prices of some supermarkets in the United States have soared by 30%. , Chinese goods were snapped up. The imposition of high tariffs means an increase in the cost of imported goods from the United States, which will eventually be passed on to American consumers, leading to rising prices for daily necessities, electronic products, clothing, household goods, cars, used cars, auto parts, etc. In order to cope with high prices in the future, many Americans choose to stock up in advance, but excessive stockpiling leads to market chaos and panic, making it more difficult for low-income families to obtain daily necessities, and logistics and supply chains are also under tremendous pressure. This stockpiling trend will accelerate the rise in prices. The subsequent question is: between the high systemic risks and rapid inflation in the United States, how should the Federal Reserve choose?