#FreeTheInternet

[freetheinterrrnet]

Still feel like a newbie wannabe anon,

Also I really have a crush on this girl if anybody noticed play it discrete

[executive-orders]

Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship (EO 14149)

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2025-01902

The executive order titled "Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship" issued by President Donald Trump on January 20, 2025, reflects a significant policy shift aimed at addressing perceived overreach by the federal government in the realm of free speech, particularly on digital platforms. Here are some key insights:

Purpose and Background:

The order explicitly criticizes the previous administration for allegedly using coercive measures to control speech on social media platforms under the pretext of fighting misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation. This reflects a narrative of government overreach that was a significant talking point in Trump's political rhetoric.

Policy Objectives:

Protection of Free Speech: The order mandates that no federal officer or employee should engage in or facilitate actions that infringe upon First Amendment rights. This is rooted in a strong stance on constitutional rights to free expression.

Resource Allocation: It prohibits the use of taxpayer resources for censorship activities, aligning with conservative views on government spending and public trust in governmental actions related to speech.

Implementation and Accountability:

Investigation into Past Actions: The Attorney General is tasked with investigating past government actions that might have curtailed free speech. This includes looking into interactions with social media companies, which could lead to policy changes or even legal actions against government officials or agencies.

Legal and Practical Implications:

Legal Constraints: The order acknowledges that it does not inherently grant new rights or benefits legally enforceable against the government, suggesting that any enforcement would likely depend on existing legal frameworks or new legislation.

Operational Challenges: Implementing this order would require a nuanced understanding of where government influence ends and private company autonomy begins, especially in an era where misinformation can have real-world consequences.

Political and Social Impact:

Political Messaging: This order serves as a strong political statement, reinforcing Trump's image as a defender of free speech and critic of "big tech" censorship, appealing to his voter base who value these principles.

Social Media and Public Discourse: It could lead to less government interaction with social media platforms regarding content moderation, potentially affecting how misinformation is handled online but also possibly leading to an increase in unchecked speech.

Future Actions:

The order calls for a report with recommendations for remedial actions, which could result in policy changes, new guidelines for government interaction with private entities, or even legislative proposals to further protect free speech.

This executive order, if fully implemented as intended, could reshape how free speech is managed in the digital age, emphasizing a hands-off approach from the government in content regulation, while still navigating the complex interplay between freedom of speech and public safety or misinformation. However, its effectiveness would largely depend on how clearly these boundaries are defined and adhered to by both government and private entities.

Analysis of Executive Order 14149 in Relation to United States Law

Constitutional Basis:

First Amendment: The core of this order is rooted in the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from abridging the freedom of speech. The order explicitly aims to reinforce this constitutional right by ending what it describes as federal censorship.

Legal Interpretation of Speech: The order's reference to "misinformation," "disinformation," and "malinformation" touches on a nuanced area of First Amendment law. The Supreme Court has generally held that the government cannot regulate speech based on its content unless it falls into certain unprotected categories (like incitement, defamation, or true threats).

Policy Implications:

Government Coercion of Private Entities: The order addresses the issue of government influence over private companies (like social media platforms) to censor speech. This is legally complex because while the government itself is constrained by the First Amendment, private entities are not. However, if government action can be shown to coerce private censorship, this might be considered an unconstitutional state action.

Resource Allocation: The directive in Section 2(c) to ensure no taxpayer resources are used for unconstitutional speech abridgement aligns with the constitutional mandate but could complicate existing programs or initiatives aimed at combating misinformation if they are perceived as censorship.

Legal Precedents and Challenges:

Precedent on Government Influence: Legal precedents like Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan (1963) suggest that government coercion of private entities to censor content can be seen as state action under the First Amendment. This executive order might be seen as an attempt to preempt or address such concerns.

Investigation and Remediation: The Attorney General’s role in investigating past actions (Sec. 3(b)) could lead to legal proceedings or policy changes. However, proving unconstitutional government conduct would require substantial evidence of coercion or direct government involvement in censorship.

Implementation Challenges:

Interagency Coordination: Effective implementation would require coordination across federal agencies to ensure compliance, as seen in Section 4(a). This might involve revising existing policies or guidelines on how agencies interact with private entities regarding content moderation.

Legal Boundaries: The order must navigate the fine line between protecting free speech and maintaining national security or public safety, areas where government has traditionally had some leeway to regulate speech.

Potential Legal Actions or Challenges:

Challenges from Affected Parties: If this order results in changes that impact how misinformation is handled, there could be legal challenges from parties who believe their rights or interests are compromised, either in terms of free speech or in combating misinformation.

Judicial Review: The order's effectiveness and legality might eventually be tested in court, particularly if there are claims of overreach or if the order leads to significant policy shifts in government interaction with private platforms.

Conclusion:

Executive Order 14149, while clearly aimed at reinforcing First Amendment rights, enters a legally contentious area regarding the balance between free speech and government's role in information dissemination. Its success in law will hinge on how it's implemented, how agencies interpret its directives, and how courts view the balance between free speech and other governmental interests.

Evaluation of the Effect of Executive Order 14149 on the Spreading of Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation

Potential Reduction in Government-Driven Censorship:

Positive Impact: By explicitly prohibiting federal agencies from engaging in or facilitating censorship, the order could reduce instances where the government pressures platforms to suppress information. This might lead to a broader range of voices and perspectives on platforms, potentially including those previously labeled as misinformation.

Negative Impact: Without government oversight, there might be less structured intervention in combating false information. This could inadvertently allow more misinformation to proliferate if platforms become more cautious or less aggressive in content moderation due to perceived government withdrawal.

Impact on Platform Responsibility:

Increased Responsibility for Platforms: With less perceived governmental pressure, social media platforms might have to take more independent action or develop more robust, transparent policies for dealing with misinformation. This could lead to:

Improved Tools: Platforms might invest more in AI and community guidelines to manage content without government influence.

Potential Inconsistency: Without uniform government guidance, different platforms might handle similar content differently, leading to varied user experiences across platforms.

Public Trust and Information Ecosystem:

Trust in Information: The order might increase public skepticism or trust depending on one's view:

Skepticism: Critics might argue that this could lead to an information environment where false narratives flourish unchecked, reducing trust in digital information sources.

Trust: Proponents might see it as a step towards a more open discourse, where the public can better engage with a variety of viewpoints to discern truth.

Educational Impact: There might be an increased focus on media literacy as both individuals and institutions recognize the need for better public discernment of information.

Legal and Policy Implications:

Legal Clarity: The order could potentially lead to clearer legal guidelines or lawsuits defining the boundaries of free speech versus misinformation control, especially in cases where misinformation leads to harm.

Policy Shifts: Federal agencies might need to adjust how they communicate or engage with the public on issues like public health or national security, where misinformation can have significant consequences.

International Considerations:

Influence Abroad: The U.S. setting such a precedent might influence other countries' policies on information control, potentially affecting global norms on free speech and misinformation.

Cross-Border Information: Misinformation often transcends national boundaries, and this order might complicate international efforts to coordinate responses to global disinformation campaigns.

Long-term Effects on Public Discourse:

Polarization: While aiming to protect free speech, the order might inadvertently increase polarization if unchecked misinformation fuels extreme viewpoints without counter-narratives.

Innovation in Information Sharing: There could be a push towards new forms of communication or platforms that prioritize veracity, possibly leading to innovations in how information is disseminated and verified.

Conclusion:

Executive Order 14149 could significantly alter the landscape of information control by reducing direct government involvement in content moderation. While this might promote a broader spectrum of free speech, it also poses challenges in managing the spread of false information. The ultimate effect will depend on how platforms, the public, and other institutions adapt to this new policy environment, balancing the right to free speech with the need to maintain an informed public.

[sad-lullabee]

DDoS?

DDoS attacks: when you flood a website with so much traffic that it crashes. 🌊💻

It’s like throwing a wrench in the machine, disrupting the status quo and making those in power stop and think. It’s digital resistance—a way of saying, “This isn’t yours to control.” When we’re constantly told to bow to authority, whether it’s governments, corporations, or whoever else thinks they hold the keys to the kingdom, a DDoS is the internet’s way of flipping the bird. ✌️🔥

Sure, it’s messy, and sometimes it hurts innocent bystanders—but what’s a little chaos in the fight for freedom? In a world where profit and control are the game, DDoS is a reminder that the internet was supposed to be free. For everyone. 🌍🖤

[dulcedominicans]

The internet should be free for all. #netneutrality #freetheinternet https://www.change.org/p/save-net-neutrality-netneutrality?recruiter=670078763&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_more.combo_new_control_progress_110217winners.nafta_milestone_share_ask_1.72_hour_ask&utm_term=204570

[artemiswitch]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Allee Harvey (@lexi_space)

Don’t throw away your shot! Tell Congress to say no to repealing Net Neutrality! This fight isn’t over! #netneutrality #freetheinternet #savetheinternet #breaktheinternet

[thewanderingswordsman2030]

Losing #NetNeutrality in layman's terms is this: 1. No Social Media (unless you pay for it) 2. No Google Anything (unless you pay for it) 3. No YouTube (unless you pay for it) 4. No Online Advertising (Unless you pay EXTRA EXTRA for it) 5. No Memes (🗣UNLESS YOU PAY FOR IT!!!) You get the idea. So go sign the petition. Link in my bio and in the post. #SaveNetNeutrality #FreeTheInternet #FreeTheMemes https://www.change.org/p/save-net-neutrality-netneutrality

[wildergreen]

We pay 3x more than people do in France to access the internet. This is because we’ve ceded too much power to the four large cable corporations who currently have a monopoly on internet access. The internet is a public good. No matter today’s vote, we must win. For ordinary people, for racial justice, for activists, for the nonhuman world. We cant let corporations cherry pick our access to information. #netneutrality #nodapl #blacklivesmatter #freetheinternet #sayhername #nobannowall #internetequality (at Federal Communications Commission)

[mfinity2050-blog]

#stopthefcc #freetheinternet 12/14 #congress must #act! #wakeupamerica!

[rolsencreator]

My new studio, removing all ads from my website and I hurt my finger. And I swear, a lot! Over and over. Sorry about that. Link in my profile as usual. #vlog #youtube #canon200d #noads #freetheinternet https://www.instagram.com/p/Bv_---Rgp4_/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1s7iw3te3bxfp

[upinternet]

UP INTERNET opposes the SIM Card Registration Act, calls for people's action to defend privacy

Last December, both the House of Representatives and the Senate passed the SIM Card Registration Act, the most brazen attack on Filipinos’ right to privacy and freedom of expression online. This February, the two versions of the bill have been consolidated by the bicameral conference. It now awaits Duterte’s signature, or lapses into law if not vetoed before March 4.

UP INTERNET deems the SIM Card Registration Act as the most dangerous threat to internet freedom in Philippine history, being the final piece to legalize cyber-surveillance nationwide. Through the association of legal identities with SIM cards, it constrains the ability of the public to remain anonymous online. The added provisions on enforcing a real-name policy for social media further compounds the situation.

The policy effectively compromises freedom of expression as it increases the difficulty of remaining anonymous online. By associating internet connections with legal identities, the right to privacy is abrogated. These premises give those in power unprecedented access to private information as well as effective control over discourse online. Under the characteristically repressive administrations of the Philippines, this type of government access and control becomes a weapon to stifle righteous opposition against tyranny. There is no true democracy if the people are not given their right to privacy and freedom of expression, only totalitarian control of those with access to our data.

Not only this, similar policies across the globe were shown to be useless against crime despite lawmakers claiming otherwise. It may in fact lead to higher cases of smartphone and more importantly, identity theft. In Mexico, their version of the law was repealed just three years after it was passed. In July 2020, the government of Laos commenced its nationwide sim registration program. Residents who failed to register will not be able to communicate with other users and connect to the internet. Despite the country’s extension of registration, the policy would only make the internet less accessible to millions with no IDs and those in remote and rural areas.

Finally, the policy will hand over our data to the Philippine government, an entity notoriously lacking in information security measures. Not only is the SIM Card Registration Act repressive and undemocratic, it is also inutile and anti-poor.

The harmful bill is now in its final stage before becoming state policy. UP INTERNET calls on the Filipino people to defend our right to privacy and join the fight to free the internet. We must act now and do everything in our power to foil the passage of this bill.#

[tmkdoom]

There is a place for all of us, that despise the idea of national borders. It is called 'the mind'. And the combined mind of all people together is the internet. Don't let the physical world take away our mind. . All flags are cloth. The Schism Jack is an idea. Bear it like a coat the keeps you warm in the cold time of narcissm. It is a meme and a start. . . . . #savetheinternet #saveyourinternet #memes #article #meme #stoparticle #eu #falseflags #artikel #flag #edit #explorepage #filterthefilter #foryoupage #explore #foryou #izaandelle #freetheinternet #videostar #dontbreaktheinternet #videostaredit #savetheworld #europe #wewantfreedom #noarticle #savetheinternetsavetheworld #saveourinternet #saynotoarticle #editor #doommetal (hier: Mainz, Germany) https://www.instagram.com/p/Bu8oDyglVe5/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1nv8nf39cbwp

[pinksoap]

Net Neutrality!!!

Go to www.gofccyourself.com go to express to comment and tell them you want net neutrality. Don't let them take it away. Even if we don't see eye to eye on things we still need the internet freedom to tell each other that.

[eagal1293]

Honestly I don’t really get involved in politics for the reason of that the government always never listens to its country and their opinions. So you can say that I’m part of the ppl that lays down and takes it, but I for sure see a tiny light at the end of the tunnel with this politician at our side. So #freetheinternet! And vivá lá resistánce!!!!!! LIVE TO RESIST!!!

I’ll just leave this here

[shimafamily]

Back!

In a stunning reversal of events,I am back! Sort of, mostly because I am no longer getting updates on Allthink, and Tumblr is unblocked again. Medium is slow as my pet turtles, so Tumblr remains the place to be (again).

This probably has to do with some tinkering around with the internet settings, so I’m not sure how long this run will last. But damn, it’s good to be back on Tumblr.

Oh it’s true, it’s true!

[dottted-org]

dottted. Auf den Punkt.

Es wird Zeit eine neue Ära einzuläuten und den Thron neu zu besetzen.

Aber von vorne.

Was ist dottted.?

dottted. beschreibt ein Projekt welches es sich zum Ziel gemacht hat, die Internetgemeinschaft zu verbinden und zu befreien gleichzeitig. Ich werde bewusst keinen Namen nennen, aber ein bekannter Internetriese hat alle eure Daten und will noch mehr davon. Gleichzeitig jongliert er damit wild umher und missachtet dabei eure ganz eigene Privatsphäre.

Ich denke ihr wisst wen ich meine.

Was erwartet mich?

Kritiker würden sagen, dass euch der gleiche R*tz wieder erwartet. Im Grunde ist damit auch schon alles gesagt. Es gibt nur einen kleinen aber feinen Unterschied: eure Daten sind bei dottted. sicher. Das Verspreche ich euch persönlich und egal wie groß das Projekt wird oder wie klein es bleiben wird, egal wie viele oder wenige User das Projekt für sich begeistern kann, es bleibt dabei.

Wir werden euch glasklar und super verständlich erklären was mit welchen eurer Daten passiert und wo, bzw. wie sie verwendet werden.

Kostet das was?

Für dich als Nutzer kostet das pauschal nichts. Allerdings haben wir auf Betreiberseite Kosten zu stemmen, wie zum Beispiel die Servermiete, die Entwicklung und die Verbesserung unseres Angebotes sowie andere Betriebskosten.

Um diese Kosten decken zu können, müssen wir leider Werbung schalten. Um dies zu umgehen könnt ihr uns mit einer Monatlichen Spende in Form eines Abonnements unterstützen und somit alle unsere Dienste werbefrei genießen. Wir werden in Zukunft auch einen Patreon-Account erstellen, auf dem ihr spenden könnt um uns zu unterstützen.

Sollte es finanziell sehr gut aussehen, werden wir auch für alle, die kein Abo haben, eine kleine, werbefreie Phase einläuten.

Zu den Abonnements: zum Anfang dachten wir an eine Preisspanne zwischen einem und 5 Euro pro Monat. Eine genaue Preisliste folgt aber noch.

Habe ich die Möglichkeit an dem Projekt mitzuwirken?

Dafinitiv. Wir sind sogar darauf angewiesen, dass ihr uns eure Wünsche, Anregungen und Verbesserungsvorschläge zukommen lasst.

Ihr könnt jederzeit eine Mail an info@dottted.org senden. Wir werden euer Anliegen in jedem Fall so bald wie möglich bearbeiten.

Für enthusiatische Entwickler und Gestalter findet ihr hier alle Infos zum Aufbau von dottted.: @dottted-dev

Wie geht es nun weiter?

Wir sind derzeit noch in der Planungsphase, wobei erste Entwürfe der website bereits online sind.

Aber hier einmal die nächsten Schritte die noch kommen:

Erstellung Patreon-Account

Erstellung Entwickler-Blog

Finalisierung des Designs

Entwicklung aller Funktionalitäten

Testing

Launch

Für die einzelnen Punkte können wir keine genauen Daten angeben, da wir allesamt noch hauptberuflich anderweitig beschäftigt sind.

[sinbella47]

Article 13 (#protectyourcommunity) (on Wattpad) https://my.w.tt/eLyfYhhgcS The new EU law is going to be a tragedy. Help me fight against it!