#AI answer checker

[desklibai]

Unlocking the Potential of AI in Education: A New Era of Learning and Assessment

In the dynamic world of education, the integration of technology has become a game-changer, transforming the way we approach learning, teaching, and assessment. One of the most exciting advancements in this realm is the rise of AI-powered tools designed to enhance educational experiences. Desklib's AI Answer platform stands at the forefront of this revolution, offering a comprehensive solution that brings together top AI models in one place, making it both instant and affordable. This platform is not just a tool; it's a gateway to a new era of education where AI grader, AI essay grading, and AI academic feedback become integral parts of the learning process.

The Transformative Power of AI in Education

The traditional educational landscape has long relied on manual grading and feedback, which can be time-consuming and subject to human error. The introduction of AI grader and AI essay grading tools has the potential to revolutionize this process. These tools leverage sophisticated algorithms to evaluate student work, providing detailed and objective feedback in real-time. By automating the grading process, educators can focus more on teaching and less on administrative tasks, ultimately enhancing the overall educational experience.

Personalized Learning with AI Writing Assistants

One of the most significant benefits of AI in education is the ability to provide personalized learning experiences. AI writing assistants are a prime example of this, offering real-time feedback on grammar, style, and content. These tools go beyond simple spell-checking to provide constructive criticism that helps students refine their writing skills. Whether it's a high school essay or a college thesis, an AI writing assistant can suggest improvements in sentence structure, vocabulary usage, and overall coherence. This personalized approach not only helps students understand their mistakes but also empowers them to take ownership of their learning journey.

Enhancing Learning with AI Academic Feedback

Every student learns differently, and AI academic feedback tools recognize this by offering personalized insights. Unlike traditional grading methods, which often provide a one-size-fits-all approach, AI can tailor its feedback to the individual strengths and weaknesses of each student. This personalized approach ensures that students receive comprehensive feedback on their thought processes and reasoning, not just their final answers. By providing detailed and objective feedback, AI tools help students understand their mistakes and make meaningful improvements.

The Role of AI in Answer Evaluation

When it comes to AI-powered answer evaluation, the benefits are manifold. AI models can handle a wide range of question types, from multiple-choice to open-ended responses. They can even evaluate complex subjects like literature, history, and science, providing nuanced feedback that goes beyond mere correctness. This holistic approach to grading ensures that students receive comprehensive feedback on their thought processes and reasoning, not just their final answers. By automating the grading process, educators can save valuable time, allowing them to focus more on teaching and less on administrative tasks.

Simplifying Assessment with AI-Based Answer Assessment

The traditional grading process can be time-consuming and subjective. AI-based answer assessment tools eliminate these challenges by providing consistent, objective evaluations. These tools can process large volumes of data quickly and accurately, ensuring that every student's work is assessed fairly and efficiently. This not only saves time for educators but also provides students with timely feedback, allowing them to make improvements while the material is still fresh in their minds.

The Desklib AI Answer Platform: A Comprehensive Solution

At the heart of this educational revolution is Desklib's AI Answer platform. This innovative tool brings together top AI models like ChatGPT 4o, Google Gemini Pro, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Mistral Large 2, and Llama 3.1 405b, all accessible through a unified interface. With AI Answer, users can easily switch between models, compare responses, and find the best answer to their queries.

A User-Friendly Experience

Desklib's AI Answer is designed with the user in mind. It supports various input types, including text, files, and images, making it versatile for different types of assignments. Whether you're uploading a research paper or submitting an image for analysis, the platform ensures a seamless experience. Additionally, users can crop images before submission, ensuring that only the relevant parts are evaluated.

Ensuring Privacy and Security

In an age where data privacy is paramount, Desklib's AI Answer platform takes user privacy seriously. All interactions are secured, and user data and queries are kept private. This ensures that students and educators can use the platform without worrying about their information being shared with third parties.

Accessible for All

Desklib's AI Answer is accessible to everyone, with options for both registered and unregistered users. While unregistered users can access basic models like GPT-4o-mini with a daily limit of 2 questions, registered users enjoy expanded access, including up to 10 questions per day. For those who subscribe, the platform offers full access to all AI models, support for image and file uploads, and the ability to ask follow-up questions.

Interactive and Informative

One of the standout features of Desklib's AI Answer is its interactivity. Subscribed users can engage in follow-up questions, allowing for a deeper exploration of topics. This feature is particularly useful for complex subjects where a single answer may not be sufficient. The platform also provides alerts and warnings if users exceed their usage limits, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted experience.

Tracking Progress

For educators and students alike, tracking progress is crucial. Desklib's AI Answer allows users to view their past conversations and questions, providing a valuable resource for reviewing previous work and understanding areas for improvement. This feature not only helps students stay organized but also allows educators to monitor progress over time.

The Future of Education

As we look to the future, the integration of AI in education holds immense potential. Tools like Desklib's AI Answer are not just changing the way we grade and provide feedback; they are transforming the entire educational experience. By offering personalized, immediate feedback and streamlining the grading process, these technologies are empowering both educators and students to achieve more.

In conclusion, the advent of AI grader, AI essay grading, and AI answer checker tools marks a new era in education. Desklib's AI Answer platform stands out as a leader in this field, providing a user-friendly, interactive, and informative tool that brings together the best AI models in one place. Whether you're an educator looking to save time or a student seeking personalized feedback, Desklib's AI Answer is your go-to solution for instant and affordable AI-powered education.

Visit Desklib's AI Answer today and experience the future of education for yourself!

[ailearningtools]

Make Studying Easier with Desklib AI Learning Tools

No more struggles with complex topics and brain-scratching questions. Desklib's AI Learning Tools will change your study routines once and for all: faster, smoother, and more pleasant. Be it tough assignments, exam preparations, or just the exploration of new concepts, here we are at your side.

Artificial Intelligence is remodelling education and changing the way students learn. You can save a lot of time in searching for concepts using Desklib, an AI-driven platform, and focus on understanding them. Let's dive into how these tools can redefine learning for students.

What Makes AI Learning Tools a Game-Changer?

AI Learning Tools, in particular, can serve almost like a personalized tutor: available to anyone, always on demand for personalized support. Their power comes in three clear ways:

Personalized Learning Experience: Stuck on a concept? These resources offer individualized explanations and build customized practice exercises to meet your needs.

Save Time: No more hours of finding a solution. Desklib provides solutions instant and accurate so that you can spend time learning concepts.

Confidence in Your Work: The AI answer checker helps you build accuracy by reviewing your solutions for errors and suggesting improvements so that you can confidently submit your assignments.

How Desklib AI Learning Tools Help Students

At Desklib, we're committed to making studying easier. Here's how our tools can help:

Instant AI Help for Students: Stuck on a math problem or need help drafting an essay? Simply enter your query, and our tools provide step-by-step guidance, acting as your ever-reliable study buddy.

AI Academic Assistance for Better Results: Upload your work to receive suggestions, edits, and feedback on clarity and argument strength. This feature will enhance both the writing and conceptual knowledge of concepts that are usually challenging.

AI Answer Checker: Eliminate the stress of uncertain answers as the AI answer checker will make sure your solutions are correct and error-free with no stress.

Why Choose Desklib for Your Study Needs?

Desklib is more than a study platform; it's your partner for success. Here's what makes it different:

Always Accessible: Study anywhere, anytime with our 24/7 tools.

User-Friendly Interface: No technical knowledge or prowess is required; the platform is very easy to use.

Reliable Resources: Access an enormous collection of high-quality sample assignments along with detailed explanations.

Full Support: You will never feel at a dead end with the help of tools like AI Academic Assistance.

Learning in the Future with AI

Desklib's integrated AI Learning Tools mark a new era in education. With features like Instant AI Help for Students, AI Academic Assistance, and the reliable AI answer checker, you can achieve more in less time, reduce stress, and make learning enjoyable.

Conclusion

Studying should not be a headache. Desklib's AI Learning Tools make it effortless for you to ace an exam with confidence. From personalized academic support to instant help, all our tools are designed to make studies simpler for you. Start with Desklib today and let the magic of AI amaze you!

[corishadowfang]

If you hear screaming in the distance, it's me, locked in mortal combat with an AI checker.*

I'm losing.

*To be clear, I don't use AI; this is completely human written content that's failing.

[ghwosty]

Ah right the phrase I want is "a big can have mixed nuts to snack on" Sorry my bad

[lightyaoigami]

☁︎｡⋆｡ ﾟ☾ ﾟ｡⋆ how to resume ⋆｡ﾟ☾｡⋆｡ ﾟ☁︎ ﾟ

after 10 years & 6 jobs in corporate america, i would like to share how to game the system. we all want the biggest payoff for the least amount of work, right?

know thine enemy: beating the robots

i see a lot of misinformation about how AI is used to scrape resumes. i can't speak for every company but most corporations use what is called applicant tracking software (ATS).

no respectable company is using chatgpt to sort applications. i don't know how you'd even write the prompt to get a consumer-facing product to do this. i guarantee that target, walmart, bank of america, whatever, they are all using B2B SaaS enterprise solutions. there is not one hiring manager plinking away at at a large language model.

ATS scans your resume in comparison to the job posting, parses which resumes contain key words, and presents the recruiter and/or hiring manager with resumes with a high "score." the goal of writing your resume is to get your "score" as high as possible.

but tumblr user lightyaoigami, how do i beat the robots?

great question, y/n. you will want to seek out an ATS resume checker. i have personally found success with jobscan, which is not free, but works extremely well. there is a free trial period, and other ATS scanners are in fact free. some of these tools are so sophisticated that they can actually help build your resume from scratch with your input. i wrote my own resume and used jobscan to compare it to the applications i was finishing.

do not use chatgpt to write your resume or cover letter. it is painfully obvious. here is a tutorial on how to use jobscan. for the zillionth time i do not work for jobscan nor am i a #jobscanpartner i am just a person who used this tool to land a job at a challenging time.

the resume checkers will tell you what words and/or phrases you need to shoehorn into your bullet points - i.e., if you are applying for a job that requires you to be a strong collaborator, the resume checker might suggest you include the phrase "cross-functional teams." you can easily re-word your bullets to include this with a little noodling.

don't i need a cover letter?

it depends on the job. after you have about 5 years of experience, i would say that they are largely unnecessary. while i was laid off, i applied to about 100 jobs in a three-month period (#blessed to have been hired quickly). i did not submit a cover letter for any of them, and i had a solid rate of phone screens/interviews after submission despite not having a cover letter. if you are absolutely required to write one, do not have chatgpt do it for you. use a guide from a human being who knows what they are talking about, like ask a manager or betterup.

but i don't even know where to start!

i know it's hard, but you have to have a bit of entrepreneurial spirit here. google duckduckgo is your friend. don't pull any bean soup what-about-me-isms. if you truly don't know where to start, look for an ATS-optimized resume template.

a word about neurodivergence and job applications

i, like many of you, am autistic. i am intimately familiar with how painful it is to expend limited energy on this demoralizing task only to have your "reward" be an equally, if not more so, demoralizing work experience. i don't have a lot of advice for this beyond craft your worksona like you're making a d&d character (or a fursona or a sim or an OC or whatever made up blorbo generator you personally enjoy).

and, remember, while a lot of office work is really uncomfortable and involves stuff like "talking in meetings" and "answering the phone," these things are not an inherent risk. discomfort is not tantamount to danger, and we all have to do uncomfortable things in order to thrive. there are a lot of ways to do this and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. not everyone can mask for extended periods, so be your own judge of what you can or can't do.

i like to think of work as a drag show where i perform this other personality in exchange for money. it is much easier to do this than to fight tooth and nail to be unmasked at work, which can be a risk to your livelihood and peace of mind. i don't think it's a good thing that we have to mask at work, but it's an important survival skill.

⋆｡ﾟ☁︎｡⋆｡ ﾟ☾ ﾟ｡⋆ good luck ⋆｡ﾟ☾｡⋆｡ ﾟ☁︎ ﾟ｡⋆

[archivlibrarianist]

"Bots on the internet are nothing new, but a sea change has occurred over the past year. For the past 25 years, anyone running a web server knew that the bulk of traffic was one sort of bot or another. There was googlebot, which was quite polite, and everyone learned to feed it - otherwise no one would ever find the delicious treats we were trying to give away. There were lots of search engine crawlers working to develop this or that service. You'd get 'script kiddies' trying thousands of prepackaged exploits. A server secured and patched by a reasonably competent technologist would have no difficulty ignoring these.

"...The surge of AI bots has hit Open Access sites particularly hard, as their mission conflicts with the need to block bots. Consider that Internet Archive can no longer save snapshots of one of the best open-access publishers, MIT Press, because of cloudflare blocking. Who know how many books will be lost this way?  Or consider that the bots took down OAPEN, the worlds most important repository of Scholarly OA books, for a day or two. That's 34,000 books that AI 'checked out' for two days. Or recent outages at Project Gutenberg, which serves 2 million dynamic pages and a half million downloads per day. That's hundreds of thousands of downloads blocked! The link checker at doab-check.ebookfoundation.org (a project I worked on for OAPEN) is now showing 1,534 books that are unreachable due to 'too many requests.' That's 1,534 books that AI has stolen from us! And it's getting worse.

"...The thing that gets me REALLY mad is how unnecessary this carnage is. Project Gutenberg makes all its content available with one click on a file in its feeds directory. OAPEN makes all its books available via an API. There's no need to make a million requests to get this stuff!! Who (or what) is programming these idiot scraping bots? Have they never heard of a sitemap??? Are they summer interns using ChatGPT to write all their code? Who gave them infinite memory, CPUs and bandwidth to run these monstrosities? (Don't answer.)

"We are headed for a world in which all good information is locked up behind secure registration barriers and paywalls, and it won't be to make money, it will be for survival. Captchas will only be solvable by advanced AIs and only the wealthy will be able to use internet libraries."

[bubblebear4life]

A/N: This is one of my longer fics I've made. It's based on @o-sunny-day drawings of Caine losing his admin privileges. He is a very grumpy boi

The Lost Bet

Caine, the Ringmaster of The Amazing Digital Circus, had lost a bet. To whom, you may ask?

Bubble.

Caine lost a bet to his AI bubble assistant.

How humiliating.

The bet was simple: Could the circus members go an entire day without using any swear words.

The answer was no.

In fact, Caine lost the bet IMMEDIATELY after it started because of an argument between Jax and Zooble.

The Ringmaster will never forget that smug look on the parasitic bubble's face as he stripped away his admin privileges. Just remembering the feeling of his powers fading sends shudders through his code.

Once Caine lost his powers, he could no longer float, causing him to drop to the checkered floor like a heavy sack of potatoes. Actually, he felt like the heavy sack of potatoes himself. Was this how all the humans felt?

Caine didn't like it one bit.

Bubble was giggling the entire time at the sad display. He now wore Caine's top hat that signified he held control over the game's admin privileges. "What do ya think, past boss?" He asked with that grating voice, summoning a mirror in front of his fellow AI.

Caine took a minute to take in his new appearance. His fancy top hat was replaced with a pathetic pork pie one, and his lovely red tailcoat vanished, leaving him in a simple white short-sleeved suit.... And no arms. He didn't have a physical model underneath his clothes, so his white-gloved hands were suspended mid-air with nothing to support them but game physics.

The former Ringmaster placed a hand on his head, attempting to shake off the sudden wave of dizziness that had struck him like a truck. This was a lot to take in.

He could already tell this was going to suck....

~~

It had taken Caine an embarrassingly long time to move from his spot on the floor, relying on his cane for support the entire time. Could you blame him? He rarely had a reason to use his legs before! It left his digital form feeling exhausted.

That led him here to The Tent's lounge that is usually meant for the humans. Caine was sulking on the plush red couch, his cane leaning beside him.

It didn't help that his performers were there as well. Their shocked expressions did nothing to lift his sour mood. "Didn't anyone tell you it's rude to stare?" He mutters, snapping his jaw shut with a loud 'click' as he turns away from them. He could still feel their gazes boring into him.

Jax was the one to break the awkward silence that descended upon them like a heavy blanket. "...This is really weird."

Ragatha shot him a warning glare. "Be nice, Jax," she scolded.

Jax threw his hands up in exasperation. "What? At least I can admit it! Don't act like this isn't strange!"

Zooble chimed in. "Yeah, Ragatha, it is pretty weird seeing him like this."

"I can still hear you!"

"We aren't exactly being quiet about it, Caine." Jax snickers at the AI's grumpy face. Boy, he getting a kick out of this.

A weird rumbling came from Caine that sounded suspiciously like a growl. That was enough for the rabbit to zip his lips in slight fear.

"Uh- Caine, how long is this supposed to last?" Pomni nervously glanced at the usually bright and energetic Ringmaster. A rain cloud seemed to hover over his head, shrouding his once vibrant form in darkness.

"...Five-" Caine was cut off by Bubble appearing in the lounge before them. Caine glares at him, jealous that he could still float and for interrupting his explanation.

"He's stuck like this for five days digital days!" Bubble chirps, spinning with an enthusiastic flourish.

The circus members stared at Bubble with a mix of shock and concern. No one dared to ask what caused this crazy change.

Gangle whimpers, "I have a bad feeling about this."

"Don't worry, my non-soapy friends! Your new Ringmaster, the one and only Bubble, is here to take care of you!" Bubble looked quite proud of his new position of power. With a distant snap that echoed off The Tent's fabric, they were all teleported to the main stage. This included Caine, who immediately fell flat on his face with a loud 'oof!' He wasn't accustomed to being teleported by others; he was supposed to be the one doing the teleporting- certainly not that blasted bubble! Caine grumbled as he tried to get back on his feet.

"Caine!" Ragatha yelped, running over to help him stand. "Are you alright?"

"Does it look like I'm alright?" He huffs, leaning heavily on his cane.

Ragatha bit her lip to stop from saying anything else. So far she wasn't a fan of Caine's new attitude.

Bubble cleared his throat to get everyone's attention. "For today's adventure, you'll be going to Harley's Orchard!" The words magically appeared above him in a blue bubble font. "You must trek through the high corn maze to find the hidden cheesecake!"

Surprisingly, most of the humans seemed to be onboard for this adventure. All except for Jax and Caine, who each had their own ways of complaining.

Caine gasped, falling to his knees and throwing his hands up in outrage. "Maze!? A MAZE!!!! THIS IS PATHETIC!!! THIS IS AN INSULT TO THE CONCEPT OF ADVENTURES!!"

Ragatha pats his shoulder in an awkward form of sympathy, trying to comfort him. "Come on, Caine. It doesn't sound that bad!"

"IT SOUNDS POSITIVELY AWFUL!!!!" The AI wailed. He hops back to his feet with a newfound energy, gesturing to the bubble in desperation. "Okay, okay I get it! Now switch back now!"

"Not until five days is over!" Bubble sang giddily, opening a portal to the location. "Have fun, everyone! You too, Caine!"

"Wait what!? Bubble you-" Caine was once again cut off as Bubble shoved everyone through the portal to the Harley's Orchard.

After the humans and AI were gone, Bubble conjured a pipe, blowing a steady stream of bubbles through it.

He'll try quitting another day.

[genuflectx]

Someone ought to tell all the rad Murder Drone artists whose art is used on the Church of Null thumbnails/slideshows that their art is, without permission, being associated with AI generated songs (and that the person is just lying about it being AI)

All the art is yoinked from Twitter which I don’t have anymore 😭 but the credits are on the video descriptions 🙏

Edit: Adding the evidence below the cut; the songs and Electrical Ink fail 3 different tests, which point towards high likelihood of AI usage

#1 - Using SubmitHub's AI song checker, first testing accuracy of checker. Claims 90% accuracy, did own test with 10 human and 10 AI. About the same accuracy on both at 60%, with remaining percentage usually "inconclusive" with a smaller percentage of inaccuracy (10% in the human test, 20% in AI test but only for Udio). Caveat: Udio throws it off, every Udio song tested was inconclusive or incorrect, however I noted a mix of human and AI tells still reported in the Udio breakdowns. Therefore, this checker is reasonably accurate at marking AI as AI and is more likely to say something is inconclusive than to mark it incorrectly, but should not be the only tool used to assess.

Sampling every other Church of Null song (testing with full MP3s), SubmitHub's checker identified 10 of 12 songs as strongly AI and the remaining 2 as inconclusive. This is a higher rate of being marked as AI than either the human or AI tests I did beforehand. If it were human there would be some marked human, if it were Udio AI it would more likely show a mix of human and inconclusive. All AI and two inconclusive is more likely Suno AI.

#2 - Using my manual spectrogram contrast test, first testing on 23 respondents. Results are in the link, with 65% of respondents getting a score of over half correctly assessed. This test becomes more accurate when used by an individual practiced in it (comparing an unlabeled spectrogram to a chart of AI and human spectrograms, then sorting it onto either side accordingly by which pattern it most closely resembles). My own score was 12/14. This test will never be 100% accurate as not every spectrogram follows the pattern; i.e. rarely, an AI song has the spectrogram appearance as a human made one.

Respondents were mixed on whether a sampling of 6 songs from Church of Null were AI or human at the end of the test, with both high scoring and low scoring assessing them about the same, with only a slightly higher rate of being assessed as AI in high scoring testers. Only one lower scoring tester assessed AI under 50%, assessing two of six as AI (33%). However, nobody assessed the set as being all human. Note, psychology may have made this set difficult, as respondents may have believed it was unlikely that a set would be all AI or all human, which would influence answers.

When I originally assessed the six spectrograms, I assessed all of them as appearing closer to AI generated spectrograms than human, using the reference charts. I am very practiced at spectrogram contrast assessment since I am the one who made these charts and tests, sampling 30+ AI and 30+ human.

#3 - Using a smell test, or suspicious tells that just make you feel like something is off with the vibes. This can be lack of credits/suspicious credits, an AI "shimmer" effect on all the audio, generic lyrics that sound AI generated/edited, a music production output that is unrealistic for hand-made music, etc.

In Church of Null's case, it's creator Electrical Ink: shows no musical production on the channel before CoN, claims to have 6 anon helpers/vocalists but only credits a weird blank "creative consulting" channel, has produced 25 beautiful songs with complex compositions and vocals in 4 months while claiming to record these in person (and simultaneously writing 62k+ words of the fanfic, or about 15k a month), includes the robotic "shimmer" present in Suno AI while claiming it's "autotune," deletes comments asking if it's Suno (happened to me), and uses art before asking permission for the thumbnails and lyric videos.

The one other credit I found under a reply to a random comment is E-LIVE-YT (a "collaborator" on one song, however E-LIVE may have exaggerated this as they couldn’t even remember Electrical Ink’s name during a livestream), a real person who uploaded at least 1 AI generated song (admitted) but claims the rest are human made. Though, they also produce music at an unrealistic rate (43 tracks in 5 months) but mostly "extensions" of existing music, something AI song generators let you do (he uses Bandlab, which has AI tools exactly for that). The ones with lyrics have Suno's "shimmer" and the lyrical breakdown that E-LIVE posts on comments read as AI summaries/analysis (right down to calling N "they," not knowing his pronoun; a shortcut to chatGPT was on their desktop during a livestream, they removed this for later streams). Additionally, E-LIVE also has strange credits to blank channels and 1 or 2 tiny channels that just upload poor quality Roblox clips.

Ironically, even this "fan" "collaborator" believes Church of Null is AI and complains about competing with it, and regular Suno AI users in the Suno Discord believe so too.

Sniff sniff.... somethin smells funny...

[desklibai]

Revolutionizing Education with AI: The Future of Grading and Feedback

In the ever-evolving landscape of education, technology has consistently played a pivotal role in shaping the way we learn, teach, and assess knowledge. The advent of AI grader and AI essay grading tools marks a significant leap forward, promising to streamline the educational process while enhancing the quality of feedback and learning outcomes. At the forefront of this innovation is Desklib's AI Answer, a comprehensive platform that brings together the best AI models in one place, making it instant and affordable for educators and students alike.

The Power of AI in Education

Imagine a classroom where every student receives personalized, immediate feedback on their work. This is not a distant dream but a reality made possible by AI answer checker and automated answer grading tools. These technologies leverage advanced algorithms to evaluate student responses, providing detailed insights and suggestions for improvement. By automating the grading process, educators can save valuable time, allowing them to focus more on teaching and less on administrative tasks.

Enhancing Learning with AI Writing Assistants

One of the most exciting applications of AI in education is the AI writing assistant. These tools offer real-time feedback on grammar, style, and content, helping students refine their writing skills. Whether it's a high school essay or a college thesis, an AI writing assistant can provide constructive criticism that goes beyond simple spell-checking. It can suggest improvements in sentence structure, vocabulary usage, and even the overall coherence of the argument.

Personalized Feedback with AI Academic Feedback

Every student learns differently, and AI academic feedback tools recognize this by offering personalized insights. Unlike traditional grading methods, which often provide a one-size-fits-all approach, AI can tailor its feedback to the individual strengths and weaknesses of each student. This personalized approach not only helps students understand their mistakes but also empowers them to take ownership of their learning journey.

The Role of AI in Answer Evaluation

When it comes to AI-powered answer evaluation, the benefits are manifold. AI models can handle a wide range of question types, from multiple-choice to open-ended responses. They can even evaluate complex subjects like literature, history, and science, providing nuanced feedback that goes beyond mere correctness. This holistic approach to grading ensures that students receive comprehensive feedback on their thought processes and reasoning, not just their final answers.

Simplifying Assessment with AI-Based Answer Assessment

The traditional grading process can be time-consuming and subjective. AI-based answer assessment tools eliminate these challenges by providing consistent, objective evaluations. These tools can process large volumes of data quickly and accurately, ensuring that every student's work is assessed fairly and efficiently. This not only saves time for educators but also provides students with timely feedback, allowing them to make improvements while the material is still fresh in their minds.

The Desklib AI Answer Platform

At the heart of this educational revolution is Desklib's AI Answer platform. This innovative tool brings together top AI models like ChatGPT 4o, Google Gemini Pro, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Mistral Large 2, and Llama 3.1 405b, all accessible through a unified interface. With AI Answer, users can easily switch between models, compare responses, and find the best answer to their queries.

A User-Friendly Experience

Desklib's AI Answer is designed with the user in mind. It supports various input types, including text, files, and images, making it versatile for different types of assignments. Whether you're uploading a research paper or submitting an image for analysis, the platform ensures a seamless experience. Additionally, users can crop images before submission, ensuring that only the relevant parts are evaluated.

Ensuring Privacy and Security

In an age where data privacy is paramount, Desklib's AI Answer platform takes user privacy seriously. All interactions are secured, and user data and queries are kept private. This ensures that students and educators can use the platform without worrying about their information being shared with third parties.

Accessible for All

Desklib's AI Answer is accessible to everyone, with options for both registered and unregistered users. While unregistered users can access basic models like GPT-4o-mini with a daily limit of 2 questions, registered users enjoy expanded access, including up to 10 questions per day. For those who subscribe, the platform offers full access to all AI models, support for image and file uploads, and the ability to ask follow-up questions.

Interactive and Informative

One of the standout features of Desklib's AI Answer is its interactivity. Subscribed users can engage in follow-up questions, allowing for a deeper exploration of topics. This feature is particularly useful for complex subjects where a single answer may not be sufficient. The platform also provides alerts and warnings if users exceed their usage limits, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted experience.

Tracking Progress

For educators and students alike, tracking progress is crucial. Desklib's AI Answer allows users to view their past conversations and questions, providing a valuable resource for reviewing previous work and understanding areas for improvement. This feature not only helps students stay organized but also allows educators to monitor progress over time.

The Future of Education

As we look to the future, the integration of AI in education holds immense potential. Tools like Desklib's AI Answer are not just changing the way we grade and provide feedback; they are transforming the entire educational experience. By offering personalized, immediate feedback and streamlining the grading process, these technologies are empowering both educators and students to achieve more.

In conclusion, the advent of AI grader, AI essay grading, and AI answer checker tools marks a new era in education. Desklib's AI Answer platform stands out as a leader in this field, providing a user-friendly, interactive, and informative tool that brings together the best AI models in one place. Whether you're an educator looking to save time or a student seeking personalized feedback, Desklib's AI Answer is your go-to solution for instant and affordable AI-powered education.

Visit Desklib's AI Answer today and experience the future of education for yourself!

[whumperless-whump-event]

Hi, the whumperless whump event sounds really cool, it’s my favourite kind of whump to read and write! and the prompts look really interesting. I’d really like to take part in the event and I just wondered if it would be ok to use AI as a spell checker or to help with background research for a story? (It would still be me writing the story). I have a personal AI use disclaimer on my AO3 profile and now I share in the author’s notes of each fic how I’ve used AI in the story, for example those reasons above, just for transparency and to show how AI can be used as a tool to support writing rather than replacing the writer. I saw on your rules that you’d put no AI so I wanted to check. Thanks for organising the event.

Hey! Thank you for submitting this ask.

AI can be useful as a tool. However, we're talking about generative artificial intelligence, specifically OpenAI, ChatGPT and similar models, which have a specific host of issues:

It's consistently proven to be untrustworthy, including misinforming users;

"Training" a generative AI model commonly steals from artists, scrapes online works, and compiles creations without consent, which is copyright infringement and theft;

GenAI replaces actions that foster community, such as beta reading and group research.

The reason I ban AI in this event isn't to deprive someone from a tool that can assist them with things they struggle on, or saving time.

I ban it because GenAI's required training scrapes the internet for art and writing without permission, and because its answers cannot be guaranteed trustworthy, regardless of the training. As for the third point, I'd be the last person to say editing or revising is an enjoyable way to spend my time, but I do think GenAI is a replacement, not an invention, and alternatives without these issues existed before GenAI did.

This is, unfortunately, a soapbox. I understand why GenAI is used in these situations. I also see that you did not ask for me to try and convince you not to use AI, so I apologize for restating what you've probably heard a thousand times.

However, for the spirit of the event, and for the sake of fostering community and human connection in creative spaces, I will not allow GenAI to be used.

Thank you for asking kindly, and I hope this doesn't deter you from participating.

[javob]

Something that worries me about schooling in relation to ChatGPT is the ratcheting effect it will have on work load and assignment design.

When I was in high-school, I didn’t cheat, but found out later my peers had been using some apps and websites (among other things) to effectively cheat on tests and assignments. The teachers had an inkling that such cheating was going on, and their solution was to make the assignments much more difficult than before to overcompensate for the perceived cheating. My grades didn’t suffer, but only because I ended up putting in way more time than normal for those assignments.

I’m sure other students simply suffered grade losses or got intel from other students on how to effectively cheat. But none of the students who used web clients to write papers or plagiarized answers really saw their grades suffer (other than not being able to answer easy content questions during class and looking stupid).

A more concrete example could also be the relationship between AI being used to write papers vs AI being used to check for cheating.

I was in school before ChatGPT was a thing, but I was still forced by the school to put my papers through plagiarism checkers.

There is no doubt in my mind that my school signed away the rights to my writing content to be used in the large language models that would become iterations of ChatGPT. And I would say the process is still ongoing, that whenever you submit a paper to be checked for plagiarism, no matter the service, that it is being used to train a large language model somewhere.

Which begs many questions and shows many problems, a significant one being, once a large language model is able to perfectly imitate my writing style, would I ever be able to escape the charges of plagiarism or honor code type violations involved using ChatGPT? If the plagiarism checkers feed the chatbots, and I feed the plagiarism checker, shouldn’t I be able to escape some culpability if my writing style matches to some degree? Where does that point lie, and can it even be measured?

All of this is also contingent on an even bigger question and that is “Can your average public school teacher even tell what good writing looks like anymore?”

I don’t really know the answers to any of these questions, but I can say that it seems like ChatGPT creates a lot more problems than it solves for an educational environment.

[qqueenofhades]

I’m in undergrad but I keep hearing and seeing people talking about using chatgpt for their schoolwork and it makes me want to rip my hair out lol. Like even the “radical” anti-chatgpt ones are like “Oh yea it’s only good for outlines I’d never use it for my actual essay.” You’re using it for OUTLINES????? That’s the easy part!! I can’t wait to get to grad school and hopefully be surrounded by people who actually want to be there 😭😭😭

Not to sound COMPLETELY like a grumpy old codger (although lbr, I am), but I think this whole AI craze is the obvious result of an education system that prizes "teaching for the test" as the most important thing, wherein there are Obvious Correct Answers that if you select them, pass the standardized test and etc etc mean you are now Educated. So if there's a machine that can theoretically pick the correct answers for you by recombining existing data without the hard part of going through and individually assessing and compiling it yourself, Win!

... but of course, that's not the way it works at all, because AI is shown to create misleading, nonsensical, or flat-out dangerously incorrect information in every field it's applied to, and the errors are spotted as soon as an actual human subject expert takes the time to read it closely. Not to go completely KIDS THESE DAYS ARE JUST LAZY AND DONT WANT TO WORK, since finding a clever way to cheat on your schoolwork is one of those human instincts likewise old as time and has evolved according to tools, technology, and educational philosophy just like everything else, but I think there's an especial fear of Being Wrong that drives the recourse to AI (and this is likewise a result of an educational system that only prioritizes passing standardized tests as the sole measure of competence). It's hard to sort through competing sources and form a judgment and write it up in a comprehensive way, and if you do it wrong, you might get a Bad Grade! (The irony being, of course, that AI will *not* get you a good grade and will be marked even lower if your teachers catch it, which they will, whether by recognizing that it's nonsense or running it through a software platform like Turnitin, which is adding AI detection tools to its usual plagiarism checkers.)

We obviously see this mindset on social media, where Being Wrong can get you dogpiled and/or excluded from your peer groups, so it's even more important in the minds of anxious undergrads that they aren't Wrong. But yeah, AI produces nonsense, it is an open waste of your tuition dollars that are supposed to help you develop these independent college-level analytical and critical thinking skills that are very different from just checking exam boxes, and relying on it is not going to help anyone build those skills in the long term (and is frankly a big reason that we're in this mess with an entire generation being raised with zero critical thinking skills at the exact moment it's more crucial than ever that they have them). I am mildly hopeful that the AI craze will go bust just like crypto as soon as the main platforms either run out of startup funding or get sued into oblivion for plagiarism, but frankly, not soon enough, there will be some replacement for it, and that doesn't mean we will stop having to deal with fake news and fake information generated by a machine and/or people who can't be arsed to actually learn the skills and abilities they are paying good money to acquire. Which doesn't make sense to me, but hey.

So: Yes. This. I feel you and you have my deepest sympathies. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to sit on the porch in my quilt-draped rocking chair and shout at kids to get off my lawn.

[olderthannetfic]

Re a few asks about AI recently, I find it really interesting that the grammar and spelling in the text an LLM spits out tends to be correct, but the same tech under the hood of a grammar or spell checker will often want to change correct text to something incorrect. I don't understand the technology well enough to guess why this is, but it's just interesting that even the one thing it's good at isn't something it can actually be used for.

I do understand why it can't correctly answer questions about grammar, though. It's an incredibly sophisticated probability machine, and the training data is full of enough fluent English that it spits out the number and tense agreements because it knows that those words stastistically go together, but it doesn't actually understand grammar as a concept and it can't understand the or the question you type. It will correctly use present tense in a sentence because it's statistically likely that present tense forms go in the same sentence, but if you ask it "is this passage in present tense?" all it can do is run the same stastical likliness algorithm to spit out the kinds of words that would commonly follow the words in your question. It doesn't know anything, it just has a database of what is likely.

--

[reverieaudios]

This question is going to sound random and out of left field, and it is not an accusation because I doubt your answer will be yes, but do you use AI for any aspect of your videos/audios?

I sincerely hope the answer is no, but I have been just battered with people saying that use of AI is inevitable and a tool that should be used (I very much think that the things they are using as tools are not AI. Like an automatic spell checker is not what I’m talking about. When I say AI I mean artificially generated images or text or audio). And that carries a significant feeling of hopelessness to it, it makes one think “does anyone actually want to create things? Is anyone willing to actually make something of their own, like humans have been doing for tens if not hundreds of thousands of years?”

And so I guess my question is more like that, an attempt to figure out if I’m alone in this or not, if professionals are actually doing their own work or not. (It also looks incredibly tacky when I see other channels use AI or stolen art. It just looks bad. But that’s besides the point.)

Absolutely not, I'm firmly of the stance that generative ai is terrible, for multiple reasons. There are the ecological impacts, the fact that it's trained on non-consenting and uncompensated people's works, appearances, and voices, the fact that shitty companies will then use it to save money because then they don't need to pay people, it's just all-around awful

So yeah, no, I'd never touch that shit with a 10 foot pole. I agree it's disheartening to see people make use of it, but anyone who would use generative ai- whether it be for writing, planning, image making (I refuse to call it art), even those "funny" character songs that blatantly steal a voice actor's voice without their consent, anything- cannot call themselves a creative. There is no excuse for it

[duckprintspress]

Sorry for being a little in the dark, but can you explain what happened with NaNoWriMo? Or at least point me towards some resources pls?

Hey anon!

Never apologize for that. Life is so fucking busy, no one can be apprised of everything going on all the time. Our brains would break even trying. Anyway, multiple things have happened with NaNoWriMo, but for the current debacle, the best answer is probably to read their own words as appended in a reblog to my original post about how to delete.

The TL:DR is, to paraphrase NaNo's own words (after they got a sponsorship from ProWritingAid, an "AI" company), they support using "AI" as part of NaNoWriMo, accusing people who disagree of being ableist and classist.

Having read both their statements, they at least imply that they mean "AI" such as grammar checkers, rather than generative "AI," but they don't actually clarify and it's at best ambiguous if they include generative LLM as being allowed and reasonable. When people got upset with them, they doubled down, saying things like "not everyone can afford an editor," which as someone who personally couldn't afford an editor and so taught myself to edit at a professional level over ten years, I'll own I find a fucking insane and insulting take. A lot of us worked our asses off to learn these skills, and it's not classist to suggest that other people...can learn too. But also...like...if I was certain they only meant grammar checkers, I might be a bit more forgiving (I mean, I use Word's grammar checker, though it's often wrong), but which LLM usages they're actually defending isn't clarified and they jump right to defending their position by tarring people who disagree with them as -isms, and that's some kinda bs argument right there.

To be clear, I think policies banning people from using LLMs in events like NaNoWriMo or on platforms like AO3 is an exercise in futility. Bans are unenforceable, and attempts to moderate will turn into harassment tools. The line between "work written by someone who isn't proficient yet" and "LLM" isn't clear, and policing that line would consume huge amounts of moderating effort for basically no benefit. IMO, for places like AO3 the best bet is simply transparency, as in, people using LLMs should fucking tag it.

To be clear secondarily, putting my "I own a small Press" hat, if someone sends us something verifiably LLM-generated, they will be permanently banned, but honestly, even something I can't verify as LLM-generated, like. Won't be good writing. It might be technically precise but an LLM can't generate a coherent story because it can't think or remember. It's just a word-probability engine. We've never had an LLM-generated submission to the best of my knowledge, but if we did, well. Ban hammer.

Anyway. Sorry. I got off topic. The point is, NaNo basically said we were all ableist and classist because we want people to write (even if they write badly!) for the...write a novel challenge.

And this made a lot of people very angry.

[theamazingdigitalraceway]

A/N: @00belle00lovely00

BROTHERLY HATRED

A RACEWAY AU ONESHOT

WARNING: swearing, physical violence

~~~

Pomni used a boost to keep pace with Seth, barreling for the finish line. The shadowed biker leaned forward, inching ahead. He kept glancing at Pomni, smirking at her frustrated determination to beat him, but it was ultimately futile. The challenger AI crosses before her, stealing first place.

"And the winner is Seth. Again." Caine reluctantly announced. The crowd gave their canned applause, reflecting Caine's disdain. He gave a bit more energy announcing the other racers crossing the finish line, but his heart wasn't as in it as usual.

Pomni leaned her head back against her kart seat and gave an exasperated groan. "[%$!#]"

Seth idled next to Pomni, leaning on his elbow. "I think the word your looking for is shoot." He teased.

Pomni deadpanned at Seth. "The word I'm searching for I can't say, for obvious [%$!#] reasons."

"Such a dirty mouth. Shame it's attached to such a second-rate racer. Get good, and maybe your trash talking might mean something someday."

Caine appeared between Seth and Pomni, glaring Seth down. "Don't talk to her like that! She's the best racer this track has ever seen!"

"Debatable." Seth said, unintimidated.

Pomni got out of her kart and grabbed Caine's elbow. "Hey, take it easy. This is part of competing. Jax and I talk like this to each other all the time. He's no different."

"I take full offense to that." Seth said.

Caine grunted, backing off some. "Pomni, he's a low, no-good cheater. You would have won this race easily if he hadn't stolen your item before the helix turn."

"I know, but isn't that what he does? He's supposed to be difficult to beat." Pomni kept lightly pulling Caine down to the ground.

Seth grinned at Caine. "See? Even your losers can take a hit gracefully. Why can't you?"

"Don't push it, Seth. I am barely holding him back." Pomni warned. "Look, can you two get along for five minutes?"

"Not really." Caine answered bluntly.

"Nope." Seth agreed flatly.

"Why not?" Pomni asked genuinely.

"Long story." Caine and Seth answered at the same time, then glared at each other for speaking.

Pomni rolled her eyes. "Okay. Both of you come with me." She grabbed Seth by his elbow and dragged him off his bike with surprising ease. She led both AIs away from the others for a more private conversation.

Seth wiped his sleeve when Pomni let go of him. "As much as I appreciate an assertive woman, you have thirty seconds to explain why I should still be here."

"Make it ten. He'll leave faster." Caine grumbled.

"Enough. Caine, Seth is doing what he was programmed to do. You of all people should understand that. I'm not offended by what he has to say. I can roll with it. Seth, stop antagonizing Caine. He has a job to do too, and constantly flaunting in his face what you can get away with really isn't necessary."

"Fuck yeah, it is." Seth sniggered.

Caine bristled, but held his tongue.

"It really isn't funny." Pomni said sternly. "Keep your antics out of bounds"

"Or what? You'll talk to us again?" Seth leaned over her. "You're as stupid as you are small if you think I'm going to-"

WHAM!!

Seth staggered back into the garage wall, holding his lower jaw. Caine hovered, stunned. Pomni flexed out her hand, shaking off the mild pain from impact. "I said not to push it, Seth. Now, listen to me very carefully." Her voice was low and serious. "We're here to race. We're here to have fun to distract from the messed up reality we found ourselves in. Don't screw it up over whatever petty bull[%$!#] is going on between you two. Keep it out of bounds."

Seth held his head high, showing no signs of pain. "Fine. I won't concern myself with checkered ass over here, but you...you don't know what fire you're playing with. You'll never win another race. Never." He glared, his silver eyes glowing menacingly.

Pomni matched his glare, unblinking. "Bring it, skidmark. And come hungry, because you'll be eating my dust."

Seth's code buzzed with the most excitement he's felt in years. Finally. A real racer. Someone willing to fight him for what they deserve. It was hard for him to not smile. "We'll see." He vanished in a wisp of silver.

Caine let out the breath he had been holding. "Marinated mackerels, Pomni!! Are you insane!? Do you have any idea what you've just done!?"

"Yeah, I got you two to stop bickering by getting Seth to focus on me. I meant what I said. You two keep your problems out of bounds. Let us enjoy the races. It's all we have..."

Caine sighed. "You don't understand. He's been going easy on you. Messing with you. After this... Pomni he's going to go out of his way to humiliate you. He won't just tease you with a second place, he'll make sure you come last. If you thought racing Jax in a serious manner was difficult, you haven't seen anything yet."

"I'll roll with it." Pomni shrugged.

"Pomniiiii," Caine groaned. "I won't be able to take that. He's going to play dirty, and there really isn't much I can do about it. Not without... drastic measures."

"Caine," Pomni took his hand. "I'll be fine. Let me handle him."

Caine slowly ran his thumb over her knuckles. "You're a brave woman. Crazy, but brave. I don't know whether to be in awe or fear."

Pomni giggled. "Why not both?"

"Then consider me attracted and afraid, because you are dangerous." Caine purred.

Pomni tried to hide the smile forcing its way on her flustered face. "Shut up."