#RNA Extraction
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
HighPrep PCR Beads vs. AMPure XP: 3 Reasons to Make the Switch
When it comes to PCR cleanup in next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows, SPRI bead-based purification remains the gold standard. For years, AMPure XP has dominated the market with its reliable but expensive solution. However, labs are now increasingly turning to a smarter alternative—MagBio Genomics' HighPrep PCR beads.
Why are more researchers switching from AMPure XP to HighPrep PCR? Because they want better value, equal (or better) performance, and true workflow flexibility. In this article, we dive into the top three reasons why HighPrep PCR has become the preferred choice for DNA purification—and why it might be time for your lab to make the switch.
Reason 1: Cost-Efficiency Without Performance Compromise
One of the biggest drivers for labs to reconsider their reagent suppliers is cost. AMPure XP is known for high recovery rates and reproducibility, but its cost per reaction adds up fast—especially for high-throughput facilities. HighPrep PCR offers a cost savings of up to 40% per sample, without compromising yield or quality.
Side-by-side tests show:
DNA recovery from 100 bp to 2 kb is nearly identical for both products.
HighPrep PCR performs equally well in removing primers, dimers, and enzymes.
Labs switching to HighPrep PCR report equivalent sequencing coverage and fidelity.
Over the course of a year, switching to HighPrep PCR can lead to tens of thousands of dollars in savings for mid-to-large-scale labs. For academic labs, that translates into more samples processed, more grant deliverables achieved, and more experiments completed on time.
By reducing per-sample purification costs, labs using HighPrep PCR can reallocate budget toward additional experiments, new equipment, or expanded sample sizes.
Reason 2: Reliable, Consistent Performance Across Applications
Whether you're doing amplicon sequencing, library preparation, or qPCR cleanup, consistency matters. HighPrep PCR beads are manufactured under strict quality controls to ensure batch-to-batch reproducibility. Unlike some generic alternatives, HighPrep PCR has gone through rigorous testing to meet the needs of sensitive molecular biology workflows.
HighPrep PCR is validated for:
Illumina and Ion Torrent library prep workflows
Post-PCR cleanup for qPCR and Sanger sequencing
Adapter dimer cleanup after ligation
Double-sided size selection protocols for fragment tuning
Automation with KingFisher, Tecan, and Hamilton platforms
In fact, one high-throughput genomics core saw a 10% improvement in recovery reproducibility after switching from AMPure XP to HighPrep PCR. The magnetic bead suspension in HighPrep remains uniform and pipetting-friendly, reducing technical variability between users and across runs.
For long-term experiments that demand reproducible input DNA, this level of consistency translates directly into higher confidence in downstream data.
Reason 3: Flexible Workflows and Automation Compatibility
HighPrep PCR is designed with user flexibility in mind. From low-input DNA to automation integration, it supports a range of protocols without sacrificing ease of use. It’s fully compatible with manual and automated workflows, making it suitable for both bench-top researchers and large core labs.
Key advantages include:
Stable bead suspension compatible with multichannel pipettes and robotic arms
Broad input range from 5 ng to several μg of DNA
Works in 96- and 384-well formats with minimal protocol adjustments
Validated for double-SPRI workflows with tunable size exclusion parameters
Automation labs save not only on cost, but also reduce hands-on time and error rates, thanks to HighPrep's compatibility with widely used platforms like KingFisher Flex and Tecan Fluent.
How HighPrep PCR Matches Up in Common Use Cases
Let’s explore how HighPrep PCR performs in real lab scenarios:
Use Case: NGS Library Prep for Illumina
Objective: Cleanup post-PCR and remove dimers before sequencing.
Outcome: HighPrep PCR shows identical Bioanalyzer traces compared to AMPure XP, with better yield retention in low-input samples.
Use Case: Size Selection for Targeted Panels
Objective: Enrich for 350–500 bp fragments.
Outcome: Dual-SPRI using 0.6x/0.8x ratio yields high purity with narrow distribution, matching performance of AMPure XP.
Use Case: High-Throughput PCR Cleanup in 384-Well Plates
Objective: Maximize speed and recovery.
Outcome: HighPrep PCR allows faster separation and easier elution, increasing daily throughput by 20%.
Performance Comparison: HighPrep PCR vs AMPure XP

Why AMPure XP Users Are Making the Switch
While AMPure XP has long set the standard, users report growing frustration with:
Rising reagent costs
Supply chain delays and backorders
Limited flexibility in size selection
Reduced support for protocol customization
MagBio Genomics recognized these pain points and engineered HighPrep PCR to offer a more responsive, transparent, and scalable alternative. Labs making the switch often report that they "should have done it sooner."
Technical Tips for Optimizing HighPrep PCR Use
Use fresh ethanol for wash steps to minimize salt retention.
Avoid overdrying the beads, which can reduce elution efficiency.
Use magnetic stands with tight separation windows for fast and clean separation.
Pre-wet pipette tips to reduce bead carryover during transfers.
Elute in a pre-warmed buffer (37°C) for maximum recovery from HMW DNA.
MagBio also provides detailed protocol templates for Illumina workflows, long-read prep, and automated systems, ensuring a smooth transition from AMPure XP.
Transition Made Easy: From AMPure XP to HighPrep PCR
MagBio offers personalized onboarding and protocol migration support. For labs making the switch, MagBio provides:
Side-by-side comparison guides
Bead ratio conversion charts
Automation scripts for major platforms
Free sample kits for initial validation
This ensures a seamless transition with minimal disruption and quick results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Will I need to change my current protocol? A: In most cases, no. HighPrep PCR can be used with the same volumes and timings as AMPure XP, or optimized for specific workflows.
Q: Can I still do double-sided size selection? A: Yes, HighPrep PCR is fully compatible with SPRI-based dual-cut protocols.
Q: Is there a minimum or maximum DNA input range? A: HighPrep PCR works with inputs from 5 ng to over 5 μg of DNA.
Q: What about RNA applications? A: While this kit is designed for DNA, MagBio offers HighPrep RNA kits specifically for RNA cleanup.
Final Thoughts
Switching to HighPrep PCR from AMPure XP isn't just about saving money—it's about empowering your lab to do more, faster, and with greater flexibility. With equivalent performance, lower cost, and validated automation support, HighPrep PCR delivers everything modern genomics labs need.
Labs around the world are making the switch. From academic research centers to clinical sequencing facilities, HighPrep PCR is transforming how DNA cleanup is done—one sample at a time.
Make the switch today and join hundreds of labs improving their workflows with HighPrep PCR beads. Explore the HighPrep PCR Clean-Up Kit at MagBio Genomics Inc.
0 notes
Text
DNA and RNA Sample Preparation Market is Estimated to Witness High Growth Owing to Increasing Adoption
The DNA and RNA sample preparation market involves processes associated with isolation, extraction, purification and quantification of nucleic acids DNA and RNA from various sources like tissues, blood, sperm, cells etc. for downstream applications in genomics, molecular diagnostics, personalized medicine and others. The sample preparation is a critical and initial step before conducting various genomic tests including Next Generation Sequencing, polymerase chain reaction and other assays. Growing awareness and adoption of precision medicine and genetic/molecular testing is driving demand for efficient nucleic acid isolation and downstream analysis.
The Global DNA and RNA Sample Preparation Market is estimated to be valued at US$ 2262.46 Mn in 2024 and is expected to exhibit a CAGR of 5.8% over the forecast period 2024 To 2031. Key Takeaways Key players operating in the DNA and RNA sample preparation are Agilent Technologies, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., DiaSorin S.p.A, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Miroculus, Inc., Illumina, Inc., PerkinElmer, Inc., QIAGEN, Sigma Aldrich Corp., Tecan Group AG, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Growing prominence of personalized medicine is creating opportunities for development of new sample preparation methods and kits which can extract nucleic acids from various types of samples. Rising incidence of chronic and infectious diseases worldwide is increasing diagnostic testing which will propel sample preparation market growth. Global expansion of key market players through acquisitions and partnerships with regional diagnostic labs and research institutes will further augment market revenues. Market Drivers Increasing funding for Genomic and genetic research from government bodies as well as private sector is one of the key factors driving the DNA and RNA Sample Preparation Market Size. Government initiatives aimed at large scale population screening and clinical testing for various genetic disorders, infectious diseases and cancers are also creating demand for high throughput nucleic acid preparation. Growing geriatric population and rising healthcare spending in developing nations also provides growth opportunities for market players in the forecast period.
PEST Analysis Political: Laws and regulations imposed by governments for research using DNA and RNA samples could impact the market. Changes in healthcare policies will also have effects. Economic: Factors like GDP growth, income levels, healthcare spending will drive demand. Rise in research activities and focus on precision medicine boost the market. Social: Growing awareness about personalized medicine and importance of genetic testing are important. Social trends also promote preventive healthcare and wellness. Technological: Advancements in fields like next generation sequencing, lab automation, bioinformatics are key for market growth. Miniaturization and portability of equipment expand applications. Developments in sample collection and storage methods improve efficiency. Geographical regions where the market in terms of value is concentrated include North America and Europe. North America accounts for the largest share in the global market due to presence of well-established healthcare industry and research institutes. Europe also captures notable share due to growing biotech sector and research funding. The Asia Pacific region is projected to be the fastest growing market during the forecast period. This is attributed to factors such as increasing healthcare expenditure, growing awareness, expanding biotech industry and rising government investments in research. Countries like China, India offer growth opportunities as they focus on healthcare infrastructure development.
Get more insights on DNA And RNA Sample Preparation Market
Also read related article on Surgical Robots Market
Discover the Report for More Insights, Tailored to Your Language
French
German
Italian
Russian
Japanese
Chinese
Korean
Portuguese
Vaagisha brings over three years of expertise as a content editor in the market research domain. Originally a creative writer, she discovered her passion for editing, combining her flair for writing with a meticulous eye for detail. Her ability to craft and refine compelling content makes her an invaluable asset in delivering polished and engaging write-ups.
(LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaagisha-singh-8080b91)

#Coherent Market Insights#DNA And RNA Sample Preparation Market#DNA And RNA Sample Preparation#RNA Sample Preparation#Nucleic Acid Extraction#Genetic Material Isolation#DNA Extraction#RNA Extraction#Molecular Biology#Genomic DNA
1 note
·
View note
Text
Scientists have extracted RNA from an extinct species for the first time!!
They extracted it from a mummified Thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger) that was stored in Stockholm.
Just 2 months after the Thylacine was granted a protection status, the last of its kind passed from exposure in 1936 at the Beaumaris Zoo in Hobart.
It was the world's largest carnivorous marsupial, estimated to stand as tall as 51 inches and weighing around 66lb.
I'm very excited for the potential of bringing this species back - Jurassic Park style. We hunted this creature to extinction and now we may be able to fix that.
#thylacine#tasmanian tiger#science#rna sequencing#rna extraction#extinct animals#extinct species#extinction
1 note
·
View note
Text
i am exhausted!!
#we changed from winter to summer time and it fucked me up#and also all those rna extractions#i just wanna eep
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm so fucking exhausted guys, physically and emotionally.
But I still need to go to lab because I have an experiment schedule to keep *sigh*
#just rambling#i just want to sleep for 12 hours straight#but nooo i need to work#the injustice#the cruelty#i'm gonna tell my supervisor i will just do RNA extraction today#if i try cryosection i will fuck up and i probably end up crying in frustration#it's too fiddly
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Today is my favourite day of the week; Sample Day! The day when we get to leave the lab and collect samples of the latest mutations in Redlight!
It's also my least favourite day of the week, as said samples have to be collected in Red Zones. But, sometimes we luck out and that week's zone has been cleared of hives before we arrive, so fingers crossed!
#prototype 2009#Redlight virus more like deadlight virus#did you know? the reason you don't see many Redlight corpses is because we collect and insinerate them!#then we sift through the ashes for the teeth and extract the traces of viral RNA inside!#Redlight infects the body and then replaces things like teeth and skin from the ground up#which is why infected are so much harder to kill than uninfected!#it'd be great for making super soldiers if it didn't destroy so much of the brain in the process
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation: Why MagBio's Magnetic Beads are the Ultimate Ampure XP Alternative
High molecular weight (HMW) DNA isolation is a critical process in modern genomics research, especially for applications like next-generation sequencing (NGS), long-read sequencing, and genome assembly. Scientists rely on high-quality, intact DNA to ensure accurate results and reproducibility. In the quest for precision, researchers often turn to magnetic bead-based reagents for PCR clean-up and size selection to achieve superior results.
While the Ampure XP system has long been considered the gold standard for DNA purification and clean-up, MagBio’s HighPrep PCR magnetic beads have emerged as a powerful and efficient Ampure XP alternative. Designed specifically for PCR clean-up and size selection, HighPrep PCR offers significant advantages, especially for High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation, making it the go-to solution for many researchers looking to optimize their workflows.
High Molecular Weight DNA Matters
Before diving into the benefits of MagBio’s HighPrep PCR, it's important to understand why high molecular weight DNA isolation is so essential. HMW DNA refers to DNA fragments that are longer and more intact than standard DNA fragments. These long fragments are especially important in applications such as long-read sequencing, structural variant analysis, and genome assembly, where large DNA molecules provide a clearer picture of genetic architecture.
Accurate High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation ensures that DNA is not fragmented or degraded during extraction and purification. Longer DNA fragments lead to better sequencing results, more comprehensive genome coverage, and a deeper understanding of genetic complexity. To achieve these results, researchers require reliable purification systems that preserve DNA integrity and enable efficient downstream analysis.
Drawbacks of Ampure XP
While Ampure XP has served as the gold standard for PCR clean-up and DNA purification, it is not without its limitations. One of the major drawbacks is that the Ampure XP system can sometimes lead to loss of HMW DNA fragments during size selection, especially for applications where precise selection of long DNA fragments is necessary. Additionally, Ampure XP requires precise buffer-to-sample ratios to achieve optimal performance, which can complicate workflows and introduce variability.
In an era where speed and efficiency are crucial, many labs are also looking for more automation-friendly solutions that integrate smoothly with liquid handling systems. Ampure XP’s protocol can be cumbersome for high-throughput applications, making it less ideal for labs that require quick turnaround times and scalable workflows.
HighPrep PCR: The Superior Ampure XP Alternative
MagBio’s HighPrep PCR offers a powerful solution to the limitations of Ampure XP, providing superior PCR clean-up and size selection for both standard and high molecular weight DNA. This paramagnetic bead-based reagent is specifically designed for efficient DNA purification, ensuring high recovery rates and consistent fragment size selection, making it ideal for applications like NGS, cloning, and PCR clean-up.
High Recovery of Amplicons >100 bp
One of the key benefits of HighPrep PCR is its ability to achieve high recovery rates of DNA fragments, especially those greater than 100 base pairs. This feature makes it particularly useful for isolating longer DNA fragments, which is essential for applications such as long-read sequencing and HMW DNA isolation. Unlike other reagents, which may lose significant amounts of long DNA fragments, HighPrep PCR ensures maximum recovery, preserving the integrity of your DNA samples.
Efficient Size Selection for High Molecular Weight DNA
Size selection is a critical step in DNA library preparation for sequencing. HighPrep PCR’s magnetic bead-based system allows for precise and uniform size selection, ensuring that only the desired DNA fragments are retained for downstream applications. This is especially important for High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation, where preserving longer DNA fragments is key to successful sequencing.
HighPrep PCR selectively binds to DNA fragments based on the concentration of beads used in the reaction. This flexibility allows researchers to fine-tune their size selection to meet specific experimental needs, whether they are working with fragmented DNA, amplicons, or genomic DNA.
No Centrifugation Required
Traditional DNA purification methods often require time-consuming centrifugation steps, which can be prone to error and introduce variability into workflows. HighPrep PCR eliminates the need for centrifugation by using magnetic beads to bind and isolate DNA fragments. This not only streamlines the process but also reduces the risk of sample loss or contamination. For labs looking to increase throughput and efficiency, this is a major advantage.
Automation-Friendly Design
As more labs move toward high-throughput automation, having a PCR clean-up reagent that integrates seamlessly with liquid handling systems is essential. HighPrep PCR is designed with this in mind, offering compatibility with most liquid handling stations. This makes it an excellent choice for labs that need to scale up their operations without sacrificing precision or reproducibility.
Automation-friendly reagents like HighPrep PCR help reduce human error, save time, and allow for more consistent results. In contrast, Ampure XP may not always offer the same level of integration with liquid handling systems, making it less suited for high-throughput applications.
Consistent Fragment Size Distribution
Achieving uniform and consistent DNA fragment sizes is essential for reliable results, especially in applications like NGS. HighPrep PCR ensures that DNA fragments are consistently sized, leading to better library quality and more accurate sequencing data. This is particularly beneficial for researchers working with complex or degraded samples, where maintaining consistency across replicates is crucial.
Flexible DNA Input Range
HighPrep PCR is highly versatile and can accommodate a wide range of DNA input concentrations, from 0.5 ng/µL to 150 ng/µL. This flexibility makes it suitable for various sample types, including HMW DNA, fragmented DNA, PCR amplicons, and genomic DNA. Whether you’re working with low-concentration samples or need to scale up for large projects, HighPrep PCR offers the adaptability needed to ensure successful DNA purification and size selection.
Rapid and Reliable Results
In a fast-paced research environment, speed is critical. HighPrep PCR offers a rapid protocol that can be completed in under 65 minutes, allowing researchers to move quickly from PCR clean-up to downstream applications. This saves valuable time without compromising on the quality or reliability of the results.
Applications of HighPrep PCR
MagBio’s HighPrep PCR is designed to meet the needs of researchers across a wide range of applications, including:
NGS Library Preparation: HighPrep PCR ensures that DNA libraries are free from contaminants and have consistent fragment sizes, leading to higher-quality sequencing data.
PCR Clean-Up: Remove unwanted primers, dNTPs, and salts after PCR to obtain pure DNA for downstream analysis.
DNA Size Selection: Achieve precise and uniform size selection for long-read sequencing or other applications requiring HMW DNA.
Cloning: Ensure that only the desired DNA fragments are retained for cloning applications.
Microarrays and Restriction Enzyme Digestions: Purify and size-select DNA for use in microarray and restriction digestion workflows.
When it comes to PCR clean-up and size selection for High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation, MagBio’s HighPrep PCR stands out as the ultimate Ampure XP alternative. Its ability to recover long DNA fragments, perform efficient size selection, and integrate with high-throughput automation makes it the preferred choice for labs looking to optimize their DNA purification workflows. By switching to HighPrep PCR, researchers can achieve better results, faster processing times, and more consistent data—all while preserving the integrity of their valuable DNA samples. If you are looking for Magnetic beads for PCR Clean Up and Size Selection, High Molecular Weight DNA Isolation, or Ampure XP alternative, check out MagBio Genomics, Inc..
0 notes
Text

#G2M's MagRNA Viral RNA-II #Extraction Kit extracts high-quality total viral nucleic acid from various biological samples, such as body fluids, serums, plasma, urine, soaking #solutions, tissue homogenate supernatant, and culture supernatant. Our comprehensive kit ensures intact and pure #RNA extraction for precise downstream #analysis. Elevate your viral research with MagRNA.
Visit our website for more information: https://www.genes2me.com/viral-rna-extraction-kit
For more details, Call us at +91-8800821778 or drop us an email at [email protected]
#ViralRNA #ExtractionKit #BiologicalSamples #Research #Innovation #magrna #viral #serums #diagnostic
#MagRNA#Viral RNA#Extraction Kit#Biological Samples#Research#Diagnostic#G2M#genes2me#analysis#serums#viral#Extraction kits
0 notes
Text

Mp Bio-Medicals Automatic Homogenization Instrument
Introducing the cutting-edge Mp Bio-Medicals Automatic Homogenization Instrument – your key to precision homogenization in the lab! This advanced instrument redefines homogenization efficiency, ensuring consistent and reliable results for your research. Engineered by Mp Bio-Medicals, a trusted name in laboratory equipment, this homogenization powerhouse delivers unmatched performance and versatility. Whether you're working with tough tissue samples or delicate biological materials, trust Mp Bio-Medicals' Automatic Homogenization Instrument for exceptional results every time.
🔬 Elevate your lab work with Mp Bio-Medicals!
0 notes
Text
3 Reasons to Switch from AMPure XP to HighPrep PCR Beads Today
If you’re working in genomics, you’ve almost certainly used AMPure XP beads. They’ve become a staple in next-generation sequencing (NGS) library prep and PCR cleanup. But what if there were a more affordable alternative that performs just as well — or better?
MagBio Genomics’ HighPrep™ PCR Clean-Up Kit.
As labs face rising costs, supply chain issues, and increasing demand for automation-compatible solutions, more researchers are making the switch. In this article, we break down the top three reasons why switching from AMPure XP to HighPrep PCR beads could be the smartest move your lab makes this year.
1. Significantly Lower Cost Without Sacrificing Quality
Let’s face it: AMPure XP beads are pricey. While they offer high-quality results, many labs — especially high-throughput and grant-funded ones — struggle to justify the cost.
HighPrep PCR beads provide:
Up to 40% savings per reaction
Equivalent or better DNA recovery (90%+ for 100 bp – 10 kb)
Full compatibility with AMPure XP protocols
You get AMPure XP performance at a fraction of the price.
Real-World Example:
One genomics core lab reported that switching to HighPrep PCR saved over $4,000 per month, allowing them to reinvest in sequencing reagents.
2. Drop-In Replacement with Seamless Protocol Compatibility
Switching purification kits can feel risky. What if the new product doesn’t work with your established workflow?
Not with HighPrep PCR.
Uses the same SPRI-based magnetic bead chemistry as AMPure XP
Compatible with standard bead-to-sample ratios (0.6x, 1.0x, 1.8x)
Supports applications from PCR cleanup to size selection
Works with both manual and automated systems (KingFisher, Hamilton, Tecan)
Whether you're cleaning up amplicons or prepping an NGS library, HighPrep PCR fits right in.
Bonus: No training curve for your staff.
If your team knows AMPure XP, they already know how to use HighPrep PCR.
3. Proven Performance for PCR Cleanup and NGS Library Prep
HighPrep PCR beads aren’t just a budget option — they’re a high-performance tool used in top labs worldwide.
Performance Highlights:
Consistent DNA recovery rates across multiple sample types
Effective removal of primers, nucleotides, enzymes, and buffers
Precise size selection for fragments from 100 bp to 1 kb+
Excellent results in qPCR, Sanger sequencing, and NGS workflows
What Researchers Are Saying:
"We validated HighPrep PCR beads side-by-side with AMPure XP and saw no difference in yield or sequencing quality. But we cut our costs nearly in half." — Director, Clinical Genomics Lab
"The automation compatibility and lot-to-lot consistency sealed the deal for us. HighPrep PCR is now our default bead cleanup kit." — Research Scientist, Cancer Center
Bonus: Reliable Availability and Sustainable Packaging
Unlike some suppliers, MagBio Genomics has ensured robust supply chains, with flexible packaging options and bulk volumes.
Reduce plastic waste with column-free, SPRI bead format
Get shipments fast and consistently
Choose from 5 mL to bulk liter sizes
With HighPrep PCR, you won't miss a project deadline due to backorders or delays.
Conclusion
AMPure XP has long been the gold standard in DNA purification. But in today's research environment, efficiency, cost control, and flexibility are just as important as performance.
MagBio Genomics' HighPrep PCR Clean-Up Kit delivers:
Trusted SPRI bead chemistry
Significant cost savings
Seamless compatibility with existing workflows
Proven results in high-throughput and clinical labs
Whether you're managing a university core facility or scaling a biotech startup, the time to make the switch is now.
Ready to make a smarter switch?
Shop the HighPrep™ PCR Clean-Up Kit and experience why labs around the world are choosing it over AMPure XP.
0 notes
Text
"In a first-ever human clinical trial, an mRNA cancer vaccine developed at the University of Florida successfully reprogrammed patients’ immune systems to fiercely attack glioblastoma, the most aggressive and lethal brain tumor.
The results in four adult patients mirrored those in 10 pet dog patients suffering from brain tumors whose owners approved of their participation.
The discovery represents a potential new way to recruit the immune system to fight treatment-resistant cancers using an iteration of mRNA technology and lipid nanoparticles, similar to COVID-19 vaccines, but with two key differences: use of a patient’s own tumor cells to create a personalized vaccine, and a newly engineered complex delivery mechanism within the vaccine.
“Instead of us injecting single particles, we’re injecting clusters of particles that are wrapping around each other like onions,” said senior author Elias Sayour, M.D., Ph.D., a UF Health pediatric oncologist who pioneered the new vaccine, which like other immunotherapies attempts to “educate” the immune system that a tumor is foreign.
“These clusters alert the immune system in a much more profound way than single particles would.”
Among the most impressive findings was how quickly the new method spurred a vigorous immune-system response to reject the tumor, said Sayour, principal investigator at the University’s RNA Engineering Laboratory and McKnight Brain Institute investigator who led the multi-institution research team.
“In less than 48 hours, we could see these tumors shifting from what we refer to as ‘cold’—very few immune cells, very silenced immune response—to ‘hot,’ very active immune response,” he said.
“That was very surprising given how quick this happened, and what that told us is we were able to activate the early part of the immune system very rapidly against these cancers, and that’s critical to unlock the later effects of the immune response,” he explained in a video (below).
Glioblastoma is among the most devastating diagnoses, with median survival around 15 months. Current standard of care involves surgery, radiation and some combination of chemotherapy.
The new report, published May 1 in the journal Cell, is the culmination of seven years of promising studies, starting in preclinical mouse models.
In the cohort of four patients, genetic material called RNA was extracted from each patient’s own surgically removed tumor, and then messenger RNA (mRNA)—the blueprint of what is inside every cell, including tumor cells—was amplified and wrapped in the newly designed high-tech packaging of biocompatible lipid nanoparticles, to make tumor cells “look” like a dangerous virus when reinjected into the bloodstream to prompt an immune-system response.
The vaccine was personalized to each patient with a goal of getting the most out of their unique immune system...
While too early in the trial to assess the clinical effects of the vaccine, the patients either lived disease-free longer than expected or survived longer than expected. The 10 pet dogs lived a median of 4.5 months, compared with a median survival of 30-60 days typical for dogs with the condition.
The next step, with support from the Food and Drug Administration and the CureSearch for Children’s Cancer foundation, will be an expanded Phase I clinical trial to include up to 24 adult and pediatric patients to validate the findings. Once an optimal and safe dose is confirmed, an estimated 25 children would participate in Phase 2."
-via Good News Network, May 11, 2024
youtube
-video via University of Florida Health, May 1, 2024
#cw cancer#cw death#cw animal death#medical news and technology#cancer#brain cancer#cancer treatment#tumor#brain tumor#florida#university of florida#medicine#biology#cell biology#mrna#mrna vaccine#vaccines#oncology#good news#hope#Youtube
449 notes
·
View notes
Text

Amanita phalloides, the deadliest mushroom of the world
Commonly known as "death cap" internationally, this mushroom of European origin occurs now in all countries with temperate climate zones worldwide. It is particularly abundant in northern, central and eastern Europe, including Germany, where it forms an ectomycorrhiza symbiosis with broad leaf tree species.
Its similarity to edible mushroom species such as the straw mushroom and the white Caesar make it particularly dangerous. It may also be confused with the cultivated mushroom and the field or meadow mushroom, although clear distinguishing features exist.
Its deadly poison are heat-stable polycyclic oligopeptides of the amatoxin group with a lethal dose of about 0.1 mg per kg of body weight. This is equivalent to 20 to 40 grams of mushroom for an adult and 1 to 2 grams for children. The poison survives cooking, freezing and drying.
Amatoxins are highly efficient inhibitors of the RNA polymerase and disrupt gene expression in human cells. This causes nausea, vomiting and severe diarrhea about 8 to 12 hours after ingestion. At this time, the toxin has already distributed throughout the whole body and enriched in the liver, so any attempt to bind the toxin in the digestive tract is inefficient. The disruption of gene expression in the liver causes the liver cells to die and the liver to dissolve. Blood coagulation is severely disturbed, leading to severe interior bleeding. Hepathic encephalopathy leading to coma is the final cause of death and occurs six to ten days after ingestion.
Early stages or a mild poisoning is treated with Silymarin, an extract from the milk thistle, which inhibits the uptake of amatoxins into the liver cells. The ultimate cure for severe cases of amatoxin poisoning is a liver transplant. Due to these therapies, the death rate of cases of Amanita poisoning has been reduced from almost 100 % to 10 to 15 %. Early diagnosis and quick action are the prerequisites for a poisitive outcome.
Mushroom hunters in Europe usually know to distinguish the death cap from edible fungi, so cases among Europeans are rare. Immigrants, however, have more frequently suffered from Amanita poisonings. Many of the victims of the last decade came from Syria, where the death cap is unknown in many regions. In the USA, immigrants from south east Asia are frequent victims of Amanita poisoning. In Australia, signs warn mushroom hunters to abstain from their leisure activity in areas where Amanita phalloides has been introduced.
55 notes
·
View notes
Text
pray for me mutuals
#doing my eleventh thousandth rna extraction and i finally saw a tiny little pellet#this is the one. please let it be the one#leaving it out to dry. please gregor dont leave me now
38 notes
·
View notes
Text
LAB EXPERIMENT
Activity title: Lab experiment
Type of activity: activity
Duration: two hours
Learning outcomes:
-Identify own strengths and develop areas for growth -Demonstrate that challenges have been undertaken, developing new skills in the process -Demonstrate the skills and recognize the benefits of working collaboratively
On friday, our group visited PMF to learn about the process of gel electrophoresis. We observed how this technique is used to separate DNA, RNA, or proteins based on their size and charge. The demonstration included extracting DNA from a flower, preparing the gel, loading the samples, applying an electric current, and analyzing the results. We also gained insight into its applications in genetic research, forensics, and medical diagnostics. It was a great opportunity to see the process firsthand and understand its significance in scientific studies.
Reflection: We can reflect on this activity by considering what we learned, how it expanded our understanding of science, and how it might influence our future interests.
23 notes
·
View notes
Note
Does spit contain mRNA? If so, would French kissing a Time Lord cause someone to share all of their memories?
Can a Time Lord read your memories through kissing?
Theoretically, yes—but it's not as simple (or romantic) as it sounds.
🧬 The Biology
Yes, human saliva does contain traces of mRNA. And yes, given the right conditions, Time Lords can interpret human memory RNA, using it to reconstruct emotional impressions or recall sequences from another being's life.
However:
The amount of mRNA present in saliva during casual contact is extremely small.
Memory RNA is not neatly packaged—it's fragmented, degraded, and heavily dependent on the tissues it came from.
Extracting a coherent memory requires focused biological intake, metabolic translation, and neural reassembly—all of which demand time, intent, and cellular integration.
A casual kiss—even of the French variety—is unlikely to transfer enough intact mRNA to reconstruct full memories. At best, a Time Lord might catch tiny emotional echoes:
A flash of a strong emotion
A hazy image
The lingering feeling that you really want cheese
Anything more would require deliberate, targeted biological sampling.
🏫 So...
If Time Lords could casually download your childhood just by snogging you, believe me, Gallifrey would have been much weirder than it already is.
Related:
💬|🥗👽Are there any foods that Gallifreyans can eat that humans can’t?: What foods Gallifreyans could eat that humans don’t, with some theoretical examples.
💬|🥗🧠Can Time Lords really learn things about a planet from tasting the dirt?: How their taste can help them figure out when and where they are.
🤔|🥗😆Why is my Gallifreyan a little bit giggly today?
Hope that helped! 😃
Any orange text is educated guesswork or theoretical. More content ... →📫Got a question? | 📚Complete list of Q+A and factoids →📢Announcements |🩻Biology |🗨️Language |🕰️Throwbacks |🤓Facts → Features:⭐Guest Posts | ����Chomp Chomp with Myishu →🫀Gallifreyan Anatomy and Physiology Guide (pending) →⚕️Gallifreyan Emergency Medicine Guides →📝Source list (WIP) →📜Masterpost If you're finding your happy place in this part of the internet, feel free to buy a coffee to help keep our exhausted human conscious. She works full-time in medicine and is so very tired 😴
#doctor who#gallifrey institute for learning#dr who#dw eu#gallifrey#gallifreyans#whoniverse#time lord biology#ask answered#GIL: Asks#gallifreyan biology#GIL: Biology#GIL: Biology/Urinary and Digestive#GIL: Species/Gallifreyans#GIL
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
Also preserved in our archive
By Vijay Kumar Malesu
In a recent pre-print study posted to bioRxiv*, a team of researchers investigated the predictive role of gut microbiome composition during acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the development of Long Coronavirus Disease (Long COVID) (LC) and its association with clinical variables and symptom clusters.
Background LC affects 10–30% of non-hospitalized individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, leading to significant morbidity, workforce loss, and an economic impact of $3.7 trillion in the United States (U.S.).
Symptoms span cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, cognitive, and neurological issues, resembling myalgic encephalomyelitis and other post-infectious syndromes. Proposed mechanisms include immune dysregulation, neuroinflammation, viral persistence, and coagulation abnormalities, with emerging evidence implicating the gut microbiome in LC pathogenesis.
Current studies focus on hospitalized patients, limiting generalizability to milder cases. Further research is needed to explore microbiome-driven predictors in outpatient populations, enabling targeted diagnostics and therapies for LC’s heterogeneous and complex presentation.
About the study The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and recruited adults aged 18 years or older who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing at Mayo Clinic locations in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona from October 2020 to September 2021. Participants were identified through electronic health record (EHR) reviews filtered by SARS-CoV-2 testing schedules.
Eligible individuals were contacted via email, and informed consent was obtained. Of the 1,061 participants initially recruited, 242 were excluded due to incomplete data, failed sequencing, or other issues. The final cohort included 799 participants (380 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 419 SARS-CoV-2-negative), providing 947 stool samples.
Stool samples were collected at two-time points: weeks 0–2 and weeks 3–5 after testing. Samples were shipped in frozen gel packs via overnight courier and stored at −80°C for downstream analyses. Microbial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using Qiagen kits, and metagenomic sequencing was performed targeting 8 million reads per sample.
Taxonomic profiling was conducted using Kraken2, and functional profiling was performed using the Human Microbiome Project Unified Metabolic Analysis Network (HUMAnN3).
Stool calprotectin levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) was detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, medications, and symptom persistence, were extracted from EHRs.
Machine learning models incorporating microbiome and clinical data were utilized to predict LC and to identify symptom clusters, providing valuable insights into the heterogeneity of the condition.
Study results The study analyzed 947 stool samples collected from 799 participants, including 380 SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals and 419 negative controls. Of the SARS-CoV-2-positive group, 80 patients developed LC during a one-year follow-up period.
Participants were categorized into three groups for analysis: LC, non-LC (SARS-CoV-2-positive without LC), and SARS-CoV-2-negative. Baseline characteristics revealed significant differences between these groups. LC participants were predominantly female and had more baseline comorbidities compared to non-LC participants.
The SARS-CoV-2-negative group was older, with higher antibiotic use and vaccination rates. These variables were adjusted for in subsequent analyses.
During acute infection, gut microbiome diversity differed significantly between groups. Alpha diversity was lower in SARS-CoV-2-positive participants (LC and non-LC) than in SARS-CoV-2-negative participants.
Beta diversity analyses revealed distinct microbial compositions among the groups, with LC patients exhibiting unique microbiome profiles during acute infection.
Specific bacterial taxa, including Faecalimonas and Blautia, were enriched in LC patients, while other taxa were predominant in non-LC and negative participants. These findings indicate that gut microbiome composition during acute infection is a potential predictor for LC.
Temporal analysis of gut microbiome changes between the acute and post-acute phases revealed significant individual variability but no cohort-level differences, suggesting that temporal changes do not contribute to LC development.
However, machine learning models demonstrated that microbiome data during acute infection, when combined with clinical variables, predicted LC with high accuracy. Microbial predictors, including species from the Lachnospiraceae family, significantly influenced model performance.
Symptom analysis revealed that LC encompasses heterogeneous clinical presentations. Fatigue was the most prevalent symptom, followed by dyspnea and cough.
Cluster analysis identified four LC subphenotypes based on symptom co-occurrence: gastrointestinal and sensory, musculoskeletal and neuropsychiatric, cardiopulmonary, and fatigue-only.
Each cluster exhibited unique microbial associations, with the gastrointestinal and sensory clusters showing the most pronounced microbial alterations. Notably, taxa such as those from Lachnospiraceae and Erysipelotrichaceae families were significantly enriched in this cluster.
Conclusions To summarize, this study demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals who later developed LC exhibited distinct gut microbiome profiles during acute infection. While prior research has linked the gut microbiome to COVID-19 outcomes, few studies have explored its predictive potential for LC, particularly in outpatient cohorts.
Using machine learning models, including artificial neural networks and logistic regression, this study found that microbiome data alone predicted LC more accurately than clinical variables, such as disease severity, sex, and vaccination status.
Key microbial contributors included species from the Lachnospiraceae family, such as Eubacterium and Agathobacter, and Prevotella spp. These findings highlight the gut microbiome’s potential as a diagnostic tool for identifying LC risk, enabling personalized interventions.
*Important notice: bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
Journal reference: Preliminary scientific report. Isin Y. Comba, Ruben A. T. Mars, Lu Yang, et al. (2024) Gut Microbiome Signatures During Acute Infection Predict Long COVID, bioRxiv. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.10.626852. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.10.626852v1.full
#mask up#public health#wear a mask#pandemic#wear a respirator#covid#still coviding#covid 19#coronavirus#sars cov 2#long covid#AI
36 notes
·
View notes