it drives me bonkers the way people don't know how to read classic books in context anymore. i just read a review of the picture of dorian gray that said "it pains me that the homosexual subtext is just that, a subtext, rather than a fully explored part of the narrative." and now i fully want to put my head through a table. first of all, we are so lucky in the 21st century to have an entire category of books that are able to loudly and lovingly declare their queerness that we've become blind to the idea that queerness can exist in a different language than our contemporary mode of communication. second it IS a fully explored part of the narrative! dorian gray IS a textually queer story, even removed from the context of its writing. it's the story of toxic queer relationships and attraction and dangerous scandals and the intertwining of late 19th century "uranianism" and misogyny. second of all, i'm sorry that oscar wilde didn't include 15k words of graphic gay sex with ao3-style tags in his 1890 novel that was literally used to convict him of indecent behaviour. get well soon, i guess...
68K notes
·
View notes
finally, josh hutcherson has reclaimed his place as prime white boy of the month. the world is healing.
1K notes
·
View notes
oh, darling, i know what you're going through
2K notes
·
View notes
i am at the perfect weight rn.. i struggle doing things (moving on my v soft bed, bending over to pick things up, seeing what’s immediately around me bc boobs) but am not out of breath going to the bakery in the morning yet :))
AND hand under belly when it’s cold outside is amazing
345 notes
·
View notes
idk who has seen the new mean girls but i just wanna say the way they updated the regina/janis backstory is literally like a fanfic prompt lmfao
347 notes
·
View notes