#FreedomOfExpression

[planet-gay-comic]

Cheeky Boys in the Wintergarden Waves of Freedom A Journey through the Evolution of Sexual Morality from Art Nouveau to Late Modernism

The development of sexual morality in the 20th century is a fascinating journey from strict societal norms to an era of personal freedom and self-expression. From Art Nouveau to the vibrant decades of the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, we witnessed an impressive evolution in the perception and practice of sexuality and individual expression.

Art Nouveau - A New Aesthetic Emerges: Art Nouveau not only brought about a change in art and design but also ushered in a relaxation of traditional sexual morals. During this era, there was a growing interest in human sexuality and a subtle challenge to societal taboos, along with a new body consciousness, in an effort to move away from the prudish and rigid Victorian era. A notable feature of Art Nouveau was its association with the Roman Baths, which became a meeting place for people of different sexual orientations. In the Roman Baths, individuals of all sexual preferences came together without inhibition, creating an atmosphere of tolerance and openness. This ambiance contributed to Art Nouveau often being seen as a precursor to the sexual revolution of the 60s.

The 60s and 70s - The Age of the Sexual Revolution: The next decades brought an explosive change in sexual morality in the Western world. The 60s brought a new wave of sexual freedom with the Hippie movement and the introduction of the birth control pill, but that was just the beginning.

In the 70s, growing awareness and increasing acceptance led to a more open attitude toward diverse sexual identities and orientations. This time was marked by the emerging LGBT movement, advocating for the rights and visibility of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender individuals.

In the 80s and 90s, clubs and discos reached their peak as places of freedom and expression. Iconic songs like "YMCA" by the Village People and "We Are Family" were not only hits but also anthems of the LGBT community, which found a safe and accepting environment in these establishments. Concurrently, the first gay saunas emerged, serving as safe havens and meeting places. The sexual revolution of this era was characterized by an openness and diversity that continues to shape the LGBT movement to this day and represents an important part of the history of sexual liberation.

The evolution of sexual morality in the 20th century tells a story of freedom and progress. From the subtle beginnings of Art Nouveau to the exuberant freedom of the late modern era, these changes reflect the ongoing struggle for personal freedom and the acceptance of different lifestyles.

Text supported by Chat-GPT-4.0 These image is generated with StableDiffusion v1.5. The poses and the backround were obtained with ControlNet v1.1.410 via open pose. Faces and background overworked with composing and inpainting.

[illuminatingfacts]

The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object. – Thomas Jefferson ✨

[zymzalchemy]

Outraged by Tumblr's increasing tendency to censor artists by wrongly categorizing their work as "pornographic" or "explicit?" This dismissive attitude towards legitimate artistic expression is not only insulting but also undermines the value and purpose of art itself.

If you're an artist, a supporter of the arts, or simply someone who believes in freedom of expression, share this post. Let's make it clear to Tumblr that censorship of art under the guise of protecting users is unacceptable.

[thehetrophobe]

they won't ever stop. no matter how much we scream. no matter how many of us fall dead. no matter what we put in TV or books. we aren't humans to their understanding. we're savages, villains, deviants of God's order.

Perhaps it's time we start acting like it.

g

[hindusforhumanrights]

First They Came for the Comedians": Kunal Kamra and the Silencing of Satire in Modi’s India

After facing backlash and censorship for a political parody, comedian Kunal Kamra responds with a bold new satire video on March 25th. Read how Kamra’s comedy is challenging free speech suppression in India. Learn More

[0illuminated1]

Find Premium Content on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/c/Illuminatedforhire In this video, I’m diving into the reality of the censorship industrial complex and how it’s impacting content creators like me. After experiencing a dramatic drop in views on YouTube, I suspect my channel is being shadowbanned due to the sensitive and controversial nature of the topics I cover. Rather than fight against the system, I’ve decided to pivot and move some of my content to a more private platform: Patreon. This gives me the freedom to create and share ideas without algorithmic limitations. I’ll be sharing deeper, more exploratory content with fewer restrictions, focusing on the topics I’m passionate about. I’m also asking for your support during this transition. If you appreciate my content and want to see more, consider joining me on Patreon for exclusive access and to help me continue sharing these important ideas without fear of censorship. If you don’t see the link to my Patreon yet, please keep an eye out for it soon—big things are coming, and I promise we’ll be breaking new ground together! Tags: censorship, shadowban, content creation, YouTube algorithm, censorship industrial complex, Patreon, new direction, exclusive content, deeper discussions, conspiracy theories, philosophical content, controversial topics, freedom of speech, content creator journey, alternative platforms, breaking new ground, truth seekers, uncensored content

[tmarshconnors]

A Literary Giant!

Salman Rushdie: A Literary Giant Who Deserves Our Respect

In an age where free speech is increasingly under threat, few writers stand as prominently for the cause as Salman Rushdie.

His life and work have epitomized the struggle for artistic expression in the face of overwhelming adversity, making him one of our time's most significant literary figures.

Regardless of one’s personal views on his novels or the controversies that have surrounded him, one thing remains clear Rushdie deserves our respect.

Salman Rushdie’s works, particularly Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses, have cemented his place in the pantheon of great modern writers. His style often blending magical realism with historical and political commentary has captivated readers worldwide. 

Midnight’s Children, a novel intertwining the history of India with a deeply personal narrative, won the Booker Prize in 1981 and remains one of the most celebrated works of contemporary literature. His ability to weave the fantastical with the real demonstrates an unparalleled mastery of storytelling.

Rushdie’s name, unfortunately, became synonymous with controversy following the publication of The Satanic Verses in 1988. The backlash against the novel, culminating in a fatwa calling for his assassination, marked one of the darkest moments in the history of free expression.

The fact that a writer whose sole crime was putting pen to paper had to spend years in hiding due to violent threats is a chilling reminder of the dangers posed by those who wish to silence dissenting voices.

Yet, despite these threats, Rushdie has remained steadfast in his commitment to the freedom of speech, never allowing fear to dictate his work or silence his convictions.

What makes Rushdie truly worthy of admiration is not just his literary talent but his resilience. Even after the horrifying attack on him in 2022, which left him severely injured, he refused to back down. His response was one of defiance and an unyielding belief in the fundamental right to express oneself. In an era where many self-censor out of fear or social pressure, his courage is a beacon of hope for writers, artists, and intellectuals everywhere.

One does not have to agree with every idea Rushdie has put forth to recognize his importance. Respecting him is about more than just admiring his literary achievements it is about standing by the principles he represents.

Free speech is the bedrock of any free society, and those who champion it, often at great personal risk, deserve our deepest appreciation. If we abandon figures like Rushdie, we cede ground to those who wish to dictate what can and cannot be said.

Salman Rushdie is not merely a novelist but a symbol of the enduring power of words against tyranny. His life’s work reminds us that literature is not just about storytelling it is about challenging norms, questioning authority, and defending the inalienable right to think freely. In a world where ideological battles over speech rage on, we must never forget the debt we owe to those like Rushdie who refuse to be silenced. He deserves our respect, not just for his contributions to literature, but for his unwavering stand for the freedoms we should all cherish.

[rockinjohnny]

It’s Even WORSE Than We Thought!

[executive-orders]

Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship (EO 14149)

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2025-01902

The executive order titled "Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship" issued by President Donald Trump on January 20, 2025, reflects a significant policy shift aimed at addressing perceived overreach by the federal government in the realm of free speech, particularly on digital platforms. Here are some key insights:

Purpose and Background:

The order explicitly criticizes the previous administration for allegedly using coercive measures to control speech on social media platforms under the pretext of fighting misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation. This reflects a narrative of government overreach that was a significant talking point in Trump's political rhetoric.

Policy Objectives:

Protection of Free Speech: The order mandates that no federal officer or employee should engage in or facilitate actions that infringe upon First Amendment rights. This is rooted in a strong stance on constitutional rights to free expression.

Resource Allocation: It prohibits the use of taxpayer resources for censorship activities, aligning with conservative views on government spending and public trust in governmental actions related to speech.

Implementation and Accountability:

Investigation into Past Actions: The Attorney General is tasked with investigating past government actions that might have curtailed free speech. This includes looking into interactions with social media companies, which could lead to policy changes or even legal actions against government officials or agencies.

Legal and Practical Implications:

Legal Constraints: The order acknowledges that it does not inherently grant new rights or benefits legally enforceable against the government, suggesting that any enforcement would likely depend on existing legal frameworks or new legislation.

Operational Challenges: Implementing this order would require a nuanced understanding of where government influence ends and private company autonomy begins, especially in an era where misinformation can have real-world consequences.

Political and Social Impact:

Political Messaging: This order serves as a strong political statement, reinforcing Trump's image as a defender of free speech and critic of "big tech" censorship, appealing to his voter base who value these principles.

Social Media and Public Discourse: It could lead to less government interaction with social media platforms regarding content moderation, potentially affecting how misinformation is handled online but also possibly leading to an increase in unchecked speech.

Future Actions:

The order calls for a report with recommendations for remedial actions, which could result in policy changes, new guidelines for government interaction with private entities, or even legislative proposals to further protect free speech.

This executive order, if fully implemented as intended, could reshape how free speech is managed in the digital age, emphasizing a hands-off approach from the government in content regulation, while still navigating the complex interplay between freedom of speech and public safety or misinformation. However, its effectiveness would largely depend on how clearly these boundaries are defined and adhered to by both government and private entities.

Analysis of Executive Order 14149 in Relation to United States Law

Constitutional Basis:

First Amendment: The core of this order is rooted in the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from abridging the freedom of speech. The order explicitly aims to reinforce this constitutional right by ending what it describes as federal censorship.

Legal Interpretation of Speech: The order's reference to "misinformation," "disinformation," and "malinformation" touches on a nuanced area of First Amendment law. The Supreme Court has generally held that the government cannot regulate speech based on its content unless it falls into certain unprotected categories (like incitement, defamation, or true threats).

Policy Implications:

Government Coercion of Private Entities: The order addresses the issue of government influence over private companies (like social media platforms) to censor speech. This is legally complex because while the government itself is constrained by the First Amendment, private entities are not. However, if government action can be shown to coerce private censorship, this might be considered an unconstitutional state action.

Resource Allocation: The directive in Section 2(c) to ensure no taxpayer resources are used for unconstitutional speech abridgement aligns with the constitutional mandate but could complicate existing programs or initiatives aimed at combating misinformation if they are perceived as censorship.

Legal Precedents and Challenges:

Precedent on Government Influence: Legal precedents like Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan (1963) suggest that government coercion of private entities to censor content can be seen as state action under the First Amendment. This executive order might be seen as an attempt to preempt or address such concerns.

Investigation and Remediation: The Attorney General’s role in investigating past actions (Sec. 3(b)) could lead to legal proceedings or policy changes. However, proving unconstitutional government conduct would require substantial evidence of coercion or direct government involvement in censorship.

Implementation Challenges:

Interagency Coordination: Effective implementation would require coordination across federal agencies to ensure compliance, as seen in Section 4(a). This might involve revising existing policies or guidelines on how agencies interact with private entities regarding content moderation.

Legal Boundaries: The order must navigate the fine line between protecting free speech and maintaining national security or public safety, areas where government has traditionally had some leeway to regulate speech.

Potential Legal Actions or Challenges:

Challenges from Affected Parties: If this order results in changes that impact how misinformation is handled, there could be legal challenges from parties who believe their rights or interests are compromised, either in terms of free speech or in combating misinformation.

Judicial Review: The order's effectiveness and legality might eventually be tested in court, particularly if there are claims of overreach or if the order leads to significant policy shifts in government interaction with private platforms.

Conclusion:

Executive Order 14149, while clearly aimed at reinforcing First Amendment rights, enters a legally contentious area regarding the balance between free speech and government's role in information dissemination. Its success in law will hinge on how it's implemented, how agencies interpret its directives, and how courts view the balance between free speech and other governmental interests.

Evaluation of the Effect of Executive Order 14149 on the Spreading of Misinformation, Disinformation, and Malinformation

Potential Reduction in Government-Driven Censorship:

Positive Impact: By explicitly prohibiting federal agencies from engaging in or facilitating censorship, the order could reduce instances where the government pressures platforms to suppress information. This might lead to a broader range of voices and perspectives on platforms, potentially including those previously labeled as misinformation.

Negative Impact: Without government oversight, there might be less structured intervention in combating false information. This could inadvertently allow more misinformation to proliferate if platforms become more cautious or less aggressive in content moderation due to perceived government withdrawal.

Impact on Platform Responsibility:

Increased Responsibility for Platforms: With less perceived governmental pressure, social media platforms might have to take more independent action or develop more robust, transparent policies for dealing with misinformation. This could lead to:

Improved Tools: Platforms might invest more in AI and community guidelines to manage content without government influence.

Potential Inconsistency: Without uniform government guidance, different platforms might handle similar content differently, leading to varied user experiences across platforms.

Public Trust and Information Ecosystem:

Trust in Information: The order might increase public skepticism or trust depending on one's view:

Skepticism: Critics might argue that this could lead to an information environment where false narratives flourish unchecked, reducing trust in digital information sources.

Trust: Proponents might see it as a step towards a more open discourse, where the public can better engage with a variety of viewpoints to discern truth.

Educational Impact: There might be an increased focus on media literacy as both individuals and institutions recognize the need for better public discernment of information.

Legal and Policy Implications:

Legal Clarity: The order could potentially lead to clearer legal guidelines or lawsuits defining the boundaries of free speech versus misinformation control, especially in cases where misinformation leads to harm.

Policy Shifts: Federal agencies might need to adjust how they communicate or engage with the public on issues like public health or national security, where misinformation can have significant consequences.

International Considerations:

Influence Abroad: The U.S. setting such a precedent might influence other countries' policies on information control, potentially affecting global norms on free speech and misinformation.

Cross-Border Information: Misinformation often transcends national boundaries, and this order might complicate international efforts to coordinate responses to global disinformation campaigns.

Long-term Effects on Public Discourse:

Polarization: While aiming to protect free speech, the order might inadvertently increase polarization if unchecked misinformation fuels extreme viewpoints without counter-narratives.

Innovation in Information Sharing: There could be a push towards new forms of communication or platforms that prioritize veracity, possibly leading to innovations in how information is disseminated and verified.

Conclusion:

Executive Order 14149 could significantly alter the landscape of information control by reducing direct government involvement in content moderation. While this might promote a broader spectrum of free speech, it also poses challenges in managing the spread of false information. The ultimate effect will depend on how platforms, the public, and other institutions adapt to this new policy environment, balancing the right to free speech with the need to maintain an informed public.

[firuzkutal]

#20January

[reexrco]

Jestem wolna od oczekiwań. Nie będę się zamykać w żadnych ramach. Jestem po prostu sobą."

"Życie to nie konkurs na idealność. To przestrzeń, gdzie każdy ma prawo być sobą, w pełni. 🌟"

"Ciało to sztuka, a my jesteśmy w niej tą najpiękniejszą paletą. 🌸👑 Nagość? To tylko forma wyrażania siebie, niczym wiatru dotykające skórę w letni dzień. Niczego nie trzeba ukrywać, niczego się nie wstydzić. W tej przestrzeni nie chodzi o ciała, tylko o dusze, które nie boją się pokazać całej swojej mocy."

"Ciało nie jest czymś, co trzeba ukrywać. Jest częścią naszej podróży. I zasługuje na szacunek. 💛"

"Ciało to tylko jedna z wielu form, w jakich istnieje nasza dusza. Nieważne, jak wygląda. Ważne, jak się czujesz. 🌸"

[latestnews-now]

Hollywood’s beloved Scream star Melissa Barrera faced backlash after speaking up for Palestine, resulting in her firing from Scream 7. In a raw interview, she shares the emotional toll, fan reactions, and her journey of resilience. Watch her inspiring story and join the conversation!

[monteage-official]

On this National Press Day, let us salute the guardians of truth and freedom! 📰✨ Wishing all journalists the strength to keep inspiring and informing. 📢💬

[technmaket360]

✈️ California Women Removed From Flight for Wearing Crop Tops: Reports 👚🚫

In a shocking turn of events, two women were reportedly removed from a flight due to their crop tops! 😲 What should’ve been a normal flight turned into a major controversy over dress codes and personal freedom. 🤔 What do you think about this incident? Is it fair, or an overreach? ✈️👗

👉 Read more here: California Women Removed From Flight for Wearing Crop Tops: Reports 🔗

#FlightDrama #DressCodeDebate #CropTopControversy #CaliforniaNews #FreedomOfExpression #TravelNews #TechNMarket360 #ViralStories #TrendingNow #NewsUpdate #WomenEmpowerment

[hindusforhumanrights]

Hindus for Human Rights Condemns Attempts to Intimidate Human Rights Activist Nadeem Khan

On November 30, 2024, Delhi Police attempted to detain Nadeem Khan, a prominent human rights activist and the National Secretary of the Association for the Protection of Civil Rights (APCR), at his brother’s residence in Bengaluru without presenting a valid warrant or legal notice.  Learn Full Story- https://www.hindusforhumanrights.org/en/blog/hindus-for-human-rights-condemns-attempts-to-intimidate-human-rights-activist-nadeem-khan