#and it was on why hard drugs should be legalised

[souperdupes]

So, as part of my language course, I had to give a speech in front of a bunch of teachers at my homophobic college, and me, being the rebel that I am, decided to do it on 'why aroace people deserve better representation'. The day arrived where I had to give it and I was so nervous because there were so many teachers and I was definitely not prepared. I said it and when I was done they were all silent. No questions, no claps, no nothing. Until the deputy head just said "see, they get it"

And that's how I found out that the deputy of a majorly homophobic college was, in fact, an aroace.

[beardedmrbean]

The Belgian government is stepping up its fight against organised crime and the drug smuggling that goes with it by hiring more customs agents at the Port of Antwerp.

As Europe’s second largest port, millions of shipping containers pass through its gates every year, which is why it is often called the gateway to the continent, alongside the Port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands.

"For the last five years, we have been breaking (drugs) records here in Antwerp," Florence Angelici, spokesperson for the Belgian Federal Public Finance Service told Euronews. "Last year, there were 89 tonnes of cocaine seized here in Antwerp. It was a very big year, but still, we see the numbers rising."

"We are currently hiring 100 new customs agents and we are about to build new scanning devices directly inside the terminals and the aim is to scan 100% of the risk containers."

Some 41 tonnes were recovered by authorities in 2017, with the number rising year-on-year to reach 65.5 tonnes in 2020.

Seizures hit a peak in 2021, with 89 metric tonnes seized after investigators cracked the encrypted messaging service Sky ECC and intercepted a billion messages during a two-year investigation.

War on drugs is already lost

For Professor Letizia Paoli, an expert in organised crime at Catholic University Leuven, the war on drugs is already lost and Europe should start focusing instead on the damage caused.

"The war against [drug] trafficking cannot be won," she told Euronews. "And I think that police forces all over Europe should focus not so much on reducing the flows because in areas such as the European Union with open borders, it's really hard to stick to the use of laws.

"Instead they should, as much as possible, try to reduce the harms associated with drug trafficking itself, the harms of violence and the harms of corruption."

Paoli added that an EU-wide discussion on the legalisation of some narcotics should be explored.

"At the same time, (we should) start a debate on whether or not some drugs should be legalised in such a way as to reduce the revenues of organised criminals."

But as drug seizures have increased, so has violence linked to organised crime. 

Just last month, Belgium's Justice Minister, Vincent Van Quickenborne, was caught up in a foiled kidnapping plot linked to organised crime in the Netherlands.

He described it as “narco-terrorism” with others even calling Belgium a "narcostate". Paoli, however, said this definition is unjustified.

"There is no reason to define Belgium as a narcostate. There are huge differences with real narcostates, such as Mexico, for example," she explained. 

"In Belgium, in the Netherlands, the public administration has more integrity, so there are very few cases known of civil servants that have been corrupted by organised criminals."

Paoli added that the record cocaine recovered last year at the Port of Antwerp nearly matched the whole EU's yearly consumption and still prices across the continent did not increase.

In fact, she said the cost of cocaine even decreased in some cases, showing that supply is still readily flowing through Europe, despite police seizures.

[oglehvass]

3 Romantic Cannabinol Holidays

While code and cannabis might seem incompatible, for the 150 attendees at the sold-out event, the concept makes perfect sense. For this grow, I was growing eight OG Kush clones with the pH Perfect Bundle from Advanced Nutrients. WolfPack, a rapidly growing Twitter community, he shares information about those stocks with his followers. Follow Newsbeat on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. Newsbeat spoke to two scientists who study the drug. Listen to Newsbeat live at 12:45 and 17:45 every weekday on BBC Radio 1 and 1Xtra - if you miss us you can listen back here. Lauve said owners have only about two weeks to get the seeds planted so they can harvest the hemp before snow falls. Botanicare's Cal/Mag is rated as the best Ca/Mg supplement for cannabis because it offers the perfect dose of two critical, yet underserved, macronutrients for marijuana plants. CBD and Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are two types of cannabinoids found naturally in the resin of the marijuana plant. Dr Caderof's research focuses on cannabinoids. CBD Oil A full night's sleep has the power to boost your mood, improve decision making, maintain knowledge retention, promote a hard-working immune system, and reduce stress and anxiety.

Below, learn how a few small steps can help relieve feelings of the Sunday scaries, and allow you to get the full night's sleep you deserve. Plus, he breaks down why melatonin can make you feel hungover -- and how to prevent that effect if you choose to keep taking it. Oftentimes, we can feel overwhelmed or anxious before starting a week when it's filled to the brim with tasks we have to accomplish. Police can give you an on-the-spot fine of £90 if you are caught with cannabis. Barricades, fencing and barbed wire surround the courthouse in downtown Minneapolis as police brace for protests. A US judge has delayed jury selection in the case of an ex-Minneapolis police officer accused of killing George Floyd, an unarmed black man, last May. Last month, a mother from County Cork set out to walk 150 miles from the remote village of Aghabullogue to the Dáil in an effort to convince the Irish health minister to legislate for the drug's medicinal use. The Dáil bill, proposed by People Before Profit TD Gino Kenny, has the support of Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin, Labour, the Social Democrats and the Green Party. He says de Hoedt's experience is "far from the evidence that we need" but it "does support that we should be researching that area further".

CBD or CBN: "CBD oil, made from the hemp plant, is nonpsychoactive but has calming and pain-soothing effects," says Axe. CBD oil does not contain THC, the psycho-active ingredient associated with the "high" in marijuana. Six months later, the stock price about doubled when it hit a high of $52.03 (£39.77) a share. So go ahead, spoil your pooch rotten with some of the best gourmet dog treats you can buy online, made with delicious and natural ingredients. Her rivals include Treatibles, which sell hemp oil "for animals of all kinds", and Pet Releaf, whose hemp dog treats look like fancy vegan snack-food. When Canada legalised marijuana just over a year ago, it seemed like anyone who was anyone wanted to break into the market. Several lawmakers took to the House floor ahead of the vote, arguing the bill had less to do with legalising marijuana and more to do with how the enforcement of cannabis prohibition has hurt communities of colour, leaving behind "a legacy of racial and ethnic injustices". MP Bill Blair during a press conference shortly after the legislation was presented to parliament.

The vote on Thursday sends the bill back to the House of Commons, where members of Parliament will decide whether to accept the dozens of amendments added to the legislation by the Senate. The US House of Representatives has passed a bill to decriminalise cannabis at the national level for the first time. The bill is expected to have the support of 90 TDs, ensuring its passage through the House. Support for federal cannabis legalisation is now at an all-time high, with a Gallup poll last month showing more than two-thirds of American adults support it. The less severe charge of third-degree murder was initially dismissed last year, but prosecutors have requested to reinstate it. The seeds used were part of a shipment from Italy that was released last week after a legal standoff between Kentucky's Agriculture Department and the federal government. It seems like you can't fully enjoy your Sunday's because you're dreading the start of a new week. According to a survey by LinkedIn, 80% of 30,000 participants reported having this feeling before the start of their week. I don't think I can wait until my dog's birthday to try these fun, frosted, organic peanut butter biscuits.

[pitterpatterpot]

We already had high, clingy Gavriel/Aedion interaction, will we also get clingy/needy (maybe drunk or high) Aedion with Gavriel interaction?

You get it right now!

~~~

“My head hurts,” Aedion states glumly, his expression turning even more downtrodden as his boot lands in a filthy puddle.

“I’m sure it does,” Kyllian grunts, Aedion’s arm slung over his shoulders.

“It’s because I fell.”

“You don’t say,” Kyllian huffs, shifting his weight.

“Kyllian?”

“Yes, Aedion?”

“I feel strange.”

The commander reigns in his frustration, the palace walls looming around them and flickering with the shadows of the night. The bar had been suspiciously empty when they arrived, and no one had questioned it when Aedion accepted and lit a pipe. The only surprise was that, instead of the usual slightly soothing drugs most pipes obtain, the one he had been given was filled with a stronger substance. One that’s left him leaning heavily against Kyllian’s side.

“That would be the herbs you smoked,” Kyllian sighs. “Did you seriously think it was just a normal smoke?”

“You said it was!” Aedion snaps. “Walking is hard.”

Kyllian sighs, nodding to a guard as they pass through the gate. “For all we know your father will spot us and-“

Aedion gasps. Kyllian grunts and jolts to a stop with him.

“Gavriel!” Aedion cries, stricken. “Kyllian, he’s my father!”

“...I know?”

“And I haven’t seen him today!” Aedion frets. “What if he’s dead?”

“That is a very large jump,” Kyllian winces, tightening his grip on Aedion. “Why don’t I get you some good food and water and we try our best to avoid the male that will rip me apart if he sees what I did to you.”

“...I want Gavriel.”

“What did I just say?” Kyllian scowls, tugging Aedion towards a kitchen. “You have to- Aedion, no!”

The demi-fae tears free of his grip and sprints down the hallway, following a familiar scent. Kyllian watches him with wide eyes, then slumps and sighs. He turns and makes his way to his own room, mentally calculating the benefits of sleeping in the armoury instead.

~~~

“Gavriel!” Aedion knocks repetitively on the door of the most common room the cadre members meet in for their late night talks. “Gavri-“

The door flings open, Gavriel looking to Aedion in concern. The Lion quickly takes stock of his son, Rowan, Fenrys and Vaughan all watching with trepidation from where they sit in the armchairs.

“What happened?” Gavriel frets. “Are you alright?”

“Gavriel!” Aedion wraps his arms around his father. “You’re alive!”

“What?” Gavriel stiffens for a moment. “Of course I’m alive. Aedion, what are...” realisation sparks in Gavriel’s eyes, and they soften along with his voice as he wraps his arms around his son. “Did you have a nightmare?”

“This entire night is a nightmare,” Aedion mutters before yawning, going lax in his father’s arms.

“Come in, sit,” Gavriel directs Aedion to the couch he was previously occupying. “Where’s Kyllian?”

Aedion shrugs, scratching at the fabric of the chair.

“You look exhausted,” Fenrys states in concern. “How long have you been back?”

“Around two,” Aedion thinks back.

“Hours,” Rowan nods.

Minutes, but Aedion is in no state to correct him. Instead he looks pleadingly up at his father.

“Can you hold me?” Aedion asks, bluntly. “Please?”

Gavriel jerks, taken back. Even the others seem surprised by this blatant request. Vaughan stands and gives the others a gentle look.

“We’ll leave you two,” he nods, Fenrys and Rowan following suit. “Feel better, Aedion.”

“Do you want to talk about your dream?” Gavriel asks, arm wrapped around Aedion with his son’s head resting on his shoulder. “And you’re still wearing your clothes. You should at least get comfortable before trying to rest.”

“I know,” Aedion mutters.

“And you...” Gavriel trails off, taking in Aedion’s eyes. “And your pupils are large.”

“Probably because I love you. They get bigger when you love something.”

Gavriel stiffens. “Aedion, where is Kyllian?”

“Don’t know.”

“When did you last see him?”

“After he gave me a funny pipe. It was sweet.”

“Right,” Gavriel stands, grabbing a blanket from a near basket and dropping it securely around his son. “You wait here.”

Huffing, Aedion squirms out from under the blanket and stands to follow his father. Gavriel frowns.

“I need you to stay here, Aedion,” Gavriel pushes him to sit again.

As soon as he turns to go to the door his son follows him once again. Gavriel winces and leads Aedion back to the couch.

“Cub, just-“

“I can take you to Kyllian!” Aedion stands, delighted.

“I think I’ll be fine,” Gavriel frets, shifting in uncertainty. “If you could just stay- that’s it, I’ll be back-“

And as soon as he reaches the reaches the door Aedion is once again by his side. Gavriel sighs, bowing his head in defeat. Aedion bounces slightly on the balls of his feet, humming quietly.

“Alright,” Gavriel concedes. “I may as well take you to Lysandra along the way.”

“Oh!” Aedion’s eyes brighten. “I love her!”

“I’m aware you do,” Gavriel huffs a laugh.

“I love you, too.”

“Thank you,” Gavriel leads Aedion down the hallway, firmly holding his son’s hand in his own. “Do you love anyone else?”

“Aelin, she’s basically my sister,” Aedion muses. “Evangeline, definitely... Rowan is becoming like a brother... I don’t love Fenrys and Vaughan and Lorcan yet... Kyllian is my best friend, so yes...”

“What about Dorian and Chaol?” Gavriel prompts, a smile in place.

Aedion stares back incredulously. Gavriel chuckles.

“Where’s Lysandra?” Aedion suddenly asks. “Is that my room? Lysandra!”

Gavriel immediately hushes his son, his loud cry booming through the palace. The bedroom door immediately swings open with the shifter popping her head out to search for the disturbing sound. She placates as she spots them, hair and clothes disheveled from bed. Aedion jumps free from his father’s grasp and flings his arms around her.

“Lysandra!” He announces. “I love you!”

“I feel the same, darling?” Lysandra replies, blinking rapidly. “Aedion, it’s three in the morning.”

“No it’s not. It’s four.”

“It seems he and Kyllian found some interesting substances,” Gavriel informs her. “I’m going to hunt him down now.”

“You’re too harsh on him,” Lysandra chastises, running a hand through Aedion’s hair to his delight. “The human equivalent of cat nip was just legalised, it’s fully possible Aedion just grabbed the wrong pipe.”

“We need to break him of that habit,” Gavriel grumbles.

“Just taking other people’s pipes or smoking at all? You are aware he doesn’t use harmful substances?”

“The borrowing pipes parts,” Gavriel confirms. “It’s unsanitary. Either way, I’ll go find Kyllian to ensure he’s safe. Good luck.”

Lysandra snorts as he turns and walks away, Aedion leaning his face into the palm of her hand.

“Alright, you oaf. Bed time.”

“Is Kyllian going to die?”

“Possibly. Now shush.”

[flamingivories]

A, E, G, I, J, K, L, R, S,T,V,W,X,Y, Z-how are you doing-like really doing?

A: If I’m in love?

- I am endlessly in love with my friends and family that I hold dear to me, but I’m guessing you’re asking about romantic love. Yes, I think? I started seeing someone at the end of November and I’m in new territory here.

E: How many holes I have in my ears?

- Just the two I use to listen. Never got my ears pierced.

G: The last person I said ‘I love you’ to?

- My close friend Rochelle after her on-again/off-again guy friend she’s been seeing broke it off with her literALLY THE DAY AFTER VALENTINES. WTF. (He’s an ass and it’s good riddance, and she agrees but it would still sting.)

I: The last time I felt jealous and why?

- Jealousy isn’t a feeling that I experience in a big way. I get small twinges of jealousy when I see people going about their lives happy and content, like why can’t I do that? But for the most part jealousy is something I try to let go of.

J: Are you insecure? What about?

- Yeah haha. Many things, but I think more than anything I’m insecure about the way people love me. Like the thought of someone being content with my company and nothing more? Hmm seems fake but whatever.

K: My full name?

- Jared John Brooker! (My middle name is so boring) you can find me on Instagram at jaredbrooker95 if you’re looking to do some internet stalking. 😂

L: If I have siblings?

- I have a sister who is two years older than me, and a younger half-brother from my Dad’s second marriage. He would be around 11 or 12 I think.

R: For me to tell 10 of my curiosities?

- Hmm like 10 interesting facts/quirks about me? Anon I fear I’m far too boring a person to find 10 interesting things about myself. 😂

1. I only drink water. (And have only drunk water my ENTIRE life.)

That’s it. That’s literally the only curiousity that I can think of at the moment. Sorry!

S: 2 habits?

- I chew my nails. To the point where they’re almost painfully short, it’s something I do when I’m anxious or stressed. (So like 89% of the time?) I also smoke cannabis fairly regularly. I fully support recreational use of cannabis and legalisation (a whole topic in and of itself) but at the same time I am trying to have a healthier relationship with it than I do at the moment, because it definitely became something of a crutch during the worse days of my depression. Using anything to excess is bad for your health my friends! Whether it’s drugs, food, sex, gambling, or any other number of vices you could care to name.

T: Five things I love unconditionally?

- My godson, My Mum, my piano, damn I’m already running out of things 😂

V: 3 big dreams?

- To finish Uni and become a qualified paramedic, to master the third movement of the Moonlight Sonata on piano, and for the world to wake up and address climate change before we all burn.

W: An idol?

- I don’t think I really have an idol as such? Quite a few people I admire and respect but I’m finding it hard to pick names out.

X: If I’ve done something I regret very much?

- Many things my dear Anon, but more like small social interactions where I made a fool of myself. Much like jealousy I try not to hold on to big feelings of regret. However questionable some of my choices were, they are what got me to where I am today. And while I still might not be 100% happy where I am right now, there are far worse places I could have ended up.

Y: If I like my town and why?

- Kind of indifferent towards it tbh. It’s a means to an end, I moved here specifically because my Uni course wasn’t offered in my hometown and when I finish Uni I’ll likely leave. I’ve yet to find a place with that feeling of ‘home’.

Z: How are you doing-like really doing??

- Oof, time for the big one!

I’m actually doing really well at the moment Anon. As I mentioned earlier I’ve been seeing someone for almost three months now. I went to school with her (and had the biggest crush on her) and we reconnected last year after 10 years. It’s been really nice but I must say I’m struggling to adapt to the change. I’ve been single for about 6-7 years now and have become very comfortable in my own company. It’s hard letting people in, and I think it’s going to take me a while. But she makes me feel happy, and calm, when I’m with her. I still get this emptiness in my chest, mostly when I’m alone, and I feel guilty because why should I feel that way? Idk

I’m still struggling with Uni. I was meant to finish up at the end of last year but I had to take time off for my mental health. So watching all my Uni friends graduate and move on with their lives was really hard. But I’m pressing on and hopefully I’ll be done by the end of this year. I’m just terrified I’m going to derail and lose motivation again.

But I’m doing well Anon, taking each day one at a time. Thanks for checking in on me, I hope you’re doing well too. 💞

[scripttorture]

I know you often speak about how torture tends to make the victim even more likely to resist and fight their torturers, but I'm wondering, is it common or feasible for them to eventually stop fighting the people hurting them as much or as often? I imagine that methods like starvation and repeated beatings would make a person very physically weak; do you think this could lead to an eventual learned helplessness?

Resistancedoesn’t necessarily mean physically fighting.

Ithink that’s an important thing to stress. Partly because I’m apacifist and partly because you’re right, a lot of torture victimscan’tphysically fight their torturers.

Resistanceand violence aren’t the same things. I think our discussions ofresistance and opposition are hampered when we confuse them. It cutsout huge swathes of everyday human resistance and opposition and Ithink it creates a much bleaker picture of the world than a moreholistic view of how we resist.

WhenAlleg describes being tortured in TheQuestionhe never responds to his torturers with violence. But he also neverstops resisting.

Herefused to answer their questions. He insisted they refer to him withthe formal ‘you’ (vous). He told them that what they were doingwas wrong and that they were going to be prosecuted for it.

That’swhat resistance looked like for him.

WhenFela Kuti was periodically released from military or police custodyhe continued to write and perform songs protesting against them. Herecorded two songs related to the most egregious attacks on him, hisfamily and colleagues. An attack that resulted in the death of hismother, multiple rapes, mass violence, the destruction of his homeand the imprisonment and torture of Fela himself.

Hemarched his mother’s funeral procession past the biggest militarybarracks in one of Nigeria’s biggest cities and left her coffin onthe steps. Then he wrote a song about it.

Theman seems to have spent most of his free life daringthe military and police to try torturing him again. Which they did.And Fela’s music survives as an emotionally charged testament tothe injustice he suffered.

That’swhat resistance looked like for him.

RonaldSearle spent his years in Japanese force labour camps drawingthe suffering he witnessed. He hid his drawings in the bedding ofdiseased, dying men.

Andwhen he survived he channelled all the awful things he’d seen intoone of the most popular and darkly comic series of drawings of hisday.

Resistancelooks like different things to different people. It depends on theirphysical capacity, their personality, their assessment of risk andthe options or materials available to them.

Adeeper study of slavery in the new world provides a huge range ofexamples showcasing the ways people resisted.

Therewas a lot of violence,ranging from individual attacks on torturers to organised warfare.The violence and the level of planning and organisation behind itshouldn’t bedownplayed. The tendency to write people in this historical period aspassive objects is wrong.

Butovert violence was not the only method of resistance victimsemployed.

Theyescaped. They assisted each other in everything from warfare to dailysurvival. They pursued educationalopportunities that they were legally denied access to. They destroyedproperty. They mangled the means of production. They spoiledharvests.

Theyalso committed suicide in large numbers.

Sono, not every character in every torture scene should fight, thatisn’t realistic. But realistically, the vast majority wouldresist.

Itmight not be violent. It might not be obvious. It might not beeffective. But none ofthat means it isn’t resistance.

Thereare a lot of small simple things you could write characters doing inorder to show this antagonism and tendency to resistance whilekeeping the character non-confrontational, seemingly cooperative ortoo terrified to act in overt ways.

Thisis not necessarily ‘learned helplessness’.

I’maware of the theory but- I’m not convinced that the evidence (suchas it is) supports the idea that this is whysome victims appear to cooperate with their abusers. It seems just aslikely to me that victims are making a hard headed assessment oftheir situation and options.

Wehave an extremely poor record of protecting victims of abuse andtorture when they report crimes. The majority of offenders are notconvicted. Those that are are given short sentences. During the trialperiod and afterwards the protection offered to victims is generallyinadequate. A lot ofvictims are attacked when they report crimes. A significant numberare murdered. In the case oftorture victims they are often being attacked by the very people theyare supposed to report attacks to.

Ina significant number of countries victims can often be arrested andcharged when they report crimes. This isn’t just legalisation inplaces like Saudi, which can lead to the arrest of victims ofdomestic violence for attempting to break up the family unit. It alsoeffects countries like the UK and the USA where victims of humantrafficking, forced prostitution and slavery often fear arrest forimmigration offences, drugs related offences and prostitution.

Victimsare aware of all ofthis.

Giventhis background- well the sad fact is that it isn’t always rationalfor victims to report crimes.

Bysimilar logic it is not always rational for them to respond toattacks with physical violence. They are awarethat this is an extremely dangerous way to choose to resist.

Bringingthe discussion back around to stories; there are a lot of ways youcould write a character resisting in a torture scenario when they’rephysically unable to fight.

Theycould refuse to give out information. They could lie. They couldsabotage anything torturers try to force them into doing. They couldrefuse to respond in any way whatsoever. They could support otherswho are actively resisting in small ways. They could refuse to reportothers for acts of resistance.

Thereare also combinations of symptoms and particular expressions ofsymptoms that would make resistance more difficult. But I think it’simportant to stress that this is...chance. These particularmanifestations of these particular symptoms are not the ‘only’ oreven the ‘most common’ ways victims can respond.

They’renot wrong ways torespond either because there’s no such thing.

Atthe moment I think they dominate the narrative on survivors. I thinkthe fictional landscape we have oscillates wildly between showingsurvivors as madepassive by torture (which isn’t possible) and vastlyunderestimating the effect torture has, to the point that survivorsseem virtually unaffected.

Thisisn’t helpful to survivors.  

WhenI’m writing characters who seem passive in torture or abusescenarios I tend to try and think about what they can reasonably do.What they have access to and what is a greater or lesser risk.

Soan enslaved character who acts as a body guard never physicallyattacks her abuser. But she often makes sure that other people whoattack him escape by deliberately slowing down, tripping or turningthe wrong way when chasing them. She makes the deliberate choice thatattacking him herself is too risky and then acts to ensure others aremore able to attack him.

Anothercharacter carries out a long running campaign of sabotage withintheir torturer’s organisation. And if acts of sabotage arediscovered tries to blame people loyal to the torturer.

Thinkabout what your character’s priorities are. An ex-soldier mightwell be determined to fight physically and might struggle to seeother methods of resistance as meaningful. A doctor being forced totreat enemy troops may not stick to proper hygiene procedures; and beaware of what not wearing gloves or washing their hands is likely tomean. Someone who ran a business might be more aware of how to damagetorturers financially, targetting things that would be the mostexpensive or inconvenient to repair.

Thereare a wealth of options available to us, enough to make everysurvivor’s story that we write unique; with their own methods andrational for resistance, tied to the specific character and thestory.

Ihope that helps. :)

Disclaimer

[louis-studio-workbook]

Reasons why I believe Cannabis should be legalised, Including facts and statistics. ( Mini essay i wrote)

Cannabis is an extremely highly used drug in NZ. According to a health study in NZ over 12% of people in NZ have used cannabis at least once. And according to the Dunedin and Christchurch Longitudinal Studies), By the age of 21, 80% of New Zealanders have tried cannabis at least one time. Cannabis is used to create a euphoric high that can last between 2 and 10 hours depending on certain factors. The use of cannabis also has minimal if any consequences on your health, again depending on certain factors such as age, another thing to take into consideration is that no one has ever been killed by a pure cannabis overdose. 

It is important to note the difference in health effects between alcohol, a drug that is readily available, fully legal and consumed regularly in NZ and cannabis, an illegal drug in most instances, with minimal health effects. 

Alcohol can cause: Liver disease, Pancreatitis, Heart damage, Stomach and digestive issues, Central nervous system damage, Erectile dysfunction, Infertility and also death from overdose.

Cannabis can cause: Brain development issues, however this is only from heavy use of cannabis as a teen, with the effects being unknown if they are even permanent or not. This is according to a study on PMC. 

It is also believed and not fully confirmed that cannabis can cause an onset of schizophrenia in certain people, especially people who have a family history of it. 

I think from this information it is clear as to why alcohol is legal, and cannabis is not, Is confusing. 

There are significantly more reasons as to why we should be legalising cannabis. 

One reason is most parents are afraid of their teen children getting into using cannabis, and for the most part they would be correct in their fears. There is a reason, alcohol is age restricted and if cannabis was legalised it would also be restricted to only people over the age of 20. From studies as shown before, use of cannabis at a young age can cause brain issues.  

However, keeping it illegal isn't going to stop teens from using cannabis, as shown before 80% of people below 21 have used cannabis at least once. So for one, it is likely that most teens at some stage are at risk of being criminalised at a young age. Meaning they may have issues finding a job, travelling overseas, or be punished by the law in over ways, just for a relatively harmless high. Also keeping cannabis illegal is also putting teens and others at risk of worse consequences. Having cannabis illegal in this country creates a very accessible black market for people to purchase cannabis from. Meaning when you purchase cannabis, you are one, helping to fund criminals, and two, you are likely unaware of where your cannabis has come from and if or not it has been laced with any over substance, which could cause addiction and severe health consequences, also by having access to the black market it might create an entry point into over hard drugs, by creating an easy access for people to obtain them. By taking Cannabis on to an open market, consumers will be aware of what goes into their cannabis, and will not be at risk of having it laced. It will also generate tax money which could go into helping fund cannabis and drug rehabilitation facilities, and in doing so decrease the revenue of criminals and gangs who benefit from making money from selling cannabis on the black market. 

Cannabis is a widely used drug for pain reduction, while cannabis for medical reasons is legal. It is extremely hard to gain a prescription for and, the prices of which are between $200 and $300 for a monthly supply, which is extremely unaffordable. Leaving plenty of people such as my grandfather in chronic pain. Legalising cannabis will help create cheap and accessible cannabis for people, such as my grandfather who does not want to risk being criminalised or using non regulated cannabis. 

Maori people are also disproportionately affected by the illegality of cannabis. 

Maori people only make up 17% of the NZ population while 37% of the people convicted for illicit drug use happen to be Maori people, aged between 17 and 25. In Washington, U.S. they legalised cannabis leading to an 8 fold decrease in the conviction of african american people for cannabis offences. Doing the same, should have the same effects of Maori people in NZ. 

An example of another country who is reaping the rewards for legalising cannabis is Canada. 

Here are some statistics showing why cannabis use from people aged between 15-17 has dropped from 19.8% to 10.4%. The highest user of cannabis in Canada is people aged between 18 and 24, there has been no increase in the usage rates for that age category. Also in canada the report shows that 13.2% of people drive 2 hours after using cannabis, this has not increased since legalisation.  

https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/info/drug-index/cannabis/

https://www.healthline.com/health/how-long-does-a-marijuana-high-last#ending-it-faster

https://www.healthline.com/health/weed-vs-alcohol#long-term-risks

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827335/

https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/news-media-and-events/canada-whats-been-happening-since-legalisation/

https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/education-and-young-people/

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/427623/cannabis-legalisation-will-reduce-maori-arrests-campaigners-say

[michiganprelawland]

The Debate to Decriminalize, Legalize, or Prohibit Drugs

By Tristan Sirls, University of Michigan Class of 2022

January 8, 2021

In 2018, voters in Michigan approved Proposal 1, which legalized the recreational use of cannabis in the state. Michigan isn’t the only state to do this, and more states have since followed in legalizing cannabis1. But for some, legalizing cannabis isn’t enough; in November of 2020, voters in Oregon made an even more dramatic step and voted to approve Measure 110. This measure decriminalized all drugs in the state, meaning that being caught with illegal substances in Oregon is now be a civil violation instead of a criminal one2. But not everyone supports these measures— those who favor continuing “the war on drugs” are often already firmly opposed to legalizing cannabis, much less decriminalizing drugs altogether. Since it seems like decriminalizing all drugs would mean decriminalizing cannabis, but not necessarily vice versa, this article will focus on the arguments for and against decriminalizing, or even legalizing all drugs.

First, there is an important distinction between decriminalizing a substance and legalizing a substance. Decriminalizing is an ambiguous term, but it largely refers to “a reduction in legal penalties”3. In the case of Oregon, decriminalizing drugs turned possession and use of illegal drugs into a civil, instead of criminal offense. So this means using illegal drugs in Oregon is still illegal, but the punishment for that drug use is more similar to a speeding ticket than jail time. This also means that the production and distribution of these illegal drugs is still against the law, and still a criminal offense. In contrast, legalizing a substance means that using that substance is not against the law, and the state might license certain producers of that substance to ensure its quality (as in the case of alcohol).

To understand why people argue to decriminalize drugs, or end drug prohibition all together, it’s important to understand why it started in the first place. Drugs like cocaine and heroin weren’t always illegal in the United States: it’s commonly said that Coca Cola originally had a bit of cocaine in it4. However in 1914, the Harrison Act was passed by Congress, “banning opiates and cocaine,” and alcohol banned four years later. Alcohol and drug prohibition policies were inspired by the 19th and 20th century temperance movements. These movements were inspired by a fear “that God would no longer bless the United States” if, in their view, immoral drug users were allowed to proliferate in society5. However, just like with the prohibition of alcohol, banning the use of opiates and cocaine didn’t stop their consumption, it just drove it underground. This led to more illegal drug trade and international drug trafficking that involved other countries like Colombia. To combat this criminal drug trade (and for a multitude of other reasons), “Nixon declared ‘drug abuse’ to be public enemy number one in 1971” and began his “war on drugs”6. This echoed the prohibition policy of the early 20th century, and claimed to promote public health by denying people the opportunity to become drug addicts, as well as prevent the crime that comes with the illegal drug trade.

So why are people arguing to decriminalize or legalize all drugs after decades of prohibition? At the core of a lot of these arguments, there is the feeling that the war on drugs has been an expensive failure. According to the ACLU: “since 1981, tax dollars to the tune of $150 billion have been spent trying to prevent Columbian cocaine, Burmese heroin and Jamaican marijuana from penetrating our borders. Yet the evidence is that for every ton seized, hundreds more get through”4. In other words, American attempts to control drug flow into the U.S. have been costly and ineffective, and have also led to high incarceration rates for citizens who do use these illegal drugs. This ties into current debates about mass incarceration in the U.S., but this article will focus solely on decriminalizing drugs. A second common line of thought has to do with the nature of the drug trade itself: making substances like cocaine illegal isn’t preventing Americans from buying and using it. Instead, it’s just forcing citizens to purchase these drugs off the black market, where there is “no quality control. When drugs are illegal, the government cannot enact standards of quality, purity or potency. Consequently, street drugs are often contaminated or extremely potent, causing disease and sometimes death to those who use them”4. If drug use and addiction are thought of as a health problem, this is an alarming fact: drug addicts who need treatment have to use potentially tainted drugs to satisfy their addiction, further endangering their health. Another concern is that criminalizing drug use is a “destructive force in inner city communities,” since “only 12 percent of drug users are black, but nearly 40 percent of those arrested for drug offenses are black”4. So keeping drugs criminalized is disproportionately affecting inner city communities and raising their incarceration rates, which is another important problem. These are only a couple reasons why some people argue the government should decriminalize, or even legalize all drugs. But what exactly would this look like?

In 2001, Portugal decriminalized all drugs, meaning that the purchase and the use of illegal drugs are minor offenses, although selling them is still a major offense. The results from this have been helpful in determining how this may look in other countries. After decriminalizing all drugs, “the lifetime prevalence of adult drug use in Portugal rose slightly, but problem drug use—that is, habitual use of hard drugs—declined after Portugal decriminalized, from 7.6 to 6.8 per 1,000”6.Along with this, rates of HIV in Portugal greatly decreased, since drug users had easier access to clean needles. Portugal’s prison population also declined, since less people were jailed for using illegal drugs. However, Portugal didn’t pass decriminalize all drugs with no preparations: the government set aside a large amount of money for treating drug addiction, and created commissions for controlling drug abuse. Portugal had also already been previously spending a considerable amount of money on social services, and with this infrastructure in mind, their decriminalization policy is often considered a success6. However, it’s also important to note that certain drug-related crimes, such as street robberies, did rise significantly after decriminalizing drugs.

This leads into some concerns about decriminalizing all drugs. One major concern is that that decriminalizing drugs would somehow indicate that there is more societal approval for drugs and consequently increase drug use. However, this concern does seem to be placated by evidence from Portugal, since drug use only slightly rose, and problem drug use actually fell. Another major concern about decriminalizing drugs is that is wouldn’t address the criminal black market trade that brings them into the country. This means the government still wouldn’t be able to regulate the production and sale of illegal drugs, leading to drug users using potentially tainted drugs. This is why some argue that legalization, and not just decriminalization, should be pursued instead.

Legalizing all drugs, instead of just decriminalizing them, would allow for governmental licensing and regulation of drug sales. This eliminates the health and safety problems that come from the criminal drug trade. But there is no data on what exactly legalizing all drugs would look like, since no country has pursued a full drug legalization policy.  However, “if cocaine were to be legalized, says Mark Kleiman, a professor of public policy at New York University who has been a critic of the war on drugs since the 1970s, there’s no evidence indicating that the number of cocaine abusers would be less than the number of alcoholics, or about 17.6 million”6. Keliman goes on to point out that legalizing cocaine could lead to even worse rates of alcoholism as well, since alcoholics may often fall asleep and therefore stop drinking. Cocaine is a stimulant and keeps the user awake, so cocaine would allow an alcoholic to keep drinking instead of falling asleep. To prevent this, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place that is able to treat and rehabilitate people with substance abuse problems.

This emphasizes that while there may be good reasons to legalize drugs, America might need to consider significantly improving its public health infrastructure, as well as making serious investments in drug treatment and rehabilitation for addicts before it could safely legalize drugs. Consider Portugal’s extensive social services and drug commission investments when it decriminalized drugs: it didn’t see much of a rise in drug use with these measures in place. Furthermore, these arguments may be more compelling for decriminalizing or legalizing some drugs over others— this might be why marijuana is currently being legalized in some states when cocaine is not. This article provides some context and considerations on both sides of the debate on whether or not to decriminalize or legalize all drugs, but there is much more to the debate than is covered here.

______________________________________________________________

1. Cannabis in Michigan. (2020). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cannabis_in_Michigan&oldid=996375876

2. Mosher, C., & Akins, S. (n.d.). Oregon just decriminalized all drugs – here’s why voters passed this groundbreaking reform. The Conversation. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from http://theconversation.com/oregon-just-decriminalized-all-drugs-heres-why-voters-passed-this-groundbreaking-reform-150806

3. Ritter, A. (n.d.). Decriminalisation or legalisation: Injecting evidence in the drug law reform debate | NDARC - National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre. UNSW Sydney. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/blog/decriminalisation-or-legalisation-injecting-evidence-drug-law-reform-debate

4. Against Drug Prohibition. (n.d.). American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from https://www.aclu.org/other/against-drug-prohibition

5. Temperance Movement—Ohio History Central. (n.d.). Retrieved January 5, 2021, from https://ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Temperance_Movement

6. Baum, D. (2016, April). Legalize It All: How to win the war on drugs. https://www.heyheyrenee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Harpers_Legalize_It_All.pdf

[terrypearrson]

A life of crime

Legal Cheek’s Aishah Hussain chats to Chris Daw QC about life at the bar, his newly released book and venture into ‘vlawging’

Chris Daw QC

Chris Daw QC’s new book, Justice on Trial, has received a mostly positive reception. He thinks this is due to the public having an appetite for the subject matter which has received a lot of media attention as of late.

The coronavirus crisis has magnified debate around prison reform while the Black Lives Matter movement has thrust questions around racial imbalance in the criminal justice system into prominence.

We’ve hit a sort of ‘reset’ point in society. People have realised that some aspects do need to change and have become, perhaps, more receptive to new ideas like the ones Daw proposes in his book.

The COVID-19 lockdown has made us realise that we can do a lot more remotely than we might have thought. For Daw — a serious crime silk at Millennium Chambers and member of Serjeants’ Inn Chambers and Lincoln House Chambers — remote-working has been “liberating”. He’s not on the go as much, travelling to court or to client conferences, and is able to maintain a sense of discipline around his diary, he tells me when we speak.

More broadly, technology and more specifically, remote monitoring, offers creative solutions to improving the criminal justice system, as Daw addresses in his book. The idea is simple: prison is costly; and by embracing technology, and the so-called “virtual prison”, we can remove non-violent offenders, who let’s be honest, “don’t learn anything useful” in physical imprisonment, and keep track of them as they go about their lives. They could go to work or through education, attend counselling or rehabilitation, and “just be more productive” than they are behind brick walls and barbed wire.

Interestingly, where he doesn’t see tech has much of a place is virtual hearings for criminal trials. “There are far too many low-level cases going through the courts that should be diverted away from the system and dealt with in other forms,” he tells me. “By using online courts for criminal cases you’re enabling a system that is already broken. Why online? Well, why do it at all? It’s a waste of time.” This narrative continues in his book.

Justice on Trial is a manifesto, if you like, proposing radical reform to the criminal justice system. It’s at breaking point, he argues, and to break free of the cycle of crime, perpetuated as much by our criminal justice system as by those behind its bars, we must rip up the playbook and start again. Daw lobbies mainly for three things: we should close all prisons but for a few inmates; legalise drugs (under government control); and put a stop to children being tried in the adult system.

Headline-grabbing, that’s for sure, and an ideology the far-right would have a field day opposing. But make no mistake: Daw is no apologist for violence and antisocial behaviour. His views do not arise from some ‘soft’ liberal perspective. He is only interested in hard facts and what works to reduce crime and prevent recidivism. Daw’s ideas are simple; they are steeped in history and intertwined with anecdotes and lived experience from his many cases and travels.

25 years in the justice system and I can tell you that it's broken.

I can also tell you how to fix it…

…but you might not like my suggestions.

Available now https://t.co/K3CN5ASpyW pic.twitter.com/EBwzzeZbjW

— Chris Daw QC (@crimlawuk) July 28, 2020

All in all, Daw presents a compelling case for reform. His ‘blueprint’ for society will make readers question the dogma they’ve been fed for years. Prison is the “default soundbite” of politicians standing for election, for example, while the ‘War on Drugs’ in modern times is, simply put, political point-scoring. It’s no wonder why then that the Prime Minister, Home Secretary and Justice Secretary top the list of people he’d most like to read his book.

Does he think his ideas will ever become reality? The answer is, sadly (or whichever way you view it), no. He doesn’t see there being motivation beyond the mainstream “lock ‘em up” mentality nor for radical drug reform. But he has faith it will succeed in parts. We’re likely to see the scaling back of drug classification to some extent, he predicts, and maybe even change in our approach to incarceration, particularly among young offenders.

The 2020 Legal Cheek Chambers Most List

Before he carved out a career in serious crime work, Daw studied and completed pupillage in Manchester. He started “at the bottom of the criminal bar”, accepting instruction on matters ranging from shoplifting to sex work. He soon progressed over a 20-year period to take on serious and organised crime cases, including murder, and numerous forms of financial crime. It wasn’t until he took silk in 2013 that his practice diversified and he began to accept instruction on “an eclectic mix” of ‘general crime’ — cases ranging from robbery to rape.

Daw has represented notorious drug barons through to premier league footballers. He takes on fewer cases now, about four to six each year, in contrast to the 20 or so he’d have on the go as a junior, but they’re far more complex and tend to last much longer. He tells me it took him just over a year to take Justice on Trial from initial concept to print; all while continuing to accept instruction and shoot a BBC documentary.

Though he has spent the years since he took silk doing private work, I was curious to ask whether he would begin his career in criminal law now, as the system is today, public sector cuts and all? The Bar Council, for example, found recently that almost four in ten criminal barristers are unsure if they will still be practising law by the end of next year. “I still would,” he responds resolutely, adding: “Being a criminal lawyer — it’s one of those things that’s either in your blood or not.”

Daw became “hooked” on the criminal law career path as a teen sitting in on crown court cases in the public gallery. “I became addicted to the whole process,” he reflects. It was never about the money, or lack thereof: 20-year-old Daw made just £9,000 in his first year of practice. “Anyone deciding on a career in criminal practice because they’ll make money from it is looking at the wrong job — there’s never been a guarantee of making money at the bar,” he says. What will get students far in this line of work is, ultimately, passion. That alone is what got Daw through what could sometimes stretch to 70 hours a week of work as a junior barrister.

He expresses sadness at the thought that youngsters could be put off a career in criminal law. “We need bright new blood in criminal law from diverse backgrounds,” he says. “I think it’s a real shame people are put off — they should go for it and that’s really important.”

To help them on their way, Daw has, again, alongside his other pursuits, entered the world of ‘vlawging’. Some of the content on his YouTube channel, which has amassed over 12,000 views, by the way, focuses on current affairs (there are snippets of some of the television interviews he has given) but the rest is chock-full with application tips on how to secure pupillage. Daw tells me he even takes video requests and follows these up if he receives enough interest.

So what’s next for Britain’s top criminal barrister? The epilogue to Justice on Trial touches on the dark web and internet of crime, something that Daw says he is fascinated to see play out in the years ahead and how law enforcement adapts to this new underworld of criminal activity. It could be the focus of a sequel, he teases, adding that he does not intend for this to be his last foray in the world of writing. He concludes:

“I enjoyed the process; and it has been rewarding to see the impact the book has had on debate. If I can contribute to just getting people talking about criminal justice and potential reform in a serious way then I consider that to be worthwhile.”

Chris Daw QC is a serious crime silk at Millennium Chambers. His new book, Justice on Trial, is out now.

The post A life of crime appeared first on Legal Cheek.

source https://www.legalcheek.com/2020/08/a-life-of-crime/

[theloobrush]

The liberal legacy

Last night my work colleague was assaulted by a group of around ten teenagers as he went about his job  just outside our regular workplace. The gang was gathered in the car park which is accessed by a narrow alley way between streets. My colleague is sore and shaken but recovering and the police were called.

Earlier this week i had reported individuals and small groups gathering around our work place, in defiance of the prohibition on people going out without good reason and forming large groups. We are in the middle of a pandemic that has taken the lives of over 2,000 people in the UK and a stupid minority continue to flout controls that are designed to save lives, including their own and their families. And if the youth think they are invincible, and won’t be touched at all by this virus, they are dead wrong. Yesterday a previously healthy 13 year old boy in London died from the virus. The other week a 19 year old died. 

We live in a society that promotes individual freedom and autonomy as the supreme virtue and value, almost as important as life itself. I call this the ‘liberal legacy’ and you will be well aware of the thinkers, bohemians, politicians and cultural influencers who have created and perpetuated the modern Zeitgeist of hyper-individualism.

But freedom to do what?  People should be free in order to become the best they can be, to have the opportunity to develop their talents and abilities to the fullest. To  securely be themselves in their private lives, and with their personal possessions if this harms none. But a warped notion of unqualified freedom has dominated the West since the 1960s at least, sustained by social elites, and left-wing groups in particular. They demand freedom for its own sake, though such freedom is, in itself, neither bad or good. A specific characteristic of modern liberals is they refuse to  accept that anyone’s freedom is subject to a higher purpose or general constraint, even that we are all bound by ethical duties to each other. Instead they focus on a philosophically ungrounded idea of ‘rights’. They reject all hierarchies of value and meaning, so they refuse to make value judgements. They are,at best, amoral. Then these amoral ideas seep down from the elites to all parts of the population, even the most dim witted and degraded, through the media and state educators.  The worst of people interpret the  elite’s doctrine of unqualified freedom as a licence to do what the hell they want, believing (rightly) that the elites are not going to challenge them and that any restrictions will be lightly imposed and barely enforced. Not surprisingly, at a time of national emergency, the authorities cannot get a substantial minority to co-operate with simple instructions to protect the population as a whole. 

What to do?  We need to begin a cultural, political and legal transformation, that will gradually repair the damage that our present elites have caused. We need to reverse the decades of erosion of the natural ties that bind society.  While the authorities may now go in hard with the full powers of the state, these shows of force will not be sufficient or sustainable without large scale public co-operation. Everyone has a responsibility for finding the offenders and enforcing law and order in their communities. To deal with the lesser offenders we need to inculcate a culture of shame. We need to shame those who are persistently anti-social. We need them to know their behaviour is unacceptable to the people around them.  They need to be derided and shunned. This public shaming can be done by social media. No more patting the bad boys on the head. No more joking about what scallywags some young people are. All anti-social behaviour needs to be publicly challenged - and consistently. We need to change the social narrative. And in a legal revolution, the community, not elite judges or out of touch magistrates, should determine the sentences for crimes that have been committed against the community. We need to bring home the idea that crime is against us, the people, their people, not ‘the state’ or ‘the crown’.

So there needs to be an end to the pity culture, and the culture of excuses. We can insist individuals take full responsibility for their actions. There is an argument that no one’s behaviour is absolutely free, and many criminals are  undoubtedly mentally disturbed or addicted to substances. Let us be completely clear: this is no reason not to impose strong measures. We must still take all necessary measures to contain the criminal  ‘cancer’ and ‘virus’ (cancers and viruses operate unconsciously of course). We need to stop discussing what people ‘deserve’ and look  simply at the effect of their actions. If their personality defects are persistently causing significant harm then, irrespective of why they are the way they are, they need to be restrained. If necessary, excluded from mainstream society as a matter purely of public protection. And as we are considering only public safety, they should not be released until they have ceased to be a significant threat to the community. Their behaviour within the prison system and level of compliance and personal development should dictate when they are ready to be released. With the benefit of the doubt given more readily for non-violent offences. For violent and sexual offences, the offender should be incarcerated or if allowed out, always subject to life long licence whereby they can be recalled at anytime for anti-social behaviour.  If there is a therapy they need and that is effective, provide it by all means, but they can’t at the same time  be free to cause mayhem. 

There should be mandatory drug testing for all offenders. All chronic addicts need to be rounded up and detained indefinitely, until they are detoxed and have demonstrated they are  likely to stay clean. Within the correction system they should be made to achieve targets of behavioural modification, evidence of change of attitude and general compliance with the correctional system.  I know that in some cases this will require that addicts be detained for many years. So be it. These individual’s minds are so damaged and deranged by addiction, they  are not free in any meaningful sense, so what harm is done by depriving them of what is only an apparent liberty?  Such a policy (of mass incarceration of addicts) will be costly, but still less costly than the total amount of money currently spent within all sections of society  on the consequences of their behaviour  including policing, resuscitating and treating adults for their medical complications, the costs to businesses and physical and mental injuries of crime victims, increased insurance premiums,  and social welfare support.  The mass incarceration of chronic addicts will also deprive the drug gangs of their main customers. 

Present drug policy has failed. To legalize all drugs would make the current  social and health disaster endemic, producing a permanently drug addled and brain damaged underclass, a zombie class. If drugs were legalised the addicts’ behaviour would continue to have massive consequences for society which no reasonably citizenry should bear.

 Attempts at public ‘ drug harm education’   continue to be a failure among a certain section of society. No person in the UK today is unaware of the damage caused by drugs (or for that matter, cigarette smoking) Reasonable people would modify their behaviour, I agree. But a minority are not able to be reasonable; they live carelessly, reckless not only about their health but the health of their children and others. Similarly, the decades long police focussed ‘War on Drugs’ is also a failure: we know attempts to interrupt suppliers are also ineffective; as each supplier  is neutralized, they are simply replaced with others, ever more cunning and vicious, and this will always be the case as the drugs trade is so lucrative. 

In a further blow to the narcotic culture, we need  to end cash welfare payments to those with addictions, replacing these with regularly ‘topped up’ prepayment cards that can only be used through  law abiding retailers, and for all  transactions to be tracked. Welfare payments are the public’s money after all, and we all have a right to see that welfare, which is taken from our taxation, is spent on real needs rather that lauderred into the hands of organized crime and terrorists. (By the way,I’m no right wing scrooge. I’m  all for the generous upgrading of welfare support for children, the disabled and carers, as long as these payments come with accountability).

As for the  the sickest, most violent paedophiles and rapists, and serial child killers, it is time to remove the velvet glove from the iron fist. If we can be sufficiently certain we have caught the actual offenders, I have no moral problem with the worst of the worst being euthanized, just as you would euthanize a rabid dog.

[andrehdda509-blog]

Legalizing Cannabis: Where Do I Stand Stagger and also Eventually Fall Down on the Subject

"The thought that marijuana could be utilized for medicinal purposes is not a new principle; as a matter of fact, it has actually been around for countless years. Before I began to do research on this topic I highly believed that marijuana could be used as an effective medicine. I had heard numerous tales about its capacity for aiding cancer and also AIDs patients, to name a few diseases, to take care of both the signs and symptoms of the conditions and also the side effects of the therapies. These therapies might consist of chemotherapy or radiation when it comes to cancer cells individuals. I also was aware of the reality that cannabis has never ever had a solitary recorded instance of an individual passing away from a cannabis overdose. This by itself is reason to claim that cannabis could be a more secure medication instead of various other prescriptions. With this evidence alone, it may seem that I am a complete fan of the prospect of cannabis being utilized for clinical functions. This is not completely the situation. Prior to doing any one of my research study I have heard the horror stories of individuals becoming totally addicted as well as having the drug take control of their lives. The entire concern of marijuana is a very debated subject and should be taken a look at from different perspectives prior to choosing a placement.

As I conducted my research study one of the major disagreements in this heated argument is about the real potential for it to aid people better deal with the signs of illness. Some individuals think that marijuana has much to supply individuals in the world of medicine; others say that it does even more damage than great. Those who are supporters of marijuana being legalized claim that it is of remarkable clinical value. They recommend that it can aid alleviate chronic discomfort, stop muscle spasms from taking place, cause a gain in appetite and also help quit queasiness, as well as also eliminate pressure within the eye. A few of the ailments that could be helped by this medication consist of AIDS, cancer, epilepsy, several sclerosis, as well as glaucoma. AIDS as well as cancer patients could benefit from cannabis by having both the discomfort associated with this illness decreased. Additionally, these patients could be aided by having a much more triggered hunger as well as less queasiness. Those with epilepsy could be assisted by possibly having seizures protected against. Individuals struggling with several sclerosis could perhaps have much less unpleasant muscle spasms. Likewise, those who have glaucoma could be supplied with relief from intra-ocular stress as well as potentially be spared extreme eye damage.

This post as a whole was basically a list of all the ways that it could be helpful for several conditions. It also explained that for a very long time marijuana was being utilized as medicine already so this thought of it being useful is not new. After seeing every one of the illness that it can possibly help with I was stunned. All I could think about with regard to individuals who deal with these diseases is that if I were in their location I would intend to try anything that might possibly function.

However, there are those who disagree entirely as well as state that marijuana has no area in the medical world what so ever before. They cite the fact that cannabis has never been approved as a true medicine by most major organizations involved in screening and licensing medicines including the Food and Drug Administration. Additionally, it has actually been explained that clinical cannabis still can not be suggested in the vast bulk of the states today. Cannabis is likewise not offered in drug stores, and probably one of the most crucial point to note is that marijuana is still placed in the same group of drugs as heroin, LSD, as well as other illegal drugs.

This post was certainly against medical cannabis. It criticized each and every part of it having clinical worth. It explained that it has actually never ever been authorized for clinical usage by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It additionally broke down the criteria for a medication to be licensed to have clinical worth and discussed each point as well as why cannabis did not qualify. This article was, if nothing else, really effective at showing the sharp contrast in views between the fans and also opposition.

An additional argument that has been made is whether cannabis has the prospective to be an addictive medication. Some people state that cannabis offers a hazard to culture as a result of its habit forming buildings. There is an excellent reason to rely on this perspective. During the time in between 1992 and also 2006, the toughness of marijuana greatly enhanced. Actually, it is estimated that this boost could be as much as one hundred seventy-five percent. This created the variety of people who are dependent upon cannabis to enhance. There are numerous risks that support reliance on marijuana. Among these is that some individuals might perhaps drive while under the influence of the medication. Using marijuana hinders electric motor abilities and also can cause mishaps. Overall, marijuana is the 2nd most regularly found medicine in the driver's systems.

When reading this short article, it became clear that the author was very versus all kinds of marijuana both medical as well as non-medical. It takes place to review the advancement of marijuana into what we have today, as well as the reason that it is so habit forming. The writer of this write-up also shows the largest factor they assume that marijuana ought to not be legalized in any kind of kind. Medical cannabis is one step closer to legalisation. This puts children as well as teens at risk as well as this article mainly makes a declaration versus such conditions.

On the other hand, there are individuals that state that marijuana is not habit forming and is actually a really risk-free medicine to use. One such individual is Paul Armentano author of ""Marijuana is not addictive"". In his short article, Armentano mentions a report done excelsior antidepressant by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). According to the IOM, less than ten percent of individuals that attempt cannabis meets the description of an individual that shows addiction. This is a far cry from the variety of people who revealed dependency to other drugs.

These medications included tobacco which went to 32 percent, heroin at 23 percent, cocaine at 17 percent, as well as alcohol at 15 percent. All of these percents are high compared to marijuana which was at less than 10 percent. An additional factor that sustains the reality that cannabis is non-addictive is the absence of withdrawal signs. Marijuana, unlike cigarette or alcohol, does not cause extreme withdrawal results. The most notable impacts of marijuana are mild apprehension, frustration, as well as absence of rest. Tobacco generates similar withdrawal effects, but much more serious by comparison. Often times cigarette's results suffice to persuade a person to launch again, which is not real for marijuana.

This short article to me was really eye-opening. It offered a large amount of details that was concentrated on the concern of whether or not marijuana is habit forming or otherwise. It contrasts reliance prices with most of the various other mistreated narcotics; as well as going over the withdrawals that each drug causes. On the whole, it plainly is in favor of cannabis being made use of as a medicine, and provides clinical proof to show why it needs to be.

Another major piece of evidence that sustains legalisation originates from a post titled ""Medical Cannabis"". While the National Company for the Reform of Marijuana Laws was conducting a study about the chemicals that marijuana consists of, scientists uncovered something fascinating. The particular chemicals that they researched are called cannabinoids which are chemicals special to the cannabis plant. These chemical substances were discovered to actually be anti-cancer.

This post is extremely crucial due to the information that it contains concerning the distinctive impacts of cannabis' chemicals. The short article likewise takes place to restate the advantages that were given previously in a separate discourse. Better in the source, the lawful victories are likewise discussed which were associated with exactly how clinical cannabis had the ability to reach where it is today.

To conclude, marijuana being utilized for medical purposes is an extremely debatable subject. So many studies have been performed with each appearing to create various outcomes. After going through all the write-ups, my viewpoint has not been guided by the resistance. I still side with those who count on legalisation for medical objectives. I do nevertheless understand that individuals have very various and also really solid opinions on the topic. It is hard to inform specifically that is right or incorrect. There is a lot proof presented both for, and against the legalization of cannabis as medication that it is much less concerning who to believe and also extra about who not to believe."

[gregoryklbb496-blog]

The Michigan Medical Marijuana Act: The First 24-Months

"The thought that cannabis could be made use of for medicinal objectives is not a brand-new idea; as a matter of fact, it has been around for hundreds of years. Before I began to do research study on this subject I highly thought that marijuana could be utilized as an effective medication. I had listened to numerous stories regarding its capacity for aiding cancer and Help patients, among other health problems, to deal with both the symptoms of the illness and the side effects of the therapies. These treatments might consist of radiation treatment or radiation when it comes to cancer cells clients. I likewise was well aware of the truth that marijuana has never ever had a solitary taped instance of an individual passing away from a cannabis overdose. This in itself is reason to say that cannabis could be a much safer medicine in contrast to various other prescriptions. With this proof alone, it may seem that I am a total advocate of the possibility of marijuana being made use of for medical purposes. This is not entirely the instance. Prior to doing any one of my study I have listened to the scary stories of individuals becoming totally addicted and also having the medicine take over their lives. The entire concern of marijuana is an extremely discussed subject and also should be checked out from various point of views before making a decision a position.

As I performed my research study among the primary debates in this heated debate has to do with the real possibility for it to help people better cope with the signs and symptoms of illness. Some people think that cannabis has much to use individuals in the world of medicine; others claim that it does more harm than excellent. Those who are proponents of cannabis being legislated claim that it is of incredible clinical value. They suggest that it can help relieve chronic pain, stop muscle spasms from occurring, cause a gain in hunger and also aid quit nausea, and also alleviate pressure within the eye. A few of the conditions that could be assisted by this medicine consist of AIDS, cancer cells, epilepsy, numerous sclerosis, and also glaucoma. AIDS and cancer individuals might gain from marijuana by having both the discomfort connected with this illness reduced. Also, these clients could be aided by having a much more stimulated hunger and also much less nausea or vomiting. Those with epilepsy could be aided by potentially having seizures stopped. Individuals suffering from multiple sclerosis can potentially have less painful muscle spasms. Additionally, those that have glaucoma could be supplied with relief from intra-ocular pressure and possibly be spared extreme eye damage.

This article overall was generally a list of completely that maybe handy for several diseases. It likewise pointed out that for a long time marijuana was being made use of as medication currently so this idea of it working is not new. After seeing every one of the illness that it could possibly help with I was amazed. All I might think about with regard to the people that suffer from these diseases is that if I were in their place I would intend to try anything that might potentially work.

However, there are those who disagree totally and also say that cannabis has no location in the medical world what so ever. They point out the fact that cannabis has never been approved as a true medicine by a lot of major organizations associated with testing and also accrediting drugs consisting of the Fda. Also, it has actually been pointed out that medical marijuana still can not be prescribed in the vast bulk of the states today. Marijuana is likewise not sold in drug stores, as well as possibly one of the most essential thing to note is that cannabis is still ranked in the very same group of drugs as heroin, LSD, and other controlled substances.

This article was certainly against medical cannabis. It slammed each and every part of it having clinical worth. It mentioned that it has actually never been authorized for clinical usage by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It additionally broke down the requirements for a medicine to be licensed to have clinical worth and also talked about each point as well as why cannabis did not certify. This article was, if nothing else, really effective at revealing the sharp comparison in views between the supporters and also resistance.

One more debate that has been made is whether cannabis has the prospective to be a habit forming medicine. Some individuals claim that cannabis provides a threat to culture because of its addicting residential properties. There is a good reason to count on this perspective. During the time in between 1992 as well as 2006, the toughness of cannabis massively boosted. Actually, it is approximated that this boost could be as long as one hundred seventy-five percent. This triggered the number of people that depend on marijuana to raise. There are a number of risks that go along with reliance on cannabis. Among these is that some customers can potentially drive while intoxicated of the medicine. Using marijuana impairs motor abilities as well as can bring about mishaps. Overall, marijuana is the second most often detected drug in the driver's systems.

When reading this short article, it became clear that the author was very against all kinds of cannabis both medical as well as non-medical. It takes place to discuss the advancement of cannabis into what we have today, along with the reason that it is so habit forming. The writer of this write-up additionally reveals the greatest reason they think that marijuana needs to not be legislated in any form. Clinical marijuana is one action closer to legalization. This places kids as well as teenagers in jeopardy and also this article generally makes a declaration versus such circumstances.

On the other hand, there are individuals that claim that cannabis is not addictive as well as is really an extremely safe medication to utilize. One such person is Paul Armentano author of ""Cannabis is not habit forming"". In his write-up, Armentano points out a report done by the Institute of Medication (IOM). According to the IOM, less than ten percent of people who attempt marijuana fulfills the description of a person that shows dependency. This is an unlike the variety of people that revealed dependency to various other drugs.

These medications included tobacco which was at 32 percent, heroin at 23 percent, cocaine at 17 percent, and also alcohol at 15 percent. Every one of these percents are high compared to marijuana which was at less than 10 percent. Another factor that supports the fact that marijuana is non-addictive is the lack of withdrawal signs and symptoms. Marijuana, unlike cigarette or alcohol, does not cause serious withdrawal impacts. The most significant impacts of marijuana are minor concern, frustration, and absence of rest. Cigarette creates similar withdrawal effects, but much more extreme by comparison. Lot of times tobacco's effects suffice to encourage an individual to launch once again, which is not real for marijuana.

This article to me was really mind-blowing. It presented a large quantity of details that was concentrated on the concern of whether marijuana is addicting or otherwise. It compares dependency rates with a number of the various other over used narcotics; along with discussing the withdrawals that each medication creates. On the whole, it clearly favors marijuana being utilized as a medication, and also provides scientific proof to show why it should be.

Another significant item of proof that sustains legalization comes from a post titled ""Medical Cannabis"". While the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Rule was carrying out a research study regarding the chemicals that cannabis consists of, scientists discovered something fascinating. The particular chemicals that they researched are called cannabinoids which are chemicals unique to the cannabis plant. These chemical compounds were found to really be anti-cancer.

This post is very important because of the details that it contains concerning the unique impacts of marijuana' chemicals. The short article also takes place to reiterate the advantages that were offered formerly in a separate commentary. Additionally in the source, the lawful victories are additionally talked about which were associated with how clinical cannabis had the ability to reach where it is today.

In conclusion, marijuana being made use of for medical functions is a cbd oil excelsior very open to question topic. A lot of researches have been done with each seeming to produce various outcomes. After going through all the posts, my opinion has not been persuaded by the opposition. I still side with those that count on legalization for clinical functions. I do nonetheless recognize that people have extremely different as well as very strong viewpoints on the subject. It is hard to tell exactly who is right or incorrect. There is a lot proof offered both for, as well as versus the legalisation of marijuana as medication that it is less concerning that to think and more about who not to believe."

[devinexok987-blog]

Marijuana Laws Up In Smoke

"The thought that cannabis could be used for medicinal functions is not a new concept; in fact, it has actually been around for countless years. Before I started to do research study on this subject I highly thought that cannabis could be used as an efficient medication. I had heard many stories about its potential for helping cancer and also AIDs people, among other health problems, to handle both the signs and symptoms of the conditions and the side effects of the therapies. These treatments could consist of chemotherapy or radiation when it comes to cancer cells individuals. I likewise was aware of the truth that marijuana has never had a solitary documented case of an individual passing away from a cannabis overdose. This in itself is cause to say that marijuana could be a more secure medicine instead of various other prescriptions. With this evidence alone, it might seem that I am a full advocate of the possibility of marijuana being utilized for medical functions. This is not completely the case. Before doing any of my research study I have actually listened to the scary tales of people becoming completely addicted as well as having the drug take control of their lives. The whole concern of marijuana is an extremely debated topic as well as must be looked at from various point of views before making a decision a placement.

As I performed my study one of the major disagreements in this warmed dispute is about the real capacity for it to assist individuals better manage the symptoms of illness. Some individuals think that marijuana has much to offer individuals in the realm of medication; others say that it does more harm than great. Those who are supporters of cannabis being legislated claim that it is of incredible clinical worth. They recommend that it can assist relieve persistent pain, stop muscle spasms from happening, trigger a gain in appetite and help quit queasiness, as well as additionally relieve pressure within the eye. A few of the conditions that could be aided by this drug include AIDS, cancer, epilepsy, numerous sclerosis, and glaucoma. AIDS as well as cancer patients can take advantage of cannabis by having both the discomfort connected with this disease reduced. Likewise, these clients could be assisted by having a more triggered cravings and much less nausea or vomiting. Those with epilepsy could be aided by potentially having seizures avoided. Individuals suffering from multiple sclerosis can perhaps have less excruciating muscle spasms. Likewise, those who have glaucoma could be offered with remedy for intra-ocular stress and possibly be spared extreme eye damage.

This post overall was essentially a listing of right that it could be valuable for a number of conditions. It likewise pointed out that for a very long time cannabis was being made use of as medicine currently so this idea of it working is not new. After seeing every one of the conditions that it can possibly assist with I was stunned. All I might consider with regard to individuals that deal with these diseases is that if I remained in their location I would certainly want to try anything that can possibly function.

Nonetheless, there are those that disagree completely and also claim that marijuana has no location in the clinical world what so ever before. They mention the fact that marijuana has actually never been approved as a true medication by most significant organizations associated with screening and also accrediting medications consisting of the Food and Drug Administration. Likewise, it has actually been pointed out that medical cannabis still can not be prescribed in the vast bulk of the states today. Cannabis is likewise not marketed in pharmacies, and also possibly the most important point to note is that cannabis is still placed in the exact same classification of drugs as heroin, LSD, and other controlled substances.

This short article was defiantly versus medical marijuana. It criticized every single part of it having clinical value. It pointed out that it has actually never ever been approved for clinical usage by the Fda (FDA). It likewise broke down the requirements for a medication to be accredited to have clinical worth and discussed each factor and why cannabis did not certify. i49 cbd This article was, if absolutely nothing else, very efficient at revealing the sharp contrast in views between the fans as well as opposition.

Another argument that has been made is whether or not cannabis has the potential to be an addicting drug. Some people say that cannabis provides a hazard to culture because of its addicting buildings. There is an excellent reason to count on this perspective. During the time in between 1992 and also 2006, the stamina of cannabis greatly increased. In fact, it is estimated that this boost could be as much as one hundred seventy-five percent. This triggered the number of people that are dependent upon cannabis to increase. There are numerous threats that accompany dependence on cannabis. Among these is that some individuals could potentially drive while drunk of the drug. Utilizing cannabis hinders motor skills and can result in mishaps. Generally, cannabis is the second most often detected drug in the vehicle driver's systems.

When reading this post, it became clear that the author was extremely versus all forms of marijuana both medical and also non-medical. It goes on to talk about the development of cannabis into what we have today, as well as the reason that it is so addicting. The writer of this short article additionally reveals the largest factor they believe that marijuana should not be legalized in any kind of kind. Medical cannabis is one step better to legalisation. This places children as well as teenagers in danger and also this write-up mainly makes a declaration against such scenarios.

On the other hand, there are people that say that marijuana is not habit forming as well as is really a very safe medication to use. One such person is Paul Armentano writer of ""Marijuana is not habit forming"". In his post, Armentano mentions a report done by the Institute of Medication (IOM). According to the IOM, less than ten percent of individuals that attempt marijuana satisfies the summary of an individual that shows addiction. This is a far cry from the variety of individuals who revealed addiction to other drugs.

These medications included cigarette which was at 32 percent, heroin at 23 percent, cocaine at 17 percent, and alcohol at 15 percent. All of these percents are high contrasted to cannabis which was at less than 10 percent. An additional factor that supports the reality that marijuana is non-addictive is the lack of withdrawal signs. Cannabis, unlike tobacco or alcohol, does not trigger serious withdrawal effects. The most significant results of cannabis are slight apprehension, frustration, and also lack of rest. Tobacco produces comparable withdrawal results, however a lot more extreme by comparison. Sometimes cigarette's effects suffice to persuade a person to launch once again, which is not real for cannabis.

This short article to me was really mind-blowing. It offered a very large amount of information that was concentrated on the concern of whether or not marijuana is addicting or not. It contrasts dependency rates with much of the other over used narcotics; in addition to discussing the withdrawals that each medicine causes. Overall, it plainly is in favor of cannabis being made use of as a medication, as well as presents scientific proof to reveal why it must be.

One more significant item of proof that sustains legalisation originates from a write-up entitled ""Medical Marijuana"". While the National Organization for the Reform of Cannabis Laws was carrying out a research regarding the chemicals that cannabis has, scientists uncovered something interesting. The particular chemicals that they researched are called cannabinoids which are chemicals special to the marijuana plant. These chemical substances were found to really be anti-cancer.

This write-up is extremely important as a result of the details that it consists of about the unique impacts of cannabis' chemicals. The article also takes place to restate the benefits that were offered formerly in a different discourse. Additionally in the source, the lawful triumphes are also gone over which were associated with just how medical cannabis was able to reach where it is today.

In conclusion, cannabis being used for medicinal functions is an extremely arguable topic. So many studies have actually been done with each appearing to create various results. After checking out all the articles, my opinion has not been persuaded by the opposition. I still side with those that believe in legalisation for clinical objectives. I do however recognize that individuals have really various as well as extremely solid viewpoints on the topic. It is hard to inform exactly who is right or wrong. There is so much evidence presented both for and also against the legalisation of cannabis as medicine that it is much less about that to believe and more concerning who not to believe."

[iambabydollrp]

About the mun!

//Hello peoples! A while back I was getting tagged in quite a lot of those ‘get to know the mun’ memes (which I loved^^) But sometimes I felt like the questions didnt really reveal a lot about me. So I’m putting together a little list of facts about me (if you’re interested) which I think really tell you something about me. So here we go.

1. I live in the UK, there are a lot of things I appreciate about the place I live, I understand how incredibly lucky I am in many ways. But I am not at all patriotic. I dislike nationalism. I’ve probably felt truly patriotic once in my life; nearly four years ago my dad got cancer, and on the day he was discharged from intensive care I wanted to hug every nurse and doctor I could get my hands on - they had saved my father with months of complex, expensive treatment and not so much as a penny ever changed hands at the point of care.

2. I am a cisgender, bisexual, biromantic female. I am a supporter of LBGTQ rights all over the world, and I firmly believe that if you cant cope with other people’s sexuality to the point you have to put them down or try and deny them basic rights then you are an asshat.

3. I believe that women should have access to birth control and abortion when needed, without being scrutinised. If you cant deal with this, please see above.

4. I am an atheist, insofar as I do not believe in any monotheistic God. I have mixed feelings about religion as a whole. There are times I find it hard to believe it is a force for good when I look at what’s happening in the world. That being said, I would fight for anyone’s right to worship whatever God they choose, like any other basic human right. Overall I think personal spirituality is probably more healthy and helpful than the ideals of organised religion.

5. I’m Caucasian, and I’m well aware how simply being white makes many aspects of my life easier than that of those who arent. I abhor racism, I dont understand it. I challenge it whenever I come across it. 

6. I have a mental illness, and a personality disorder, and I take medication for the aforementioned. I’ve suffered with OCD, panic attacks and a mild form of psychosis for most of my life, and throughout my life I’ve dealt with it anywhere from fantastically to catastrophically. I’m currently more toward the ‘good’ end of the scale though. Luckily I’ve only ever spent one night in a psychiatric hospital. I believe that even now mental illness isnt recognised enough, and not enough money or resources go into treating it.

7. I dont believe in the death penalty. As a humanist, this goes without saying. Killing a human being who has killed somebody else and calling it justice is an insane logic - to my mind anyway. ‘An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind’. 

8. I dont get why people want guns. I’m so glad I live somewhere with strict gun laws and largely unarmed police. When I look at the statistics for the US I just feel so sad that so many people die pointlessly - many at the hands of law enforcement officials. I get the whole right to bear arms thing but...in a choice between the two I’d pick ‘right to not be summarily shot’ by police or someone a bit unhinged every time.

9. I’m essentially a pacifist and I hate violence. That might raise a few eyebrows if you’ve read some of my threads, but in the end I dont think you can solve anything with war, even with the best intentions. We have a charity here in the UK called Help For Heroes which makes me really angry - its almost like if we call everybody who dies or gets horribly injured in our wars ‘heroes’ then we make what happened to them ok. Its not ok. Once a month I go to our local cemetery and place a stone on each of the two, white military headstones - both teenage boys, just so their mothers knew somebody was there. These people are undeniably brave, but they were also victims.

10. Immigration is not the problem. In the current climate in the UK, immigrants are being increasingly scapegoated. Many of these people are refugees. They are human beings and deserve a full, safe life the same as everybody else.

11. I believe in the legalisation of most drugs (some I would think twice about). This would make them a lot safer, and would be better for the economy. I feel a similar way about prostitution - if it was legalised and regulated it would be safer for the women who do it.

12. I Dont believe in ghosts BUT, I do believe that people really do experience strange phenomena, and see things. I think this is more due to psychological or cultural facts and the given stimulus of a place/room which causes similar perceptions in different people.

Anyway, I hope that makes me a bit more real ^^ if there’s anything else you wanna know just ask!

[manuelvmiv713]

Depersonalization - Facts Tips and also Cures!

"The thought that marijuana could be utilized for medical objectives is not a brand-new principle; in fact, it has actually been around for hundreds of years. Prior to I began to do study on this subject I highly thought that cannabis could be utilized as an effective medication. I had heard several tales regarding its possibility for aiding cancer cells and also Help people, to name a few ailments, to manage both the symptoms of the diseases and also the negative effects of the therapies. These treatments can consist of radiation treatment or radiation when it comes to cancer cells people. I likewise was well aware of the reality that marijuana has never ever had a solitary documented instance of an individual passing away from a marijuana overdose. This by itself is cause to say that marijuana could be a more secure medicine in contrast to other prescriptions. With this evidence alone, it may seem that I am a total supporter of the possibility of marijuana being made use of for clinical purposes. This is not completely the situation. Before doing any one of my study I have listened to the horror tales of people becoming entirely addicted and having the drug take over their lives. The entire issue of marijuana is an extremely debated topic as well as needs to be checked out from various perspectives prior to making a decision a setting.

As I performed my research study among the main debates in this heated argument has to do with the real capacity for it to aid individuals much better handle the signs and symptoms of conditions. Some people believe that cannabis has much to provide individuals in the world of medicine; others claim that it does even more injury than great. Those that are proponents of marijuana being legislated claim that it is of incredible medical value. They suggest that it can aid reduce persistent discomfort, stop muscle spasms from happening, create a gain in cravings as well as assistance quit nausea, as well as also relieve stress within the eye. A few of the conditions that could be helped by this medicine consist of AIDS, cancer, epilepsy, several sclerosis, and also glaucoma. AIDS as well as cancer cells patients might benefit from marijuana by having both the discomfort associated with this illness decreased. Also, these people could be helped by having a more stimulated hunger and much less queasiness. Those with epilepsy could be helped by possibly having seizures protected against. People dealing with numerous sclerosis could possibly have less uncomfortable muscle spasms. Also, those that have glaucoma could be provided with relief from intra-ocular pressure and possibly be saved severe eye damages.

This write-up all at once was essentially a listing of right that maybe valuable for several illness. It additionally mentioned that for a long time marijuana was being made use of as medicine already so this idea of it working is not new. After seeing all of the illness that it could possibly assist with I was shocked. All I could think of with regard to the people that suffer from these illness is that if I were in their place I would certainly wish to try anything that could potentially function.

Nevertheless, there are those that disagree entirely and claim that cannabis has no place in the medical world what so ever. They mention the truth that cannabis has actually never been approved as a true medication by most significant organizations associated with testing as well as accrediting medicines consisting of the Food and Drug Administration. Also, it has actually been mentioned that medical cannabis still can not be suggested in the substantial majority of the states today. Marijuana is also not marketed in drug stores, as well as probably the most essential point to note is that cannabis is still placed in the exact same classification of medicines as heroin, LSD, and various other illegal drugs.

This post was certainly versus clinical marijuana. It slammed every single part of it having clinical worth. It mentioned that it has never been approved for clinical use by the Fda (FDA). It also broke down the requirements for a medicine to be licensed to have clinical value as well as spoke about each point and also why cannabis did not certify. This article was, if absolutely nothing else, extremely efficient at showing the sharp contrast in views in between the fans as well as resistance.

An additional disagreement that has been made is whether cannabis has the potential to be a habit forming medicine. Some people claim that cannabis offers a risk to society because of its habit forming residential properties. There is a good reason to rely on this viewpoint. While between 1992 and also 2006, the toughness of cannabis enormously increased. In fact, it is estimated that this rise could be as much as one hundred seventy-five percent. This caused the variety of individuals who are dependent upon cannabis to enhance. There are a number of threats that go along with reliance on cannabis. One of these is that some users might potentially drive while drunk of the medication. Utilizing cannabis hinders electric motor skills and can lead to crashes. Overall, marijuana is the 2nd most regularly found drug in the vehicle driver's systems.

When reading this short article, it became clear that the writer was extremely against all kinds of marijuana both clinical and also non-medical. It goes on to review the evolution of marijuana right into what we have today, in addition to the reason that it is so addictive. The author of this article additionally reveals the most significant factor they believe that cannabis must not be legalized in any kind of type. Medical cannabis is one step better to legalisation. This places youngsters as well as teens at risk and this article generally makes a declaration against such scenarios.

On the other hand, there are individuals who state that marijuana is not habit forming and also is in fact a really secure drug to make use of. One such person is Paul Armentano author of ""Marijuana is not habit forming"". In los angeles cbd map his post, Armentano mentions a report done by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). According to the IOM, less than ten percent of people that attempt cannabis fulfills the summary of an individual who shows addiction. This is a far cry from the number of individuals that revealed dependency to other medicines.

These medications consisted of cigarette which was at 32 percent, heroin at 23 percent, cocaine at 17 percent, as well as alcohol at 15 percent. All of these percents are high compared to cannabis which was at less than 10 percent. One more element that sustains the fact that marijuana is non-addictive is the lack of withdrawal signs and symptoms. Cannabis, unlike cigarette or alcohol, does not trigger severe withdrawal results. One of the most significant results of marijuana are slight apprehension, frustration, and lack of sleep. Cigarette produces similar withdrawal results, but much more severe by comparison. Sometimes tobacco's effects are enough to convince an individual to launch once more, which is not true for cannabis.

This article to me was extremely eye-opening. It presented a very large quantity of details that was focused on the concern of whether or not marijuana is habit forming or otherwise. It compares reliance prices with much of the various other over used narcotics; in addition to reviewing the withdrawals that each medicine causes. On the whole, it plainly favors cannabis being utilized as a medicine, and provides scientific proof to show why it should be.

One more major item of proof that supports legalization originates from a short article labelled ""Medical Cannabis"". While the National Organization for the Reform of Cannabis Regulation was carrying out a research study concerning the chemicals that marijuana contains, researchers uncovered something interesting. The particular chemicals that they studied are called cannabinoids which are chemicals special to the cannabis plant. These chemical compounds were found to actually be anti-cancer.

This article is really crucial as a result of the details that it contains regarding the unique results of cannabis' chemicals. The post also goes on to reiterate the benefits that were given formerly in a separate discourse. Further in the source, the legal victories are also reviewed which were related to exactly how clinical cannabis was able to reach where it is today.

To conclude, cannabis being made use of for medical objectives is an extremely debatable topic. Numerous studies have actually been performed with each appearing to create various results. After checking out all the articles, my point of view has actually not been swayed by the opposition. I still side with those who believe in legalisation for clinical purposes. I do however understand that individuals have extremely various as well as very strong point of views on the subject. It is hard to inform specifically that is right or wrong. There is so much proof presented both for, and also against the legalisation of cannabis as medication that it is much less concerning that to think as well as more about that not to think."

[milohbyt208-blog]

The One-of-a-kind Challenges Dealing With Medical Marijuana Sellers and also Users

"The thought that marijuana could be utilized for medicinal purposes is not a brand-new principle; in fact, it has been around for thousands of years. Before I began to do research on this subject I strongly believed that marijuana could be made use of as a reliable medication. I had listened to many tales regarding its capacity for helping cancer cells as well as AIDs patients, to name a few illnesses, to handle both the signs and symptoms of the diseases and also the side effects of the treatments. These treatments might consist of radiation treatment or radiation in the case of cancer patients. I also was well aware of the fact that cannabis has never ever had a single recorded instance of an individual dying from a marijuana overdose. This by itself is reason to state that cannabis could be a more secure medication as opposed to other prescriptions. With this evidence alone, it may appear that I am a full fan of the possibility of marijuana being utilized for medical purposes. This is not completely the case. Before doing any one of my research study I have listened to the scary tales of people coming to be totally addicted and having the medicine take control of their lives. The whole issue of marijuana is a very discussed subject and also ought to be considered from various point of views prior to choosing a position.

As I conducted my study among the primary debates in this heated discussion is about the actual potential for it to help individuals better manage the signs and symptoms of illness. Some individuals believe that cannabis has much to supply people in the world of medication; others say that it does even more injury than excellent. Those who are supporters of cannabis being legislated state that it is of remarkable clinical value. They recommend that it can aid minimize persistent discomfort, quit muscle spasms from taking place, cause a gain in hunger as well as assistance quit queasiness, and additionally alleviate stress within the eye. A few of the disorders that could be assisted by this medication include AIDS, cancer, epilepsy, several sclerosis, and glaucoma. AIDS as well as cancer individuals could take advantage of cannabis by having both the pain related to this disease decreased. Additionally, these patients could be aided by having a much more triggered cravings as well as much less nausea. Those with epilepsy could be assisted by potentially having seizures protected against. People dealing with multiple sclerosis might possibly have much less excruciating muscle spasms. Also, those who have glaucoma could be offered with relief from intra-ocular pressure and possibly be spared extreme eye damages.

This write-up as a whole was generally a checklist of all the ways that maybe practical for a number of diseases. It also explained that for a very long time cannabis was being utilized as medicine currently so this idea of it working is not new. After seeing every one of the conditions that it could potentially aid with I was stunned. All I can think about with regard to individuals that suffer from these diseases is that if I remained in their area I would want to try anything that might possibly work.

Nevertheless, there are those that differ completely as well as state that marijuana has no area in the clinical world what so ever. They mention the reality that cannabis has actually never been approved as a true medication by the majority of significant organizations involved in screening and also certifying drugs including the Fda. Likewise, it has actually been pointed out that clinical marijuana still can not be prescribed in the large majority of the states today. Marijuana is likewise not sold in drug stores, as well as possibly the most essential point to note is that marijuana is still ranked in the very same group of drugs as heroin, LSD, and also various other illegal drugs.

This short article was defiantly versus medical marijuana. It criticized every part of it having clinical value. It explained that it has actually never been accepted for clinical use by the Fda (FDA). It also broke down the requirements for a medicine to be accredited to have medical value and also spoke about each point and why marijuana did not certify. This short article was, if absolutely nothing else, very reliable at showing the sharp comparison in views between the supporters and also opposition.

Another argument that has actually been made is whether marijuana has the possible to be an addicting drug. Some individuals state that cannabis presents a danger to culture as a result of its addicting properties. There is an excellent reason to count on this perspective. While between 1992 and also 2006, the stamina of marijuana enormously increased. As a matter of fact, it is estimated that this boost could be as much as one hundred seventy-five percent. This created the number of people that depend on marijuana to increase. There are several dangers that go along with reliance on marijuana. Among these is that some users could possibly drive while drunk of the drug. Utilizing marijuana impairs motor skills as well as can lead to mishaps. In general, marijuana is the second most often found medication in the driver's systems.

When reading this write-up, it became clear that the author was extremely against all forms of marijuana both clinical and also non-medical. It goes on to discuss the development of cannabis right into what we have today, along with the reason that it is so habit forming. The author of this short article likewise reveals the most significant factor they assume that cannabis needs to not be legislated in any kind. Medical cannabis is one step better to legalisation. This puts children and also teenagers in jeopardy as well as ptsd treatment poinciana fl this post generally makes a statement against such conditions.

On the other hand, there are individuals who state that cannabis is not habit forming and is in fact a very risk-free medicine to utilize. One such individual is Paul Armentano author of ""Cannabis is not addicting"". In his post, Armentano cites a report done by the Institute of Medication (IOM). According to the IOM, less than ten percent of people who try marijuana meets the summary of an individual who displays dependency. This is an unlike the number of people that showed dependency to various other drugs.

These medications consisted of cigarette which was at 32 percent, heroin at 23 percent, cocaine at 17 percent, and alcohol at 15 percent. Every one of these percents are high compared to marijuana which went to less than 10 percent. Another variable that supports the truth that marijuana is non-addictive is the lack of withdrawal signs and symptoms. Marijuana, unlike cigarette or alcohol, does not cause extreme withdrawal impacts. One of the most noteworthy effects of cannabis are mild worry, agitation, as well as lack of rest. Tobacco creates similar withdrawal results, yet much more severe comparative. Often times tobacco's effects are enough to convince an individual to start up once again, which is not real for cannabis.

This short article to me was really eye-opening. It presented a large amount of details that was concentrated on the concern of whether or not cannabis is addicting or not. It compares reliance prices with much of the various other abused narcotics; in addition to discussing the withdrawals that each medicine triggers. On the whole, it plainly is in favor of marijuana being utilized as a medication, and presents scientific proof to show why it should be.

One more major piece of proof that sustains legalization comes from an article labelled ""Medical Cannabis"". While the National Company for the Reform of Marijuana Rule was performing a research about the chemicals that marijuana contains, scientists found something fascinating. The particular chemicals that they studied are called cannabinoids which are chemicals distinct to the marijuana plant. These chemical compounds were found to really be anti-cancer.

This write-up is extremely important due to the details that it has about the distinct effects of marijuana' chemicals. The article likewise goes on to restate the advantages that were offered previously in a different commentary. Even more in the resource, the legal triumphes are additionally talked about which were related to just how clinical marijuana was able to reach where it is today.

To conclude, marijuana being utilized for medicinal functions is a very arguable topic. A lot of researches have actually been performed with each appearing to create various outcomes. After reviewing all the write-ups, my viewpoint has not been guided by the opposition. I still side with those that rely on legalisation for clinical purposes. I do however recognize that people have extremely different and also very solid point of views on the subject. It is hard to inform exactly that is right or incorrect. There is so much evidence offered both for and against the legalization of cannabis as medicine that it is less regarding that to think and also much more concerning that not to believe."