#visions of beyond]

[bookwyrminspiration]

If I knew how to draw it would be over for you hoes <- is an artist

[hurlyburlytopsyturvy]

a seer’s stolen luck

based on this post

[stil-lindigo]

warmth.

a comic about not being alone.

--

creative notes:

--

all my other comics

store

[dailyhmsw]

loop 280

[beskarfrog]

he would love an egg hunt

[valentinemesis]

this is how candy crocker can still win

[mmmairon]

Home was the only place left.

Prints

[just-a-beatlemaniac69]

I really dig what Marvels been doing with its most popular characters lately:

Making them into worse/broken down versions of themselves. With deep regrets from their pasts that they wish they could change.

Who get suddenly strung along (much to their annoyance) by a far more bubbly character in contrast, to save that said characters universe from destruction.

Begrudgingly growing a bond with this character

To then team up with a rag-tag team of multiversal losers by the 3rd act

Then to a have a moment of vulnerability with the bubbly character in the third act. Where they also get tricked out of sacrificing themselves by the bubbly character.

[xx-r0t-dot-com-xx]

bonded like stray cats who cannot be adopted separately

[greetings-inferiors]

My theory for how Rose and Dirk's game is going to go is that they'll each have 4 kids of their respective species, but then somehow the candy kids will connect to their session, but before Dirk can intervene and wipe them out, Terezi stops him and says that she's joining the game, with the candy kids as her champions, thus putting them under her protection - and she'd be able to tell if he tries to control them, too, meaning he'd have to truly leave them alone.

[wishchip106]

i was playing around with tumblrs filters

if anyone can guess this animal i will drink tonight

[oscahpitlane]

i do × landoscar

[anistarrose]

Asexuality can be about more than just sexual attraction and lack thereof. There have historically been multiple avenues to asexuality.

First of all: of course, you don't have to identify as ace if you're sex-repulsed/sex-averse, but feel like your attraction has something else going on that's important to you. And of course, you can identify as ace if you're sex-favorable, but feel like your lack or near-lack of attraction is important to you too. Nothing I am about to say negates those things.

However, for some people, sex aversion/repulsion is the most important factor in falling under the mantle of asexuality. The most important factor in resonating with the language of asexuality, finding a home in the asexual community, and considering asexuality both an identity they can take pride in, and use to communicate their experiences.

As useful as it can be to describe and discuss sexual attraction, said sexual attraction is ultimately a social construct that may be impossible to parse, uncomfortable to parse, inapplicable, and/or irrelevant to many on the asexual spectrum. Many of us active in the asexual community are familiar, either firsthand or secondhand, with how slippery the concept of sexual attraction can be — the turtles in ponds metaphor, the search for something you're not sure you even know the shape of. What's the boundary between attraction and non-attraction, between sexual and sensual and aesthetic?

Really, should something so slippery and confusing be the only metric we're allowed to define ourselves by? I argue it can be useful for many, but should never be a requirement — and personally, it's not how I define myself. I identify as asexual in part because the question of "Do you experience sexual attraction?" is fundamentally impossible for me to answer. An intractable problem, which I reject the need to answer or solve in order to know myself as a person.

Moreover, asexuality has a long history, serving as a useful term and community to ace-specs with a wide variety of experiences with attraction, desire, and action. While the "Non-Libidoists" of the early 2000's were by no means correct that a lack of interest in sex/masturbation should the only avenue to an asexual identity, they highlight that aversion and indifference to sex have been many people's reason to find a home in asexuality, throughout much of that term's usage.

Multiple avenues to asexuality are possible, and that goes both ways. Asexuals who have or want to have sex need to be welcomed and cherished, but positing that "little to no sexual attraction" is the only valid definition of asexuality is an overcorrection — and an alienating, exclusory overcorrection at that.

[cowgirls-blues]

One of them knows how to install a doorknob.

[nekoprankster218]

you know, even tho canonically Thel and pre-rampancy!Cortana knew each other for like only a few hours, I still think a face-to-face interaction between them during the Created era would’ve been neat; esp since even tho they didn’t know each other for too long, Thel was there as Chief grieved and searched for her and likely she became aware at some point what good allies they are with each other, so that still might’ve influenced smth of their interactions as they debated whose galactic socio-political ambitions was the best way forward

[silverlining-ships]

"Told you."

"Told me... what?"

"Told you, I got you 🧡"