joe20xx

[joe20xx]

The taste of a thorn

Ahead to adorn

Facsimile smile, decorated

On the web, hearted

By the masses

Shows a cheek to the asses

Inside the mind of today

Forgot it’s another way

Demeaned by deliberate dullards

Who drank up all their cupboards

Talking in the recess rivers

Of reactionary streams

Many more ask for another

From their sisters to the brother

Of a transition to sense

Blind by those only bring fence

Oh, fence. Offensive recompense

For self expressions and their joy

Wherein themselves, they toy

Learning, discovering, Living

Others, smothers, demand covers

Contrary to consistent

Plurality exsistent

Confusion, protrusion

Flagellate forth for

Sins of self discovery

Rather red reading

Mythos recovery

Stigma of stigmatyr

Callously coerced leading

To a Foster Father

An escape, to immaterial lies

Here lies the nesthead of flies

[joe20xx]

Every cry for the pragmatic is useless when backing further and further from an ideal; every cry for the common man or the business man irrelevant to the individual accountable. One idiot is still an idiot; the rest might be less idiotic, but they’re still idiots for not adhering to a sense of value they claim to have by encouraging such idiocy. That makes it idiocy okay, or worse only punishable by a centralize system rather than social pressures; such apathetic nihilism collapses on itself, when the boot flips and reason becomes made evident to cultural dividers, yet at the avoidable expense of everyone involved in such “postmodern” theater of champagne “trust fund” activism.

[joe20xx]

The notion of stepping forth when others don’t is not profound; what is profound is how much one would need to, in an ever anxious and evolving world. And for some it is easier, for others it’s a nightmare; yet for many such divergent thoughts are luxury they can’t prioritize over their more pressing priorities.

To wander in thought and in the world is a luxury of successful nations, that while not perfect are more so than others; to become more perfect is inevitable (as the world doesn’t remain static, like a module), whether or not it is desired for those without the means to dawdle (especially if such requires aid to such focus).

[joe20xx]

During elections and moments of political panic, those that dehumanize others will defend themselves with the reactionary shares and posts that don’t have them think: “hold on is that actually true, or is that just reinforcing my fears or likes?”.

And they will quick to defend their side, in their own collective cognitive dissonance. The algorithm is known to reinforce such, yet provocative material tend to incite pseudo intellectualism for clicks; then denial kicks in, as if one isn’t responsible for their behavior “because it’s so addictive”, despite not having a history of addiction prior.

“The propagandists’s purpose is to make one set of people forget that another set of people aren’t human.”- Huxley

No one controls elections truly; “they” may control the narrative, but only gullible-impulsive people believe everything a particular spin doctor says.

[joe20xx]

"All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players. They have their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts."- Shakespeare

Due to psychological stressors of our times, much of the presumed negatives about indulgent behaviors are more common without negative favours, while culture is split in how handle to such- as if the culture tribes’s supposed virtue where more important than the individual’s assessment (self-acceptance/actualization).

There some arguments, both in regards to market and state ultimatums, that diminish individual risk assessment that take a negative defense of such oligarchs and plutarchs over the trader principle of the transactions; this involves both parties not just one, as if people need to boxed into tribal groups instead of pursue their own happiness and interests.

[joe20xx]

Limits of Subjectivity

Those that view reality, facts, and morality as subjective tend to have issue with either meaning anything other than perspective, opinion, and somehow “no not that”. If matters don’t have some objectivity, then there’s nothing that can’t be argued nor agreed to “voluntarily” (in the “postmodern” sense). Yet in establishing, that often puts limits of which many are unable to agreed, beyond minimal basis, despite the popular demand for “more”, “better”, “universal”, etc. interventions (to satiate a worry with minimal involvement).

[joe20xx]

To oppose an idea without an idea isn’t merely antintellectual; it’s unintelligible. If one provides no substitute yet demands silence, they’re a tyrant; if they provide a subtitute that is lesser, it is more than the authoritarian, supremist idea that demands no persuasion being needed. Not engaging is a substitute to such coercion; if something is truly self-destructive, it will die and it should be so, instead of turned into to dividing point of ideolgues. Intervening on a deadened matter can unnecessarily cause the unwanted persistence of such, as an unintended consequence.

[joe20xx]

Analogy

In a larger jungle one is freer, yet in all jungles someone will still be thinking about creating grouping zones (safety) rather than teaching life lessons (independence). A free monkey can still be intimidated, yet an independent one can find another banana tree and community of chimps. A safe monkey may not be aware of and even convince themselves to give up, when there’s another jungle that could be explored.

[joe20xx]

There’s desire to look beyond the materialism of reality, while denying the material of existence, while seeking spiritualism, and attempt to grasp the spiritual contrary; all in attempt to both be free in manners similar to an idealized childhood and idealized adulthood, at times intersecting each and inducing conflict. Rather than reexamining any of the prior dualisms, as the learned experience is seen as beneficial despite it not leading to benefit in the subjective manner which is conflicted.

[joe20xx]

When one admits something is stupid, they admit it’s not in their best sense of self-interest. Yet tend to use such as an excuse to deny self-interest, which is illogical. In parenting and other managerial governances, it is important to have reminders of such; not that impulse can’t lead to better decisions, yet because impulse is not the correct induction theory. Guessing is sometimes necessary, yet less likely things are not wise; though, circumstances can make better things less likely, as an understanding of such may yet not be clear to the consensus.

[joe20xx]

Demisexual makes more sense, when sapio tends to refer to an intelligence and intelligence tends to fixate on planning everything with concerns of agency, and agency is seen as emotional outcry for the despot’s plans; and that a relationship needs a level of agency for respect rather than the abusive basis of arbitrary predetermined dominance vs submission based on group association rather than metrics of individuals indecent of the group. Yet even saying that, people worry enough to forgoe agency beyond themselves, whether as an individual or group to an authority and become accustomed to submitting to it increments of soft despotism that it ends up being considered “common sense”, instead of climbing the peaks of reason.

[joe20xx]

One person views another assumes they don’t wish or do wish. The other often rationalizes the answer expected, would not always be truly honest yet may be perceived such; they may be even honored for such lack of development. “How virtuous” thine trauma, like that of Quasimodo. (“Those that can you believe absurdities can commit atrocities.”) Sacrfice is such a cultist mentality; as if berating oneself was worse than truly demonstrating greater worth than those so ignoble they demand nobility. (“Good is not a thing you are. It’s a thing you do.”)

[joe20xx]

How art the stars that shine upon the moon/When moonlight lit upon you so soon/Silken threads saturate the solstice soon/And, hallowed heathers hark Hecate/Spin Moon Magic spun thine plate/Hourglass evenings initiate/Wed the wolve and widow/Begot the Pyre evermore/in the leafy meadow/Rising Fenix, soar.