#you sent this to analytics larrie so i corrected it hopefully

[srldesigns6277]

"Zero photographic evidence of what? Larry being real? I beg to differ. We have both photographic and videographic evidence, we have statements of confirmation from both the involved parties on film."  Where is the larry evidence on film? Because it would stop being a conspiracy if larry evidence was on film. Any NDA and injunction against the press is null the moment there is actual evidence posted that makes all those NDAs you claim so many people signed null and void. Any person, namely Louis, will at least do a tell all or many more would sell their story if there was ANY evidence of larry being real on film nullifying all the NDAs and injunctions. Louis will stop that " babygate " you claim is forced upon him covered by NDAs and injunctions. Or do you claim that both Louis and Harry love exploiting children who don't get a choice? Will you ignore this ask too saying people should use google? Once the information from NDAs and injunctions is made public they are all void. Google it. 

Hello New Copy and Paste Anon,

Thank you for including me. Also I will answer you in two parts I just had to wake up.

So first off where is there larry evidence on film. Well that evidence is in the way they interact with each other, their eyes, their actions and reactions. While we have been messing with him, louis' reaction at Rolling Stone UK is one such reaction. Often their evidence is in the subtle things. I was luck enough to see 1d in concert twice in 2015 and their actions on stage showed how much they cared for each other and on a different level than niall or Liam. They would just look at one anther and know what was needed or how to respond and care. Watch an ultimate compilation you see the larry evidence.

Secondly, mention NDAs and say Google them. You obviously haven't. The point of an NDA is to give a person incentive to not speak about what had occurred. So saying you can just break them and be free is a bit ignorant. Should you break an NDA you will more than likely have to pay an insane amount of money or be sued by companies/people with the best lawyers on retainer. It would be the dumbest decision.

Please Sony tried to sue George Michael when he was outed in the early 2000s, but because it was a honey pot sting by the police, he wasn't at fault for being outed, they couldn't go through with it.

Before saying something like this please look into NDAs and Larry itself. You can believe what you want but know that so can we.

Sam