genesiskoussiafes - Tumblr blog

[genesiskoussiafes]

I dont know who needs to hear this but your full body commissions are worth more than $20

[genesiskoussiafes]

Fruits Basket - Manga Illustration part I

Part 1 // Part2 // Part3

Anime S1 // S2 // S3 Final

[genesiskoussiafes]

Kyo & Tohru & Yuki- Fruits Basket Manga Illustration arts part II

Part 1 // Part2 // Part3

Anime S1 // S2 // S3 Final

[genesiskoussiafes]

Pixel Art by SUN PIXELS

[genesiskoussiafes]

my recipe for drawing hands!

(small note that this is a shortcut that is more abt style and ease than anatomical accuracy. it helps to take time to really properly study hands, makes it easier to bend the rules a bit like this and have it still look good!!)

(learn rules b4 u break them or whatevah)

[genesiskoussiafes]

「つみあげた優しさ、そっちへいかない約束」

[genesiskoussiafes]

these guys show up to the feast, drink your mulled wine, slap your squire's ass and call your liege a knave, wyd ?

[genesiskoussiafes]

🌺🦄✨

[genesiskoussiafes]

Storm dragon animation

And some work in progress:

[genesiskoussiafes]

There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue! 

I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product. 

Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?

Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.

Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases. 

Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use. 

[genesiskoussiafes]

the siren 🌊

[genesiskoussiafes]

Hey everybody. This is my first post... I ma pretty sure. I recently started getting the courage to try and post some of my art. I like printmaking, painting, drawing, and dungeons and dragons. I hope we can chat about these things!

[genesiskoussiafes]

I love the folklore and legend of the rabbit in the moon. Anyone else know about it?

[genesiskoussiafes]

Long ago, the four nations lived together in harmony.

Katara, linocut on mulberry paper, by GENCHAII genchaiistamps.com

Do not repost image please, thank you ❤️

[genesiskoussiafes]

WIP stamps for upcoming market

[genesiskoussiafes]

"finished" art is a scam i just work on smth until i dontn wanna work on it anymore and then its finished. boom

[genesiskoussiafes]

221129 bumkeyk: 후드 유선 이어폰 (hood wired earphones)