#Global Payroll Companies

[infotreeglobalsolutions]

We have placed many employees in positions that have grown into lifelong careers. The keyword for both clients and employees is Options. We give employees options of opportunities in areas and companies they never dreamed of.  We give our clients options of candidates so they can choose the best for their position.

[mercanstalks]

Tips For Redefining HR With Employer Of Record In UAE

The Employer of Record in UAE (EOR) model is a popular outsourcing solution for HR functions. EOR companies act as the official employer of a company's staff, taking care of all HR functions, including payroll, benefits, compliance, and tax management. This model is increasingly being adopted by businesses in the UAE to redefine their HR processes. Here are some tips for redefining HR with a PEO in UAE. 

Best Redefining tips with Employer of Record

1. Evaluate Your HR Processes

Before you start working with an EOR in the UAE, it is essential to evaluate your current HR processes. Determine what HR functions are taking up most of your time and resources, and identify areas that need improvement. Once you have identified the areas that need improvement, you can work with the EOR to streamline your HR processes.

2. Identify Your HR Needs

The next step is to identify your HR needs. Determine what HR functions you want to outsource and which ones you want to keep in-house. For instance, you may want to outsource payroll and benefits management but keep employee relations and training in-house. This will help you determine the right EOR for your business.

3. Choose the Right EOR

Choosing the right EOR is critical for the success of your HR outsourcing strategy. Look for an EOR that has experience in the UAE market, understands local employment outsourcing services, and has a proven track record of delivering quality HR services. You may also want to consider the size and scope of the EOR's operations, as well as their technology and infrastructure.

4. Set Clear Expectations

Once you have chosen an EOR, it is essential to set clear expectations. Define the scope of the EOR's responsibilities, the service level agreements, and the key performance indicators. This will ensure that both parties are on the same page and that the EOR delivers the services as per your expectations.

5. Communicate Effectively

Effective communication is critical when working with an EOR in the UAE. Establish regular communication channels with your EOR, and keep them informed about any changes in your business or HR processes. This will help the EOR provide you with the right HR services and ensure that they are aligned with your business goals.

6. Focus on Compliance

The UAE has specific regulations for employment, taxation, and other business matters. It is essential to ensure that your HR processes are compliant with these regulations. Your EOR should have a thorough understanding of the local laws and regulations and help you stay compliant.

7. Measure Your Success

Measuring the success of your EOR partnership is critical for continuous improvement. Establish key performance indicators and regularly track and analyze your HR metrics. This will help you identify areas that need improvement and make data-driven decisions to optimize your HR processes.

Conclusion

Redefining HR with an Employer of Record in the UAE can help businesses save time, reduce costs, and ensure compliance with global payroll companies. By evaluating your current HR processes, identifying your HR needs, and choosing the right EOR, you can streamline your HR processes and focus on your core business operations. Clear communication, focusing on compliance, and measuring your success will help you optimize your HR processes and achieve your business goals. By following these tips, you can redefine your HR functions with an EOR in the UAE and take your business to new heights.

[chapscontracting]

Global Payroll Companies - Your company will not need to invest in expensive software to help manage your global payroll services, and your international payroll providers will help you to avoid expensive fines that come from being noncompliant.

[vncglobal]

Payroll Accuracy: Tips for Error-Free Payroll Processing

The processing of payroll is an essential operational task inside an organisation, as it guarantees the accurate and timely compensation of personnel. Nevertheless, the intricacy of payroll computations and the dynamic nature of tax legislation might provide a significant challenge in undertaking this endeavour. Mistakes in payroll administration can lead to employee dissatisfaction, non-compliance with regulations, and potential legal ramifications. In order to mitigate such complexities, it is imperative to give precedence to the precision of payroll calculations. Discover the strategic advantages of outsourcing your payroll to VNC Global - an excellent Payroll management company in Singapore. Choose VNC Global for secure and cost-effective payroll management.

This blog post aims to examine key strategies that can facilitate accurate payroll processing and enhance search engine optimisation (SEO) endeavours.

●    Stay Informed About Tax Laws:

Keeping up-to-date with tax rules is crucial for maintaining payroll accuracy due to the frequent changes in tax regulations. It is imperative to consistently assess and examine the tax regulations at the federal, state, and municipal levels in order to guarantee adherence and conformity. It is advisable to utilise tax compliance software or seek guidance from tax professionals in order to ensure the maintenance of an updated payroll system.

●    Implement Robust Payroll Software:

It is advisable to allocate resources towards the acquisition of dependable payroll software capable of managing intricate computations and streamlining diverse payroll procedures. These technologies have the potential to reduce errors that are commonly associated with human calculations and data entry. Some commonly used payroll software alternatives are ADP, Gusto, and QuickBooks.

●    Maintain Accurate Employee Records:

It is vital to ensure the up-to-dateness and accuracy of all employee information, encompassing tax forms, personal particulars, and bank account details. The presence of erroneous personnel data can result in payment inaccuracies and non-compliance concerns. It is imperative to consistently assess and revise employee records. Experience the peace of mind that comes with organized financial records. Connect with VNC Global - the most trusted provider of Bookkeeping services for small businesses in Singapore and transform your business together.

●    Use a Standardized Payroll Process:

Establishing a standardised procedure for payroll processing entails the development of a comprehensive framework that delineates the sequential stages involved, commencing from the first data entry phase and culminating in the distribution of the payroll. Ensuring uniformity in payroll operations can aid in mitigating the probability of errors.

●    Double-Check Calculations:

Despite the utilisation of sophisticated payroll software, it remains imperative to conduct a thorough verification of computations in order to identify and rectify any potential errors. Incorrect payments can occur as a result of a minor error during data entry or due to a software malfunction. It is imperative to conduct a comprehensive examination of each paycheck prior to initiating the payroll processing procedure.

●    Cross-Train Payroll Staff:

To mitigate the risk of excessive dependence on a sole payroll administrator, it is advisable to implement cross-training measures for the payroll staff. It is advisable to implement a cross-training programme for the payroll workforce, ensuring that multiple employees have the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively manage payroll tasks. Implementing this measure will effectively mitigate potential interruptions that may arise due to personnel turnover or absence.

●    Conduct Regular Audits:

It is recommended to conduct regular audits of the payroll system in order to rapidly identify and resolve any problems or anomalies that may arise. These audits have the potential to identify any potential concerns prior to their escalation into severe difficulties. Maximize your time and resources by outsourcing your Accounting services for small businesses in Singapore to VNC Global. Request a quote to simplify your financial tasks.

●    Seek Professional Help:

It is advisable to explore the option of engaging the services of a professional payroll service provider in order to outsource your payroll processing. These organisations possess expertise in payroll and tax compliance, hence diminishing the probability of errors.

Final Thoughts:

The maintenance of payroll accuracy is of utmost importance in ensuring employee satisfaction, adhering to tax requirements, and mitigating potential legal complexities. One can effectively decrease errors in payroll processing by acquiring knowledge of tax rules, utilising dependable software, upholding precise record-keeping practises, and adhering to standardised procedures. Furthermore, the implementation of routine audits and the utilisation of professional assistance, when deemed essential, can significantly augment the level of accuracy. Ensuring payroll accuracy is crucial not only for the welfare of employees but also for the prosperity of the organisation.

Effortlessly manage your payroll with a tailored payroll system in Singapore. Reach out now to VNC Global’s accurate Payroll management system in Singapore and see how we can enhance your payroll processes.

[unisonglobususa]

Explore the intricacies of hiring a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with our blog, ‘Revealing How much does it cost to hire a professional CPA’. We delve into the factors that influence the cost of hiring a CPA, including location, qualifications, experience, and previous year’s tax fees. Learn about the alternatives to individual CPAs and the advantages of hiring a professional. Our blog also provides insights into the typical costs of a small business CPA, hourly rates, and charges for tax services. This comprehensive guide is a must-read for US-based Accounting & Tax Services, CPAs, EAs, and Accounting Firms looking to make informed decisions in 2024. 

Visit: https://unisonglobus.com/how-much-does-it-cost-to-hire-a-cpa/  

[kumarblog123]

Alta Global Services

Alta FMS offers extensive solutions for plumbing, carpentry, and masonry needs. Our skilled plumbers are adept at handling everything from simple repairs to complex installations, ensuring efficient water flow and proper drainage systems. Our carpenters excel in crafting custom furniture, repairing fixtures, and enhancing interior spaces. Additionally, our masons specialize in building and repairing structures, including brickwork, stone masonry, and concrete installations, ensuring durability and aesthetic appeal for all projects.

[journeytoleadership]

3 Leadership Apps For Global Payroll

Sometimes, working internationally for yourself, for an entity or with people from another entity, payroll can become a stumbling block… What currency? Which law do I abide by? Which compliance? Which liability? Which entity to I attach myself to? What about taxes?… There are many payroll methods out there. But, if you are looking for different way to get things done with your international…

[myndsolution1]

A Comprehensive Guide to Payroll Outsourcing

In the fast-paced modern world where innovations are happening in the blink of an eye, and traditional methods are becoming obsolete by the second, the business environment also evolves as the clock ticks. Amidst this, keeping up with the trends requires a strategic approach to all aspects of your operations. Payroll is an aspect that can become a time-consuming task and a potential source of errors if not managed carefully. This is where the services of payroll management services and multi country payroll service providers come into play. These payroll outsourcing services and global payroll outsourcing companies provide a solution to streamline processes and ensure compliance.

[mercanstalks]

What is a PEO? Guide to Professional Employer Organizations

As businesses in Australia strive to be more competitive and profitable, many are turning to Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs) to help streamline their operations. PEOs, also known as Employer of Record in Australia, provide a comprehensive range of services that enable small and medium-sized businesses to outsource their human resource functions, including payroll management. In this article, we will delve deeper into what PEOs are, their benefits, and how they can help businesses grow.

What is a PEO in Australia?

PEOs (PEO in Australia)are professional service companies that provide a range of HR services to other businesses. In essence, PEOs act as the employer of record for their client’s employees, meaning they handle all payroll, tax, and regulatory compliance obligations on behalf of their clients. This can help businesses reduce the administrative burden of managing their own HR functions and free up their time and resources to focus on their core business activities.

PEOs have been around for a while in the US, where they are a popular solution for businesses looking to outsource their HR functions. In Australia, the use of PEOs is still relatively new, but there has been a growing interest in recent years as businesses seek to streamline their operations and reduce their administrative burden.

Benefits of using a PEO in Australia

1. Access to Expertise

One of the most significant benefits of using a PEO is that it provides businesses with access to a team of HR experts who have in-depth knowledge and experience in managing HR functions. These experts can help businesses navigate complex HR regulations and compliance requirements and stay up to date with changes in legislation that could impact their operations. This can be especially important for small and medium-sized businesses that may not have the resources to hire a dedicated HR team.

2. Cost Savings

Another key benefit of using a PEO is that it can help businesses save money. By outsourcing their HR functions, businesses can reduce the costs associated with recruiting, hiring, training, and managing staff. PEOs also have economies of scale that allow them to negotiate better rates for services such as insurance and workers' compensation, which can further reduce costs for their clients.

3. Increased Efficiency

By outsourcing global payroll outsourcing companies to a PEO, businesses can also increase their efficiency. PEOs have streamlined processes and technologies that can help businesses manage their HR functions more effectively. This can include automated payroll and time tracking systems that reduce the administrative burden of managing employee records, timesheets, and payroll calculations.

4. Reduced Risk

Compliance with HR regulations can be complex, and failure to comply can result in significant financial and legal penalties. By outsourcing their HR functions to a PEO, businesses can reduce their risk of non-compliance and ensure that they are meeting their obligations as an employer. PEOs can provide expert advice on compliance matters and manage all regulatory reporting and filings on behalf of their clients.

How to choose the best PEO?

One of the key HR functions that businesses can outsource to a PEO is payroll management. payroll outsourcing australia involves delegating the management of employee pay and related compliance requirements to an external service provider, such as a PEO. This can be a significant time saver for businesses, allowing them to focus on their core activities and avoid the administrative burden of managing payroll.

Choosing the Right PEO in Australia

When choosing a PEO in Australia, it’s essential to do your research and find a provider that aligns. These companies have a presence in multiple countries and can help businesses manage their HR functions across different jurisdictions. This can be particularly important for businesses with a global footprint, as they may have different compliance requirements in each country they operate in.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

How to design a tech regulation

TONIGHT (June 20) I'm live onstage in LOS ANGELES for a recording of the GO FACT YOURSELF podcast. TOMORROW (June 21) I'm doing an ONLINE READING for the LOCUS AWARDS at 16hPT. On SATURDAY (June 22) I'll be in OAKLAND, CA for a panel (13hPT) and a keynote (18hPT) at the LOCUS AWARDS.

It's not your imagination: tech really is underregulated. There are plenty of avoidable harms that tech visits upon the world, and while some of these harms are mere negligence, others are self-serving, creating shareholder value and widespread public destruction.

Making good tech policy is hard, but not because "tech moves too fast for regulation to keep up with," nor because "lawmakers are clueless about tech." There are plenty of fast-moving areas that lawmakers manage to stay abreast of (think of the rapid, global adoption of masking and social distancing rules in mid-2020). Likewise we generally manage to make good policy in areas that require highly specific technical knowledge (that's why it's noteworthy and awful when, say, people sicken from badly treated tapwater, even though water safety, toxicology and microbiology are highly technical areas outside the background of most elected officials).

That doesn't mean that technical rigor is irrelevant to making good policy. Well-run "expert agencies" include skilled practitioners on their payrolls – think here of large technical staff at the FTC, or the UK Competition and Markets Authority's best-in-the-world Digital Markets Unit:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/13/kitbashed/#app-store-tax

The job of government experts isn't just to research the correct answers. Even more important is experts' role in evaluating conflicting claims from interested parties. When administrative agencies make new rules, they have to collect public comments and counter-comments. The best agencies also hold hearings, and the very best go on "listening tours" where they invite the broad public to weigh in (the FTC has done an awful lot of these during Lina Khan's tenure, to its benefit, and it shows):

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events/2022/04/ftc-justice-department-listening-forum-firsthand-effects-mergers-acquisitions-health-care

But when an industry dwindles to a handful of companies, the resulting cartel finds it easy to converge on a single talking point and to maintain strict message discipline. This means that the evidentiary record is starved for disconfirming evidence that would give the agencies contrasting perspectives and context for making good policy.

Tech industry shills have a favorite tactic: whenever there's any proposal that would erode the industry's profits, self-serving experts shout that the rule is technically impossible and deride the proposer as "clueless."

This tactic works so well because the proposers sometimes are clueless. Take Europe's on-again/off-again "chat control" proposal to mandate spyware on every digital device that will screen everything you upload for child sex abuse material (CSAM, better known as "child pornography"). This proposal is profoundly dangerous, as it will weaken end-to-end encryption, the key to all secure and private digital communication:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/18/encryption-is-deeply-threatening-to-power-meredith-whittaker-of-messaging-app-signal

It's also an impossible-to-administer mess that incorrectly assumes that killing working encryption in the two mobile app stores run by the mobile duopoly will actually prevent bad actors from accessing private tools:

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/09/04/oh-for-fucks-sake-not-this-fucking-bullshit-again-cryptography-edition/

When technologists correctly point out the lack of rigor and catastrophic spillover effects from this kind of crackpot proposal, lawmakers stick their fingers in their ears and shout "NERD HARDER!"

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/01/12/nerd-harder-fbi-director-reiterates-faith-based-belief-in-working-crypto-that-he-can-break/

But this is only half the story. The other half is what happens when tech industry shills want to kill good policy proposals, which is the exact same thing that advocates say about bad ones. When lawmakers demand that tech companies respect our privacy rights – for example, by splitting social media or search off from commercial surveillance, the same people shout that this, too, is technologically impossible.

That's a lie, though. Facebook started out as the anti-surveillance alternative to Myspace. We know it's possible to operate Facebook without surveillance, because Facebook used to operate without surveillance:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3247362

Likewise, Brin and Page's original Pagerank paper, which described Google's architecture, insisted that search was incompatible with surveillance advertising, and Google established itself as a non-spying search tool:

http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf

Even weirder is what happens when there's a proposal to limit a tech company's power to invoke the government's powers to shut down competitors. Take Ethan Zuckerman's lawsuit to strip Facebook of the legal power to sue people who automate their browsers to uncheck the millions of boxes that Facebook requires you to click by hand in order to unfollow everyone:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/02/kaiju-v-kaiju/#cda-230-c-2-b

Facebook's apologists have lost their minds over this, insisting that no one can possibly understand the potential harms of taking away Facebook's legal right to decide how your browser works. They take the position that only Facebook can understand when it's safe and proportional to use Facebook in ways the company didn't explicitly design for, and that they should be able to ask the government to fine or even imprison people who fail to defer to Facebook's decisions about how its users configure their computers.

This is an incredibly convenient position, since it arrogates to Facebook the right to order the rest of us to use our computers in the ways that are most beneficial to its shareholders. But Facebook's apologists insist that they are not motivated by parochial concerns over the value of their stock portfolios; rather, they have objective, technical concerns, that no one except them is qualified to understand or comment on.

There's a great name for this: "scalesplaining." As in "well, actually the platforms are doing an amazing job, but you can't possibly understand that because you don't work for them." It's weird enough when scalesplaining is used to condemn sensible regulation of the platforms; it's even weirder when it's weaponized to defend a system of regulatory protection for the platforms against would-be competitors.

Just as there are no atheists in foxholes, there are no libertarians in government-protected monopolies. Somehow, scalesplaining can be used to condemn governments as incapable of making any tech regulations and to insist that regulations that protect tech monopolies are just perfect and shouldn't ever be weakened. Truly, it's impossible to get someone to understand something when the value of their employee stock options depends on them not understanding it.

None of this is to say that every tech regulation is a good one. Governments often propose bad tech regulations (like chat control), or ones that are technologically impossible (like Article 17 of the EU's 2019 Digital Single Markets Directive, which requires tech companies to detect and block copyright infringements in their users' uploads).

But the fact that scalesplainers use the same argument to criticize both good and bad regulations makes the waters very muddy indeed. Policymakers are rightfully suspicious when they hear "that's not technically possible" because they hear that both for technically impossible proposals and for proposals that scalesplainers just don't like.

After decades of regulations aimed at making platforms behave better, we're finally moving into a new era, where we just make the platforms less important. That is, rather than simply ordering Facebook to block harassment and other bad conduct by its users, laws like the EU's Digital Markets Act will order Facebook and other VLOPs (Very Large Online Platforms, my favorite EU-ism ever) to operate gateways so that users can move to rival services and still communicate with the people who stay behind.

Think of this like number portability, but for digital platforms. Just as you can switch phone companies and keep your number and hear from all the people you spoke to on your old plan, the DMA will make it possible for you to change online services but still exchange messages and data with all the people you're already in touch with.

I love this idea, because it finally grapples with the question we should have been asking all along: why do people stay on platforms where they face harassment and bullying? The answer is simple: because the people – customers, family members, communities – we connect with on the platform are so important to us that we'll tolerate almost anything to avoid losing contact with them:

https://locusmag.com/2023/01/commentary-cory-doctorow-social-quitting/

Platforms deliberately rig the game so that we take each other hostage, locking each other into their badly moderated cesspits by using the love we have for one another as a weapon against us. Interoperability – making platforms connect to each other – shatters those locks and frees the hostages:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

But there's another reason to love interoperability (making moderation less important) over rules that require platforms to stamp out bad behavior (making moderation better). Interop rules are much easier to administer than content moderation rules, and when it comes to regulation, administratability is everything.

The DMA isn't the EU's only new rule. They've also passed the Digital Services Act, which is a decidedly mixed bag. Among its provisions are a suite of rules requiring companies to monitor their users for harmful behavior and to intervene to block it. Whether or not you think platforms should do this, there's a much more important question: how can we enforce this rule?

Enforcing a rule requiring platforms to prevent harassment is very "fact intensive." First, we have to agree on a definition of "harassment." Then we have to figure out whether something one user did to another satisfies that definition. Finally, we have to determine whether the platform took reasonable steps to detect and prevent the harassment.

Each step of this is a huge lift, especially that last one, since to a first approximation, everyone who understands a given VLOP's server infrastructure is a partisan, scalesplaining engineer on the VLOP's payroll. By the time we find out whether the company broke the rule, years will have gone by, and millions more users will be in line to get justice for themselves.

So allowing users to leave is a much more practical step than making it so that they've got no reason to want to leave. Figuring out whether a platform will continue to forward your messages to and from the people you left there is a much simpler technical matter than agreeing on what harassment is, whether something is harassment by that definition, and whether the company was negligent in permitting harassment.

But as much as I like the DMA's interop rule, I think it is badly incomplete. Given that the tech industry is so concentrated, it's going to be very hard for us to define standard interop interfaces that don't end up advantaging the tech companies. Standards bodies are extremely easy for big industry players to capture:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/30/weak-institutions/

If tech giants refuse to offer access to their gateways to certain rivals because they seem "suspicious," it will be hard to tell whether the companies are just engaged in self-serving smears against a credible rival, or legitimately trying to protect their users from a predator trying to plug into their infrastructure. These fact-intensive questions are the enemy of speedy, responsive, effective policy administration.

But there's more than one way to attain interoperability. Interop doesn't have to come from mandates, interfaces designed and overseen by government agencies. There's a whole other form of interop that's far nimbler than mandates: adversarial interoperability:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/10/adversarial-interoperability

"Adversarial interoperability" is a catch-all term for all the guerrilla warfare tactics deployed in service to unilaterally changing a technology: reverse engineering, bots, scraping and so on. These tactics have a long and honorable history, but they have been slowly choked out of existence with a thicket of IP rights, like the IP rights that allow Facebook to shut down browser automation tools, which Ethan Zuckerman is suing to nullify:

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

Adversarial interop is very flexible. No matter what technological moves a company makes to interfere with interop, there's always a countermove the guerrilla fighter can make – tweak the scraper, decompile the new binary, change the bot's behavior. That's why tech companies use IP rights and courts, not firewall rules, to block adversarial interoperators.

At the same time, adversarial interop is unreliable. The solution that works today can break tomorrow if the company changes its back-end, and it will stay broken until the adversarial interoperator can respond.

But when companies are faced with the prospect of extended asymmetrical war against adversarial interop in the technological trenches, they often surrender. If companies can't sue adversarial interoperators out of existence, they often sue for peace instead. That's because high-tech guerrilla warfare presents unquantifiable risks and resource demands, and, as the scalesplainers never tire of telling us, this can create real operational problems for tech giants.

In other words, if Facebook can't shut down Ethan Zuckerman's browser automation tool in the courts, and if they're sincerely worried that a browser automation tool will uncheck its user interface buttons so quickly that it crashes the server, all it has to do is offer an official "unsubscribe all" button and no one will use Zuckerman's browser automation tool.

We don't have to choose between adversarial interop and interop mandates. The two are better together than they are apart. If companies building and operating DMA-compliant, mandatory gateways know that a failure to make them useful to rivals seeking to help users escape their authority is getting mired in endless hand-to-hand combat with trench-fighting adversarial interoperators, they'll have good reason to cooperate.

And if lawmakers charged with administering the DMA notice that companies are engaging in adversarial interop rather than using the official, reliable gateway they're overseeing, that's a good indicator that the official gateways aren't suitable.

It would be very on-brand for the EU to create the DMA and tell tech companies how they must operate, and for the USA to simply withdraw the state's protection from the Big Tech companies and let smaller companies try their luck at hacking new features into the big companies' servers without the government getting involved.

Indeed, we're seeing some of that today. Oregon just passed the first ever Right to Repair law banning "parts pairing" – basically a way of using IP law to make it illegal to reverse-engineer a device so you can fix it.

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/03/28/oregon-governor-kotek-signs-strong-tech-right-to-repair-bill/

Taken together, the two approaches – mandates and reverse engineering – are stronger than either on their own. Mandates are sturdy and reliable, but slow-moving. Adversarial interop is flexible and nimble, but unreliable. Put 'em together and you get a two-part epoxy, strong and flexible.

Governments can regulate well, with well-funded expert agencies and smart, adminstratable remedies. It's for that reason that the administrative state is under such sustained attack from the GOP and right-wing Dems. The illegitimate Supreme Court is on the verge of gutting expert agencies' power:

https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2024/05/us-supreme-court-may-soon-discard-or-modify-chevron-deference

It's never been more important to craft regulations that go beyond mere good intentions and take account of adminsitratability. The easier we can make our rules to enforce, the less our beleaguered agencies will need to do to protect us from corporate predators.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/20/scalesplaining/#administratability

Image: Noah Wulf (modified) https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thunderbirds_at_Attention_Next_to_Thunderbird_1_-_Aviation_Nation_2019.jpg

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

[the-garbanzo-annex-jr]

"I’m pleased to announce that today PayPal committed to me that it no longer services this entity," he said. "For American companies, national security should be more important than the bottom line. Doing business with fiscal sponsors of Palestinian terrorists is not acceptable."

The revelation is the latest blow to Alliance for Global Justice's ability to rake in cash for itself and the 140 organizations it fiscally sponsors, including Samidoun, which has shared staffers with the Popular Front, according to Zachor Legal Institute, a think tank that contacted the Treasury Department and IRS about companies working with the Arizona group. Alliance for Global Justice also sponsors the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, a coalition accused of having terror ties that the Democratic fundraising giant ActBlue recently booted off its platform.

AFGJ had to move its fundraising operation to PayPal after Stripe, the Irish-American payment processor that handled $817 billion transactions in 2022, parted ways with it in early September. Salsa Labs stopped working with AFGJ in February, prompting the Arizona charity to put out a 1,000-word statement urging donors to send paper checks. Watchdogs, including Israel's NGO Monitor, have also zoned in on how AFGJ has sponsored Collectif Palestine Vaincra, which it says has coordinated with the Popular Front for a child "indoctrination" camp in the Gaza Strip.

AFGJ's online fundraising portal now produces an error that reads, "Your payment has been declined," when the donation button is pressed. The organization, which did not return a Washington Examiner request for comment, published a press release on its website noting that its projects have "found themselves to be targets of right-wing media attacks.

"The accusations caused financial institutions to cancel AFGJ’s contracts for accepting credit card donations for itself and its projects, distributing funds to projects, and carrying on other vital forms of business, without any investigation or due process by the banks," Alliance for Global Justice said this week. "AFGJ and its 140 fiscally-sponsored projects were suddenly de-platformed, blocked, from using these services. Projects that depend upon these tools have seen their payrolls, rent payments, and other critical financial transactions blocked."

[shituationist]

I think companies like Google and Microsoft have incentive to embellish and even falsify the results of their machine learning projects, but I do worry that sufficiently capable (we won't say "conscious," because that doesn't matter) AI agents are going to replace human workers in services while "advanced economies" have made their economies dependent on the existence of a service sector with high-paying jobs (on a global scale) buttressing a comfortable middle class existence for the average adult.

This isn't just an AI thing. Professionals in the US and Western Europe advocate more restrictive work visa and credentialing programs in order to protect their salaries. This also goes for unskilled workers, who are afraid of the influx of Latin American labor in the US (especially when bosses can hire these workers under the table and pay them less, while paying no payroll taxes on that labor).

The whole existence of the labor market is increasingly at odds with human needs and the technical horizon of the world economy. Coupling livelihood to wages has also been a monstrous feature of our society, but it is becoming more and more monstrous as the number of jobs which provide a consistently decent standard of living seem to be increasingly the purview of machines.

Theorists like Steven Wolfram seem to think that "computational irreducibility" will keep plenty of jobs around forever, but I don't know. Automation in manufacturing didn't increase the total number of manufacturing jobs in the US and Europe. People didn't go from making the tenth part of the head of a pin to the thousandath part. People who were displaced by automation and offshoring were instead shuffled into the service sector, but as automation hits that sector, where's the next sector for them to go to?

Socialist planned economies struggled with this too, but because of more conscious political objectives, since an employment guarantee (an artefact of the appropriation of capitalist, specifically Fordist, thinking) was part of their social contract, and automation would reduce the number of jobs or otherwise make workers redundant (but you couldn't just fire them, especially since things like housing were often tied to jobs), so there was a conservative impulse outside of the military production sector to keep jobs labor intensive. Political ossification and the gerontocracy ensured that people with no adequate knowledge of on-the-ground conditions would be able to reach a ministerial position and make the Soviet state unable to undertake needed reforms (so they ended up privatizing everything and sending millions to an early grave with the liquidation of the planned economy instead). Glushkov's OGAS project is a testament to this: early digitalization of the planned economy was killed because ministers didn't want to hand over any control to a computer network, even if that computer network would have breathed new life into the planned economy or made it more competitive with its imperialist rivals (bear in mind here that many ex-Soviet ministers would go on to become oligarchs after privatization was pursued).

I don't know. I'm a little scared and therefore motivated to be skeptical of recent advances in artificial intelligence. "Artificial General Intelligence" has seemingly been redefined from "scary superintelligence that's gonna became conscious and kill us all" to "computer program that can complete any task that a human can do", which is a more realistic goal and arguably feasible from a materialist vantage point (even if not commercially profitable). It isn't there yet, and there's reasons to think the current approach could hit a wall, but even without breaching that kind of "intelligence", the impact of automation in services could mean that service workers are increasingly subject to the precarity that American manufacturing workers have been and which such bromides as "learn to code" have been intended to address.

Every day I am more convinced that our choice is between socialism or barbarism: a global planned economy in which our basic and social needs are addressed through collective, non-commercial, association(s), in which opportunities to make our lives meaningful through work have become "life's prime want"; or a capitalist world-system which mericlessly throws people into the industrial reserve army of labor, making people's lives subject to impersonal forces completely and totally beyond their control, preserving the class structure at all costs and bribing the remnants of the labor aristocracy and bureaucracy with patronage while potentially billions suffer. Worst case scenario is we only get the former through the latter.

(I would appreciate it if you have anything to say about this post, don't do it through a reblog but through a reply or DM, just for my anxiety's sake 🥺)

[shantitechnology]

Boosting Efficiency:  The Role of ERP Software in Modern Manufacturing Operations

In today's fast-paced manufacturing landscape, efficiency is not just a desirable trait; it's a necessity.  To stay competitive and meet the demands of the market, manufacturers must streamline their processes, optimize resource utilization, and enhance decision-making capabilities.  This is where Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software steps in as a game-changer.  In this article, we'll delve into the pivotal role of ERP systems in revolutionizing manufacturing operations, particularly in India's thriving industrial sector.

Understanding ERP for Manufacturing Industry

ERP systems for manufacturing are comprehensive software solutions designed to integrate and automate core business processes such as production planning, inventory management, supply chain logistics, financial management, and human resources.  By consolidating data and operations into a unified platform, ERP empowers manufacturers with real-time insights, facilitates collaboration across departments, and enables informed decision-making.

Streamlining Operations with ERP Solutions

In the dynamic environment of manufacturing, where every minute counts, efficiency gains translate directly into cost savings and competitive advantages.  ERP software for manufacturing offers a multitude of features that streamline operations and drive efficiency:

1.   Enhanced Production Planning:  ERP systems enable manufacturers to create accurate production schedules based on demand forecasts, resource availability, and production capacity.  By optimizing production timelines and minimizing idle time, manufacturers can fulfill orders promptly and reduce lead times.

2.   Inventory Management:  Efficient inventory management is crucial for balancing supply and demand while minimizing holding costs.  ERP software provides real-time visibility into inventory levels, automates reorder points, and facilitates inventory optimization to prevent stockouts and overstock situations.

3.   Supply Chain Optimization:  ERP solutions for manufacturing integrate supply chain processes from procurement to distribution, enabling seamless coordination with suppliers and distributors.  By optimizing procurement cycles, minimizing transportation costs, and reducing lead times, manufacturers can enhance supply chain resilience and responsiveness.

4.   Quality Control:  Maintaining product quality is paramount in manufacturing to uphold brand reputation and customer satisfaction.  ERP systems offer quality management modules that streamline inspection processes, track product defects, and facilitate corrective actions to ensure adherence to quality standards.

5.   Financial Management:  Effective financial management is essential for sustaining manufacturing operations and driving profitability.  ERP software provides robust accounting modules that automate financial transactions, streamline budgeting and forecasting, and generate comprehensive financial reports for informed decision-making.

6.   Human Resource Management:  People are the cornerstone of manufacturing operations, and managing workforce efficiently is critical for productivity and employee satisfaction.  ERP systems for manufacturing include HR modules that automate payroll processing, manage employee records, and facilitate workforce planning to align staffing levels with production demands.

The Advantages of ERP for Manufacturing Companies in India

India's manufacturing sector is undergoing rapid transformation, fueled by factors such as government initiatives like "Make in India," technological advancements, and globalization.  In this dynamic landscape, ERP software plays a pivotal role in empowering manufacturing companies to thrive and remain competitive:

1.   Scalability:  ERP solutions for manufacturing are scalable, making them suitable for companies of all sizes – from small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to large conglomerates.  Whether a company is expanding its operations or diversifying its product portfolio, ERP systems can adapt to evolving business needs and support growth.

2.   Compliance:  Regulatory compliance is a significant concern for manufacturing companies in India, given the complex regulatory environment.  ERP software incorporates compliance features that ensure adherence to industry regulations, tax laws, and reporting requirements, minimizing the risk of non-compliance penalties.

3.   Localization:  ERP vendors catering to the Indian manufacturing sector offer localized solutions tailored to the unique requirements of the Indian market.  From multi-currency support to GST compliance features, these ERP systems are equipped with functionalities that address the specific challenges faced by Indian manufacturers.

4.   Cost Efficiency:  Implementing ERP software for manufacturing entails upfront investment, but the long-term benefits far outweigh the costs.  By streamlining processes, optimizing resource utilization, and reducing operational inefficiencies, ERP systems drive cost savings and improve overall profitability.

5.   Competitive Edge:  In a fiercely competitive market, manufacturing companies in India must differentiate themselves through operational excellence and agility.  ERP software equips companies with the tools and insights needed to outperform competitors, adapt to market dynamics, and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Choosing the Right ERP Software for Manufacturing

Selecting the right ERP solution is crucial for maximizing the benefits and ensuring a smooth implementation process.  When evaluating ERP software for manufacturing, companies should consider the following factors:

1.   Industry-specific functionality:  Choose an ERP system that offers industry-specific features and functionalities tailored to the unique requirements of manufacturing operations.

2.   Scalability and flexibility:  Ensure that the ERP software can scale with your business and accommodate future growth and expansion.

3.   Ease of integration:  Look for ERP systems that seamlessly integrate with existing software applications, such as CRM systems, MES solutions, and IoT devices, to create a cohesive technology ecosystem.

4.   User-friendliness:  A user-friendly interface and intuitive navigation are essential for ensuring widespread adoption and maximizing user productivity.

5.   Vendor support and expertise:  Select a reputable ERP vendor with a proven track record of success in the manufacturing industry and robust customer support services.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ERP software has emerged as a cornerstone of modern manufacturing operations, empowering companies to enhance efficiency, drive growth, and maintain a competitive edge in the global market.  For manufacturing companies in India, where agility, scalability, and compliance are paramount, implementing the right ERP solution can be a transformative investment that paves the way for sustainable success.  By harnessing the power of ERP, manufacturers can optimize processes, streamline operations, and unlock new opportunities for innovation and growth in the dynamic landscape of the manufacturing industry.