#benito musolini

[carayconelrojerio]

Un 28 de abril de 1945 la escoria humana de Benito Musolini moría de la misma forma que deberían morir todos los criminales fascistas.

Celebrémoslo con una bella canción.

[silkclover]

I think Pinocchio telling Benito Musolini to eat shit was one of the best parts of the movie

[italeean]

Hi, would you mind sharing a little perspective about Benito Musolini (a prominant figure from Italy). I just learned about him at school, and when my teacher said he's from Italy, I immediately thinks of your account! Tbh My teacher haven't shared any facts about Musolini (He just mentioned that Musolini was a prominent figure from Italy w/o any further explanation). If you know something about him, please do share! I believe your explanation will be the most authentic (since you grew up and receive education in literally Italy) Thank you!! ... Also, Imagine if one day you stumbled upon a tickle fic with Musolini in it (as lee or ler) how would you feel about it? lol (this question is so random I'm sorry)

WARNING: SUPER LONG POST UNDER THE CUT

So... since you said you don't know any facts about this "person" and your teacher didn't do a great job at talking about him (he made him sound like a positive character from what you told me), I'll start with a little history lesson

WWI ended in 1918 with the victory of USA, England, France and Italy (who was initially allied with Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire). However, Italians didn't get what they wanted (like Istria) because they were labeled as "unreliable" for being allied with Austria and Germany before joining WWI on the other side. Basically, at the beginning, Italy "made friends" with Austria to get back the areas of Trento and Trieste from the Empire with diplomacy, but when the Great War broke out, they decided to take that land by force.

Anyway, being disrespected after winning the war caused a lot of discontent in the population, even among the younger ones (because yes, even 17-year-old guys had to go to war...). WWI was the first war to be fought with technological weapons and gas (mustard gas). Compared to the "romantic" kind of war, the one where there were heroes that distinguished themselves, this kind of war caused a much more significant psychological damage, also caused by the shell shock, and Italians felt like they were made fun of because they got injured, invalid or traumatized for nothing. This discontent is called "vittoria mutilata" (mutilated victory).

In this climate of economic crisis and deep instability, Benito Mussolini became popular with his complaints of how things were going and about the "vittoria mutilata". He even founded the movement of Fasci Italiani di Combattimento in 1919, which became PNF, or Partito Nazionale Fascista (Fascist National Party) in 1921, and the 28th of October 1922, he and his blackshirts (his followers, who got that name because they always wore black shirts) marched on Rome.

The king could have declared the state of siege and made the army intervene, but he let Mussolini do what he wanted, because he decided that Fascism was better than Communism (whose echoes were arriving from Russia, which would've officially become USSR 2 months later). However, dictatorship didn't arrive just like that. There were held elections... although they were basically not democratic and fascists "casually" won. Giacomo Matteotti investigated and was ready to present the evidence he had gathered to the Parliament, but the 10th of June 1924, the day before the scheduled presentation of said proof, he disappeared and was found dead.

I won't go into too much detail about his political maneuvers he took all the power with, I'll just focus on how his political choices affected the population.

1925: The government proclaims the Leggi Fascistissime (Ultra-Fascist Laws..?). With these laws, the President of the Council (Mussolini) became the Chief of the Government, every non-fascist political organization was disbanded, the police got more power and was free to act however they wanted (basically the George Floyd case was the normality here), censor was legalized and a Special Court was created to condemn people who were politically dangerous for the integrity of the government. Death penalty and exile were also reintroduced. The elections were extremely controlled: the government itself presented the list of candidates with no possibility of integration and the votes were made by applause in the squares (if it doesn't make sense, it's normal)

1926: Quota 90, it was an economic maneuver to give more value to Lira (Italian currency before Euro), which turned into a flop.

1929: Patti Lateranensi (Lateran Treaty). Basically it's an agreement between the Fascism and the Church to make sure religion doesn't intervene against Mussolini. In exchange, Catholicism becomes the State Religion and it also becomes a subject at school. This compromise with another authority and the presence of the king makes Fascism an imperfect totalitarianism because Mussolini, also known as Il Duce (The Leader, from Latin), wasn't the only authority in the country.

But what happens in the world? The crisis of 1929 hits the world and in 1933 Hitler wins the elections, democratically I think, and at Hindenburg's death in 1934 he also gets the position of President of Republic. The Nazi dictatorship begins.

In the beginning, Mussolini and Hitler aren't even interested in each other, they get closer only after some events.

1935: Italy invades Ethiopia with a scandalous war because Mussolini thinks Italy should have colonies as well, but the Society of Nations (UNO's ancestor) disapproves and Italy receives sanctions. In response to that, Il Duce decided to switch to the autarchic economy, which meant no more import-export and absolute self-sufficiency. Foreign words were banished from the vocabulary or were "italianized", and foreign drinks and foods were changed with Italian variations. For example, coffee was made with macerated chards. In this context of tensions with France and England, Mussolini got closer to Hitler.

1936: Civil war breaks out in Spain and Mussolini sends troops to help Francisco Franco, the soon-to-be dictator, take control of the nation.

1937: Italy joins the alliance between Germany and Japan (they became the Axis)

1938: The racist laws are proclaimed in Italy, following the example of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, and antisemitism spreads in the nation. Some ghettos and concentration camps are also built, and you can still visit Fossoli.

1939: WW2 breaks out, but Italy still doesn't participate; Mussolini will join only a year later because, according to him "we needed a few hundreds of corpses to throw on the peace table". (Which meant we needed to sacrifice some soldiers to say "Hey, we participated, too! We want our share of whatever there is to gain!"). Let me tell you all this: we weren't ready for that war. Our equipments had never been upgraded since WWI and Italy always needed Hitler's help to finish any kind of war campaign that was started. Many people also died during the russian winter, which was brutal, and in the end we sided with the Allies when the US started the invasion (or the liberation) of Italy in 1943, after the arrest of Mussolini.

25/04/1945: The Allies finally free Italy from the Nazi-fascists (yes, the nazists had started the invasion of Italy the 8th of September 1943)

28/04/1945: Mussolini is found by someone partigiani (the ones who always made resistance to the fascism and even helped the Allies during the occupation of Italy) and gets shot.

After this ✨️not-so-amazing✨️ history lesson based on my knowledge from my years of high school, I'll share my opinions

I'm a progressist, so I'm very far from the extreme right political orientation

People still complain about how we are still under the influence of the US... guess what? If our Duce hadn't joined the war in 1940, we would've come out of this as honorable winners

My great grandfather nearly lost both his feet due to gangrene caused by the serious burns during the war in Ethiopia, a war than gave Italy nothing more than a stupid title

The only decent thing Mussolini did was La Battaglia del Grano (The Wheat Battle). He reclaimed some marshy areas and made them cultivated, but it was still insufficient for autarchy

Mussolini supported racism, which I absolutely do not believe in, censorship, authoritarianism, he forced Italians to be catholic, he punished people publicly by making them drink castor oil (a very strong purge)

The police or the blackshirts could come at your place and beat you to a pulp or even kill you if you were suspected of being against the regime

Women were given an economic incentive if they had children. The more babies they had, the bigger the incentive became. It meant that women were only supposed to be mothers, without being able to choose to remain single.

Homosexuals were directly dragged to the concentration camps

I don't wanna think about what happened to disabled people and kids during those ages...

Would you really think I'd want a world like this?

And would you think I'd ever read a fanfiction about such a shitty man?

And that's all I have to say 😸 I hope I didn't bore you all with this talk, but I felt like this was the bare minimum to make you all understand what Italy went through all these years, in a dictatorship that lasted 20 years.

Guys, just remember one thing: if you're going through a crisis in your country and a candidate to the leadership or someone who claims to be a rebel makes promises of making your country great, putting your own country above any other nation, restoring the economy in a short time or anything that sounds dreamy, they're probably fooling you. And by the way, if every country thought only for themselves, the world and the global society would probably collapse; also, I don't wanna live in a world of egoists so please, let's choose cooperation and integration over autarchy. I can guarantee that it brings no good in the long term.

I know yours was just curiosity, and I'm happy you asked me about this. Don't take my final questions as a sign of anger, I just think they are a good conclusion to this kind of talk 🥰

[ahgeeitslee]

If I was in a room with Lusamine, Benito Musolini, Mark Wahlberg, and the sun from the raisin brand commercials. And I had a gun with three bullets. I would shoot myself on the leg three times because I'd want to beat her to death with my own hands.

[trotoarima]

Život kao konstantna borba

U javnom diskursu političkih aktera na vlasti (a i građana i građanki Srbije) često može da se čuje da je "život konstantna borba", da "život nije lak", da "ako je život lak onda nije autentičan", i tako dalje.

Kada ga upotrebljavaju građani i građanke, u svakodnevnom životu, obraćajući u dijalogu prijateljima, komšijama, poznanicima - taj kontekst je drugačiji jer je van javne sfere (Habermas). Više bih se osvrnuo na upotrebu te konstrukcije od strane političke elite na vlasti. Ali pre toga, bitno je naglasiti gde se upotrebljavala ta konstrukcija ili ideja (da ne kažem percepcija) kroz savremenu istoriju političkih ideja.

U "Enciclopedia Italiana di Scienze, Lettere e Arti" (poznatijoj kao Treccani") iz 1932. godine, nalazi se esej "La dottrina del fascismo" čiji je autor Benito Musolini. Zapravo je autor manjeg dela Musolini, dok je najveći deo napisao Đovani Đentile.

U eseju se navodi: "Fascism conceives of life as struggle, believing that it pertains to man to conquer that life which is really worthy of him, creating, first of all, within himself the tools (physical, moral, and intellectual) to build it. As it is for the individual, so it is for a nation, so it is for humanity.

...

Hence, life, as conceived by the fascist, is serious, austere, religious: fully aloft in a world supported by the moral and responsible forces of the spirit. The fascist despises the “easy” life." (prevod italijanskog filozofa Ezio Vailati-ja)

Dakle, kada Predsednik Srbije koristi ovaj diskurs, osim što targetira najveći deo liberalnijeg dela stanovništva kao "hedoniste" koji su lenji, želi da predstavi probleme države kao "probleme društva" u kome pojedinci treba da budu svesni da ne treba da uživaju (najvećim delom), već da se konstantno bore. Kroz muke, koje obično "generišu" egzogeni elementi kao što su "Zapad", "velike sile", vremenske nepogode, "istorijski nepovoljan položaj", i tako dalje.

Njegov diskurs je takav, da nam upućuje da slučajno ne pomislimo na život ispunjen blagostanjem, materijalnim i kulturnim, nego da budemo srećni što uopšte imamo priliku da se "borimo".

[guyclement]

Thank you for subscribing, it’s free, and it encourages me!Une exploration dans la ville de Brindisi. Ce bâtiment aux dimensions conséquentes se trouve à côté de l'école fondée par Musolini: Le « Collegio Navale Niccolò Tommaseo », c’est Benito Mussolini, le 8 septembre 1934, qui a procédé à la pose de la première pierre du Collège.An exploration in the town of Brindisi. This large building is located next to the school founded by Musolini: The «Collegio Navale Niccolò Tommaseo», it was Benito Mussolini, on September 8, 1934, who laid the foundation stone of the College.An exploration in the town of Brindisi. This large building is located next to the school founded by Musolini: The «Collegio Navale Niccolò Tommaseo», it was Benito Mussolini, on September 8, 1934, who laid the foundation stone of the College.Una exploración en la ciudad de Brindisi. Este edificio de dimensiones consecuentes se encuentra junto a la escuela fundada por Musolini: el «Collegio Navale Niccolò Tommaseo» es Benito Mussolini, el 8 de septiembre de 1934, que procedió a la colocación de la primera piedra del Colegio.Un'esplorazione nella città di Brindisi. Accanto alla scuola fondata da Musolini si trova questo edificio dalle dimensioni notevoli: il «Collegio Navale Niccolò Tommaseo», fu Benito Mussolini, l'8 settembre 1934, a procedere alla posa della prima pietra del Collegio.Eine Erkundung der Stadt Brindisi. Dieses Gebäude von großer Größe befindet sich neben der von Musolini gegründeten Schule: Das «Collegio Navale Niccolò Tommaseo», es war Benito Mussolini, der am 8. September 1934 den Grundstein für das College legte.Zwiedzanie miasta Brindisi. Ten duży budynek znajduje się obok szkoły utworzonej przez Musoliniego: «Collegio Navale Niccolo Tommaso», to Benito Mussolini, 8 września 1934, który położył kamień węgielny Kolegium.Retrouvez-moi sur les réseaux / Follow me for daily content:👍 Facebook:  Urbex Guy Clement  https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?...👉 Youtube  URBEX Guy Clément  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNhQ...📸 Instagram:  @abandoned.urbex.world  https://www.instagram.com/abandoned.u...     🎵TikTok: @urbexguyclement https://www.tiktok.com/@urbexguycleme...     🐦Twitter: @GuyPellegrin https://twitter.com/GuyPellegrin     Instagram 👉👉 @abandoned.urbex.world Facebook 👉👉 URBEX Guy Clément Youtube 👉👉 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNhQ... "Write your past, your present is over"- "Ecrivez votre passé, votre présent est fini" BIENVENUE sur ma chaîne URBEX Guy Clément. Je suis un explorateur passionné de voyages et d'urbex. Je publie sur ma chaîne toutes mes explorations : des plus classiques aux plus insolites et parfois même incroyables. N'hésitez pas à laisser des commentaires pour me dire ce que vous avez aimé et vos suggestions. Vous pouvez vous abonner à ma chaîne pour être informés en priorité de mes dernières explorations.

[listinsemanal]

Cementerio de mascotas en Italia y la gallina de Musolini - Europa - Internacional

Cementerio de mascotas en Italia y la gallina de Musolini – Europa – Internacional

Era el año 1922 cuando Benito Mussolini le pidió a un veterinario de confianza, Antonio Molón, que le permitiera a sus hijos enterrar a su querida mascota en un lote detrás de su hogar. También había sido el mismo Molón quien les había regalado el ave a los hijos de ‘Il Duce’ -el apodo con el que se llamaba a Mussolini-, y así fue fundado el primer cementerio de mascotas de Italia: Casa…

[ernestdescalsartwok]

OTTO SKORZENY-PINTURA-ARTE-WAFFEN-SS-DIVISION BRANDENBURG-RETRATO-LIBERADOR-MUSSOLINI-PERSONAJES-HISTORIA-SEGUNDA GUERRA MUNDIAL-ARTISTA-PINTOR-ERNEST DESCALS por Ernest Descals Por Flickr: OTTO SKORZENY-PINTURA-ARTE-WAFFEN-SS-DIVISION BRANDENBURG-RETRATO-LIBERADOR-MUSSOLINI-PERSONAJES-HISTORIA-SEGUNDA GUERRA MUNDIAL-ARTISTA-PINTOR-ERNEST DESCALS- Retratos de los personajes en la historia de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, pintura de la Colección de Arte "Gran Sasso",el retrato de OTTO SKORZENY,el hombre que liberó al Duce Benito Mussolini de su prisión en Campo Imperatore, en los montes Abruzzo, Apeninos de Italia, lo he pintado con su expresión decidida, el carácter que forma a los hombres para ser capaces de asumir los retos que el Destino propone, con su uniforme de las Waffen SS y mirada que traspasa paredes, el responsable de la peración Eiche encargada a la División Brandenburg, fuerza especiales con misiones casi imposibles. Retratar en las pinturas es buscar la expresión y los rasgos que otorgan identidad propia, he trabajado la obra con grafito sobre papel de 70 x 50 centímetros. Ilustrar personas y momentos que han sido protagonistas de hechos históricos en las diversas series que sigo haciendo intentando aportar los valores plásticos adecuados. Autor Artista pintor Ernest Descals.

[albumcongregatio]

Цитата Итальянского Вождя !

„Не нация создает государство, как это провозглашает старое натуралистическое понимание, легшее в основу национальных государств 19-го века. Наоборот, государство создает нацию, давая волю, а следовательно, эффективное существование народу, сознающему собственное моральное единство.“

Бенито Муссолини.

[theculturedmarxist]

FASCISM What It Is and How To Fight It

1969 PAMPHLET INTRODUCTION    

By George Lavan Weissman

   * * *    

Liberals and even most of those who consider themselves Marxists are guilty of using the world fascist very loosely today. They fling it around as an epithet or political swearword against right-wing figures whom they particularly despise, or against reactionaries in general.

Since WWII, the fascist label has been applied to such figures and movements as Gerald L. K. Smith, Senator Joseph McCarthy, Senator Eastland, Barry Goldwater, the Minutemen, the John Birch Society, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George Wallace.

Now, were all these fascist, or just some? If only some, then how does one tell which are and which aren't?

Indiscriminate use of the term really reflects vagueness about its meaning. Asked to define fascism, the liberal replies in such terms as dictatorship, mass neurosis, anti-Semitism, the power of unscrupulous propaganda, the hypnotic effect of a mad-genius orator on the masses, etc. Impressionism and confusion on the part of liberals is not surprising. But Marxism's superiority consists of its ability to analyze and differentiate among social and political phenomena. that so many of those calling themselves marxists cannot define fascism any more adequately than the liberals is not wholly their fault. Whether they are aware of it or not, much of their intellectual heritage comes from the social-democratic (reformist socialist) and Stalinist movements, which dominated the left in the 1930s when fascism was scoring victory after victory. These movements not only permitted Nazism to come to power in Germany without a shot being fired against it, but they failed abysmally in understanding the nature and dynamics of fascism and the way to fight it. After fascism's triumphs, they had much to hide and so refrained from making a Marxist analysis which would, at least, have educated subsequent generations.

But there is a Marxist analysis of fascism. It was made by Leon Trotsky not as a postmortem, but during the rise of fascism. This was one of Trotsky's great contributions to Marxism. He began the task after Mussolini's victory in Italy in 1922 and brought it to a high point in the years preceding Hitler's triumph in Germany in 1933.

In his attempts to awaken the German Communist Party and the Communist International (Comintern) to the mortal danger and to rally a united-front against Nazism, Trotsky made a point-by-point critique of the policies of    the social-democratic and Stalinist parties. This constitutes a compendium    of almost all the mistaken, ineffective, and suicidal positions that workers' organizations can take regarding fascism, since the positions of the German parties ranged from opportunistic default and betrayal on the right (social democratic) to ultra-left abstentionism and betrayal (Stalinist).

The Communist movement was still on its ultra-left binge (the so-called Third Period) when the Nazi movement began to snowball. To the Stalinists, every capitalist party was automatically "fascist". Even more catastrophic than this disorienting of the workers was Stalin's famous dictum that, rather than being opposites, fascism and social democracy were "twins". The socialists were thereupon dubbed "social fascists" and regarded as the main enemy. Of course, there could be no united front with social-fascist organizations, and those who, like Trotsky, urged such united fronts, were also labeled social fascists and treated accordingly.

How divorced from reality the Stalinist line was may be illustrated be    recalling its translation into American terms. In the 1932 elections, American Stalinists denounced Franklin Roosevelt as the fascist candidate and Norman Thomas as the social-fascist candidate. What was ludicrous as applied to US politics was tragic in Germany and Austria.

(Recently [1969], the term social fascism had begun cropping up in articles by members of the new left. Do those using it imagine that they have invented the term? Or, if they are aware of its history, are they indifferent to its connotations?)

After the Nazis came to power, the Stalinists boasted that their line had been 100 per cent correct, that Hitler could only last a few months, and that a Soviet Germany would then emerge. The time limit for this miracle was extended from three, six, to nine months, and then the idle boasts dwindled into silence. The magnitude of the defeat suffered by the working class, the special character of fascism, distinguishing it from other reactionary regimes or dictatorships, became apparent to all, and the threat to the Soviet Union or a rearmed German imperialism began to take on reality. This brought about a change in Moscow's line in 1935 and the Communist parties throughout the world thereupon zigzagged far to the right, to the right even of the social-democrats. This was their stance in the face of the spreading fascist danger in France and Spain.

The military ruin of German and Italian fascism in WWII convinced most people that fascism had been destroyed for good and was so utterly discredited that it could never again entice any followers. Events since then, particularly the emergence of new fascist groups and tendencies in almost every capitalist country,have dispelled such wishful thinking. The illusion that WWII was fought to make the world safe from fascism has gone the way of the earlier illusion that WWI was fought to make the world safe for democracy. The germ of fascism is endemic in capitalism; a crisis can raise it to epidemic proportions unless drastic countermeasures are applied.

Since forewarned is forearmed, we offer this new compilation -- a small selection from Trotsky's writings on the subject -- as a weapon for the anti-fascist arsenal.

[ulisesbarreiro]

La sociedad argentina en 1924...

                              Ideologías extremistas... En este caso el fascismo 

Vemos en estas dos imágenes del Diario “La Razón” de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, del año 1924 (Año XIX, Nº 5424). Como mostraban orgullosamente el autografo de Benito Mussolini. Hoy en día se lo estudia como un dictador más de los tantos que hubo en las sociedades humanas.

Pero si nos posicionamos en ese momento histórico veremos como una parte, o gran parte de la sociedad argentina, los fanáticos de ideologías, en este caso de extrema derecha, lo amaban.Y creían en un estado manejado con puño de hierro y con valores hiper nacionalistas de fondo. 

Sin duda a modo de un pequeño viaje en el tiempo, vemos como los medios de comunicaciones reflejan parte de lo que las personas de su tiempo quieren ver en las portadas de los diarios, en el caso de la prensa escrita.

                                                                              Ulises Barreiro

[grootpoepjeplasjehoofd]

Everyone is sure they know what fascism is. The most self-consciously visual of all political forms, fascism presents itself to us in vivid primary images: a chauvinist demagogue haranguing an ecstatic crowd; disciplined ranks of marching youths; colored-shirted militants beating up members of some demonized minority; surprise invasions at dawn; and fit soldiers parading through a captured city. Examined more closely, however, some of these familiar images induce facile errors. The image of the all-powerful dictator personalizes fascism, and creates the false impression that we can understand it fully by scrutinizing the leader alone. This image, whose power lingers today, is the last triumph of fascist propagandists. It offers an alibi to nations that approved or tolerated fascist leaders, and diverts attention from the persons, groups, and institutions who helped him. We need a subtler model of fascism that explores the interaction between Leader and Nation, and between Party and civil society. The image of chanting crowds feeds the assumption that some European peoples were by nature predisposed to fascism, and responded enthusiastically to it because of national character. The corollary of this image is a condescending belief that the defective history of certain nations spawned fascism. This turns easily into an alibi for onlooker nations: It couldn’t happen here. Beyond these familiar images, on closer inspection, fascist reality becomes more complicated still. For example, the regime that invented the word fascism—Mussolini’s Italy—showed few signs of anti-Semitism until sixteen years after coming to power. Indeed, Mussolini had Jewish backers among the industrialists and big landowners who helped finance him at the beginning. He had close Jewish cronies such as the Fascist Party militant Aldo Finzi, and a Jewish mistress, the writer Margherita Sarfatti, author of his first authorized biography. About two hundred Jews took part in the March on Rome. By contrast, Marshal Pétain’s collaborationist French government at Vichy (1940–44) was aggressively anti-Semitic, while on other scores it is better considered authoritarian than fascist, as we will see in chapter 8. So it becomes problematical to consider an exacerbated anti-Semitism the essence of fascism. Another supposed essential character of fascism is its anticapitalist, antibourgeois animus. Early fascist movements flaunted their contempt for bourgeois values and for those who wanted only “to earn money, money, filthy money." They attacked “international finance capitalism" almost as loudly as they attacked socialists. They even promised to expropriate department-store owners in favor of patriotic artisans, and large landowners in favor of peasants. Whenever fascist parties acquired power, however, they did nothing to carry out these anticapitalist threats. By contrast, they enforced with the utmost violence and thoroughness their threats against socialism. Street fights over turf with young communists were among their most powerful propaganda images. Once in power, fascist regimes banned strikes, dissolved independent labor unions, lowered wage earners’ purchasing power, and showered money on armaments industries, to the immense satisfaction of employers. Faced with these conflicts between words and actions concerning capitalism, scholars have drawn opposite conclusions. Some, taking the words literally, consider fascism a form of radical anticapitalism. Others, and not only Marxists, take the diametrically opposite position that fascists came to the aid of capitalism in trouble, and propped up by emergency means the existing system of property distribution and social hierarchy.

Robert Paxton, The Anatomy of Fascism

[cowboy]

Gandalf the Grey and Gandalf the White and monty pythons and the holy grails black knight And Benito Musolini

And the. Blue Meanie

[legendarycollectorengineer]

Es necesario aclarar que, en la segunda guerra mundial, murieron entre 50 y 60 millones de personas. Alemania y otros países europeos quedaron devastados. Pero no se terminó con el fascismo ni el nazismo. Los gringos se llevaron a muchos científicos y prominentes nazis con su operación “paper clip”, pero también huyeron a España, Brasil, Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay y Chile; esos son los casos más sonados.

 Aunque fue Benito Musolini en inventor del fascismo, realmente lo que está en su base es el contubernio entre corporaciones de negocios y gobiernos; la militarización y sus símbolos externos son parafernalia escénica.

En el Reino Unido las simpatías filonazis eran ya fuertes antes del conflicto bélico, al grado que existen fotografías de la familia real haciendo el saludo nazi. En Gringolandia su aristocracia, que no es otra sino la del dinero, también era filonazi, con Henry Ford como gran admirador de Hitler.

Antes del 1° de septiembre de 1939 prácticamente en todo el mundo existía fuerte admiración por Hitler, pues logró sacar de la absoluta ruina hiperinflacionaria a Alemania.

Después de la segunda guerra los filofascismos y filonazismos se hicieron intrahistóricos pero siguieron tan vivos y latentes en buena parte del mundo que, incluso en Rusia, país que sufrió la mayor cantidad de muertos durante el conflicto, existen grupúsculos con esas filiaciones.

La mejor definición de ambas expresiones de extrema derecha es el contubernio mafioso entre empresas y gobiernos, algo que define claramente a la mayoría de los países occidentales.

No se engañen, el fascismo y el nazismo siempre estarán muy cerca, y al servicio, del gran capital.

[nowiwonderhowwhatsherfacehasbeen]

old blogpost #9832235

Child laborers in the United States, late 1800s.

Benito Musolini's headquarters.

An actual Titanic boarding pass.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

[radiogornjigrad]

Esad Kočan: DOK IMA VREMENA

Esad Kočan: DOK IMA VREMENA

Ilustracija: Fassbinder, Lili Marleen Davna je priča o umjerenom fašizmu, traje ona otkad je fašizma. Hajde da prošetamo. U američkoj štampi Benito Musolini tridesetih je opisivan kao umjereno, narodu omiljeno biće, najefikasnija terapija protiv boljševizma, od kojeg bi vjetropirasti Italijani mogli oboljeti. „Divan džentl-men“, govorio je za Dučea 1933. godine Ruzvelt. I Hitlera je krasila…