#angularjs vs laravel

[orangemantrausa]

Can't decide between AngularJS vs Laravel ? Our in-depth comparison helps you choose the best framework for your next web development project.

[roamnook]

Discover 2024's top tech stack matchups! Nagios vs Prometheus, Docker Compose vs Kubernetes, Amazon CloudWatch vs Kibana, and more. Explore trending tools and see open source vs SaaS alternatives.

New and Polarizing Facts in the Digital World | RoamNook

New and Polarizing Facts in the Digital World

Welcome to the RoamNook blog, where we bring you the latest and most exciting facts, figures, and data in the digital world. In today's article, we will dive deep into key facts, hard information, numbers, and concrete data that will grab your attention and bring new information to the table. Our aim is to provide you with practical and informative content that highlights the real-world applications of this information and explains why it matters to you, the reader.

The Power of Numbers and Data in the Digital Age

In the era of digitization, where technology plays a vital role in various aspects of our lives, understanding the power of numbers and data has become increasingly important. From IT consultation to custom software development and digital marketing, RoamNook, an innovative technology company, specializes in providing solutions that fuel digital growth. In this article, we will explore some of the most fascinating and polarizing facts in the digital world, backed by concrete data and objective information.

Exploring Trending Developer Tools in 2024

Let's start by taking a look at the trending developer tools in 2024. We will compare open source and SaaS alternatives, highlighting their features, strengths, and weaknesses. Here are some of the most popular comparisons:

Nagios vs. Prometheus

Nagios, a widely used monitoring system, goes head-to-head with Prometheus, a cutting-edge open source monitoring and alerting toolkit. We will delve into the technical aspects, performance, and real-world applications of both tools, providing you with concrete data to make an informed decision.

Docker Compose vs. Kitematic vs. Kubernetes

When it comes to containerization and orchestration, Docker Compose, Kitematic, and Kubernetes are top contenders. We will explore their strengths, scalability, and ease of use, so you can choose the right tool for your specific needs.

Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kibana

Managing and monitoring your cloud resources is crucial, and Amazon CloudWatch and Kibana are two popular options. We will provide an in-depth analysis of their features, dashboards, and integration capabilities to help you make an informed decision.

PhpStorm vs. Sublime Text

For developers, choosing the right integrated development environment (IDE) is essential. PhpStorm and Sublime Text are widely used options. We will compare their features, performance, and compatibility to assist you in finding the ideal IDE for your projects.

Bazel vs. Buck vs. Pants

Build tools are critical in software development, and Bazel, Buck, and Pants are three popular choices. We will analyze their build speeds, scalability, and compatibility with different programming languages, empowering you to choose the best tool for your projects.

AngularJS vs. Spring Boot

Front-end and back-end frameworks play a vital role in web development. AngularJS and Spring Boot are often favored by developers. We will compare their performance, ease of use, and community support to help you decide which framework aligns with your development goals.

Laravel vs. Sails.js

When it comes to server-side frameworks, Laravel and Sails.js are popular choices. We will examine their features, scalability, and security to guide you in selecting the framework that best suits your project requirements.

PyCharm vs. Visual Studio Code

Choosing the right code editor is crucial for developers. PyCharm and Visual Studio Code are two widely used options. We will compare their features, extensions, and performance to help you make an informed decision.

Atom vs. Sublime Text vs. TextMate

Code editors are at the heart of every developer's toolkit. Atom, Sublime Text, and TextMate are popular choices. We will explore their features, customization options, and community support to assist you in finding the perfect code editor.

Adyen vs. PayPal vs. Stripe

When it comes to online payment processing, Adyen, PayPal, and Stripe are leading the way. We will delve into their transaction fees, security measures, and integration capabilities, enabling you to choose the right payment gateway for your business.

Ansible vs. Capistrano vs. Chef

Deployment automation tools play a crucial role in the software development lifecycle. Ansible, Capistrano, and Chef are three popular choices. We will analyze their ease of use, scalability, and configuration management capabilities to help you streamline your deployment processes.

GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy

Version control and continuous deployment are vital in modern software development. GitLab and Octopus Deploy are widely used platforms. We will compare their features, integration capabilities, and scalability to assist you in choosing the right solution for your deployment needs.

Bugzilla vs. Jira

Issue tracking and project management are essential for efficient collaboration. Bugzilla and Jira are widely adopted tools. We will explore their features, customization options, and workflow management to help you manage your projects effectively.

Crisp vs. Drift

Customer engagement and live chat solutions are crucial for building strong relationships with your clients. Crisp and Drift are two popular options. We will compare their features, chatbot capabilities, and integrations, enabling you to provide exceptional customer support.

Google Maps vs. Mapbox vs. OpenStreetMap

Mapping and geolocation services are fundamental in many applications. Google Maps, Mapbox, and OpenStreetMap are commonly used options. We will delve into their features, customization options, and pricing models to help you choose the right mapping solution.

Flask vs. Spring

Server-side frameworks are crucial for building robust web applications. Flask and Spring are two popular choices. We will compare their features, performance, and community support, allowing you to select the framework that aligns with your development goals.

Jetty vs. Apache Tomcat

Servlet containers play a vital role in Java web development. Jetty and Apache Tomcat are widely used options. We will explore their features, performance, and compatibility to guide you in choosing the right servlet container for your projects.

Crystal vs. Rust

Programming languages are essential tools for developers. Crystal and Rust are gaining popularity. We will compare their features, performance, and safety measures, arming you with the information needed to select the best programming language for your projects.

ngrok vs. PageKite

Tunneling services are crucial for exposing local development environments. ngrok and PageKite are widely used options. We will discuss their features, security measures, and ease of use to help you choose the right tunneling service for your projects.

Amazon SQS vs. Kafka

Message queueing systems are essential for building scalable and reliable distributed systems. Amazon SQS and Kafka are two popular choices. We will compare their features, throughput, and fault-tolerance capabilities, providing you with the insights needed to make an informed decision.

Botkit vs. Botpress

Building chatbots has become increasingly valuable in various industries. Botkit and Botpress are widely used platforms. We will analyze their features, natural language processing capabilities, and integration options, helping you select the right tool for chatbot development.

Grafana vs. Prometheus vs. Splunk Cloud

Monitoring and observability are crucial for application performance. Grafana, Prometheus, and Splunk Cloud are top contenders. We will explore their features, data visualization capabilities, and scalability, equipping you with the knowledge to choose the ideal monitoring solution.

Dart vs. Golang vs. JavaScript

Programming languages form the foundation of software development. Dart, Golang, and JavaScript are widely adopted languages. We will compare their performance, syntax, and ecosystem, allowing you to make an informed decision when selecting the ideal language for your projects.

BrowserStack vs. Sauce Labs vs. Selenium

Testing automation tools are essential for achieving quality in software development. BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and Selenium are industry-leading options. We will analyze their features, browser compatibility, and ease of use, equipping you with the knowledge to streamline your testing processes.

Bootstrap vs. Material Design for Angular vs. UIkIt

Design frameworks play a crucial role in creating visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces. Bootstrap, Material Design for Angular, and UIkIt are popular choices. We will compare their features, design flexibility, and component libraries to help you choose the right framework for your projects.

Golang vs. Laravel

When it comes to server-side frameworks, Golang and Laravel are widely adopted options. We will analyze their performance, scalability, and ease of use, arming you with the information needed to make an informed decision.

Bringing the Power of Data and Technology to Your Digital Growth

At RoamNook, we believe in the transformative power of data and technology. Our innovative solutions, ranging from IT consultation to custom software development and digital marketing, are designed to fuel digital growth for businesses. By leveraging the latest tools, frameworks, and platforms, we help our clients stay ahead in the fast-paced digital landscape.

As we conclude this article, we invite you to reflect on the abundance of information and knowledge available in the digital world. How can you harness these facts and figures to drive your own growth? Whether you're a developer exploring new tools, a business owner seeking digital solutions, or an individual looking to expand your technical knowledge, the digital landscape offers countless opportunities for learning and growth.

And if you're ready to take the next step in your digital journey, we encourage you to connect with RoamNook. As an innovative technology company, we specialize in IT consultation, custom software development, and digital marketing. Let us fuel your digital growth and help you unlock the endless possibilities of the digital world.

Sign up or login to RoamNook today!

Visit RoamNook Website

Source: https://stackshare.io/stackups/jenkins-x-vs-spinnaker&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwihxYqjva2GAxX7FFkFHUHTCmoQFnoECAAQAw&usg=AOvVaw3GkEEPiqr-nGOoXkoNKkkf

[fancystarlightstudent]

Top Full Stack Developer Interview Questions (2024)

In the dynamic landscape of technology, Full Stack Development has emerged as a crucial field, demanding professionals with a diverse skill set and a deep understanding of both frontend and backend technologies. As companies continue to embrace digital transformation, the demand for skilled Full Stack Developers remains high. This article delves into the top Full Stack Developer interview questions for 2024, focusing on the Java Full Stack roadmap and Python Full Stack syllabus.

 Introduction to Full Stack Development

Full stack development refers to the practice of working on both the front end and back end of a web application or software. A full stack developer is someone who is proficient in working with both the client-side and server-side technologies, allowing them to handle all aspects of the development process.

In a typical full stack development scenario, the front end involves creating the user interface and user experience (UI/UX) of the application. This includes designing and developing components such as web pages, forms, buttons, navigation menus, and interactive elements using technologies like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and front-end frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js.

On the other hand, the back end involves working with the server-side logic, databases, and server management. This includes tasks such as handling user authentication, processing data, managing server requests, and interacting with databases to store and retrieve information. Technologies commonly used in back-end development include programming languages like Node.js, Python, Java, or PHP, along with frameworks like Express.js, Django, Spring Boot, or Laravel.

Full stack developers are required to have a diverse skill set that encompasses both front-end and back-end technologies. They need to understand how to integrate these technologies seamlessly to build fully functional and responsive web applications. Additionally, they should be familiar with version control systems like Git, deployment processes, and have a good grasp of software development principles and best practices.

Overall, full stack development offers a holistic approach to building web applications, allowing developers to work on all layers of the software stack and deliver end-to-end solutions that meet user requirements effectively.

Top Interview Questions for Full Stack Developers

Technical Questions

Sure, here are some top interview questions for full-stack developers:

Frontend Development:

What are the key differences between HTML, CSS, and JavaScript?

Explain the box model in CSS and how it affects layout.

What is responsive web design, and how do you ensure your web applications are responsive?

How do you optimize website performance, both in terms of loading speed and user experience?

What are CSS preprocessors like Sass or Less, and why would you use them?

Backend Development:

What is the difference between server-side scripting and client-side scripting?

Explain the role of databases in web development and discuss different types of databases you are familiar with.

What is RESTful API, and how do you design and consume RESTful APIs?

How do you handle authentication and authorization in a web application?

Discuss the importance of caching in backend development and some popular caching strategies.

Full-Stack Development:

What is the MEAN (MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, Node.js) stack, and how does it differ from the MERN (MongoDB, Express.js, React, Node.js) stack?

Explain the concept of MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture and how it's implemented in web development.

How do you handle state management in a single-page application (SPA)?

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of monolithic vs microservices architecture for web applications.

What tools and technologies do you use for version control, continuous integration, and deployment?

Problem-Solving:

Given a scenario, how would you approach debugging a frontend/backend issue in a web application?

Describe a challenging project you worked on and how you overcame technical obstacles during its development.

Implement a simple algorithm (e.g., reverse a string, find the largest number in an array) using a programming language of your choice.

How do you ensure code quality and maintainability in a collaborative development environment?

Discuss your experience with testing methodologies such as unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing.

Soft Skills and Communication:

How do you prioritize tasks and manage your time effectively when working on multiple projects or tasks simultaneously?

Describe a situation where you had to work in a team and resolve conflicts or disagreements effectively.

How do you stay updated with the latest trends and technologies in web development?

Explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder or client.

Discuss a project where you had to quickly learn a new technology or framework and how you approached the learning process.

These questions cover a range of topics and skills that are important for full-stack developers, including technical knowledge, problem-solving abilities, communication skills, and project management experience. Adjust the complexity of the questions based on the seniority level of the position you are hiring for.

Behavioral Questions

Certainly, here are some behavioral questions tailored for full-stack developers:

Adaptability and Learning:

Describe a time when you had to quickly learn a new technology or programming language for a project. How did you approach the learning process, and what was the outcome?

Can you give an example of a challenging technical problem you faced and how you overcame it through self-directed learning or seeking help from others?

Problem-Solving and Decision Making:

Walk me through a complex issue you encountered during a project. How did you analyze the problem, identify possible solutions, and make a decision on the best course of action?

Describe a situation where you had to prioritize tasks or features in a project with tight deadlines. How did you decide what to focus on first, and what was the result?

Collaboration and Communication:

Discuss a project where you worked closely with a team of developers, designers, or other stakeholders. How did you ensure effective communication and collaboration among team members?

Can you share an example of a time when you had to present technical information or solutions to non-technical stakeholders? How did you ensure they understood the key points?

Handling Challenges and Failures:

Describe a project or task that didn't go as planned. What challenges did you face, and how did you handle the situation? What did you learn from the experience?

Have you ever made a mistake in your code that caused a significant issue? How did you identify and rectify the error, and what steps did you take to prevent similar mistakes in the future?

Leadership and Initiative:

Have you ever taken the lead on a project or initiative? What was your role, and how did you ensure the project's success?

Describe a time when you proposed an innovative solution or improvement to an existing process or technology. How was your idea received, and what was the outcome?

These behavioral questions focus on the candidate's ability to adapt, solve problems, collaborate effectively, learn from challenges, and take initiative. They provide insights into the candidate's past experiences and behaviors, which can help assess their fit for the role and the team dynamics.

Java Full Stack Developer Interview Questions

Sure, here are some Java Full Stack Developer interview questions:

What is the difference between JDK, JRE, and JVM?

Explain the concept of object-oriented programming and its key principles.

What is a servlet? How does it differ from an applet?

What is JDBC? How do you connect Java applications to databases using JDBC?

Can you explain the Spring framework and its core features?

What is RESTful web services? How do you implement RESTful APIs in Java?

Explain the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture and its advantages in web development.

What are some commonly used design patterns in Java? Provide examples.

How do you handle transactions in a Java application? Discuss the transaction management options.

What tools and technologies do you use for front-end development in a Java Full Stack environment?

Can you explain the concept of microservices architecture? How does it differ from monolithic architecture?

How do you ensure security in a Java web application? Discuss some best practices.

What is Docker, and how do you use it in Java application deployment?

Discuss the differences between SOAP and RESTful web services.

Can you explain the concept of dependency injection and how it is implemented in Spring?

These questions cover a range of topics typically encountered in Java Full Stack Developer interviews. Candidates should be able to demonstrate their understanding of Java programming, web development concepts, frameworks like Spring, and related technologies.

Python Full Stack Developer Interview Questions

Certainly! Here are some Python Full Stack Developer interview questions:

What is the difference between Python 2 and Python 3? Why should we use Python 3 for new projects?

Explain the concept of virtual environments in Python and why they are useful.

How does Flask differ from Django? When would you choose one over the other for a web development project?

What is ORM (Object-Relational Mapping)? Provide an example of an ORM library used in Python.

Describe the process of deploying a Flask or Django application to a production server.

What are decorators in Python? How can decorators be used in web development?

Explain the role of WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) in Python web applications.

What is RESTful API? How would you design and implement a RESTful API using Python?

Discuss the importance of testing in software development. What are some popular testing frameworks used in Python?

How do you handle database migrations in Django or Flask applications?

Describe the difference between synchronous and asynchronous programming. When would you choose asynchronous programming in Python?

What are some strategies for optimizing the performance of a Python web application?

Discuss the security considerations you would take into account when developing a web application in Python.

Have you worked with any cloud platforms for deploying Python applications? If so, which ones and what was your experience?

Can you explain the concept of caching in web development? How would you implement caching in a Python-based web application?

These questions cover a range of topics relevant to python full stack syllabus , including web frameworks, databases, testing, optimization, security, and deployment. Adjust the complexity of the questions based on the candidate's level of experience.

 Tips for Acing Full Stack Developer Interviews

Review and practice coding exercises related to data structures, algorithms, and design patterns.

Showcase your portfolio projects and highlight your contributions and problem-solving skills.

Prepare for behavioral questions by reflecting on past experiences and achievements.

Stay updated with the latest trends and technologies in Full Stack Development.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Full Stack Developer interviews in 2024 require a comprehensive understanding of various technologies, from core programming languages to advanced frameworks and tools. By preparing diligently and showcasing your skills and experiences effectively, you can increase your chances of landing a rewarding Full Stack Developer role.

 FAQs

What is the role of a Full Stack Developer? A Full Stack Developer is responsible for designing, developing, and maintaining web applications, handling both frontend and backend aspects of the software.Which programming languages are essential for Full Stack Development? Key languages include JavaScript, Python, Java, and frameworks such as React, Angular, Spring Boot, and Django.How can I improve my skills as a Full Stack Developer? Practice coding regularly, work on real-world projects, stay updated with industry trends, and participate in online communities and forums.What are some common challenges faced by Full Stack Developers? Challenges may include managing diverse technologies, ensuring scalability and performance, and staying updated with rapid technological advancements.What opportunities does Full Stack Development offer in the job market? Full Stack Developers are in high demand across industries, offering lucrative career prospects and opportunities for growth and innovation.

and innovation.

[bestremoteteam]

When it comes to choosing between AngularJs and Laravel, there are a few parameters that are pivotal. Let’s look at each in detail.

https://www.bestremoteteam.com/blog/angularjs-vs-laravel/

[angularjsindia-blog]

AngularJS Vs Laravel: A Comparison for an Improved Web App Development

Till now, you must have come across the end-to-end comparisons between front-end development frameworks. Like that of AngularJS Vs Django, AngularJS Vs ExtJS, and many more. For the first time, you will find here the functional and beneficial comparison between AngularJS Vs Laravel. Yes, the difference between a pioneer front-end development and back-end development frameworks. The comparison is here to better understand the relevance of the most popular front-end and back-end development frameworks. So, here, you will get to know the relevant features and benefits of both the frameworks that help to create a profit-driven web application.

Read More At – AngularJS Vs Laravel: A Comparison for an Improved Web App Development

[kyleomara12]

Laravel Vs. AngularJS Which Is Good For You? - AIS Technolabs 

Laravel and AngularJS both are very popular frameworks with some of the best features and benefits for developers.

Visit More Info : https://www.aistechnolabs.com/larave-vs-angularjs-which-is-good/

[attsoftwareblog]

Best WooCommerce Vs Squarespace eCommerce

WooCommerce is the preferred eCommerce solution for WordPress users. It is lightweight, easy to customize, and can be used on large and small websites. Squarespace Commerce is praised for its beautiful themes and ease of use. Both are  Highly-regarded eCommerce platforms. Now it's time for us to compare Squarespace Commerce and WooCommerce to determine which one wins. Dokanapps.com is one of the best company who deals in WooCommerce setup hire angularjs developer, WooCommerce customer app development and many more.

Squarespace is one of the newest companies in eCommerce. It started as a basic site builder and then expanded to online stores. WooCommerce has been a leader for a long time. It is not only the most preferred overall eCommerce solution, but it also dominates the WordPress eCommerce market.

This article will help you make informed decisions about your online store platform. Both Squarespace and WooCommerce have their strengths and weaknesses. Pricing isn't the only thing that matters here. Squarespace is an excellent platform for beginners. WooCommerce offers everything you need to grow your eCommerce business quickly.

Our goal is to show you how Squarespace Commerce compares to WooCommerce so that you can make an informed decision about your site. Hire Laravel Developer to Build Stunning Web Applications to impress your target Group.

Pitting WooCommerce vs Squarespace Commerce

1 - WOOCOMMERCE

It is a free eCommerce WordPress plugin.

You will need to pay for your web host (we recommend Bluehost and SiteGround), domain name, theme and any potential plugins.

Sell unlimited products.

2 - Squarespace

There are two eCommerce plans available: one is for $26 per month and the other for $40 per month.

Hosting is included in every eCommerce plan. An annual purchase includes domains.

Sell unlimited products.

WooCommerce vs Squarespace Commerce: Pricing

The free plugin makes WooCommerce a strong start. It's free to download and install the woocommerce developer plugin on your WordPress website. You get the best inventory management and store design tools available, all free. It's not a free ride.

WordPress is completely free. However, WooCommerce requires a self-hosted WordPress website. You could end up paying anywhere from $4 to $100 per month. If you work on a large site, the pricing can be even more expensive.

If you sign up for 36 months, Bluehost will cost $99, That's $2.75/month. It would cost $4.99/month to get a managed hosting plan like SiteGround. I would budget between $4 and $25 per month to start an online store.

A WooCommerce theme is what you will most likely need. It will cost you $40 and $100 (one-time fee)

[uzo1]

Front End vs Back End Development: What Is the Difference?

In web development, front end and back end are two of the most popular terms. They are both very crucial and quite different from each other. Each side needs to communicate and operate effectively with the other as a single unit to improve the website’s functionality.  

Front End Development: This is the part of the website that user interact directly with. It is also referred to as the ‘client side’ of the application. It includes everything that users experience directly such as text colours and styles, images, graphs and tables, buttons, colours, and navigation menu. HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are the languages used for Front End development. The structure, design, behaviour, and content of everything seen on browser screen when websites, web applications, or mobile apps are opened up, is implemented by front End developers. Responsiveness and performance are two main objectives of the front End. The developer must ensure that the site is responsive i.e., it appears correctly on devices of all sizes and no part of the website should behave abnormally irrespective of the size of the screen.

Front end languages include:

1.      HTML: HTML stands for Hyper Text Markup Language. It is used to design the front end portion of web pages using markup language. HTML is the combination of Hypertext and Markup language. Hypertext defines the link between the web pages. The markup language is used to define the text documentation within tag which defines the structure of web pages.

2.      CSS: Cascading Style Sheets fondly referred to as CSS is a simply designed language intended to simplify the process of making web pages presentable. CSS allows you to apply styles to web pages. More importantly, CSS enables you to do this independent of the HTML that makes up each web page.

3.      JavaScript: JavaScript is a famous scripting language used to create the magic on the sites to make the site interactive for the user. It is used to enhancing the functionality of a website to running web-based software.

Front end frameworks and libraries include:

1.      AngularJS: AngularJS is a JavaScript open-source front-end framework that is mainly used to develop single page web applications (SPAs). It is a continuously growing and expanding framework which provides better ways for developing web applications. It changes the static HTML to dynamic HTML. It is an open-source project which can be freely. It extends HTML attributes with Directives, and data is bound with HTML.

2.      React.js: React is a declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces. ReactJS is an open-source, component-based front end library responsible only for the view layer of the application. It is maintained by Facebook.

3.      Bootstrap: Bootstrap is a free and open-source tool collection for creating responsive websites and web applications. It is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JavaScript framework for developing responsive, mobile-first web sites.

4.      jQuery: jQuery is an open-source JavaScript library that simplifies the interactions between an HTML/CSS document, or more precisely the Document Object Model (DOM), and JavaScript. Elaborating the terms, jQuery simplifies HTML document traversing and manipulation, browser event handling, DOM animations, Ajax interactions, and cross-browser JavaScript development.

5.      SASS: It is the most reliable, mature and robust CSS extension language. It is used to extend the functionality of an existing CSS of a site including everything from variables, inheritance, and nesting with ease.

Some other libraries and frameworks are: Semantic-UI, Foundation, Materialize, Backbone.js, Express.js, Ember.js etc.

 Backend Development: Backend is server side of the website. It stores and arranges data, and also makes sure everything on the client-side of the website works fine. It is the part of the website that you cannot see and interact with. It is the portion of software that does not come in direct contact with the users. The parts and characteristics developed by backend designers are indirectly accessed by users through a front-end application. Activities, like writing APIs, creating libraries, and working with system components without user interfaces or even systems of scientific programming, are also included in the backend.

Back end languages include:

1.      PHP: PHP is a server-side scripting language designed specifically for web development. Since PHP code executed on the server side so it is called server-side scripting language.

2.      C++: It is a general-purpose programming language and widely used now a days for competitive programming. It is also used as backend language.

3.      Java: Java is one of the most popular and widely used programming language and platform. It is highly scalable. Java components are easily available.

4.      Python: Python is a programming language that lets you work quickly and integrate systems more efficiently.

5.      JavaScript: JavaScript can be used as both (front end and back end) programming languages.

6.      Node.js: Node.js is an open source and cross-platform runtime environment for executing JavaScript code outside of a browser. You need to remember that NodeJS is not a framework and it’s not a programming language. Most of the people are confused and understand it’s a framework or a programming language. We often use Node.js for building back-end services like APIs like Web App or Mobile App. It’s used in production by large companies such as PayPal, Uber, Netflix, Walmart and so on.

Back end frameworks include:

The list of back end frameworks includes: Express, Django, Rails, Laravel, Spring, etc.

The other back end program/scripting languages are: C#, Ruby, REST, GO etc.

[elsnertechnologiesusa]

AngularJS and Laravel both are very popular frameworks with some of the best features and benefits for developers. Let us understand AngularJS and Laravel individually

[mbaljeetsingh]

Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS

We have big JavaScript frameworks that tons of people already use and like, including React, Vue, Angular, and Svelte. Do we need another JavaScript library? Let’s take a look at Alpine.js and you can decide for yourself. Alpine.js is for developers who aren’t looking to build a single page application (SPA). It’s lightweight (~7kB gzipped) and designed to write markup-driven client-side JavaScript.

The syntax is borrowed from Vue and Angular directive. That means it will feel familiar if you’ve worked with those before. But, again, Alpine.js is not designed to build SPAs, but rather enhance your templates with a little bit of JavaScript.

For example, here’s an Alpine.js demo of an interactive “alert” component.

CodePen Embed Fallback

The alert message is two-way bound to the input using x-model="msg". The “level” of the alert message is set using a reactive level property. The alert displays when when both msg and level have a value.

It’s like a replacement for jQuery and JavaScript, but with declarative rendering

Alpine.js is a Vue template-flavored replacement for jQuery and vanilla JavaScript rather than a React/Vue/Svelte/WhateverFramework competitor.

Since Alpine.js is less than a year old, it can make assumptions about DOM APIs that jQuery cannot. Let’s briefly draw a comparison between the two.

Querying vs. binding

The bulk of jQuery’s size and features comes in the shape of a cross-browser compatibility layer over imperative DOM APIs — this is usually referred to as jQuery Core and sports features that can query the DOM and manipulate it.

The Alpine.js answer to jQuery core is a declarative way to bind data to the DOM using the x-bind attribute binding directive. It can be used to bind any attribute to reactive data on the Alpine.js component. Alpine.js, like its declarative view library contemporaries (React, Vue), provides x-ref as an escape hatch to directly access DOM elements from JavaScript component code when binding is not sufficient (eg. when integrating a third-party library that needs to be passed a DOM Node).

Handling events

jQuery also provides a way to handle, create and trigger events. Alpine.js provides the x-on directive and the $event magic value which allows JavaScript functions to handle events. To trigger (custom) events, Alpine.js provides the $dispatch magic property which is a thin wrapper over the browser’s Event and Dispatch Event APIs.

Effects

One of jQuery’s key features is its effects, or rather, it’s ability to write easy animations. Where we might use slideUp, slideDown, fadeIn, fadeOut properties in jQuery to create effects, Alpine.js provides a set of x-transition directives, which add and remove classes throughout the element’s transition. That’s largely inspired by the Vue Transition API.

Also, jQuery’s Ajax client has no prescriptive solution in Alpine.js, thanks to the Fetch API or taking advantage of a third party HTTP library (e.g. axios, ky, superagent).

Plugins

It’s also worth calling out jQuery plugins. There is no comparison to that (yet) in the Alpine.js ecosystem. Sharing Alpine.js components is relatively simple, usually requiring a simple case of copy and paste. The JavaScript in Alpine.js components are “just functions” and tend not to access Alpine.js itself, making them relatively straightforward to share by including them on different pages with a script tag. Any magic properties are added when Alpine initializes or is passed into bindings, like $event in x-on bindings.

There are currently no examples of Alpine.js extensions, although there are a few issues and pull requests to add “core” events that hook into Alpine.js from other libraries. There are also discussions happening about the ability to add custom directives. The stance from Alpine.js creator Caleb Porzio, seems to be basing API decisions on the Vue APIs, so I would expect that any future extension point would be inspired on what Vue.js provides.

Size

Alpine.js is lighter weight than jQuery, coming in at 21.9kB minified — 7.1kB gzipped — compared to jQuery at 87.6kB minified — 30.4kB minified and gzipped. Only 23% the size!

Most of that is likely due to the way Alpine.js focuses on providing a declarative API for the DOM (e.g. attribute binding, event listeners and transitions).

Bundlephobia breaks down the two

For the sake of comparison, Vue comes in at 63.5kB minified (22.8kB gzipped). How can Alpine.js come in lighter despite it’s API being equivalent Vue? Alpine.js does not implement a Virtual DOM. Instead, it directly mutates the DOM while exposing the same declarative API as Vue.

Let’s look at an example

Alpine is compact because since application code is declarative in nature, and is declared via templates. For example, here’s a Pokemon search page using Alpine.js:

CodePen Embed Fallback

This example shows how a component is set up using x-data and a function that returns the initial component data, methods, and x-init to run that function on load.

Bindings and event listeners in Alpine.js with a syntax that’s strikingly similar to Vue templates.

Alpine: x-bind:attribute="express" and x-on:eventName="expression", shorthand is :attribute="expression" and @eventName="expression" respectively

Vue: v-bind:attribute="express" and v-on:eventName="expression", shorthand is :attribute="expression" and @eventName="expression" respectively

Rendering lists is achieved with x-for on a template element and conditional rendering with x-if on a template element.

Notice that Alpine.js doesn’t provide a full templating language, so there’s no interpolation syntax (e.g. in Vue.js, Handlebars and AngularJS). Instead, binding dynamic content is done with the x-text and x-html directives (which map directly to underlying calls to Node.innerText and Node.innerHTML).

An equivalent example using jQuery is an exercise you’re welcome to take on, but the classic style includes several steps:

Imperatively bind to the button click using $('button').click(/* callback */).

Within this “click callback” get the input value from the DOM, then use it to call the API.

Once the call has completed, the DOM is updated with new nodes generated from the API response.

If you’re interested in a side by side comparison of the same code in jQuery and Alpine.js, Alex Justesen created the same character counter in jQuery and in Alpine.js.

Back in vogue: HTML-centric tools

Alpine.js takes inspiration from TailwindCSS. The Alpine.js introduction on the repository is as “Tailwind for JavaScript.”

Why is that important?

One of Tailwind’s selling points is that it “provides low-level utility classes that let you build completely custom designs without ever leaving your HTML.” That’s exactly what Alpine does. It works inside HTML so there is no need to work inside of JavaScript templates the way we would in Vue or React  Many of the Alpine examples cited in the community don’t even use script tags at all!

Let’s look at one more example to drive the difference home. Here’s is an accessible navigation menu in Alpine.js that uses no script tags whatsoever.

CodePen Embed Fallback

This example leverages aria-labelledby and aria-controls outside of Alpine.js (with id references). Alpine.js makes sure the “toggle” element (which is a button), has an aria-expanded attribute that’s true when the navigation is expanded, and false when it’s collapsed. This aria-expanded binding is also applied to the menu itself and we show/hide the list of links in it by binding to hidden.

Being markup-centric means that Alpine.js and TailwindCSS examples are easy to share. All it takes is a copy-paste into HTML that is also running Alpine.js/TailwindCSS. No crazy directories full of templates that compile and render into HTML!

Since HTML is a fundamental building block of the web, it means that Alpine.js is ideal for augmenting server-rendered (Laravel, Rails, Django) or static sites (Hugo, Hexo, Jekyll). Integrating data with this sort of tooling can be a simple as outputting some JSON into the x-data="{}" binding. The affordance of passing some JSON from your backend/static site template straight into the Alpine.js component avoids building “yet another API endpoint” that simply serves a snippet of data required by a JavaScript widget.

Client-side without the build step

Alpine.js is designed to be used as a direct script include from a public CDN. Its developer experience is tailored for that. That’s why it makes for a great jQuery comparison and replacement: it’s dropped in and eliminates a build step.

While it’s not traditionally used this way, the bundled version of Vue can be linked up directly. Sarah Drasner has an excellent write-up showing examples of jQuery substituted with Vue. However, if you use Vue without a build step, you’re actively opting out of:

the Vue CLI

single file components

smaller/more optimized bundles

a strict CSP (Content Security Policy) since Vue inline templates evaluate expressions client-side

So, yes, while Vue boasts a buildless implementation, its developer experience is really depedent on the Vue CLI. That could be said about Create React App for React, and the Angular CLI. Going build-less strips those frameworks of their best qualities.

There you have it! Alpine.js is a modern, CDN-first  library that brings declarative rendering for a small payload — all without the build step and templates that other frameworks require. The result is an HTML-centric approach that not only resembles a modern-day jQuery but is a great substitute for it as well.

If you’re looking for a jQuery replacement that’s not going to force you into a SPAs architecture, then give Alpine.js a go! Interested? You can find out more on Alpine.js Weekly, a free weekly roundup of Alpine.js news and articles.

The post Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

via CSS-Tricks https://ift.tt/3aMMDvq

[suzanneshannon]

Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS

We have big JavaScript frameworks that tons of people already use and like, including React, Vue, Angular, and Svelte. Do we need another JavaScript library? Let’s take a look at Alpine.js and you can decide for yourself. Alpine.js is for developers who aren’t looking to build a single page application (SPA). It’s lightweight (~7kB gzipped) and designed to write markup-driven client-side JavaScript.

The syntax is borrowed from Vue and Angular directive. That means it will feel familiar if you’ve worked with those before. But, again, Alpine.js is not designed to build SPAs, but rather enhance your templates with a little bit of JavaScript.

For example, here’s an Alpine.js demo of an interactive “alert” component.

CodePen Embed Fallback

The alert message is two-way bound to the input using x-model="msg". The “level” of the alert message is set using a reactive level property. The alert displays when when both msg and level have a value.

It’s like a replacement for jQuery and JavaScript, but with declarative rendering

Alpine.js is a Vue template-flavored replacement for jQuery and vanilla JavaScript rather than a React/Vue/Svelte/WhateverFramework competitor.

Since Alpine.js is less than a year old, it can make assumptions about DOM APIs that jQuery cannot. Let’s briefly draw a comparison between the two.

Querying vs. binding

The bulk of jQuery’s size and features comes in the shape of a cross-browser compatibility layer over imperative DOM APIs — this is usually referred to as jQuery Core and sports features that can query the DOM and manipulate it.

The Alpine.js answer to jQuery core is a declarative way to bind data to the DOM using the x-bind attribute binding directive. It can be used to bind any attribute to reactive data on the Alpine.js component. Alpine.js, like its declarative view library contemporaries (React, Vue), provides x-ref as an escape hatch to directly access DOM elements from JavaScript component code when binding is not sufficient (eg. when integrating a third-party library that needs to be passed a DOM Node).

Handling events

jQuery also provides a way to handle, create and trigger events. Alpine.js provides the x-on directive and the $event magic value which allows JavaScript functions to handle events. To trigger (custom) events, Alpine.js provides the $dispatch magic property which is a thin wrapper over the browser’s Event and Dispatch Event APIs.

Effects

One of jQuery’s key features is its effects, or rather, it’s ability to write easy animations. Where we might use slideUp, slideDown, fadeIn, fadeOut properties in jQuery to create effects, Alpine.js provides a set of x-transition directives, which add and remove classes throughout the element’s transition. That’s largely inspired by the Vue Transition API.

Also, jQuery’s Ajax client has no prescriptive solution in Alpine.js, thanks to the Fetch API or taking advantage of a third party HTTP library (e.g. axios, ky, superagent).

Plugins

It’s also worth calling out jQuery plugins. There is no comparison to that (yet) in the Alpine.js ecosystem. Sharing Alpine.js components is relatively simple, usually requiring a simple case of copy and paste. The JavaScript in Alpine.js components are “just functions” and tend not to access Alpine.js itself, making them relatively straightforward to share by including them on different pages with a script tag. Any magic properties are added when Alpine initializes or is passed into bindings, like $event in x-on bindings.

There are currently no examples of Alpine.js extensions, although there are a few issues and pull requests to add “core” events that hook into Alpine.js from other libraries. There are also discussions happening about the ability to add custom directives. The stance from Alpine.js creator Caleb Porzio, seems to be basing API decisions on the Vue APIs, so I would expect that any future extension point would be inspired on what Vue.js provides.

Size

Alpine.js is lighter weight than jQuery, coming in at 21.9kB minified — 7.1kB gzipped — compared to jQuery at 87.6kB minified — 30.4kB minified and gzipped. Only 23% the size!

Most of that is likely due to the way Alpine.js focuses on providing a declarative API for the DOM (e.g. attribute binding, event listeners and transitions).

Bundlephobia breaks down the two

For the sake of comparison, Vue comes in at 63.5kB minified (22.8kB gzipped). How can Alpine.js come in lighter despite it’s API being equivalent Vue? Alpine.js does not implement a Virtual DOM. Instead, it directly mutates the DOM while exposing the same declarative API as Vue.

Let’s look at an example

Alpine is compact because since application code is declarative in nature, and is declared via templates. For example, here’s a Pokemon search page using Alpine.js:

CodePen Embed Fallback

This example shows how a component is set up using x-data and a function that returns the initial component data, methods, and x-init to run that function on load.

Bindings and event listeners in Alpine.js with a syntax that’s strikingly similar to Vue templates.

Alpine: x-bind:attribute="express" and x-on:eventName="expression", shorthand is :attribute="expression" and @eventName="expression" respectively

Vue: v-bind:attribute="express" and v-on:eventName="expression", shorthand is :attribute="expression" and @eventName="expression" respectively

Rendering lists is achieved with x-for on a template element and conditional rendering with x-if on a template element.

Notice that Alpine.js doesn’t provide a full templating language, so there’s no interpolation syntax (e.g. in Vue.js, Handlebars and AngularJS). Instead, binding dynamic content is done with the x-text and x-html directives (which map directly to underlying calls to Node.innerText and Node.innerHTML).

An equivalent example using jQuery is an exercise you’re welcome to take on, but the classic style includes several steps:

Imperatively bind to the button click using $('button').click(/* callback */).

Within this “click callback” get the input value from the DOM, then use it to call the API.

Once the call has completed, the DOM is updated with new nodes generated from the API response.

If you’re interested in a side by side comparison of the same code in jQuery and Alpine.js, Alex Justesen created the same character counter in jQuery and in Alpine.js.

Back in vogue: HTML-centric tools

Alpine.js takes inspiration from TailwindCSS. The Alpine.js introduction on the repository is as “Tailwind for JavaScript.”

Why is that important?

One of Tailwind’s selling points is that it “provides low-level utility classes that let you build completely custom designs without ever leaving your HTML.” That’s exactly what Alpine does. It works inside HTML so there is no need to work inside of JavaScript templates the way we would in Vue or React  Many of the Alpine examples cited in the community don’t even use script tags at all!

Let’s look at one more example to drive the difference home. Here’s is an accessible navigation menu in Alpine.js that uses no script tags whatsoever.

CodePen Embed Fallback

This example leverages aria-labelledby and aria-controls outside of Alpine.js (with id references). Alpine.js makes sure the “toggle” element (which is a button), has an aria-expanded attribute that’s true when the navigation is expanded, and false when it’s collapsed. This aria-expanded binding is also applied to the menu itself and we show/hide the list of links in it by binding to hidden.

Being markup-centric means that Alpine.js and TailwindCSS examples are easy to share. All it takes is a copy-paste into HTML that is also running Alpine.js/TailwindCSS. No crazy directories full of templates that compile and render into HTML!

Since HTML is a fundamental building block of the web, it means that Alpine.js is ideal for augmenting server-rendered (Laravel, Rails, Django) or static sites (Hugo, Hexo, Jekyll). Integrating data with this sort of tooling can be a simple as outputting some JSON into the x-data="{}" binding. The affordance of passing some JSON from your backend/static site template straight into the Alpine.js component avoids building “yet another API endpoint” that simply serves a snippet of data required by a JavaScript widget.

Client-side without the build step

Alpine.js is designed to be used as a direct script include from a public CDN. Its developer experience is tailored for that. That’s why it makes for a great jQuery comparison and replacement: it’s dropped in and eliminates a build step.

While it’s not traditionally used this way, the bundled version of Vue can be linked up directly. Sarah Drasner has an excellent write-up showing examples of jQuery substituted with Vue. However, if you use Vue without a build step, you’re actively opting out of:

the Vue CLI

single file components

smaller/more optimized bundles

a strict CSP (Content Security Policy) since Vue inline templates evaluate expressions client-side

So, yes, while Vue boasts a buildless implementation, its developer experience is really depedent on the Vue CLI. That could be said about Create React App for React, and the Angular CLI. Going build-less strips those frameworks of their best qualities.

There you have it! Alpine.js is a modern, CDN-first  library that brings declarative rendering for a small payload — all without the build step and templates that other frameworks require. The result is an HTML-centric approach that not only resembles a modern-day jQuery but is a great substitute for it as well.

If you’re looking for a jQuery replacement that’s not going to force you into a SPAs architecture, then give Alpine.js a go! Interested? You can find out more on Alpine.js Weekly, a free weekly roundup of Alpine.js news and articles.

The post Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS published first on https://deskbysnafu.tumblr.com/

[recruitmentdubai]

Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS

We have big JavaScript frameworks that tons of people already use and like, including React, Vue, Angular, and Svelte. Do we need another JavaScript library? Let’s take a look at Alpine.js and you can decide for yourself. Alpine.js is for developers who aren’t looking to build a single page application (SPA). It’s lightweight (~7kB gzipped) and designed to write markup-driven client-side JavaScript.

The syntax is borrowed from Vue and Angular directive. That means it will feel familiar if you’ve worked with those before. But, again, Alpine.js is not designed to build SPAs, but rather enhance your templates with a little bit of JavaScript.

For example, here’s an Alpine.js demo of an interactive “alert” component.

CodePen Embed Fallback

The alert message is two-way bound to the input using x-model="msg". The “level” of the alert message is set using a reactive level property. The alert displays when when both msg and level have a value.

It’s like a replacement for jQuery and JavaScript, but with declarative rendering

Alpine.js is a Vue template-flavored replacement for jQuery and vanilla JavaScript rather than a React/Vue/Svelte/WhateverFramework competitor.

Since Alpine.js is less than a year old, it can make assumptions about DOM APIs that jQuery cannot. Let’s briefly draw a comparison between the two.

Querying vs. binding

The bulk of jQuery’s size and features comes in the shape of a cross-browser compatibility layer over imperative DOM APIs — this is usually referred to as jQuery Core and sports features that can query the DOM and manipulate it.

The Alpine.js answer to jQuery core is a declarative way to bind data to the DOM using the x-bind attribute binding directive. It can be used to bind any attribute to reactive data on the Alpine.js component. Alpine.js, like its declarative view library contemporaries (React, Vue), provides x-ref as an escape hatch to directly access DOM elements from JavaScript component code when binding is not sufficient (eg. when integrating a third-party library that needs to be passed a DOM Node).

Handling events

jQuery also provides a way to handle, create and trigger events. Alpine.js provides the x-on directive and the $event magic value which allows JavaScript functions to handle events. To trigger (custom) events, Alpine.js provides the $dispatch magic property which is a thin wrapper over the browser’s Event and Dispatch Event APIs.

Effects

One of jQuery’s key features is its effects, or rather, it’s ability to write easy animations. Where we might use slideUp, slideDown, fadeIn, fadeOut properties in jQuery to create effects, Alpine.js provides a set of x-transition directives, which add and remove classes throughout the element’s transition. That’s largely inspired by the Vue Transition API.

Also, jQuery’s Ajax client has no prescriptive solution in Alpine.js, thanks to the Fetch API or taking advantage of a third party HTTP library (e.g. axios, ky, superagent).

Plugins

It’s also worth calling out jQuery plugins. There is no comparison to that (yet) in the Alpine.js ecosystem. Sharing Alpine.js components is relatively simple, usually requiring a simple case of copy and paste. The JavaScript in Alpine.js components are “just functions” and tend not to access Alpine.js itself, making them relatively straightforward to share by including them on different pages with a script tag. Any magic properties are added when Alpine initializes or is passed into bindings, like $event in x-on bindings.

There are currently no examples of Alpine.js extensions, although there are a few issues and pull requests to add “core” events that hook into Alpine.js from other libraries. There are also discussions happening about the ability to add custom directives. The stance from Alpine.js creator Caleb Porzio, seems to be basing API decisions on the Vue APIs, so I would expect that any future extension point would be inspired on what Vue.js provides.

Size

Alpine.js is lighter weight than jQuery, coming in at 21.9kB minified — 7.1kB gzipped — compared to jQuery at 87.6kB minified — 30.4kB minified and gzipped. Only 23% the size!

Most of that is likely due to the way Alpine.js focuses on providing a declarative API for the DOM (e.g. attribute binding, event listeners and transitions).

Bundlephobia breaks down the two

For the sake of comparison, Vue comes in at 63.5kB minified (22.8kB gzipped). How can Alpine.js come in lighter despite it’s API being equivalent Vue? Alpine.js does not implement a Virtual DOM. Instead, it directly mutates the DOM while exposing the same declarative API as Vue.

Let’s look at an example

Alpine is compact because since application code is declarative in nature, and is declared via templates. For example, here’s a Pokemon search page using Alpine.js:

CodePen Embed Fallback

This example shows how a component is set up using x-data and a function that returns the initial component data, methods, and x-init to run that function on load.

Bindings and event listeners in Alpine.js with a syntax that’s strikingly similar to Vue templates.

Alpine: x-bind:attribute="express" and x-on:eventName="expression", shorthand is :attribute="expression" and @eventName="expression" respectively

Vue: v-bind:attribute="express" and v-on:eventName="expression", shorthand is :attribute="expression" and @eventName="expression" respectively

Rendering lists is achieved with x-for on a template element and conditional rendering with x-if on a template element.

Notice that Alpine.js doesn’t provide a full templating language, so there’s no interpolation syntax (e.g. in Vue.js, Handlebars and AngularJS). Instead, binding dynamic content is done with the x-text and x-html directives (which map directly to underlying calls to Node.innerText and Node.innerHTML).

An equivalent example using jQuery is an exercise you’re welcome to take on, but the classic style includes several steps:

Imperatively bind to the button click using $('button').click(/* callback */).

Within this “click callback” get the input value from the DOM, then use it to call the API.

Once the call has completed, the DOM is updated with new nodes generated from the API response.

If you’re interested in a side by side comparison of the same code in jQuery and Alpine.js, Alex Justesen created the same character counter in jQuery and in Alpine.js.

Back in vogue: HTML-centric tools

Alpine.js takes inspiration from TailwindCSS. The Alpine.js introduction on the repository is as “Tailwind for JavaScript.”

Why is that important?

One of Tailwind’s selling points is that it “provides low-level utility classes that let you build completely custom designs without ever leaving your HTML.” That’s exactly what Alpine does. It works inside HTML so there is no need to work inside of JavaScript templates the way we would in Vue or React  Many of the Alpine examples cited in the community don’t even use script tags at all!

Let’s look at one more example to drive the difference home. Here’s is an accessible navigation menu in Alpine.js that uses no script tags whatsoever.

CodePen Embed Fallback

This example leverages aria-labelledby and aria-controls outside of Alpine.js (with id references). Alpine.js makes sure the “toggle” element (which is a button), has an aria-expanded attribute that’s true when the navigation is expanded, and false when it’s collapsed. This aria-expanded binding is also applied to the menu itself and we show/hide the list of links in it by binding to hidden.

Being markup-centric means that Alpine.js and TailwindCSS examples are easy to share. All it takes is a copy-paste into HTML that is also running Alpine.js/TailwindCSS. No crazy directories full of templates that compile and render into HTML!

Since HTML is a fundamental building block of the web, it means that Alpine.js is ideal for augmenting server-rendered (Laravel, Rails, Django) or static sites (Hugo, Hexo, Jekyll). Integrating data with this sort of tooling can be a simple as outputting some JSON into the x-data="{}" binding. The affordance of passing some JSON from your backend/static site template straight into the Alpine.js component avoids building “yet another API endpoint” that simply serves a snippet of data required by a JavaScript widget.

Client-side without the build step

Alpine.js is designed to be used as a direct script include from a public CDN. Its developer experience is tailored for that. That’s why it makes for a great jQuery comparison and replacement: it’s dropped in and eliminates a build step.

While it’s not traditionally used this way, the bundled version of Vue can be linked up directly. Sarah Drasner has an excellent write-up showing examples of jQuery substituted with Vue. However, if you use Vue without a build step, you’re actively opting out of:

the Vue CLI

single file components

smaller/more optimized bundles

a strict CSP (Content Security Policy) since Vue inline templates evaluate expressions client-side

So, yes, while Vue boasts a buildless implementation, its developer experience is really depedent on the Vue CLI. That could be said about Create React App for React, and the Angular CLI. Going build-less strips those frameworks of their best qualities.

There you have it! Alpine.js is a modern, CDN-first  library that brings declarative rendering for a small payload — all without the build step and templates that other frameworks require. The result is an HTML-centric approach that not only resembles a modern-day jQuery but is a great substitute for it as well.

If you’re looking for a jQuery replacement that’s not going to force you into a SPAs architecture, then give Alpine.js a go! Interested? You can find out more on Alpine.js Weekly, a free weekly roundup of Alpine.js news and articles.

The post Alpine.js: The JavaScript Framework That’s Used Like jQuery, Written Like Vue, and Inspired by TailwindCSS appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

source https://css-tricks.com/alpine-js-the-javascript-framework-thats-used-like-jquery-written-like-vue-and-inspired-by-tailwindcss/

from WordPress https://ift.tt/2We2Ap8 via IFTTT

[bestremoteteam]

The distinctive features of Laravel make it the most used and preferred framework.

https://www.bestremoteteam.com/blog/angularjs-vs-laravel/

[goodcore101]

9 Must Decisions in Web Application Development

So you’ve decided to create a web application? Great, welcome to a world without any easy choices. There is a vast amount of different great technologies in every step you are going to make. And for every option, you will find a notable company that used it with great success.The web development market is huge. It’s the biggest programming space by far, with never-ending technology options. Looking at the StackOverflow survey of 2019, 52% of all developers are full-stack developers, 50% are back-end developers and 32.8% are front-end developers.

As you can probably guess, 134.8% of all developers is a pretty big market.There are many popular technologies, databases, philosophies, design patterns and methodologies in the software world. They change drastically every few years, but somehow the old ones never seem to die. Cobol and ClearCase are great examples of something that shouldn’t still exist but clearly does.We will talk about 9 technological choices you have to make when developing a proper web application. Some will not be relevant to your product, but most will be. A lot of these choices give way to an entirely new group of choices, but that’s just modern-day development.I’m mostly a .NET developer, but I’ll try to stay objective and not to express too many personal opinions.This article is talking about web applications, not websites. The distinction is a bit hard to put into words. Blogs and standard e-commerce sites are websites, whereas interactive websites like eBay and Facebook are web applications. Pretty much anything you can’t build (easily) with WordPress is a web application.

1. Client & Server Architectural Pattern

Since the internet came to life, we developed many different ways to build web applications. We had CGI, PHP, ASP, Silverlight, WebForms, and a bunch of others. In the last 10-15 years, we came to agree on 2 architectural patterns: model-view-controller(MVC) on the server-side or single-page-application (SPA) on the client side and Web API on the server side. Out of those two, the second approach (SPA + Web API) is getting the most traction in recent years.The first decision in your web application is to choose an architectural approach.Single Page Application (SPA) and Web APIEver since AngularJS was released in 2010, SPA and Web API combination gradually became the most popular way to write modern web applications. And with some good reasons. With this pattern, the entire client side part of the application is loaded just once rather than loading each page from the server. The routing is done entirely on the client side. The server provides just the API for data.There are many advantages to this approach:

Sine the entire client is loaded once in the browser, the page navigation is immediate and the web application experience becomes more like a desktop application experience.

Separation between client-side and server-side. There’s no longer necessity for full-stack developers (that know both server-side and client-side).

Testing both the client and server is easier because they are separate.

Your Web API server is reusable for any type of application – web, desktop, and mobile.

And some disadvantages:

Initial project setup is slower. Instead of creating one "new project" in your favorite MVC framework, you now have separate projects for the client-side and server-side. You’ll have to deal with more technologies overall.

Slower first-page load. In a SPA we are loading the entire client-side for the first page.

You’ll have to use bundlers like webpack for a decent develop experience. This adds some overhead like having to deal with bundler configuration. However, this is also an advantage because the bundler allows to easily add more tools to the build chain, like babel and a linter.

Model-View-Controller (MVC)The server-side MVC pattern got popular in 2005 with the release of Ruby on Rails and Django frameworks.In MVC, each route request goes to a Controller on the server. The Controller interacts with the Model (the data) and generates a View (the HTML/CSS/JavaScript client-side). This has several advantages. It creates a nice separation of concern between the client, server, and the different components. As a result, more developers can work on the same project without conflicts. It allows to reuse components. Since the Model is separate, you can replace it with a testable data set.Some popular MVC frameworks are Ruby on Rails, ASP.NET MVC, Django, Laravel, and Spring MVCYou can somewhat combine between MVC and SPAs. One View can be a single page application on its own. This is best done with thin SPA frameworks like Vue.js.OthersThere are a couple of other ways you can go, which aren’t considered great options nowadays. They are old technologies, which were replaced for a reason. Some of those are:

Classic ASP

Classic PHP (without MVC)

WebForms

Static pages and Web API (this is still valid for static content, but not for a web application)

2. Server-side Web API (when choosing SPA & Web API)

If you chose to go with a single page application (SPA) framework, then the next step is to choose a server-side technology. The standard means of communications are HTTP requests, so the server will provide an HTTP API. This means the server-side and client-side are decoupled. You can also consider using a RESTful API pattern.There’s an abundance in great server side technologies. This is both a blessing and a curse. There are so many good choices that it becomes difficult to choose. Here are some of the more popular technologies:

Node.js – JavaScript

ASP.NET Web API – C#

Java – Spring, Jersey, Apache CXF, Restlet

Python – Flask, Django REST framework

Go

Ruby – Sinatra, Ruby on Rails – Rails is mostly MVC, but Rails core 5 supports API-only applications.

All of these frameworks are free and most are open source.This is not an exhaustive list, but those are the most popular technologies. Choosing a popular framework is important. It probably got popular for a reason. A popular framework will have better support, better documentation, and more documented issues. Perhaps most importantly, you’ll find more developers that are familiar with that framework.Checking market popularity with Google Trends and surveys in this particular category was a bit difficult. Instead, we can see popularity by looking at Tags in StackOverflow. We can see overall usage according to the total number of questions asked. And we can see the trends according to the number of questions asked in the last month. This is not a perfect indicator of popularity, but I think it’s pretty good. Here are the results:

Node.js, for example, has 291K questions, 161K watchers and 5K questions asked this monthThe big 4 winners are Node.js, ASP.NET, Spring, and Ruby on Rails. Flask, Django REST and GO are much less popular. However, this is not a fair comparison. Spring, ASP.NET, and Ruby on Rails are primarily MVC and not API-only, so they really have a much lower value. Go is a programming language, so it’s overvalued as well. On the other hand, Django-rest, and Flask are server-side API technology only, so their value is "real". Node.js is also not an MVC framework, rather a technology to run JavaScript natively. But, it’s mostly used for Web API with something like Express.js framework.Keep in mind that even though Node.js is clearly the most popular, the other ones are still extremely popular technologies.Java Jersey, Apache CXF and Ruby Sinatra usage was so much lower in comparison that I didn’t even include them in the chart. There are probably hundreds of other lesser known frameworks that don’t appear as well.Besides popularity, here are some more considerations when choosing:

For web applications that provide big-data analysis, consider going with a Python backend.

Do you want to work with a strongly-typed programming language like C#, Java, and Go? Or weakly typed languages like JavaScript, Ruby, and Python? This is a big consideration. Make sure your development team is comfortable with the language.

With Node.js, you work in the same language in client-side and server-side. I claim that’s way too much JavaScript, but the world seems to think it’s a good idea.

Which development technologies are more popular in your area of the world? Prefer those.

If you love C#, but afraid to be stuck with a Microsoft proprietary tech that’s tightly coupled to Windows, then fear no more. The latest versions of ASP.NET (.NET Core) are open-source, work on Linux and have great performance on top.

If you have a team that’s already experienced with a framework or language, go with their known technology. This consideration trumps all others.

3. Server-side MVC (when choosing MVC)

Like with Web API, there’s a big selection of server-side technologies that use the MVC pattern. Up to a few years ago, the MVC pattern was by far the most popular way to build web applications. The most notable frameworks are:

C# – ASP.NET MVC

Java – Spring MVC, Apache Struts, Play Framework

Groovy – Grails Framework

Python – Django

Ruby – Ruby on Rails

PHP – Laravel

And here’s the popularity contest results according to Stack Overflow Tags:

This is a normalized chart. ASP.NET MVC, for example, has 183K questions, 63K watchers and 856 questions asked this month.These results were interesting and quite surprising for me. I expected Ruby on Rails, Spring and ASP.NET MVC to be on top. Instead, I found that Django, Ruby on Rails and Laravel were the most popular frameworks. Ruby on Rails has the most questions in all times. Django and Laravel seem to be rising in popularity with the most questions asked in the last 30 days.Besides popularity, the additional considerations when choosing a framework are similar to the ones for Web Api server side:

For web applications that provide big-data and statistics, consider going with Python Django.

The strongly typed vs weakly typed language is still a consideration.

If you have a team that already knows and loves a framework or a language, go with the already-known known technology.

On a personal note, I’m dumbfounded that PHP is gaining popularity.Performance Benchmarks – for Both Web API and MVCIf you’re building a small business web application, performance might not matter as much. But for big applications that should serve many requests, response times are crucial. The most notable performance benchmarks comparison site is

https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/

. Here, you can find a huge list of frameworks and various server configurations. Those are all benchmarked and compared into something like this:

The candidates in the above test include a server with a web framework, a database, and an ORM. In the benchmark, the framework’s ORM is used to fetch all rows from a database table containing an unknown number of messages.If we go by language, the fastest is Rust, followed by C, Go, Java, C++, PHP, C#, and Kotlin. If we go back to our "popular" frameworks and look for them, we’ll find this:

ASP.NET Core Web API (42.8% of best result)

Node.js variation (17.9% of best result)

ASP.NET Core MVC (17.2%)

Spring (4.4%)

Laravel variation (2.9%)

Django (1.9%)

Ruby on Rails (1.3%)

By the way, the #1 performance winner Actix is a Rust language framework that I didn’t include due to its very low popularity.

4. Choosing a Single Page Application (SPA) Framework

If you chose to use a Web API and SPA (not MVC), then the next decision is to choose a SPA Framework.Just a few years ago, a new JavaScript framework sprouted about once a week. Luckily, those days are behind us and the field stabilized a bit.The most notable SPA frameworks of all times (well, since 2010) are:

React

AngularJS

Angular (2+)

Vue.js

Ember.js

Polymer

Aurelia

Backbone.js

Let’s do our usual trick with StackOverflow:

So this chart shows a few conclusions at a glance:

All past frameworks except for React, AngularJS, Angular, and Vue.js are dead. If you’ve been following web development news in the past few years, that should come as no surprise.

AngularJS has the most questions but the least new questions. Even though there’s probably a huge amount of code written with AngularJS, it’s a legacy framework. It’s not recommended to choose it for new projects.

React and Angular dominate the market with Vue.js a distant 3rd. React in particular has the most interest.

This means your best choice in 2020 is between React, Angular, and Vue.js. These frameworks have the best community support, the most documented issues, and the best component/library support. With React and Angular having the most support.Here are a few more points to consider:

Angular was built as a sort of "enterprise" framework that considered everything and forces you into a particular mode of work. React and Vue.js are more separated into components and allow you to pick and choose development approaches.

React won the "Most loved web framework" title in StackOverflow survey of 2019, with Vue.js a close second.

5. Database

Every modern web application has some sort of database. Or several databases even. In the old days, there were just relational databases and the differences were in performance and features. Today, we’re in the age of "specialized databases". We need different databases for different purposes, which makes this decision pretty important. I’d say even more important than the previous decisions of server-side and client-side technology because those offer pretty much the same thing in different flavors.It’s important to understand your business needs when choosing a database. If your product needs high-performance Search capabilities, consider using Elastic Search. If you have a high-load of similar requests, whose response doesn’t change very frequently, consider using Redis for its caching. If you just want to store a bunch of JSON documents without much fuss, then go with a document-store database like MongoDB.Databases can be divided into several types:

Relational Databases – A classic table database that works with SQL queries like Microsoft SQL Server.

NoSql databases:

Document-store databases like MongoDB

Key-Value stores like DynamoDB and Redis

Wide column store like Cassandra

Graph-based database like Neo4j.

Before choosing a specific database, it’s best to decide on the type of the database you need.Like with other technologies, choosing a popular database is very important. You’ll have more forums, bigger community and more developers familiar with the technology. Besides, they probably got popular for a reason. According to Stack Overflow 2019 survey, the most popular databases are:

MySQL is by far the most popular database. Note that the all 4 first spots are filled with relational databases. This might serve as some kind of indication that relational databases are the best choice in most applications.Here are a few points to consider when choosing:

Some of the commercial databases like Oracle and SQL Server can be quite pricey. Consider using one of the many open-source databases if the cost is an issue and you have a lot of data.

Relational database stood the test of time. They are fast, reliable and have a ton of tools that work with them. You’ll also find more developers familiar with the technology.

If you’re using a certain cloud provider, see which databases they support as cloud-as-a-service. This can reduce some initial development time when starting out. You might not actually need your cloud provider because there are services that provide independent database-as-a-service services like MongoDB Atlas.

For small web applications, the considerations are different than for large enterprise applications. You’ll need databases with the ability to scale, possibly to multiple machines (sharding).

For distributed databases, consider the CAP theorem. It states that a database can provide only as much 2 out of 3 guarantees between Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance. Consider which two guarantees are most important to your needs and which database provides those two.

For big applications or apps with high-frequency requests, you’ll need to consider performance. One of the best places to find performance comparisons is DB-ENGINES. Here are the latest scores while writing this:

Database choice is obviously a huge topic and an important one. Unlike other decisions, I suggest giving this one more weight and do additional research.

6. Deployment

In 2020, we have a big variety of Cloud Offerings. I believe that deployment in the cloud is the best fit in almost all cases. With a few exceptions. So before comparing cloud service providers, let’s talk about why you would deploy to the cloud and what alternatives you have.There are actually 3 options available:

Cloud deployment – Instead of bothering with setting up your servers in the basement, you can rent compute power and storage from a company like AWS or Azure. In fact, ever since AWS was launched in 2006, the software world is changing in this direction. There are many advantages to this:

On-premise deployment – On-premise servers is the way organizations worked up to 2006. You had a server room and an army of sys-admins to keep them running. In 2020, we still have a lot of on-premise deployments. These companies either started on-premise and just didn’t move to the cloud or they have some good reasons to stay on-premise. You should consider staying on-premise if:

Hybrid cloud solution – The big cloud providers allow you to install a fully operational cloud server on-premise. That is, you’ll have an AWS or Azure portal installed in your own data center. Pretty crazy concept and not for everyone, especially due to the cost. Both Azure Stack and AWS Outposts require you to buy new customized hardware. Google recently released Anthos, which doesn’t require customized hardware.

With the Cloud, you can use dynamic scaling to cut costs. In low-pressure times, reduce the number of servers and in high-pressure times increase them. Since you pay-per-minute or per-hour, you can dramatically decrease costs.

The initial setup and deployment are much easier. In some cases, like with Azure App Service, deploying to a server for the first time is literally a few clicks.

You need to employ much fewer sys-admins (but a few DevOps engineers).

You no longer need to buy server machines, store them in the basement and upkeep them. It’s all in the cloud man.

You have some security or legal issues to place your server in the cloud. Maybe it’s software in the military and government sectors.

You’ve invested so much effort in your on-premise server farm that it no longer makes sense moving to the cloud. It can happen if you’re a big enough company and you’ve made your on-premise solution automated enough to justify the upkeep.

You’re big enough that it makes financial sense not to pay to the middle man. One example is Dropbox who aren’t in the cloud. They did the math and it makes sense for them to be on-premise.

Comparing Cloud Service ProvidersCloud services are divided into 3 categories: Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS). To deploy our web application, we’re interested in IaaS. The three dominant IaaS cloud providers are: Amazon’s AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. Besides, it’s worth mentioning IBM Cloud, DigitalOcean, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Compute, Red Hat Cloud, and Alibaba Cloud.Besides AWS, Azure, and GCP, the only real competitor in terms capabilities is Alibaba. Unfortunately for them, major western enterprises are not so willing to work with a Chinese company.The 3 big cloud providers have somewhat similar offerings. They all offer services like Scalable Virtual Machines, Load balancers, Kubernetes orchestrators, serverless offerings, storage as a service, database as a service, private networks & isolation, big data services, machine learning services, and many more.Competition is fierce. Prices are somewhat similar and when one of the providers comes up with a new popular product, the other providers will adjust and offer similar products.

7. Authentication & AuthorizationIn practically all web applications we have a Sign-in mechanism. When signed in, you are identified in the web application and can: Leave comments, buy products, change personal settings and use whatever functionality the application offers. The ability of your application to verify that you are who you say you are is called Authentication. Whereas Authorization means permissions mechanism for different users.There are a couple of ways you can go with authentication and authorization:

The manual solution – Most web frameworks have support for authentication and authorization (usually with JWT tokens). If not, there’s always a free 3rd party library available. This means you can manually implement basic auth mechanisms.

External Identity Server – There are several open-source and commercial identity providers that implement the OpenID Connect standard. This means that client-server communication will involve a dedicated identity server. The advantages are that these servers have already implemented a bunch of auth features for you. These might include:

Single sign-on and sign-out with different application types

Built-in support for external identity providers (Google, Facebook,…)

Role-based permissions (authorization)

Multi-factor authentication

Compliant with standards like ISO, SOC2, HIPAA,…

Built-in analytics and logs

Your cloud provider probably has an identity server, like AWS Cognito or Azure Active Directory B2C.Notable open-source solutions are: IdentityServer, MITREid Connect, Ipsilon.Notable commercial solutions: Auth0, Okta, OneLoginMake sure to do some price calculations before committing to a commercial solution like Auth0. They tend to get kind of pricey and using an open-source implementation is also a good option.

8. Logging

Server-side logging is pretty important for any type of software, and web applications are not an exception. Whether to implement logging or not is not really a decision – implement logging. The decision is where to send these logs and hot to consume them.Here are some logging targets to consider:

A database. Logging to a database has many advantagesThere’s a myriad of choices for a database to store your logs. We can categorize them as follows:

Error/Performance monitoring tools can also act as logging targets. This is very beneficial since they can display errors alongside log messages that were in the same Http request context. A few choices are elmah.io, AWS Cloudwatch and Azure Application Insights.

Logging to File is still a good logging target. It doesn’t have to be exclusive, you can log both to file and a database for example.

You can retrieve the logs from anywhere, without access to the production machine.

It’s easy to aggregate logs when you have multiple servers.

There’s no chance the logs will be deleted from a local machine.

You can easily search and extract statistics from the logs. This is especially useful if you’re using Structured Logging.

Relational Databases are always an option. They’re easy to set up, can be queried with SQL and most engineers are already familiar with them.

NoSQL Databases like CouchDB. These are perfect for structured logs that are stored in JSON format.

Time-series Databases like InfluxDB are optimized to store time-based events. This means your logging performance will be better and your logs will take less storage space. This is a good choice for intense high-load logging.

Searchable Solutions like Logstash + Elastic Search + Kibana (The "Elastic Stack") provide a full service for your logs. They will store, index, add search capabilities and even visualize your logs data. They work best with structured logging.

Once you have logging in place, I suggest doing a test run on retrieving them or searching them. It’s going to be a shame to wait until you have a bug in production only to find out that you have some kind of problem in your logging.

9. Payment Processor

In many web applications, you are going to be charging your customers. That is, receive credit card, PayPal or Bitcoin for services (well, not Bitcoin). Even though theoretically, you can implement payment processing yourself, it’s not recommended. You’ll have to deal with PCI compliance, security issues, different laws in different countries (like GDPR), frauds, refunds, invoices, exchange rates, and a million other things.There are several big commercial players in this field like PayPal, Stripe, 2checkout, and BlueSnap. Those have a rich API and you can integrate the payment in your own site.Here are some things to consider when choosing a payment processing company:

Security and PCI Compliance – Make sure your chosen payment processor has PCI compliance. Any company that handles credit card has to uphold this standard. All the major companies will be PCI compliant.

Fees – The standard fees in the industry are 2.9% of the transaction + 30 cents. Maybe some companies offer a cheaper rate.

Exchange Rates – If you have international customers, they will pay in their own currency. Check which exchange rates the payment processor charges.

Ease of API – One of the most important considerations is the ease of API. Be sure you will have a lot of interaction with the payment processor. You’ll want hooks on transaction events, modification of invoices, adding discounts or more fees, refunds, and so on. Stripe, in particular, is known for it’s excellent API.

Popularity – Big companies will have more forums and internet discussions. With PayPal or Stripe, that’s not going to be a problem. With big companies, you’ll also find more developers familiar with the framework.

Data portability – If you ever wanted to change payment processors, the current processor needs to allow that option. PayPal, for example, just won’t give you your customer’s credit card data. Whereas Stripe allows to export card data.

Summary

As you can see, web application development in 2020 is not getting any closer to a consensus. If anything, we have more technologies to choose from and as much controversy as ever. I guess this is good news for us developers since we can afford to have specialties and get paid extra for our respective narrow fields.In almost all decisions, all the choices are pretty good. That means you won’t make a terrible mistake by choosing the one over the other. On the other hand, by choosing one you’re usually stuck with them. Suppose you chose to go with AWS and then decided to move to Azure. That’s not going to be that easy.There were a lot more "Must" decisions I wanted to include like Error Monitoring, Application Performance Management tools, ORMs, Mobile support + PWAs, and Localization. Then, there are a bunch of client-side decisions like free or paid UI Controls, bundlers, linters, and so on. This article got a little bigger than I planned, so I’ll leave those to another post.Thanks for reading, Cheers.

Source: https://michaelscodingspot.com/web-application-development/

[javascripttutorial4u]

@JavaScript : RT @VueJSTutorials: Beginner's Guide: Vue.js vs Vanilla JavaScript https://t.co/ztFpsGJbV2 #vue #vuejs #laravel #php #dev #html5 #js #coder #code #geek #angularjs #coding #developer #wordpress #bootstrap #css3 #css #javascript #es6 https://t.co/ynCawWQtzX

[bestremoteteam]

The specific features of this framework enable smooth software development and extensive experience.

https://www.bestremoteteam.com/blog/angularjs-vs-laravel/