#even with bullshit club and all

[44hive]

🇵🇸🤍

[junebugtwin]

even while it was happening, you knew it wasn't going to last

[scorndotexe]

genuinely sorry about all the dndposting recently it hasn't even been interesting but i'm so desperate to dm. i've got storytelling skills!!! i've got improv skills!!! i want to build a story around characters!!! i want to see what players do with what i give them!!!

[gaydelgard]

the margin for error on passing non-romanced character relationship checks in psi is NONEXISTENT

i had to replay s1 TWICE to get on kay's good friendship path

i took every (non-romance) option for ivo (diamond or free) but the free choice in s3 ep2 actually LOSES you 4% approval

which the wiki seems unaware of (but i CHECKED on my profile before and after the episode and it was down 4%)

this is from the romance guide on his wiki page

again im not romancing him so 4% is enough to tank the relationship ig cause it was enough to lose me this check in ep 5

[vampgf]

calling chappell "self-obsessed" when 1) none of us even know her and 2) the reasoning is bc you don't like her confidence and willingness to call fans out for being creepy and setting boundaries is the weirdest fucking conclusion to make ngl

[moonmoonthecrabking]

my dad is super fucking overprotective that i, at the age of 19, am no longer allowed to lead church youth group without my brother. does that sound ridiculous? yeah, there’s a fucking reason for that

[howldean]

i’m so fucking pissed rn

[alittleemo]

microdosing on being hunted for sport by requesting to follow casual friends on instagram

[mellomadness]

sometimes I wonder if I should take a gender studies class just so I can bitch every day about how an imaginary boyfriend is often seen as a requirement for a woman to feel safe enough to have fun at a club, or the idea that an imaginary person with a fake “claim” over me has more influence over predatory men than my own voice saying “No, I’m not interested, get lost”

[aloysarrow]

I wish GI wasn't trying to push people (kinda specifically longer players) away from the game, like damn. I really hope new players are watching closely and not just deciding "there are haters" or "complainers." Some of the things, like the age old where's the end-of-game road map, have been actual game needs that haven't been addressed for years. Game needs, guys. Idk, if you still call some people haters/complainers, then I'm probably gonna call you a bootlicker lol

[kuiinncedes]

fngfdjngjdfkng

[jackiemeandthispod]

the wheezing & gasping in the mic every episode hurts my ears it's a podcast you're not supposed to do that just laugh normally

I am actually so glad someone brought this to our attention!!! This is a great opportunity to remind y’all that you have absolutely no obligation to listen to our shitty wheezing laughter, so problem solved bestie!!! No one’s holding a gun to your head you can simply ✨not listen to us✨ anytime you choose!!!

[milimeters-morales]

sometimes i think too long about everything i’ve given up on because of my chronic pain and mental issues, and among all of them my top regret is having to leave archery and violin behind :[

[jvzebel-x]

news letter from SWOP Behind Bars, sent Monday, July 17th, in regards to the Woodhull Freedom Foundation's constitutional challenge to FOSTA

[images 1,2,&3 text:

"The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday, July 7th 2023, that the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) is constitutional, upholding key portions of the law that critics have said intrudes on First Amendment speech protections and harms sex workers.

FOSTA suspends Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, a law that grants online platforms protection from liability for user-generated speech. After FOSTA passed, social media platforms were forced to censor sex-worker generated content in fear of being held criminally liable under the law. Since becoming law five years ago, FOSTA has been condemned for making sex work more dangerous and increasing online censorship. While lawmakers passed the law to combat sex trafficking, critics have alleged that the law has hindered law enforcement from using websites to catch actual traffickers, and that sex trafficking reports actually tripled the year after FOSTA was enacted.

Although the Court did not issue the constitutional ruling that was sought, it held that the law must be interpreted narrowly in order to avoid “grave constitutional questions”. By imposing the interpretive discipline Congress lacked, the Court ruled out many of the broader applications of FOSTA that caused Woodhull and its partners to challenge it.

Specifically, it held that FOSTA “Does not proscribe facilitating prostitution more generally, which could extend to speech arguing for the legalization of prostitution or that discusses, educates, or informs about prostitution.” It also clarified that the law “Does not reach the intent to engage in general advocacy about prostitution or to give advice to sex workers generally to protect them from abuse. Nor would it cover the intent to preserve for historical purposes web pages that discuss prostitution.”/text]

[heyyesimtrash-whatofit]

Hi so guess who got her art stolen! By someone who’s on here no less!

[xcziel]

.