#astrophysiques

[itsgerges]

Best Regards

The Planets Were Moving In Their Orbits Before The Sun Creation (Revised) https://app.box.com/s/dufa274dvpay3fqn6syz6sefjljfwnx9 or https://app.box.com/s/89vxxtv3hc8si245fwxpbw0ts9b126nz or https://www.tumblr.com/itsgerges/762780127698567168/the-planets-were-moving-in-their-orbits-before-the?source=share or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/239300.html

The Sun Creation The sun is created depending on the planets motions- because- the sun rays is created by the planets motions energies- In details- Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and from this energy the sun rays is created- means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays but the planets motions energies total is used to produce the sun rays– that explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body (from the planets motions energies total)- This theory is discussed based on 5 hypotheses. The First Hypothesis The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I suppose -the sun rays is produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion- also – I claim No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states. The Second Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The Third Hypothesis The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the wave reflection causes changes for the waves properties and data- the major change is that- the reflection causes to square the wave velocity- means- the gravitational wave moves by velocity (V), if this wave is reflected, it would move by velocity (V^2) after the reflection- The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- two times in the outer planets and one time only in the inner planets- The Fourth Hypothesis The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time The rate of time use is useful because it enables to accumulate the planets motions energies during a period of time- understandable- Planet motion energy is small energy and the sun rays is massive energy and that necessitates to accumulate the planets motions energies total during a period of time to store motion energy sufficient to be used for the sun rays creation- Shortly- if the planets motions don't use rates of time, no massive motion energy can be provided and for that NO enough energy will be found to produce the sun rays-means- No light beam can be created The rate of time depends on the velocities rate Example (one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock) because Mercury velocity =1.6 the Earth velocity– the hypothesis is explained and proved in details

The Fifth Hypothesis Neptune Motion Causes Negative Effects On The Sun Rays Production Process are (1) Neptune motion caused the gravitational waves to be reflected two times in the outer planets where one reflection is enough for the required process- the wave reflection is repeated by Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion (2) Neptune caused to decrease the gravitational wave speed by one percent- where the gravitational wave moves by speed of light Neptune caused to decrease this speed by 1% creating a speed = (99% of the speed of light=297000 km/s) and by this speed (0.99C) the relativistic effects are created in the solar system

NOTICE The solar system is one machine performs one Job- and this Job is The Sun Rays Production - All planets motions are used as parts to perform this one Job-

The Sun Rays Production Is Done By Two Basic Tasks (1st task) The Provision Of The Sufficient Energy For The Sun Rays Production- and the sufficient energy is prepared by the motions of the five planets (Saturn- Jupiter- Venus- The Earth- The Moon – and Mars) because these five planets motions are used to create the general rate of time based on which The Sun Rays Are Created. (discussed in details in the 3rd hypothesis)

(2nd task) The mechanism by which the light beam is created- and this mechanism is the relative motion- the gravitational waves move relative to the sun point of space- by this relative motion the sun rays are created- means- the required energy is prepared and provided by the aforementioned five planets- and when the sufficient energy be provided this energy is sent to the planets which create the mechanism and the mechanism uses the sufficient energy to produce The Sun Rays The mechanism depends on the motions of 3 planets (Mercury- Venus and the moon) Specially Venus, because Venus reflects the wave toward Mars and defines its trajectory angle to create the relative motion between the wave and the sun point of space- the relative motion is discussed in details in the explanation of the (first and second hypotheses)  The Explanation Of The First And Second Hypotheses

Let's remember The 1st Hypothesis This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam – I suppose (The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Nuclear Fusion -Also All Stars Rays Are Created By This Method And No Rays Is Created By The Nuclear Fusion Process) And –The 2nd Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The two hypotheses explain how the sun rays creation depends on the planets motions because The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies as the article states AND The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- The two hypotheses are discussed together in 4 Points

First Point (The Gravitational Waves Source)

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- I provide 2 major proves for this hypothesis which are- (1st proof/ Planet Motion Energy Analysis) and (2nd proof /The Sun Gravitational Field Refutation)

1st Proof / Planet Motion Energy Analysis Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), Let's ask, where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit- Note- the moon velocity is 27.8 km/s BUT the Earth and the moon revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity should be considered equal the earth velocity relative to (the sun) – The 1st Proof Conclusion The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why? The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion that – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

2nd Proof / The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following (1) The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- (2) No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity – Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner creation and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions. (3) The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon- (4) The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation) d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example- Venus orbital distance (108.2)2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3) d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance 50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition. Notice Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation) Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth- (5) Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the explanation of the 3rd hypothesis- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The 2nd Proof Conclusion The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

Second Point (The Gravitational Waves Nature Analysis) Let's ask (1) If The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light While The Planets Move By Low Velocities? Or Generally– regardless the gravitational waves source- how can the gravitational waves move by speed of light? From where the energy is provided to enable the waves to move by the speed of light? (2) Can the gravitational waves be reflected in the solar system? what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties, features and nature? (3) Can the gravitational waves energy be increased? Means can one gravitational wave move by low velocity and this wave motion is accelerated to move by high velocity motion? again from what source the energy is provided and how the acceleration is done? (4) If the gravitational waves are produced by the same gravitational field (The physics book states "the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field") does that mean all gravitational waves move by equal velocities? can some waves move faster than the others? why and how? (5) If the planets data are reflected on each other – can we discover the geometrical reason behind this features? Planet velocity is example where the velocities are defined by the rule (v1v2= constant) this rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- why the velocities are reflected on each other? what's the geometrical reason behind? suppose the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system, why this cause the planets data to be reflected on each other?

(6) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Because the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light) but the waves moves by speed of light only (C=300000 km/s) how the value (C^2) can be produced by the waves motions? (7) If the gravitational waves produce a light beam, does that mean the waves use electric field to produce this light beam? Is there another method to produce a light beam doesn't use electric field or charges? (8) If the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system can we discover that? can we prove that? and can we know in what planet orbit the reflection is done and if the waves are reflected many times?

The Gravitational Waves Properties, Features and nature Here I compare between the two theories about the gravitational waves source and their effects on the waves properties- 1st Theory (The Physics Book Theory) The physics book states, the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- this theory tells little about the gravitational waves properties and nature because the mass gravity concept is puzzled and not understood for that the waves properties and features are puzzled also- let's test this idea- In The Sun gravitational field theory no one knows how the mass gravity force works and if the gravity needs time to work- or if the gravity creates a geometrical design to practice the effect of one mass on the other- the mechanism is not clear and for that the gravitational waves are not clear- for example – no one knows why the gravitational waves can move by speed of light or what waves move by this speed and in what planet orbit or if the wave motion velocity is accelerated gradually from low velocity to high velocity– we shortly know nothing about these gravitational waves- let's ask more questions- are these waves reflected and what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties and nature- where do these waves go? And what's the useful result of these waves energy? can these waves energy be used at all? are there just moving energy in space without an useful goal or result? And The new article tells the gravitational waves move by speed of light can produce a light beam? How these waves can produce a light beam by their motion? DEEP ANALYSIS I wish the respectful reader notices the major change in vision by this article-because- the physics book states the sun rays is produced by the sun nuclear fusion- here- the source of energy is the sun mass and the used method is the sun nuclear fusion- and the light beam is produced Let's put the new article here again This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- the light beam is created by the gravitational waves motions- the article tells- the light beam can be produced by the Motion Energy – The article tells (The High Velocity Motion Can Produce A Light Beam)- here the article removed simply The Sun Nuclear Fusion Machine- the whole machine be useless because the light beam can be produced by (the motion energy)- I wish the respectful reader sees the miracle and wonder behind- There are 2 major changes (1st Change) The source of energy The source of energy is the motion energy– No longer the sun mass be used as the sun rays source of energy- BUT – the motion energy is used as the source of energy – here- the fatal error of the sun nuclear fusion theory is seen clearly – because- the solar system is so rich in motion energy- the moving planets since thousands of years provide massive motion energy stored in the space- and by that- the solar system is very rich system in the motion energy- and we should ask (why do we need an outer source of energy?) why the solar system doesn't use its massive motion energy to produce the light beam? Also if the massive motion energy is not used- where's this massive energy? because it can cause continuous risk for the soalr system stability if no way to use this stored massive energy The sun nuclear fusion theory is completely wrong because it doesn't see the massive motion energy stored in the solar system (2nd Change) the light beam production machine The gravitational waves motions can produce the light beam- this is stated by the article but how? by what method the gravitational waves can produce the light beam? The article doesn't explain how the gravitational waves can produce a light beam? But I put an explanation for this method in my theory discussion

2nd Theory (My Theory) I suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- let's remember my theory because we will use it in the waves properties discussion I asked –where any moving body produce energy by its motion =(1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? The planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as fish swimming creates waves in the water planet motion energy creates waves in the space- means planet moves and creates waves in space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity by that- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and creates waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions create waves move by these planets velocities – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total

I explained this theory before in more details- now – let's discover the gravitational waves properties and features in details- let's put this analysis in the next point (third point) because we need to analyze the wave reflection process to discover the waves properties and features

Third Point (The Gravitational Waves Reflection)

Let's ask Question No.(1) If the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s, how can they move by speed of light? How the velocity 205.8 km/s can be accelerated to be 300000 km/s (speed of light) and where this acceleration is done? Another question can help greatly this discussion Question No.(2) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S)- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Let's think how to answer this question- these gravitational waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) but the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light)- means- the wave velocity is squared- and how can the wave velocity to be squared? This feature I have discovered in the solar system- the waves are reflected and the reflection causes to square the velocities- means- the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the gravitational waves before the reflection moved by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and the reflection causes the velocity to be squared- by that- after the reflection the gravitational waves speed is squared and changed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to be (C^2= squared speed of light) and the light beam is created from this value (C^2) Means- the waves reflection is the method by which the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) is changed into (C^2)- that means- without the waves reflection NO light beam can be created. Notice– the waves reflection is proved strongly in the solar system because it causes to reflect the planets data- means- huge amount of planets data proves the waves reflection–we may remember one example – planet velocity is defined by the rule (v1v2=constant) this rule proves the planets velocities are reflected on each other The paper provides hundreds of similar data proves the waves reflection AND The waves reflection causes to square the velocity- this feature is repeated in the solar system frequently – because- the waves are reflected three times in the solar system for that the velocity squaring is a feature repeated with each reflection and by that the planets data provides a strong proof for it- Shortly- The waves reflection causes to square the velocities- now- let's use this feature to know how the unified wave its velocity (205.8 km/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- (Please note this unified wave is the gravitational wave)

The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s Means the unified wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s BUT If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1 Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1 BUT The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light) That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) NOTICE No. (1) Please note the important observation Without 7.1 the velocity will be only 42683 km/s (even after the waves reflection) and NOT the speed of light That tells- the light beam production process depends on the previous light beam production process- means- a motion by (99%) of speed of light should be found before the wave reflection occurrence and without this motion with (0.99 C) the gravitational waves can't move by speed of light because we need a source for Lorentz length contraction effect with rate (7.1) That tells the light production process is done in chain process, the new light beam production depends on the old light beam and if this dependency is removed the gravitational waves can NOT move by the speed of light and No light beam can be created in this case NOTICE No. (2) We need to pay more attention for the importance of the motion by the speed of light- because the technique of the machine depends on the waves reflection- means- the waves can increase its velocity only by the reflection process – now the reflection causes to square the velocities- this is very important news why?? Because - If the waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s), the waves reflection will produce the value (C^2= squared speed of light) and from this value the light beam can be produced Now – suppose the wave velocity is less than speed of light- suppose the wave moves by speed = (90%) of the speed of light= (270000 km/s) - the waves reflection will square this speed that will produce (0.81 C^2) which is NOT (C^2= squared speed of light) and as a result No Light Beam Can Be Produced. NOTICE No. (3) The unified wave (gravitational wave) do NOT produce the speed (0.99C = 297000 km/s) this speed can NOT be produced by the unified wave motion– because - the unified wave velocity is 205.8 km/s and by the first waves reflection this velocity will be squared and produce speed of light (205.8^2 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s) as I have explained- (means- the gravitational waves velocity is not increased gradually- the wave acceleration system doesn't use gradual increasing for the wave velocity- for that the speed 0.99C is never mentioned by the wave acceleration system) The speed (0.99C = 297000 km/s) is NOT created by the solar system motion design at all- the solar system design produces the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) perfectly- BUT- this speed (0.99C) is created by Neptune negative effect on the solar system- because Neptune created interaction with Saturn and Neptune decreased Saturn rotation period from 10.84 hours to 10.7 hours and that caused to delay the unified wave with (1%) and by that the total speed is decreased (1%) and that caused the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) is decreased by one percent (1%) and that produces the speed (0.99C = 297000 km/s)- and this speed causes to create the relativistic effects in the solar system – the interaction between Neptune and Saturn is explained later (CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow

E-mail mrwaheid1@yahoo.com gergesgerges@yandex.ru ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[researcherpicker]

CHPT 5 : Le mot

... Quel statut donner aux individus capables de nous transmettre une aussi belle chose?

Suis je idiot? Pourquoi cette notion de statut social aurait-elle eu lieu dès les premières heures de l’humanité?

https://www.pourlascience.fr/sd/archeologie/les-classes-sociales-existent-depuis-longtemps-18490.php

Rien en ma possession ne me permet d’affirmer une telle chose. Je succombe à la superposition de ce que je sais avec ce que je désir de la société dans laquelle j’évolu, tout en projetant ce fantasme sur ce pauvre homo sapiens qui n’a rien demandé. Dans une volonté à peine dissimulée, de décrire un temps où nous les humains nous aurions été fabuleux, comme le reste de la nature. Quand je dis nature, ma pensée ne se limite pas aux plantes, aux animaux, aux forêts, aux montagnes, aux mers et aux océans, mais au cosmos dans lequel nous voyageons.

C’est de ce recul dont nous avons le plus besoin, pour envisager l’inenvisageable, l’indicible et l’idée même que notre évolution est une affaire discutable. Car pour l’heure, on peut continuer de reconnaître que l’art nous émeut, qu’il touche une chose en nous d'indescriptible et ce tout au long de notre fugace existence. Puisque les neurosciences nous invitent à considérer que la musique précède la parole, je m’aventure dans une voie qui tend vers la théorie que la musique nous précède tout simplement.

Qu’est ce qui peut bien me faire dire cela?

L’harmonie, que l’on peut observer ici et là, offre une piste à explorer. Notamment, l’idée est que cette harmonie musicale et sa compréhension mathématique ont permis de mettre en contraste le fait que l’on retrouve dans la distribution des planètes, dans leurs révolutions et leurs rotations des rapports similaires à ceux observés dans la musique. 

L'Harmonie secrète de l'Univers - Jean-Philippe Uzan

Par ailleurs, la théorie de la protéodie évoque à juste titre, que les protéines de certains végétaux peuvent être stimulées par des ondes sonores. Ces ondes alors inaudibles à l'oreille humaine, restent hors de notre perception. Cependant en les transposant, nous parvenons à entendre dans ces ondes, des harmonies musicales. Bien que ce phénomène reste  très mal connu, de nombreuses recherches ont été menées avec plus ou moins de succès, révélant qu’une composition musicale appropriée peut aider l’agriculture, entre autres.

Les ondes existent à différents niveaux, le spectre sonore ne nous est pas accessible dans sa totalité. Il est certain que ce qui nous échappe n’échappe pas au fait que rien n’est laissé au hasard. Qui perçoit les très basses fréquences et qui les très hautes? Comment une onde peut-elle agir sur la matière?

Nous évoluons dans un monde fait de vibration en lien avec des ondes, que nous soyons incapable de nous en rendre compte ne conforte pas la thèse que nous y  sommes insensible. 

Car il y a bien des choses qui nous parviennent, sans même que notre conscience en ai entendu parler.

En voilà un domaine dans lequel les spéculations vont bon train. La conscience semble être cernée par une zone grise des plus opaques. Il est difficile de s’y aventurer, tant ses choses nous ramènent aux mystères et mysticismes, nous faisant construire des stratagèmes mentaux pour parvenir ne serait-ce qu’un peu à appréhender l’idée même de conscience. Il existerait un questionnement scientifique sur la pensée dite non résonnante. Une pensée qui se passe du mot pour construire les concepts qui les dépasse.

 Les neurosciences s'intéressent à la conscience, une théorie est née, elle se trouverait dans une sorte de cloud. Notre conscience serait tout bonnement délocalisée.

Une verticalité que je m’empresse de relever, alors que je cherche toujours vers l’horizon les traces d’un équilibre. Comme tout problème il se doit d’être simplifié. La conscience abrite ce qui appartient à nos perceptions conscientes, incluant la conscience de notre verticalité, de notre corporalité et de notre capacité à ressentir. Alors que tous nos capteurs sont connectés à notre cerveau, nous confondons le sommet de notre corps avec le ciel, dans lequel des nuages transportent au-delà de notre boîte crânienne le résultat de notre pensée.

Plaçant le dit inconscient bien plus haut que notre triste enveloppe charnelle, alors qu’en fait ce qui n’est pas conscient peut vite le devenir, un exemple, que je trouve fort à propos, est donné par un neuro psychologue dont la recherche se porte sur l'état de transe, il dit : En règle générale je n’est pas forcément conscience de ce que ma voute plantaire me permet de ressentir, maintenant que j’y consacre de l'intérêt, je peux aisément percevoir un tas de chose se passant sous mes pieds. 

Nous n’avons pas toujours besoin d’avoir accès à tel ou tel ressentis, que les très nombreux capteurs dont nous sommes équipés, transmettent à notre cerveau, certainement pour des raisons de traitement d’informations et de leur hiérarchie. Pour autant, toutes ces informations ne sont pas inutiles, elles sont en quelque sorte traitées en arrière-plan, hors de ce que l’on nomme le conscient. Ce pourrait-il, que l’on confonde notre pensé, celle que l’on construit à partir des mots avec la conscience? Et à l'opposé notre pensée non résonnante avec notre inconscient? Le mot permet-il la pensée? La pensée existe-t-elle avant le mot?

Ce qui est sûr, c’est que l’outil qu’est le langage à transformé notre mode de communication, nous permettant d’échanger des informations simples ou complexes, mais pas si complexes que ça. Car le mot est définitivement incapable de transmettre à coup sur, une émmotion. Il peut, au mieux éclaircir un sentiment, l'étiquetter en quelque sorte, afin que nous puissions éventuellement trouver dans notre lexique intérieur le sentiment rattaché au mot qui le désigne. 

C’est peut-être là une piste qui pourrait nous permettre de poser encore une myriade de questionnements. Le langage a t-il été créé pour transmettre nos sentiments? Ou, est-il juste un outil pour transmettre une information simple? Peut-être nous a-t-il permis d'échanger nos concepts?  

Car comme le souligne Éric Sadin, l’un des plus importants piliers de notre altérité est de pouvoir acquérir le concept d’une autre personne afin de le cerner et d’en faire sien par le biais de son propre système de pensée. L'hégémonie est complète lorsque la pensée unique ne permet plus l’échange, il est donc question de doxa et d’une dérive récurrente vers la doctrine. 

Prenons pour exemple le système capitaliste, dont la doxa est constitué d’un concept vertical, libéral et inégalitaire.  Que l’on y adhère de notre plein gré ou pas, importe peu. Car la succession de choix qui s’impose à nous, dépend de notre capacité à nous tenir au étages supérieur de l'ascenseur social. Plus on se trouve en dessous plus nos choix sont restreints, à l’inverse plus on monte plus nos choix se multiplient jusqu’à un niveau d’absurdité impensable. Une fois cela installé, nous pouvons le considérer comme admis par la majorité, quand bien même qu’une grande partie subisse cette réalité de plein fouet. Le fait est que ce système avantage la soumission aux règles qu’il édicte, proposant/imposant à chacun de participer à l’édification de cette verticalité, en vers et contre tous. Cela est rendu possible par la hiérarchie patriarcale, offrant à toute les strates des outils de dominations et  permettant un effet de répercussion allant du haut vers le bas. Enfin, le mot dans ce contexte ne reflète plus le sens qu’il est censé avoir, transformant notre outil de communication privilégié en une machine à transformer les réalités.

Crédits photos : ©orso

[dandanjean]

La fabrication du réel

Si la compréhension du caractère holistique de la matière inanimée, de sa capacité à s’organiser dans un système ouvert et en non-équilibre en est encore à ses balbutiements, la matière vivante pose un problème autrement formidable. Cette énigme est la suivante : comment un ensemble de molécules qui, a priori, ne ressentent que l’action de leurs toutes proches voisines, sait s’organiser pour…

[agentfascinateur]

Goodbye Hubert Reeves 💫

[scienceacumen]

Neutrinos are tiny subatomic particles, often called 'ghost particles' because they barely interact with anything else. Every time atomic nuclei come together (like in the sun) or break apart (like in a nuclear reactor), they produce neutrinos. Even a banana emits neutrinos—they come from the natural radioactivity of the potassium in the fruit.

Once produced, these ghostly particles almost never interact with other matter. Over the past decade, IceCube has detected hundreds of high-energy neutrinos that originated outside the solar system. In 2017, other telescopes pinpointed the origin of a neutrino detected by IceCube to a galaxy four billion light-years away.

These are abundant subatomic particles that are famous for passing through anything and everything, only very rarely interacting with matter. About 100 trillion neutrinos pass through your body every second ���

📷: Mark Ross Studios

[frenchcurious]

La Tour Einstein est un observatoire astrophysique situé dans le parc scientifique Albert Einstein à Potsdam, en Allemagne, construit en 1921 par l'architecte Erich Mendelsohn (1887-1953). - source Sameh Shawky.

[world-beauty]

Illusion and Evolution in Galaxy Cluster Abell 2667

Credits: NASA, ESA, Jean-Paul Kneib, Laboratoire d�Astrophysique de Marseille, et al.

[spacetimewithstuartgary]

Unburied treasure: Rover researchers find unexpected minerals on Mars that hint at possibility of ancient life

Sometimes scientists must dig and work and sweat to make scientific discoveries. And sometimes a robot rolls over a rock that turns out to be a revelation.

That's what happened when Mars exploration expert Roger Wiens, professor of Earth, atmospheric, and planetary sciences in the College of Science at Purdue University, had NASA's Perseverance rover shoot its laser at some oddly pale rocks lying on the Martian surface—and discovered that they are composed of unusually high aluminum associated with the mineral kaolinite.

That was interesting on its own, but what made the discovery fascinating is that this mineral typically forms only in very warm and wet environments. The discovery, published by Wiens and his team in Communications Earth & Environment, suggests that Mars may have been warmer, wetter and weirder than scientists suspected.

"On Earth, these minerals form where there is intense rainfall and a warm climate or in hydrothermal systems such as hot springs. Both environments are ideal conditions for life as we know it," Wiens said. "These minerals are what's left behind when rock has been in flowing water for eons. Over time, the warm water leaches away all the elements except those that are really insoluble, leaving behind what we found on Mars. It's fascinating. It's unexpected on a cold, dry planet like Mars."

Rock hound rover

Wiens has worked on and with Mars rovers for decades and literally gave Perseverance its head. The blocky projection on top of the rover, which superficially resembles a quadruped's neck and head, is SuperCam, an instrument developed by an international team of researchers and engineers that Wiens led before coming to Purdue.

SuperCam is the result of a collaboration with Los Alamos National Laboratory and the French Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie. The instrument uses a suite of techniques to analyze the Martian surface. Now Wiens leads the research team that uses SuperCam's tools to make discoveries on Mars.

Researchers observed the small, pale pebbles in the Martian soil the first day the rover landed. But the rover team was too busy working on other things to check out the odd little rocks.

Eventually, scientists observed some larger rocks of a similar color lying on the surface, not part of the bedrock beneath the rover's wheels. Geologists call these loose rocks "float rocks" because they are "floating" above the bedrock—they are out of place, away from where they were formed. Once SuperCam's laser analyzed the rocks, the team members realized they had an interesting discovery.

"These rocks are very different from anything we've seen on Mars before," Wiens said. "They're enigmas."

The team proceeded to analyze the rocks more deeply for insights into their composition and structure. Two researchers from Wiens' team led the study. Candice Bedford, research scientist, and Clement Royer, postdoctoral researcher, had just arrived at Purdue when the discovery was made, and they developed the detailed study, along with Briony Horgan, professor of planetary science in the College of Science, and several of her and Wiens' students. The team found more than 4,000 of these white rocks and pebbles scattered across the surface.

The mineral that makes up many of these pale rocks is called kaolinite. What especially excites the scientists is that it typically forms in environments that are warm, wet and hospitable to some forms of microbial life. On Earth, it is found in sedimentary deposits resulting from ancient soils and coastlines and intense hydrothermal environments, and the mineral is quite soft. On Mars, the rocks are white but not as soft, possibly due to other processes that may have hardened the rocks.

These rocks were also found to contain spinel, likely aluminum spinel, which can form either in an igneous or a metamorphic environment, and can be found as remnants in sedimentary rocks. Wiens and his team are unsure which happened here—whether the spinel formed from the kaolinite or the kaolinite formed around the spinel.

Once upon a blue Mars

"The big questions about Mars are about water," Wiens said. "How much water was there? How long was there water? Given how cold and dry Mars is now, where did all that water go? As a mineral, kaolinite has a lot of water bound up in its structure. It's possible that a lot of the water is still there, on Mars, bound up in the minerals."

"Although we have not seen these rocks 'in place' in bedrock with the rover, and we're not sure where these float rocks came from, from orbiting satellites we know that there are kaolinite-rich rocks in Jezero crater's rim," said Bedford, co-lead author of this research.

"Investigating these rocks in place will help us test our hypotheses on how the rocks formed, how they relate to Mars' ancient environment and the habitability of the planet in the past. We are keeping our eyes wide open looking for the source of these rocks now that Perseverance is exploring the crater rim."

Those insights might help guide humans to the first true signs of ancient extraterrestrial life, since, as far as we can tell, life can't exist without water. By studying Mars' present, scientists uncover clues to its—and Earth's—past, as well as insight into where to look for hints of life in the future.

TOP IMAGES: Rover traverse and light-toned float rocks detection. Credit: Communications Earth & Environment (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s43247-024-01837-2

LOWER IMAGE: Hypotheses for the origin, alteration, and eventual emplacement of aluminum (Al) rich material in Jezero crater, Mars. Credit: Communications Earth & Environment (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s43247-024-01837-2

[itsgerges]

Best regards

Planet Diameter Is Defined By A Mathematical Equation

The Paper tests and analyzes My Planet Diameter Equation (my 4th equation)

The Equation defines each planet diameter and proves it's created as a function in the planet rotation period and velocity – let's introduce the equation in following-

Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity                                                          

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination        (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)

Example

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8         

89143          = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km    = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

Planet Diameter Equation Importance

The Planet Diameter Equation produces many useful results but the major one is (The Change In The Solar System Classical Vision)- shortly- the equation forces use to accept a new vision about the solar system creation and motion- let's summarize this vision ideas in following…

(1)

The Planet Creation Data Is Defined Based On Exact Equations- this is a simple idea

The airplane manufacturer needs exact equations to define this airplane length, width, weight and all dimensions otherwise this airplane can't fly safely

The planet creation data is similar to that- the planet diameter, mass, density and all creation data should be defined based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely- clearly – the idea is a simple one –

BUT

No one believes in it- Why?

Because- the physics Book tells- the planet is created by random process and the planet data are effected by historical events- let's use an example-

Jupiter diameter = 142984 km because it's created by random process and effected by historical factors and be = 142984 km by chance and if this diameter be 170000 km that has no effect on Jupiter motion theory- for that – Jupiter motion theory doesn't know why Jupiter diameter is =142984 km

This analysis is a crucial one- because- it causes to remove the source of knowledge 

By that- the planets data is available for everyone but no one can use it-No one knows Why Mars diameter = 6792 km or why its rotation period is 24.6 hours- why Venus orbital inclination =3.4 degrees – the data is available but useless because every one believes by heart that – the data is created by random and no geometrical reason was found behind its creation.

That shows the massive importance of My Planet Diameter Equation- 

The equation tells – The planet diameter is created based on a geometrical rule and by an exact equation-

Means- Jupiter original diameter is created as (142984 km) by a geometrical reason and the diameter isn't changed by any historical effect- and still be 142984 km without change. 

What did I do to find this equation?

I have put the planets diameters in front of me and tried to find one rule controls all of them and found this equation-

Means- I used the data in place to neglect it for the idea tells (The Data Is Created By Random Process Without Any Geometrical Reason And They Are Useless)

Also this is noticeable- the book tells (The Data Is Created By Random) but no one tried to prove or disprove this idea-

The idea is more deep- because it tells– The Matter Dimensions Are Defined Based On Geometrical Reasons  

It's not only for planets diameters- it's the matter dimensions generally are produced by geometrical rules – that tells us – the planet diameter equation can help to answer the question (what's the matter?) or (how is the matter created?)

(2)

Now we realized, the planet diameter is created based on a geometrical rule – but the classical vision has many other wrong ideas- again- the planet diameter equation can help here also –

The next idea to examine tells (The Matter Is Motionless By Nature)  

This idea creates the mass gravity concept- and – the mass gravity become the matter motion reason since four hundreds years!

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity- Newton is wrong- because-the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion are done by the same one force otherwise this planet would be broken by effect of 2 forces on it- also – the mass gravity itself can't cause any motion- because – any motion produces energy and from what source to pay this motion energy- that would necessitate to decrease the mass itself by the motion energy value- it's not correct – the mass gravity connects two masses together- as a lorry and its trailer- if one mass moves the other will move with it but the motor is outer reason and not the mass gravity.

This refutation is not necessary- where the urgent question asks (Why Is The Matter Motionless By Nature? Who proved this idea?)- the matter is created from a movable energy and moves with it by nature- the mass gravity doesn't cause any motion in the universe. 

(3)

Let's answer (What's The Matter?)

The matter and space are created from the same one energy- and - If we suppose the space is similar to the sea of water, the matter be similar to a whirlpool or a vortex found on the sea page- means- the matter is a geometrical design distinguish from the space- as the whirlpool, it's created from the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves picture

The whirlpool (vortex) is carried by the waves motion- similar to that- the matter is carried by its original energy and moves by it- No Mass gravity is required for the matter motion- means- the matter is movable by nature.

The whirlpool dimensions are defined by the sea water motion features- for example- we have a whirlpool its diameter is (2 meters)- this diameter is defined by the sea water motion velocity, the amount of the water and other motion features- by that- the water motion analysis explains how the whirlpool dimensions are created

Also- the whirlpool is created but the creation requirements are needed every day- means- even if this whirlpool is found since years it can be changed immediately if the water motion features are changed- means- the whirlpool creation process is NOT a historical one.

Also - the matter is similar to a creature muscle, the muscle is found based on the blood motion and without this motion the muscle can be changed or removed.

Similar to that- the matter is created based on a moving energy, if this motion is changed the matter dimensions will be changed also-

(4)

The previous matter definition is suitable for Lorentz transformation, where it was noticeable that Einstein had used 2 equations only of  Lorentz transformation (time and distance) for the space-time geometry and neglected the mass equation as it would be not found- where Lorentz 3 equations are created based on the same concept and by similar experiments- Einstein had neglected the mass equation (Not For Any Physical Reason) but for his own bias, believing that, the matter is found (regardless any motion), here my planet diameter equation proves the matter is created depending on the motion features which enable to put the mass value on a coordinate with the space-time geometry

(5)

What's The Major Idea I Try To Explain In This Discussion?

Example- Saturn diameter 12536 km, its mass 568 x 1024 kg, its orbital distance 1433 million km, its orbital period 10747 solar days, its orbital inclination 2.5 degrees, its axial tilt 26.7 degrees.

This data can tell us how Saturn is created and how its motion is done and what's its motion effect on the other planets- the neglect of the planets data removed the source of knowledge and left us with the imaginary ideas – let's use example for explanation

Example- The planet diameter equation proves the planet diameter is created based on its orbital incantation- NOW- Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus (I prove that in the paper discussion) and Mars had migrated from its original orbit – BUT- Mars diameter is created in its original orbit and depended on its original orbital inclination- and – after Mars Migration its orbital inclination is changed but its diameter equation still show the original orbital inclination because the diameter is created based on it

Shortly – the planet data is similar to the Creature Genes and can help to discover how this planet is created and how its motion is done

Thanks a lot – please read

Can The Gravitational Waves  Produce A Light Beam?

or

or

or

or

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow   (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae                  https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                            mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com

                                      gergesgerges@yandex.ru                   

ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook                        https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 

Researcherid                   https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                                                     https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                                 https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications         http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare                            https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[the-starfall-station]

Ophelia Robotnik

Elle est la fille accidentelle du Docteur Eggman, et donc la cousine de Maria dont elle est de 15 ans son aînée. Bien qu'il l'ait reconnu comme sa fille, Eggman ne s'en ait jamais occupé et est parti juste après l'avoir reconnu. Elle a été élevée par sa mère et sa grand mère maternelle, toutes deux scientifiques dans la génétique.

Ophelia a hérité du génie de Gerald Robotnik, son arrière grand père, et s'est d'abord intéressée à la robotique avant de faire ses études en génétique et en astrophysique. Elle est un véritable couteau suisse scientifique, s'intéressant à tout, et faisant des expériences exceptionnelles.

Lors de l'apparition de l'immense gemme du chaos, elle fut l'une des premières scientifiques à être recrutée avec son père pour créer un anneau capable de contenir le pouvoir de la gemme.

Etroitement surveillé par le G.U.N. durant tout le processus qui se passa sur Terre, elle fut un peu plus libre lorsqu'elle fut envoyer en orbite autour de la Lune pour mettre en place cet anneau, puis la station The Starfall quelques années plus tard, où Docteur Eggman et Ophelia trouveront une créature à la surface de la gemme géante qu'ils ne déclarèrent pas, créant un laboratoire secret ensemble pour le conserver et l'étudier.

A désormais 36 ans, elle travaille sur le projet "Chaos Gem's Destroyer" ordonné par le G.U.N. afin de créer une arme pour détruire la gemme géante. En désaccord avec eux, Eggman quittera la station, sans savoir que la créature lui avait été dérobée par sa fille alors qu'il comptait l'emmener sur Terre pour créer un être pour assouvir sa soif de pouvoir.

Ophelia travaillera donc en parallèle sur son propre projet, voulant créer une forme de vie ultime capable d'utiliser l'énergie chaotique de la gemme pour diverses causes comme soigner des personnes atteintes de maladies incurables comme le fut Maria. C'est ainsi que Lazurit et Violet finirent par voir le jour, ainsi que des robots qu'elle appelle sobrement "Assistant".

[researcherpicker]

CHPTR 2:3 : La vie

La croyance en quoi que ce soit soulève chez moi de nombreux questionnements. Il est devenu commun de dire que de vouloir réfuter l’existence d’un dieu ou tenter de la prouver, mènerait à découvrir plus ou moins la même chose.

J’avoue que mon cerveau a du mal avec l’idée de pouvoir prouver l’existence de dieu, par quoi commencer?  Réfuter son existence semble bien plus abordable, surtout qu’il existe pas mal de réponses à une foule de questionnement jadis imprononçables.

Commençons par la base : Comment la vie est-elle apparue?

L’évolution telle qu’on la connaît aujourd’hui semble être une piste sérieuse face au créationnisme qui se base sur des écrits dont le but premier était d'aider à l’éducation. Oui des récentes découvertes prouvent que la genèse serait en fait un manuel scolaire. Pas de quoi en faire un tintouin, les preuves tangibles qui révèlent au monde que la religion est un concept créé de toute pièce, ne fera pas la une des journaux.

De toute manière, cette révélation fait face à une réalité bien étrange, que l’on nomme conviction. J’ai la conviction que l’univers est fini.

https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/espace/le-mystere-persistant-de-la-vitesse-expansion-univers-cosmos

Qui peut me contredire? Puisque aucune preuve tangible n’existe et que cette conviction semble être une chose qui m’appartient, donc chacun sa conviction, sa réalité en quelque sorte. 

Voilà qui est intéressant, aurions nous chacun, une réalité différente? 

Je dirais oui, différentes mais se ressemblant tout de même, nous permettant d’interagir les uns avec les autres. Finalement les consonances qui existent de part et d’autre nous permettent de nous connecter et éventuellement de faire des allers retours d’un monde à l’autre à moins que l’on parvienne, ne serait-ce qu’un temps, à en créer un nouveau, dans lequel subsisterait la réalité de chacun. j’en viens à me dire qu’il y a une infinité de mondes dans des mondes, comme en mathématique, des tas de petits infinis. 

Autant de possibilités que d’interactions, difficile à imaginer pour notre petit cerveau, c’est comme l’apparition de la vie dans notre galaxie. Mystère auquel il n’existe toujours pas de réponse concrète. Par ailleurs des scientifiques se sont penchés sur les probabilités d’une telle apparition et ont déterminé qu’il faudrait plus de temps pour expérimenter toutes les possibilités que l’âge de la terre soit 4,54 milliards d'années.

 Nous pouvons en conclure que notre planète à en quelque sorte a gagné au loto. Ce qui laisse un vide à combler me direz vous, cependant une théorie propose que l’eau de notre planète est plus vieille qu’elle, elle aurait l’âge de notre système solaire soit 4,56 milliards d’années et aurait été apportée par des astéroïdes qui se seraient écrasés sur terre. 

Une direction à vérifier certes, mais tout de même plus proche d’une explication qu’une main démiurge qui aurait créé la vie.

 J’avoue qu’il paraît plus simple d’éviter un raisonnement complexe, trop complexe pour nos perceptions et notre compréhension et d'accepter le fait de n’avoir aucune réponse. Pour autant il me semble possible d’accepter sans abandonner. Pour ce faire, il ne faut pas juste se contenter de poser une question, mais de commencer par celle qui a une réponse. Car dans cette réponse il y a forcément une autre question, c’est comme un dédale, quand on arrive dans un cul de sac, nous ne restons pas là prostré dans l’abandon, estiment qu’il n’y a pas de chemin puisque celui-ci ne mène nul part. Nous rebroussons chemin afin de trouver une autre voie, une autre question si vous préférez et ce jusqu’à trouver la sortie, quand bien même qu’il puisse exister une telle chose. 

La mort potentiellement peut jouer ce rôle, bien que l’on puisse observer que nos questionnements, quand ils sont riches, nous survivent. Albert Einstein n’a pas emporté dans sa tombe la théorie de la relativité, c’est devenu un héritage précieux auquel on se réfère, quand on essaye pas de le mettre à mal , comme il se doit d’être fait avec toutes les théories. Certains y verront une forme d’éternité, les moins égocentrés, une forme de continuité. 

Pour ma part je pense que nos actions ne sont jamais isolées, leurs causalités nous dépasse, quand bien même que l’on essaye d’avoir une certaine maîtrise sur les effets que l’on cherche éventuellement à produire. Nous sommes bien incapable d’en avoir une vue d’ensemble, alors que nous faisont également parti de ces causalité, que nos vie ne dépande pas uniquement de notre volonté et de nos possibilités, mais d’un tas de données innérantes à l’ensemble du monde. 

C’est ainsi que j’imagine l’avènement de l’humanité, comme autant de rebond vers notre évolution puis vers notre régression. Oui, effectivement j’estime que nous sommes en train de régresser, mais cela n’est qu’une théorie et comme telle, elle se forge sur du concret, sinon c’est une croyance et comme vous l’avez certainement compris il n’en est rien. Je me base tout d’abord sur l’observation que l’on peut avoir sur l’ensemble du vivant, sur l'écosystème, voir sur la formation de l’univers et sur les récentes découvertes archéologiques, notamment en musico-archéologie ainsi que dans les neurosciences où les outils technologiques nous offrent de nouveaux point de vue sur notre cerveau. De nombreuses découvertes ou redécouverte, grâce justement aux moyens que l’on dispose au vingt et unième siècle, permettent de mettre en lumière la présence de l’art dès les premières heures de l’humanité. En effet des portraits découvert dans la grotte de la Marche , qui serait pour le coup les premiers portrait de l’histoire de l’art, à Gibraltar a été découvert une gravure rupestre potentiellement abstraite ,

 de nouvelles disciplines ont permis de sortir des placards certains objets, jugés insignifiant jadis, ainsi la trouvaille de flûtes taillées dans des fémurs de cygne et de vautour, nous apprend que Neandertal et sapiens étaient capables de créer des instruments dont la capacité à générer des notes extrêmement proche de nos instruments contemporains est stupéfiante. En gros ils connaissaient la musique telle que nous la connaissons, fait corrélé par les neurosciences qui ont déterminé que la musique précède le langage.

 La musique est essentielle au développement de notre cerveau, fait vérifier par des expériences menées sur des foetus in utero et des grands prématurés.

Crédits photos : ©orso

serie 35mm argentique "Sale"

[dandanjean]

L'IA et l'origine de l'univers

En physique, des équipes cherchent depuis des décennies une particule qui ferait le pont entre l’infiniment petit et l’infiniment grand. Et c’est grâce au collisionneur du CERN qu’on espère la découvrir. On y pulvérise des protons pour obtenir une pluie de particules plus légères. Cela génère des milliers de données. Pour les analyser, on se tourne vers l’intelligence artificielle. L’IA et…

[crazyfeathers]

La bande à Lena

Magdalena Gonzalez est née à Germantown, quartier rendu populaire par les populations immigrées qui s'y sont établies, et là-bas pour survivre à la misère et à la criminalité rampantes, elle s'est formée une bande d'amis. Et elle est pour le moins éclectique.

Douglas Fortland, Douggy.

🤗A rencontré Lena au O'Faeries🤗

Age : 26 ans

Origine : Angleterre

Occupation : Commis dans les cuisines du O'Faeries.

Physique : Blonds coupés court, barbe entretenue, rondouillet, yeux bleu-vert.

Allan Lennox, Lannou.

🤗ami d'enfance de Lena🤗

Age : 25 ans.

Origine : Irlande du Nord.

Occupation : Chef d'un Gang de Germantown.

Physique : Grand et mince, tignasse bouclé couleur châtain clair, tâches de rousseur et de fines lèvres.

Harold Brontey, Roldy.

🤗A rencontré Lena par Jared🤗

Age : 26 ans.

Origine : Angleterre.

Occupation : Doctorant en Astrophysique à l'université Jefferson.

Physique : lunettes, cheveux bruns en désordre, petit, mal rasé, yeux chocolats.

Jared Knightley, Dada

🤗voisin et meilleur ami de Lena🤗

Age : 24 ans.

Origine : Angleterre.

Occupation : Barman au O'Faeries.

Physique : grand, brun, yeux bleus, très beau et élégant.

Owen Collins, Winny.

🤗a rencontré Lena au O'Faeries🤗

Age : 22 ans.

Origine : Irlande du Nord.

Occupation : Serveur et Escort au O'Faeries.

Physique : maigre, petits os, peau diaphane, yeux bleus, roux.

Alexandra Collins, Alex.

🤗a rencontré Lena au O'Faeries🤗

Age : 21 ans.

Origine : Irlande du Nord.

Occupation : Coiffeuse, Maquilleuse et Styliste de Lena au O'Faeries.

Physique : taille moyenne, cheveux d'un roux vif et ondulés, yeux bleus.

Histoire à lire ici : Sailing to Philadelphia - Crazyfeathers - Wattpad

[severecandycheesecake]

Science en 3D Modélisation3D #ScienceEtTechnologie #Innovation #Recherch...

# La Contribution de la Modélisation 3D dans le Domaine Scientifique

La modélisation 3D a révolutionné de nombreux domaines scientifiques en offrant des outils précis et puissants pour visualiser, analyser et expérimenter des phénomènes complexes. Son impact est particulièrement significatif en médecine, en astrophysique, en ingénierie et en biologie, facilitant des avancées qui étaient auparavant difficiles, voire impossibles, à réaliser.

## 1. **Médecine et Sciences Biomédicales** Dans le domaine médical, la modélisation 3D joue un rôle crucial dans l’imagerie et la chirurgie. Grâce aux scanners IRM et aux tomographies, les spécialistes peuvent reconstruire des organes en trois dimensions, permettant une analyse détaillée des anomalies et une meilleure planification des interventions chirurgicales. De plus, l'impression 3D de prothèses et d'implants sur mesure améliore considérablement les traitements des patients.

## 2. **Astrophysique et Exploration Spatiale** Les astronomes utilisent des modèles 3D pour simuler la formation des galaxies, les trajectoires des exoplanètes ou les collisions cosmiques. Ces visualisations permettent de mieux comprendre les structures célestes et de préparer des missions spatiales avec une précision accrue. Par exemple, les simulations 3D ont joué un rôle clé dans la planification des missions martiennes, en analysant la topographie des surfaces à explorer.

## 3. **Ingénierie et Conception Technologique** Les ingénieurs exploitent la modélisation 3D pour concevoir des infrastructures, des véhicules et des avions avec une optimisation poussée. Dans l’aéronautique, la simulation numérique permet d’étudier l’aérodynamisme des appareils avant leur fabrication, réduisant les coûts et améliorant la sécurité. Cette technologie est également essentielle dans la conception des structures architecturales et industrielles, garantissant des constructions plus solides et efficientes.

## 4. **Biologie et Sciences Environnementales** En biologie, la modélisation 3D aide à comprendre la morphologie et l’évolution des espèces. Les chercheurs peuvent reconstituer des fossiles en trois dimensions, analysant leur anatomie et leurs modes de vie. De plus, la modélisation 3D est précieuse pour simuler des écosystèmes et anticiper l’impact des changements climatiques sur les habitats naturels.

## 5. **Perspectives Futures** Avec l’essor de l’intelligence artificielle et du calcul haute performance, la modélisation 3D est appelée à se perfectionner encore davantage. L’intégration de la réalité virtuelle et augmentée ouvre des possibilités inédites, offrant aux chercheurs et ingénieurs une immersion totale dans leurs études et conceptions.

En conclusion, la modélisation 3D est un outil incontournable du progrès scientifique. Son développement continu promet des avancées toujours plus impressionnantes, façonnant l’avenir de la recherche et de l’innovation technologique.