sometimes family is a sassy omniscient narrator, his mute video game protagonist, a reincarnated human with multiverse powers, and a humanised adventure line teen who fucks around and finds out
61 notes
·
View notes
We should appreciate and use more the fact that snatcher is canonically a character that breaks the fourth wall, often too, and is self aware
27 notes
·
View notes
He's humming to himself, a little, amused smirk on his lips. Oh, this will be fun.
6 notes
·
View notes
Reacting to canon lines Pt. 7
Ink MK: You can see it, can't you? This is your fate. Your friends will turn on you, seeing you for the monster you will become. They will destroy you, Harbinger of Chaos. It's just like the Lady Bone Demon said. Despite your efforts, all you'll ever do is cause pain and suffering. ... Then prove us wrong.
->
Wukong: ... Thunder Bringer
MK: SHUT
Pigsy: What in the hell?
Nezha: You're one to talk Andrew
Wukong: A
Pigsy: I'm... not going to touch that
Nezha: Yeah we're not even supposed to have this information technically
Pigsy: What -
Nezha: Doesn't matter anyways who does that bastard even think he is? The only pain MK ever caused was when he nailed Wukong in the nuts with his cosplay Monkey King staff
Wukong: *whinnying noise*
MK: UNTRUE! I spilt hot soup on that customer that one time
Nezha: Oh right
Macaque: *Filming all of this while Mama Baozhai watches on in horror*
14 notes
·
View notes
it's still stewing in my brain jfc I don't think this is even a joke anymore I now Fully Believe a muppet movie would make an *apposite* adaption for hit korean web novel Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint by SingnShong . as in .
Imagine the shots in pivotal emotional scenes putting less focus on kdj (muppet) and more on kdj (kdj) to reflect the fourth wall thinning . 49 leaving the train without 51 . Which Kim Dokja Does Yoo Joonghyuk Hold During His Final Moments In Dark Castle .
. . much to think about. ...
31 notes
·
View notes
five hours later after the narry bobbi fabulous one and ive done it
love handel tsp, in all its full glory (feat. virgil, lynne, and stanley!)
also the isolated members under the cut!
58 notes
·
View notes
theres like, two levels of “playersexual”.
the first is the authors making all the romance options bi, which. like technically it can often stem from the same mechanical reasoning as “true” playersexuality (omfg im gatekeeping?????), that its easier, more efficient, or more equitable to just have all the options available to any character setup. in that sense theyre absolutely taxonomically related, but from a semantic and ethical point of view it seems kinda dogshit to reduce textually bi (one way or another, theres a lotta ways to do that) people to a mere practical development choice? like dude i think that characters just bisexual its kinda fucking wierd to frame his ability to be attracted to [character in context thats not the pc’s gender] and also romance the player character as some sort of “lazy writing shortcut”.
the second is far more nebulous as it exists more in what is LACKING than what is there. the anomalous ‘real’ “oh actually this was just a studio being either programming/writing lazy or like. genuinely just bizzare on a spiritual level”. skyrim romance is roughly egalitarian in implementation but there is effectively 0 external queers aside from two dead guys on an island and Possibly this one vampire from the morthal quest who seems like shes grooming a child? its a world absent of same-gender relationships but incapable of recognizing the player as anything extraordinary in that respect. romanceable npcs showing attraction to other npcs is rare in general, even, though going back over it in my head my initial presumption of it being completely absent is verifiably false. i think. ANYWAYS this theoretically would also include characters whose textual sexuality CHANGES to match the player character, which -discounting allowances for potential watsonian mischaracterization (i.e. a character being labeled gay by an unreliable commentator in a save in which they end up in a same-gender relationship, and other such things) can show up in really weird ways like ok in stardew valley i’m not actually saying Leah’s ORIENTATION necessarily changes but her ex’s gender specifically changing to match the player is SO FUCKING WIERD WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT. LIKE WHAT IS THAT EVEN IMPLYING?! WHUH?!!?
2 notes
·
View notes
I am the narrator: a discreet and self-effacing narrator. This book is not about me.
Iris Murdoch, from The Philosopher’s Pupil
26 notes
·
View notes