#sflc

[worksmarter4yourfuture]

How To File For The Sick And Family Leave Credit Step by Step  Video shares a step-by-step process of how to see if you qualify, how much you are eligible for, and how to file in 30 minute or less.  

[no1ryomafan]

Not to talk about fucking mega man again but every time I remember star force and I am FOREVER sad that the two of the prominent antagonists from the game that’s considered the best in the series are NEVER talked about:

Not only cause “wow these designs are fucking fantastic” but even if I think Pat is the better written “villain”-in quotations cause he’s not really evil-especially in the sympathetic light, these two are still written well and have a nice dynamic. There is hardly ANY fan content of these two-i once saw someone complaining omega xis barley gets art when BUDDY hes more fucking known by people who never touched the games then these two-and I can’t begin to understand why when people love tragic siblings in this series given Pandora and Prometheus are so loved and these two are basically them just less tragic happy ending and everything but still go through angst and I can’t begin to understand why they are so IGNORED in the game that is again consider the best in its own sub series-

Until I remember the only fucking thing people talk about from this game universally is a character death that gets SPOILED BY EVERYONE cause the general mm fandom has to sleep on star force sighhhh.

[let-them-eat-rakes]

da man...

junpei

[pigcop]

Sflc

[salemfieldslearningcenter]

SFLC: More Than a Daycare, A Foundation for Life

At SFLC, we go beyond traditional daycare by partnering with parents to nurture every child’s academic, social, emotional, and spiritual growth. Our safe, loving environment fosters confidence, self-worth, and positive values, ensuring a bright start for a successful future.

Click here to know more

[indizombie]

Contact tracing app Aarogya Setu is facing renewed criticism for lack of transparency, with many security experts pointing out that what the government released as the app’s ‘back-end code’ was not what it was claimed to be. “What they’ve released right now is some non-functional code snippets. It is client-side code loaded onto the app from a web address and not the server functions or the data-handling part. The back-end code, which handles the data, including the data schemas, has still been kept secret," said Anivar Aravind, an advisory board member at the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), who had challenged the mandatory imposition of the app in the Karnataka high court, highlighting its implications on privacy.

Prasid Banerjee. 'Experts seek full Aarogya Setu code, not bits of it', Mint

[crowcostanzo-blog]

#DECA #SFLC #jacobhughes (at Hilton Branson Convention Center Hotel) https://www.instagram.com/p/B3mmWjjJMVa/?igshid=168o97yhcviqh

[yvngcocomsgrv]

(YVNGCOCOMSGRV)

[brwworld-blog]

This Internet shutdown tracker will let you know of instances of govt-imposed internet bans in India

This Internet shutdown tracker will let you know of instances of govt-imposed internet bans in India

Internet shutdowns have seen an increase in frequency over the years, with 2016 recording close to 30 instances, according to the InternetShutdown tracker released by SFLC.in.

Even though we have the freedom of speech, we all know it isn’t absolute. In a country such as India, where offence is taken liberally, absolute freedom of speech could prove to be detrimental as well. A lot of the time, we…

[kamkaml-blog]

#Jesusisgangsta#pickupthybedandwalk#pickupthymatandwalk#comeasyouare#sflc#pastorgeorgewestlake#deliverance#servicetoallmankind (at Sheffield Family Life Center)

[hackerztrickz-blog]

Truecaller online jio phone

A great many people still accept that the way Truecaller makes its mutual phonebook of contacts is to scratch the data from every client's rundown of contacts, in this manner surrendering your data regardless of whether you don't utilize the application, as long as somebody you know does. In any case, Truecaller expressed this isn't the situation. In a blog entry, the organization said that it uses telephone indexes, informal organizations, and furthermore includes names when the "network proposes names through our site and applications."

It additionally noted, "Truecaller does not transfer phonebooks to make them accessible or open from Google Play or Apple App Store downloads. We pursue Google Play and Apple App Store rules carefully, which precludes any application from doing as such." However, before Google and Apple changed their rules, Truecaller did in reality transfer your contacts.

"When we were permitted to transfer Truecaller online jio phone phonebooks, this was never managed without an unequivocal assent of the client and was a discretionary authorization," Manan Shah, Director Marketing — India, Truecaller, wrote to HuffPost India. "The application's center highlights remained completely useful regardless of whether the client decided not to share their phonebook. We generally have and will keep on submitting to all guidelines/arrangements and henceforth when the Play Store and App Store changed these strategies, we agreed to them."

Protection specialists still prompt alert around applications like this, as you could discover your name and number recorded on the application regardless of whether you've never utilized it."Truecaller isn't new to debate and security infringement. The very structure of the base administration lays on allowing itself the consent to gather and share individual data about you that isn't openly accessible, regardless of whether you never pursued the administration and never consented to their Terms of Service and Privacy Policy," an announcement from the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) noted.

"The application gathers data from various clients, and after that offers that data with outsiders, without assent from or even notice to clients to whom that data relates. Assent is taken from clients that give their location book to Truecaller, and not from clients to whom that data relates."

Consents incorporate amplifier, your gadget data, camera, area, photographs, media, and records, sending and getting instant messages, every one of your contacts, Wi-Fi associations, and substantially more. "There are explanations behind every one of these consents, and numerous applications that are innocuous are likewise utilizing numerous comparative authorizations," called attention to Saravanan K, a portable security specialist in Bengaluru — which focuses to the bigger stressing situation. Outsider trackers in Truecaller

Things get murkier as you consider Truecaller's advancement from being an application that sits in everybody's telephone, assembling an immense swathe of information, into a promotion stage and a money related administrations suppliers. At the point when the Truecaller UPI connecting episode occurred, an Indian security analyst who passes by Nemo chose to investigate the application and found that it was loaded up with outsider following Software Development Kits (SDKs), basically bits of code from different organizations that sit inside the Truecaller application and can be utilized to follow clients.

[hamadpra]

$49.99 Only! ~ Eagle Allied Industries MAP Modular Assault Pack SFLCS 7P200 SOCOM MLCS used!, Military Pouches For Sale, Military Surplus Bags and Pouches, Military Surplus Ammo Pouches, Military Surplus Pouch, Military Surplus Magazine Pouches, New Militaria Pouches, Small Military Pouches, Original Militaria Pouches, Leather Military Pouches, Military Ammo Pouches BUY HERE!

[victoriadelights]

Loved this set up for Ria’s 15th birthday, have a fab day🥰 x • • • #bespokeparties #bespokedecor #eventprofs #luxuryevents #balloondecor #corporateevents #bridetobe #flowers #tablesetting #eventplanners #love #weddinginspo #weddingideas #eventdesigner #kidspartyideas #eventhire #partydecorations #eventrentals #partystyling #styling #backdrop #weddingflowers #partyplanning #eventinspiration #weddingstyle #kidsparty #like #eventspace #sweet #prophire https://www.instagram.com/p/CZt5BP-sFlC/?utm_medium=tumblr

[federalcontractor]

SOURCES SOUGHT: DRY-DOCK: USCG STA SAN DIEGO (45682) FY22

This notice is issued by the U.S. Coast Guard, Surface Force Logistics Center, Norfolk, VA to identify sources capable of providing services in accordance with thWork Items in Attachment. The vessel will be restricted to an area no greater than 400 nautical miles from the boat’s location at 2710 N. HARBOR DRIVE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 to the contractor’s facility. Anticipated Period of Performance: The USCG SFLC intends on awarding one (1) contract(s) on a firm-fixed price basis consisting of an estimated sixty-four (64) calendar day period of performance (Subject to change at the discretion of the Government). Anticipated NAICS Code/Size Standard: The applicable NAICS Code is 336611, Ship Building and Repairing and the size standard is 1250 employees. Submission of Information: Companies having capabilities necessary to meet or exceed the stated requirements are invited to provide information to contribute to this market survey/sources sought notice including commercial market information and company information. Companies may respond to this Sources Sought Notice via e-mail to Regina.ElliottDougherty@uscg.mil no later than 26 September 2021 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time. Email size not t

Original Set Aside: Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)

Product Service Code: J999 – NON-NUCLEAR SHIP REPAIR (WEST)

NAICS Code: 336611 – Ship Building and Repairing

Place of Performance:

Original Response Date: Sep 26, 2021 02:00 pm EDT

Full details via beta.sam.gov

Check out our RESOURCES page for a sample letter that we use in response to government market research.

[johnvazhathara]

State Regulation Of Profiteering By Schools Does Not Violate Managements' Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(g) : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that State's regulation of profiteering by education institutions cannot be held to be violating the managements' fundamental right to trade and profession under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

A bench comprising Justice AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari held so while upholding the constitutional validity of the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016.

As per the Act, the fees of private unaided schools must be determined by a School Level Fees Committee(SLFC), which includes a representative of the school management, five parents, three teachers and the principal. Further, the Act establishes regulatory commissions which can determine if the fee structure evolved by the schools has elements of profiteering.

A group of private schools challenged the provisions of the 2016 Act contending that its provisions resulted in impinging the autonomy of private schools.

Rejecting this argument, the Court observed :

"Setting up of an independent final adjudicatory authority especially created for considering the question as to whether the fee structure proposed by the school Management results in profiteering or otherwise, it does not impinge upon the fundamental right of the school Management guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution"(Paragraph 43).

The Court also held that the provisions of the 2016 Act and the Rules made under it which mandate maintenance of books of accounts by schools and which give SFLC and the statutory commissions to make reasonable inquiry into the accounts do not violate the fundamental rights of the schools under Article 19(1)(g).

"The fee structure determined by the school Management can be altered by the Adjudicatory Authorities only upon recording a negative finding on the factum of amount claimed towards school fees relating to particular activities is an essential expenditure or otherwise; and that the fee would be in excess of reasonable profit being ploughed back for the development of the institution or otherwise. The recovery of excess amount beyond permissible limit would result in profiteering and commercialisation. In our opinion, therefore, even Rule 11 is a relevant and reasonable provision and does not impact or abridge the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution"

Referring to the constitution bench judgments in this regard including TMA Pai Foundation and P.A. Inamdar case, the court observed that Government has power to provide for external regulatory mechanism for determination of school fees or so to say fixation of "just" and "permissible" school fees at the initial stage itself.

The Court followed these precedents which hold that fees charged by the educational institutions must be commensurate to their services and they cannot indulge in 'profiteering' or 'commercialization. The Court said that a private institution has the autonomy to fix its own fees so long as it does not result in 'profiteering' and 'commercialization', and to that extent the State has power to impose regulations.

The Court was delivering its judgment in the case Indian School, Jodhpur vs State of Rajasthan and connected cases, which were appeals filed by private unaided schools from Rajasthan challenging a Government order, which permitted CBSE schools in the state to collect only 70% and state board schools to collect only 60% of the annual school fee on account of the COVID pandemic.

States cannot impinge on autonomy of private schools

At the same time, the Court held that States cannot impinge on the autonomy of private schools under the guise of fixing "just" and "permissible" school fees.

"It is one thing to say the State may regulate the fee structure of private unaided schools to ensure that the school management does not indulge in profiteering and commercialization, but in the guise of exercise of that power, it cannot transcend the line of regulation and impinge upon the autonomy of the school to fix and collect "just" and "reasonable" school fees from its students", the Court said(paragraph 99).

The State can provide independent mechanism only to regulate the fees fixed by school Management to the extent that it does not result in profiteering and commercialisation, the Court clarified(paragraph 94).

The judgment said that the determination of school fee structure(which includes reduction of fixed school fee for the relevant period) is the exclusive prerogative of the school Management running a private unaided school, it is not open to the Legislature to make a law touching upon that aspect except to provide statutory mechanism to regulate fees for ensuring that it does not result in profiteering and commercialisation by the school Management(paragraph 99).

Schools Have Saved Operational Costs During Lockdown; Can't Charge Students For Unused Facilities

The Supreme Court also held that private schools demanding fees from students for the activities and facilities not availed by them due to the lockdown amounts to 'profiteering' and 'commercialization'.

Taking judicial notice of the fact that classes have been held online during the last academic year, the Supreme Court observed that schools must have saved on overheads and operational costs. The Court reckoned that schools must have saved at least 15% in that way, and hence, they have to give a deduction in annual school fees to that extent. The Court said that the schools "must willingly and proactively" reduce fees to that extent.

The Supreme Court partly allowed the schools' appeals, by allowing them to collect annual tuition fee after giving a deduction of 15% towards the savings made on account of overheads and operational costs. The Court has allowed six monthly instalments for the payment of fees.

While allowing schools to charge 85% of the annual fees, the Court also directed that no student should be debarred from attending either online classes or physical classes on account of non­-payment of fees, arrears/outstanding fees including the installments,and shall not withhold the results of the examinations of any student on that account.

If any individual request is made by the parent/ward finding it difficult to remit annual fees for the academic year 2020-­21 , the school Management must consider such representation on case ­to ­case basis sympathetically.

The school Management shall not withhold the name of any student/candidate for the ensuing Board examinations for Classes X and XII on the ground of non­payment of fee/arrears for the academic year 2020­-21, if any, on obtaining undertaking of the concerned parents/students.

Also from the judgment  :

Schools Have Saved Operational Costs During Lockdown; Can't Charge Students For Unused Facilities : Supreme Court

Authorities Under Disaster Management Act Have No Power To Alter Fee Structure Of Private Schools: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Rajasthan Private Schools To Give 15% Deduction In Annual School Fees; No Student To Be Debarred For Non-Payment Of Fees

Case: Indian School, Jodhpur Vs. State Of Rajasthan [CA 1724 OF 2021]

Coram: Justices AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari

Citation: LL 2021 SC 240

Click here to Read/Download Judgment