#online mba classes

[ubsseduau]

MBA Course Fees in Australia

Explore MBA Fees in Australia for International Students at UBSS. It offers affordable MBA cost, quality teaching, and skill development. Contact us now for more information.

[naukrisambad]

Top 5 Best Universities For Online MBA Programs In 2024

Determining the “top” universities for online MBA programs can vary based on various factors such as accreditation, reputation, faculty expertise, curriculum, flexibility, affordability, and career outcomes. However, several universities consistently rank highly for their online MBA programs. Here are five universities that are often recognized for their excellence in online MBA education. Top…

[disha01]

Best Online MBA Colleges in India

It is important to give top priority to accredited institutions that provide a comprehensive curriculum and interactive learning experiences when looking for the best online MBA colleges in India. Seek out universities that prioritize coursework that is applicable to the industry and offer networking opportunities to strengthen your professional network. Furthermore take into account the program's flexibility in meeting your schedule and the availability of state-of-the-art technology for online learning environments. Aspiring business professionals can choose from a number of highly viewed best online MBA colleges in India because of their reputation for providing top-notch instruction. Make a wise choice to guarantee a fulfilling educational experience.

[collegedisha575]

Online MBA Course

Taking an online MBA course in India has grown in popularity among professionals looking to advance their careers and gain flexibility, especially in light of the changing nature of education. Comprehensive online MBA course are available in India from numerous respectable universities, combining affordability with excellent instruction. These courses offer students the chance to improve their managerial abilities while juggling work and personal responsibilities. They are applicable to a variety of fields. An online MBA programme in India offers a strategic path to academic success and career advancement as the demand for flexible learning options rises.

[colllegedisha001]

Online MBA Courses India

Online MBA courses in India provide prospective professionals with a rare opportunity to enhance their professions without the limits of traditional, in-person schooling. These programmes allow you to juggle career, family, and academic obligations. Students receive access to a diverse range of cutting-edge business courses, including finance, marketing, and leadership, all while studying from the comfort of their own homes. With an increasing number of top colleges and institutions offering online MBA courses india, students can select from a wide range of specializations and adapt their education to their career objectives. 

[artprints12]

Best Coaching Class for CLAT in Pune | Toppernicus

Join Toppernicus, the best coaching class for CLAT in Pune. Experience expert faculty, personalized coaching, and proven success strategies to ace your CLAT exam. Enroll today for top results!

[projectchampionz]

THE EVOLVING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEALTHCARE MANAGERS IN THE FACE OF INDUSTRY CHALLENGES

THE EVOLVING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEALTHCARE MANAGERS IN THE FACE OF INDUSTRY CHALLENGES ABSTRACT The healthcare industry has faced significant challenges in recent years, including rising costs, staffing shortages, increasing patient demands, and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These challenges have transformed the roles and responsibilities of healthcare managers, who are now…

[mitsde123]

Enhance Your Career with MIT SDE: Distance Education in Maharashtra

Maharashtra, a state known for its rich cultural heritage and economic prowess, is home to some of the most dynamic cities in India, including Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur and Maharashtra. To meet the educational needs of this vibrant region, MIT School of Distance Education (MIT SDE) offers a range of innovative and flexible learning solutions. Whether you are a working professional or a student, MIT SDE’s programs in Maharashtra provide the perfect blend of quality education and convenience.

[ateamcommerceacademy]

Get Ready For The Best: ACCA UK Chartered Accountant Course with A Team Commerce Academy 

[shubhamsarva]

DY Patil Online MBA Placement Success: Nurturing Future Business Leaders

DY Patil University's Online MBA program is not only a beacon of quality education but also a proven pathway to career success. The program's dedication to academic excellence, innovative teaching methods, and a rigorous curriculum has translated into remarkable placement opportunities for its graduates. DY Patil's Online MBA placement success story is a testament to the university's commitment to nurturing future business leaders in the digital age.

DY Patil's Online MBA program combines the best of both worlds: a world-class education delivered through a flexible online platform. This format allows professionals and aspiring business leaders to enhance their knowledge and skills while maintaining their current professional commitments. The program covers a wide range of specializations, including finance, marketing, human resources, operations, and more, ensuring that graduates are well-prepared for various business sectors.

The Online MBA Placement Cell at DY Patil University plays a pivotal role in connecting students with industry leaders. Through a well-structured process, it facilitates internships and placement opportunities for students to gain hands-on experience and secure promising careers in their chosen fields. The university's strong industry partnerships further enhance the placement prospects for its MBA graduates.

Key features of DY Patil's Online MBA placement success include:

Industry-Relevant Curriculum: The MBA program is designed to meet the current and future demands of the business world, equipping students with the skills and knowledge required to excel in their careers.

Corporate Connect: The university fosters strong ties with a wide network of corporate partners, creating a wealth of placement opportunities for students.

Career Development Support: DY Patil's dedicated career development team provides personalized guidance, interview preparation, and job placement support to ensure students are well-prepared for the job market.

Global Exposure: Graduates of the Online MBA program have access to global job opportunities, reflecting the program's global perspective.

DY Patil University's Online MBA placement success story is a testament to its vision of creating not just graduates but well-rounded business professionals who can navigate the complexities of the corporate world. The program's holistic approach to education, strong industry connections, and career support services combine to ensure that graduates embark on a promising and rewarding journey in the world of business and management.

[seo155]

ExamNest: Unleash Your Potential with the Best CAT Online Test Series

Elevate your CAT exam preparation with ExamNest's Best CAT Online Test Series. Maximize your score and enhance your chances of success. Join now!

[989sak]

JAIN UNIVERSITY ONLINE EDUCATION

Jain College is a famous private university situated in Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Established in 1990, the college has developed to become one of the leading and online educational institutions in the country. It is seen by the University Grants Commission (UGC) and is an individual from different esteemed bodies, including the Association of Indian Universities (AIU) and the Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU).

[disha01]

Best Online MBA Colleges in India

A number of Indian universities provide excellent online MBA programs that combine flexibility with high-quality instruction. The Indian School of Business (ISB), Symbiosis Centre for Distance Learning (SCDL), NMIMS Global Access School for Continuing Education, ICFAI University, and Amity University Online are a few of the best online learning MBA colleges in India. These universities are renowned for their extensive curricula, knowledgeable instructors, and coursework that is pertinent to the industry. In order to find the program that best suits their career objectives and desires, prospective students should conduct extensive research on each one, taking into account elements like faculty expertise, accreditation, and alumni achievement.

[mansishirma]

Best MBA Colleges in India

Are you looking for a transformative MBA program? Our curated list of Best MBA Colleges in India features renowned institutions that offer high-quality education that matches global standards. With a comprehensive curriculum, industry-focused training, dedicated mentorship by leading experts, and collaborations with top business schools worldwide, these colleges provide students not only with a sound business education but also an environment where innovation and entrepreneurial skills are nurtured. Pursue your MBA degree from one of these leading colleges and take your career to unprecedented levels.

Website: https://www.umeacademy.com/latest-articles/top-10-online-mba-colleges-in-india/

[mostlysignssomeportents]

The one weird monopoly trick that gave us Walmart and Amazon and killed Main Street

I'm coming to BURNING MAN! On TUESDAY (Aug 27) at 1PM, I'm giving a talk called "DISENSHITTIFY OR DIE!" at PALENQUE NORTE (7&E). On WEDNESDAY (Aug 28) at NOON, I'm doing a "Talking Caterpillar" Q&A at LIMINAL LABS (830&C).

Walmart didn't just happen. The rise of Walmart – and Amazon, its online successor – was the result of a specific policy choice, the decision by the Reagan administration not to enforce a key antitrust law. Walmart may have been founded by Sam Walton, but its success (and the demise of the American Main Street) are down to Reaganomics.

The law that Reagan neutered? The Robinson-Patman Act, a very boring-sounding law that makes it illegal for powerful companies (like Walmart) to demand preferential pricing from their suppliers (farmers, packaged goods makers, meat producers, etc). The idea here is straightforward. A company like Walmart is a powerful buyer (a "monopsonist" – compare with "monopolist," a powerful seller). That means that they can demand deep discounts from suppliers. Smaller stores – the mom and pop store on your Main Street – don't have the clout to demand those discounts. Worse, because those buyers are weak, the sellers – packaged goods companies, agribusiness cartels, Big Meat – can actually charge them more to make up for the losses they're taking in selling below cost to Walmart.

Reagan ordered his antitrust cops to stop enforcing Robinson-Patman, which was a huge giveaway to big business. Of course, that's not how Reagan framed it: He called Robinson-Patman a declaration of "war on low prices," because it prevented big companies from using their buying power to squeeze huge discounts. Reagan's court sorcerers/economists asserted that if Walmart could get goods at lower prices, they would sell goods at lower prices.

Which was true…up to a point. Because preferential discounting (offering better discounts to bigger customers) creates a structural advantage over smaller businesses, it meant that big box stores would eventually eliminate virtually all of their smaller competitors. That's exactly what happened: downtowns withered, suburban big boxes grew. Spending that would have formerly stayed in the community was whisked away to corporate headquarters. These corporate HQs were inevitably located in "onshore-offshore" tax haven states, meaning they were barely taxed at the state level. That left plenty of money in these big companies' coffers to spend on funny accountants who'd help them avoid federal taxes, too. That's another structural advantage the big box stores had over the mom-and-pops: not only did they get their inventory at below-cost discounts, they didn't have to pay tax on the profits, either.

MBA programs actually teach this as a strategy to pursue: they usually refer to Amazon's "flywheel" where lower prices bring in more customers which allows them to demand even lower prices:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaSwWYemLek

You might have heard about rural and inner-city "food deserts," where all the independent grocery stores have shuttered, leaving behind nothing but dollar stores? These are the direct product of the decision not to enforce Robinson-Patman. Dollar stores target working class neighborhoods with functional, beloved local grocers. They open multiple dollar stores nearby (nearly all the dollar stores you see are owned by one of two conglomerates, no matter what the sign over the door says). They price goods below cost and pay for high levels of staffing, draining business off the community grocery store until it collapses. Then, all the dollar stores except one close and the remaining store fires most of its staff (working at a dollar store is incredibly dangerous, thanks to low staffing levels that make them easy targets for armed robbers). Then, they jack up prices, selling goods in "cheater" sizes that are smaller than the normal retail packaging, and which are only made available to large dollar store conglomerates:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/27/walmarts-jackals/#cheater-sizes

Writing in The American Prospect, Max M Miller and Bryce Tuttle1 – a current and a former staffer for FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya – write about the long shadow cast by Reagan's decision to put Robinson-Patman in mothballs:

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-08-13-stopping-excessive-market-power-monopoly/

They tell the story of Robinson-Patman's origins in 1936, when A&P was using preferential discounts to destroy the independent grocery sector and endanger the American food system. A&P didn't just demand preferential discounts from its suppliers; it also charged them a fortune to be displayed on its shelves, an early version of Amazon's $38b/year payola system:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/28/enshittification/#relentless-payola

They point out that Robinson-Patman didn't really need to be enacted; America already had an antitrust law that banned this conduct: section 2 of the the Clayton Act, which was passed in 1914. But for decades, the US courts refused to interpret the Clayton Act according to its plain meaning, with judges tying themselves in knots to insist that the law couldn't possibly mean what it said. Robinson-Patman was one of a series of antitrust laws that Congress passed in a bid to explain in words so small even federal judges could understand them that the purpose of American antitrust law was to keep corporations weak:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/14/aiming-at-dollars/#not-men

Both the Clayton Act and Robinson-Patman reject the argument that it's OK to let monopolies form and come to dominate critical sectors of the American economy based on the theoretical possibility that this will lead to lower prices. They reject this idea first as a legal matter. We don't let giant corporations victimize small businesses and their suppliers just because that might help someone else.

Beyond this, there's the realpolitik of monopoly. Yes, companies could pass lower costs on to customers, but will they? Look at Amazon: the company takes $0.45-$0.51 out of every dollar that its sellers earn, and requires them to offer their lowest price on Amazon. No one has a 45-51% margin, so every seller jacks up their prices on Amazon, but you don't notice it, because Amazon forces them to jack up prices everywhere else:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/01/managerial-discretion/#junk-fees

The Robinson-Patman Act did important work, and its absence led to many of the horribles we're living through today. This week on his Peoples & Things podcast, Lee Vinsel talked with Benjamin Waterhouse about his new book, One Day I’ll Work for Myself: The Dream and Delusion That Conquered America:

https://athenaeum.vt.domains/peoplesandthings/2024/08/12/78-benjamin-c-waterhouse-on-one-day-ill-work-for-myself-the-dream-and-delusion-that-conquered-america/

Towards the end of the discussion, Vinsel and Waterhouse turn to Robinson-Patman, its author, Wright Patman, and the politics of small business in America. They point out – correctly – that Wright Patman was something of a creep, a "Dixiecrat" (southern Democrat) who was either an ideological segregationist or someone who didn't mind supporting segregation irrespective of his beliefs.

That's a valid critique of Wright Patman, but it's got little bearing on the substance and history of the law that bears his name, the Robinson-Patman Act. Vinsel and Waterhouse get into that as well, and while they made some good points that I wholeheartedly agreed with, I fiercely disagree with the conclusion they drew from these points.

Vinsel and Waterhouse point out (again, correctly) that small businesses have a long history of supporting reactionary causes and attacking workers' rights – associations of small businesses, small women-owned business, and small minority-owned businesses were all in on opposition to minimum wages and other key labor causes.

But while this is all true, that doesn't make Robinson-Patman a reactionary law, or bad for workers. The point of protecting small businesses from the predatory practices of large firms is to maintain an American economy where business can't trump workers or government. Large companies are literally ungovernable: they have gigantic war-chests they can spend lobbying governments and corrupting the political process, and concentrated sectors find it comparatively easy to come together to decide on a single lobbying position and then make it reality.

As Vinsel and Waterhouse discuss, US big business has traditionally hated small business. They recount a notorious and telling anaecdote about the editor of the Chamber of Commerce magazine asking his boss if he could include coverage of small businesses, given the many small business owners who belonged to the Chamber, only to be told, "Over my dead body." Why did – why does – big business hate small business so much? Because small businesses wreck the game. If they are included in hearings, notices of inquiry, or just given a vote on what the Chamber of Commerce will lobby for with their membership dollars, they will ask for things that break with the big business lobbying consensus.

That's why we should like small business. Not because small business owners are incapable of being petty tyrants, but because whatever else, they will be petty. They won't be able to hire million-dollar-a-month union-busting law-firms, they won't be able to bribe Congress to pass favorable laws, they can't capture their regulators with juicy offers of sweet jobs after their government service ends.

Vinsel and Waterhouse point out that many large firms emerged during the era in which Robinson-Patman was in force, but that misunderstands the purpose of Robinson-Patman: it wasn't designed to prevent any large businesses from emerging. There are some capital-intensive sectors (say, chip fabrication) where the minimum size for doing anything is pretty damned big.

As Miller and Tuttle write:

The goal of RPA was not to create a permanent Jeffersonian agrarian republic of exclusively small businesses. It was to preserve a diverse economy of big and small businesses. Congress recognized that the needs of communities and people—whether in their role as consumers, business owners, or workers—are varied and diverse. A handful of large chains would never be able to meet all those needs in every community, especially if they are granted pricing power.

The fight against monopoly is only secondarily a fight between small businesses and giant ones. It's foundationally a fight about whether corporations should have so much power that they are too big to fail, too big to jail, and too big to care.

Community voting for SXSW is live! If you wanna hear RIDA QADRI and me talk about how GIG WORKERS can DISENSHITTIFY their jobs with INTEROPERABILITY, VOTE FOR THIS ONE!

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/08/14/the-price-is-wright/#enforcement-priorities