#Amazon data extraction

[retailgators]

Our Amazon product data scraping service helps you gather real-time pricing, reviews, ratings, and product details effortlessly. Stay ahead in eCommerce with accurate and structured data for market analysis, competitor research, and business growth. Get the best Amazon data extraction solutions today

[3idatascraping]

How To Extract Amazon Product Prices Data With Python 3?

How To Extract Amazon Product Data From Amazon Product Pages?

Markup all data fields to be extracted using Selectorlib

Then copy as well as run the given code

Setting Up Your Computer For Amazon Scraping

We will utilize Python 3 for the Amazon Data Scraper. This code won’t run in case, you use Python 2.7. You require a computer having Python 3 as well as PIP installed.

Follow the guide given to setup the computer as well as install packages in case, you are using Windows.

Packages For Installing Amazon Data Scraping

Python Requests for making requests as well as download HTML content from Amazon’s product pages

SelectorLib python packages to scrape data using a YAML file that we have created from webpages that we download

Using pip3,

pip3 install requests selectorlib

Extract Product Data From Amazon Product Pages

An Amazon product pages extractor will extract the following data from product pages.

Product Name

Pricing

Short Description

Complete Product Description

Ratings

Images URLs

Total Reviews

Optional ASINs

Link to Review Pages

Sales Ranking

Markup Data Fields With Selectorlib

As we have marked up all the data already, you can skip the step in case you wish to have rights of the data.

Let’s save it as the file named selectors.yml in same directory with our code

For More Information : https://www.3idatascraping.com/how-to-extract-amazon-prices-and-product-data-with-python-3/

[iwebdatascraping0]

[actowizsolutions0]

Unlock Business Insights with Search Engine Data Scraping Services

In today’s digital world, data is the key to business success. Whether you are monitoring market trends, analyzing competitors, or gathering insights, search engine data scraping services provide a powerful way to extract valuable information. From business listings to product details and customer sentiments, scraping search engine data can enhance decision-making and business strategies.

Benefits of Search Engine Data Scraping Services

Market Research and Competitor AnalysisExtract data from search engines to gain insights into market trends, industry patterns, and competitor strategies.

SEO and Keyword AnalysisRetrieve search rankings, keyword suggestions, and search volume data to refine your SEO strategy and improve online visibility.

Lead Generation and Business ListingsGather contact details, business information, and customer reviews to enhance marketing and sales strategies.

Price Monitoring and E-commerce InsightsTrack product prices, customer reviews, and sales trends to stay competitive in the e-commerce market.

Industry-Specific Applications

Restaurant Industry: Extraction Restaurant Data

Businesses in the food industry can leverage extraction restaurant services to collect customer reviews, menu details, and competitor pricing. This information can help improve offerings and boost customer engagement.

Real Estate: Data Scraping Services for Property Insights

With real estate data scraping services, businesses can extract property listings, market trends, and agent details to stay ahead in the real estate industry.

Food Delivery and Menu Aggregators: Extract Menus

Restaurant aggregators and food delivery services can use extract menus solutions to collect accurate menu details, pricing, and offers from various restaurants.

E-commerce: Amazon Data Scraping for Competitive Analysis

E-commerce businesses can benefit from amazon data scraping services to track product pricing, customer reviews, and competitor strategies for better positioning in the marketplace.

Why Choose Actowiz Solutions?

Actowiz Solutions specializes in providing high-quality data scraping services tailored to various industries. Our expertise ensures accurate, real-time data extraction while maintaining compliance with industry regulations.

Leverage search engine data scraping services to gain actionable insights and drive business growth. Contact Actowiz Solutions today for customized data solutions!

[webscreen-scraping]

The ASIN (Amazon Standard Identification Identifier) is a ten-digit number that is used to identify products on Amazon. This is unique to each product and is assigned when a new item is added to Amazon's stock. Except for books, which have an ISBN (International Standard Book Number) instead of an ASIN, almost every product on Amazon has an ASIN code. This Amazon product identifier is required before you may sell on Amazon. To achieve the best and most precise results, you can use an Amazon scraping tool to scrape Amazon product data.

[tech2globe62]

Grow Your Business with an Amazon Consultant

Grow your business by partnering with an Amazon Consulting Agency. These experts provide tailored strategies to optimize your product listings, manage PPC campaigns, and enhance overall brand visibility. An Amazon Consulting Agency helps you navigate the complexities of the platform, ensuring higher rankings and increased sales. Leverage their expertise to maximize your Amazon presence and drive significant business growth.

[mobiledatascrape]

Scrape Data from Amazon and Flipkart Mobile Apps

Uncover competitive secrets and market trends by scraping data from Amazon and Flipkart mobile apps. Access valuable insights to fuel your e-commerce success.

know more:

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Threats to Democracy in Brazil: The Rise of Technofeudalism and the Assault on Democratic Institutions

We are living in a time when threats to democracy emerge from multiple fronts. Some of these threats are traditional—such as corruption and political violence—but others are novel and particularly insidious, leveraging digital technologies to undermine democratic institutions in unprecedented ways. One such force is what Cédric Durand coined as technofeudalism, a new order in which digital monopolies accumulate power, wealth, and control over political discourse, exacerbating social inequalities and manipulating public perception to their advantage.

At the turn of the 21st century, the rise of information technology brought great hope for decentralization, innovation, and democratization. The internet was hailed as a tool that would empower individuals, allowing them to access knowledge, connect across borders, and engage in civic participation. However, instead of delivering on these promises, the so-called “digital revolution” has created a landscape dominated by corporate monopolies, where a handful of platforms control the vast majority of information, economic transactions, and even social interactions.

This is the essence of technofeudalism: an economic system where control over data and digital infrastructure is concentrated in the hands of a few corporate actors—Google, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft—who act as modern-day feudal lords. Unlike traditional market capitalism, where businesses compete for customers, these platforms do not simply participate in the economy; they own it. Users are not merely consumers but digital subjects who must pay rent—either through direct fees or by extracting their personal data—to access basic services.

In Brazil, this dynamic is particularly dangerous. As a country that has long struggled with economic inequality and institutional fragility, the rise of technofeudalism presents a severe challenge to sovereignty, democracy, and social justice. With digital platforms acting as arbiters of truth, political engagement, and economic opportunity, we must ask ourselves: Who controls Brazil’s democracy in the digital age? This question is motivated by five major threats.

Continue reading.

[ranticore]

Two questions about Siren:

After the revolution, did Atom make any attempt to reclaim the planet?

Did the authorities/general public ever find out about Siren?

No and no

So Atom was the type of corporation that didn't really have to care about bad PR in the public eye. They were like Amazon - demonstrably shit, but has that ever really stopped them? Their product, their geneweave technology, was their golden goose and proprietary technology. Maybe there might have been a headline in the news cycle for a day, "Atom fined for 'unethical' genetic experimentation" and then that would be that, buried under more news. People would move on, clients who already wanted to buy the products of that experimentation didn't care, etc.

Why not go back to Siren? Well because public perception is not the issue. Clients' perception is. You do NOT want your potential clients (mostly extraction & colonisation giants in the space exploration business) to know that your amazing unethical products that they pay top spacedollar for started a bloody revolutionary war, destroyed a colony on a promising planet, and killed many of your top technicians. You don't want to wave a neon sign at that incident. You want to bury it and forget it; the geneticists never made it off Siren, the data is lost, the planet still unnamed and unlabelled in official charts. Mounting a massive militarised reclamation mission would be flashy and expensive. Ishmael was made on Ceti, the planet from which the settlers came, and his genetic information is still there. Better to take that and try again, in a more controlled environment. Plus the Siren mission was partially funded by investors (usually future clients paying to have some say over the product - hey we want to union bust on a genetic level, can you do that for us?) and it wouldn't go down well with those investors to sidle up and ask for more money to clean up their oopsie ("what happened to all the money we gave you??" "oh the mission results were inconclusive")

[3idatascraping]

How to Extract Amazon Product Prices Data with Python 3

Web data scraping assists in automating web scraping from websites. In this blog, we will create an Amazon product data scraper for scraping product prices and details. We will create this easy web extractor using SelectorLib and Python and run that in the console.

[iwebdatascraping0]

📦 Flipkart vs Amazon — Comparing Price, Ratings & Delivery TAT 🛍️

A data-driven showdown between India’s two eCommerce giants!

Using real-time web scraping, brands and analysts can now extract and compare:

✅ Product-wise #PriceDifferences

 ✅ User #Ratings & Reviews across platforms

 ✅ #DeliveryTAT (Turnaround Time) by pin code & category

 ✅ Seller consistency, inventory levels & service quality

 ✅ Promo patterns & flash deal effectiveness

💡 “Understanding platform-level differences helps brands tailor strategy, pricing, and fulfillment models for maximum reach.”

[bsenvs3000w25]

Unit 9: Can Trees make their own Rain?

Hi everyone,

Welcome to my Week 9 blog post! 

This week, I want to share one of my favorite nature facts trees can actually create their own rain!

Introduction Forests offer much more than just habitats for wildlife and a source of oxygen; they play a crucial role in generating rainfall. This may come as a surprise, but studies indicate that forests can effectively produce their own rain through a phenomenon known as the Biotic Pump Theory.

Forests significantly influence local weather systems, playing a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and supporting diverse ecosystems. This highlights the importance of conserving our forests, not only for the wildlife that depends on them but also for the overall climate and water cycle they sustain. Protecting these natural habitats is essential for preserving both biodiversity and human life.

The Biotic Pump Theory suggests that trees can make and sustain rainful through atmospheric circulation. As trees release water vapor, they reduce atmospheric pressure over the forest. This creates a suction effect, pulling in moisture-rich air from surrounding areas. This continuous cycle helps sustain regular rainfall within the forest.

The Amazon Rainforest, one of Earth's most studied ecosystems, is a prime example of this phenomenon. Researchers have observed that rainfall begins in the Amazon two to three months before oceanic winds bring in moist air. But where does this early moisture come from? The answer lies in the trees themselves. Trees extract water from the soil through transpiration and release it into the air as water vapour. This vapour rises, cools, condenses into clouds, and eventually falls as rain.

Clouds over Amazon Rainforest

A quote that particularly resonated with me was: "In regards to mental health, experiences of awe can reduce stress and improve mood” (Green & Keltner, 2017, in Beck et al., 2018, Chapter 21). Although I’ve never had the chance to visit the Amazon Rainforest, I’ve always been captivated by its stunning beauty. A moment that truly left me in awe was my first visit to Banff, Alberta, where I experienced many breathtaking views.

NASA Data Satellite data has provided clear evidence that the moisture accumulating over the Amazon is primarily due to transpiration rather than ocean evaporation. Scientists analyzed water vapour using NASA's Aura satellite and found it contained high deuterium levels. Since ocean evaporation leaves deuterium behind, the presence of this isotope in the atmosphere of the rainforest indicates that the moisture originated from the trees, not the sea.

NASA Aura Satellite

Final Thoughts

If the Biotic Pump Theory is proven to be true, it will be essential to understand its role in regulating climate and rainfall. However, deforestation threatens this phenomenon. When vast areas of forest are cleared, the natural process of moisture transport is disrupted, leading to decreased rainfall and an increased risk of desertification. Regions that rely on the biotic pump for water could face agricultural collapse, water shortages, and the loss of vital ecosystems. These changes not only endanger local communities but also contribute to global climate instability. Therefore, it is essential to conserve these forests for future generations.

Regions that depend on The Biotic Pump: -American Southwest -African Sahel -Congo Rainforest -South Asia -Indonesian Archipelago

This week, our textbook emphasized the power of awe and how nature can inspire us to take action (Beck et al., 2018, Chapter 21). Were you in awe to learn that forests can create their own rain? Does this information make you feel compelled to take action?

Thanks for reading! Biona🌳🌧 References:

Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Chapter 21: The bright future of interpretation. In Interpreting cultural and natural heritage (pp. 457–467). Sagamore-Venture Publishing.

Biotic Pump Greening Group. Biotic Pump. https://www.thebioticpump.com/ 

Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. (2025, March 7). Amazon Rainforest. https://www.britannica.com/place/Amazon-Rainforest 

Latour, M. (2019). Biotic Pump Model. SIProtectors. https://www.siprotectors.org/biopic-pump-model

The Biotic Pump. Climate Action Tai Tokerau. (2020, March 28). https://northlandclimatechange.org/the-biotic-pump/ 

[webscreen-scraping]

The ASIN (Amazon Standard Identification Identifier) is a ten-digit number that is used to identify products on Amazon. This is unique to each product and is assigned when a new item is added to Amazon's stock. Except for books, which have an ISBN (International Standard Book Number) instead of an ASIN, almost every product on Amazon has an ASIN code. This Amazon product identifier is required before you may sell on Amazon. To achieve the best and most precise results, you can use an Amazon scraping tool to scrape Amazon product data.

[mariacallous]

In the old ranchlands of South Texas, dormant uranium mines are coming back online. A collection of new ones hope to start production soon, extracting radioactive fuel from the region’s shallow aquifers. Many more may follow.

These mines are the leading edge of what government and industry leaders in Texas hope will be a nuclear renaissance, as America’s latent nuclear sector begins to stir again.

Texas is currently developing a host of high-tech industries that require enormous amounts of electricity, from cryptocurrency mines and artificial intelligence to hydrogen production and seawater desalination. Now, powerful interests in the state are pushing to power it with next-generation nuclear reactors.

“We can make Texas the nuclear capital of the world,” said Reed Clay, president of the Texas Nuclear Alliance, former chief operating officer for Texas governor Greg Abbott’s office and former senior counsel to the Texas Office of the Attorney General. “There’s a huge opportunity.”

Clay owns a lobbying firm with heavyweight clients that include SpaceX, Dow Chemical, and the Texas Blockchain Council, among many others. He launched the Texas Nuclear Alliance in 2022 and formed the Texas Nuclear Caucus during the 2023 state legislative session to advance bills supportive of the nuclear industry.

The efforts come amid a national resurgence of interest in nuclear power, which can provide large amounts of energy without the carbon emissions that warm the planet. And it can do so with reliable consistency that wind and solar power generation lack. But it carries a small risk of catastrophic failure and requires uranium from mines that can threaten rural aquifers.

In South Texas, groundwater management officials have fought for almost 15 years against a planned uranium mine. Administrative law judges have ruled in their favor twice, finding potential for groundwater contamination. But in both cases those judges were overruled by the state’s main environmental regulator, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Now local leaders fear mining at the site appears poised to begin soon as momentum gathers behind America’s nuclear resurgence.

In October, Google announced the purchase of six small nuclear reactors to power its data centers by 2035. Amazon did the same shortly thereafter, and Microsoft has said it will pay to restart the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania to power its facilities. Last month, President Joe Biden announced a goal to triple US nuclear capacity by 2050. American companies are racing to license and manufacture new models of nuclear reactors.

“It’s kind of an unprecedented time in nuclear,” said James Walker, a nuclear physicist and cofounder of New York-based NANO Nuclear Energy, a startup developing small-scale “microreactors” for commercial deployment around 2031.

The industry’s reemergence stems from two main causes, he said: towering tech industry energy demands and the war in Ukraine.

Previously, the US relied on enriched uranium from decommissioned Russian weapons to fuel its existing power plants and military vessels. When war interrupted that supply in 2022, American authorities urgently began to rekindle domestic uranium mining and enrichment.

“The Department of Energy at the moment is trying to build back a lot of the infrastructure that atrophied,” Walker said. “A lot of those uranium deposits in Texas have become very economical, which means a lot of investment will go back into those sites.”

In May, the White House created a working group to develop guidelines for deployment of new nuclear power projects. In June, the Department of Energy announced $900 million in funding for small, next-generation reactors. And in September it announced a $1.5 billion loan to restart a nuclear power plant in Michigan, which it called “a first-of-a-kind effort.”

“There’s an urgent desire to find zero-carbon energy sources that aren’t intermittent like renewables,” said Colin Leyden, Texas state director of the Environmental Defense Fund. “There aren’t a lot of options, and nuclear is one.”

Wind and solar will remain the cheapest energy sources, Leyden said, and a build-out of nuclear power would likely accelerate the retirement of coal plants.

The US hasn’t built a nuclear reactor in 30 years, spooked by a handful of disasters. In contrast, China has grown its nuclear power generation capacity almost 900 percent in the last 20 years, according to the World Nuclear Association, and currently has 30 reactors under construction.

Last year, Abbott ordered the state’s Public Utility Commission to produce a report “outlining how Texas will become the national leader in using advanced nuclear energy.” According to the report, which was issued in November, new nuclear reactors would most likely be built in ports and industrial complexes to power large industrial operations and enable further expansion.

“The Ports and their associated industries, like Liquified Natural Gas (LNG), carbon capture facilities, hydrogen facilities and cruise terminals, need additional generation sources,” the report said. Advanced nuclear reactors “offer Texas’ Ports a unique opportunity to enable continued growth.”

In the Permian Basin, the report said, reactors could power oil production as well as purification of oilfield wastewater “for useful purposes.” Or they could power clusters of data centers in Central and North Texas.

Already, Dow Chemical has announced plans to install four small reactors at its Seadrift plastics and chemical plant on a rural stretch of the middle Texas coast, which it calls the first grid-scale nuclear reactor for an industrial site in North America.

“I think the vast majority of these nuclear power plants are going to be for things like industrial use,” said Cyrus Reed, a longtime environmental lobbyist in the Texas Capitol and conservation director for the state’s Sierra Club chapter. “A lot of large industries have corporate goals of being low carbon or no carbon, so this could fill in a niche for them.”

The PUC report made seven recommendations for the creation of public entities, programs, and funds to support the development of a Texas nuclear industry. During next year’s state legislative session, legislators in the Nuclear Caucus will seek to make them law.

“It’s going to be a great opportunity for energy investment in Texas,” said Stephen Perkins, Texas-based chief operating officer of the American Conservation Coalition, a conservative environmental policy group. “We’re really going to be pushing hard for [state legislators] to take that seriously.”

However, Texas won’t likely see its first new commercial reactor come online for at least five years. Before a build-out of power plants, there will be a boom at the uranium mines, as the US seeks to reestablish domestic production and enrichment of uranium for nuclear fuel.

Texas Uranium

Ted Long, a former commissioner of Goliad County, can see the power lines of an inactive uranium mine from his porch on an old family ranch in the rolling golden savannah of South Texas. For years the mine has been idle, waiting for depressed uranium markets to pick up.

There, an international mining company called Uranium Energy Corp. plans to mine 420 acres of the Evangeline Aquifer between depths of 45 and 404 feet, according to permitting documents. Long, a dealer of engine lubricants, gets his water from a well 120 feet deep that was drilled in 1993. He lives with his wife on property that’s been in her family since her great-grandfather emigrated from Germany.

“I’m worried for groundwater on this whole Gulf Coast,” Long said. “This isn’t the only place they’re wanting to do this.”

As a public official, Long fought the neighboring mine for years. But he found the process of engaging with Texas’ environmental regulator, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, to be time-consuming, expensive, and ultimately fruitless. Eventually, he concluded there was no point.

“There’s nothing I can do,” he said. “I guess I’ll have to look for some kind of system to clean the water up.”

The Goliad mine is the smallest of five sites in South Texas held by UEC, which is based in Corpus Christi. Another company, enCore Energy, started uranium production at two South Texas sites in 2023 and 2024, and hopes to bring four more online by 2027.

Uranium mining goes back decades in South Texas, but lately it’s been dormant. Between the 1970s and 1990s, a cluster of open pit mines harvested shallow uranium deposits at the surface. Many of those sites left a legacy of aquifer pollution.

TCEQ records show active cases of groundwater contaminated with uranium, radium, arsenic, and other pollutants from defunct uranium mines and tailing impoundment sites in Live Oak County at ExxonMobil’s Ray Point site, in Karnes County at Conoco-Phillips’ Conquista Project, and at Rio Grande Resources’ Panna Maria Uranium Recovery Facility.

All known shallow deposits of uranium in Texas have been mined. The deeper deposits aren’t accessed by traditional surface mining, but rather a process called in-situ mining, in which solvents are pumped underground into uranium-bearing aquifer formations. Adjacent wells suck back up the resulting slurry, from which uranium dust will be extracted.

Industry describes in-situ mining as safer and more environmentally friendly than surface mining. But some South Texas water managers and landowners are concerned.

”We’re talking about mining at the same elevation as people get their groundwater,” said Terrell Graham, a board member of the Goliad County Groundwater Conservation District, which has been fighting a proposed uranium mine for almost 15 years. “There isn’t another source of water for these residents.”

“It Was Rigged, a Setup”

On two occasions, the district has participated in lengthy hearings and won favorable rulings in Texas’ administrative courts supporting concerns over the safety of the permits. But both times, political appointees at the TCEQ rejected judges’ recommendations and issued the permits anyway.

“We’ve won two administrative proceedings,” Graham said. “It’s very expensive, and to have the TCEQ commissioners just overturn the decision seems nonsensical.”

The first time was in 2010. UEC was seeking initial permits for the Goliad mine, and the groundwater conservation district filed a technical challenge claiming that permits risked contamination of nearby aquifers.

The district hired lawyers and geological experts for a three-day hearing on the permit in Austin. Afterwards, an administrative law judge agreed with some of the district’s concerns. In a 147-page opinion issued in September 2010, an administrative law judge recommended further geological testing to determine whether certain underground faults could transmit fluids from the mining site into nearby drinking water sources.

“If the Commission determines that such remand is not feasible or desirable then the ALJ recommends that the Mine Application and the PAA-1 Application be denied,” the opinion said.

But the commissioners declined the judge’s recommendation. In an order issued March 2011, they determined that the proposed permits “impose terms and conditions reasonably necessary to protect fresh water from pollution.”

“The Commission determines that no remand is necessary,” the order said.

The TCEQ issued UEC’s permits, valid for 10 years. But by that time, a collapse in uranium prices had brought the sector to a standstill, so mining never commenced.

In 2021, the permits came up for renewal, and locals filed challenges again. But again, the same thing happened.

A nearby landowner named David Michaelsen organized a group of neighbors to hire a lawyer and challenge UEC’s permit to inject the radioactive waste product from its mine more than half a mile underground for permanent disposal.

“It’s not like I’m against industry or anything, but I don’t think this is a very safe spot,” said Michaelsen, former chief engineer at the Port of Corpus Christi, a heavy industrial hub on the South Texas Coast. He bought his 56 acres in Goliad County in 2018 to build an upscale ranch house and retire with his wife.

In hearings before an administrative law judge, he presented evidence showing that nearby faults and old oil well shafts posed a risk for the injected waste to travel into potable groundwater layers near the surface.

In a 103-page opinion issued April 2024, an administrative law judge agreed with many of Michaelsen’s challenges, including that “site-specific evidence here shows the potential for fluid movement from the injection zone.”

“The draft permit does not comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements,” wrote the administrative law judge, Katerina DeAngelo, a former assistant attorney general of Texas in the environmental protection division. She recommended “closer inspection of the local geology, more precise calculations of the [cone of influence], and a better assessment of the faults.”

Michaelsen thought he had won. But when the TCEQ commissioners took up the question several months later, again they rejected all of the judge’s findings.

In a 19-page order issued in September, the commission concluded that “faults within 2.5 miles of its proposed disposal wells are not sufficiently transmissive or vertically extensive to allow migration of hazardous constituents out of the injection zone.” The old nearby oil wells, the commission found, “are likely adequately plugged and will not provide a pathway for fluid movement.”

“UEC demonstrated the proposed disposal wells will prevent movement of fluids that would result in pollution” of an underground source of drinking water, said the order granting the injection disposal permits.

“I felt like it was rigged, a setup,” said Michaelsen, holding his 4-inch-thick binder of research and records from the case. “It was a canned decision.”

Another set of permit renewals remains before the Goliad mine can begin operation, and local authorities are fighting it too. In August, the Goliad County Commissioners Court passed a resolution against uranium mining in the county. The groundwater district is seeking to challenge the permits again in administrative court. And in November, the district sued TCEQ in Travis County District Court seeking to reverse the agency’s permit approvals.

Because of the lawsuit, a TCEQ spokesperson declined to answer questions about the Goliad County mine site, saying the agency doesn’t comment on pending litigation.

A final set of permits remains to be renewed before the mine can begin production. However, after years of frustrations, district leaders aren’t optimistic about their ability to influence the decision.

Only about 40 residences immediately surround the site of the Goliad mine, according to Art Dohmann, vice president of the Goliad County Groundwater Conservation District. Only they might be affected in the near term. But Dohmann, who has served on the groundwater district board for 23 years, worries that the uranium, radium, and arsenic churned up in the mining process will drift from the site as years go by.

“The groundwater moves. It’s a slow rate, but once that arsenic is liberated, it’s there forever,” Dohmann said. “In a generation, it’s going to affect the downstream areas.”

UEC did not respond to a request for comment.

Currently, the TCEQ is evaluating possibilities for expanding and incentivizing further uranium production in Texas. It’s following instruction given last year, when lawmakers with the Nuclear Caucus added an item to TCEQ’s biannual budget ordering a study of uranium resources to be produced for state lawmakers by December 2024, ahead of next year’s legislative session.

According to the budget item, “The report must include recommendations for legislative or regulatory changes and potential economic incentive programs to support the uranium mining industry in this state.”