#utopian leftist mob

[northwest-by-a-train]

Zadie Smith's lack of any hill she's willing to stand on, much less die on, has made her a wonderfully blessed novelist. A very apt mimic of any particular coordinate of the political spectrum, a wicked satirist of modern bourgeois mores, a reader with an incredibly wide palette. Though she has gotten less adventurous as a writer as the years have gone on, she has gotten better at the craft, and she did build from a higher mastery than most.

That said, most of her energy, and in this she joins a great many writers coming from the urban working class of color, seems to be spent not being conflated. Conflated with other black female writers, conflated with protestors, conflated with critics of the establishment. Oh, she does criticize, empathize, recognize herself. But always prefacing it with layers upon layers of self-justification and differentiation. She, like her icon & model David Foster Wallace, feels the need to set herself apart from anything we could categorize her as in bad faith.

So she is a feminist, but worry not, she still loves Updike, Larkin and Pound. She is a utopian socialist but she has nothing in particular to say about the state of the world. She of course has an opinion on the current conflict in Palestine, but she won't tell because it's not important and it's "just words".

Of course you can read Larkin and Pound as a committed leftist feminist and think your personal opinion on world politics is irrelevant compared to what is going on in the world. My gripe is that someone with such high literary pretensions, such admiration for the gusto of free spirits both past & present (someone willing to go to bat for Kanye's trumpist phase in the name of poetry in the very same magazine where she so artfully defends at length that no statement from either student protesters or counter-protesters has value, nor hers) someone who spends so much of her time quoting moral philosophers and pondering the future of writing... That this someone has essentially given up on politics.

My gripe, my visceral annoyance at her, my point is that the "towering mind of her generation" has given up on politics except as background, coordinates to tack the nuance-lacking masses onto, but that great spirits transcend somehow. No wonder she loves Harold Bloom & James Wood. Or that she's a child of Blair's cool Brittania. As a public intellectual, there is no duty to say anything meaningful, or whereof one cannot speak, to remain silent. If your thesis is that you have none and the dead are more important, why spend 4000 words talking about yourself, and how above it all you are and how ineffectual anyone writing about it is, and how you're the only one smart enough to have the dignity of recognizing it ? Why not make form fit content, as you have so often done ? Why not attack specific words, specific utterances that ignore the dead, instead of fighting strawmen ?

The truth is that Smith's outbursts of calling for dignity, reason, nuance, cooler heads are not anything new, not anything groundbreaking, nothing unprecedented, even by the great. You can hear echoes of it in Camus refusing to denounce colonialism because Algerians refuse to speak French. It is the cry of the moral esthete, for whom to side with the dubious, the inarticulate, the incoherent, the angry, all that is like poison to her. Oh, yes, she can defend Kanye's nonsensical racist, and already then antisemitic rants. But Kanye is an artist, "one of our best living poets". So are any writers of dubious politics, any convicted felon, any instance of sustained personal cruelty worth defending against the mob. Their sensibility just hasn't been expanded far enough, they just don't get it. The mob hasn't created anything worthwhile. The mob is childish, does not know the right words, does not rise up to the occasion like it should.

The truth is that Zadie Smith stands for something. If she really believed in the dead, or in utopian socialism, or in responsible public intellectuals, she would have written differently. She stands for transcendence. Her right to be in the world without anyone being able to make moral pronouncements on her, her work, the work of others. She stands for a plane above this world that matters to this world in ways she finds complex and delicate. She stands for herself being judged only on, and from, this plane.

Thankfully, like a child in a playground that insists the game she devised is very good and we should all follow the rules, and really she is a skillful player and we will all have fun with once we simply follow the rules, we are all free to ignore her.

We are free to live in the real world and make real moral decisions, getting our hands and our consciences dirty, yes, but also stand by real human beings. Beings whose freedoms to play pretend, to read and write, to transcend, is hampered by real people who do not care for the right words or the correct moral stance. We are free to fight for a liberated Palestine though we may be partisan, simplistic, quick to anger and inarticulate.

[mogwai-movie-house]

I think the reason why leftists think "everything is political !! Star trek was always political !!!" is that they genuinely can't imagine their political ideas not being 100% unequivocally true, right, correct, and accepted. So they aren't able to realize there's a difference between bipartisan truisms like "Slavery is bad" and their political ideas like "White people should give black people reparations". To them, those are the exact same thing, so yes, of course star trek has always been political, nothing's changed at all.

You can't create a believable fictional universe peopled by believable fictional characters when you can't even accept or understand there are good people in your own world who might think and vote differently to you.

There's a difference between examining and dwelling deeply upon eternally recurring themes like injustice, slavery, the wonders and dangers of progress, utopianism, the irrationality of the mob, etcetera etcetera, and simply loudly stating the current mandatory positions of this year's Democrat Party, having all your NPCs applaud and then calling it a day.

Wokeness has killed art.

[irreplaceable-spark]

Message to CEOs

CEOs need to stop saving the world with the globalists, narcissists, and eternal builders of the tower of Babel, and stand up for what they are and what they do. If they deliver what they're paid to deliver, there is nothing to feel guilty for.

[davidmann95]

Sooo… Superman and the Authority?

magnus-king123 asked: Your thoughts on Superman & the authority Give it to me...lol

Anonymous asked: Seeing Bezos take his little trip into space the same day Morrison puts out a Superman comic that touches on how far we’ve fallen from the days when we dreamed of utopian futures where everyone explored the stars was a big gut punch. Not used to Superman being topical in that way.

Anonymous asked: What'd you think of Superman and the Authority#1?

This is far beyond what I can fit in the normal weekly reviews, so taking this as my notes on the first six pages, with this and this as my major lead-in thoughts:

* Janin's such a perfect fit for Morrison - the scale, the power, the facial expressions selling the character work, the screwing around with the panel formatting as necessary to sell the effect, the numinous sense of things going on larger than you can fully perceive amidst the beauty and chaos. It's a shame he wasn't around 25 years ago to draw JLA, but I'll take him going with Morrison onto other future projects.

* His intro action sequence is such a great demonstration of why Black actually does have something to offer, and also how he's such a dumbass desperately needing Superman to save him from himself.

* While Jordie Bellaire didn't legit go with an entirely monochromatic palate the way early previews suggested, it's still an effect frequently and excellently deployed here. And glad to see Steve Wands carry into this from Blackstars since there's such an obvious carryover from its work with Superman.

* "Gentlemen. Ladies. Others." Great both because of the obvious - hey, Superman's nodding at me! - and because it's a phrasing that reinforces that this take on him (and let's be real Morrison) is old as hell.

* I'm mostly past caring about whether this is an alt-Earth Superman until it becomes indisputable one way or another, this and Action both rule so what does it really matter? But while there are still a couple signs in play suggesting some kind of division (the Action Comics #1036 cover, Midnighter up to time-travel shenanigans) the "lost in time" quote clearly thrown in after the fact to explain how he could have met Kennedy outside of 5G that wouldn't be necessary for an Elseworlds, the assorted gestures towards Superman's current status quo, the Kingdom Come symbol appearing in Action, and that Morrison would have had to completely rewrite the ending if this wasn't supposed to be 'the' version of Clark Kent going forward as was the intent when they first planned it all say to me that no, no fooling around, this is our guy going forward one way or another.

* Janin and Bellaire making the first version of the crystal Fortress ever that actually looks as cool as you want it to.

Anonymous asked: I like that Superman and The Authority is basically the anti-All-Star; instead of the laid back, immortal Superman who is supercharged, we have a stressed, ageing Superman whose tremendous powers are fading. The former will always be there to save us, but the latter is running out of time and needs to pull off a Hail Mary. Also, he mentions in his monologue to Black that he was "lost in time" when he met JFK, so maybe he is the main continuity Clark. Or he's the t-shirt Supes from Sideways.

* You're absolutely right - the power reversal is obvious and the ticking clock in play seemingly isn't for his own survival but everyone around him as he wakes up and realizes all the old icons grew complacent with the gains they'd made and he's not leaving behind the world he meant to. Both, however, are built on the idea of preparing the world to not need them anymore - it'll still have a Superman in his son, but that'll only work because of the others he empowers and inspires. The question is what happens to Clark if he's not going to live in the sun for 83000 years.

* Clark's 'exercise' here does more to sell me on the idea of Old Man Superman as a cool idea than however many decades of Earth 2 stuff.

* Intergang being noted alongside Darkseid and Doomsday speaks to how much Kirby informed Morrison's conception of Superman.

* This isn't exactly the most progressive in its disability politics but at least it makes clear Black's being a piece of shit about it.

* It's startling how much Clark can get away with saying stuff in here you'd never expect to come out of Superman's mouth. "I made an executive decision" "Privacy, really...?" "You have nowhere to go, Black. Nothing to live for." "There are few people in my life who I instinctively and viscerally dislike, and you've always been one of them." It only works because there's zero aggression behind it, he's just past the point of niceties and being totally frank while making clear none of these assessments preclude that he cares and is going to unconditionally do the right thing every time. He is absolutely, per Morrison, humanity's dad picking us up when we're too drunk to drive ourselves home.

* The story doesn't put a big flashing light over it, but it's not even a little bit subtle having the material threat of the issue be a ticking timebomb left by the carelessness and hubris of generations past.

* Manchester keeps trying to poke the bear and prove his hot takes about Superman and it's just not working. The front he put up under Kelley is gone after decades of defeats, and as Morrison understands what actually conceptually works about him as a rival to Superman underneath the aging nerd paranoia he's exposed as what he absolutely would be in 2021: a dude with a horrific terminal case of Twitter brainworms. I was PANICKED when I heard there was an 'offensive term' joke in this, I was braced for Morrison at their well-meaning worst, but it's such a goddamn perfect encapsulation of a very specific breed of Twitter leftist who uses their politics first and foremost as a cudgel and justification to label their abrasive, judgmental shittiness as self-righteousness (plus it's a killer payoff to a joke from way back in his original appearance). Cannot believe they pulled that off when they're so very, very open about basically not knowing how the internet works.

* @charlottefinn: Manchester Black using his telekinetic powers to force someone he hates to fave a problematic tweet so that he can screenshot it and start a dogpile

@intergalactic-zoo: “Once they cancel Bibbo, Superman won’t be *anyone’s* fav’rit anymore!”

* Friend noted this issue had to be fully the conversation because the whole premise stands on the house of cards of these two somehow working together, and with three 'silent' inset panels the creative team pulls off that turning point.

* So much of this feels on the surface like Morrison bringing back the All-Star vibes with Clark, but when he drops a "That's all you got?" in a brawl you realize what's underlining that bluntness and confidence in the face of failure is that deep down this is still the Action guy too. This dude ain't gonna get wrecked in his Fortress while the other guy chuckles about him being A SOFT WEE SCIENTIST'S SON!

* Bringing up Jor-El made me realize that Morrison already spelled out that this is the final threat to Superman, what he faces at the end of the road:

"Now it's your turn, Superman."

* A l'il Superman 2000/All-Star reference with the Phantom Zone map!

* There's so much intertextuality going on here even by Morrison standards - Change or Die with the old hero putting together a team of morally nebulous folks out to 'fix' everything, Flex Mentallo with the muscleman trying to redeem the punk, Doomsday Clock with the fate of the world hinging on whether Superman can get through to a meta stand-in for an idea of 'modern' comics cynicism, DKR and New Frontier and Kingdom Come and Multiversity and Seven Soldiers and What's So Funny and All-Star and Action and the last 5 years of monthly Superman comics and Authority and probably Jupiter's Legacy and Tom Strong - but none of that's needed. You could go in with the baseline pop cultural understanding of the character and not care about any of the inside baseball shit and get that this is a story about a leader of a generation that let down the people they made all their grand promises to as inertia and day-to-day demands and complacency let him be satisfied with the accomplishments they'd made long ago, looking at a new era and seeing the ways its own activists are dropping the ball. The only thing that fundamentally matters in a "you have to accept you're reading a superhero story" sense is that because he's Superman he's willing to own up to it and listen to people who might know better about some things and try to set things right while he and those who'll take his place still have a chance. And yes, the oldster looking back on their legacy with a skeptical eye and hoping for better from the next generation, hoping most of all that their little heir apparent can fulfill the promise inside of him instead of being a provocating little shitkicker, is obviously also autobiographical.

* The overlaying Kennedy reprisal is such a great visual of a sudden intrusive thought.

* The Kryptonite secret is the obvious "This is going to matter!" moment, but "He lied about his son" is a bit that doesn't connect to anything going on right now so maybe that's important here too? More significantly, the Justice League can't actually be the villains here but that Ultra-Humanite's crew are in an Earth-orbiting satellite makes pretty clear what's up.

* I've said before that between Superman, OMAC, and a New Gods-affiliated speedster this was going to use all of Morrison's favorite things. King Arthur playing a role isn't exactly dissuading me.

* Love the idea that all the antiheroes have their own community in the same way as the capes and tights crew. They definitely all privately think the rest are posers though and that they alone are Garth Ennis Punisher in a mob of Garth Ennis Wolverines.

* Manchester's fallen so far he's gone from trying to convince Superman to kill to convince him to dunk on people for their bad takes and Clark just doesn't get it. Official prediction of dialogue for upcoming issues:

"According to these bloody Fortress scans, the only thing that can restore your powers is an unfiltered hit of dopamine. Don't worry, Doctor Black has a few ideas."

"Hmm. Maybe I'll plant a nice tree?"

"...fuck you."

* Ok I already talked about how great the Fortress looks in here but LOVE this library.

* A pair of pages this seems like the right spot to discuss from Black's original appearance that underlines both his and Superman's inadequacies up to this point:

Responding to the problem of "the government and penal system are hopelessly corrupt" neither of them has any actual notion of what to do about it in spite of their respective posturing beyond how to handle individual outside actors - each is in their own way every bit as small-minded and reactionary as the other. Clark's coming around though, and he's holding out hope for the other guy.

* Superman: Have a lovely mineral water :) proper hydration is important :)

Manchester Black: *Is a dude who can get so mad he vomits and passes out. At water.*

* That last page is the one to beat for the year, and does more to put over the idea of this as an Authority book than that Midnighter and Apollo are literally going to show up. It also feels like Morrison tacitly acknowledging all the ways the premise could go or at least be received wrong - from Superman saying 'enough is enough' to who he's bringing into the fold to go about it - in the most beautifully on-the-nose fashion imaginable. Maybe they'll save us all! Or maybe they'll drown us in their vomit.

[rauthschild]

Supreme Court War Raises Genocide Fears For Trump Supporters After Biden Brands Them An “Infection”

By: Sorcha Faal, 

A deeply troubling new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing the order issued by President Putin this morning to immediately deploy 60 Ilyushin Il-76 military transport planes in an exercise for the rapid long-range movement of tens-of-thousands of combat forces, says necessitating this action is the rapidly deteriorating situation currently underway in the United States, where due to the sudden death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, its socialist Democrat Party officials have declared “It means that we are going to war”—a declaration of war now joined by socialist Democrat Party leader Joe Biden, who warned President Donald Trump and the Republican Party that if they try to replace Ginsburg, “They are going to push the nation deeper into the abyss”—a dire warning followed by socialist leader Biden standing so badly out of breath he could barely speak at a podium yesterday, after which he fled from this podium in Philadelphia-Pennsylvania, ignoring the questions shouted at him by reporters—reporters that most assuredly would have asked Biden why he said during his speech that 200-million Americans had died from the coronavirus—and most critically, would have asked Biden why he dangerously uttered the inflammatory words: “The infection this president has unleashed on our democracy can be fatal”.

Words of “dehumanization” socialist leader Biden used to describe President Trump and Trump supporters to create the impression that they are all infectious disease ridden vermin needing to be exterminated—and was last exampled in our world during the 7 April to 15 July-1994 Rwandan Genocide that killed over 1-million—a genocide that began with the sudden assassination of a political leader, and when the Hutu peoples thought they might lose power, saw them telling their socialist mobs to arm themselves with machetes, clubs, blunt objects, and other weapons and encouraged them to rape, maim, and kill their Tutsi neighbors and to destroy or steal their property—and to start this genocide, saw Hutu socialist leaders comparing their opponents to infectious vermin like Biden has now done—which makes it more than terrifying why socialist leader Biden specifically mentioned “200-million dead Americans”, as in a United States having a population of 330-million, of whom 76.3% are white, a genocide against these 252-million white American citizens to kill 200-million of them would give these socialist forces the utopian “racial diversity” they’ve started this war to achieve.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=H2vCAjImJJ0&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=JimmyKimmelLive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=-2STo2Ttvtg&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=TruetheVote

An actual racial war that now sees leftist Hollywood filmmaker Michael Moore ordering socialist mobs to “Get Out In The Streets And Be Ruthless!”—and to show the American people what is in store for them, yesterday saw white leftist Hollywood host Jimmy Kimmel emceeing the Emmy Awards on live nationwide television, where he allowed himself to be publically humiliated by radical black communist actor Anthony Anderson, who ordered Kimmel to shout “Black Lives Matter”, and then ordered Kimmel to “shout it louder”—all of which occurred yesterday during the same time that socialist mobs in Portland-Oregon stopped cars and ordered the terrified people in them to raise fists and smash businesses in honor of Justice Ginsburg—socialist mobs in Seattle-Washington began assaulting single white women who were driving their cars—socialist mobs in Philadelphia-Pennsylvania began attacking random white citizens—socialist mobs in San Diego-California attacking diners while young white mothers clutched their terrified babies—which explains why another young white mother in Texas has just vowed to leave her husband forever unless he stops supporting President Trump—a young white mother no doubt terrified after hearing about the black socialist radical who walked into a bar in Louisville-Kentucky and shot three white people dead for no reason—and whose defense against appears hopeless, as best exampled by Jake Gardner putting a gun to his head and committing suicide yesterday, who was the young white man who defended himself against a socialist terrorist trying to kill him, a defense ruled as justifiable by police, but saw him about to be arrested by the order of a radical socialist prosecutor—and further exampled by the police chief in the socialist Democrat Party stronghold city of Minneapolis-Minnesota telling his terrified citizens his forces can no longer protect them—though to counter all of this socialist mob violence, the prestigious True The Vote organization has just released a powerful warning video explaining to the American people what is causing this Marxist revolutionary coup.      

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2JHHN1qhyQ&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=SufficientGrace

According to this report, when future historians write about what is occurring in the United States today, they will squarely place the blame for this socialist violence on the backs of the American people—specifically because they failed to ask the most important question of their lifetimes: “Why did former President Obama never write or talk  about his most important executive experience?”—a question if asked, would have seen them discovering that from 1995 to 1999, Obama led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge that poured more than $100-million into the hands of community organizers and radical education activists to indoctrinate America’s children into believing socialist lies—a Chicago Annenberg Challenge socialist indoctrination plot that was the brainchild of Bill Ayers, who with his wife Bernardine Dohrn (who in 2010 said: “The real terrorist is the American government”) led the most dangerous and deadly American socialist terrorist organization ever known called the Weather Underground from the late 1960s to the late 1970s—a socialist terrorist organization infiltrated by FBI informant Larry Grathwohl, who in his book “Bringing Down America: An FBI Informer With the Weathermen” and under oath testimony to the US Congress, chillingly described the meetings he sat in on where Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn detailed their plot to forcefully put tens-of-millions of American citizens in socialist re-education camps, where up to 25-million of them would be eliminated to protect themselves against a counter revolution—an extermination that would be aided by Communist Chinese and Cuban military forces they would allow to come in and take parts of America for themselves—a genocidal plot neither Bill Ayers or his wife Bernardine Dohrn weren’t  able to fully realize, as first they needed their socialist forces to penetrate into the highest reaches of the US government—and when that was achieved, would see these socialist forces in the US government doing everything in their power to raise the military and economic strength of their main ally Communist China, while at the same time, doing everything they could to crush the American people and their own nation’s economic power—all occurring at the same time entire generations of American children would be indoctrinated into socialist ideology—all of which has now been accomplished—but left standing nearly alone to oppose them, is the most fearsome enemy they’ve ever faced, President Donald Trump.

As these socialist forces begin their endgame maneuvers to destroy President Trump, which will allow them to begin their genocide of all Trump supporters, this report concludes, most fearfully being watched by Russian intelligence services is the United States’ most powerful weapons developer called the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)—that aside from its having created the first atomic bomb in human history, has one of the world’s most secretive biological programmes—the one of most concern being the “Biogeochemical Transformations at Critical Interfaces”, that Russian intelligence experts have long suspected conducts secret research into how waterways and water systems can be used to deploy radioactive, chemical and disease agents—which is why Russian intelligence analysts continuously track the scientists receiving training at ORNL in its Biogeochemical Transformations at Critical Interfaces programme, and to which American universities they’re sent after receiving training—such as Jennifer Mosher that ORNL reports was placed on the faculty at Marshall University—the same Assistant Professor Jennifer Mosher that Marshall University has just been suspended after she was secretly video taped saying about President Trump’s supporters “I hope they all die before the election”—and with Professor Mosher and her socialist comrades being able to make good on this deadly genocidal threat, makes it clear why after this video threat was released, it was followed within hours by a letter signed by some 235 retired senior American military officers backing the reelection of President Donald Trump and warning that electing former Vice President Joe Biden would lead to the growing influence in government by “socialists and Marxists”—and explains why United States Attorney General William Barr has just designated New York City as an “Anarchist Jurisdiction”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cps9RjrYpLE&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=JudgeBritt

[loudlytransparenttrash]

Hi, Loudly, I discovered your blog today & I find it very reassuring. I appreciate your calm, well presented thoughts (I wish that happened more on tumblr). I recently lost an SJW friend who didn't want me talking of religion, dating, & race, bc I'm white & follow Jesus. I have Christian & non Christian friends who think I did the right thing by letting her go. I want people to know that there's freedom in knowing the truth, loving people as individuals, & thinking for yourself. God bless you :)

Hi :) Thanks for your message! Being conservative, or even having one foot outside of the leftist circle jerk, it’s inevitable you’re going to upset the PC-brigade, which often includes some of your own friends. The problem conservatives face is the left think we’re evil, we just think they’re wrong. So in most cases, it’s those leftist friends who shun us and unfriend us, merely for having different political opinions, or they will feel sorry for us or look down on us, hellbent on “educating” us to “be better,” because they’ve been taught dissidence against their wonderful, utopian ideas is wrong and dangerous. 

I’ve said many times in my posts, don’t allow politics to break up friendships and relationships. Be the rational and sane one as it’s a safe bet their mental framework is always going to be based on emotion rather than reason, and encourage them to find common ground with you and agree to disagree in order to maintain your friendship. I know that’s easier said than done. I have friends who have turned on me and completely trashed me over social media once I deserted the only acceptable worldview young people are allowed to have. On the other hand, some friends have agreed to never discuss anything remotely political or any current affair while we hang out. While I know they’re humiliated to have a conservative friend, they’re good sports and just pretend that I’m no different, at least it saves them from crying and it does keep our friendship focused on all the other things which made us friends to begin with. 

In your case, it’s clear your friend has been completely consumed by the lunacy of identity politics. It’s an argument that has never made sense to me. A white person isn’t allowed to speak about black issues but a black person is an expert on what’s wrong with white people. A man isn’t allowed to speak about women’s issues but a feminist is an expert on what’s wrong with men. A non-Muslim isn’t allowed to talk about Islamic issues but Muslims are experts on what’s wrong with Westerners, Jews, Christians. Identity politics splits us into groups and our skin colors and gender then determine what we’re allowed to believe, what we’re allowed to say and it decides our oppression ranking. It’s in complete contrast to the civil rights mantra of judging the content of one’s character rather than their skin color. Today that gets you labeled a racist.

So while I hope your friendship is important enough to not let this shit come between you both, I think you did the right thing to remove yourself from this backwards logic which is aimed at preventing dissidence and keeping whites “in their lane.” Your identity does not determine the credibility of facts. Facts are facts regardless of what color or size of lips they come from. You don’t need to play football to understand and speak about football. As long as you equip yourself with reliable information, you’re allowed to say whatever the hell you want and while your skin color may make the outrage mob even more outraged when you speak, it doesn’t stop what you have to say from being any less true, and as long as you’re unapologetically speaking the truth, then nothing else matters. Thank you for your message and good luck with your friend :) xx 

[republicstandard]

Earth 2070: A Glimpse at One Possible Future

Back in 2019, having a sense of what was to come, select Frenchmen, Spaniards, and their European kin started to move in small numbers back into the old medieval haunts of their ancestors. Motivated by an instinct never articulated for sure imprisonment, these prescient few lived as they had done, raised their families, and carried on as before, but with the knowledge that, at the very least, there was one extra protection against that day they knew in their bones would eventually arrive. Their countrymen were too paralyzed by fear or too deluded by utopian visions to see that an old, weary continent, but for the far-sighted few, had already surrendered.

(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:10817585113717094,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7788-6480"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.lockerdomecdn.com/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

Not that this ennui was limited to Europe, no. Across the Western world the painted-faces of tolerance and inclusion happily abolished their borders, and if it was an ocean that separated them, that, too, was abolished, as the ships streamed in to port and planes landed and more vibrant colors were sewn into the rich tapestry of humanity in New Zealand and Australia and Nova Scotia. Backward as they were, and heaped with scorn, the prescient ones quietly rejected these “gifts”; some of their progeny stayed, some left for the vibrant big cities, but their numbers were replaced by others sensing where the river of history was flowing.

There was much global congratulations on the release of the French census one year that showed they had finally joined their enlightened cousins in demographic transformation. It hadn’t been easy. French President Jean Loumont was a veritable rock star at the Annual Global Diversity Summit sponsored by the United Nations in Dubai. Most memorable, perhaps, was the embrace shared by Loumont with UK Prime Minister Raheem Sahel, with German Prime Minister Hidayet Gülden looking on approvingly in the background. After a series of contentious trade disputes, the notorious near-miss of Brexit and the full re-integration of Britain in an arduous process into the European Union, the moment reminded the global community that progress doesn’t just happen on demand. It is a difficult process, hard-won through activism and political change and education, but it seemed, finally, that humanity was ready to embrace this new, long-heralded future. Almost everyone, anyway.

Notably absent at the Summit were heavy-weights Japan, the Russian Federation, and the United States, always behind the curve it seemed. Chinese President Xi Xiu had drafted a resolution condemning the three nations—as well as the other abstainers in the Visegrad Union, the Balkan League, the Baltic Defense League, Ukraine, Belarus, Argentina, and Uruguay—which was co-signed by every other major international political leader present. Some of these so-signers, like Italian Prime Minister Giorgio Sentorini and Spanish Prime Minister Felipe Fernandez, did so with great reservation, but under immense pressure from their home populations. Sentorini, with yet another election looming, was backing off some incendiary comments he had made a few months prior regarding the root cause of a crime wave across southern Italy.

The Summit was a perfect chance for healing and reconciliation for those nations present. After an introductory speech by Gülden that featured a standing ovation for his commitment to stronger sentencing for those convicted of hate speech and Holocaust Denial, and praising the contributions of his fellow Turks in transforming Germany from a nation stained with shame from the Holocaust to one at the vanguard of demographic change, the keynote address by South African President Prince Malusi-Iwoh Buza really set the world on fire. After the first two-thirds of the internationally televised speech drew polite applause and much nodding of heads to President Buza’s social justice boilerplate, Buza shifted gears, calling for the “abolition of whiteness,” which has been such a uniquely destructive and pernicious force in human history. After citing well-documented examples of oppression, racism, enslavement, and genocide, Buza put the exclamation mark on the speech by rising to a crescendo with the immortal words of Susan Sontag:

“The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al., don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history; it is the white race and it alone — its ideologies and inventions — which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself!”

The gallery exploded in applause, and around the globe, Buza quickly became canonized, surpassing in just one evening his countryman Nelson Mandela as the patron saint of justice and equity.

It was not a good night for everyone around the globe, however. Riots in Milwaukee, Baltimore, Memphis, and St. Louis in the United States claimed a total of 138 lives, and the banlieues of Paris burned for three days straight. Across the entire planet, Buza’s words stirred a ferment in the breast of those victimized by whiteness, by colonization, and by systemic oppression. In Sydney, three teenaged girls walking home from school were raped and decapitated by an agitated mob of Aborigines. A Leftist demonstration in Amsterdam turned violent, and seventeen civilians and eight police officers were killed. The world-renowned Mullah Ishaq Azam led a demonstration in Copenhagen that turned violent, with twelve of his followers killed by police. In Durban, South Africa, a white woman was accused of uttering that most unholy of words—kuffar—and was lynched from a streetlamp. Toronto, Frankfurt, Brussels, Stockholm, Oslo, and Auckland all witnessed major unrest, but the worst violence of all was the horrific massacre in central Cameroon of an entire village of Christians.

Despite all of the forward progress toward a unity of all peoples, civil unrest became the norm for the next few months. Already unwilling to enter the notorious “No-Go Zones” of Europe for fear of their lives, police in major European cities—along with first responders—began to restrict their patrols even further. The neighborhoods bordering these No-Go Zones became increasingly victimized, and fires often burned out of control. One firetruck dared to try and put out a fire raging on the outskirts of Rinkeby, in Sweden, and the firemen were brutally assaulted, the truck stripped for parts while several apartment buildings went up in flames. Eighty-nine people died that day.

Buza’s world tour was met with a dramatic spike of violence in every city he landed in, but the global press was essentially eating out of the palm of his hand. His speeches, all generally variations on a theme, advanced the abolishment of whiteness as the singular aim of his administration, as the single greatest good mankind could commit to in order to secure an equitable future for all. The constitutional land expropriations in South Africa, already decades in the books, had reduced the few remaining whites in the country to abject poverty, and the general outcry at fast-tracking thousands of white farmers out of that South Africa in 2018 by the Australian government was a blow that nation was never quite able to recover from. Ostracized by most of the global community for its explicit racism, Australia had tried to make amends by increasing its acceptance of refugees and loosening its immigration laws, and the youth vote galvanized by this naked racism pushed the Australian government hard to the Left. Their sweeping legal changes in 2022 regarding hate speech and racist speech were still not enough to remove their scarlet letter in the eyes of the world, and despite her presence at the Global Diversity Summit, Prime Minister Andrea O’Hara was treated a bit like a leper. Never mind that her nation was far ahead of France in equity, justice, and demography, the stain was still there.

(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:10817587730962790,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-5979-7226"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.lockerdomecdn.com/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

The world was moving forward, coming together under the aegis of globalism—diversity, equity, and inclusion; the abolition of borders; the rise of socially-conscious megalopolies driving social change; supra-national entities and banking syndicates determining fiscal and immigration policy—in short, much of the world was finally in the hands of those who truly knew what was best for its people.

It was truly the dawn of a Golden Age.

from Republic Standard | Conservative Thought & Culture Magazine https://ift.tt/2P2mDlu via IFTTT

[oldguardaudio]

Rush Limbaugh -> Stupid Leftist Protests Have No Impact – You know, this Berkeley business and Milo Yiannopoulos, the editor at Breitbart, openly gay, gay conservative, challenges political correctness from college campus to college campus.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

RUSH: You know, this Berkeley business and Milo Yiannopoulos, the editor at Breitbart, openly gay, gay conservative, challenges political correctness from college campus to college campus.

There’s two schools of thought on what is happening. One of the schools of thought is that the students at these universities, Berkeley being the most recent, they are just so scared, so frightened of anybody showing up that is going to say anything that they don’t agree with, makes ’em really frightened. That they go bonkers, and they start burning down buildings and destroying property and trying to injure people in order to show their dissatisfaction over this guy coming to campus to make a speech.

The other school of thought is that this really isn’t student centered, that it is professional rent-a-mob focused bought and paid for by leftist organizations and that the real protesters are not students, that they are black-clad, wear masks or other kind of paraphernalia on their faces to hide their identity. They show up with explosives and bricks and bombs. They let the students get the so-called protest started, and then the real rioters show up and start doing all the property damage.

[amazon_link asins=’1618688502,B0089N25HQ,1621573702,1595230459,B005UNULE2′ template=’ProductCarousel’ store=’hoaxandchange-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’b895a08f-ea22-11e6-bf3f-83d1d15e132b’]

And it wouldn’t matter who was showing up, whenever the students object to anything, the professional rioters get in gear, and then they call it a protest, you know, free speech. It’s the antithesis of free speech when somebody’s not allowed to speak because the audience doesn’t want to hear it.

But folks, it isn’t new. This kind of activity, people wring their hands over it, but it happened in the sixties. It happened with the Students for a Democratic Society. It happened when Reagan was governor of California. He even met with these people. It happened at Berkeley, and there was property damage. There were riots.

The difference then and now is only one arrest. There was serious property damage last night and a considerable threat to innocent people, and only one person was arrested. As long as that’s the case, there isn’t gonna be any deterrence to this. These people are still the losers. They lost in November; they have been losing, even through the eight years of Obama, they have been losing. The Democrat Party, which is their vessel, has been losing significantly.

And what’s on display every day, I mean, they can act like children all day long and they can destroy the — I mean, these students are destroying their school. They’re destroying and doing damage where they go to college. They’re inflicting all of this damage on themselves, in a sense. What has to be obvious to them is that it’s not making a difference. It’s not stopping Donald Trump. It’s not changing the outcome of the election, and everything they’re doing adds up to nothing, because it isn’t changing anything.

Yeah, they might keep Milo Yiannopoulos off campus, but it’s not stopping Donald Trump, and it’s not stopping Milo Yiannopoulos. He will just go someplace else, or say what he was gonna say on the Breitbart website. Milo probably loves it, all the notoriety, the attention. To be able to cause this kind of havoc, big feather in your cap.

But at the end of the day I think what’s driving the Democrat Party and the American left crazy is that what they’re doing doesn’t matter. They lost. They really are not affecting any change, nor are they stopping any. They’re not even changing public opinion. Public opinion is still majority for Trump in what he’s doing. The Democrat Party can’t stop anybody. The Democrat Party can’t stop any of Trump’s nominees. The Democrat Party cannot stop or interrupt any of Trump’s policies. That has to dawn on ’em.

Hollywood celebrities are literally bat excrement, folks. They’ve always been mindless, but it’s on full display now. Some of the things that Hollywood celebrities are tweeting out and saying, I mean, it is genuine special kind of stupid that’s on display for everybody to see now. It’s not just ignorance. It is genuine stupidity, from Chelsea Handler to Sophia Bush of Chicago PD to what’s-her-face, Lena Dunham’s always been off her rocker. Lena Dunham’s never been right.

You just go down the list of any of them, and they’re genuinely dumb. They are dumb and stupid and they haven’t the slightest idea what they’re talking about. And they haven’t the slightest idea who Barack Obama really was. They don’t have the slightest idea what Barack Obama was really doing. They live in a make-believe world where, when people who they think think like them are in power, then everything is utopian. Whether it is or isn’t, they don’t care to examine it.

If like-minded people are in power, then it has to be blissful, it has to be wonderful. They’re not even aware of what Obama was destroying. They’re not aware of the damage Obama was doing. They’re not aware of anything. And it’s embarrassing. It literally is embarrassing that we have, in this country, this much concentrated stupidity and idiocy that is willing to put it all on display. They’re so stupid and so ignorant, they don’t even know how stupid and ignorant they are, which of course kind of makes sense. If you’re dumb, you’re dumb.

They don’t have any proper education. But of course in their minds they are the smartest and the best and the brightest and the most aware and the kindest and the most compassionate. It’s gotta be blowing their minds. It’s just gotta be destroying them. They lost. They can’t come to grips with it. The techniques that they’ve used in the past to intimidate and bully people into laying down and quitting and going away are not working on this administration.

And, because of that, they’re not working on the Republican Party, yet. And so it’s all for naught. And they end up destroying their own houses. They end up destroying their own institutions. Berkeley is one of their institutions, one of their precious universities, and they’re destroying it. They’re not destroying Trump’s house. They’re not destroying the White House. It’s the most amazing thing to see.

And with each passing day I think there’s a bit more revelation. Every passing day they realize just a little bit more how totally ineffective and irrelevant they are. It makes ’em go even battier and they become even more unhinged. But if you don’t have any historical perspective beyond the day you were born, I can’t blame you for thinking, “My God, we’re losing the country, it’s unraveling.”

That isn’t what’s happening. What’s happening, folks, is we’re reclaiming the country. What’s happening is the country is being refocused. The direction of the country’s being changed, and it is being reclaimed from the left that wanted to destroy it, as founded, who wanted to transform it, as founded.

What you’re seeing is a bunch of people taking their country back from people who thought they already had succeeded in transforming it. They thought that the opportunity to take this country back, to reclaim it, was gone. We, you and I, had been defeated. You and I were in a minority. You and I were not able to stop them. The reality is, they can’t hold on to what they did. They’re desperately trying to. The point here is that this is going to be daily, and Trump addressed it at the prayer breakfast today. This is what it looks like.

It was never going to be peaceful. The left was never going to say, “You know what? You won. It was a great, great fight, and we have all the respect in the world for you, and we’re gonna continue our efforts to transform America, but you won.” It’s never gonna be like that. It was never gonna be them acknowledging or respecting us or the opponents. It’s always gonna look like this. Trump better start firing more people in the federal government, folks. Sally Yates is not the only one there trying to undermine him.

Somebody’s leaking these transcripts of his phone calls and then lying about what he’s saying to the president of Mexico or the prime minister of Australia. One of the best ways, one of the fastest ways to get rid of this left-wing deadweight would be just have a policy to cut the federal government by 20%. Twenty percent across the board. Whack, whack, whack, whack, whack! Just do it. But I would speed up the timetable of getting rid every Obama and Clinton appointee that’s still in positions where you can fire ’em. Just do it!

And even when you do, this stuff is gonna continue. You have to hang in, folks. So far, you are. Every bit of data — polling data and otherwise — indicates you have not lost spirit. You’ve not lost your conviction, your courage. You’re still supporting Trump. This is what reclaiming your government and your country means. This is what it looks like. Taking our country back? This is what it looks like. So just steel yourselves. And if you ever have any doubts, if you ever have any questions — if you ever are, perhaps, losing your resolve — you make sure you are here every day.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Folks, are you aware the Democrats walked out of Congress to protest Abraham Lincoln? Did you know that? You didn’t know that. I’m not surprised. I mean, most people don’t. The Democrats walked out of Congress to protest Abraham Lincoln. They were afraid to lose their slaves, and they hated Lincoln. They just despised Lincoln, so they walked out, and it ended up being great for Republicans. They were able to do all kinds of things with no opposition. Let them walk out. I don’t know…

Judd Apatow is some worthless, irrelevant actor who doesn’t know it, so he keeps tweeting things, and he tweeted something to that effect that the Berkeley riots are just beginning, adding, “When will all the fools still supporting Trump realize what’s at stake?” Mr. Apatow (whoever he is) is one of these people that still hasn’t come to grips with what happened to him and his side. When will the fools in Hollywood realize that they lost and that there’s nothing they can do about it, and that all they’re doing is making fools of themselves — and, by the way, probably inflicting great damage on future box office?

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Donald Trump tweeted at 6:13 this morning: “If UC Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view — NO FEDERAL FUNDS?” I mean, that hits ’em right in the breadbasket. I mean, that’s right in the cauliflower there, folks. These people can’t survive without their federal funding, without their subsidies. I looked it up. I have the numbers here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers. The UC Berkeley’s website brags, “Each year, the UC Berkeley campus receives well over half a billion dollars in research and other support from external sources.”

Of that half a billion dollars, “The federal government provided 55% of these funds, and California state agencies and other government sources, industry, and the nonprofit sector supplied the rest.” So we’re basically looking at $370 million a year the federal government gives Berkeley. Just yank it! Only one arrest. You’ve seen the video? There were fires, property damage. Why do these people…? By the way, somebody needs to explain something. I got an email with a great question.

Why do these crazed leftists — every time they do this — destroy a Starbucks? Isn’t Starbucks their home away from home? Isn’t Starbucks the quintessential liberal hangout? Why do they destroy…? I mean, they literally destroy the Starbucks. I just saw the photo. It doesn’t exist. I mean, it exists, but you can’t go in there. The front’s off, the glass is blown out, the tables are a wreck. (interruption) You have a theory why they destroy Starbucks? (interruption) Mmm-hmm. Mmm-hmm. Mmmm-hmm. (interruption)

Oh, they’re upset because Starbucks is “corporatist”? (interruption) Globalist and corporatist? Well, that makes sense. Well, I mean, they are. I mean, this Howard Schultz guy, he’s always at Davos. He’s with the globalists. He’s in there. But he’s also for every liberal cause under the sun, including immigration.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here’s Bill in San Diego. Bill, great to have you. I’m glad you waited.

CALLER: (garbled cell connection) Hey, Rush. Just have a question. Do the police want to arrest the rioters, the protesters that turn into a riot? Because you’d think by now they’d have some kind of strategy. Maybe like the dye packs they use for banks that explode. They shoot off some dye packs into the crowd where they’re doing the riots. It paints them and they’re able to extract them later and charge them. Because you don’t see that. Also, ’cause we’re busy working in your audience and you watch cable news, what was the response of the Democrats with all the national media going to them asking them if they’re going denounce their supporters and what they’re gonna do to stop it?

RUSH: Wait a minute. I’ve got a bad phone connection here. What was the last thing you said? What…? Since I can’t see what’s on TV, what’s the response of the Democrats, national media, asking them if they’re gonna denounce their supporters? What’s that about?

CALLER: Well, because they go to Trump and ask him if he’s gonna stop his supporters from doing violence, which was the Democrats paying for it. Did they go to the Democrats and ask them to denounce their supporters?

RUSH: Oh, you’re talking about during the campaign. Oh, okay. So during the campaign they went to Trump and said, “Hey, Trump, when are you gonna stop your mad supporters from ripping things up?” It turns out it wasn’t Trump supporters doing it. They were Hillary campaign activists. This has been documented to be true. Project Veritas video uncovered Robert Creamer, husband of Jan Schakowsky, congresswoman, Illinois, working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign admitting that he hired for $1500 a person people to show up at Trump rallies and cause violence.

But the media did ask Trump, “Well, when are you gonna shut down your people? When are you gonna tell people to stop violence?” So he’s asking here, “When are the Democrats gonna tell these people in Berkeley to stop it?” It’s a great question. They’re not gonna tell ’em to stop it. They are encouraging it! Folks, do you think Obama might have something to do with this? I’m not saying per se because this stuff has been going on for time immemorial, but it was just last week that Barack Hussein O issues a statement encouraging people who are protesting, encouraging the opposition.

This is the guy who said, “They bring a knife to a fight, we bring a gun,” or something like that. Yeah, I think Obama has tacitly encouraged this kind of stuff, and not just last week, but during his entire Regime. What are we talking about? We’re talking Berkeley. You know what happened across the Bay at San Francisco, San Francisco City? The San Francisco Police Department told ICE and the FBI (paraphrased), “Screw you! We are not capturing illegal aliens using San Francisco as sanctuary.” The police department!

Not the mayor. Not the city council. The San Francisco cops told ICE, if I have this right. I saw this this morning. If I’m wrong about this, I can get this corrected before the program’s over, but I’m sure I saw this, that it was the police department specifically telling some federal law enforcement agency that they were not going to try to apprehend people violating the sanctuary city law. These leftists… You have to understand out there, Bill, the leftists have strategically placed themselves in countless places in countless bureaucracies, including fire departments and police departments and in every other avenue of bureaucracy that you can think.

They’re everywhere. It’s been a tactic, it’s been a strategy, to be put into positions in the bureaucracy where you can’t be voted out because you’re not voted in. You are a career appointee per se. The training occurs at many top-flight universities, including in the Ivy League. But your idea of paint dye on all the protesters to be able to identify them later? Just round ’em up at the time. They’re all there!

Just grab the paddy wagons and round ’em up and arrest them. I mean, this is clear. This is… These are not misdemeanors these people are engaging in; it’s pure felony. This is property destruction. This is wanton attempt to maim and injure. You know, this isn’t just idly marching down the street and throwing chewing gum at people and spitballs. There was only one arrest at this whole thing in Berkeley.

Rush Limbaugh -> Stupid Leftist Protests Have No Impact – You know, this Berkeley business and Milo Yiannopoulos, the editor at Breitbart, openly gay, gay conservative, challenges political correctness from college campus to college campus. Rush Limbaugh -> Stupid Leftist Protests Have No Impact - You know, this Berkeley business and Milo Yiannopoulos, the editor at Breitbart, openly gay, gay conservative, challenges political correctness from college campus to college campus.

[loudlytransparenttrash]

10 Ways Of Overcoming The Social Justice Stranglehold

It’s no mistake that cultural Marxists in the form of social justice warriors and feminists tend to create artificial divisions between people and “classes” while attacking and homogenizing very real and natural divisions between individuals based on biological reality and inherent genetic and psychological ability.

They do this most commonly by designated arbitrary “victim status” to various classes, dividing them from each other based on how “oppressed” they supposedly are. The less statistically prominent a particular group is (less represented in a job field, media, education, population, etc) in any western society based on their color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc, generally the more victim group status is handed to them by social justice gatekeepers. Whites and males (straight males) are of course far at the very bottom of their list of people who have reason to complain and are repeatedly targeted and attacked by SJW organizations and web mobs as purveyors of some absurd theory called “The Patriarchy”.

It is not enough anymore to simply continue pointing out the insanity of political correctness, we must also take useful steps toward reversing the destruction already done.

Do you have leftist leaning friends or family members? It doesn’t matter. Are you employed in a workplace crawling with social justice ideologues? Stop seeing them as part of the equation because they do not matter. Worried about losing a relationship if you make a stand? Say good riddance. This is what must be done by free thinkers if they are to counter and reverse the collectivist nightmare of cultural Marxism. Here’s some solutions, which must be enacted by individuals in their daily lives regardless of the potential backlash:

1. Feel no shame

Social justice relies on shaming tactics, usually by slandering an opponent with a label that does not really apply to them in order to control the person’s arguments and behavior. If you don’t care about being called a bigot, a racist, a sexist, a misogynist, a homophobe, etc, because you know you aren’t, then there is not really much that they can do to you. They have overused these attacks to the point of having no meaning.

2. Do not self-censor

This does not mean you should go too far out of your way to act like an asshole, but the thought police have power only if you give power to them. Say what you want to say when you want to say it, and do it with a smile. Let them froth and scream until they have an aneurism. Cultural Marxists are generally piss-weak, anxiety-riddled children. They avoid physical confrontation like they avoid logic, so why fear them?

3. Realize there is no such thing as white privilege or male privilege

In reality, there is only institutionalized “privilege” for victim-status groups. There is no privilege for whites, males, white males or straight white males. When confronted with such claims, demand to see proof of such privilege. Invariably, you will get a long list of first world problems and complaints backed by nothing but easily debunked talking points and misrepresented statistics. People should not feel guilty for being born the way they are, and this includes those “darn white male devils”…

4. Demand facts to back claims

Cultural Marxists tend to argue on the basis of opinion and emotion rather than fact. Present facts to counter their claims, and demand facts and evidence in return. Opinions are irrelevant if the person is not willing to present supporting facts when asked. 9.5/10 you’re going to win the argument so don’t be afraid to confront their obvious exaggerations and fabrications.

5. Do not play the game of “unconscious bias”

If social justice cultists can’t counter your position with facts or logic, they will invariably turn to the old standby that you are limited in your insight because you have not lived in the shoes of a - (insert victim group here). I agree. In fact, I would point out that this reality of limited perception also applies to THEM as well. They have not lived in your shoes, therefore they are in no position to claim you enjoy “privilege” while they do not. They love to pretend that they know everything about everybody and therefore have the right to judge and position us all in the victim rankings. This is why facts and evidence are so important, and why anecdotal evidence and personal feelings are irrelevant where cultural Marxism is concerned.

6. Let them know their fears and feelings do not matter

No one is entitled to have their feelings coddled and normalized by others. Whether the issue is the nonexistent “boogeyman rape culture” or “racist white cops are going on purge-like killing sprees of young innocent black people”, their irrational and delusional fears are not our concern, it’s not society’s job to alleviate their phobia of men, straight people or white people, that is what psychotherapists are for. Why should any individual relinquish their liberties in the name of placating frightened nobodies?

7. Maintain your rights, they do not hurt other people

PC cultists will invariably argue that a certain group of people (we all know who that is), whether they know it or not, is indirectly harming others by essentially breathing and it’s up to them to recognize, apologize and change their oppressive ways. "We live in a society”, they say, “and everything we do affects everyone else…”. Don’t take such accusations seriously; these people do not understand how freedom works.

For instance, hypothetically as I don’t hold these views, that I refuse to bake a gay wedding cake for a couple. I would be accused of violating their rights but in reality I would only be preserving my own. I would have every right to not bake that cake if I didn’t want to, not a single person could make me. Also, I would point out that the gay couple in question has every right in a free society to bake their own cake or open their own cake shop to compete with mine. This is how freedom works. It is not based on collective entitlement; it is based on personal responsibility.

8. Refuse to deny the scientific fact of biological sex

Sexes are first and foremost genetic imperatives. Society does not determine gender roles; nature does. A man who gets his genitals removed and takes hormone pills is not and will never be a woman. A woman who tapes down her breasts and shaves her hair will never be a man. No amount of social justice, denial of biology and science or wishful thinking will ever allow them to reverse their genetic proclivities. Their psychological and sexual leanings do not change their inborn biological reality. I’m not saying we should attack or hate these people by any means, we should treat people equally, but the moment they begin to go bananas and call you cis scum over getting their pronoun wrong or assuming one of their 200 genders, it’s time to refuse to play along with this nonsense.

9. Deny the illusion of Utopian equality

There is no such thing as pure equality. Society is not a homogeneous entity, it is an abstraction built around a group of unique individuals. Individuals can be naturally gifted, or naturally challenged. But there will always be some people who are more apt towards success than others.

I have no problem whatsoever with the idea of equality of opportunity, which is exactly what we have in this country. I do have a problem however with the lie of universal equality through engineered means.

Standards of success should not be lowered in order to accommodate the least skilled people to facilitate artificial parity. For example, I constantly hear the argument that more people with victim group status should be given greater representation in positions of influence and regard within our culture, from science and engineering, to media, to business CEO’s, to politics, etc. The key word here is “given”, rather than “earned”. There is nothing wrong with one group of people excelling in a field more than another group, and there is nothing wrong with inequality when it comes to individual achievement. We must begin refusing to reward people for mediocrity and punishing success simply because the winners are not part of a designated victim group.

10. If you are a man, embrace your role

Men in particular have a considerable task ahead in terms of their personal endeavors if they hope to repair the destruction of social justice.

For thousands of years, men have been the industrial force behind all human progress and achievement. Today, they are told to be relegated to cubicles and customer service and to stay out of the way of badass, strong and independent women because their presence around a female is scary and oppressive… If we have any chance of undoing the damage of cultural Marxism, modern men must be men again.

You don’t have to prove to anyone you do “manly things”, just go out and do them. Most importantly, embrace your masculinity. Men are meant to be strong, hard working, competitive, protective and brave. Yes, women can be too but we are telling men that these qualities are toxic, only for feminists to use them for their own empowerment. They’re either toxic or they’re empowering. Make your mind up, ladies.

Men, you also need to be a threat again. That does not mean a threat against women, your family or anyone around you, but our men are supposed to be threatening to those who would threaten us. Modern society has not removed the need for masculinity and this will become more obvious the more our culture sinks into economic despair and the more our country’s values become overtaken. Just take a peep into Europe, their men are being raped by Somalian refugees and they apologize and feel guilty that his poor, victimized rapist faces deportation.