Tumgik
#the whitechapel murders
k-i-l-l-e-r-b-e-e-6-9 · 5 months
Text
𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔭𝔢𝔩 - 𝔄𝔩𝔬𝔫𝔢 ℑ𝔫 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔯𝔤𝔲𝔢
18 notes · View notes
s-e-c-t-i-o-n-8 · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
15 notes · View notes
andrewmannequin · 8 months
Text
Suicide Silence - Green Monster
20 notes · View notes
thisaintascenereviews · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
I Was Wrong About Deathcore
Deathcore as a genre has gone through quite a transformation over the last 20 years, especially in its early years. Bands like Bring Me The Horizon, Veil Of Maya, All Shall Perish, Suicide Silence, Whitechapel, and Job For A Cowboy brought forth a style of metalcore that took death metal elements into the fold, creating a heavier and more menacing sound. Unfortunately, the metal community hated it, and deathcore was mocked incessantly by the metal community. I remember countless metal publications crapping all over the genre, like it was nothing, and many elitists would say it’s not “real metal,” which you also heard with metalcore, but look at how big both genres are now. In retrospect, those people that doubted the genre and mocked it, their comments haven’t aged well, because both of these genres are insanely huge. Deathcore, in particular, is doing well for itself, but it wasn’t always like that. You can say the same for metalcore as well, and I’ve got a piece in the works about that, but for now, let’s talk about deathcore, and where it’s been for the past decade and where it may potentially go in the future.
I’ve expressed before that I’m just not into the genre anymore, but I’ve recently spent some time with a handful of albums, both from bands I know and bands I don’t, and I’ve come to the realization that I was wrong about the quality of the genre over the last few years. That’s not to say I’m a diehard fan now, but I wanted to write this piece to explain how I went from loving the genre as a teenager to not being much of a fan in my late 20s, only to enjoy it more now at 30. It seems like things like this go full circle, because I was the same way with metalcore as well, and only up until about five or six years ago, I didn’t really listen to a lot for the longest time. I loved deathcore in high school, partially because it was the “heaviest” music I had ever heard, at least at the time. I had already been a fan of metalcore, but deathcore was even heavier. The genre reached its peak in the early 2010s with the second coming of the genre, and that included Carnifex, Whitechapel, Thy Art Is Murder, and a lot of other bands. Those bands were already around, but they only ended up getting bigger. After a certain point, however, I saw the genre start to turn to how heavy and “brutal” a band could get, instead of writing good songs.
One of my biggest issues with heavier music that I run into a lot, depending on the genre, is that bands never know how to write a cohesive song, and instead, they want to be as heavy and brutal as possible, as well as cram as many riffs and breakdowns as possible. Bonus points if the vocalist sounds like a garbage disposal as well. I see this in progressive metal a lot, too, where the bands play as intricately and technical as possible, but they can’t make a catchy or accessible song worth a damn. There was a point where I thought musicianship was more important, but I don’t think so these days. These days, I’m more into listening to catchy and accessible stuff that has something to go back to, versus something that sounds impressive. Sure, you can play your instruments well, but why should I care if I don’t have anything to go back to? Deathcore has been going in that direction recently, being that bands are starting to be more accessible and memorable, versus trying to be as heavy and brutal as possible.
Lorna Shore’s latest record, Pain Remains, is a good example of that, but at the same time, that album is a good example of being over the top and overblown. Pain Remains is at an 11 constantly with its brand of symphonic and blackened deathcore, and while the album does try to get heavy and brutal, there is a lot of variety in both the musicianship and vocals. I reviewed that album a couple of years ago, and my biggest issue with it was how intense and over the top it was, but I don’t think it bothers me as much now, because I just needed to sink my teeth more into it. I didn’t spend enough time with it, and I see the album’s importance now, but I will admit that it’s a very overwhelming album at times, because it throws a lot at you. It throws a lot of different things, though, and that’s a good thing. Relistening to that album recently made me dive back into the genre for a bit, including the new Carnifex album from last year, Necromanteum. I liked that album a lot when it came out, despite it being pretty similar to what they’ve been doing, but Carnifex is a good example of a deathcore band that has more going for them than just being brutal and heavy. They utilize symphonics as well, and black metal riffery, so there’s more or less a good amount of variety on the album.
I’ve listened to a handful of other things, including the new Drown In Sulphur album, Dark Secrets Of The Soul, and I will say that blackened deathcore has become the new trend of the genre, aside from being brutal and heavy, but it all depends on the band’s ability to execute it. Like with all trends, it’ll fade, and the next new thing will come, but it looks like bands trying to be as brutal as possible is the thing of the past and the blackened deathcore sound is what’s big, so I’m looking at the genre with some optimism again, and I’m enjoying some of what I’m hearing. Another great album I’ve been into is the debut Ov Sulfur album, The Burden Ov Faith, in which the band tackles symphonic and blackened deathcore, along with some metalcore and hard rock influence by including clean vocals on the majority of the record.
It’s not that I don’t like bands being really heavy and brutal, it’s that I don’t care for it when that itself is the gimmick. There’s nothing with merely doing that, and sounding like that, but I want there to be more at this point in time. Maybe 20 years ago, it was new and fresh, but now it’s boring and played out, so I’m happy to see a band like Lorna Shore really do something with that. Other bands are following suit, and who knows where the genre will go in the next few years, especially when this trend dies down, but if this is where the the genre is now, I could get into this. Deathcore may not reach the same heights it did ten years ago, but times change, and it’s great to see some newer bands carrying the torch for any certain style of music.
7 notes · View notes
conradscrime · 1 year
Text
The Canonical Five: Mary Jane Kelly
Tumblr media
April 02, 2023
Mary Jane Kelly is who is known as Jack the Ripper’s 5th and final canonical five victim, however, there is much less information known about her upbringing compared to the other four women. 
It is believed by many that the information we do know about Mary Kelly is embellished, with her having fabricated details that are known about her early life. 
The man Mary Kelly had most recently been living with before her murder was named Joseph Barnett, and he later claimed Mary had told him she was born in Limerick, Ireland around 1863 and her family had moved to Wales when she was a child. 
Supposedly Mary Kelly had told an acquaintance that she had been disowned by her parents, but she was close with her sister. It was said from Joseph and Mary’s landlady that she had come from a somewhat wealthy, good family. Joseph also claimed Mary confirmed she had seven brothers and at least one sister. 
Mary’s landlord, a man named John McCarthy claimed she had received mail from Ireland, but not regularly. It was also believed that Mary was illiterate, as Joseph claimed she would ask him to read her the newspaper reports of the Jack the Ripper killings. 
Though it’s been reported Mary had blonde or red hair, she went by the nickname of “Black Mary” suggesting she actually had quite dark hair. She also had blue eyes and some claimed to have known her as “Fair Emma.” It is estimated that Mary stood at about 5′7″ tall, and some said she was quite attractive. 
On November 10, 1888, the day after her murder,
the Daily Telegraph
described Mary as “tall, slim, fair of fresh complexion, and of attractive appearance.” 
In 1879, at around the age of 16, Mary married a coal miner named Davis or Davies who ended up getting killed 2-3 years later in a mining explosion. After this, Mary lived with a cousin in Cardiff, and this is where it is believed she started being involved in sex work. 
In 1884, Mary left Cardiff and moved to London, where she worked as a domestic servant while lodging in Crispin Street, Spitalfields. In 1885, it’s believed she moved to the district of Fitzrovia. 
Mary eventually began working in a high class brothel in the West End of London, becoming one of the most popular girls. She did quite well for herself and bought expensive clothes and hired a carriage at this time. Supposedly Mary had met a client named Francis Craig who took her to France, but she returned to London two weeks later, not having liked the France life. 
It is believed that in 1885 Mary Kelly began drinking heavily. She moved around quite a bit lodging with different women and different men around this time. 
It was on April 8, 1887, that Mary Kelly met Joseph Barnett, with the pair agreeing to live with each other after only knowing one another for a day. They lived in George Street, and soon a place called Little Paternoster Row, but were evicted for not paying rent and of drunk and disorderly conduct. 
In early 1888, the two moved into 13 Miller’s Court, a single room a the back of 26 Dorset Street, Spitalfields. Mary had lost her key to the door, so she would bolt and unbolt the door from outside, putting her hand through a broken window by the door. A neighbour claimed Mary had broken the window when she was drunk, and a man’s coat often was used to act as a curtain. 
It was said by Mary’s friend Lizzie Albrook, that Mary was sick of how she was living in 1888 and wanted to go back to Ireland. Her landlord said that she was a quiet woman when she was sober but very noisy when drunk. When Mary was drunk she often could be abusive to people, and was nicknamed “Dark Mary.” 
Joseph lost his job as a fish porter in July 1888 due to committing theft, and because of this, Mary turned back to sex work. Mary would often let other sex workers sleep in their room at night when it was really cold because she did not have it in her to refuse them shelter. 
It is believed that on October 30, 1888, Joseph moved out as him and Mary got into a fight about a sex worker named Julia sharing their room with them. Between November 1 and November 8, Joseph visited Mary almost everyday, sometimes giving her money. 
The last time Joseph visited Mary was between 7-8 pm on November 8, 1888. Joseph claimed Mary was with her friend, Maria Harvey and that he did not stay long. He also apologized to Mary for not having any money to give. It is reported that both Joseph and Maria left Miller’s Court at the same time. 
Joseph went back to his lodging house and played cards, falling asleep around 12:30 am. Before Joseph left Mary that night, her friend Lizzie Albrook also visited. Lizzie claimed Mary was sober. 
In the evening, Mary reportedly had one drink in the Ten Bells public house with a woman named Elizabeth Foster. Later on, Mary was seen drinking with two other people at the Horn of Plenty pub on Dorset Street. 
A sex worker named Mary Ann Cox, who also was a resident of Miller’s Court claimed to have seen Mary going home drunk with a stout, ginger haired man, around the age of 36 at 11:45 pm. The man was wearing a black bowler felt hat, had a thick moustache, had blotches on his face and was holding a can of beer.
Mary Ann actually had spoken to Mary Kelly, they both said goodnight. Mary Kelly then entered the room with the man. Mary Ann heard her singing the song, “A Violet from Mother’s Grave.” She was still singing when Mary Ann left her place at midnight, and when she returned an hour later around 1 am. 
Elizabeth Prater lived in the room directly above Mary Kelly. She reportedly went to bed at 1:30 am, and the singing had stopped. 
A man named George Hutchinson who knew Mary, claimed he had met up with her around 2 am on November 9, 1888 on Flower and Dean Street. Mary had asked George for a loan of sixpence, though he claimed to be broke. George said Mary Kelly walked toward the direction Thrawl Street when she was approached by a man of “Jewish appearance.” 
The man was looked to be about 34-35 years old and George said he was suspicious of him because while it did seem like Mary knew him, his appearance made him look suspicious in that particular part of town. It was also said that this man made an obvious effort to disguise his looks from George, having his hat covering over his eyes as he passed. 
George provided police with a very detailed description of said man, and told them he had overheard Mary talking with the man, complaining she had lost her handkerchief, and the mysterious man gave her a red one that he had. George heard Mary say to the man, “Alright my dear, come along. You will be comfortable.” And then the two walked into 13 Miller’s Court with George following them, though George never saw either one of them again. 
A laundress named Sarah Lewis also claimed she had been walking in the area to meet up with friends around 2:30 am, when she noticed two or three people standing near the Britannia pub, among the people was a nicely dressed young man with a dark moustache and he was talking to a woman. 
Both the man and woman appeared to be drunk and there was a poorly dressed woman standing near them. Opposite from Miller’s Court, Sarah said she saw a stout looking shorter man standing at the entrance to the courtyard. Sarah also saw an obviously drunk woman with a man further up the courtyard. 
Mary Ann returned to her room around 3 am that morning and claimed she did not hear or see any light coming from Mary Kelly’s room at the time. She did think she heard someone leaving at around 5:45 am. 
Elizabeth Prater who lived in the room above Mary Kelly and Sarah Lewis who was sleeping at 2 Miller’s Court that night both reported hearing a faint cry that said “Murder!” between 3:30 and 4 am, but didn’t do anything about it because this was common to hear cries in the area. Sarah Lewis said it was only one scream so she did not think much of it. She also claimed she did not sleep that night and heard people coming and going out of the court throughout the night. 
Elizabeth Prater said she left her room at 5:30 am to walk to the pub for a drink, but saw nothing out of the ordinary. 
On the morning of November 9, 1888, Mary’s landlord sent his assistant to collect the rent. Mary herself was 6 weeks behind, owing 29 shillings. Shortly after 10:45 am, the assistant knocked on her door but got no response. He tried to then turn the handle, but the door was locked. He looked through the keyhole but did not see anyone in the room. 
Using the broken window, he peered inside the room and found Mary Kelly, completely mutilated lying on the bed. She was estimated to have died 3-9 hours before she was discovered. 
The assistant ran to tell the landlord, and then went to inform the police. The assistant immediately told the police it was the work of Jack the Ripper. A surgeon came to look at the body, and police gave orders to prevent anyone from entering or exiting the yard (I know, impressive for 1888 police work.) 
Bloodhounds were sent in, but it appeared to be impractical. It appeared that women’s clothing had been burning, and authorities believed Mary Kelly’s clothes were burnt by the murderer to provide light so they could see what they were doing. 
Joseph Barnett identified Mary Kelly’s body, he could only identify her by the ear and her eyes due to the severe mutilation. 
The mutilation done to Mary Kelly was the most extensive of all of the Whitechapel murders, with many believing it’s due to the fact that the Ripper had more time to commit this one in a private setting. 
During the autopsy it was noted that it most likely took 2 hours to perform all of the mutilations on Mary’s body, the death was further estimated to have occurred between 2 to 8 am. 
Her body was found lying naked in the bed, her head turned on the left cheek. Her legs were left wide apart, the whole surface of the abdomen and thighs were removed and her abdominal cavity was emptied (but later said there was food found in it). Her breasts were cut off, her face was hacked beyond recognition, gashes occurring in all directions. Her ears were partly removed. 
Her neck was cut through the skin and her other tissues were cut down to the vertebrae. Her air passage was cut at the lower part of the larynx. Her heart was taken. There was also blood splatters on the wall, lining up with her cut throat.
She had a superficial cut on her thumb, which some believe was caused while she tried to defend herself from her attacker. 
It was believed during the autopsy that Mary Kelly had been killed from a slash to her throat, and the mutilations were performed after she had died. It was not believed that the murderer had any medical knowledge. 
The inquest into Mary’s death began on November 12, 1888. After testimony, the jury had a short deliberation and the verdict was that Mary Kelly had been murdered by a person or persons unknown. 
Police did house to house questioning trying to get answers as to who murdered Mary Kelly. A few people claimed to have seen Mary on the morning of November 9, after she had supposedly been murdered, though police could not find anyone to corroborate those sightings, as well as the descriptions of Mary didn’t match. 
On November 10, 1888, Mary’s murder was linked to four other murders: Mary Ann Nicholas, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, and Catherine Eddowes. There was also an offender profile made, which stated the killer was an eccentric person, who was in an extreme state of satyriasis while performing the mutilations on Mary and the four previous victims. 
There were no other similar murders after Mary Kelly’s and a lot of people believe she was the final victim of Jack the Ripper. Most believe these Whitechapel murders ended due to the killer dying or going to prison. 
Over 100 years after the Whitechapel murders, two authors named Paul Harrison and Bruce Paley theorized that Joseph Barnett, Mary’s partner, had actually murdered her during a jealous rage. They took the theory farther, stating that perhaps Joseph also murdered the other 4 canonical five, trying to scare Mary from engaging in sex work. 
Others believe Joseph did kill Mary, but only Mary and had tried to make it look like a Jack the Ripper killing to avoid being captured. The fact that Mary was found lying naked on her bed, with her clothes folded on a chair leads many to believe that her killer was someone she knew or who she thought was a client. 
Some people do not believe Mary Kelly was a victim of Jack the Ripper at all. Mary was assumed to be around 25 years old, much younger than the other victims who had all been in their 40′s. Also, her mutilations were more extensive than the other four, she was killed in a private location and her murder occurred 5 weeks from the previous killings which had all occurred within a month. 
In 1939, author William Stewart theorized that Mary might have been killed by a midwife, “Jill the Ripper” in which Mary was going to have an abortion. Stewart believed perhaps the midwife had burned her own clothes, putting on Mary’s and that’s why people the next morning believed they saw Mary after she had been killed. 
Mary Kelly was buried on November 19, 1888 in St Patrick’s Roman Catholic Cemetery in Leytonstone. None of her family members could be found to attend her funeral. The inscription on her grave reads, “In loving memory of Marie Jeanette Kelly. None but the lonely hearts can know my sadness. Love lives forever.” 
19 notes · View notes
blamed-for-nothing · 17 days
Text
3 notes · View notes
axmetal · 7 months
Text
4 notes · View notes
toxicmetalzine · 3 months
Text
Enemies Everywhere
Tumblr media
Listen to the new single "God Of Pain" from Enemies Everywhere! Stream the track here: https://toxicmetalzine.com/post/listen-to-the-new-single-god-of-pain-from-enemies-everywhere…
2 notes · View notes
afieldinengland · 6 months
Text
once upon a time you could separate british children by those who were unsettlingly interested in jack the ripper and those who weren’t
4 notes · View notes
foxlecter · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Here’s some closeups of my main patch pants. I always have such a difficult time taking good pictures of the front 😅
10 notes · View notes
Audio
Whitechapel  -  Fairy Fay
28 notes · View notes
s-e-c-t-i-o-n-8 · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
10 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
"MY KNIFE'S SO NICE AND SHARP, I WANT TO GET TO WORK RIGHT AWAY..."
PIC(S) INFO: Part 2 of 2 -- Spotlight on Jack the Ripper 6 inch action figure by McFarlane Toys, part of McFarlane's Monsters Series 3 "Six Faces of Madness," released in June 2004. 📸: Dave Evans & RK*Pictures.
"Grand work the last job was. I gave the lady no time to squeal. How can they catch me now."
-- JACK THE RIPPER, excerpt from the "Dear Boss" letter, dated 25 September 1888
Source: www.flickr.com/photos/54293526@N00/3117874746 (Flickr 3x).
2 notes · View notes
lifewithaview · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Rupert Penry-Jones in Whitechapel (2009) S3E1
When a vast police archive is discovered at the station, Chandler persuades a reluctant Miles that Buchan be taken on as a police researcher. That night Ben Salter and three employees are murdered in Ben's tailor shop with no suggestion of forced entry. Fear spreads through the area as folk suppose the killer to be supernatural, though Buchan sees a connection to the Ratcliffe Highway killings 200 years earlier. Chandler's main suspect is Dan Wilkie, a rival of Ben Salter as a teenager, until Ben's embittered half-brother Marcus is pulled in and placed in custody - from which he mysteriously disappears.
3 notes · View notes
conradscrime · 2 years
Text
The Canonical Five: Elizabeth Stride
Tumblr media
September 13, 2022
Elizabeth Stride, the third victim of the canonical five, was born Elisabeth Gustafsdotter on November 27, 1843 in Stora Tumlehed, in Sweden. She was the second born out of four children in total. Elizabeth’s father, Gustaf Ericsson was a farmer, and the family lived on a farm where the children were expected to complete chores. 
Elizabeth moved to the city of Gothenburg and became a domestic servant to a few different families. Elizabeth was described as between 5′2-5′5 inches tall, with curly dark brown hair, and light grey eyes. 
Elizabeth had begun sex worker at an earlier age than some of the other canonical five victims, police records from as early as March 1865, confirm she was arrested for this. On April 21, 1865, Elizabeth gave birth to a stillborn daughter. 
In February of 1866, Elizabeth had moved to London, though the reasoning is unclear. Elizabeth supposedly told people she knew two different stories about why she made the move, telling some she relocated for employment by a “gentlemen who lived near Hyde Park” and others thought she moved because she had family already living there. 
It is believed that Elizabeth briefly dated a policeman, but on March 7, 1869 she married a man named John Thomas Stride, who was a ship’s carpenter and who was 22 years older than her. 
The couple ran a coffee shop in Poplar, east London for several years, while also making income from John’s carpenter work. In 1874, the marriage began to fall apart, however the couple were still living together. In 1875 they sold the coffee shop due to financial struggles. 
In 1881, it is believed that Elizabeth and John had reunited and lived together again in the district of Bow, however they permanently separated later that year, with Elizabeth being admitted to a Whitechapel workhouse infirmary suffering from bronchitis in December 1881. Elizabeth was discharged on January 4, 1882, and is believed to have begun living on Flower and Dean Street in Whitechapel. 
On October 24, 1884, John Stride died of tuberculosis. Elizabeth was known to have told several people that her husband and 9 children had drowned in the 1878 sinking of the Princess Alice in the River Thames. Elizabeth would tell people she had survived by climbing the ship’s mast, though none of this was true. 
Elizabeth began a tumultuous relationship with a local dock labourer named Michael Kidney, with the two often separating, and Elizabeth would then go sleep in local lodging houses before going back to live with Michael. In April 1887, Elizabeth filed a formal assault against Michael, but she did not pursue this charge. 
Elizabeth was often charged for drunk and disorderly conduct and the use of obscene language. She would often show up to the Thames Magistrates’ Court using the alias Annie Fitzgerald. 
Elizabeth and Michael got into an argument on September 26, 1888, and separated, with Elizabeth taking residence at 32 Flower and Dean Street. She earned money by cleaning the lodging house for a few days. The day before her murder, Elizabeth was known to have cleaned two rooms at her lodging house and was paid sixpence for it. 
That evening she was wearing a black jacket and skirt, with a black bonnet. At 6:30pm, Elizabeth visited the Queen’s Head pub on Commercial Street before going back to her lodging house alone. 
Elizabeth was seen with a man described as short, with a dark moustache, wearing a morning suit and bowler hat at 11pm close to Berner Street. A second eyewitness claimed to have seen Elizabeth with a man wearing a peaked cap, black coat and dark pants standing on the pavement opposite number 58 Berner Street around 11:45pm. This eyewitness said Elizabeth had repeatedly kissed this man, before he said, “You would say anything but your prayers.” 
At 12:35 am, PC William Smith saw Elizabeth with a man wearing a hard felt hat at 40 Berner Street in Whitechapel. The man was carrying a package about 18 inches long. Smith didn’t feel that anything was suspicious so he continued on toward Commercial Road. 
Between 12:35-12:45am, a dockworker named James Brown saw who he thought appeared to be Elizabeth standing with her back against a wall at the corner of Berner Street saying to a man with a long black coat and average build, “No. Not tonight. Some other night.” 
Elizabeth Stride’s body was discovered around 1am on September 30, 1888, in the adjacent Dutfield’s Yard by a man named Louis Diemschutz. He had driven into the yard with his horse and two wheeled cart when he horse abruptly went to the left to avoid what appeared to be a bundle on the ground. 
Blood was still flowing from a single knife wound inflicted to Elizabeth’s neck, her hands were cold, but other parts of her body were still fairly warm. It appeared that Elizabeth had been killed very shortly before she was discovered at 1am, with several witnesses coming forward saying they were around the area between 12:30-12:50am and did not see anything. 
Elizabeth’s body was lying on the near side with her face toward the wall, her head towards the yard and her feet towards the street. Her left arm was extended and there was a packet of cachous in her left hand. Her right arm was over her stomach, the back of the hand and wrist had clotted blood on it. Her legs were drawn up with her feet close to the wall. 
Elizabeth had a silk handkerchief around her neck that was slightly torn. Some believe it was cut. Her throat had been deeply gashed. Rigor mortis was thorough. There was mud on the left side of her face, and over both shoulders, under the collarbone and in front of her chest was a blueish discolouration. 
There was a clear cut incision on her neck. It was six inches in length and two and a half inches in a straight line below the angle of the jaw. The cut was clean and deviated downwards a little. The arteries and other vessels were all cut through. Her stomach contained partially digested food, consisting of cheese, potato and flour or milled grain powder. All her teeth on the lower left jaw were missing. 
It was believed that Elizabeth’s murderer may have pulled her backwards by her neckerchief before cutting her throat. It was strongly indicated that the person who had killed Elizabeth was right-handed. 
Israel Schwartz told investigators that he saw Elizabeth being attacked outside Dutfield’s Yard around 12:45am by a man with dark hair, a small brown moustache and was around 5′5 in height. The man attempted to pull Elizabeth onto the street before turning her around and shoving her to the ground. The man shouted the word, “Lipski” either to Schwartz or to another man who had been nearby lighting a pipe. 
Michael Kidney was suspected in Elizabeth’s murder due to their on again off again relationship, as well as the fact that he had no alibi. Investigator’s eventually eliminated Michael as a suspect though there’s not much information on why. 
At the inquest it was determined that there was about 25-30 people in the International Working Men’s Educational Club which was right by where Elizabeth was murdered that night. No one there said that they heard or saw anything strange around that time. 
On the second day of the inquest a woman named Mary Malcolm swore that the body was not of Elizabeth Stride, but it was her sister, Elizabeth Watts that had been murdered. Though, police and doctors were certain it was Elizabeth Stride. The doctors also testified that it would of been impossible for Elizabeth to cry out for help. 
On October 3, Michael identified Elizabeth formally, stating that he had been in a relationship with her for nearly three years. He did admit that they separated quite frequently due to Elizabeth’s heavy drinking, though she always returned. 
The inquest into her death lasted five days with it being adjourned until October 23, 1888. The verdict was unanimous and read, “Wilful murder against some person or persons unknown.” 
While Elizabeth’s murder had occurred in close connection to the other two murders, that of Mary Ann Nichols and Annie Chapman as they had both had deep cuts to their neck, Elizabeth had received no mutilation injuries, her sole injury was a deep cut beneath her jaw. 
Some believe that Elizabeth is not connected to the other murders and that Jack the Ripper was not her killer. This is based on how there was no mutilation done to her body and that this is the only murder by Jack the Ripper that occurred south of Whitechapel Road. It is also believed that the knife used on Elizabeth Stride was shorter and a different design than was used on the other four canonical five victims. 
Many however do believe that Jack the Ripper is responsible for Elizabeth Stride’s death, based off of the location, who she was, and how the murder happened. Some believe Jack the Ripper heard Diemschutz’s horse approach so he ran off without being able to finish or mutilate Elizabeth. 
The same night, another woman named Catherine Eddowes was murdered, shortly after Elizabeth. Both women lived on Flower and Dean Street at the time. Perhaps Jack killed Catherine because he didn’t get to fulfill his full fantasy of mutilating Elizabeth due to being interrupted? 
On October 1, 1888, a postcard dubbed the “Saucy Jacky” and signed Jack the Ripper, was received by Central News Agency. The letter took responsibility for both Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddowes’ murders, describing the murders as a “double event.” 
The card was postmarked more than 24 hours after the murders, long after details of the murders had been known to the public, meaning anyone could have written the letter, and not necessarily the killer himself. Most Ripperologist’s agree that this postcard is a hoax, written by some journalist. 
On October 16, 1888, a parcel containing half of a human kidney was sent to the Chairman of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee, George Lusk. The note is widely known as the “From Hell” letter, because that’s what the writer put as the return address. The writer said they had fried and eaten the other half of the human kidney, and the writing was different than the Saucy Jacky postcard, another reason why most think the postcard was a fraud. 
The kidney was discovered to be human and from the left side. It had also been preserved in spirits before it was mailed. Major Henry Smith claimed that this kidney matched the missing one from victim Catherine Eddowes, because the length of the renal artery matched the missing length from her body. The section of kidney also showed signs of Bright’s disease, which Catherine supposedly had. 
Elizabeth was buried on October 6, 1888 in the East London Cemetery, with a small number of people at her funeral. Her headstone is inscribed with her name and the years of her birth and death. 
42 notes · View notes
blamed-for-nothing · 19 days
Text
Tumblr media
Stay with me here... he didn't really die at Ford's Theater...
2 notes · View notes