Tumgik
#servant hacking poll
tgrailwar-zero · 2 months
Note
We should probably do a quick hack/scan to make sure nothing ‘he’ left activates then.
Tumblr media
"Do as you wish."
9 notes · View notes
dgrailwar · 3 months
Note
... unless she survived...
... mmh...
... for- for the record, Miss Ganesha- Blanca isn't a creepy crawly, she's a really cute and pretty snow-white moth, you'd know her unmistakably at a glance... though I suppose it doesn't matter if she didn't survive...
...
... I need to get my mind off Lord Pretender, he's not my Servant anymore- hey, Miss Ganesha? I noticed, way back when we tried to spar and you blasted us with lasers, but you give off a real different sort of energy than I'd expect from a Divinity... are you perchance a Pseudoservant?
Er- sorry if the question is overly prying or anything I'm just trying to shoot the breeze cuz the idea of being the container for a Saint Graph is super cool to me cuz then I could so stuff like fly or shoot lasers- like what you were doing- how often does that even happen- not that I think I could be a Pseudoservant, I just think it'd be neat if it did happen- [unintentional social awkwardness energy]
Round 12, Day 1 - MoonCancer
Tumblr media
"Bugs are bugs are bugs, dude. Anyways... Trust me, the pseudo-Servant thing isn't all it's cracked up to be. I mean, sure, on paper it seems cool. Here's divine power and wisdom, go get 'em, right? Thing is, once a god foists their responsibilities onto you, the pressure meter gets turned up to a thousand. I mean, luckily Lord Ganesha's a nice guy for a god, but apparently the intermediary for this sorta junk is far from it... 'MoonCancer', gimme a damn break..."
Tumblr media
"Ah, my bad. Ranting. And plus, I should shut up on that last point... 'speak of the devil and she shall appear', or whatever."
Tumblr media
She sat back down by her computer, her fingers idly clicking in and arranging complex inputs as she spoke.
"Anyways, having god-like powers is great, but being human means that you're generally in 99% less dangerous scenarios with 99% less pressure, so there's ups and downs. Plus, I was already a god-tier Spiritron hacker even before Lord Ganesha, y'know?"
MoonCancer is in a 'Clue Encounter'!
'Clue Encounters' are risk-free. Simply focus your attention on one specific thing, and you'll gather information towards it!
One option, however, is a dud. And the dud isn't always obvious. If the dud option wins out, then you get nothing useful. At all.
Ganesha's advantage is that she gets an extra choice! Additionally, if you're feeling spicy, you can try to balance the polls ('See Results' not included) in order to maximize the information learned! However, if you fail, you'll just get the result of the winning option.
18 notes · View notes
aurumacadicus · 5 months
Text
It's that time of month again, friends! And for June, we're doing something special: Queer-themed books, both a fiction and non-fiction selection! We'll be reading both over the course of five weeks. Tumblr will vote, and the book club will then vote among the top three in Discord. If you'd like to join the book club, send me a message and I'll send you a link to the discord! Keep an eye out for the other poll, and check out the books' summaries under the cut!
My Deary Henry – A Jekyll & Hyde Remix by Kalynn Bayron
London, 1885. Gabriel Utterson, a 17-year-old law clerk, has returned to London for the first time since his life—and that of his dearest friend, Henry Jekyll—was derailed by a scandal that led to his and Henry’s expulsion from the London Medical School. Whispers about the true nature of Gabriel and Henry’s relationship have followed the boys for two years, and now Gabriel has a chance to start again.
But Gabriel doesn’t want to move on, not without Henry. His friend has become distant and cold since the disastrous events of the prior spring, and now his letters have stopped altogether. Desperate to discover what’s become of him, Gabriel takes to watching the Jekyll house.
In doing so, Gabriel meets Hyde, a strangely familiar young man with white hair and a magnetic charisma. He claims to be friends with Henry, and Gabriel can’t help but begin to grow jealous at their apparent closeness, especially as Henry continues to act like Gabriel means nothing to him.
But the secret behind Henry’s apathy is only the first part of a deeper mystery that has begun to coalesce. Monsters of all kinds prowl within the London fog—and not all of them are out for blood…
Gideon the Ninth by Tamsyn Muir
The Emperor needs necromancers. The Ninth Necromancer needs a swordswoman.
Gideon has a sword, some dirty magazines, and no more time for undead nonsense.
Tamsyn Muir’s Gideon the Ninth, first in The Locked Tomb Trilogy, unveils a solar system of swordplay, cut-throat politics, and lesbian necromancers. Her characters leap off the page, as skillfully animated as arcane revenants. The result is a heart-pounding epic science fantasy.
Brought up by unfriendly, ossifying nuns, ancient retainers, and countless skeletons, Gideon is ready to abandon a life of servitude and an afterlife as a reanimated corpse. She packs up her sword, her shoes, and her dirty magazines, and prepares to launch her daring escape. But her childhood nemesis won’t set her free without a service.
Harrowhark Nonagesimus, Reverend Daughter of the Ninth House and bone witch extraordinaire, has been summoned into action. The Emperor has invited the heirs to each of his loyal Houses to a deadly trial of wits and skill. If Harrowhark succeeds she will become an immortal, all-powerful servant of the Resurrection, but no necromancer can ascend without the cavalier. Without Gideon’s sword, Harrow will fail, and the Ninth House will die.
Of course, some things are better left dead.
Compulsory + All Systems Red by Martha Wells
“As a heartless killing machine, I was a complete failure.”
In a corporate-dominated spacefaring future, planetary missions must be approved and supplied by the Company. Exploratory teams are accompanied by Company-supplied security androids, for their own safety.
But in a society where contracts are awarded to the lowest bidder, safety isn’t a primary concern.
On a distant planet, a team of scientists are conducting surface tests, shadowed by their Company-supplied ‘droid – a self-aware SecUnit that has hacked its own governor module, and refers to itself (though never out loud) as “Murderbot.” Scornful of humans, all it really wants is to be left alone long enough to figure out who it is.
But when a neighboring mission goes dark, it’s up to the scientists and their Murderbot to get to the truth.
Dear Wendy by Ann Zhao
Sophie Chi is in her first year of college (though her parents wish she’d attend a “real” university rather than a liberal arts school) and has long accepted her aroace (aromantic and asexual) identity. She knows she’ll never fall in love, but she enjoys running an Instagram account that offers relationship advice to students at her school. No one except her roommate can know that she’s behind the incredibly popular “Dear Wendy” account.
When Joanna “Jo” Ephron (also a first-year aroace college student) created their “Sincerely Wanda” account, it wasn’t at all meant to take off or be taken seriously—not like Wendy’s. But now they might have a rivalry of sorts with Wendy’s account? Oops. As if Jo’s not busy enough having existential crises over gender identity, whether she’ll ever truly be loved, and the possibility of her few friends finding The One then forgetting her!
While tensions are rising online, Sophie and Jo grow closer in real life, especially once they realize their shared aroace identity and start a campus organization for other a-spec students. Will their friendship survive if they learn just who’s behind the Wendy and Wanda accounts?
Exploring a-spec identities, college life, and more, while perfect for fans of Alice Oseman’s Loveless, this is ultimately a love story about two people who are not—and will not—be in love!
A Marvelous Light by Freya Marske
Robin Blyth has more than enough bother in his life. He’s struggling to be a good older brother, a responsible employer, and the harried baronet of a seat gutted by his late parents�� excesses. When an administrative mistake sees him named the civil service liaison to a hidden magical society, he discovers what’s been operating beneath the unextraordinary reality he’s always known.
Now Robin must contend with the beauty and danger of magic, an excruciating deadly curse, and the alarming visions of the future that come with it—not to mention Edwin Courcey, his cold and prickly counterpart in the magical bureaucracy, who clearly wishes Robin were anyone and anywhere else.
Robin’s predecessor has disappeared, and the mystery of what happened to him reveals unsettling truths about the very oldest stories they’ve been told about the land they live on and what binds it. Thrown together and facing unexpected dangers, Robin and Edwin discover a plot that threatens every magician in the British Isles—and a secret that more than one person has already died to keep.
Looking for Love in All the Haunted Places by Claire Kann
Lucky Hart has a special affinity for the supernatural but almost no one takes parapsychology seriously. She's estranged from her family, lost her friends, and has been rejected from graduate school. Twice. But her big break finally arrives when she gets insider info about a troubled production company. Every actor on their new show mysteriously quits after spending three nights inside Hennessee House, an old Victorian with a notorious reputation.
After scheming her way onto the show to investigate, Lucky meets Maverick Phillips and chemistry instantly crackles between them. He tempts her in ways no one ever has, challenging and supporting her, and making her finally feel seen. Their connection is so palpable everyone notices it—including Hennessee House.
Now Lucky and Maverick’s relationship has a challenger: the lonely, sentient house desperate for her undivided attention. As love begins to clash with career, Lucky refuses to choose one over the other because everyone deserves a happily ever after, even houses with haunted hearts. But when all her plans begin backfiring one-by-one, she realizes that if she wants to have it all? She’ll have to risk everything.
Under the Whispering Door by TJ Klune
When a reaper comes to collect Wallace Price from his own funeral, Wallace suspects he really might be dead.
Instead of leading him directly to the afterlife, the reaper takes him to a small village. On the outskirts, off the path through the woods, tucked between mountains, is a particular tea shop, run by a man named Hugo. Hugo is the tea shop's owner to locals and the ferryman to souls who need to cross over.
But Wallace isn’t ready to abandon the life he barely lived. With Hugo’s help he finally starts to learn about all the things he missed in life.
When the Manager, a curious and powerful being, arrives at the tea shop and gives Wallace one week to cross over, Wallace sets about living a lifetime in seven days.
14 notes · View notes
dankusner · 4 months
Text
Judiciary in Danger
Tumblr media
Trump trials highlight growing threats against judges, and that’s bad for both parties
Stories about judges who were threatened, ambushed and killed or whose families were harmed used to be the kind of thing you’d read about in the international section of your local newspaper.
Now those headlines are becoming our own, to the detriment of our democracy.
The menacing rhetoric and the actual threats against judges overseeing former President Donald Trump’s multiple legal cases have drawn attention to the increasing risk of presiding over a court in this hyperpartisan environment.
While Trump hasn’t called for violence, his statements and social media posts attacking the integrity of the judges are part of a dangerous pattern of declining respect in our judiciary.
That has emboldened both political extremists and disgruntled defendants seeking revenge for cases that have nothing to do with politics.
The statistics are chilling.
The U.S. Marshals Service reported that the number of federal judges who received serious threats jumped to 457 in fiscal year 2023, up from 300 in 2022 and 224 the year prior, according to CNN.
Threats against federal prosecutors that were serious enough to warrant investigation also skyrocketed.
The state judiciary, too, is under fire.
Tumblr media
A poll by the National Judicial College found that 70% of about 400 respondents, mostly state judges, had received harassing or menacing communications, according to Reuters.
The news agency obtained the survey results in advance of publication.
Some judges have been targeted by people involved in low-profile criminal or civil cases.
But many judges point to heightened political polarization as the source of their troubles.
Though the far right has been particularly nasty, danger can come from anywhere.
Recall the armed man arrested on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s street in 2022.
He was reportedly angry about the overturning of Roe vs. Wade.
And earlier this year, a Houston woman was sentenced to prison for threatening to kill a Florida judge whom she accused of “helping” Trump.
Threats against judges have escalated to such a degree that U.S. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas is sponsoring a bipartisan bill that would establish an intelligence center to monitor threats against state and local judges and court personnel.
State courts typically get less protection than the federal bench.
A public servant as powerful as a judge accepts a measure of risk, but that risk is becoming untenable.
The more desensitized we become to these attacks, the more we dilute judicial independence — the ability of our judges to make rulings free from pressure.
This principle is foundational to our rule of law and the envy of other countries around the globe.
But we are making it so that the power and prestige of the bench will be overshadowed by the vitriol and the risk of harm.
This will repel decent and capable people and leave partisan hacks or unqualified lawyers in charge of our courts.
That’s bad news for all of us.
0 notes
robertreich · 4 years
Video
youtube
Trump’s 2020 Election Strategy in 25 Steps
Trump will do anything to be re-elected. His opponents are limited because they believe in democracy. Trump has no limits because he doesn’t.
Here’s Trump’s re-election playbook, in 25 simple steps:
1. Declare yourself above the law.
2. Use racist fearmongering. Demand “law and order” and describe protesters as “thugs”, “lowlife” and “rioters and looters”. Describe Covid-19 as “Kung-Flu”. Retweet posts from white supremacists. In your campaign ads, use a symbol associated with Nazis.
3. Appoint an attorney general more loyal to you than to America, and politicize the Department of Justice so it’s lenient on your loyalists and comes down hard on your enemies. Have it lighten the sentence of a crony convicted of lying under oath. Order investigations of industries you dislike.
4. Fire US attorneys who are investigating you.
5. Fire independent inspectors general who are looking into what you’ve done. Crush any whistleblowers you find.
6. Demean and ignore the intelligence community. Appoint a director of national intelligence more loyal to you than to America. Demand that the head of the FBI pledge loyalty to you.
7. Pack the federal courts with judges and justices more loyal to you than to the constitution.
8. Politicize the Department of Defense so generals will back whatever you order. Refer to them as “my generals”. Have them help clear out protesters. Order the military to surveil protesters. Tell governors you’ll bring in the military to stop protesters.
9. Purge your party of anyone disloyal to you and turn it into a mindless, brainless, spineless cult.
10. Get rid of accumulated experience and expertise in government. Demean career public servants. Hollow out the state department, the Department of Justice, Health and Human Services, and public health.
11. Reward donors and cronies with bailouts, tax breaks, subsidies, government contracts, regulatory rollbacks and plum jobs. Put their lobbyists in charge of your agencies. Distribute $500bn in pandemic assistance to corporations in secret, without any oversight.
12. Coddle dictators. Don’t criticize their human rights abuses. Refuse to work with the leaders of other democracies. Withdraw from international treaties.
13. Create scapegoats. Demonize migrants and lock up asylum-seekers at the border even if they’re children. Put a white nationalist in charge of immigration policy. Blame Muslims, Mexicans and Chinese.
14. Denigrate and ridicule all critics. Describe opponents as “human scum”. Attack the mainstream media as purveyors of “fake news” and “enemies of the people”.
15. Conjure up conspiracies against yourself supposedly led by your predecessor and your opponent in the last election. Without any evidence, accuse your predecessor of “treason”. Fabricate a “Deep State” out to get you.
16. Downplay real threats to the nation, such as a rapidly spreading pandemic. Lie about your utter failure to contain it. Muzzle public health experts. Urge people to go back to work even as the pandemic worsens in parts of the country.
17. Encourage armed supporters to “liberate” states from elected officials who disagree with you.
18. Bribe other nations to investigate your electoral opponent and flood social media with lies about him.
19. Use rightwing propaganda machines like Fox News and conspiracy theory peddling One America News to inundate the country with your lies. Ensure that the morally bankrupt chief executive of Facebook allows you to spread your lies on the biggest media machine in the world.
20. Suppress the votes of people likely to vote against you. Intimidate voters of color. Encourage Republican governors to purge voter rolls, demand voter ID and close polling places.
21. Seek to prevent mail-in ballots during the pandemic. Claim they will cause voter fraud, without evidence. Threaten to close the US postal service.
22. Get Vladimir Putin to hack into US election machines, as he did in 2016 but can now do with more experience and deftness. Promise him that in return you’ll further destabilize America as well as Nato. Allow him to put a bounty on killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan. 
23. If it still looks like you’ll be voted out, try to postpone the election.
24. If you’re voted out of office notwithstanding all this, refuse to leave. Contest the election, claim massive fraud, say it’s a conspiracy, get your cult of a political party to support your lies, get your propaganda machine to repeat them, get your justice department to back you, get your judges and justices to affirm you, get your generals to suppress any subsequent rebellion.
25. Declare victory.
Memo to America: Beware Trump’s playbook. Spread the truth. Stay vigilant. Fight for our democracy.
263 notes · View notes
Link
LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN
October 21, 2020
Heather Cox Richardson
As we enter the home stretch to this election, we are bombarded with so much news the only way to make sense of it is to divide it into categories.
The president is angry and self-pitying while campaign officials are trying to tip the election with the dubious laptop story. Administration officials are also working as quickly as they can to push through whatever they can while they are still in power, hoping what they are doing flies under the radar with so much going on. And this flurry of activity means there are bad slips.
At the same time, Democratic candidate Joe Biden is trying to get elected, but in such a storm of crazy that his actual policies, which are quite developed, are simply not getting much airtime. Instead, people have begun to look to him as a return to an America in which strength was measured not by dominance but by caring.
The president began the day by tweeting about Biden’s proposed tax plan, which he calls “the Radical Biden-Harris Agenda.” He claims that the plan will “slash the typical American’s income by $6,500 per year. They will raise TAXES by $4 TRILLION DOLLARS – triggering a mass exodus of jobs out of America and into foreign countries…. Your 401k’s will crash with Biden. Massive Biden Tax and Regulation increases will destroy all that you have built! Additionally, 180 Million People will lose their Private Healthcare Plans.”
In fact, though, it is the administration that is talking about slashing things, including millions of dollars from Democratic-led cities that Trump and Barr have labeled “anarchist jurisdictions”: New York City; Portland, Oregon; Washington, D.C.; and Seattle, Washington. That money would cut federal grants for coronavirus relief, HIV treatment, newborn screening, and so on. Officials from the affected cities, as well as the U.S. Conference of Mayors, say they will sue if the administration tries to follow this through.
In a move that threatens to destroy our nonpartisan civil service, Trump today signed an Executive Order creating a new category of public servant who is not covered by normal rules. These employees can be hired by agency heads without having to go through the merit-based system in place since 1883, and can be fired at will. This new “Schedule F” will once again allow presidents to appoint cronies to office, while firing those insufficiently loyal. It also appears to shield political appointees from an incoming administration by protecting them from firing because of political affiliation.
Yesterday, an inspector general for the United States Postal Service issued a report requested by Congress examining the effects of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy’s changes to the postal service. The report concluded that the changes resulted in “significant negative service impacts across the country.” DeJoy is a Trump loyalist. The USPS Board of Governors, made up of Trump appointees, rejects the report’s conclusions.
Meanwhile, a number of senior administration officials and lawmakers from both parties are worried that the White House is fast-tracking a business deal worth billions of dollars in what is essentially a no-bid contract to a company associated with Republican operatives, including Karl Rove. The company, Rivada, wants to lease the Department of Defense’s mid-band spectrum. This spectrum is wildly valuable for the 5G market, the next-generation mobile network. Pentagon leaders are opposed to the deal since the military uses that spectrum, and they say they have not been able to study the effect of commercial use of the spectrum on military readiness. Pentagon lawyers say the White House has no authority to sell or lease its spectrum. Lawmakers of both parties oppose the deal. One senior official told CNN, “Something is really fishy about this.”
Today, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe blamed Iran for hacked emails purporting to come from the alt-right Proud Boys warning Democrats to vote for Trump. Ratcliffe said “we have identified that two foreign actors, Iran and Russia, have taken specific actions” relating to the election. He said the emails were designed to hurt Trump. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told Rachel Maddow that intelligence officers in a classified briefing about the matter did not, in fact, say that there was any attempt to hurt Trump. “I’m surprised that Ratcliffe would say that to the public…. I had the strong impression it was much rather to undermine confidence in elections….”
Meanwhile, Trump continues to push the laptop story. He is reportedly considering firing FBI director Christopher Wray after the election because Wray has refused to announce an investigation into Biden, his son Hunter Biden, or other Biden associates. After Wray’s refusal to back up Trump’s insistence that this summer’s violence was from “Antifa,” the FBI director’s unwillingness to announce a Biden investigation is apparently infuriating the president. In 2016, then FBI director James Comey announced a new investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails just 11 days before the election, an announcement political scientists say helped to swing victory to Trump. While the president can, in fact, fire an FBI director, it is unusual, and certainly should not happen because the director refuses to attack the president’s political rival. The term of the FBI director is set at 10 years so the director serves at least two presidents, and is not bound to the political cycle.
Trump is railing not just at Wray, but also at Attorney General William Barr. Trump was counting on Barr’s probe of the Russia investigation to implicate high-ranking members of the Obama administration just before the election, but Barr has backed off on delivering the report. Trump is frustrated, recently retweeting a photo of Barr with the caption “for the love of GOD ARREST SOMEBODY.” Barr has been staying out of the news lately, although he was in Memphis, Tennessee, today, announcing arrests made there under his Operation Legend, the name for the police crackdown in a number of cities announced in July.
Pushing the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop got a lot more difficult today when Sacha Baron Cohen revealed that his new Borat film shows Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani—the source of the laptop-- in a compromising position with a young woman. Giuliani insists the scene is a “complete fabrication,” but the stills I saw (and I was trying really hard not to see any of this) indicate that this explanation will convince only those determined to be convinced. As many observers have pointed out, if Baron Cohen could prank Giuliani so easily, what does that say about how well Giuliani could identify foreign influence operations?
For his part, Biden is acting like a normal presidential candidate, which just doesn’t grab the headlines the way Trump’s actions do. After Trump attacked Biden’s tax policy, though, a number of stories noted the actual terms of the plan.
Biden proposes to raise taxes on the wealthy. He would get rid of some of the 2017 Trump tax cuts, including the cut in the income tax rate for people making more than $400,000 a year. Trump cut that rate from 39.6% to 37%. Biden would put it back where it was. This change would affect fewer than 10% of taxpayers. People would also pay into the Social Security payroll tax for incomes over $400,000. That tax is currently collected only on $137,700 of earnings. Under this plan, the nation’s top 1% of earners would bring home about 15.9% less money after taxes than they do now.
Biden also proposes to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, and establish a 15% minimum tax on the so-called “book income” of a corporation, that is, the amount its directors report to shareholders, which often makes a corporation look quite profitable while it pays little or no tax. He would also increase taxes on international profits. These proposed taxes would make up more than half of the revenue the Treasury would see from the new measures.
The Biden proposals would raise between $2.4 and $4 trillion over a decade. The Penn Wharton Budget Model concludes that the top 1% of earners would pay about 80% of the tax increases. Its report continues: “All groups outside of the top 5%... see their after-tax incomes fall by less than 1 percent.” The Washington Post awarded four Pinocchios to Trump’s attacks on Biden’s tax plan. The Tax Foundation could not score Trump’s own plan because he has made no actual proposals.
Biden had powerful help today getting out his message. Former President Barack Obama, who has largely stayed out of the political fray, has reentered it powerfully. In a speech in Philadelphia, Obama directly attacked Trump, tearing apart his successor’s response to the coronavirus and his administration in general. No one gets under Trump’s skin like Obama does, and the former president seemed to be deliberately needling the president, perhaps to prod him to more self-destruction at tomorrow’s debate.
His appearances were not just attacks on Trump, though. They were reminders of what the presidency looked like just four years ago, and they were designed to make sure people get to the polls. “We’ve got to turn out like never before,” President Obama said. “We cannot leave any doubt in this election…. A whole bunch of people stayed at home and got lazy and complacent. Not this time,” he said. “Not in this election.”
Still, what made most news for Biden today was an old video of the former vice president at a memorial service for Chris Hixon, the athletic director at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, who died when he tried to disarm the killer. In the clip, which circulated widely on social media, Biden expresses his sympathy to Hixon’s parents and is walking away when Hixon’s son Corey, who has Kabuki Syndrome, runs up and, as Biden turns to see what’s happening, throws himself into Biden’s embrace. Biden spontaneously kisses the young man’s forehead and asks if he’s okay. When he shakes his head no, Biden hugs him, cradling his head, and reassures him, “It’s going to be okay. We’re going to be okay, I promise.”
—-
LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN
Heather Cox  Richardson
1 note · View note
gear-project · 6 years
Note
Hello, there seems to be tale of a new Guilty Gear installment rather than an Xrd addition from the recent anniversary interview. Honestly I'm a bit saddened by this especially considering the statement made for newer games to be simpler (I also really just wanted Testament to eventually show up in Xrd with all its crazy mechanics rather than a new game). But anyway, can you confirm how true this rumour is?. Is it really that Xrd has come to an end after what feels like a short time?.
Since Baf0’s conversation on Twitter on the Dengeki Report kinda blew it up, I’ll reiterate it here (since Dustloop posts don’t last forever… full translation courtesy of RedSilverSnake):
—The password to unlock Testament and Dizzy in the arcade version of X was “misosoup,” apparently because a programmer working on the game was overheard saying, “Now I want to drink some miso soup…”[I mentioned this earlier.  FYI GGX also had a button code in the console versions.  Look it up at GameFAQs.]
—The development team was casual with naming conventions at the time, to the extent that one of the ideas of what to call what became roman cancels was “cosmetic galaxy.” [I explained some of GGX history, Roman Cancels are wordplay for Roman Candle, a Firework… this symbolism actually transferred all the way to Revelator when Sol talks about Fireworks in one of the closing chapters of the story.]
—There was a question about Fanny from GG Petit, but Ishiwatari says he can’t answer anything about her because he wasn’t involved in her creation. [Sammy Staff were part of the people who assisted in her creation, but the GG character poll suggested that Ishiwatari wasn’t above putting her in a future game if players still wanted her to appear.]
—Advance had a unique move for Venom that Ishiwatari meant to hide, but it somehow made it into the game. [They describe it as a Bomb technique, which I think was hinted at in Night of Knives as well when Millia clashed with Venom.  There’s an item called Calvados Bomb in MOM Mode that generates poison which might have stemmed from that idea.]
—Not everyone who worked on XX knew that Bridget was a boy, which led to a shocked exclamation from a designer. [Story Mode states officially that Bridget is Male and identifies as Male, wishing to become more “manly” as part of his interests. 4chan be damned.]
—When the topic of the series’ bosses being women came up, it was mentioned that Leopaldon’s gender is unknown, but Ishiwatari says that he thinks the dog piloting it may have been female, thus keeping this tradition unbroken. [Gears can be considered “gender neutral” in some cases, because of their DNA, but yes the Dog inside Leo’s mouth COULD be Female, but we don’t know for sure!]
—Leopaldon’s designer did the effects for Jam’s new super in Xrd. [It was also said that Da Eun, Kum Haehyun’s Head Maid was the girl who appeared in Korean #Reload’s original stage.]
—Overture’s total development time was five years, so Ishiwatari says he has a lot of memories about it. [Black memories, I assume, given the reception. >_>]
—The name of Overture’s genre, melee action, has a double meaning; the “melee” part is homonymous with the Japanese word 命令/meirei, which refers to orders, like the ones you give to servants in the game. [Hopefully they’ll do something more improved in a Crusades-like setting someday ala God Eater.]
—Ishiwatari was fixated on how roman cancels could be changed in Xrd, and Pachi recalls racking his mind over the suggestion that they be possible at any time, even during a downed state. [FYI the only way to cancel a knockdown is to recover before it!  BlazBlue has Emergency Rolls and Quickrise motions for this reason, also there was a hack in Accent Core (PSP version codes) that could allow for unlimited cancels in to anything at one point, so the coding is there for it!]
—One idea that was tested during Xrd’s development was being able to roman cancel KOs, but this caused a bug among certain characters where they’d just fall right after getting up following the RC.[This is where the idea of Resurrection came from (related to the Gill boss character from Street Fighter III).]
—Bridget was #1 on the Revelator poll to decide the next playable character until the very last day, when Dizzy got a sudden boost. [Poor Order-Sol…]
—The staff had specific ideas for other characters in the poll, such as Izuna dashing rather than having a regular walk (like in Cross Tag Battle). [I’m sure he’s still in the works for the next game as Izuna was mentioned in Revelator.]
—One of Haehyun’s attendants actually debuted in the Korean version of #Reload, having been added to one of the stages. [Her name is Da Eun, and she is voiced by Elphelt’s VA in Kum’s Episode!]
—Ishiwatari also says that Xrd is probably finished as of Rev 2, and maybe hints that work has already started on the next real sequel.
Now, on to THIS:
As I said, GGXrd Revelator (excluding the add-on Rev2) is technically the SECOND of the Xrd Series… Rev2 (while it is a standalone game now), is the equivalent of “X Plus” to Guilty Gear X.
Most likely there is production for a THIRD XRD game… Revelator’s story hints at it, AFTER STORY hints at it, even the GUILTY GEAR BEGIN novel suggests something’s going to happen after REVELATOR…
So you KNOW something is gonna happen.  Basically the statement is “We’re done with Revelator Add-ons”, is what they’re saying.
So the next GG is gonna be BIG.  That’s all you guys need to know.  Keep supporting ARC System Works, and maybe (JUST MAYBE) the next GG will get a dub like BBTag has!
All we have to do is support any releases (including GG1 and Accent Core for the Nintendo Switch, Steam, and PS4 releases).  Guilty Gear The Missing Link should be coming in the next few months along with Guilty Gear XX Accent Core Plus R.
I’m banking on this because HAPPY CHAOS (a hinted character) says so!  So you should believe in HAPPY CHAOS!
12 notes · View notes
magpieandsons · 4 years
Text
39 - Resist!
Your hands scrabble for a hold on the glowing grotesquerie reaching inside you. Just when you think you have it in your grip, your hands go ice cold and slip through its form. You shut your eyes tight, concentrating on your inner voice screaming “NO!” against the intrusion as tendrils of alien thought pry into your mind.
Without intending to, your struggling, staggering steps are taking you closer to the entrance of the corridor, even as your back is pressed against the wall and the rows of boxes. You know that’s the direction the spirit wants you to go, so you dig in your heels and stretch your hands along the walls. You find purchase on one of the cask handles, grasping it for all your worth.
At the far end of the corridor, Darrel is barking and growling, and Caspin is gasping out spell words. You don’t know what Murph is doing but you don’t have the strength to look. Even the little attention it takes to listen further down the hallway saps at your concentration. Sinking to the ground, you can feel the ghost’s hold tightening on your mind as the seconds tick by.
Abruptly you’re calm.
You open your eyes and sit upright.
That bastard, wizard of an Ithildahnin is gathering power about him in waves, but he’s not ready to set it loose yet. There’s still time to reach the book. Yes - the book. This body is small, but it’ll manage.
Standing up seems hard. There’s still resistance from the form, a little bit of suppressed consciousness stiffening the legs, and refusing to release the handle of the box. You wrench at this stubborn arm, drawing casket 205 partly out of its resting place. There’s a dog in front of you, and looming over it’s worldly form, you glimpse the ethereal shape of an angry orc. Does the gnome know it’s dog is not a dog?
The question is the last thought to pass through your mind before the dog bites at your leg, and at the same moment a sharp pain blooms at the back of your head.
You wake in the dark - a greater, more complete dark than you’re used to. You ache all over, but the worst is in the back of your head. You’re cold through to your bones and there’s something poking into your shoulder. Moaning slightly, you try to shift away from the painful object and the sound of your voice comes back dull and enclosed. You reach out and your hand connects with wood. In a rush, you know exactly where you are. You open your mouth to scream your terror when the overturned coffin is pulled off you.
Caspin, his voice somewhere in the distance, says “Get another potion into the gnome. I’m almost done here.”
Murph appears above you with a small vial in his hand. He cocks his head at you, seeming to notice that you’re awake. Regardless he kneels, grabs your chin and pours the contents of the bottle down your throat. You hack and sputter, but despite your distress you feel better almost instantly. Murph drags you to your feet, gives you a slap on the back and walks off. You follow the valet, brushing bits of cloth and dust off you and trying not to look around you or to think too hard about it.
Caspin is near the far door, stamping out a fire. His face is smeared with dark ash and he has a small cut on his chin. He smiles at you a little recklessly and gestures to the smoldering pile. “A close one, but all sorted now.”
The burned up object on the ground is clearly a book, its pages reduced to a blackened edge clinging to a smoking leather spine. You cast a glance up the hallway. The lectern is too far away for you to see in the low light; all the same, you’re certain of where the book came from. You feel a pang of sadness at the thought that it might have contained the last record of the servants stuffed in the coffins around you.
Darrel appears at your side sniffing you over carefully. You ask him if he’s alright and he nods in a particularly un-dog-like way.
“We should go,” Murph mutters.
“Yes,” Caspin agrees, and produces the key he looted.
- Take the lead again.
- Hang back and let Caspin proceed.
https://strawpoll.com/yay2ze2w poll ends 5/12/20 at 10pm
0 notes
Text
Distant Thunder
MON DEC 16, 2019
So... there’ve been a few bumps in the road as far as that coming impeachment trial in the Senate goes.
A couple entries ago, I talked about being happy there would even be a trial at all... rather than the whole impeachment being adjourned with 51 votes the second it hit the Senate floor.
I felt it was perfectly satisfactory to have a short and sweet trial, with zero witnesses... where the prosecution presented their case... the defense did a meaningless little jig, and then a quick vote... that would either expose all GOP senators as a bunch of morally bankrupt political hacks with zero loyalty to the Constitution... OR... in the case of a cascading failure at the last minute, threatening to melt the entire Trump junta into a flaming pile of molten aluminum... a conviction.
Easy.
But... Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham had to go and get cocky.  
Near the end of last week, McConnell, reiterated several times in a spot on national television that he was working so closely with the White House on the rules for the impeachment trial that his and Donald Trump’s preferred game plan would be one in the same.  He said there would be no difference between what he wanted, and what Trump wanted, for this trial, when it was all hashed out.
He also added that this trial was merely a formality, and that the end result, an acquittal of Trump, was a foregone conclusion.
Now, McConnell seemingly said this in order to reassure that core voter base of blindly irrational hot heads who live in a fantasy world where the Constitution never existed, and electricity is witchcraft.
But... normal people were also listening to this baldfaced admission of bias in favor of the accused party.
If that wasn’t enough, Lindsey Graham... the other guy I’ve pointed to several times as being neck deep in the Trumpian scheme to defeat the Constitution and turn this nation into a dictatorship... said publicly that he was not, and would not pretend to be an impartial juror... and vowed to do whatever he could to make the impeachment, “die,” as quickly as possible.
There, he seems to have been threatening to bring up a vote to immediately adjourn the trial... even though nobody else believes that was ever a viable option.
At first, these... defacto pledges of allegiance to Trump, by McConnell and Graham were just kind of blinked at by the media like... sure!.. of course you would be this way... because you came from Hell.
But then some Democrats and prominent scholars actually spoke up and said... Erm... yeah!... they both just violated, in advance, the special oaths they will need to take before the Senate trial begins.  So... they should recuse themselves immediately.
Of course they did not.
No word at all on what Justice Roberts, who’s job it will totally be to force their recusals after such unambiguous declarations of allegiance... but you know... his robes will have to be on fire before he even blinks on anything like this.
But after the slight dust-up of the Democrats and scholars balking, then Chuck Schumer... Senate minority leader, today, went out there on prime-time to talk about how they really do need to call witnesses for this trial, in order for it to truly be considered a fair trial... with Bolton, and Mulvaney being on his list of four key witnesses to hear from, because they were closest to the center of the action.
As of today, there hasn’t been a ton of push back yet on Schumer’s proposal, because... well... it all goes back to that 51 vote threshold that each and every detail having to do with the trial, needs to pass. 
Schumer knows he has the backing of a handful of GOP senators... some moderate... some about to retire... some up for reelection in 2020.  For different reasons, all of them want or need the trial to have some semblance of legitimacy.
And I imagine they will only become more insistent about this, as those Senators in thrall to Trump, such as McConnell, and Graham, double and triple down on their prejudicial vows to acquit no matter what.
Meanwhile, a new Fox News poll came out saying that a solid 50% of the voting public at present wants Trump both impeached and removed.
That’s just a tick above where we were at a month ago... but the needle has moved that one tick... and this is still a solid majority... with those opposed to both being only 40%, and 10% being squeamish about the removal bit, but still in favor of impeachment as a well deserved slap in the face.
All taken together, these events seem to suggest that this early... and by, “this early,” I mean... Christmas and New Year are dominating everybody’s brains right now, in mid December...
...this early... the full gravity of a Constitutional Presidential impeachment is starting to be felt, both by the public, and members of the Senate.
These are just twinges, mind you... like the mild furrowing of brows people do when the sky darkens, and you hear that first distant rumble of thunder, and see that first flash of lightning that says the storm the weatherman predicted is nearing... and maybe it’s gonna be serious.
Maybe we should go down in the basement?
Well... get the candles and the hand crank radio ready, but nobody get too freaked out unless we hear those tornado sirens.  Probably we won’t hear the tornado sirens.  Probably the tree in the front yard won’t get struck by lightning.
In my opinion, we are not at the stage of tornado sirens... in terms of Senators being spooked into doing their Constitutional duty out of fear that a historic tornado really is gonna suck them up into the sky.
But... that sky is darkening a bit... and that distant thunder is rumbling a bit... both by virtue of the grim severity of what is truly at stake.
McConnell, and Graham’s flouting of the same... their middle fingers firmly extended in the direction of history... will only come to look more brainless and foolhardy as the storm moves closer... driving away those Senators who, for the moment, remain paralyzed.
A situation could be developing, therefore, wherein the core Trump fanatics of the Senate expose themselves as being in total opposition to any impeachment trial whatsoever... in the hopes of bullying the rest into submission... only to isolate themselves, as the rest lean away toward really wanting to be seen as impartial jurors.
This bit of rotational drift could gain momentum if Trump himself begins to level threats against all Senators who would defy him... as he most certainly will.
Weirdly, Trump himself this week, in one of his many public rants, said that he now thinks the Democratic conspiracy to impeach him began before he ever announced his candidacy in 2016... an idea that’s been ridiculed left and right.
But... I have to admit that my model here, does actually support this claim.
The Donald Trump in our timeline is but one of countless twins out there in the hyperverse, each one rising to power at different times, and causing different levels of damage to the nation and the world before being defeated... most often at some gruesome cost. 
In this blog I demonstrated last September, how we were warned about him, presumably by an AI left behind by a time treveler, back in 2013, some three years before he would declare his candidacy.
So... according to my model, Trump is right that pro-human-rights agents originating in some version of a future United States, have been and continue to be on the prowl, looking to flunk him out of power on every worldline.
Does he now know about this?
Do his devoted servants in Congress also know?
Do they gnash their teeth at the fundamental unfairness of being thwarted, only by the meddling of SJWs from parallel worlds, with time machines!  Grrrrrrr!
We don’t know.  Maybe he’s just crazy.
At any rate, things are still developing with this impeachment.
That’s enough analysis for tonight.
I’m going to bed.
0 notes
truck-fump · 4 years
Text
Trump’s 2020 Election Strategy in 25 StepsTrump will do anything...
New Post has been published on https://truckfump.life/2020/06/30/trumps-2020-election-strategy-in-25-stepstrump-will-do-anything/
Trump’s 2020 Election Strategy in 25 StepsTrump will do anything...
youtube
Trump’s 2020 Election Strategy in 25 Steps
Trump will do anything to be re-elected. His opponents are limited because they believe in democracy. Trump has no limits because he doesn’t.
Here’s Trump’s re-election playbook, in 25 simple steps:
1. Declare yourself above the law.
2. Use racist fearmongering. Demand “law and order” and describe protesters as “thugs”, “lowlife” and “rioters and looters”. Describe Covid-19 as “Kung-Flu”. Retweet posts from white supremacists. In your campaign ads, use a symbol associated with Nazis.
3. Appoint an attorney general more loyal to you than to America, and politicize the Department of Justice so it’s lenient on your loyalists and comes down hard on your enemies. Have it lighten the sentence of a crony convicted of lying under oath. Order investigations of industries you dislike.
4. Fire US attorneys who are investigating you.
5. Fire independent inspectors general who are looking into what you’ve done. Crush any whistleblowers you find.
6. Demean and ignore the intelligence community. Appoint a director of national intelligence more loyal to you than to America. Demand that the head of the FBI pledge loyalty to you.
7. Pack the federal courts with judges and justices more loyal to you than to the constitution.
8. Politicize the Department of Defense so generals will back whatever you order. Refer to them as “my generals”. Have them help clear out protesters. Order the military to surveil protesters. Tell governors you’ll bring in the military to stop protesters.
9. Purge your party of anyone disloyal to you and turn it into a mindless, brainless, spineless cult.
10. Get rid of accumulated experience and expertise in government. Demean career public servants. Hollow out the state department, the Department of Justice, Health and Human Services, and public health.
11. Reward donors and cronies with bailouts, tax breaks, subsidies, government contracts, regulatory rollbacks and plum jobs. Put their lobbyists in charge of your agencies. Distribute $500bn in pandemic assistance to corporations in secret, without any oversight.
12. Coddle dictators. Don’t criticize their human rights abuses. Refuse to work with the leaders of other democracies. Withdraw from international treaties.
13. Create scapegoats. Demonize migrants and lock up asylum-seekers at the border even if they’re children. Put a white nationalist in charge of immigration policy. Blame Muslims, Mexicans and Chinese.
14. Denigrate and ridicule all critics. Describe opponents as “human scum”. Attack the mainstream media as purveyors of “fake news” and “enemies of the people”.
15. Conjure up conspiracies against yourself supposedly led by your predecessor and your opponent in the last election. Without any evidence, accuse your predecessor of “treason”. Fabricate a “Deep State” out to get you.
16. Downplay real threats to the nation, such as a rapidly spreading pandemic. Lie about your utter failure to contain it. Muzzle public health experts. Urge people to go back to work even as the pandemic worsens in parts of the country.
17. Encourage armed supporters to “liberate” states from elected officials who disagree with you.
18. Bribe other nations to investigate your electoral opponent and flood social media with lies about him.
19. Use rightwing propaganda machines like Fox News and conspiracy theory peddling One America News to inundate the country with your lies. Ensure that the morally bankrupt chief executive of Facebook allows you to spread your lies on the biggest media machine in the world.
20. Suppress the votes of people likely to vote against you. Intimidate voters of color. Encourage Republican governors to purge voter rolls, demand voter ID and close polling places.
21. Seek to prevent mail-in ballots during the pandemic. Claim they will cause voter fraud, without evidence. Threaten to close the US postal service.
22. Get Vladimir Putin to hack into US election machines, as he did in 2016 but can now do with more experience and deftness. Promise him that in return you’ll further destabilize America as well as Nato. Allow him to put a bounty on killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan. 
23. If it still looks like you’ll be voted out, try to postpone the election.
24. If you’re voted out of office notwithstanding all this, refuse to leave. Contest the election, claim massive fraud, say it’s a conspiracy, get your cult of a political party to support your lies, get your propaganda machine to repeat them, get your justice department to back you, get your judges and justices to affirm you, get your generals to suppress any subsequent rebellion.
25. Declare victory.
Memo to America: Beware Trump’s playbook. Spread the truth. Stay vigilant. Fight for our democracy.
0 notes
tgrailwar-zero · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
[ Hacking was successful. With a 'Great Success', the parameters of the Servant are already discerned, removing it as an option and given for free. ]
SABER - Main Body:
Strength: D (B) Endurance: C+ (A+) Agility: E (C) Mana: C Luck: A+ NP: A+
PHANTOM SABER (LUNE):
Strength: C+ Endurance: C Agility: A Mana: B Luck: A++ NP: B
Action descriptions are under the cut.
Taking an action will alert the enemy Servant that they've been hacked.
'Discern Skills' reveals Servant skills. Noble Phantasms may be revealed depending on the success of the option.
'Inflict Negative Status' inflicts a random negative effect. Once specific items are acquired, then a specific effect can be chosen.
'Inflict Positive Status' inflicts a random positive effect. With your current items, if this option wins, you can choose between healing HP or MP at the expense of your items.
Each Servant has a special 'hacking' ability. 'Suncell Adaptation' is KUKULKAN's.
'Suncell Adaptation' is the merge of several skills. The concept of KUKULKAN being 'an invader who adapts', and the Interlopers innate magecraft, acting as a minor version of 'Spirit Core Liberation'. A random aspect from the hacked Servant will be copied and turned into a 'one time use' item- however, this action fully alerts the individual being hacked of your presence (if they weren't aware beforehand).
52 notes · View notes
dgrailwar · 4 months
Text
Round 11, Day 2 - Team MoonCancer
Tumblr media
"Alright! We're staying in! Just the way I like it!"
She paused, before sighing.
Tumblr media
"However... and I know this is weird coming from me, but... Listen, it's been a weird few days. Giant worms. The sky turned red. There's clearly weird shit going on, so why not just take a peek into what's going on? I am a pro hacker. I've got the chops for it. So... Why not, y'know?"
MoonCancer rolled a 'Clue Encounter'!
'Clue Encounters' are risk-free. Simply focus your attention on one specific thing, and you'll gather information towards it!
One option, however, is a dud. And the dud isn't always obvious. If the dud option wins out, then you get nothing useful. At all.
Ganesha's advantage is that she gets an extra choice! Additionally, if you're feeling spicy, you can try to balance the polls ('See Results' not included) in order to maximize the information learned! However, if you fail, you'll just get the result of the winning option.
15 notes · View notes
Text
28 February 2020
Drinks, data, discussion
We're giving Data Bites a break in March, but if you have 4 March pencilled into your diary, there's still an opportunity to discuss all things data, as we'll be going for drinks instead. If you'd like further details, drop me a line on gavin[dot]freeguard[at]instituteforgovernment[dot]org[dot]uk.
We're also on the lookout for:
Any reflections on the first octet (thanks, Giuseppe) for a short report we're publishing in April
Suggestions for future speakers, and any subject areas you'd like to see covered
Sponsors.
Please do get in touch!
Other things in brief:
A big thank you to Vuelio and an excellent panel for a fun discussion yesterday evening on the small matter of what 2020 holds in store. (No, we didn't stand up for the key change.) More on the hashtag.
A good discussion at the IfG yesterday morning on all things outsourcing transparency. Tl;dr: we need better data and more transparency. Some thoughts and links from me here.
I was quoted in a Times article on how civil servants are using Slack, revealed after a questionable deployment of an FoI exemption (more here, here and here on FoI).
And finally... another plea for help: we're looking for all sorts of frameworks about how to think about data, information, etc. Any suggestions very welcome - via Twitter or the email address above.
Have a great weekend
Gavin
Today's links:
Graphic content
You'll either love it or hate it
Marmot Review 10 Years On (UCL Institute of Health Equity)
Gains in UK life expectancy stall after decade of austerity, report says* (FT)
Austerity blamed for life expectancy stalling for first time in century (The Guardian)
UK politics, people and public services
Deprivation profiles for Welsh Local Authorities (Jamie Whyte)
School funding (Graham for IfG)
Housing (Ian Mulheirn on a BBC briefing)
Where are all the UK's new homes being built? (Centre for Cities for BBC News)
One in 10 new homes in England built on land with high flood risk (The Guardian)
Special advisers (IfG)
Migration Statistics Quarterly Report: February 2020 (ONS)
Study the biggest driver of migration to the UK, but overall levels remain stable (ONS)
Outer London most exposed to new immigration rules* (FT)
Electoral systems across the UK (IfG)
Labour partisans (strong identifiers) are now really distinctive compared with other groups (Paula Surridge)
More (Matt Singh)
GE2019: How did demographics affect the result? (House of Commons Library)
Capital Investment: why governments fail to meet their spending plans (IfG)
The trillion-pound question (Resolution Foundation)
Coronavirus
China fall in coronavirus cases undermined by questionable data* (FT)
13,000 Missing Flights: The Global Consequences of the Coronavirus* (New York Times)
Mapping the Coronavirus Outbreak Across the World* (Bloomberg)
US politics
What Defines The Sanders Coalition? (FiveThirtyEight)
Responses to our polling on the Democratic primary (G. Elliott Morris, via Ketaki)
What the Democratic Candidates Discussed During the Debates: Annotated Transcripts* (Bloomberg - and a bit behind the data, via Petr)
Sport
Alex Ovechkin is the eighth member of the NHL's 700-goal club* (Washington Post)
Liverpool have been in a winning position for... (Opta)
Uefa’s ban on Man City does not change football’s inequality* (FT)
Will Liverpool’s machine football conquer America?* (FT)
Globalisation has left lower-league football clubs behind* (The Economist)
How We Analyzed Allstate’s Car Insurance Algorithm (The Markup)
Everything else
Are there too many central bankers?* (The Economist)
The World’s Biggest Economies Get a Jolt of Government Spending* (Bloomberg)
Some lesser known visualisation techniques to show rankings when your data is just too big for a regular bar chart (Maarten Lambrechts)
Graph workflow
What is Complexity Science? (#ComplexityExplained, via David)
Meta data
Data
The Value of Data (Bennett Institute/ODI)
It’s Now or Never for National Data Strategies (Diane Coyle for Project Syndicate, via Graham)
How do we create trustworthy and sustainable data institutions? (ODI)
Data Dialogues' participatory futures projects announced (Nesta)
Three types of agreement that shape your use of data (Leigh Dodds)
Government rejects call for DCMS to audit departments’ data-sharing rules (Civil Service World)
How can data transform our health and care system? (Nesta)
AI, algorithms
The algorithm is watching you (London Review of Books)
Data Analytics and Algorithms in Policing in England and Wales: Towards A New Policy Framework (RUSI)
Rules urgently needed to oversee police use of data and AI – report (The Guardian)
Met Police chief defends facial recognition from 'ill-informed' critics (BBC News)
RUSI Annual Security Lecture
AI = “Automated Inspiration” (Cassie Kozyrkov, Towards Data Science)
Clearview AI hack is sweet irony for privacy advocates (New Statesman)
Suppose you have to choose... (Geoffrey Hinton)
Facial recognition is spreading faster than you realise (The Conversation)
Google AI will no longer use gender labels like 'woman' or 'man' on images of people to avoid bias (Business Insider)
Innovating responsibly with data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) (LOTI)
Digital government
Getting out early feels good: meet the Defra team building a new digital service for GB exporters (Defra)
A thread about UK digital government (warning: contains half finished thoughts) (Richard Pope)
UK digital government in the 2010s - what was it all about politically? (Bennett Institute)
Why Government Leaders Need to Become Digital Leaders (Governing)
Information
Inside the infodemic: Coronavirus in the age of wellness* (New Statesman)
How the Coronavirus Revealed Authoritarianism’s Fatal Flaw (The Atlantic)
Together at last – UK’s planning and housing statistics now in one place (ONS)
About the size of a London flat (ONS)
What Africa Check, Chequeado and Full Fact have learned about tackling bad information (Poynter)
Everything else
The Markup
Slouching towards dystopia: the rise of surveillance capitalism and the death of privacy (New Statesman)
Economists should learn lessons from meteorologists* (FT)
Robert Chote interview: OBR chief reflects on ten years as the nation’s top fiscal watchdog, and how he is still a reporter at heart (Civil Service World)
'I give fusion power a higher chance of succeeding than quantum computing' says the R in the RSA crypto-algorithm (The Register)
Oracle Reveals Funding of Dark Money Group Fighting Big Tech* (Bloomberg)
Katherine Johnson Dies at 101; Mathematician Broke Barriers at NASA* (New York Times)
Katherine Johnson: NASA mathematician and much-needed role model (The Conversation)
Democracy tech will be the next hot investment space (Wired)
The perils of opening the mind (Boston Globe)
Transparency
How can outsourced public services be made more transparent? (Institute for Government)
Grammar school scoring is wrong, says father – and hopes finally to prove it (The Guardian, via Nick)
Financial secrecy is the enemy in the fight against corruption (Thom Townsend)
Who uses WhatDoTheyKnow? (mySociety)
Opportunities
JOBS: NatCen
JOBS: What Works for Children's Social Care
JOB: Head of Information Rights (National Archives)
JOB: Delivery Manager (Convivio)
JOB: Artificial intelligence and algorithms reporter (Washington Post)
JOB: Partnerships and Community Manager – Understanding Patient Data (Wellcome)
JOB: Digital innovation (city) lead (Futuregov)
MoJ on the hunt for Head of Prisons Digital Services to help end reliance on ‘monolithic supplier owned systems’ (diginomica)
FELLOWSHIP: Google News Initiative (with FT, Guardian, Reach, Independent, TBIJ, Telegraph, First Draft News)
Building trust in how you handle data: a hierarchy (ODI)
EVENT: Data Trusts 2020: from theory to practice (ODI)
EVENT: Press Play: the power of data to transform physical activity (Ipsos MORI)
EVENT: FutureFest (Nesta)
And finally...
I graphed out my unaccepted Twitter DM requests (Katy Montgomerie)
The One With All The Polling (YouGov)
Duck (Terrible Maps, via Tim)
Sliding flaws: EU publishes misleading Brexit chart (Politico)
An actual chart from the 1998 Comprehensive Spending Review (via Sukh)
Civil servants discuss the politics of Love Island on Slack* (The Times)
0 notes
bountyofbeads · 5 years
Text
One day, the Trump superpower of his shameless self-regard may fail him
By Megan McArdle | Published October 04, 2019 5:40 PM ET | Washington Post | Posted October 7, 2019 10:25 AM ET
Take a break for just a moment. Step back from the dizzying rotation of the impeachment-grade news cycle and the frantic hurly-burly of partisan disputation. Enjoy a deep cleansing breath, and cast yourself back to a more innocent time, like the spring of 2015. Then just sit with it for a moment, pondering how absolutely astonishing our current predicament really is.
President Trump is on the fast track to impeachment — all right, yes, it’s not really all that surprising. But when you think back over the past four years, don’t you feel your breath catching in your throat, your eyes widening, your mouth falling ajar as you contemplate the amazing fact that Donald Trump ever became president of the United States, and thus, liable to impeachment?
I’ve literally lost count of all the moments at which I thought well, he’s done it now, no campaign could possibly survive that unforced error. Starting in July 2015, when he said of John McCain, “He’s not a war hero … I like people who weren’t captured.” This from a man who’s certainly no war hero, in part because a friendly podiatrist secured him a draft deferment for (apparently evanescent) bone spurs.
Americans don’t like anyone who impugns the honor of the nation’s warriors, especially not anyone who avoided service and is insulting a warrior who spent more than five years being tortured by the enemy in a notorious communist prison camp. Obviously, the Trump campaign was over … er, I meant to say, just begun.
There was still plenty of time for Trump to attack the parents of a dead soldier, to claim that judges of Mexican ancestry shouldn’t be allowed to oversee the trial involving a class-action lawsuit over his now-defunct Trump University and, in a hot-mic recording, to be revealed bragging about groping women. There was still time for reports about Trump routinely stiffing small vendors, for the clip of him discussing his own daughter in a salacious radio interview. And, gosh, that’s only the very craziest, most indisputably unacceptable stuff that happened before commander bone spurs became commander in chief.
How could any candidate have survived just one of these thermonuclear scandals, much less all of them? Trump must have had some previously undetected superpower — and in reality, he does, a quite obvious one: a perfect lack of concern about anyone except himself.
A normal person, possessed of a modicum of empathy and a healthy capacity for shame, wouldn’t have done such things. But if a normal politician had somehow done them, and gotten caught, he likely would have slunk away, withdrawing partly to avoid further public shaming but also to shield innocent bystanders — his family, his party — who would otherwise suffer for his sins. Not Trump, who seems largely indifferent to any suffering except his own and entirely immune to remorse, or its wistful cousin, regret.
Which is why his supporters like him. They were tired of having concerns about immigration dismissed as racist, beyond the pale — and they tired, too, of having their opinions about crime, terrorism or trade met with the same unanswerable accusation. Trump ignored the whole pious apparatus of unspoken rules that axiomatically excluded their arguments from the public square. The fact that he was shameless, brazen and unconcerned by procedural nicety, in his campaign and in his presidency, was one of his main attractions.
These traits have delivered enough victories — the 2016 election, the confirmation of Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court — that his supporters are loath to question them now. Possibly his supporters are right; maybe Trump’s devil-may-care indifference is pure genius and will bring still more victories for those who followed him down the road less traveled.
Yet it seems at least worth asking why so few politicians chart the course of nakedly shameless self-regard. Was Trump simply the first explorer daring enough to discover a novel route to power? Or is this an extremely risky passage, safe to travel only under unusual circumstances, and otherwise a dead end?
I’d argue the latter, though of course I — effete #NeverTrumper — can be expected to say nothing else. But even his most ardent supporters ought to recognize that superpowers can make one a villain as often as a hero, and that this particular superpower is at the very least risky for them.
Because if the waters turn stormy and the public rebels — if polls suggest we’re looking at a Democratic president and a filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate — then the day will come when even many of Trump’s supporters want him to stage a strategic withdrawal. And on that day, they’ll discover that he pays exactly as little heed to his followers as he does to anyone else who is not named “Trump.”
It’s not news that Trump is corrupt. What’s new is how he is succeeding in corrupting our government.
By Fred Hiatt | Published October 06, 2019 5:44 PM ET | Washington Post | Posted October 7, 2019 10:25 AM ET |
It is no longer surprising to see President Trump wielding the government as an instrument purely for his personal benefit or vengeance.
What is both alarming and new is how government, increasingly, is giving way and giving in.
Three years into Trump’s term, we are witnessing the accelerating erosion of a bedrock American principle: that the awesome power of government will be wielded fairly, based on facts and evidence, and without regard to political fear or favor.
A normal government that cared about corruption in Ukraine, as officials in this administration sometimes pretend they do, would seek improvements in its judicial system. But Trump has no such concern, as you can tell from his July 25 phone call with Ukraine’s president. He never mentions corruption, but presses only for two specific investigations he hopes will benefit his domestic political fortunes.
A government committed to rescuing Americans from unfair detention abroad — as Trump likes to boast he is — would be committed to rescuing all Americans from unfair detention abroad.
But this administration picks and chooses, based on Trump’s whims and grudges. For a Christian cleric held in Turkey, Trump goes all out. For a New York Times reporter endangered in Egypt, the administration does not bestir itself, as Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger recently recounted.
Some officials have indulged these impulses almost from the start. That Times reporter barely escaped arrest two years ago. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’s dishonest maneuverings to get a question about citizenship added to the 2020 Census took place in the spring of 2017. Last year, officials devised their policy to separate children from parents at the border, and then repeatedly lied about it.
But as time goes on, the government more and more is endorsing and amplifying policies that serve Trump’s political interest. Just recently:
●As soon as Trump decided to make political hay out of California’s homeless population, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler accused the (Democratic) state of allowing human feces to pollute its waterways and demanded action. Around the country, 3,508 community water systems are out of compliance with standards; only California attracted the EPA’s attention.
●When the House Ways and Means Committee requested Trump’s tax returns, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Charles Rettig flatly refused — though the law says the returns “shall” be turned over if requested.
●When another House committee wanted former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to testify about Trump’s efforts to fire special investigator Robert S. Mueller III, White House counsel Pat Cipollone — who is supposed to represent the law, not the president’s personal well-being — happily asserted executive privilege on behalf of this tale of obstruction, though Lewandowski never actually worked in the White House.
●Indulging another Trump obsession, the State Department has intensified an investigation of Obama-era officials who sent emails to Hillary Clinton — including by retroactively classifying some of their messages, as The Post reported a few days ago.
●When the intelligence community’s inspector general ruled that the whistleblower complaint about Trump and Ukraine should be sent to Congress, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel conveniently offered a contrary opinion. No, the OLC said, “the appropriate action is to refer the matter to the Department of Justice.”
●Which was doubly convenient, in fact, because Justice, with great efficiency, determined that — although soliciting assistance from a foreign power on behalf of a political campaign is against the law — Trump had nothing to worry about, on the pretext that prosecutors were unable to assign a dollar value to the help he had solicited. Case closed. Case never even opened, in fact.
What’s going on? Senior officials who had the fortitude to defend the rule of law have gradually been replaced by those who put ambition over principle. A few who still try to do the right thing are kept in vulnerable “acting” positions and hemmed in by toadies and hacks in subordinate positions.
Meanwhile, honest civil servants leave or become demoralized. They watch first-class research agencies be deliberately disrupted and degraded. They see Trump firing (Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch) and threatening (the still anonymous whistleblower) honest professionals. Resistance to abuse of power naturally dwindles.
Yes, take this as a warning of what a second term would mean. Norms get eroded, a nonpartisan bureaucracy can be corrupted.
But remember also that the whistleblower and intelligence inspector general refused to bend. Thousands of public servants like them are continuing to fulfill their missions as best they can. We need to keep faith with them as they work, often under pressures we can’t imagine, to keep government fair and honest.
The new GOP strategy: Don’t believe the president
By James Downie | Published October 06, 2019 7:00 PM ET | Washington Post | Posted October 7, 2019 10:25 AM ET
You knew there was never going to be just one whistleblower. A president who stands on the White House lawn and asks foreign countries to investigate his political opponents was never going to otherwise keep such schemes to a small circle of loyalists. And so it has come to pass. ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos revealed Sunday morning, “ABC News has learned that the legal team representing the first whistleblower is now representing a second whistleblower. Attorney Mark Zaid told me that this second whistleblower is a member of the intelligence community with firsthand information on some of the allegations at issue.”
Confronted with that new information on the various Sunday morning talk shows, Republican congressmen and senators largely opted for the same mix of misinformation and non-answers that they’ve been stuck with even as poll after poll shows support for an impeachment inquiry rising. In one area, though, a new talking point has emerged: Don’t believe the president.
This goes back to the president’s appearance on the South Lawn on Oct. 3, when Trump asked China to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter. There’s no way to defend a president publicly asking a geopolitical rival to investigate domestic political rivals, so Republicans have decided to pretend he didn’t do that. The first up was Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.): “I don’t think it’s a real request,” he told reporters Friday morning, “I think he did it to provoke you to ask me and others and get outraged by it.” Republicans on the Sunday shows followed suit. “I doubt if the China comment was serious, to tell you the truth,” said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) on CBS’s “Face the Nation." On ABC, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) feigned incredulity: “George, you really think he was serious about thinking that China’s going to investigate the Biden family?”
It isn’t the first time that Republicans, confronted with a controversial Trump quote, have said the president wasn’t being serious. Trump even told special counsel Robert S. Mueller III that his infamous request to Russia to find Hillary Clinton’s “missing” emails was a joke. That Capitol Hill Republicans would go back to this well is no surprise; it’s an easy dodge when, according to The Post’s Robert Costa and Philip Rucker, GOP lawmakers and aides say privately that their “collective strategy is simply to survive and not make any sudden moves.”
The difference this time is that the president himself isn’t claiming that he was joking, not in any of his numerous Twitter missives since that South Lawn appearance. Instead, he laid into criticism from Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) about his request to China. And Sunday afternoon he said on Twitter that he would “would LOVE running" against Biden.
Not only wasn’t Trump joking about asking China to investigate Biden, he isn’t pretending that he was. In other words, Republican politicians don’t want you to believe the president.
One reason Trump fit in so well with the GOP and especially its Fox News propaganda arm is that he and those around him have made livings telling people not to believe their own eyes. Years of “Trump’s a brilliant businessman, not a bumbling heir with multiple bankruptcies” easily transitioned to “Mexico will pay for the wall, not taxpayers.” But the narrative of “right good, left bad” was always bigger than one person, even one as influential as the president. Now, that narrative demands a new reality: “Don’t believe Trump even when he’s telling you to believe him.” The myth has swallowed Trump himself.
Watch: ON WEBSITE
0 notes
xpaladinorg · 6 years
Text
For the People Act of 2019 (H.R.1)
Introduced in House (01/03/2019)
For the People Act of 2019 - H.R.1
To expand Americans’ access to the ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, and strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and for other purposes.
SEE THE FULL TEXT HERE
Key take-aways:
Elections & Voting
Easier voting registration, including online and automatic registration
Same-day registration and at least 15 days of early voting for federal elections.
Election Day would become a federal holiday.
Efforts and policies that remove voters from rolls or hinder their ability to vote would be stoped.
Voting rights restored to felons after finishing their sentences.
To prevent computer tampering federal elections would require paper ballots.
State election officials could no longer be involved in federal campaigns.
The reinstatement of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Campaign Finance
Prohibition of all foreign political money
Disclosure of large donations from politically active 501(c)(4) organizations.
Digital/social media companies are required to provide public databases detailing all political ad purchases of $500 or more.
Policies to block Political ads produced or purchased by foreign nationals or organizations. 
Presidential inaugural committees must disclose all expenditures as well as the existing donor disclosure.
A matching-fund program for House candidates who will only seek/raise small-dollar campaign contributions.
New updates to the public financing system for presidential candidates.
An end to superPACs that support individual candidates also known as “Side-cars.”
Ethics
Mandatory tax return disclosure by all presidential candidates and their vice-presidents.
Presidents-elect transition plans will require an ethics plan for their team and would be required to file a full financial disclosure within 30 days of taking office.
Members of Congress will no longer be allowed to serve on any pro-profit corporate board.
Members of Congress would be required to use personal money to pay any legal costed and penalties for employment misconduct (barring the use of any taxpayer money).
The establishment of a code of ethics on the Supreme Court. 
Stronger regulation on foreign and domestic lobbying.
This Act is organized into 3 divisions with titles and subtiles as follows:
Division A—Voting
TITLE I—ELECTION ACCESS
Subtitle A—Voter Registration Modernization Subtitle B—Access To Voting For Individuals With Disabilities Subtitle C—Prohibiting Voter Caging Subtitle D—Prohibiting Deceptive Practices And Preventing Voter Intimidation Subtitle E—Democracy Restoration Subtitle F—Promoting Accuracy, Integrity, And Security Through Voter-Verified Permanent Paper Ballot Subtitle G—Provisional Ballots Subtitle H—Early Voting Subtitle I—Voting By Mail Subtitle J—Absent Uniformed Services Voters And Overseas Voters Subtitle K—Poll Worker Recruitment And Training Subtitle L—Enhancement Of Enforcement Subtitle M—Federal Election Integrity Subtitle N—Promoting Voter Access Through Election Administration Improvements Subtitle O—Severability
TITLE II—ELECTION INTEGRITY
Subtitle A—Findings Reaffirming Commitment Of Congress To Restore The Voting Rights Act Subtitle B—Findings Relating To Native American Voting Rights Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood Subtitle D—Findings Relating To Territorial Voting Rights Subtitle E—Redistricting Reform Subtitle F—Saving Voters From Voter Purging Subtitle G—Severability
TITLE III—ELECTION SECURITY
Subtitle A—Financial Support For Election Infrastructure Subtitle B—Security Measures Subtitle C—Enhancing Protections For United States Democratic Institutions Subtitle D—Promoting Cybersecurity Through Improvements In Election Administration Subtitle E—Preventing Election Hacking Subtitle F—Miscellaneous Provisions Subtitle G—Severability
Division B—Campaign Finance.
TITLE IV—CAMPAIGN FINANCE TRANSPARENCY
Subtitle A—Findings Relating To Illicit Money Undermining Our Democracy Subtitle B—DISCLOSE Act Subtitle C—Honest Ads Subtitle D—Stand By Every Ad Subtitle E—Secret Money Transparency Subtitle F—Shareholder Right-To-Know Subtitle G—Disclosure Of Political Spending By Government Contractors Subtitle H—Limitation And Disclosure Requirements For Presidential Inaugural Committees Subtitle I—Severability
TITLE V—CAMPAIGN FINANCE EMPOWERMENT
Subtitle A—Findings Relating To Citizens United Decision Subtitle B—Congressional Elections Subtitle C—Presidential Elections Subtitle D—Personal Use Services As Authorized Campaign Expenditures Subtitle E—Severability
TITLE VI—CAMPAIGN FINANCE OVERSIGHT
Subtitle A—Restoring Integrity To America’s Elections Subtitle B—Stopping Super PAC-Candidate Coordination Subtitle C—Severability
Division C—Ethics.
TITLE VII—ETHICAL STANDARDS
Subtitle A—Supreme Court Ethics Subtitle B—Foreign Agents Registration Subtitle C—Lobbying Disclosure Reform Subtitle D—Recusal Of Presidential Appointees Subtitle E—Severability
TITLE VIII—ETHICS REFORMS FOR THE PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, AND FEDERAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
Subtitle A—Executive Branch Conflict Of Interest Subtitle B—Presidential Conflicts Of Interest Subtitle C—White House Ethics Transparency Subtitle D—Executive Branch Ethics Enforcement Subtitle E—Conflicts From Political Fundraising Subtitle F—Transition Team Ethics Subtitle G—Ethics Pledge For Senior Executive Branch Employees Subtitle H—Severability
TITLE IX—CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS REFORM
Subtitle A—Requiring Members Of Congress To Reimburse Treasury For Amounts Paid As Settlements And Awards Under Congressional Accountability Act Of 1995 Subtitle B—Conflicts Of Interests Subtitle C—Campaign Finance And Lobbying Disclosure Subtitle D—Access To Congressionally Mandated Reports Subtitle E—Severability
TITLE X—PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE PRESIDENTIAL TAX TRANSPARENCY
Sponsor: Rep. Sarbanes, John P. [D-MD-3]
Committees: House - House Administration; Intelligence (Permanent Select); Judiciary; Oversight and Reform; Science, Space, and Technology; Education and Labor; Ways and Means; Financial Services; Ethics; Homeland Security
Latest Action: 01/03/2019 Introduced in House
Status Introduced
Source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/HR1
0 notes
asylum-ireland-blog · 6 years
Text
Ahead of election, Sweden warns its voters against foreign misinformation
New Post has been published on http://asylumireland.ml/ahead-of-election-sweden-warns-its-voters-against-foreign-misinformation/
Ahead of election, Sweden warns its voters against foreign misinformation
(STOCKHOLM) — “If Sweden is attacked, resistance is required,” Swedes were warned this year.
A 20-page leaflet, mailed to all households in Sweden and resembling a wartime government communiqué, was, in fact, part of Sweden’s effort to guard against Russian aggression — a growing concern, particularly as Swedes head to the polls for national elections on Sunday.
“Be on the lookout for false information,” the pamphlet warned, in its English translation. “Do not believe in rumours — use more than one reliable source in order to see whether the information is correct.”
Swedish schools, meanwhile, received a package of materials this spring from the Swedish Media Council to educate students on spotting disinformation, aimed at preparing for Sunday’s elections.
Sweden may have reason to worry.
One in three news articles shared with political hashtags in Sweden came from “junk news” sites, according to a recent study from Oxford University. The presence of Twitter bots seeking to influence Swedish politics doubled in August, according to the Swedish Defense Research Agency.
The agency, which studied accounts tweeting election-related hashtags, said suspected bot accounts increased from 500 to approximately 1,200 active last month.
Their purpose: to foment populism, promote far-right alternative news sites and support the Sweden Democrats — Sweden’s far-right, anti-immigrant party that took 12.9 percent in Sweden’s last national elections in 2014.
That percentage made it the third largest party in Sweden’s parliamentary system. That was before the 2015 European migration crisis brought large numbers of asylum-seekers to Sweden, which ranks among the top countries in Europe in non-European Union migrants per capita — and the party is expected gain seats this year.
And that was before the 2015 European migration crisis brought large numbers of asylum-seekers to Sweden, which ranks among the top countries in Europe in non-European Union migrants per capita.
“We’re seeing an ongoing attempt to influence the Swedish elections in that direction,” Swedish Justice Minister Morgan Johansson, a member of the center-left leading party, told ABC.
Sunday’s vote has drawn attention and concern across Europe, as the far-right Sweden Democrats vie for support against the country’s leading party, the center-left Social Democrats, and the leading opposition party, the Moderates.
Swedes will elect their representatives to parliament Sunday, which will, in turn, elect a prime minister and form a government.
To combat foreign attempts to exploit division, Sweden has taken on the problem holistically.
“Where foreign influence has been successful, it has been in countries where they have low or no awareness about the threat and their own vulnerabilities to that threat,” Mikael Tofvesson, head of the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency’s task force for guarding against election interference, told ABC.
“Our perspective here is that we need to have a whole of society approach,” Tofvesson said.
The 2016 U.S. presidential election has drawn heightened attention to Russian hacking and disinformation around the world. Special counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence agents for allegedly hacking the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
American intelligence agencies publicly accused Russia of interfering in the 2016 election in an attempt to help Donald Trump and harm Clinton, the Democratic nominee.
Russia has denied meddling with the election.
American efforts to counter influence, meanwhile, have been more limited. The Department of Homeland Security has worked with state governments, which manage U.S. elections independently of the federal government, to scan for vulnerabilities and prevent hacks.
The FBI this month launched a web page aimed at countering foreign influence, but the federal government has not undertaken a broad effort to educate the public or coordinate measures to counter disinformation, as opposed to hacking, with public officials.
In Sweden, Tofvesson said he’s seen influence attempts there since 2015 — and his agency received a mandate to address political interference in 2016.
Since then, it has trained 10,600 civil servants in spotting foreign influence campaigns, in a series of sessions lasting up to two days. It has conducted similar sessions with political parties and journalists, and it has coupled its counter-influence materials with regular elections-administration training for local officials involved in running Sunday’s vote.
A 24/7 line of communication with social-media companies lets government officials report fake pages or accounts, and the MSB has been in regular contact with Facebook, Twitter, and Google.
So far, Tofvesson said, it has only requested one page be removed — an automated Facebook account purporting to represent a municipality.
This spring, it convened a national conference with about 40 different groups involved in the election, which met again more recently.
A 45-page handbook, disseminated to public-information officers in and outside of government, outlines the types of fake accounts, hacking techniques and social-psychological tricks seen in online disinformation campaigns. It also lays out several ways to counter them, depending on the situation.
It recommends “a robust but measured fact-based response.”
“In some ways, what Sweden is doing is kind of going back to the security policies it had during the Cold War,” said Erik Brattberg, director of the Europe Program and a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “It’s sort of a broader effort of societal resilience recognizing that the integrity of a democratic system, a political system, is essential for national security.”
A non-NATO member on Russia’s periphery, Sweden maintains status as an “enhanced” NATO partner and moved closer to the Western alliance with a 2016 agreement making it easier to host NATO troops for exercises and in crisis scenarios — the kind of expansion of NATO’s influence that has irked Moscow.
Anti-NATO messaging has been a component of online disinformation in Sweden, experts say.
“One [message] is that Sweden is a country in chaos, there are way too many immigrants, crime is going up,” Brattberg said of disinformation narratives, but also that “there’s a lot of disinformation about what kind of presence NATO has in Sweden, that NATO would put nuclear weapons in Sweden” and that problems would arise from NATO troop presence.
Although Sweden’s efforts have been ongoing since 2016, Sunday’s elections have brought the government’s purpose into focus. As far as election hacking itself is concerned, Sweden enjoys two advantages touted by many state officials in the U.S.: a decentralized voting system, run by local administrators, that uses paper ballots — a recommendation cybersecurity experts have made for guarding against hackers manipulating vote totals.
“Other countries have digitized the election process, but we have gone the other way,” said Johansson, the Swedish Justice minister. “It might be old fashioned, but it’s very hard to mess with.”
Copyright © 2018, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.
,http://sandhillsexpress.com/abc_world/ahead-of-election-sweden-warns-its-voters-against-foreign-misinformation-abcid36108035/
0 notes