#70million

[airtaskforce]

Sewa Ruko Tempat Usaha 2 Lantai Hadap Barat Denpasar Utara 70 Juta Ruko 2 lantai SHM IMB Hadap barat Akses jalan 12 m Lebar depan 9 m Luas tanah 95m2 Luas bangunan 70m2 Air Pompa Listrik 2200 watt 1 kamar tidur 2 kamar mandi Harga 70 juta per tahun Contact: Air Task Force 082322854759 info@airtaskforce.com Brighton Paradise Bali ——————————— For Rent : West Facing 2-floors Shophouse North Denpasar 2-floors shophouse SHM IMB West facing Access road 12 m Front width 9 m Land area 95sqm Building area 70sqm Pump Water 2200 watts of electricity 1 bedroom 2 bathrooms Price 70 million per year Contact: Air Task Force 082322854759 info@airtaskforce.com Brighton Paradise Bali Sumber: https://www.airtaskforce.com/lindawati1234-128

[stephscanvic]

L’outrenoir de Soulages… Soulager par le noir. Balèze. Encore un monsieur approché dans mon ancienne vie. Un monsieur sérieux qui cherchait la lumière dans l’obscurité. Il avait raison, sa quête n’était pas vaine. J’ai eu la chance de découvrir ses toiles intimidantes à Beaubourg, avec un guide lumineux. Un guide envoûtant qui m’a ouvert les yeux sur la beauté profonde d’une œuvre qui ne se laisse pas approcher facilement. La visite était bien trop matinale pour moi & ce monsieur discret parlait si doucement qu’au début je me suis dit que ça n’allait pas m’aider mais vite au contraire ce fut comme la poursuite d’un rêve, un rêve déconcertant, comme une de ces grandes histoires mystiques qu’on se raconte parfois à soi-même… Jamais je n’avais eu une telle révélation lors d’une visite d’exposition. Ce guide traduisait poétiquement les toiles, pour chacune il avait une clé secrète, il entrebâillait la porte sur toute la beauté à découvrir en chaque pièce, rayon de lumière sur l’outre-noir… Est-ce que j’aurais aimé l’œuvre de Soulages si j’avais erré seule entre ces grands panneaux spectraux ? Est-ce que j’aurais vu la lumière ? Je me souviens d’une dispute sur "le beau" au Prado avec mon pote Manu, fils d’artiste, artiste lui-même, il tentait de me faire comprendre qu’une œuvre pouvait être belle malgré moi & surtout sans moi, que le beau nous dépassait. Je le trouvais bien prétentieux & je pensais plutôt que le beau était subjectif, qu’au fond le "bon goût” qu’il sous-tendait n’était qu’un truc de bourgeois… On s’était fait méchamment jeter de la salle des Goya parce qu’on parlait trop fort… Aujourd’hui je pense à Goya en me disant que je suis passée devant lui sans le voir, et que dans la vie on passe devant beaucoup de beautés cachées parce qu’on n’a pas trouvé le guide. "And 70 million would be wrong wrong wrong And 70 million never see it at all" https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=erbd9cZpxps #guide #outrenoir #oeuvreaunoir #noircestnoir #eyeswideshut #beau #voir #soulages #holdyourhorses #70million https://www.instagram.com/p/CkS3KSyL5Ok/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[persephoneflouwers]

-

[jrueships]

average gay people flirting

[chimerahyperfix]

what do you mean I've exhausted all the bomberman content. what do you mean. it's only been two weeks

[awesome-casuallyfamouscollector]

[VERY GOOD NEWS]: Ukraine sinks $70M Russian warship Ivanovets in the Black Sea using boat drones

Ukraine has sunk another Russian warship in the Black Sea using drones. The Ivanovets, a $70million missile cruiser, went down on January 31. Video shows multiple Ukrainian boat drones dodging bullets before hitting the stern of the warship, disabling it in the water and then causing it to sink. According to the Ukrainians, a search and rescue operation found no survivors. Kyiv said the mission was carried out by shadowy ‘Group 13’ of the Main Intelligence Directorate, Ukraine’s spy agency, along with the Digital Ministry. It is at least the fifth battleship that Putin has lost from his once-feared Black Sea Fleet, which is being beaten by a country with no functioning navy. British Intelligence estimated Ukraine had destroyed a fifth of the fleet even before the Ivanovets was sunk, helping Ukraine keep its ports open.

P.S. Ukraine writes a new page in naval warfare history..."Ship wreck of the day!" the Ukrainian ministry said in a post on its social media pages. "Warriors of the special unit 'Group 13' of the [Defense Intelligence of Ukraine] destroyed the [Russian] missile corvette 'Ivanovets' of the russian Black Sea Fleet."

The main thing is that Ukraine invented these naval drones by itself. This country is capable of producing them itself, and it does not depend on politically correct fools who still want to save the Kremlin's regime from defeat...

[mrsbsmooth]

Potential models for Cassius

Look, the second they said there was a Greek man coming in, I was sold. But now we have the awful wait to find out if he’s actually hot.

So in the meantime, here are some disgustingly hot Greek guys he could be based on.

1. Konstantinos Argiros

Hooooo boy. A sexy Greek singer? Now I’ve dated one too many musicians IRL to ever go for one in a game (also, Ryan, ew). But I would let Konstantinos serenade me in front of the villa and be honest, so would you.

2. George Parashos

Some random male model I found, but COME ON! This man is so delicious he should change his name to spanakopita. He’s what we all pictured when we heard “greek” and “bombshell”. Mmmmmm. (Anyone finds his Insta lmk immediately)

3. Giannis Antetokounmpo

I mean, we could all do worse than a 6”11 NBA superstar worth USD$70million. That, he’s Greek & Nigerian, and he’s cute as hell? Gimme. (The man’s got a literal freak flag on Insta come onnnn)

4. Panagiotis Vasilakos

He was the bachelor, what else needs to be said? The man is so striking in looks with those light eyes, and he’s a HUGE cat lover… Seb, anyone?

But I mean feel free to add on any other potential guys you find, I'd kill for a curly-haired cutie with a beard, some chest hair, and a snail trail, maybe a little gold cross necklace bleaughfssgb someone get me some water.

[listen-to-the-inner-walrus]

so i have a soft spot for the 2006 film poseidon which is a film i reckon about 24 other people remember existing since warner bros lost like $70million on it, and i just like, need to talk about it.

its a loose remake of a 1972 film, and overall, its a very silly film, however its also connected to massive advancements in oceanography, and through that connection, also connected to an incident that could have killed around 10000 american recruits during ww2 in less than an hour.

and i cannot stop thinking about this stupid film so please enjoy this stupidly long post no one is going to read because I Need To Infodump.

so poseidon (2006)...

it's a very of its time disaster film with your group of plucky survivors trying to overcome more and more obstacles as they desperately fight for safety. among them, youve got kurt russell as an ex nyc firefighter and mayor because its 2006, of course you do. emmy rossums here because of course she is (again, its 2006), and surprise richard dreyfus is here as a gay naval architect who survives the film. fergie even has a cameo and its honestly a crime that the song she sings for it is not on spotify.

but the film is also very much not a of its time disaster film, because production decided to not update the setting. and i have absolutely no idea why. and its confused me for years now because its an easy fix.

see the 1972 film (the poseidon adventure) and the book its based on, both take place on an ocean liner, and that makes sense for that time.

contrary to popular beliefs, ocean liners =/= cruise ships.

during the late 19th century and most of the 20th century, ocean liners were all the rage, because if you wanted to go from liverpool to new york, they were your best bet.

with the invention of steam engines, they were no longer dependent on weather, and once wood was swapped for steel, they were at serious less risk of sinking. this meant they could run reliable trips from point a to point b and back again. they were essentially buses for the ocean. thats what titanic was btw.

while less popular due to jet travel in the 70s, people were still using them. the ss michelangelo sailed her maiden voyage in 1965, and ran for ten years still. it does make sense for both the book and film to take place on an ocean liner.

it does not make sense for the 2006 iteration to take place on an ocean liner, but it does. and its not even an ocean liner turned cruise ship like the rms queen mary 2 or the ss france/ss norway. there were no ocean liner only businesses operating in 2006 because you can now take a plane rather than a five day trip across the atlantic.

but in poseidon (2006), the rms poseidon is not a cruise ship. it is an ocean liner, and designating it as rms means it is also delivering international royal mail. theres even a plot about a stowaway aboard the ship which is just a tad bit bizarre. its such an odd choice not to simply update it so its a cruise ship. most people dont know the difference between them, theres no reason to specify that it is an ocean liner.

(its especially odd because the gay naval architect apparently knows the vessel very well which, sir, who is paying you to draft up ocean liner designs in 2006??)

weirdly enough though, the film does decide to update the actual cause for the disaster, which will bring us back to the ww2 point.

the general gist of the story is that some environmental event causes the ship to capsize (turn upside down in the water), and our heroes have to escape the ship.

i have attempted to read the book, but i didnt enjoy it and i was getting a feeling that the author, paul gallico, was antisemitic. he was. he specifically expressed it by saying jewish folks love basketball because its a game specialised for tricky characters, to paraphrase. yeah no theres also basketball antisemitism going on.

in the book, its an underwater earthquake that causes the ship to capsize. the quake created a 90ft wave (put a pin in that, we'll get back to it) which i believe hit the ship side-on, after the ship fell into a deep trough.

i have no idea if this is possible irl as im just an autistic with a special interest in ocean liners.

in the 1972 film, its a tsunami that hits the ship. i believe the tsunami is also caused by an underwater earthquake (again, put a pin in that) which would hit the ship on the side and cause it to roll right over (put a pin in this too btw).

again, i dont know about the veracity of this happening irl. i know tsunamis are related to underwater earthquakes, but as far as i know, they dont form into the massive wave until the wave is closer to shore?

but anyway, in the 2006 film, the capsizing is caused by a rogue wave.

as aforementioned, my special interest is ocean liners so i know quite a lot about rogue waves and i dont know how much of that is common knowledge so time for another abrupt explanation of niche topics.

so rogue waves, what are they? well, theyre big fuck off waves. descriptions tend to put them anywhere from 50ft high to 100ft (10 stories high).

for a wave to be considered a rogue wave, it needs to be more than twice the height of any other wave in that region. theyre unpredictable and often occur out of nowhere. theyre more common in some specific regions like off the coast of south africa, and are distinct from tsunamis. they can occur both in the ocean and on the great lakes.

for centuries, sailors have told tales of them but like krakens and sea monsters, they werent believed. this is partly due to survivorship bias because if youre in a wooden sailboat and get hit by a rogue wave, youre not going to survive. it was only after advancements in ship building that people began to survive them. and even then, its not guaranteed.

some theorise rogue waves were responsible for the sinking of both the ss munich/munchen and the edmund fitzgerald.

still, it wasnt until one was recorded by a research post in 1995 that rogue waves genuinely became a serious topic within oceanography.

however, we did have credible reports of them hitting ocean liners long before then. both the rms lusitania (in 1910) and the ss michelangelo (in 1966) were badly damaged when they ran into rogue waves bow first (head-on). they both fell into deep troughs before the wave hit and both of their bows sustained serious damage. three people lost their lives on the ss michelangelo.

(damage done to ss michelangelo)

despite this, it was preferable for both vessels to hit the wave head-on. both were ocean liners with bows designed to break through waves, and designed to be able to keep sailing even if the bow was caved in.

(fun fact: if titanic had hit the iceberg head on, there was a very good chance she wouldnt have sunk)

now you might want to know why we know it was preferable to be hit head-on, and why i specified the ship would have been hit side-on. this is how the ship was hit in the 2006 film also. and well, this is when were getting into ww2 territory.

the lusitania and michelangelo are not the only ocean liners to encounter a rogue wave. this also happened to the rms queen mary in 1942.

just some quick background on the queen mary; she was launched in 1936 and built with the goal of stealing the blue riband (the record for fastest journey for a passenger line from southampton to new york) from the ss normandie, owned by french line. queen mary was owned by the cunard line whose reputation partly rested on speed. both the lusitania and mauritania (both cunard ships) had won the blue riband at some point. in 1942, queen mary held the blue riband and was considered the fastest passenger liner in the world.

at that point though, she has been requisitioned by the admiralty for the war effort and was acting as a troop ship. a very effective troop ship as she averaged 28 knots in speed and they managed to up her capacity from around 3300 (including crew) to 16000.

she also was owned by cunard line who have a long history of conferring with the admiralty during peacetimes. their ships were designed with spaces left for guns and weapons. part of why the lusitania was sunk by a u-boat in ww1 was her secretly carrying firearms back from the "neutral" america to the uk despite it still being a passenger ship. the admiralty knew queen mary would be a massive benefit in a war.

this isnt to say that she was perfect, however. she was a famous roller. see, when youre building a ship, you expect it to roll somewhat on any difficult seas. to combat extreme rolling (which can be fatal), ships are built with their centres of buoyancy and gravity close together. this reduces rolling, but can cause very sudden lists (tilts). as queen mary was a big fuck off ship, it was assumed she wouldnt roll badly, so she was designed with a slightly bigger gap between those centres which caused very slow rolling from side to side. this often felt like the ship would never right itself, and as handrails were not considered necessary at first, passengers had to shuffle down hallways.

cunard took her in for repairs and added stabilisers to lessen the roll. they also added handrails. it didnt fix the rolling, but it was bearable and not considered dangerous. she soon became a superstar liner, and again, a very good troop ship.

hitler had even put a monetary bounty specifically on the queen mary for whichever submarine could shoot her, with the iron cross promised also. this did not come to pass.

(rms queen mary as a troopship)

what did come to pass, however, was a 92ft high rogue wave smashing into her portside (left). this is the absolute opposite of what you want to happen.

there was an attempt to steer her head-on into the wave but ocean liners that size take two miles to stop moving. they also couldnt risk too sudden of a turn because they were in the atlantic in a storm. this attempt to change course is repeated in the 2006 film and is also unsuccessful.

so now when the wave hit queen mary, it caused her to begin listing to starboard (right side) because a 90ft ocean wave just smashed into her. and she began to list. the portholes broke and wager poured in, making the list worst.

at first, it was 15°, then 20°, then 25°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 52°

then she stopped. and she stayed there, listing 52° to starboard. she was nearly capsized. and what must have felt like hours for those 11000 recruits and crew, she just stayed there, nearly on her side in the atlantic ocean.

and then finally, she began to right herself, one degree at a time, until she was back steady as if nothing had happened.

the technicians had later examined the ship and estimated that if shed listed just 3° extra, they would have capsized and sank, taking 11000 men with her.

so i imagine at this point, if youre even reading this anymore, youre like okay, kai, we get it, you dont wanna get hit broadside by a rogue wave, do we need all this detail?

and well, no. you dont need to know it and i dont need to tell it but here i am, telling you so.

but it is very relevant to poseidon (2006) because remember how its a remake of a film based on a book? and that book was written by the basketball antisemite? yeah, so paul gallico was on board the queen mary when this happened.

and this is what inspired him to write the book.

obviously, at the time, we didnt fully understand rogue waves so gallico explained it as an underwater earthquake, but we know now it was a rogue wave.

and so the 2006 film honours that and makes it a rogue wave. they never really explain it so unless youre insufferable like me, you might just be like what the fuck? is that poseidon (god) doing that?

but im gonna redirect your attention to the fact that the queen mary was 3° away from capsizing and that 3° could have caused an entirely different outcome to the war.

if she had capsized, she would have taken 10000 recruits with her and the allies would have lost their best troop ship. morale would have been affected because back then, ocean liners were household celebrities. they were adored by residents.

im not a historian, and especially not a war historian, so im not gonna be like oh look alternate history where the nazis won oooh how edgy?

but like, just a few more feet of water on that wave and parts of ww2 would be so different.

it also would have affected the cunard line massively after the war, and the white star line (titanics owners) as well. i believe their merger was after ww2.

also, gallico would have died so his book wouldnt have existed, neither would the film adaptation or the remake. it all just comes back around like a never ending carousel of feral seahorses.

but anyway, away from all the existential crises. i wanted to actually address what made me want to write this stupidly long post in the first place:

an article i skim read that addressed the veracity of the inciting event in the 2006 film, aka the rogue wave.

after a mostly accurate explanation of rogue waves and at least one misuse of cruise ship for ocean liner, the article concluded that a rogue wave hitting an ocean liner like that was simply so unlikely, it was basically impossible.

and if youve got this far in my ramblings, you might be able to understand the level of bafflement i felt reading that.

because while it is a fair conclusion as it is a very unlikely thing to happen. but THIS FILM EXISTS BECAUSE A ROGUE WAVE SMASHED INTO AN OCEAN LINER AND NEARLY CAPSIZED IT

[unmask-strange-aeons]

Canon

I would like to take a minute and talk about the canon of the big 4 for a bit.

March 26, 2010 How to train your dragon (Httyd)

October 14, 2010 Legend of the Boneknapper Dragon (Httyd short film)

November 24, 2010 Tangled

November 15, 2011 Book of Dragons (Httyd short film)

November 15, 2011 Gift of the Night Fury (Httyd short Film)

June 22, 2012 Brave

(August 7, 2012 Riders of berk (Httyd series))

(September 4, 2012 Defenders of berk (Season 2 of Riders of berk))

November 30, 2012 Rise of the Guardians

Now when we talk Big 4 before 2014, we are talking about those four movies, or the charaters before the movies. Or in Httyd case afther the series.

June 13, 2014 Httyd 2

November 11, 2014 Dawn of the Dragon Racers (Httyd short movie)

June 26, 2015 - February 16, 2018 Race to the Edge (Httyd series playing before the 2 movie)

March 24, 2017 - March 1, 2020 Rapunzel´s Tangled Aventures (Tangled series playing before the end epiloge)

February 22, 2019 Httyd 3 the Hidden world

December 3, 2019 Httyd Homecoming (Httyd Short Movie)

 December 23, 2019 Snoggletog Log (This thing is like just a fireplace where persons and dragons go around with some good music no lore or plot whatsoever)

As we all see there is so much Httyd media, why? because it was the most success full movie of the og 4. And from what i read Httyd was always planned to be a triliogy. And the shows that came along? Well money. Brave and Guardians never got a 2nd movie or series why? Well Guardians was a flop DreamWorks actully lost 70Million, so no more Guardians content as for Brave, they just didnt do that.

So this is all the possible media that could be inside the big 4...

We have:

Brave: 1h 33m / 93m

Rise of the Guardians: 1h 37m / 97m

Tangled: 1d 7h 10m / 31h 10m / 1870m

Httyd:  2d 4h 30m / 52h 30m / 3150m

The Big 4: 3d 14h 40m / 86h 40m / 5200 minutes

Now do i say you need to watch all of those around 4 days of content to understand the big 4? Not really, most of the content is about them as a friend group and in that sense the Canon really doesnt matter that much. BUT if you see like an older version of hiccup running around in edits, fanart or something else, thats why. Now in all fairness, I have not seen all dragon content. (Please dont come after me httyd fans) I have seen the first and second movie. So if in fact the 3 movie or the shows have a real inpact on the Big 4 Story wise (while i didnt see any) please let me know.

[cold-neon-ocean]

One day I'll properly draw my fankid for Baatar and Kuvira, but I've been thinking about him a lot recently lol While the idea of Baatar siring like a $70million racehorse and him and Kuv ending up with a lot of kids (like his own parents) is all parts intriguing, ironic, and funny to me, in my mind I always pictured them with one kid they can pour all their obsession into. Especially with Baatar having grown up feeling lost in a sea of siblings.

I've had him in my mind for years but in two very different genres, one being the very light hearted Spy x Family-esque younger years and then the later idea where he grows up to be the sort of "next gen" villain who is even worse than his parents were. I always felt Baatar and Kuvira lent themselves well to being the start of a generational antagonist family because I truly feel like their DNA combined would create the Homelander of the avatar universe or something. I just struggle to combine those two aspects into a character that feels cohesive~ (though that is what AU's are for I guess lol)

[skippyv20]

Kris Jenner joined in the surprise for the celebrity couple to renew their vows

Harry and Meghan have not been seen together since the publication of Spare

The Duchess of Sussex raised 'gentle concerns' over her husband's memoir

comment…invited or crashed….or paid….😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[maipareshaan]

Wait the Sandy Hook school shooting parents got a 70million dollar settlement from the gun manufacturer???? What. 11 years later?

Also the now issue is that they are asking for school records which is being seen as a 'it was fake' conspiracy which is somehow a very big real thing and someone was even sued for a big sum over it.

[sorceresski]

70million for off brand Haaland is crazy💀

[stylesunchained]

Barbie making $70million in the first day is INSANE! And I'm so happy for Greta and everyone involved. I haven't had the chance to watch it yet but I'm so excited!!

And that’s just in America! It did US$150M worldwide and I’m shocked tbh. I am incredibly happy for Greta, the cast and crew because this movie deserves the praise. It was sincerely the best thing I’ve seen in years. It had the same excitement as when I watched Endgame which id basically the last time I was so happy and excited to go to a movie theater. Ever since then it feels like movies just weren’t as fun anymore. And I’m gonna go see Oppenheimer too because the cast is perfection and Cillian deserves his praise as well. Idk, I’m so happy about Barbenheimer, I think it was cinematic cultural phenomenon we’ve needed for a long ass time to make movies feel like movies again (did u see what I did there)

[nowtheheadline]

Real-life ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ fugitive mysteriously dies a year after fleeing UK trial over £70million Ponzi scam

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/30511558/wolf-wall-street-fugitive-mysteriously-dies-ponzi-scam/