#nonvolition

[tnf4csdyh]

Elsa Jean made horny couple Joanna Angel and Small Hands scream in hot threesome Cogiendo con mi prima y mojando la camara Hot big tit lesbian babes Frida Sante, Tindra Frost eat pussy and finger each other for intense orgasm Two rich nymphomaniacs milf enjoy in a homey orgy Paula Shy gets her holes filled up with jizz of creampie by All Internal Soquei na Soninha, vagabundo do Tinder Marshallese girl suck my Dick Naughty America - MILFs in costume, Casca Akashova & Rachael Cavalli, need some dick after a big sca BBC and blonde Glam babe Bibi Miami fingerfucked hard while blowing dick

[hungwy]

The inalienable sense of choice conceived in action which is retroactively assigned as nonvolitional which may nevertheless have actually been nonvolitional but cannot be ignored as the immediate experience of choice

[poisonheadcrabsalesman]

Mayday

Where’s the Infinity in Halo Infinite? Is she still in one piece? What’s going to happen? Hopefully not this!

Roland POV of a sinking ship. Inspired by many things but also the Old Russia 2 lore from Destiny.

-

Mayday. Mayday. Mayday. This is UNSC INF-101 Infinity, requesting immediate support. Survivors aboard. Prioritization code: November Zero dash One dash-

He can’t listen to his own voice echoing through the dying ship, the recording he made so any help would hear a human enough sounding voice and maybe-

No one’s coming. There is no one else. Humanity’s last bastion, the Infinity in all her glory was dying. He couldn’t help seeing the numbers, he was the ship after all. Disparate threads of himself feeding him live data from cameras, sensors, and neural interfaces that were going dark--. 

No. 

He can’t look and see the biosigns blipping out. Can’t focus on that or he’ll lose himself to the waves of grief threatening to wash over his matrix.

---

Casualties on multiple levels. Loss of atmosphere in hangars 3, 5, 11, and 12. Comms were offline on several decks as the enemy jammed signals and fought him at every turn. The aft weapons controls were gone, too close to the engine room which had been the enemy’s first target. 4.9 meters of titanium armor and energy shielding wasn’t enough to save her from the organized Banished onslaught. All the frigates that had been scrambled, along with the pelicans and broadswords were silent. 

They were floating there as each pass took more from him. More of his eyes went dark, more of his crew went missing, more of his massive web was undone and he was left trying to stitch together solutions. MAC cannons were still online but without a firing solution or visible target they were useless. 

Spartans and scientists huddled near his hearts and brains, the last few server rooms still sealed were bright lights compared to the growing darkness. It was worse than the last time the ship was boarded because he is painfully aware and no killcode is preventing him from working properly. He’s just overwhelmed.

Roland isn’t made for combat. His specialization is in astronavigation and administration. He’s trying to be brave but the conditions are terrible and falling fast. His crew, his people, his ship. They always found a way. He hadn’t been with them long but they had always survived, always found a way to shoot their way out. But now.

They’re dead in the water and the Banished ships are circling like sharks. Nonvolitional AI tell him the numbers, voices blank and unhelpful as he thinks, thinks, thinks. Thinking is what he does, what he is, a being of pure thought and yet he’s drawing a blank because he cannot accept, won’t accept what’s about to happen.

Time means so little and so much to AI. They process everything on an incomprehensible scale compared to humans. Roland was supposed to have a few more years with them. But his crew was too slow, too human to know what they were up against, to know the mounting odds. Roland was sure the captain had an idea. He could see it in the set of his mouth and the way he’s squared his shoulders.

Roland’s eyes on the bridge still work and he takes in the bridge crew seemingly frozen in time at their stations. Sees the stiff postures and dilated pupils, sees them looking to the captain for direction and strength. Roland knows he’ll give it to them until the very end. He’s so proud of his captain, and all of his crew. 

He also knows that he can’t panic. No one wants to see their own ship fearing the end while they’re still on it. 

He tries accessing the one remaining repulsor engine and it sputters weakly but still fires. Part of him calculates the chances of survival if they attempt to land on the Halo in front of them. Some of his crew might survive. 

He forms his avatar on the bridge’s holodisplay and stares out the viewport, stares past the remnants of UNSC ships and floating debris. The chances aren’t great but he’s working with what he’s got. Miller wouldn’t like it and the thought makes him grit his avatar’s teeth before he turns back to his crew. 

Commander Palmer is still frozen in time, standing tall and strong next to their captain. She’d make sure he doesn’t make any stupid decisions, like try to take the ship in manually. Lt. Jet would back up his math and Captain Lasky would have to agree that it’s their best course of action.

Roland rolls his shoulders and clasps his hands and allows his processing speeds to dwindle before he burns out another stack. He has his plan, now to make his humans listen. No one else has to die. His ship cannot become a tomb with him sitting alone in the empty cold. 

Captain Lasky mumbles to Commander Palmer about his half formed plan. Not bad for a human with only a few seconds to respond, Roland thinks as he turns it over. He lets the captain finish before turning to face him with a bit of a flourish. He’s allowed to be a little dramatic, given the circumstances.

"That's because you haven't heard my great idea." He crosses his arms and musters a smile for them. He’s going to save as many of them as he can.

[kontextmaschine]

I suppose one thing about the personality change sexuality shift is while it still respects sexual orientation as nonvolitional, it undermines any "born this way" sense; I was only born once

[7r0773r]

Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion by Jia Tolentino

The first time I was ever paid to publish anything, it was 2013, the end of the blog era. Trying to make a living as a writer with the internet as a standing precondition of my livelihood has given me some professional motivation to stay active on social media, making my work and personality and face and political leanings and dog photos into a continually updated record that anyone can see. In doing this, I have sometimes felt the same sort of unease that washed over me when I was a cheerleader and learned how to convincingly fake happiness at football games—the feeling of acting as if conditions are fun and normal and worthwhile in the hopes that they will just magically become so. To try to write online, more specifically, is to operate on a set of assumptions that are already dubious when limited to writers and even more questionable when turned into a categorical imperative for everyone on the internet: the assumption that speech has an impact, that it’s something like action; the assumption that it’s fine or helpful or even ideal to be constantly writing down what you think. (The I in the Internet, p. 12)

***

At one point in The Presentation of Self, [Erving] Goffman writes that the audience’s way of shaping a role for the performer can become more elaborate than the performance itself. This is what the online expression of solidarity sometimes feels like—a manner of listening so extreme and performative that it often turns into the show. (The I in the Internet, p. 29)

***

In The Attention Merchants, Tim Wu observes that technologies designed to increase control over our attention often have the opposite effect. He uses the TV remote control as one example. It made flipping through channels “practically nonvolitional, he writes, and put viewers in a “mental state not unlike that of a newborn or a reptile.” On the internet, this dynamic has been automated and generalized in the form of endlessly varied but somehow monotonous social media feeds—these addictive, numbing fire hoses of information that we aim at our brains for much of the day. In front of the timeline, as many critics have noted, we exhibit classic reward-seeking lab-rat behavior, the sort that’s observed when lab rats are put in front of an unpredictable food dispenser. Rats will eventually stop pressing the lever if their device dispenses food regularly or not at all. But if the lever’s rewards are rare and irregular, the rats will never stop pressing it. In other words, it is essential that social media is mostly unsatisfying. That is what keeps us scrolling, scrolling, pressing our lever over and over in the hopes of getting some fleeting sensation—some momentary rush of recognition, flattery, or rage. (The I in the Internet, p. 30)

***

In a later Awl piece, [Matt] Buchanan described the chopped salad as “the perfect mid-day nutritional replenishment for the mid-level modern knowledge worker” with “neither the time nor the inclination to eat a lunch . . . which would require more attention than the little needed for the automatic elliptical motion of the arm from bowl to face, jaw swinging open and then clamping shut over and over until the fork comes up empty and the vessel can be deposited in the garbage can under the desk.” (Always Be Optimizing, p. 67)

***

As a teenager, I subsisted on pizza and queso and cinnamon rolls, trying to immunize myself with apathy and pleasure-seeking throughout the long stretch of time when girls, overwhelmed by sudden expectations of beauty, transmit anorexia and bulimia to one another like a virus. (Always Be Optimizing, p. 69)

***

It wasn’t until third grade or so that I grasped the fact that identity could govern our relationship to what we saw and what we read. It happened on one afternoon in particular, when I was sitting on the floor of my dim pink room, next to my pink polka-dot curtains, playing Power Rangers with my friend Allison, who insisted, over and over, that I had to play the Yellow Ranger. I didn’t want to, but she said there was no other way we could play. When I realized she wasn’t kidding—that she genuinely believed this to be something like a natural law—the anger that hit me was almost hallucinatory. She was saying, in effect, that I had failed to understand my own limits. I couldn’t be the Pink Ranger, which meant I couldn’t be Baby Spice. I couldn’t be Laura Ingalls, rocking her bench until she got kicked out of the classroom; I couldn’t be Claudia Kincaid, taking baths in the fountain at the Met. A chasm opened up between us. I told Allison I didn’t want to play anymore. She left, and I sat still, shimmering with rage. (Pure Heroines, p. 96)

***

Identity, according to [Adriana] Cavarero, is not something that we innately possess and reveal, but something we understand through narratives provided to us by others. She writes about a scene in The Odyssey where Ulysses sits incognito in the court of the Phaeacians, listening to a blind man sing about the Trojan War. Having never heard his own life articulated by another person, Ulysses starts to weep. Hannah Arendt called this moment, “poetically speaking,” the beginning of history: Ulysses “has never wept before, and certainly not when what he is now hearing actually happened. Only when he hears the story does he become fully aware of his significance.” Cavarero writes, “The story told by an ‘other’ finally revealed his own identity. And he, dressed in his magnificent purple tunic, breaks down and cries.” (Pure Heroines, pp. 124-25)

***

I kept hearing the little factoid that people my age would change careers an average of four times in our first decade out of college. Stories about how millennials “prefer” to freelance still abound. The desired takeaway seems to be: Millennials are free spirits! We’re flexible! We’ll work anywhere with a Ping-Pong table! We are up for anything and ready to connect! But a generation doesn’t start living a definitively mercurial work trajectory for reasons of personality. It’s just easier, as Malcolm Harris argues in his book Kids These Days, to think millennials float from gig to gig because we’re shiftless or spoiled or in love with the “hustle” than to consider the fact that the labor market—for people of every generation—is punitively unstable and growing more so every day. I’ve been working multiple jobs simultaneously since I was sixteen, and I have had an exceptionally lucky professional life, and, like a lot of Americans, I still think of employer-sponsored health insurance as a luxury: a near-divine perk that, at thirty, I have had for only two years in my career—the two years that I was working at Gawker, which was sued into the ground by the dropout-loving, suffrage-hating, Trump-supporting billionaire Peter Theil. (The Story of a Generation in Seven Scams, p. 169)

***

And here one of the most soul-crushing things about the Trump era reveals itself: to get through it with any psychological stability—to get through it without routinely descending into an emotional abyss—a person’s best strategy is to think mostly of himself, herself. As wealth continues to flow upward, as Americans are increasingly shut out of their own democracy, as political action is constrained into online spectacle, I have felt so may times that the choice of this era is to be destroyed or to morally compromise ourselves in order to be functional—to be wrecked, or to be functional for reasons that contribute to the wreck. (The Story of a Generation in Seven Scams, p. 193)

[dutchsmoke74-blog]

Marijuana heals and recovers

Marijuana imitates such a large number of neurological responses of different drugs that it is greatly hard to order in a particular class. Analysts will put it in any of these classifications: hallucinogenic; psychedelic drug; or serotonin inhibitor. It has properties that copy comparable substance reactions as opioids. The explanation behind this perplexity is the multifaceted nature of the various psychoactive properties found inside marijuana, both known and obscure. One late customer I saw couldn't recuperate from the visual mutilations he endured because of inescapable hallucinogenic use as long as he was all the while smoking marijuana. This appeared to be because of the hallucinogenic properties found inside dynamic cannabis (Ashton, 2001). Despite the fact that not sufficiently solid to create these visual twists without anyone else, marijuana was sufficiently solid to keep the mind from mending and recuperating.

Neurophysical Effects of THC:

Neurological messages between transmitters and receptors not just have power over feelings and mental functioning. It is similarly how the body reins both volitional and nonvolitional working. The cerebellum and the basal ganglia control all substantial development and coordination. These are two of the most liberally invigorated regions of the mind that are activated by marijuana. This clarifies marijuana's physiological impact causing adjusted pulse (Van Tuyl, 2007), and a debilitating of the muscles (Doweiko, 2009). THC at last influences all neuromotor action to some degree (Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

An intriguing marvel I have seen in all customers who recognize marijuana as their drug of decision is the utilization of marijuana smoking before eating. This is clarified by impacts of marijuana on the "CB-1" receptor. The CB-1 receptors in the cerebrum are discovered vigorously in the limbic framework, or the nucleolus accumbens, which controls the reward pathways (Martin, 2004). These reward pathways are what influence the hunger and dietary patterns as a feature of the body's characteristic survival nature, making us ache for eating nourishment and compensating us with dopamine when we at long last do (Hazeldon, 2005). Martin (2004) makes this association; calling attention to that remarkable to marijuana clients is the incitement of the CB-1 receptor straightforwardly setting off the craving.

         The intensity of marijuana is estimated by the THC content inside. As the market in the city turns out to be more focused, the power in the city turns out to be more unadulterated. This has caused a pattern in regularly rising strength that reacts to request. One typical joint of weed smoke today has an indistinguishable THC intensity from ten normal joints of weed smoked amid the 1960's (Hazelden, 2005).

THC levels will depend for the most part on what part of the cannabis leaf is being utilized for creation. For example cannabis bud can be between two to nine times more strong than completely created clears out. Hash oil, a type of marijuana created by refining cannabis tar, can yield more elevated amounts of THC than even high review buds (Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

The need to raise the measure of marijuana one smokes, or the need to escalate from poor quality to high review is referred to clinically as tolerance. The mind is productive. As it perceives that neuroreceptors are being animated without the neurotransmitters radiating those compound flags, the cerebrum creatively brings down its concoction yield so the aggregate levels are back to typical. The smoker won't feel the high any longer as his mind is currently "enduring" the more elevated amounts of synthetic concoctions and he or she has returned to feeling ordinary. The smoker presently raises the measurement to recover the old high and the cycle proceeds. The smoker may discover exchanging up in grades powerful for some time. In the end the cerebrum can stop to deliver the compound out and out, totally depending on the engineered adaptation being ingested (Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004; Hazelden, 2005).

[transporttransportingtransport]

I emphasize the nonvolitional in the act because so much is taken for granted in the name of neurotypicality, in the name of volition, of inten- tionality, of agency. For those who pass as neurotypical, for whom move- ment usually reads as volitional, it seems absolutely acceptable to have lis- tened to the song on the couch instead of walking to the corner to get milk. But for the autistic or anyone else for whom activation and impulse control may be an issue, the daily experience of not ending up where our move- ment seemed initially to be directed is not only deeply frustrating, but can also be taken as a sign of our lesser value as human beings: anything that makes us less independent in the eyes of a world that takes intentionality and volition as a normative standard tends to decrease our perceived value as contributors to society.

[daspetstuff]

Physical and Pharmacological Effects of Marijuana

Presentation:

Cannabis isn't just the most mishandled unlawful medication in the US (Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004; NIDA, 2010) it is indeed the most manhandled illicit medication around the world (UNODC, 2010). In the US it's anything but a timetable I substance which implies that it is lawfully considered as having no clinical use and it is exceptionally habit-forming (US DEA, 2010). Doweiko (2009) clarifies that not all cannabis has misuse potential. He hence recommends utilizing the basic wording marijuana when alluding to cannabis with misuse potential. For clearness this wording is utilized in this paper too.

Today, marijuana is at the cutting edge of worldwide contention discussing the propriety of its far and wide illicit status. In numerous Association states it has gotten authorized for clinical purposes. This pattern is known as "clinical marijuana" and is emphatically acclaimed by advocates while at the same time abhorred cruelly by rivals (Dubner, 2007; Nakay, 2007; Van Tuyl, 2007). It is in this setting that it was chosen to pick the subject of the physical and pharmacological impacts of marijuana for the premise of this examination article.

What is marijuana?

Marijuana is a plant all the more accurately called cannabis sativa. As referenced, some cannabis sativa plants don't have misuse potential and are called hemp. Hemp is utilized broadly for different fiber items including paper and craftsman's material. Cannabis sativa with misuse potential is the thing that we call marijuana (Doweiko, 2009). It is intriguing to take note of that albeit generally reads for a long time, there is a ton that scientists actually don't think about marijuana. Neuroscientists and researcher understand what the impacts of marijuana are nevertheless they actually don't completely get why (Hazelden, 2005).

Deweiko (2009), Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs (2004) bring up that of roughly 400 realized synthetic substances found in the cannabis plants, scientists know about more than sixty that are suspected to effectsly affect the human cerebrum. The most notable and strong of these is ∆-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. Like Hazelden (2005), Deweiko states that while we know a considerable lot of the neurophysical impacts of THC, the reasons THC delivers these impacts are hazy. Click here : mail order marijuana

Neurobiology:

As a psychoactive substance, THC straightforwardly influences the focal sensory system (CNS). It's anything but a huge scope of synapses and catalyzes other biochemical and enzymatic movement too. The CNS is animated when the THC actuates explicit neuroreceptors in the mind causing the different physical and passionate responses that will be explained all the more explicitly further on. The solitary substances that can enact synapses are substances that copy synthetic compounds that the mind creates normally. The way that THC invigorates mind work instructs researchers that the cerebrum has normal cannabinoid receptors. It is as yet muddled why people have regular cannabinoid receptors and how they work (Hazelden, 2005; Martin, 2004). What we can be sure of is that marijuana will invigorate cannabinoid receptors up to multiple times more effectively than any of the body's normal synapses at any point could (Doweiko, 2009).

Maybe the greatest secret of everything is the connection among THC and the synapse serotonin. Serotonin receptors are among the most animated by every single psychoactive medication, however most explicitly liquor and nicotine. Free of marijuana's relationship with the synthetic, serotonin is now a little gotten neurochemical and its alleged neuroscientific parts of working and design are still generally speculative (Schuckit and Tapert, 2004). What neuroscientists have found completely is that marijuana smokers have extremely undeniable degrees of serotonin movement (Hazelden, 2005). I would speculate that it very well might be this connection among THC and serotonin that clarifies the "marijuana upkeep program" of accomplishing restraint from liquor and permits marijuana smokers to stay away from agonizing withdrawal indications and stay away from yearnings from liquor. The viability of "marijuana support" for helping liquor forbearance isn't logical yet is a marvel I have actually seen with various customers.

Strangely, marijuana imitates such countless neurological responses of different medications that it is incredibly hard to arrange in a particular class. Analysts will put it in any of these classifications: hallucinogenic; psychedelic drug; or serotonin inhibitor. It has properties that impersonate comparative substance reactions as narcotics. Other substance reactions emulate energizers (Ashton, 2001; Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004). Hazelden (2005) arranges marijuana in its own extraordinary class - cannabinoids. The justification this disarray is the intricacy of the various psychoactive properties found inside marijuana, both known and obscure. One late customer I saw couldn't recuperate from the visual bends he endured because of unavoidable hallucinogenic use as long as he was all the while smoking marijuana. This appeared to be because of the hallucinogenic properties found inside dynamic cannabis (Ashton, 2001). Albeit not sufficiently able to deliver these visual twists all alone, marijuana was sufficiently able to keep the cerebrum from mending and recuperating.

Feelings:

Cannibinoid receptors are situated all through the cerebrum accordingly influencing a wide assortment of working. The most significant on the enthusiastic level is the incitement of the cerebrum's core accumbens debasing the mind's regular prize places. Another is that of the amygdala which controls one's feelings and fears (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, and Damaslio, 1995; Van Tuyl, 2007).

I have seen that the weighty marijuana smokers who I work with actually appear to share a shared characteristic of utilizing the medication to deal with their annoyance. This perception has proven based outcomes and is the premise of much logical exploration. Examination has truth be told tracked down that the connection among marijuana and overseeing outrage is clinically huge (Eftekhari, Turner, and Larimer, 2004). Outrage is a protection instrument used to make preparations for passionate outcomes of difficulty filled by dread (Cramer, 1998). As expressed, dread is an essential capacity constrained by the amygdala which is intensely invigorated by marijuana use (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, and Damaslio, 1995; Van Tuyl, 2007).

Neurophysical Impacts of THC:

Neurological messages among transmitters and receptors not just control feelings and mental working. It is additionally how the body controls both volitional and nonvolitional working. The cerebellum and the basal ganglia control all real development and coordination. These are two of the most plentifully animated spaces of the cerebrum that are set off by marijuana. This clarifies marijuana's physiological impact causing adjusted pulse (Van Tuyl, 2007), and a debilitating of the muscles (Doweiko, 2009). THC at last influences all neuromotor movement somewhat (Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

A fascinating wonders I have seen in practically all customers who distinguish marijuana as their medication of decision is the utilization of marijuana smoking prior to eating. This is clarified by impacts of marijuana on the "CB-1" receptor. The CB-1 receptors in the cerebrum are discovered vigorously in the limbic framework, or the nucleolus accumbens, which controls the prize pathways (Martin, 2004). These award pathways are what influence the hunger and dietary patterns as a feature of the body's regular endurance nature, making us desire eating food and remunerating us with dopamine when we at long last do (Hazeldon, 2005). Martin (2004) makes this association, bringing up that extraordinary to marijuana clients is the incitement of the CB-1 receptor straightforwardly setting off the craving.

What is high evaluation and second rate?

A current customer of mine clarifies how he initially smoked up to fifteen joints of "poor quality" marijuana every day except at last changed to "high evaluation" when the second rate was beginning to demonstrate incapable. Eventually, fifteen joints of high evaluation marijuana were getting ineffectual for him also. He frequently neglected to get his "high" from that by the same token. This whole cycle happened inside five years of the customer's first since forever experience with marijuana. What is high and second rate marijuana, and for what reason would marijuana start to lose it's anything but some time?

The power of marijuana is estimated by the THC content inside. As the market on the road turns out to be more cutthroat, the intensity on the road turns out to be more unadulterated. This has caused a pattern in truly rising strength that reacts to request. One normal joint of marijuana smoked today has the same THC power as ten normal joints of marijuana smoked during the 1960's (Hazelden, 2005).

THC levels will rely essentially upon which piece of the cannabis leaf is being utilized for creation. For example cannabis buds can be between two to multiple times more strong than completely created leaves. Hash oil, a type of marijuana created by refining cannabis pitch, can yield more significant levels of THC than even high evaluation buds (Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

Resilience:

The need to raise the measure of marijuana one smokes, or the need to escalate from poor quality to high review is referred to clinically as resistance. The mind is productive. As it perceives that neuroreceptors are being animated without the synapses emanating those substance flags, the cerebrum creatively brings down its synthetic yield so the absolute levels are back to typical. The smoker won't feel the high any longer as his cerebrum is currently "enduring" the more elevated levels of synthetics and the individual in question has returned to feeling ordinary. The smoker presently raises the portion to get the old high back and the cycle proceeds. The smoker may discover changing around in grades successful for some time. At last the cerebrum can stop to deliver the substance by and large, altogether depending on the manufactured form being ingested (Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004; Hazelden, 2005).

For what reason isn't there any withdrawal?

The other side of the toleran

[codylane23-blog]

Sports Media Internship Entry 6 - Career Aspirations

As studies for Sports Media and Internships conclude, the thoughts and plans on future career aspirations are coming to the forefront for Sports Media students including Cody. According to Sorgo & Spernjak (2020, p.317), ‘These decisions are important and influenced by many internal (Gläser-Zikuda et al. 2005) and external, volitional and nonvolitional factors shaping their career aspirations and decisions leading toward their actual occupations.’

Cody is an avid sports fan and has interests and passions for a wide range of sports. Over the last six years, Cody has seen his enthusiasm for horse racing develop evermore as the months and years go by to the point where he is targeting a career in racing media. While he is keeping an open mind, with the variety of different sports that he is into, he has found that he has an ability that can see him go a long way in the industry coupled up with his eagerness to learn more about the industry. 

Cody has always strived to feature in front of a camera or behind a microphone and that has not changed. While a lot of hard work is required, Cody is going to do whatever it takes to realise his dream and continues to work towards it every single day.

He has greatly appreciated the faith shown by SEN in him to do the racing form every single week for feature racing in NSW, which included some of the biggest race days on the annual racing calendar. Cody tipping the winner for some of the major races across the Spring Carnival was a big highlight and it goes a long way to pressing your claims towards becoming a professional racing form analyst in the media.

Cody will begin working with a horse racing business who provide horse racing tips, shares in horses and organising and hosting race day events and functions at the beginning of 2021. He will also be continuing to contribute to SEN Tracks racing previews by providing his thoughts and tips for some of the big race days in horse racing.

Cody is actively going to be looking at other options within the racing industry as he strives to gain himself an opportunity to work towards his ambition of being behind the microphone or in front of the camera. He is fortunate enough to have made many contacts in the racing industry in such a short space of time and he will continue to build those connections over the coming years.

He will be looking to apply at various papers who cover racing, television and radio networks both in Melbourne and across the country as Cody very much has an open mind and will take on any opportunity that presents itself. He has done well to make the contacts across the country that he has and will look to use that to his advantage going forward into the future to realise his ultimate dream.

References

Sorgo, A & Spernjak A 2020, ‘Classroom Experience As Predictors Of Career Aspirations’, Journal Of Baltic Science Education, vol.19, no.2, pp.317-332, viewed 3rd December 2020, ProQuest Central

[mostlysignssomeportents]

#5yrsago Pokertox: freezing the face-muscles implicated in your poker tells

NYC's Dr Jack Berdy offers a botox treatment called "pokertox," which freezes parts of the face implicated in poker "tells" -- nonvolitional expression-changes that signal your opinion of your cards to your adversaries.

Some players look at their cards and ‘‘might raise their eyebrows or raise one eyebrow’’ if they do or don’t like what they see.

“Some squint, or furrow their brows,’’ Berdy said.

“We can inject Botox appropriately’’ so the other player doesn’t get the message that they’re angry, disappointed or happy.

“What someone sees across the table is no movement,’’ he said.

Remember the TSA's plan to turn mall-cops into mind-readers by teaching them to read semi-mythical "microexpressions" and so detect terrorists? Even if it worked, anyone wanting to foil it could presumably plump for some terror-tox injections and pass through the TSA look-into-my-eyes-and-swear-you're-not-a-jihadi checks smoothly and without batting an eyelash.

https://boingboing.net/2012/11/26/pokertox-freezing-the-face-mu.html

[hungwy]

Are you working with nominative-accusative or ergative-absolutive in your conlang?

as a preface, ive never formalized any of the ideas below. im just taking basic thus-far unrelated things ive come up with like word order and verb classes and spitballing as i type this.

core arguments in [conlang] are differentiated through word order. there is no overt marking of core arguments otherwise (however, non-core arguments may take marking some time in the future, i havent decided). the typical structure of a transitive predicate is so:

agent (A) - verb - patient (P)

alignment is typically about what form the sole argument of an intransitive verb takes. for intransitive predicates where the subject is performing the verb, the sole argument (S) sits in the same spot as A in a transitive predicate.

sole argument (S) - verb

we would then in this context consider the language nominative-accusative, because S is behaving similarly to A.

however, there are a class of verbs which are intransitive and semantically passive -- emotion verbs like "to be angry" and nonvolitional verbs like "to fall" or "to be confused/caused confusion". i call these "verbs of experience". because arguments in [conlang] are organized by agency and patiency(word?), S is placed in the same position as P -- after the verb. thus in this context S behaves like P, which is the hallmark of ergative-absolutive alignment.

verb [of experience] - sole argument (S)

thus the language could be considered split-ergative.

it is important to point out here that [conlang] does not allow null subjects. in any construction all core arguments are accounted for either through explicit reference ("THE DOG bit the cat") or dummy pronouns ("IT bit the cat"), and verbs have inherent transitivity built into their semantics (though in the future i might consider a small class of labile verbs). so if you're "missing" a nominal of some sort in the agent slot just before a verb, you already know that the verb is actually a verb of experience.

but again. im spitballing and this is subject to refinement

(there is also something to be said about how terms like unaccusative and unergative fit into this)

[qualityindicastrains-blog]

Physical and Pharmacological Effects of Marijuana

Presentation:

Cannabis isn't just the most manhandled unlawful medication in the US (Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004; NIDA, 2010) it is in certainty the most mishandled illicit medication around the world (UNODC, 2010). In the US it is a timetable I substance which implies that it is lawfully considered as having no medicinal use and it is exceptionally addictive (US DEA, 2010). Doweiko (2009) clarifies that not all cannabis has misuse potential. He accordingly proposes utilizing the basic phrasing marijuana when alluding to cannabis with maltreatment potential. For clearness this phrasing is utilized in this paper too. Look At This Web-Site Quality Indica strains

Today, marijuana is at the cutting edge of worldwide discussion discussing the fittingness of its across the board unlawful status. In numerous Association states it has moved toward becoming legitimized for medicinal purposes. This pattern is known as "restorative marijuana" and is firmly extolled by supporters while all the while despised cruelly by rivals (Dubner, 2007; Nakay, 2007; Van Tuyl, 2007). It is in this setting it was chosen to pick the theme of the physical and pharmacological impacts of marijuana for the premise of this exploration article.

What is marijuana?

Marijuana is a plant all the more effectively called cannabis sativa. As referenced, some cannabis sativa plants don't have misuse potential and are called hemp. Hemp is utilized generally for different fiber items including paper and craftsman's canvas. Cannabis sativa with maltreatment potential is the thing that we call marijuana (Doweiko, 2009). It is fascinating to take note of that albeit broadly reads for a long time, there is a great deal that specialists still don't think about marijuana. Neuroscientists and researcher comprehend what the impacts of marijuana are nevertheless despite everything they don't completely get why (Hazelden, 2005).

Deweiko (2009), Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs (2004) point out that of around 400 realized synthetics found in the cannabis plants, specialists know about more than sixty that are suspected to effectsly affect the human cerebrum. The most notable and intense of these is ∆-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. Like Hazelden (2005), Deweiko states that while we know huge numbers of the neurophysical impacts of THC, the reasons THC delivers these impacts are hazy.

Neurobiology:

As a psychoactive substance, THC straightforwardly influences the focal sensory system (CNS). It influences a huge scope of synapses and catalyzes other biochemical and enzymatic movement too. The CNS is animated when the THC actuates explicit neuroreceptors in the cerebrum causing the different physical and passionate responses that will be explained all the more explicitly further on. The main substances that can actuate synapses are substances that copy synthetic compounds that the mind delivers normally. The way that THC animates cerebrum capacity instructs researchers that the mind has regular cannabinoid receptors. It is as yet hazy why people have regular cannabinoid receptors and how they work (Hazelden, 2005; Martin, 2004). What we cannot deny is that marijuana will animate cannabinoid receptors up to multiple times more effectively than any of the body's common synapses ever could (Doweiko, 2009).

Maybe the greatest puzzle of all is the connection among THC and the synapse serotonin. Serotonin receptors are among the most invigorated by every single psychoactive medication, yet most explicitly liquor and nicotine. Free of marijuana's association with the substance, serotonin is as of now a little gotten neurochemical and its alleged neuroscientific jobs of working and reason for existing are still for the most part theoretical (Schuckit and Tapert, 2004). What neuroscientists have found conclusively is that marijuana smokers have large amounts of serotonin movement (Hazelden, 2005). I would estimate that it might be this connection among THC and serotonin that clarifies the "marijuana support program" of accomplishing restraint from liquor and enables marijuana smokers to dodge excruciating withdrawal manifestations and maintain a strategic distance from yearnings from liquor. The viability of "marijuana support" for helping liquor restraint isn't logical however is a wonder I have by and by seen with various customers.

Strikingly, marijuana imitates such a significant number of neurological responses of different medications that it is incredibly hard to arrange in a particular class. Specialists will put it in any of these classifications: hallucinogenic; drug; or serotonin inhibitor. It has properties that copy comparative compound reactions as narcotics. Other compound reactions emulate stimulants (Ashton, 2001; Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004). Hazelden (2005) orders marijuana in its very own uncommon class - cannabinoids. The explanation behind this perplexity is the multifaceted nature of the various psychoactive properties found inside marijuana, both known and obscure. One ongoing customer I saw couldn't recuperate from the visual twists he endured because of inescapable hallucinogenic use as long as he was all the while smoking marijuana. This appeared to be because of the hallucinogenic properties found inside dynamic cannabis (Ashton, 2001). In spite of the fact that not sufficiently able to deliver these visual twists alone, marijuana was sufficiently able to keep the cerebrum from mending and recouping.

Feelings:

Cannibinoid receptors are situated all through the cerebrum in this way influencing a wide assortment of working. The most significant on the enthusiastic level is the incitement of the mind's core accumbens debasing the cerebrum's regular reward focuses. Another is that of the amygdala which controls one's feelings and fears (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, and Damaslio, 1995; Van Tuyl, 2007).

I have seen that the overwhelming marijuana smokers who I work with by and by appear to share a shared characteristic of utilizing the medication to deal with their indignation. This perception has prove based outcomes and is the premise of much logical research. Research has in reality discovered that the connection among marijuana and overseeing outrage is clinically critical (Eftekhari, Turner, and Larimer, 2004). Outrage is a protection component used to make preparations for passionate outcomes of affliction filled by dread (Cramer, 1998). As expressed, dread is an essential capacity constrained by the amygdala which is intensely invigorated by marijuana use (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, and Damaslio, 1995; Van Tuyl, 2007).

Neurophysical Impacts of THC:

Neurological messages among transmitters and receptors not just control feelings and mental working. It is additionally how the body controls both volitional and nonvolitional working. The cerebellum and the basal ganglia control all real development and coordination. These are two of the most liberally invigorated regions of the cerebrum that are activated by marijuana. This clarifies marijuana's physiological impact causing adjusted pulse (Van Tuyl, 2007), and a debilitating of the muscles (Doweiko, 2009). THC eventually influences all neuromotor action somewhat (Gold, Ice Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

A fascinating marvels I have seen in practically all customers who distinguish marijuana as their medication of decision is the utilization of marijuana smoking before eating. This is clarified by impacts of marijuana on the "CB-1" receptor. The CB-1 receptors in the cerebrum are found vigorously in the limbic framework, or the nucleolus accumbens, which controls the reward pathways (Martin, 2004). These reward pathways are what influence the hunger and dietary patterns as a feature of the body's common endurance nature, making us pine for eating sustenance and compensating us with dopamine when we at long last do (Hazeldon, 2005). Martin (2004) makes this association, calling attention to that one of a kind to marijuana clients is the incitement of the CB-1 receptor straightforwardly setting off the hunger.

[articlesonline]

Physical and Pharmacological Effects of Marijuana

Cannabis is not only the most abused illicit drug in the United States (Gold, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs, 2004; NIDA, 2010) it is in fact the most abused illegal drug worldwide (UNODC, 2010). In the United States it is a schedule-I substance which means that it is legally considered as having no medical use and it is highly addictive (US DEA, 2010). Doweiko (2009) explains that not all cannabis has abuse potential. He therefore suggests using the common terminology marijuana when referring to cannabis with abuse potential. For the sake of clarity this terminology is used in this paper as well.

Today, marijuana is at the forefront of international controversy debating the appropriateness of its widespread illegal status. In many Union states it has become legalized for medical purposes. This trend is known as "medical marijuana" and is strongly applauded by advocates while simultaneously loathed harshly by opponents (Dubner, 2007; Nakay, 2007; Van Tuyl, 2007). It is in this context that it was decided to choose the topic of the physical and pharmacological effects of marijuana for the basis of this research article.

What is marijuana? Marijuana is a plant more correctly called cannabis sativa. As mentioned, some cannabis sativa plants do not have abuse potential and are called hemp. Hemp is used widely for various fiber products including newspaper and artist's canvas. Cannabis sativa with abuse potential is what we call marijuana (Doweiko, 2009). It is interesting to note that although widely studies for many years, there is a lot that researchers still do not know about marijuana. Neuroscientists and biologists know what the effects of marijuana are but they still do not fully understand why (Hazelden, 2005).

Deweiko (2009), Gold, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs (2004) point out that of approximately four hundred known chemicals found in the cannabis plants, researchers know of over sixty that are thought to have psychoactive effects on the human brain. The most well known and potent of these is ∆-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. Like Hazelden (2005), Deweiko states that while we know many of the neurophysical effects of THC, the reasons THC produces these effects are unclear.

Neurobiology: As a psychoactive substance, THC directly affects the central nervous system (CNS). It affects a massive range of neurotransmitters and catalyzes other biochemical and enzymatic activity as well. The CNS is stimulated when the THC activates specific neuroreceptors in the brain causing the various physical and emotional reactions that will be expounded on more specifically further on. The only substances that can activate neurotransmitters are substances that mimic chemicals that the brain produces naturally. The fact that THC stimulates brain function teaches scientists that the brain has natural cannabinoid receptors. It is still unclear why humans have natural cannabinoid receptors and how they work (Hazelden, 2005; Martin, 2004). What we do know is that buy weed online cheap will stimulate cannabinoid receptors up to twenty times more actively than any of the body's natural neurotransmitters ever could (Doweiko, 2009).

Perhaps the biggest mystery of all is the relationship between THC and the neurotransmitter serotonin. Serotonin receptors are among the most stimulated by all psychoactive drugs, but most specifically alcohol and nicotine. Independent of marijuana's relationship with the chemical, serotonin is already a little understood neurochemical and its supposed neuroscientific roles of functioning and purpose are still mostly hypothetical (Schuckit & Tapert, 2004). What neuroscientists have found definitively is that marijuana smokers have very high levels of serotonin activity (Hazelden, 2005). I would hypothesize that it may be this relationship between THC and serotonin that explains the "marijuana maintenance program" of achieving abstinence from alcohol and allows marijuana smokers to avoid painful withdrawal symptoms and avoid cravings from alcohol. The efficacy of "marijuana maintenance" for aiding alcohol abstinence is not scientific but is a phenomenon I have personally witnessed with numerous clients.

Interestingly, marijuana mimics so many neurological reactions of other drugs that it is extremely difficult to classify in a specific class. Researchers will place it in any of these categories: psychedelic; hallucinogen; or serotonin inhibitor. It has properties that mimic similar chemical responses as opioids. Other chemical responses mimic stimulants (Ashton, 2001; Gold, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs, 2004). Hazelden (2005) classifies marijuana in its own special class - cannabinoids. The reason for this confusion is the complexity of the numerous psychoactive properties found within marijuana, both known and unknown. One recent client I saw could not recover from the visual distortions he suffered as a result of pervasive psychedelic use as long as he was still smoking marijuana. This seemed to be as a result of the psychedelic properties found within active cannabis (Ashton, 2001). Although not strong enough to produce these visual distortions on its own, marijuana was strong enough to prevent the brain from healing and recovering.

Emotions: Cannibinoid receptors are located throughout the brain thus affecting a wide variety of functioning. The most important on the emotional level is the stimulation of the brain's nucleus accumbens perverting the brain's natural reward centers. Another is that of the amygdala which controls one's emotions and fears (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, & Damaslio, 1995; Van Tuyl, 2007).

I have observed that the heavy marijuana smokers who I work with personally seem to share a commonality of using the drug to manage their anger. This observation has evidenced based consequences and is the basis of much scientific research. Research has in fact found that the relationship between marijuana and managing anger is clinically significant (Eftekhari, Turner, & Larimer, 2004). Anger is a defense mechanism used to guard against emotional consequences of adversity fueled by fear (Cramer, 1998). As stated, fear is a primary function controlled by the amygdala which is heavily stimulated by marijuana use (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, & Damaslio, 1995; Van Tuyl, 2007).

Neurophysical Effects of THC: Neurological messages between transmitters and receptors not only control emotions and psychological functioning. It is also how the body controls both volitional and nonvolitional functioning. The cerebellum and the basal ganglia control all bodily movement and coordination. These are two of the most abundantly stimulated areas of the brain that are triggered by marijuana. This explains marijuana's physiological effect causing altered blood pressure (Van Tuyl, 2007), and a weakening of the muscles (Doweiko, 2009). THC ultimately affects all neuromotor activity to some degree (Gold, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs, 2004).

[digitalpreacher]

we now live in a world characterized in part by non-order because it remains in process of being ordered—a process that is hampered because humans have not filled the role for which they were created. This non-order is reflected in natural disasters, disease and pain, among many other things. Sin is not the cause of all of these aspects of our current situation, but they demonstrate human inability to enforce order within creation. I would additionally be inclined to place at least some demon activity in this category, insofar as they may be amoral and nonvolitional spiritual forces that are part of the non-ordered world and bring non-order. This matches the profile that they have in the Gospels."

from "The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2-3 and the Human Origins Debate" by John H. Walton, N. T. Wright

[latestmarijuananews]

Marijuana News

From the United States this really is just a schedule-I substance that means that it's lawfully considered as having no clinical usage and it's highly addictive (US DEA, 2010). Doweiko (2009) explains that maybe not all of cannabis has misuse potential. He therefore suggests utilizing the frequent vocabulary bud when speaking to cannabis with misuse potential. For the sake of clarity that this vocabulary is employed within this newspaper also.

Now, bud are at the forefront of worldwide controversy because the appropriateness of its wide spread illegal status. In most Union nations it's been legalized for medical functions. It's in this circumstance that it had been decided to pick the subject of the bodily and medicinal effects of bud to the cornerstone of this research article.

What's marijuana? Pot is a plant more accurately referred to as cannabis sativa. As previously mentioned, some cannabis sativa plants don't need abuse potential and also are known as berry. Hemp can be employed widely for assorted fiber products for example paper and artist's canvas. Cannabis sativa with misuse potential is that which we call bud (Doweiko, 2009). It's intriguing to observe that even though widely studies for several decades, there was that investigators still don't know concerning bud. Neuro scientists and biologists understand very well what the consequences of marijuana are however they still don't fully comprehend just why (Hazelden, 2005).

Deweiko (2009), Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs (2004) mention that of approximately 400 understood compounds within the cannabis plants, researchers understand of over sixty which can be considered to possess carcinogenic effects on the human anatomy. Much like Hazelden (2005), '' Deweiko says that while individuals understand lots of the neurophysical ramifications of THC, the reason why THC produces these impacts are somewhat uncertain.

Neurobiology: It affects a enormous selection of hormones and catalyzes other biochemical and behavioral action also. The only substances which could trigger neuro-transmitters are compounds that mimic compounds that the brain produces naturally. The simple fact that THC stimulates brain work instructs boffins which the mind has natural cannabinoid receptors. What we do understand is that bud will excite cannabinoid receptors upto twenty five times longer knowingly than some one of the human body's natural hormones ever might (Doweiko, 2009).

Serotonin receptors are being among the very aroused with psychiatric drugs, however, most notably smoking and alcohol. Independent of bud relationship with the compound, dopamine is a tiny known neuro chemical and its own assumed neuro-scientific functions of function and functioning continue to be mostly hypothetical (Schuckit & Tapert, 2004). Exactly what neuro scientists are finding liberally is that marijuana smokers have rather substantial degrees of dopamine action (Hazelden, 2005). I'd hypothesize that it might be that connection between THC and dopamine which explains the "bud care program" of achieving abstinence from alcohol also allows bud smokers to prevent painful withdrawal symptoms also prevent cravings out of alcohol. The efficiency of "marijuana care" for helping alcohol abstinence isn't scientific but is still just a phenomenon I've personally observed with many customers.

Interestingly, marijuana imitates numerous neurological responses of other medication that it's very tricky to classify in a certain class. Researchers will put it at one or more of these categories: Zinc; hallucinogendopamine or; inhibitor. It's properties which mimic similar compound reactions since opioids. Hazelden (2005) classifies bud in its very own special category - cannabinoids. The cause of this confusion may be the intricacy of the various psycho active properties found within bud, both unknown and known. 1 recent client that I watched might not get over the visual distortions he suffered as a consequence of pervading psychedelic usage provided that he had been still smoking bud. But perhaps not strong enough to produce these visual distortions by itself, bud was strong enough to protect against the mind from recovering and healing.

Illness: Cannibinoid receptors can be found through the brain hence affecting a large array of functioning.

I've discovered that the significant marijuana smokers that I utilize personally appear to talk about a commonality of working with the medication to control their anger. This monitoring has shrouded established results and may be the cornerstone of much scientific research. Anger is just a safety mechanism utilized to safeguard against psychological effects of hardship fueled by panic (Cramer, 1998).

Neurophysical Ramifications of THC: Neuro-logical connections between transmitters and receptors not only restrain emotions and mental functioning. It's also the way the body regulates both volitional and nonvolitional working out. These really are just two of the very densely stimulated aspects Cannabis News of the mind which are actuated by bud. THC fundamentally affects all neuromotor actions to your level (Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

An intriguing happenings I've seen in just about all customers who identify marijuana as their drug of choice could be the usage of marijuana smoking before ingestion. The CB-1 receptors within the mind are present profoundly in the limbic system, and also the nucleolus accumbens( which modulates the benefit pathways (Martin, 2004). These benefit pathways are exactly what affect the desire and eating habits within the human body's natural survival instinct, so inducing us to crave consuming food and rewarding individuals with dopamine whenever we finally do (Hazeldon, 2005). Martin (2004) causes this particular connection, pointing out that particular unique to marijuana users would be the stimulation of the CB-1 receptor instantly activating the desire.

What's high quality and low quality? An existing client of mine explains how he originally consumed to fifteen minutes of "low grade" grass per day but finally switched into "high quality" once the minimal quality was needs to prove unsuccessful. In the long run, four joints of top quality bud have become unsuccessful for him personally as well. He regularly neglected to receive his "high" out of that either. This whole process happened within five decades of the customer's first ever experience with bud. What's high and very low grade bud, and why would bud begin to reduce its effects after a time?

The effectiveness of marijuana is quantified by the THC material within. As the marketplace in the street grows more competitive, the effectiveness in the street gets to be more pure. This has generated a tendency in ever rising potency that reacts to requirement. 1 moderate joint of marijuana smoked now gets the identical THC effectiveness as ten ordinary joints of marijuana consumed throughout the 1960's (Hazelden, 2005).

THC degrees will be based chiefly about which area of the cannabis foliage is being used for production. For example cannabis buds might vary between 2 to eight times stronger than fully developed foliage. Hash oil, also an application of bud manufactured by distilling cannabis resin, which may yield higher quantities of THC than even substantial tier buds (Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

Tolerance: The necessity to boost the sum of bud one cigarettes, or the requirement to subtract from low quality to high quality is well known clinically as endurance. The mind is still efficient. As it admits that neuro-receptors happen to be aroused minus the neuro-transmitters emitting those compound signs, the mind resourcefully lowers its compound output signal so the overall levels return to normalcy. The smoker won't have the high anymore because his brain is currently "tolerating" the high degrees of compounds and he or she's straight back to feeling normal. The smoker currently increases the dose to acquire the old return and the cycle persists. The smoker could wind up in levels effective for a short time.

Exactly why isn't there some drawback? The reverse side of the tolerance method is referred to as "dependence." As the entire body stops producing its own organic compounds, it currently needs the bud user to keep smoking in order to keep up the operation of compounds without disturbance. The human anatomy is currently ordering the intake of the THC which makes it extremely tough to stop. Actually, studies reveal that marijuana dependence is much better than apparently harder drugs such as cocaine (Gold, Frost-Pineda, and Jacobs, 2004).

With stopping other drugs such as stimulants, opioids, or alcohol the system responds in unwanted and at times seriously dangerous manners. That is because of the abrupt absence of compound input connected together with the simple fact that the mind has ceased its very own all-natural neurotransmission of the chemicals sometime past.

While research has demonstrated similar withdrawal responses is bud users like in alcohol or other medication (Ashton, 2001), which I've observed often in my private interaction with customers could be the apparent absence of withdrawal undergone by the majority of marijuana consumers. Ofcourse they undergo cravings, however, they do not report using the exact same neurophysical withdrawal reaction which the other medication users possess. Some bud smokers utilize this because their ultimate proof that bud "is perhaps not just a medication" and they ought to therefore not be subjugated for the exact therapy and search for healing efforts as other medication or alcohol addiction.

The truth is the fact that the apparently insufficient severe drawback is actually a product of the uniqueness of the means by which the human body stores THC. THC nevertheless, is finally changed into protein and also becomes stored is excess muscle and fat. This instant procedure of storage within your body fat book is a much lesser process. As the pace of re entry into the system's system is too slow to produce virtually any side outcomes, it is going to help with relieving the prior smoker throughout the withdrawal process in a far more manageable and hassle free way. The more one cigarettes the more one stores. Ergo, in rather large customers I've seen it use up to four weeks before pee displays show a rid THC degree.

Comparable to THC's slow emptying like cleansing could be the slow speed of initial beginning of esophageal reaction. Customers report that they don't become high smoking bud straight off - it takes them a while to allow their bodied for use to it until they believe the highquality. That is clarified by the slow absorption of THC into fat attaining peak concentrations in 45 days. Since the THC starts to produce slowly into the blood flow, the bodily reaction will get increased rapidly with every fresh smoking of bud leading in another premium. As the consumer repeats this procedure and elevated degrees of THC collect within the human body and keep steadily to make it to the mind, the THC is finally distributed into the neocortical, limbic, sensory, and motor areas which were detailed sooner (Ashton, 2001).

Physiology: The neurology and neurophysiology of bud was described to date. There are lots of physical elements of marijuana smoking too. They estimate research demonstrating signs that chronic marijuana smokers, those who usually do not smoke tobacco, do have significantly more health issues compared to non physicians as a result of respiratory disorders.

The definitive research Assessing the substantial negative biophysical overall health ramifications of marijuana isn't conclusive. While some research indicates that marijuana smokers reveal dysregulated growth of epithelial cells inside their lung tissue that could cause cancer, and other studies have demonstrated no positive relationships at both between marijuana use and lung cancer, upper respiratorydisease, or upper gastrointestinal system infections (NIDA, 2010).

This last fact about the less detrimental consequences of marijuana smoking even compared to legal drugs such as alcohol and smoking is most commonly the exact first offered by proponents of legalizing marijuana because of its favorable health benefits (Dubner, 2007; Nakaya, 2007; Van Tuyl, 2007). Nakaya (2007) points into the apparently results of marijuana on alzheimers, cancer, and multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and AIDS. Without scientific, personal experiences of the good aid of sufferers in chronic disease is mentioned as benefits which can be asserted to outweigh the unwanted outcomes. Van Tuyl (2007) says "nearly all medication - including the ones that are valid - pose greater dangers to human wellbeing or society compared to does bud." She insists mimicking the smoking of marijuana wouldn't warrant the positive results but whined still that the risks related to smoking may also be "mitigated by alternative channels of management, such as vaporization" (pg. 22 23). The disagreements purpose out clinically researched drugs such as opioids, benzodiazepines, and amphetamines which can be administered by prescription to a regular basis.

[asteriaeos]

In matrilineal societies women had high status because they produced children, fed their communities, and possessed usufruct rights to land passed in the female line. The shift to patrilineality eradicated women’s rights to land and to chil- dren, but it did not affect most women’s willingness to care for their children. Because they continued to do this work even when they were deprived of their rights over the chil- dren, men assumed that women were biologically programmed to tend their offspring and needed no reward for doing so. Men believed that women were nonvolitional beings, bound to their bodies and their instincts. But stud- ies have shown that mothering is learned; it is not in- stinctive. We learn to mother by being mothered, and crea- tures who are not mothered cannot do it. Taking care creates love, for a baby, a piece of land, an animal. Men devalue this work, attributing it to mere instinct, ignoring the many women who abandon children or raise them cruelly.

From Eve to Dawn -  Marilyn French