Hear me out: we're in 4x08 and the Cali gang is looking for “Nina” and at one point Jonathan stops the van to check if Mike located the computer correctly, given Suzie's coordinates.
Just for context: this is the first time we are shown the Cali gang after the van scene.
The sequence is the following:
Nothing wrong right? Just four guys trying to see if they're going the right way? Well, yes, but the whole "straight, straight, straight..." thing stood out to me.
During the van scene, like many others, I've always got the feeling Jonathan wanted to blow Mike's head up: he couldn't quite get his head around the fact that Mike didn't understand Will was talking about his own feelings.
Typically, when you can't understand something, you just stop and think through that -> Jonathan stops the van, before he gets too lost in trying to make some sense of what he had witnessed minutes prior
Mike doesn't understand why Jonathan stopped the van -> he doesn't think there's anything to make some sense of
If you understand where I'm trying to go here, Jonathan then, wants to prove Mike wrong regarding his calculation (but in the analogy, also regarding his "pretending to be straight").
The calculation is correct and Mike's facade of the "straight guy" doesn't crack at all (remember: we're from Jonathan's pov -> he stopped to think, but all the facts bring to Mike being actually straight).
But that doesn't make sense = it doesn't make sense that Mike is straight (indeed, Jonathan witnessed Mike's monologue in S2 + who knows what else!):
Yes, apparently, Mike is straight: because he's with El, because he didn't react at Will's muted love confession in the back of the van BUT, Jonathan can sense that something doesn't add up, i.e., that Mike isn't really straight.
And his feeling about this is kinda confirmed, because his thoughts are interrupted by Argyle, who found some tracks... and we all know that Argyle is often associated with rainbow imagery.
Ergo, I think that Jonathan actually knows and realized about Mike being queer.
(in the tags i lay out some more evidence ABOUT manual driving lol, but that is more of a crack thing lol)
379 notes
·
View notes
in impel down iva injected luffy with healing hormones to combat magellan’s poison so he’s been screaming in pain and suffering for the last 10 hours. all i can think about is how in the one piece timeline kuma took away his pain maybe not even a week ago on thriller bark, and so then i wonder how much worse luffy’s suffering would be if that hadn’t happened, if it would be ten fold, or compounded into something where he wouldn’t even be able to scream.
and while i’m thinking about all of that all luffy can think about is his big brother, calling out for ace because that’s who all of this is for
20 notes
·
View notes
finally posting the healed tattoos! unfortunately you guys get the upside down version -- it's really hard to get a good picture with my arms down by my sides. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
22 notes
·
View notes
so i was watching some of my dashcam footage that i deliberately saved bc of Calgary Driver Shenanigans taking place in proximity to me and i straight up hate people who brake-check so much
pulling that shit is so dangerous, even at "low" speeds. and even if someone is riding your asshole hard, you don't brake-check them. as soon as you do a brake-check, you have now made yourself the more reckless driver in that equation.
you should never, ever do something to deliberately cause a collision when operating heavy machinery.
like, i cannot even fathom the kind of self-absorbed loser you have to be to play chicken like that in a way that could get someone fucking killed.
just... like... i keep thinking back to this accident that happened here one or two years ago, where a pick-up truck brake-checked a minivan on the highway in less than ideal driving conditions and the van spun out, and then rolled multiple times into the ditch, and one of the children in the van was ejected. the pick-up truck didn't even stop and as far as i'm aware was never even found. like that driver fucking killed a kid.... and for what? the driver of the van maybe pissed them off? was driving a bit too close?
like please, if you are someone who brake-checks because you assume you'll be just fine if you get hit bc "lol i'm insured" you should always assume that the worse possible outcome could happen. when operating heavy machinery going more than 20mph around other people also operating heavy machinery going the same or higher speeds, you should always be thinking about the worst case scenario of pulling a dumbass move that affects multiple ppl.
like when you brake-check someone, you think this is a tussle that's just between you and that person, yeah? and you feel justified because maybe this person is driving too close, or they seem distracted, or maybe they pissed you off earlier, right? Oh, but I bet you looked all around, considered all of the variables, and determined that should an accident occur, it's only the two of you that's gonna have your day ruined, right? I'm sure you're cocky enough to think that. Like I'm positive (sarcastic) you've thought about all of these things before brake-checking:
the other vehicles in the road other than you and the person behind you
is there a big truck behind the person behind you that is going to have a fucking heart attack trying to stop?
the road conditions in general
what if the driver behind you doesn't have new tires? what if one of their tires blows out trying to brake and they spin out?
are their pedestrians you might be endangering if your stupid move causes an accident?
what if the other driver has kids in the car? passengers in general? your beef is with the driver, but causing an accident would be punishing their innocent passengers too
what if the accident you cause totals your car? are you able to be without a car?
what if the accident totals the other person's car? what if their livelihood depends on them having a car?
what if the other person doesn't have insurance? yeah, that's illegal, but it does you no good. if you think your insurance is going to pick up the tab in that case with no fight at all, you're naive as fuck. like unless you have complete car insurance and not just liability insurance, your insurance company will fucking fight any claim you make. even with complete car insurance, they fight claims. remember, car insurance companies are in the business of hoarding the money you pay them. they do not actually want to pay out.
what if the other driver has a dashcam and can definitively prove that you braked for no reason other than to endanger literally everyone else on the road?
like that's just some of the things to fucking consider re: brake-checking. and when the list of risks is that long while incomplete, what do you even gain by brake-checking?
brake-checking is petty, stupid, and fucking reckless. it can seriously injure people that aren't even involved in your beef, and it can even kill people. brake-checking is some of the most self-absorbed behaviour to have behind the wheel, and people who do it are fucking losers.
period.
even if the other driver is following too close, or driving aggressively. you don't make an already dangerous situation even more dangerous oh my fucking god like why isn't that common fucking sense.
7 notes
·
View notes