#combine harvester price

[myfieldking]

Our harvesters are equipped with the latest technological advancements, delivering unmatched efficiency and precision in the field. From powerful engines and intelligent harvesting systems to advanced monitoring and control features, our machines are designed to optimize crop harvesting and minimize downtime. With our harvesters, you can significantly increase your productivity while reducing labor and time investments. For more information about the harvester price, get in touch with our team.

[machinary]

Efficient Harvesting: The Advantages of Fieldking's Harvester Machines

Fieldking's harvester machines combine cutting-edge technology with reliability to streamline your harvesting process. Designed to handle various crops with precision and efficiency, our harvesters ensure minimal waste and maximum yield. With features like advanced cutting systems and durable components, these machines deliver exceptional performance in diverse field conditions. Fieldking offers competitive pricing without compromising on quality, making high-efficiency harvesting accessible to all farmers. Invest in a Fieldking harvester machine to boost productivity, reduce labor costs, and achieve optimal harvest results with ease and reliability.

[acecranesindia]

Harvest your fields with ease with ACE ACT 60 Harvester With modern features - ✅ Rubber Tracks ✅ Maximum Ground Clearance ✅ No crop loss ✅ Low 🛠 Maintenance Cost ✅ Warranty - 1000 Hours or 1 Year

☑️ Recognized by Ministry of Agriculture ☑️ Available on subsidy by Agriculture Department ☑️ Finance facility available

Contact your nearest ACE Agri-Equipment dealer today and bring home the ACE ACT 60 Harvester 🈷️

[godabariagro]

Best Combine Harvester Prices in India

Find the most competitive combine harvester prices in India. Explore top models with advanced features that enhance farming efficiency. Compare costs, specifications, and benefits to choose the best harvester for your needs. Get the latest deals and make an informed purchase to boost your agricultural productivity.

[vdsocialnetwork]

Kartar 4000 Combine Harvester || Full Details With Price 2024 #vishavkar...

[jctracks]

The Evolution and Advantages of Rubber Crawler Tracks

In the ever-evolving world of heavy machinery and construction equipment, rubber crawler tracks have emerged as a versatile and advantageous solution. From their humble beginnings as a means to reduce ground pressure, they have evolved into a cornerstone technology that offers benefits across various industries.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Podcasting “Capitalists Hate Capitalism”

I'm touring my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me in Torino (Apr 21) Marin County (Apr 27), Winnipeg (May 2), Calgary (May 3), Vancouver (May 4), and beyond!

This week on my podcast, I read "Capitalists Hate Capitalism," my latest column for Locus Magazine:

https://locusmag.com/2024/03/cory-doctorow-capitalists-hate-capitalism/

What do I mean by "capitalists hate capitalism?" It all comes down to the difference between "profits" and "rents." A capitalist takes capital (money, or the things you can buy with it) and combines it with employees' labor, and generates profits (the capitalist's share) and wages (the workers' share).

Rents, meanwhile, come from owning an asset that capitalists need to generate profits. For example, a landlord who rents a storefront to a coffee shop extracts rent from the capitalist who owns the coffee shop. Meanwhile, the capitalist who owns the cafe extracts profits from the baristas' labor.

Capitalists' founding philosophers like Adam Smith hated rents. Worse: rents were the most important source of income at the time of capitalism's founding. Feudal lords owned great swathes of land, and there were armies of serfs who were bound to that land – it was illegal for them to leave it. The serfs owed rent to lords, and so they worked the land in order grow crops and raise livestock that they handed over the to lord as rent for the land they weren't allowed to leave.

Capitalists, meanwhile, wanted to turn that land into grazing territory for sheep as a source of wool for the "dark, Satanic mills" of the industrial revolution. They wanted the serfs to be kicked off their land so that they would become "free labor" that could be hired to work in those factories.

For the founders of capitalism, a "free market" wasn't free from regulation, it was free from rents, and "free labor" came from workers who were free to leave the estates where they were born – but also free to starve unless they took a job with the capitalists.

For capitalism's philosophers, free markets and free labor weren't just a source of profits, they were also a source of virtue. Capitalists – unlike lords – had to worry about competition from one another. They had to make better goods at lower prices, lest their customers take their business elsewhere; and they had to offer higher pay and better conditions, lest their "free labor" take a job elsewhere.

This means that capitalists are haunted by the fear of losing everything, and that fear acts as a goad, driving them to find ways to make everything better for everyone: better, cheaper products that benefit shoppers; and better-paid, safer jobs that benefit workers. For Smith, capitalism is alchemy, a philosopher's stone that transforms the base metal of greed into the gold of public spiritedness.

By contrast, rentiers are insulated from competition. Their workers are bound to the land, and must toil to pay the rent no matter whether they are treated well or abused. The rent rolls in reliably, without the lord having to invest in new, better ways to bring in the harvest. It's a good life (for the lord).

Think of that coffee-shop again: if a better cafe opens across the street, the owner can lose it all, as their customers and workers switch allegiance. But for the landlord, the failure of his capitalist tenant is a feature, not a bug. Once the cafe goes bust, the landlord gets a newly vacant storefront on the same block as the hot new coffee shop that can be rented out at even higher rates to another capitalist who tries his luck.

The industrial revolution wasn't just the triumph of automation over craft processes, nor the triumph of factory owners over weavers. It was also the triumph of profits over rents. The transformation of hereditary estates worked by serfs into part of the supply chain for textile mills was attended by – and contributed to – the political ascendancy of capitalists over rentiers.

Now, obviously, capitalism didn't end rents – just as feudalism didn't require the total absence of profits. Under feudalism, capitalists still extracted profits from capital and labor; and under capitalism, rentiers still extracted rents from assets that capitalists and workers paid them to use.

The difference comes in the way that conflicts between profits and rents were resolved. Feudalism is a system where rents triumph over profits, and capitalism is a system where profits triumph over rents.

It's conflict that tells you what really matters. You love your family, but they drive you crazy. If you side with your family over your friends – even when your friends might be right and your family's probably wrong – then you value your family more than your friends. That doesn't mean you don't value your friends – it means that you value them less than your family.

Conflict is a reliable way to know whether or not you're a leftist. As Steven Brust says, the way to distinguish a leftist is to ask "What's more important, human rights, or property rights?" If you answer "Property rights are human right," you're not a leftist. Leftists don't necessarily oppose all property rights – they just think they're less important than human rights.

Think of conflicts between property rights and human rights: the grocer who deliberately renders leftover food inedible before putting it in the dumpster to ensure that hungry people can't eat it, or the landlord who keeps an apartment empty while a homeless person freezes to death on its doorstep. You don't have to say "No one can own food or a home" to say, "in these cases, property rights are interfering with human rights, so they should be overridden." For leftists property rights can be a means to human rights (like revolutionary land reformers who give peasants title to the lands they work), but where property rights interfere with human rights, they are set aside.

In his 2023 book Technofeudalism, Yanis Varoufakis claims that capitalism has given way to a new feudalism – that capitalism was a transitional phase between feudalism…and feudalism:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/28/cloudalists/#cloud-capital

Varoufakis's point isn't that capitalists have gone extinct. Rather, it's that today, conflicts between capital and assets – between rents and profits – reliably end with a victory of rent over profit.

Think of Amazon: the "everything store" appears to be a vast bazaar, a flea-market whose stalls are all operated by independent capitalists who decide what to sell, how to price it, and then compete to tempt shoppers. In reality, though, the whole system is owned by a single feudalist, who extracts 51% from every dollar those merchants take in, and decides who can sell, and what they can sell, and at what price, and whether anyone can even see it:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/01/managerial-discretion/#junk-fees

Or consider the patent trolls of the Eastern District of Texas. These "companies" are invisible and produce nothing. They consist solely of a serviced mailbox in a dusty, uninhabited office-building, and an overbroad patent (say, a patent on "tapping on a screen with your finger") issued by the US Patent and Trademark Office. These companies extract hundreds of millions of dollars from Apple, Google, Samsung for violating these patents. In other words, the government steps in and takes vast profits generated through productive activity by companies that make phones, and turns that money over as rent paid to unproductive companies whose sole "product" is lawsuits. It's the triumph of rent over profit.

Capitalists hate capitalism. All capitalists would rather extract rents than profits, because rents are insulated from competition. The merchants who sell on Jeff Bezos's Amazon (or open a cafe in a landlord's storefront, or license a foolish smartphone patent) bear all the risk. The landlords – of Amazon, the storefront, or the patent – get paid whether or not that risk pays off.

This is why Google, Apple and Samsung also have vast digital estates that they rent out to capitalists – everything from app stores to patent portfolios. They would much rather be in the business of renting things out to capitalists than competing with capitalists.

Hence that famous Adam Smith quote: "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices." This is literally what Google and Meta do:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedi_Blue

And it's what Apple and Google do:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/27/23934961/google-antitrust-trial-defaults-search-deal-26-3-billion

Why compete with one another when you can collude, like feudal lords with adjacent estates who trust one another to return any serf they catch trying to sneak away in the dead of night?

Because of course, it's not just "free markets" that have been captured by rents ("Competition is for losers" -P. Thiel) – it's also "free labor." For years, the largest tech and entertainment companies in America illegally colluded on a "no poach" agreement not to hire one-anothers' employees:

https://techcrunch.com/2015/09/03/apple-google-other-silicon-valley-tech-giants-ordered-to-pay-415m-in-no-poaching-suit/

These companies were bitter competitors – as were these sectors. Even as Big Content was lobbying for farcical copyright law expansions and vowing to capture Big Tech, all these companies on both sides were able to set aside their differences and collude to bind their free workers to their estates and end the "wasteful competition" to secure their labor.

Of course, this is even more pronounced at the bottom of the labor market, where noncompete "agreements" are the norm. The median American worker bound by a noncompete is a fast-food worker whose employer can wield the power of the state to prevent that worker from leaving behind the Wendy's cash-register to make $0.25/hour more at the McDonald's fry trap across the street:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/02/its-the-economy-stupid/#neofeudal

Employers defend this as necessary to secure their investment in training their workers and to ensure the integrity of their trade secrets. But why should their investments be protected? Capitalism is about risk, and the fear that accompanies risk – fear that drives capitalists to innovate, which creates the public benefit that is the moral justification for capitalism.

Capitalists hate capitalism. They don't want free labor – they want labor bound to the land. Capitalists benefit from free labor: if you have a better company, you can tempt away the best workers and cause your inferior rival to fail. But feudalists benefit from un-free labor, from tricks like "bondage fees" that force workers to pay in order to quit their jobs:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/21/bondage-fees/#doorman-building

Companies like Petsmart use "training repayment agreement provisions" (TRAPs) to keep low-waged workers from leaving for better employers. Petsmart says it costs $5,500 to train a pet-groomer, and if that worker is fired, laid off, or quits less than two years, they have to pay that amount to Petsmart:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/04/its-a-trap/#a-little-on-the-nose

Now, Petsmart is full of shit here. The "four-week training course" Petsmart claims is worth $5,500 actually only lasts for three weeks. What's more, the "training" consists of sweeping the floor and doing other low-level chores for three weeks, without pay.

But even if Petsmart were to give $5,500 worth of training to every pet-groomer, this would still be bullshit. Why should the worker bear the risk of Petsmart making a bad investment in their training? Under capitalism, risks justify rewards. Petsmart's argument for charging $50 to groom your dog and paying the groomer $15 for the job is that they took $35 worth of risk. But some of that risk is being borne by the worker – they're the ones footing the bill for the training.

For Petsmart – as for all feudalists – a worker (with all the attendant risks) can be turned into an asset, something that isn't subject to competition. Petsmart doesn't have to retain workers through superior pay and conditions – they can use the state's contract-enforcement mechanism instead.

Capitalists hate capitalism, but they love feudalism. Sure, they dress this up by claiming that governmental de-risking spurs investment: "Who would pay to train a pet-groomer if that worker could walk out the next day and shave dogs for some competing shop?"

But this is obvious nonsense. Think of Silicon Valley: high tech is the most "IP-intensive" of all industries, the sector that has had to compete most fiercely for skilled labor. And yet, Silicon Valley is in California, where noncompetes are illegal. Every single successful Silicon Valley company has thrived in an environment in which their skilled workers can walk out the door at any time and take a job with a rival company.

There's no indication that the risk of free labor prevents investment. Think of AI, the biggest investment bubble in human history. All the major AI companies are in jurisdictions where noncompetes are illegal. Anthropic – OpenAI's most serious competitor – was founded by a sister/brother team who quit senior roles at OpenAI and founded a direct competitor. No one can claim with a straight face that OpenAI is now unable to raise capital on favorable terms.

What's more, when OpenAI founder Sam Altman was forced out by his board, Microsoft offered to hire him – and 700 other OpenAI personnel – to found an OpenAI competitor. When Altman returned to the company, Microsoft invested more money in OpenAI, despite their intimate understanding that anyone could hire away the company's founder and all of its top technical staff at any time.

The idea that the departure of the Burger King trade secrets locked up in its workers' heads constitute more of a risk to the ability to operate a hamburger restaurant than the departure of the entire technical staff of OpenAI is obvious nonsense. Noncompetes aren't a way to make it possible to run a business – they're a way to make it easy to run a business, by eliminating competition and pushing the risk onto employees.

Because capitalists hate capitalism. And who can blame them? Who wouldn't prefer a life with less risk to one where you have to constantly look over your shoulder for competitors who've found a way to make a superior offer to your customers and workers?

This is why businesses are so excited about securing "IP" – that is, a government-backed right to control your workers, customers, competitors or critics:

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

The argument for every IP right expansion is the same: "Who would invest in creating something new without the assurance that some­one else wouldn’t copy and improve on it and put them out of business?"

That was the argument raised five years ago, during the (mercifully brief) mania for genre writers seeking trademarks on common tropes. There was the romance writer who got a trademark on the word "cocky" in book titles:

https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/16/17566276/cockygate-amazon-kindle-unlimited-algorithm-self-published-romance-novel-cabal

And the fantasy writer who wanted a trademark on "dragon slayer" in fantasy novel titles:

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/06/14/son-of-cocky-a-writer-is-trying-to-trademark-dragon-slayer-for-fantasy-novels/

Who subsequently sought a trademark on any book cover featuring a person holding a weapon:

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/07/19/trademark-troll-who-claims-to-own-dragon-slayer-now-wants-exclusive-rights-to-book-covers-where-someone-is-holding-a-weapon/

For these would-be rentiers, the logic was the same: "Why would I write a book about a dragon-slayer if I could lose readers to someone else who writes a book about dragon-slayers?"

In these cases, the USPTO denied or rescinded its trademarks. Profits triumphed over rents. But increasingly, rents are triumphing over profits, and rent-extraction is celebrated as "smart business," while profits are for suckers, only slightly preferable to "wages" (the worst way to get paid under both capitalism and feudalism).

That's what's behind all the talk about "passive income" – that's just a euphemism for "rent." It's what Douglas Rushkoff is referring to in Survival of the Richest when he talks about the wealthy wanting to "go meta":

https://pluralistic.net/2022/09/13/collapse-porn/#collapse-porn

Don't drive a cab – go meta and buy a medallion. Don't buy a medallion, go meta and found Uber. Don't found Uber, go meta and invest in Uber. Don't invest in Uber, go meta and buy options on Uber stock. Don't buy Uber stock options, go meta and buy derivatives of options on Uber stock.

"Going meta" means distancing yourself from capitalism – from income derived from profits, from competition, from risk – and cozying up to feudalism.

Capitalists have always hated capitalism. The owners of the dark Satanic mills wanted peasants turned off the land and converted into "free labor" – but they also kidnapped Napoleonic war-orphans and indentured them to ten-year terms of service, which was all you could get out of a child's body before it was ruined for further work:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/26/enochs-hammer/#thats-fronkonsteen

When Varoufakis says we've entered a new feudal age, he doesn't mean that we've abolished capitalism. He means that – for the first time in centuries – when rents go to war against profits – the rents almost always emerge victorious.

Here's the podcast episode:

https://craphound.com/news/2024/04/14/capitalists-hate-capitalism/

Here's a direct link to the MP3 (hosting courtesy of the Internet Archive; they'll host your stuff for free, forever):

https://archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_465/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_465_-_Capitalists_Hate_Capitalism.mp3

And here's the RSS feed for my podcast:

http://feeds.feedburner.com/doctorow_podcast

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/18/in-extremis-veritas/#the-winnah

[shanastoryteller]

Happy Pride, Shana! 🏳️‍🌈☺️💕

Please, I need more of your Jim and Sybok buddy fic!

a continuation of 1 2 3 4

Sybok double checks Jim's numbers, then triple checks them, and normally that would get him a some sarcastic indignation, but instead Jim just paces and rubs his hands against his thighs and simultaneously looks his age and at the same time far too old.

"The ion storms are unpredictable," he says finally. "It's possible we'll be able to get a signal out to Starfleet before the spring."

"Well, anything's possible," Jim agrees. "Seventy three years of ion storm data says it's not fucking likely, though." He runs his hands through his hair. "The season just started, if I'd started a few weeks ago, we could have got a message out before the storms rolled in-"

"Hey," he says sharply. "We're lucky you discovered it this early. We can start conserving food now, and maybe - maybe we'll get lucky again."

Fall has just started, the season of harvest that gets them through the austere winter. Tarsus IV doesn't get cold, not like it can on Earth, but it does get dry. Sybok had actually been looking forward to the winter, since the climate would more closely resemble what he grew up with on Vulcan.

That had been when he'd though food would be abundant, if a combination of heavily salted and flash frozen.

Jim gives him a look that reminds him, horribly, of his father. "What's the official Vulcan stance on luck again?"

He glares. "It is illogical to ignore the possibility of survival just because of a low probability."

"That's not it and you know it," he laughs, humorless.

"Maybe we can develop some sort of pesticide to save the remaining crops.

Jim's reaction is pure offense, which is at least an improvement on hopelessness. "Okay, I didn't graduate from the VSA, but I did run these experiments myself, you know. It's all already infected almost all of our crops. They're a goner, and everyone is going to figure that out in a couple of weeks when everything rots from the inside out."

Yeah. They can probably synthesize something to counteract these parasites for the next planting season, but that depends on them being around come spring.

"We won't all die," Sybok says quietly, because many planets have endured similar circumstances in their past, however distant. "There are always survivors."

Jim presses his lips together. "Yeah. Because Vulcans' strict vegetarian diet really lends itself it to cannibalism."

Sybok's stomach rolls but he keeps his face neutral. "Technically, as I am the only Vulcan on planet, it would not be cannibalism."

There are always survivors, but their survival comes at a price. He already knows that it's a price he's unwilling to pay.

He should have listened to Amanda.

[ranchstoryblog]

Nendoroid Claire Reminder: Where to order, release dates, when preorders close, and using the request form.

If you haven't gotten your preorders in for Nendoroid Claire just yet, time's running out! We've put together one last little info post with eeeeverything you need to know if you want to get your order in! Typically these things are pretty much made-to-order with very little shelf stock, so don't get left out and have to struggle with the aftermarket if you really want one!

When do preorders close?

2024/05/15 (JP)

29/05/2024 (EU)

No date listed on Goodsmile US, but Claire's page features the "Pre-Orders Closing" tag, so it's safe to say it'll probably be gone by the end of May.

When does it ship?

Both Goodsmile Japan's official page and Goodsmile Europe lists September, 2024.

Goodsmile US lists Q1 2025.

So if you absolutely want Claire the soonest possible, go with EU or JP. Including shipping, a member of our community ordering from the Japanese store to the US has said their total came out to $60.99. Another ordering from the US store had their price come out to $50.18. So if you're willing to wait, you can probably save a few bucks.

Listed Price

US - $42.99 - Goodsmile US Page

EU - €44,92 - Goodsmile EU Page

JP - ￥6,900 - Goodsmile JP Page

Goodsmile's store bills when the item is preparing to ship, not when the order is placed. So you don't have to have the money ready right now. Other storefronts will vary.

There is an exception if you use Paypal or Amazon Pay however, which will charge immediately.

Goodsmile Shop Exclusive: Golden Watering Can

If you preorder through one of the official Goodsmile shops, Claire will also come with this cute little golden watering can in addition to her standard green one.

Non-GoodSmile Retailers:

If you want to see if you can find a discount, lower shipping, or if you're already a figure collector and want somewhere that will do convenient things like combine orders to be shipped at a later date, there's a handy list of all of the ones that should be offering preorders for Claire here:

Note that these other stores won't come with the golden watering can.

The Goodsmile Request Form

If you're really hoping for other Story of Seasons characters to join Claire in the future, remember to make good use of the official request form. https://support.goodsmile.com/hc/en-us/articles/14948741690009-Product-requests-and-rerelease-requests

Probably the most key piece of info is to be specific about your request since there's some variations of characters in the series, and a few characters that share the same names. If you ask for the Harvest Goddess, there's at least 5 different ones, so mention the specific game. Similarly, If you ask for "Popuri," there's the original design from Harvest Moon 64, her alternate universe counterpart with a fresh new design in SoS FoMT, and the design from Island of Happiness.

If you want more info, we did a full write-up on the process in a previous post here:

and lastly, we'll close by sharing the promotional photos again! The tiny cow is so cute!

[sexhaver]

oh yeah me n bailey have been playing Elder Scrolls Online for the last week or two and hit the level cap (without champion levels) yesterday. probably the funniest part is that we're playing on screens literally right next to each other but she uses a controller while i use KBM, and even though i installed the same UI mods for her as for me, the Easy Reader console version of the UI you get by booting up with a controller connected seems to overwrite those mods. so i'll be working with a list of every possible enchantment combination (without needing to translate runes) and able to make my alchemy writs automatically at the press of a button and i look over and bailey is fighting with the Fisher-Price UI to let her make a single potion. at least she still has the minimap and harvesting node tracker and numbers/percentages on health bars; there are people out there just completely rawdogging this shit!

[twinsimming]

Pasteurize Milk Mod by Twinsimming 🐄

I was heavily inspired by the cows from The Sims 4: Cottage Living and wanted to flesh out the Milkin’ It Dairy Corral cows from The Sims 3 Store to provide more gameplay options.

Requirements

This is a script mod that requires CCLoader and the Milkin’ It Dairy Corral from The Sims 3 Store to function properly. If you want to create all of the flavors of milk available in this mod, the following packs/store content/mods are required:

The Sims 3: Late Night

The Sims 3: Showtime

The Sims 3: Supernatural

The Sims 3: Seasons

The Sims 3: University Life

Bohemian Fruits and Nuts from The Sims 3 Store or Strawberry Plant - v1.2 by douglasveiga

Interactions

Pasteurize: A new inventory interaction added to the Milkin’ It Dairy Corral milk bottles that allows you to turn the three existing milk types (regular milk, chocolate milk, and soy milk) into milks that actually sell for simoleons!

Each type of milk sells for a different price, and the selling price increases the higher the quality of the milk is. Sims can also drink the milk and each milk flavor has their own moodlet!

Pasteurized Milk (Got Milk?)** §10

Pasteurized Chocolate Milk (Chocolate Chuckles) §15

Pasteurized Soy Milk (Plant Power)** §20

**= custom moodlet

The quality of the milk also affects its moodlets.

Normal quality milks will give a +10 or +15 moodlet

Nice quality or higher will give a +20 or +25 moodlet

Bad quality or worse milks will give your sim a custom negative Spoiled Milk moodlet of -10 or -15, as well as a -10 Nauseous moodlet, so they'll throw up after a period of time.

Add Flavor: A new inventory interaction added to the Milkin’ It Dairy Corral milk bottles to combine certain harvestables and regular milk to create several different types of flavored milk. These milks are also drinkable and give the following moodlets:

New Flavors:

Strawberry Milk = Regular Milk + Strawberry (Social Strawberry) §30

Fire Milk = Regular Milk + Ghost Chili (Spicy) §60

Golden Honey Milk = Regular Milk + Honey (Life is Sweet) §50

Pumpkin Spice Milk = Regular Milk + Pumpkin + Cinnamon (Cinnamon) §75

Obsidian Milk = Regular Milk + Midnight Bean (Midnight Buzz) §45

Rainbow Milk = Regular Milk + Wonderpetal (Blizzard) §50

Banana Milk = Regular Milk + Banana (Bananah) §20

The quality of harvestables must be Nice or better to add to regular milk. Flavoring milk will always result in Nice or higher quality milk and will match the quality of the harvestable used.

The selling price will always be higher than selling the harvestables by themselves.

The moodlets given are also a bit stronger than if your sim gained them through other means.

Drinking any flavor of milk will remove the negative Too Spicy moodlet if you have The Sims 3: Supernatural installed. It also hydrates Plant Sims and Mermaids.

All flavors of milk can be purchased at the grocery store and will be Normal quality.

Turn Milk Into Butter: Requires two Milkin’ It Dairy Corral milk bottles and produces a new Butter ingredient. Butter can also be purchased at the grocery store for §5.

Turn Soy Milk Into Tofu: Requires two Milkin’ It Dairy Corral soy milk bottles and produces a Tofu ingredient.

New Moodlets

Got Milk?: Given when sims drink Pasteurized Milk, lasts 3 hours, +20 mood

Plant Power: Given when sims Pasteurized Soy Milk, lasts 3 hours, +20 mood

Spoiled Milk: Given when sims drink Bad or worse quality milk, lasts 3 hours, -20 mood

Cooking Overhauls

I created this mod with Cooking Overhaul mods in mind, to add things like Pasteurized Milk and Butter into existing recipes, but they are not required to use this mod.

For those who do have a Cooking Overhaul mod installed follow the instructions in the text file titled "For Cooking Overhauls" to enable Pasteurized Milk and Butter to be used in recipes.

Personally, I added Butter to the Grilled Cheese, Cookies, and Lobster Thermidor recipes.

Conflicts & Known Issues

- This is a new script mod, so there shouldn’t be any conflicts.

- The qualities of the milks will revert to Normal if you travel to other worlds with them in your inventory. This seems to be an issue with all non-harvestable ingredients, so I don’t know if this is something that can be fixed.

Credits

EA/Maxis for The Sims 3 and The Sims 4, Visual Studio 2019, ILSpy, SmoothJazz, Notepad+++, CCLoader, Blender, s3pe, TSRW, Sims4Studio, Milkshape, and Gimp.

Default cow texture is by aminovas here!

Thank You

To @greenplumbboblover, Battery,  @zoeoe-sims, and TheSweetSimmer for helping me with the code and prop animations. This mod would never have gotten this far without you all.

To @puddingface1902 for your custom moodlet templates.

To @flotheory for your wonderful animation converting tutorial.

To douglasveiga for the amazing CCLoader tool.

And to @puffkins2000​, @phoebejaysims, @misspats3​, @bietjie​, @simsdeogloria​, and SonyaYU for testing the mod and providing invaluable feedback!

Download @ ModTheSims

[myfieldking]

For those working in farming and agriculture, having the right tools for the job is essential. That's why we offer a wide selection of agricultural machinery that has been sourced from some of the best manufacturers in the world. Our agriculture tools are designed to make your job easier, so you can work smarter, not harder. From power tillers and grain harvesters to tractors and grain drills, we have the tools to help you get the job done quickly and efficiently.

Whether you're a hobby farmer or a professional agricultural worker, we have the right tools for you to get the job done right. Invest in the right tools and make your agricultural work easier with our selection of top-of-the-line agricultural implements.

[machinary]

Essential Tools: The Importance of Agricultural Implements

Agricultural implements are vital tools that enhance the efficiency and productivity of farming. These tools range from simple hand-held devices like hoes and sickles to advanced machinery such as tractors, plows, and harvesters. They assist in various farming activities, including soil preparation, planting, irrigation, and harvesting. By reducing manual labor and increasing precision, agricultural implements help farmers manage their land more effectively, leading to higher yields and better-quality produce

[acecranesindia]

ACE ULTRA एवं ACE ACT 60 मल्टी-क्रॉप हार्वेस्टर तेज, बेहतर और लाभप्रद कटाई सुनिश्चित करता है।

धान, दाल, सोयाबीन, चना, गेहूँ, सरसों, मक्का और बाजरे की कटाई के लिए उपयुक्त है।

ACE ULTRA & ACE ACT 60 Multi-Crop Harvester ensures faster, better and more profitable harvesting.

Suitable for harvesting paddy, pulses, soybean, gram, wheat, mustard, maize and millet.

[godabariagro]

Combine Harvester Machine Price

Efficiency, visibility, and comfort are the three most important elements when designing a combine harvester. Innovative threshing, separating, and cleaning tools, along with improved drive systems and cutting-edge monitoring and control systems, boost harvesting to a new level; these instruments are both user-friendly and incredibly long-lasting. Finding high-quality, affordably priced combine harvesters was a major obstacle in India. When it comes to combine harvester machine price, GAM Harvester has the best deals. To purchase, visit the website.

[vdsocialnetwork]

Panesar g60 combine harvester Price with Details New Model 2024 #Panesar...