#AccessToJustice

[worldwatcher3072]

Upholding the Rule of Law:

Striving for Equality and Justice

In a just and democratic society, the rule of law stands as the cornerstone of fairness, ensuring that every individual, regardless of their position or power, is subject to the same legal standards. However, recent concerns about disparities in the application of the law have sparked discussions on the need to address any flaws in the system. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of the rule of law and its impact on societal trust, emphasizing the importance of upholding equality and justice for all.

The Rule of Law: An Unwavering Principle

The rule of law is not a mere catchphrase; it is a fundamental principle that underpins the functioning of democratic societies. At its core, the rule of law dictates that the law should be applied uniformly and consistently, without discrimination or favoritism. It ensures that no one, regardless of their status or influence, is above the law, and everyone is held accountable for their actions.

Challenges to the Rule of Law

While the rule of law is a guiding principle, its application can sometimes be influenced by power dynamics, political considerations, or disparities in resources. Such challenges can lead to perceptions that there are "two standards of law"—one for the powerful and privileged and another for the marginalized and less fortunate. When this happens, the very essence of justice is compromised.

The Erosion of Public Trust

When the rule of law appears to be inconsistent or biased, it erodes public trust in the legal system and institutions. Citizens lose faith in their ability to seek justice, and a sense of injustice permeates the collective conscience. This loss of trust can have far-reaching consequences, including decreased civic engagement and an increase in corruption and social unrest.

Addressing Flaws and Ensuring Equality

To maintain the integrity of the rule of law, it is crucial to identify and address any flaws in its application. This involves empowering an independent judiciary that can impartially interpret and enforce laws. Additionally, transparency in legal proceedings is essential to building trust and instilling confidence in the fairness of the system.

Promoting Access to Justice

A key aspect of upholding the rule of law is ensuring that all individuals have equal access to justice. Legal assistance and representation should not be limited to those with resources; rather, it should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their economic background. Equal access to justice enhances the legitimacy of the legal system and safeguards human rights.

Individual Commitment to Justice

Upholding the rule of law requires the commitment of each citizen to stand for justice and fairness. Civic engagement, public awareness, and holding public officials accountable are vital in safeguarding the principles of the rule of law. By advocating for a just and equitable society, individuals can collectively influence positive change.

The rule of law is a powerful concept that ensures a level playing field for all individuals within a democratic society. Striving for equality and justice under the law is an ongoing effort that demands the commitment of both citizens and institutions. By addressing any flaws in the application of the law and promoting transparency, accessibility, and impartiality, we can reinforce the rule of law and create a society where justice prevails for all, regardless of their status or influence. Let us unite in our pursuit of a fair and just world, upholding the principle that no one is above the law.

[ivygorgon]

An open letter to the U.S. Congress

Pass a bill to make Trump’s trial viewable by ALL Americans!

1,333 so far! Help us get to 2,000 signers!

I understand that the Senate just passed a bill, S. 3250, to permit victims of crimes associated with the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 to access court proceedings in the criminal case against the perpetrators. This new law will mean that affected people who are too old or infirm to travel to Washington, D.C., or those who are too far away to readily make the trip will still be able to observe court proceedings. Prosecutors at the Justice Department supported the move because they thought it was important for people affected by the crime to see justice in action. They are correct. Bearing this precedent in mind, I would like Congress to swiftly pass a similar bill for Trump’s prosecution for interference in the 2020 election. This case, United States v. Donald J. Trump, is of even more singular importance than the Lockerbie case. If such access can be offered for those victims it can be offered to the American people for a trial in which they have a distinct and unparalleled interest. This is one of the most important court cases this country will ever see. It is in the best interests of every US citizen to provide full access to it. There are, furthermore, no compelling reasons not to do so. Please introduce and/or support such a bill right away. People will be able to learn more about the arguments being made and it is more difficult to pass off disinformation about a proceeding that the public has full access to. Thanks.

▶ Created on January 22 by Jess Craven

📱 Text SIGN PIYDKC to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409

[mark-matos]

Robot Lawyers and the Future of Justice: A Call for Reform

An AI lawyer is a type of legal technology that utilizes artificial intelligence algorithms to assist lawyers in their work. These systems are designed to analyze vast amounts of legal data and documents in order to identify patterns, extract insights, and make predictions about legal outcomes. AI lawyers can also assist in legal research, drafting legal documents, and even in predicting the outcome of legal cases. While AI lawyers are not intended to replace human lawyers, they can help to increase the efficiency and accuracy of legal processes, allowing lawyers to focus on more complex legal work. As technology continues to advance, it is likely that AI lawyers will become more prevalent in the legal profession, transforming the way lawyers work and enhancing their ability to serve their clients.

As AI chatbots and robot lawyers begin to flood the courts, the US legal system faces a reckoning. The recent article by Keith Porcaro highlights the potential consequences of an overburdened court system and the desperate need for reform. Let's delve into the implications of robot lawyers and what we can do to make the legal system more accessible and equitable for all.

Debt collection agencies are already utilizing AI to file thousands of small-dollar cases, often targeting those who are unrepresented and vulnerable. The courts are ill-equipped to handle the sheer volume of these cases, many of which contain errors and lack proper documentation. This results in unjust outcomes, as people find themselves trapped in a system that doesn't care about the accuracy of the cases filed against them.

The rise of AI chatbots and robot lawyers, such as ChatGPT, has the potential to exacerbate this problem. While it might seem like a boon to those who cannot afford legal representation, the reality is that the courts are already struggling to handle the cases they have. If AI-generated cases increase even further, the system will likely crumble under the weight of the workload.

So, what can be done to prevent a future where the legal system is overrun by defective robot-generated cases? Porcaro offers several suggestions for reform:

Incorporate design friction into high-volume filing processes. This could involve requiring structured data submissions, which would make it more difficult for defective and incomplete filings to reach court dockets.

Embrace data to better understand the needs of parties involved in legal proceedings, and to create more responsive and adaptive court systems.

Reevaluate and reform outdated policies, such as those that allow consumer debt to be turned into wage garnishments.

Improve the process of notifying defendants of legal cases, ensuring they are properly informed and able to defend themselves.

Recognize the rise of AI-powered legal advice as a call for systemic reform, and establish guidelines for legal assistance software to minimize errors and protect users' data.

Ultimately, the legal system must adapt to the rise of AI and the changing landscape it brings. By addressing the current flaws and inefficiencies, we can pave the way for a more just and equitable future where AI-powered legal assistance is not a threat, but a valuable resource for those in need.

As Porcaro so aptly puts it, "For most people, the future of law doesn't need to be an endless stream of AI-generated legal threats… It just needs to be a source of help for the human problems people encounter every day."

About Mark Matos

Mark Matos Blog

[thxnews]

Boosting Justice: 20 Nightingale Courts Remain Open

A Commitment to Speedier Trials

In an effort to expedite legal proceedings and enhance access to justice, the UK government has announced that 20 Nightingale courtrooms will continue their operations into 2024. This initiative, aimed at both men and women aged 18-75 across the UK, marks a significant step in addressing the backlog of cases that has accumulated, particularly in the wake of the pandemic. These temporary courtrooms, strategically located from Swansea to London, are set to play a pivotal role in ensuring that justice is served without undue delay.  

The Backbone of Legal Efficiency

The Nightingale Legacy: A Pandemic Solution Turned Justice Staple Originally deployed as a response to the COVID-19 crisis, Nightingale courts have evolved from temporary measures to integral components of the UK's legal infrastructure. Their continued use underscores a proactive approach to clearing the case backlog, with venues accommodating a wide array of proceedings, from minor offences to more complex family and small claims cases. Justice Minister Mike Freer highlighted the critical role of these courts, stating, "People who break the law must face justice," and affirming the government's dedication to maintaining this additional capacity. This move coincides with Crown Courts handling the highest case volumes since 2019, emphasizing the urgency of providing swifter access to justice.  

Strategic Locations for Maximized Impact

A Geographical Spread to Address Local Needs The decision to keep a majority of these courtrooms operational until March 2025 reflects a strategic approach to alleviate local case backlogs and support ongoing court maintenance projects. We have chosen locations such as the Barbican and Grand Connaught Rooms in London, as well as others in Chichester, Cirencester, and beyond, for their potential to significantly reduce waiting times for trials.  

A Multi-Faceted Approach to Judicial Efficiency

Investment and Innovation at the Forefront Alongside extending Nightingale courts, the government further demonstrates its commitment through substantial investments in court modernization and repairs, totaling £220 million. These funds are earmarked for essential upgrades to ensure that court facilities can continue operating efficiently, minimizing disruptions from unplanned maintenance. Furthermore, the transition towards increased use of remote hearings represents a modern approach to case management, harnessing technology to maintain momentum in judicial processes. An Adaptive Legal System As we look ahead, the role of Nightingale courts in the UK's legal landscape signifies more than just a temporary fix; it represents a dynamic and adaptable justice system. We plan to close some temporary courts, such as those in Maidstone and Wolverhampton, reflecting an evolving need for space. However, the overall strategy ensures that the judiciary can flexibly respond to demands. In Conclusion The continued operation of 20 Nightingale courtrooms is a testament to the UK's commitment to justice, efficiency, and adaptability. By addressing the backlog and investing in the future of the legal system, the government is paving the way for a more accessible and responsive judiciary.   Sources: THX News, Ministry of Justice, HM Courts and Tribunals Service, & Mike Freer MP. Read the full article

[lexdexsolutions]

Legal Aid Eligibility Criteria

The concept of legal aid is a beacon of hope for those who find themselves entangled in the complexities of the legal system without the means to hire a private attorney. Legal aid is a vital service that ensures access to justice for all, regardless of one’s financial status. However, like any other system, it comes with requirements and eligibility criteria to ensure that it serves those who…

[rpbp]

Such a pleasure to speak with Scientific American reporter Jesse Greenspan last week about the war over words in the legal profession and its ramifications for access to justice. Excerpts follow and you can read the full piece on Scientific American's site.

Reading through legal documents can be a real slog....As it turns out, even lawyers dislike such impenetrable language; according to a new study, they both prefer and better understand simplified texts....

Contract attorneys largely rely on preexisting templates, which save time and money and are seen as less risky....

But a break from tradition could particularly benefit those who often fall on the margins of the legal system. In immigration proceedings, for example, ensuring that documents are “clear and digestible, not to mention available in multiple languages, could make a pretty big difference for many, many people,” says Rebecca Pilar Buckwalter-Poza, an attorney and progressive advocate. She also cites custody disputes as being in need of simplification, “especially in instances where there’s a domestic violence component or there are other power dynamics in play.” The average U.S. attorney charges some $300 per hour, she notes, and there’s generally no right to counsel in civil proceedings, creating significant hurdles for those who can’t afford a lawyer’s help....

In Ben-Shahar’s view, simplifying these contracts would do nothing to protect consumers, especially when they’re up against “a powerful, well-advised, sophisticated company.” But other legal scholars feel this couldn’t hurt. “Anything that chips away at barriers to justice is a welcome development,” Buckwalter-Poza says.

Read the full piece at Scientific American.

[scholarshipja]

#FirstClassJusticeSystem: How can I confirm if a person is a JP? #JusticeOfThePeace #AccessToJustice JUST A TIP: Confirm a JP using the list posted on our website at https://moj.gov.jm/justice-peace . You may also call the Ministry at 876-906-4923 or 888-JUSTICE (587-8423) @delroychuckjm @mojofficialjm https://www.instagram.com/p/CkI0NVSuXuW/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[iimtcollege]

- 9th November- ⚖️ National Legal Services Day !🔗 Legal Services Day reminds us Know your rights: Educate yourself and your community about your legal rights and how to access legal aid when needed. . https://www.iimtindia.net/ Call Us: 9520886860 .

#NationalLegalServicesDay#AccessToJustice#LegalAid#JusticeForAll#LegalServices#IIMTNoida#IIMTGreaterNoida#IIMTDelhiNCR#IIMTIndia

[rsauud]

In the video Fennie Kakaza, Coordinator of the Mount Frere Paralegal Advice Centre discusses their work and difficulties. The Advice Centre operates in an integrated method to resolve #accesstojustice, #localeconomicdevelopment with a concentrate on #youth and #women, #foodsecurity and gender-based violence awareness. These are all locations that SCAT focuses on in our financing. Thank you…

[legalassistance]

Stand Up for Justice: We Fight For Your Right at Affordable Prices

In this empowering video, we reveal the true meaning of fighting for your rights and how it intersects with affordable and express legal assistance. At Affordable and Express Legal, we believe that everyone deserves fair treatment and access to legal support without financial burden. Join us as we explore the ways in which "We Fight For You Right" is not just a motto but a mission. Throughout this video, we'll share insights into various legal assistance options that won't drain your wallet. We understand the struggles you may face when seeking justice, and that's why we're committed to providing affordable solutions that don't compromise on quality.

🔥 Join the movement for affordable legal help! 🔥 Subscribe now and click the notification bell to stay updated on our latest videos, where we continue to champion your rights!

#WeFightForYouRight #AffordableLegalAssistance #ExpressLegalHelp #JusticeForAll #FightForYourRights #LegalAid #AffordableJustice #EmpowermentThroughLaw #AccessToJustice #StandUpForYourRights

[sudarshanlive319]

SUDARSHAN LIVE KHABAR LOBBY

Sudarshanlive: 02/11/2022, Report by – ICC, international news updates #AccessToJustice #ICCOutreachThank you for joining our discussion this month on #ICC Outreach. We are committed to promoting access to justice and being on the ground with the people through Outreach events and activities. We hope you will join us in this cause.#MoreJustWorld

[crazywritesworld]

crazywrites

[wolves-atmydoor]

Link in my bio!! @nickzlewis and I are taking part in the Milton Keynes Legal Walk tomorrow on behalf of the @uniofbuckingham Law School in order to help to raise money for the fantastic Midland Legal Support Trust, which funds local advice services. Advice agencies do an amazing job in preventing homelessness, resolving debt problems, gaining care for the elderly and disabled and fighting exploitation for some of the most vulnerable people in our society. The money we raise will help keep the agencies operating and try to ensure their services are as effective as possible. Help me aid access to justice by donating! (Link in my bio) #legalwalk #accesstojustice #justiceforall #miltonkeyneslegalwalk2019 #MKlegalwalk #legalaid https://www.instagram.com/p/B2y6ZxnliJM/?igshid=1m02g2kne04a5

[thxnews]

Lord Chancellor's Washington Speech

Official UK Government Transcript of the Speech

Friends, ladies and gentlemen. It is a huge pleasure to be here in Washington DC and an honour to address this distinguished audience. When Britain’s great novelist, Charles Dickens, who of course you all know, visited the United States in 1842, he wrote that on the occasions he encountered his fellow Brits here, the British displayed, and I quote ‘an amount of insolent conceit and cool assumption of superiority, quite monstrous to behold.’ I want to be clear that I am not intending to repeat that! I’ll do so not least as an admirer of America, and a humble student of American history at university. It was there I was first introduced to the defining principle, first set out by John Adams, of America as a ‘nation of laws, not of men’. And also as a barrister – i.e. attorney myself - of the inalienable right of citizens to be defended in court however unpopular their cause, also indelibly demonstrated by John Adams in his famous defence of British soldiers in the eighteenth century. The US today is, of course, a beacon of the values that our two countries demonstrate in the world – of democracy, of diplomacy and of deference to the international rule of law, and that’s what I want to focus on today: on the importance of the rule of law, the existential threats it faces, and how together we can - and indeed we must - face down these threats and emerge stronger. What do I mean by the rule of law in the international context? The idea that all nations are bound by common rules and principles that govern the way we interact with each other, no matter our size or power. And it’s underpinned by mutual consent and agreement, peaceful resolution of disputes, and regard for international institutions. My central argument is that we need to restate that these are not quaint notions to get dewy-eyed over, or trite phrases to trot out in seminars; rather they can be the guarantors of freedom, security and prosperity for all our people. And it’s worth pointing out that the order has brought about an extraordinary growth in international trade - indeed, the volume of world trade has multiplied roughly 45 times since 1950, while worldwide living standards have almost tripled. So this is no tedious law lecture. It’s food in citizens’ stomachs. But this is now under threat. The truth is we are in a global contest of ideas, a contest between rule of law nations like ours and those who offer an authoritarian alternative, a solution that says ‘might is always right’. And it means that a global post-war consensus, which we assumed was unshakeable now needs shoring up. But rather than letting complacency reign, we must reinforce the rule of law foundations on which it was built. We don’t need a history lesson to remind ourselves how the international rules-based international order came into being in the long shadow cast by World War II. What’s important is that it lit the way towards a new era: one based on mutual consent and common obligation…  where states could resolve their disputes peacefully, act with restraint, and hold each other to account for their actions. It allowed us to achieve a depth of international co-operation that would have been unfathomable just a few short years before. And this was properly expressed in the late George Bush senior’s visionary 1990 address to Congress following the fall of the Berlin Wall – which I was reminding myself of before I came here to America. As that authoritarian regime crumbled, he set out a vision of the world where in his words: ‘ the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak’. But the world is very different today. The accord they worked so hard to build is not just fraying at the edges, it is threatening to break down altogether due to the actions of international actors – such as Russia and Iran. Many believed – and this is important – that it had a remorseless momentum… that it would inevitably draw rising powers into its orbit… that its future would grow and was guaranteed. I believe the illusion and assumption that nations would automatically see the benefits of the Rules Based International Order has been eroded. But why? Why has it been eroded? The rule of law is being attacked on three fronts, contributing to this current crisis of consensus. First, the agreements that have helped secure the world’s stability and success since 1945 are no longer respected. By ‘those agreements’ I am referring to the legally recognised borders that have been the guardian of peace over decades. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the starkest but not the only demonstration.  And of course, it’s from a country, Russia, which after all is the successor state to the Soviet Union which signed and for a time broadly abided by arms reduction treaties for the benefit of all humankind. And looking further afield, when Hamas carried out armed incursions into Israel, butchering over a thousand innocent men, women and children in their homes and taking approximately 250 more as hostages, it was an unprecedented, and wholly unlawful assault. Amid this growing normalisation of illegality, of states disregarding borders and flouting international law, hostile geopolitical spheres of influence and indeed axes are being formed and strengthened in direct opposition to the Rules Based International Order. Recent assaults on commercial cargo ships in the Red Sea by the Hamas-supporting Houthis are just one example of these deadly alliances in action. And why have the Houthis been able to wreak so much havoc in the Red Sea? Because they are backed by agents of chaos in Iran. And all this geopolitical unrest brings me to the second threat to the rules-based order. The reality is that this unstable geopolitical landscape is making middle ground and non-aligned states feel caught in the crossfire of conflicts for which they bear no responsibility. They understandably fear the repercussions, and some are beginning to equivocate. Desperate to avoid the costs of dispute and conflict, states are left unsure which way to turn to seek reassurance, stability, and protection. And we must ask ourselves whether sustained instability of the type we are seeing risks making states like these feel they have no choice but to enter into alliances which undermine the Rules Based International Order. These alliances are pursuing a zero-sum outcome through fear, rather than mutual prosperity through shared values. They not only undermine the rules based order, but could shift the balance of power so the contest of ideas about how we should be governed – whether through the rules-based system as we cleave to, or through the chaos preferred by our competitors – is lost. So it is imperative that we ensure that non-aligned states and rising powers make the right choice. And what of the poorest and most vulnerable countries? This brings me to the third risk I think we must consider. Despite huge economic advances in the Global South enabled by the Rules-Based International Order, many of the poorest countries are struggling to protect their citizens from hunger, the effects of climate change and the impact of increased populations. That in turn can pull them into the orbit of authoritarian nations who offer them a quick fix. While rule of law underpins prosperity, its absence feeds poverty, insecurity and instability. And for citizens, this leaves many feeling they have no choice but to leave their home country and seek better opportunities elsewhere in the world. This has led to record levels of migratory movements, and fuelled illegal migration. It is clear that unmanaged illegal migration disregards borders and is putting unacceptable pressure on the national systems of rules-based countries like ours - as countries whose sovereign legislatures believe in, and consciously have chosen to be part of, the order I refer too.  The actions of criminal gangs smuggling people across borders brings those very rules into disrepute, particularly if they are perceived to afford, perversely, an unfair advantage to those who break the rules rather than those who abide by them. For rule of law countries in Europe, we are experiencing an influx of illegal migration. In the UK, that manifests as a steady stream of small boats across the English Channel bringing illegal migrants into our country. And in 2023, we saw a 36% reduction in the number of small boat arrivals compared to the year before, but we must continue to go further. Because we see dangerous tactics used by Organised Criminal Gangs to facilitate crossings and people who put their lives in the hands of criminal gangs. Too many perish. I know tragedies are also happening at your southern border. So, what does all this mean for the rule of law, and, crucially, how we strengthen it? Well as Thomas Paine put it in his rallying cry of 1776, “in America the law is king” – now those were heavily loaded words at the time. It meant, among other things, that the law is supreme. And if the law is supreme, it must have power, and if it must have power, it must therefore be respected. Put another way, it must be enforced. That means ensuring accountability, it means consequences. And it means bearing down on those who commit international crimes, until justice is served. And we can be proud of the leadership our two nations have shown. Together, we have, along with the European Union, established the Atrocity Crimes Advisory Group, to support Ukraine’s Prosecutor General with funding and expertise in the domestic investigation and prosecution of more than 120,000 alleged conflict related crimes. In 2022 the UK led a state party referral to expedite the International Criminal Court’s investigation into the situation in Ukraine, and we continue to support the ICC so it has the resources it needs to carry out its independent investigations. We welcome the recent legal changes here that have enabled America to assist the ICC’s investigation into the situation in Ukraine. And we continue to fight international terrorism in all its contexts. The UK and US were right to stand up to the aggression in the Red Sea by carrying out air strikes on strategic Houthi targets in Yemen, and the international community clearly accepts that it was the correct course of action in the circumstances. So, amid the contest of ideas, and conflicting narratives, it is incumbent on all of us – the UK, the US and our allies in the G7 and NATO – to show that the rules-based international order works and it is worth upholding. While others cause chaos, as part of the International Rules-Based Order – as nations who believe in the rule of law – it is our legal systems that are the engine room for prosperity across the globe, supporting trade the world over. English common law and US common law are the basis for no less than 27 percent and 20 percent of the world’s legal systems respectively. However, both international and domestic law must evolve if they are to meet the challenges posed by insecurity, and to win what I’ve called ‘the global contest of ideas’. Because, as Thomas Paine also famously said, “a state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation.” In the UK, we are making clear once and for all that it is Parliament that should decide who comes to our country, not international criminal gangs. Through landmark emergency legislation, we will control our borders, deter people taking perilous journeys across the channel, and help end the continuous legal challenges filling our courts. We are a humane, welcoming nation but it’s fair that everyone plays by the rules. Our legally binding removal treaty with Rwanda makes absolutely clear that individuals relocated will not be returned to a country where they might be placed in danger. But above all, the principle of relocating people to another country to have their asylum claims processed is lawful – the UK High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court too have found it to be so. Indeed, the UN Refugee Agency itself has its own scheme for refugees in Rwanda, albeit not through treaty. And look, the unique genius of the common law, of course, is its flexibility - its readiness to adapt and respond to societal changes and perspectives. As the UK Government has made clear, we need some of that same spirit when it comes to the challenge of uncontrolled migration, and the evolution of the rules-based system as a whole. As countries that believe in the rule of law, it’s crucial for us to demonstrate that it works for citizens in our own countries. For our justice systems that means that while we update them to make them fit for the 21st century, we must do so in a way which strengthens the values and principles on which they are built. Access to justice is a key part of that – probably the single biggest reason I came into politics - and the current era of rapidly changing technology is opening up new possibilities for improvement all the time. For criminal and civil justice, we must ensure that citizens can continue to access justice in ways that work for them today. And there are a number of important ways we can do this. First, by making sure our legal systems adapt to a changing world – updating our legal frameworks to take account of advancing technology, and fostering environments in which our legal professionals are properly equipped to practise the law both now and in a more technologically driven future. Second, by showing our communities and victims that criminal justice works – so that justice is not just done, but seen to be done. Whether that’s the worst offenders being imprisoned for longer, or those at the lower end of the scale repaying their debt to the communities they’ve wronged. Third, by harnessing new technology to ensure that the order of the Court is properly enforced. In England and Wales, GPS and alcohol monitoring tags mean we can deliver tough community sentences, avoiding short, costly stints in prison which research shows do little to reduce reoffending. I’m looking forward to visiting New York this week to see similar projects in action. Fourth, by developing digital tools to improve how individuals and businesses can access the law in ways that work for them, opening up early legal advice and support so they can, where appropriate, settle disputes outside of court. Fifth and finally, by keeping pace with advancing methods of delivery, such as transformational technologies like generative AI, and fostering innovation and the growth and adoption of lawtech – so that we can maintain the attractiveness as destinations for global businesses that are a boon to both our economies. In each area, there are opportunities; to improve justice for our citizens and to demonstrate our commitment to the rule of law; to show that we believe in its ability to make our societies fairer and allow them to flourish further; to show that we can evolve and adapt while our opponents remain rigid and dogmatic. These are some of the most powerful ways that we can make the case for the rules-based order. So look, as others have said before me, the relationship between our two nations is not just special – it is essential. Because when we stand together in the face of the chaos that our opponents seek to create… when we pursue accountability for the wrongdoing that others wreak on their neighbours… we will win the argument for the international order that our predecessors worked so hard to build and which has served the world so well. To end where I began, with Charles Dickens. As Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher observed when she visited Washington in 1981, Dickens was right to say that the people here are ‘…hard to deceive, prompt to act, lions in energy.’ Those are the qualities we need, you and us – as we fiercely defend the rule of law and make the case for a more secure and more prosperous future in the world. Thank you.   Sources: THX News, Ministry of Justice & The Rt Hon Alex Chalk KC MP. Read the full article

[lawnerds]

Why do people not receive access to justice? We provide affordable lawyer services for family, immigration, criminal and civil law! Call /text 587-887-8837 for details!

[velxenon]

Our republic is founded on public #trust and #confidence in the justice system. The goal of the “lawyer in the library” program is to provide brief limited legal advice, and we will contribute “equity in law libraries” by providing extended special legal services, that fall outside the knowledge of lawyers in the library, thereby further removing barriers to court access. #swipeleft 👈 #joggerpants #package #derivative #personalty #merch #accesstojustice #exlibris #fundraiser #library #association #libraryassociation #program #investmentclub #club #assets #assetaccumulation #mobilelaw #benevolence #legalinformation #parties #intent #purpose #subjectmatter #logos #prose #prosocio #prosolido (at VEL XENON) https://www.instagram.com/p/CUz5WlgrDfr/?utm_medium=tumblr