#mediamanipulation

[undergroundusa]

"[T]he mainstream media complex and its toady polling organizations want you to believe a significant portion of the Republic doesn’t want waste, fraud, and corruption exposed and eliminated. Further, they want you to think that everyone hates Elon Musk…"

READ & LISTEN NOW: https://www.undergroundusa.com/p/the-manufactured-opposition-to-doge

[unpluggedfinancial]

Digital Stockholm Syndrome: Why We Defend the Systems That Enslave Us

Imagine waking up in a cage, chained to the wall, and thanking your captor for keeping you safe. That sounds absurd—until you realize that’s exactly what most people do every day. They wake up, clock in, pay taxes, trust banks, defend broken education systems, and rally behind corrupt governments. All while calling it freedom.

That’s not freedom. That’s psychological capture. That’s Digital Stockholm Syndrome.

We’ve been conditioned to love our chains because we’ve forgotten what it feels like to be truly free.

When the Cage Becomes Home

Let’s start with the basics: Stockholm Syndrome occurs when a hostage forms an emotional bond with their captor. It’s a survival mechanism. But survival is a poor substitute for living.

In the modern world, we’ve bonded with systems that actively harm us. We’ve made peace with dysfunction. We treat banks like temples, even though they extract wealth from us through inflation and fees. We glorify public schooling, even though it crushes curiosity in favor of obedience. We vote for politicians as if they’re saviors, even though they serve interests that rarely align with ours.

The average person doesn’t just accept these systems—they defend them. Even when they’re hurting. Even when they know something feels wrong. Why?

Because it’s familiar. Because they were taught to. Because anything outside the system feels terrifying.

We aren’t afraid of tyranny. We’re afraid of freedom. Because freedom is unfamiliar. It requires thinking. Responsibility. Courage.

Trauma Bonding with Institutions

When people grow up inside a system that fails them, they don’t always reject it. Often, they double down. They form a trauma bond.

That’s how you get generations of people who defend the very systems that broke them. They tell their kids the same lies they were told. Get a degree. Get a job. Get a mortgage. Stay in line. Don’t question. Be a good little gear in a massive machine that doesn’t care about you.

The system creates a problem—like student debt or the housing crisis—then sells you a solution that makes it worse. You struggle, but you're told that's just life. You suffer, but you're told that's just adulthood. You numb out, but you're told that's just growing up.

This isn’t growth. It’s institutional gaslighting.

And because the system gives you just enough to survive, you mistake that for support. Like a prisoner who's allowed a walk in the yard and thinks it's a privilege.

Algorithmic Captivity

But it gets deeper. The algorithm is the new warden. It’s not just that people are conditioned by old institutions. Now they’re programmed in real time.

Social media feeds, news apps, streaming services—every scroll tightens the leash. You're fed ideas, opinions, and desires that aren't your own. And the worst part? You start to believe they are.

The algorithm doesn't care if you're informed. It cares if you're engaged. It doesn't care if you're free. It cares if you're addicted.

You're not just being watched. You're being shaped.

Attention is currency. The more they steal, the poorer you become—mentally, emotionally, spiritually.

And in this silent war for your mind, most people are unarmed. They've outsourced their thoughts, their values, their reality. All to machines that thrive on manipulation.

Bitcoin as the Breakup Text

Then along comes Bitcoin. Not as a solution to everything, but as a sign that freedom is still possible.

Bitcoin doesn’t care if you're ready. It doesn’t bend for your feelings. It doesn’t beg for approval. It just is.

It doesn’t promise comfort. It promises sovereignty.

It’s a breakup text with your financial abuser. A quiet declaration that says, "I’m done being lied to. I’ll take responsibility for my own money. I’ll take the risk—because I finally understand the real risk is staying in this cage."

Bitcoin isn’t salvation. It’s an invitation.

An invitation to wake up. To think differently. To stop defending what’s killing you and start building something that serves you.

Burn the Bridge, Build the Door

This post isn’t just about Bitcoin. It’s about seeing the trap.

It’s about recognizing that if you’re still defending the system that’s drowning you, then you’re not surviving. You’re sleepwalking.

The first step isn’t revolution. It’s clarity. Realizing that normal wasn’t working. That most of the beliefs you were given were survival scripts, not life scripts.

It’s time to break the trauma bond. To unlearn the learned helplessness. To stop thanking your captor for the scraps they call stability.

Build your own compass. Write your own code. Claim your damn mind back.

Your captor doesn’t need a gun anymore. Just a screen—and your loyalty.

Rip it back.

And don’t apologize for waking up.

Take Action Towards Financial Independence

If this article has sparked your interest in the transformative potential of Bitcoin, there’s so much more to explore! Dive deeper into the world of financial independence and revolutionize your understanding of money by following my blog and subscribing to my YouTube channel.

🌐 Blog: Unplugged Financial Blog Stay updated with insightful articles, detailed analyses, and practical advice on navigating the evolving financial landscape. Learn about the history of money, the flaws in our current financial systems, and how Bitcoin can offer a path to a more secure and independent financial future.

📺 YouTube Channel: Unplugged Financial Subscribe to our YouTube channel for engaging video content that breaks down complex financial topics into easy-to-understand segments. From in-depth discussions on monetary policies to the latest trends in cryptocurrency, our videos will equip you with the knowledge you need to make informed financial decisions.

👍 Like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell to stay updated with our latest content. Whether you’re a seasoned investor, a curious newcomer, or someone concerned about the future of your financial health, our community is here to support you on your journey to financial independence.

📚 Get the Book: The Day The Earth Stood Still 2.0 For those who want to take an even deeper dive, my book offers a transformative look at the financial revolution we’re living through. The Day The Earth Stood Still 2.0 explores the philosophy, history, and future of money, all while challenging the status quo and inspiring action toward true financial independence.

Support the Cause

If you enjoyed what you read and believe in the mission of spreading awareness about Bitcoin, I would greatly appreciate your support. Every little bit helps keep the content going and allows me to continue educating others about the future of finance.

Donate Bitcoin: 

bc1qpn98s4gtlvy686jne0sr8ccvfaxz646kk2tl8lu38zz4dvyyvflqgddylk

[samspeaksofficial]

India’s economy might be struggling, but hate is thriving. In this video, we dive deep into how manufactured outrage is masking inflation, unemployment, and the crumbling education system. If you care about where this country is headed, you need to see this.

[kristynguyen7]

Blog Post #5 - Week 7 (due 3/6) 

Exploring Bias, Racism, and Social Validation in the Digital Age 

How do social media platforms perpetuate racial biases through their design and algorithms? 

Social media platforms often perpetuate racial biases through their design and underlying algorithms, which reflect the biases of their creators and the broader society. Senft and Noble (2014) highlight that “racism is part of life on the internet… it is now a global reality” (p. 112). For instance, search algorithms may prioritize content that aligns with prevailing societal biases, resulting in the marginalization of minority voices. This perpetuation occurs because algorithms are not neutral; they are designed by individuals who may unconsciously embed their own biases into these systems. Consequently, users are often presented with information that reinforces existing racial prejudices, thereby maintaining systemic inequities within digital spaces. 

How does Ruha Benjamin critique the notion that technology is naturally unbiased, and what examples does she use to support her argument? 

Benjamin (2019) challenges the notion that technology is naturally unbiased, arguing that “coded inequity makes it easier and faster to produce racist outcomes” (p. 48), even when no one is explicitly racist. She illustrated this through examples like biased healthcare algorithms that allocate fewer resources to Black patients, reinforcing systemic disparities. Such technologies claim objectively but reflect the social values of their creators. By embedding discrimination into automated systems, technology amplifies racial injustices under the guide of efficiency, making systemic biases less visible and harder to challenge. Addressing this requires ethical design and accountability. 

How does the presence of white supremacy online challenge traditional understandings of race, racism, and civil rights in the digital era? 

The presence of white supremacy online complicates common perceptions of race and racism by demonstrating how digital spaces are not neutral but rather sites of ideological struggle. Daniels (2009) highlights how white supremacists have used the Internet to advance their political goals, often through sophisticated and deceptive means such as cloaked websites. These sites “appear to be legitimate sources of civil rights information yet actually disguise-or cloak-white supremacist content several page-layers down” (p. 6). This demonstrates how digital media can be weaponized to undermine racial equality and distort historical truths. Consequently, critical digital literacy is essential for recognizing and challenging online white supremacy. 

How does the social rating system in Nosedive reflect real-world anxieties about social media validation? 

The episode highlights the dangers of a society obsessed with external validation, where individuals are judged solely by their social ratings. Lacie’s desperation to increase her score reflects modern anxieties about online approval. As she states, “I’m on my way up. I can feel it” (Brooker & Wright, 2016), her worth is entirely dependent on others’ perceptions. This mirrors real-life issues where people curate their lives for likes and followers, leading to anxiety and inauthentic interactions. The episode serves as a warning about the psychological and societal consequences of excessive reliance on digital validation. 

In what ways does Nosedive critique the illusion of a “perfect” life portrayed on social media? 

The episode critiques the fabricated nature of online personas, as characters maintain forced positivity to maintain high ratings. Lacie’s friend Naomi exemplifies this, saying, “I mean, 4.2 is still good, but I want to keep my circle… high” (Brooker & Wright, 2016), showing how friendships are based on status rather than authenticity. This reflects how social media encourages people to project unrealistic perfection while hiding struggles. Lacie’s breakdown demonstrates the unsustainable pressure of maintaining an idealized self. The episode ultimately reveals the emptiness behind digital perfectionism, urging viewers to embrace authenticity over superficial online approval. 

Word Count: 493

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity Press.

Brooker, C. (Writer), & Wright, J. (Director). (2016). Nosedive (Season 3, Episode 1) [TV series episode]. In C. Brooker (Creator), Black Mirror. Netflix.

​​Daniels, J. (2009). Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Senft, T. M., & Noble, S. U. (2014). Race and social media. In J. Hunsinger & T. M. Senft (Eds.), The social media handbook (pp. 107-125). Routledge.

[immunobiz]

🎬 INTRODUCTION – "Plandemic: Indoctrination"

Et si tout ce que vous croyiez savoir… était soigneusement orchestré? Et si la peur, la censure et la désinformation étaient les véritables virus?

Dans un monde où les récits sont contrôlés, où les voix dissidentes sont étouffées, ce reportage dérange. Il gratte là où ça fait mal : dans les coulisses du pouvoir, de la science subventionnée et des médias complices.

Plandemic: Indoctrination vous invite à sortir de la matrice, à questionner l’inquestionnable et à oser penser par vous-même. 🧠⚡

Préparez-vous à un choc de lucidité. Ce que vous allez voir ne peut plus être "dévu".

🎬 INTRODUCTION – "Plandemic: Indoctrination"

What if everything you thought you knew… was carefully orchestrated? What if fear, censorship, and disinformation were the real viruses?

In a world where narratives are controlled and dissenting voices are silenced, this documentary disrupts. It digs deep—into the shadows of power, funded science, and complicit media. Plandemic: Indoctrination invites you to break free from the matrix, to question the unquestionable, and to dare to think for yourself. 🧠⚡

[ajaydmr]

Global DeepFake AI Market Analysis: Trends, Innovations, and 2025 Forecast Study

The Global DeepFake AI Market is experiencing exponential growth, expected to jump from USD 79.1 million in 2024 to USD 1,395.9 million by 2033, reflecting a remarkable CAGR of 37.6%. As synthetic media reshapes how we communicate, advertise, and educate, the technology offers groundbreaking benefits—but also poses serious ethical and regulatory questions.

🎯 Download your free report sample here: Request PDF Sample

What is DeepFake AI?

DeepFake AI combines deep learning and artificial intelligence—primarily through Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)—to create highly realistic digital replicas of people, voices, and environments. These synthetic assets can simulate speech, mimic facial expressions, and recreate entire video scenes with astonishing accuracy.

Key applications include:

Face-swapping for film and entertainment

Voice synthesis for assistants and dubbing

Interactive avatars in marketing and customer service

Educational simulations

Real-time multilingual ad localization

Today, DeepFakes are no longer viewed solely as tools of deception—they’re being embraced for creative, commercial, and constructive purposes.

To learn more, visit the DeepFake AI Market Report for full insights.

Driving Forces Behind Market Expansion

1. The Rise of Synthetic Content Platforms

The growing accessibility of synthetic media tools is fueling adoption across industries. Even non-technical users can now generate realistic content, allowing:

Marketers to launch localized campaigns faster

Educators to create immersive learning modules

Influencers to scale engagement with digital clones

By removing traditional production barriers, DeepFake platforms are saving time and drastically cutting content creation costs.

2. Surge in Demand from Entertainment & Advertising

Entertainment studios and brands are actively integrating DeepFake tools to revive historical characters, recreate scenes, and deliver messages in multiple languages. These AI-driven efficiencies help personalize experiences while optimizing budgets.

3. Progress in AI Infrastructure

The boom in GPU performance, cloud computing, and open-source AI models has lowered entry barriers for developers. As a result, DeepFake capabilities are becoming more advanced and scalable.

Breakthroughs include:

Real-time video synthesis

Enhanced facial motion capture

Seamless integration with NLP and audio tools

North America: Leading the DeepFake Revolution

With a 34.6% share of the global market in 2024, North America leads in both innovation and adoption. The region benefits from:

A robust ecosystem of AI startups and research labs

Supportive regulatory initiatives around digital content

High demand for immersive and personalized media experiences

U.S.-based media companies are already deploying DeepFake solutions for dubbing, multilingual content delivery, and AI-generated performances.

Key Risks and Ethical Challenges

As DeepFake AI advances, so do the concerns surrounding its misuse:

Political Misinformation: DeepFakes can impersonate public figures and spread disinformation

Privacy Violations: Individuals may be targeted without consent

Detection Gaps: Improved quality makes fakes harder to identify

Public Trust Erosion: The line between real and fake becomes dangerously thin

To address these threats, detection systems using AI are emerging to identify manipulated content by analyzing visual patterns, audio anomalies, and facial inconsistencies.

Positive Potential: Where DeepFake AI Adds Value

Despite its risks, DeepFake technology holds immense promise across sectors:

✅ Education: Realistic simulations for training in healthcare, defense, and safety ✅ Customer Experience: AI avatars deliver round-the-clock, localized support ✅ Corporate Communication: Executives can engage global teams in multiple languages ✅ Cultural Preservation: Recreating historic figures and events in museums ✅ Inclusive Media: Empowering diverse communities with customizable virtual representations

📌 Interested in learning how DeepFake AI can be applied to your industry? Get the full report

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the market value of DeepFake AI in 2024? A: USD 79.1 million.

Q: What’s the market forecast for 2033? A: Expected to reach USD 1,395.9 million.

Q: Which region dominates the market? A: North America, with 34.6% market share.

Q: What industries are early adopters? A: Entertainment, marketing, education, and virtual services.

Q: Is DeepFake AI dangerous? A: It can be if misused—but detection technologies and ethical frameworks are evolving rapidly.

Final Word: Navigating the Future of Synthetic Media

The DeepFake AI market is no longer a fringe segment—it’s a transformative force impacting how we create and consume digital content. The future will demand a careful balance: encouraging innovation while putting guardrails in place to prevent abuse.

Businesses must invest in ethical practices, detection tools, and transparent policies to unlock the full potential of DeepFake AI—without compromising public trust.

🔍 Download your sample report today and explore how your organization can thrive in this rapidly evolving landscape.

[juhnkit]

Chris Henson Rants: #96 P.Diddy's Baby Lotions

      I AM ABSOLUTELY LOSING IT OVER THIS BABY OIL COVERAGE!!! 😤😤😤 Chris Henson here, and I swear my NEWS FEED has been HIJACKED by MORE MOISTURIZER ARTICLES THAN THERE ARE POTHOLES ON HIGHWAY 31!!!   I just wanted to read about P. DIDDY’S CASE!!! THE ACTUAL CHARGES!!! SEX TRAFFICKING, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, AND SERIOUS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS!!! And suddenly my screen is FLOODED with “1,000…

[sergeyshcherbakov]

The man behind the USSRs biggest propaganda myth #ussr #sovietunion #historyshorts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRZr_4GYN74 They called it a revolution. But three years later… the Soviet Union turned it into theater. This happened thanks to Nikolai Evreinov — a man who believed in the theatricalization of reality. How was the staging of the Winter Palace storm organized? And how was Evreinov rewarded for it? It's something worth knowing. ✅ Stay Connected To Me. 🔔 Join Sergey Shcherbakov for more content that uncovers truths and explores the world from new angles!: https://www.youtube.com/@shcherbakov.sergey?sub_confirmation=1 ✅ For Business Inquiries: shcherbakov.meaning@gmail.com ============================= ✅ Other Videos You Might Be Interested In Watching: 👉 Even mom can't be trusted: cognitive dissonance during the war https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8gYkyFj1l4 👉 How truth becomes propaganda. Mind-blowing power of INTERPRETATIONS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U2VLG7Jg8U 👉 A unique study in Antarctica. I didn't expect to find THIS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYLtZ4xM2gE ================================ ✅ About Sergey Shcherbakov: Sergey Shcherbakov is a leading independent researcher and strategic communication expert with a focus on the post-Soviet region. As a bestselling author and former founder of a top SMM agency, he brings a wealth of experience to his exploration of the complex nature of "meaning." Join him on this channel for insightful discussions, expert analysis, and thought-provoking perspectives on the intersection of human psychology, culture, and society. For Collaboration and Business inquiries, please use the contact information below: 📩 Email: shcherbakov.meaning@gmail.com 🔔 Hit that subscribe button for more videos that explore deep topics, uncover hidden truths, and provide insights into how the world really works!: https://www.youtube.com/@shcherbakov.sergey?sub_confirmation=1 ================================= #sovietunion #propaganda #historicaltruth #winterpalace #redmyth Disclaimer: I do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred by you acting or not acting as a result of watching any of my publications. You acknowledge that you use the information I provide at your own risk. Do your own research. Copyright Notice: This video and my YouTube channel contain dialogue, music, and images that are the property of Sergey Shcherbakov. You are authorized to share the video link and channel and embed this video in your website or others as long as a link back to my YouTube channel is provided. © Sergey Shcherbakov via Sergey Shcherbakov https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT2oru4CaQeeNAqBAruTFdw April 28, 2025 at 06:15AM

[0illuminated1]

The Death of Critical Thinking: How Blind Acceptance Leads to Control

In this presentation, we explore the decline of critical thinking in modern society and how it paves the way for manipulation and control. As emotional appeal, false dichotomies, and the illusion of expertise take precedence over logic and reason, individuals become more susceptible to external influences. Discover why blind acceptance is dangerous, how it strips away personal freedom, and what steps can be taken to reclaim our minds and make informed decisions. This is a call to action for those seeking to think for themselves and break free from the grip of societal manipulation.

[undergroundusa]

"Internews does not 'train' journalists; it breeds ideological drones who infiltrate the global mainstream media infrastructures. It functions more like a 'Ministry of Truth,' dictating permissible discourse and what narratives the public is allowed to consume…"

READ & LISTEN NOW: https://www.undergroundusa.com/p/usaids-dark-and-scandalous-narrative

[mirandatrannzz]

[Week 10]

🌐  The Double-Edged Sword of Social Media: Pressure, Politics, and the Need for Collective Responsibility

Politics vs. Platforms: When Social Media and Governments Clash

The intersection of social media and government regulation exposes a fragile balance between free expression and political influence (Briggs, S. , 2018).

Platforms like Meta have faced criticism for silencing pro-Palestinian voices, with over 1,050 instances of content takedowns and suppression documented by Human Rights Watch during the Israel-Palestine conflict (2023).

📌 This is not mere content moderation - it is a calculated response to geopolitical pressures, raising concerns about platforms shaping political narratives rather than merely hosting discussions (McLaughlin & Velez, 2017).

On the other hand, corporate ambition often clashes with national governance.

In Vietnam, strict data-sharing regulations challenge Meta’s data-driven business model, highlighting how regulatory policies shape user privacy and digital freedoms (Huynh, 2025).

⚠️ These cases prove that social media is far from neutral - it is an arena where corporate and political interests dictate the boundaries of online discourse.

The Dark Side of Online Discourse: Harassment & Hate Speech

Beyond political suppression, social media’s engagement-driven algorithms fuel online toxicity, prioritizing outrage over ethical discourse (KhosraviNik & Esposito, 2018).

The case of Vietnamese pop star Sơn Tùng M-TP is a perfect example of how social media can turn public discourse into a toxic battleground (TUOI TRE ONLINE, 2022).

⚠️ Trigger Warning: This content includes discussions of suicide. Please proceed with caution.

This is the music video that sparked controversy

This is the official music video released after the scandal

🎵 His 2022 music video, There's No One At All, raised valid concerns about its portrayal of mental health. However, the conversation quickly spiraled into mass outrage.

(TUOI TRE ONLINE, 2022)

Algorithms, designed to maximize engagement, amplified negativity (Pohjonen & Udupa, 2017), turning: ➡️ Constructive criticism into harassment ➡️ Discussion into cancel culture ➡️ Concern into hate speech 

This incident highlights the challenges of regulating online content in a decentralized digital environment (Pohjonen & Udupa, 2017).

Once the backlash gained momentum, the sheer volume of hate speech and personal attacks made it nearly impossible to control.

The Sơn Tùng M-TP case proves how social media platforms can quickly become tools for targeted harassment, where: ✔️ Algorithmic amplification fuels negativity ✔️ The rapid spread of outrage overwhelms regulatory systems

⚖️ It serves as a stark reminder that the pursuit of engagement often trumps ethical considerations, leading to a digital world where outrage thrives while nuanced debate is silenced (Pohjonen & Udupa, 2017).

Beyond the Law: Collective Responsibility in Digital Spaces

Given the systemic nature of algorithmic amplification and online toxicity, legal solutions alone are insufficient. The viral spread of harmful content demonstrates the need for a multifaceted approach:

📚 Strengthening Digital Literacy Educating users on algorithmic manipulation can empower them to critically assess content and resist misinformation (Sari & Suryadi, 2022). By understanding how platforms prioritize outrage, users can make more informed engagement decisions, reducing the spread of harmful narratives.

🏛  Holding Platforms Accountable Through CSR Social media companies must take responsibility for the consequences of their algorithms. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives should enforce stricter content moderation policies to prevent the prioritization of harmful engagement over user well-being (Tamvada, 2020). Advocacy groups and public pressure are key to driving ethical platform policies.

🌱 Shifting Online Culture Addressing systemic issues requires a cultural shift in how digital spaces operate (Badel & Baeza, 2021). Beyond regulatory measures, fostering a safer online environment demands ethical platform design, stronger digital literacy programs, and corporate accountability. Without proactive efforts, social media will continue to prioritize profit over ethical responsibility.

Final Thoughts: The Need for Collective Action

⚡ Combating online toxicity and political influence is not the responsibility of a single entity - it is a shared duty. Governments, platforms, and users must work together to create a more ethical digital space.

🔍 Understanding the interplay between corporate interests, regulations, and user behavior is the first step toward moving beyond reactive solutions and toward real change.

Let's build a better, more responsible online world together. 

💬 If this resonates with you, share your thoughts below! 

🔄 Reblog to spread awareness!

References

Badel, F., & Baeza, J. L. (2021). DIGITAL PUBLIC SPACE FOR A DIGITAL SOCIETY: A REVIEW OF PUBLIC SPACES IN THE DIGITAL AGE. ArtGRID - Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts, 3(2), 127–137. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/artgrid/issue/67840/1002117

Briggs, S. (2018, March 8). About | HeinOnline. HeinOnline. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/collsp52&div=5&id=&page=

Human Rights Watch. (2023). Meta’s Broken Promises: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content on Instagram and Facebook. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and

Huynh, T. T. (2025). Everyone Is Safe Now: Constructing the Meaning of Data Privacy Regulation in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.36

KhosraviNik, M., & Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003

McLaughlin, B., & Velez, J. A. (2017). Imagined Politics: How Different Media Platforms Transport Citizens Into Political Narratives. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317746327

Pohjonen, M., & Udupa, S. (2017). Extreme Speech Online: An Anthropological Critique of Hate Speech Debates. International Journal of Communication, 11(0), 19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5843

Sari, A. D. I., & Suryadi, K. (2022). Strengthening Digital Literacy to Develop Technology Wise Attitude Through Civic Education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.006

Tamvada, M. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and accountability: a New Theoretical Foundation for Regulating CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–14. Springeropen. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8

TUOI TRE ONLINE. (2022, April 29). Dư luận phẫn nộ vì MV There’s no one at all của Sơn Tùng M-TP có cách giải quyết độc hại. TUOI TRE ONLINE. https://tuoitre.vn/du-luan-phan-no-vi-mv-theres-no-one-at-all-cua-son-tung-m-tp-co-cach-giai-quyet-doc-hai-20220429155227083.htm

[ptitolier]

The Art of Defamation: A Weapon of Influence?

Defamation isn’t just about lies—it’s about power. Throughout history, words have been weaponized to discredit opponents, shape public perception, and manipulate the truth. Whether through political smear campaigns, corporate rivalries, or viral social media scandals, defamation operates at the intersection of influence and deception.

In today’s digital age, false narratives spread faster than ever. A single rumor can destroy reputations, polarize societies, and erode trust in institutions before the truth even has a chance to surface. But where do we draw the line between criticism and defamation? Is it just an inevitable side effect of free speech, or a deliberate tool of manipulation?

This article explores:

- The historical roots of defamation as a tool of power

- The strategies behind character attacks and misinformation

- The philosophical dilemma between truth, freedom, and ethics

- How defamation thrives in the digital age—and what it means for democracy

Is defamation simply part of politics and public discourse, or does it reveal a deeper crisis in how we consume and trust information?

Read the full article on Medium:

[tmarshconnors]

BBC: A Propaganda Machine

The British Broadcasting Corporation once a beacon of integrity and trust has devolved into nothing more than a manipulative propaganda machine, a mouthpiece for elitist narratives, and a master of gaslighting the British public. It is an absolute disgrace when one considers what the BBC once stood for, particularly during the Second World War. The same institution that once provided truthful reports to a nation fighting for its survival now peddles half-truths and agenda-driven rhetoric, insulting the intelligence of those who fund it.

A Legacy Betrayed

During the darkest days of World War II, the BBC was instrumental in keeping morale high, broadcasting uncensored reports to occupied Europe, and ensuring that the British people received reliable information amidst the fog of war. Churchill himself understood the power of the BBC as a tool for truth, using it to rally the nation against tyranny.

Fast forward to today, and what do we see? A corporation that actively engages in narrative manipulation, cherry-picking stories to fit a predetermined script rather than reporting facts objectively. It no longer serves the British public but instead operates as a megaphone for globalist interests, woke ideology, and leftist hysteria.

Bias and Deception: The BBC’s Daily Bread

The BBC has perfected the art of subtle manipulation. From slanted reporting on immigration and Brexit to its laughable attempts at cultural revisionism, it has become an enemy of truth. There was a time when one could turn on the BBC and expect at least a semblance of neutrality, but now, it operates under the guise of impartiality while systematically undermining traditional British values and the voices of the silent majority.

Take its coverage of Brexit, for example. The BBC spent years subtly (and sometimes not so subtly) trying to convince the British public that they had made a catastrophic mistake, framing Leave voters as ill informed and xenophobic rather than acknowledging the real, legitimate concerns over sovereignty and national identity. Or consider its handling of immigration, where it refuses to acknowledge the detrimental impact of mass, uncontrolled migration, instead painting anyone who raises concerns as a ‘far-right extremist.’

Gaslighting the Public

One of the most insidious tactics the BBC employs is gaslighting. It tells people that their concerns are baseless, that what they see happening with their own eyes is not real, and that if they dare to question the official narrative, they are conspiracists or bigots. It is an institution that thrives on manipulating perception, coercing the public into accepting falsehoods as truth.

Crime rates are rising? You’re just being paranoid. Immigration is straining public services? Don’t be ridiculous; diversity is our strength. The economy is faltering? No, no, it’s all in your head things are better than ever! This Orwellian doublespeak is a grotesque insult to the British people who live through these realities every day.

A Bloated, Unaccountable Relic

The worst part? The BBC forces you to pay for this drivel through the extortionate and outdated TV licence. It is no longer a service but a racket, demanding money under the threat of prosecution to fund its agenda driven nonsense. Why should the British people be financially coerced into supporting an organisation that no longer represents them?

With alternative media sources on the rise, many Britons are finally waking up to the BBC’s dishonesty. People are tuning out, cancelling their TV licences, and seeking independent voices who report the facts without ideological taint. And yet, the BBC continues to behave as if it holds the moral high ground, oblivious to the growing disdain towards it.

Enough Is Enough

It is time for Britain to face a hard truth: the BBC is not the respectable institution it once was. It no longer upholds journalistic integrity, nor does it serve the people who fund it. Instead, it pushes a narrow, politicised agenda while gaslighting the public into submission.

Defund it. Abolish the licence fee. Let it compete in the free market where it will either adapt to reality or perish under the weight of its own hubris. Britain deserves better. The people deserve better. The BBC, as it stands today, is nothing more than a national disgrace.

[immunobiz]

🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦 Pierre a déclaré hier que les médias canadiens ne répéteront pas cette information. 🚨🤔 Les grandes chaînes cachent souvent des vérités importantes. 📺❌ Il est crucial de rester informé et de chercher la vérité ailleurs. 📚🔍 Ne laissons pas les médias manipuler l'opinion publique. 📰👀

Pierre said yesterday that Canadian media will not repeat this information. 🚨🤔 Major outlets often hide important truths. 📺❌ It's crucial to stay informed and seek the truth elsewhere. 📚🔍 Don't let the media manipulate public opinion. 📰👀 🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦🙏🇨🇦

[ajaydmr]

Global DeepFake AI Market Industry Report: Growth Insights, Challenges & Forecast (2025)

[gaurish-akki-studio]

ದೇಶದೊಳಗಿನ ದ್ರೋಹಿ..! ಈಕೆ ಬರಿ ಯೂಟ್ಯೂಬರ್‌ ಅಲ್ಲ..! | Jyoti Malhotra

In an age where social media influencers are gaining the trust of millions, a shocking case has emerged — the story of Jyoti Malhotra, a travel vlogger allegedly involved in sharing sensitive information with Pakistan's ISI. What began as a harmless YouTube channel called Travel with Jo soon transformed into a potential threat to India's national security.

This article investigates how a common influencer, with just a few lakh subscribers, was able to access high-security Indian border areas, attend events hosted by the Pakistan High Commission, and interact with suspected ISI operatives — all while publishing vlogs that downplayed national tensions and praised Pakistan.

Her videos, which once struggled to gain views, suddenly went viral after she published content related to Pakistan. From using encrypted messaging apps like Telegram and Snapchat, to uploading footage from sensitive military and religious locations in India, the shift in her content strategy raised serious alarms.

Eventually, she was arrested under multiple sections of the Official Secrets Act (1923). This blog explores the sequence of events, her association with a man identified as Danish (allegedly an ISI agent), and how her lifestyle dramatically changed after her international travels — especially after trips to Pakistan, China, and the Middle East.

This case highlights a dangerous trend — the weaponization of social media platforms and YouTube creators by foreign intelligence agencies. It serves as a wake-up call: not all content is innocent, and not every influencer has pure intentions.