#epochryphal

[lizardywizard]

🎶✨ when u get this u have to put 5 songs u actually listen to, then tag 10 of your favourite followers (non-negotiable, positivity is cool) ✨🎶

ugh ive just been listening to my old mix cds over and over so its old jpop but

@fierceawakening @strangecranes @wolffyluna @cryptovexillologist @earlgraytay @akesi-waso @2-gecs @soilrockslove @obstructed-birdsong @epochryphal @thislousytshirt

[fatalism-and-villainy]

thoughts on things the state is good for, if any

I feel like I would need more details on what “the state” encapsulates here, because it’s a word that for me is made up of postmodernist abstractions (hello Foucault). But assuming some kind of centralized government, I think it’s good for fostering autonomy. This idea that in an ideal world we would all rely on community and mutual aid makes me extremely nervous, because i suspect that would inevitably lead to more popularity contests, except this time what’s at stake is survival and having basic needs met. 

I do actually agree that fostering more community and interpersonal networks is good, and that loneliness and isolation are major problems in our society as it is. (This is actually why I’m not fond of takes like “maybe we’ll all be working from home in the future! there’s actually no need to have offices!” because hooo boy is your goal to just isolate people further and cut off any means of meeting and interacting with people, something that is already difficult as an adult? Not to mention that not everyone is, in fact, more productive at home... but we’re getting off topic.)

Point is, while I’m in favour of mutual aid, I think that leaving people at the mercy of community support without any kind of centralized, bureaucratic support is seriously over-optimistic and not taking into account how vicious communities can be.

[aceadmiral]

epochryphal replied to your post “So, I have a lot of feelings about @fuckyeahasexual‘s tweet storm...”

i think the twitter thread is attempting to address the (singular? primary?) stereotype-spectre of what a “tumblr ace” is, and it’s one that i’ve seen raised a lot (and do feel targeted by, as nonbinary, queer, interested in microlabels and unnatural hair colors, etc). i agree the thread inadvertently reinforced the idea that that is indeed the only/main type of ace on tumblr by focusing on the respectability politics of dismissing that stereotype

I’ve definitely also seen that stereotype a lot (and have certainly had it applied to me) and that’s kind of what gets me about it? The people to whom it applies are not exclusively on tumblr, and not all those on tumblr even want anything to do with the asexual community. Paring down “tumblr aces” to those people who were involved in those “accomplishments” listed erases not only the histories of other tumblr-based activists, but also the quotidian hopes and fears and dreams of a lot of aces on tumblr who deserve to be remembered as well. I dunno, I can’t say I’m objective about this sort of thing, because I have certainly had plenty of bad run-ins with people who center their own circles and neglect everybody else. But regardless of the intent (which I do think was genuine), I can’t escape the conclusion that it was poorly done, and in intra-community conflicts the how is often way more important than the what.

[intersex-ionality]

so i was probably born perisex, but have transitioned into a decidedly altersex body (vaginectomy + no nipples on flat chest + super low natural hormone levels), which i usually describe as being physically my gender + physically non-binary. this has caused some healthcare access issues, but is not really an intersex experience. i’m trying to figure out if saying “have” or “USED to have perisex privilege” makes more sense? i still do in ways for sure, like the health records stuff... thoughts?

As a general rule of thumb, privilege is so conditional that moving away from visible normalcy strips you of it. You might still have some of the internalized beliefs that privilege granted you, but I struggle to see how someone looking at you, seeing your body disagrees with their idea of the sex binary, and then making your life more difficult (whether actively or passively) could ever constitute being seen or treated as “normal” by an oppressive structure.

I can’t decide these things for you, only you can. But it sounds to me like the past tense is much more accurate here.

And, this kind of circumstance is exactly why terms like parasex (anyone who is intersex or has otherwise become alienated from perisex privilege) were created.

Life isn’t binary. Being perisex privilege isn’t binary either.

I wish I had a more eloquent response for you, but–and I cannot emphasize this enough–I’m really on the fence about the entire concept of “perisex privilege” being applied to trans people at all.

I’m not sure it works that way. Very few people actually think of trans bodies as having “normal” sex characteristics. It’s literally the reason why trans people, trans women and transfems in particular, but all trans people to a degree, have such a high risk of murder/violence from their sexual partners compared to cis people.

I’m trying to pin down my exact feelings on the matter, and explain them coherently, and that essay is drafted, but man. Man I am treading into some dangerous territory by making claims such as, “intersex and trans people were historically considered members of the same social group with unique sub-identities (fucked up over gender roles), similarly to how gay, bi and ace people are considered members of the same social group with unique sub-identities (fucked up over relationship standards). Maybe that was a good thing, actually, and we should re-acknowledge the amount of intense overlap happening here?”

Neither trans nor intersex queer theorists love that kind of thing, tbqh. But I can’t shake it, you know?

[miseriathome]

Movie theater accessibility pt 2.1

@epochryphal replied to pt 2:

i feel like my main issues are 1) captionboxes display nothing at all before the movie (not even a welcome message) so there’s zero way to check if it’s working in advance, and 2) every single time (like a dozen at this point) there are random cut-outs (often several) where one to five lines are dropped/not captioned.  i have no idea why either of these is a thing or how to complain properly

Pre-show content tends to be uncaptioned across the board, even with open captions. Unfortunately, this issue specifically is out of the hands of individual theaters because of how trailers are supplied vs how feature presentations are supplied.

Caption devices are fed the text tracks via infrared transmissions inside each auditorium. I imagine the issue of lines dropping relates to that transmission not getting through or the device not properly receiving it, so I’m not sure how fixable it is, but it’s worth bringing up so that the techy theater staff can deal with it.

With regards to testing that they work beforehand, I’ve found that sometimes the range of the transmission extends slightly beyond single theaters, such that you’ll occasionally pick up frequencies from other auditoriums you pass while walking down the hall. In that way, it may be possible to test whether the device works by hovering near the doors of other theaters that are already playing movies to see if they display anything. Really, you could straight-up walk inside another theater for a hot second, or you could ask a staff member to accompany you/bring the device into a test theater on your behalf to make sure it turns on properly.

I’m planning to have a broader “how to complain about inaccessibility” part within the series, although I need significantly more research before I get there. That being said, here are some ideas for how to handle caption device issues that come readily to mind:

Put on self-confident airs and straight-up ask for two devices from the beginning. They’re a free resource anyways and customer service basically revolves around bending over backwards for people who get read as “entitled” in the name of “customer satisfaction.”

That’s the same reason why I say you can get a staff member to test the equipment for you--either they’ll do it because their job requirements are to do what customers want them to, or they won’t do it and you can keep complaining higher and higher up the chain until you get something out of it. (Almost always it’ll stop with a manager and they’ll give you free tickets or something for the “inconvenience.” I saw somebody get multiple free tickets because they weren’t allowed to take their Chipotle into the theater and they kicked up a fuss about being asked to eat it outside/leave it in their car. The managers thought it was bullshit but they gave the free tickets anyways because it’s company policy of basically all chain retail/customer service places to do exactly that.) You have my express permission to be a major Karen if you’re in the right about something.

Alternately, get a chill friend who doesn’t use captions to come with you to the movies and also ask for a device. That way if yours stops working, you can steal theirs. It’s the same tactic as the last bullet point, except that there’s no reasonable argument to deny giving out two when there are two separate people requesting them. The friend doesn’t even have to be seeing the same movie as you, since the devices pick up whichever signal they’re in range of. Hell, ask the person behind you in line to nab you one.

And, to reiterate, definitely complain--the movie theater industry is horrendously unprofitable (by corporation standards) and they seriously will bend over backwards and kiss your feet if you make something out to be a serious problem. Make sure it’s a manager who hears what you have to say, not floor staff. Just “hey, I experienced [this] while watching, and it impaired my experience. You might want to get that checked out” is fine. If they give excuses like “oh yeah, we know, it’s just like that,” your response should immediately be “then why are you selling tickets for this theater/movie or not disclosing this information or otherwise allowing this to impact customers’ experience” (whatever iteration fits best with the excuse given)? If all else fails, you also have the options of doing the surveys on your receipts, leaving negative reviews of the establishment online, and use the contact us forum on their website. They quite actually care very much about these things, and corporate always throws shitfits about the tiniest little issues not being up to snuff.

If you’re dealing with an independent theater instead of a corporate chain, your results will vary. I want to say that indie establishments will skew more sympathetic, but honestly there’s no way to say.

The non-care that many establishments take with their supplemental technologies really is appalling. Floor staff are undertrained about how they work and why they’re important, and customers having to leave their theaters to get new devices is viewed as equally trivial as having to leave to get drink refills or use the bathroom. Charging cables also become faulty and batteries die and the devices themselves aren’t built with convenient indicators or notable features that staff can use to distinguish or keep track of them, either. There are problems across the board from the device manufacturers to the movie leasing companies to corporate theater priorities to individual theater maintenance to customer lack of education, which is why the only practical suggestions I can offer at the moment with my limited knowledge are “game the system when possible” and “complain about everything.”

This is a US-based series. If you have additions, corrections, or other information you’d like to share, please feel free to add to this knowledge base in the replies or as a reblog! Understanding accessibility options and providing education needs to be a community effort, and I would genuinely love this project to go beyond myself and my own knowledge bases.

[solipsistful]

epochryphal replied to your post: lmfao i love that i write a grumpy “atheists face...

Salutes. right how much conscious effort is necessary to properly Distance from christian culture. also hey is pillowfort any good, i live in fear of the “no suggestive drawings appearing under 18” rule and also on my phone’s apps

yeah idk. i lean towards seeing use in the term “cultural Christianity” in the sense that US culture is, y’know, super influenced by ideas in Christian theology in ways that go beyond “do you believe in Jesus y/n, do you celebrate Christmas y/n” -- but i get that’s gonna be a hella fraught thing for survivors of religious abuse, and it sucks if it gets used to say basically “you can’t/shouldn’t disidentify with this thing that hurt you”. 

i think there’s a matter of here of, like, how much you want to attribute “<feature of mainstream American culture>” to being a Cultural Thing vs. to being a certain type of religious thinking, and if it is a Cultural Thing, do you want to still call it “Christian in the sense that mainstream American culture is Christian” when that still may be covering... very non-Christian people. (and then the issue of calling it “Christian culture” when there are a looot of approaches there, usually people mean a kind of white Protestantism; “Christian” as shorthand for a lot of things, really). where are the boundaries of “religion”, is i think the question, which lmao don’t ask me -- that’s never been an object in my life. :V

of course i spend half my time reading people like Foucault, whose whole thing was “psychiatry is from the ground up super influenced by Christian ideas about sin, authority, mind/body dualism, therapy-as-confession etc.” so like... those connections to theology can run deep, theoretically, but i wouldn’t call anyone who uses psychiatric models adopting some aspect of Christianity. i get more :/ at the specific idea -- or at least how it feels from the outside -- that people who have converted to another religion are more exempt from interrogating that stuff, because they’ve adopted things that can “fill in that blank”, while ex-Christian atheists are easy enough to generalize as Christian-Lite.

anyway

i generally like pillowfort. largely, it’s interesting having some connection back to discussions on asexuality and aromanticism after, y’know, tumblr. also, privacy features?? it’s slow though, which means we don’t spend that much time on it, which means there’s even less activity. :V but hey, i think their invite system is now causing more activity again.

i know there was that whole issue, and the kinda-retroactive banning, but i wouldn’t really be the person to ask how it’s affecting things -- i at least haven’t heard of any further Issues like that. though the mobile website kinda sucks, if that’s an issue lmao

- ace

[adventures-in-asexuality]

rowan.... rowan; “i mean yes of course i have been in dangerous bell situations” - Rowan

look. look! there are a lot of dangerous bell situations you can get into! even the smallest church bells are still several hundredweight, so that’s several hundred pounds of metal you’re trying to control.

like, okay, batbetbitbotbut mentioned the issue with full vertical ringing is that you don’t want to break the stay, which is the bit of wood that prevents the bell from just going round and round and round and round and ROUND AND ROUND until it has exhausted all its kinetic energy. you go round one rotation, stop the bell just before it reaches the stay, rotate back the other way, stop the bell, etc etc etc. it works well. you don’t die. you control the bell.

but the stay is just a piece of wood up in a church tower; eventually, even if you’re a perfect ringer and never ever tap the stay when you’re ringing (that’s why you stop just before you reach the stay, so you’re not wearing the wood out faster), it will break. when that happens, the first thing you learn when you’re ringing is that you let go. you let go of the damn rope, you let it go up into the ceiling, you look ashamed and awkward while everyone else stops ringing and figures out what to do. otherwise, that rope is climbing towards the ceiling with all the stored energy of a several-hundred-pound bell and it will take it with you.

this is why, by the way, your belfry ceiling should be low. I learned at my grandmother’s church - and I should say, I was never more than a learner; I didn’t visit my grandmother often enough to get good, and I could only ring occasionally at my own church because I would’ve needed to be in the belfry ringing at the same time as I was getting robed up for the choir - but at her church, the belfry ceiling was maybe seven feet at most. it was a small room, and the holes which the rope disappeared through were sometimes unsettlingly near, but when someone broke a stay, or had any other misfortune, at worst they would have been dragged up a couple of feet and slammed into the ceiling. you should still let go, but that’s a good precaution.

now, at my church, the belfry ceiling was far distant. I think it was actually the floor of the room that the bells were housed in, and it was, god, it was so high that I cannot even estimate it. look at a church tower. divide it in half. yeah, maybe that high.

so, obviously trying to perfectly control the ropes up that height was a problem, so they’d put in a sort of metal framework; little circles where the ropes should go through, and a few struts connecting each circle.

first off, obviously, if you break a stay and don’t let go, you’re in trouble. at the very best, you’re hitting the metal frame ten, twenty feet above you. if you don’t manage to stop then... well. up the tower you go. it wasn’t safe. I didn’t like it.

the other thing about this setup was that, as I was always a learner, I was often having some amount of trouble controlling the bell. as I’ve said a lot, it’s several hundred pounds of bell, and the ringing system is set up so that you personally are not moving all several hundred pounds, because we’re not weightlifters. what this does mean is that you have to be really in tune with everything else in the mechanism, or you’ll lose control of the bell as it starts swinging to its own tune.

now, that’s possible in all places. I’ve lost control at my grandmother’s church enough! but there, well, the rope is going through a small hole in the ceiling seven feet up, and then it’s going through more rooms and more small holes and... you get the idea. even if you fuck up - and you can and will - it’s a lot easier to recover there.

my church, though - well, the metal circles, like I said, were a) quite large and b) a long way above us. and above that, there’s nothing until you hit the ceiling. losing control of a bell there was always terrifying, because suddenly this rope is leaping around like a live fish in your grip, and you’re trying desperately to hold onto it and get it back into place so that you can continue ringing and not break a fucking stay, but none of the design of that goddamn belfry worked with you in any way whatsoever. terrifying. (the floor of that belfry was also a lot bigger, so it wasn’t like someone could just quickly set their bell to rest and help you by moving over two feet; they’d have to do that and get across to where you were and deal with the furiously angry rope. terrifying. and, yeah, honestly pretty dangerous. the worst I’ve been hurt is rope burns and pulled muscles, which honestly is pretty par for the course, but - yeah. make your belfries safer! have fun ringing and not worrying that you will be pulled into the infinite darkness of the tower above you!

[antirealisation]

epochryphal replied to your post “Hello who wants more “Serpent processing his own shit talking about...”

ooo. this makes sense to me (though i dunno that johnny Has to know what purple means Explicitly rather than a vague inkling he’s obfuscating from self) (but yeah mm the fantastical symptoms and the getting worse)

I like it the more aware of it, or the possibilities, he is, lol. Like, if the whole idea of Trauma & Denial is that he’s having these weird images of being stalked by a monster cuz he can’t fully handle the image of how threatening his guardians were, sure, That’s Trauma For Ya, but if that’s not an aspect of it that he actually struggles with, if he can say “yes this is because of my awful upbringing” -- or, with the “purple rain” thing, try to make those connections as much as possible, even in a contrived way -- and yet it doesn’t transform the “fantastical” symptoms into more obviously posttraumatic, the way it should...

If that makes sense? I dunno if that makes sense. Having a frustratingly hard time collecting and articulating thoughts lately, just in general. :/

What I’m saying is, the times I say, “Look I’m triggered by references to domestic violence cuz the body’s parents had an unhealthy relationship” can feel so contrived, trying to use it to explain situations where it’s a bit more of a stretch (“... alcoholism is meant to be Chaotic, right?”, purple rain) not actually believing it myself, still resulting in a lot of impossible images no matter how much I try to believe it or how much “sense” it might make if contextualised to the body’s history.

[paradife-loft]

(sends two bc they’re good) the “who could ever love a monster like you?” one

(lmao it’s only been weeks since I’ve had these prompts inmy inbox)

(but now I’m kinda glad it’s taken me forever because nowI’ve been inspired to write JASPER ANGST :D)

(inspired by/spoilers for A Single Pale Rose, so.)

She floated, bodiless again after a brief moment of freedom,in a soft pink haze.

The place, if you could call it that, was the same prisonshe’d been enveloped by once already until – barely moments ago, moments packedtogether in a flurry of action until they seemed too full for their true span.The only difference now (everything was different) was the renewedclarity of her mind. Sharp, lucid, lucent, all the facets connecting now asthey should, perfect as the day she’d emerged, no longer cracked and warpedlike her sister –

– no. She had never been perfect, no matter what they allmight have thought; this entire planet and anything that came from it wasstained by some vein of imperfection. Not simply the ignominy of politics andfailed conquest, she knew now, but something worse; a flaw in the entireAuthority, spreading from its weakest link through all she touched.

Corruption was a power of the Diamonds, after all.

Jasper was not conscious of time passing, here contained injust her gem, but her rage didn’t need time for her to be aware of it. A fury,hatred, disgust, suffusing every bond that made her, trying to claw its way outof her confining bubble to explode in a shower of violence. She wanted to scream.

And she had no form here, but a wild, shattering soundripped forth from her throat nonetheless. She curled down into herself, wishingshe could stop it, wishing that – that human mockery – had neverreturned her mind.

A weight, a presence seemed to settle down on her shouldersas she thought of it, and Jasper raised her head to look – a figure hadshimmered into the light. To think of her was to summon her, here.

Truth grabbed hold of her reflexes, and Jasper did what shewould never have in life.

The salute she crossed her arms into, the submission,prostrating herself, filled a hole and completed her in a way she couldn’t evenremember. So different from the substitute she’d served almost all her life(which was satisfactory, but never enough) – this was the one she’d beenmade for. The one she’d barely known. Something like love welled inJasper’s chest, and if only she didn’t look up, it wouldn’t be ruined–

She didn’t have the strength in her.

And though she could feel the strength, the mantle of herDiamond all around her – all she could see was the form of Rose Quartz.

“Do you understand now why you were wrong?” Rose asked. Shespoke with the same voice, the same, look, that she reserved for all the gemsshe had recruited to her cause. All her weak gems.

They had always been enemies, and Rose had never looked ather like that.

(They had never been enemies, and her Diamond hadnever looked at her at all.)

“All I ever did was to serve you,” Jasper said, almostfrantic, unable to stop the cracks in her voice any more than she could stopthe tears blurring her eyes. And she knew it was a lie. “My Diamond…”

How could you??she wanted to scream, how could you use us like this, all of us made foryou, who would have done anything for you – how could you demand the one thingwe couldn’t do –

Because she was every bit a failure as the Crystal Gems. Sherejected the authority of her Diamond. (Her Diamond was corrupt, and so suchwas everything that came from her – and only a corrupt gem could say as much,couldn’t she!)

Rose Quartz simply looked down at her, still with that lookof pity, and shook her head. “I’m not your Diamond any more, Jasper. And maybeI never was. My sisters made you to fight for Pink, but at that point, maybePink was as much a lie as Rose was.”

She knelt, until her gaze was level with Jasper’s; shereached out with both hands to cradle her face. Jasper flinched back,shuddering with a sickness at the perverseness of such false equality. Jasperought to wrench herself away, knock her head back and shove her away. She oughtto do none of those things; she could never harm a Diamond. She couldn’t move.

“But don’t you see?” the form of Rose continued. “That’s thepoint. We don’t have to be what anyone else made us. And I will love usall, just the same. For being what we want to be.”

The fire of Jasper’s rage reignited as she heard thosewords, and instinct allowed her to do what her conscious mind couldn’t condone.Rose cried out as Jasper smashed into her head, flailing to catch her balance asshe stood, putting backwards distance between the pair of them.

“What I want to be is your Jasper! My Diamond’sperfect Quartz soldier! And that’s the one thing you – couldn’t – let– me – be!”

Her chest heaved with the force of her screams, the gasping breathsshe tried to hold in; and the image of Rose Quartz, knocked back to the floor,flickered and glowed as it re-formed, standing, wearing a haughty, imperiousglare, as Pink Diamond.

Pink Diamond looked down at Jasper like she were worthlessand disgusting as the lowest organic creature, filth and structureless dirt.“Of course not,” she sneered, and oh, this was worse, worse than pity, thefarthest estimation possible from the respect she’d been granted by thefalseness that was Rose Quartz. Jasper could feel herself growing smaller,growing misshapen, by the moment. Under such awful pressure.

“How could I ever want your service? A gem too broken toeven realise her nature, to think she could stand amongst the legions ofHomeworld like an equal? To be better than them? You’re a monster. Andnobody could ever want a monster like that. No Diamond could ever lovethat.”

The tiny, shrunken remains of Jasper’s form quivered, andcracked - and the vision broke apart. Jasper winked out of existence. HerDiamond shattered, and even the splinters faded.

The hazy, pink world was formless once again.

Just a gem, and a bubble, and the faintest echo of a sob.

[raindrop-cake]

epochryphal replied to your post: younginhumans: hey guys here are some actually...

really impressive how op never uses the word bi in the post or tags while listing bi/queer/pan/etc artists but specifying wlw and lesbian and also implying the creator of ‘girls’ is straight (she’s bi and has been harassed over this backlash). and by impressive i mean transparently biphobic

i’m sorry i didn’t know that at all about ‘girls’, i haven’t actually heard it. also i didn’t realise that about just using wlw instead of mentioning bi or pan but that makes a lot of sense and i will try to keep an eye out for it in future. thank you for telling me.

[asukaskerian]

hmm, dirk confides about planning to summon kurloz with someone in MOTDP, maybe jane?

if he’s telling anyone, he wants to be stopped.

jane stops him. she tells him clearly she will not condone this and it’s irresponsible and unforgiveable. if he wants to rescue kurloz he will find 1. an official safe area to do it in and 2. have oversight. why don’t you go to the university and ask the researchers supervising your doctorate if they want to see that shit. gasp you won’t have TOTAL CONTROL over it??? dirk. dirk. stop being so dirk for like one minute i love you but stop.

i mean later the felt totally break in the university and steal baby kurloz anyway, but dirk is still working as a cop at the time and so he can go out and counter kurloz’ powers with fancy new protective sigils and whatever because damn straight he figured out Some Shit while he had kurloz junior at hand, too. i mean he really likes the guy but he’s under no illusions that he’s not terrifying and amoral, either.

i dunno if it changes the endgame very much, but at least it saves a lot of dirk’s friendships and siblings bonds from taking pretty sucky damage.

[fatalism-and-villainy]

epochryphal replied to your post “necro-divergent replied to your post “A lot of top/bottom…”

right! the idea that is Enlightened to be in all ways Equal in give/take and in *desire itself* is this like. anti-d/s thing in the way rolequeer is swerfy in a queer hat, and is also like the whole Everyone Is Bi Actually It’s Just Degrees, and like. as if fiction is the place to Actualize some obvious ideal of egalitarianism and universal sameness and goodness where everyone shares the same (Correct) preferences because without societal oppressions no one would have any others

That’s such a good point about equality in “desire itself” not always being necessary, and how that overlaps with ace/aro discourses (and probably stuff relating to empathy as well) - certain acts and dynamics mean different things to the different people involved, and that’s okay actually? or at least, it can be. 

(I feel like I still have.... very little grasp on what “rolequeer” actually IS - my sense is that it’s “switching is the only enlightened and proper way to engage in kink, but other than that... no idea.)

There are a lot of situations/premises within which it could be done, but I tend to find “everyone is bi” extremely boring. Because it doesn’t really allow for difference, for that unique epistemic position and sense of having distinct experiences from others, that are part of what makes queerness in general interesting to me to explore in fiction. And the fun of making up sexual orientations, for me at least, is imagining how those internal feelings align with/are influenced by the characters’ social/gendered position, the narratives about sexuality and relationships they’ve learned, etc. What certain interpersonal dynamics and sexual acts MEAN to them. 

And given that I’m technically bi, but have very different feelings towards different genders, when I do have bi characters, I like to have at least some of them have very mixed or ambivalent feelings towards that part of themselves, or who don’t process their attraction to different genders in an equivalent way. As far as I can tell, “everyone is bi” doesn’t really allow for difference in how the different bi characters approach their own sexuality. As far as I can tell, it’s more for ease in shipping than anything else? Which is fine, but it’s certainly not my preferred approach. (And if people do try to push it as “better” or more “progressive” or whatnot, then that’s very gross.)

[thislousytshirt]

@epochryphal oh my god congrats on beating minecraft!!! i havent done it yet haha. also yeah minecraft is secretly a creepypasta, lov it

i will die irl if you send me screenshots, PLEASE

[intersex-ionality]

hmm do you know if there’s any good differentiation between “atheist as in no supernatural exists and all can be explained scientifically” (your definition) and “atheism as in no conscious supernatural entities aka gods exist, but maybe supernatural forces do” (me!)? i tend to use “atheist witch” to help convey that but yeah, i feel kinda alienated from both atheism and witchiness individually because they tend to be Science vs Gods

Yeah, there’s actually between 5 and 12 “types” of atheism, including atheistic mysticism, which is where the belief in supernatural entities or forces that do not function as deities would come in. It may or may not be functionally distinct from spiritual atheism, which is the belief that all systems in the universe are interconnected in such a complex way as to be incomprehensible and thus functionally indistinguishable from other systems of interconnected spirituality.

In both cases, this leaves room for an atheist witch such as yourself to engage with the indescribable complexity of reality in any number of fashions that can, collectively, be referred to as magic or energy work or what have you. For example, we know the placebo effect works even if you tell someone that the medicine they’re being given is a placebo, and while that can be chalked up to the power of the human mind to override the human body, that override still requires the placebo to occur. So, how is that functionally distinct from believing that the placebo itself is the cause of the change, rather than believing the human mind’s interaction with the placebo is the cause of the change? In both cases, the placebo is necessary, after all.

There are all kinds of philosophical distinctions to be made, yes, but at the practical level there’s not that much to be done to distinguish, “I’m giving you this placebo because the magic of it will help your brain overcome your body’s limitations and speed up healing or control symptoms,” and, “I’m giving you this placebo because the material of it will help your brain overcome your body’s limitations and speed up healing or control symptoms.”

It’s not entirely a semantic difference, as anyone who has ever been caught in a conversation between a scientific atheist and a spiritual atheist can readily attest there are many minute differences, but it edges terribly close, given that the practical in both cases is the same.

[solipsistful]

epochryphal replied to your photoset ““i’m tired of just drawing headmates read: Serpent all the time oh i...”

“hey! thomas is NOT normal!” - a sentence i could envision anyone in the system saying

it continues to kill me that there was a period of time where our system was 40% Thomases

two very different people, too. Thomas Darcelle’s whole thing is basically “Lawful Neutral-wannabe-Good surrounded by bad influences, who handles the resultant scrupulosity uhh poorly.”

meanwhile Thomas Allein is an even-more-intellectualizing Tyler Durden

- Ace

[adventures-in-asexuality]

epochryphal replied to your post “what resembles the grave but isn’t: dropped kerbs on only one side of...”

oh my god. okay firstly that is apparently a britishism so i initially was like... kerns... of corn...? for crows...? only eaten on one side of like a road divider...? ominous... but weird... then i was like “okay kerbs is making me think kerberos and THAT’S wrong” and looked it up, and then “that’s such an adorable, like, evocative spelling, soundways. aw. anyway like the grave - hm, because disappointin—OH BECAUSE DROP YES I SEE AA” and anyway i thought this was a fun jaunt

this is a fun jaunt! though I would add that: like the grave but not because I was so incredibly startled and jostled out of my pre-9am bleary state into ‘oh god can I actually get up this kerb?!’

alternatively, it resembles the grave of accessible design.