#Reverse Engineering Drawing Services | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

shadesofmauve · 4 months ago

Text

Alliance Normandy SR-2 redesign: Deck 5

We've finally arrived at the bottom: deck 5, home of the hangar, the Kodiak shuttles, and now, Marine Land!

There are some oddities with this deck, because I was guessing at how fast the hull tapers towards the bottom at the back (I'm working off references that show front and rear elevations, but that only shows you the broadest points). I messed up something with my core chamber measurements and had to make the entire rear end (heh) slightly bigger here before posting, but the deck design errs on the side of narrower.

Hangar

When I wrote A Star To Steer Her By I ignored the silly shipbuilding because I was focused on a relationship (and because it wasn't supposed to be a door-stopper novel. Oops), but as I went on things like "this hangar should be regularly exposed to vacuum, how can you leave gym equipment in here" bothered me more and more. By the time of Sunset and Evening Star I couldn't let that state of affairs stand. So: this hangar is regularly exposed to vacuum. No fancy force fields that keep in the air but let out shuttles. You don't leave anything in here that isn't protected from vacuum and strapped down.

The hangar is the limiting factor in the size of the entire ship; it has to fit between the central elevator and the hangar door, and it must fit two Kodiaks. To reach this size I had to make the Kodiaks boxier; my drawings are taller for their length than the game models. They still seat twelve, and there's room for one to do a 180 on it's axis while the other is in its cradle. The hangar floor slopes down slightly towards the door in the middle, and the Kodiaks are 'shelved' to the sides.

Cortez runs the flight deck from the exact same place he is in game, but now he has bulkheads and windows between himself and the cold death of space. Airlocks on either side give access to the flight deck. There are also giant doors straight into the deck 4 cargo bays, but those won't open unless the hangar is pressurized.

Marine Land

Jack's Sulking Pit is now a gym, with weights, treadmill, stationary bike, heavy bags, and mats for sparing (and occasionally making pillow forts for evacuee toddlers). Mats are usually stored stowed against the wall, and other equipment can be moved as needed.

To port are the marine berths. The usual compliment of marines is a dozen, including their unit leader, but there are twelve bunks as well as the officer's tiny cabin (because there's no point wasting the space, and you never know). Other than their semi-privacy, the marine racks are no different from the enlisted racks on the two decks above.*

*"Except for the smell." — the rest of the crew, probably.

Berthing the marines on deck 5 is all about quick access to their arms, armor, and transport. Directly across from the marine berths is the entrance to the locker room and armory. After armoring up they grab their weapons and can get to the shuttle through an airlock entrance in the armory. On the way back, they reverse the process; stow weapons, strip off armor — often dropping damaged plating into the recycler chute as they go by — strip down, and shower.

The Alliance military is gender neutral, and nowhere is this as obvious as the marine lockers. The marine unit regularly strips down in front of each other; it's just part of getting ready for work. You can't be body-shy and be an Alliance Marine.

(I like to think the separate bathrooms on the crew deck were the Illusive Man's weird traditionalist decision. Sometimes the gendered-bathroom thing starts to grate on Bo Huan, the third-watch pilot, so they come down to deck five to use the locker room showers, leading Joker to quip "Ah, the third gender: marine!")

More engineering, and the answers to a few questions

Ladders from deck 4 lead down to another engineering area on the hangar level. It's not connected to the main areas of the deck by conventional corridors, but it is accessible through the warren of service passages that run throughout the ship. More of those access-ways lead aft of the eezo core chamber to the fusion plant (not shown). Because the core chamber narrows faster than the ship, it's easier to get around it here than it is on the engineering deck, where the core chamber is at it's widest but the hull has started to narrow. These access tunnels are rarely comfortable to get through, though they often open out into areas that are easier to work in, or into surprising pockets of unused space. They may require crawling or climbing, or clambering over obstacles.

All the maintenance accesses are kept pressurized and aired up, but the habitable area shown on these posts is wrapped in an inner hull, and the doors for maintenance access are all pressure doors: if a hit damages the tunnel you use to access the ship's innards, it won't kill all the crew in the room next to it.**

**It will obliterate the illicit still and the not-actually-a-secret-make-out-nest, as well as anyone stupid enough to be distilling and***/or fucking in those locations, which is why we don't lollygag between the hulls in combat, private!

***AND?****

****Some people are remarkably talented.

Normandy redesign posts

Intro

Loft

Command

Crew

Engineering

Hangar

82 notes · View notes

momodori-p · 4 months ago

Text

hi guys, I'm finally reopening commissions, as I'm in a bit of a financial pickle at the moment. I can't really go into too much detail about the issues, but it's not very good and is stressful. I'm disabled and currently working but it's contract/freelance work that is meant more as a side gig; unfortunately looking for more permanent/stable employment is not good. I live in a household with my mom and brother who is also disabled and unable to work, and we are very strained on financials right now.

on top of helping my mother out with bills, I need money to help pay for medical bills so I can fully treat my disability since it's treatable and reversible; along with that, I need money to upgrade my PC as I'm an AV tech getting his foot in the industry better and need to use it for video/audio engineering for future commissions/work.

before you consider please note that my turn around time is very slow because my disability affects me a lot, with uncontrollable twitching and limb pain; as well as the fact that I'm not as used to drawing anymore. please do not commission me if you dislike having a long turn around time.

all of the information including my prices and terms of service can be found on the carrd linked below. I'm a bit hesitant to ask for donations, but since some have expressed wanting to donate to my ko-fi I'll link it in the case that you would like to do so.

thank you for the support, even if you can't buy/donate, a share is very helpful <3

carrd:

ko-fi:

#art #artists on tumblr #commissions #open commissions #commissions open

33 notes · View notes

nasuversekinkmeme · 1 year ago

Note

just for starters, this isn't a prompt, to get that out of the way. but one thing that you've mentioned (more than once, i think?) is that if people really want a specific prompt filled, that they need to not request it multiple times, and instead should commission someone to write it/draw it for them.

which is a great idea! but a big problem i've seen in the fate fandom in particular is the fact that it's really not easy to find people who are willing to take commissions, because that's not something people advertise much as writers, and this fandom is kind of spread out all over the place in terms of who is using what social media the most.

i was wondering if you had any ideas of people in the fgo/fate/type-moon fandom who actually take commissions, or if you would be willing to maybe have a link to people who are willing to take writing commissions on the blog somewhere?

honestly, i'm hoping people who are offering to do commissions will see this post so i can get in contact with them, because i really don't know who within this fandom is actually offering their writing services, specifically. i have money i am willing to spend (and have spent in the past) on fanfic commissions, but the problem i have is simply just finding people who i know are actually open and available to do the job

People aren't allowed to advertise their commissions on fanfic websites, however they are allowed to advertise on their own social page. A good way to find people who take writing commissions is to find a writer you like on ao3, check their profile/the author's notes to see if they have any socials linked, and then check if any commission sheet is linked over there.

Additionally, a lot of writers never consider opening commissions because they are either not aware that's an option, or not aware that people would be willing to pay for them. If you like a specific writer, you can always directly message them to see if they would be willing to write stuff for money. It works surprisingly often.

If all else fails, you can always look up "fan fic commission" or "fic commission" or any keyword to that effect on your chosen social media (or vgen/ko-fi/this sort of place) and reverse engineer if that person is one you'd like to commission. Here are a few writers I have found this way who appear to be writing type-moon stuff in some capacity:

NOTTHISWAY (ao3)

peachykeendesu

ShiningOak

Aikotters

FalseGrailWar

Tackypies (ao3)

If you take writing commissions, feel free to reblog this post and advertise. I will not reblog it. This is not what this blog is for. But I encourage anyone looking for fic commissions to go through the notes of this blog. If any of you decide to mod a "type moon commission hub" or something to that effect, feel free to reblog this post as well.

#mod answer #anonymous #fic commission

26 notes · View notes

dailyanarchistposts · 6 months ago

Text

Topics: health care, monopoly

In a recent article for Tikkun, Dr. Arnold Relman argued that the versions of health care reform currently proposed by “progressives” all primarily involve financing health care and expanding coverage to the uninsured rather than addressing the way current models of service delivery make it so expensive. Editing out all the pro forma tut-tutting of “private markets,” the substance that’s left is considerable:

What are those inflationary forces? . . . [M]ost important among them are the incentives in the payment and organization of medical care that cause physicians, hospitals and other medical care facilities to focus at least as much on income and profit as on meeting the needs of patients. . . . The incentives in such a system reward and stimulate the delivery of more services. That is why medical expenditures in the U.S. are so much higher than in any other country, and are rising more rapidly. . . . Physicians, who supply the services, control most of the decisions to use medical resources. . . . The economic incentives in the medical market are attracting the great majority of physicians into specialty practice, and these incentives, combined with the continued introduction of new and more expensive technology, are a major factor in causing inflation of medical expenditures. Physicians and ambulatory care and diagnostic facilities are largely paid on a piecework basis for each item of service provided.

As a health care worker, I have personally witnessed this kind of mutual log-rolling between specialists and the never-ending addition of tests to the bill without any explanation to the patient. The patient simply lies in bed and watches an endless parade of unknown doctors poking their heads in the door for a microsecond, along with an endless series of lab techs drawing body fluids for one test after another that’s “been ordered,” with no further explanation. The post-discharge avalanche of bills includes duns from two or three dozen doctors, most of whom the patient couldn’t pick out of a police lineup. It’s the same kind of quid pro quo that takes place in academia, with professors assigning each other’s (extremely expensive and copyrighted) texts and systematically citing each other’s works in order to game their stats in the Social Sciences Citation Index. (I was also a grad assistant once.) You might also consider Dilbert creator Scott Adams’s account of what happens when you pay programmers for the number of bugs they fix.

One solution to this particular problem is to have a one-to-one relationship between the patient and a general practitioner on retainer. That’s how the old “lodge practice” worked. (See David Beito’s “Lodge Doctors and the Poor,” The Freeman, May 1994).

But that’s illegal, you know. In New York City, John Muney recently introduced an updated version of lodge practice: the AMG Medical Group, which for a monthly premium of $79 and a flat office fee of $10 per visit provides a wide range of services (limited to what its own practitioners can perform in-house). But because AMG is a fixed-rate plan and doesn’t charge more for “unplanned procedures,” the New York Department of Insurance considers it an unlicensed insurance policy. Muney may agree, unwillingly, to a settlement arranged by his lawyer in which he charges more for unplanned procedures like treatment for a sudden ear infection. So the State is forcing a modern-day lodge practitioner to charge more, thereby keeping the medical and insurance cartels happy—all in the name of “protecting the public.” How’s that for irony?

Regarding expensive machinery, I wonder how much of the cost is embedded rent on patents or regulatorily mandated overhead. I’ll bet if you removed all the legal barriers that prevent a bunch of open-source hardware hackers from reverse-engineering a homebrew version of it, you could get an MRI machine with a twentyfold reduction in cost. I know that’s the case in an area I’m more familiar with: micromanufacturing technology. For example, the RepRap—a homebrew, open-source 3-D printer—costs roughly $500 in materials to make, compared to tens of thousands for proprietary commercial versions.

More generally, the system is racked by artificial scarcity, as editor Sheldon Richman observed in an interview a few months back. For example, licensing systems limit the number of practitioners and arbitrarily impose levels of educational overhead beyond the requirements of the procedures actually being performed.

Libertarians sometimes—and rightly—use “grocery insurance” as an analogy to explain medical price inflation: If there were such a thing as grocery insurance, with low deductibles, to provide third-party payments at the checkout register, people would be buying a lot more rib-eye and porterhouse steaks and a lot less hamburger.

The problem is we’ve got a regulatory system that outlaws hamburger and compels you to buy porterhouse if you’re going to buy anything at all. It’s a multiple-tier finance system with one tier of service. Dental hygienists can’t set up independent teeth-cleaning practices in most states, and nurse-practitioners are required to operate under a physician’s “supervision” (when he’s out golfing). No matter how simple and straightforward the procedure, you can’t hire someone who’s adequately trained just to perform the service you need; you’ve got to pay amortization on a full med school education and residency.

Drug patents have the same effect, increasing the cost per pill by up to 2,000 percent. They also have a perverse effect on drug development, diverting R&D money primarily into developing “me, too” drugs that tweak the formulas of drugs whose patents are about to expire just enough to allow repatenting. Drug-company propaganda about high R&D costs, as a justification for patents to recoup capital outlays, is highly misleading. A major part of the basic research for identifying therapeutic pathways is done in small biotech startups, or at taxpayer expense in university laboratories, and then bought up by big drug companies. The main expense of the drug companies is the FDA-imposed testing regimen—and most of that is not to test the version actually marketed, but to secure patent lockdown on other possible variants of the marketed version. In other words, gaming the patent system grossly inflates R&D spending.

The prescription medicine system, along with state licensing of pharmacists and Drug Enforcement Administration licensing of pharmacies, is another severe restraint on competition. At the local natural-foods cooperative I can buy foods in bulk, at a generic commodity price; even organic flour, sugar, and other items are usually cheaper than the name-brand conventional equivalent at the supermarket. Such food cooperatives have their origins in the food-buying clubs of the 1970s, which applied the principle of bulk purchasing. The pharmaceutical licensing system obviously prohibits such bulk purchasing (unless you can get a licensed pharmacist to cooperate).

I work with a nurse from a farming background who frequently buys veterinary-grade drugs to treat her family for common illnesses without paying either Big Pharma’s markup or the price of an office visit. Veterinary supply catalogs are also quite popular in the homesteading and survivalist movements, as I understand. Two years ago I had a bad case of poison ivy and made an expensive office visit to get a prescription for prednisone. The next year the poison ivy came back; I’d been weeding the same area on the edge of my garden and had exactly the same symptoms as before. But the doctor’s office refused to give me a new prescription without my first coming in for an office visit, at full price—for my own safety, of course. So I ordered prednisone from a foreign online pharmacy and got enough of the drug for half a dozen bouts of poison ivy—all for less money than that office visit would have cost me.

Of course people who resort to these kinds of measures are putting themselves at serious risk of harassment from law enforcement. But until 1914, as Sheldon Richman pointed out (“The Right to Self-Treatment,” Freedom Daily, January 1995), “adult citizens could enter a pharmacy and buy any drug they wished, from headache powders to opium.”

The main impetus to creating the licensing systems on which artificial scarcity depends came from the medical profession early in the twentieth century. As described by Richman:

Accreditation of medical schools regulated how many doctors would graduate each year. Licensing similarly metered the number of practitioners and prohibited competitors, such as nurses and paramedics, from performing services they were perfectly capable of performing. Finally, prescription laws guaranteed that people would have to see a doctor to obtain medicines they had previously been able to get on their own.

The medical licensing cartels were also the primary force behind the move to shut down lodge practice, mentioned above.

In the case of all these forms of artificial scarcity, the government creates a “honey pot” by making some forms of practice artificially lucrative. It’s only natural, under those circumstances, that health care business models gravitate to where the money is.

Health care is a classic example of what Ivan Illich, in Tools for Conviviality, called a “radical monopoly.” State-sponsored crowding out makes other, cheaper (but often more appropriate) forms of treatment less usable, and renders cheaper (but adequate) treatments artificially scarce. Artificially centralized, high-tech, and skill-intensive ways of doing things make it harder for ordinary people to translate their skills and knowledge into use-value. The State’s regulations put an artificial floor beneath overhead cost, so that there’s a markup of several hundred percent to do anything; decent, comfortable poverty becomes impossible.

A good analogy is subsidies to freeways and urban sprawl, which make our feet less usable and raise living expenses by enforcing artificial dependence on cars. Local building codes primarily reflect the influence of building contractors, so competition from low-cost unconventional techniques (T-slot and other modular designs, vernacular materials like bales and papercrete, and so on) is artificially locked out of the market. Charles Johnson described the way governments erect barriers to people meeting their own needs and make comfortable subsistence artificially costly, in the specific case of homelessness, in “Scratching By: How the Government Creates Poverty as We Know It” (The Freeman, December 2007).

The major proposals for health care “reform” that went before Congress would do little or nothing to address the institutional sources of high cost. As Jesse Walker argued at Reason.com, a 100 percent single-payer system, far from being a “radical” solution,

would still accept the institutional premises of the present medical system. Consider the typical American health care transaction. On one side of the exchange you’ll have one of an artificially limited number of providers, many of them concentrated in those enormous, faceless institutions called hospitals. On the other side, making the purchase, is not a patient but one of those enormous, faceless institutions called insurers. The insurers, some of which are actual arms of the government and some of which merely owe their customers to the government’s tax incentives and shape their coverage to fit the government’s mandates, are expected to pay all or a share of even routine medical expenses. The result is higher costs, less competition, less transparency, and, in general, a system where the consumer gets about as much autonomy and respect as the stethoscope. Radical reform would restore power to the patient. Instead, the issue on the table is whether the behemoths we answer to will be purely public or public-private partnerships. [“Obama is No Radical,” September 30, 2009]

I’m a strong advocate of cooperative models of health care finance, like the Ithaca Health Alliance (created by the same people, including Paul Glover, who created the Ithaca Hours local currency system), or the friendly societies and mutuals of the nineteenth century described by writers like Pyotr Kropotkin and E. P. Thompson. But far more important than reforming finance is reforming the way delivery of service is organized.

Consider the libertarian alternatives that might exist. A neighborhood cooperative clinic might keep a doctor of family medicine or a nurse practitioner on retainer, along the lines of the lodge-practice system. The doctor might have his med school debt and his malpractice premiums assumed by the clinic in return for accepting a reasonable upper middle-class salary.

As an alternative to arbitrarily inflated educational mandates, on the other hand, there might be many competing tiers of professional training depending on the patient’s needs and ability to pay. There might be a free-market equivalent of the Chinese “barefoot doctors.” Such practitioners might attend school for a year and learn enough to identify and treat common infectious diseases, simple traumas, and so on. For example, the “barefoot doctor” at the neighborhood cooperative clinic might listen to your chest, do a sputum culture, and give you a round of Zithro for your pneumonia; he might stitch up a laceration or set a simple fracture. His training would include recognizing cases that were clearly beyond his competence and calling in a doctor for backup when necessary. He might provide most services at the cooperative clinic, with several clinics keeping a common M.D. on retainer for more serious cases. He would be certified by a professional association or guild of his choice, chosen from among competing guilds based on its market reputation for enforcing high standards. (That’s how competing kosher certification bodies work today, without any government-defined standards). Such voluntary licensing bodies, unlike state licensing boards, would face competition—and hence, unlike state boards, would have a strong market incentive to police their memberships in order to maintain a reputation for quality.

The clinic would use generic medicines (of course, since that’s all that would exist in a free market). Since local juries or arbitration bodies would likely take a much more common-sense view of the standards for reasonable care, there would be far less pressure for expensive CYA testing and far lower malpractice premiums.

Basic care could be financed by monthly membership dues, with additional catastrophic-care insurance (cheap and with a high deductible) available to those who wanted it. The monthly dues might be as cheap as or even cheaper than Dr. Muney’s. It would be a no-frills, bare-bones system, true enough—but to the 40 million or so people who are currently uninsured, it would be a pretty damned good deal.

2 notes · View notes

tvaccaro · 2 years ago

Note

How do you make your magic system more unique besides pulling from various myths and folktales ? I used to sort of Frankenstein magic systems together based on what would work for the characters but over time that went from being extremely useful to very repetitive. All my magic systems felt like carbon copies of each other after a while

Oooo well firstly hi! The Vagus art still lives rent free in my head lmfao

Anyhow, it really depends on what you need from your story. The use of "Frankenstein" makes me think maybe your lens is a bit too focused on individual characters. That's not a bad thing inherently, especially for magical realism or a soft magic system. But generally, you also need to keep in mind the way your magic system interacts with the story itself and the world at large, as well as what magic can mean thematically. It's a process of making it feel cohesive as a whole so everything feels purposeful.

When I was making the magic system for De Cineribus, I decided to keep it relatively basic since it was my first attempt at a novel. And at the end, I was also really obsessed with Tales of Zestiria and Berseria, both of which use the same elemental system for their world.

And so fire, water, earth, and air it was. But a lot of the extra details I came up with wound up inadvertently creating themes I hadn't really anticipated. The eye color system, for example, which determines the number of elements you can learn and how much raw power you have access to. It provided a roadblock for Felix learning magic that made his story more engaging, while also creating this sort of magical class structure in the Medeian Empire.

I do wish I did more with the light and dark alignments in the first book, aside from the detail of how it changes the way your element is expressed (i.e. blue flames or red, water or ice, etc.). But I do have some ideas of where it can lead in future books, namely in the emotions and values the different alignments draw their powers from. Sorta like the differing philosophies of the elements in ATLA.

Now admittedly, I don't recall whether I knew Felix would have blue flames at the very beginning (like, back when I made him before deciding this animated slice of life would be a novel series), or if I figured that out after I'd ironed out the larger magic system. But a lot of this was learning to listen to what my gut was telling me on what worked for the story versus what didn't. So you can absolutely start with your characters' individual magic, then iron it out from there. But in your case I think trying it from the opposite approach might help.

My suggestion is start with the foundation of your magic system as a whole, and then over time, narrow in on your characters and where they fit into the larger picture. Reverse engineering (starting with individual characters) can work, but that seems to be where your carbon-copy problem might be originating from. It results in a messier broader picture that leaves it feeling unfocused and not cohesive. Same goes for pulling from myths and folklore. That's fine, but always be sure it's in service to your grander purpose, not just your characters.

Hope this helps! (also hope you enjoy the rest of the story - lowkey I have big plans for the De Cineribus series)

#writing advice #writerblr #writing is hard #writers problems #writers of tumblr #writing problems #magic system

11 notes · View notes

female-malice · 2 years ago

Text

Since 2020, no fewer than 10 former government officials, military officers and scientists, along with a former senate majority leader, have alleged (or suggested) publicly that the U.S. government has recovered advanced craft of unknown origin — that is, UFOs.

Nearly all of these individuals also claim that the government transferred multiple craft to defense contractors for scientific and technical analysis.

Key members of Congress, drawing on testimony from dozens of whistleblowers, appear to find these extraordinary allegations credible.

Bipartisan legislation sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) aimed to establish a process with the ostensible goal of revealing the existence of “non-human intelligence” to the public. But the legislation, which is co-sponsored by three Republican and two Democratic senators, is now in jeopardy.

In comments yesterday on the Senate floor, Schumer stated that “House Republicans are also attempting to kill another commonsense, bipartisan measure passed by the Senate, which I was proud to cosponsor… to increase transparency around what the government does and does not know about unidentified aerial phenomena.”

According to reports, Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, are leading efforts to prevent any meaningful version of this provision from being added to the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act.

Members of Congress generally clamor for enhanced government oversight — a core function of the legislative branch — and transparency. So what could cause a small group of influential lawmakers to suddenly resist it?

Notably, the legislation calls for the U.S. government to reassert control over “recovered technologies of unknown origin” currently held by defense contractors. Some analysts suspect that corporations potentially holding such exotic technology are exerting undue pressure and influence to oppose the provision in Schumer’s legislation.

In his only public comments on the legislation to date, Turner denied “holding up” the measure, while adding, “I do think it’s a poorly drafted piece of legislation.”

A closer analysis of Schumer’s 64-page bill tells a starkly different, and intriguing, story.

At its core, the Schumer legislation strongly hints that elements of the U.S. government, in collaboration with defense contractors, have long operated surreptitious “legacy programs” to “reverse engineer” retrieved UFOs. Other secret programs supposedly “examine biological evidence of living or deceased non-human intelligence.”

The remarkable nature of Schumer’s bipartisan legislation is only trumped by revelations that key members of Congress appear intent on blocking or neutering it for what seems to be no good reason.

As Schumer and his co-sponsors suggest, “credible evidence and testimony indicates” that government records describing UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering programs have been concealed from Congress and the public for decades.

The legislation largely mirrors the allegations of David Grusch, a decorated former military officer and intelligence official. The intelligence community’s internal watchdog deemed Grusch’s whistleblower complaint “credible and urgent.” At the same time, an eyebrow-raising report citing multiple sources alleges that a secretive CIA unit is overseeing clandestine retrievals of “non-human craft.”

A core objective of the Schumer legislation is to “restore proper oversight over [UFO] records by elected officials in both the executive and legislative branches of the federal government.”

As analysts have noted, there are only two elected officials in the executive branch. So one of the highest-ranking U.S. senators is implying that some presidents and vice presidents have not been informed of clandestine efforts to retrieve and reverse engineer “technologies of unknown origin” — UFOs — or examine “biological evidence of non-human intelligence.”

As a remedy to this startling inference, Schumer’s legislation mandates sweeping government transparency with subpoena powers.

The legislation would establish an independent panel, composed of “distinguished persons of high national reputation” in the fields of national security, foreign affairs, science, economics, sociology and history, to review UFO records deemed too sensitive to release immediately.

At a recent academic symposium on unidentified anomalous phenomena, retired U.S. Army Col. Karl Nell described how this review board might guide the president in methodically revealing the existence of “non-human intelligence” to the public.

Moreover, according to Nell, a core objective of the legislation is averting “catastrophic” or “uncontrolled” disclosure. As the Daily Mail put it, “catastrophic disclosure” is characterized by “a chaotic release of earth-shattering revelations” which may result in profound geopolitical, social or economic turmoil.

In stark contrast to “catastrophic disclosure,” the Schumer-envisioned “controlled disclosure campaign” would facilitate a measured, deliberate process to reveal the apparent existence of “non-human intelligence.”

Of note, there appears to be some geopolitical urgency to “disclosure.” High-ranking military and intelligence officials allege that China and Russia may also be attempting to reverse-engineer craft of “non-human origin.” This is echoed in congressional language warning of the “increasing potential for technology surprise from foreign adversaries.”

Moreover, as former deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence Christopher Mellon aptly notes, a strategic, methodical disclosure of the existence of “non-human intelligence,” while potentially destabilizing, could ultimately bear profoundly positive results.

Describing the compounding shocks of climate change, geopolitical rivalries, artificial intelligence and extreme political polarization, Mellon states that “we need a powerful ontological jolt to promote the collaboration required to manage these common global threats.”

Take, for example, climate change. If, as congressional legislation implies, the U.S. government or defense contractors possess advanced craft of unknown origin that utilize “propulsion technology other than chemical propellants, solar power, or electric ion thrust,” a “controlled disclosure” to facilitate broader scientific study of such remarkable technology is long overdue.

On what grounds, then, would a handful of influential members of Congress oppose the sweeping transparency outlined in Schumer’s extraordinary initiative?

2 notes · View notes

jitters-art · 2 years ago

Note

AHHHH JITTER i was out playing volleyball and i have your sasuke and naruto drawing (the one where they're sitting down and hugging) as my phone wallpaper (i hope that's okay) and i was waving my phone around while gesticulating and one of the loud homophobes out there saw it and i had to gaslight them into thinking it wasn't Sasuke and Naruto but i dont think he believed me but he let it slide after i said Naruto was a girl and had to reverse engineer homophobia on why it obviously wasn't naruto in the picture (which was hard because sometimes i forget what is or isn't queer in straight society) and it was so stressful 😭😭

Anyways I hope you've been having a better time than I did (my game score was 2:6 but we won the last two games and i was the last service ace but still!) I love your most recent drawing 🫶🏾. Please stay safe and remember to drink water 💖!

OMGGGGGGG yes that’s totally okay to use my art as wallpapers 😭🫶 that just absolutely made my day i just gushed about that to my friends i didn’t ever think anyone would do something like that 🥹🥹 i appreciate you sooo much. but wowwww i’m so sorry you had that experience…. some people really can’t just mind their business… stay safe but also rule that wallpaper with pride hehe !!

aw i’m sorry you didn’t have the best game but i hope you at least had a good time! i’m doing wonderful— i’m on vacation with a couple of friends right now ^.^ thank you so so much… narusasu is too adorable i always have the best time drawing them. hope you’re staying safe and hydrated as well !! and thank you again so much for liking my art enough to use it as a wallpaper, you’re so sweet that means everything to me 🫶🫶

#ask and i shall answer #supermegabitchboyexceptimagirl

3 notes · View notes

kyleemclauren · 1 year ago

Text

The word "extinguish" here is pulled from the phrase Microsoft used internally to describe their strategy, "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish", of entering markets with widely supported standards then introducing proprietary extensions to break compatibility. Microsoft's abuse of monopoly power was the subject of a Department of Justice lawsuit, whose proceedings lasted almost a decade before being settled (dropped) by the George W Bush administration. People paid for their software because Linux was released in 1991; Until then DOS's only major competitor was UNIX, which was at the time also a locked down and proprietary OS. Thanks to the 1998 DMCA, it's actually now a felony to do much of the reverse engineering that allowed many of these open source products to be created, essentially locking off anything that touches "content". As a different platform example, it's illegal to create a competing app that can support Audible's audiobooks, for instance, because doing so requires circumventing Audible-mandated DRM controls.

Facebook is a bit more speculative, but he's drawing a comparison to the network effects of email, USENET, the internet, etc. Because it's speculative I can't really comment as much here, but the cycle of "use network effects to become enormous, then enshittify" is the same - The data you give to Facebook is locked into a proprietary service that can't be modified, and Facebook actively works to break interoperability with open source tools that would allow competitive compatibility. Apple vs Beeper is an example of an ongoing fight to prevent network interoperability, fought on much the same terms.

My gut feeling is that he's right, without Facebook we would have a more advanced internet, but here we are in this timeline, so who knows.

#open source

26K notes · View notes

techadvantageeng · 10 days ago

Text

Engineering Innovation and Precision: How Advantage Engineering Technologies, PLLC Empowers Product Development with Expert CAD Solutions

In the fast-moving world of engineering and design, innovation alone isn't enough—success demands precision, documentation, and the ability to move ideas from concept to reality without delay or miscommunication. For companies looking to develop, refine, or manufacture mechanical systems, industrial equipment, or custom components, a trusted partner in design and drafting is essential.

Advantage Engineering Technologies, PLLC delivers exactly that. With a strong foundation in engineering principles and decades of industry experience, the firm offers comprehensive, product development services expert AutoCAD drafting services, and full-spectrum CAD drafting services that turn ideas into fully realized, manufacturable solutions.

The Importance of Precision in Product Development

Whether a company is launching a new HVAC component, designing a proprietary industrial part, or modifying existing mechanical systems, the path from concept to creation is filled with technical and logistical challenges. Product design must balance form and function while meeting performance targets, regulatory requirements, and budget constraints.

Advantage Engineering Technologies understands these challenges intimately. Their product development services are tailored to guide clients through every stage of the development process—from initial concept sketches to final production drawings.

Their product development expertise includes:

Feasibility studies and concept validation

Mechanical design and engineering analysis

2D and 3D modeling

Prototype development support

Manufacturing documentation

Design optimization for performance and cost-efficiency

The firm's collaborative approach ensures that every solution is not only technically sound but also aligned with the client’s business goals, market expectations, and production methods.

AutoCAD Drafting Services: Where Detail Meets Dependability

For projects that demand accuracy, compliance, and clear communication, AutoCAD drafting services remain an industry standard. Advantage Engineering Technologies offers high-quality AutoCAD drafting support for clients in manufacturing, construction, HVAC, mechanical engineering, and beyond.

Their AutoCAD services include:

2D mechanical drawings

Detailed part and assembly drawings

Fabrication and manufacturing blueprints

HVAC layouts and mechanical plans

Revision and redlining of existing drawings

As-built documentation

The firm’s drafting professionals are skilled in creating drawings that are fully compliant with client standards, industry norms, and specific manufacturing processes. Every line, dimension, and annotation is carefully reviewed, ensuring that stakeholders—from engineers and fabricators to installers—are working from a single, accurate source of truth.

With fast turnaround times and a strong focus on precision, Advantage’s AutoCAD drafting services are ideal for companies that require technical documentation they can trust and implement immediately.

CAD Drafting Services: Supporting Every Stage of the Design Lifecycle

While AutoCAD drafting remains a core tool, CAD drafting services extend far beyond 2D documentation. Today’s projects often require seamless transitions between concept modeling, prototyping, simulation, and fabrication—all of which rely on strong CAD support.

Advantage Engineering Technologies offers complete CAD drafting services, including:

2D and 3D CAD modeling

Parametric modeling and assemblies

Reverse engineering of physical components

Legacy drawing conversion (paper-to-digital or 2D-to-3D)

File formatting for CNC and other manufacturing processes

Design for manufacturability (DFM) and design for assembly (DFA)

These services support industries ranging from HVAC and mechanical systems to precision manufacturing and custom product design. Whether drafting a new mechanical assembly or revising an existing system to meet updated specifications, Advantage provides the clarity, accuracy, and flexibility clients need.

Their team works in industry-leading platforms like AutoCAD, SolidWorks, Inventor, and Revit—ensuring compatibility with a wide range of project types and stakeholder requirements.

Integrated Engineering Services: A Seamless Workflow

What distinguishes Advantage Engineering Technologies is their ability to integrate all of these services—product development, AutoCAD drafting, and CAD drafting—into one cohesive process. Instead of working with multiple vendors or departments, clients enjoy the convenience of a single, experienced partner managing their project from start to finish.

This integrated workflow includes:

Initial Consultation and Concept Development

Understanding project goals, technical requirements, and potential constraints.

3D Modeling and Simulation

Developing detailed models and running stress, thermal, or fluid flow analyses as needed.

2D Drafting and Documentation

Creating detailed drawings and manufacturing specs using AutoCAD or other CAD platforms.

Revision and Optimization

Iterating designs based on feedback, testing, and manufacturing input.

Final Delivery and Support

Providing complete drawing packages, model files, and documentation ready for fabrication or production.

This full-service approach reduces miscommunication, accelerates design cycles, and ultimately delivers better-performing, cost-effective results.

Why Clients Trust Advantage Engineering Technologies, PLLC

Across industries—from HVAC and construction to manufacturing and industrial systems—clients choose Advantage Engineering Technologies because they consistently deliver quality, precision, and responsiveness.

Here’s what sets them apart:

Technical Expertise: With a foundation in mechanical and systems engineering, their team understands both the big picture and the fine details.

Speed and Accuracy: Fast turnaround times don’t come at the expense of quality. Their process is built for both.

Client-Centric Approach: Every project is tailored to meet the specific goals, standards, and challenges of each client.

Software Proficiency: Skilled in AutoCAD, Revit, SolidWorks, and other major platforms, the team is equipped for diverse project demands.

Commitment to Excellence: From concept to completion, Advantage focuses on delivering value, not just drawings.

Conclusion: Engineering Your Vision with Precision

Whether you're developing a new product, upgrading existing mechanical systems, or simply need accurate and reliable technical drawings, Advantage Engineering Technologies, PLLC is the partner that delivers results. Their unmatched combination of product development services, AutoCAD drafting services, and CAD drafting services helps clients reduce risk, accelerate innovation, and stay ahead of the competition.

In a world where precision fuels progress, Advantage Engineering Technologies is committed to being the engine behind your next successful project.

0 notes

asseteyes · 13 days ago

Text

Introduction: The Importance of Professional CAD Drafting Services

In today’s fast-paced industrial and engineering world, CAD drafting services play a crucial role in transforming conceptual ideas into functional products. Whether you're designing complex machinery, creating electrical control panels, or preparing detailed general assembly drawings, precision and expertise are non-negotiable.

A trusted machine design company doesn't just provide software access—they deliver end-to-end support for every aspect of product development. From SolidWorks design to electrical schematics, professional CAD drafting ensures every line, curve, and component meets industry standards and specific project requirements.

What Are CAD Drafting Services?

Computer-Aided Design (CAD) drafting involves creating 2D and 3D models used in manufacturing, construction, and product development. These digital blueprints serve as the foundation for prototyping, testing, and mass production.

CAD drafting services typically include:

Mechanical part modeling

General assembly drawing

Electrical panel layout and wiring schematics

Sheet metal drafting

Fabrication and installation drawings

3D rendering and animation for design presentations

SolidWorks Design: A Cornerstone of Modern Engineering

SolidWorks is one of the most powerful 3D CAD software solutions available today. It is widely used for machine design, product modeling, and general assembly drawings.

Our CAD drafting service offers complete support for SolidWorks projects, including:

3D part modeling and simulation

Assembly modeling and kinematics

Motion studies and stress analysis

Bill of Materials (BOM) generation

Design for manufacturability (DFM) support

Whether you’re working on a new product or redesigning an existing one, SolidWorks provides the accuracy and flexibility needed for success.

General Assembly Drawing: The Blueprint of Manufacturing

A general assembly drawing is a critical component of the manufacturing documentation process. It shows how different parts fit and work together in a complete system.

Our team provides detailed GA drawings that:

Define part relationships clearly

Include section views and exploded diagrams

Highlight fasteners, welds, and joining methods

Support fabrication, assembly, and inspection teams

With professional drafting, your general assembly documentation becomes a communication tool for engineers, vendors, and production teams.

Electrical Control Panel Design: Where Precision Meets Safety

Electrical control panel design requires a deep understanding of circuit logic, component specification, and regulatory compliance. Our CAD services ensure your electrical layouts are safe, efficient, and easy to troubleshoot.

We deliver:

Detailed wiring diagrams

PLC I/O schematics

Terminal block layouts

Panel enclosure design and space planning

Compliance with IEC, NEC, UL, and NFPA standards

By using advanced CAD tools, we help reduce downtime, improve safety, and streamline system integration.

Machine Design Company: Why Partner with Professionals?

Working with a specialized machine design company gives you access to a multidisciplinary team of engineers and drafters with industry experience. Our firm goes beyond basic drafting—we deliver innovation and manufacturability in every project.

Our services include:

End-to-end mechanical design

Reverse engineering and legacy drawing updates

Sheet metal, piping, and structural steel design

CNC-ready file generation

Product development consulting

From concept to creation, our goal is to make your designs functional, cost-effective, and production-ready.

Why Choose Our CAD Drafting Services?

Here's what sets us apart:

Expertise Across Industries – We serve clients in manufacturing, automation, automotive, electronics, and more.

Certified SolidWorks Professionals – Our drafters are certified and skilled in the latest versions of SolidWorks, AutoCAD, and EPLAN.

Quality-First Approach – Every drawing goes through a thorough QC process to ensure dimensional accuracy and standards compliance.

Fast Turnaround – Need a quick revision? We’re structured for agility and responsiveness.

Cost-Effective Solutions – Outsourcing CAD services to us saves time, reduces errors, and improves your ROI.

Case Study: Streamlining Control Panel Design for an Automation Firm

One of our recent projects involved working with an industrial automation company to redesign their electrical control panels using SolidWorks Electrical and AutoCAD Electrical. By creating clean wiring schematics, detailed enclosure layouts, and comprehensive terminal plans, we reduced their panel assembly time by 40% and minimized field wiring errors.

This is just one example of how our CAD drafting service can directly impact your efficiency and product quality.

Industries We Serve

Industrial Automation

Manufacturing and Fabrication

HVAC and MEP

Automotive and Aerospace

Robotics and Mechatronics

Consumer Products and Tooling

Whether you're a startup or an established OEM, our solutions are scalable and tailored to your needs.

Getting Started with Our CAD Drafting Service

Starting a project is simple. Here’s how it works:

Consultation – Share your requirements and goals with us.

Proposal – We provide a clear scope of work, pricing, and timelines.

Design Execution – Our team begins the drafting and modeling process.

Review & Revisions – Collaborate with us through each review stage.

Delivery – Final files are delivered in your preferred formats.

We support DWG, DXF, SLDDRW, STEP, IGES, and PDF deliverables depending on your workflow.

Conclusion: Your Trusted CAD Drafting Partner

When accuracy, speed, and engineering excellence matter, our CAD drafting services are your competitive edge. From SolidWorks design to general assembly drawing, machine design, and electrical control panel design, we are equipped to handle complex projects with confidence.

As a leading machine design company, we pride ourselves on delivering value-driven design support that moves your project forward—efficiently and effectively.

#hvac #cad drafting

0 notes

resolutegroup · 1 month ago

Text

What to Look for in an EMS Provider in India & Why India Is Emerging as a Global Hub

Choosing the right electronics manufacturing services (EMS) provider in India is crucial for any company looking to scale its hardware production efficiently and cost-effectively. Whether a startup launching a new device or an established business optimizing your supply chain, partnering with a reliable EMS provider can make or break your product journey.

In recent years, India has emerged as a competitive and technologically advanced hub for electronics manufacturing. With government initiatives like “Make in India,” a growing talent pool, and robust infrastructure, the country is positioning itself as a global leader.

In this answer, I’ll explain the key factors to consider when selecting an EMS provider in India and why India is gaining international attention in the electronics manufacturing sector.

Key Qualities to Look for in an EMS Provider in India

1) End-to-End Capabilities: Look for a company that provides comprehensive services—from prototyping and PCB assembly to final product assembly, testing, and packaging. An integrated approach ensures better communication, faster turnaround, and lower costs.

2) Advanced Infrastructure & Technology: The provider should have modern manufacturing facilities equipped with surface mount technology (SMT) lines, automated optical inspection systems, X-ray inspection, and cleanroom environments if necessary. This ensures precision and scalability.

3) Certifications & Quality Standards: A reputable electronics manufacturing services provider in India should have internationally recognized certifications such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and IPC standards. This ensures the products meet global quality and safety norms.

4) Customization & Flexibility: Whether you're working with a small batch or a mass production order, the provider must be agile enough to adapt to your volume needs. Ask if they offer engineering support for design for manufacturing (DFM) to improve efficiency and reduce costs.

5) Component Sourcing Capabilities: Efficient sourcing of components, especially during global supply chain shortages, is a big advantage. Established EMS companies have vendor relationships and procurement teams that ensure reliable sourcing at competitive rates.

6) Experience & Industry Focus: Look for companies with experience in your sector—consumer electronics, medical devices, automotive electronics, IoT, or industrial applications. Industry-specific knowledge can improve compliance and functionality.

7) Communication & Project Management: Effective collaboration is vital. Evaluate their communication channels, reporting frequency, and project management tools. You want a provider who acts like a partner, not just a vendor.

8) Post-Production Services: Value-added services such as after-sales support, repair, maintenance, and reverse logistics can enhance customer experience and reduce lifecycle costs.

Why India Is Becoming a Preferred Destination for EMS

1) Cost Advantage: Manufacturing in India offers lower operational and labor costs than Western countries and other Asian competitors like China. This makes Indian EMS providers extremely attractive for global brands.

2) Skilled Workforce: India produces thousands of engineering graduates annually, many specializing in electronics and communications. This talent pool supports innovation and high-quality output.

3) Government Support: The Indian government’s Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for electronics manufacturing draws domestic and international investments. Regulatory reforms and tax incentives also contribute to a business-friendly environment.

4) Strategic Location: Geographically, India serves as a gateway between the East and the West. For companies looking to distribute in both regions, India offers logistical advantages.

5) Robust Domestic Demand: With a population of over 1.4 billion and increasing digital adoption, India represents a massive electronics market. EMS providers benefit from this dual opportunity of domestic and export markets.

6) Sustainability & Compliance Focus: Many Indian EMS firms adopt green manufacturing practices and comply with global environmental standards like RoHS and WEEE, aligning with ESG-conscious companies.

Resolute GOC – A Prominent EMS Provider in India

One leading name in the industry is Resolute GOC, a full-service electronics manufacturing services provider in India. With advanced infrastructure, a customer-centric approach, and a focus on precision, Resolute GOC supports industries ranging from telecom and defense to healthcare and consumer electronics.

They provide solutions that cover every stage of the manufacturing lifecycle, ensuring scalability, accuracy, and time-to-market efficiency. Whether you're looking for PCB assembly, turnkey solutions, or custom-built components, they bring technical expertise and operational excellence.

Final Thoughts

Partnering with the right EMS provider is a strategic decision that affects your product quality, time-to-market, and cost efficiency. India offers a compelling value proposition due to its skilled talent, favorable policies, and advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

When evaluating an electronics manufacturing services provider in India, always prioritize transparency, technical expertise, and adaptability. Don’t just compare quotes—assess their track record, certifications, technology, and communication style.

With the right EMS partner by your side, you can focus on innovation and go-to-market strategies while they take care of the engineering and execution behind the scenes.

Have more questions about choosing the right EMS provider in India?

Drop them below, happy to help you navigate the options!

#Electronics Manufacturing Services Provider in India #Electronics Manufacturing Services Provider

1 note · View note

waterheaterpump · 1 month ago

Text

Air-Source Or Ground-Source Heat Pumps – Which Is Right For Your Commercial Property?

With the ongoing increase in energy costs and the rising ambition of sustainability goals, commercial property owners are actively looking for HVAC solutions that provide lasting value. Among the most effective and environmentally friendly technologies available today are heat pumps – systems that transfer heat rather than produce it, offering both heating and cooling functions. However, before making a purchase, commercial buyers need to consider a crucial question: Should you opt for an air-source or a ground-source heat pump? This blog delves into the key differences, benefits, and drawbacks of each system to assist you in making a well-informed choice that aligns with your business’s requirements, climate, and financial plan.

Understanding the two types of heat pumps

Air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) draw heat from the external environment and transfer it indoors during the winter months, while reversing this function in the summer to provide cooling. When you install a trusted commercial heat pump in Bangalore, like the one from Vindsol, you will notice the ease of installation, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability to the environment.

Ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs), on the other hand, extract heat from below the earth’s surface through a network of underground loops. Given that ground temperatures remain relatively constant throughout the year, these systems generally deliver greater efficiency, particularly in colder regions.

The factors affecting your buying decision

Installation complexity and site suitability

A key distinction between the two systems is their installation prerequisites. Air-source heat pumps are generally straightforward to install, needing only wall or rooftop areas for their external units. They are particularly suitable for properties with restricted outdoor space or in urban settings where excavation is not feasible. On the other hand, ground-source systems necessitate significant land for either horizontal loops or deep vertical drilling, which can be both time-intensive and expensive. Although they provide outstanding efficiency, the practicality of their installation is heavily influenced by the amount of available land, soil quality, and site accessibility.

Climate and location

The effectiveness of both systems is largely influenced by your geographical area. In areas with moderate to warm climates, air-source heat pumps excel, even in winter, due to improvements in low-temperature functionality. Conversely, in colder climates where winter temperatures can be quite low, ground-source systems may deliver more reliable performance because of the consistent underground temperatures. For companies situated in urban or temperate zones where freezing conditions are uncommon, air-source heat pumps generally offer adequate performance with reduced installation challenges.

Environmental impact and energy efficiency

Air-source and ground-source heat pumps are considerably more energy-efficient compared to conventional heating systems. Ground-source systems generally excel in efficiency, especially in colder climates. Nevertheless, advancements in compressor technology and variable-speed controls have allowed modern air-source systems to close the efficiency gap. In terms of carbon emissions, both systems provide businesses with a practical option for minimizing their environmental impact and achieving green building certifications or government incentives.

Maintenance and durability

Both systems are engineered for durability, with expected lifespans ranging from 15 to 25 years based on usage and upkeep. Air-source systems generally necessitate more frequent inspections, including filter cleaning, refrigerant assessments, and servicing of components, yet they offer easier access for maintenance. In contrast, ground-source systems have fewer exposed components, which minimizes wear and tear. Nevertheless, problems with the underground loops can be challenging and costly to fix. Therefore, the expenses and intricacies associated with underground repairs must be taken into account when assessing long-term reliability.

Upfront cost vs. Long-term savings

From a financial standpoint, air-source systems typically present a lower initial investment, appealing to companies aiming to upgrade without significant capital expenditure. In contrast, ground-source systems, while costlier to install, provide greater operational efficiency and can lead to reduced utility expenses in the long run. Nevertheless, the return on investment may take over ten years, and the intricacy of installation could heighten maintenance challenges. For those seeking a solution that balances upfront costs with enduring performance while minimizing the need for extensive infrastructure modifications, an air-source heat pump is frequently the more sensible option.

Which system is right for your business?

Ultimately, the decision between air-source and ground-source heat pumps is influenced by factors such as local climate, property configuration, available space, budget considerations, and sustainability objectives. For businesses situated in urban or temperate climates, where excavation is restricted and a rapid return on investment is desired, air-source systems present a practical, scalable, and dependable option. Alternatively, if your property is located in a rural area with ample land and you seek to maximize long-term energy savings, investing in ground-source systems could be beneficial, assuming you are ready to handle the complexities of installation and possible maintenance.

As the trends in commercial heating and cooling evolve towards sustainability, investing in a heat pump and selecting the appropriate type can significantly influence your building’s efficiency, operational expenses, and environmental footprint. By comprehending the advantages and disadvantages of air-source versus ground-source systems, you will be more prepared to choose a solution that aligns with your technical specifications and business objectives. Whether your focus is on cost-effectiveness, installation simplicity, or long-term energy savings, the right heat pump can revolutionize your property’s energy consumption while positioning your business for a more sustainable future.

Resource: Read more

#Vindsol #HeatPumps #EcoFriendly #EcoFriendlyHeatingSolutions #SustainableLiving #HotWaterSolutions #HeatingSolutions #HeatPumpsBangalore #WaterHeater #WaterHeating #CommercialHotWaterHeatPumps #CommercialHeatPumpsBangalore #CommercialWaterHeater #CommercialHeatPumps #VindsolCommercialHeatPumps

0 notes

premiumcadd · 2 months ago

Text

The Role of Reverse Engineering in Modern Product Innovation

In today's competitive market, innovation is no longer a luxury—it's a necessity. Companies across industries are constantly seeking ways to improve their products, reduce time to market, and stay ahead of the curve. One powerful method enabling this innovation is reverse engineering. Combined with advanced CAD Design and Drafting Services, reverse engineering plays a pivotal role in transforming existing products into new, improved solutions.

What is Reverse Engineering?

Reverse engineering is the process of deconstructing a product to understand its design, architecture, and functionality. It involves analyzing the physical object, capturing its specifications, and recreating its digital model using tools like 3D scanning and CAD software. This technique is especially valuable when original design documentation is unavailable or when products need to be modified, improved, or repurposed.

How Reverse Engineering Drives Innovation

Product Improvement and Optimization Reverse engineering allows manufacturers to dissect and analyze existing products to identify weaknesses or inefficiencies. With the help of CAD Design and Drafting Services, engineers can redesign components to improve durability, functionality, or cost-effectiveness. This process often leads to better versions of products that align with current market demands.

Legacy Product Reproduction Many companies still use legacy products with outdated or lost design files. Reverse engineering recreates these models digitally, enabling businesses to manufacture replacement parts or update the entire system. This is especially vital in industries like aerospace, automotive, and healthcare, where equipment longevity matters.

Competitive Benchmarking Understanding competitors' products is essential for staying competitive. Reverse engineering allows companies to analyze competitor products legally and ethically to understand what makes them successful. With CAD drafting, insights gained can be translated into innovative design elements for new product lines.

Rapid Prototyping and Customization By converting scanned data into 3D models using CAD tools, businesses can quickly develop prototypes. These digital models make it easier to test changes before final production, reducing the risk of costly errors. Reverse engineering also allows for customization of components based on user feedback or new specifications.

The Role of CAD Design and Drafting Services Reverse engineering wouldn't be possible without accurate CAD Design and Drafting Services. These services translate physical objects into detailed digital formats, ensuring precision and efficiency throughout the development process. CAD tools help engineers visualize, modify, and validate the designs before moving to production.

Moreover, CAD drafting provides detailed documentation such as technical drawings, material specs, and assembly instructions—critical for both internal teams and third-party manufacturers.

Final Thoughts As industries move toward smarter, more efficient product development cycles, the integration of reverse engineering and CAD Design and Drafting Services is becoming increasingly important. Whether you're looking to improve an existing product, recreate a legacy component, or analyze the competition, reverse engineering offers a clear path to innovation.

Businesses that invest in this approach not only streamline their design processes but also gain a competitive edge in a fast-moving market. By leveraging the power of digital tools and precise CAD documentation, innovation becomes a repeatable and scalable process.

#cad design services #cad #caddesign #caddrafting

0 notes