#supreme court lawyer

[pslaw1]

Top rated Law Firm Gurgaon | PSLAW Advocates & Solicitors

PSLAW Advocates & Solicitors is the top-rated law firm in Gurgaon, offering expert legal services tailored to your needs. Our team of experienced advocates and solicitors is dedicated to providing comprehensive legal solutions, ensuring the best outcomes for our clients. As a leading law firm, we specialize in various legal fields and are committed to excellence and client satisfaction. Trust PSLAW Advocates & Solicitors for all your legal needs in Gurgaon.

Address: Chamber no- 101, Block C, Gurgaon District & Sessions Court, Gurgaon, Haryana 122001

Phone : (+91) 9312411311, 9650157427, 9910535523

[lloydlawcollege]

Guide to Becoming a Supreme Court Lawyer

Discover the essential steps to becoming a Supreme Court lawyer, from earning an LLB degree to gaining practical experience, passing the bar exam, and specializing in legal fields. Follow this comprehensive guide to embark on a prestigious legal career path.

[advabhisheksinha]

WRITS AT THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

REMEDIES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF RIGHTS CONFERRED BY THIS PART

1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this part is guaranteed.

2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs including within the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this part.

3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) & (2), Parliament may by Law empower any other Court to exercise within local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under Clause (2).

4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

Transfer Petition, Special Leave Petition, Supreme Court Lawyer, Advocate, Delhi, AOR, Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, Advocate for Supreme Court Case, SLP, Bail, Supreme Court Lawyer Bombay, WRIT, Constitutional Law

[brownstonelawsblog]

Criminal Appeals Attorneys

If you are involved in a criminal case in which decision was not rendered in your favor, you can always seek the assistance of criminal defense appeal lawyers and criminal appellate attorneys to represent you in the court of law to perfect your criminal appeal. Criminal appeals and federal crime appeals– whatever the scope and kind of appeal you intend to file, you need the services of criminal appeals lawyers to back you up. In addition to this, appeal is a narrow area of court relief that only the knowledge and skills of criminal appellate attorneys possess. With this, looking for great criminal appeals lawyer is the first thing you should be considering.

[kislaypandaysupremecourtlawyer]

The legislature must bring the C.A.’s Protection Bill for Chartered Accountants of India, Dr Kislay Panday

[criminal-lawyer-in-delhi]

Delhi Offers Excellent Supreme Court Lawyers

Are you looking for Supreme Court lawyers to support your court case? Do you want someone to guide you with the judicial process? Are you not sure how to handle police and the process of the Indian Judicial system? Then, getting the best criminal lawyer in Delhi is the best solution. The Criminal lawyers provide the best legal support and assist you in moving around the judicial system neatly without any issues. You can get out of the legal mess in quick time and positively with the Criminal Lawyers in Delhi NCR. The lawyers in Delhi are equipped to take up any kind of legal matters. Irrespective of whether it’s a complex case or simple one, the approach adopted by the best criminal lawyer in Delhi is the same. The cases are handled systematically with no pressure passed on to the client.

Criminal Lawyers offer specialty assistance The best part about Criminal lawyer in Delhi is that they can handle any Criminals cases covering – white collar crimes, criminal breach of trust, cheating, FIR, Bail, private complaints, sexual harassment, human rights harassment, trial law, criminal writs, appeals, revisions, drug violations, banking frauds, property cases, IP cases and many more. Once you have engaged the best criminal lawyer in Delhi you can be rest assured that your cases will be completed on time.

Besides, the services offered by Criminal Lawyers cover:

Legal guidance and assistance in advance on the success rate of a case.

Legal assistance in registration of police complaints and FIR.

Supporting the client in the filing of complaint with the magistrate under various sections covering 200, 190, 156 (3) criminal procedure 1973.

Support services in representing clients in the trial before the court.

Supporting clients in filing a petition.

Helping clients in defending criminal complaints and many more as per need.

Besides getting the best possible decision for clients, the Lawyers in Delhi region also help in getting the right compensation. They are versed in handling police and the dynamics of the judicial system in India. Hence, success is guaranteed with Criminal lawyers in Delhi. The highly experienced team of lawyers analyze the case from different angles and safeguard the client from any unexpected turn around. Counter arguments and evidence are prepared by the skilled lawyers in such a way that the magistrate gets convinced in the first attempt of the case.

Don’t ever compromise on the right Criminal Lawyer for your case. Getting the finest can help you in guarding you from any uncertainties. In addition, the lawyers in Delhi are One Stop Platform for any legal cases. The best part about the criminal lawyers in Delhi is that the initial counselling to understand the case is completely free. There is no obligation from clients to pay any fees initially. The Supreme Court Advocate handles every case with mutual trust and offers the best service which is time bound and cost bound. Transparency and trust are the two key mottos offered by the best criminal lawyers in Delhi.

The 10 Best Delhi Lawyers for Supreme Court Case:

Sidhant Dhingra : The firm is headed by Mr. Sidhant Dhingra (Advocate) who is best known as Criminal Defence Lawyer. He actively practices at the Supreme Court of India, High Court of Delhi and all District Courts in Delhi.

Fali S. Nariman : He is considered one of the most accomplished constitutional lawyers in India and has appeared in many important cases, particularly in civil liberties and human rights law.

K.K. Venugopal : He is a senior advocate and one of the most respected lawyers in the country. He has appeared in many landmark cases and has served as the attorney general of India.

Soli Sorabjee : He is a senior advocate and former attorney general of India, known for his expertise in constitutional law and human rights.

Gopal Subramanium : He is a senior advocate and former solicitor general of India, known for his expertise in constitutional law and commercial law.

Rajeev Dhavan : He is a senior advocate and leading constitutional lawyer, known for his expertise in minority rights and secularism.

T.R. Andhyarujina : He is a senior advocate and former attorney general of India, known for his expertise in constitutional law and commercial law.

C.U. Singh : He is a senior advocate and leading criminal lawyer, known for his expertise in criminal law and human rights.

Mukul Rohatgi : He is a senior advocate and former attorney general of India, known for his expertise in commercial law and constitutional law.

Arvind Datar : He is a senior advocate and leading commercial lawyer, known for his expertise in intellectual property law, competition law, and arbitration.

These are some of the best lawyers in Delhi for Supreme Court cases, but it's important to note that there are many other talented and accomplished lawyers in the city as well. It's recommended to conduct further research, speak with multiple lawyers and select the one that you feel most comfortable working with and have confidence in their ability to handle your case effectively.

[lovealwayssay]

Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but I feel like the Supreme Court waited until the debate to make these decisions so people would be distracted, just like how all the huge strikes on Gaza have been during major televised events in the US. They’re trying to distract us from what is going on.

[artielu]

Insert supernatural set about how partisan unqualified Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida just dismissed the mishandling of classified documents in the Trump case.

What a fucking travesty.

Y'all better vote for Biden in November. If Trump gets reelected, he will have absolutely no consequences for mishandling, misappropriating, stealing, and selling United States secrets and then storing them in his fucking bathroom at the very much not secure maralago, where Victor Orban, fascist authoritarian prime Minister of Hungary and Putin ally, just visited again. See

Elections have consequences so here we fucking are.

"The Superseding Indictment is DISMISSED because Special Counsel Smith’s appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution,” wrote Judge Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by the former president.

Special counsel Jack Smith had contested this argument, and other federal courts had upheld the constitutionality of special counsels."

[ . . . ]

"Her opinion closely tracked the reasoning outlined by conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in a recent concurrence in a separate case against Trump."

Clarence Thomas, bought and paid for by Harlan Crow, billionaire, and aligned with and married to Ginny Thomas, who participated in January 6 insurrection.

If Trump is reelected, Thomas will retire and Trump will put a younger ultraconservative judge up for SCOTUS. Like Aileen Cannon. And if Democrats lose the Senate majority in November, Mitch McConnell will be Senate majority leader again and he will have the Senate confirm Cannon. And there will be nothing that the Senate Democrats can do about it.

Love that quid pro quo - I'll dismiss the federal case against you for stealing US secrets, which you totally fucking did, and then when you get reelected, put me on the Supreme Court and I'll deliver for you again, just like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett. And we'll be on the Supreme Court for the next 30+ years. What civil rights shall we destroy next? So much to do!

This is an absolute horror show.

You need to vote blue in November.

You may not like Biden, but you should like his team.

Kamala Harris, Black Asian woman, pro choice and smart as hell.

Pete Buttigieg, gay married father dedicated to our safety in transportation and infrastructure.

Deb Haaland, an indigenous woman leading the department of the interior and actually addressing indigenous needs.

Jennifer Granholm, leading the department of energy and trying to create green jobs and switch us to renewable energy.

Monica Bertagnolli, leading the national institute of health, a surgical oncologist (cancer doctor) who actually believes in science

and hundreds more people. Dedicated, qualified civil servants working for us.

And Biden needs a blue Senate and a blue House to get anything passed, because separation of powers.

You may not like your choices but you have only two: red or blue. One of them will win every single federal election.

Your refusal to vote blue just makes it more likely that red will win. Is that what you want?

[lawbyrhys]

Lawyer's Take on Biden's SCOTUS Reform Ideas

This is a supplementary piece to the SCOTUS Immunity Ruling; if you don't understand that, you can read my post on it and come back here.

Yesterday afternoon, July 29, President Joe Biden gave a speech in which he shared his opinions on the SCOTUS immunity ruling, as well as his opinions on Supreme Court reform and associated topics. Let's break it down.

"I have great respect for our institutions and the separation of powers laid out in our Constitution, but what’s happening now is not consistent with that doctrine of separation of powers."

Biden's stance is a rarity; it makes him the first sitting president in generations to call for such reform to the highest court in the land. Among his groundbreaking proposals are a Constitutional amendment to strip the criminal immunity granted to Presidents by the SCOTUS decision, impose term limits on Supreme Court justices, and instate a stricter code of conduct for the high court. While it'll be difficult for him to get any of these charges through with the split Congress as it is, presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee Kamala Harris—a former prosecutor and attorney general—wholeheartedly endorses the changes, too.

The amendment proposed—“No One Is Above the Law Amendment"—would, as stated, strip all Presidents of prosecutorial immunity to their "official acts" as the recent SCOTUS ruling granted. The amendment would cement that the "Constitution “does not confer any immunity from federal criminal indictment, trial, conviction, or sentencing by virtue of previously serving as President.” Biden went on to say, "I share our Founders’ belief that the president must answer to the law." That's an A+ stance.

Trump, though, always the major projector that he is, went on to respond to Biden's statements in his own to entertainment network Fox News:

“He desperately wants immunity. There’s no way he would write off immunity for a president.” He must've been talking to a mirror.

As for the Justices' term limits, Biden added that setting limitations on their service would make the systematic appointment of Justices “more predictable and less arbitrary.”

Of course, these changes would need Congressional approval; it's highly unlikely Biden would be able to secure that in his term. Should Democrats secure a majority in November, though, the likelihood of these changes being adopted into legislation would greatly increase.

So what do I think about all of this? These are all excellent proposals—we must do everything in our power to ensure that our judicial system remains the fair, just and impartial crown jewel of our country and it's democracy. I have been appalled by both the recent actions and inactions of those at the highest level, and I think some accountability is overdue. believe adopting an amendment would clear up the litigious ambiguity of the SCOTUS ruling. The term limits would help keep the court moral and accountable in their role of maintaining the utmost in just and nonpartisan decisions. I think it is a reasonable expectation that as this country grows and shifts, just like the laws within it, the way those laws are upheld in the highest Court of the land is accountable to some changes and reinforcement of its own. Of course, these changes must remain adherent to the Constitution, but that's why it would require an amendment. Keep it lawful and just.

Is all of this unprecedented? Absolutely, but so was the immunity ruling. American history is full of unprecedented action; we make history here. So long as the Constitution is upheld at every step, I see no reason to stop breaking ground.

[anotherpapercut]

the way white liberals talk about Ruth Bader Ginsburg as if she had some sort of unique ability to decide cases correctly and was like the only person standing in the way of the US and utter chaos is so funny to me bc like a) Sotomayor and Jackson have better judicial records than her ?? and b) if you trained an AI by making it watch 250 hours of John Oliver I think it would make the correct decision as often or more than she did

[supercoolreallyawesome]

shunned from the weed circle at a party after asking for a "quick honk on that bobo" (ref)

[dylsexai]

If you as a lawyer stand in front of the highest court in the land and argue that people who don't have homes should be considered criminals, you are a bad person. You are not "just doing a job." This is one of those things where you should quit your job.

There's no nuance here. No angle for understanding. "But if I don't do it someone else will" well let someone else do it. Give them an opportunity to say no as well.

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

A bill that would add child sex trafficking and statutory rape to the crimes eligible for the death penalty was debated Monday in a Missouri Senate committee — despite conflicting with U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

The legislation is sponsored by state Sen. Mike Moon, an Ash Grove Republican who said Monday that one of the “principal purposes of government” is to “punish evil.”

Rape of children under 14 and child trafficking of children under 12 would be crimes eligible for the death penalty under his bill.

“And what’s more evil than taking the innocence of the child during the act of a rape? Children are in large part defenseless and an act such as rape can kill the child emotionally,” he said.

“And so I believe a just consequence, after a reasonable opportunity for defense, is death.”

The Senate Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee heard the bill Monday.

State Sen. Karla May, a Democrat from St. Louis, pointed to Moon’s stance of “believing in life” as an outspoken opponent of abortion without exception for rape or incest, yet supporting expanding the death penalty.

“A 12 year old who gets pregnant, you believe that she should bring that child in the world, am I correct?” May asked.

“What crime did that child, that developing human child, commit to deserve death?” Moon replied.

“…But you believe in killing the father to that child?” May asked, if the father is a rapist.

“Yes,” Moon said. “If an attacker commits a heinous crime such as the ones that I mentioned in this presentation, I believe that if they’re charged and convicted, absolutely.”

The Rev. Timothy Faber testified in support of Moon’s bill, pointing to the “lifelong repercussions” of child rape and trafficking.

“It’s also a well established fact that those who commit sexual crimes seldom if ever change their ways,” he said. “Once a sexual offender, always a sexual offender.”

Elyse Max, co-director of Missourians to Abolish the Death Penalty, opposed the bill during Monday’s hearing.

“If the goal is to overturn established U.S. Supreme Court precedent, it’s far from a guarantee,” Max said, “and the amount of resources the state of Missouri would have to spend as well as the trauma to child victims during the process cannot be understated.”

The U.S. Supreme Court in the 2008 case Kennedy v. Louisiana ruled giving the death penalty to those convicted of child rape violates the constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment unless the crime results in the victim’s death or is intended to. Only homicide and a narrow set of “crimes against the state” can be punishable by death, the court ruled.

“Adding statutory rape and trafficking as death-eligible crimes are a slippery slope,” Max said, “of expanding the death penalty to non-murder crimes that would bring the constitutionality of Missouri’s death penalty into doubt.”

“Instead of spending millions of dollars to possibly change long-standing precedent, Missouri resources should be spent to protect children from abuse in the first place, and ensure survivors have access to mental health treatment and proper support, following the offense,” Max said.

Moon said, regarding the Supreme Court precedent, that it’s worth challenging.

“That’s something that we need to start the conversation about,” he said, “and those things need to be challenged.”

Florida passed a similar law for victims of rape under age 12 last year. It received bipartisan support. In December, prosecutors in that state announced they’d seek the death penalty in a case of a man accused of sexually abusing a child.

Florida’s Gov. Ron DeSantis has said the state’s bill could lead the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit the issue.

Mary Fox, director of Missouri State Public Defender, which provides defense for the majority of death penalty cases in the state, argued Monday that the death penalty is “no deterrent to a crime.”

Fox also noted that an 18 year old dating a 14 year old could be executed under Moon’s legislation because that would be considered statutory rape.

Mei Hall, a resident of Columbia who also said she was a victim of sexual abuse, also testified in opposition.

“I don’t wish my abuser death,” Hall said. “I wish them to be sequestered away and unable to harm more people, for sure. But I don’t think it’s the state’s place to kill people in general and I don’t think it’s the state’s place to make it more difficult for child victims to come forward.”

Lobbyists from Empower Missouri and Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers also testified against the bill. A lobbyist from ArmorVine, testified in support.

Missouri was one of only five states to carry out death sentences last year, along with Texas, Florida, Oklahoma and Alabama. There are two executions scheduled for this year.

Three House bills filed this year would eliminate the state’s death penalty, but none has made it to a committee hearing.

[pslaw123]

Top Qualities to Look for in the Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Divorce in Delhi is a complex process that necessitates not only legal understanding but also the support of a sympathetic companion.

Navigating the complexities of the legal process with the assistance of competent and empathetic counsel can significantly elevate this endeavour.

Understanding the Legal Landscape:

Divorce proceedings in India require seasoned professionals, and PS Law Firm is the preeminent option for locating the most qualified divorce attorney in Delhi.

The firm, backed by a proficient team, possesses a comprehensive understanding of legal complexities and provides customized strategies and all-encompassing assistance.

Assisting clients in navigating the complex legal landscape, PS Law Firm places a high value on openness and effective communication, enabling clients to experience a smooth divorce process.

The Best Divorce Lawyers at PS Law Firm:

PS Law Firm divorce lawyers are skilled and client-focused. Expert divorce lawyers use particular methods, clear communication, and speedy results. Our faithful friends help divorces go well.

Expertise in Family Law:

PS Law Firm’s reputation as the preeminent divorce lawyer in Delhi is primarily attributed to our team of exceptionally qualified and seasoned divorce attorneys specializing in family law.

They adeptly maneuver through the intricacies of divorce cases by utilizing their exceptional credentials and strategic methodology.

Regarding child custody and property divisions, PS Law Firm’s unwavering commitment to excellence guarantees customized and impactful legal counsel, solidifying its preferred firm for achieving favorable outcomes in family law.

Client-Centric Approach:

With a client-centric approach, PS Law Firm distinguishes itself as the top divorce lawyer in Delhi.

Prioritizing comprehending individual needs and concerns, our approach transcends mere legal expertise.

In addition to rendering legal counsel, our divorce attorneys act as empathetic counselors, extending consoling compassion throughout trying circumstances.

The PS Law Firm Advantage:

Customized Legal Strategies:

As the preeminent divorce lawyer in Delhi, PS Law Firm demonstrates exceptional proficiency in customizing legal approaches to suit the specific situations of every client.

Recognizing the unique characteristics of each divorce proceeding, we are dedicated to offering customized advocacy, thereby increasing the likelihood of a positive resolution.

With our customized approach, PS Law Firm guarantees legal expertise and a personalized route to triumph, establishing ourselves as your reliable ally in traversing the intricate realm of divorce law.

Transparent Communication:

PS Law Firm, widely recognized as the preeminent divorce lawyer in Delhi, prioritizes transparency.

We place a high value on transparent and unambiguous communication, guaranteeing that our clients are well-informed throughout the divorce proceedings.

By cultivating trust, this dedication enables clients to make informed decisions at every stage of their legal process.

Transparency is not merely a guiding principle at PS Law Firm; it is a commitment that ensures our clients have a knowledgeable and uncomplicated divorce experience.

Timely Resolution:

PS Law Firm, the top divorce attorney in Delhi, recognizes the critical nature of a speedy resolution.

Because a speedy resolution mitigates the psychological and financial strain on our clients, our divorce attorneys move swiftly to finalize the paperwork.

Our goal is to expedite the resolution of divorce disputes without compromising on quality. By doing so, we provide closure to our clients and streamline and reduce the cost of the legal process.

Navigating the Divorce Process:

Divorce proceedings can be daunting, but the process becomes more manageable with the proper legal representation.

PS Law Firm guides clients through the various stages of divorce, including:

Consultation and Case Evaluation:

By starting your legal journey with PS Law Firm, you will be granted access to a concise yet thorough consultation and a case evaluation.

Through the initial action you undertake, we can acquire knowledge regarding your particular circumstances, examine the specific details of your case, and formulate an individualized strategy for the following phases of the legal process.

Negotiation and Mediation:

PS Law Firm has established itself as the preeminent divorce lawyer in Delhi due to its outstanding achievements in negotiation and mediation.

Our legal professionals prioritize efficiency and harmony in the resolution process to reduce the probability of protracted court battles.

They endeavor to find solutions that satisfy the interests and concerns of all individuals concerned.

Litigation Support:

To protect our client’s legal rights if litigation is necessary, PS Law Firm provides unwavering assistance and makes compelling arguments in court during the proceedings.

We offer legal counsel and are dedicated to standing by our clients and ensuring they have a strong presence in obtaining a just and equitable resolution to their concerns.

Conclusion:

The top divorce lawyer in Delhi, PS Law Firm, embodies strong advocacy qualities and legal prowess.

We navigate your voyage with clarity and efficacy by utilizing a client-centric approach, proficient practitioners, and customized strategies.

We guarantee your secure and robust transition into a new phase, encompassing everything from consultation to litigation.