christopherlamell-dualitykid237

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

https://a.co/d/cZq6JaQ

Check out water from the well! It’s a philosophy book composed from duality. It even breaks down duality with mathematics, teaching spotting and combining potential cells!

Wow! this is awesome knowledge!

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

The Daily Newsletter

Earth Order Sums up to be about freedom, harmony and ability.

It’s very wide-open, accepting, lenient and liberal; it seems like a nihilist wrote it. The idea is that we can all do anything together without rubbing each other the wrong way, and it uses segregation and voting to win us over. It says each city, or region, sets their own rules and enforces them and as long as we follow the laws, we get a choice where we go in the afterlife. It goes on to say that we can even have violent and vulgar laws to follow, or allow violent and vulgar behavior but only so many people are allowed to participate. The laws are all based around fair behavior—an idea brought to light in another philosophy book. It says something like equal energy shared is fair. The same idea was behind karma, eye for an eye and reaping what you sow. It’s a definition that’s definable with math and physics. It’s still a nihilist viewpoint. Earth Order says it’s fair to allow some unfair behavior because fair treatment isn’t the new “good” and “evil.” I stay true to nihilism. It says there’s only one restriction in Earth Order and that’s limiting your potential so strict that you can’t change; it defies the nature of freedom and ability.

Voting, condoning, allying, universal languages and universal, electronic currency come together to create a unity and stronger capability. The economy creates potent money that benefits ability and just like the justice system it gives a structure of what the economies trying to do. Throughout the whole book, it tells you what the goal(s) are—anarchy—and that, in case the writing’s primitive or if the writer made a mistake, the reader(s) can correct them.

Anarchy

That means no government is the end result of Earth Order as if the government melted away. People enforce laws—if they choose to—and trade civilly among themselves, policing “crime” on their own. The philosophy is that knowledge and autonomy will change the person enough that they’ll stabilize naturally…without a government. Isn’t that crazy? One day: utopia…even with violent, quirky, cute, funny, perverted people.

Any law your region settles with is the law you abide by. Amish people have a place in Earth Order. Buddhist monks have a place in Earth Order. Christians (half of my family) have a place in Earth Order. If anything, it’s a good political science read. Instead of Plato’s “Republic,” it’s Christopher LaMell’s “Earth Order.”

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

I started working on the matrix

I’m going to be helping people in the matrix every day from now on. There’s people that are being controlled—think brainwashed—and I’m going to help them get “sober” and free. I call it the matrix because it’s a simulation you get hooked up to and you can use it like a program or app. Seriously. Some guy’s claiming he solved relativity and that he’s God or a messiah. I solved duality and I’m not God or a messiah. This looks bad on me, too, so I’m going to help as much as I can. Don’t call me anything. If I say something like, “I’m the H2O king,” he’ll tell everyone HE’S the H2O king and he’ll do terroristic stuff so the H2O king will look bad. I’m not the H2O king, for the record. Or maybe I am….

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

Hey Tumblr. I published a philosophy book called “Earth Order” and it uses relativity/duality and nihilism to entice political change. It’s a free, fair, harmonious ideology that demonstrates a democracy. Hope you enjoy!

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

Hey Tumblr. I published a philosophy book called “Earth Order” and it uses relativity/duality and nihilism to entice political change. It’s a free, fair, harmonious ideology that demonstrates a democracy. Hope you enjoy!

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

The story of the great harlot:

A demon sees the future some time ago and in the future, two other demons try to kill all spirits with a disease that makes the “spirit” perish after a long time of suffering. The harlot, who’s used to torture and rape, decides to help with a medicine that’s transferred through touch and taste. She/he/it decides to incarnate to be a sex slave for some time…eternity, it seems…and while at work, she sees a vision of duality and another demon becomes helpful and supposedly on her side. Never-mind.

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

I’m starting a classroom every Tuesday and Thursday and it will stay open from 9am—9pm. It’s a place to come and chat and discuss duality!

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

I’m finished with “Water from the Well: a philosophy collection” and “Earth Order.” Check them out if you like philosophy. Check them out even if you don’t! They’re fantastic reads. It’s controversial, fresh, easy to read and short, too. Have fun no matter what you do.

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

The Well of Knowledge

Relativity. Duality. “The Well of Knowledge”. Whatever you want to call it, it’s a description of all reality—it explains everything, even art (something math can’t do well)—and because reality is infinite and exists in potential, duality explains reality’s infinite potential. However, just because there’s the potential for something to exist doesn’t mean it has to exist in the palpable world. For instance, we have an unlimited amount of potential for subatomic particles, but in this world, there are only a few types that make up space. Like the Schrödinger’s cat experiment suggests, though, potential exists.

Duality is the pinnacle of all knowledge. It explains more of reality than mathematics and is as essential as communication. You can even explain math and communication with duality. It’s very easy to use, too. What we’re describing is the production of two opposite potentials, bound by their association, the way hot and cold are bound by temperature.

When we begin to explain duality to people, we first have to explain what an opposite is. An opposite is two separate energies, or potentials, that are fundamentally associated with polar differences. Fire and ice aren’t opposites because there’s no reason they’re fundamentally associated. Hot and cold are. When we talk about hot and cold, we discuss them fundamentally by saying they’re temperatures (that’s where they share basic similarities). Fire and ice aren’t fundamentally associated by anything. Sure, fire’s hot and ice is cold, and that makes them appear to be opposites, but they’re just not natural opposites. I’ve used the same type of question to teach kids, asking if a dog and a cat were opposites, knowing they’re different by some core theme (one chases; one gets chased), but they aren’t similar on some fundamental plane. Men and women are opposites but not dogs and cats.

The forces are the two equal, opposite nodes expelling energy within the “fundamental association” (the fundamental association is the big circle, or energy, and the forces are at the center of the two smaller circles). The forces are the sources of the potential and both forces provide infinite potential. They look like two springs in a well. They’re equal, opposing energies and they’re mixing, thanks to them being bound. The equality between the two forces is what creates symmetry (they’re both infinite: one’s infinitely positive and the other’s infinitely negative). We know they’re infinite because potential is boundless: in between two points are infinite points. A circle provides infinite potential and because the opposing forces are equal, the sweet-spots are circular. The same is true for the realm of potential—it’s infinite, too. Duality wouldn’t make sense as any other shapes—only circles provide infinity and equality—the dualistic nature is what does it and that potential is endless, or can go in all directions. Also, we know infinite exists, we just can’t define it.

The energies at the absolutes, or nodes, are forced out so hard, that anything close to the nodes is around absolute. When you’ve reached that close to the absolute, it’s called the “sweet-spots” (the two smaller circles that look like springs). When potential reaches a sweet-spot, it has become exceptionally like one opposite over the other, like around positive one and around negative one, or solid enough to be called solid and gaseous enough to be called gas. For example, wood and metal are both solids (around negative one) but one is more solid than the other, so it would be closer to the absolute or farther away from the opposing force (picture). We know the absolutes are reachable. Space and time tell us the infinite nodes can be reached...math, too: 2=2 is intrinsic and it’s absolutely, one-hundred-percent true. Also, to say the absolutes can’t be reached proves that they can. To say, “it’s impossible to reach the absolutes” sets an absolute that exists (i.e. “impossible”). To say that the absolutes can be reached might be intrinsic. Also, not only does the absolute “impossible” exist, and so does the opposite: “possible”, so the absolutes can be reached. That means infinite is reachable and our assumptions that space and time are infinite and eternal are backed up with duality.

The realm of potential is the largest, confining circle. When we describe temperature, we can only talk about the two energies “hot” and “cold”. Temperature confines hot and cold. When we discuss the potential of temperature, we cannot discuss “solid” or “gas” (two completely different opposites). We can discuss the temperature of the gas or solid, but it would be in terms of hot and cold. We’re confined by the fundamental association.

This idea claims there’s non-physical energy, or matter, like radiation, heat, gravity, etc. and it can be described in terms of gases and solids, too—it can also be broken down into nonphysical elements, possibly the strong force, the weak force, the fifth force, electromagnetism and gravitation. Radiation is dispersed like a cloud and gravity touches everything. Gravity’s a solid and radiation is a gas. It also says that there’s not an opposite for everything, only that everything exists in opposites—everything’s dualistic. There’s no opposite to temperature, but “temperature” is divided into opposites (hot and cold). People often ask, “What’s the opposite of a tree?” Well, the tree doesn’t have a fundamental opposite, but it’s made up of opposites like everything else: solids, liquids and gases; it grows up and down, right and left, forward and backward, etc. Duality explains all reality and we can expect to understand reality in a simple, dualistic, mathematical way.

The middle area—in between the sweet spots—is the turbulent middle ground: a mix of the two opposing forces and describes liquids as opposed to solid and gas, or warm and cool as opposed to hot and cold. Liquids are like solids and like gases. Metalloids are in between metal and nonmetal and approach each absolute/sweet-spot in varying degrees, creating different types of metalloids—some more like metals and others more like nonmetals. It’s like a number line from negative one to positive one. This idea generates a way to define potential.

The area close to the fundamental association and close to the sweet-spot, where the friction is highest in the middle-sides is called the “strange area”. A fungus is in between a plant and an animal and is located in the strange area because it’s alike to a plant (middle ground for alive and dead) and it’s alike to an animal (sweet-spot of alive). Animal is one absolute, plant is the middle ground and rocks are the opposing absolute. In between plant and animal is a fungus. This is pretty common knowledge. The mix becomes radically different in that area. I think water is a base, or neutral, liquid. It’s located in the center of the mixture area. Sand, though, is located in the strange area. A grain of sand is around solid; it’s in the sweet spot. It could be more solid, but it’s exceptionally like solid (around negative one). A beach is more like a liquid. It blows around in the wind; it sinks beneath your feet. As a whole, it’s not solid enough to be called solid or liquid enough to be called liquid. It’s a “strange liquid” on the solid side, like fungi’s in the place of living and dead matter. Clouds aren’t gas nor liquid. They’re strange liquids on the gas side. It’s as if they were a mixture of the middle area and the sweet-spots.

When the energies from the forces collide, they create a fourth energy: friction. The friction is highest at the absolutes where the energy is expelled. All along the “equator”, except at the absolutes, the friction is around one hundred percent. It dies off to zero at the crest (not around zero, but absolute zero). This helps add up to the knowledge explaining its self. It’s intrinsic because it exists as the two opposite forces and a mix (the obvious proof). It explains its self, but like all science, it has its learning curve. It consists of two flowing, opposite energies, one stagnant energy and friction: the in between, creeping energy. There’s possibility and impossibility because some ideas don’t have potential: they’re outside of the fundamental association (aka: the realm of potential). Also, there’s one-hundred percent friction and zero percent friction (one-hundred percent and zero percent being opposites) which all make the knowledge intrinsic.

It’s a simple physics problem; it’s easy to apply, but the philosophy has to be explained. Two equal, infinite energies are being produced and bound, creating a collision. If we break it down mathematically, we can pick the two opposites negative infinity and positive infinity, but since negative one and positive one give us the same, clear answers, we’ll use negative one and positive one (one node is positive one and the other node is negative one). Directly in between negative one and positive one is the neutral zero and it runs from the collision point to the crests. In between zero and either absolute are infinite numbers, like 0.5, 0.75, 0.82, etc. We know this from looking over graphs in basic mathematics. We can assign a number for the mixture of positive and negative one. We can assign a number to the relative friction. We have four different energies (three types): the two forces, the fundamental association and the friction. Using this, we can gauge the mix between the two opposites and the friction in that “potential cell” (where the exact mix is located).

The theorem is: Potential cell is mix.y; friction. This means that you can point out a place in potential with the mix and it’s decisive factors and with the friction level. You can say where exactly helium is on then gas side by discerning it’s mix and friction level and we can mathematically explain the whole world through opposites.

U=mx§y; Fr.

• A=~-1mx§0.00y;75fr.

• B=~-1mx§+0.5y;75fr.

• C=~-1mx§0.0y/~+1mx§0.0y/0mx§0.0y;~100fr.

• D=0mx§+1y;40fr.

• E=-0.55mx§-0.10y;40fr.

• F=0mx§0.00y;0fr.

• G=-0.5mx§0.0y;25fr.

When you start to explain which potential cell you want to acknowledge, first we discern it’s mixes in between negative one and positive one. This gets a little difficult when you’re describing various potential cells in the sweet-spots. Their mixes are all around one or around negative one, so we have to explain the mix in two ways: the second way is describing what side of the absolute the potential cell is on. If it’s closer to the point where the two forces collide, it’s described as positive, like potential cell=~+1mx§+0.5y;~100fr. If the potential cell is located closer to where the forces collide with the fundamental association, it’s written as negative, like potential cell=~+1mx§-0.5y;~100fr which is located on the opposite side of the sweet-spot. After we discern it’s mix, we can gauge its friction level, which is pretty easy. At the absolutes, it’s 100fr; at the equator—besides the absolutes—Its ~100fr; and it dies down to 50fr at the bottom of the sweet-spots and then to 0fr at the crest.

There’s various sections within duality that are alike, creating “The Duality Sects”. They’re places where the potentials are similar enough to group together. When the area has had vibrant change, a new sect is made.

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

I started wondering tonight about particle physics and if there were non-physical elements like there’s physical elements (metals, no mental sand metallics) that make up our universe. The fundamental interactions are what I immediately thought of as to what energy makes up the non-physical energy, like “Spirit Matter.” Gravitation and the strong force are somewhat alike because they create more energy, or keep matter together. The weak force does the opposing function(s) and it makes energy decay or fall apart. Electromagnetism is alike to the weak force and it’s located in between the potential for stable energy and decaying energy. Its functions are related to electric charges, magnetic movements and the magnetic field. I’m using duality to guess at the functions of electromagnetism and to me, it looks like it’s describing energy decaying and staying stable, so we think of things like magnetic movements that push and pull energy, magnetic fields that effect stable energy and electric charges which seems like is energy stabilizing from some quasi-decay. If the middle ground is all about “stabilizing” energy, then dark matter and dark energy are probably so related, they could be the same force. The original line of thinking was that these interactions are the elements of the non-physical world but after observing reality, it seems like the elements that make up the non-physical energy are more like the natural elements of the physical world. Spirit and heat are two prime examples of non physical energies that aren’t made up of the fundamental interactions. So, will there be a non-physical element(s) to make the elemental table after duality breaks through into particle physics? What gives non-physical energy different colors, feel, sound, etc. could be explained with a non-physical elemental chart. What would the opposites be that make up the non-physical elements?: active and dormant, changing and staying the same, vibrant and dull, etc. These characteristics of non-physical energy would be like atomic weight, element features, etc. Maybe strings are the elements of non-physical energy. I’m not sure how far into string theory we’ve gotten and I’m not sure how chaotic our grasps at understanding strings are because I’ve heard scientists aren’t getting anywhere with the study, but duality might help there, too. When I studied strings, I concluded with duality studies that if there’s strings, they can be still or in motion, separate or connected…even semi-connected…and they’re multi-dimensional, like membranes or one cell organisms. Since they’re non-physical, they can cross one another and create a semi-connected state. The four interactions of space still pull, push and stabilize on the strings and for some reason, this idea is why I think string theory is falling part so much. Non-physical energy that becomes excited seems to be able to be excited easier than physical matter—as if physical matter were the dormant sister of active non-physical energy. It seems like strings supposedly “jump around” because potential exists and potential is a non-physical energy…for one…and when a string gets excited, it can move through space more easily since there’s no dense matter. Who knows how fast strings can move? This theory of strings, “The Well of Knowledge String Theory,” also corrects the rocky absolutes of subatomic particles. The spin is never actually absolute one; the spin is at AROUND one. The charge, likewise, is never at ABSOLUTE one; it’s at around one, instead. This problem with quantum mechanics is what I think leads to string theory problems. It makes me want to say, “No wonder string theorists think physics allows strings to ‘misbehave.’” They probably can’t do the impossible and the problem IS something easy to fix. Anyway, I thought I’d share some duality studies. Thanks to the well of knowledge, Wikipedia and google.

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

[christopherlamell-dualitykid237]

The Well of Knowledge

Relativity. Duality. “The Well of Knowledge”. Whatever you want to call it, it’s a description of all reality—it explains everything, even art (something math can’t do well)—and because reality is infinite and exists in potential, duality explains reality’s infinite potential. However, just because there’s the potential for something to exist doesn’t mean it has to exist in the palpable world. For instance, we have an unlimited amount of potential for subatomic particles, but in this world, there are only a few types that make up space. Like the Schrödinger’s cat experiment suggests, though, potential exists.

Duality is the pinnacle of all knowledge. It explains more of reality than mathematics and is as essential as communication. You can even explain math and communication with duality. It’s very easy to use, too. What we’re describing is the production of two opposite potentials, bound by their association, the way hot and cold are bound by temperature.

When we begin to explain duality to people, we first have to explain what an opposite is. An opposite is two separate energies, or potentials, that are fundamentally associated with polar differences. Fire and ice aren’t opposites because there’s no reason they’re fundamentally associated. Hot and cold are. When we talk about hot and cold, we discuss them fundamentally by saying they’re temperatures (that’s where they share basic similarities). Fire and ice aren’t fundamentally associated by anything. Sure, fire’s hot and ice is cold, and that makes them appear to be opposites, but they’re just not natural opposites. I’ve used the same type of question to teach kids, asking if a dog and a cat were opposites, knowing they’re different by some core theme (one chases; one gets chased), but they aren’t similar on some fundamental plane. Men and women are opposites but not dogs and cats.

The forces are the two equal, opposite nodes expelling energy within the “fundamental association” (the fundamental association is the big circle, or energy, and the forces are at the center of the two smaller circles). The forces are the sources of the potential and both forces provide infinite potential. They look like two springs in a well. They’re equal, opposing energies and they’re mixing, thanks to them being bound. The equality between the two forces is what creates symmetry (they’re both infinite: one’s infinitely positive and the other’s infinitely negative). We know they’re infinite because potential is boundless: in between two points are infinite points. A circle provides infinite potential and because the opposing forces are equal, the sweet-spots are circular. The same is true for the realm of potential—it’s infinite, too. Duality wouldn’t make sense as any other shapes—only circles provide infinity and equality—the dualistic nature is what does it and that potential is endless, or can go in all directions. Also, we know infinite exists, we just can’t define it.

The energies at the absolutes, or nodes, are forced out so hard, that anything close to the nodes is around absolute. When you’ve reached that close to the absolute, it’s called the “sweet-spots” (the two smaller circles that look like springs). When potential reaches a sweet-spot, it has become exceptionally like one opposite over the other, like around positive one and around negative one, or solid enough to be called solid and gaseous enough to be called gas. For example, wood and metal are both solids (around negative one) but one is more solid than the other, so it would be closer to the absolute or farther away from the opposing force (picture). We know the absolutes are reachable. Space and time tell us the infinite nodes can be reached...math, too: 2=2 is intrinsic and it’s absolutely, one-hundred-percent true. Also, to say the absolutes can’t be reached proves that they can. To say, “it’s impossible to reach the absolutes” sets an absolute that exists (i.e. “impossible”). To say that the absolutes can be reached might be intrinsic. Also, not only does the absolute “impossible” exist, and so does the opposite: “possible”, so the absolutes can be reached. That means infinite is reachable and our assumptions that space and time are infinite and eternal are backed up with duality.

The realm of potential is the largest, confining circle. When we describe temperature, we can only talk about the two energies “hot” and “cold”. Temperature confines hot and cold. When we discuss the potential of temperature, we cannot discuss “solid” or “gas” (two completely different opposites). We can discuss the temperature of the gas or solid, but it would be in terms of hot and cold. We’re confined by the fundamental association.

This idea claims there’s non-physical energy, or matter, like radiation, heat, gravity, etc. and it can be described in terms of gases and solids, too—it can also be broken down into nonphysical elements, possibly the strong force, the weak force, the fifth force, electromagnetism and gravitation. Radiation is dispersed like a cloud and gravity touches everything. Gravity’s a solid and radiation is a gas. It also says that there’s not an opposite for everything, only that everything exists in opposites—everything’s dualistic. There’s no opposite to temperature, but “temperature” is divided into opposites (hot and cold). People often ask, “What’s the opposite of a tree?” Well, the tree doesn’t have a fundamental opposite, but it’s made up of opposites like everything else: solids, liquids and gases; it grows up and down, right and left, forward and backward, etc. Duality explains all reality and we can expect to understand reality in a simple, dualistic, mathematical way.

The middle area—in between the sweet spots—is the turbulent middle ground: a mix of the two opposing forces and describes liquids as opposed to solid and gas, or warm and cool as opposed to hot and cold. Liquids are like solids and like gases. Metalloids are in between metal and nonmetal and approach each absolute/sweet-spot in varying degrees, creating different types of metalloids—some more like metals and others more like nonmetals. It’s like a number line from negative one to positive one. This idea generates a way to define potential.

The area close to the fundamental association and close to the sweet-spot, where the friction is highest in the middle-sides is called the “strange area”. A fungus is in between a plant and an animal and is located in the strange area because it’s alike to a plant (middle ground for alive and dead) and it’s alike to an animal (sweet-spot of alive). Animal is one absolute, plant is the middle ground and rocks are the opposing absolute. In between plant and animal is a fungus. This is pretty common knowledge. The mix becomes radically different in that area. I think water is a base, or neutral, liquid. It’s located in the center of the mixture area. Sand, though, is located in the strange area. A grain of sand is around solid; it’s in the sweet spot. It could be more solid, but it’s exceptionally like solid (around negative one). A beach is more like a liquid. It blows around in the wind; it sinks beneath your feet. As a whole, it’s not solid enough to be called solid or liquid enough to be called liquid. It’s a “strange liquid” on the solid side, like fungi’s in the place of living and dead matter. Clouds aren’t gas nor liquid. They’re strange liquids on the gas side. It’s as if they were a mixture of the middle area and the sweet-spots.

When the energies from the forces collide, they create a fourth energy: friction. The friction is highest at the absolutes where the energy is expelled. All along the “equator”, except at the absolutes, the friction is around one hundred percent. It dies off to zero at the crest (not around zero, but absolute zero). This helps add up to the knowledge explaining its self. It’s intrinsic because it exists as the two opposite forces and a mix (the obvious proof). It explains its self, but like all science, it has its learning curve. It consists of two flowing, opposite energies, one stagnant energy and friction: the in between, creeping energy. There’s possibility and impossibility because some ideas don’t have potential: they’re outside of the fundamental association (aka: the realm of potential). Also, there’s one-hundred percent friction and zero percent friction (one-hundred percent and zero percent being opposites) which all make the knowledge intrinsic.

It’s a simple physics problem; it’s easy to apply, but the philosophy has to be explained. Two equal, infinite energies are being produced and bound, creating a collision. If we break it down mathematically, we can pick the two opposites negative infinity and positive infinity, but since negative one and positive one give us the same, clear answers, we’ll use negative one and positive one (one node is positive one and the other node is negative one). Directly in between negative one and positive one is the neutral zero and it runs from the collision point to the crests. In between zero and either absolute are infinite numbers, like 0.5, 0.75, 0.82, etc. We know this from looking over graphs in basic mathematics. We can assign a number for the mixture of positive and negative one. We can assign a number to the relative friction. We have four different energies (three types): the two forces, the fundamental association and the friction. Using this, we can gauge the mix between the two opposites and the friction in that “potential cell” (where the exact mix is located).

The theorem is: Potential cell is mix.y; friction. This means that you can point out a place in potential with the mix and it’s decisive factors and with the friction level. You can say where exactly helium is on then gas side by discerning it’s mix and friction level and we can mathematically explain the whole world through opposites.

U=mx§y; Fr.

• A=~-1mx§0.00y;75fr.

• B=~-1mx§+0.5y;75fr.

• C=~-1mx§0.0y/~+1mx§0.0y/0mx§0.0y;~100fr.

• D=0mx§+1y;40fr.

• E=-0.55mx§-0.10y;40fr.

• F=0mx§0.00y;0fr.

• G=-0.5mx§0.0y;25fr.

When you start to explain which potential cell you want to acknowledge, first we discern it’s mixes in between negative one and positive one. This gets a little difficult when you’re describing various potential cells in the sweet-spots. Their mixes are all around one or around negative one, so we have to explain the mix in two ways: the second way is describing what side of the absolute the potential cell is on. If it’s closer to the point where the two forces collide, it’s described as positive, like potential cell=~+1mx§+0.5y;~100fr. If the potential cell is located closer to where the forces collide with the fundamental association, it’s written as negative, like potential cell=~+1mx§-0.5y;~100fr which is located on the opposite side of the sweet-spot. After we discern it’s mix, we can gauge its friction level, which is pretty easy. At the absolutes, it’s 100fr; at the equator—besides the absolutes—Its ~100fr; and it dies down to 50fr at the bottom of the sweet-spots and then to 0fr at the crest.

There’s various sections within duality that are alike, creating “The Duality Sects”. They’re places where the potentials are similar enough to group together. When the area has had vibrant change, a new sect is made.