panic-house-genshou-blog

[panic-house-genshou-blog]

My judgment regarding price levels, discount rates and standard of services by LiveCustomWriting

Are you looking for academic help? If the answer is positive, you’ve reached the right place. We want to make your job easier by objectively presenting the most popular custom essay writing services on the internet.

We received numerous requests to make review of LiveCustomWriting, and we decided to honor them. So, what is there that you should know about this firm?

Introducing LiveCustomWriting.com

To start with, while LiveCustomWriting.com introduces itself as a reliable, professional writing company, we noticed a handful of grammatical errors as we scanned the website. In terms of the services offered, we couldn’t find a lot of information on the topic.

From what we’ve seen, Live Custom Writing offers assistance with the typical range of standard essays and research papers.

Perhaps the company should be more upfront on this topic so that students could determine if it’s the right option for them or the other way around. Many professional writing companies feature writing samples on their website. Unfortunately, though, this isn’t the case with LiveCustomWriting.com. This means students cannot gauge the quality of the writing before placing an order.

Writing Staff and Customer Support

Once again, the information on the writers is skim, as well. There are some brief introductions presenting the main figures behind the foundation of the website, but that is all. We were unable to find each writer’s educational background.

Of course, LiveCustomWriting.com claims that it hires only the most proficient experts in their fields of study, guaranteeing that the quality it supplies is unmatched. Still, we feel that such claims should be supported by actual evidence.

According to customer feedback, the support agents were helpful and eager to assist them. This is, obviously, a positive point.

Prices and Discounts

It appears that the pricing system is widely influenced by the type of paper you order, and its complexity level. For example, the price per page for a high-school essay starts at $16.99. The higher the academic level, the more expensive the rate of the essay – that is to say, the price per page for a Ph.D. paper begins at $20.99.

Oddly enough, though, we couldn’t find any other coupon codes or a specific promo code that students could use for obtaining discounts. This is kind of unusual, especially for a self-respecting custom essay company. What is more, according to customer reviews, the Live Custom Writing customer support agents said that, according to their policy, they were unable to provide any coupon codes.

On a different note, the company doesn’t provide any additional freebies either. Nonetheless, we did find that LiveCustomWriting.com has a blog containing a range of posts regarding the benefits of choosing custom writing services. Unfortunately, the purpose of these posts is purely promotional, as opposed to being informative for the sake of students.

Customer Feedback

What about the customer feedback and testimonials – what do they have to say about the reliability of the company? As mentioned beforehand, the reviews are mixed, some granting the firm a high rating, while others offer contrasting opinions concerning the quality of the writing. On the bright side, the deadlines are respected, so there shouldn’t be any concerns in this department. But perhaps the firm could consider enhancing the quality control, to maximize their efficacy.

What is the bottom-line? It appears that, on the whole, Live Custom Writing could do with some improvements. The information listed on the website isn’t sufficient. At the same time, the mixing opinions presented in reviews aren’t necessarily reassuring. That’s why it would be best if you conducted further research before you place an order on their website.

[panic-house-genshou-blog]

Twelve Angry Men

The concept of communication entails a variety of approaches and has its basis on behaviors and implication of various models and theories. The frame work of communication is based on the interface between different parties involved in the communication process. The focus in this discussion relates to interpersonal communication in the context of the film analyzed and its social relevance. The concept of interpersonal communication incorporates the study of various aspects essential in interrelations and the processes of instructional association. The interpersonal mode of communication can either be based on the direct or indirect type of communication procedure. The film Twelve Angry Men presents a suitable platform on which the analysis of interpersonal communication as a fundamental aspect in the communication process will be based. The major objective for undertaking the analysis of this film is to establish a relationship between communication models and theories to works of literature. Most of these models and aspects have been illustrated in the film to highlight the degree of influence that most of these theories and models have on the communication process and more specifically the process of interpersonal communication.

Attitude Change and Persuasion

The art of persuasion is based on attitude and is an essential aspect of the absorbing nature of “the movie, the Twelve Angry Men.” Persuasion can be defined as a process through which attitudes are informed. Basing on the definition provided by social psychologists Richard Petty and John Cacioppo, persuasion is based on two specific concepts including; peripheral and central. The fact that there is an integral part played by the art of persuasion in the plot of “12 Angry Men,” the following theories and models can be applied. The principle mechanism on which persuasion is applied is when someone can be influenced by the power of argument through carefully thinking about a given commutation. The approach taken by Fonda and the reserved businessman in regard to change in attitude has its basis on the central route.  The manner in which Fonda makes an appeal for the innocence of the accused followed a well thought and elicited angle. His points are stipulated by use of empirical evidence and in so doing ends up swaying the other jurors. There were a lot of sheds of the central route to the argument characterizing the approach adopted by Fonda. In the same manner, the businessman makes the utilization of his stoic and equally inductive personality to come up with a coherent and logically based argument with facts at its core.  The business man just like Fonda makes an attempt to use the central route to persuasion in bid to change attitudes. In the same way, the foreign juror petitions the central route in the course of persuasion when trying to advocate for “going deeper,” while referring to fact examination. On the other hand, the peripheral style of persuasion is defined by shallow indicators in which the argument is surrounded. This is as opposed to arguments a based on the validity of the facts of the argument. In regard to the film, this route of persuasion is taken by the sickly man who makes attempts to urge the other jurors to interpret the attitudes on the basis of peripheral moral ethnic as well as tribal cues. In the end, when shunned by his fellow jurors, the sickly man persuades his associates to condemn the man because; in his opinion everyone knows the manner of behavior of these African Americans. He contends that they are all the same. He says they are all liars, thieves and drunkards”. By using such non-factual, social indicators, the sick man makes the utilization of the peripheral route to persuade and change attitudes.

The attitude and persuasion theories are both apparent in the film the “Twelve Angry Men”. The plot underlines the peripheral and centrally based theories in relation to the modification in attitude while attaching credibility to the impact that the source theory has in the art of persuasion in intrapersonal communication.

Self-disclosure

Self-disclosure is an important aspect of the concept of communication particularly as reflected in the theory of social penetration. Self disclosure is a gradual process in regard to the interaction levels and can vary basing on the degree of closeness an individual has in a given relationship. The concept entails the expression of the manner of feeling of an individual, the ideas as well as experiences that one has in regard to the past, present as well as the future.  Self disclosure as a feature of communication inspires compassion, adoration and concern for others. The film under analysis is made up various scenes where this specific aspect of interpersonal communication has been illustrated. This aspect is majorly seen in the conversations occurring between the jury members. One is able to provide a description of the personalities of the judges on the basis of their intercourse. An example relate to when the Foreman makes a revelation of himself to the viewers as quite a formal person though not that predominantly intelligent. This is illustrated by his statement in Act 1 where he utters that “Its’ all right; you can now handle this in any particular you want to want. He further goes on to say that he implies that that he will not be making any rules. He says that if it’s going to be discussed first, then a vote can be cast and that that is one way. The other way is that the vote can be cast as of the very moment to ascertain what the stand is”.

Group Process

It is recommended that the jury environment should be made up of a small group status. Relating to the way that the Twelve Angry men have collectively assembled themselves in a direct public interface in quest of a decision; they fit the definition of a small group. There are several theories and concepts of group performance which apply in the film; the “Twelve Angry Men”. Such theories like Social facilitation and social loafing are evidently being applied within the film. According to the social facilitation theory, the presence of others makes the performance of a particularly difficult task undertaking quite difficult and yet enhances the accomplishment of the easier tasks. In the film, a humble man with obvious profound intellect is mystified and hesitant when faced by the group for an assessment of his reason and judgment. This timorous colleague, a banker by profession is only able to establish his intellect at a later time in the film. However while under scrutiny in the attendance and under the examination of by the group, he is not able to present a feasible, well-argued reply to his associate juror’s inquires. In particular, this man crumples in the midst or in the face of the scrutiny of others, demonstrating the evaluation apprehension theory which is a constituent of social facilitation.

Rhetorical Sensitivity

Rhetorical sensitivity is a fundamental component in the process of effective communication. For that reason therefore, if the most suitable skills of communication are to be developed, they must be built on the paradigm of change in the manner of perception. This manner of change has its basis on the reaction of the audience and places very careful attention on the thoughts and feelings of the audience. Additionally, its main purpose is to steer clear of pessimistic condemnation that may affect the viewers negatively. Various scenes in the film have been used by the script writer to feature and expound on various themes. Despite the charges facing the boy, some of the jurors are incredibly devoted not to offend the boy or his family. For example, the eighth juror does not want to consider the guilt of the teenager. "It is not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first" uttered the eighth juror in Act 1. This exhibits that there is sympathizing and considering with people's emotions. He does not look to be bothered with his choice of rejecting the innocence of this young man. He asserts this when he says “that is old enough”. The innocent little nineteen year old lad stabbed his own father four inches deep into his chest. They confirmed it a dozen ways . He employs sarcasm to the teenager convict and hardly listens to the other jurors.

Role Taking

The concept of role taking in regard to the communication process involves associating with some other person’s position in the course of interaction. In such a scenario, the communicator puts themselves in the listener’s situation to ensure that there is an effective and proficient delivery of the message anticipated. Such an attribute of interface is manifest within the movie’s greater part of the scenes. To come up with the most viable decision, the jury members make arguments in their presentations with the situation of the boy in mind.  They take time to make an analysis of the facts that surround the charges faced by the boy to be in position to make the just judgment in relation to the case. A case in point relates to the contention of the eighth jury who while, arguing the clumsiness of the information provided by the old woman, he states that “perhaps she candidly thought she did see the boy murder her father. I pronounce that she saw just a blur” (Act 1). According to this statement, it’s evident that the juror puts himself in the position of the woman to be able to discount the information that supports her claims.

Conclusions

Interpersonal communication is a very crucial factor within communication and it is affected by various aspects. From this movie, it is shown that there is a fundamental role played by interpersonal communication within the community. Interpersonal communication assesses a number of factors that include respecting and listening to leader, engaging in decision making, determining relationships between people and also compelling people to take a stand. Besides it is influenced by diverse aspects including hostility which affects the manner in which people communicate. On the basis of what is shown in the movie, it’s obvious that interpersonal communication plays a huge role in the manner that people associate with each other in the community and thereby an important factor in the communication process.