#Laravel Vs Drupal

[sphinxshreya]

Why PHP Development Companies Still Lead in Web App Development

In the rapidly changing digital landscape, web application technologies evolve at lightning speed. Yet, the demand for a PHP development company has not only remained steady—it has grown. As businesses seek scalable, secure, and efficient web applications, PHP continues to be a go-to language, supported by a vast community and a proven track record. The rise of cloud-native apps and digital transformation projects have only strengthened PHP’s relevance.

Hiring a PHP development company in 2025 means working with experts who understand the legacy of PHP while leveraging its modern frameworks like Laravel and Symfony. These frameworks make development faster, cleaner, and more secure. Moreover, PHP powers over 77% of websites with server-side programming, including giants like Facebook and WordPress. So, why fix something that clearly isn’t broken?

What’s even more compelling is PHP’s low barrier to entry, wide pool of skilled developers, and cost-efficiency. A PHP development company often delivers projects at a fraction of the cost compared to companies working with newer or more niche technologies. This affordability doesn’t mean compromising quality; it reflects the maturity of the platform and the abundance of available tools and talent.

PHP Development: Is Still Worth it in 2025? Absolutely. PHP has evolved drastically, with PHP 8+ introducing JIT compilation and substantial performance boosts. This makes web apps faster and more capable. When you engage a PHP development company, you're not just hiring coders; you're partnering with professionals who use a battle-tested language backed by decades of improvements and community contributions.

Furthermore, PHP’s compatibility with various platforms and hosting services makes it a versatile choice. A reputable PHP development company ensures seamless integration of PHP-based applications with MySQL, PostgreSQL, and even cloud services like AWS and Azure. This makes it ideal for startups and enterprises alike looking for flexibility and scalability.

The industry today is flooded with tech stacks—Node.js, Python, Ruby, Java, and more. However, few have PHP's balance of performance, simplicity, and support. That’s why many of the Top PHP Web Development Companies remain at the forefront of digital solutions. These firms combine PHP's robust capabilities with innovative front-end frameworks to build dynamic, user-friendly applications.

A PHP development company also offers extensive CMS and eCommerce solutions. Platforms like Magento, Drupal, and Joomla rely heavily on PHP. Customizing or extending these platforms requires PHP proficiency. Thus, businesses seeking tailored solutions for online stores or content-rich sites often find PHP development teams indispensable.

Security is another reason why businesses prefer a PHP development company. While no language is immune to vulnerabilities, PHP has matured significantly. Modern PHP frameworks offer built-in protection against common threats like SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and cross-site request forgery (CSRF). Moreover, these frameworks follow MVC architecture, which inherently promotes secure and clean coding practices.

Many companies still face the classic question: Which is Best for Web Development – PHP vs Python? The answer depends on project scope and goals. PHP excels in web-centric development with hundreds of pre-built modules and libraries. Python, while versatile, is often more suited to data science, machine learning, and scripting. However, when it comes to pure web development, a PHP development company offers better speed-to-market and lower overhead.

A reliable PHP development company also understands the importance of responsive design and performance optimization. Whether your audience accesses your app via mobile or desktop, PHP apps can be optimized using modern tools like caching mechanisms, CDN integration, and performance tuning, ensuring users have a seamless experience.

What differentiates the best firms from the rest is their ability to offer tailored, scalable, and secure solutions. A custom software development company specializing in PHP often blends industry knowledge with technical expertise to create platforms that are both user-centric and future-ready. Whether it's a customer portal, booking system, or CRM, PHP remains a powerful engine under the hood.

With open-source support and a mature ecosystem, PHP continues to outpace many newer languages in real-world implementation. Businesses turn to a PHP development company because they know it guarantees reliability and speed without excessive overhead. Additionally, PHP's long-standing presence ensures stability—there's little risk of the language becoming obsolete anytime soon.

Even in 2025, PHP isn’t just surviving—it’s thriving. With thousands of new developers entering the field each year, PHP remains one of the most taught and used languages globally. When you hire a PHP development company, you're investing in a stable technology that offers long-term value and continuous innovation.

So, why do companies keep choosing PHP over other technologies? It boils down to three things: speed, scalability, and support. A modern PHP development company leverages tools like Laravel, CodeIgniter, and CakePHP to cut down on development time while increasing application robustness. These companies often maintain dedicated QA teams and DevOps integration to ensure smoother project delivery.

Despite the arrival of countless JavaScript-based frameworks and back-end alternatives, PHP has adapted without losing its core strengths. A PHP development company in 2025 doesn’t look like the PHP shops of 2010—they’re more agile, cloud-integrated, and aligned with DevSecOps and CI/CD pipelines. This evolution reflects PHP’s resilience and adaptability.

In conclusion, if you're planning your next web application, don't overlook the advantages of partnering with a trusted PHP development company. Whether you're a startup aiming for rapid deployment or an enterprise seeking system modernization, PHP provides a cost-effective and high-performance solution. With features tailored for modern web demands, experienced developer communities, and proven scalability, PHP continues to be a strategic asset in web app development.

[manavkapoor]

Why Headless Laravel CMS is Taking Over Traditional Web Development

Hey folks! 🚀 If you’ve been keeping up with web development trends, you’ve probably heard the buzz about headless Laravel CMS. It’s revolutionizing how we build and manage websites, leaving traditional CMS platforms like WordPress and Drupal in the dust. But why? Let’s dive in and explore why businesses and developers are making the switch—spoiler alert: it’s all about flexibility, speed, and scalability!

Understanding Headless Laravel CMS and Its Growing Popularity

A headless CMS isn’t some futuristic tech—it’s a smarter way to manage content. Unlike traditional CMS platforms that bundle the frontend and backend together, a headless CMS decouples them, giving developers the freedom to use any frontend framework while Laravel handles the backend like a pro.

What is a Headless CMS and How Does It Work?

Imagine a restaurant where the kitchen (backend) and dining area (frontend) operate independently. 🍽️ The kitchen prepares the food (content), and the waitstaff (APIs) deliver it to any dining setup—be it a food truck, rooftop café, or home delivery. That’s how a headless CMS works! It stores and manages content, then delivers it via APIs to any device or platform—websites, mobile apps, smartwatches, you name it.

Why Laravel is Perfect for a Headless CMS

Laravel isn’t just another PHP framework—it’s a powerhouse for API-driven development. With built-in support for RESTful and GraphQL APIs, Eloquent ORM for smooth database interactions, and a robust ecosystem, it’s no wonder Laravel is the top pick for headless CMS setups.

Headless Laravel CMS vs. Traditional CMS Solutions

Traditional CMS platforms like WordPress are great for simple websites, but they struggle with scalability and multi-channel content delivery. A headless Laravel CMS, on the other hand, offers:

No frontend restrictions (use React, Vue.js, or even a mobile app).

Better performance (no bloated themes or plugins slowing things down).

Future-proof flexibility (adapt to new tech without overhauling your backend).

Benefits of Using a Headless CMS with Laravel

Enhanced Performance and Scalability

Did you know? Websites using headless CMS architectures load up to 50% faster than traditional setups. 🏎️ By separating the frontend and backend, Laravel ensures your content is delivered lightning-fast, whether you’re serving 100 or 100,000 users.

Multi-Platform Content Delivery

With a headless Laravel CMS, your content isn’t tied to a single website. Publish once, and distribute everywhere—web, mobile apps, IoT devices, even digital billboards! Companies like Netflix and Spotify use headless CMS to deliver seamless experiences across platforms.

Improved Security and Backend Control

Traditional CMS platforms are hacker magnets (looking at you, WordPress plugins!). A headless Laravel CMS reduces vulnerabilities by:

Limiting exposure (no public-facing admin panel).

Using Laravel’s built-in security (CSRF protection, encryption).

Offering granular API access control.

Key Technologies Powering Headless Laravel CMS

RESTful and GraphQL APIs in Laravel CMS

Laravel makes API development a breeze. Whether you prefer REST (simple and structured) or GraphQL (flexible and efficient), Laravel’s got you covered. Fun fact: GraphQL can reduce API payloads by up to 70%, making your apps faster and more efficient.

Integrating Laravel CMS with JavaScript Frontend Frameworks

Pairing Laravel with React, Vue.js, or Next.js is like peanut butter and jelly—perfect together! 🥪 Frontend frameworks handle the UI, while Laravel manages data securely in the background. Many Laravel web development companies leverage this combo for high-performance apps.

Database and Storage Options for Headless Laravel CMS

Laravel plays nice with MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and even cloud storage like AWS S3. Need to scale? No problem. Laravel’s database abstraction ensures smooth performance, whether you’re running a blog or a global e-commerce site.

Use Cases and Real-World Applications of Headless Laravel CMS

E-Commerce and Headless Laravel CMS

E-commerce giants love headless CMS for its agility. Imagine updating product listings once and seeing changes reflected instantly on your website, mobile app, and marketplace integrations. Companies like Nike and Adidas use headless setups for seamless shopping experiences.

Content-Heavy Websites and Laravel Headless CMS

News portals and media sites thrive with headless Laravel CMS. Why? Because journalists can publish content via a streamlined backend, while developers use modern frameworks to create dynamic, fast-loading frontends.

API-Driven Web and Mobile Applications

From fitness apps to banking platforms, headless Laravel CMS ensures real-time data sync across devices. No more clunky updates—just smooth, consistent user experiences.

Challenges and Best Practices for Headless Laravel CMS

Managing API Requests Efficiently

Too many API calls can slow things down. Solution? Caching and webhooks. Laravel’s caching mechanisms (Redis, Memcached) and event-driven webhooks keep performance snappy.

Handling SEO in a Headless Laravel CMS Setup

SEO isn’t dead—it’s just different! Use server-side rendering (SSR) with Next.js or Nuxt.js, and leverage Laravel’s meta-tag management tools to keep search engines happy.

Ensuring Smooth Frontend and Backend Communication

Clear API documentation and webhook integrations are key. A well-structured Laravel backend paired with a modular frontend ensures seamless updates and maintenance.

Final Thoughts

Headless Laravel CMS isn’t just a trend—it’s the future. With better performance, unmatched flexibility, and ironclad security, it’s no surprise that Laravel development companies are leading the charge. Whether you’re building an e-commerce platform, a content hub, or a multi-platform app, going headless with Laravel is a game-changer.

Key Takeaways

Headless Laravel CMS = Speed + Flexibility 🚀

API-first architecture = Content everywhere 📱💻

Security and scalability built-in 🔒

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the difference between a traditional CMS and a headless CMS?

A traditional CMS (like WordPress) combines the backend (content management) and frontend (display) in one system. A headless CMS decouples them, allowing content to be delivered via APIs to any frontend—websites, apps, or even smart devices. This offers greater flexibility and performance.

2. Why should I use Laravel for a headless CMS?

Laravel’s robust API support, security features, and scalability make it ideal for headless CMS setups. Its ecosystem (including tools like Laravel Sanctum for API auth) simplifies development, making it a top choice for Laravel web development services.

3. Can I integrate Laravel’s headless CMS with React or Vue.js?

Absolutely! Laravel works seamlessly with JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue.js, and Next.js. The backend serves content via APIs, while the frontend framework handles the UI, creating a fast, dynamic user experience.

4. How does a headless CMS improve website performance?

By separating the frontend and backend, a headless CMS reduces server load and eliminates bloated themes/plugins. Content is delivered via optimized APIs, resulting in faster load times and better scalability.

5. Is SEO more challenging in a headless CMS setup?

Not if you do it right! Use server-side rendering (SSR) with frameworks like Next.js, implement proper meta tags, and leverage Laravel’s SEO tools. Many headless CMS sites rank just as well—or better—than traditional ones.

There you have it, folks! 🎉 Headless Laravel CMS is reshaping web development, and now you know why. Ready to make the switch?

[masterdemolitioninc]

CSS MINIFIER THE BEST TOOLS

CSS MINIFIER The Best Tools

css minifier api command line npm webpack php node to normal offline minify and compress compressor js wordpress plugin online javascript bootstrap babel best beautifier browser brackets  comparison check closure code download de decompressor decompress dreamweaver

directory drupal expand minified error explained express email example eclipse file for from format github gulp generator grunt html htaccess helps with multiple option how inverse @import in visual studio phpstorm java codeigniter keep comments library by laravel mix linux liquid media query map

mac means magento 2 modules maven method notepad++ normalize tool on options python postcss performance reverse remove rollup reset regex rails readable stack overflow sass shopify sublime text 3 style size single unminify uglify un using upload ubuntu url vscode 2017 & version 4 windows without

yii2 files package minify-css-string 5 script php-html-css-js-minifier.php topic nodejs convert change converter vs minify_css_compressor netbeans 8.2 apache way c# extension free exclude gradle gulpfile.js css/javascript next string your asp.net cara gtmetrix minifying joomla resources (html javascript)

wp rocket yslow css/bootstrap.min.css bootstrap.min.css not cdn beautify prettify minification unknown kaios django function software spaces tools gzip break whitespace checker yui-compressor ve nedir minimize cc 8 7 cannot read property 'length' of undefined find module 'is-obj' expected a

pseudo-class or pseudo-element postcss-svgo missed semicolon 'type' 'trim' lexical 1 unrecognized the can reduce network payload sizes compare dev/css/minify combine divi w3 total cache task minifies gulp-sass concat all rename gulp-clean-css clean gulp-minify-css working names special scss watch

css-html-js-minify nginx which attribute brainly benefits bash button css.com class cli document difference google loader one meaning minify_css middleman build server react terminal tutorial 2019 2015 create (minify) zend framework opencart symfony

[hydralisk98]

hydralisk98′s web projects tracker:

Core principles=

Fail faster

‘Learn, Tweak, Make’ loop

This is meant to be a quick reference for tracking progress made over my various projects, organized by their “ultimate target” goal:

(START)

(Website)=

Install Firefox

Install Chrome

Install Microsoft newest browser

Install Lynx

Learn about contemporary web browsers

Install a very basic text editor

Install Notepad++

Install Nano

Install Powershell

Install Bash

Install Git

Learn HTML

Elements and attributes

Commenting (single line comment, multi-line comment)

Head (title, meta, charset, language, link, style, description, keywords, author, viewport, script, base, url-encode, )

Hyperlinks (local, external, link titles, relative filepaths, absolute filepaths)

Headings (h1-h6, horizontal rules)

Paragraphs (pre, line breaks)

Text formatting (bold, italic, deleted, inserted, subscript, superscript, marked)

Quotations (quote, blockquote, abbreviations, address, cite, bidirectional override)

Entities & symbols (&entity_name, &entity_number, &nbsp, useful HTML character entities, diacritical marks, mathematical symbols, greek letters, currency symbols, )

Id (bookmarks)

Classes (select elements, multiple classes, different tags can share same class, )

Blocks & Inlines (div, span)

Computercode (kbd, samp, code, var)

Lists (ordered, unordered, description lists, control list counting, nesting)

Tables (colspan, rowspan, caption, colgroup, thead, tbody, tfoot, th)

Images (src, alt, width, height, animated, link, map, area, usenmap, , picture, picture for format support)

old fashioned audio

old fashioned video

Iframes (URL src, name, target)

Forms (input types, action, method, GET, POST, name, fieldset, accept-charset, autocomplete, enctype, novalidate, target, form elements, input attributes)

URL encode (scheme, prefix, domain, port, path, filename, ascii-encodings)

Learn about oldest web browsers onwards

Learn early HTML versions (doctypes & permitted elements for each version)

Make a 90s-like web page compatible with as much early web formats as possible, earliest web browsers’ compatibility is best here

Learn how to teach HTML5 features to most if not all older browsers

Install Adobe XD

Register a account at Figma

Learn Adobe XD basics

Learn Figma basics

Install Microsoft’s VS Code

Install my Microsoft’s VS Code favorite extensions

Learn HTML5

Semantic elements

Layouts

Graphics (SVG, canvas)

Track

Audio

Video

Embed

APIs (geolocation, drag and drop, local storage, application cache, web workers, server-sent events, )

HTMLShiv for teaching older browsers HTML5

HTML5 style guide and coding conventions (doctype, clean tidy well-formed code, lower case element names, close all html elements, close empty html elements, quote attribute values, image attributes, space and equal signs, avoid long code lines, blank lines, indentation, keep html, keep head, keep body, meta data, viewport, comments, stylesheets, loading JS into html, accessing HTML elements with JS, use lowercase file names, file extensions, index/default)

Learn CSS

Selections

Colors

Fonts

Positioning

Box model

Grid

Flexbox

Custom properties

Transitions

Animate

Make a simple modern static site

Learn responsive design

Viewport

Media queries

Fluid widths

rem units over px

Mobile first

Learn SASS

Variables

Nesting

Conditionals

Functions

Learn about CSS frameworks

Learn Bootstrap

Learn Tailwind CSS

Learn JS

Fundamentals

Document Object Model / DOM

JavaScript Object Notation / JSON

Fetch API

Modern JS (ES6+)

Learn Git

Learn Browser Dev Tools

Learn your VS Code extensions

Learn Emmet

Learn NPM

Learn Yarn

Learn Axios

Learn Webpack

Learn Parcel

Learn basic deployment

Domain registration (Namecheap)

Managed hosting (InMotion, Hostgator, Bluehost)

Static hosting (Nertlify, Github Pages)

SSL certificate

FTP

SFTP

SSH

CLI

Make a fancy front end website about 

Make a few Tumblr themes

===You are now a basic front end developer!

Learn about XML dialects

Learn XML

Learn about JS frameworks

Learn jQuery

Learn React

Contex API with Hooks

NEXT

Learn Vue.js

Vuex

NUXT

Learn Svelte

NUXT (Vue)

Learn Gatsby

Learn Gridsome

Learn Typescript

Make a epic front end website about 

===You are now a front-end wizard!

Learn Node.js

Express

Nest.js

Koa

Learn Python

Django

Flask

Learn GoLang

Revel

Learn PHP

Laravel

Slim

Symfony

Learn Ruby

Ruby on Rails

Sinatra

Learn SQL

PostgreSQL

MySQL

Learn ORM

Learn ODM

Learn NoSQL

MongoDB

RethinkDB

CouchDB

Learn a cloud database

Firebase, Azure Cloud DB, AWS

Learn a lightweight & cache variant

Redis

SQLlite

NeDB

Learn GraphQL

Learn about CMSes

Learn Wordpress

Learn Drupal

Learn Keystone

Learn Enduro

Learn Contentful

Learn Sanity

Learn Jekyll

Learn about DevOps

Learn NGINX

Learn Apache

Learn Linode

Learn Heroku

Learn Azure

Learn Docker

Learn testing

Learn load balancing

===You are now a good full stack developer

Learn about mobile development

Learn Dart

Learn Flutter

Learn React Native

Learn Nativescript

Learn Ionic

Learn progressive web apps

Learn Electron

Learn JAMstack

Learn serverless architecture

Learn API-first design

Learn data science

Learn machine learning

Learn deep learning

Learn speech recognition

Learn web assembly

===You are now a epic full stack developer

Make a web browser

Make a web server

===You are now a legendary full stack developer

[...]

(Computer system)=

Learn to execute and test your code in a command line interface

Learn to use breakpoints and debuggers

Learn Bash

Learn fish

Learn Zsh

Learn Vim

Learn nano

Learn Notepad++

Learn VS Code

Learn Brackets

Learn Atom

Learn Geany

Learn Neovim

Learn Python

Learn Java?

Learn R

Learn Swift?

Learn Go-lang?

Learn Common Lisp

Learn Clojure (& ClojureScript)

Learn Scheme

Learn C++

Learn C

Learn B

Learn Mesa

Learn Brainfuck

Learn Assembly

Learn Machine Code

Learn how to manage I/O

Make a keypad

Make a keyboard

Make a mouse

Make a light pen

Make a small LCD display

Make a small LED display

Make a teleprinter terminal

Make a medium raster CRT display

Make a small vector CRT display

Make larger LED displays

Make a few CRT displays

Learn how to manage computer memory

Make datasettes

Make a datasette deck

Make floppy disks

Make a floppy drive

Learn how to control data

Learn binary base

Learn hexadecimal base

Learn octal base

Learn registers

Learn timing information

Learn assembly common mnemonics

Learn arithmetic operations

Learn logic operations (AND, OR, XOR, NOT, NAND, NOR, NXOR, IMPLY)

Learn masking

Learn assembly language basics

Learn stack construct’s operations

Learn calling conventions

Learn to use Application Binary Interface or ABI

Learn to make your own ABIs

Learn to use memory maps

Learn to make memory maps

Make a clock

Make a front panel

Make a calculator

Learn about existing instruction sets (Intel, ARM, RISC-V, PIC, AVR, SPARC, MIPS, Intersil 6120, Z80...)

Design a instruction set

Compose a assembler

Compose a disassembler

Compose a emulator

Write a B-derivative programming language (somewhat similar to C)

Write a IPL-derivative programming language (somewhat similar to Lisp and Scheme)

Write a general markup language (like GML, SGML, HTML, XML...)

Write a Turing tarpit (like Brainfuck)

Write a scripting language (like Bash)

Write a database system (like VisiCalc or SQL)

Write a CLI shell (basic operating system like Unix or CP/M)

Write a single-user GUI operating system (like Xerox Star’s Pilot)

Write a multi-user GUI operating system (like Linux)

Write various software utilities for my various OSes

Write various games for my various OSes

Write various niche applications for my various OSes

Implement a awesome model in very large scale integration, like the Commodore CBM-II

Implement a epic model in integrated circuits, like the DEC PDP-15

Implement a modest model in transistor-transistor logic, similar to the DEC PDP-12

Implement a simple model in diode-transistor logic, like the original DEC PDP-8

Implement a simpler model in later vacuum tubes, like the IBM 700 series

Implement simplest model in early vacuum tubes, like the EDSAC

[...]

(Conlang)=

Choose sounds

Choose phonotactics

[...]

(Animation ‘movie’)=

[...]

(Exploration top-down ’racing game’)=

[...]

(Video dictionary)=

[...]

(Grand strategy game)=

[...]

(Telex system)=

[...]

(Pen&paper tabletop game)=

[...]

(Search engine)=

[...]

(Microlearning system)=

[...]

(Alternate planet)=

[...]

(END)

[arminafsharnejad]

Armin Afsharnejad - Ruby on Rails vs PHP: Which Is Best For You?

Did you know there is more than one approach to creating a web application? It doesn't matter what sort of app you are attempting to develop, programmers have their best practice and their chosen code languages to execute the job. Expert Armin Afsharnejad says in the galaxy of web applications, most program developers have to choose between Ruby on Rails vs. PHP. So what is the best approach for you? Well, read on to find out!

Scalability 

Ruby on Rails vs. PHP: Both can scale. Nevertheless, because of the number of resources Ruby utilizes versus PHP, scalability matters will emerge much before in your app's life process. Scaling an app in Ruby on Rails versus PHP will abut on very standard points. Hence, scaling will be based on how the application was developed.

Community Support

Ruby on Rails is younger, but a developed technology. It even has substantial community support, which is aspiring significantly. On the other hand, PHP is revered and prominent and has a robust market for PHP coders. PHP libraries, tricks, Q&As, have already decoded problems.

Price Of Development Services

There is a thought that PHP developers are more inexpensive and could be discovered more leisurely than Ruby (Rails) innovators.

The fact is that the cost for the developer's assistance relies on their capabilities, and the approvingly skilled programmers are well paid in both languages.

Honestly, at the moment "PHP developer" term doesn’t live heretofore. Right now, we can speak concerning or Drupal developers, for instance. And the price of Rails and Laravel /  engineers is roughly identical.

Both Ruby on Rails and PHP are best in their fields, so they aren’t comparable.

According to Armin Afsharnejad, these are some of the factors that may help you choose which language may better suit your needs. Ideally, this snippet of information may politely oblige you in your prospective trials.

[ironcrusadeblaze]

Did you know that JetBrains PhpStorm is a commercial, cross-platform IDE for PHP Code Editor mac, built by the Czech Republic-based company JetBrains Dreamweaver Vs Phpstorm provides an editor for PHP, HTML, and JavaScript with on-the-fly code analysis, error prevention and automated refactorings for PHP and JavaScript? PhpStorm is perfect for working with Symfony, Laravel, Drupal, WordPress, Zend Framework, Magento, Joomla!, CakePHP, Yii, and other frameworks. Phpstorm Server License PHP editor online and offline actually ‘gets’ your code and deeply understands its structure, supporting all the PHP language features for modern and legacy projects. It provides the best code completion, refactorings, on-the-fly error prevention, and more. Make the most of the cutting edge front-end technologies, such as HTML 5, CSS, Sass, Less, Stylus, CoffeeScript, TypeScript, Emmet, and JavaScript, with refactorings, debugging, and unit testing available.

[stackmobileappdevelopment]

Node.js vs. PHP. Which is best for backend development?

Today, programmers around the world are using both PHP and Node.js for different projects. Many advocates Node.js as the future of web development, while many developers argue that the server-side is the unspoken domain PHP.

So, in this blog, we’ll discuss how using one for certain technologies can reap you maximum benefit.

Both PHP and Node.js can build apps of any complexity, and they are built around different concepts and structures. If you are a developer or an app owner choosing between these two programming languages, you should be aware of their significant benefits.

PHP web development

PHP is a server-side scripting language that is utilized to build static websites or dynamic websites or web applications. PHP stands for Hypertext Preprocessor, earlier known as Personal Home Pages. PHP scripts can only be used on a server that has PHP installed.

A survey by W3Tech revealed that around 79% of the sites in their data are made using the PHP programming language. Further, the ever-enhancing popularity of content management systems like Drupal, WordPress, Shopify, WooCommerce, etc. portraits how PHP has covered the backend development under its wings.

Benefits of PHP

Designed for web

PHP was invented explicitly for the web, unlike its competitors Java and Python. This means it is genuinely equipped to work with servers, HTML, and databases. And this is one feature that has made it a suitable server-side solution. PHP also works efficiently with profound web applications that require high computing and server-side rendering.

Quick development

Apart from the efficient code base, another feature that PHP is known for is its ease of deployment and compatibility with hosting services. Powering almost 79% of the web across the globe and being an industry standard for the past two decades, it is the best programming language for all physical or virtual servers.

Robust codebase, frameworks, and community

PHP has been here for 20+ years now. It means PHP has a massive community, rich codebase, documentation, and frameworks.

Selecting PHP for web development or web application provides you a variety of frameworks and CMS such as Joomla, WordPress, Drupal, Symphony, Laravel, and more. These platforms and frameworks also allow you to build and deploy an e-commerce website or blog very efficiently.

Node.js development

Node.js is a server-side platform built on Chrome’s JavaScript runtime for efficiently developing fast and scalable network applications. It utilizes an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it efficient and hassle-free for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Node.js applications are developed with the use of JavaScript and can be run within the Node.js runtime on Microsoft Windows, OS X, and Linux. It also provides a rich library of several JavaScript modules, which simplifies the web application development using Node.js to a great extent.

Pros of Node.js

Performance and scalability

Node.js is a fast development language and can serve numerous concurrent events at a time. By adopting Node.js development, you can develop scalable server-side applications that utilize the maximum storage of a CPU device. This is what makes Node.js is the best programming language for real-time applications, single-page applications, and data-driven applications.

Flexibility

Node.js provides freedom and flexibility to the programmers when it comes to choosing the architecture and pattern. Also, the programmers access an unfathomable archive of NPM to choose from, making the development process more efficient and quicker.

One language across the stack

Several popular client-side frameworks such as React, Ember, and Angular are written in JavaScript, which is the prime language of modern browsers. While using Node.js server-side, you have all the advantages of one scripting language across your application development stack.

Read More

[blog-theninehertz]

What are the Top 7 PHP IDEs and Code Editors a Web Developer Uses?

And not being able to select between best IDEs and code editors to build your PHP web design? PHP is preferred over other programming languages based on the project requirements. Here in this blog, we are going to briefly describe top 7 PHP IDEs and Code Editors, PHP developers can use for web development.

Surely, this post will help you find the best IDEs for your project. Still, you find any confusion and don’t want to take a risk. You can hire PHP web developer from the best PHP web development company, who is skilled and has worked on the latest trends. He will not only help you select the best IDE tools considering your project requirements but also will give the physical form to your project.

PHP is the acronym of Hypertext Preprocessor which is a general-purpose programming language and written at the server-side. It is widely used for developing dynamic and interactive web pages. It is free and easy to use programming language. If you are a newbie and want to learn PHP, there are several tutorials available online which will ease up learning PHP for you.

For experienced, when it comes to the exact definition of an IDE and a code editor, they still get confused. So firstly we will find out the difference between IDE and Code Editor and then move ahead to discuss the top 7 PHP IDEs and Code Editors a web developer uses.

Let’s start with!

IDE vs Code Editor: Learn PHP Programming Language

Writing code is one of the common skills among developers. However, they do find it difficult to differentiate between the definition of an IDE and a code editor. The crossover of features between the two could be considered as the reason behind such confusion.

To understand IDE, it is an Integrated Development Environment that comes with a self-contained package that allows developers to write, compile, execute and debug code in the same place. Whereas, a code editor is a text editor enriched with features enabling writing code using native capabilities or via optional plugins.

IDE allows writing code in a specific language. You can even compile/interpret and perform debugging as well. Whereas code editors are more general in purpose, they can work on different programming languages. Also, there is a limitation of just writing code with the code editors.

However, Code completion, highlighting a section of code, hints and custom folding of sections of code are a number of common features between the IDE and code editors. Which one do you choose out of IDE and Code editors? It totally depends on your personal choice, the programming language you are working on and workflows as well.

Here is the list of web development tools that hold high priority among the developers. I hope this blog will help you choose an appropriate one for your projects in 2020.

1. PHPStorm

PHPStorm is one of the most popular IDE tools, developers used for PHP web development. It is updated with all the latest features to enable you with rapid web development. JetBrains is the authority behind its development and release in 2009. PHPStorm is written in Java since its launch and has been among the first choices of developers for writing code in PHP.

PHPStorm is compatible with working with all the key frameworks such as Symfony, Yii, CakePHP, Zend Framework and Laravel. Also, it allows working on Content Management Systems (CMS) including WordPress, Drupal, and Magento.

PHPStorm not only manages backend tasks but also gives you the liberty to work on the front end. It includes working on CSS, HTML5, Sass, Typescript, JS, CoffeeScript, Less, Stylus, etc. using Unit testing, code refactoring and debugging.

If you are using this platform with Zend Debugger, you can easily integrate it with databases like SQL and composers, vagrant, rest client, remote deployment and command tools.

2. Eclipse

Eclipse is another name that comes to the mind of the developers when asked for the most widely used IDE in the field of web development. It was launched in Nov 2001 and is a cross-platform tool that can be utilized for any operating system whether for Windows, Linux or Mac. Most of the developers used this IDE for Java and Android development, however, the efforts of Eclipse community developers made it possible to use for other development languages using plugins.

If you want to develop a PHP web application using Eclipse, you have to download it and install the Eclipse package for PHP developers. It is an open-source and free to use tool which comes packed with all the capacity to support PHP languages like Git client, XML Editor, and Mylyn.

Some of the important features of Eclipse comprises code formatting, syntax highlighting, code assist, code navigation, refactoring, PHP debugging, code templates, syntax validation, and eclipse ecosystem.

3. NetBeans

NetBeans also makes its way to the list of world’s most popular IDEs for PHP web development. It is feature-rich, free, and supports multiple languages like English, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Brazilian, and basic Chinese. A wide range of developers uses this open-source IDE for PHP website development.

NetBeans was released in 1996 which initially supported only Java and was pretty slow, but now it becomes much faster than others and supports multiple languages like PHP, C/C++, and HTML5. Not even this, you can use it for a range of PHP frameworks and WordPress CMS.

NetBeans is one of the most preferred IDE tools due to its features like code templates, smart code completion, quick fixes, getter setter generation, hints, and refactoring. Other than this, it avails developers with functionalities like formatting, rectangular selection, code folding and try/catch code completion.

4. Zend Studio

Zend Studio is among the top commercial PHP IDE for PHP website development. It targets professional web developers and currently enjoys a clientele of over 40,000 developers for the development of PHP websites.

Some of the key features which make Zendio Studio more preferable among others is its fastest performance, validation while coding and searching the PHP Code.

Not even this, Zend Studio allows mobile app development based on existing PHP apps and server backend. This way, you can easily coordinate between current websites and web applications with mobile-based apps.

5. Komodo

ActiveState developed Komodo IDE in the year 2000. Now it has become a highly preferred PHP MySQL development and functional tool. Komodo inherits most of its functionalities from the Python interpreter. It is compatible with Mozilla and Scintilla because the number of features and functionalities among them are similar and utilizes common languages as well.

Komodo uses numerous extensions and pipe features which turned it down as a huge success.

With Komodo, you can start CGI Environment Simulation and build a holodeck web server. It replicates all the activities on a real web server. The CGI Environment Simulation enables its fast installation.

6. Sublime Text 3

It is another PHP development that is very useful to perform like a pro text editor, i.e. for prose, markup, and code. Sublime Text 3 comes with an amazing feature- a custom UI toolkit that allows users to play across words, symbols or lines using particular key shortcuts for the activity.

In addition to this, the user can make changes to any section of code at any time. Such facilities of Sublime Text 3 make it the most customizable and flexible text editor that exists.

Being a lightweight, cross-platform development tool, Sublime Text 3 works on different operating systems like Linux, Windows, and OSX.

You can easily convert this text editor into a graceful Sublime PHP IDE with the help of different plugins and packages that are available in the market. Some of the popular names which are most helpful in doing so are package control, xDebug client?—?CodeBug, Sublime PHP companion, Simple PHPUnit, PHPCS, CodIntel, and PHPDoc.

Converting a text editor into a PHP IDE using add-on packages, avails developers with the ease of PHP development. They can enjoy the classiness of sublime text and the sturdiness of PHP at the same time.

7. Atom

Atom is a free, open-source text and source code editor from GitHub. It is one of the best cross-platform development tools that support working on various OS like Windows, OS X, Red Hat Linux, Fedora 22+ and Debian Linux. Atom consists of a dedicated ecosystem that is supported by a vast community. The availability of numerous plugins and packages in the market improves its functionality to the next level.

When it comes to PHP, the Atom editor can easily be converted into a fully-featured PHP IDE using packages available free of cost. These packages turn atom editor more effective than any other commercial PHP IDEs in the market. It includes hyperclick-php, php-cs-fixer, atom-autocomplete-php, linter-php and php-integrator-base.

Full Article is Originally Published at The NineHertz Blog on 17th February 2020

[maansoftwares]

People find the most reliable platform in development which can give them complete access to their content as well as a liberty to develop their choice of design without having required programming knowledge. Let’s go through some niche notes of these platforms and figure out the best as per the requirements of our website and through our intellects.

[dorothydelgadillo]

A Detailed Comparison Between WordPress And October CMS

A Detailed Comparison Between WordPress And October CMS

Leonardo Losoviz

2019-03-18T12:00:28+01:002019-03-18T11:37:39+00:00

Three months ago, WordPress finally released React-powered Gutenberg to power its default content editing experience, triggering many people who are not happy with this change to look for alternatives. Some folks decided to fork and release pre-Gutenberg WordPress, however, for me this doesn’t make much sense since it still carries 15 years worth of technical debt. If I were to find an alternative to WordPress, I would try to avoid being stuck in the past, and aim for a clean cut through some mature platform built on modern foundations.

This article compares WordPress to the arguably similar yet more modern October CMS on a wide arrange of both technical and non-technical topics. The goal of the article is not to convince people to stick to WordPress or to switch to October CMS, but simply to demonstrate what aspects must be taken into account before concluding the move to a different platform. The same comparison could (and should) also be done with other platforms before making a sensible decision.

Why October CMS

I found out about October CMS when it won an award, after which I went into research mode and spent a good deal of time digging deep into this CMS — from the perspective of both a user and a developer. As I gained knowledge on this CMS, I felt confident that I could provide an objective evaluation of its features as contrasted to WordPress. I chose this CMS for the comparison over alternative options such as Grav, Statamic, ButterCMS, Joomla, Drupal, Jekyll, Hugo, and others, for the following reasons:

I know how this CMS works (unlike Grav);

It is free and open source (unlike Statamic and ButterCMS);

At five years, it is “relatively” new (unlike Joomla and Drupal);

It is a dynamic (not static) content generator and based in PHP (unlike Jekyll and Hugo).

I believe that October CMS is a good candidate because it is based on Laravel which is a framework used for building modern applications. After seven years of existence, it has received positive approval from developers (as evidenced by its sizeable community and ecosystem), and marks a distinct contrast over coding in WordPress, i.e. WordPress is mostly procedural programming while Laravel is decidedly object-oriented programming.

What’s The Difference Between The Two?

Below I will compare WordPress and October CMS on different categories and highlight what, I believe, is good and not so good about them. However, I will not pick a winner, since that’s not the objective of the article and, in any case, there is no “best” or even “better” CMS: each CMS has its own set of strengths and weaknesses that will make it more or less suitable for each task, project, company, team, and anything else. Moreover, a project may benefit from using more than one CMS, such as using some CMS to manage and provide data, and another CMS to render the view. To decide which of the dozens of CMSs out there is most suitable for your own needs is entirely up to you.

In addition, this article could never draw definitive conclusions since it is only concerned with a subset of all possibilities. For instance, we can also find online comparisons such as “WordPress vs Drupal vs Joomla”, “WordPress vs Static Site Generators” and even “WordPress vs Medium”. Because none of these articles sees the full picture, then none of these comparisons can ever be conclusive, and should not be treated as such.

Let’s start with the comparison.

Philosophy And Target Group

It is no coincidence that WordPress powers nearly 1 in 3 websites. Ever since its inception, it has strived to be extremely user-friendly and has done so successfully, removing friction for technical and non-technical users alike as well as for people from all backgrounds — irrespective of their education and economic levels. WordPress’ founder Matt Mullenweg expressed that WordPress’ motto of “Democratize Publishing” for the current era meant the following:

“People of all backgrounds, interests, and abilities should be able to access Free-as-in-speech software that empowers them to express themselves on the open web and to own their content.”

WordPress is easy to use for everyone and its inclusivity is evidenced on the development side too: It’s not uncommon to find people without a programming background (such as marketers, designers, bloggers, sales people, and others) tinkering with their WordPress installations, designing their own themes and successfully launching their own websites. WordPress is user-centric, and the needs of the users trump those of the developers. In WordPress, the user is king (or queen).

In contrast, October CMS is more geared towards the developer, as explicity established from its very first release:

“October makes one bold but obvious assumption: clients don’t build websites, developers do. The role of a client is to manage the website and convey their business requirements. The web developer, and the industry itself, revolves around mediating these factors.”

In the words of its founders, the CMS’ mission is to “prove that making websites is not rocket science.” Being based on Laravel, October CMS can claim to have strong foundations of reusable, modular code that can produce properly-architected applications, maintainable in the long term and fully customizable without requiring hacks — the type which attracts serious programmers. October CMS can also provide a great user experience, however, it is not as simple or frictionless as that provided by WordPress. Users may need to be explained how to use certain functionality before being able to use it. For instance, embedding a form from some plugin has a lengthy explanation on how to do it, which is more cumbersome than the self-evident, drag-and-drop functionality provided by several form plugins in WordPress.

Installation

WordPress is famous for its 5-minute installation, even though many people point out that (taking into consideration all the plugins that must be installed) a typical installation requires 15 minutes or more. In addition, WordPress also offers the Multisite feature, which allows us to create a network of multiple virtual sites under a single installation. This feature makes it easy for an agency to administer the sites of multiple clients — among other user cases.

Installing October CMS is also very smooth: The Wizard installation itself takes even less than five minutes, and if you install it through the Console installation, it is even faster. You can do the latter by simply navigating to the target directory and then executing curl -s https://octobercms.com/api/installer | php (after which we need to input the database configuration, otherwise it behaves as a flat-file CMS). Once the installation has been completed, we will have a fully functioning website, but still quite bare (if you add the time needed to install and configure the required plugins, you can expect it to take at least 15 minutes).

Installing October CMS with the Wizard is a breeze. (Large preview)

Security

WordPress has been accused of being insecure due to the high amount of vulnerabilities that are constantly found. This forces users to have the software for the CMS and all installed plugins always up to date to avoid security exploits. Among the main issues is WordPress’ support for older versions of PHP which are not supported by the PHP development community anymore (WordPress currently supports PHP 5.2.4, while the latest fully supported PHP version is 5.6). However, this problem should be resolved in April 2019 when WordPress will officially start supporting PHP versions 5.6 and upwards.

Otherwise, WordPress is not necessarily insecure because of itself, but because of its high popularity, which makes it a primal target for hackers. However, this plays both ways: WordPress ubiquity means that its security team must really take their job seriously by constantly looking for exploits and fixing them as soon as possible, otherwise up to a third of the web is at risk. The stakes are just too high.

October CMS, on the other hand, doesn’t have a reputation of being insecure. However, since there are roughly 27,000 live sites that use October as compared with WordPress’ millions, we can’t judge the two of them on the same terms. Nevertheless, the team behind October CMS does take security seriously, as evidenced by the Wizard installation’s prompt to input the CMS backend URL, set as /backend by default but changeable to anything else, as to make it more difficult for hackers to target the site. In contrast, changing WordPress’ login and backend URLs from /wp-login.php and /wp-admin respectively to something else must be done through a plugin. In addition, October CMS can function as a flat-file CMS (i.e. without a database) and avoid database-related vulnerabilities such as SQL injection.

Technology Stack

Both WordPress and October CMS run on the traditional LAMP stack: Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. (However, only PHP is fixed: we can also use Windows, Nginx, MariaDB, and others.) October CMS can also behave as a flat-file CMS, meaning that it can do without a database, however, at the cost of forgoing many functionalities (such as blog posts and users) the only functionality that is guaranteed is pages, which is considered to be the basic unit for the creation and publishing of content and shipped as a core feature.

Concerning the language stack, sites built with both WordPress and October CMS are based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript (note that PHP is used to generate the HTML). October CMS also makes it easy to use LESS and SASS files.

Programming Paradigm

WordPress follows a functional programming paradigm, based on calculating computations by calling functions devoid of application state. Even though WordPress developers do not need to stick to functional programming (for instance, for coding their themes and plugins), the WordPress core code inherits this paradigm from 15 years of preserving backwards compatibility, which has been one of the pillars to WordPress’ success but which has the unintended consequence of accumulating technical debt.

On the other side, October CMS follows an imperative programming paradigm, based on calculating computations by manipulating objects’ state. October CMS sits on top of Laravel, a web framework fully founded on Object-Oriented Programming principles that enable the production of modular applications based on concepts such as the Model-View-Controller to decouple the user interface from the application data, Dependency Injection to configure class dependencies, and the Interface Segregation Principle to define the core services provided by the framework, among many others.

Hooks/Events

Programming in WordPress could be characterized as HDD which stands for “Hook-Driven Development”. A hook is a mechanism that allows changing a default behavior or value and allowing other code to execute related functionality. Hooks are triggered through “actions” which allow executing extra functionality, and “filters” that allow modifying values.

Hooks, which are widespread across the WordPress codebase, are one of the concepts that I most like from coding in WordPress. They allow plugins to interact with other plugins (or with a core or theme) in a clean way, providing some basic support of Aspect-Oriented Programming.

Good news is that Laravel (and in consequence October CMS) also supports the concept of hooks, which is called “events”. Events provide a simple observer implementation, enabling code to subscribe and listen for events that occur in the application and react as needed. Events make it possible to split a complex functionality into components, which can be installed independently yet collaborate with each other, thus enabling the creation of modular applications.

Dependence on JavaScript Libraries

The latest version of WordPress incorporates React-powered Gutenberg for its default content creation experience. Hence, WordPress development now relies by and large on JavaScript (predominantly through React), even though it is also possible to use other frameworks or libraries (as evidenced by Elementor Blocks for Gutenberg which is based on Marionette). In addition, WordPress still relies on Backbone.js (for the Media Manager) and jQuery (legacy code), however, we can expect the dependence on these libraries to wither away as Gutenberg is consolidated as the new norm.

October CMS depends on jQuery, which it uses to implement its optional AJAX framework to load data from the server without a browser page refresh.

Pages, Themes and Plugins

Both WordPress and October CMS treat a page as the basic unit for creating and publishing content (in WordPress case, in addition to the post), support changing the site’s look and feel through themes, and allow to install and extend the site’s functionalities through plugins. Even though the concepts are the same in both CMSs, there are a few differences in implementation that produce somewhat different behavior.

In WordPress, pages are defined as content and stored in the database. As a result, page content can be created through the CMS only (e.g. in the dashboard area), and switching from one theme to another doesn’t make an existing page become unavailable. This produces an overall frictionless experience.

In October CMS, on the other hand, pages are static files stored under the theme directory. On the positive side from this architectural decision, page content can be created from an external application, such as text editors like Sublime or Visual Studio Code. On the negative side, when switching from one theme to another, it is required to manually recreate or copy the pages from the current to the new theme, or otherwise, they will disappear.

Significantly, October CMS resolves routing through pages, hence pages are used not just as containers for content but also for functionality. For instance, a plugin for blogging depends on a page for displaying the list of blog posts under a chosen URL, another page to display a single blog post under another chosen URL, and so on. If any of these pages disappear, the associated functionality from the plugin becomes unavailable, and that URL will produce a 404. Hence, in October CMS themes and plugins are not thoroughly decoupled, and switching themes must be done carefully.

October CMS enables the creation of content from external applications. (Large preview)

Core vs Plugin Functionality

WordPress attempts to deliver a minimal core functionality which is enhanced through plugins. WordPress relies on the “80⁄20 rule” to decide if to include some functionality in its core experience or not. If it benefits 80% of the users it goes in, otherwise, it belongs to plugin-land. When adding plugins to a site, they can lead to bloat if too many plugins are installed. Plugins may also not work well with one another, or execute similar code or load similar assets, resulting in suboptimal performance. Hence, whereas launching a WordPress site is relatively easy, a bigger challenge is its general maintenance and being able to preserve an optimal and performant state when adding new features.

The WordPress plugin directory claims to have almost 55,000 plugins. (Large preview)

Likewise, October CMS also attempts to deliver a minimal core functionality, but on steroids: the only guaranteed functionality is the creation and publication of pages, and for everything else we will need to install one plugin or another, which is expressed as:

“Everything you need, and nothing you don't.”

The objective is clear: most simple sites are only composed of pages, with possibly no blog posts, users or login area. So why should the application load resources for these when they are not needed? As a consequence, functionalities for blogging, user management, translation and several others are released through the plugin directory.

Searching for 'Rainlab' in October’s plugins directory displays plugins created by October CMS' team. (Large preview)

October CMS also includes certain features in its core which (even though they are not always needed) can enhance the application significantly. For instance, it provides out-of-the-box support to upload media files to Amazon S3 and accesses them through the Rackspace CDN. It also includes a Media Manager which is mostly used through plugins, e.g. for adding images into a blog post. (Pages can also use the Media Manager to embed media files, however, the CMS also ships with an Assets section to upload media files for these which seems more suitable.)

I believe that October’s opinionatedness can perfectly enable us to produce an application that is as lean as possible — mostly concerning simple sites. However, it can also backfire and encourage bloat, because the line of what is needed and what is not is an arbitrary one, and it’s difficult to be set in advance by the CMS. This difficulty can be appreciated when considering the concept of a “user”: In WordPress, website users and website admins belong to the same user entity (and through roles and privileges we can make a user become an admin). In October CMS, these two are implemented separately, shipping in core the implementation for the website administrator which can log in to the backend area and modify the settings, and through a plugin the implementation of the website user. These two types of users have a different login process and a different database table for storing their data, thus arguably breaching the DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) principle.

This problem arises not only concerning the behavior of an entity but also what data fields it must contain. For instance, should the website user data fields be predefined? Is a telephone field required? What about an Instagram URL field, considering that Instagram got kind of cool only recently? But then, when building a professional website shouldn’t we use a LinkedIn URL field instead? These decisions clearly depend on the application and can’t be decided by either CMS or plugin.

The October CMS plugin called User implements users but without any user field, on top of which plugin User Plus adds several arbitrary user fields, which are possibly not enough, so plugin User Plus+ adds yet other user fields. When, where and how do we stop this process?

Another problem is when there is no room to add new capabilities to an entity, which leads to the creation of another, extremely similar entity, just to support those required capabilities. For instance, October CMS ships with pages, and allows to create “static pages” through a plugin. Their nature is the same: both pages and static pages are saved as static files. The only difference between them (as far as I can tell) is that static pages are edited with a visual editor instead of the HTML editor, and can be added to menus. In my opinion, only structural differences, such as having one entity saved as a static file and the other one stored in the database, could justify creating a second entity for a page (there is a pull request to do this), but for simple features, as is the case currently, it constitutes development bloat.

In summary, a well implemented October CMS application can be very lean and efficient (e.g. by removing the database when not needed), but on the contrary it can also become unnecessarily bloated, forcing developers to implement several solutions for similar entities, and which can be very confusing to use (“Should I use a page or a static page?”). Because neither WordPress or October CMS has found a perfect solution for removing bloat, we must design either application architecture with care to avoid down-the-road pain.

Content Creation

Gutenberg makes two important contributions to WordPress: It uses components as the unit for building sites (which offers several advantages over coding blobs of HTML), and it introduces an entity called a “block” which, once Gutenberg Phase 2 is completed (presumably in 2019), will provide a unified way to incorporate content into the site, thus enabling a simpler user experience as opposed to the more chaotic process of adding content through shortcodes, TinyMCE buttons, menus, widgets, and others.

Since WordPress 5.0 Gutenberg is the default content creation experience. (Large preview)

Because Gutenberg blocks can produce and save static HTML as part of the blog post, then installing many Gutenberg blocks doesn’t necessarily translate into bloat on the website on the user side, but can be kept restricted to the admin side. Hence, Gutenberg can arguably be considered a good approach to produce websites in a modular way, with a simple yet powerful user experience for creating content. Possibly the biggest drawback is the (unavoidable, but not easily so) requirement to learn React, whose learning curve is rather steep.

If React components are the basic unit for creating content in WordPress, October CMS is based on the premise that knowing good old HTML is enough for building sites. Indeed, when creating a page, we are simply presented an HTML (Markup) editor:

Creating a page in October CMS. (Large preview)

If the page were solely static HTML, then there would be no need for a CMS. Instead, October CMS pages are written using Twig templates which are compiled to plain optimized PHP code. They can select a layout to include the scaffolding of the page (i.e. repetitive elements, such as the header, footer, and so on), can implement placeholders, which are defined on the layout to allow the page to customize content, and can include partials, which are reusable chunks of code. In addition, pages can include content blocks, which are either text, HTML or Markdown files that can be edited on their own and can attach components which are functionalities implemented through plugins. And finally, for whenever HTML is not enough and we need to produce dynamic code, we can add PHP functions.

The editor is all about HTML. There is no TinyMCE textarea for adding content in a visual manner — at least not through the default experience (this functionality belongs to plugin-land). Hence, having knowledge of HTML could be considered a must for using October CMS. In addition, the several different inputs for creating content (pages, layouts, placeholders, partials, content blocks, components, and PHP functions) may be very effective, however, it is certainly not as simple as through the unified block interface from WordPress. It can even get more complex since other elements can also be added (such as static pages and menus, and snippets), and some of them, such as pages and static pages, seemingly provide the same functionality, making it confusing to decide when to use one or the other.

As a result, I dare say that while pretty much anyone can use a WordPress site from the admin side, October CMS is more developer-friendly than non-technical user-friendly, so programmers may find it a joy to use, but certain other roles (marketers, sales people, and the like) may find it non-intuitive.

Media Manager

Both WordPress and October CMS are shipped with a Media Manager which allows adding media files to the site effortlessly, supporting the addition of multiple files simultaneously through a drag-and-drop interface and displaying the images within the content area. They look and behave similarly; the only notable differences I found are that WordPress’ Media Manager allows to embed image galleries, and October’s Media Manager allows to manually create a folder structure where to place the uploaded files.

October CMS ships with a powerful Media Manager. (Large preview)

Since the introduction of Gutenberg, though, WordPress’ media capabilities have been enhanced greatly, enabling to embed videos, pictures and photo galleries in place as compared to within a TinyMCE textarea (which only provides a non-accurate version of how it will look like in the site), and unlocking powerful, yet easy-to-use features as shown in this video.

Internationalization

WordPress core uses gettext to enable the translation of themes and plugins. Starting from a .pot file containing all strings to translate, we need to create a .po file containing their translation to the corresponding language/locale, and this file is then compiled to a binary .mo file suitable for fast translation extraction. Tools to perform these tasks include GlotPress (online) and Poedit (downloadable application). Conveniently, this mechanism also works for client-side localization for Gutenberg.

Poedit allows to translate strings for themes and plugins for WordPress. (Large preview)

WordPress currently doesn’t ship any solution in core to translate content, and will not do so until Phase 4 of Gutenberg (targeted for year 2020+). Until then, this functionality is provided by plugins which offer different strategies for storing and managing the translated content. For example, while plugins such as Polylang and WPML store each translation on its own row from a custom database table (which is clean since it doesn’t mix content together, but slower since it requires an additional INNER JOIN of two tables when querying the database), plugin qTranslate X stores all translations on the same field from the original database table (faster for querying the data, but content mixed all together can produce wreckage on the site if disabling the plugin). Hence, we can shop around and decide the most suitable strategy for our needs.

October CMS doesn’t ship the multilingual functionality through its core, but as a plugin created by the October CMS team that guarantees a faultless integration into the system. From a functional point of view, this plugin delivers what it promises. From a development point of view, it is not quite ideal how this plugin actually works. In WordPress, a page is simply a post with post type “page” and there is a single translation mechanism for them, but in October CMS, there are entities “page”, “static page” and “blog post” and, even though quite similar, they require three different implementations for their translations! Then, the content from a “page” can include message codes (e.g. codes called nav.content, header.title, and so on), each of which contains its translations for all locales as a serialized JSON object in database table rainlab_translate_messages. The content from a “static page” is created into a new static file per locale, however, all translated URLs for all locales are stored not in their corresponding file but instead on the default language’s file. The content for the “blog post” is stored as a serialized JSON object with one row per locale in database table rainlab_translate_attributes and the translated URL is stored with one row per locale in database table rainlab_translate_indexes. I don’t know if this complexity is due to how the plugin was implemented or whether it is due to October CMS’ architecture. Whichever the case, this is another instance of undesired bloat on the development side.

Plugin Management

Both WordPress and October CMS offer a sophisticated plugin manager which allows to search for plugins, install new plugins, and update currently-installed plugins to their latest version — all from within the backend.

October CMS enables to keep all plugins up-to-date effortlessly. (Large preview)

Dependency Management

October CMS uses Composer as the package manager of choice, enabling plugins to download and install their dependencies when being installed, thus delivering a painless experience.

WordPress, on the opposite side, hasn’t officially adopted Composer (or any PHP dependency manager) because the community can’t agree if WordPress is a site or a site dependency. Hence, if they require Composer for their projects, developers must add it on their own. With the switch to Gutenberg, npm has become the preferred JavaScript dependency manager, with a popular developer toolkit depending on it, and the client-side libraries being steadily released as autonomous packages in the npm registry.

Interaction With The Database

WordPress provides functions to retrieve database data (such as get_posts) and store it (such as wp_insert_post and wp_update_post). When retrieving data, we can pass parameters to filter, limit and order the results, in order to indicate if the result must be passed as an instance of a class or as an array of properties and others. When the function doesn’t fully satisfy our requirements (e.g. when we need to do an INNER JOIN with a custom table) then we can query the database directly through global variable $wpdb. When creating a plugin with a custom post type, the code will most likely be executing custom SQL queries to retrieve and/or save data into custom tables. In summary, WordPress attempts to provide access to the database through generic functions in the first stage, and through low-level access to the database in the second stage.

October CMS employs a different approach: Instead of connecting to the database straight away, the application can use Laravel’s Eloquent ORM to access and manipulate database data through instances of classes called Models, making the interaction with the database also be based on Object-Oriented Programming. It is high-level access; just by following the rules on how to create tables and set-up relationships among entities, a plugin can retrieve and/or save data without writing a line of SQL. For instance, the code below retrieves an object from the database through model Flight, modifies a property, and stores it again:

$flight = Flight::find(1); $flight->name = 'Darwin to Adelaide'; $flight->save();

Upgrading The Data Model

Another reason for WordPress’ success (in addition to not breaking backward compatibility) has been its database architecture, which was engineered to enable applications to grow over time. This objective is accomplished through “meta” properties, i.e. properties that can be loosely added to a database object at any moment. These properties are not stored in a column from the corresponding entity table (either wp_posts, wp_users, wp_comments or wp_terms), but instead as a row in the corresponding “meta” table (wp_postmeta, wp_usermeta, wp_commentmeta or wp_termmeta) and retrieved doing an INNER JOIN. Hence, even though retrieving these meta values is slower, they provide unlimited flexibility, and the application’s data model rarely needs to be re-architected from scratch in order to implement some new functionality.

WordPress provides unlimited flexibility for upgrading the application’s data model. (Large preview)

October CMS doesn’t use meta properties but instead can store several arbitrary values, which are not directly mapped as columns in the database tables, as a serialized JSON object. Otherwise, when an object needs some new property, we need to add a new column on the corresponding table (which is the reason behind plugins User Plus and User Plus+, mentioned earlier on). To update the application’s database schema, October CMS relies on Laravel’s Migrations, which are sets of instructions to execute against the schema (such as add or drop a column, rename an index, etc) and which are executed when upgrading the software (e.g. when installing a plugin’s new version).

Headless Capabilities

Both WordPress and October CMS can be used as headless, i.e. treating the CMS as a content management system that makes content accessible through APIs, which allows to render the website on the client-side and can power other applications (such as mobile apps). Indeed, WordPress is steadily heading towards headless, since the Gutenberg content editor itself treats WordPress as a headless CMS (and, as a consequence, Gutenberg can also work with any other CMS too, as Drupal Gutenberg demonstrates).

A headless system needs to implement some API to return the data, such as REST and GraphQL. WordPress supports REST through WP REST API (merged in core), exposing endpoints under some predefined route /wp-json/wp/v2/...; October CMS supports REST through plugins RESTful and API Generator, which allow to create custom endpoints and, as a consequence, support versioning as part of the endpoint URL and can offer a better security against bots. Concerning GraphQL, WordPress supports it through WPGraphQL, while October CMS currently has no implementations for it.

Quite importantly, a headless system needs to offer powerful content management capabilities. As mentioned earlier on, WordPress has a very solid database architecture, offering a plethora of data entities (users, posts and custom posts, pages, categories, tags and custom taxonomies, comments) over which the application can be reasonably well modelled, meta properties to extend these data entities (enabling the application to upgrade its data model accordingly and without major changes), and with plugin Advanced Custom Fields filling the gap to construct relationships among the data entities. In addition, plugin VersionPress allows to version control the database content using Git. Hence, WordPress is undoubtedly a good fit for managing content, as demonstrated in several projects in the wild.

On its part, and as mentioned earlier on, October CMS can omit the database and behave as a flat-file system, or it can have a database and behave as a hybrid, storing the content from pages as static files and blog posts (and others) on the database. As a consequence, content is not centralized, and its management involves a different approach. For instance, while we can use Git to version control pages, there is no support to version control the database per se; the solution to this is to populate data into the database through Seeders which, being code, can be put under version control and executed upon deployment. In addition, October CMS doesn’t offer a baked-in database model featuring predefined data entities that can support the needs of most applications. Hence, more likely than not the application will need custom development to implement its data model, which means more work, but also means that it can be more efficient (e.g. accessing a property from a column is faster than from a row in another table through an INNER JOIN, which is the case with WordPress’ meta properties).

CLI Support

Both WordPress and October CMS can be interacted with from the console through a Command Line Interface (CLI): WordPress through WP-CLI and October CMS through Laravel’s Artisan. In addition to Laravel’s commands, October CMS implements several custom commands for updating the system, migrating the database, and others. These tools make it very convenient to access the site from outside a browser, for instance for testing purposes.

Managed Hosting

It is not a problem finding a managed hosting provider for a WordPress site: given WordPress’ market share, there are dozens (if not hundreds) of providers out there vying with each other for the business, constituting a very dynamic market. The only problem is finding the most suitable provider for our specific sites based on all of their offerings, which can vary based on price, quality, type (shared or dedicated services), bandwidth and storage size, customer support, location, frequency of renewal of equipment, and other variables which we can navigate mainly through reviews comparing them (such as this one, this one or this one).

Even though nothing near as many as WordPress, October CMS still enjoys the offering from several hosting providers, which allows for some consideration and selection. Many of them are listed as October Partners, and several others are found DuckDuckGoing, but since I haven’t found any independent review of them or article comparing them, the task of finding out the most suitable one will take some effort.

Marketplace, Ecosystem And Cost

WordPress’ commercial ecosystem is estimated to be USD $10 billion/year, evidencing how many people and companies have managed to make a living by offering WordPress products and services, such as the creation of sites, hosting, theme and plugin development, support, security, and others. Indeed, its size is so big it is even bloated, meaning that it is very common to find different plugins solving the same problem, plugins that underdeliver, underperform or have not been updated for years, and themes which seem to look-alike each other. However, when creating a new site, the size and variety of the ecosystem also means that we will most likely find at least one plugin implementing each of the required functionalities, enabling us to save money by not having to develop the functionality ourselves, and the availability of customizable themes enables to produce a reasonably distinctive-looking site with minimal effort. As a consequence, we can easily create and launch a WordPress site for less than USD $100, making WordPress a sensible option for projects of any budget.

Being relatively new (only five years so far), OctoberCMS certainly doesn’t enjoy anything near WordPress’ marketplace and ecosystem sizes, however, it has been growing steadily so its size is bound to become bigger. Currently, its marketplace boasts 600+ plugins, and only a handful of themes. Concerning plugins, the October CMS team is requesting the community to put their effort into the creation of original plugins, delivering functionality not yet provided by any other plugin.

Hence, even though 600+ plugins doesn’t sound like much, at least these translate into 600+ different functionalities. This way, even though it is not possible to choose among several vendors, at least we can expect to have those basic website features (such as blogging, comments, forum, integration with social media, e-commerce, and others) to be covered. Also, since October’s founders are personally reviewing all submitted plugins and judging them according to quality guidelines, we can expect these plugins to perform as expected. As another plus, October plugins can incorporate elements from Laravel packages (even though not all of them are compatible with October, at least not without some hacks). Concerning themes, the low number of offerings implies we will most likely need to develop our own theme by hiring a developer for the task. In fact, I dare say that the theme in October CMS will most likely be a custom development, since themes and plugins are not thoroughly decoupled (as explained earlier), with the consequence that a market for easily-swappable themes is more difficult to arise. (This is a temporary problem though: once this pull request is resolved, pages will be able to be stored in the database, and swapping themes should not disrupt functionality.)

In my opinion, because of the smaller offerings of themes and plugins, creating a simple site with OctoberCMS will be more expensive than creating a simple WordPress site. For complex sites, however, October’s better architecture (Object-Oriented Programming and Model-View-Controller paradigms) makes the software more maintainable and, as a consequence, potentially cheaper.

Community

Being a part of and having access, WordPress’ community represents one of the most compelling reasons for using WordPress. This is not simply as a matter of size (powering nearly one third of all websites in the world, there are so many stakeholders involved with WordPress, and its community is representatively big) but also as a matter of diversity. The WordPress community involves people from many different professions (developers, marketers, designers, bloggers, sales people, and so on), from all continents and countries, speaking countless languages, from different social, educational and economic backgrounds, with or without disabilities, from corporate, not-for-profit and governmental organizations, and others. Hence, it is quite likely that, for whatever problem we encounter, somebody will be able to help on any of the support forums. And contributing to WordPress is pretty straightforward too: The Make WordPress group congregates stakeholders interested in supporting different projects (accessibility, design, internationalization, and many others) and organizes how and how regularly they communicate — mostly through some dedicated channel on its Slack workspace.

Furthermore, the WordPress community is real and tangible: it doesn’t exist just online, but it gathers offline in WordCamps and meetups all over the world; in 2018, there were a total of 145 WordCamps in 48 countries with over 45,000 tickets sold, and a total of 5,400 meetup events from 687 meetup groups. Hence, it is likely that there is a local chapter nearby which anyone can join to ask for help, learn how to use the platform, keep learning on a regular basis, and teach others as well. In this sense, WordPress is not just a CMS but, more importantly, it’s also people, and considering to leave WordPress should never be done only on its technical merits but on the power of its community, too.

WordCamp Kuala Lumpur 2017 drew more than 200 attendees, coming from several countries. (Large preview)

October CMS’ community is nothing near in size or diversity as WordPress’, even though it has been growing steadily following the increasing popularity of the software. October provides a support forum to ask for help, however, it is not very active. A Slack workspace exists which is pretty active and where, quite importantly, October’s founders participate regularly, helping make sure that all enquiries are properly addressed. This channel is a great source for learning low-level tips and tricks about the software, however, it is geared towards developers mainly: There are no channels concerning accessibility, design, internationalization, and other topics as in the WordPress community, at least not yet. Currently, there are no conferences concerning October CMS, but there is Laracon, the conference for the Laravel community.

Maintainers And Governance

Can we trust that the software will be maintained in the long term, so that if we decide to start a project today, we will not need to migrate to some other platform down the road? How many people are taking care of developing the software? And who is deciding in what direction the software moves towards?

Powering one-third of all sites in the world, WordPress is not short of stakeholders contributing to the software; hence we need not fear that the software will fall into decay. However, WordPress is going through internal deliberations concerning its governance model, with many members of the community expressing that decisions concerning WordPress’s direction are being taken unilaterally by Automattic, the company running WordPress.com. Center stage of this perception was the decision to launch Gutenberg, which many members disagreed with, and which suffered a lack of proper communication by the project leads during its development and release. As a consequence, many community members are questioning the role of “benign dictator”, which has been historically granted to WordPress’ founder and Automattic’s CEO Matt Mullenweg, and researching different governance models to find a more suitable one for the future of WordPress. It is yet to be seen if this quest produces any result, or if the status quo perseveres.

Decisions concerning October CMS’ direction are mainly taken by founders Alexey Bobkov and Samuel Georges and developer and community manager Luke Towers, which keep the project going strong. October CMS doesn’t have the luxury of having a governance problem yet: Its current concern is how to make the project sustainable by generating income for the core software’s maintainers.

Documentation

WordPress documentation in its own site is not extremely comprehensive, but it does the job reasonably well. However, when taking all of the documentation about WordPress into account from all sources, such as general sites (Smashing Magazine, CSS tricks, and many others), specialized sites (WPShout, WPBeginner, and many others), personal blogs, online courses, and so on, there is practically no aspect of dealing with WordPress that hasn’t already been covered.

October CMS doesn’t enjoy anything near the many third-party courses, tutorials or blog posts about it as much as WordPress does, however, the documentation on its site is reasonably comprehensive and certainly enough to start coding. October founders also regularly add new documentation through tutorials. One aspect that I personally enjoyed is the duplication of Laravel’s documentation into October’s documentation for everything of relevance, so the reader must not fill the gaps by him/herself and having to guess what is October’s domain and what is Laravel’s. However, this is not 100% perfect. October’s documentation uses terms originating from Laravel, such as middleware, service containers, facades and contracts, without adequately explaining what these are. Then, reading Laravel’s documentation in advance can be helpful (luckily, Laravel’s documentation is decidedly comprehensive, and Laravel’s screencasts, Laracasts, are another great source of learning, not just concerning Laravel but web development in general).

Conclusion

I set out to discover what features may be enticing for developers looking for alternatives to WordPress by comparing WordPress to a similar CMS, which I defined as being free and open source, based in PHP and producing dynamic content, and enjoying the support from some community. From the CMSs fulfilling these conditions, I chose October CMS for the comparison because of the knowledge I got about it, and because I appreciated its clean and modular coding approach as provided by Laravel, which could offer a fresh and modern perspective for building sites.

This article did not intend to pick a winner, but simply analyze when it makes sense to choose one or the other CMS, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. There is no “best” CMS: only the most suitable CMS for a specific situation. Furthermore, anyone looking for a CMS to use on a particular project with a specific team and given a certain budget, should do some research and compare all the offerings out there to find out which one is most suitable for the particular context. It’s important not to limit to a few CMSs as I’ve done here in this article, but instead give a chance to all of them.

On a personal note, as a developer, what I found in October CMS is really appealing to me, mostly its ability to build modular applications as provided through Laravel. I would certainly consider this CMS for a new website. However, in the process of writing this article I also “rediscovered” WordPress. Being so popular, WordPress receives more than its fair share of criticisms, mostly concerning its old codebase and, since recently, the introduction of Gutenberg; however, WordPress also has certain excellent features (such as its super-scalable database model) which are seldom praised but should be taken into account too. And most importantly, WordPress should not be considered on its technical aspects alone: in particular, the size of its community and ecosystem places it a level or two above its alternatives. In a nutshell, some projects may benefit from sticking to WordPress, while others may better rely on October CMS or another platform.

As a final note, I would like to remark that exploring how another CMS works is a very rewarding activity on its own, independent of the decision reached concerning whether to use that particular CMS or not. In my case, I had been working for years on WordPress alone, and delving into October CMS was very refreshing since it taught me many things (such as the existence of PHP Standards Recommendations) which I had not been exposed to through WordPress. I may now decide to switch CMSs, or stick to WordPress knowing how to produce better code.

Further Reading on SmashingMag:

Caching Smartly In The Age Of Gutenberg

Improving WordPress Code With Modern PHP

Lessons Learned While Developing WordPress Plugins

How To Use Heatmaps To Track Clicks On Your WordPress Website

Be Watchful: PHP And WordPress Functions That Can Make Your Site Insecure

(rb, ra, yk, il)

[ellencrichton11]

PHP vs. ASP.NET - tririd.com

There is no doubt on the fact that both of these programming languages have become successful ventures, and have developed great websites.

But, the question still remains fresh for non-technical people, which platform should you choose when you start with web-apps exercise.

So, let us see some differences which make your vision clear which language should you choose.

Beginning:

PHP was started by a single developer Rasmus Lerdorf a couple of decades ago. PHP stands for Personal Home Page. So the idea at that time was to build small homepages for people, not to build large scale applications.

ASP.NET on the other hand was, from the starting itself, to be used in organizations and Microsoft based the concepts of this technology in such a way.

In Present Years:

PHP has again gained more popularity, because of frameworks such as Laravel 

ASPNET is used in large organizations to build their small to medium sized internal applications.

Examples:

Some well-known solutions

·         CMS: WordPress, Drupal, TYPO3

·         Onlineshoping Systems: Magento, WooCommerce, Shopware, Oxid

The marketing team needs software to automate their marketing processes. Then this technology could be the way to go.

PHP and its peripheral tools like Database (MySQL), Server (Apache) and Operating System (Linux) are all license free. 

ASPNET and its peripheral tools (e.g. Third Part Tools) all have a license cost attached. 

Freedom in coding:

f you opt for PHP, you are free to develop however you want. All solutions are open source and can be configured as you feel right. You have complete freedom.

The Official Microsoft ASP.NET Site is more corporate in nature. Also because a company “Microsoft” is standing behind this technology.

Conclusion:

So, here we have given some differences for both languages. Now, choice is depend on user's requirement.

Tririd Technologies Pvt Ltd is Software company in Ahmedabad which provide Web site Design, software development and SEO service across the world.

We use both PHP and Asp.net in development.

For more information

Call us @ 8980010210

Visit us@ http://www.tririd.com/web-application-development/

[vieclam365vn]

Trọn bộ thông tin về Apache là gì? Ưu – nhược điểm của Apache

1. Apache là gì? Tổng quan sâu về máy chủ web Apache 1.1. Khái niệm Apache và máy chủ web Apache là một phần mềm máy chủ web miễn phí và mã nguồn mở cung cấp khoảng 40% các trang web trên toàn thế giới. Tên chính thức là Máy chủ HTTP Apache và được Quỹ Phần mềm Apache duy trì và phát triển. Nó cho phép chủ sở hữu trang web phân phát nội dung trên web - do đó có tên là máy chủ web. Đây là một trong những máy chủ web lâu đời nhất và đáng tin cậy nhất, với phiên bản đầu tiên được phát hành cách đây hơn 20 năm, vào năm 1995. Khi ai đó muốn truy cập một trang web, họ nhập một tên miền vào thanh địa chỉ của trình duyệt của họ. Sau đó, máy chủ web cung cấp các tệp được yêu cầu bằng cách hoạt động như một người giao hàng ảo. Thiết lập đặc biệt này cho phép người dùng tối ưu hóa các tính năng mà nó đem lại. Nó cải thiện đáng kể hiệu năng của máy chủ bằng cách bù các mặt yếu hơn của một phần mềm với các điểm mạnh của phần mềm khác. Song song với khái niệm Apache người ta thường nhắc đén máy chủ web. Một máy chủ web là máy chủ tệp, máy chủ cơ sở dữ liệu, máy chủ thư viện và máy chủ web sử dụng các loại phần mềm máy chủ khác nhau. Mỗi ứng dụng này có thể truy cập các tệp được lưu trữ trên một máy chủ vật lý và sử dụng chúng cho các mục đích khác nhau. Công việc của một máy chủ web là phục vụ các trang web trên internet. Để đạt được mục tiêu đó, nó hoạt động như một người trung gian giữa máy chủ và máy khách. Nó lấy nội dung từ máy chủ theo từng yêu cầu của người dùng và đưa nó lên web. Thách thức lớn nhất của máy chủ web là phục vụ nhiều người dùng web khác nhau cùng một lúc - mỗi người đang yêu cầu các trang khác nhau. Các máy chủ web xử lý các tệp được viết bằng các ngôn ngữ lập trình khác nhau như PHP, Python, Java và các ngôn ngữ khác. Bằng cách biến chúng thành các tệp HTML tĩnh và phục vụ các tệp này trong trình duyệt của người dùng web. Khi bạn nghe thấy máy chủ web từ, hãy nghĩ về nó như là công cụ chịu trách nhiệm cho giao tiếp máy chủ-máy khách thích hợp. Apache là một trong những máy chủ web phổ biến nhất cho phép bạn chạy một trang web an toàn mà không phải quá đau đầu. Đó là sự lựa chọn thường xuyên nhất mà các doanh nghiệp nhỏ muốn có sự hiện diện trên web. Bạn có thể cài đặt một trang web WordPress trên máy chủ web Apache mà không cần bất kỳ tùy chỉnh nào. Ngoài ra, Apache hoạt động liền mạch với nhiều hệ thống quản lý nội dung khác ( Joomla , Drupal , v.v.), các khung web (Django, Laravel, v.v.) và ngôn ngữ lập trình. Điều này làm cho nó trở thành một lựa chọn chắc chắn cho tất cả các loại nền tảng lưu trữ web, chẳng hạn như VPS hoặc lưu trữ chia sẻ . Tầm quan trọng của web không nên được đánh giá thấp, nó đã giúp mở ra thế giới, dân chủ hóa thông tin và là một trong những phát minh vĩ đại nhất từng có. Mặc dù nó có ảnh hưởng sâu sắc đến thế giới, web được tạo thành từ nhiều yếu tố khác nhau, chẳng hạn như phần mềm máy chủ web. Apache chạy trên 67% tất cả các máy chủ web trên thế giới và được thiết kế để nhanh chóng, đáng tin cậy và an toàn cũng như có khả năng tùy biến cao để có thể đáp ứng nhu cầu của các môi trường khác nhau. Một máy chủ web hoạt động bằng cách kiểm tra trang web đã được yêu cầu và cung cấp cho người dùng trang web. Apache và các máy chủ web khác, sau đó có khả năng xử lý các giao tiếp với trang web, xử lý các yêu cầu và đảm bảo rằng các mô-đun đã sẵn sàng để sử dụng. Hơn nữa, nó cũng xóa bộ nhớ, bộ nhớ cache và các mô-đun cho khách hàng mới sử dụng trang web 1.2. Máy chủ web Apache hoạt động như thế nào? Mặc dù gọi Apache là máy chủ web, nhưng nó không phải là máy chủ vật lý mà là phần mềm chạy trên máy chủ. Công việc của nó là thiết lập kết nối giữa máy chủ và trình duyệt của khách truy cập trang web (Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, v.v.) trong khi phân phối tệp qua lại giữa chúng (cấu trúc máy khách-máy chủ). Apache là một phần mềm đa nền tảng, do đó, nó hoạt động trên cả máy chủ Unix và Windows. Ví dụ: khi khách truy cập muốn tải một trang trên trang web của bạn, trang chủ hoặc trang của bạn Giới thiệu về chúng tôi, trình duyệt của họ sẽ gửi yêu cầu đến máy chủ của bạn và Apache trả lời phản hồi với tất cả các tệp được yêu cầu (văn bản, hình ảnh, v.v. .). Máy chủ và máy khách liên lạc qua giao thức HTTP và phần mềm Apache chịu trách nhiệm liên lạc thông suốt và an toàn giữa hai máy. Apache có khả năng tùy biến cao, vì nó có cấu trúc dựa trên mô-đun. Các mô-đun cho phép quản trị viên máy chủ bật và tắt các chức năng bổ sung. Apache có các mô-đun để bảo mật, lưu trữ, lưu lại URL, xác thực mật khẩu và hơn thế nữa. Bạn cũng có thể thiết lập các cấu hình máy chủ của riêng mình thông qua một tệp có tên .htaccess ,  đây là tệp cấu hình Apache được hỗ trợ với tất cả các gói Hostinger . 1.3. Apache so với các máy chủ web khác Ngoài Apache, còn có nhiều máy chủ web phổ biến khác. Mỗi ứng dụng máy chủ web đã được tạo cho một mục đích khác nhau. Trong khi Apache được sử dụng rộng rãi nhất, nó có khá nhiều lựa chọn thay thế và đối thủ. 1.3.1. Thiết kế máy chủ lưu trữ của Apache vs Nginx Nginx, phát âm là Engine-X, là một ứng dụng máy chủ web mới hơn được phát hành lần đầu tiên vào năm 2004. Cho đến ngày nay, nó đã trở nên khá phổ biến trong các chủ sở hữu trang web. Nginx được tạo ra để giải quyết vấn đề được gọi là c10k , có nghĩa là một máy chủ web sử dụng các luồng để xử lý các yêu cầu của người dùng không thể quản lý hơn 10.000 kết nối cùng một lúc. Do Apache sử dụng cấu trúc dựa trên luồng, chủ sở hữu của các trang web có lưu lượng truy cập lớn có thể gặp phải các vấn đề về hiệu suất. Nginx là một trong những máy chủ web giải quyết vấn đề c10k và có lẽ là máy chủ thành công nhất. Nginx có một kiến ​​trúc hướng sự kiện mà không tạo ra một quy trình mới cho mỗi yêu cầu. Thay vào đó, nó xử lý mọi yêu cầu đến trong một luồng. Quy trình tổng thể này quản lý một số quy trình công nhân thực hiện xử lý các yêu cầu thực tế. Mô hình Nginx dựa trên sự kiện phân phối các yêu cầu của người dùng giữa các quy trình công nhân một cách hiệu quả, do đó dẫn đến khả năng mở rộng tốt hơn nhiều. Nếu bạn cần quản lý một trang web có lưu lượng truy cập cao, Nginx là một lựa chọn tuyệt vời, vì nó có thể làm điều đó bằng cách sử dụng các tài nguyên tối thiểu. Không thể ngẫu nhiên mà nó được sử dụng bởi nhiều trang web có khả năng hiển thị cao như Netflix, Hulu, Pinterest và Airbnb. Tuy nhiên, đối với người chơi vừa và nhỏ, Apache mang đến một số lợi thế so với Nginx, chẳng hạn như cấu hình dễ dàng, nhiều mô-đun và môi trường thân thiện với người mới bắt đầu. 1.3.2. Thiết kế máy chủ lưu trữ của HTTP Apache vs Tomcat Tomcat là một máy chủ web cũng được phát triển bởi Quỹ phần mềm Apache, do đó tên chính thức của nó là Apache Tomcat . Đó cũng là một máy chủ HTTP, tuy nhiên, nó cung cấp năng lượng cho các ứng dụng Java thay vì các trang web tĩnh. Tomcat có thể chạy một số đặc tả Java khác nhau như Java Servlet, JavaServer Pages (JSP), Java EL và WebSocket. Tomcat đã được tạo riêng cho các ứng dụng Java, trong khi Apache là máy chủ HTTP có mục đích chung. Bạn có thể sử dụng Apache cùng với các ngôn ngữ lập trình khác nhau (PHP, Python, Perl, v.v.) với sự trợ giúp của mô-đun Apache thích hợp (mod_php, mod_python, mod_perl, v.v.). Mặc dù bạn cũng có thể sử dụng máy chủ Tomcat để phục vụ các trang web tĩnh, nhưng mục đích đó kém hiệu quả hơn so với máy chủ Apache. Chẳng hạn, Tomcat tải trước Máy ảo Java và các thư viện liên quan đến Java khác mà bạn sẽ không cần trên hầu hết các trang web. Tomcat cũng ít cấu hình hơn so với các máy chủ web khác. Ví dụ: để chạy WordPress , lựa chọn tốt nhất là máy chủ HTTP có mục đích chung như Apache hoặc NGINX. 2. Ưu và nhược điểm của Apache Một máy chủ web Apache có thể là một lựa chọn tuyệt vời để chạy trang web của bạn trên nền tảng ổn định và linh hoạt. Tuy nhiên, nó cũng đi kèm với một số nhược điểm bạn cần chú ý. Ưu điểm: - Nguồn mở và miễn phí, ngay cả cho mục đích thương mại. - Phần mềm ổn định, đáng tin cậy. - Thường xuyên cập nhật, vá bảo mật thường xuyên. - Linh hoạt do cấu trúc dựa trên mô-đun của nó. - Dễ dàng cấu hình, thân thiện với người mới bắt đầu. - Đa nền tảng (hoạt động trên cả máy chủ Unix và Windows). - Hoạt động tốt với các trang web WordPress. - Cộng đồng lớn và hỗ trợ dễ dàng có sẵn trong trường hợp có vấn đề. Nhược điểm: - Vấn đề về hiệu suất trên các trang web cực kỳ lưu lượng truy cập. - Quá nhiều tùy chọn cấu hình có thể dẫn đến lỗ hổng bảo mật. Hy vọng rằng thông qua bài viết này bạn đã nắm được những thông tin về Apache là gì cũng những giải đáp thắc mắc liên quan cho mình.

Đọc nguyên bài viết tại: Trọn bộ thông tin về Apache là gì? Ưu – nhược điểm của Apache

#timviec365vn

[bestonlinemarketingcompany]

PHP vs Node.JS

Both PHP and Node.js can manage web applications of any complexity, but they are built with different architectures and concepts. If you want to develop an app for your company and are confused between these two environments, you should be well aware of the major limitations or advantages.

PHP is one of the most used back-end programming languages for creating websites and web applications. Node.JS is not a script but an environment for working in the back-end which is written in javascript. However, it is possible to create codes for the back-end in javascript with the help of Node.JS.

Since last few years, both the platforms have continued to improve and expand. Moreover, Node.JS developers can now choose from various other javascript development frameworks like React.JS, Angular.JS, Meteor, and much more.

In this post, we are going to make a brief comparison between PHP and Node.JS.

What is PHP?

PHP is a server-side scripting language which is the most popular choice for web developers after it released in 1995. These days majority number of websites are running on PHP, because of the popularity of choice of language for content management systems(CMS) like Drupal, WordPress, and Joomla and also for modern development frameworks like Symfony, Laravel, and CakePHP which has accelerated the development with PHP.

What is Node.JS?

Javascript is a programming language which typically runs on every web browser and makes the webpage interactive and dynamic. However, since the release of Node.JS in 2009, it is now possible to do asynchronous coding with javascript in the back-end. Node.JS is a runtime and development environment with a number of frameworks available that run on top of it.

Major Differences: PHP vs Node.JS

Both PHP and Node.JS are a server-side programming language. Here are the major differences between PHP and Node.JS:

Runtime Environments: Both PHP and javascript can be embedded into HTML directly. For that, both need an interpreter for running it. PHP is simple and straightforward to install and use on server-side and it is powered by Zend Engine. On the other hand, Node.JS is the running environment of javascript on the server-side which is powered by V8 javascript engine of Google.

Concurrency: PHP uses multi-threaded, blocking I/O for carrying out multiple tasks in parallel like other server-side programming languages. Javascript is unique as it uses various techniques to achieve event-driven,non-blocking I/O execution model which uses a single thread for execution. However, PHP is a mature language and has found its way to achieving asynchronous process most notably by using HVVM project launched by Facebook.

JSON: JSON is a very lightweight data format which gives an edge to Node.JS over PHP in handling JSON files. While JSON can work with PHP, but it’s more situational.

Simplicity: All the concepts of PHP are much simpler to use than Node.JS. While setting up the server all you need is a “.PHP” file with some code contained in the tags, enter the URL into the browser, and you are done. At the back, there is a web server like MySQL with PHP installed is easily able to interpret the file and display that web page in the browser. Setting up the Node.JS server is not difficult but it mostly requires few lines of codes and a basic understanding of how callback functions and closures work.

When to use PHP or Node.JS

Both these are server-side technologies, but Node.JS provides a benefit of working on a javascript stack for both front and back-end. If you are trying to choose between these two server-side technologies. Here are mentioned below for the same.

When to use PHP:

– For software stacks like WAMP, MAMP, and LAMP.

– For content management systems like Drupal, WordPress, Joomla etc.

– For servers like SQL, MySQL, Oracle etc.

When to use Node.JS:

– Single page dynamic web applications (SPAs).

– Using with software stacks like MEAN stack.

– Using server-side technologies like Express.js, Node.JS, MongoDB, etc.

– Using with front-end technologies like Angular.JS, jQuery, React.JS etc.

Conclusion:

Both these programming languages are good and it finally comes to the decision of the businesses on which platform they want to develop their website. If you want a good database integration than PHP is an ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for designing interactive user interfaces than you should go for Node.JS. Therefore, it ultimately comes down to businesses preference and requirements of their project.

For more details on our products and services, please feel free to visit us at Internet Marketing Company New Delhi, Internet Marketing New Delhi, Online Marketing New Delhi, Online Marketing Company New Delhi, Online Marketing Companies New Delhi

[poochome-blog]

Laravel Vs Wordpress

There are actually 2 large Group based on PHP: Content Management Systems (WordPress, Drupal and so on) and also structures (Laravel, Symfony and so on). WordPress supplies a remedy which is actually extremely pliable along with rapid progression pattern which is actually very most more effective for non-technical customers.

If our company chat concerning Laravel, that a lot more reassured, good and also dependable system as contrasted to the Laravel. For cultivating a multifunctional as well as very sophisticated complicated web site after that Laravel will definitely be actually the very best possibility for individuals.

Laravel Development Service: That is actually substantially selected through those small business owner and also creators that are actually trying to specified in addition to a varied organisation web site or even internet function. This gives the thorough collection from devices, package deals, and also plugin for developing a sophisticated device. The html coding needed for this will definitely be actually needed to comply with the suggestions as well as change state-of-the-art performance.

WordPress Development Service: This is actually one of the most well-liked CMS possessing a large variety from plugins on call that aids you through delivering lengthy functions to your internet site. If your site happens under content-based website after that WordPress will certainly be actually the ideal possibility for cultivating Blog, Newspaper, Courses as well as various other educational sites.

Factors have to be actually taken into consideration while reviewing:

Safety and security

All the public libraries are actually built through realized growth providers, at opportunities cyberpunks can easily conceal doubtful code in styles as well as plugins. profile could be actually accessed through making use of mixtures from various usernames and also security password. The web site may be actually shielded through trailing some preferred surveillance hacks.

Protection is among the bottom lines that should be actually looked at while creating the web site. As most of us understand that WordPress Solution possesses protection pests which bring about sensitivities in downloadable plugins as well as concepts.

Laravel delivers better protection to your web site. Laravel deals safety and security attributes such as:

When matched up along with the WordPress, internet site created making use of Laravel is going to possess really good filling velocity. WordPress web site possessing puffed up as well as the non-optimized code is going to consistently level for cyberpunks.

Plugin built in the WordPress established through the 3rd event.

Plugin.

There are actually pair of large teams located on PHP: Content Management Systems (WordPress, Drupal and so on) as well as platforms (Laravel, Symfony and so on). One of these, our experts are going to speak concerning WordPress CMS as well as Laravel-PHP structure as they each are actually other off each various other. WordPress offers an answer which is actually very pliable along with quick advancement pattern which is actually very most more suitable for non-technical customers. This uses SEO welcoming CMS where a customer could effortlessly establish a basic web site and also certain information.

Rate.

Verifying Users

Stashing Password

Shield of encryption

Steering clear of SQL treatment

Securing Routes

HTTP Basic Authentication

Cross-site ask for bogus (XSS).

Perfect for User-based activities.

Updates.

WordPress possesses normal updates for settling the safety concerns yet meanwhile, a downside is that might maintain your website unsafe off the online dangers as well as might down your internet site.

For offering sophisticated performances to the web site plugin are actually demanded. Plugin established in the WordPress created through the 3rd event. Every plugin is going to possess their personal surveillance dangers as well as concerns. contact plugin developer