#how to make money with chatgpt in 2023

[aifyit]

Get Paid to Chat with ChatGPT: 5 Proven Methods for Online Earnings

Hey everyone! I'm excited to share my latest blog post on "5 ways to earn money using ChatGPT". Check it out on my website now and let me know your thoughts in the comments. #chatgpt #earnmoneyonline #ai

ChatGPT is not just a virtual assistant that answers your questions or provides information about various topics. It is a powerful tool that can help you earn money in many ways. With the increasing demand for online work and the need for remote employment opportunities, ChatGPT has emerged as a promising source of income for those who are willing to put in the effort. In this article, we will…

[nkaffiliatemarketing]

[make-money-2023]

7 Ways Make Money Online

1. Convert your passion into money

A tool to help support the creator economy and the gig economy, Festi is an easy, fast and free way to earn money. Using Festi’s payment platform, creators can charge for online classes from anywhere at any time. “For example, if you are a fitness instructor and realize you have an hour to work out at the end of the day (or the next morning), you can post a pop-up workout (in person or on Zoom) and charge people to join you,” says founder Rita Ting-Hopper. Two of the top users are Bolivian sisters Jaz and Gabriela, who post high-intensity dance fitness classes. “With Festi, you can turn any idea into a business by posting your offer in literally minutes,” says Ting-Hopper. “There is no need to create a website, figure out a payment system or chase down Venmos to get paid.”

2. Make music

Have some musical talent? Check out Songfinch, which makes it possible for anyone to earn money by writing and producing music. Founded in 2016, Songfinch is backed by big industry names including The Weeknd, Quincy Jones and Doja Cat. Here’s how it works: People can order a personalized one-of-a-kind song from a Songfinch artist, from birthday jingles to holiday tunes to anniversary odes. The songwriters work on their own timeline and retain the full rights to everything they create. Some Songfinch artists have been able to earn up to $80,000 in one year.

3. Become a virtual assistant

As a virtual assistant, you can offer administrative, technical or creative services to clients from the comfort of your own home. And guess what—it pays well. You can find virtual assistant job opportunities through websites like Flexjobs, 24/7 Virtual Assistants and Fancy Hands.

4. Write a book

Whether you’re burning to pen the next great American novel or just have an idea for an e-book that will teach someone how to do something, it’s easier to write a book than you think. Gone are the days of agents and book publishers. These days, self-publishing has become simple and profitable, thanks to sites like Barnes & Noble Press (a free service that lets you sell print or ebooks to millions of readers), Blurb (which helps you create, print and sell professional-quality photo books) and Lulu (a print-on-demand platform with free tools to help create, publish and sell your story).

5. Offer freelance services

Writing, editing, graphic design, coding, digital marketing, admin work—whatever skill you have, the options are endless when it comes to freelancing. But how to get the word out there? You can easily offer services to clients around the world via a number of websites that allow users to enjoy the freedom and flexibility of finding freelance work from anywhere across the globe to grow your brand—and your dreams. Some of the best online talent solutions for connecting businesses with freelancers include Fiverr, Upwork, Freelancer and Working Not Working.

6. Market your skills

Or perhaps your skills are more hands-on, from handyman work to cleaning to moving to home remodeling to something as simple as waiting in line. TaskRabbit is a platform that connects people with skilled professionals who can complete various tasks, while Airtasker is a company that acts as a marketplace for services providers. Unlike the traditional gig economy, Airtasker uses a flex economy model, with its “Taskers” working wherever and whenever they want and determining how much they want to get paid.

7. Share your internet bandwidth

Here’s an interesting way to earn passive income: Honeygain, an app that allows you to make money online by sharing your Internet connection. How does it work? Install the application and make sure that it’s running in the background; the app will do the work for you. The shared connection is used for various business cases, including ad verification, price comparison and brand protection. According to Honeygain, the company takes privacy seriously and uses various encryption technologies to ensure that the data being transmitted through the platform is safe and protected. Users can increase their earnings by adding more devices and connecting them to different IP addresses, adding referrals, opening a “lucky pot” every day and participating in social media contests.

[earnmoneyonlineai]

Earn $1000 Daily Online

10 Legitimate Ways to Earn up to $1000 Daily Online

Introduction: In today's digital age, the internet offers countless opportunities to earn money online. Whether you're looking to supplement your income or want to pursue a full-time online career, there are legitimate avenues that can help you earn up to $1000 per day. In this article, we'll explore ten proven methods that can generate substantial income online. Keep in mind that success in any online endeavor requires dedication, perseverance, and consistent effort. Let's dive in!

Freelancing: Freelancing is a popular way to monetize your skills and expertise. Platforms like Upwork, Freelancer, and Fiverr connect freelancers with clients seeking services such as writing, graphic design, programming, virtual assistance, and much more. By showcasing your abilities and building a reputation, you can attract high-paying clients and earn a significant income.

Online Tutoring: If you have knowledge in a particular subject, consider online tutoring. Websites like VIPKid, Tutor.com, and Chegg Tutors allow you to teach students of all ages and earn money on an hourly basis. Subjects like mathematics, languages, and science are in high demand, and providing quality education can help you earn a substantial income.

Affiliate Marketing: Affiliate marketing involves promoting products or services and earning a commission for each sale or referral made through your unique affiliate link. Platforms like Amazon Associates, ClickBank, and ShareASale offer a wide range of products to promote. By creating valuable content, building a loyal audience, and effectively marketing products, you can earn significant commissions.

Create and Sell Online Courses: If you have expertise in a particular field, consider creating and selling online courses. Platforms like Udemy, Teachable, and Skillshare provide the infrastructure to host and market your courses to a global audience. By offering valuable knowledge and skills, you can attract students and generate a steady stream of income.

E-commerce and Dropshipping: Setting up an online store and engaging in dropshipping can be a lucrative venture. Platforms like Shopify and WooCommerce provide easy-to-use tools to create and manage your online store. Identify trending products or a niche market, establish reliable suppliers, and implement effective marketing strategies to drive traffic and generate sales.

Stock and Forex Trading: Engaging in stock or forex trading requires knowledge and skill, but it can also be highly rewarding. Learning technical analysis, understanding market trends, and managing risk are crucial aspects of successful trading. Online brokerages like eToro and TD Ameritrade provide user-friendly platforms to start your trading journey.

Content Creation on YouTube: YouTube has become a massive platform for content creators to earn money through advertising revenue, brand sponsorships, and merchandise sales. Find a niche that interests you, create engaging videos, and consistently produce high-quality content to grow your subscriber base. Once you meet the monetization requirements, you can earn a significant income from your YouTube channel.

Online Surveys and Microtasks: Although not as lucrative as some other methods on this list, participating in online surveys and microtasks can provide a supplemental income. Websites like Swagbucks, Amazon Mechanical Turk, and Survey Junkie offer opportunities to complete surveys, watch videos, perform small tasks, and earn rewards or cash.

Virtual Real Estate: Investing in virtual real estate, such as domain names and websites, can be a profitable venture. Purchase domain names with potential value or create niche websites with quality content and traffic. By selling these assets on platforms like Flippa or through private negotiations, you can earn a substantial return on your investment.

Online Consulting and Coaching: If you have expertise in a particular field, consider offering online consulting or coaching services. Whether it's business,

[moneymentality]

A Proven Path To Becoming A Crypto Millionaire: Click the LINK to GET RICH with BITCOIN now!

[goood515]

Are SEO Services Worth It?

In today's digital landscape, businesses are constantly seeking ways to improve their online presence and drive more organic traffic to their websites. Search engine optimization (SEO) has emerged as a crucial strategy to achieve these goals. However, many business owners and marketers often wonder if investing in SEO services is truly worth it. In this article, we will explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of SEO services to help you make an informed decision.

Here you will find a secret that will make your site in the first Google search to find out the secret here

Increased Organic Traffic:

One of the primary advantages of SEO services is the potential for increased organic traffic to your website. By optimizing your website's content and structure, SEO experts can improve your rankings in search engine results pages (SERPs). Higher rankings mean better visibility, which in turn leads to more clicks and visitors. The targeted nature of organic traffic also means that the people landing on your website are more likely to be interested in your products or services, increasing the chances of conversion.

Long-term Results:

Unlike some other forms of digital marketing, SEO is a long-term strategy that can yield sustainable results. While it may take time to see significant improvements in rankings, the efforts put into optimizing your website can have a lasting impact. By focusing on creating high-quality content, building authoritative backlinks, and improving user experience, SEO services can help establish your website as a valuable resource in your industry. This can lead to continued organic traffic and brand exposure, even after the initial optimization work is done.

Here you will find a secret that will make your site in the first Google search to find out the secret here 🔍✨

Cost-effectiveness:

Compared to traditional advertising methods, SEO services can be highly cost-effective. While there are upfront costs associated with hiring an SEO agency or specialist, the long-term benefits can outweigh the initial investment. Unlike paid advertising, where you need to continuously spend money to maintain visibility, SEO focuses on organic rankings that can drive traffic without ongoing expenses. Additionally, the targeted nature of SEO means that you are reaching potential customers actively searching for products or services related to your business, increasing the chances of conversion and maximizing your return on investment (ROI).

Competitive Advantage:

In today's competitive online landscape, having a strong SEO strategy can give you a significant advantage over your competitors. By outranking them in search results, you can capture a larger share of organic traffic and potential customers. SEO services can help you identify and target relevant keywords, optimize your website's structure, and improve your overall online presence. By leveraging the expertise of SEO professionals, you can stay ahead of the curve and ensure that your website remains visible and competitive in search engine rankings.

Potential Drawbacks:

While SEO services offer many benefits, it's important to consider some potential drawbacks as well. SEO is a constantly evolving field, and search engine algorithms are regularly updated. This means that the strategies and techniques used today may not be as effective in the future. It's essential to work with an SEO agency or specialist who stays up-to-date with the latest industry trends and adapts their strategies accordingly. Additionally, achieving significant improvements in rankings can take time, and results may not be immediate. Patience and consistent efforts are required to see the full benefits of SEO services

Here you will find a secret that will make your site in the first Google search to find out the secret here 🔍✨

 SEO services can be highly valuable for businesses looking to improve their online visibility and drive organic traffic to their websites. The benefits of increased organic traffic, long-term results, cost-effectiveness, and competitive advantage make SEO a worthwhile investment for many businesses. However, it's crucial to work with experienced professionals who can adapt to the ever-changing SEO landscape and deliver sustainable results. By considering the potential drawbacks and making informed decisions, businesses can harness the power of SEO to enhance their online presence and achieve their marketing goals.

[mohitjr]

Learn How This Person is Making $1,000 Every Day Just From Home Easily

[freshdailyaffirmations]

Chat Gpt Make Money $100/Daily with Chatgpt AI (Chat GPT Tutorial) Part 1

[donascozylivingroom]

SPECIFIC/UNSPECIFIC MANIFESTORS

Hey y'all.

In May of 2023 I affirmed almost only 1 affirmation "all my wishes come true easilly and effortlessly". it was the most blessed period of my life since my childhood. i even traveled to Corfu, Greece, which is one of those "travel is hard to get" ones for me, that i have more resistance to usually. it was the most beautiful vacation.

plus, everything in my life went so good, i was journaling every day and i looked through what i was writing and putting pictures of in my goodnotes app on my ipad (another manifestation of mine i will maybe make a post another time) and my life was super happy.

so i decided that this year this will be my only affirmation. because last year i was like yeah well this is great but i want specific things and this is kinda good/awesome things that are coming sort of as a surprise from the universe. but it didn't work as well for me to affirm for specific things, i manifested a lot but it didn t make me as happy. so i decided this year to try again and let the universe decide.

but this leads me to my point: I know of myself what I am in Human Design, an unspecific manifestor. This means exactly what i iterrated here: unspecific affirmations work better for us unspecific manifestors. it's not that we cannot get specific things, it's that we are more 'made' to flow with the abundance of the universe.

for example for me as an unspecific manifestor, i get results faster if i affirm "i have a lot of money" rather then "i have X (specific) sum of money".

and as a specific manifestor, one would better get super speciffic with what they are manifesting.

i think this is an untalked subject in the manifestation world, that trips people up. for example an unspecific manifestor might teach a specific manifestor that "they are better off looking for the feeling of the desire and to affirm with feeling" while a specific manifestor might tell an unspecific to get super specific and manifest simply through mindless repetition, and both won't work the same for each other.

so i started with my affirmation, "all my wishes come true easilly and effortlessly" (no red car, no million dollars, no specific sp, etc - literally, unspecific) 6 days ago and today i started journaling too.

just while i was journaling i noticed things happening around me that made me feel like this aff works so well for me. for ex i didn't like what my brother was listening to and just affirming a few times he left to listen in his apartment. then he came back with soft music and he got an ad for an event that i saw yesterday with my friend and she said it seemed too expensive for her for what they offered (but i secretly wished we could go) . seeing the ad, i told my brother what she said without thinking much of it and he offered to pay for both of us 🥰. coincidence? i think not.

so to find out whether u are a specific or unspecific manifestor in HD u have to look online and ask google or chatgpt how to find out "am i a specific or unspecific manifestor in human design" (because i forgot which arrow in the chart exactly shows u) and then do ur chart with ur date and time of birth.

U can find many interesting things by doing ur chart and sending it to chatgpt, rather than paying for an explanation, but anyways....

good luck! :)

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Google's chatbot panic

The really remarkable thing isn’t just that Microsoft has decided that the future of search isn’t links to relevant materials, but instead lengthy, florid paragraphs written by a chatbot who happens to be a habitual liar — even more remarkable is that Google agrees.

If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/16/tweedledumber/#easily-spooked

Microsoft has nothing to lose. It’s spent billions on Bing, a search-engine no one voluntarily uses. Might as well try something so stupid it might just work. But why is Google, a monopolist who has a 90+% share of search worldwide, jumping off the same bridge as Microsoft?

There’s a delightful Mastodon thread about this, written by Dan Hon, where he compares the chatbot-enshittified front ends to Bing and Google to Tweedledee and Tweedledum:

https://mamot.fr/@danhon@dan.mastohon.com/109832788458972865

“At the front of the house, Alice found two curious characters, both search engines.

“‘I am Googl-E,’ said the one plastered in advertisements.

“‘And I am Bingle-Dum,’ said the other, who was the smaller of the two, and sported a pout, as to having fewer visitors and opportunity for conversation than the other.

“‘I know you,’ said Alice. ‘Are you to present me with a puzzle? Perhaps one of you tells the truth and the other lies?’

“‘Oh no,’ said Bingle-Dum.

“‘We both lie,’ added Googl-E.”

It just keeps getting better:

“‘This is truly an intolerable situation. If you both lie,’

“ — ‘And lie convincingly,’ added Bingle-Dum — 

“‘Yes, thank you. If that is so, then how am I to ever trust either of you?’

“Googl-E and Bingle-Dum turned to face each other and shrugged.”

Chatbot search is a terrible idea, especially in an era in which the web is likely to fill up with vast mountains of AI bullshit, the frozen gabble of stochastic parrots:

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Google’s chatbot strategy shouldn’t be adding more madlibs to the internet — rather, they should be figuring out how to exclude (or, at a minimum, fact-check) the confident nonsense of the spammers and SEO creeps.

And yet, Google is going all-in on chatbots, with the company CEO ordering an all-hands scramble to cram chatbots into every part of the googleverse. Why on earth is the company racing Microsoft to see who can be first to leap off the peak of inflated expectations?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gartner_hype_cycle

I just published a theory in The Atlantic, under the title “How Google Ran Out of Ideas,” where I turn to competition theory to explain Google’s sweaty insecurity, an anxiety complex that the company has been plagued by nearly since its inception:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/02/google-ai-chatbots-microsoft-bing-chatgpt/673052/

The core theory: a quarter of a century, the Google founders had one amazing idea — a better way to do search. The capital markets showered the company in money, and it hired the very best, brightest, most creative people it could find, but then it created a corporate culture that was incapable of capitalizing on their ideas.

Every single product Google made internally — except for its Hotmail clone — died. Some of those products were good, some were terrible, but it didn’t matter. Google — a company that cultivated the ballpit-in-the-lobby whimsy of a Willy Wonka factory — couldn’t “innovate” at all.

Every successful Google product except search and gmail is an acquisition: mobile, ad-tech, videos, server management, docs, calendaring, maps, you name it. The company desperately wants to be a “making things” company, but it’s actually a “buying things” company. Sure, it’s good at operationalizing and scaling products, but that’s table-stakes for any monopolist:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/06/technical-excellence-and-scale

The cognitive dissonance of a self-styled “creative genius” whose true genius is spending other people’s money to buy other people’s products and take credit for them drives people to do truly bonkers thing (as any Twitter user can attest).

Google has long exhibited this pathology. In the mid-2000s — after Google chased Yahoo into China and started censoring its search-results and collaborating on state surveillance — we used to say that the way to get Google to do something stupid and self-destructive was to get Yahoo to do it first.

This was quite a time. Yahoo was desperate and failing, a graveyard of promising acquisitions that were gutshot and left to bleed out right there on the public internet as the dueling princelings of Yahoo senior management performed a backstabbing Medici LARP that had them competing to see who could sabotage the others. Going into China was an act of desperation after the company was humiliated by Google’s vastly superior search. Watching Google copy Yahoo’s idiotic gambits was baffling.

Baffling at the time, that is. As time went by and Google slavishly copied other rivals, its pathology of insecurity revealed itself. Google repeatedly failed to make a popular “social” product, and as Facebook commanded an ever-larger share of the ad-market, Google made a full-court press to compete with it. The company made Google Plus integration a “key performance indictator” for every division, and the result was a bizarre morass of ill-starred “social” features in every Google product — products that billions of users relied on for high-stakes operations, which were suddenly festooned with “social” buttons that made no sense.

The G+ debacle was truly incredible: some G+ features and integrations were great and developed loyal followings, but these were overshadowed by the incoherent, top-down insistence of making Google a “social-first” company. When G+ collapsed, it totally imploded, and the useful parts of G+ that people had come to rely upon disappeared along with the stupid parts.

For anyone who lived through the G+ tragicomedy, Google’s pivot to Bard — a chatbot front-end for search results — is grimly familiar. It’s a real “die a hero or live long enough to become a villain moment.” Microsoft — the monopolist that was only stayed from strangling Google in its cradle by the trauma of its antitrust dragging — has transformed from a product-creation company to an acquisitions and operations company, and Google is right behind it.

Just last year, Google laid off 12,000 staffers to please a private-equity “activist investor” — in the same year, it declared a $70b stock buyback, extracting enough capital to pay those 12,000 Googlers’ salaries for the next 27 years. Google is a financial company with a sideline in adtech. It has to be: when your only successful path to growth requires access to the capital markets to fund anticompetitive acquisitions, you can’t afford to piss off the money-gods, even if you have a “dual share” structure that lets the founders outvote every other shareholder:

https://abc.xyz/investor/founders-letters/2004-ipo-letter/

ChatGPT and its imitators have all the hallmarks of a tech fad, and are truly the successor to last season’s web3 and cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps. One of the clearest and most inspiring critiques of chatbots comes from science fiction writer Ted Chiang, whose instant-classsic critique was called “ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web”:

https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web

Chiang points out a key difference between the output of ChatGPT and human authors: a human author’s first draft is often an original idea, badly expressed, while the best ChatGPT can hope for is a competently expressed, unoriginal idea. ChatGPT is perfectly poised to improve on the SEO copypasta that legions of low-paid workers pump out in a bid to climb the Google search results.

Speaking of Chiang’s essay in this week’s episode of the This Machine Kills podcast, Jathan Sadowski expertly punctures the ChatGPT4 hype bubble, which holds that the next version of the chatbot will be so amazing that any critiques of the current technology will be rendered obsolete:

https://soundcloud.com/thismachinekillspod/232-400-hundred-years-of-capitalism-led-directly-to-microsoft-viva-sales

Sadowski notes that OpenAI’s engineers are going to enormous lengths to ensure that the next version won’t be trained on any of the output from ChatGPT3. This is a tell: if a large language model can produce materials that are as good as human-produced text, then why can’t the output of ChatGPT3 be used to create ChatGPT4?

Sadowski has a great term to describe this problem: “Habsburg AI.” Just as royal inbreeding produced a generation of supposed supermen who were incapable of reproducing themselves, so too will feeding a new model on the exhaust stream of the last one produce an ever-worsening gyre of tightly spiraling nonsense that eventually disappears up its own asshole.

This is the last day (Feb 17) of my Australian tour for my book Chokepoint Capitalism with my co-author, Rebecca Giblin. We’ll be in Canberra at the Australian Digital Alliance Copyright Forum.

Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

[Image ID: Tweedledee and Tweedledum, standing at the bottom of Humpty Dumpty's wall. Dee and Dum have the logos for Google and Bing on their chests. Humpty is about to fall and is being held up by a motley collection of panicking businessmen."]

[marxism-leninism-utenaism]

that article is extremely funny but this bit specifically is bullshit

OpenAI’s shift towards profitability, combined with Sam Altman’s recent public statements indicates a number of things. Although Altman might not prioritize profits, OpenAI does. While OpenAI is routinely pumping more money to make their GPT LLMs more powerful and more clever, Sam Altman has made several public statements that basically say that AI, if unregulated by the government will prove to be disastrous. In fact, Altman, has been very vocal about the need for guidelines on how AI is developed. There have been numerous instances where Altman has predicted that AI, in its current form will take away millions of jobs. Some tech experts would even go as far as to say that Altman is having a Frankenstein moment–one, where he is somewhat regretful of the monster that he has created, although it seems that would be a farfetched reading of the situation. Despite this, OpenAI has been on the lookout for new and better ways to monetise its GPT-4 LLMs. However, it hasn’t achieved profitability. Its losses reached $540 million since the development of ChatGPT. Microsoft’s $10 billion investment, along with that of some other venture capital firms has kept OpenAI afloat and going for now. However, as Analytics India Magazine reports, OpenAI’s projection of reaching $200 million in annual revenue in 2023 and aiming for $1 billion in 2024 seems ambitious, given its mounting losses.

altman is agitating for regulation of the black-box algorithm industry because he wants to shut the door behind him. he and his company would like to impose increase compliance and regulatory costs on their competitors, and to be the people who can speak with the expert's voice when the regulations that govern them are drafted.

this isnt some moral play its an economic one. even in this segment forbes sets out the exact economic incentives driving this activity but completely fail to connect the dots on why they are acting like this.

[fuckinghomepage]

AUGUST 28, 2023

IT'S FUCKING MONDAY.

WORDS OF WISDOM OF THE FUCKING DAY:

A ROOM WITHOUT BOOKS IS LIKE A BODY WITHOUT A SOUL.

EDUCATE YOUR IGNORANT ASS:

10 DAMN RULES FOR PLAY. more>>

FUCKING MIND-BLOWING BOOK OF THE DAY:

HOW MOTHERFUCKERS MAKE MONEY ONLINE WITH CHATGPT. more>>

USEFUL SHIT OF THE GODDAMN DAY:

GET SOME FUCKING WORK DONE OUTSIDE. more>>

WEBSITE OF THE FUCKING DAY:

KNUCKLE TATTOO GENERATOR. more>>

AWESOME-AS-SHIT VIDEO OF THE DAY:

HOW A GODDAMN NUCLEAR WAR WILL START. more>>

[mariacallous]

Until the dramatic departure of OpenAI’s cofounder and CEO Sam Altman on Friday, Mira Murati was its chief technology officer—but you could also call her its minister of truth. In addition to heading the teams that develop tools such as ChatGPT and Dall-E, it’s been her job to make sure those products don’t mislead people, show bias, or snuff out humanity altogether.

This interview was conducted in July 2023 for WIRED’s cover story on OpenAI. It is being published today after Sam Altman’s sudden departure to provide a glimpse at the thinking of the powerful AI company’s new boss.

Steven Levy: How did you come to join OpenAI?

Mira Murati: My background is in engineering, and I worked in aerospace, automotive, VR, and AR. Both in my time at Tesla [where she shepherded the Model X], and at a VR company [Leap Motion] I was doing applications of AI in the real world. I very quickly believed that AGI would be the last and most important major technology that we built, and I wanted to be at the heart of it. Open AI was the only organization at the time that was incentivized to work on the capabilities of AI technology and also make sure that it goes well. When I joined in 2018, I began working on our supercomputing strategy and managing a couple of research teams.

What moments stand out to you as key milestones during your tenure here?

There are so many big-deal moments, it’s hard to remember. We live in the future, and we see crazy things every day. But I do remember GPT-3 being able to translate. I speak Italian, Albanian, and English. I remember just creating pair prompts of English and Italian. And all of a sudden, even though we never trained it to translate in Italian, it could do it fairly well.

You were at OpenAI early enough to be there when it changed from a pure nonprofit to reorganizing so that a for-profit entity lived inside the structure. How did you feel about that?

It was not something that was done lightly. To really understand how to make our models better and safer, you need to deploy them at scale. That costs a lot of money. It requires you to have a business plan, because your generous nonprofit donors aren't going to give billions like investors would. As far as I know, there's no other structure like this. The key thing was protecting the mission of the nonprofit.

That might be tricky since you partner so deeply with a big tech company. Do you feel your mission is aligned with Microsoft’s?

In the sense that they believe that this is our mission.

But that's not their mission.

No, that's not their mission. But it was important for the investor to actually believe that it’s our mission.

When you joined in 2018, OpenAI was mainly a research lab. While you still do research, you’re now very much a product company. Has that changed the culture?

It has definitely changed the company a lot. I feel like almost every year, there's some sort of paradigm shift where we have to reconsider how we're doing things. It is kind of like an evolution. What's more obvious now to everyone is this need for continuous adaptation in society, helping bring this technology to the world in a responsible way, and helping society adapt to this change. That wasn't necessarily obvious five years ago, when we were just doing stuff in our lab. But putting GPT-3 in an API, in working with customers and developers, helped us build this muscle of understanding the potential that the technology has to change things in the real world, often in ways that are different than what we predict.

You were involved in Dall-E. Because it outputs imagery, you had to consider different things than a text model, including who owns the images that the model draws upon. What were your fears and how successful you think you were?

Obviously, we did a ton of red-teaming. I remember it being a source of joy, levity, and fun. People came up with all these like creative, crazy prompts. We decided to make it available in labs, as an easy way for people to interact with the technology and learn about it. And also to think about policy implications and about how Dall-E can affect products and social media or other things out there. We also worked a lot with creatives, to get their input along the way, because we see it internally as a tool that really enhances creativity, as opposed to replacing it. Initially there was speculation that AI would first automate a bunch of jobs, and creativity was the area where we humans had a monopoly. But we've seen that these AI models actually have a potential to really be creative. When you see artists play with Dall-E, the outputs are really magnificent.

Since OpenAI has released its products, there have been questions about their immediate impact in things like copyright, plagiarism, and jobs. By putting things like GPT-4 in the wild, it’s almost like you’re forcing the public to deal with those issues. Was that intentional?

Definitely. It's actually very important to figure out how to bring it out there in a way that's safe and responsible, and helps people integrate it into their workflow. It’s going to change entire industries; people have compared it to electricity or the printing press. And so it's very important to start actually integrating it in every layer of society and think about things like copyright laws, privacy, governance and regulation. We have to make sure that people really experience for themselves what this technology is capable of versus reading about it in some press release, especially as the technological progress continues to be so rapid. It's futile to resist it. I think it's important to embrace it and figure out how it's going to go well.

Are you convinced that that's the optimal way to move us toward AGI?

I haven't come up with a better way than iterative deployments to figure out how you get this continuous adaptation and feedback from the real end feeding back into the technology to make it more robust to these use cases. It’s very important to do this now, while the stakes are still low. As we get closer to AGI, it's probably going to evolve again, and our deployment strategy will change as we get closer to it.