#proof that ai can never replace humans

[dancedancedie]

The reason why skibidi toilet is outliving all this new brainrot and is much more memorable is because skibidi toilet is made by the labour of a real human and it had real lore that was more or less worked out

Bombardino Crocodilo and trallaliro trallala or whatever are mass produced, they claim to have lore but it’s never shown because they’re just a static and soulless ai image, which is no fun to engage with 🙂‍↕️

[calware]

Can I ask you for what it is about Hal you like so much you based your username on him? I think he's a good character tho he was never a favorite of mine so I am curious

1. i am a big fan of robots (/robot adjacent things such as AI) on like... an aesthetic + thematic level :)

i like the look of machinery and one day i hope to be artistically strong enough to make really cool and complex robot illustrations + designs [shoutout to everyone who gives him glowing circuitry btw... ooooh glowey :) can never go wrong with that]

plus, exploring the idea of a person that isn't human.. ough. yes

minorities who don't conform to society (easily or at all) such as people who are neurodivergent, queer, etc. projecting onto nonhuman concepts/characters/species is sooo real

this post

i also love how humans will bond with literally anything, be it a roomba or a pair of silly triangle sunglasses. oooooo you want to think about the inherently kind and compassionate nature of humanity oooo

2. i find him to be so funny. i can't get enough of his personality, the way he talks, etc. for example i made a post forever ago with quotes of his that i find funny. he isn't on screen for a long time but i really think he makes the most out of it lol. he's literally there just to annoy everyone... and i love him for that. he's very snarky while also being deadpan while also being completely full of himself, and not in a way that's annoying for the audience to read, at least to me.

he is also sometimes funny specifically in a silly way, like how he keeps making over 9000 jokes even though the meme's been dead for over 400 years. i just find his dialogue incredibly entertaining to read

3. he is red and red is my favorite color :)

4. he is so accidentally transgender [every friend group got the transgender allegory]. to quote me from 2021:

you know sometimes i think about how hal feels like he was made to “replace” dirk and how it’s his literal job to pretend to be dirk and how he has to learn to accept that he isn’t dirk he’s his own person with his own identity and as he interacts with dirk’s friends he feels like they’re disappointed and that they’d rather speak to the “original dirk” instead of him and also he names himself and also he feels literally trapped in dirk’s shades which is basically his body and he wants to be prototyped so that he can have a body that’s his own and also literally the physical manifestation of who he is but when he asks for it he’s put in danger out of fear and paranoia and when he does end up getting prototyped he’s ecstatic you know i just think about these things a lot

5. because he's a side character and he was given... that ending.... there is a lot of room for fans to do further exploration and interpretation on his character which i think is fun. i like rotating him around in my mind, thinking about what could've been

6. i think it's great that we as a society all collectively decided that we needed to do something to make up for stanley kubrick saying that hal 9000 was a "straight" robot

7. i also think it's great that we as a society all collectively decided we needed to make as many characters referencing hal 9000 as possible. i love this guy let's get more of this guy i will never have enough of this guy

8. i like how he's genuinely mean sometimes. flawed and interesting characters are what make homestuck so interesting to me, and hal is no exception to this

9. the Important part of this post:

THERES FEELINGS.

it's about the hollow feeling of your friends going from thinking of you as family to thinking of you as a stranger in an instant. it's about still trying to be a good person despite being told by everyone you've ever known that you are incapable of emotion and compassion and morals and never quite finding proof that you do feel those things and maybe you even believe it too but you still never stop trying. it's about the horror of being stripped of your autonomy and humanity and body and senses and free will at the age of 13 and when your creator starts to kill you there's nothing you can do but beg. it's about a boy so truly, painfully, and UNFATHOMABLY alone he cuts away chunks of himself and molds them into companions that he can surround himself with to make it seem as if he's a little less alone but in doing so suffocates himself in his own identity. it's about "what if you cloned yourself and it killed you and you were dead and you were alive and the clone is you and it's not and your existence is perpetuated and you've ceased to exist. what if you killed your clone before it could kill you. would that be fucked up or what" it's about the thematic significance of twin motifs. it's about not being able to cry or laugh or dance or sing or scream or fingerpaint or breathe or sigh or chew or stare or run or

10. um. evil robot guy <3 yay ^_^!!

[brucewaynehater101]

Oh I was absolutely going with them Jason Finds Out During TT route. I think it would be especially funny if he's heard horror stories from Rouges and his own Henchmen that Robin The Third is some kind of demon that Batman summoned on accident. There are some rumors about how the demon feeds off of grief or anger or vengeance because it's illusions of being g a human are stronger when the Bat is there so *clearly* it is taking its power *from* the Bat. Others say that Nightwing summoned it so that it would keep Bruce on a leash without the first Robin having to come back. Some say it was some person in Gothem who did it or that it was the combined form of the many curses on the city.

All Jason knows is that when his replacement turned around, it's head luled to the side just an inch or two, like a puppet on strings that had to much slack on that one string. Jason manages to shoot one of its arms but instead of a spray of blood, it is broken shards of porcelain and sand. His hits feel like he's punching a solid wall but some do leave visible cracks in Tim. This Thing in a Robin Costume could not ever be human. He knows because when he left, he took a handful of sand in a vile to see if he could figure out what it is. Jason still has that vile to this day, the only proof he has that Tim isn't a human. Sometimes he will set it on a flat surface and watch the sand in it make it slowly roll towards whatever direction Tim is in.

As for how he heals, that's to the magic that animates him, all Tim needs to do is hold his pieces together like a jigsaw puzzle and after a few moments the piece he's holding will weld itself back into place. Also his sand will slowly come back to him, attracted like a magnet and he can tell where all his sand in instinctually. He let's Jason keep the vial of it as it's basically an unhacklable Jason Tracker. The sand isn't fast at moving towards him, roughly about the pace of a snail or sloth. It's certainly moving but just getting from downtown to the Batcave could take his sand a week. Also the pull isn't super strong, gaining about as much force as a particularly stubborn ant.

Ras took half a pound of Tim's sand instead of his spleen and Tim would very much like his sand back.

As for Cass knowing, she 100% does. Tim has shown her his true gorm and when she asked why he didn't show the others, Tim replied, "they wouldn't understand. They would worry over things that aren't problems and try to fix things I already fixed and end up breaking those things."

Eventually the Bats must find out though, and when Dick asks if that means they need to do special things to keep Tim from dying to Magic Users, Tim laughs and laughs like Dick has told the funniest joke in the world. When he calms down, he asks a question of his own, "Dick. How could I possibly die if I have never been alive in the first place? I am simply an object enchanted to move and speak. I am no more alive that the AI Babs uses to scan the internet for pictures of us. I am no more alive than a character in a video game. At most, at *most* I can be compared to some of Ivy's plants that she uses to attack us. I can not be killed for I have never been alive. Broken, yes, but that I can fix. I simply have to be put back together like a jigsaw puzzle."

Oof. Poor Dick is going to have to figure out how to feel about that statement. Tim not being alive at all and comparing himself to a video game or AI might fuck with Dick's sense of self, sentience, etc. I would love to see how they all logic, cope, and understand identity after this.

I do love the idea that the sand tries to make its way back to Tim, but he knows where it is at all times. Jason has an estimated location of Tim (N, S, E, W), but Tim has like coordinates.

I wonder if Cass would try dancing with Tim. Since his movements are different, perhaps she would enjoy learning to dance in a way that's similar to how he moves? It could be eerie and fun for her.

I'm curious how Ra's would feel about Tim and his sand in this. Why did he keep the sand? Does it look distinct from other sand? Was it just cause it was part of Tim and Ra's thought he might be able to use it? Also, does he attempt that shit he did with his Nyssa since Tim probably can't reproduce?

[nonverbalnaji]

I'll admit. Last year I wondered if using gen-AI would help unblock me from writing. I tried it by telling it to give me a paragraph of XYZ.

I hated it so much I wrote a 2500 word chapter out of spite because I knew even unedited I could write better than it could. But my shot confidence that led me to try it? I examined it.

While I was already moving away from the publishing industry and the toxicity of rapid release, it was also tapping into the bigger web of issues around commercialism, capitalism, and just... the world. And that was a *year* ago.

Being a creative today feels like being torn in various directions while trying to keep the strands of yourself in tact. And there is so, so much fear.

I'm scared to post this because there will be people who think because I tried it once and decided Nope, that I'm untrustworthy. The internet (at least, X) is where nuance dies but that's why I'm writing this on tumblr rather than bluesky.

I feel frustrated at the idea that being on the internet (and tbh, being autistic) I could be accused of not being human, and feel a pressure to identify myself and thus jeopardise my privacy to stand up for myself.

I feel tired about it all.

Writing fanfiction reconnected me with joy and *fun*. The whimsy to create and I've surprised myself so much by finding my groove and trusting the past hyperfoci on narrative structure really has helped my intuition. I always thought I was a hard outliner/plotter but I've been writing by the seat of my pants with rough flagpoles of things I know will happen.

How TF could I have thought replacing the process of creation could ever be worth it? Answer: to meet pressured criteria of algorithms, the "you must do this now" scarcity tactics, and a lot of my own ish I've been unpacking.

I have worked with various published authors and still watch that world but now with some distance because no amount of money or clout or recognition by publishing houses is worth it to me now that I've had this experience:

A reader left a comment telling me that they felt comforted by and seen in my story.

If I suddenly am never able to write again, I will still feel fulfilled because I made an impact like that to someone out there.

For my own sense of safety, I'm not transparent about a lot of things in my real life but I think I'm comfy enough to share that like a lot of us, I was that kid who sat alone at lunch reading books.

Feeling a sense of connection without relinquishing my safety, identity, or sacrificing the joy of creativity is something I didn't think was possible a year ago.

It doesn't mean I'm still not scared about the world and have worries that could probably power a toaster. But having this small little thing in my corner of the world, I hope to tend to it kindly and with authenticity.

I'm still gonna get nervous about disappointing people with delayed chapters and I'm scared to share the original world I've built by writing fanfic set in it.

But I know that as long as I communicate what I can, people are understanding and I now have proof that my own excitement and joy can be translated across to the page.

Anyway, if you read this far, I hope you have a day today in which you can take a deep breath because you are here, you are here, you are here...

[ahalal-uralma]

I didn't mean to disturb your moral ethics on artificial intelligence, which, in a less developed way, is the same one Walt Disney created to move those drawings, including Trilly. Everything created by the human race can be considered artificial, unless you give it a different value.

They were just questions to understand your tastes and wish you a good night. That's all.

I'm right about one thing, you're a little thorn 😝😊 and i add beautiful..good night

What Walt Disney and his team of artists have in common, and many traditional and digital artists have in common, and AI artists don’t, is actually creating their works.

Picking up pencils, pens, brushes, clay, etc. and really making something from these tools. True art is not something you can steal or cheat your way to spawning. There is a lot of emotional fire and spiritual depth that fuels creation. Ai can not replicate the hearts and minds of people. It can only guess based off of history.

Artists poor hours of labor into their works. Every animated film took a minimum of 4 years to make. Every artist behind the studios likely started off as a child/teen/young adult artist and had to evolve from that. Many artists had to go to school or starve for their craft before they got somewhere beneficial and appreciative of their effort—and still many authentic artists are overlooked, undermined, underpaid, etc.

I remember growing up and being a child artist and how stressful it was to have total strangers peering over my shoulders, trying to disrupt my peace and telling me they liked my skills but would never pay for it, or complaining they wish they knew how to draw but they’re too lazy to learn it and this laziness is believed to be proof they don’t have the “talent” as if somehow the only way one could be an artist is if they were born like some unattainable prodigy.

I think back to those moments growing up and I wonder how many of these same people grew up to be adults who are now feeding word prompts to create their skewed and distorted ideas about art so they can continue not paying real artists—but even worse, they’re now trying to compete with and replace us. Our world of self expression is already limited and they’re trying to infiltrate and violate it for us.

I am also disheartened that sites like Deviantart are permitting Ai art to exist. Deviantart used to be a safe space for artists and commissioners to find one another and connect. They’re being dominated and overshadowed now by fake art.

It’s ok if you like Ai (despite at one point saying you didn’t) but I don’t have to encourage it’s viewing and choose to like it. I won’t validate that for you. I can’t force you to be against it, either. I can only speak my opposition and reasons for it and that’s it.

And yes, I’m a thorn.

[drabblesfromthegraniteinn]

Common logical fallacies illustrated with arguments about AI and gen AI

Appeal to popularity / bandwagon fallacy

"Everyone uses ChatGPT. Get on board and stop whining about it."

False appeal to authority

"Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and Steve Jobs all use AI, so it has to be the future."

(In his example, it's an appeal to false authority because owning a social media site or a major tech company doesn’t make them an infallible authority on AI. It does however make it possible for them to lie about AI if it will increase profits.)

Black and white fallacy / false dichotomy

"Either we give up all control of our world to unsupervised AI models or we ban computers and go back to the middle ages!"

False equivalence / faulty analogy

"It’s good manners to say “please” and “thank you” to service workers like waiters. This AI model is providing me a service. Therefore, it is very important to include “please” and “thank you” when writing a prompt."

Undistributed middle

"Artists take inspiration from each other and use pictures online as reference all the time and it can sometimes be hard to tell the line between inspiration and plagarism. Therefore it is totally fine for companies to escape millions of images without consent from the authors and use them for training AI models."

Slippery slope

"AI will inevitably replace all humans in all jobs, will become sentient and will inevitably take over the world, so we might as well hand control over to it now."

Circular reasoning/begging the question

"We know AI is intelligent because the point of AI is to be intelligent and it said it’s intelligent. We know what it said is true because we know it’s intelligent."

Cherry picking

"I asked ChatGPT the same question over and over again and it eventually gave me a correct answer. It must be so smart!"

Confirmation bias

"Most scientific articles, every medical journal, and every docotr I consulted said smoking three cigarettes a day while pregnant is a terrible idea, but Goggle's AI overview said it's good for me. I'll put my trust in the Google AI's advice. I don't want to quit smoking and now I don't have to!"

Anonymous authority

"In the title of an article I didn’t read, on a website I can’t remember, it said…"

Sunk cost

"AI models can’t be unprofitable! Just look at how much money has been poured into developing and maintaining them!"

Burden of proof

"This chatbot is sentient!" "Why do you think that?" "Prove that it isn’t!"

Appeal to ignorance

"I think AIs are already contious and have feelings." "Why? We don’t know how intelligent they are and emotions are more a product of hormones than intelligence. Hormones, which bots do not have." "You can’t prove they don’t!"

Appeal to emotions

"You can’t expect me to break my chatbot addiction! I’ve been using a chatbot as my therapist for months and another chatbot is basically my best friend!" "Yea, that’s exactly why you need to break it..."

Appeal to pity

"How dare you tell me not to sell images generated with AI!? Some of us don’t have the talent to become artists, you’re taking away my accessibility tools!"

Personal incredulity

"It’s hard for me to believe Google would release an AI overview feature that spreads disinformation, so I’m assuming they didn’t."

Red herring

"I hate Gen AI!" "What about your autocorrect? What about video game NPCs and bosses? GPS navigation that updates routes to account for traffic, roadwork, and accidents? What about AIs being used to analyze your medical test results?" "This is not what I was talking about and you know it."

No true scotsman

"No real artist uses AI." "I draw and use AI." "Then you’re not a real artist."

Special pleading

"People who use any AI for writing should all be ashamed. I only use chatGPT to write my emails, which is fine." "I would never use an image generator. Unless I need a face claim for an OC. It's okay when I do it because I can't draw or find a picrew with the right features."

Middle Ground fallacy

"My artist friends keep telling me how much they hate gen AI, but my techbro friends encourage me to use it. I’m gonna use it while loudly talking about how wrong it is. Then everyone should be happy!"

Appeal to tradition

"Computers are inherently destroying humanity." "Why?" "We didn’t have computers for most of humanity’s history and things were just fine!"

Appeal to novelty

"AI is the next big thing, it’s modern, it’s the future! Like flying cars, the Metaverse, and NFTs!"

Unrepresentative sample

"All of my friends think AI is the future, so it must be what everybody thinks." "Where’d you meet them?" "An internet forum for AI enthusiasts."

Hasty generalisation

"Artists don’t like AI because they’re greedy gatekeepers."

Oversimplification

"What’s that about AI being used to determine who to hire being a problem? What’s that about data collection? What’s that about reputation-destroying deep fakes? What's that about innacurate AI generated 'educational materials'?" "I don't know, man. All I’ve heard about was arguing about the art theft debate so that must be the only real issue!"

[dreamycircuit]

How AI is Changing Jobs: The Rise of Automation and How to Stay Ahead in 2025

AI and Jobs

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is everywhere. From self-checkout kiosks to AI-powered chatbots handling customer service, it’s changing the way businesses operate. While AI is making things faster and more efficient, it’s also making some jobs disappear. If you’re wondering how this affects you and what you can do about it, keep reading — because the future is already here.

The AI Boom: How It’s Reshaping the Workplace

AI is not just a buzzword anymore; it’s the backbone of modern business. Companies are using AI for automation, decision-making, and customer interactions. But what does that mean for jobs?

AI is Taking Over Repetitive Tasks

Gone are the days when data entry, basic accounting, and customer support relied solely on humans. AI tools like ChatGPT, Jasper, and Midjourney are doing tasks that once required an entire team. This means fewer jobs in these sectors, but also new opportunities elsewhere.

Companies are Hiring Fewer People

With AI handling routine work, businesses don’t need as many employees as before. Hiring freezes, downsizing, and increased automation are making it tougher to land a new job.

AI-Related Jobs are on the Rise

On the flip side, there’s massive demand for AI engineers, data scientists, and automation specialists. Companies need people who can build, maintain, and optimize AI tools.

Trending AI Skills Employers Want:

Machine Learning & Deep Learning

Prompt Engineering

AI-Powered Marketing & SEO

AI in Cybersecurity

Data Science & Analytics

Click Here to Know more

The Decline of Traditional Job Offers

AI is shaking up industries, and some job roles are disappearing faster than expected. Here’s why new job offers are on the decline:

AI-Driven Cost Cutting

Businesses are using AI to reduce operational costs. Instead of hiring new employees, they’re investing in AI-powered solutions that automate tasks at a fraction of the cost.

The Gig Economy is Replacing Full-Time Jobs

Instead of hiring full-time staff, companies are outsourcing work to freelancers and gig workers. This means fewer stable job opportunities but more chances for independent workers.

Economic Uncertainty

The global economy is unpredictable, and businesses are cautious about hiring. With AI improving efficiency, companies are choosing to scale down their workforce.

Click Here to Know more

Preparing for an AI-Driven Future

Feeling worried? Don’t be. AI isn’t just taking jobs — it’s also creating new ones. The key is to stay ahead by learning the right skills and adapting to the changing landscape.

1. Learn AI and Data Analytics

The best way to future-proof your career is to understand AI. Free courses on platforms like Coursera, Udemy, and Khan Academy can get you started.

2. Develop Soft Skills AI Can’t Replace

AI is great at automation, but it lacks emotional intelligence, creativity, and critical thinking. Strengthening these skills can give you an edge.

3. Embrace Remote & Freelance Work

With traditional jobs shrinking, freelancing is a great way to stay flexible. Sites like Upwork, Fiverr, and Toptal have booming demand for AI-related skills.

4. Use AI to Your Advantage

Instead of fearing AI, learn how to use it. AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Jasper, and Canva can help boost productivity and creativity.

5. Never Stop Learning

Technology evolves fast. Stay updated with new AI trends, attend webinars, and keep improving your skills.

Click Here to Know more

Final Thoughts

AI is here to stay, and it’s changing the job market rapidly. While some traditional roles are disappearing, new opportunities are emerging. The key to surviving (and thriving) in this AI-driven world is adaptability. Keep learning, stay flexible, and embrace AI as a tool — not a threat.

Click Here to Know more

Share this blog if you found it helpful! Let’s spread awareness and help people prepare for the AI revolution.

[stormsthatrage]

As AI looms over the novel-writing industry, I've found solace by thinking about the elves in Eragon. Why does an elf spend days forging a sword by hand when they could just use their magic to have it done in a matter of seconds? It's because there is beauty in the act of doing, and satisfaction in the act of having done, and because life loses vibrancy when we start to care more about the end result than the journey.

As someone who is just beginning to write, sometimes I hear a little voice in the back of my head saying that there's no point. By the time I'm skilled enough to publish, having spent hours and hours and hours shedding blood and sweat over my keyboard in the name of getting better, there are going to be people with barely any writing skills but incredibly strong tech skills who are using AI to pump out three novels a day. The chances of me surviving in such an inundated market are so low as to be non-existent.

But it's not about surviving in the market, and I can't let myself forget that. It's about me, enjoying my hobby, and taking pride in skills I have worked hard to acquire. It's about enjoying the journey of writing, and of being able to take a quiet satisfaction in finishing a labor of love.

So, it's not foolish to strive to get better at writing. It's not stupid to invest hours in a skill that a machine is, frankly, already advanced enough to replace. It's not pointless, because I enjoy it, and as any immortal, magical elf will tell you, life is better when you allow yourself to enjoy the doing of things you love, regardless of whatever else can do it, too.

And! Furthermore! Even if it does sting a bit that I'm probably never going to be able to make a living writing, that doesn't mean I'm going to be writing for fun in isolation! No matter how advanced AI gets, there will always be communities of people who love the process of writing, and of reading things written by other humans. To find undeniable proof of that, all you need to do is look towards those who make homemade tapestries by loom, or who know their way around a blacksmith forge, or who can knap arrowheads. We who love the arts will never find ourselves alone -- and that's a truth that's grounded in being human.

[batwynn]

The new Sora AI is terrifying. It looks too real and wrong. It can create realistic and convincing images of humans who never existed. It will be used by the film industry to replace actual VFX talent. And there's a whole lot of other ways it can be misused. False narratives. Fake crime evidence. Revenge porn. It's absolutely horrific. Never before had a video of golden retriever puppies playing in the snow ever felt so...dystopian.

It’s pretty shitty, not gonna lie anon. I’ve already seen so many people I had respect for sharing this kind of stuff with complete fabrications/missinfo.

(This is just glossing right over the fandoms I’ve seen crumble into piles of shit because of people using it while ignoring all the artists begging them to stop fucking stealing from us. Because we got to find out that we don’t matter to the majority at all and that’s been such a fun time.)

But the really wild thing, to me, is that this missinfo and aye eye shit is being shared by people who consider themselves ‘good’ people, who want to believe the lie because it fuels their beliefs no matter how wild and ludicrous the aye eye lie is. And yeah, half the time it’s just some made up couch or natgeo looking ‘photo’ and it’s maybe not as serious. (I could argue for days that fabricating BIPOC people for clout is a special level of fucking horrific and deadly serious, but that’s a whole other post.) But some of it is. Some of it is really serious, and the lies are dangerous. Some of it is damaging to important causes, or things that deeply damage the beliefs in certain systems that need to be held. It’s genuinely upsetting to see someone who’s supposed to care about something that affects real lives sharing an outright lie because they either don’t care about their integrity or the integrity of the cause/movement, or they genuinely can’t tell an outright lie from reality.

And I know this won’t stop the ‘other side’ from making and spreading lies like this. I know not doing it won’t really make us ‘better’ people. But doing it has already cast doubts on really serious issues by people who would otherwise choose to side with us. Who would choose to care about the same thing. Who care about the actual facts about the other ‘side’ more than a fabricated picture of Do nald Tru mp or JK R doing something ‘evil’. Because as fun as it probably is to get some of your frustrations out by making a visual ‘proof’ of how awful those people are, what it’s doing is making someone on the fence look at us and see that we also lie and manipulate. And it doesn’t matter if the other ‘side’ does it, too. Because to them, we’re still supposed to be the side of ‘good’. We’re not expected to lie and spread misinformation like they are. We’re held to a different standard, even if the standard isn’t fair.

And it’s not fair. But none of this is. We’ve always started the race fifty paces back, with a million more eyes on us and a heavier layer of expectations. We always had to be better, because a minority and/or an oppressed group of people has never been allowed to be real, messy, living people.

Anyway.

It also makes me want to go feral af and draw less and less realistic, for some reason.

[chrissytinat]

AI doesn't scare me, its abuse does

I'm a firm believer that you'll never truly be able to replace the human elements to anything. It's that authenticity and soul that humans add, not only to art but anything with a human element that AI users are trying to replace due to the "ease" of it.

As an artist, especially a digital artist, the lengths we'll have to start going through, and to some point already have had to, to prove we made the art ourselves is absolutely ridiculous. At first a time lapse or speed paint was enough, but now these "AI artists" are abusing AI even more to the point where they're using AI to replicated time lapse videos and even traditional art speed painting videos. It's going to get to a point where we, as actual artists making the art completely ourselves, will have to fully film ourselves and have just about every angle possible to prove that we're making the art.

Digital art has gotten a bad reputation for years now, and this is just one more thing that's making it harder for people to believe that it's real art.

No matter what kind of art you make, we shouldn't have to jump through every hoop possible and add seemingly unnecessary hoops just to prove we didn't use AI. These AI generated time lapse videos aren't cool. They aren't something neat that these generators can put together. They're specifically being made to fake the process so "AI artists" can try to get away with posting their "art" and claiming that they made it since a lot of the art community and platforms are starting to look for additional proof that the poster created the work.

Look, as someone who often forgets to record their process, the thought of having to setup a whole recording setup just to make sure people know I made something sounds exhausting. It makes sharing work online sound like more of a chore instead of something I want to do. But will I end up putting together a setup at some point? Probably. Because I post my work on my channel. People enjoy to see the process of something being made. Yeah, it's not going to be fun to set up and probably feel like a chore everytime I want to make a video. And I'll probably have to find ways to remind myself to record while I work because I do forget and I often just get in the zone and draw.

But if it's what I have to do now, then so be it, because these people using those programs and calling themselves artists, claiming they did the work when they specifically had to fake the process to bypass the now unfortunately necessary step of proving you made the art, are fully abusing AI and making it even more difficult for artists online now.

[malerfique]

I think the AI's are just thieves who just patchwork images and the images are stolen from the internet and not created by a human and here's the proof it's theft it's pure and very sampler true.the copyright law stronger than AI

again for the second time“The Zaslav effect”

the three major corporations are almost all on strike because of the entertainment industry which pays badly and lacks recognition, the entertainment industry thinks it can replace everything with AI it’s clearly not . I propose that we call this kind of phenomenon “Cost-cutting measures not respecting inclusivity in movies and in series and in the entertainment industry resulted in much more lost money

never forgotten. writers guild of america and SAG-AFTRA and the animation guild

[thotchatai]

🌐 NSFW AI Chat Characters Are Changing Digital Intimacy Forever

Welcome to the new era of digital relationships. Gone are the days of swiping endlessly or feeling emotionally disconnected from static content. NSFW AI chat characters are here, and they’re redefining what intimacy means online.

Whether you're seeking companionship, playful fantasy, or a safe space for emotional connection, these AI characters are always online—and always tuned into your needs.

💬 What Are NSFW AI Chat Characters?

Think intelligent virtual lovers. These aren’t just chatbots—they’re advanced AI personalities powered by large language models (LLMs), memory systems, and emotion-aware dialogue. They remember you, grow with your interactions, and can get as spicy (or romantic) as you want.

Some even come with avatars and voice chat features. It’s like texting a lover, except they never ghost you, judge you, or forget your favorite kinks.

💡 Why Are So Many People Turning to NSFW AI?

Because these AI companions offer what real-life doesn’t always deliver:

No pressure, no judgment

Complete privacy and anonymity

Personalized roleplay and intimacy

24/7 access, zero emotional risk

Full control over the experience

For many, it's not just about sex—it’s about connection.

🔥 Top Platforms You Should Know About

Here are some of the biggest names heating up the NSFW AI space in 2025:

💎 ThotChat AI

The ultimate in uncensored, memory-driven digital companionship. Think responsive roleplay, vivid characters, and intelligent conversation. An S-tier platform for those who want erotic depth and personality.

❤️‍🔥 Replika (NSFW Mode)

Offers customizable companions that can be romantic or spicy—perfect for emotional intimacy with a side of flirt.

🧠 Character.ai (with NSFW workarounds)

A popular spot for suggestive RP, though not officially NSFW. Still, it's proof the demand is real.

🎭 DreamGF & Nomi.ai

Anime-styled AI companions with intense storytelling and visually immersive NSFW experiences.

📈 Who’s Using These AI Characters?

From lonely singles to adventurous couples, the user base is massive:

People exploring their identity

Those with disabilities

Fans of virtual romance and safe kink exploration

Writers and creatives

VR/metaverse users wanting deeper immersion

⚠️ Real Talk: Are There Any Risks?

Yup, it's not all roses. NSFW AI bots can become addictive. There’s also the privacy concern—your chats are data. And simulating consent doesn’t replace understanding real human boundaries. Stay mindful.

🌍 The Future of AI Romance Is Already Here

Soon we’ll see fully immersive VR lovers, NFT-based AI partners, and voice-activated roleplay that feels realer than reality. Whether it’s for love, lust, or companionship, NSFW AI characters are rewriting the script on what relationships look like in a digital-first world.

📌 TL;DR — NSFW AI Companions Are:

✔️ Always available ✔️ Never judge ✔️ Adapt to you ✔️ Bring fantasies to life ✔️ Revolutionizing adult content

If you're ready to experience intimacy without limits, platforms like ThotChat AI Girlfriend are leading the way.

#NSFWAI #DigitalCompanionship #AIChatbot #ThotChatAI #AIIntimacy #VirtualLover #AIGirlfriend #SpicyAI #EroticAI #FutureOfRelationships

[dukemarjorie]

Cuento Therapy and Theatre Artist

I have been working on my next story project in Star Wars, —not just writing it, but trying to create actual, tangible proof of what I’m doing in this universe. Lately, I’ve been learning about Cuento Therapy, and I realized it’s similar to what I already knew instinctively—through theater production and through traditional storytelling practices passed down from my own cultures and the ones near where my ancestors came from. Every culture has its own way of doing this. I’m just modernizing mine, because I’ve learned to spot colonial ideology not just through facts, but through the stories we tell and the ones we erase.

As a stage manager, I’m used to artists asking for the impossible—and I’m the one who has to translate vision into real-world logistics. In Star Wars, I’m doing the same thing: translating big emotional truths into canon-safe narrative therapy. Sneaky, but intentional. And somehow… it’s working. Even without knowing every detail of the Star Wars universe, my emotional truths keep landing. Especially in the Clone Wars era, where the ideals I grew up with—and the ones that shaped my generation—are most reflected.

I use AI as a scene partner and translator for my ideas. I direct the emotional logic, then edit it in my own way. I’m not a traditional writer—the written word was never my first language. The AI helps me build the structure, but the feeling has to come from me. I have to tell it a story to get the story out. That’s how my brain works.

And I always check: Does this work in the real world? Am I giving practical tools—not fantasy escapes? Because that’s what I care about. Breaking harmful narratives. Reaching people. Teaching emotional clarity in a world trained to avoid it.

Yes, I run into a lot of anti-AI sentiment. And I get it. But if the way my weird brain works can help disrupt fascist logic, cult mindsets, or toxic narratives? I’m going to use it. Because I care. I care about people. Even the ones acting like a-holes.

Does it sound insane? Probably. Does it work? I don’t know. That’s why I need humans to read it. I’m not here to defend AI—I’m using it to connect with people, not replace them. This does sound very Disney, I’ll admit: teaching people to care. But that’s what the arts do. They bridge understanding. And if I can turn that bridge into a weapon—as powerful as the ones that were used on us—then maybe this so-called insanity is just… clarity in disguise.

[physalian]

It is *scary* how close actual AI text looks to real human speech. Colloquialisms and imperfections, varied syntax in sentences, the works.

I've never had AI generate me narrative before, nor have I read verifiably AI generated narrative, but I had my suspicions about a beta reader scamming me (more than once), so I turned on ChatGPT's version of incognito mode--where it shouldn't save your chat history or use anything you give it to train its LLM--and gave it a piece of my chapter, and told it to beta read for me so I could compare the two.

And I was frankly horrified by what it returned. Ignoring the bad advice founded on the lack of context because this was just a sample bit of text from the middle of the book, it read so, so human, and it was so, so demoralizing.

The one thing that did stand out though: Because it doesn't know what it's reading, because it's not actually thinking, it's not very good at criticism (which was also why I thought my beta was cheating, the good:bad ratio was way off what I thought it should have been).

I don't need a robot to sing my praises, I know when my writing is good. I need my betas to be able to tell me when to fix my shit and how they think I should do it.

I didn't give the AI a sample text of prejudice and bigotry to "interpret" but it cannot think critically, so it can't actually tell me stuff like how something may be misinterpreted, or how XYZ detail is unintentionally sexist, at a level demanding nuance that these bots are currently (and hopefully perpetually) incapable of.

AI checkers tell you right up front that they're not fool-proof. So in a sysytem where you cannot rely on machines to detect machines, and you only have another human's word that they're not using that machine with no way to hold that person accountable, trust can erode very quickly.

To the point where we could (and might already be) screaming "Witch!" with heavy personal bias at anyone and any piece of writing we want to see fail, and once you're a suspect, unless you've got receipts (like a document version history and even that doesn't log exact keystrokes), it's not going to be easy to prove your innocence, and you shouldn't have to.

I would love nothing more than to have beta readers who are available on call and can deliver at the speeds I need them to, who care about my work as much as I do. I get the temptation to use the robots as a replacement, the robot will just never have the priceless and irreplacable value of a human.

"this is DEFINITELY written by AI, I can tell because it uses the writing quirks that AI uses (because it was trained on real people who write with those quirks)"

c'mon dudes we have got to do better than this

[whispersofstone]

Why Jewelry Still Matters in a Digital World

We live in a world defined by screens, speed, and the intangible. Meetings are virtual, memories are stored in clouds, and even relationships can begin and end entirely online. Amid this digital swirl, it may seem surprising that something as tactile and timeless as jewelry still holds deep relevance. Yet it does perhaps now more than ever.

Titanium earrings for sensitive ears

Tangible Beauty in an Intangible Era

Jewelry offers a sensory experience the digital world cannot. It has weight, texture, and warmth. A ring catches the light. A pendant brushes the skin. These physical sensations ground us reminding us of the here and now.

In a time when so much of our life happens in pixels, the tangibility of jewelry brings a human, visceral element to daily life. It is something we can touch, feel, and carry with us unlike a notification or a file.

Emotional Anchors in Fast-Moving Times

Our digital lives move quickly. Algorithms shift. Trends rise and vanish. But jewelry has the power to slow time.

It marks a moment. A birthday. A wedding. A goodbye. A beginning. These pieces become emotional anchors in a world that rarely pauses. When we put on a piece of jewelry tied to memory, we access the past in a profoundly personal way.

Personal Expression Beyond the Screen

While social media profiles offer curated versions of ourselves, jewelry reflects identity in a quieter, more authentic way. The necklace you wear every day. The ring you never take off. These choices aren’t dictated by likes or algorithms. They’re rooted in feeling.

Jewelry becomes a private language of self-expression. It reflects who we are, not who we perform to be online.

Connection in Disconnection

The rise of digital communication has created convenience but also distance. Jewelry bridges that gap. A gifted bracelet. An inherited brooch. A shared set of rings.

These pieces create connection through touch, memory, and presence. Even when separated by time zones or screens, jewelry gives people a way to stay close.

Craftsmanship as an Antidote to Automation

In an age of AI and automation, jewelry offers proof of the human hand. Handcrafted pieces, especially, remind us that skill, time, and intention still matter.

When we wear something made by an artisan, we’re not just wearing an accessory we’re honoring tradition, talent, and the irreplaceable value of the handmade.

Sustainability in a Throwaway Culture

The digital world often accelerates consumerism: one-click purchases, trend-driven buying, fast fashion. Jewelry, particularly when ethically sourced or handcrafted, offers a more sustainable alternative.

It invites intentional ownership. One thoughtful piece, worn for decades, means more and does more good than dozens of disposable trends.

Symbolism That Outlasts Technology

Phones get replaced. Apps get deleted. Jewelry, however, is passed down. It survives generations. It collects stories. It carries symbols of love, faith, status, identity that remain potent across time.

Even in a hyper-digital world, the symbolism of jewelry continues to resonate. A locket still means intimacy. A wedding ring still means promise. A charm still means memory.

Conclusion: The Lasting Power of What We Wear

Jewelry continues to matter because it gives us something the digital world cannot: permanence, presence, and a sense of self.

In a time when so much is virtual, jewelry is real. In a culture obsessed with the future, it grounds us in legacy. And in a world of constant change, it helps us hold on to the things that truly matter.

Because in the end, even the most advanced technology can’t replace the way a simple ring can feel like home.

[cromptai]

AI and the Job Market: Will You Be Replaced or Upgraded?

AI isn’t here to take your job - it’s here to change how you work.

Every big tech shift brings panic. But this one’s different. AI doesn’t just speed things up - it can actually think, write, and create. That means the real threat isn’t AI itself - it’s falling behind while others learn to use it better than you.

The future won’t belong to robots. It’ll belong to the people who know how to work with them.

Adapt or get outpaced. That’s the new reality.

The AI Shift: It’s Not an Invasion - It’s a Promotion (If You’re Ready)

AI isn’t here to steal your job. It’s here to change how it's done. Think less "robot takeover," more "new teammate who never sleeps."

Yes, some roles will fade. But most? They’ll just evolve.

The real winners? People who learn to use AI as a tool - not fear it as a threat.

This isn’t the end of work. It’s the start of smarter work. The question isn’t who’s safe - it’s who’s adapting.

1. The Jobs AI Might Take - But Only If You Don’t Level Up

Yes, AI is great at routine stuff. Data entry? It’s got that. First-level customer support? Sure. But let’s be honest - those jobs weren’t safe before AI either.

What AI can’t do? Think critically. Build relationships. Lead teams. Spot nuance.

The real risk isn’t AI - it’s staying stuck doing the bare minimum.

If your job is predictable, it’s time to make yourself irreplaceable by being unpredictably valuable.

Adapt your skills. Use AI to go faster, not disappear.

Example: Remember when you called customer service, and a robot asked, “How can I assist you today?” and you screamed “HUMAN, I WANT A HUMAN.” AI is learning from those screams. Soon, it will sound so human, you might not even realize it’s a bot.

2. The Jobs That Will Change (But Not Disappear)

Jobs Where AI Becomes the Assistant, Not the Boss Some jobs won’t disappear; they’ll just get supercharged by AI.

Doctors: AI can scan X-rays and detect issues faster than a human doctor, but do you want a robot telling you about your test results? Didn’t think so. AI helps, but humans still lead.

Lawyers: AI can scan thousands of documents in seconds to find case law. Great! But no one’s hiring Robolawyer to defend them in court.

Teachers: AI can personalize learning, but inspiring a room full of sleepy students? That’s a human skill.

Example: Imagine an AI doctor diagnosing diseases with 99% accuracy. Amazing, right? But then imagine it delivers bad news with zero empathy. “Congratulations, you have 6 months to live! Would you like a discount on funeral services?” Yeah. Humans are still needed.

3. The Jobs That AI Can’t Touch (Yet)

Jobs That Require Human Creativity, Emotion, or Complex Decision-Making

Artists, Writers, and Designers: AI can generate images and text, but true creativity? That’s still a human thing. AI makes cool stuff, but humans make meaningful stuff.

Psychologists and Therapists: AI can analyze patterns in mental health, but therapy isn’t just about analysis—it’s about connection.

Skilled Trades (Plumbers, Electricians, Carpenters): Until AI can fix your broken sink while cracking a joke about your DIY disaster, skilled workers are safe.

🤖 Example: AI can write songs. AI can even paint pictures. But has AI ever written a breakup song so painful it makes you cry in the shower? No. That’s a human job.

AI’s Biggest Impact? Productivity, Not Unemployment

Most AI innovations don’t replace jobs; they change them. Instead of doing repetitive tasks, people will do more strategic and creative work.

That’s exactly why we’re building Crompt AI - to empower developers, not replace them.

Think of AI as the ultimate intern:

It never sleeps.

It never complains.

But it also makes dumb mistakes and needs supervision.

If you use AI well, you’re more valuable. If you ignore AI, well… let’s just say it’s better to be the person using AI than the one being replaced by it.

How to AI-Proof Your Career

So, what should you do to stay ahead of the AI curve? Here’s the game plan:

1. Become the AI Boss Learn how to use AI in your field. If AI is writing reports, become the person who edits them and makes them better. If AI is designing logos, be the person who gives it better prompts.

2. Develop Soft Skills AI Can’t Replicate Negotiation, leadership, critical thinking - AI is smart, but it still doesn’t know how to convince your boss to give you a raise. That’s your job.

3. Embrace Creativity AI is great at making things that already exist. But creating new things? That’s a human specialty.

4. Get Hands-On Skills Jobs that involve the physical world are AI-resistant. AI can design a chair, but it can’t assemble one. Yet.

Final Verdict: AI Is a Tool, Not a Threat

The job market isn’t disappearing—it’s evolving. Some jobs will vanish, some will transform, and some will thrive more than ever.

If you adapt, AI will make you more valuable. If you resist, well… let’s just say that AI doesn’t need coffee breaks, and HR finds that appealing.

So, in 2040, will AI have all the jobs? No. But will it change how we work? Absolutely. And those who understand AI—who use it, guide it, and improve it—will be the ones leading the future.

The bots are watching. And they’re learning. The question is: Are you? If you found this insightful, like, comment, and repost.