#the title is an unintentional theft from there

[merwgue]

Feyre, as the protagonist of the ACOTAR series, has committed numerous actions that could be considered criminal under real-world laws. Below is a breakdown of the crimes she could potentially be charged for, based on actions from each book, and the possible legal repercussions.

1. A Court of Thorns and Roses (ACOTAR)

1.1. Poaching and Trespassing

Crime: Killing a faerie in the form of a wolf while on Prythian territory without permission.

Real-World Equivalent: Illegal hunting (poaching) and trespassing on private property.

Potential Sentence:

Poaching: 1-5 years, fines depending on the severity.

Trespassing: Usually a misdemeanor, resulting in fines or up to 1 year in jail.

1.2. Complicity in the Death of Faeries Under the Mountain

Crime: Indirect involvement in the deaths of faeries during the trials set by Amarantha, even though she was coerced.

Real-World Equivalent: Manslaughter (unintentional but contributing to the deaths through participation).

Potential Sentence: 5-15 years, though her coercion and duress could mitigate this significantly.

---

2. A Court of Mist and Fury (ACOMAF)

2.1. Trespassing in the Spring Court

Crime: Entering and leaving the Spring Court without permission after forming ties with the Night Court.

Real-World Equivalent: Unauthorized entry onto sovereign territory.

Potential Sentence: Generally a misdemeanor, but with repeated offenses, it could escalate. Fines or up to 1 year in jail.

2.2. Destruction of Property (Spring Court)

Crime: Sabotaging and destroying part of the Spring Court.

Real-World Equivalent: Vandalism and destruction of property.

Potential Sentence: 1-10 years depending on the extent of damage, with potential fines or restitution.

2.3. Theft (Spring Court)

Crime: Stealing important information, documents, and assets from the Spring Court while pretending to be loyal to Tamlin.

Real-World Equivalent: Theft and espionage.

Potential Sentence: 5-15 years, depending on the value of what was stolen and its strategic importance.

2.4. Theft of a Magical Artifact (Summer Court)

Crime: Stealing Tarquin’s most powerful artifact, the Book of Breathings, from the Summer Court.

Real-World Equivalent: Grand larceny, theft of national/cultural treasures.

Potential Sentence: 10-20 years depending on the value and importance of the stolen artifact, including diplomatic consequences.

2.5. Involuntary Manslaughter (Tithe Refusal)

Crime: Refusing to enforce the Spring Court’s tithe, resulting in the death of the water-wraiths who depended on Feyre’s mercy.

Real-World Equivalent: Negligent homicide or involuntary manslaughter.

Potential Sentence: 5-10 years depending on the circumstances, though mitigating factors like lack of intent could reduce the sentence.

---

3. A Court of Wings and Ruin (ACOWAR)

3.1. Destruction of the Spring Court

Crime: Deliberately dismantling the political and economic systems of the Spring Court while acting as a spy for the Night Court.

Real-World Equivalent: Treason (though technically not against her homeland) or acts of war.

Potential Sentence: Life imprisonment or death penalty in certain jurisdictions, though a less extreme punishment could be 20-40 years for treason and sabotage.

3.2. Collusion and Espionage

Crime: Spying for the Night Court while pretending to align with the Spring Court.

Real-World Equivalent: Espionage.

Potential Sentence: 10-25 years for espionage, with potential fines and loss of any titles/rights in the Spring Court.

3.3. Accessory to Murder (Hybern Soldiers and the King of Hybern)

Crime: Being involved in the war efforts that led to the deaths of Hybern soldiers and the King of Hybern.

Real-World Equivalent: Accessory to murder or war crimes.

Potential Sentence: 15-30 years for accessory to murder, though wartime actions are often handled differently.

3.4. Imprisonment and Oppression of Illyrians and Hewn City

Crime: Complicity in the continued oppression of the Illyrians, including the mutilation of female Illyrians’ wings (although Feyre was not directly involved in wing clipping, her role in the Night Court hierarchy ties her to this systemic abuse).

Real-World Equivalent: Human rights violations, gender-based violence, illegal confinement.

Potential Sentence: 20-50 years for complicity in human rights abuses and gender-based violence.

Crime: Complicity in the continued imprisonment and oppression of the people of Hewn City, preventing their access to the privileges of Velaris and escaping abuse.

Real-World Equivalent: Conspiracy to perpetuate systemic discrimination and abuse.

Potential Sentence: 10-30 years, depending on the level of abuse and confinement they are subjected to.

4. A Court of Frost and Starlight (ACOFAS)

4.1. Illegal Occupation of Spring Court Lands

Crime: Continually crossing into Spring Court land and occupying or disrupting its governance, even in a non-violent way.

Real-World Equivalent: Trespassing, illegal occupation.

Potential Sentence: Fines, probation, or up to 1 year in jail.

5. A Court of Silver Flames (ACOSF)

5.1. Complicity in Abuse (Locking Nesta in the House of Wind)

Crime: Participating in the forced confinement of Nesta, who was struggling with mental illness, without a licensed mental health professional’s involvement.

Real-World Equivalent: Kidnapping, unlawful imprisonment, endangerment of a mentally ill person.

Potential Sentence: 5-20 years, with charges depending on the level of harm caused to Nesta and whether it could be deemed abusive.

Summary of Potential Charges

1. Poaching and Trespassing: 1-5 years, fines

2. Manslaughter (Under the Mountain): 5-15 years

3. Trespassing in the Spring Court: Up to 1 year

4. Destruction of Property (Spring Court): 1-10 years

5. Theft (Spring Court): 5-15 years

6. Theft of the Book of Breathings (Summer Court): 10-20 years

7. Involuntary Manslaughter (Tithe Refusal): 5-10 years

8. Destruction of Spring Court: 20-40 years

9. Espionage: 10-25 years

10. Accessory to Murder (War Crimes): 15-30 years

11. Imprisonment and Oppression of Illyrians: 20-50 years

12. Complicity in the Oppression of Hewn City: 10-30 years

13. Illegal Occupation of Spring Court Lands: Fines, up to 1 year

14. Unlawful Imprisonment (Nesta): 5-20 years

Total Potential Sentence

If Feyre were to face all charges and be convicted, the total potential prison sentence could range from 122 years to life imprisonment, especially for the severe charges related to espionage, human rights abuses, and complicity in oppression.

[illuminatedferret]

ascensions lian

one of my favorite things about rereading tgcf is finding little bits of info where MXTX showcases how crazy strong xie lian is. like in the PROLOGUE we learn that if people trying to ascend fail their Heavenly Tribulations they either die or are (socially? physically?) ruined. like, nevermind the rigors of cultivating to ascension, the act of ascension itself is lethally dangerous.

and XIE LIAN

this motherfucker ascended for the first time IN HIS SLEEP. the second time he was so busy pummeling bai wuxiang that he didn't even notice it!!! what the hell!!! what the hell is this guy on and how do i get some

[canonlyaccesswebsitethroughvpn]

does vpn hide brosing histrory from school wifi

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

does vpn hide brosing histrory from school wifi

Browsing history encryption

Browsing history encryption is a crucial aspect of online privacy and security. When you browse the internet, your browser records a history of the websites you visit, including sensitive information like personal details, financial transactions, or medical records. This browsing history can be vulnerable to hacking, surveillance, or data breaches if not properly protected.

Encrypting your browsing history involves scrambling the data to make it unreadable to anyone without the decryption key. This helps safeguard your online activities from unauthorized access and maintains your privacy. Encrypted browsing history ensures that even if someone gains access to your device or network, they will not be able to decipher the websites you have visited.

There are various tools and techniques available to encrypt your browsing history. Using a virtual private network (VPN) can encrypt your internet connection and hide your browsing history from prying eyes. Browsers like Firefox and Chrome also offer extensions and settings for secure browsing, such as private or incognito mode, HTTPS connections, and clearing cookies regularly.

By encrypting your browsing history, you take an important step towards protecting your online privacy and data security. It gives you more control over who can access your internet activity and helps prevent targeted ads, data tracking, or identity theft. Making encryption a part of your online routine can enhance your cybersecurity posture and provide peace of mind while navigating the digital world.

School WiFi restrictions

Title: Navigating School WiFi Restrictions: Tips for Students

School WiFi restrictions have become a common reality in educational institutions worldwide. While these restrictions are often implemented to ensure a focused learning environment and protect students from accessing inappropriate content, they can sometimes feel limiting to students who rely on the internet for research, collaboration, and even relaxation during breaks.

Understanding the reasons behind WiFi restrictions can help students navigate them more effectively. Schools often block access to certain websites or content categories to maintain a safe and productive online environment. This may include social media platforms, gaming websites, or explicit content. Additionally, bandwidth limitations might be in place to prevent network congestion and ensure equitable access for all users.

For students looking to bypass these restrictions, it's essential to remember that doing so may violate school policies and could result in disciplinary action. However, there are legitimate ways to work within these boundaries:

Use Educational Resources: Many schools provide access to educational platforms and resources that are whitelisted on the network. Utilize these resources for research and studying.

Request Access: If there's a legitimate reason to access a blocked website for academic purposes, students can request temporary access from school administrators or IT staff.

Use Mobile Data: When WiFi restrictions pose too many limitations, consider using mobile data for internet access, if permitted by school policies and regulations.

Stay Informed: Schools may periodically update their WiFi restrictions or policies. Stay informed about any changes to avoid unintentional violations.

Utilize VPNs (with Caution): While some students may attempt to use Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to bypass restrictions, it's crucial to understand that this may violate school policies and could have consequences if detected.

By respecting school WiFi restrictions and exploring alternative solutions, students can maintain a balance between leveraging technology for educational purposes and adhering to school guidelines.

VPN privacy for students

In today's digital age, students rely heavily on the internet for research, communication, and entertainment. As they navigate through online platforms for academic and personal reasons, their privacy and security become paramount. This is where VPN (Virtual Private Network) services come into play, offering a robust solution for students looking to safeguard their online activities.

VPN provides students with a secure and encrypted connection to the internet. By using a VPN, students can protect their personal information from potential cyber threats such as hacking, data breaches, and identity theft. This is especially crucial when connecting to public Wi-Fi networks on campus or in libraries, where the risk of data interception is high.

Moreover, VPN allows students to access restricted content and bypass censorship, enabling them to explore a wide range of online resources without limitations. This is particularly beneficial for students studying abroad or in countries with strict internet regulations.

Additionally, VPN enhances privacy by masking the user's IP address and location, making it harder for authorities or malicious entities to track their online behavior. Students can browse the web anonymously, free from the prying eyes of advertisers and other third parties seeking to gather their data for targeted marketing purposes.

By incorporating VPN into their online routine, students can enjoy a heightened level of privacy and security while navigating the vast landscape of the internet. It provides them with the peace of mind they need to focus on their studies and online activities without compromising their sensitive information.

Internet censorship bypass

Title: Navigating the World Wide Web: Strategies to Bypass Internet Censorship

In an era where access to information is considered a fundamental right, internet censorship remains a significant hurdle for individuals seeking unrestricted online exploration. Whether imposed by governments, institutions, or even internet service providers, censorship can limit access to certain websites, platforms, or content deemed inappropriate or threatening by authorities.

However, despite these barriers, there are several strategies available to bypass internet censorship and access restricted content. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) stand out as one of the most effective tools in circumventing censorship. By encrypting internet traffic and routing it through servers in other locations, VPNs can effectively mask a user's location and bypass censorship filters.

Another method to bypass censorship is through the use of proxy servers. Similar to VPNs, proxies act as intermediaries between a user and the internet, allowing users to access content through a different IP address. This can help users bypass geographical restrictions and access blocked websites.

Additionally, technologies such as the Tor network provide anonymity and circumvention of censorship by routing internet traffic through a series of volunteer-operated servers, encrypting data at each step. This decentralized approach makes it difficult for authorities to track or block users' online activities.

Furthermore, utilizing alternative DNS (Domain Name System) servers can bypass censorship imposed by ISPs (Internet Service Providers). By changing DNS settings to use alternative servers, users can access websites that may be blocked by default DNS servers.

Despite these methods, it's essential to acknowledge the legal and ethical considerations associated with bypassing internet censorship. Users should familiarize themselves with local laws and regulations governing internet usage to avoid potential repercussions.

In conclusion, while internet censorship remains a challenge in many parts of the world, there are various strategies available to bypass restrictions and access information freely. Whether through VPNs, proxy servers, Tor, or alternative DNS servers, individuals can exercise their right to unrestricted online access. However, it's crucial to approach these methods responsibly and stay informed about the legal implications of circumventing censorship.

Online anonymity tools

Online anonymity tools are essential for internet users who prioritize their privacy and security online. These tools provide a layer of protection against various online threats such as data breaches, identity theft, and surveillance. By masking your IP address and encrypting your internet connection, online anonymity tools help you browse the web anonymously and avoid being tracked by websites, advertisers, or malicious third parties.

One of the most popular online anonymity tools is a Virtual Private Network (VPN). A VPN creates a secure and encrypted connection to the internet, ensuring that your online activities remain private and anonymous. It also allows you to bypass geo-restrictions and access websites and content that may be blocked in your region.

Another effective tool for online anonymity is the Tor network. Tor directs your internet traffic through a volunteer overlay network consisting of thousands of relays to conceal your location and usage from anyone conducting network surveillance or traffic analysis. This helps to protect your online identity and activities from being monitored or tracked.

In addition to VPNs and the Tor network, there are other anonymity tools such as proxy servers, anonymous browsers, and encrypted messaging apps that can further enhance your online privacy and security. It is important to choose reputable and trustworthy tools that prioritize user privacy and do not store or sell your data.

Overall, utilizing online anonymity tools is crucial for safeguarding your privacy and security in an increasingly digital world. By taking proactive measures to protect your online identity, you can browse the web with confidence and peace of mind.

[thecowprintshop]

Cow Flower Crown Phone Case Wallet Plus Your Title For Cow Lovers who're on the lookout for a cellphone case that does double responsibility as a pockets, this Personalized Floral Cow Phone Case Wallet is an absolute game-changer and finest in school. Our design group at Cowloco spent numerous hours discovering the right union of cow lover vogue style and good performance. This cellphone accent is their brainchild. That includes a cow flower crown entrance design and floral prints from cowl to cowl, this Flower Cow Phone Case Wallet proudly exhibits off its female nature.  Good for feminine members of the herd who need to carry the cow lover mark with magnificence. With an choice to bear your identify (by filling out the choice), it seamlessly integrates together with your ardour and private fashion as an extension of who you might be. The sensible design will defend your smartphone, simplify charging, and consolidate your most important gadgets into one enjoyable and attractive folio. An beautiful mix of practicality and safety with out compromising the fashion! Phone Case Wallet Jampacked with Options You Want Adopting a folio design, this cellphone case pockets conveniently stashes each your cellphone, your playing cards, and money in the identical place. With a entrance cowl that buckles closed over your display with a snap closure button. There are slots contained in the folio flap that may maintain as much as three playing cards and a handy pocket behind for storing enterprise playing cards or money. Even once you replenish all the out there pockets house, the slim construction of this cellphone case pockets permits your cellphone to really feel gentle whereas protecting its slim profile. Capturing photos together with your cellphone can also be made useful with its nifty sliding cradle resolution. Simply select your cellphone mannequin to match the cradle dimension. This function means that you can take footage even with the cellphone held within the case -simply slide the cellphone up, expose the digicam and snap away. Snap closure button-secured flap cowl retains every thing cosy whereas out and about. The cellphone case pockets is designed with a tender inside for full display and physique safety, with strengthened stitching to protect towards put on and tear. A wrist strap means that you can carry your cellphone safely and reduce your threat of unintentional drops or falls. All corners of your cellphone are protected inside this case, and also you’ll have straightforward, open entry to all your ports and buttons for complete performance. The fake leather-based bi-fold pockets design and TPU bumper on the within supplies two-for-one safety and safety which is sort of as vital because the storage. The bumper is to make sure that it has the very best likelihood at surviving a drop or fall, whereas the flip cowl retains your display show in pristine situation. This cellphone case pockets additionally affords built-in RFID theft safety, stopping scammers from scanning and stealing your card info.  One-Cease Carry Case for Your Phone and Different Each day Necessities For the reason that value of smartphones these days is extra of like an funding slightly than a traditional day by day buy and our pockets could possibly be equally useful or much more, it’s vital to not lose observe of those valuable possessions. You need this stuff to be as a lot as doable consolidated in a single place and straightforward to achieve everytime you want them. Because of this Personalized Flower Cow Phone Case Wallet - the fashionable and handy method to carry round your naked requirements with a single accent. It combines the performance of a pockets with a cellphone case, bank card slots, and a pocket for any unfastened payments. A implausible accent choose for anybody who needs their smartphone and pockets to mix into one easy-to-grab package deal. Consequently, you'll be able to carry each your vital playing cards, cash, and smartphone in the identical container.

 Ideally suited for on-the-go customers who don’t need the majority of a separate pockets when going out, which suggests you’re manner much less more likely to neglect your cellphone or your pockets behind once you’re headed out the door. Options: Cow Flower Crown Print Design/Floral Prints  Personalized NAME Print Constructed-in RFID Fake Leather-based Folio Design Strengthened Stitching Bifold Wallet Type Snap Closure Button 3 Card Slots, Money Payments Pocket Slide-up Phone Cradle Digital camera Entry TPU Bumper Phone Case Protector Wrist Strap   Transport Worldwide Transport $4.95 Free Worldwide Transport on Orders Over $75 Manufacturing Time: 5-7 Working Days Supply Time USA: 7-10 Working Days Supply Time Worldwide: 15-20 Working Days  If a number of merchandise are ordered in a single order, they won't essentially all arrive collectively in a single parcel. Some will arrive earlier than others, individually. When you've got any additional questions on our merchandise, service, or enterprise, please get in contact by electronic mail and we are going to intention to get again to you inside 8 enterprise hours. Returns Within the uncommon case that your order arrives broken or the flawed merchandise was despatched out to you, we are going to try to place this proper, both by means of a full refund or ship a free substitute. Our coverage lasts 30 days. If 30 days have passed by since your buy, sadly, we are able to’t give you a refund or trade. For full particulars, please learn our refund policy. When you've got any additional questions on our merchandise, service, or enterprise, please get in contact by electronic mail and we are going to intention to get again to you inside 8 enterprise hours.

[retrograde-marmalade]

(FREY/LEON)

minor (DOUG/DYLAS)

Saving Our Savior

Chapter One

Words:  3810

-

"So... what you're saying..." Leon managed to say through gritted teeth, "... is that Frey has become a Guardian?"

An attempted theft of the Rune Sphere in Leon Karnak has resulted in Frey's imprisonment in the tower as an unintentional fifth Guardian. They have the Rune Sphere, so all they have to do is save Frey and put it back where it belongs. But how do they defeat the strongest monster Norad has ever known?

Leon is not sure, but he won't rest until he saves her. No matter what, he will bring her home.

- - - - - - A multi-chapter fic that will eventually include the Earthmates from the other main Rune Factory titles.

[blackjack-15]

Puttering Around — Thoughts on: Secret of the Old Clock (CLK)

Previous Metas: SCK/SCK2, STFD, MHM, TRT, FIN, SSH, DOG, CAR, DDI, SHA, CUR

Hello and welcome to a Nancy Drew meta series! 30 metas, 30 Nancy Drew Games that I’m comfortable with doing meta about. Hot takes, cold takes, and just Takes will abound, but one thing’s for sure: they’ll all be longer than I mean them to be.

Each meta will have different distinct sections: an Introduction, an exploration of the Title, an explanation of the Mystery, a run-through of the Suspects. Then, I’ll tackle some of my favorite and least favorite things about the game, and finish it off with ideas on how to improve it.

If any game requires an extra section or two, they’ll be listed in the paragraph above, along with links to previous metas.

These metas are not spoiler free, though I’ll list any games/media that they might spoil here: CLK, CUR.

The Intro:

In our next Jetsetting game, Nancy travels back from Modern-Day England and straight into 1930s Titusville (aka River Heights 70+ years ago) to help an acquaintance who’s in the middle of two unrelated plots to turn Titusville upside down.

A game famously reviewed as “pleasant but inconsequential”, Secret of the Old Clock tends to be passed over for both praise and censure, famous for two minigames (the sewing minigame and the mini-golf) but otherwise overlooked. It’s a shame, really, that it’s sandwiched in between two much flashier games, as CLK is a wonderfully solid entry into the Nancy Drew series. It pioneers the two-culprit variation on the standard Nancy Drew plot, tackles a new time period, and includes dozens of in-jokes towards the Nancy Drew books.

It’s also the first introduction of Carson Drew as a phone character, which is a lot of fun, and makes sense that he’d show up in the game that includes nods to all things canon. He doesn’t show up again until much later in the series, so it’s nice to introduce him here after hearing about him for 12 games.

As opposed to CUR right before it, CLK takes care to ground itself in a linear plotline, handling its story with relative ease and taking care not to reach too far out of the box. This is one of its greatest strengths, and provides a much better game overall because of it. It’s a simple story, pretty well told.

Though it doesn’t stand up to other more “simple” games before it such as CAR or DDI, it never reaches any of the lows of SCK, FIN, or CUR, and allows the player to be sucked in to its fantastic facsimile of life in the 1930s for teen sleuth Nancy Drew — blue roadster and all.

The Title:

As CLK is a mixture of the first four Nancy Drew books, it retains the title of the first book. As a nod to the history of Nancy Drew, it’s a great choice for the title.

Unfortunately, though the Old Clock does appear and hold secrets, it’s just not prominent enough to deserve the title that it holds. The other three books — The Hidden Staircase, The Bungalow Mystery, and The Mystery at Lilac Inn — are other options, and The Mystery at Lilac Inn would have been the most appropriate title. It doesn’t have the immediate name recognition, which is why they didn’t pick it, but it really is much better and encapsulates the game much better, as the game revolves around the Mysteries that are tied to the Inn.

That’s all I really have to say about that, so onto the mystery!

The Mystery:

Nancy Drew is summoned to the Lilac Inn to help Emily Crandall, the friend of Nancy’s friend Helen Corning, who needs to put her recently deceased mother’s jewelry into a safe, and figures that Nancy’s father would have one.

If it sounds to you like a simple, if slightly contrived premise, then you’d be right.

Once Nancy gets there, however, she finds out that Emily is cracking under the pressure of running an Inn, that her guardian Jane Willoughby isn’t as much help as she should be, and that Emily and her mother were depending on money from Josiah Crowley’s will, which mysteriously only included his recent ESP teacher, Richard Topham, rather than the Crandalls and the local banker.

From there, things go from bad to worse as the inn’s kitchen catches fire, Emily’s jewels are stolen (and partially returned), and voices in the walls start manifesting — not to mention the fetch quests around Titusville that Nancy is sent on and the ridiculous Richard Topham hiding everything about himself other than how pompous he really is.

Nancy soon figures out that this mystery is two-headed, with one side revolving around the Inn itself and the other around Josiah Crowley’s real — and missing — will. Our villains catch on too, however, and Nancy has to race against their suspicion to expose the frauds, discover hidden secrets and identities, and solve the Secret of the Old Clock.

As a mystery, this one really is quite good for its time. Dual villains, each unconcerned with the other, hidden inheritance, Shakespeare references — it’s got it all. Though Jim Archer lets it down a bit in his sheer nothingness, and it functions as a howdunnit with a weird whodunnit beginning, CLK is solid ground after the incredibly shaky mystery in CUR, and it’s a lot of fun to play through.

The Suspects:

Emily Crandall is our protagonist and resident watering pot of CLK who spends the game moping and being Generally Unhelpful. Her mom’s death notwithstanding, Emily’s stressors are the Inn, her lack of money, and her fake-guardian making her think that she’s crazy.

So maybe her total lack of common sense in wanting to call in Nancy because Nancy’s bound to have a safe at home is a result of copious amounts of mental stress. One can only hope so, as by her next birthday she’s the legal owner of the Inn.

Emily actually would have been interesting as a villain, but she, like Jim, just isn’t enough of a presence in the game — which stands out since she’s the closest we’ve got to a main character! She cries a lot, she sits a lot, and that’s about it. She would have had to be a misguided villain, convinced that her guardian (who would have had to actually be Jane Willoughby) is after her fortune…but HER still isn’t up to that level yet, and it’s probably better that they went with a story they can tell wholly and mostly convincingly.

Honestly speaking, Emily, being as she is, is a more successful Linda Penvellyn, which I don’t actually think is unintentional. She’s being harassed and abused by someone who’s basically a family member but is still largely unfamiliar to her, the tie to her remaining family is gone (though Emily’s mother is dead, unlike Hugh Penvellyn), and she is being gaslighted to believe that she’s crazy.

Emily was allowed more agency, more screen time, and more pity by the writers and creators, and because of that, her situation with her Evil Jane is far more obvious to the average player, and she’s treated with far more sympathy than Linda historically has been by the fandom (though recent fan discussion has begun trending in Linda’s favor, which I think is wonderful and fantastic).

Jane Willoughby is, of course, not Jane Willoughby after all, but actually Marion Aborn, proving that identity theft in the 30s was as easy as…well, saying that your name was someone else’s name.

An acquaintance of the actual Jane Willoughby and a petty thief, Marion intercepted the letter about Gloria’s death and Jane’s status as Emily’s guardian and decided to try to cash in on potential cash by tormenting Emily until she signed over the Inn. Exploding the kitchen, stealing Emily’s jewels, and attempting to make the girl think that she was crazy to make her sell the Inn before her 18th birthday (after which Marion would receive no profits).

As one of two culprits, Marion is the more “subtle” culprit and has the more complicated background, but is also the one you have to deal with the most, and thus suffers slightly from being in the spotlight (and thus showing the obviously evil side of her) a little too much. As this game isn’t really concerned with its culprits as a centerpiece, however, Marion’s antics fit right in.

Marion also gets points for being a much more intelligent abusive culprit (contrasting Jane), working hard to make Emily think she’s crazy with a clear goal in mind and even going as far as stealing, then partially replacing, Emily’s jewels to really hammer home the idea that the girl wasn’t mentally well to others — and to Emily herself.

Richard Topham is a self-proclaimed ESP expert and everyone-else-proclaimed dick who ended up somehow being the beneficiary of Josiah Crowley’s will, despite his spoken intentions to leave it to the Crandalls and Jim Archer. He also has a very obnoxious cat named Uri, voiced by a lovely cat named Carl (though I bet you were expecting me to say Jonah Von Spreecken — never fear, he shows up as the Tubby Telegram guy!)

Richard is our other culprit, guilty of falsifying Josiah Crowley’s will when no one could find the original, leaving most everything to himself rather than to the Crandalls or Jim Archer as Josiah wanted. A slight throwback to the 1920s obsession with spiritualism that itself was a post-war reaction to massive death, Richard is as sleazy as they come, testing Nancy for an “inferior mind” and taking advantage of every situation in order to come out on top.

As a culprit, Richard’s technically the one with the bigger crime, but is overshadowed by the plotline with Emily and Marion and is thus a little forgettable, even though it was his actions that started this whole mess in the first place.

Finally, Jim Archer is the local banker who’s not having too good of a time during, well, the Great Depression, where hundreds of banks (and dozens of bankers’ hearts) failed. Promised a boon by Josiah Crowley, he, like Emily, is left in the lurch after the false will was presented. Jim was also a fellow student with Carson Drew at law school, but turned to banking as a career instead.

Despite his office being the location where Nancy finally figures out the mystery of the titular Old Clock and where she discovers that “Jane” is actually Marion, Jim really doesn’t have much to do in this game. He gives Nancy the dreaded sewing minigame and reminds the player that the stock market crash was a recent event, but other than that has very little impact.

Jim would have been a poor choice for a villain — he just doesn’t have the personality or impact necessary — as the only storyline readily available would have been him doing Dirty Deeds to keep his bank afloat…except for the fact that if he were a villain, his bank would have been doing fine, with no need for the will anyway.

The Favorite:

My favorite moment in the game, odd as it might seem, is the CB radio conversation-slash-puzzle. It’s so rare in these pre-Nik games that we actually get to see the lives of those not really related to the case/mystery and get a sense for the world spinning on despite the incident, and this is a great example of that done right.

Like the “freezer moment” mentioned in my Danger on Deception Island meta, this moment where Nancy can see how Josiah Crowley’s life has impacted people for the better, rather than the main game where so far his death has made everything worse. It’s a wonderful moment, and honestly the game is worth replaying on the merit of that alone (though there are many wonderful things about it).

My favorite puzzle is getting down into the secret passage (and all of the puzzles within the passage). It’s a ton of fun to find hidden passages that aren’t full of Deadly Traps or human remains, and the whole Creepy’s Corner puzzle is delightfully campy and awesome.

The best location in the game by far is the carriage house, where the aforementioned conversation takes place. Beautifully lit, nicely hidden away in stages, and the only place that doesn’t feel like a 1960s set of a 30s period piece.

I love this game as homage to the original Nancy Drew titles; though they’re changed somewhat to suit both a video game style and the take on the original canon that the video game universe took (such as making Nancy’s mother’s death at 10 as it was originally, which was the smartest move they’ve ever done).

Video-Game-Style Nancy’s far more like her original 30s version than the sanitized, “fashion-ized” version in the 60’s rewrites — a fact that becomes more and more clear as the series goes on — and it really does show here, as cowboy-cop Nancy wrangles not one but two crooks.

Speaking of, the last thing that I’ll mention in this section is the fact that there are two different culprits, each uncaring of the other. In a game series that was originally only supposed to be 12 games long (meaning CLK would be the last one), this is a delightfully fresh take and it makes untangling who did what a lot of fun and makes CLK different from most games before it.

I’ll talk more about this in later Nancy metas, but the shift from “one crime, one culprit” to a more “spread the guilt” approach really makes the games go up a level or two in enjoyability and in complexity, and CLK is a great example of how just having two culprits really makes the game much more fun to play around with.

The Un-Favorite:

All of that being said, there are some things in CLK that I really don’t love.

The sewing puzzle is honestly the worst; it’s hard with a mouse and nearly impossible with a trackpad, it’s tedious, and it doesn’t matter for the rest of the game, which is probably the worst part given how much effort it takes. It’s a puzzle for a puzzles’ sake, and doesn’t tell us anything we don’t already know (we know Jim’s not doing well; we know it’s the Great Depression, etc.), not to mention not rewarding the player nor Nancy for the effort.

My least favorite moment in the game would have to be Nancy’s first encounter with Richard Topham. Nancy’s autonomy is usually respected in both the 30s original drafts (less so in the 60s re-writes) and in the games, and Richard’s comments about lesser minds and his little test are, even with Nancy’s snarky comment about him in her diary, frankly out of place.

They don’t serve as a “relic of the times”, they don’t make us hate Richard more than we would have for stealing money from people who are literally drowning in bills and debt…and as much as the Nancy Drew books and character are feminist rather than Feminist, it’s honestly not great to have both his ‘clients’ during the course of the game be women that he treats the way he does.

It wasn’t necessary to have him behave the way he does, it contradicts the Spiritualist movement (which was most popular among women to a startling degree, and male Spiritualists tended to treat their female clients very well because that was the bulk of their clientele), and it doesn’t tell us anything new about him, because Nancy and the players already know he’s a fake and a blowhard.

The Fix:

So how would I fix Secret of the Old Clock?

The first and biggest fix I’d make is to include a strong storyline about Spiritualism. As noted several times above, Spiritualism was a huge force in the 1920s, and a period piece set in the year 1930 should necessarily reflect that. Quite frankly, all the nonsense about Jim Archer’s wife should just be cut and replaced with a big Spiritualism puzzle of some sorts.

I’m not saying a séance — no need to retread MHM — but an actual nod to Spiritualism (and through it, the first World War, which given Nancy’s age of 18, would have happened when she was a child) more than just “and this character is a psychic of sorts, don’t really think about it” would improve the game and ground it in its time period. Other than the references to money troubles and the ease of identity theft, there’s not much to ground CLK in its period, and I really think a Spiritualism storyline would aid that.

And if Spiritualism is involved, Richard becomes a more present, more serious character — and a more serious threat. It also opens the opportunity for the two plotlines to intersect — is Emily being driven crazy by stress, an enemy, or a malevolent spirit (which could even be supposed to be her mom, should they want a slightly darker turn)? Richard might visit the house to ensure there are no ‘malevolent presences’ around — and ensure that Crowley didn’t hide his will there.

It wouldn’t become a ‘haunting’ game; it would instead work on the aesthetic of familiar spirits — something that would be explored more fully in the next game.

I know this has been said, but I can’t emphasize enough that the sewing puzzle should be cut, even if there’s nothing to take its place. It’s a perfect example of the wrong puzzle, the wrong controls, and the wrong side-quest at the wrong time. I’m also not sure why they made Jim Archer a middle-aged banker rather than Helen Corning’s fiancée, but that’s too small a change to really bother with.

The other important change I would make is to change CLK from a weak whodunit — our culprits are already clearly the culprits — to a strong howdunit, which is what it really wants to be.

The beginning can stay the same — Nancy’s journey, Emily’s mother’s death, Richard’s faking of the will, Josiah Crowley’s death and promises, etc. — but introducing Richard Topham at the Inn, there to ‘visit’ and offer condolences and because he sensed Heavy Psychic Energy and wondered if it was coming from the house or from Emily. Have Emily tell Nancy in confidence that the other reason she called her in was because she’s either going crazy or being attacked on all sides, and the game can proceed on from that point.

Because the villains aren’t secret or even quasi-hidden in plain sight — save for Marion’s identity theft — it’s a much more natural shift to a howdunit than other games. Emily’s living in fear of Marion, running the Inn, and the possible Malevolent Spirit that may or may not be her mother haunting her through the Secret, Secret Passageway in the Inn, and Nancy’s suspicious of Richard Topham who inherited all of Crowley’s wealth, of the ‘hauntings’ of the Inn, and of the missing will and the gifts Josiah left behind.

Those two plotlines alone are enough to carry the game, especially including the Edutainment section on Spiritualism that would tie in with Richard Topham (and possibly include Emily’s mother having an interest due to her husband dying in the war), and so Jim Archer just isn’t needed as much. Whether he stays in the game in an even more reduced role or whether he’s replaced by a ninth-hour character in the form of Emily’s actual guardian, the real Jane Willoughby, is up to personal preference (though I personally like the second option).

Like all the Jetsetting games, CLK begins with a small problem that snowballs into larger and larger consequences. By emphasizing a Spiritualist plotline (culminating with the technology-based ‘encounters’ Josiah had with his CB radio friends), trimming down the fat with Jim Archer, and selling CLK from the beginning as more of a howdunit than a whodunit, CLK would improve enough to be more than just a good game, and become a standout of its era — as befitting the start of the titular teen detective.

[mst3kproject]

Female Jungle

This movie has serious MST3K cred.  It’s got Kathleen Crowley from The Rebel Set, Jayne Mansfield from The Loves of Hercules (in her first screen role), Bruno VeSoto from Daddy-O, and John Carradine! It also has that old favourite, a misleading title.  Just as The Undead had no zombies and Pod People had neither pods nor people, Female Jungle features not a single leather-clad woman swinging on a vine.  Disappointing.

Rather than being a bad jungle adventure, Female Jungle is a bad noir mystery.  Up-and-coming actress Monica Madison has been murdered in front of the sleazy Can-Can Club, while she should have been at a glitzy movie premiere.  What was she doing there, and who killed her?  Too bad off-duty detective Jack Stevens, who was in the area, was too falling-down drunk to remember what happened… or even whether he was the killer!  In the attempt to clear his name, Stevens delves into the complicated relationships between Miss Madison, her publicist Almstead, a struggling artist named Al, and the women in Al’s life – including his wife Peggy and mistress Candy.  It turns out there were a lot of people who might have a reason to kill Monica Madison… but the actual ending makes no damn sense at all.

If Female Jungle had been on MST3K it would have belonged in the Joel era, because this movie is a fucking ordeal, right up there with garbage like Project Moon Base and Jungle Goddess.  For starters, nothing happens.  Theoretically this story involves exciting things like car chases, love affairs, jewel thefts, and drunken brawls, but we never see any of it, only hear about it in long, pointless conversations.  Sometimes the long, pointless conversations turn into long, pointless arguments in which both parties seem to change their minds twice in five minutes.  Sometimes the actors talk extra-fast, apparently in the effort to fit more talking into the available seventy minutes.  The fact that a vital clue comes from a talk radio program is almost a joke, because even the people in the movie are doing nothing but listening to talking!

The only thing worse than a movie that’s ninety-five percent talking is one that’s ninety-five percent talking by people who can’t act.  Nobody in this movie can act.  Even John Carradine can barely act in this movie. Lawrence Tierney as Stevens isn’t even convincing as being tipsy, never mind so drunk he can’t figure out where he was for the last four hours.  Burt Kaiser (also the writer and producer) as Al studiously avoids looking into the camera. Kathleen Crowley as Peggy spends much of the movie fake-crying.  Jayne Mansfield as Candy looks like she has no idea how she sank this low, and this is her first film.

The direction is incredibly boring, featuring lots of static shots from way too far away, interspersed with bizarre intrusive close-ups on people who aren’t even participating in the conversation. Everything is under-lit (Tom Servo’s comment on The Giant Spider Invasion being ‘film extra-noir!’ comes to mind), which is particularly annoying during the rare scenes in which something is actually happening and you can’t fucking tell what it is.  A lot of scenes that needed music don’t have any, and the ones that do have music play it way too loud, which makes for another unintentional joke when Peggy asks Almstead to turn it down.

The characters are to a man (and woman) drunk and terrible.  There are bits where it looks like Al and Peggy might be about to reconcile, but we don’t want them to reconcile because Al is an abusive fuck.  Stevens has a brief scene with Candy that makes it look like they’re romantically involved, but apparently they’re not, and then he yells at her.  She goes running off to seek comfort from Al and he yells at her.  Stevens threatens a suspect for insisting his lawyer be present for questioning, and then keeps barking questions at him until he breaks down. The only decent person in the entire cast is George the Can-Can Club janitor, and even he has his questionable moments when it looks like he might be protecting the killer.

In particular, the many loves of Al the artist are supposed to be very important, but we have no idea what any of these women see in him.  He’s an unemployed drunk who cheats on his wife with a regular mistress, and cheats on that mistress with a third woman.  All three seem to have tried to help him with his problems only to get it thrown back in their faces.  He’s not wealthy, he’s not particularly good-looking, he’s only mildly talented, and he’s definitely not charming.

I guess the theme of Female Jungle is gratitude?  Al wasn’t grateful for the love of the women in his life and abandoned them all one by one, while Monica wasn’t grateful to Almstead for making her a star.  I would love to analyze this but I can’t.  It’s there, but it’s not used in any way that would make it worth talking about.

While we have several potential villains in this story, finding a hero is more difficult.  Any attempt at a plot summary will probably make it sound like it’s Stevens, but he’s not actually in the movie very much.  When he is, he’s threatening women and suspects, yelling at his colleagues, and generally behaving like a thinner, better-dressed version of Mitchell. All the actual investigating and solving was done by Almstead, although while we’re actually watching him work it out we’re meant to think he’s the killer trying to cover his tracks.  Why wasn’t this movie about Almstead?

Two reasons, actually.  First, because he already knows what’s going on and the whole premise of this film seems to be that nobody knows what’s going on – especially the audience!  And second, he’s John Carradine.  Everybody knows John Carradine is the bad guy.

The final revelation of who killed Monica Madison is what feels like ten minutes of John Carradine telling a story that makes no damned sense.  There was apparently a blackmail scheme involved but we never find out what it was about.  By the end of a murder mystery we should have enough clues that the confession or explanation makes everything fall into place, but instead, here we’re just sitting there wondering what the fuck.  Most of this was not at all foreshadowed and the parts that were don’t make any sense either – a major plot point turns on a stolen diamond necklace but we never find out why the culprit stole it.  It feels like they made the whole movie up as they went along and the result desperately needs a guy and two robots at the bottom of it.

The biggest sin committed by Female Jungle is one I’ve gotten mad about before – it straight-up lies to the audience.  Conventions of fiction vary from culture to culture but one of the assumptions we make here in the west is that characters in a movie do not know they’re in a movie and therefore cannot talk directly to the audience.  Even Shakespeare’s asides follow this rule, in that Hamlet isn’t really supposed to be talking to the audience, but giving us a window on his inner monologue, and it can only be broken in very special circumstances.  Bilbo Baggins told two different versions of his competition with Gollum, but Bilbo is explicitly the narrator even though his story is in the third person, so he knows he has an audience that he wants to look good for.

Female Jungle has no narrator, not even potentially.  There is no one character whose story we’re following and who may therefore be said to be ‘telling’ it to us, as for example Chasen is telling us the story in Indestructible Man.  The only possible candidate would be Stevens, but we’re often watching stuff he has no way to know or care about.  Therefore nobody is aware there is an audience, and nobody should be able to lie to that audience.  The killer breaks this rule, though, as he does things that make no sense once we know he is the killer. He does try to frame Almstead, but often in ways that seem directed at the audience rather than the cops.  Murdering Candy serves no purpose except to say ‘surprise, this guy kills women!’

Between the darkness, the downright deceptive attempts at misdirection, and the fact that nobody’s decisions make any sense, Female Jungle reminds me very strongly of The Dead Talk Back.  Female Jungle actually manages to be worse than that movie on several levels, but there is one mistake I’m glad they avoided.  In The Dead Talk Back we got to know Renee a little, but only through a voice talking over shots of her changing her clothes.  In Female Jungle we don’t actually meet Monica at all – she dies before the opening titles.  This is, itself, not very good storytelling, but at least the movie doesn’t have an opportunity to sexualize her.  We see a couple of photographs of her later, one of them a standard Hollywood head shot and the other a candid of her sitting at a nightclub table, but neither is intended to be sexy.  One of Al’s artworks tries to depict her as a sexpot, but the emphasis of the piece is so obviously the plot point necklace that it ruins the effect.

Yeah, that’s my compliment for Female Jungle: it didn’t go out of its way to remind us that the victim made for an attractive corpse.  I have seen way, way too many bad movies.

[bigpapaonatrain]

How To Download GTA V Totally Free On The Epic Games Shop

Grand Theft Auto Online

With the enormous game globe and also liquid technicians of Grand Theft Auto V as a foundation, Grand Theft Auto Online develops and also expands with regular material updates created by Rockstar Games and the Grand Theft Auto area. Some reports have recommended that we could see the next Grand Theft Auto revealed this year, with a prospective launch in 2021. For a begin, throughout the PS5 games disclose on June 11, Rockstar disclosed it’s bringing a boosted and an expanded edition of GTA 5 to the next-gen console in 2021, suggesting that GTA 6 will undoubtedly be launched at some point afterwards.

The newest variation of Grand Theft Auto, which you know as GTA V, is also ending up being quite preferred throughout the world. The Rockstar video game designers have made Grand Theft Auto V an extraordinarily thrilling and fantastic game.

Below you’ll uncover for how long it is available free of cost and just how you can download the Costs Version. It’s uncertain if GTA 5 on the Legendary Games Shop supports cross-play with the Heavy steam variation of the video game, which is worth bearing in mind if you intend on dabbling in the extremely preferred and still-updated GTA Online. According to a now-deleted Tweet from the official Impressive Games, Store account mentions that Grand Theft Auto V will be free on the platform for a week, meaning that you can retrieve the video game on your account till May 21.

Impressive Gamings Store caught up on the popularity with the help of the launch of the game Fortnite. Now, with GTA 5 coming on board, the business has been dealing with system accidents since a lot of individuals are trying to order the free duplicates of the video game. While getting GTA 5 free noises exciting, it gets even much better as the business is using the Premium Version free of cost.

Typically, the firm will promote each brand-new free video game weeks beforehand.

Grand Theft Auto is now an ever-growing online world, where Rockstar isn’t afraid to continue to reinvent as well as alter the video game often.

I can upload finished videos straight from the Rockstar Editor to YouTube and the Rockstar Games Social Club for effortless sharing.

The next free title is still labelled as an “enigma video game,” which is irregular for Epic.

This adds trustworthiness to the reality that GTA 5 will undoubtedly be the title that comes to be free on the solution beginning tomorrow. However, it isn’t the first time Rockstar’s most celebrated game was readily available free-of-charge for gamers in 2020.

The special edition includes GTA Online, and the Bad guy Venture Beginner Load for the multiplayer gaming experience. GTA 5 has previously belonged of many deals throughout the years, and just recently was on Xbox Video Game Pass till it was changed by Red Dead Redemption 2. Yet this Legendary Games shop free week is literally that, free, as you do not need a different membership to anything to gain access to it.

GTA 5 Tips

Grand Theft Auto V is virtually seven years old and also has collected over 100 million players because of time across five systems. If you still somehow haven’t played the game yet, you might get a possibility to capture GTA V free on COMPUTER soon, however just through a disruptive market. Grand Theft Auto V additionally includes Grand Theft Auto Online, the ever-evolving and also vibrant Grand Theft Auto world for multiple gamers.

Some updates add new video game settings and also features. Others include themed gameplay web content, such as the Self-reliance Day Special upgrade that added patriotic-themed material on July 1, 2014. The widely expected Online Heists upgrade released on March 10, 2015, and also experienced some first technical problems because of the raised user load. Shortly after the game’s PC release, some players reported being banned from Grand Theft Auto Online for making use of the field of vision and cosmetic mods in single-player. Rockstar stated in their official blog site they had prohibited no one from Online for making use of single-player mods, but that recent updates to the COMPUTER version had the “unintentional effect” of making such mods unplayable. They stated that mods are unauthorised and might cause unforeseen technological issues and instabilities.

So no, a free week in the Legendary Gamings shop is no skin off Rockstar’s back, and also they may end up hooking individuals right into GTA Online. As a result, getting them to invest money there instead of down the road. Post-release content is consistently added to Grand Theft Auto Online through free title updates.

And yes, the game will be yours to keep forever when you have redeemed it on your account. In the present world of PC gaming, video game lovers continuously want to play some fascinating games which can supply excellent home entertainment and enjoyable to them. For many years, Grand Theft Auto is ending up being is the best activity adventure game that video game love or have ever before played. You can be among the people who enjoy playing unique versions of Grand Theft Auto 5 as well as pass some quality time.

[localocksmithnearme]

Kia Fob Keys And Remote Program Union NJ

If you want to program a transponder key, wish to pick your locked car door, wish a sidewinder key cut or want to replace your ignition, our Kia lock smiths in Union NJ are available to adjust your ignition, locks, lock-out and keys needs for any Kia model and year you drive. Just is to lift your cellphone and call us at (973)200-4870 to chat with our call center representative to obtain a credible price estimate and our courteous handy Kia lock smith techs will arrive to your location swiftly to get your key-fob replaced, ignition switch repaired or chipped key programmed  onsite twenty four hour 7 day a week 365 days a year. Save money, time and effort driving to the dealer and schedule an appointment with us for a quick mobile vehicle lockout, fob key and smartkey copied, chipped key programming or vehicle anti theft system/passive anti theft keys replacement. We feel honour in our well rounded technicians and ensure to restore your tranquility of mind by clarifying your Kia key lock malfunctions effortlessly and safely at your side 24 hour.

Models: Sedona, Spectra, Forte5, Sportage, Rondo, Opirus, Picanto, Convertible, Pride, Credos, Sephia, SUV, Rio, Mohave and K900

Kia key replacement in Union NJ

One of the main element of any Kia is it's lock and key instrument, which have to be re-keyed if lost or warn-out. When this style of a headache transpires we, at Union Key Replacement, in Union NJ, are thoroughly experienced to adjust all designs of car ignition, lock or key pains on site.

Kia transponder key is uniquely decoded to operate an explicit car and our adroit craftsmanship can forge Kia switch-blade key, passive anti theft system, Tibbe or sidewinder keys, likewise install, repair or replace any type of keys, ignition and locks at your side 24/7.

About Kia locks and key technology

Constructed in 1944,  Kia is Kia Motors marquee that assemble common motor vehicles distributed to Mexico, China, North America and the Middle East. Since 2004 line of  Kia cars are employing  transponder as an underlying electronic and anti-theft lock and key system. A set of  transponder keys that might be duplicated by a prevalent control panel process or by diagnostic equipage if one of the keys is lost. In 2007  Kia designate the Smart Entry System with remotes, smart key and push-button start to suit frequent actions  like pressing a dial to lock or open up the doors besides push-button start ignition or proximity key.

Ignition cylinder repair

Perhaps one of the most trivial signs of ignition malfunction is a car that won't turn on, ignition key is hard to turn, key wont turn in the ignition key-hole or the steering wheel is stuck.

In some cases your ignition malfunction is because of corrosion or dirt caught in the ignition key-pocket or possibly a detach or loose arbor or pin inside the ignition cylinder prohibiting the switch from turning normally.

Bad ignition cylinder must be replaced or repaired as quickly as possible and is a duty that should be left to a skilled car lock man (in particular if your vehicle is equipped with air-bag system).  ignition lock replacement or repair commonly engage disabling the steering wheel, which might provoke unintentional airbag positioning if done unqualified personal. Ignition cylinder replacement or repair normally costs $145–$349.

When dealeng with a crumbling key, the symptom may be that you will have difficulties turning the key in the ignition which actually indicate that the key is dint and should be substituted. A dint key should be reproduced from the VIN to avoid the risk of transfering the fault to the  cut and programmed key. An automobile locksmith has to employ dedicated Kia cutters, programmers and diagnostic tools to generate a brand new key which will costs $150–$250.

Transponder chipped key construct

Newer motor vehicle assembled with engine control module and vehicle keys are armed with digitized chip found stowed into the apex of the key or on the blade (in VAT) keys. When the transponder key is inserted to the ignition key-pit, the transponder chip transmit a distinct code for the vehicle ECM to be validated. Without this adaptable authorization code, the vehicle will not activate.

When a car owner lose or want to duplicate his key, the transponder should be de-coded with a new key-code so it would be adopted by the immobiliser.

Some manufacturers of cars years and models dispense control board plan for duplication of keys, however if all keys are gone, the engine control unit should be re-programmed by suitable programmer owned by a locksmith or the dealer-ship.

Kia keyless entry device

Smart-keys are a top choice in motorist comfort and convenience, you are adept to unlock and lock your car door and furthermore starting the car engine – while avoiding holding the key. You merely need to have it on yourself, whether in your pocket or purse.

When ever the motorist approaches their motor vehicle, they’re identified by a paired combination of audio and infrared chip located inside the smart-key. The car door unlock and open when the motorist rips the handle. The car engine powers up with the touch of a push buttons on the dashboard. The push buttons is replacing the mechanical key by opening the current on the car fuel pump.

Closing the car doors when leaving is just as simple. The motorist merely pushes a clicker on the door lock handle – many smart-keys might even lock as soon as the motorist go's out of reach.

Copy vs lost car keys

The platform of cutting and programming a car key differ among different models and year of the car. On several vehicles, dash-board programming can be used for extre key programming. Dashboard programming ward off the obligatory overpriced key programmer and key codes when linking a new chipped key to the motor vehicle. Vehicles who don't support Control board programming  option need to have a backup key coded employing a specific key programmer that is applicable only to Kia dealership or a legitimate locksmith.

This programmer costs a few thousands of dollars to purchase which is the reason having a discrete car key costs way more than it does to only cut an old type metal bladed key.

If you lost all keys to your car you’ll most likely need to tow your car to the dealer or find a motor vehicle locksmith to come down to your premise to re-code the car computer to adopt the new key and refuse the lost one. Lost key recovery requisite proof of ownership papers as insurance, title or registration and will costs $175–$275.

24hour car lock-out

Have you ever locked out of your vehicle with the key inside? If you did, you know how bothersome it might be when one facing similar manifestation.

Union Key Replacement popalock agent yields total 24hr popalock service at an affordable price. Utilizing our one of a kind lockpicking tools that will unlock your car averting any harm to the car pickup, van, car or SUV.

Car locks conversing

Did you lost the last key to your vehicle?, got one of your Kia keys kidnapped? or bought a brand-new Kia ignition and recommend to regain an aged one?, cleave to insure that no one else attain the power to run your vehicle? Good News! You are exactly in the right place, now that re-keying of vehicle locks is one of Union Key Replacement prime quirk. Our specialists can rekey the internal pins into your door or ignition lock, so it would adopt the newish key and rebuff the obsolete one. Take up the cell phone and call our dispatching center to get your car lock corrected by a adroit key-smith immediately

Last word

Did you purchase a copy smart key and need it programmed, broke your keys in the ignition or can't find the keys to your vehicle? Outstanding news! We are in service 24 hr and are able to be with you in no time to effortlessly deliver you with replacement keys, car lockout and ignition repair) on premises. If you locked your self out or find that your key wont turn in the ignition key-space pick up your phone and call (973)200-4870. Our experts haul key programmer and lock bumping apparatus and are able to drive to you hastily to repair your ignition cylinder, replace a lost key or unlock your car door on the spot and get you on your way to your next activity as early as possible. . If you’re goggling for Kia key replacement service 24HR in Union New Jersey, call (973)200-4870 for the most trusted keysmiths, keyless entry, remote fob and car trunk, locks and ignition switch repair by a local mobile locksmith.

[im-not-a-what]

What The Deuce

Title: What the Deuce

Summary:  Neal Gold and Lily Vincent don't start on the right foot when they meet at camp. But friendship blooms, and they discover some odd coincidences about each other's families. Before they know it, they've stumbled on a long-kept secret that will throw the Golds and the Vincents for a monumental loop and into an overdue reunion.

Rating: T

Genre: modern AU, family drama & shenangians, long-lost relatives

Chapter: (1) Unfortunate Circumstances

Characters/Pairings: Swanfire, Lily (Rumbelle & Maleficent appearing later)

Notes: Yes, the long discussed Mal/Rumple siblings AU. Fair warning, it starts off very Parent-Trap-ish (sprinkled with teen!Swanfire) but will hopefully evolve into a more original plotline.

AO3 link

Neal should’ve seen this coming—his being sequestered to the far corner of the computer lab with a girl whose gaze could cut glass, which she now directed at his skull. If he had simply stayed level-headed, he would’ve backed off and avoided this. But no, he couldn’t manage to be a sensible person. There was plenty of blame to lob at the glowering girl next to him, but he mostly, and silently, berated himself.

He shouldn’t have let Lily get to him. He should’ve noticed her animosity and sidestepped it on the first day of tech camp. The first lunch, specifically. But avoiding aggressive girls hadn’t been on his mind. He’d been busy looking for a table since his roommates, Michael and John Darling, had gone ahead without him. The prospect of eating in a college dining hall had weakened his knees. With haste, he’d navigated past college students to the part of the hall reserved for the middle-school and high-school kids attending the camp.

That’s when, by chance, his eyes found Emma: bright, grinning, playfully side-eying her friend over a remark.

Neal felt he was seeing a lighthouse. Sure, blame volatile hormones, but a bout of courage (or desperation for a seat) prompted him to rein in his nerves over talking to a pretty girl—a pair of pretty girls, he noticed once he widened his focus—and to approach the table with what he hoped looked like casual friendliness.

“Hey, is it all right if I sit here?”

The contrast in the girls’ reactions was the prelude to everything. The blonde girl eyed him with caution, but her wariness faded behind a smile and what he dared to think was a spark of interest. The black-haired girl with full, frowning eyebrows and nighttime eyes showed nothing but distrust. She looked annoyed and offended that a strange boy had interrupted their insular comradery.

“Sure, go ahead,” said the blonde.

The brunette glanced at her friend, distrust turning to distress. The blonde didn’t notice.

Neal hesitated. Maybe he was about to make unintentional waves. But hey, the brunette could’ve just been shy. He’d be nice, make a little small talk, and maybe she’d relax.

Emma introduced herself right off the bat. When her friend refused to make a peep, Neal shared his name, coupled with eye contact. The girl sat stiffly, as if she suspected he had a knife palmed under the table. Yup, the promise of things to come. He got along well with Emma with hardly any missteps, which in his fifteen-year-old mind was a miracle. Maybe Lily’s reticence was a cosmic counterbalance. That didn’t mean her reticence had to evolve to hostility like a resentment-fueled Pokémon.

Whenever he and the girls ran into each other, Emma let him join them while they walked or got snacks at one of the campus cafes before heading to their respective activities. They were in the same game design class, too. More mixed blessings. Neal had asked about their project, or what their other summer plans were. A few times, Lily had rolled her eyes or muttered that they didn’t have time to chat, or that he was interrupting their conversation. Flashes of embarrassment came and went with Emma—either she was only half-aware of her friend’s rudeness or was trying to deny it.

He hadn’t intended to insert himself into their team, if that was Lily’s problem. He was working with John and Michael on an adventure platformer set on a mysterious island, committed mainly to the artistic side of his group project. Emma and Lily were brainstorming a racing game, along the lines of Mario Cart meeting Grand Theft Auto. There wasn’t much he could do to undermine their work. Emma was the one asking more questions about his ideas. Neal happily answered them, too glad to have her attention to care if her racing game somehow lifted ideas from his island fantasy adventure.

Despite no overlap between their games, Lily was the one who started inexplicably walking by Neal’s computer at his team’s work station. Neal caught her observing his work on the graphics while John coded and Michael contributed ideas to mechanics. After the third time Lily sauntered by them, Neal warned the brothers. Michael flailed a little, more worried about losing credits for an unoriginal game than having his ideas stolen. John assured both his younger brother and Neal that no one was getting their hands on the game code.

If only it had been as simple as theft of intellectual property. If only Neal hadn’t misread Lily’s intentions. At the end of the first week, on the day each group had to present the first phase of game development, complete with a rudimentary demo or, at the very least, concept art and level layouts, Neal’s team volunteered to go first. The coding for their first level was fine, untouched. When Neal pulled up the files for his landscapes and character designs, he gaped at the sight of his lush jungle footpaths, waterfalls and caves recolored in neon rainbow hues. Instead of gleaming crocodiles and iridescent, carnivorous birds big enough to eat grown men, buck-toothed and googly-eyed unicorns haunted the environs. All things considered, the giggles and snickers peeling throughout the classroom were mild, hardly the stuff of mortifying nightmares, but Neal turned hot anyway. One giggling spectator was also sitting back with her arms folded, far too proud to be just amused. Emma, right next to Lily, wasn’t laughing or even smiling. She mostly frowned in helpless confusion. Her attention slid to Lily with half-realized suspicion.

Neal wasn’t the only one upset.

“What the hell did you do that for?!” John shrilly whispered once they’d escaped from class.

“It wasn’t me! You know I’d never do that!”

“I encrypted all our files! No one could’ve hacked into them—”

“So sure of yourselves.”

The boys all but jumped at Lily’s unwanted arrival. Neither John nor Michael recognized her, even if they could begin to guess what she’d done. Her smirk and cocked hips spoke volumes.

Seeing Michael and John so baffled by this girl, a stranger to them, someone they’d never done a thing to, incited Neal more than any personal insult would have. Teeth bared, and for once in his life hoping he could be as intimidating as his father to people who pissed him off, he rushed up Lily, stopping only a few inches short of collision. A quick blink in his field of vision reminded him that Emma was coming out the classroom door.

“If you have a problem with me, keep it between us! Those guys didn’t deserve that!”

“You can’t prove anything,” Lily answered, her voice light and coy. “But it looks like whoever did the art was the only one who screwed up. The game levels worked just fine.”

“It doesn’t matter! This is their game, too!”

“And you broke through my encryption!” John stepped up. His glare was surprisingly effective through the glasses. “That’s destruction of private property!”

Lily deigned to give John all of one glimpse. Her primary focus was reserved for Neal. “Again, you can’t prove anything.”

“I don’t need to!” Neal shouted. “I’ll tell the teacher exactly what you did! Want me to post it on Facebook? Twitter? So everyone knows what a—”

“Hey!” Emma shouted.

His heart could’ve dropped out of his chest and flopped on the floor. Neal didn’t doubt, much as he wanted to, that Emma’s reprimand was aimed at him.

She charged like a Valkyrie, ready to defend her friend’s honor regardless the suspicions he’d seen in her face earlier. “Lily didn’t do anything! She’s not that kind of person! And if you start spreading crap about her, I’ll make you sorry!”

For a moment, he did consider yielding. The last thing he wanted was to incur the wrath of a girl he had a crush on. He certainly didn’t want to throw mud at someone who didn’t deserve it. How could Emma be so confident of Lily’s innocence? Maybe he should trust her, wait this out—

Lily’s smirk grew. “I told you he was a punk-ass loser.”

The words fell like snow and stung like frostbite. They burned away Neal’s good sense. He glared at Lily, then shot a pained look at Emma. “I’m sorry, but it’s not worth this. I didn’t do anything to deserve this.”

Another scowl at Lily. “Kiss your credits goodbye.”

Another sad glance at Emma. “I’m sorry. I hope you find better friends.”

He marched to the classroom. By now, a gaggle of curious teens loitered in small clumps, their attention snagged by the shouting. Some kids continued to watch as Neal headed to the room to report his classmate.

Their nosiness was rewarded. Lily went off like a ticking bomb. She’d held still, watching, barely shaking, until Neal came within two feet of the door. Then she launched after him. A tiger would’ve envied her speed and bloodlust.

Lily matched Neal in height but had a lighter frame. Rather than knock him over, she jumped on his back and lock her arms around his head and neck. The new weight unbalanced him so that he lumbered forward. He had enough self-preservation instinct to turn as he reached the door and partly use Lily’s body to absorb the impact. The pain was evident by her grunt. She wasn’t deterred. She twisted herself against the momentum of Neal’s body so he again lost his balance. This time, nothing saved him from hitting the ground. They both cried out and groaned while rolling across the linoleum. Each scrambled to gain the upper hand.

Emma’s, “Oh my God!” drowned in a tsunami of excited shouts from spectators who were now pooling around the wrestling kids.

No matter how many times Neal managed to get on top of Lily and pin one of her arms, she found a vulnerable spot to knee or elbow. Even in the heat of battle, Neal minded where his hands went. That put him at a disadvantage. When he got a hold of both her wrists, Lily writhed and went as far as spitting in his face. She fought dirty, but it occurred to Neal later that she could’ve swung things fully in her favor as soon as the teacher showed up. She could’ve played the victim, as though she were the one being assault. Granted, several people could verify that she started the fight, but that would’ve carried only so much weight. In the instant that it happened, when she knocked her forehead into his spittle-covered mug and flung him on his back so she could pounce, Neal saw their teacher and burned with humiliation. By the time Lily heard the man shouting at them to stop, it was too late to cover the vicious snarl on her face with tears and pleas.

They’d been forced to a sit-down with the camp director in one of the cramped, too brightly lit administrative offices. The teacher had told them they’d be lucky not to get their butts sent home right then and there. The director, Ms. Shepherd, was a stern woman with a small, often pursued mouth. Her stare made even Lily squirm. She declared that the camp, rarely needing to discipline campers for physical assault, was willing to exercise a one-warning policy, since no one was severely hurt. Their parents would be notified of the incident and informed of the punishment awaiting them: bathroom duty in the dorms, Neal for the boys, Lily for the girls. And, in light of their shared class and Lily’s apparent sabotage of Neal’s work, Ms. Shepherd deemed it fitting to pair them off. They would start over with a new game project. Bathroom cleaning earned disgusted winces; at the second punitive measure, they gawked in outrage.

“If you want to win enough credits for a prize at the end of camp, you’d better figure out how to work together.” Shepherd dug her stare into each of them. “Surely a brother and sister can learn to be civil.”

“What?” Lily barked.

“We’re not brother and sister!” Neal was nauseous. How could anyone think he was related to this crazy chick?

The director sat back. She hadn’t been joking. “Huh. Well, forgive me. I thought I saw a resemblance.”

For the first time, even as anger boiled under their skins, Neal and Lily peeked at each other, searching yet skeptical. The look ended with them turning away like repelled magnets.

“Remember,” Shepherd said, “one more toe out of line and you’ll both be sent home.”

The threat sat in their thoughts as they sat together in the classroom the next day, but it motivated neither of them to work on their joint project. Neal doodled in his notebook, which gave the teacher the impression that something was getting accomplished.

“You two better have something by the end of class,” he warned as he walked by, particularly at Lily. Her hands were occupied staying warm under her arms, and her attention was rapt on the clock over the classroom door.

More unproductive minutes rolled by. Neal peered up and noticed everyone else crowded around their computers, invested in their work. A drop of self-loathing somehow changed into motivation— whether to avoid disappointing himself or to spite Lily remained to be seen. Neal resumed drawing, now with purpose. He couldn’t use the idea he’d discussed with his former teammates; they were now assisted by a boy named Rufio on the art. Emma had been reassigned join two sisters, Elsa and Anna, who at least seemed nice. Anna was the chattiest one, but in the brief intervals where she stopped talking, Emma and Elsa exchanged friendly words while working. Emma snuck a glimpse far across the room, met by Neal’s curious gaze. He ducked back into the notebook.

After scribbling some new ideas—monsters that John and Michael didn’t think would fit in their island, badass warrior women, dark wizards trying to open a portal to another dimension—Neal gave up inventing a story and turned his energy to sketches. He started with a model for a heroine dressed in a knight’s tunic and pants. She carried a sword. Not a fully armored knight—more like a wandering rogue who belonged nowhere but helped anyone she could in her travels. He set her up against a dragon that had Lily’s eyes.

“What are you doing?”

Neal snapped his head toward Lily. She’d gotten up and behind him to spy over his shoulder. He slapped the notebook shut.

“What do you care? You want to ruin another drawing of mine for no good reason?”

Lily pressed her lips together, the first hint of guilt. “It was just a prank.” Not nearly as much guilt as he’d hoped.

“No, it wasn’t. If you have a problem with me, just tell me what it is.”

Lily snorted. “As if that would do any good.”

Neal held his notebook in a protective pose, but he turned his swivel chair so he faced her. “We’re stuck together. You might as well. Do you just hate guys?”

“You’d like to think that.” Lily stomped back to her chair. Even as she plopped down, she let the chair spin around enough that they looked at each other. “I know you have designs on Emma.”

Neal would’ve laughed if the meaning of her words didn’t leave a queasy feeling in his stomach. “‘Designs?’ This isn’t Victorian times.”

“You know what I mean.” She crossed her legs, imbuing her attitude with false sophistication.

“If you mean I like Emma, sure. She seems like a cool person.”

Lily scoffed. “Right, that’s all it is. She’s ‘cool.’”

“What is your problem? It’d be one thing if Emma didn’t want me around. If that’s what’s going on, I won’t bother her anymore. But she hasn’t said or done anything to make me think so. You’re the one being a—”

“A bitch?” The word rolled off her tongue with adult ease.

While he’d been tempted to blurt out it earlier, Neal didn’t have the nerve or anger to say the word now. He was tired of being angry. “You’re the one who doesn’t like me. That’s what I’m getting at. What have I done? If I’ve offended you, I didn’t mean to.”

Lily fell back on nonverbal resistance, but her closed-off posture looked more awkward than defiant. Maybe she was getting embarrassed over her own behavior, or at least the reasons behind it. Neal tried to resume sketching (and brainstorming to how to grovel to Director Shepherd for another project partner). However, for all his understandable ire, he’d been bitten by the curiosity bug. He checked in with Lily and saw that she was simply stewing, and not necessarily over him. But several minutes later, she nearly debunked this notion.

“She doesn’t need a boy in her life,” she said, crisp and quiet.

Neal paused, despite being a few strokes away from deeming his dragon drawing complete. “Did she say that?” He didn’t expect an honest answer. That didn’t stop him from seeking one.

Lily shifted her shoulders, as though fighting against the impulse to give him what he wanted, or to tell him what she wanted him to believe. “I know her. She’s had guys let her down. She doesn’t need any more of that.”

“I’m not like that.” Neal kept his voice low, controlled. He would avoid another fight. “It may be hard to believe since we barely know each other. And yeah, I like Emma, but not just in that way. If I can only be her friend, that’s fine.”

She watched him askance. “I’ve never met a guy who didn’t have a problem being friend-zoned.”

“Maybe all the guys you know are jerks.” He shrugged. A little smile bled through.

“I don’t doubt that. That’s why it’s just Emma and me. We don’t need anyone else.”

A niggling question jumped into Neal’s mind, but he let a few moments of reflection pass before posing it. “Only you two? You must have other friends.”

Lily half-shrugged. She didn’t look at him.

More reflection brought an epiphany. Suddenly all the irrational hatred, even the sabotage, made some sense. And with it, Neal’s anger all but melted. All right, a smidgen sat like a dying ember in his chest, but most of him ached with sympathy. “All right,” he said gently. “I get it.”

Lily was as on fire as ever, even in silence. “Get what?”

Neal licked his lips as he picked his words. It was like crossing a minefield. “Emma is your best friend. Maybe the only real friend you feel you can depend on. You don’t want anything, or anyone, getting in the way of that.”

The words had her flinching, but she turned her chair in his sole direction. Neal braced his hands on his chair’s armrests in case he had to dodge an attack.

“Don’t act like you know me, or Emma. You’re just some guy who wants to get into my friend’s pants.”

“That’s not true!” He straight away regretted the lack of restraint when half a dozen heads, including the teacher’s, turned to them. To make the teacher think he and Lily were deliberating over their project, he rolled his chair closer to hers and bowed his head.

“First of all, I’m not trying to seduce your friend. I wouldn’t know how. And if you’re so sure she’s not interested in dating, you don’t have anything to worry about. Second, I’d have been happy to be your friend, too, if you’d let me.”

“Not interested,” Lily sniped.

“Fine. Third, I do understand. I don’t have a lot of friends back home, either. I’m not one of the popular kids, and I don’t care about being popular, or having tons of friends. But it was nice knowing there were some kids my age to hang out with. Emma seems like someone who’ll give you a chance to sit with her and have a conversation without it being super awkward. I’m sorry if I’m wrong, but it doesn’t seem I am.”

The change happened in seconds. Even as she scowled, her chin tightened and her eyes watered. Neal froze in panic. Oh, God, was she going to cry? Was she going to tell the teacher he was bullying her?

“How can you possibly know that?” She sniffed. Her eyes held their water. “You’ve know her for barely a week. You made that assumption just by looking at her. You can’t know her that quickly. It’s just a line.”

“Hey,” Neal whispered. He stopped his hand from reaching for hers. “I’m not trying to upset you. I don’t know how I know that about Emma. I saw her and I . . . I just trusted my gut.”

Hands clutched, Lily stared down. Her long lashes hid the tears, but now and then a flicker of light betrayed dew.

“What’s wrong? Seriously.”

“It’s nothing.” Some tears dripped. She rubbed her eye with her jacket sleeve.

Neal looked at the teacher. He hadn’t noticed Lily starting to cry. If he did, that would create new problems fast. Neal then remembered a gift from his dad on his last birthday, one he thought kind of ridiculous at the time, but hey, he’d take it. He rolled his chair over to his backpack, came back with it, opened the smaller pocket and pulled out a folded square of cloth.

“Here.” He held it out to Lily.

She had to wipe her eyes to see. Her confusion only deepened. “The hell is that?”

“A handkerchief.” Neal didn’t bother hiding his embarrassment. “My dad thinks they should come back in fashion. Personally, I think they’re silly, but I don’t have any tissues.”

As though half-certain it was poisoned, Lily plucked up the kerchief by only two fingers and shook it open. On the white cloth’s corner, the letters N.G. were stitched in gold-colored thread.

“Are . . . are those your initials?”

Neal winced. “Yeah.”

Lily snorted, almost laughing. “Is your dad for real?”

“Not really.”

“Sad thing is, I think my mom might carry one of these around, too.” That seemed reason enough to mop up her eyes with the kerchief. Once she was done, she returned it to Neal. A quiet minute went by. Her attention drifted to the notebook in his lap.

“So, are you going to tell me what you’ve been drawing? Is it for a game?”

Neal picked up the book, more inclined to share, but he waved it at her as he asked, “Can I be sure you’re not going to draw stupid eyes and big teeth on these?”

Lily rolled her eyes. “Not if it’s my game, too.”

With a budding smile, Neal opened the book. “It’s a vague idea. If you have any suggestions—”

“Wow.” She studied the scene of the warrior girl standing against a mighty, beautiful dragon and a horde of monsters scattered all over the page. “You can make that on a computer?”

“If I have enough time. You like it?”

“Yeah. As long as the dragon is truly badass, I’m on board.”

Neal lowered the book and gave her a thoughtful look. “I’m going to take a wild guess that you’ve got some coding experience.”

Half her mouth curled while she bit the other side. “You could say that.”

He nodded. “All right. We better get started.”

[elizabethcariasa]

New Taxpayer Advocate highlights COVID-19 effects on the IRS and taxpayers in her first report

Erin M. Collins took over as National Taxpayer Advocate on March 30, just as the United States was coming to grips with the coronavirus, so it's no surprise that the pandemic and its effects on taxes are part of her first official report to Congress.

"Starting in the midst of a pandemic and witnessing IRS offices closing one by one was not the way I envisioned my role when I accepted the position," wrote Collins in the report's preface.

But, added Collins, there's been a silver lining.

In conference calls with her leadership team, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) employees and the Internal Revenue Service's COVID-19 response team, Collins said, "I have been extraordinarily impressed by their commitment and focus on the health and safety of all employees during this pandemic, while still doing as much as possible to assist taxpayers."

That type of teamwork is critical to face the continuing tax and pandemic challenges the IRS and TAS face and which Collins highlights in her report, officially titled "FY [Fiscal Year] 2021 Objectives Report To Congress."

COVID-19 also is why a large portion of Collins' initial report examines how usual tax concerns, such as slow refunds and taxpayer service, are being additionally, and adversely, impacted by the pandemic and the ways the IRS has dealt with it.

Pandemic challenges to taxpayers: Collins praised the IRS' decision to postpone more than 300 filing, payment and other time-sensitive deadlines.

She also had kind words for the agency's People First Initiative, created to provide temporary relief from some tax compliance actions, as well as the agency's added task this year of distribution of COVID-19 economic relief payments.

But, and you knew this was coming because pointing out improvement areas is what the National Taxpayer Advocate does, Collins cited what she described as "notable adverse taxpayer impacts." They include:

Taxpayers who filed a 2019 paper return and are entitled to refunds may be in for a long wait. Since the suspended processing of paper tax returns due to COVID-19 office closures, it's now facing a backlog of 4.7 million paper returns. Even with recent and upcoming IRS office re-openings, Collins notes that it's unclear when it will be able to fully deal with these filings.

Some taxpayers whose returns were mistakenly flagged by IRS processing filters are experiencing lengthy delays in receiving their refunds. (Slow issuance of refunds is a perennial Taxpayer Advocate issue, most recently cited in January.) All tax returns claiming refunds are passed through filters designed to detect identity theft and other types of refund fraud and some of these filters are producing "false positive" rates of more than 50 percent. That means more than half the taxpayers whose returns are stopped by certain filters are entitled to the refunds they claimed.

  "The effects of COVID-19 will continue to be felt for the foreseeable future…. We will continue to identify areas where taxpayers' needs are not being met and will continue to advocate for alternative approaches to meet those needs." — Erin M. Collins, National Taxpayer Advocate

  Another topic that's always touched on by the Taxpayer Advocate office is the difficulty that taxpayers have in getting help from the IRS. Collins' report is no different. She notes that as part of its pandemic procedures, the IRS shut down its Accounts Management telephone lines, so taxpayers could not reach a live assistor by telephone. It also closed Taxpayer Assistance Centers, making it impossible for taxpayers to obtain in-person assistance. And IRS mail facilities also closed, making it impossible for the agency to log or process taxpayer responses to compliance notices. The only resources readily available were IRS.gov and automated telephone lines. The IRS has begun reopening its operations, but it will take some time before they are restored to full capacity.

Collins also expressed concern about the way the IRS is dealing with delayed notices. The agency prepared more than 20 million such documents that could not be mailed due to office closures. The IRS is mailing these notices now, but with some collection notices bearing old dates and include response deadlines that often have passed. The IRS plan to include inserts noting new compliance dates will be confusing and concerning to many taxpayers who may not read the inserts, said Collins.

CARES remedy created new challenges: During the country's dealing with the coronavirus, we've repeatedly heard that we can't let the cure be worse than the disease. That was directed at business closures' effects on the economy, but it also can apply to legislative efforts to provide relief to individuals.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which was enacted on March 27 and, among other things, created the economic impact payments, is a case in point in Collins' report.

The Taxpayer Advocate says that while the IRS generally did a commendable job implementing the CARES Act, taxpayer challenges remain. They include:

Individuals who did not receive some or all of their economic impact payments (EIPs), also referred to as stimulus amounts, may have to wait until next year to receive them. To date, the IRS has taken the position that most taxpayers who did not receive their full payments must wait until they file their 2020 income tax returns to claim the amounts as credits against their 2020 tax liabilities. Collins says, however, there is no legal constraint on the IRS' ability to issue additional EIP amounts as advance refunds during 2020. She says her office will continue to urge the IRS to provide full EIPs to eligible taxpayers this year as rapidly as possible.

Employers are struggling to determine whether they qualify for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) and in what amounts. The ERC is a complex, refundable tax credit and the IRS has provided considerable guidance regarding when and how to claim the ERC. However, several areas require further clarification. If clarity is not provided, taxpayers will be more likely to make unintentional errors, increasing the risk of an audit. TAS will continue to advocate that the IRS further clarify these rules.

Businesses are facing challenges when seeking to utilize the CARES Act provision that authorizes the use of net operating losses to offset taxable income in prior years, and in some cases to receive refunds. For businesses to determine the optimal application of the CARES Act provisions so they can exercise their right to pay no more than the correct amount of tax, they may need to create and run complex financial models involving multiple tax years. The report says the IRS has provided timely guidance in the form of frequently asked questions (FAQs), but it expresses concern that FAQs are not authoritative or binding on the IRS.

More to come: I know, this is a long post. But Collins has been thorough in her first report as National Taxpayer Advocate.

Her initial message to Congress also deals with how the IRS is handling jobs assigned in connection with the Taxpayer First Act (TFA). That law, enacted last summer, was the most far-reaching revision of our tax system 1998's IRS Restructuring and Reform Act. It also includes 23 provisions recommended by the National Taxpayer Advocate, some of which have, again due to the pandemic, have been detoured.

Since it's a Monday (and I have some personal tasks to take care of today), I'll look at Collin's thoughts on the TFA, as well as her take on what she sees as insufficient responses by the IRS to her predecessor's prior recommendations, in future posts.

If you want a preview of those upcoming posts, as well as more on the COVID-19 tax matters cited in this one, feel free to peruse Collin's full report. It's an invigorating way to kick off a week!

You also might find these items of interest:

Taxpayer Advocate not taking coronavirus payment cases

New Taxpayer Advocate tax map guides filers through system's twists and turns

IRS taxpayer service 'woefully inadequate,' says Taxpayer Advocate Olson in final report to Congress

  Coronavirus Caveat & More Information In 2020, we're all dealing with extraordinary circumstances, both in our daily lives and when it comes to our taxes. The COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to reduce its transmission and protect ourselves and our families means that, for the most part, we're focusing on just getting through these trying days. But life as we knew it before the coronavirus will return, along with our mundane tax matters. Here's hoping that happens soon! In the meantime, you can find more on the virus and its effects on our taxes by clicking Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Taxes.

  Advertisements

  // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ // <![CDATA[ (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]> // ]]>  

[bobbynolanios88]

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and…

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ��asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and can’t add value to anything to generate wealth, it has one thing going for it. That ‘one thing’ is that the number of Bitcoins in existence is limited to 21m. So, the counter-argument to my bearishness is that demand for the virtual currency could rocket if people decide to adopt it as a mainstream currency, which could push the price up because of limited supply.

Rupert’s tantalising headline suggested $100,000 as a possibility, although he balanced that by saying that “If everyone suddenly stops using it, then the price will likely fall to zero.”

However, I think the case for Bitcoin at £100,000 is tenuous. I remember the long search for the creator of Bitcoin. In the end, some bloke (or several people) called Satoshi Nakamoto reckons he (or they) started it off. But how can we be sure? I reckon there’s a big flaw in the case for mainstream adoption of Bitcoin because if Satoshi Nakamoto declared the creation of 21m Bitcoins, what’s to stop some other person declaring the creation of 21m of something else to compete?

That’s already happening, of course. Witness the proliferation of Altcoins (or Alternatives to Bitcoin), such as Ethereum, Ripple, Monero and Bytecoin. Then there are all those so-called ‘forks’ where a single blockchain diverges into two paths. Bitcoin forks include Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, and Ethereum forks include Ethereum Classic and Ethereum Fog, for example. Then we’ve got intentional forks, unintentional forks, hard forks, soft forks, and other nonsense that could work against an investment in Bitcoin.

A basketful of risks

Meanwhile, if you trade in cryptocurrencies, it pays to hold your nose. They’ve been popular in the criminal underworld and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has warned that virtual currencies are risky because the exchanges lack regulation or safeguards. That means they’re vulnerable to theft, hacking, fraud and market manipulation because of potential self-dealing by exchanges. Meanwhile, the Bank of International Settlements has cautioned that Bitcoin lacks any stability of price, requires high energy consumption, has high and variable transaction costs, and is vulnerable to debasement from forking.

It all paints a bleak picture for the outlook for Bitcoin. But The Economist threw a few crumbs of comfort to Bitcoin-believers in 2015 when it claimed some of the criticisms were unfair. The publication argued that the underlying blockchain technology is useful and Bitcoin’s volatility could settle down. But I must say there’s been scant evidence of those views over the ensuing three years! On balance, I’m sticking to my bearish stance on Bitcoin and will continue to seek my fortune in shares instead.

Want To Boost Your Savings?

Do you want to retire early and give up the rat race to enjoy the rest of your life? Of course you do, and to help you accomplish this goal, the Motley Fool has put together this free report titled “The Foolish Guide To Financial Independence”, which is packed full of wealth-creating tips as well as ideas for your money.

The report is entirely free and available for download today, so if you’re interested in exiting the rat race and achieving financial independence, click here to download the report. What have you got to lose?

Kevin Godbold has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Original Source http://bit.ly/2SSb5mU

[courtneyvbrooks87]

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and…

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and can’t add value to anything to generate wealth, it has one thing going for it. That ‘one thing’ is that the number of Bitcoins in existence is limited to 21m. So, the counter-argument to my bearishness is that demand for the virtual currency could rocket if people decide to adopt it as a mainstream currency, which could push the price up because of limited supply.

Rupert’s tantalising headline suggested $100,000 as a possibility, although he balanced that by saying that “If everyone suddenly stops using it, then the price will likely fall to zero.”

However, I think the case for Bitcoin at £100,000 is tenuous. I remember the long search for the creator of Bitcoin. In the end, some bloke (or several people) called Satoshi Nakamoto reckons he (or they) started it off. But how can we be sure? I reckon there’s a big flaw in the case for mainstream adoption of Bitcoin because if Satoshi Nakamoto declared the creation of 21m Bitcoins, what’s to stop some other person declaring the creation of 21m of something else to compete?

That’s already happening, of course. Witness the proliferation of Altcoins (or Alternatives to Bitcoin), such as Ethereum, Ripple, Monero and Bytecoin. Then there are all those so-called ‘forks’ where a single blockchain diverges into two paths. Bitcoin forks include Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, and Ethereum forks include Ethereum Classic and Ethereum Fog, for example. Then we’ve got intentional forks, unintentional forks, hard forks, soft forks, and other nonsense that could work against an investment in Bitcoin.

A basketful of risks

Meanwhile, if you trade in cryptocurrencies, it pays to hold your nose. They’ve been popular in the criminal underworld and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has warned that virtual currencies are risky because the exchanges lack regulation or safeguards. That means they’re vulnerable to theft, hacking, fraud and market manipulation because of potential self-dealing by exchanges. Meanwhile, the Bank of International Settlements has cautioned that Bitcoin lacks any stability of price, requires high energy consumption, has high and variable transaction costs, and is vulnerable to debasement from forking.

It all paints a bleak picture for the outlook for Bitcoin. But The Economist threw a few crumbs of comfort to Bitcoin-believers in 2015 when it claimed some of the criticisms were unfair. The publication argued that the underlying blockchain technology is useful and Bitcoin’s volatility could settle down. But I must say there’s been scant evidence of those views over the ensuing three years! On balance, I’m sticking to my bearish stance on Bitcoin and will continue to seek my fortune in shares instead.

Want To Boost Your Savings?

Do you want to retire early and give up the rat race to enjoy the rest of your life? Of course you do, and to help you accomplish this goal, the Motley Fool has put together this free report titled “The Foolish Guide To Financial Independence”, which is packed full of wealth-creating tips as well as ideas for your money.

The report is entirely free and available for download today, so if you’re interested in exiting the rat race and achieving financial independence, click here to download the report. What have you got to lose?

Kevin Godbold has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Original Source http://bit.ly/2SSb5mU

[vanessawestwcrtr5]

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and…

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and can’t add value to anything to generate wealth, it has one thing going for it. That ‘one thing’ is that the number of Bitcoins in existence is limited to 21m. So, the counter-argument to my bearishness is that demand for the virtual currency could rocket if people decide to adopt it as a mainstream currency, which could push the price up because of limited supply.

Rupert’s tantalising headline suggested $100,000 as a possibility, although he balanced that by saying that “If everyone suddenly stops using it, then the price will likely fall to zero.”

However, I think the case for Bitcoin at £100,000 is tenuous. I remember the long search for the creator of Bitcoin. In the end, some bloke (or several people) called Satoshi Nakamoto reckons he (or they) started it off. But how can we be sure? I reckon there’s a big flaw in the case for mainstream adoption of Bitcoin because if Satoshi Nakamoto declared the creation of 21m Bitcoins, what’s to stop some other person declaring the creation of 21m of something else to compete?

That’s already happening, of course. Witness the proliferation of Altcoins (or Alternatives to Bitcoin), such as Ethereum, Ripple, Monero and Bytecoin. Then there are all those so-called ‘forks’ where a single blockchain diverges into two paths. Bitcoin forks include Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, and Ethereum forks include Ethereum Classic and Ethereum Fog, for example. Then we’ve got intentional forks, unintentional forks, hard forks, soft forks, and other nonsense that could work against an investment in Bitcoin.

A basketful of risks

Meanwhile, if you trade in cryptocurrencies, it pays to hold your nose. They’ve been popular in the criminal underworld and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has warned that virtual currencies are risky because the exchanges lack regulation or safeguards. That means they’re vulnerable to theft, hacking, fraud and market manipulation because of potential self-dealing by exchanges. Meanwhile, the Bank of International Settlements has cautioned that Bitcoin lacks any stability of price, requires high energy consumption, has high and variable transaction costs, and is vulnerable to debasement from forking.

It all paints a bleak picture for the outlook for Bitcoin. But The Economist threw a few crumbs of comfort to Bitcoin-believers in 2015 when it claimed some of the criticisms were unfair. The publication argued that the underlying blockchain technology is useful and Bitcoin’s volatility could settle down. But I must say there’s been scant evidence of those views over the ensuing three years! On balance, I’m sticking to my bearish stance on Bitcoin and will continue to seek my fortune in shares instead.

Want To Boost Your Savings?

Do you want to retire early and give up the rat race to enjoy the rest of your life? Of course you do, and to help you accomplish this goal, the Motley Fool has put together this free report titled “The Foolish Guide To Financial Independence”, which is packed full of wealth-creating tips as well as ideas for your money.

The report is entirely free and available for download today, so if you’re interested in exiting the rat race and achieving financial independence, click here to download the report. What have you got to lose?

Kevin Godbold has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Original Source http://bit.ly/2SSb5mU

[teiraymondmccoy78]

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and…

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and can’t add value to anything to generate wealth, it has one thing going for it. That ‘one thing’ is that the number of Bitcoins in existence is limited to 21m. So, the counter-argument to my bearishness is that demand for the virtual currency could rocket if people decide to adopt it as a mainstream currency, which could push the price up because of limited supply.

Rupert’s tantalising headline suggested $100,000 as a possibility, although he balanced that by saying that “If everyone suddenly stops using it, then the price will likely fall to zero.”

However, I think the case for Bitcoin at £100,000 is tenuous. I remember the long search for the creator of Bitcoin. In the end, some bloke (or several people) called Satoshi Nakamoto reckons he (or they) started it off. But how can we be sure? I reckon there’s a big flaw in the case for mainstream adoption of Bitcoin because if Satoshi Nakamoto declared the creation of 21m Bitcoins, what’s to stop some other person declaring the creation of 21m of something else to compete?

That’s already happening, of course. Witness the proliferation of Altcoins (or Alternatives to Bitcoin), such as Ethereum, Ripple, Monero and Bytecoin. Then there are all those so-called ‘forks’ where a single blockchain diverges into two paths. Bitcoin forks include Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, and Ethereum forks include Ethereum Classic and Ethereum Fog, for example. Then we’ve got intentional forks, unintentional forks, hard forks, soft forks, and other nonsense that could work against an investment in Bitcoin.

A basketful of risks

Meanwhile, if you trade in cryptocurrencies, it pays to hold your nose. They’ve been popular in the criminal underworld and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has warned that virtual currencies are risky because the exchanges lack regulation or safeguards. That means they’re vulnerable to theft, hacking, fraud and market manipulation because of potential self-dealing by exchanges. Meanwhile, the Bank of International Settlements has cautioned that Bitcoin lacks any stability of price, requires high energy consumption, has high and variable transaction costs, and is vulnerable to debasement from forking.

It all paints a bleak picture for the outlook for Bitcoin. But The Economist threw a few crumbs of comfort to Bitcoin-believers in 2015 when it claimed some of the criticisms were unfair. The publication argued that the underlying blockchain technology is useful and Bitcoin’s volatility could settle down. But I must say there’s been scant evidence of those views over the ensuing three years! On balance, I’m sticking to my bearish stance on Bitcoin and will continue to seek my fortune in shares instead.

Want To Boost Your Savings?

Do you want to retire early and give up the rat race to enjoy the rest of your life? Of course you do, and to help you accomplish this goal, the Motley Fool has put together this free report titled “The Foolish Guide To Financial Independence”, which is packed full of wealth-creating tips as well as ideas for your money.

The report is entirely free and available for download today, so if you’re interested in exiting the rat race and achieving financial independence, click here to download the report. What have you got to lose?

Kevin Godbold has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Original Source http://bit.ly/2SSb5mU

[adrianjenkins952wblr]

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

Was I wrong about Bitcoin all along?

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and…

I’ve been bearish on Bitcoin since it surged to almost $20,000 a little over a year ago. I think the cryptocurrency suffered from speculation that created an unsustainable bubble, a bubble that could still be deflating and could retreat by more than 90% from where it is now.

But am I wrong about Bitcoin? In December, my Foolish colleague Rupert Hargreaves punched out an interesting article that made me think about the whole cryptocurrency ‘asset’ class.

A tenuous case for the upside?

Although unlike a trading company, Bitcoin pays investors no dividend, generates no cash inflows, owns no tangible assets, and can’t add value to anything to generate wealth, it has one thing going for it. That ‘one thing’ is that the number of Bitcoins in existence is limited to 21m. So, the counter-argument to my bearishness is that demand for the virtual currency could rocket if people decide to adopt it as a mainstream currency, which could push the price up because of limited supply.

Rupert’s tantalising headline suggested $100,000 as a possibility, although he balanced that by saying that “If everyone suddenly stops using it, then the price will likely fall to zero.”

However, I think the case for Bitcoin at £100,000 is tenuous. I remember the long search for the creator of Bitcoin. In the end, some bloke (or several people) called Satoshi Nakamoto reckons he (or they) started it off. But how can we be sure? I reckon there’s a big flaw in the case for mainstream adoption of Bitcoin because if Satoshi Nakamoto declared the creation of 21m Bitcoins, what’s to stop some other person declaring the creation of 21m of something else to compete?

That’s already happening, of course. Witness the proliferation of Altcoins (or Alternatives to Bitcoin), such as Ethereum, Ripple, Monero and Bytecoin. Then there are all those so-called ‘forks’ where a single blockchain diverges into two paths. Bitcoin forks include Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, and Ethereum forks include Ethereum Classic and Ethereum Fog, for example. Then we’ve got intentional forks, unintentional forks, hard forks, soft forks, and other nonsense that could work against an investment in Bitcoin.

A basketful of risks

Meanwhile, if you trade in cryptocurrencies, it pays to hold your nose. They’ve been popular in the criminal underworld and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has warned that virtual currencies are risky because the exchanges lack regulation or safeguards. That means they’re vulnerable to theft, hacking, fraud and market manipulation because of potential self-dealing by exchanges. Meanwhile, the Bank of International Settlements has cautioned that Bitcoin lacks any stability of price, requires high energy consumption, has high and variable transaction costs, and is vulnerable to debasement from forking.

It all paints a bleak picture for the outlook for Bitcoin. But The Economist threw a few crumbs of comfort to Bitcoin-believers in 2015 when it claimed some of the criticisms were unfair. The publication argued that the underlying blockchain technology is useful and Bitcoin’s volatility could settle down. But I must say there’s been scant evidence of those views over the ensuing three years! On balance, I’m sticking to my bearish stance on Bitcoin and will continue to seek my fortune in shares instead.

Want To Boost Your Savings?

Do you want to retire early and give up the rat race to enjoy the rest of your life? Of course you do, and to help you accomplish this goal, the Motley Fool has put together this free report titled “The Foolish Guide To Financial Independence”, which is packed full of wealth-creating tips as well as ideas for your money.

The report is entirely free and available for download today, so if you’re interested in exiting the rat race and achieving financial independence, click here to download the report. What have you got to lose?

Kevin Godbold has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Original Source http://bit.ly/2SSb5mU