Black Radical Feminist, Capricorn, writer, social program developer, loves intellectually stimulating women.
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Note
Did you see Ellen’s new hair on the cover of TIME Magazine? Her hair looks so awful. It looks like a stereotypical bad boy haircut from a cartoon
I did and it does, but what I think is more interesting about that cover is that it’s a perfect example of gender as a construct

Ellen page is 5’1” and thin as fuck, but if you had only seen her shot like this, what would you guess? that she’s around 5’10” with wide shoulders, a muscular torso, and thick-knuckled, sinewy hands? Her body hasn’t changed. She could have always been shot like this, her body emphasized (or de-emphasized) in this way. She could have always been dressed like this. “I’m fully who I am,” but she’s still who she was. The masculine image (big and strong, not just dainty and wearing a tie) was just off limits to her until she became a man.
655 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hold up a sec; help me understand something. Your gf who you love with all your heart gets a miraculous once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to bring her strap to life for one night and have real sensation in it. She's super happy and excited that she'll get to feel what it's like being inside you and feel closer to you than ever before, and you'll both get to feel good together and maybe even come at the same time. You'd still tell her "no fuck off I don't do dick"?
I don’t think I can spare the energy to actually answer this question I’m too distracted by the unsettling second-person prose you’ve written about me and my nonexistent love life. Take it back to Wattpad and leave gay people in peace mayhaps?
1K notes
·
View notes
Photo
Sylvia Rivera calling out gays and lesbians for their trans exclusion in 1973 at the Christopher Street Liberation Day rally (x)
222K notes
·
View notes
Text

Found on Facebook
693 notes
·
View notes
Text
The title says it all.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperStraight/comments/m0hrf2/bringing_back_a_classic_of_mine_in_honor_of_this/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb
In bedded in the Reddit post is a bunch of these receipts of Transbian incels post.
0 notes
Video
I’ve been told to “listen to transwomen.” So let’s hear what they have to say! Here’s one:
“I’m not saying that I endorse skinning cis girls to buid a woman suit…but I get it…I’ve wanted to kill cis girls for way less :)”
His full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEJOp5O93Ac
Source for more clips, like him mocking women for having uteruses: https://twitter.com/vaginasupremacy/status/1346354525892976640
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
It's Gender Ideology Conversion Therapy of LGs. We are HOMOSEXUALS. Their Gender Identities and fabricated bodies, will never override our INNATE SAME SEX SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS.
Trans people: no one is forcing you to date trans people, but if you refuse a trans person you have a genital fetish.
Trans people: no one is trying to redefine your sexuality, but if you say you only engage sexualy with this specific set of genitals you need to stop calling yourself a lesbian, because men have pussy too.
You’re all blind if you can’t see how violent this kind of discourse is.
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
It's all White narcissitic and Misogynistic bullshit, aided and abetted by the Queer Handmaidens and Trans men/Transmasc NB Shieldmaidens.
Sexual theories by the MOST sexually repressed of the alphabet soup of letters.
a trans men arguing that i must call myself “bi” because i like pussy, and both woman and “men” have pussy. why can’t you all live your life without forcing your posmod worldview into us, gays and lesbians? i didn’t endure all kinds of mental abuse to come out as a LESBIAN to witness these people feeling entitled to try to force me to redefine my sexuality because “it invalidates my gender identity uwu” and call me a bigot if i refuse to do so. your LESBOPHOBIA is showing.
23 notes
·
View notes
Note
We can all break down the lie of Stonewall. Storme started the first day of the Stonewall Riots by punching an officer while she was being handcuffed. She shouted "Are you just going to stand there and watch this happen.?* That's what set it off that first day, out of 6 days.
They have NEVER been pivotal to the success of the LGB Liberation Movement. They have gone back in history and transed who they consider to be GNC people through clothing choices, posthumously.
I will return to the Transwashing of the LGB Liberation Movement later.
I am currently invested in breakdown the back of Transbian Rape Culture.
You're not saving the LGB community; you're harming it. Transgender people have been included with the community form the beginning. Terfs are already attacking bi people, as seen in the gender critical tag, to make it the LG community, and soon after that'll split up as well. Just because you met a single mentally unwell trans women doesn't justify bigotry. The only gay guy in my small town is on the sex offenders list, but it's illogical to assume all of them are like that. Stop being a bigot
ok i’m procrastinating my classwork right now so let’s do this *cracks knuckles*
it’s easier for me to break this down into small chunks so i’ll start from the top.
“You're not saving the LGB community; you're harming it.”
never said i was saving it, i just advocate for it. none of us here know whether our efforts will be successful. there’s no harm in advocacy. how am I harming LGBs?
“Transgender people have been included with the community form the beginning.“
Wrong. the T was only added in the 1990s. Marsha P Johnson was not trans and self-identified as a gay man in this documentary. The first brick at the Stonewall Riots was thrown by a lesbian named Storme Delarverie. The gay man who founded the first Pride, Fred Sergeant, openly admits that trans people were not part of the gay/LGB”T” rights movement and did not do anything for our rights. I’m not even American and there’s even less to be said for the trans movement in my country. Trans people do nothing more than ride our coat tails.
Also, how are the struggles of trans people related to same sex attracted people? gay men, lesbians and bisexual people all experience same sex attraction and all face similar problems in life as a result of that. gender identity, dysphoria, and transitioning are a totally different issue. why are we all grouped under the same umbrella when we barely even live under the same sky?
“Terfs are already attacking bi people, as seen in the gender critical tag, to make it the LG community, and soon after that'll split up as well. “
You’re employing a logical fallacy here known as the slippery slope hypothesis. however, i will admit to being aware of infighting between the L, G, and B factions of this movement. it’s important to remember 2 things here:
1. we do not represent the majority of LGB people, we represent a vocal and militant minority. because of these strong beliefs, “terfs” often end up in heated debates with one another when disagreements arise. I personally do not agree with the points some homosexuals make about bisexual people, nor do I agree with the occasional insensitivity of some bisexual people towards homosexuals.
2. separatism exists in many oppressed groups. female separatism, lesbian separatism, gay male separatism and bisexual separatism all already exist. the people calling for LG to drop the B are totally entitled to go ahead and do so - but it doesn’t mean the rest of us will follow.
“Just because you met a single mentally unwell trans women doesn't justify bigotry“
You’re jumping to conclusions about my personal life. I’ve met several trans people and every single one i met is like that. however, i still don’t think all trans people are like that, of course reasonable and nice trans people exist. honestly i’m so tired of tumblr discourse wheeling out the hashtag-not-all-[group] trope, it’s been done to death. show some mercy and pull the plug on it already.
that said, i still cannot accept the inclusion of a group of people with a significant proportion that routinely send us rape/death threats and call us homophobic slurs when they don’t get their way. you can’t threaten your way into a community. it doesn’t work like that. please see my receipts tag and this document of receipts on the abuse of gay men by trans activists. i understand that this is not representative of all trans people, but these homophobes and misogynists would be automatically included if i was inclusive of trans people as a whole. i will not break bread with my oppressors. they can find their own safe space.
“The only gay guy in my small town is on the sex offenders list, but it's illogical to assume all of them are like that.“
He sounds like an asshole.
“Stop being a bigot”
Stop being uninformed.
138 notes
·
View notes
Text
No one's banning Trans women forensic examiners and no men examiners or Trans women are losing their jobs. Women are being given a choice. The issue here is Trans women trying to make listening to and examining Female rape victims a VALIDATION VECTOR.
So a law enabling women and girls who have been sexually assaulted to request a FEMALE examiner, is called transphobic.
TRAs are literally demanding that Trans women be able to examine rape victims. This is how corrosivly narcissistic these people are.
They are making the ability to listen and exam women and girls who were raped into a Gender Validation Vector
Don't ever say the Trans Liberation Movement is not Misogyny.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
“As philosopher Daniel Dennett commented,“Postmodernism, the school of ‘thought’ that proclaimed ‘There are no truths, only interpretations’ has largely played itself out in absurdity, but it has left behind a generation of academics in the humanities disabled by their distrust of the very idea of truth and their disrespect for evidence, settling for ‘conversations’ in which nobody is wrong and nothing can be confirmed, only asserted with whatever style you can muster.” And if all you’ve got is rhetoric, that is, “interpretations” and “assertions,” as opposed to, say, factual evidence, then the only way, or at least the most tempting way, to conclusively win an argument is through rhetorical manipulations. If you can’t say, “Your opinion is wrong, and here are facts showing your opinion is wrong,” you’re pretty much stuck with, “Your opinion is oppressing me, triggering me, hurting my feelings.” And that’s precisely what we see. And of course we can’t argue back, in part because nobody can verify or falsify your feelings, and in part because by then we’ve already been deplatformed.”
—
Derrick Jensen,
Liberals and the New McCarthyism
(via genderisanexperience)
916 notes
·
View notes
Photo
You know he's a closeted MAP. All this Activistm wouldn't ever be done by someone who wasn't.

This is Andrew Extein. The freak who wrote “Why Queers Should Care About Sex Offenders”. Other hits include “Capitol Punishment: The Troubling Consequences of Federal Child Pornography Laws” and “Fear the Bogeyman: Sex Offender Panic on Halloween” in which he bemoans that “we (society) believe that sex offenders prove a serious threat to children and families”.
He’s a clinical social worker and specifies in his bio that he is especially interested in working with kids and teens. Oh and he cares deeply about “men’s issues”, of course lmao. He also says he does “feminist therapy” and works with people who have been sexually abused which is frankly fucking horrifying.
[submission]
509 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thank you. There was an interview tonight with the CEO of Microsoft. He further assessed the current situation. The attack is still going on. That there may be different kinds of attacks to the Cyber Network they haven't found yet. The most frightening of all: cyber mercenary companies in the US. They will use their hacking skill to perpetrate malicious malware attack on companies and other government Cyber Networks for highest bidder. He said there have to Federal laws passed to name what this is, a criminal enterprise.

The story is getting worse still.
Today CISA said that the hackers used many different tools to get into government systems, taking them into critical infrastructure, which could include the electrical grid, telecommunications companies, defense contractors, and so on. Officials said that the hacks were “a grave risk to the federal government.”
Later in the day, it came out that the Energy Department and the National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees our nuclear weapons, was also hit, although a Department of Energy spokesperson said that there is no evidence that the hackers breached critical defense systems, including the NNSA.
Microsoft’s president, Brad Smith, today said the company had identified 40 different companies, government agencies, and think tanks the hackers infiltrated, and that those forty were just the tip of the iceberg. Smith said that more companies had been hit than government agencies, “with a big focus on I.T. companies, especially in the security industry.”
The Associated Press quoted a U.S. official as saying: “This is looking like it’s the worst hacking case in the history of America. They got into everything.” Tom Kellermann, the cybersecurity strategy chief of the software company VMware, told Ben Fox of the Associated Press that the hackers could now see everything in the federal agencies they’ve hacked, and that, now that they have been found out, “there is viable concern that they might leverage destructive attacks within these agencies.”
It is not clear yet how far the hackers have penetrated, and we will likely not know for months. But given the fact they have had access to our systems since March and have almost certainly been planting new ways into them (known as “back doors”), all assumptions are that this is serious indeed.
Initially, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo downplayed the attack, saying that such attacks are common and that China, not Russia, is the biggest offender. Trump has said nothing about the attacks, and administration officials say that they are simply planning to hand the crisis off to Biden.
But this attack does not come out of the blue for the Trump administration. There was discussion of strengthening our security systems against attackers after the 2016 election, and on July 9, 2017, Trump suggested we would partner with Russia to address the issue. “Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded,” he tweeted.
Congress instead created the CISA within the Department of Homeland Security in 2018 to protect against precisely the sort of attack which has just occurred, shortly after Russia hacked our electrical grid, including “multiple organizations in the energy, nuclear, water, aviation, construction, and critical manufacturing sectors,” according to the FBI and Department of Homeland Security report.
In response to the Russian attack, the U.S. hit Russia’s electrical grid in June 2019.
Since then, administration officials have deliberately forced out of CISA key cybersecurity officials. The destruction was so widespread, according to Dr. Josephine Wolff, a professor of cybersecurity policy at Tufts University’s Fletcher School who holds her PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), “they signify the systematic decimation of the personnel most directly responsible for protecting critical infrastructure, shielding our elections from interference and guarding the White House’s data, devices and networks.”
Almost exactly a year ago, on December 19, 2019, Wolff warned in the New York Times that “As we head into 2020, worrying about the integrity of our elections, the growing scourge of ransomware and the increasingly sophisticated forms of cyberespionage and cybersabotage being developed by our adversaries, it’s disconcerting to feel that many of our government’s best cybersecurity minds are walking out the front door and leaving behind too few people to monitor what’s coming in our back doors.”
Just a month ago, Trump continued this process, firing Christopher Krebs, the former director of CISA, on November 18, saying he was doing so because Krebs defended the 2020 election as “the most secure in American history.” Krebs said that there “is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”
And now, here we are. Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) said to SiriusXM about the hack: "Our national security is extraordinarily vulnerable. And, in this setting, to not have the White House aggressively speaking out and protesting and taking punitive action is really, really quite extraordinary."
The timing of the exposure of this hack might be coincidence, but it is curiously well timed. It illustrates to the world that Russia now holds power over the U.S. while the perpetrators can assume, after four years of Trump’s refusal to stand up to Putin, that they will not have to face immediate retaliation for the attack as they would have to if it were revealed just a month later.
President-elect Biden was briefed on the attack today. He warned that his administration would impose “substantial costs on those responsible for such malicious attacks, including in coordination with our allies and partners.” “A good defense isn’t enough; we need to disrupt and deter our adversaries from undertaking significant cyberattacks in the first place,” Biden said. “I will not stand idly by in the face of cyberassaults on our nation.”
47 notes
·
View notes
Text
@auntiewanda that quote: "That F on their legal documentation means they are legally Female." No that F actually means FABRICATED.
So a law enabling women and girls who have been sexually assaulted to request a FEMALE examiner, is called transphobic.
TRAs are literally demanding that Trans women be able to examine rape victims. This is how corrosivly narcissistic these people are.
They are making the ability to listen and exam women and girls who were raped into a Gender Validation Vector
Don't ever say the Trans Liberation Movement is not Misogyny.
2K notes
·
View notes
Note
I love this chart. It lays it all out. But some TRA Tranhole will come out the woodwork to say it's:
1) Terf man haters, 2) not all men and 3) It's transphobic and transmisogy.
The one thing that makes me so angry about liberal feminism is how they focus on male suicide rates and male mental illness, and ignore how majority of rape victims are women and 90% of eating disorder sufferers are women and girls.. its like to them issues affecting women don’t exist. They make it seem like men and women are equally violent too.
Yah. I like to drop this little diddy on them...

Another important factor is that when it comes to suicide rates, the ways men and women attempt to kill themselves is different, which directly ties into the success. Men use guns and hanging, which are widely successful methods. Women, on the other hand, pursue methods that are not inconveniencing to clean up...methods that don't leave a big mess.....like pills or cutting wrists in a bathtub. These methods are more survivable.
Female socialization, up until the end.
396 notes
·
View notes