#except. shes in charge of hiring/staffing/scheduling

[wellthatschaotic]

are nts allergic to giving full clear instructions or something

[apartmentcleaninggxiy189-blog]

The 10-Second Trick For Office Cleaning

iframe width="560" height="315" alt="All about Domestic Cleaning" type="text/html" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tylMfUFB4jc" frameborder="0">

Participant Marian Smith of King, North Carolina, claims she's employed a number of cleaning business throughout the years, but constantly reviews testimonials on Angie's Checklist initially. "I inspect to see if any issues have been lodged, and I constantly ask if the firm is adhered and also insured," she states. Those questions, professionals agree, offer a good beginning.

In addition to recommendations, Ray Smith, owner of Environment-friendly Brilliant Cleaning Solutions in Clermont, Florida, recommends figuring out if the business carries out background checks on staff members, which is a concern our professionals say most property owners neglect. As well as be sure to ask if it will coincide staff cleansing your home every time.

I started a cleaning company business right here in my home community of Toronto back in 2006, it's called Tidy My Room that would certainly have thought!? Over the years, I've learned a great deal about this industry and I intended to answer an inquiry that I obtain asked a whole lot: Just how do I know which cleansing firm to work with? Whether you wish to work with a cleaning company to assist you with a one-off task, a yearly spring tidy, or something on an extra regular basis, there are a couple of things you require to inquire about prior to you choose.

7 Easy Facts About Office Cleaning Explained

" Yet, it's cheaper to hire an under-the-table cleansing lady for cash money!" is something I usually hear. Amusing sufficient, I always encourage individuals to work with that maid if rate is their major issue, and if things go well, keep her close. Yet, when points don't go well, that's when you generate a service firm.

So, right here are 10 things you should consider when you're aiming to hire a cleaning company firm. Start by asking family and friends that they use recommendations offer you a within check out what a business is all concerning not simply what they say on their site (let's be sincere, a business can write anything).

Happy people do not tend to create as several evaluations as miserable people who really feel forced to shower the globe with their terrible experiences. Bear in mind, usually, those evaluations are people utilizing it as a chance to vent, blow a tale disproportionate, or try to damage the credibility of the firm.

Cleaner Can Be Fun For Anyone

No one is excellent. The other point to keep an eye out for is a company with an ideal rating. I know firms who pay customers to compose reviews for them, so certainly, they're going to be 100% ideal. Regardless, an excellent general rule is to stay clear of a business with all best ratings, prevent the firm with all horrible scores, as well as discover the ones with really consistent high ratings.

A firm should be willing to tell you if they have this protection and also offer duplicates of their policies at your request. Currently, be aware https://cleaning-click.co.il that this includes to the price of operating a solution firm, which is why the rates are higher per hour or per job. Nonetheless, this degree of assurance is valuable, especially when you're letting somebody into your home, and also can eventually be on the hook for something that fails remember, we reside in a litigious globe! For how long have they stayed in business for? Does the company have any kind of honors, certifications, or associations with expert companies? I such as to watch out for this because it makes me feel comforted that a business is credible and worried with their reputation.

These are things we have actually striven to obtain and also tout happily as a company. It shows our staff, customers, as well as possible clients, that we have done whatever we can to provide exceptional service. To give this a little bit extra context, there are a couple of companies below in Toronto that have a poor credibility as well as just fold and re-open under an additional name.

The Ultimate Guide To House Cleaning

Does the company take demands or offer a set solution? Just how detailed will they get? Relying on what you wish to be done, inquire regarding what level of solution is offered. If you can customize it as well as work with someone to come as well as tick a bunch of points off your to-do list, or if you just get the very same service each see regardless of what you wish to be done, or, if you can do a combination.

Make certain to ask about damage, damages, and also satisfaction guarantees a company needs to back up its work and its employees. If you're not delighted as a client, what are they prepared to do for you, just how will they make it right? It's just a truth of life points will damage.

This sounds insane, as well as I recognize many companies don't do this. They tell the customer to claim it under their very own house owner's insurance policy, or chalk it up to an inevitable error. If you're not happy with the cleansing, what will the business provide you? A touch-up? A free cleaning? Absolutely nothing? Companies have different plans about this so figure out what choice you have if you're not happy with the degree of solution you have actually received.

The smart Trick of Professional House Cleaning That Nobody is Discussing

Generally, agreement workers don't appreciate the very same advantages as employees do, neither do they have the exact same kind of oversight. While they're normally less costly to employ, they are most of the times inconsistently trained and are not as trustworthy because the reality is they're "changeable" to a large extent by that I mean that there is little to no investment in their real work product by the firm outsourcing the job, so they can swiftly relocate on to one more contractor while having actually lost little to no investment (training, taxes, advantages, etc.).

Staff members likewise pay tax obligations and also have tax obligations paid on their part by the company, which supports the province or state and also nation you live in. These 2 classifications as well as the legislations bordering them will certainly vary from nation to country. In Canada, I recognize the regulations inside and also out, and our personnel are workers because it is much better for them (regretfully, more expensive and much less lucrative for us!), as well as far better for the nation.

Do they utilize their very own cleaning supplies and also tools, or do you have to supply your very own? We require our clients to supply their very own and, certainly, assist them establish specifically what they require. We offer kits or offer them with a shopping checklist based on their details demands.

The Best Strategy To Use For Cleaner

Further, each residence has various needs; pets, individuals, finishes, and whatnot. I'm a huge proponent of utilizing the ideal products and also devices on each surface area, as well as I believe it is far better to offer your very own to reduce as well as decrease cross-contamination as well as potential harm to surface areas. Learn what the policy for terminating or altering your service is.

Many firms charge a cancellation fee since it can be tough to reschedule cleaners in the nick of time, and the business needs to cover off their shed wages. So, if you recognize this information, you can better plan and plan for any scheduling concerns.

Unknown Facts About Office Cleaning

Keeping a house clean can be a perpetual job that consumes much of our leisure time. If life appears to focus on wiping, vacuuming, cleaning as well as altering bedding, employing a professional housekeeping solution in your area may be the solution. This guide covers whatever to get out of a housekeeping or house cleaning solution consisting of package alternatives, what questions to ask and also what they charge.

Fascination About Professional House Cleaning

Depending upon your place or the firm you make use of, these solutions are referred to by numerous names: house cleaner, cleaning solution or housemaid. "House maid" historically described a salaried, live-in staff member of well-off houses who ran the household a lot like a butler. Today, it's just an additional name for a housekeeper. Picking the best solution is a straightforward process of research study and asking the appropriate inquiries.

Find out what services cover. Establish your budget plan and also what you actually need done. Interview solutions and also ask the ideal concerns. Understand what to anticipate when the service begins. Before you select a housekeeper, ask yourself if you truly need it. If what you're trying to prevent is a chaotic mess, you may wish to choose an individual coordinator.

Housemaid service are different and specialized. The majority of service business begin with a base plan after that relocate into specialized continuous or one-time solutions for your details needs. Special home cleaning company are often available for larger tasks such as garages, post-moving or post-construction. Housemaid solutions, staffed by skilled expert cleaner, are available in a wide array of choices including: Regularly set up regular check outs.

Home Cleaning Things To Know Before You Buy

One-time aid on unique occasions. Demanding jobs such as garage or cellar cleansing. Occasions before and also after. Some business likewise offer gift certifications. Residence cleaning up requirements differ significantly based on your house size, place as well as what you truly want and also require. With many large business, you can expect a basic plan with optional services.

Single visits often tend to set you back twice as much as an on a regular basis arranged recurring see. Yet how much is your leisure time worth to you? The average American invests regarding doing chores. House maid services expense a standard of. For independent maids, expect to invest in between considering that they charge between.

You might be priced quote much more per hour for an expert business, yet they usually operate in groups to do the job promptly. Weekly, Bi-Weekly or Regular monthly. Complete Cooking Area Cleansing Complete Shower Room Servicing Vacuuming Dusting Altering Linens Cuisine Addons to the typical package if you require something specific. Laundry Moving furnishings Polishing woodwork Ceilings & light fixtures Window Drape Furniture Flooring waxing Carpet cleansing Consists of anything from common and optional services in seldom used locations or before special occasions.

Fascination About House Cleaning Services

You can also employ a local house maid recommendation network for a mix of both. Independent housekeeper deal with references and referrals offering a reliable service on a budget. You ought to still have these professionals finish http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/?action=click&contentCollection&region=TopBar&WT.nav=searchWidget&module=SearchSubmit&pgtype=Homepage#/cleaning company a background check before working with. Bigger organizations evaluate their employees ahead of time. Exact same person whenever Personalized service Prices much less without above Uniformity gradually Guaranteed as well as adhered Background checks completed No employment documentation or tax obligations Dependable Not normally guaranteed Employment kinds to submit No history check Expensive Big crews many employees in your house per hr for someone per hr generally for a group of 2 Similar to any kind of solution that will certainly enter your residence, you'll intend to adhere to a couple of standards.

Prior to working with a service, meeting firms or individuals. Inspect out the questions listed below that you can ask in the meeting Make certain to collect referrals as well as call them. After all, they will have a great deal of accessibility to your home, and you ought to be comfy with them. If they give previous client call details, ask those referrals how satisfied they were with the service specialist's: Punctuality or routine availability, Cleansing abilities and tools, Mindset or job ethic, and Professionalism and trust or trustworthiness.

In some instances, a solution will certainly ask for to use the home owner's materials. If somebody in your house has allergies, consult your cleansing service to discuss particular products that may be advantageous. Prior to any work begins, figure out the exact scope of the services you require. You may likewise intend to discuss added duties over a normal cleansing routine, like laundry.

The Definitive Guide to Cleaning Services Prices

Think about co-creating a checklist of assumptions and responsibilities of the solution. Be extremely details as well as do not expect the professional to know exactly how you desire something done. Spend a couple of minutes reviewing locations you want cleaned up frequently. If it is very important that specific locations obtain special interest each see, direct them out.

See to it you discover a service that is open to personalized demands. Prior to each browse through, be sure to leave a list of trouble locations. The kind of home you own may affect service sees. Accessible car parking locations and coded entrances may produce access barriers that enhance travel time as well as therefore costs.

[bluewatsons]

V. B. Dubai, The Time Politics of Home-Based Digital Piecework, 50 C4eJ (2020)

The woman did not go on; she stayed right there, hour after hour, day after day, year after year . . . racing with death. It was piecework, and she was apt to have a family to keep alive; and stern and ruthless economic laws had arranged it that she could only do this by working just as she did, with all her soul upon her work, and with never an instant for a glance at the well-dressed ladies and gentlemen who came to stare at her, as at some wild beast in a menagerie.” – Upton Sinclair, The Jungle

Introduction

In a 1924 Issue of True Romances magazine, the Auto Knitter Hosiery Co. of Buffalo, New York ran an advertisement targeted at women in need of additional income (Boris 1994, 155). The ad, entitled “How They Make Money in Their Own Homes,” centered the testimony of “Mrs. Unger,” who explained that her husband’s wages were not enough to support their small family. But Mrs. Unger, who cared for their infant child, did not want to “go” to work (Ibid). Having heard through a friend about an opportunity to earn from the sanctity of her home, she sent off for yarn and instructions. Before long Mrs. Unger said she was knitting for Auto Knitter Hosiery “in real earnest . . . putting in every minute [she] could spare from [her] housework.” Other manufacturers of the era similarly hawked homework as a pathway to “profit” and “dignified labor” for women who needed to earn “extra money . . . in their spare time” (Ibid).

But the reality of this homework belied the commercial narratives on profit and dignity. What was being advertised benignly in women’s magazines—industrial homework—was a hotly contested labor practice of garment manufacturers in the early 20th century. Homeworkers—most commonly immigrant women laboring in crowded tenements—were paid by the piece, not the hour, and earned roughly one-half of what women factory workers made (Boris 1985, 746; Daniels 1989, 15). They interspersed long, poorly paid hours of needling or knitting with other obligations of family and community life. Through the sustained advocacy of labor and social reformers, homework paid in piece was largely abolished in the U.S. garment industry soon after the New Deal (Boris 1985, 761). It was, by the 1980s, re-sanctioned, but through a highly regulated certification and hourly wage-based system (Boris 1994, 341; Stone 2006, 19).[1]

Homework as a labor practice and source of precarious, underpaid piecework has made a rapid resurgence in the twenty-first century digital economy, and yet, in contrast to the previous century, it has received little to no attention from labor reformers or regulators. [2] In reviving and intensifying it, technology capitalists have leveraged carveouts in existing work laws to grow an informal economy of dispersed data laborers paid to work by the piece.[3] Jeff Bezos, for example, launched Amazon Mechanical Turk in 2005, famously unveiling his plan to provision “humans as a service” through this crowdsourcing labor platform. AMT, like analogous tech labor companies, has a website—mturk.com—in which requesters with data-related microtasks dispatch these tasks to an atomized and dispersed virtual workforce who compete for and complete the tasks or “turk.” Individual workers are paid, not for their time, but by the piece, which, on AMT is called a Human Intelligence Task or HIT (Irani et al 2013, 1). Unlike homeworkers of the previous century, today’s digital homeworkers both have to spend time competing for tasks and to risk completing tasks that the go unpaid. These workers or, on AMT, “turkers” are treated as independent contractors, and neither data processing requestors nor the labor platform companies assume the legal responsibilities of the employer. Thus, digital homeworkers—more than half of whom are based in the U.S.—do not have access to the minimum wage, overtime, or any safety net protections (Difallah et al 2018).[4] Critically, they also do not have the ability to negotiate pay or the protected right to organize for better working conditions.[5] Since the amount of payment for each task is typically a few cents (sometimes less than one cent), data homeworkers are compelled to work swiftly and quickly through a set of tasks for extraordinarily low and unpredictable wages.

The labor of these precarious data processing workers is critical to the infrastructural monopolies that produce artificial intelligence (AI). Yet, much of the debate around the “future of work” and automation in the United States focuses on the supposedly inevitable displacement of workers by technological shifts. With few notable exceptions, the role of these precarious data homeworkers in the creation of automation and the poor conditions under which they labor has gone under appreciated.[6] Power, in imaginaries of the looming future displacement of workers, is seen to be concentrated entirely in the hands of entrepreneurs and engineers whose algorithms and machines aspire to mimic tasks or services traditionally completed by humans.[7] But central to the infrastructure of AI is the labor of dispersed and atomized workers in global supply chains who create, gather, pick, clean, label, and/or otherwise process the data that informs and shapes AI systems. Through a combination of homework and piece pay, these data workers’ labor is essential to the pace and growth of AI. They—and other overlooked workers—are (and will continue) to be critical to automation production for decades to come. Meanwhile, homework as a labor practice renders nearly invisible data-processing workers and their working conditions.[8]

The development of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology is an instructional example of this invisibility and the lack of regulation over this labor. For technology industrialists, the development of AV technology is an attempt to create fleets of private vehicles for the transport of goods and bodies that generate profit without the overhead of labor costs—that is, without human workers. Despite early, manic projections that self-driving cars would replace ride-hail and truck drivers by 2019, engineers now prognosticate that fully autonomous vehicles will be unavailable for half a century, if then.[9] Meanwhile, any AV advancements rely upon a long and complicated supply chain of dispersed data workers, many of whom complete individual tasks but have no idea what they are working on (Fussell 2019). These include the Uber drivers who produce and collect data about their labor, cities, speed, and traffic patterns; the temporary and contracted workers who drive lidar sensor-equipped vehicles to acquire data images of driving environments;[10] the workers in the U.S. and globally who label, organize, and manage that data to feed AV AI systems; and the millions of temporary workers from staffing agencies who are hired by technology firms to labor as low-level engineers. At almost every stage of the long and complicated data supply chains that produce basic AI infrastructures, home-based digital pieceworkers labor outside the boundaries of employment protections, conducting time-intensive tasks that are—and will continue to be—integral to the success of the automation technology itself. Though critical, these workers remain unseen, including to those charged with the enforcement of work laws.

With this invisibility in mind, this essay averts the gaze from anxieties about the “future of work” and automation to the past and present of these data workers whose labor, which cannot be automated, makes automation and AI possible. From the perspective of technology capitalists, the practice of paying people by piece who work in their homes and ostensibly on their own schedules is an innovation: a new kind of labor arrangement to lower overhead and introduce speed and flexibility to production. As AMT advertises to requestors (including technology companies and researchers), it’s a “good way to break down a manual, time-consuming project into smaller, more manageable tasks to be completed by distributed workers over the Internet” (Amazon Mechanical Turk 2020). Technology capitalists in the U.S. who utilize homeworkers through hiring entities like AMT are unburdened with the risks and expenses associated with being an employer. Requesters can “hire” workers with the click of a button and terminate them just as quickly. Unlike with employee layoffs, these terminations are neither reported to state authorities[11] nor do they trigger legal liabilities. Absent a supervisor, the way in which workers are paid—by the piece and without a wage floor—ties remuneration directly to production speed. But the payment per task is so low that a 2018 study found that the average hourly wage of an AMT data homeworker was an astounding $2 per hour[12] (Hara et al 2018).

In contrast to an earlier era of homework and despite staggeringly low pay, this digital homework has garnered little to no attention from regulators. The growing informal data economy has been largely understood, even by critics, as a new kind of work, rather than as a revived (and reviled) labor process deserving of reform.[13] In Part I, I situate contemporary digital homework historically by returning to the reform efforts and debates surrounding U.S. homework in the early 20th century. Drawing on the scholarship of feminist historians Eileen Boris and Cynthia Daniels, I show how these earlier efforts focused not just on the precarities of the work itself, but on the need to protect the time and space of “private family” from “public work” and the “ravages of industrial capitalism” (Daniels 1989, 21). In affirming that homework threatened the gendered division of labor and “sacred motherhood,” homework reformers reified the Fordist family and the cultural ideal of the male breadwinner. This not only reinforced the economic dependence of women on the Fordist family wage, but also obscured the ways in which women’s unpaid labor in the home sustained industry. But in the contemporary post-Fordist economy, temporal and spatial boundaries between gendered work in the family are less demarcated (Cooper 2017, 8), families are economically diversified (O’Brien 2019, 363), and the home is an acceptable site for production. Digital homework no longer represents a threat to the prevailing economic order; instead, it buttresses it. Homework through AMT, for example, is (mis)understood as an opportunity to enhance the economic autonomy of the private family. For single parents, the disabled, and others who cannot labor as part of the full time, scheduled workforce—and for those whose regular income is by itself insufficient—this data homework purports to provide flexibility and unlimited earning potential.

How do these claims manifest in the lives of workers, and what should the experiences of data pieceworkers mean for the future of work and work regulation? In Part II, I use the narratives of digital homeworkers to explore their relationship to time in work and non-work life. Although piecework payment ostensibly liberates homeworkers from the rigid discipline of the industrial clock such that the data workers are working “on their ‘own’ time,” I find that workers continue to think about data piecework through the structure of the hourly wage. They bemoan that much of their work time—spent competing for and revising tasks—is unaccounted for and unremunerated. Through the structure of digital piece payment, a politics emerges in which time, visible and accounted for in wage work, becomes an invisible node of power (Sharma 2014, 8). Far from offering true flexibility, this power circumscribes the temporal autonomy of digital homeworkers and reinforces the ideological commitment and economic need to work all the time, even filling “spare” time with industrial productivity.[14] In this sense, digital home-based piecework, however poorly paid, reinforces the mythical possibility of self-reliance and stands in conceptual opposition to the welfare state (Cooper 2017, 73). I conclude by considering the implications of hourly wage regulation of this work as a countervailing force to the precarious lives of these digital pieceworkers, to prevailing neoliberal norms around work and time, and to the frenetic pace of AI and automation production more broadly.

1. Time & Piece Pay: From Garment Homework to Digital Homework

The struggle over time has been central to capitalist development across the various phases of the industrialism and fundamental to new shifting time-sense related to labor discipline. Historian E.P. Thompson famously contrasted the “irregular labor rhythms” of pre-capitalist life to the time-thrift of industrialism, marking a profound change in how workers thought about and experienced time. Factory life, Thompson argued, brought with it the now familiar landscape of time discipline via timesheets, timekeepers, informers, and the machine (Thompson 1967, 82). Working in tandem with the growing moralization of “the work ethic,” industrial time discipline[15] shaped how many workers thought about the relationship between time and productivity more broadly, marking as immoral the “unpurposive passing” of the clock (Thompson 1967, 96). Nonetheless, despite the ways in which worker subjectivities were influenced by and constituted through industrial time discipline, long working hours were also met with individual and organized resistance. Over many decades, workers, trade unions, and social reformers engaged in protracted labor struggles to reverse the discipline of the factory clock, winning higher wages that corresponded to shorter workdays and weeks for industrial workers (Schorr 1992, 7; Thompson 1967, 85).

While the time discipline endemic to waged work remains ever relevant in the post-industrial digital world, the growing reality of many workers in today’s technology-enabled work economy is less analogous to factory workers and more similar to piece-paid homeworkers of the previous century.[16] The lives of these U.S. homeworkers in the late 19th and early 20th century existed both inside and outside the temporal domain of the factory. On the one hand, women who performed this homework labored to the rhythm of their families, including a breadwinning husband, his life structured to conform to the factory clock. On the other, their paid work was not directly timed by factory clocks or subject to the immediate time discipline of bosses or machines. Like the work of independent craftworkers, theirs was task-oriented and paid in piece. But their relationship of subordination to industrial capitalists fundamentally changed their relationship to work time. In E.P. Thompson’s terms, this introduction of hierarchy to piecework altered time such that it became “currency: . . . not passed but spent” (Thompson 1967, 61). Homework paid in piece, largely seen as exploitative of both women and children, was vigorously fought by social reformers of the era who demanded and eventually won state intervention (Daniels 1989, 25-29). But unlike labor reforms in other parts of the industrial economy, the successful reform efforts were not rooted in the ideal of leisure, in lower hours, or in higher pay for homeworkers. Rather, in fighting to abolish homework in the early 20th century, reformers were motivated by a socially conservative moral conception of the breadwinning father, idealized motherhood, and the family wage (Boris 1994; Daniels 1989).

In this highly gendered and racialized [17] homework economy, women earned almost one-half of what women working in the factory made for a full week’s work, and factory women, of course, made far less than factory men.[18] While (mostly men) factory workers operated machines, immigrant homeworkers did the garment finishing at home. According to one Senate investigation, “Italian homeworkers and their children finished 98 percent of all garments” (Daniels 1989, 15). During the seven months of the year when work could be found, homeworkers worked between 8 and 10 hours a day sewing garments. This work took place in between and after care work, including preparing meals, caring for children, and cleaning the home. Industrialists recognized these women as a surplus labor pool that they could readily exploit, both because the workers were mostly immigrant women and because the depressed wages of breadwinners in immigrant families made additional income, however insignificant, a necessity. As one journalist wrote in 1912, homework “‘exists because the manufacturer finds it economical to spread his finishing processes through thousands of kitchens . . . .They get their work done for practically nothing’” (Daniels 1989, 19). Ironically, manufacturers argued against providing higher wages to the women homeworkers by relying on the same ideal of a male breadwinner that reformers leveraged to abolish the practice. The women, in the manufacturers’ making, were just working for “pin money” and did not “need to earn a living wage” (Daniels 1989, 17).

Feminist historians have highlighted the role that gendered space played in this conceptualization (Boris 1994, 2; Daniels 1989, 13) but, I argue, have underemphasized the gendered time politics of both the work and subsequent debates about its regulation. A woman’s time was highly regulated by the tempo of her family and its demands. She was expected to fit in homework wherever possible, but because it was “in between” and not during designated hours, manufacturers claimed that it was impossible to offer her an hourly wage. Indeed, industry representatives capitalized on this reality, reframing homework as “pleasure” that could be conducted to make productive the time allocated for relaxation and sociality (Boris 1994, 155). They described it as part of the “leisurely routine of small town life” where a woman might make supplemental income while talking with friends (Ibid).[19] But labor advocates during the Great Depression who sought to abolish the practice painted a different picture. They argued that industrial homework curtailed the fulltime factory employment of breadwinning men, lowered wages of all factory workers, and undercut wage and health standards. Unions claimed it was difficult to organize these isolated women workers, and that the ability of manufacturers to claim their time and labor undermined striking factory workers. These social reformers also argued that homework “commercialized” the home, disrupting the time a woman could devote to caring for family. As the Labor Department’s Women’s Bureau put it, homework upset the “normal demands of home and children upon the housewife and mother” (my emphasis) (Boris 1985, 745).[20]

In understanding women’s temporal lives through this binary (work or home), advocates drew on ideals of “sacred motherhood” to challenge the social costs of homework which, they argued, forced a woman “to exploit her own children and to neglect her home” to earn a pittance (Boris 1985, 756). This conceptualization obscured the economic importance of women’s unpaid labor and undercut the possibility of “unproductive” leisure. The idea that abolishing homework would protect home life from the evils of industrialization—including labor exploitation and child labor—ignored the existing realities of unpaid work and the “irregular labor rhythms” of the home for many women. Indeed, it privileged and reinforced traditional models of paid and unpaid work distribution in the home, ignoring how that model “depended upon having one person who was fully dedicated to [the home’s] maintenance” (Weeks 2011, 157-8). The family, then, was seen as an alternative to work rather than as a site of gendered unpaid work, equally deserving of reform, revision, and reimagining. By the late 1930s, these arguments against industrial homework were ultimately successful in abolishing the practice by law,[21] but in the process, they reified the nuclear family, traditional gender roles, and the invisibility of women’s care work as labor.

In comparison to homework of the previous century and to other realms of the digitally mediated in-person piecework economy[22], contemporary digital homework paid in piece—like HITs completed by turkers on AMT—is neither decried as illegal exploitation nor the object of reform. In fact, U.S. labor advocates and regulators have shown little interest in addressing the time-driven precarities of data-processing piecework by enforcing existing work laws in the industry. Why? The answer lies in the work’s invisibility—both physically (in the home) and conceptually (as a hidden part of AI production)—and in how digital homework is conceptualized in relationship to the existing economic order. Almost a century later, in the post-Fordist neoliberal context, where the temporal and spatial boundaries between gendered work in the family are less demarcated (Cooper 8) and families are diversified (O’Brien 2019, 363), homework is no longer understood as a social problem. Instead of being criticized for commercializing the home, digital homework is lauded as a technological innovation that allows people—regardless of their gender—to move quickly and “flexibly” between the institutions of family and work to sustain life.[23] Rather than standing in opposition to the current politics of time in which neoliberal practices merge with networked devices to encourage all workers to be “on” at all times, digital homework reinforces it. Unlike garment homeworkers in the 20th century, digital homeworkers do not necessarily rely upon a single breadwinner. For many, it is fulltime work, or at least income upon which they are dependent. Underregulated, it does the political work of re-shaping everyday rhythms of workers to reaffirm the economic function of the private family against the shrinking welfare state. Discursively and affectively, though critically not materially, digital piecework is too often seen as a way for all people to aspire to “economic self-sufficiency,” especially when no other form of economic support or paid work is available, possible, or desirable.[24]

2. Digital Homeworkers: Temporality, Task Politics, & Perpetual Crises

How do the claims of flexibility and economic autonomy made by technology industrialists compare to the lived experiences of digital homeworkers paid in piece? In examining the narratives of AMT data processors in this section, I argue that although they are ostensibly working “on their ‘own’ time,” a politics emerges in which time, accounted for in wage work, becomes an invisible node of power (Sharma 2014). This power reinforces the neoliberal ideological commitment to work all the time, filling “spare” time, not with leisure, but with poorly paid productivity. People for whom work outside the home is impossible—because of childcare, disability, limited transportation, or lack of work opportunities—can turn, not to the state or to community, but to themselves in attempt to minimally provide. AMT workers, for example, describe moving, frenzied, between care tasks and digital tasks, both of which shift from minute to minute, second to second. They frenetically work to claim higher-paying batches in a competitive, auction-like system that requires constant vigilance[25] and simultaneously label images for artificial intelligence systems, only to remember that it’s time to take their child to the doctor or to get to the store before it closes. Belying narratives of flexibility and independence, the autonomy of digital homeworkers to engage in leisure or to volitionally decide how to spend time is circumscribed.

Although paid by the task, digital homeworkers think of their time through the medium of the hourly wage. While manufacturers in the previous century claimed it was impossible to measure the time that garment homeworkers spent laboring in order to pay them by the hour and not the piece, time laboring online can be meticulously accounted for. Digital homeworkers are even advised to install accessory scripts (Image 1) into their browser to “increase turking efficiency” (MTurk Guide). Turkers use these accessory scripts to attempt to calculate how much money they will earn per hour if they move through batches of HITs at a particular speed. In turn, the scripts intensify the anxiety of piecework, operating as tools of self-management and time discipline—pushing workers without human supervisors to maintain an exacting speed in order to increase their income. On the one hand, these scripts pressure homeworkers to labor at a dizzying pace, frantically completing tasks that are essential for AI production. On the other, the scripts are the only way that these workers can even attempt to approximate how much—or how little—money they will make on a given day or week.

Still, digital homeworkers are acutely aware of what these scripts cannot and do not account for: in particular, how much time the workers spend looking for work or doing data processing tasks that go unpaid. In this sense, they recognize the extent to which technology industrialists have found ways to gamify piece pay, intensifying uncertainty in their lives. Janey, for example, who lives in a small former mining town in Appalachia and has been a digital pieceworker for almost five years, expressed in one of our conversations how profoundly frustrated she was at the functional logic of AMT, which prevented her from predicting and calculating potential income. She bemoaned that the insecurities and temporal demands of digital homework nagged at her through the day and even into the night. Both her conscious and unconscious time was spent looking for work, and this time, she explained, went uncompensated.

If I work 12-16 hours a day, I’ll make maybe $5/hour. But that’s when there is work, but when you’re sitting in between jobs and you consider that time, when you’re just looking for work, then the hourly wage falls dramatically. There are so many of us now, and fewer quality jobs. Sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night just to see if I can grab some good requests. Most HITs are gone if you don’t click right away.

Janey and her homeworking colleagues—like garment homeworkers of the previous century—work not just long, but also unpredictable hours each day—hours that well exceed the traditional 8-hour shift. This time is spent not just completing tasks, but also competing for them. When I asked Janey how she decided that she had worked enough in one day, she answered that it was only when she met her financial goals that she let herself rest.

If I need to make $50 to pay the rent, then I’ll work sixteen hours straight. Whatever I need to do . . . . But then there are those times when you don’t get paid or your work is rejected . . . so you can’t predict the time or the money, really. But you do the best you can.

As Janey eloquently articulated to me, the very logic of AMT obfuscates the possibility of any meaningful wage calculation. She is pit against other turkers as she constantly and anxiously seeks to “claim” work, time that itself goes unremunerated. And simultaneously, the lack of work standards and the reality that completed tasks can be rejected arbitrarily by requestors means that until she is paid, Janey cannot even rely on the income from batches that she completes.

If the experience is so temporally unpredictable and exacting, why do people like Janey turk in the first place? After Janey’s husband and father of her 3 children died of an opioid overdose, a friend recommended AMT to her as a way she could make money at home, and not, she told me “just depend on welfare checks.” She explained, “There was nothing else around here, I mean, nothing . . . and even if there was, I couldn’t do it. I have these kids.” Though she eventually met a new partner, Janey continued to work as the breadwinner. She noted that her new boyfriend was “younger and had never worked.” These days, he works retail—the first job he has ever had. But, she says, “The kids are mine. So I provide.” Digital pieceworkers like Janey bear the weight of breadwinning with minimal state support, and they also harbor many frustrations about how much time they spend working and how they are remunerated.

Dawn, another turking homeworker who lives in an economically depressed, post-industrial U.S. Rust Belt town, has been working as a digital pieceworker for four and a half years. “We used to have good union jobs around here,” she told me, “but those days have passed.” Although she had previously worked as an organizer on political campaigns, Dawn, like Janey, told me that she took up digital home-based piecework because she needed to work from home and without a pre-determined schedule, “Starting around the end of 2015, I had these illnesses that hit me over night. No one knew what was wrong with me; I was ending up in the ER constantly. That’s why I started turking. I needed the flexibility.”

When Dawn tried to point to the “good days” or to be positive about her work, she found herself discussing how time in between the demands of work and family, time that could be spent recreating or in a state of leisure, was adulterated by the temporal anxieties endemic to digital piecework.

I mean, there are days when you meet your goal by noon, and I can . . . cook a nice meal, or whatever. But then you wonder if you should spend that time turking, because what if you come up short the next day or the next week. Is it okay to stop? I don’t know. And then there are the days when I’m so sick I can’t work. When things were really bad, I would push through it, like my heart rate would go up so high, and I needed to go to the ER. And then I’d come back a few hours later and keep working. Sometimes, I’d lay on the floor with feet up and my laptop on my belly and just keep working while I waited for my heart rate to return to normal.

The urgency to compete for and complete tasks—even through emergencies—is itself, I argue, a form of time politics. Many digital pieceworkers—like a growing number of people in the U.S.—live in a feeling of perpetual crisis, they must work quickly, right now, to make rent, to pay for groceries, to care for their children. Through the disciplinary power of time politics, data-processing piece workers internalize the “propaganda of time thrift” (Thompson 1967, 90), often to the detriment of their well-being. For example, in articulating the affective labor that some of the AMT data tasks require of her, Dawn divulged how emotionally overwhelmed she would sometimes be by her work. She framed these emotions not through their effect on her psyche, but through their impact on her time, and consequently, her income. Like other digital homeworkers, slowing down to think, relax, or recreate brought on feelings of guilt and remorse.

The work can be really emotionally taxing. Like this one project . . . I have to label things as hate speech. The things that you sit there and read are horrendous, and you think, people can’t say these things. Or you’ll do a survey that says ‘tell me the worst thing you’ve ever experienced’—and I’m like, you want me to drudge up my worst memories and share them, so I can feed my family. And it makes you feel so bad that you waste time thinking about things or staring into space, and then you can’t meet your goals. And then you just feel bad for the rest of the day. (my emphasis)

For digital homeworkers paid by the piece, time is enforced, not through a didactic supervisor or wage and hour laws, but through a self-management that produces the obligation to cognize all time through the potential for productivity and, accordingly, to work exhaustively.

The speed demanded by the piece payment structure of digital piecework melds with neoliberal ideologies to define what it means not just to survive but to feel worthy. Turking makes it possible to move distractedly between family and work, placing the responsibility of predicting one’s wages—a near impossibility—on the workers themselves. Simultaneously, it engineers an anti-welfare subjectivity: a sense that if they could do it on their own, and if they failed, well, that was on them. Dawn mentioned on more than one occasion that she preferred turking to relying on state proffered safety net protections, which she perceived to be both inadequate and arbitrary,

The other side of it is, right now, if I were to file for disability which is what my doctor wants me to do, and I have too much pride to do at the moment . . . they [the state] deny every case, and even if I get it, during those two years, you can’t work, so you have to magically support yourself for 2 years. So even though turking is depressing work, it gives me a sense that I am contributing to my household, so I feel good about that. (my emphasis)

Through the ever-availability of data processing work, Janey and Dawn both strive to sustain themselves and their families. And yet, the very structure of digital homework precludes not only sufficient remuneration but also financial security and temporal autonomy.

Attention to the lived experiences and everyday crises of digital homeworkers like Janey and Dawn undermines the individual choice, independence, and flexibility that digital homework purports to provide. Through the bodies of the digital pieceworkers themselves, time politics does the dual work of fueling the pace of digital capitalism and sustaining anti-welfare subjectivities. Pieceworkers, then, are casualties, not agents to the temporal orders of automation production. In so much as digital homework exerts power over workers through and with time, reform efforts, I argue, must also focus on time, re-asserting the discipline of the clock on technology capitalists through demands for time-based wage payments.

Conclusion: Against Piece Pay

Digital homework is much more central and integral to today’s technology economy than industrial homework ever was to the garment industry in the previous century. Hidden behind internet platforms and laboring in their homes, today’s data processing pieceworkers conduct time-consuming, poorly paid tasks critical to AI and automation. Nevertheless, in marked contrast to homework of the previous century, their important work remains largely invisible to reformers and regulators, many of whom are otherwise engaged in dynamic policy debates on the potential displacement of U.S. workers by automation.[26] To make sense of the disregard for the enforcement of existing work laws in the data processing economy, this essay historically situates the time politics of piecework in the precarious lives of contemporary digital homeworkers.

Digital homework paid in piece is hyped by technology capitalists as an innovative pathway to economic stability for the people who are unable to support themselves and their families through waged work outside of the home or through one full time job alone. In reality, this work builds on and intensifies an abolished labor practice utilized by industrialists in the previous century to profit off the desperation of immigrant women and their families. Like garment manufacturers before them, companies like Amazon Mechanical Turk argue that digital piecework provides “an opportunity” for workers to move quickly and flexibly between the institutions of family and work to provide. But the life experiences of contemporary homeworkers belie this contention. Rather than provide flexibility, the time politics embedded in the structure of data piecework circumscribes autonomy, fueling both the drive and the financial need of homeworkers to work all the time, even thru crises. This reinforces the existing neoliberal economic order in which productive, paid work is not seen as an infringement into non-work life, but instead accepted as the subsumption of life as work.

I end this essay by suggesting that rather than abolish this homework, as reformers did in the garment industry, digital piecework can and should be formalized and regulated to account for all time laboring. The enforcement of existing wage and hour laws on the labor processes of today’s technology industrialists, for example, has the potential to introduce temporal autonomy and financial predictability into the uncertain, anxious lives of people like Dawn and Janey, who, for reasons different than women homeworkers of the previous century, cannot work outside the home. As a small intervention into the time politics of digital piecework—one that harkens back to minimal standards in most low-wage sectors—such regulation could serve as a countervailing force to the growing acquiescence of life as work in the digital piecework economy. It could also give digital homeworkers the time to reinvent their lives, to create collective spaces and relationships in nonwork, nonfamily time. In this sense, eradicating piece pay in digital capitalism can be linked to the greater struggle to transform temporal politics around productive paid work, enabling workers—of all genders—to imagine new life and formulate new demands, unscripted from the existing binary of work and family. For reformers and regulators concerned about job loss to automation, the hourly wage may also be understood as a force of friction, slowing down the wheels of digital capitalism, creating time to consider—and even control—the future of work.

Bibliography

Accenture. “Autonomous Vehicles: The Race is On.” 2018. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-73/accenture-autonomous-vehicles-the-race-is-on.pdf

Alkhatib, Ali, Michael S. Bernstein, and Margaret Levi. “Examining crowd work and gig work through the historical lens of piecework.” In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017), pp. 4599-4616.

Amazon Mechanical Turk. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://www.mturk.com/.

Boris, Eileen. Home to work: Motherhood and the politics of industrial homework in the United States. Cambridge University Press, 1994.

— — — “Regulating Industrial Homework: The Triumph of ‘Sacred Motherhood.’” The Journal of American History 71, no. 4 (1985): 745-763.

California Future of Work Commission. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://futureofwork.ca.gov/.

Chin, “Key Volkswagen Exec Admits Full Self-driving Cars ‘May Never Happen.’” The Drive. January 13, 2020. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://www.thedrive.com/tech/31816/key-volkswagen-exec-admits-level-5-autonomous-cars-may-never-happen/.

Collier, Ruth Berins, V.B. Dubal, and Christopher Carter. “Disruptive Regulations: The Politics of Uber in the US.” Perspectives on Politics 16, no. 4 (2018), pp. 919-937.

Cooper, Melinda. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. MIT Press, 2017.

Daniels, Cynthia R. “Between Home and Factory: Homeworkers and the State.” Homework: Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home (1989): pp. 13-32.

Difallah, Djellel, Elena Filatova, and Panos Ipeirotis. “Demographics and Dynamics of Mechanical Turk Workers.” WSDM: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 135-143. February 2018.

Dubal, V. B. “Wage Slave or Entrepreneur: Contesting the Dualism of Legal Worker Identities.” Calif. L. Rev. 105 (2017): 65.

Freeman, Carla. Entrepreneurial selves: Neoliberal respectability and the making of a Caribbean middle class. Duke University Press, 2015.

Gray, Mary L., Siddharth Suri, Syed Shoaib Ali, and Deepti Kulkarni. “The crowd is a collaborative network.” Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, (2016), pp. 134-147.

Hara, Kotaro, Abigail Adams, Kristy Milland, Saiph Savage, Chris Callison-Burch, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. “A Data-driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2018), pp. 1-14.

Irani, Lilly. “Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114, no. 1 (2015): pp. 225-234.

— — — “Hype, Profit, Labor, and Agency in the Shadows of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Workshop: What’s at Stake in the 4th Industrial Revolution? Medium (Mar 29, 2019). Accessed July 4, 2020. https://medium.com/whats-at-stake-in-a-fourth-industrial-revolution/hype-profit-labor-and-agency-in-the-shadows-of-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-509afd51a82c/.

— — — and M. Six Silberman. “Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk.” CHI 2013, April 27-May 2, 2013.

MTurk Guide. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://www.mturkguide.com/scripts.html.

O’Brien, M.E. To Abolish the Family. Endnotes #5. October 2019. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://endnotes.org.uk/file_hosting/EN5_To_Abolish_the_Family.pdf

Roberts, Sarah T. Behind the screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. Yale University Press, 2019.

Roediger, David R. The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. Verso, 1999.

Roose, Kevin. “The Hidden Automation Agenda of the Davos Elite.” The New York Times. Jan. 25, 2019. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/technology/automation-davos-world-economic-forum.html.

Salehi, Niloufar, Lilly C. Irani, Michael S. Bernstein, Ali Alkhatib, Eva Ogbe, and Kristy Milland. “We are Dynamo: Overcoming Stalling and Friction in Collective Action for Crowd Workers.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2015), pp. 1621-1630.

Semuels, Alana. “The Internet is Enabling a New Kind of Poorly Paid Hell.” The Atlantic. Jan 23, 2018. Accessed July 4, 2020. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2018/01/amazon-mechanical-turk/551192/

Schor, Juliet. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. Basic Books, 2008.

Schüll, Natasha Dow. Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press, 2014.

Sharma, Sarah. In the meantime: Temporality and cultural politics. Duke University Press, 2014.

Sinclair, Upton. The Jungle. Dover Thrift Editions, 2001.

Stone, Katherine V. W. “Legal protections for atypical employees: Employment law for workers without workplaces and employees without employers.” Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 27 (2006): 251.

Taylor, Astra. “The Automation Charade.” Logic Magazine: Failure 5 (2018). Accessed July 4, 2020. https://logicmag.io/failure/the-automation-charade/.

Thompson, E. P. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past and Present, No. 38 (December 1967): pp. 56-97.

Wallis, George W. “Chronopolitics: The Impact of Time Perspectives on the Dynamics of Change.” Social Forces 49, No. 1 (1970): 102-108.

Weeks, Kathi. The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Duke University Press, 2011.

Weil, David. The Fissured Workplace. Harvard University Press, 2014.

Footnotes

The re-emergence of homework and homework debates in the 1980s followed the resurgence of the practice in both the garment industry and in the technology industry, particularly for microcomputer assembly and word processing (Boris 1994, 341).

In contrast, other forms of digital piecework have received quite a great deal of regulatory attention—particularly in the so-called “gig economy.” (Collier et al 2018).

Technology capitalists insist that these digital homeworkers are independent contractors, but the question of their status as either employees or as independent contractors is a legal one that has not yet been definitively decided in the United States, in large part because of lack of public and private enforcement.

Although the demographics shift, an online “m turk tracker” indicates that in June 2020, on any given day, roughly 56-81% of turkers were laboring in the U.S.; 11-33% were in India; and 9-21% were in other countries. This data was accessed at http://demographics.myturk-tracker.com/#/countries/all on July 3, 2020 (Difallah et al 2018).

In the United States, the protected right to organize to better working conditions is reserved for employees. Independent contractors who attempt to organize could be liable for violations of anti-trust laws. Turkopticon is a third-party platform created by Lilly Irani and M. Six Silberman that facilitates non-traditional organizing without implicating anti-trust laws. Through Turkopticon, instead of negotiating directly with requestors and AMT to raise and standardize the price of tasks, turkers can recommend superior jobs to each other and alert other workers to bad requestors who refuse to pay (Lilly et al. 2013). Dynamo, another third-party platform, was also created to help workers facilitate and organize letter writing campaigns to better their work environment. Amazon has made it difficult for turkers to enroll in Dynamo (Salehi et al. 2015).

In the academy, Lilly Irani’s work is the most notable exception. Professor Irani has written extensively on “turking” as a labor process that “transforms people into ‘human computation’” (Irani 2015, 227). She argues that through platforms like AMT, technology industrialists have “generated an industry of startups claiming to be the future of data.” But, she notes, “Hiding the labor is key to how these startups are valued . . . .” Rather than advertising themselves as “labor companies,” Irani explains, they hide the labor “rendering it manageable through computing code” and call themselves “technology companies (Ibid, 231). Mary L. Gray and Siddarth Suri have also written on the human labor powering artificial intelligence systems, calling workers like those who labor on AMT “ghost workers” (Gray et al 2019). Sarah T. Roberts’ important book Behind the Screen, which focuses on commercial content moderation, also makes visible the labor processes created by “microlabor websites” (Roberts 2019).

Astra Taylor calls this process “fauxtomation.” Taylor argues that “automation exponentially oversells the shifting workplace dynamic.” She describes how automation does not take away or remove work; instead, it changes the person doing the work and ensures that as much labor as possible goes uncompensated or under-compensated (Taylor 2018).

Lilly Irani writes, “By hiding the labor and rendering it manageable through computing code, human computation platforms like AMT have generated an industry claiming that the future of work resides in the programming powers of master engineers and algorithms and robots they produce” (Irani 2019, 3).

In 2020, for example, the CEO of Volkswagen, admitted that fully autonomous vehicles might “never happen.” (Chin 2020).

In a single working day, one of these vehicles produces as much data as the Hubble Space Telescope produces in one year. All of this data needs to be sorted and labeled (Accenture 2018, 3).

Under the WARN Act, companies in the U.S. with 100 or more employees must provide employees and state officials 60 day advanced notification before mass layoffs or plant closings.

The federal minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 since 2009.

For example, Alana Semuels, in a widely circulated expose on the precarities of turking, describes it as a “new kind of poorly paid hell.” (my emphasis) (Semuels 2018).

Indeed, the incursion of networked devices and work into all aspects of everyday life was the initial step that enabled digital homework like turking.

I use the term “industrial time discipline” to encompass scientific management theory, but it is much broader than just systems to introduce speed to the production process. In addition to time management techniques, this time discipline extended to self-management techniques, constituting how workers feel about their identities and their lives.

Increasingly, for example, technology companies use independent contractors, temporary workers (hired through staffing agencies), and vendors (who hire their own workers) to core and peripheral aspects of work. This practice displaces the risk and liabilities associated with employment onto other entities, including the workers themselves. Economist David Weil calls this phenomenon the “fissuring” of the workplace.

The labor history traced by David Roediger explains how Italian immigrant workers were viewed as “below white” in the construction of racial identity in the early 20th century (Roediger 1991). While Jewish men and single Jewish women predominated in the factory, married Italian women predominated amongst garment homeworkers (Daniels 1989, 16). Manufacturers explained that the Italian women had “more delicate fingers” than women of other “races.” (Boris 1994). One said, “[T]hese green horns . . . they cannot speak English and they don’t know where to go and they just come from the old country and I let them work hard, like the devil, for less wages.” (Daniels 1989, 18).

The difference, for some, was as much as $3.60 versus $6 per week. This $3.60 per week represented the labor of many people who assisted the woman—including children (Daniels 1989, 16).

In fact, employers frequently had no idea how homeworkers fit the work into their home schedule. Even when time records were required by law, homeworkers used books filled in advance by employers so that it appeared that they were making exactly the minimum wage in a forty-hour work week (Boris 1994, 155).

A failed attempt to regulate homework through the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1933 reinforced the belief that only legal prohibition could end the exploitative nature of homework (Boris 1985, 747-61).

The administrator of the Wage and Hour division explained in 1943, “the very factors that make homework seem attractive . . . the absence of factory discipline, the fact the work can be done on the worker’s own time, and in a casual way, and that she is enabled to attend at the same time to her household responsibilities while supplementing the family income, preclude any possibility of reasonable assurance that . . . home workers . . .  are . . . actually receiving the minimum [wage].” (Boris 1994, 299). The Fair Labor Standards Act Between ultimately banned homework in specified industries, forecasting a widescale reduction of the system. 1939 and 1957, at least six congressional amendments attempted to exempt homeworkers from FLSA coverage (Ibid 286). While, in the 1940s, some manufacturers attempted to get out from under these regulations using independent contractor business models, courts stymied these efforts (Ibid 279).

Much of the work in the digital piecework economy is visible, in-person service work—like ride-hailing and food delivery—conducted outside the home. In jurisdictions all over the world, including the U.S., public and private enforcement actions have been brought against companies that proliferate this kind of piecework, like Foodora, Uber, Instacart, DoorDash, and Ola. They have been charged with misclassifying their workers as independent contractors paid by the piece, instead of as employees paid by the hour.

Fascinatingly, men turk more than women. Only one-third to one-half of people turking in the U.S. during the month of June 2020 were women. This data was accessed at http://demographics.myturk-tracker.com/#/countries/all on July 3, 2020.

In the shadow of liberation movements that rightfully challenged nuclear family and male-bread winner model of capitalism, we have “witnessed the strategic reinvention of a much older, poor-law tradition of private family responsibility.” (Cooper 2017, 21). As Melinda Cooper has painstakingly detailed in her book Family Values, neoliberals have found common cause with social conservatives on the question family.

The very way in which AMT operates, forcing workers to competitively and constantly search for and grab good work in an auction-like system, functionally resembles how online poker produces “addiction by design,” profiting off a system in which the phenomenon of chance is gamified, rather than tamed (Schull 2014).

For example, in 2020, the Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, created a Future of Work Commission with the purpose, among other things, of considering “automation and the resulting transitions for workers” (California Future of Work Commission 2020). Pointing to the hypocrisy of these conversations, Kevin Roose reports that corporate executives all over the world publicly, “wring their hands over the negative consequences that artificial intelligence and automation could have for workers,” and privately, “spend . . . billions of dollars to transform their businesses into lean, digitized, highly automated operations” (Roose 2019).

[thisdaynews]

Paella, billboards and campaign swag: 33 things that cost the 2020 candidates big money

New Post has been published on https://thebiafrastar.com/paella-billboards-and-campaign-swag-33-things-that-cost-the-2020-candidates-big-money/

Paella, billboards and campaign swag: 33 things that cost the 2020 candidates big money

POLITICO Illustration/FEC

campaign finance

The campaigns spent big on advertising and staffing — along with sometimes-bizarre odds and ends that fueled the startup businesses.

Running for president costs millions of dollars in staff salaries, even more in advertising fees and tons in travel — but sometimes, what a campaign really needs to get through a day is five-figures worth of paella.

That’s among the eye-catching expenses hidden in plain sight among thousands of lines of campaign charges contained in the latest round of FEC disclosures. There were a few through-lines across the Democratic campaigns from April through June: Digital advertising is at or near the top of most expense lists, as candidates try to build massive donor lists to qualify for debates and fund a long primary campaign. Staff salaries, too, are a major cost — for those who can afford it, as some smaller campaigns make the crucial choice to prioritize advertising in order to make the debates.

Story Continued Below

But some expenditures are singular, from consulting payments to a sitcom-inspired fundraising firm to the campaign event in Los Angeles fueled by a company called “Got Paella.” And some, like the digital advertising expenses, illustrate broad stories about the state of the campaign and the Democratic Party, like the top Democratic law firm working for at least seven different 2020 presidential candidates.

Here are the most revealing, outlandish or just weird ways Democratic presidential campaigns spent money between the start of April and the end of June:

Joe Biden: $102,353 for the launch ad that never was

Biden paid $102,352.90 on May 16 to the firm owned by Mark Putnam, a famed Democratic ad man who worked for former President Barack Obama and produced viral campaign spots for congressional candidates including Amy McGrath and Jason Kander. Putnam’s firm shot footage for a launch ad before Biden jumped into the race in April — except it didn’t ever run. Instead, Biden advisers chose to go with a different video. Putnam left Biden’s campaign in June.

Kirsten Gillibrand: $350,000 on a digital firm that the campaign ditched

Gillibrand’s campaign spent $346,681.03 in the second quarter on Anne Lewis Strategies, a consulting firm that directed the campaign’s online ads and had played a central role as Gillibrand became one of the party’s top online fundraisers in 2017.

But by mid-spring of this year, Gillibrand cut the firm loose, as she struggled to raise money from individual donors online. Now, the campaign has brought its digital advertising and fundraising in-house, which presidential campaigns traditionally haven’t done in the past. Throughout the second quarter, Gillibrand’s campaign dropped $842,192.14 on ads paid directly to Google, Facebook and Twitter.

Ten different campaigns: $4.1 million in direct payments to Facebook for ads

It’s not just the Gillibrand campaign: A number of other Democrats are paying less and less money to digital advertising consultants to develop online strategies and instead moving their programs in-house, the Democratic digital group Acronym noted recently. Campaigns — including Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttegieg’s — are opting to hire staff who directly run their advertising programs, partially in a bid to save money on traditional consultant commissions.

Tulsi Gabbard: $100,198 on billboards

The Hawaii congresswoman’s single biggest expense went into an unusual form of advertising: billboards, according to her FEC filing. Many of her competitors would drop that cash on digital ads, arguably reaching more voters.

Bernie Sanders: $751,068 on swag

Sanders’ campaign boughta lotof t-shirts, buttons, hats and bumper stickers in the second quarter — over three-quarters of a million dollars worth, using them to stock Sanders’ online campaign store. It’s not just for fun or for random on-the-street advertising: Sanders’ campaign has been using stickers and other items to entice donations from his email list.

Joe Biden: $256,798 on private jet travel

The Biden campaign gave $256,798.18 to Advanced Aviation, a charter jet and helicopter service. Using private jets was a source of contention during the 2016 race: Bernie Sanders took some criticism for his frequent travel on private jets. Part of the Biden campaign’s expense was for carbon offsets that the campaign is purchasing when the former vice president travels, a spokesman said.Part of the Biden campaign’s expense was for carbon offsets that the campaign is purchasing when the former vice president travels, a spokesman said.

Pete Buttigieg: $299,066 on private jet travel

Buttigieg also racked up a big bill on private jets — a practice he can afford as the top second-quarter fundraiser in the 2020 primary field, who packed his recent schedule full of events requiring quick travel. He flew around on three different private jet companies during the second quarter, dishing out $299,065.56 to Advanced Aviation, Vertivue Air Charter and Evojets.

Joe Biden: $12,075 on paella

Biden spent $12,075.00 on food from the Los Angeles-based Got Paella, which serves the traditional Spanish seafood-and-rice dishes, in early May, shortly after he launched his campaign — likely for a fundraiser when the former vice president stopped in Southern California. While prospecting for online donors is costing Democratic campaigns a lot, traditional high-dollar fundraising events come with serious costs as well, from candidate travel to the spread for guests.

It’s unclear if Biden or anyone else shouted “What am I supposed to do with all this paella?” before, during or after the event.

Pete Buttigieg: $64,000 to two event spaces in NYC, Fenway Park

Buttigieg is known for his sold-out fundraisers, and it costs a lot to host those standing-room-only crowds. Two of Buttigieg’s most expensive line-items went to site rentals in New York City and Boston in June. There was $27,901.39 to Brooklyn Steel for a grassroots fundraiser and $36,276.88 to Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox, for a fundraiser in one of the field’s suites.

Cory Booker: $500 on car repairs

The Booker campaign charged $500.00 for “auto repair” to Capital Certified Collision Center, a Washington D.C.-based auto body shop.

Marianne Williamson: $2,011 to self-help movie company Streaming for the Soul

Williamson paid $2,011.30 to Streaming for the Soul, LLC, a streaming video company that offers titles online including “Psychic Mediumship” and “Living the Luminous Life.” Williamson paid the company for videography, editing and other services.

Seven candidates: $652,517 to powerhouse Democratic law firm Perkins Coie

Almost one-third of the Democratic presidential field has retained Perkins Coie for legal services, sending nearly two-thirds of a million dollars to the firm in the second quarter. Under Marc Elias, the chair of the firm’s political law practice, Perkins Coie has taken over legal business for most of the Democratic Party’s top committees and campaigns and is always a good bet to be involved in recount or voting-rights litigation where Democrats have a stake in the outcome.

But little illustrates Perkins Coie’s size and influence in Democratic politics than the fact that these campaigns — including two of the five first-tier candidates in Harris and Warren — are all eager to retain the firm’s resources despite being locked in competition with each other. Biden, Buttigieg and Sanders, among others, used different law firms in the second quarter.

Jay Inslee: $30,226 to the mysterious, ingeniously named fundraising firm Banana Stand LLC

The Inslee paid $30,226.10 to a Gilbert, Ariz.-based fundraising firm that appears to have been named with a nod to the sitcom Arrested Development. But the “Mr. Manager” behind Banana Stand LLC remains a mystery: The firm has no website, and only one other federal campaign — Richard Ojeda’s 2018 bid for House of Representatives — has paid money to a firm called Banana Stand LLC in recent years.

Joe Biden: $3.5 million on digital advertising

Biden spent $3,435,563.74 on expenses marked as digital advertising in three months — a mammoth sum that shows how he’s working to build up a list of small-dollar donors, 10 years after the last time he ran a race solo. It was the single biggest expense for the Biden campaign last quarter, but it helped return a big day-one fundraising number, $8.3 million in second-quarter small-dollar donations, and easily more than enough donors to qualify for future debates.

Andrew Yang and Bernie Sanders: $16,497 and $13,634, respectively, on Airbnb

While many campaigns stick to traditional hotels, some are increasingly branching out into Airbnb, whether they’re seeking cost efficiencies or just going with the 21st-century flow. Two that went all in: Yang and Sanders, which spent $16,497.43 and $13,634.44 on Airbnb last quarter, respectively. Beto O’Rourke spent a smaller amount: $1,901.82.

Cory Booker: $1,500 to rent out space in a private club in Philadelphia

Booker’s campaign put down $1,500.00 to rent space at the elite Fitler Club, a “private lifestyle club” for young sophisticates where membership each year costs upwards of $5,000 per year, according to Eater Philadelphia. The rental appears to have been for a May 16 fundraiser hosted by a pair of Philadelphia lawyers.

Elizabeth Warren: $9,295 to a PAC helping her bid

Warren paid $9,295.00 to the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a PAC that endorsed the Massachusetts senator earlier this year. The expenses were for “campaign materials and internet advertising,” the filing said. The PCCC is one of Warren’s oldest allies in politics, and the group likes to promote its place in the “Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party.”

Seth Moulton: $1,109 on Harvard Clubs

Moulton’s campaign spent $1,069 at the Harvard Club of New York for lodging on May 29. Moulton, who has three degrees from Harvard, also spent $40 for “membership dues” for the Harvard Club of Boston.

Kamala Harris: $4,943 at upscale hotels

The Harris campaign is sleeping in style: It paid $4,943.49 to three four- and five-star hotels during the second quarter. The Harris campaign paid $978.78 to The Line, a stylish modern hotel in Los Angeles; $1,535.20 to the historic The Citizen Hotel in downtown Sacramento; and $2,429.51 to Loews New York, presumably for a stay at the Loews Regency on Park Avenue.The payments were for multiple stays and multiple individuals, a Harris campaign spokesman said.

Pete Buttigieg: $112,890 on lodging during the Democratic National Committee’s first debates

Buttigieg dropped $112,890.12 at the Hilton Miami Downtown during the DNC’s debate week, a hefty sum for the marquee event. But the campaign was hosting a big event of its own, in addition to housing staff for several days. The hotel is where Buttigieg and top aides detailed the plans for the next stage of their campaign to donors, including significantly ramping up early-state staff by Labor Day.

Beto O’Rourke: $328 on minor league baseball

Beto O’Rourke spent $328 for an event at the Iowa Cubs, a minor league baseball team based in Des Moines. The team ran a promotion earlier this year inviting fans to watch the movie “Field of Dreams” after a game; undoubtedly, O’Rourke and other underdog Democrats are hoping the first caucus state makes their own dreams come true next year.

Kamala Harris: $500,000 for new online donors

Harris dropped a cool half-million dollars in April and May for “digital acquisition,” which is campaign-speak for buying contact lists for potential small-dollar donors. She purchased the lists from the firm Authentic Campaigns, Inc., her main digital vendor. Harris’ campaign fundraising has been carefully balanced between small- and large-dollar donors so far, per her FEC reports, partly because of careful and long-term list-building activities.

Amy Klobuchar: $324 on a Minneapolis Star-Tribune subscription

Klobuchar may be running for president, but she’s still keeping tabs on her hometown paper. Her presidential campaign is still paying up for a subscription to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, as well as subscriptions to The New York Times.

Eric Swalwell and Seth Moulton: $9,066 and $12,400, respectively, for coworking spaces

Not every presidential campaign has a sprawling headquarters or its own dedicated field offices. Swalwell’s short-lived presidential campaign appears to have set itself up at least in part at The Yard 13, a coworking company with offices in several cities.Moulton’s campaign, meanwhile, spent $12,400 on WeWork, a coworking company.

Pete Buttigieg: $153,048 on security

Buttigieg hired several security firms for the second quarter, providing personal and event security for the campaign. The Secret Service doesn’t typically get involved in non-incumbent campaigns until later on in an election cycle, and unlike other candidates, Buttigieg has also dealt with protesters at his events attacking him for being gay.

Seth Moulton: $116,300 on primary state research

Moulton’s campaign spent $50,500 for primary state focus groups and $65,800 on primary state polling from veteran consultancy The Mellman Group in late May. He may be a long-shot, but he clearly didn’t jump into the presidential race blind. Notably, The Mellman Group polled for Moulton when he pulled off his Democratic primary upset over a longtime incumbent in 2014.

Pete Buttigieg: $1,133,151 on merch

Buttigieg’s campaign spent seven figures to pump out a range of merchandise for the once little-known mayor who became a viral sensation in 2019. His online campaign store features T-shirts that say: “Pete, Chasten, Buddy & Truman,” which is a play on the candidate, his spouse and their dogs. Another one? “Chasten for First Gentleman,” featuring his smiling face.

Michael Bennet: $550 on books at Barnes and Noble

When the Colorado senator shows up for a meet-and-greet at a home in Iowa or New Hampshire, he doesn’t come empty-handed. His campaign spent $549.54 on books at Barnes and Noble, which Bennet gifts to his hosts. The titles, often wrapped in a blue ribbon, include “Evicted,” by Matthew Desmond and “Frederick Douglass,” by David W. Blight.

Andrew Yang: $377 on a karaoke event space

Andrew Yang’s campaign spent $376.65 for “event space” at Karaoke City, which bills itself as “Midtown Manhattan’s Largest Karaoke Experience” in May. We should all be so lucky to experience it.

Amy Klobuchar: $65,000 on office set-up services

The Klobuchar campaign got a lot of help moving into their campaign headquarters in Minneapolis. The campaign spent $65,801.40 on Synergy Builders, LLC, a construction company to help set up their office space — a step above a last-minute IKEA raid. The campaign also paid another $1,900.73 to AAA Movers in Minneapolis for additional “office set up,” according to her FEC filing. The campaign also dropped $22,912.37 on office supplies and equipment.

John Delaney: $699 on cake

John Delaney spent $699 at Smith Island Baking Company, a cake company in Crisfield, Md., on the Chesapeake Bay. That’s enough to serve cake to more than 170 people, according to the estimates on the site — or, in 2020 campaign terms, 0.13 percent of the 130,000 individual donors Democrats need to amass to qualify for the September debates.

Read More

[newstfionline]

Ambulance trips can leave you with surprising—and very expensive—bills

By Melissa Bailey, Washington Post, November 20, 2017

One patient got a $3,660 bill for a four-mile ride. Another was charged $8,460 for a trip from a hospital that could not handle his case to another that could. Still another found herself marooned at an out-of-network hospital, where she’d been taken by ambulance without her consent.

These patients all took ambulances in emergencies and got slammed with unexpected bills. Public outrage has erupted over surprise medical bills--generally out-of-network charges that a patient did not expect or could not control--prompting 21 states to pass laws over the years protecting consumers in some situations. But these laws largely ignore ground ambulance rides, which can leave patients stuck with hundreds or even thousands of dollars in bills and with few options for recourse, finds a Kaiser Health News review of 350 consumer complaints in 32 states.

Patients usually choose to go to the doctor, but they are vulnerable when they call 911 or get into an ambulance. The dispatcher picks the ambulance crew, which may be the local fire department or a private company hired by the municipality. The crew, in turn, often picks the hospital. Moreover, many ambulances are not summoned by patients, but by police or a bystander.

Betsy Imholz, special projects director at the Consumers Union, which has collected more than 700 patient stories about surprise medical bills, said at least a quarter concern ambulances.

“It’s a huge problem,” she said.

Forty years ago, most ambulances were free for patients, provided by volunteers or town fire departments using taxpayer money, said Jay Fitch, president of Fitch & Associates, an emergency services consulting firm. Today, ambulances are increasingly run by private companies and venture capital firms. Ambulance operators now often charge by the mile and sometimes for each “service,” such as providing oxygen. If the ambulance is staffed by paramedics rather than emergency medical technicians, that will result in a higher charge--even if the patient didn’t need paramedic-level services. Charges range from zero to thousands of dollars.

The core of the problem is that ambulance companies and private insurers often can’t agree on a fair price, so the ambulance service doesn’t join the insurer’s network. That leaves patients stuck with out-of-network charges that are not negotiated, Imholz said.

This happens to patients frequently, according to a recent study of more than half a million ambulance trips taken by patients with private insurance in 2014. The study, by two staffers at the Federal Trade Commission, found that 26 percent of these trips were billed on an out-of-network basis.

That figure is “quite jarring,” said Loren Adler, co-author of a recent report on surprise billing.

The KHN review of complaints revealed two common scenarios leaving patients in debt: First, patients get into an ambulance after a 911 call. Second, an ambulance transfers them between hospitals. In both scenarios, patients later learn the fee is much higher because the ambulance was out-of-network, and after the insurer pays what it deems fair, they get a surprise bill for the balance, also known as a “balance bill.”

The Better Business Bureau has received nearly 1,200 consumer complaints about ambulances in the past three years; half were related to billing, and 46 mentioned out-of-network charges, spokeswoman Katherine Hutt said.

While the federal government sets reimbursement rates for patients on Medicare, it does not regulate ambulance fees for patients with private insurance. Those patients are left with a highly fragmented system in which the cost of a similar ambulance trip can vary widely from town to town. There are about 14,000 ambulance services across the country, run by governments, volunteers, hospitals and private companies, according to the American Ambulance Association. (The Washington area reflects that mix.)

For a glimpse into the unpredictable system, consider the case of Roman Barshay. The 46-year-old software engineer, who lives in Brooklyn, was visiting friends in the Boston suburb of Chestnut Hill last November when he took a nasty fall.

Barshay felt a sharp pain in his chest and back, and he had trouble walking. An ambulance crew responded to a 911 call at his friends’ house and drove him four miles to Brigham and Women’s Hospital, taking his blood pressure as he lay down in the back. Doctors there determined he had sprained tendons and ligaments and a bruised foot, and released him after about four hours, he said.

After Barshay returned to Brooklyn, he got a bill for $3,660, or $915 for each mile of the ambulance ride. His insurance had covered nearly half, leaving him to pay the remaining $1,890.50.

“I thought it was a mistake,” Barshay said.

But Fallon Ambulance Service, the private company that brought him to the hospital, was out-of-network for his UnitedHealthcare insurance plan.

“The cost is outrageous,” said Barshay, who reluctantly paid the bill after Fallon sent it to a collection agency. If he had known what the ride would cost, he said, he would at least have been able to refuse the ride and “crawl to the hospital myself.”

In a statement, UnitedHealthcare said: “Out-of-network ambulance companies should not be using emergencies as an opportunity to bill patients excessive amounts when they are at their most vulnerable.”

“You feel horribly to send a patient a bill like that,” said Peter Racicot, senior vice president of Fallon, a family-owned company based outside Boston.

But ambulance firms are “severely underfunded” by Medicare and Medicaid, Racicot said, so Fallon must balance the books by charging higher rates for patients with private insurance.

Racicot said his company has not contracted with Barshay’s insurer because they couldn’t agree on a fair rate. When insurers and ambulance companies can’t agree, he said, “unfortunately, the subscribers wind up in the middle.”

It’s also unrealistic to expect EMTs and paramedics at the scene of an emergency to determine whether their company takes a patient’s insurance, Racicot added.

Ambulance services must charge enough to subsidize the cost of keeping their crews ready around the clock, said Fitch, the ambulance consultant. In a third of the cases where an ambulance crew answers a call, he added, they end up not transporting anyone and the company typically isn’t reimbursed for the trip.

In part, Barshay had bad luck. If his injury had happened just a mile away--inside Boston’s city limits--he could have ridden a city ambulance, which would have charged $1,490, according to Boston EMS, a sum that his insurer probably would have covered in full.

Very few states have laws limiting ambulance charges, and most state laws that protect patients from surprise billing do not apply to ground ambulance rides, according to Brian Werfel, a consultant to the American Ambulance Association. And none of the surprise-billing protections apply to people with self-funded employer-sponsored health insurance plans, which are regulated only by federal law. That’s a huge exception: 61 percent of privately insured employees are covered by self-funded employer-sponsored plans.

Medicare rates vary widely by geographic area. On average, ambulance services make a small profit on Medicare payments, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office. If a patient uses a basic life support ambulance in an emergency in an urban area, for instance, Medicare payments range from $324 to $453, plus $7.29 per mile. Medicaid rates tend to be significantly lower.

There’s evidence of waste and fraud in the ambulance industry, Donaldson added, citing a study from the Office of Inspector General at the Department of Health and Human Services. The report concluded that in 2012 Medicare paid more than $50 million in improper ambulance bills, including for supposedly emergency-level transport that ended at a nursing home, not a hospital. One in 5 ambulance services had “questionable billing” practices, said the report, which noted that Medicare spent $5.8 billion on ambulance transport that year.

Most complaints reviewed by Kaiser Health News did not appear to involve fraudulent charges. Instead, patients got caught in a system in which ambulance services can legally charge thousands of dollars for a single trip--even when the trip starts at an in-network hospital.

That’s what happened to Devin Hall, a 67-year-old retired postal inspector in Northern California. While he faces Stage 3 prostate cancer, Hall is also fighting a $7,109.70 bill from American Medical Response, the nation’s largest ambulance provider.

On Dec. 27, 2016, Hall went to a local hospital with rectal bleeding. Because the hospital didn’t have the right specialist to treat his symptoms, it arranged for an ambulance ride to another hospital about 20 miles away. Even though the hospital was in his network, the ambulance was not.

Hall was stunned to see that AMR billed $8,460 for the trip. His federal health plan, the Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, paid $1,350.30 and held Hall responsible for $727.08, records show. (According to his plan’s explanation of benefits, it paid that amount because AMR’s charges exceeded the plan’s Medicare-based fee schedule, which is based on Medicare rates.) But AMR turned his case over to a debt collector, Credence Resource Management, which sent an Aug. 25 notice seeking the full balance of $7,109.70.

“These charges are exorbitant--I just don’t think what AMR is doing is right,” said Hall, noting that he had intentionally sought treatment at an in-network hospital.

He has spent months on the phone calling the hospital, his insurer and AMR trying to resolve the matter. Given his prognosis, he worries about leaving his wife with a legal fight and a lien on their Brentwood, Calif., house for a debt they shouldn’t owe.

After being contacted by Kaiser Health News, AMR said it pulled Hall’s case from collections while it reviews the billing. After further review, company spokesman Jason Sorrick said the charges were warranted because it was a “critical care transport, which requires a specialized nurse and equipment on board.”

Sorrick faulted Hall’s health plan for underpaying, and said Hall could receive a discount if he qualifies for AMR’s “compassionate care program” based on his financial and medical situation.

“In this case, it appears the patient’s insurance company simply made up a price they wanted to pay,” Sorrick said.

In July, a California law went into effect that protects consumers from surprise medical bills from out-of-network providers, including some ambulance transport between hospitals. But Hall’s case occurred before that, and the state law doesn’t apply to him because of his federal insurance plan.

The consumer complaints reviewed by Kaiser Health News reveal a wide variety of ways that patients are left fighting big bills:

• An older patient in California said debt collectors called incessantly, including on Sunday mornings and at night, demanding an extra $500 on top of the $1,000 that his insurance had paid for an ambulance trip.

• Two ambulance services responded to a New Jersey man’s 911 call when he felt burning in his chest. One of them charged him $2,100 for treating him on the scene for less than 30 minutes--even though he never rode in that company’s ambulance.

• A woman who rolled over in her Jeep in Texas was charged a $26,400 “trauma activation fee”--a fee triggered when the ambulance service called ahead to the emergency department to assemble a trauma team. The woman, who did not require trauma care, fought the hospital to get the fee waived.

In other cases, patients face financial hardship when ambulances take them to out-of-network hospitals. Patients don’t always have a choice in where to seek care; that’s up to the ambulance crew and depends on the protocols written by the medical director of each ambulance service, said Werfel, the ambulance association consultant.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who has been pushing for federal legislation protecting patients from surprise hospital bills, said in a statement that he supports doing the same for ambulance bills.

Meanwhile, patients do have the right to refuse an ambulance ride, as long as they are older than 18 and mentally capable.

“You could just take an Uber,” said Adler, co-author of the surprise-billing report. But if you need an ambulance, there’s little recourse to avoid unexpected bills, he said, “other than yelling at the insurance company after the fact, or yelling at the ambulance company.”

[apartmentcleaninggxiy189-blog]

Not known Details About Domestic Cleaning

iframe width="560" height="315" alt="The Single Strategy To Use For Apartment Cleaning" type="text/html" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wri3FbnBpsA" frameborder="0">

Member Marian Smith of King, North Carolina, says she's employed numerous cleansing companies over the years, yet constantly reads testimonials on Angie's Listing initially. "I examine to see if any type of issues have been lodged, as well as I always ask if the business is bonded as well as guaranteed," she claims. Those queries, professionals concur, offer a good start.

In enhancement to referrals, Ray Smith, proprietor of Eco-friendly Brilliant Cleansing Provider in Clermont, Florida, suggests figuring out if the business performs history checks on workers, which is a question our professionals say most homeowners forget. And also make certain to ask if it will certainly be the very same team cleaning your house every time.

I began a cleansing solution firm right here in my residence town of Toronto back in 2006, it's called Tidy My Space who would have believed!? Throughout the years, I've discovered a great deal concerning this sector and also I wished to answer an inquiry that I get asked a lot: Exactly how do I recognize which cleaning firm to hire? Whether you want to hire a cleaning company to assist you with a one-off job, an annual springtime clean, or something on a more regular basis, there are a few things you need to inquire regarding before you choose.

The Buzz on Home Cleaning Services

" But, it's cheaper to employ an under-the-table maid for money!" is something I often hear. Funny enough, I always recommend people to employ that maid if price is their major worry, as well as if points go well, maintain her close. However, when points don't go well, that's when you bring in a service company.

So, below are 10 points you need to take into consideration when you're seeking to work with a cleansing service company. Start by asking family and friends that they utilize references provide you an inside check out what a firm is everything about not simply what they claim on their site (allow's be straightforward, a business can write anything).

Pleased individuals do not have a tendency to create as many evaluations as miserable people that feel compelled to shower the world with their terrible experiences. Remember, sometimes, those evaluations are people utilizing it as a possibility to air vent, blow a tale disproportionate, or try to harm the reputation of the company.

Not known Facts About Office Cleaning http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/?action=click&contentCollection&region=TopBar&WT.nav=searchWidget&module=SearchSubmit&pgtype=Homepage#/cleaning company Services

Nobody is perfect. The various other point to look out for is a business with an ideal rating. I know business that pay customers to compose reviews for them, so obviously, they're mosting likely to be 100% ideal. Regardless, a good general rule is to avoid a firm with all perfect scores, stay clear of the company with all horrible scores, and also find the ones with really constant high scores.

A firm needs to agree to tell you if they have this coverage and offer copies of their policies at your request. Currently, understand that this contributes to the cost of operating a service company, which is why the rates are higher per hour or per work. Nevertheless, this degree of assurance is beneficial, especially when you're allowing a person right into your residence, and also could eventually be on the hook for something that goes incorrect bear in mind, we stay in a litigious globe! For how long have they been in organisation for? Does the firm have any kind of honors, accreditations, or associations with specialist companies? I like to look out for this since it makes me really feel comforted that a company is credible and concerned with their reputation.

These are points we have actually functioned tough to acquire as well as promote happily as a company. It shows our personnel, clients, and also possible customers, that we have done every little thing we can to provide exceptional solution. To give this a bit extra context, there are a couple of business right here in Toronto that have a poor reputation and merely shut down as well as re-open under an additional name.

Indicators on Professional Cleaning Services You Need To Know

Does the firm take requests or supply a set solution? Exactly how detailed will they get? Depending upon what you intend to be done, inquire regarding what level of service is provided. If you can personalize it and also hire somebody ahead as well as tick a bunch of points off your to-do list, or if you just obtain ניקיון דירות the very same solution each browse through irrespective of what you want to be done, or, if you can do a combination.

Make certain to ask about breakage, damages, and complete satisfaction assures a firm needs to back up its work and its workers. If you're not pleased as a customer, what are they prepared to do for you, exactly how will they make it right? It's just a truth of life things will damage.

This appears crazy, and also I recognize numerous business do not do this. They tell the customer to claim it under their very own home owner's insurance coverage, or chalk it up to an inescapable error. If you're not happy with the cleansing, what will the firm provide you? A touch-up? A complimentary cleansing? Nothing? Companies have different plans concerning this so learn what recourse you have if you're not happy with the degree of service you've gotten.

The 5-Second Trick For Cleaning Services Company

Normally, contract employees don't delight in the exact same advantages as staff members do, nor do they have the same kind of oversight. While they're normally less expensive to work with, they are commonly times inconsistently educated and are not as trustworthy because the truth is they're "replaceable" to a huge level by that I mean that there is little to no financial investment in their actual job item by the firm contracting out the work, so they can promptly move on to another professional while having lost little to no investment (training, taxes, advantages, etc.).

Workers also pay taxes and have actually tax obligations paid on their behalf by the employer, which sustains the district or state and country you stay in. These two classifications and the regulations surrounding them will certainly vary from country to nation. In Canada, I know the regulations throughout, as well as our team are staff members due to the fact that it is better for them (sadly, more pricey and less profitable for us!), as well as far better for the country.

Do they utilize their very own cleaning supplies and also tools, or do you have to provide your very own? We need our clients to supply their own and, naturally, help them determine exactly what they need. We sell sets or offer them with a buying checklist based on their specific needs.

The smart Trick of Commercial Cleaning Companies That Nobody is Talking About

Better, each home has various needs; pets, individuals, coatings, and also whatnot. I'm a huge proponent of making use of the appropriate items and also tools on each surface, and I think it is better to give your own to decrease as well as reduce cross-contamination as well as prospective injury to surfaces. Figure out what the plan for terminating or altering your service is.

Many firms charge a termination fee because it can be hard to reschedule cleansers in the nick of time, and also the business has to cover off their lost wages. So, if you know this info, you can better prepare and plan for any scheduling problems.

The 6-Minute Rule for Move Out Cleaning

Keeping a house tidy can be a never-ending job that consumes much of our downtime. If life seems to revolve around wiping, vacuuming, cleaning and also altering bed linens, working with an expert housekeeping solution in your location may be the solution. This overview covers every little thing to anticipate from a housekeeping or house maid solution consisting of package options, what concerns to ask as well as what they charge.

How Office Cleaning can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.

Depending upon your place or the business you use, these solutions are referred to by numerous names: caretaker, cleaning service or house maid. "House cleaning" historically referred to a salaried, live-in worker of rich homes that ran the family a lot like a butler. Today, it's simply one more name for a maid. Selecting the ideal solution is a simple process of research study and asking the ideal concerns.

Learn what solutions cover. Establish your budget as well as what you really require done. Meeting solutions as well as ask the ideal inquiries. Recognize what to expect when the solution starts. Before you choose a housekeeper, ask yourself if you really require it. If what you're trying to stay clear of is a messy mess, you may wish to go with a pda.

House maid solution are different as well as specialized. Many service companies begin with a base bundle after that move right into specialized recurring or single services for your details demands. Special residence cleaning company are commonly readily available for larger tasks such as garages, post-moving or post-construction. Maid services, staffed by trained specialist house cleaners, are available in a variety of alternatives including: On a regular basis set up regular check outs.

Cleaning Services Near Me Things To Know Before You Buy

Single help on unique celebrations. Requiring tasks such as garage or cellar cleansing. Events prior to as well as after. Some companies likewise offer present certifications. Residence cleansing needs differ considerably based on your residence size, location and what you actually want and also need. With the majority of large companies, you can expect a basic plan with optional solutions.

One-time brows through have a tendency to set you back twice as much as a frequently set up persisting browse through. However exactly how much is your totally free time worth to you? The average American invests about doing duties. House cleaning solutions expense approximately. For independent maids, anticipate to invest in between since they bill between.

You may be priced estimate extra per hour for a specialist firm, but they generally function in teams to obtain the task done quickly. Weekly, Bi-Weekly or Month-to-month. Full Cooking Area Cleansing Full Bathroom Servicing Vacuuming Dusting Transforming Linens Dishes Addons to the conventional package if you require something specific. Washing Relocating furnishings Sprucing up woodwork Ceilings & lights Window Drapery Upholstery Flooring waxing Carpet cleansing Includes anything from standard and also optional solutions in seldom used areas or prior to special events.

Not known Details About Professional Cleaning Services

You can additionally employ a local housemaid recommendation network for a mix of both. Independent cleaner service recommendations and referrals giving a trustworthy solution on a budget. You should still have these specialists complete a background check prior to working with. Bigger companies screen their employees in advance. Very same person every time Customized service Expenses less without overhanging Consistency gradually Insured as well as bound History checks finished No work paperwork or taxes Dependable Not generally insured Employment forms to file No background check Expensive Large teams several employees in your house per hour for a single person per hr normally for a team of two Much like any solution that will enter your house, you'll intend to comply with a couple of standards.

Prior to working with a solution, meeting companies or people. Examine out the questions listed below that you can ask in the interview Make certain to collect referrals as well as call them. After all, they will certainly have a whole lot of accessibility to your residence, and you should be comfortable with them. If they supply previous customer get in touch with details, ask those references how satisfied they were with the solution professional's: Preparation or schedule accessibility, Cleaning up abilities as well as equipment, Perspective or work values, as well as Professionalism and reliability or trustworthiness.

In some instances, a solution will request to utilize the property owner's products. If somebody in your house has allergies, consult your cleansing service to talk about particular items that might be beneficial. Before any kind of job begins, figure out the exact scope of the solutions you need. You may also intend to bargain extra jobs above a normal cleansing regimen, like washing.

The Definitive Guide to Home Cleaning Services Near Me

Think about co-creating a list of expectations and also responsibilities of the service. Be really specific and also don't anticipate the expert to understand precisely just how you desire something done. Spend a couple of mins going over locations you desire cleaned routinely. If it is essential that specific locations get unique attention each visit, aim them out.

Make certain you find a service that is open to personalized requests. Prior to each see, make certain to leave a list of problem areas. The kind of house you own might affect solution check outs. Accessible vehicle parking areas and also coded gates might create access obstacles that increase travel time and also therefore costs.