#and many more Integration with third-party systems

[mariacallous]

Evidence is mounting that Europe’s far right will score better than ever before in the upcoming European Parliament elections on June 6 to June 9—and that the continent’s young voters will fuel its ascent. The young adults now gravitating to far right aren’t Nazis or xenophobic racists, but they may have a hand in an outcome that will, at the very least, shift the European Union’s priorities and accents to the right. A particularly solid right-wing finish—and cooperation across the hard-right spectrum—could rattle EU unity and throw a wrench into the bloc’s workings at a time when it is confronting acute crises on several fronts, not least the war in Ukraine.

Since new laws mean that even people under 18 will be eligible to vote in some countries—16-year-olds in Austria, Germany, Malta, and Belgium, and 17-year-olds in Greece—there had been hope that these new voters would put a brake on the populist surge engulfing Europe. The idea behind giving 16- and 17-year-olds the vote was partly based on their long-term investment in politics. The policies designed today will affect them for many decades, in contrast to their grandparents.

And in the 2019 European Parliament election, young voters showed great promise by turning out in record numbers, a hopeful sign that reflected their enthusiasm for the common European project. With the climate movement rocking the streets, their votes went disproportionately to green parties that championed strong climate protection and deeper EU integration—two sets of long-term interests. This landed green representatives from Portugal to Latvia in the Brussels parliament and prompted the EU administration to approve the European Green Deal in 2020.

But the democratic exuberance of voters in their late teens, 20s, and early 30s could boost a very different trend this June, as growing numbers of younger voters are siding with far-right populist parties—the very ones that want to scupper the Green Deal and rein in the EU. In recent national votes conducted in Portugal, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Finland, and France, young people voted in unprecedented numbers for extreme nationalist and euroskeptic parties. (Though some observers have argued that reporting about these trends is incomplete or oversimplified.) And surveys in Germany show the youth vote becoming ever more sympathetic to the Alternative for Germany (AfD), a far-right party that has undergone a radicalization that makes it among Europe’s fiercest, hard-right electoral parties.

“There’s no doubt that these parties have been making inroads to younger voters,” said Catherine de Vries, a Dutch political scientist. “The parties don’t look so extreme anymore, as they’ve been around for a while now. And young people think that the mainstream parties have had their chance. The system still doesn’t work for them, so let the other guys have a try.”

A German study published this year by a team led by youth researcher Simon Schnetzer showed that a full 22 percent of the young people (in this case, ages 14 through 29) surveyed would vote for the AfD if German elections were held today—twice as many as just two years ago. The tally for the Green Party fell by a third during that time frame. A full quarter of those asked said they weren’t sure who’d they vote for—another all-time high result.

The grounds for the pronounced shift are vague: Researchers tend to cite a general unhappiness with the post-pandemic economic and political conditions. “It seems as if the coronavirus pandemic left [young people] irritated about our ability to cope with the future, which is reflected in deep insecurity,” wrote the study’s authors. The issues described by participants that most impact this insecurity included their personal finances, professional opportunities, the health sector, and social recognition. They expressed less concern about the climate crisis and more about inflation, the economy, and old-age poverty.

“We can speak of a clear shift to the right in the young population,” said Klaus Hurrelmann, one of the study’s authors and a professor at the Hertie School in Berlin. The AfD’s foremost campaign priority of stopping immigration and refugee relief plainly struck a chord: Compared to a separate study conducted five years ago, about half as many (26 percent) of the young participants (26 percent) in the 2024 study said they were not in favor of taking in refugees. But just as important as the content of immigration policies, the authors underlined, was the idea that young people feel unheard or involved in the political process.

The change in sympathy in many young Germans reflects survey results, elections, and the statements of other young people across Europe. In the Netherlands’ elections last year, the most popular party among people under 35 (at 17 percent) was the Party for Freedom, led by Geert Wilders, a far-right populist with a long record of EU-trashing.

The explanation provided by many Dutch experts: It’s all about bestaanszekerheid, a Dutch word translated as “livelihood security.” This refers to having a decent and regular income, a comfortable home, access to education and health care, and a buffer against unexpected problems, de Vries told the Guardian. Young peoples’ leading concerns in the Netherlands are housing, overcrowded classes, and struggling hospitals, she said, which Wilders addressed in his campaign.

In Portugal’s March legislative elections, the far-right Chega party, which prioritized courting young people, raked in more of their votes than any other party. The meaning of chega, which can be translated as “that’s enough,” accurately describes many young voters’ motive for supporting it. Their gripes: “a very low average wage and an economy that cannot absorb educated young people,” according to political scientist António Costa Pinto in an interview with Euronews

“In the past, right-wing sympathizers accused immigrants of taking their jobs,” said Eberhard Seidel, the managing director of a Berlin-based nongovernmental organization called Schools Without Racism. “Now there are enough jobs but not enough housing for people who work. They still have to live with their parents.”

Observers say that the far right has excelled at grabbing the youth’s attention, not least with the social media platform TikTok. The recent German study found that 57 percent of young people imbibe their news and politics through social media. More than 90 percent use messaging service WhatsApp, followed by Instagram (80 percent) and YouTube (77 percent). TikTok stands at 51 percent; more than half of all 14- to 29-year-olds now use the app regularly, compared to 44 percent last year. The epiphany prompted an immediate response from German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach, who on declared in his first video on the platform, posted on March 19: “Revolution on TikTok: It starts today.”

Other opinion surveys show that young voters are diverse, divided, and undecided. A YouGov poll conducted in August 2023 showed that young Europeans are overwhelmingly concerned about the climate crisis and its likely effects, and more willing than older people to change behavior to mitigate those effects. Another poll, conducted in Germany, showed human rights violations at the top of younger people’s lists, followed by climate change, sexual harassment, and child abuse.

Younger voters still aren’t the drivers of xenophobia in the way that their parents’ generation was, Seidel said. A vote for the AfD doesn’t necessarily mean that they favor expelling immigrants from Germany or exiting the EU. “They take the basics of democracy and the social system for granted,” he said. “And they’re not fully aware of the implications of a rightward lurch in their political systems.”

Neither were Brexit’s voters, Seidel noted. And they found out the hard way.

[axvoter]

Blatantly Partisan Party Review XXIX (federal 2025): Teal Independents

Running where: seats in all 8 states and territories; go to the Climate 200 website of “community candidates” to see if one is in your electorate

Prior reviews: federal 2022

What I said before: “I would largely define the teals as centre to centre-right … Three issues unite the teals. They want much stronger action on climate change, guided by scientific advice. They want integrity in politics … [and] they want gender equity.”

What I think this year: A big story from the last election was the success of the “teals”, independent candidates—almost entirely well-educated professional women—who were grouped together for three reasons other than demographics. First, the colour of branding that some of them used; second, their alignment on broad policy objectives as described in the quote above; third, they received funding from Climate 200, a fundraising organisation that clean energy activist Simon Holmes à Court founded. The teal colour has to many observers connoted an amalgam of Greens sensibility about climate change with liberal (or Liberal) attitudes towards economic issues.

In 2022, teals only challenged (ex-)Liberal incumbents or defended seats held by existing independents whom Climate 200 chose to support (they have challenged some Labor incumbents at state level since). Liberal incumbents in 2022 lost to six independent challengers: Kate Chaney (Curtin, WA), Zoe Daniel (Goldstein, VIC), Monique Ryan (Kooyong, VIC), Sophie Scamps (Mackellar, NSW), Allegra Spender (Wentworth, NSW), and Kylea Tink (North Sydney, NSW). David Pocock won a Senate seat for the ACT; unlike the teals, he registered a party in his own name because of the different voting system in the Senate. Zali Steggall, whose victory in Warringah (NSW) at the 2019 election was a harbinger of the teal wave, retained her seat.

Climate 200 contributed to the successful campaigns of three more longstanding incumbent independents: Rebekha Sharkie and Andrew Wilkie, who are not teals in a meaningful sense, and Helen Haines, who can more readily be counted as one based on her voting record. Sharkie retained Mayo, nominally as a member of Centre Alliance but which by 2022 was close to death as a broader party. Haines held Indi in rural Victoria, continuing the legacy of her predecessor, independent MP Cathy McGowan, who was pivotal in the promotion of the “Voices of” movement (a related but distinct phenomenon). And in Tasmania, left-wing independent Wilkie won Clark (based on Hobart) in 2010 and has owned it ever since; he will not lose that seat until he resigns, dies, or throws baby Tasmanian devils into the Derwent live on air.

This year, Climate 200 is funding more candidates across the nation, although the electorates in which they have a chance remain mostly Liberal-held. Not every independent supported by Climate 200 uses teal colours—if you go to the link posted in the “running where” section above, each candidate is colour-coded based on the predominant colour used in their campaign. The incumbent teals are contesting their seats except for Kylea Tink, whose seat was abolished in a redistribution and has not chosen to stand in another seat. David Pocock has declined Climate 200 funding and believes he can retain his ACT seat without it (I expect he's right).

Where do the teals sit politically? Some comprise a lost generation of moderate Liberal women, alienated from the party because of its climate inaction/denialism and structural sexism, with Kate Chaney and Allegra Spender the most obvious examples—not just in their descent from former Liberal MPs but also in their economic views. But not all fit this categorisation. Some have more centre-left origins. What is telling is Pat Leslie’s overview, particularly figure 1 at that link. Haines, Steggall, and the cohort of 2022 form a clear grouping even if they are not of one mind on every issue (Spender sits closest to the Libs in her voting pattern). Meanwhile, Wilkie and Sharkie clearly sit on different points on the political spectrum: Wilkie is on the left close to the Greens; Sharkie votes similarly to Dai Le (an indie who is very much not a teal) and to ex-National indie Andrew Gee.

The issues underpinning the teal movement in 2022 have remained prominent for the teals as elected representatives and for those seeking to enter parliament this year. As MPs, teals backed an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, and all their electorates had majorities for Yes except Indi. There has been also in my view a strain of wowserism, driven in part by the teal MPs including a couple of medical practitioners and in part as representing electorates with many (or potentially themselves being) concerned parents of teenagers. This backfired in late 2023 in the debate about Hard Solo, which Monique Ryan led complaints about; when it was first announced, I assumed it was a novelty that would go flat quickly and be quietly withdrawn a few months later. Instead, it got more publicity than Carlton & United Breweries could have possibly anticipated, and although CUB had to change the name to Hard Rated, they have continued selling it successfully. I am convinced this fuss from an older generation is what made it cool for young people. I never expected to see it on tap at my local pub and be a popular choice for the young tradies. More substantively, though, some of this teal concern manifests in things that I support such as seeking greater regulation on gambling ads.

The biggest thing for me is TEALS PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD FORM A PROPER FUCKING POLITICAL PARTY. The teals capitalise on attitudes held among some of the Australian electorate that political parties are a bad thing and independent candidates are somehow more honest or virtuous. Parties emerged for fucking good reasons in colonial parliaments of Australia between the late 1870s and early 1910s. They provide stability of government (in the pre-party era, the average term of a premier was 1.5 to 2 years; since the rise of parties, the average term is 3.5 to 5 years; yes, I have a dataset on this). The opaque voting blocs and unpredictable legislative defeats and no-confidence votes in pre-party parliaments were based on shifting alliances, often as much personal and ideological. Parties made parliament more workable, negotiations more transparent, and outcomes more predictable. Parties also have institutional memory and enable continuity across the nation and over time. They co-ordinate policymaking and make more efficient use of resources, financial and human alike, so that teals wouldn’t have been whinging to the Saturday Paper that the election being called for 3 May rather than 12 April was bankrupting them. (I’m still flabbergasted Labor considered 12 April so seriously; 3–17 May always seemed the sensible option to me.) Party politics is a good thing.

And forming a party might also help the teals deal with their diversity problem: look at those elected or at the Climate 200 page and it’s mostly professional white women who are GenX or young Boomers. The Greens and Labor alike show how proactive party preselection processes can elevate younger, Indigenous, and ethnically diverse candidates into winnable positions. The teals can’t do that—teal voters in each electorate want their own Monique Ryan or Zali Steggall and can’t vote for a candidate from a party with that woman at the head, they have to vote for a local from the same demographic.

So, look, teals vote very similarly and need to make this official through a party structure. I suspect one reason they are averse to forming a party structure despite the obvious financial and organisational advantages it would provide is because of a misconception in Australia about party discipline. Some teals even talk about the constraints of being in a party. Our political parties have a tradition of a very firm whip, especially Labor (as seen in Fatima Payman’s departure and subsequent formation of Australia’s Voice). Even Liberal and National backbenchers cross the floor rarely, despite having more freedom to do so. It is possible to have more personal discretion for MPs in voting without going to the US extreme where a party cannot count on any serious degree of loyalty from its ostensible members. The British system of one-, two-, and three-line whips could provide inspiration. A teal party with a more permissive party whip than that of the major parties would give them all the benefits of party organisation with only modest sacrifices of their current freedom of action.

(I would also love to no longer need to tease out which indies are teals and which indies are a different and possibly anti-teal hue; Kevin Bonham has made a valiant attempt at classifying the indies)

I expect most of the incumbent teals will be returned, and some of the challengers look strong. At the last election, four made the two-candidate-preferred count, and all four are recontesting this year: Alex Dyson in Wannon (VIC), Nicolette Boele in Bradfield (NSW), Kate Hook in Calare (NSW), and Caz Heise (NSW). They will be competitive again. Erchana Murray-Bartlett is a new one to watch in McPherson (QLD) for her energetic campaign in a traditionally LNP seat that is currently vacant. Kate Hulett came within 0.81% of winning the state seat of Fremantle (WA) in March, managed to resolve a citizenship issue just in time to stand for the federal seat of the same name, and fancies her chances—although the federal division’s larger scope will make it tricky. Tina Brown in Berowra (NSW) has the apparent support of Liberal grandee Phillip Ruddock, whose wife Heather has quit the Libs to support Brown’s campaign. And there’s chatter about Suzie Holt’s chances in Groom (QLD) but I do not see that happening. Or maybe we will be surprised—I never anticipated Sophie Scamps winning Mackellar on Sydney’s Northern Beaches, but the Northern Beaches is another world and they like it that way. Anyway, whoever gets in, I hope the successful teals throw a big celebration together and party all the way to the AEC register of parties.

Recommendation: In all instances I recommend you preference a teal above a Liberal or National candidate and the various far-right crackpots. Just how strong a preference you give them will vary based on individual, but it will be generally a decent or good one—especially given how many dire candidates are on some ballots.

The Australian preferential system is designed to avoid the need for tactical voting, but there are strategic considerations in some cases. If you live in a Liberal-held seat and Labor or the Greens are not competitive to win (i.e. most of the seats mentioned above), you should ponder who is likely to end up second and third as preferences are distributed. If there are three candidates left in the count and none has 50%, the third one will be eliminated, and the preferences of their voters will decide which of the remaining two wins the seat. Where will their preferences go? If the third-placed candidate is Labor or Green, the easy majority of their voters are likely to preference the teal, which might get them over the line. If the third-placed candidate is a teal, however, a significant portion of their voters will break back to the Liberals and give the Liberal the win ahead of Labor or the Greens.

So, consider your vote very carefully if a party left of a teal indie has no chance of winning your seat: the best way to try to stop the Liberals winning might be voting 1 for the teal—or at least preferencing them above the other big parties—to help them finish in the top two at the three-candidate-preferred stage of the count. I do not normally recommend tactical voting, but in this case it’s relevant and I would personally do it if I was in a Liberal-vs-teal seat.

[gravesung]

adeo & prison (+ lethe tidbits.)

after he leaves the criminal underworld and goes into politics, adeodatus does a lot of prison visits with different programs and reform initiatives. humanizing and de-isolating inmates is important to him, though he has ambitions to rework the entire prison system once he gets elected.

sometimes he participates in whatever activity the program is engaging in — watching a performance, leaving discussions, helping with classes/education, etc — and sometimes he'll just hang around and talk with inmates whose visitors stood them up. a lot of them develop a good rapport with him over time. once they're released, he'll help them get work and/or enroll in school if they haven't yet (ie. those who have been in and out of the prison system most of their lives).

in particular, he's big on writing recommendation letters to plead their case to potential employers. when the letter is coming from a national leadership candidate?? it's gonna get taken seriously. and if he looks into the employer and finds out they're part of an opposing (conservative) political party, he'll "gently convince" (read: bribe) a local millionaire to write it in his stead.

shortly after he first met lethe — future fiancée, iykyk — he found her shoved into a holding cell and charged for assault and battery. he recognized the street-corner busker he'd befriended and was like ??????? tf you doin here??? and got her out on bail, got the charges dropped, got her record cleared under the table without telling her any of it. this happened more than once. SDKJFHSDJKF look!! people were trying to steal her shit!! it was just very hardcore self defense ok!!

anyway the third time she was sent to prison, it stuck, and she spent two months there before bail could be posted. this was honestly when the bulk of their actual bonding took place. he visited as often as he was allowed, brought her things, they learned about each other's histories — in his case, learning about a history filled with gaps and inconsistencies that he was so so so curious about solving.

and thus, his initial fixation began. to the outside eye, this was just what adeo did — he took in mentees, guided them out of precarious situations, helped them re-integrate into society. but that was the thing about lethe. it's rare that adeo can't read someone minutes into talking to them for the first time, and rarer still that when they lie to him, he can't figure out the truth in a roundabout way. he knew something was off about her story. but he couldn't pinpoint it — and she had no records to look into. no living family, no deceased family with any history beyond the factories they worked in. it was all dead ends. which was strange for someone who must have been in and out of hospitals, PT centers, orthopedic and prosthetic centers for years with those arms.

in truth, this was the primary reason he kept pursuing her even after she was out of prison for the final time. he wanted to know. it was weird!!! he'd never experienced this kind of cat-and-mouse before, and it was making him feel emotions he hadn't felt in a long, long time!!! little did he know. lol.

anyway. the prison reform programs he fostered continued to grow after he went missing five years ago, as did many other aspects of his legacy & his impact on the city. even all these years later, his name hasn't left people's mouths. there is still a great deal of hope that he is alive out there somewhere, and as they slowly suffocate under the constricting fear of the thing terrorizing the streets he once protected, they pray and pray for his return. i think the biggest theories are that he got captured by another nation's government and is being held prisoner somewhere KKJDHHSJDS

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Christian Paz at Vox:

Voters in Germany maintained a few global trends this past weekend: They kicked out incumbents, their youth moved to the right, and they delivered another surprise. Their radical, anti-immigrant party (Alternative für Deutschland, or AfD) finished second, and was likely boosted by some LGBTQ voters. The rightward shift of gay, lesbian, and bisexual voters is a dynamic playing out across western Europe. In the UK, France, and now Germany, gay voters or their allies are backing far-right or nativist political parties at growing rates. That queer shift to the right doesn’t seem to be materializing in the United States, however. During the 2024 election, LGBTQ voters actually got more Democratic than in 2020. What explains this gulf, especially as so many other global political trends replicate themselves in the US? After reviewing the trends and historical context, I offer two theories: that Europeans have had vastly different experiences with international migration than those in the US; and that the American LGBTQ community has historical reasons to distrust a radicalized Republican Party in a two-party system.

The “homonativist” shift of European gays and their allies

It was once thought that the growing public acceptance of queerness and homosexuality would reinforce — or at least coincide — with generally more progressive views on political issues, both in and outside the United States. But that doesn’t appear to be the case. In Germany, those trends can be traced back to before the pandemic: Multiple analyses of LGBTQ voters found small, but sustained support from gay voters for AfD and center-right parties in 2021’s elections when compared to the 2017 federal elections there. One study even found that the probability of voting for the AfD increased in 2021 if you were LGBTQ. This year, one pre-election survey suggested AfD would receive the highest share of LGBTQ voters’ support among the major parties. (The AfD having a charismatic gay leader this year likely didn’t hurt either.)

As the researcher and political analyst François Valentin writes, this dynamic has been true in France and the United Kingdom going back to as early as 2015. One analysis of vote choice in 2015 found that it was married gay men who were most likely to support the anti-immigrant National Front (FN), the French far-right party, in that year’s regional elections (and more likely than married straight men), while married gay women supported the FN at about the same level as straight women. It was during that time that the FN went through a refresh, becoming less antagonistic to LGBTQ people and courting them. In the United Kingdom, the center-left Labour Party has generally held strong support from lesbian, gay, and bisexual voters, while far-right parties have struggled to gain a substantial share of these voters in recent years. But across Europe, there has emerged a different kind of electorate: one with progressive views on homosexuality, but conservative or reactionary views on immigration. Nearly a third of the British electorate could fall under this “homonativist” classification, according to one analysis prepared for the London School of Economics. Far-right parties in France and Germany have been nearly single-mindedly focused on tougher policies toward migrants and refugees, suspicion of Islam in particular, opposition to European Union integration, and a reclamation of native or national identity. The UK’s Conservative party has embraced many of these nativist ideals as well.

[...]

Why “homonativists” still haven’t gotten their footing in the US

Not only have LGBTQ voters not seen the same rightward drift as their European counterparts, but they’ve actually seen the opposite: From 1992 to 2016, exit polls have shown this bloc of voters have been steadily getting more liberal. (Exit polls can be noisy and unreliable, and usually corrected months after elections, but are still the best tool we have for measuring trends for groups like LGBTQ voters.)

In 2020, polling did suggest a rightward turn for queer voters: Trump cut into the Democratic margin of victory with the demographic compared to 2016 by nearly 20 points. In 2024, signs were pointing toward another year of Republican improvement with these voters. But the final result was another twist: Kamala Harris won the highest level of support from LGBTQ voters in modern history — 86 percent. In fact, LGBTQ voters were one of the only demographics that shifted left last year. And their ideologies have remained consistently liberal — 47 percent of LGBTQ men and 63 percent of LGBTQ women identify as liberal. The explanations here are various — starting with the unique American political experience of the gay rights movement. But one key thing to understand is that while most European nations have multiparty systems that can give voters a sense that the most extreme positions of any given party will be checked by a team of rivals, the US really only has two parties. And while both started off as hostile to gay rights, the Democratic Party has been quicker to tolerate, accept, and champion LGBTQ people. The Republican Party has been much more hostile. That’s been particularly true during the last five years, which have featured GOP fearmongering around trans athletes and bathrooms, “grooming,” and “Don’t Say Gay” legislation. In this way, the Republican Party went in the opposite direction of many European far-right or right-wing parties’ toning down of homophobic or bigoted speech and positions.

Around the world, more and more of the LGBTQ+ vote (especially the cis gay male vote) is backing far-right parties, and this is true across European nations. In the USA, however, the opposite happened: more LGBTQ+ people voted Democratic compared to past elections, and that is due to the GOP’s rabid hatred for the LGBTQ+ community.

[ecrivainsolitaire]

Open Art Guild – Testing the boundaries of collective IP ownership

Experimental release: Dr. T’chem’s Office (authorised for personal and commercial use)

I���ll try to keep this brief (you can read the full thesis statement here) but as we all know, intellectual property law is broken. It’s being exploited from every side and art workers are more vulnerable than ever to automation, copyright theft and myriad other unforeseeable forms of theft from the proletariat. We as a collective need to come together and work towards the creation of a better future.

The Open Art Guild is my proposal for the first of many steps towards a far away but necessary goal: the eradication of intellectual property as it pertains to the arts. It’s based on the open source standard and the creative commons, and the goal is for us to start creating a future where we stop thinking of artworks as private property to hoard, and start sharing the responsibilities and the benefits of their creation with the collective. And as I am proposing the idea, I should give the first step.

Which is why I am announcing the release of my short story series, Dr. T’chem’s Office, into the Open Art Guild license. This is an episodic HFY comedy series about the office hours of a sleazy yet well intentioned xenoanthropologist in charge of human integration into the crew of a spaceship, who happens to find them fascinating. You can read the first few instalments here:

| Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 |

The basics of the license go as follows: I’m giving any artist permission to use the assets of my artwork (in this case, settings, characters, plot lines and other unique concepts) both for personal use and for commercial use, provided they commit to crediting the original artist, giving away 30% of any profit back to the hands of the collective in the breakdown the guidelines specify, and giving the same license to any works they create derivative from this series. Any artist can join the Guild by remixing existing artworks in its database or voluntarily submitting their own works. For the time being this prototype model will have to rely on the honour system, but I have outlined the basic guidelines for a platform dedicated to facilitating the Guild’s business and income redistribution.

The purpose of this experiment is to test whether this system is financially viable, what modifications it needs, and how to enforce it. It’s also a way to study what the community thinks of this model. To summarise the implications, here are the pros and cons as I see them.

Pros:

- All fan art, spin-offs, third-party merchandise and other forms of adaptation become automatically authorised and monetisable, provided both the original artist and the remixer are active members of the Guild.

- All adaptations are automatically non-exclusive and must give away the same rights as the original, diminishing the incentive for massive corporations to try and scam an artist out of their intellectual property.

- It effectively unionises freelance artists of all fields to balance out negotiations with non Guild entities.

- It encourages artists to continue their output in order to reap the benefits of the Guild, by using the redistribution system as an incentive, instead of the current status quo where artists are actively fighting market forces all by themselves in order to make enough time and resources to work on their craft.

- It provides a safety net where everyone is invested in the continuous welfare of everyone else, giving a sense of class solidarity and facilitating donations and shared resources.

- It motivates artists to invest in each other, as the growth of one means the growth of the whole Guild.

- Eventually, if the project succeeds and the proposed platform comes to exist, it would effectively create a universal basic income for all Guild members, as well as a self sustained legal fund to protect their assets from IP theft by non Guild entities.

- It will give you complete control over whether your art can be used for AI dataset training, on an opt-in, post-by-post basis, so you don’t have to wonder who might be stealing it. If the platform is created, all works whose creators have not authorised to be used for this will have data scrambling features to make sure thieves can’t use them.

Cons:

- It will require all Guild members to permanently renounce to 30% of their profit, in order to build up the funds and distribution system.

- It will have to be built entirely on trust of the collective, at least until a platform can be established, which may take weeks or may take decades depending on lots of unpredictable factors.

- Leaving the Guild will require all artworks shared with the collective to become Creative Commons; once you renounce your right to monopoly of your IP, it’s permanent, no way to go back. This is necessary in order to prevent asset flippers and other forms of IP scabs to join the Guild, extract other people’s assets and then scram.

- Due to banking regulations entirely out of our hands, some artists will have participating in the redistribution. If the platform ever becomes a reality, one of its main goals will be to remedy this immediately.

This proposal requires a high cost, but it provides an invaluable reward. If the system works, it will empower all artists to profit from their work and protect it as a collective. If it doesn’t, all that will have happened is that you will have created a lot of Creative Commons art, which financially isn’t ideal, but artistically is extremely commendable. Even in the worst case scenario, corporations will not be able to hold your art hostage with exclusivity deals. To me, the benefits vastly outweigh the costs, but I do want to emphasise: there will be costs. This is an effort to subvert the entire way art has been monetised since the 1700s. It will require a lot of work, a lot of people, and a lot of time, to make it work. But I believe it can work. If you believe it too, you are welcome to join the Open Art Guild.

Please do read the guidelines for the Guild and the guidelines for the platform before you start creating, and give me whatever feedback you have. If it’s good, if it’s lacking, if I’m overstepping legal boundaries, if you can find loopholes, anything. I tried to make it airtight but I’m not a legal expert. This is not my project, it is a project for the proletariat. Everyone should have a say on what they’re signing on for. And regardless of what you think, share it with all artists you can. This will only work if as many people as possible participate.

Doctor T’chem’s Office’s license

This work has been released under the Open Art Guild license, and has been approved for reuse and adaptation under the following conditions:

For personal, educational and archival use, provided any derivative works also fall under a publicly open license, to all Guild members and non members.

For commercial use, provided redistribution guidelines of the Guild be followed, to all active Guild members.

For commercial use to non Guild members, provided any derivative works also fall under a publicly open license, with the explicit approval of the artist and proper redistribution of profit following the guidelines of the Guild.

For non commercial dataset training of open source generative art technologies, provided the explicit consent of the artist, proper credit and redistribution of profit in its entirety to the Guild.

Shall this work be appropriated by non Guild members without proper authorisation, credit and redistribution of profit, the non Guild entity waives their right to intellectual property over any derivative works, copyrights, trademarks or patents of any sort and cedes it to the Creative Commons, under the 4.0 license, irrevocably and unconditionally, in perpetuity, throughout time and space in the known multiverse. The Guild reserves the right to withhold trade relations with any known infractors for the duration its members deem appropriate, including the reversal of any currently standing contracts and agreements.

[dressesandleatherboots]

Okay, so I have like 7 followers, and it is highly likely that none of them are German, but I would be failing everything I believe in, if I did not at least try to remind people to GO! VOTE! tomorrow on the 23.02.2025.

Voting is one of the highest honours, privileges, and rights we have in any functioning democracy.

Inaction and indecision will only ever benefit authoritarians seeking to sow distrust in the institutions that our grandparents and great grandparents built after the war to try and install as many safeguards and bulwarks against a possible return of fascism as they could.

Our very own past aswell as the events currently underway in the US should remind us of that.

With this in mind I am not going to pretend I am neutral.

The AFD, a Neo-Nazi party, is a stain upon the integrity of our very nation, an insult to every single holocaust-survivour, every fallen soldier, every rebel, partisan-fighter, and every other victim of the Third Reich. A danger to everything we, the people, have built over the past 80 years.

The fight against the AFD, their apologists and enablers, and everything they collectively stand for does not end with a vote, our vote, but it is were it starts.

Because voting is an honour, a privilege, and a right, yes, but now more than ever, it is strategic.

The people you are voting for will not 100% support everything you want them to, they are not your champions, or your messiahs BUT if you make your mark behind their party/candidate they will be your representative and your ally. (And under a democratic system, you can actually hold them accountable to ensure they are.)

Democracy does not function without negotiation or compromise, and progress is a slow and frustrating process, that takes real dedication and tenacity. Stop waiting for your big heroes and start doing the work, because nothing will ever change without you, without us.

Never again is NOW! Fucking VOTE!

And if you don't know which party actually represents what you care about, try this Wahl-O-Mat (official government resource provided by the 'Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung'.), it will ask you a couple questions in regards to different topics and then show you which party you are most compatible with, aswell as their explanations of and summaries for each point individually in accordance with their official programs:

Now, no more excuses, get after it!

[mspinky1]

TARI.EXE (Puzzlevision Corruption)

I'm not even kidding, I had a dream where that TV guy and Tari have some sort of connection and kidnapped her so she becomes his property again, forcing the SMG4 gang to go through endless unwanted simulations to entertain him. I've been thinking about that dream repeatedly, and ever since Western Spaghetti I did want there to be some sort of connection. Can't wait to see more of TV Guy (or Puzzlevision as it says on his face). Also, the background text are just command prompt text, or rather Tari's programming. I've been finding so many examples of how to do program writing.... or coding? Idk lol. At some point my brain just stopped working. Anyways, i'll put below what the text says, and if you pay attention to the numbers in the written sequence, you'll see some hidden detail (Hint: The numbers are episode dates).

Background Text:

TASCORP Windows [Version 17.6.02023]

(c) 2023 TASCORP Corporation. All rights reserved.

C: \Users\TARI>ipconfig/flushDNS

Windows IP Configuration

Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache.

C: \>taskkill /f /im TARI.exe

SUCCESS : The process "TARI.exe" with PID 250818 has been terminated.

C: \>winge install "Puzzlevision SIM"

Found Puzzlevision SIM [TASCORP.Puzzlevision SIM] Version 28.10.23

This application is licensed to you by its owner.

TASCORP is not responsible for, nor does it grant any licenses to, third-party packages.

Downloading https://puzzlevisionsiminstall.net.com/stable/smg4/Setup-v28.10.23.exe

90.0 MB / 90.0 MB

Successfully verified installer hash

Starting Package install . . .

Successfully installed

X: \windows\system23>cd C: \Windows\system23

C: \windows\system23>systemreset

PUZZLEVISION SIMUL. Windows

Copyright (C) Puzzlevision Corporation. All rights reserved.

C: \WINDOWS\system23>sfc /scannow

Beginning system scan. This process will take some time.

Beginning verification phase of system scan.

Verification 100% complete.

Puzzlevision Resource Protection found corrupt files and successfully repaired them.

Puzzlevision Resource Protection did not find any integrity violations.

[stuartpaulblogs]

How Much Bitcoin Can You Withdraw on Cash App? Everything You Need to Know

Bitcoin has emerged as one of the most popular digital currencies, and Cash App has become one of the easiest ways to buy, sell, and manage Bitcoin. Cash App offers a convenient way to access the cryptocurrency market, providing a platform for users to hold, transfer, and withdraw their Bitcoin. However, if you're new to Cash App or Bitcoin in general, you might wonder, "What is the Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit?" or "How much Bitcoin can you withdraw on Cash App?"

In this blog, we will explore Cash App's Bitcoin withdrawal limits, how they work, how to increase them, and other common questions users have. Whether you want to withdraw your Bitcoin to an external wallet or understand how Cash App's withdrawal system works, we've got you covered. Let's start with everything you need about the Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit.

Introduction to Cash App and Bitcoin Withdrawals

Cash App is a popular mobile payment service that allows users to transfer funds, buy and sell stocks, and, most notably, buy and hold Bitcoin. With the rise of cryptocurrencies, more people are turning to Cash App to purchase Bitcoin due to its user-friendly interface, simplicity, and seamless integration with other Cash App features like Cash Card and direct deposits.

For many users, holding Bitcoin in their Cash App wallet is a convenient way to accumulate digital assets. However, once you accumulate Bitcoin on the Cash App, you should know how to transfer it to an external wallet or a third-party exchange. Cash App, like many other platforms, limits Bitcoin withdrawals to ensure the security and integrity of transactions.

Understanding the Cash App Bitcoin Withdrawal Limit

The Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit refers to the maximum amount of Bitcoin you can transfer from your Cash App wallet to an external wallet or exchange. This limit is set to prevent fraudulent activity, ensure proper compliance with regulations, and maintain the platform's security.

Various withdrawal limits depend on factors such as account verification, transaction history, and Cash App's policies. This article will walk you through all the essential aspects of withdrawal limits so you can better understand how they work and how to navigate them.

How Much Bitcoin Can You Withdraw on Cash App?

Your account verification status determines the Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit. Users who have fully verified their accounts can generally withdraw more significant amounts of Bitcoin than those who haven't completed the verification process. Let's break it down further:

Unverified Accounts: If you have an unverified Cash App account, your Bitcoin withdrawal limit is set at 0.001 BTC (or 100,000 Satoshis, the smallest unit of Bitcoin).

This limit is designed for casual users who haven't gone through the full verification process.

Verified Accounts: The Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit increase significantly after completing the Cash App's verification process, which includes providing personal information and verifying your identity. A verified account can withdraw up to $2,000 worth of Bitcoin daily, with a weekly withdrawal limit of $5,000. However, these limits are subject to change based on Cash App's policies, market conditions, and applicable laws.

What is the Cash App Bitcoin Withdrawal Limit Per Day?

For users with verified accounts, the Cash App Bitcoin daily withdrawal limit is $2,000 worth of Bitcoin. This amount can vary if the value of Bitcoin fluctuates.

Example: If Bitcoin is valued at $50,000 per BTC, the daily limit would allow you to withdraw up to 0.04 BTC daily. If Bitcoin's value is lower, such as $30,000 per BTC, the daily limit will allow you to withdraw approximately 0.066 BTC.

This daily limit ensures that users can move their Bitcoin easily but also places restrictions to prevent abuse or large-scale withdrawals that could be linked to fraud or money laundering.

What is the Cash App Bitcoin Weekly Withdrawal Limit?

In addition to the daily withdrawal limit, Cash App also sets a weekly withdrawal limit. This limit is typically set at $5,000 worth of Bitcoin per week for verified users. This ensures that large-scale withdrawals are not made rapidly, adding another layer of security to the platform. Example: If Bitcoin costs $50,000, you can withdraw approximately 0.1 BTC weekly.

Cash App Bitcoin Monthly Withdrawal Limit

While Cash App's withdrawal limits are typically set daily and weekly, the platform may also impose monthly limits on Bitcoin withdrawals. These monthly limits can vary depending on the user's verification status, account activity, and changes in Cash App terms and conditions. As of the latest updates, verified users are typically allowed to withdraw up to $20,000 worth of Bitcoin monthly, though this amount may fluctuate. Always check Cash App's official terms to get the most accurate information.

How to Increase Cash App Bitcoin Withdrawal Limit?

While Cash App does provide default withdrawal limits, there are several ways to increase Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit. These increases are usually tied to your account's verification status.

1. Complete Account Verification

Cash App requires users to complete identity verification to access higher withdrawal limits. This involves providing personal details, including your full name, date of birth, and a valid government-issued ID.

Once your account is fully verified, you may qualify for increased withdrawal limits.

2. Regular Account Activity

Regularly using the Cash App, including making deposits, transfers, and purchases, can help increase your Bitcoin withdrawal limits over time. Cash App may review your account activity periodically and adjust your limits accordingly.

3. Enable Two-Factor Authentication

Enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) on your Cash App account adds a layer of security and may increase your withdrawal limits, as Cash App will consider your account more secure.

4. Contact Cash App Support

If you feel your withdrawal limits are too restrictive, contact Cash App's customer support, which may provide you with additional options. They can help you increase your limit based on your usage history and account security.

5. Wait for Cash App's Periodic Review

Cash App periodically reviews accounts and adjusts limits based on user behavior. This review might take several months, and if your account is deemed trustworthy, your Bitcoin withdrawal limit may increase without your further action.

Why is the Cash App Bitcoin Withdrawal Not Working?

If you encounter issues with your Bitcoin withdrawal on Cash App, here are some common reasons why:

Low Account Verification: Ensure that your account is fully verified. If it's unverified, you'll face restrictions.

Bitcoin Network Congestion: Sometimes, the Bitcoin network can be congested, which may delay withdrawals.

Limit Reached: Ensure that you haven't hit your daily or weekly Bitcoin withdrawal limit.

Cash App Server Issues: Sometimes, Cash App may experience downtime or technical difficulties. Check for any announcements from Cash App support.

Conclusion

Understanding the Cash App Bitcoin limit is essential for anyone using the platform to manage Bitcoin transactions. Whether you're a casual user or a regular trader, knowing your limits and how to increase them can help you confidently navigate the platform. Remember to complete account verification, maintain secure practices, and know Cash App's policies to maximize your Bitcoin withdrawal potential. With this knowledge, you can make informed decisions and use Cash App to manage your Bitcoin withdrawals effectively.

FAQ

How much is the Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit?

For verified users, the daily withdrawal limit is typically $2,000, with a weekly limit of $5,000 and a monthly limit of $20,000.

Can I increase my Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit?

Yes, you can potentially increase your Bitcoin withdrawal limits by completing account verification, enabling two-factor authentication, and regularly using the Cash App.

Why is my Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal not enabled?

Your Bitcoin withdrawal may not be enabled due to account verification issues, insufficient funds, or problems with your linked bank account. Make sure your account is verified and fully set up to withdraw Bitcoin.

What is the Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit per day?

The daily Bitcoin withdrawal limit for verified accounts is usually $2,000, which can vary depending on market conditions and Cash App's internal policies.

How can I check my Cash App Bitcoin withdrawal limit?

You can check your current Bitcoin withdrawal limit by going to the "Bitcoin" section within the Cash App, where you'll see your available withdrawal limits.

How can the Bitcoin withdrawal limit on Cash App be increased?

You can increase Cash App withdrawal limit by completing the entire account verification process and ensuring your account is in good standing. Cash App may also periodically review your account and increase your limits based on usage.

Can I withdraw Bitcoin to a different wallet on the Cash App?

Yes, the Cash App allows you to withdraw Bitcoin to external wallets. Make sure the wallet is compatible with Bitcoin withdrawals.

[spacetimewithstuartgary]

Most powerful gamma ray observatory gets green light

At the start of the year, the European Commission established the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) as a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC), furthering its mission to become the world's largest and most powerful observatory for gamma-ray astronomy.

The creation of the CTAO-ERIC will enable the observatory's construction to advance rapidly and provide a framework for distributing its data worldwide, significantly accelerating its progress toward scientific discovery. On Feb. 13, 2025, the ERIC Council approved to immediately negotiate the establishment of Japan as a strategic partner and the United States, Brazil and Australia as third-party members.

"This field did not exist before 1989 when the first gamma ray source was detected. At that point, we knew of four sources in the world," said Dave Kieda, professor in the Department of Physics & Astronomy at the University of Utah and the CTAO spokesperson for the U.S. "The past 35 years, we went from detecting the first to now seeing several hundred. With CTAO, we're going to see thousands. And the University of Utah is part of that legacy."

The CTAO-ERIC was established with the international support of 11 countries and one intergovernmental organization that contributed to the technological development, construction and operation of the observatory. For Kieda, the new array will give astronomers an unprecedented view of the mysterious radiation he's spent his career studying.

"Over the last decade, people have discovered that these high-energy gamma rays are present in many, many types of very energetic astronomical phenomenon, but we don't know much about where they come from," Kieda said.

Think about it this way, he explained. The stars you can see with your eyes in the sky follow a predictable, rather uneventful existence for most of their lifetime. They burn hydrogen for a long time, then eventually run out of fuel and explode as a supernova.

"We're looking at what comes after a star exhausts its life," Kieda continued. "It turns out, these high-energy gamma rays have massive consequences for the fate of our galaxy in terms of how stars are formed, where galaxies evolve, and what other hidden energies and matter could be out there that determine whether the universe will eventually collapse or continuously expand forever."

Kieda's research group led the design and construction of key hardware for the medium-sized telescopes (MSTs) in the CTAO array, integrating technology he previously developed for the VERITAS (Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System) experimental observatory and for the new ultra-high resolution gamma ray Schwarzchild-Couder Telescope.

Before CTAO, VERITAS was the world's most sensitive very-high-energy-gamma-ray observatory that could detect brief flashes of the blue "Cherenkov" light, created as the gamma rays hit the Earth's atmosphere.

VERITAS operated for nearly two decades at the Whipple Observatory in Amado, Arizona. Over that time, Kieda designed and built crucial technology at the U with the help of dozens of graduate and undergraduate students. The CTAO array will be up to 20 times more sensitive than VERITAS and may solve the mystery of where the gamma rays originate.

"We've actually seen higher energy emissions than anybody ever anticipated. We've seen many diverse places produce this radiation. We've just started to scratch the surface of where this stuff comes from," he said. "With the new sensitivity, we expect to see gamma rays emitted in coincidence with gravitational waves and neutrinos."

The ERIC not only provides the central organization with a formal framework to accept and operate the current telescope prototypes, but it also allows for the initial start of construction for an eventual full array of more than 60 telescopes across both telescope sites in Spain and Chile.

On the CTAO-North site, where the Large-Sized Telescope prototype (LST-1) is under commissioning, three additional LSTs and one MST are expected to be built in the next 1–2 years. Meanwhile, on the CTAO-South site, the first five Small-Sized Telescopes (SSTs) and two MSTs are expected to be delivered by early 2026.

Thus, with the aid of the ERIC, the observatory is expected to be able to operate intermediate array configurations as early as 2026. These sub-sets of the final arrays will already be more sensitive than any existing instrument, bringing the observatory's early science within reach.

The impact of the ERIC will extend beyond hardware, influencing several other key areas. In the coming months, the observatory will prepare to integrate and operate advanced software designed to control the telescopes and their supporting devices on-site, as well as to manage data processing.

"The ERIC status strengthens the presence of the CTAO in Europe and its role as a key player in the European Research Area, but the support we have received and the scope of the CTAO ERIC's influence goes far beyond European borders," explained Prof. Federico Ferrini, co-Managing Director.

"To build and operate the world's largest gamma-ray observatory that serves the ambitious needs of the global scientific community, we are counting on an increasing number of partners from around the world."

IMAGE: Three classes of telescopes are required to cover the full CTAO energy range. A medium-sized telescope is depicted third from the left. Credit: University of Utah

[thinkleaptechnology]

How Low-Code Platforms Are Transforming Healthcare and Elevating Patient Experience

The healthcare sector is a highly evolving landscape. The current race for digitization has made it crucial for service providers to stay updated with the latest technology and regulations. Patient satisfaction is of the highest requirement, but inefficient processes, paperwork, and security concerns often hinder positive outcomes. To enhance speed, transparency, and efficiency, many providers are turning to low-code platforms, driving digital transformation. 

Why Low-Code is a Perfect Fit for Healthcare

Low-code platforms enable both technical and non-technical users to build digital healthcare solutions. It simplifies healthcare operations, speeds-up processes and makes healthcare more accessible for patients. 

Most healthcare professionals lack IT training, limiting their ability to use digital tools. Low-code bridges this gap by providing an intuitive interface for rapid, cost-effective app development. With scalable architectures and seamless third-party integration, these platforms improve workflows, patient care, and operational efficiency. 

Key Benefits of Low-Code in Healthcare

Workflow Optimization and Automation:

               Low-code platforms like iLeap streamline administrative and clinical processes. Automating billing, budgeting, and resource management reduces manual effort and errors. Tasks like appointment scheduling and reminders can also be automated, freeing up time for patient care. 

 Seamless Integration:

               A majority of legacy healthcare enterprises rely on legacy systems which is often a major reason for downtimes and slow processes. A robust low-code platform integrates easily with existing software and third-party applications, ensuring unified workflows without IT disruptions.

Customizable Features:

               Low-code solutions automate emails, manage patient records, and schedule appointments efficiently. Platforms like iLeap also support threshold management and escalation for timely responses to critical situations. 

Enhancing Patient Care with Low-Code

Patient Registration and Records : 

Custom applications streamline patient intake, scheduling, second opinions, and billing, reducing wait times and improving experiences.

Automated Appointment Reminders and Feedback: 

By automating reminders and surveys, healthcare staff can focus on critical tasks, reducing no-shows and improving service quality. 

Telehealth and Centralized Communication:

Legacy systems cause fragmented communication and delays. Low-code platforms facilitate telehealth solutions, including video consultations, secure messaging, and EHR integration, ensuring timely care.

Compliance and Accountability:

Regulatory compliance is crucial. Low-code solutions streamline reporting and documentation, ensuring transparency and adherence to guidelines. By 2030, on-demand compliance reports will be necessary, making digital transformation essential.

 

iLeap: Driving Digital Healthcare Transformation 

iLeap enables healthcare providers to build secure, scalable applications tailored to their needs. By optimizing workflows, financial management, and patient experiences, iLeap helps organizations stay ahead in digital transformation. 

Learn more about iLeap’s low-code application development platform. Schedule a call with us 

[mariacallous]

Is China a part of the global south?

Beijing certainly thinks so. For instance, at the recently concluded Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, a conference held every three years between China and African leaders, Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke of the global south’s “shared path toward modernization.” China has set up a development fund containing the term “South-South.” And Foreign Minister Wang Yi has also explicitly stated more than once that China is and will always be a member of the global south.

Though the terms used have changed over time, China’s rhetorical embrace of the developing world is not exactly new. Its roots go back to the early years of Chinese Communist Party rule. After the revolutionary fervor of the early 1950s subsided somewhat, China participated in the historic 1955 Bandung Conference that brought Asian and African leaders from recently decolonized countries together in a common front against global inequities. In 1964, Premier Zhou Enlai, Mao Zedong’s righthand man, formulated China’s Eight Principles for Economic Aid and Technical Assistance to Other Countries. Mao’s own worldview defined two “intermediate zones” between the United States and the Soviet Union, the latter zone comprising Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

The intermediate zones framing later morphed into the Three Worlds theory in 1974. In a conversation with Zambian President Kenneth Kaunda, Mao defined the “Third World” as including Africa, Latin America, and all of Asia, except Japan. This brief reference was elaborated on at length in a famous speech by Deng Xiaoping to the U.N. General Assembly in the same year, in which he said: “China belongs to the Third World.”

Mao, like many of his contemporaries, defined the Third World in predominantly economic and postcolonial terms. The framing made sense in the 1970s, when China was among the world’s poorer countries. The average Chinese lived no better, and in some cases worse, than the wide swath of recently decolonized countries.

Fast-forward to today, and much has changed. A different understanding of the meta-region stretching from Latin America to Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands is needed—and in turn, China’s place within it must be reconsidered.

In this meta-region, 45 states that the United Nations has dubbed “least developed countries” remain mired in poverty and, in some cases, state failure. But about 80 others have grown substantially. Many, especially in Asia, made globalization and capitalism their own and turbocharged growth with corresponding social investments. They industrialized, integrated with the global economy, and built respectable levels of domestic infrastructure.

China itself is among the biggest beneficiaries of this transformation—from a country that experienced state-induced famines during the disastrous 1958-62 Great Leap Forward to now a highly industrialized, upper-middle-income country.

As economies diverge and the colonial era recedes into the past, the term “global south” has gained currency, especially since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It is best described as a “geopolitical fact,” a vast middle that sits outside the great-power system made up of the three great powers and core U.S. allies in Europe, East Asia, and Australasia. The “rest” have achieved varied levels of economic and social development but remain outside the select club of core alliances and global rulemaking. By definition, therefore, a great power cannot be a part of the global south.

China’s sheer size; high levels of GDP, trade, investment, and increasingly innovation; and successful military modernization mean that it now qualifies as a great power. It has joined Russia and the United States in this select category—though the United States is clearly the most powerful of the three and Russia barely makes the grade.

China is indeed working closely with a few global south states on major issues, for example with Brazil on a Ukraine peace plan, and as a part of the BRICS grouping. But Beijing’s global south rhetoric, while drawing on a real shared history, is today a stratagem, designed to win influence among the developing world and further its aims of influencing the global order.  If anything, China’s emergence as a great power opens the door for a divergence from the global south on three important fronts: trade and investment, climate, and geopolitics.

Divides on trade are already visible. Middle-income global south countries such as Indonesia and Chile have recently slapped tariffs on Chinese imports as China has increasingly shifted into advanced manufacturing. Jakarta has just banned a giant Chinese online retailer, citing threats to local businesses. Mexico wants to reduce Chinese imports in its supply chain. Concerns over local trade have also triggered actions against Chinese imports in Brazil.

Meanwhile, Beijing’s flagship investment program, the Belt and Road Initiative, has become much smaller and more targeted of late, with spending falling off sharply as a slowing China focuses more at home. China is also on the “other side” when it comes to negotiating debt relief with poorer states in the G-20’s Common Framework, an odd position for a nation that claims to still be developing.

China and the global south have historically cooperated closely on climate change in the G-77+China coalition. They routinely push the U.N. principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities” (CBDR) and legitimately demand much greater climate finance commitments from wealthy states. The CBDR principle puts the onus on financing the energy transition on the global north, since wealthy countries have been the dominant contributors to destructive climate change due to their much larger cumulative carbon emissions. Unsurprisingly, Washington tends to minimize or ignore CBDR in climate negotiations.

But China’s own emissions have risen to the point that it has itself become a major contributor to not only annual but also historical emissions. With 14.7 percent of the global share, China now ranks third in cumulative emissions since 1750, not far behind the United States and the European Union. (The leading global south emitter, India, comes in much lower at nearly 3.4 percent.) The CBDR principle puts China on the side of wealthy states much more than developing countries.

China could justifiably point to its already significant efforts as a source of climate finance. But it will resist what should be a logical shift in its status and oppose formally taking on climate finance targets.

China and the global south may also yet diverge on the broader geopolitical plane. Highly militarized U.S.-China competition can destabilize the global order and risk major conflict; it is therefore not in the global south’s interests. Any actions by Beijing contributing to regional or global destabilization will not be welcomed in the global south. (The same is true for any such behavior by Washington.)

But China’s relative weakness compared with the United States, and an economic slowdown at home, also creates incentives for a revived G-2 in order to craft updated rules of global governance. Xi seemed to propose exactly this last year.

Washington is currently in no mood to engage in such a conversation with Beijing due to China’s perceived threat to its global primacy, sharp differences over Taiwan, and the Russia-Ukraine war. But as planetary challenges multiply, and as China closes the gap in strategic innovation despite its economic crunch, both sides may be incentivized toward deeper, though sectoral, cooperation—perhaps after a nasty crisis that stops short of war.

Any new, future G-2, even if partial, would sit uneasily with most of the global south, as the latter’s demands might not be factored in a backroom deal between the two most powerful states in the international system. The very act of excluding these states from such a conversation would also rankle. The net effect would be to widen their divide with Beijing.

China could bridge its growing gap with the global south by being more proactive on issues such as debt, climate, and trade and refraining from provocative actions in theaters such as the South China Sea. Continuing U.S. failures that cost the lives of innocents (such as in the Middle East escalation) or U.S. over-militarization in Asia could also ensure China remains attractive in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

While Beijing has traditionally enjoyed a natural convergence with the global south, the future looks a lot more complicated.

[mayormimii]

Your turn for the ask game!! Haruspex; thoughts on the Kin?

Jerboa; Soul-and-a-Halves or the Dogheads?

Rat; what scares you the most in the game?

Booha; favourite voiceline?

Herb Bride; favourite song from the soundtrack?

Clairvoyance; favourite Mistress? (maybe not so much character because I know the answer but what they are conceptually, if that makes a difference?)

Yay!!

Haruspex; thoughts on the Kin?

I keep back judgement of aspects of Pathologic I hope to better understand in the future, so I tend to withhold commentary on the Kin, but I can at least appreciate how fantastical they are as a fictional race. I don't enjoy the hive-mind characterization I hear they suffer from in 2, which ironically took the time to vary their designs (fun, we love Siskin) and integrate some individuals into the Town (more backstory for how Kin theology influenced the townspeople). This habit of the West to see the East as collectivistic denies the latter potential for meaningful interpersonal conflict, like Oyun who secures Vlad the Elder's management of the Kin. Is it true he's less horrid in 2? As Shohat put it in Notes on the "Post-Colonial":

...despite the broad patterns of geo-political hegemony, power relations in the Third World are also dispersed and contradictory. The First/Third World struggle, furthermore, takes place not only between nations (India/Pakistan, Iraq/Kuwait), but also within nations, with the constantly changing relations between dominant and subaltern groups, settler and indigenous populations [...] The notion of the three worlds, in short, flattens heterogeneities, masks contradictions, and elides differences.

The fact that they're nomadic (often shepherds) and consist of such interconnected clans--in which aunts/uncles/cousins share the responsibility of rearing one child (e.g. Taya)--inspires questions in me of how similar they might be to my own ancestors. We share the belief that humans are made from earthen clay. The Worms would be races alongside djinn (the shabnak-adyr, spirits from the Earth among Boddho's Children) and humans, that way. Suok reminds me of Iblis. I've recently been told that the ancestors of the Turks we now know had migrated from the Steppe, which might explain why their language shares a family with other Eurasian tongues. I could come up with so, so many headcanons of the Kin that way.

I don't know what to say about the Kin's natural, organic 'decay'. I should be siding with the older generation. But how much of that is of the youth's volition, their agency to pursue what works for them rather than what did for their forefathers? Asides from the erasure a more powerful third party forces on a people through hard or soft power, definitely asides from that, I think the ways of life that are meant to survive will do so for as long as the people who receive them find them fitting, and other inevitably die out. Adopting the caste system from, I believe, Buddhism raises questions about how social hierarchies are likely inherited and even morally justified. Likely those who live in the Abbattoir belong to a higher caste?

Jerboa; Soul-and-a-Halves or the Dogheads?

The Souls-and-a-Halves are diverse, and the conversations had while bartering with them are more memorable, so I’ve come to see them as friends. I used to favor them over even the Termites. Initially, I wondered if they were talking about Pokémon, and now I like to believe they truly do have half-souls.

Rat; what scares you the most in the game?

The most terrified I’ve ever been was seeing the infected for the first time in the Earth quarter without registering what they were. Now, I only pity them. Presently, it’s trying to hide in an infected house—only to find that it’s not infected when a marauder leaps out at me from the end of a corridor. The run cycle gives me the creeps. Or the opposite, when I sneak into a house with stationary enemies and never know who’s around the corner. Also, Var’s house in general.

Booha; favourite voiceline?

Tough to narrow; I enjoy the voice lines more than most written dialogue, so charming to catch them mid-reverie. To list a few...

Eva: “We sometimes differ more widely from ourselves than we do from others.” (Currently relate)

Peter: “There are fine things, old boy, which are more brilliant when unfinished than when finished too much.” “Truth is foundational and the reason of the perfection of beauty, old boy.” “We fear everything, old boy, as mortals do, and desire everything as if we were immortal.” (His voice is the most grounded and grounding.)

Capella: “This Bachelor isn’t that smart. Intelligent, yes, but not smart. The killer will get to him before he gets to the bottom of this.” (She seemed incapable of harboring negative feelings toward anyone, so this was a refreshing surprise.)

Herb Bride; favourite song from the soundtrack?

The Polyhedron's theme in Classic + a draw between Childhood Grave and Useless Science in 2. I have a liking for psychedelic or dreamy melodies, maybe a little forlorn. As far as video game OSTs go, Pathologic’s definitely not among my favorites.

Clairvoyance; favourite Mistress?

The Beige Mistress; it’s sweet that the White Mistress would find a sister and partner in a ‘rival’ like planets pulling meteoroids in different directions to keep a celestial balance. Her purpose of keeping the dead ‘alive’ and unforgotten is what grants meaning in protecting the old world, fostering and cultivating it lest it wither away. I'll never forget her, “They don’t make towns like this anymore.” Maybe I should've answered the question before the last with it, because I guess I can relate to that in more ways than one.

Thank you x4!! 💕💕

[obanicrypto]

Omniston on STONfi DEX: The Future of Secure and Transparent Trading

In the world of decentralized finance (DeFi), security and transparency are top priorities. That's where Omniston, a groundbreaking feature on STONfi DEX, comes in. It’s set to transform the way we trade and interact with cryptocurrencies, and in this article, I’ll explain exactly what it is, how it works, and why it’s a big deal for you.

What Is Omniston

Omniston is a decentralized liquidity protocol that’s designed to simplify and enhance trading on STONfi DEX. It uses something called a Request for Quote (RFQ) mechanism, which allows traders to connect directly with market makers. This is a significant shift from traditional liquidity pools where assets sit idly, waiting to be used.

If you’ve ever tried to buy something online and had to wait for the best deal, you’ll appreciate Omniston’s approach. Instead of just offering you a price based on the liquidity available at the moment, Omniston lets you request a price and then choose the best one offered by market makers. It’s like a digital marketplace for trading, but with enhanced control and efficiency.

Why Should You Care About Omniston

You might be wondering, "Why does Omniston matter to me?" If you’ve ever traded on a decentralized exchange (DEX), you know how challenging it can be to find the right price and ensure that your funds are safe. Here’s how Omniston makes a difference:

1. You Control Your Funds, Always

The biggest concern for many in DeFi is the safety of their funds. Omniston solves this by letting you maintain control of your assets throughout the entire trading process. You don’t have to deposit your funds into a centralized system or trust someone else to hold your money. When you initiate a transaction, the funds stay in your wallet until the deal is finalized. This reduces the risk of hacks or mismanagement.

2. No Middlemen, No Trust Required

In traditional finance, you often have to trust a third party, like a bank or exchange, to facilitate the transaction. In DeFi, however, trust is minimized. Omniston uses smart contracts to ensure that trades happen only when both parties meet their agreed-upon terms. There’s no need to rely on any middleman or intermediary—everything is automatic and secure, based on the rules set by the blockchain.

3. No Hidden Fees and Full Transparency

Have you ever been caught off guard by hidden fees or unexpected costs when trading? With Omniston, that won’t happen. Thanks to its RFQ mechanism, you can clearly see the price you’ll pay for a trade before you confirm it. You won’t encounter surprise slippage or fees because everything is transparent and outlined up front. This kind of clarity is something that can often be missing in traditional trading systems.

How Does Omniston Improve the STONfi DEX Experience

STONfi DEX has always been about empowering users and making decentralized trading more accessible. With the introduction of Omniston, it takes things to a whole new level.

Unified Liquidity: In the past, liquidity has been scattered across different platforms, which can make it hard to find the best prices. Omniston brings liquidity together in one place, creating a more efficient trading environment where users can get the best deals without jumping between platforms.

Efficiency at Its Best: Omniston’s integration combines the best of on-chain and off-chain processes. Trades are initiated off-chain and then settled on-chain, allowing for quicker, cheaper, and more efficient transactions. This is like cutting through the red tape and streamlining the entire process.

Better Access for Developers: Omniston is also a boon for developers. It allows them to tap into a larger pool of liquidity and connect their projects with a wider audience. With millions of users in the TON ecosystem, this opens up a wealth of opportunities for those looking to build and grow within the space.

Why Liquidity Matters More Than You Think

If you're new to crypto trading, understanding liquidity is key. Think of liquidity like water: it needs to be abundant and easily accessible for the whole system to work efficiently. If liquidity is fragmented across multiple platforms, it becomes harder to get the best prices, and the process slows down.

Omniston solves this by creating a unified liquidity system. This ensures that when you trade, you have access to all available liquidity, meaning you can always get the best price in a fraction of the time.

The Bigger Picture: Omniston's Impact on the DeFi Ecosystem

Omniston is more than just a new feature for STONfi DEX—it’s part of a broader push to make DeFi more secure, transparent, and user-friendly. By eliminating the need for middlemen and giving traders more control over their funds, Omniston is setting a new standard for decentralized exchanges.

For you, this means a better, more reliable trading experience. Whether you’re an experienced trader or someone just getting into DeFi, Omniston simplifies the process, enhances security, and reduces fees. It’s a big leap forward in creating a decentralized financial system that actually works for everyone.

Final Thoughts

Innovation in DeFi is happening at an incredible pace, and Omniston is one of the most exciting developments I’ve seen in a while. By combining smart contract technology with a revolutionary RFQ mechanism, it provides a solution that addresses some of the biggest pain points in decentralized trading today.

The introduction of Omniston on STONfi DEX is a huge step toward making DeFi more accessible, secure, and efficient for everyone. If you’ve been hesitant to dive into decentralized trading because of security concerns or hidden fees, Omniston provides the clarity and control you need to make the leap.

It’s time to embrace the future of DeFi, and Omniston is leading the way. What do you think about these innovations? Let’s talk in the comments below!

[obavee]

Why Omniston on STONfi DEX is a Game Changer for DeFi

When I first heard about Omniston, I was immediately intrigued. After spending some time diving into the details, I realized just how revolutionary this protocol is for the future of decentralized finance (DeFi). If you're looking for a simple, no-fluff explanation of why Omniston matters, here's what you need to know.

What Exactly is Omniston?

In simple terms, Omniston is a new way to trade and exchange crypto, built right into STONfi DEX. It’s a decentralized liquidity protocol that connects market makers and traders directly, without relying on traditional liquidity providers or centralized services.

To make it easier to picture, imagine going to an auction. You put out a request for something you want to buy, and the sellers bid to give you the best price. Once you find your match, you complete the deal right then and there, no middlemen involved. That's how Omniston works—just on the blockchain.

The Key Benefits of Omniston

So, why should you care about Omniston? Here are the key advantages that make it stand out from the rest:

1. Security Without Deposits:

Normally, when you want to trade crypto, you have to deposit your funds in a liquidity pool or trust a third party to hold your assets. With Omniston, there's no need for any of that. The funds only move during the transaction, and smart contracts ensure that your assets are secure. It’s like making a purchase with a trusted middleman, but without actually handing your money over until you’re ready to complete the deal.

2. No Need for Third-Party Trust:

One of the biggest risks in traditional trading is trusting a third party to hold your funds. But with Omniston, there's no need for that trust because the blockchain handles everything. Think of it like using an online payment service where the system automatically ensures both buyer and seller are protected. You don’t have to worry about someone walking off with your funds.

3. No More Slippage:

Slippage—when the price of an asset changes between the time you place an order and when it gets filled—is one of the most annoying issues in trading. With Omniston, this doesn’t happen. The RFQ (Request for Quote) system allows you to see exactly how many tokens you’ll receive before confirming the trade. So, no surprises or price hikes at checkout.

A Unified Liquidity Solution

One of the biggest headaches in DeFi is fragmented liquidity. Different platforms often have their own pools of liquidity, which can make it hard to get the best prices. Omniston solves this by consolidating all liquidity into one service, giving you access to a broader range of projects and allowing developers to reach a larger user base.

Imagine trying to find a rare book. If you go to one bookstore, it might be out of stock, but if there’s a network of bookstores sharing inventory, you’ll find it easily. That’s what Omniston does for liquidity.

More Affordable, Faster Trading

By combining on-chain transactions with off-chain orders, Omniston lowers the cost of trading. The result? Faster, more affordable transactions. Think of it like upgrading from taking a bus to using a high-speed train—you get to your destination quicker, and it’s more efficient.

Why Omniston Matters on STONfi DEX

Omniston is integrated into STONfi DEX, and that’s a game-changer. By combining these two innovations, we’re not just improving one part of DeFi—we’re raising the bar across the entire space. Here’s how:

1.Better Security & Transparency: Every transaction is verified on the blockchain, and you don’t need to trust a middleman to make it happen.

2.Access to a Unified Liquidity Pool: No more jumping between platforms to find the best deal. Everything you need is in one place.

3.Efficient, Low-Cost Trading: Faster transactions and lower fees make this a win for traders and projects alike.

For those of us who’ve been around the crypto space for a while, Omniston is a breath of fresh air. It fixes the problems that have been holding DeFi back for too long, and it’s only going to get better as more people start using it.

Final Thoughts

If you’re new to DeFi, Omniston is an exciting development. If you’re an experienced trader or developer, it’s even more thrilling because it’s changing the entire landscape of decentralized exchanges.

By eliminating issues like liquidity fragmentation, slippage, and the need for third-party trust, Omniston is setting the stage for a new era in DeFi. This is just the beginning, and I’m excited to see how the future unfolds with innovations like these driving the space forward.

What are your thoughts on Omniston and STONfi DEX? How do you see these developments impacting the future of DeFi? I’d love to hear from you in the comments below!

[lunarsilkscreen]

Long-Term Strategy for Game Series Support

We're entering an era of Long-Term support for Video Games Series. (THAT'S A LIE, WEVE BEEN THERE FOR A MINUTE NOW.)

As Developers and Publishers start shutting down online services for older games (and in some cases disabling the game entirely)

Which is necessary, considering that servers take money to continue running. And older game players simply aren't bringing in revenue to keep the lights on. (Because they're not bringing in any money)

The question that AAA developers should be asking; "How do we integrate our games backend into a shared eco-system in order to reduce costs for each individual game, and increase adoption of newer services/games for our players?"

This is a question that must be asked because Developers and Publishers already know how difficult it is to retain profits while competing with the Resale and Third-Party markets like GameStop.

Many developers have started creating "Always On" services which require the game to be connected to the internet in order to play offline portions. (To verify authenticity that the game was purchased from an official source and not pirated.)

After-all it's hard to continue paying for online services if pirates are using them.

Still, services like Hearthstone provide a free service, free product, and still manage to turn profit. Part of this is because of the competitive environment and sponsored tournaments.

By offering a prize, plenty of players can be convinced to play, just in case they feel like going pro next year.

But they probably won't. Despite that; the game is incredibly fun to play. Except when several players in a row have the exact combo that enables them to keep tempo, and so you gotta grin and bear it till it becomes fun again.

Or buy more cards.

Still, how do you create an environment for the casual players of casual games. Like Animal Crossing, or Pokemon. Since most Pokemon players aren't competitive.

After a half-a-decade, the business model dictates that you sell a new game to replace the old one.

Part of the problem here is that each new game has a lot of the same content as the old game, and thus; in order to switch you need throw away your old save file and start from scratch.

Many players that would do that just because they can would have done so already. And so older players may end up giving up both the old and new, simply because it's easier to do so.

Despite the newest games having a lot of the same content, a lot of old content is lost. Like the Story. What would traditionally be called the "Movie" or "Novel" portion. Depending on if it was a cutscenes or several hundred lines of text.

And so in order to re-experience the old content; many players may instead choose to simply to pirate the old content, or read about it from online sources.

Part of the solution is to simply offer the old content to new players. And to try to convince older players into the new areas by allowing them to bring their old content and achievements with them.

This can be accomplished a few different ways. Crypto is one way to create a ledger tied to a players account so that they can share their content between platforms and games.

Nearly every platform, PlayStation, XBOX, and while Nintendo doesn't offer a platform specific variant, game often still include achievements.

And this system can be used to store certain content on a player basis to brought into newer or different games.

This would also enable cross-game items/content/achievements that players could bring with them from series to series.

Which would be a boom for cross-promotional purposes. And by creating an environment and a system that enables to store this in the same place(cloud). You could also control for DataBase specifications in order to reduce size and increase speeds for each individual game.

Now, I am pretty well Versed in Learning Content Distribution. SCORM(This is an acronym you don't need to know, and would only raise more questions if I explain it, so I'll stick to the surface here.) SCORM, TinCan, and xAPI (not to be confused with Twitter) are specifications created for the Learning Management Environment (Education, College, Government, and corporate training models) in order to do exactly what I'm talking about with as little or as much data bandwidth requirements, is relatively secure and includes cross-service achievement-like systems.

As well as content-distribution systems.

I would assume there's a way to integrate it with Crypto. It would replace the monkey WEBMs with something more substantial.

And this service or system would allow not only players to bring their accounts and achievements and items with them from game to game (or from game to social media) but games to communicate with each other.

Again, I'm thinking "Eco-system" here. Publishers would be able to do large-scale cross-promotional events with many games simultaneously. And enable platform-hoping between games with content from each individual event.

What this means is that you would also be able to provide a place for those old games to exist, even if they don't participate it the Events anymore. AND encourage players to try new and other games because they don't lose their original save files doing so.