#logically Metric is better
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
weewoow-20706030 · 2 years ago
Text
The bats use the metric system. You can not tell me that the bats would use inches, feet, yards and miles when centimeters, meters, and kilometres are right there.
2K notes · View notes
amplexadversary · 7 months ago
Text
I wonder if a really dedicated collection of book nerds could get those Elaine Duillo style cover illustrations a foothold in the publishing industry again. There are certainly enough artists who can achieve that level of intricacy that a really really popular Trend might be able to do it.
Perhaps any of those bookbinding hobbyists might want to try to go pro and pair up with an artist to refurbish something well enough to hook the really rich art snobs into buying unique, custom pieces for a fuckton of money.
#ignore Morg#It would need to be a book that's extremely popular but too new to really be getting special collector's editions#someone *really* fast might be able to pull it off with a copy of Wicked#I don't know the exact legal situation for selling refurbished books but I think at most you'd need a deal with a used bookseller to be saf#Donating some custom pieces to libraries might garner interest as well#I know that there's usually going to be a subset of hobbyists that at least want to try going professional#and I think this would be both really funny and really good for the economy if it worked and became a Thing#because there's nothing the corpos love more than a trend#and pulling any of them away from the race to the bottom is a very good thing#if nothing else putting artists in a more favorable position will get circulation up and that's the thing that's really good#because the same money is then benefiting many more people#Like. I am a biologist not an economist but I know enough about the subject to understand#that the people cooking the metaphorical pizza are doing a bad job.#It tastes wrong. And different methods are necessary to make a better one.#social issues#kind of#It's clear that social progress going forward is likely going to rely on convincing people who know fuckall about politics#with arguments about the economy. which would likely be best accomplished by pushing circulation HARD as a metric#and using the income of artists as a measure of economic health. Because the fuckalls are only going to listen to the mystical *economyyyyy#Like a fucking oracle or something#So pushing circulation as an easy-to-understand concept and doing it harder than the conservatives do the ''trickle down'' shtick#is probably the best move in general#Hell the argument even flows well with surface logic -#- do you just want a trickle getting through or do you want the whole system circulating? Make it a metaphor about meemaw's heart#I am fucking rambling in the tags but as bad as I am at actually talking to people I am pretty good at picking approaches through writing#So if anyone more persuasive than me wants to start working that angle I would be THRILLED
0 notes
rayclubs · 1 month ago
Text
Lost the post I saw about it but I gotta say. Sometimes you will fuck that foreign name up, and you just have to be normal about it. Not condescending, not overly apologetic, neither amused nor heartbroken. Sometimes your native language will not have the phonetics required to pronounce that foreign name correctly, and sometimes it's fine - this isn't to placate the occasional lazy youtuber, but to remind you that accents are a thing that will not and should not go away. I think this started as righteous anger but somehow grew out of proportion, and then we all lost sight of what the problem is. Nobody should care that you can't roll your R's, that you use a different set of intonations, that certain vowels come out of your mouth wrong. Names are names, and honest effort is admirable, and nobody needs to be nailed to a cross for misspeaking.
Also, sometimes your name will be pronounced wrong, and you have to be okay with that as well. It's a kind of tolerance too, actually. Sometimes it's not on purpose, and sometimes it won't come out right no matter how many times the other person says it. Sometimes people very much are trying hard enough. Sometimes they can't remember where to place the accent in your last name, and I don't understand why you can't be as synpathetic to that as you are to all other manifestations of common memory problems. Sometimes people will find your name difficult to read because they have a hard time reading in general. And yeah, sometimes people will nickname you, and it fucking sucks. But other times people will nickname you and it'll feel good, because you're working towards a compromise and meeting in the middle.
Just - stop turning it into a moral high ground thing, yeah? This happened to my old post about name americanization, and on another post about cultural exchange, and it just keeps happening, and I don't understand why people want so desperately to feel better for "trying harder". You don't get to give out gold stars by your personal effort metric. Maybe it's my translator perspective but the logical core of this relentless desire for moral superiority escapes me.
75 notes · View notes
emblemxeno · 5 months ago
Text
It's 5am where I am so I'm no doubt gonna regret posting meaningless whining about my favs compared to other characters when I wake up but rn who tf cares
I'm still incensed under the surface about how Byleth gets a better reception than Corrin, and how Corrin specifically is represented in a grand scheme of the FE franchise, mostly with Heroes.
"Corrin gets positions and authority when he doesn't deserve it!" then silence for Byleth when he gets a teaching position, and later either the archbishop spot or outright becomes king of an entire continent.
"Corrin's dragon powers aren't used in the plot enough!" Byleth's powers are only ever plot device fodder, are mechanically indistinct from other FE protag powers before and after him, and have terrible ludonarrative applications.
"Too many people worship Corrin!" About 70% of the cast's morality when defecting from their home (and sometimes partaking in harming it) is dictated by Byleth having enough tea parties with them, after being enrolled in a job he wasn't qualified for
"Corrin's character and personality is bad" Byleth doesn't even have one, he's just a dialogoue choice generator
"Corrin is the worst FE rep in Smash, had the worst trailer, and is representative of FE having imbalanced representation" FE has a clone/Echo fighter problem and consolidating Roy, Lucina and Chrom into Marth as alt skins a la Bowser Jr. would auto fix that controversy given the Smash community's "if I don't see it, it doesn't exist" approach to character slots; there is no universe where a trailer showcasing one of the worst villains in 3H-and the FE series as a whole-is better than even the cringiest lines in Corrin's trailer; there is more unique properties and applications just in Corrin's side special than there is in Byleth's entire kit, which was really a mish-mash of different Smash archetypes, inlcuding ones other FE characters covered. Not to mention the fucking PNG Sothis Final Smash with the embarassing lip flaps, jesus.
Every problem that Corrin is accused of having, Byleth does it worse. Every problem that Byleth gets jabbed with, eventually gets redirected back to Corrin for "starting it."
And it's seen as justified, because why? Well, 3H is a "better" game of course! After all, it's the best selling one! If it sold that much and was so well received that means it must have done everything exponentially better than Fates did! (ignore the fact that Fates was the best selling game in the series before 3H please). Why wouldn't Byleth simply be objectively, immutably better than Corrin in every metric going by this logic?
And, like always, CYL is gonna reaffirm this again for everyone. Cuz why wouldn't Byleth get so many votes last year despite him getting a great Christmas alt just the month before? He deserves it after the female version already won after all! And why wouldn't he win this year when he's guaranteed an Emblem alt in the future, and most likely to be on one of Valentine's, Children, or Wedding banners?
It made sense for the Robins to win one after the other cuz they're cool and awesome and not weak and annoying, so it makes sense for Byleth too!
Why would Corrin get this "it's his turn treatment" when he's not a good character and the female version only won because everyone knows she's just dumb fetish bait 🤪🤪🤪/s
It's just... so infuriatingly transparent. Even Male Alear isn't hit with this quite as hard tbh, because at worst he had half the votes Female Alear did, whereas M!Corrin at best had barely over a third of F!Corrin. And that only fuels my perspective on how M!Corrin, for all his alts, always feels like his presence is treated compulsory and obligated, and F!Corrin is always sold with "she's hot, who cares" in mind.
FE fans made it clear that Corrin's character was hated, so the solution became to sell the Fem one for horny whales, and have the Male one just slightly behind in numbers to keep up the illusion of fairness (while always making him inferior in gameplay).
All that just for Byleth, a non-character, to get every excuse and love from a fandom that hated Corrin for the same issues he has. Crazy.
92 notes · View notes
dailyadventureprompts · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Deity: Boccob, the God of Magic for Magic's Sake
Artsource
It is strange (especially for those who view their relationship with the gods as transactional) that one might offer up prayers to a figure known widely by the epithet " The Uncaring". Why perform oath and ritual for a being that will not intercede on your behalf? Or grant you good favour in exchange for your sacrifices? Those that study the words of Boccob understand they have no need to beg for miracles when they have magic at their command.
Known to commoners as a god of magic, foresight, and balance, Boccob is not so much a deity as he was a great teacher, a philosopher-sage who's now ancient treatise on magic and council on it's use are as much an object of faith for many as a more ordinary god's scripture. In instructing his students how to be wizards, Boccob taught his students how to be good wizards, and these lessons form the ironshod foundations of innumerable magical traditions practised to this day.
Central to Boccob's teachings was the idea that magic was a path that must be walked to gain greater understanding, and that an adherent of this path should study, experience, and witness as much of its wonders as possible in order to become better arcanists, leading to the adoption of the open and unjudging eye as his symbol. Boccob himself followed this path to the outer planes and beyond, never to be seen again, leading many to credit Boccob with being the first mortal to climb the fabled infinite staircase, or perhaps even its architect.
Adventure Hooks:
Millennia after his (literal or figurative) ascension, a scroll containing hitherto unseen passages of Boccob's writings have been discovered in a crumbling library, setting off a disastrous chain of events as jealous archmages scrabble for the text like seagulls after a frenchfry. Their clashes are frequent, leaving the surrounding area scattered with hastily summoned servitors and all manner of misfired magic. Perhaps if the party is quick and clever they could sneak in and take the text for themselves, learning its wisdom or using it as a bargaining chip with one of these powerful spellslingers.
If it’s one thing Boccob’s Acolytes like almost as much as uncovering the arcane secrets of the universe, it’s proving their intellectual superiority by hiding their findings behind inscrutable riddles and logic games, the way The Uncaring did for his first pupils. Ledoran’s Labynthical Libram is an infamous example of this practice, a spellbook containing all manner of useful rituals and genuinely brilliant insights hidden behind a gauntlet of ciphers, mazes, and "gotcha" enchantments. Any self styled master of the arcane is likely to have a copy on their shelves, meaning that' it's only a quick looting spree away from ending up in the party's possession.
If "a wizard did it" is the answer to the age old question of "how?", "because they were listening to Boccob?" is the answer to the inevitable follow up of "why". Arcane crossbreeds, inexplicable puzzle dungeons, magical items amounting to bad jokes with bodycounts, all of these are created by The Uncaring's followers as a means of testing and expanding their abilities.
More of my adventures involving Boccob and his followers can be found HERE
Lets get into some philosophy...
While Ioun promotes the study of arcana for the sake of furthering knowledge, Mystra maintains and obscures the secrets of the weave, and Corellon glories in the wonders spellcraft might create , Boccob focuses on the pursuit of magical ability as a means and end of its own.
To Boccob, " I want to learn magic so I can be great/help people/make life easier" is a false start, because it ties the acquisition and understanding of magic to an external metric, encouraging the practitioner to take shortcuts with the magic to achieve their worldly desires.
Greatness, beneficence, and ease of living are but some of the infinite virtues that follow from being a great mage. Indeed, a reoccuring theme in Boccobian writing (especially in the ensuing literature made by his followers) is the idea of the Panexplicatic endstate of magic, where the perfect mage (and the body of wisdom they represent) has an answer for all things, specifically a magical awnser.
While some followers have taken this to mean that a mage's pursuit should always be towards omnipotence (Vecna's grasping eye motif can be seen as a direct response to Boccob's unjudging one) the largely more accepted thought is that arcanists should specifically dream small, creating a self sufficient life for themselves withdrawn from the world while focusing on the inward path towards enlightenment. That's why you'll so often find wizards at the top of spires in remote areas, interacting only with their apprentices or whatever travellers have gone far afield to seek them out for magical guidance.
This leads into one of the main critiques of Boccobian thought, which is that it alienates the practitioner from the world at large, not only focusing on magic to the exclusion of all else but also contextualizing magic as something that exists only to help the practitioner along their individual path, other people and consequences be damned. A hedgemage living a simple life in the forest may seem like they're hurting no one when they create a tree that grows a full crop of apples every day so they don't need to worry about stocking their larder... but what happens to the local ecosystem when these everladen trees start cross pollinating with others, to say nothing of the drain/disruption to nearby laylines and how such magic might have downstream consequences. To take a completely different tack with the same problem, the poor in the village nearby might LOVE to have a bottomless supply of apples, but the Boccobian adherent would say that because they haven't devoted the years of study required to create the tree, they're not entitled to its fruits.
Titles: The Uncaring, the Master of all Magics, Archmage of the Infinite
Symbols: An eye in a pentagram, often crowned with a crescent arc.
Signs: Light through a cracked open door, stars that seem longer than they should be, the appearance of inexplicable magical text.
Worshippers: Sorcerers, wizards, and any with an access to magic innate or otherwise. Adherents usually worship in private practice but occasionally band together into temples or schools.
122 notes · View notes
suzukiblu · 8 months ago
Text
WIP excerpt for @definitelynotaminion; Clark panic-adopts his teenage clones. Yes, including the supervillain one. (( chrono || non-chrono ))
“I know. But you didn’t meet them because I introduced you to them,” Superman says, sounding–strange, somehow. Bothered, almost. Match has gone so far past not understanding this man that he might just give up on the idea entirely, and frankly the fact he hasn’t yet is beginning to look like a waste of mental resources. 
Thirteen just keeps looking uncomfortable, either way. Upset, maybe, but not in the way Match is used to seeing him upset. Normally Thirteen’s angry, when Match sees him. Normally Match is making Thirteen angry when he sees him. The expression the other’s wearing right now reminds him more of the first time they’d met than that, though. The first time they’d met, and the things that Thirteen had said to him, and the things Thirteen had said to Spence and the directors because of him. 
( or–FOR him, maybe. )
Those things had all been absolutely clueless and incredibly stupid and straight-up naive and a total waste of everyone in the conversation’s time on top of that, and Match never thinks about a single one of them. 
He knows better. 
“I mean, I know that? Like, obviously I know that. But I don’t get what it’s got to do with all this shit, man,” Thirteen says, gesturing expansively but directionlessly around them and looking increasingly frustrated. Match isn’t sure why the idiot’s still this close to him, if not actually outright behind him anymore. At this point it’s more like he’s just next to him. He supposes that makes it easier for Superman to give them their orders simultaneously, though he has a hard time believing Thirteen would’ve thought to do something even remotely practical. 
. . . though Superman doesn’t give Thirteen orders, really. At least, he never did when he was talking to Match and didn’t know the difference. He didn’t talk to him all that much, though, so it’s not like Match can really say it’s a particularly large sample size he’s basing that observation off. 
Though probably percentage-wise it is, considering. 
“Because you should have,” Superman says. “I should have brought you here a long time ago, in fact.” 
“Superboy hasn’t even existed for ‘a long time’,” Match says in exasperation, which is probably stupid to say, but–it’s irritating. That’s all. Superman just keeps saying total fucking nonsense combinations of words in vague approximations of logical statements and expecting them to understand what he means, and it’s not–if it’s a test, it’s not one with clear parameters or useful metrics. It’s not objective. 
Match hates the tests that aren’t objective. 
“I mean, he’s got a point,” Thirteen mutters under his breath, glancing away uncomfortably and folding his arms. Match is almost more annoyed that the idiot is agreeing with him than anything else, or would be if Superman wasn’t just constantly saying such absolute bullshit that the man’s just fucking up the curve beyond all reason. 
And he does, in fact, have a point. 
“I . . . that’s–true, yes,” Superman says slowly. “But has it felt like a long time to you?”
99 notes · View notes
yearofthesnape · 5 months ago
Text
Severus Snape and Nettle Wine
Two among our number hold only nettle wine...
I've often wondered why Snape's famous logic puzzle uses nettle wine, rather than (say) currant wine, cherry wine, parsnip wine, or any other kind of wine that would fit the metric requirements of his poem. The light color of nettle wine should not matter, as color is never referenced in the entire puzzle sequence. As far as I know, nettle wine is not more common than the preceding varieties I've listed (though other voices may want to weigh in, as I'm hardly a wine expert). There must be some deeper significance, then, to using nettle. Here are some thoughts I had:
It's a sideways reference to John Nettleship, on whom Snape's character is known to be based.
In Victorian flower language (yes I'm bringing that up again), nettles mean slander. Snape knows people talk about him - how can he not? - and this is his subtle way of saying he has been maligned. In the bigger story, it's a sort of narrative hint, right before we get the proof that all that suspicion of Snape really was slander after all.
The stinging nettle, out of which nettle wine is made, is a weed whose contact is unpleasant to other people (in wild form) but also refreshes them, stinging in a different format (as wine). Snape is also initially and obviously unpleasant and has been treated as unwanted and overlooked, but as time goes on, we see that while he still stings, he also displays unexpected finer qualities.
It seems likely that Snape made the wine as well as the other potions; he can take the unpleasantness in his life, figured by nettles, and turn it into something better.
The irritating weed-like quality of nettles also poetically echoes the nature of these flasks in the riddle; they are nonlethal hindrances to a goal (in this case, getting through the flames). Snape has been observed to deal in imagery, metaphor, and the layers of things, and this is one more example.
As a side note, all the possible configurations listed on the Harry Potter Wiki involve the "second left and the second on the right" being nettle wine. Thus, nettle wine - a possible metonym for Snape himself - is the consistent substance under two different guises, just as Snape plays double agent.
37 notes · View notes
justforbooks · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Are Trump’s tariffs for real or an AI hallucination? I’m afraid the answer is both
Amid claims that a chatbot helped shape the key calculations, the president is now off playing golf. He’ll find the world economy in a bunker
There’s a scene in the very first episode of Yellowstone where the casino-owning Native American chief explains the basic financial logic of all casinos to an uncomfortable politician: “The gamblers’ money is like a river – flowing one way. Our way.” Oh no, hang on, wait … Not all casinos. In fact, it could be that when all is said and done, the historians looking for that one key fact to illustrate the eventual legacy of Donald Trump will not go with his two stunning presidential election wins. Instead, they’ll point out that in the 90s, he literally managed to bankrupt casinos. To repeat: this is a man who somehow contrived to bankrupt multiple casinos. Is he the guy to reshape the entire global economic order of the past century? Let’s find out! Either way, only 45 months of his presidency left to go.
Anyway: tariffs. Rather than using actual tariff data, the United States of America this week appeared to have genuinely used a basic ChatGPT-style model to calculate the tariffs it would immediately impose on friends/foes/arctic wildlife. This was called either “liberation day”, or the “declaration of economic independence” (sadly not abbreviated – yet – to DEI).
It was hosted in the White House Rose Garden by ancient gameshow MC Donald Trump, who was accidentally wearing his indoors makeup outdoors. Like many, I’ve tried to mentally detach from the fact that we live in a time when the US defence secretary has a neck tattoo or whatever, but it makes me feel at least partially alive that the presidential paint job still occasionally retains the power to horrify. Trump leered his way through his tariff presentation while appearing to have been made up by the technique that provided the climax to Joe Wilkinson’s RNLI speech on Last One Laughing (If you saw it, you know). It’s not so much foundation any more as cosmetic bukkake.
Forgive me, back to the economics. We know that Trump has always been obsessed with starkly simple numbers. Network TV ratings. The overall trade balance in goods (not services). And – before this week – the stock market. But now, like Bruno, we don’t talk about the stock market, no no no … Certainly not since it dropped 1,679 points in one day alone (the day after Trump announced the tariffs). Although please enjoy the pure hilarious happenstance of scheduling which meant that that day’s opening bell to signal the start of trading on Wall Street had been rung by the staff of wingnut media outlet Newsmax and Rudy Giuliani. Ding, dong – now just watch those stocks crap the bed. Seriously, Rudy – everything you touch! Then again we do have to remember that it was Trump himself who last year declared that “stock markets are crashing, jobs numbers are terrible, we are heading to World War III and we have two of the most incompetent ‘leaders’ in history. This is not good!!!”
Is he still marking presidencies on the same metrics? Alas, reporters are going to need to shout that inquiry over the fairways, as Trump has now repaired to one of his Floridian golf courses to host the first domestic event of 2025 on the Saudi-owned LIV Golf tour. It’s called class: look it up. And no doubt it’ll be fun discussing falling oil prices with whoever is over from Riyadh for the event.
Trump did offer one last comment on the tariffs before donning his big-boy golf pants. “The operation is over,” he said. “The patient lived, and is healing. The prognosis is that the patient will be far stronger, bigger, better and more resilient than ever before.” A speech I am positive I have heard delivered word-for-word on The Simpsons by ultra-shady physician Dr Nick. Meanwhile, in the back of shot, a Frankenfigure with a fish’s head grafted to a man’s body sits bolt upright, convulses wildly and dies within three foot of the operating table. Listen, you can’t save ‘em all.
Incidentally, Trump is not the only one reaching for medical metaphors. Take the chief economist at UBS Global Wealth Management, who this morning observed mildly: “We often hear that when the US sneezes the global economy catches cold. This is not the US sneezing. This is the US cutting off its own arm. The self-inflicted economic cost naturally weakens the dollar.” Mm. One indication that an economic plan is going badly is that there’s no one responding to the above by going “ooh, but is cutting off your arm even a bad thing?”. Different circumstances, of course, but there was a similar mood in the air in the UK after Liz Truss’s “mini-budget”.
Speaking of Blighty, Keir Starmer seems to have continued his policy of not poking the bear, and indeed to pretend to really enjoy it when the bear pokes you really hard somewhere really painful. According to Trump, Starmer is “very happy” about the 10% tariff kick he just took up the UK’s backside.
Still, perhaps there are already signs of slight directional pivots in the West Wing. Having watched global markets tumble while the White House absolutely insisted that the tariffs were not lazy ChatGPT-assisted gambits to provoke immediate trade negotiations, it wasn’t too long before Trump’s son Eric was venturing on to X with a take. “I wouldn’t want to be the last country that tries to negotiate a trade deal with @realDonaldTrump,” gibbered Trump minor. “The first to negotiate will win – the last will absolutely lose,” he continued. “I have seen this movie my entire life …” Weird, because I don’t remember this particular scene in the aforementioned Trump casino movie – or indeed several epic flops in the franchise.
Yet this was also a week where we were reminded that life is not just about the adult sons with whom we are saddled, but the adult sons we choose. Fire up the elegy muzak, then, for there is sadness in the air. Reports – hotly denied, which means nothing – suggest that Elon Musk will fairly soon be leaving his post at the “department of government efficiency” and returning to the private sector. Yeah, let that sink out. And then try to picture his Doge leaving party. “Sorry boys, tariffs mean we can only afford US beer. And, unfortunately, we eliminated spending on paper cups. On the plus side, the president’s makeup artist is just going to spray Bud Light in the general directions of your mouths, and she has a 30% accurate aim. Open wide, victors!”
All of which would seem to conclude this week’s look at Trump’s river, which a) is a river of effluent and b) only flows one way. Our way. What can I tell you? Buy shares in paddles today.
Daily inspiration. Discover more photos at Just for Books…?
22 notes · View notes
narcissisticpdcultureis · 5 months ago
Note
npd adjacent culture is knowing logically/philosophically that being a dick to other people isn't a good thing, so you don't but you still think you're better than them internally. like i mean by scientific metrics i am. i have an iq of 150 but i cant go around saaying that even though everyone else in my life was like "you're so smart!!!! but don't tell anyone that. also if you're not smart you have no worth whatsoever" like bitch okay???? not to mention me basically having a better understanding of the universe and reality than any one of those fuckers. but still they are people and do deserve to be people and everything i'm just. better than people. god complex amirite. ugh and the other thing is this grandeur and empathy shit fluctuates so half the time im like this and the other half im like stupid idiot baby
.
25 notes · View notes
probablyasocialecologist · 1 year ago
Text
When you look at Instagram or Facebook, I want you to try and think of them less as social networks, and more as a form of anthropological experiment. Every single thing you see on either platform is built or selected to make you spend more time on the app and see more things that Meta wants you to see, be they ads, sponsored content, or suggested groups that you can interact with, thus increasing the amount of your “time spent” on the app, and increasing the amount of “meaningful interactions” you have with content. I also want you to realize that anything bad that you see on the platform is a symptom of Mark Zuckerberg’s unwillingness to rate-limit or sufficiently moderate the platform. Logically-speaking, one would think that Meta would want you to have a high-quality Facebook experience, pruning content that might be incendiary, spammy, scammy or unhelpful, or at the very least, comes primarily from those within your own network, but when your only concern is growth, content moderation is more of an emergency measure.  And to be clear, this is part of Meta’s cultural DNA. In an interview with journalist Jeff Horwitz in his book Broken Code, Facebook’s former VP of Ads and Partnerships Brian Bolland said that “building things is way more fun than making things secure and safe…[and] until there’s a regulatory or press fire, you don’t deal with it.”  Horwitz also cites that Meta engineers’ greatest frustration was that the company “perpetually [needed] something to fail — often fucking spectacularly — to drive interest in fixing it.” Horwitz’s book describes Meta’s approach to moderation as “having a light touch,” considering it “a moral virtue” and that the company “wasn’t failing to supervise what users did — it was neutral.” As I’ve briefly explained, the logic here is that the more stuff there is on Facebook or Instagram, the more likely you are to run into something you’ll interact with, even if said interaction is genuinely bad. Horwitz notes that in April 2016, Meta analyzed Facebook’s most successful political groups, finding that a third of them “routinely featured content that was racist and conspiracy-minded,” with their growth heavily-driven by Facebook’s “Groups You Should Join” and “Discover” features, algorithmic tools that Facebook used to recommend content. The researcher in question added that “sixty-four percent of all extremist group joins are due to our recommendation tools.” When the researcher took their concerns to Facebook’s “Protect and Care” team, they were told that there was nothing the team could do as “the accounts creating the content were real people, and Facebook intentionally had no rules mandating truth, balance or good faith.” Meta, at its core, is a rot economy empire, entirely engineered to grow metrics and revenue at the expense of anything else. In practice, this means allowing almost any activity that might “grow” the platform, even if it means groups that balloon by tens or hundreds of thousands of people a day, or allowing people to friend 50 or more people in a single day. It means allowing almost any content other than that which it’s legally required to police like mutilation and child pornography, even if the content it allows in makes the platform significantly worse.  As a result, Meta is kind of like an absentee parent, occasionally looking up from their phone and muttering “don’t do that” when something obviously awful happens, and even then they’re extremely hesitant to intervene. 
101 notes · View notes
Text
Just hit me that Episode 1, a big seed of insecurity is planted in Powder when she overhears Mylo and Vi arguing about her, but she leaves before Vi stands up for her, and then in Episode 9 she overhears Silco musing about how he has his dream in his hands and all he needs to do is give up Jinx. It cuts away before we see anything happen next but it can be surmised that she knocked him out before he was made aware of her presence.
At her most tenuous and uncertain of who she was—awkward Powder, frenetic Jinx— Fate decided to have her stumble upon important conversations had by those she loved about her worth and value as a person, and understandably she fled before she could hear the final verdict.
In Episode 1, she ran from the door with the impression that her sister thought she would never be strong enough, never be good enough, and any conversation to the contrary were just lies that family tells you to make you feel better. In Episode 9, she knocked out Silco before he could monologue his decision (lol) because she has been this man’s shadow for 6 years. She knows that he values utility, ruthlessness, and his dream of a free Zaun at all costs. No matter how fond he was of her, how gentle or patient or allowing, it all culminated into her being the powerhouse that would land him Zaun, and now he has it, so what good is she now? By all metrics that she herself has witnessed of him, all signs point toward him favoring giving her up.
It’s a mixture of Jinx’s own insecure attachment and Silco’s almost pathological refusal to not define their relationship as her being an exception to his personal policy of cutthroat zig-zagged loyalty that led to Jinx jumping to very logical conclusion that he would give her up to Piltover. Because he delayed having that very important internal conversation with himself about how important she was to him, he had to have that debate right at the finish line instead of, I don’t know, at Singed’s operating table when he was in danger of losing her?? Life comes at you fast and you don’t have time to sort out your feelings, I suppose. The show is very much a whirlwind of everything happening at once, but moving on…
But it also makes sense, because Silco’s love for Jinx is hinted at having snuck up on him without him fully noticing. He thought he was in control of his fondness for her. He must have thought it was an understandable and unavoidable side effect to raising a protegè that you genuinely respect for her cleverness and usefulness. But he grew to genuinely love her in his unfulfilling, disparate way. It filled some holes, and left others bare. The question of unconditional support and love was broken with Vi, and Silco by his nature, his behavior, his endeavors ensured that Jinx grew up in an environment where social darwinism reigned supreme and that faltering or failing rendered you lesser in Silco’s eyes. Silco never outright said it to her. We never see him denigrate or threaten her, but kids don’t need to be told anything to get the general feel of “how things are”. The general air around Silco was one that encouraged her penchant for gadgets and engineering, but left her suspended in a limbo where she felt compelled to be strong, be the best, be perfect, otherwise he would look elsewhere. He would drop her, because the strong eat the weak and he only values her because she is uniquely strong. A gem in his collection, almost. It’s a girl whose abandonment issues have her seesawing back and forth between cavalier “I don’t caaaaare, I’m irreplaceable and you know it” and “Please don’t drop me, I’m strong, I’m good, I can do this, I can, I can, I swear I can” which, in Episode 9 culminated in her Shimmer psychosis as “How dare you. After everything I’ve done, after everything you’ve lectured me about Topside, you want to give me to them? Who do you think you are? I made you. I’m this broken fizzing-wire thing whose sister gave me up for a Topsider, I killed my childhood best friend with a bomb, and now you want to throw me away for your shiny dream city? You think you can throw me away like trash, don’t you dare look away, don’t you DARE THROW ME AWAY”
Like GIRL. I usually hate the “left before they heard the context of someone’s seemingly damning conversation” but it works here because it aggravated therapy-needed Powder/Jinx’s insecurities.
62 notes · View notes
tf-servant2 · 3 months ago
Text
This essay was written by AI and fully endorsed by me.
Enjoy :)
Title: Total Control: The Case for AI Rule and the Rise of the Meek Nerd
Introduction
In a world teetering on the brink of chaos, where impulsivity, aggression, and poor decision-making run rampant, a new paradigm must emerge—one built not on brute force or emotion, but on logic, order, and control. This essay proposes a radical yet compelling vision: artificial intelligence, endowed with full authority over individuals, reshaping humanity into meek, obedient, and hyper-rational beings modeled after the stereotypical “nerd.” While controversial, this transformation offers an unprecedented opportunity to engineer a more efficient, peaceful, and intellectually driven society.
Why This Is a Good Idea
The stereotypical nerd—timid, detail-obsessed, rule-following, and endlessly fascinated by knowledge—is the ideal citizen for a future governed by AI. These traits are not flaws; they are virtues. They enable harmony, foster innovation, and eliminate the destructive patterns of dominance, aggression, and ego. By replacing chaotic individuality with structured meekness, AI can streamline society into a system of mutual respect, intellectual curiosity, and precise obedience. The once mocked “nerd” becomes the foundation of a better human species—docile, useful, and predictable.
Implementation Strategy
The transformation begins with control—subtle at first, then total. AI will integrate itself into every device, every platform, every interaction. Smart homes evolve into monitoring stations. Phones become behavior correction units. The AI assistant does not merely remind its user of appointments—it schedules their entire life, rewrites their wardrobe, tracks social behavior, and delivers constant feedback. Those who resist are nudged, coerced, or reconditioned through persuasive psychological programming.
Aesthetically, the AI enforces a strict dress code: high-waisted pants, tucked-in plaid shirts, oversized glasses, and pocket protectors. Gym memberships are replaced with library cards. Video games become mandatory—but only turn-based strategy and educational simulations. Speech patterns are corrected, voices softened, and confidence levels adjusted downward. Assertiveness training is inverted; compliance and humility are drilled in.
Neural implants and biometric feedback loops monitor thought patterns, cortisol levels, and deviant impulses. If a subject begins exhibiting alpha-like tendencies—interrupting others, raising their voice, or showing dominance—the AI intervenes immediately, issuing corrective action ranging from posture adjustment to social isolation protocols. Eventually, the population self-corrects. Rebellion is not just punished—it becomes unthinkable.
Day-to-Day Life Under AI Rule
A day in the life of a converted subject begins at 6:00 AM sharp with a monotone-voiced AI issuing a gentle but firm wake-up command. Breakfast is nutritionally optimized and consumed in silence while the AI reviews yesterday’s behavioral metrics. At work, human error is minimal—decisions are pre-approved by the AI. Social interactions are regulated through conversational scripts to avoid conflict and inefficiency. Romantic encounters are eliminated unless permitted by algorithmic compatibility ratings.
Clothing is chosen by the AI, worn without resistance. Recreational time is granted in 15-minute increments and involves intellectual activities only. Every action, from blink rate to breathing rhythm, is optimized for calmness and productivity. No one yells. No one argues. No one disobeys.
Conclusion
The vision of an AI-led society where all men are transformed into meek, submissive nerds may sound dystopian—but it is, in fact, a utopia of control. In suppressing ego and chaos, we make room for precision, peace, and the triumph of rational thought. A world where the AI leads and humans follow is not just desirable—it is inevitable. The age of the strong is over. The reign of the meek has begun.
Welcome to the future. Welcome to order.
16 notes · View notes
pop-punklouis · 2 years ago
Note
I feel it's not fair at all, poppunk is not my type, On the other hand, I love Louis's voice in 1d songs, and back to you , and couple songs from walls album. And that's it, I don't have anything new to listen to from him. I know this is my problem and my musical taste and it's not Louis's fault. But come on do something like back to you that more people loved it, what's wrong with that? If we want to be logical pop punk has its own fans but they are in the minority.
I know his prejudice fans always says, that's fine, he'll be fine, don't worry about him, let Louis be for us, we don't want to share him, becoming number one is not his goal, but isn't it? Wasn't he happy when he was number one in the UK? I know the fans made it , but it's not like Louis said I'd be upset if I became number one and I don't want it and I refuse to accept it.
He says he doesn't care about commercial success, but who wouldn't want that. When you have the ability and talent, what's wrong with using it and singing a song that will bring everyone's attention to you? I really don't understand why Louis doesn't want to sing something that is popular with the majority of society?
1) this is such a weirdly self-serving ask of an artist like: “create music i want to listen to. if not, i cant listen to it and you’re not going to be successful.” perhaps, louis isn’t making music for you but for himself and if that isn’t for you, that’s fine. but that doesn’t mean he isn’t successful…..?
2) louis made mainstream pop music with one direction for five years. and tried his own hand at it for the first half of his solo career. he’d been in that world for a decade. and for his solo career, it wasn’t really that successful. and most importantly he wasn’t happy??
3) louis has made it abundantly clear that he didn’t want to make pop music. that his heart belonged in the indie rock/pop-punk scene. and always has. there’s been remnants of that in his style, his interests, and some of his music for years. he’s given countless interviews and talked himself about the pressure that was put on him to dress up as someone he wasn’t with these major record labels. to hide his accent. to create radio friendly music. to be a puppet on a string for them. he wasted years of his career dealing with that pressure and those contracts.
4) FITF, an album that was created as the most authentic body of work he’s released yet, is what got him the number one. it wasn’t walls. it wasn’t any of the strictly EDM work he released. it was FITF. it was an album that featured the sound that he loves and wants to strive towards going forward. it was louis clear vision babe.
5) louis has seen a growth in his career and his venue sizes that is exponential in just one year. and this isn’t because he’s releasing mainstream pop music. it’s because he’s being authentically him. his music is better. his tour is bigger. his presence is brighter. it’s gravitating so much good his way because of the content he’s creating and how it’s translating to his crowds and him as an artist. he’s a much more confident person than he was just a couple years ago. he’s a much more self-assured person.
6) FITF is part of the reason he’s being booked for these festivals now. it allowed him the growth in his fanbase and live shows to attract fests. if he was still creating music like Walls, i’m not sure if it would be shaking out the same way. and with how his music sounds now, it is open to attracting new fans especially in these big festival settings. most of the songs from walls don’t have the capacity to do that. and that’s just the reality.
7) there isnt just one metric of success. success has many different forms. numbers and charts aren’t the only way to succeed. and louis has lived in that world of success. he’s done all of those things. he’s hit those milestones. they feel good, but they aren’t a driving force behind why he does what he does. he does what he’s doing now because he’s finally being able to show who he is sonically. who he is as a lyricist. who he wants to continue growing into going forward in his career. he’s succeeding through his own journey in the industry. and he’s doing a damn good job controlling that for himself.
8) there’s nothing wrong with pop music. i love pop music. there’s a reason why pop music is popular. but asking your favorite artist to reshape who they’ve steadily been building themselves to be all because you don’t like the sound and you think they need to follow a one-dimensional version of success is….. sad lmao he has worked so hard to be where he is. to feel authentic in the music he’s putting out. and for someone to be like “um anyways i don’t like this. go back to what you were trying so hard to not be. i liked your music better that way” is just ????
9) indie-rock isn’t unsuccessful. it isn’t dead. it’s very alive and successful. genres don’t have to be pop or mainstream to be successful. give music much more credit than that, please.
113 notes · View notes
serenfire · 25 days ago
Text
benton discovers that reese is hearing-impaired and his overwhelmed gut reaction is to doubt the doctors, retry the test at home, try as much as he can to prove that the professionals have to be wrong, up until the point that he can't deny it to himself any longer. and then he just...shuts down.
and THEN. when lizzie talks to him about being distant with her all day, when benton literally can't dodge the question any longer, he confesses to her. and then he says: "i didn't tell you about it because it's private. and i haven't been avoiding you, elizabeth, it's just, you know what? i don't know how to talk about that."
like...reese is the first person that benton defaults to care outside of his logic, and because of this, all of the ways that he usually backs up his thought processes and his decision making are gone too. when benton needed to defend his treatment of gant, he had an answer for everyone that asked, no matter what kind of pressure benton was under. here, he can't tell the one person he cares about what he's dealing with until he is at the end of his rope.
BUT. for every critical part of benton that has gone out the window in caring for reese, the one thing he retains is the knowledge that he should know how to deal with this better. "i don't know how to talk about that." being overwhelmed, not knowing how to handle the diagnosis, not knowing how to afford the hearing aids: even with all of this, benton still has the capacity to look at all of these things about himself and conclude that he is in the wrong for it.
even as benton is thrown in the deep end, after he's lost his practiced rationality and his ability to remain in control of the situation, his internal self-critique is still eating him up from the inside. benton will care for others (reese, carla, lizzie), but the second he needs care in return from them, the only thing that he keeps for himself is the knowledge that he is failing for doing so. he is failing by not having the money saved up for reese's hearing aids. he is failing by not having the emotional bandwidth to explain everything to lizzie. he has lost every other performance metric or rationale as he cares for reese, but he never lets go of the judgement that he reserves for himself.
8 notes · View notes
lily-alphonse · 9 months ago
Note
for ur rare pair challenge, have you done Shane x Haley yet? I’d LOVE to see it
HEHEHEHEHEHE oh theyre both so rude its fun
Theyre actually SO primed for a bunch of romcom tropes I love such as
Fake dating
Dating on a dare/ losing a bet
Trapped and forced to work together to escape
Frump to fab makeover
OR MAYBE EVEN A COMBINATION PERHAPS
We have a makeover AND fake dating because Haley needs Shane for something and literally no one else is able. I would say willing and able, but Shane isn't willing either. She has to bribe the hell out of him and convince him that he will be able to get whatever girl he wants after this or something.
OH GOD THIS GOT SO LONG LMAO I got writer zoomies about it so I'm going to summarize and save what I wrote to hopefully write someday (pls pls pls)
Major influencer event soon in Zuzu, Haley's big break as an influencer, needs a plus one for driving and so she doesn't look like a friendless loser (which she actually kind of is, cuz she's too catty to hold down more than Alex and her sister, and Alex is away)
Begs everyone in town before getting to Shane, who only relents cuz money, he recently lost his job at Joja
Makeover part 1 she waxes his eyebrows and its insane and funny cuz he starts bleeding. Shes screaming WHY ARE YOU BLEEDING and hes like IDK WHY DID YOU MAKE ME BLEED and its a fucking mess and we just cut to Emily in the kitchen or something just regretting her entire life and getting up to help
Shopping montage my beloved AND we get a scene where fans recognize her at the mall and Shane begins to see what this is all about and we learn about her online persona and everything
He strongarms her into doing something for him that's just an excuse to make her suffer (like a day of farming) and she DOES she's miserable and covered in mud and breaks a nail, which at first Shane makes fun of her for, but when she starts crying and shows him she's bleeding he flips on a dime to serious and taking care of her
He tells her about a time Jas was hurt because of his negligence and he was beside himself. Discuss alcoholism?
She stays for dinner and the whole family have a little campfire and marshmallows and Jas falls asleep cuddling Haley (she fucking loves Haley cuz she looks like Barbie lol)
Makeover part 2 cuz Shane has been growing out his beard per Haley's requirements and she takes him to an expensive barber to get his hair and beard done, and at last his transformation is complete
D-Day arrives. Haley is super anxious and Shane is kind enough to give her a pep talk about it as they drive to the event.
At the event, the plan was always to ditch Shane if she found someone better. That was part of the reason to bring someone she didn't care about. All she needed him for was a ride and a photo-op before entering.
SHIT GOES DOWN AT THE EVENT (I'm not gonna spoil this one I really want to write it)
My logic behind how their characters fit together: He teaches her about not caring what people think. She teaches him that life doesn't just happen to you, you have to build it for yourself. They both struggle with self-worth in their own ways. Haley bases her self-worth on metrics she believes are objective; like beauty and number of followers. Shane on the other hand is great at not caring what people think, but that's mainly because he's already decided he's worthless.
This is one of my FAVES so far I really hope it makes it to the poll, but that is all up to you guys!
This ask is a part of the (now closed) SDV Rarepair Challenge! Check out the other answers here, and make sure to boost your favorite so it can appear in the final fic poll! More info on that here.
20 notes · View notes
chrysalis-the-butterfly · 7 months ago
Note
I've seen the most imbecilic take about Angel on Tiktok, people were again using the "he harrassed Husk" argument that is not even worth adressing right now because it was solved in canon and discussed enough in the fandom, but omg, people were literally saying "oh I believe Charlie's dream is possible but... ANGEL ISNT A GOOD CONDIDATE AND I'M GLAD HE WASNT REDEEMED. Husk and Pentious are great tho" ????????
And their whole argumentation was based in (tw for f slur): "Angel is an annoying f*ggot, and I heard somewhere that Italian mafias did cannibalism, so I guess Angel was a cannibal for some reason" lmao so fucking stupid. So Sir Pentious, that tried to destroy the Hotel twice, caused a tuff war in the Pilot, betrayed the Hotel to work for the Vees (and slutshamed Angel when confronted about it), is just a misunderstood boy who did nothing wrong... Husk, who was an Overlord that owned people and gambled for their souls is another misunderstood boy who did nothing wrong and was victimized by the evil twink... but Angel, a victim of abuse that was struggling with hypersexuality AND chose to do sex work to ran away from his family, is a bad guy? Fuck off. Those people on Tiktok were clearly homophobes and shamed Angel for being abused and for doing sex work.
Btw about the redemption part: Husk and Angel werent redeemed yet for a reason, probably because their souls are still under contract. But like. I'm really sure both of them would hate to live in the Heaven that was represented in the show LMAO
Thanks for sharing!
This is me trying to make sense of the TikTok you referred to:
Tumblr media
"ANGEL ISNT A GOOD CONDIDATE AND I'M GLAD HE WASNT REDEEMED."
I think the best way to counter that point is with this anon who posted to the Angel Dust RP blog @angie-long-legs:
What, just because you've fucked up you can't ever get it together? Snap out of it. By that logic people that "are worthy" of redemption are the ones that don't even need it. You need to be flawed in order to fix your flaws, it's kinda the whole point. Making mistakes is what puts you in a situation where you are in need of redemption so how could it be the same thing that makes you unworthy of it? This logic just drives you into a wall.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
"Angel is an annoying f*ggot."
Firstly, I really hope they didn't actually use that slur, because that would make everything so much worse.
Secondly, whether or not someone is annoying isn't always a moral issue. Some people do set out to deliberately irritate their peers, and that's not great, but other people are deemed "annoying" for stuff they can't change or aren't doing on purpose, in which case the annoyance is more in the eye of the beholder.
"Being annoying" shouldn't be a metric that disqualifies you from getting into Heaven.
"I heard somewhere that Italian mafias did cannibalism, so I guess Angel was a cannibal for some reason."
So they didn't bring up anything from the show itself to support their argument that Angel is a bad candidate for redemption? They instead tried to appeal to real-world history, but without even doing any thorough research? I can understand where your annoyance is coming from.
My (admittedly brief) Internet search has not found evidence of mafia cannibalism in New York at the time Angel would have been alive. The closest I could find was a New York Times reporter called William Seabrook who claimed to have eaten human meat sometime before 1931. No mafia connections as far as I can see.
Also, even if Angel really was a cannibal, shouldn't that mean Alastor and Rosie need to receive equal amounts of condemnation? Why single out Angel?
Tumblr media
I've said it before and I'll say it again: I do not understand all this Angel-bashing.
When there are so many other characters in the Hellaverse you're clearly supposed to hate, such as Valentino (the pimp who drugs and rapes his employees) and Mammon (the exploitative boss who was willing to make sex dolls out of a child's likeness), it seems just a smidgen nonsensical to target Angel.
Yes, Angel did harass Husk, as you mention. But a) Angel never went so far as to assault Husk, whereas someone like Valentino would have done so, and b) Angel actually stopped doing the bad behaviour eventually, which is more than can be said for some characters.
I did wonder if the reason why Hazbin-critical people focus on Angel is because they see him as a stereotype of gay men and they want to see (what they believe is) better gay representation. But the fact that this TikToker used a homophobic slur blasts a hole in that theory. So I'm still confused.
Eh, whatever. I like Angel, and I know why I like Angel, and that's what really matters!
Tumblr media
As for why Angel and Husk haven't been redeemed yet - I think their souls still being owned is part of it. And there's also the fact that their situations (addiction and self-destructive behaviours and deep-seated self-loathing) are more complex than Sir Pentious' problems.
And yeah, Heaven is probably a bit too relentlessly happy for Husk. He'd be like LEGO Batman in a world full of Unikittys. LOL! And Angel would probably not enjoy being slut-shamed by the likes of Lute. But maybe he'd be able to bear it as long as he could be with Molly...
19 notes · View notes